From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 00:12:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010012.l410Cd2f001720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 20:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > You might be missing some BRs, perhaps libgnome-devel Actually gtk2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 00:32:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232036] Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010032.l410WGvR002059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible Alias: perl-YAML-Tiny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-YAML-Tiny -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 00:32:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238518] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238518 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: coryc257 at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 00:34:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238518] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010034.l410Ydt2002107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - Alias: weechat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238518 coryc257 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: - | | Platform|All |i386 Severity|medium |low Alias| |weechat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 01:05:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238518] Review Request: weechat - Terminal based IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010105.l4115HOF002858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Terminal based IRC client Alias: weechat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238518 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: weechat - | |Terminal based IRC client Platform|i386 |All Severity|low |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 01:27:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010127.l411Rik4003363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 21:27 EST ------- Gotcha. I'm not worried about the version of Getopt::Long; my own usage (not to mention the non-trivial test suite) both indicate to me that 2.35 is just fine. I'll give upstream a couple days to respond to the bug I filed with them, then move forward with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 01:28:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010128.l411SYa8003386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-04-30 21:28 EST ------- Hi Hans. Just so you don't think I've up and vanished or anything (^_^), I've been very busy with schoolwork and whatnot recently; but I'm working my way through the review and should finish it within the next couple of days. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:23:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010223.l412N5ox005127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-30 22:23 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Math-Stats New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:24:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010224.l412Ojc5005214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 22:24 EST ------- I took a look at LICENSE; this package's licensing and (in specific) royalty-free, etc, etc, patent grants all look OK to me. The font license also looks similarly OK. You're missing BRs on perl(Test::More) and (a well hidden one) on perl(XML::Parser::Expat) -- both of which can be fixed post-import. + source files match upstream: 3e674248b44f68af13cc4d23f018ba50 PDF-API2-0.60.tar.gz 3e674248b44f68af13cc4d23f018ba50 PDF-API2-0.60.tar.gz.srpm + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate (noarch) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. (noarch) + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-PDF-API2-0.60-2.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(PDF::API2) perl(PDF::API2::Annotation) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::ASCII85Decode) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::ASCIIHexDecode) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Array) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Bool) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Dict) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::File) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Filter) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::FlateDecode) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::LZWDecode) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Literal) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Name) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Null) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Number) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Objind) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Page) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Pages) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::RunLengthDecode) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::String) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Utils) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::AATKern) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::AATutils) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Anchor) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Bsln) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Cmap) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Coverage) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Cvt_) = 0.0001 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Delta) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Fdsc) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Feat) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Fmtx) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Font) = 0.32 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Fpgm) = 0.0001 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::GDEF) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::GPOS) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::GSUB) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Glyf) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Glyph) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Hdmx) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Head) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Hhea) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Hmtx) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::ClassArray) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::CompactClassArray) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::OrderedList) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::StateTable) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::Subtable) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::LTSH) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Loca) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Maxp) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Chain) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Contextual) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Insertion) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Ligature) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Noncontextual) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Rearrangement) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Subtable) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Name) = 1.1 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::OS_2) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::OldCmap) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::OldMort) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::PCLT) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::PSNames) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Post) = 0.01 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Prep) = 0.0001 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Prop) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Segarr) = 0.0001 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Table) = 0.0001 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Ttc) = 0.0001 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Ttopen) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Utils) = 0.0001 perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Vhea) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Vmtx) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::XMLparse) perl(PDF::API2::Content) perl(PDF::API2::Content::Text) perl(PDF::API2::Lite) perl(PDF::API2::Matrix) perl(PDF::API2::NamedDestination) perl(PDF::API2::Outline) perl(PDF::API2::Outlines) perl(PDF::API2::Page) perl(PDF::API2::Resource) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::BaseFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::CIDFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::CIDFont::CJKFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::CIDFont::TrueType) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::CIDFont::TrueType::FontFile) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::DeviceN) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Indexed) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Indexed::ACTFile) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Indexed::Hue) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Indexed::WebColor) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Separation) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ExtGState) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::BdFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::bankgothic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::courier) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::courierbold) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::courierboldoblique) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::courieroblique) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::georgia) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::georgiabold) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::georgiabolditalic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::georgiaitalic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::helvetica) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::helveticabold) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::helveticaboldoblique) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::helveticaoblique) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::symbol) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::timesbold) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::timesbolditalic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::timesitalic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::timesroman) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::trebuchet) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::trebuchetbold) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::trebuchetbolditalic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::trebuchetitalic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::verdana) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::verdanabold) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::verdanabolditalic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::verdanaitalic) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::webdings) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::wingdings) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont::zapfdingbats) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::Postscript) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::SynFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Pattern) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Shading) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::UniFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::codabar) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::code128) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::code3of9) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::ean13) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::int2of5) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::Hybrid) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::GD) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::GIF) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::JPEG) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::PNG) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::PNM) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::TIFF) perl(PDF::API2::UniWrap) perl(PDF::API2::Util) perl(PDF::API2::Version) = 0.60 perl(TiffFile) perl-PDF-API2 = 0.60-2.fc6 == requires dejavu-fonts dejavu-fonts-experimental perl >= 0:5.006 perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Compress::Zlib) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Encode) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Find) perl(FileHandle) perl(IO::File) perl(List::Util) perl(Math::Trig) perl(PDF::API2) perl(PDF::API2::Annotation) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Array) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Bool) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Dict) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::File) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Filter) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Literal) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Name) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Null) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Number) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Objind) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Page) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Pages) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::String) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::PDF::Utils) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::AATKern) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::AATutils) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Anchor) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Bsln) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Cmap) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Coverage) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Cvt_) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Delta) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Fdsc) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Feat) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Fmtx) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Font) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Fpgm) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::GDEF) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::GPOS) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::GSUB) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Glyf) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Glyph) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Hdmx) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Head) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Hhea) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Hmtx) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::ClassArray) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::CompactClassArray) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::OrderedList) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::StateTable) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Kern::Subtable) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::LTSH) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Loca) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Maxp) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Chain) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Contextual) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Insertion) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Ligature) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Noncontextual) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Rearrangement) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Mort::Subtable) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Name) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::OS_2) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::PCLT) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Post) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Prep) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Prop) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Segarr) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Table) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Ttopen) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Utils) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Vhea) perl(PDF::API2::Basic::TTF::Vmtx) perl(PDF::API2::Content) perl(PDF::API2::Content::Text) perl(PDF::API2::Matrix) perl(PDF::API2::NamedDestination) perl(PDF::API2::Outline) perl(PDF::API2::Outlines) perl(PDF::API2::Page) perl(PDF::API2::Resource) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::BaseFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::CIDFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::CIDFont::CJKFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::CIDFont::TrueType) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::CIDFont::TrueType::FontFile) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::DeviceN) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Indexed) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Indexed::ACTFile) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Indexed::Hue) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Indexed::WebColor) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ColorSpace::Separation) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::ExtGState) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::BdFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::CoreFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::Postscript) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Font::SynFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Pattern) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::Shading) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::UniFont) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::codabar) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::code128) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::code3of9) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::ean13) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::BarCode::int2of5) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Form::Hybrid) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::GD) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::GIF) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::JPEG) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::PNG) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::PNM) perl(PDF::API2::Resource::XObject::Image::TIFF) perl(PDF::API2::Util) perl(PDF::API2::Version) perl(POSIX) perl(Symbol) perl(Unicode::UCD) perl(XML::Parser::Expat) perl(base) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(vars) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.69 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.76 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:24:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010224.l412OpVr005233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:25:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010225.l412Pt5p005305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-pear- |Review Request: php-pear- |Net-Curl - PEAR: OO |Net-Curl - OO interface to |interface to PHP's cURL |PHP's cURL extension |extension | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-30 22:25 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Net-Curl New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:26:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010226.l412QfuD005362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-04-30 22:26 EST ------- - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime APPROVED. If your other sponsorship doesn't happen for any reason, lemme know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:27:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010227.l412RSuQ005437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-04-30 22:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Net-POP3 New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010237.l412bqQD006012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Alias| |tastymenu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:48:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010248.l412mMeS006692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 22:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > - disable autoprov -- with this small of a package it's easier than filtering > > Well, maybe. But I'd argue that filtering is more reliable. If you update the > package at a later time and don't notice new functionality that would have a > provide, the filtering will automatically pick it up. Your method won't. No problem; switched to a filtering approach. > > - include full test suite in %%doc > > What's the rationale here? Is this needed? Well, technically nothing in %doc is needed :) I've been realizing more and more lately that test suites can also make good documentation, so I've started including them verbatim in %doc. Some of them -- like Moose -- even go so far as to say "the best documentation for [this feature] is still in the test suite." Even beyond that, it's certainly possible that someone will want to test ths package as installed -- having the test suite around enables such activity. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Prototype-0.9053-3.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CGI-Prototype.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010250.l412o6c4006797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 22:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > You're missing BRs on perl(Test::More) and (a well hidden one) on > perl(XML::Parser::Expat) -- both of which can be fixed post-import. ok, I give.. What makes perl(XML::Parser::Expat) a BR? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:56:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010256.l412u56j007098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 22:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PDF-API2 Short Description: Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Owners: bjohnson at symetrix.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 02:57:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010257.l412vi6M007194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 22:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > You're missing BRs on perl(Test::More) and (a well hidden one) on > > perl(XML::Parser::Expat) -- both of which can be fixed post-import. > > ok, I give.. What makes perl(XML::Parser::Expat) a BR? PDF/API2/Basic/TTF/XMLparse.pm uses it. The module will build w/o it being installed, but if the test suite ever actally starts being comprehensive, chances are something will fail. So I'd call it a BR, though I may just be being super pedantic here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 03:03:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010303.l41339ng007504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-04-30 23:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Well, technically nothing in %doc is needed :) All right, let's not be too pedantic :) > I've been realizing more and more lately that test suites can also make good > documentation, so I've started including them verbatim in %doc. Some of them -- > like Moose -- even go so far as to say "the best documentation for [this > feature] is still in the test suite." So what I read is "this test suite serves as a good addition to the documentation" - which is good enough for me. I just haven't seen anyone else packaging the test scripts, except as separate packages like mysql-test. > Even beyond that, it's certainly possible that someone will want to test ths > package as installed -- having the test suite around enables such activity. Well, in theory, if it passed in the buildsystem, it should be good, but.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 03:09:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010309.l4139APL007845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 23:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Well, technically nothing in %doc is needed :) > > All right, let's not be too pedantic :) Who, me? O:-) > So what I read is "this test suite serves as a good addition to the > documentation" - which is good enough for me. I just haven't seen anyone else > packaging the test scripts, except as separate packages like mysql-test. Yah. I think we just never really saw it as anything more than a part of the build process before. > > Even beyond that, it's certainly possible that someone will want to test ths > > package as installed -- having the test suite around enables such activity. > > Well, in theory, if it passed in the buildsystem, it should be good, but.... That's another thing, too. If a package's test suite requires network access, we have to disable it by default, as it'd bomb out in mock. WWW::Myspace or most of the POE::Component::* modules are good examples of this: good, solid test suites I have to disable large parts of by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 03:15:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010315.l413F4sb008194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-04-30 23:15 EST ------- http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/alexandria.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/alexandria-0.6.1-2.fc7.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------- * Tue May 1 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.6.1-2 - Fix scriptlets typo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 03:21:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010321.l413LmN1008629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-04-30 23:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Though Pod-tests are not really important, this doesn't necessarily provide > > trust into this package's quality. > > Well, IMHO any failure in %check is a blocker until it is known why the test > fails. The tests are there for a reason. If the test reveals a bug (in the > software package, not the buildsystem or Fedora) - and it is deemed minor to the > operation of the package, it should be reported upstream and the test failure > should be commented in the spec file as a known problem. > > If the failure is a bug in the test itself or the test is invalid, the test > should be removed (with a proper comment in the spec file) or fixed. It should > also be reported upstream. > > Blindly ignoring failures is never a good thing. Oh I agree -- and this isn't just ignoring it. The "falure" this test reports is that the new() method isn't documented... These tests are development aids, a easy way for the developer to check to make sure they documented everything. A "fail" here doesn't say anything about the code, or its quality -- aside from any conclusions we may want to draw from it -- just that one or more methods have no documentation, and the other ones have (potentially bad) documentation. It's important to note that when run by default, as _upstream_ defines default, these tests are skipped. By not defining TEST_POD=1, we're just running the suite as intended. /me hands back the soapbox :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 03:51:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010351.l413pplh010820@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-04-30 23:51 EST ------- I happen to really need this but given the depth of the issues and the fact that I'm not up on KDE packaging, I'm not sure if I'd be the best reviewer. Still, I'll see what crops up as I get it built and do some testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 05:56:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 01:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010556.l415u5pD017810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 01:55 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [-] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 0d09d6fcf9616789ca2efbefbc7ed401 MD5SUM upstream package: 0d09d6fcf9616789ca2efbefbc7ed401 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 06:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 02:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010603.l4163EQn017982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 02:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Gotcha. I'm not worried about the version of Getopt::Long; my own usage (not to > mention the non-trivial test suite) both indicate to me that 2.35 is just fine. > I'll give upstream a couple days to respond to the bug I filed with them, then > move forward with this. I think we both have a comfort zone about this, but I'm just stating for the record for what /might/ happen if we are both wrong :) Ping me when you are ready to proceed and we'll take it up from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 06:09:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 02:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010609.l41699gd018173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 02:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > PDF/API2/Basic/TTF/XMLparse.pm uses it. The module will build w/o it being > installed, but if the test suite ever actally starts being comprehensive, > chances are something will fail. So I'd call it a BR, though I may just be > being super pedantic here... Ok, I'm convinced :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 06:21:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 02:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010621.l416L00E018507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-01 02:20 EST ------- Sorry for the obvious mistakes; they should all be fixed now. New versions at ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/libopenraw -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 07:00:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 03:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010700.l4170HvC019300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-05-01 03:00 EST ------- I need sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 08:49:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 04:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010849.l418nPvq025918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-05-01 04:49 EST ------- I just noticed your widelands submission and since I've packaged an old version of it privately, I have some comments about your spec file to add (I'll attach a diff between your original and what my comments would implement for good measure): 1) Shorten the summary a bit, I suggest something like "Open source realtime-strategy game" 2) Consider using just Release: 0.build%{buildnum}.%{rel}%{?dist} to avoid redundancy in the release tag and have the dist/version tag. 3) I'd add the version of the package for which my patches are built in the filename, i.e. widelands-build10-workfix.patch and widelands-build10-flagfix.patch. This way changes in the patches are more obvious (because the version gets bumped then). 4) Add some blank lines between spec file sections and changelog entries, this improves readability. 5) Capitalize the GenericName of the desktop file ("Realtime Strategy Game") 6) No need to use --delete-original when installing the spec file as the buildroot will be emptied at the beginning of %install I'll be on vacation from next week on, so unfortunately I can't volunteer for the review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 08:52:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 04:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010852.l418q1dA026133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-05-01 04:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153852) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153852&action=view) Diff between original spec file and what the changes suggested in comment #5 would implement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 08:54:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 04:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010854.l418s7sY026325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-01 04:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) [...] > 3) I'd add the version of the package for which my patches are built in the > filename, i.e. widelands-build10-workfix.patch and > widelands-build10-flagfix.patch. This way changes in the patches are more > obvious (because the version gets bumped then). It is a matter of preference, but I think using unversioned patch filenames is better because their history can be preserved in CVS, which doesn't support file renaming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 09:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 05:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705010906.l4196lRo027161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-05-01 05:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > [...] > It is a matter of preference, but I think using unversioned patch filenames is > better because their history can be preserved in CVS, which doesn't support file > renaming. That's a point I've not thought of... Hard to say what's better with the current SCM (CVS). I think there are patches of at least two different natures: On the one side some patches fix actual bugs in the upstream package that will hopefully get fixed in the next upstream version, they are probably rather short-lived and the history of the patch won't be that interesting (it's created and then dropped later on). Then there are patches that change policy and have probably a longer life than the other ones. Here preservation of history would be more worthwhile. Eventually we'll hopefully move to a more modern SCM (which preserves renaming) ;-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 10:31:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 06:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011031.l41AV3DX031176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jonathansteffan at gmail.com 2007-05-01 06:31 EST ------- SRPM: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1-4.fc7.src.rpm Tar: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz Spec: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 10:31:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 06:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011031.l41AV8ET031204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-01 06:31 EST ------- * rpmlint: W: ekg2-python no-documentation W: ekg2-voip no-documentation E: ekg2 no-binary W: ekg2 no-documentation W: ekg2-gtk2 no-documentation W: ekg2-logsqlite no-documentation W: ekg2-gpg no-documentation W: ekg2-ioctld no-documentation W: ekg2-jabber no-documentation W: perl-ekg2 no-documentation E: perl-ekg2 script-without-shebang /usr/share/ekg2/scripts/sample.pl E: perl-ekg2 script-without-shebang /usr/share/ekg2/scripts/dupa.pl E: perl-ekg2 script-without-shebang /usr/share/ekg2/scripts/irc.pl W: ekg2-gadu-gadu no-documentation W: ekg2-xosd no-documentation * use versioned dependencies for the main package (current solution breaks updates) * fix perl-ekg2 issues reported by rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 10:37:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 06:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011037.l41Abpwr031443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-01 06:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > 2) Consider using just > > Release: 0.build%{buildnum}.%{rel}%{?dist} > > to avoid redundancy in the release tag and have the dist/version tag. It's written in Package Naming Guidelines that we have to use 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} release tag for pre-releases and there's also an example: alsa-lib-0.9.2-0.1.beta1 So let's treat build10 as an %{alphatag} and it'll be indeed compatible with naming guidelines, won't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 11:25:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 07:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011125.l41BPi20001027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 07:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > It's written in Package Naming Guidelines that we have to use > 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} release tag for pre-releases and there's also an example: > alsa-lib-0.9.2-0.1.beta1 > > So let's treat build10 as an %{alphatag} and it'll be indeed compatible with > naming guidelines, won't it? This versioning is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 11:39:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 07:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011139.l41Bd7OB001441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-01 07:38 EST ------- > I assume the .la files are really needed for KDE? In most cases, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 11:40:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 07:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011140.l41Bev0J001514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-05-01 07:40 EST ------- Agreed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 11:41:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 07:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011141.l41Bfor9001613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-01 07:41 EST ------- > I added the script to remove the unnecessary .la files Most kde apps really *do* need those for proper function at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 12:15:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011215.l41CF7O2003672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-01 08:15 EST ------- Is there any reason why you left the contents of the folder "test" behind ? There might be 2 kinds of users which could use this package: * a user which wants to install a package which depends on this package * a user which wants to use this package to create his/her own software. Hence in this case, the contents of the folder "test" might be considered as examples to him/her. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 12:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011225.l41CPsnh004397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gemi at bluewin.ch ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2007-05-01 08:25 EST ------- rpmlint is silent on this: good. However: configure: WARNING: Building tdom without threads enabled, but building against a Tcl that IS thread-enabled. Is there a reason why threads are disabled? Also, it seems that RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 12:42:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011242.l41Cg18X004905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-01 08:41 EST ------- Hello Jasper, * being the one who sponsored you * and having received several unpleasing (private) emails concerning your personal character in the Fedora World (irc,mailing list...) * having worked which you on the kadischi project in the past, I'm thereby pointing to you from my own perspective that you have proven yourself to be quite disagreeable and quick to lash out at people trying to help you on IRC who don't give you exactly the answer you want, very quickly resorting to profanity and name-calling. However I respect the way you are pushing the dying project "Kadischi" to the surface, I guess you need support, so do any other fedora maintainer. Maintaining a package "X" in the Fedora Universe requires good communication with other fedora maintainers and with steering community members eventually. I know, the kadischi project is very dear to you and I'm sure that you will cooperate without any inconvenience in any situation to any fedora contributor. Am I right ? It is important for me to know where you stand to continue kadischi's review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 12:43:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011243.l41Ch4U7005057@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jasperhartline at ade | |lphia.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 12:57:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011257.l41Cvli4006372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 jasperhartline at adelphia.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jasperhartline at ade| |lphia.net) | ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 08:57 EST ------- I'm sure I've been harsh in some situations, and or not fully understanding of what is being presented to me by people who are unsure of some of my requests and what I am meaning, but yes I am very willing to participate and contribute to the Fedora Project with my maintaining and packaging of Kadischi without inconvenience to other Fedora Controbutors. I think the major issue is that the newer project livecd-tools/Pilgrim/Punji is said to "obsolete" or "make Kadischi irrelevant" which may be the case, however it doesn't hold weight in the sense that providing Kadischi in Fedora Extras, or what is now to be just Fedora, gives users flexibility in the tools they choose to use, and options or choices to use several different tools or all of the tools provided to do a single task. In any case, to answer your main question, No.. I have no problem cooperating with current Fedora Contributors and maintainers. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 13:10:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 09:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011310.l41DAxOo008079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-05-01 09:10 EST ------- This release is fixing all of the build stoppers that Brain noticed: http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SPECS/evolution-brutus.spec http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SRPMS/evolution-brutus-1.1.26.2-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-devel-1.1.26.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-debuginfo-1.1.26.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/RPMS/i386/evolution-brutus-1.1.26.2-1.fc7.i386.rpm http://www.omesc.com/content/downloads/dist/Rawhide/SOURCES/evolution-brutus-1.1.26.2.tar.gz Best regards, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 13:12:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 09:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011312.l41DCepE008416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-01 09:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > In any case, to answer your main question, No.. I have no problem cooperating with current Fedora Contributors and maintainers. > Thanks. Thanks, the quick answer. You'll need to add me as your co-maintainer of kadischi for cvsextras when approved. %{?dist} is missing in the spec file. Can you make some informal reviews of some packages queued for review so that you can grasp the fedora packaging guidelines quickly. Don't forget to add me in the CC: list of the bug you are reviewing. - Strigi ( 223586 ) - ruby-gettext-package (237380) might be simple -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 13:14:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 09:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011314.l41DEVPk008645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding at omesc.com 2007-05-01 09:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #103) > This release is fixing all of the build stoppers that Brain noticed: ^^^^^ I'm sure you're clever but that should read "Brian" ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 13:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 09:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011332.l41DWxjX010054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 09:32 EST ------- Well, if you want me to include all files under test/ directory as documentation, I want to create -doc subpackage because test/ directory are by 3 times larger than ruby-amazon package itself. What do you think? ------------------------------------------------- 180K /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/amazon 12K /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/amazon.rb 592K test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 13:42:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 09:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011342.l41DgXik010516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 09:42 EST ------- One more comment Including test/ directory results in making this rpm contain almost all files of original tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 14:00:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] New: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/machineball.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/machineball-1.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Machine Ball is a futuristic sport with amazing 3D graphics and realistic physics with very simple rules: Get the ball into your opponents goal. You can use your machine to push the ball in, or you can collect powerups such as missiles and blast the ball into the goal. Be creative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 14:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011403.l41E3bkN011762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-01 10:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Well, if you want me to include all files under test/ directory > as documentation, I want to create -doc subpackage because > test/ directory are by 3 times larger than ruby-amazon package > itself. What do you think? -doc subpackage would be appropriate. (In reply to comment #5) > One more comment > Including test/ directory results in making this rpm contain > almost all files of original tarball. is it wrong ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 14:17:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011417.l41EHVta012389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 10:17 EST ------- Here is the new SPEC file and SRPM: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.5-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 14:44:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011444.l41Eix9c015963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-01 10:44 EST ------- I haven't looked yet, but if this game points / uses Lucas Trademark PipeDream anywhere, then the use of that TM in docs / credits / etc, must be removed. For more on this see the pipenightdreams review and spec file, and also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224627 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 14:45:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011445.l41EjIIi016013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jasperhartline at adelphia.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 10:45 EST ------- Chitlesh Goorah has asked me to do an informal package review on this package. Upon installing all BuildRequires needed to build this package, I find that development package "file-devel" is not available for Fedora Core 6. This leads up to the package requiring file-devel which is not available using rpmbuild --rebuild strigi-0.3.11-2.src.rpm and not being able to build this package on Fedora Core 6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 14:58:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011458.l41EwY9G016895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 10:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Well, if you want me to include all files under test/ directory > > as documentation, I want to create -doc subpackage because > > test/ directory are by 3 times larger than ruby-amazon package > > itself. What do you think? > > -doc subpackage would be appropriate. Updated. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-amazon.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-amazon-0.9.2-3.fc7.src.rpm ---------------------------------------------------- * Tue May 2 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.9.2-3 - Split documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 14:58:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011458.l41EwfQp016919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 10:58 EST ------- Chitlesh Goorah has asked me to do an informal review of this package. Upon installing all BuildRequires, the package builds cleanly in Fedora Core 6 with a single warning from rpmlint: W: ruby-gettext-package invalid-license Ruby License/LGPL This should be LGPL rather than Ruby License/LGPL In examining your SPEC file, I see you can collapse some Requires and BuildRequires using this format: BuildRequires: irb, ruby-devel, ruby(abi = %{rubyabi} Requires: irb, ruby(abi) = %{rubyabi} rather than: BuildRequires: irb BuildRequires: ruby-devel BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = %{rubyabi} Requires: ruby(abi) = %{rubyabi} Requires: irb I also notice in the SPEC, the %files section has: %files -f %{name}.lang You might want to look into using: %{find_lang} instead. See: rpmbuild --showrc | grep find_lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 15:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011501.l41F1VvI017154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 11:01 EST ------- I have done an informal package review for package reviews BZ# 223586 and 237380 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 15:03:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011503.l41F3cV8017328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-01 11:03 EST ------- I have returned to first method of versioning. * Tue May 01 2007 Karol Trzcionka - 0-0.2.build10 - Return to first method of versioning - Some changes in summary and GenericName - Make spec-file more clear New URLs: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/widelands/widelands.spec http://karlik.nonlogic.org/widelands/widelands-0-0.2.build10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 15:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011506.l41F6FaZ017564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 15:06:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011506.l41F6DN4017545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-01 11:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Prototype Short Description: Create a CGI application by subclassing Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 15:09:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011509.l41F9UAB017787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 11:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > with a single warning from rpmlint: > W: ruby-gettext-package invalid-license Ruby License/LGPL > > This should be LGPL rather than Ruby License/LGPL See the real COPYING text. This is licensed under LGPL or Ruby License. This type of dual license is very common for ruby related modules > > In examining your SPEC file, I see you can collapse some Requires and > BuildRequires using this format: > BuildRequires: irb, ruby-devel, ruby(abi = %{rubyabi} > Requires: irb, ruby(abi) = %{rubyabi} > > rather than: > BuildRequires: irb > BuildRequires: ruby-devel > BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = %{rubyabi} > Requires: ruby(abi) = %{rubyabi} > Requires: irb I _strongly_ recommend the latter style (i.e. my style) and also some other reviewers recommend the latter style * This style makes it easy that what is really changed on taking diff when the dependency is changed. * This style makes diff output smaller. * For this package, the BuildRequires has only 3 packages so the difference is small. However, please consider the case in which one package has 29 BuildRequires...... > I also notice in the SPEC, the %files section has: > %files -f %{name}.lang > You might want to look into using: > %{find_lang} > instead. Already I use %find_lang. Note that there is no %{name}.mo files -------------------------------------------- %find_lang rails %find_lang rgettext %{__cat} *.lang >> %{name}.lang --------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 15:30:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011530.l41FUFPe019701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 11:30 EST ------- Just from I checked your spec file: * Some of the directories which should be owned by this package are actually not owned. * Please specify the full URL of the source or provide the way we can get the source of this package. * The group of this package "Applications/System" is correct? For example, pungi has "Development/Tools" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 15:52:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233603] Review Request: guidance - System administration tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011552.l41FqdRN022415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-01 11:52 EST ------- maybe notify -> pynotify looks like we have another missing python module: ImportError: No module named tooltip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 15:53:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011553.l41FrKhV022615@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Just from I checked your spec file: > > * Some of the directories which should be owned by > this package are actually not owned. Can you specify which directories you are talking about? > * Please specify the full URL of the source or provide the > way we can get the source of this package. The URL is a pointer to the Wiki page on FedoraProject.org where it can be retrieved using CVS. > * The group of this package "Applications/System" is correct? > For example, pungi has "Development/Tools" Yes, System/Applications is correct to my knowledge, since there is no development package associated with this package, nor is it built against in any form or fashion. It isn't an IDE for programming, or any sort of compiler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 16:18:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011618.l41GIeC2026801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 12:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Just from I checked your spec file: > > > > * Some of the directories which should be owned by > > this package are actually not owned. > Can you specify which directories you are talking about? > > * Please specify the full URL of the source or provide the > > way we can get the source of this package. > The URL is a pointer to the Wiki page on FedoraProject.org where it can be > retrieved using CVS. > > > * The group of this package "Applications/System" is correct? > > For example, pungi has "Development/Tools" > Yes, System/Applications is correct to my knowledge, since there is no > development package associated with this package, nor is it built against in any > form or fashion. It isn't an IDE for programming, or any sort of compiler. And mockbuild failed on FC-devel i386. The build log shows that -lz is needed on some compiling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 16:20:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011620.l41GKHx4027141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 12:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153866) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153866&action=view) mock build log of kadischi-3.5-3 on FC-devel i386 Sorry, the previous my comment was a draft. Please ignore it... (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Just from I checked your spec file: > > > > * Some of the directories which should be owned by > > this package are actually not owned. > Can you specify which directories you are talking about? They are: -------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/%{name}/lib/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/post_install_scripts/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/initrd/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/ks_examples/ ......... --------------------------------------------------- Not only the files under these directories but also these directories themselves must be owned. NOTE: When you write: ------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir foo/ ------------------------------------- (where foo/ is a directory), this means the directory foo/ only, where when you write ------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) foo/ ------------------------------------- this means the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc.. under foo/. > > * Please specify the full URL of the source or provide the > > way we can get the source of this package. > The URL is a pointer to the Wiki page on FedoraProject.org where it can be > retrieved using CVS. In this case, you have to write as comments how you created the source tarball (please check the section "Using Revision Control" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL . And in that case, it is mandatory that the date when you created the tarball by cvs is included into release number. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages And mockbuild failed on FC-devel i386. The build log shows that -lz is needed on some compiling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 16:25:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011625.l41GPvRe028411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 12:25 EST ------- Sorry, two more issues: E: kadischi non-executable-script /usr/share/kadischi/desktop/userhome.sh 0644 W: kadischi spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/kadischi-3.5/COPYING The formar: * This script has shebang (/bin/bash) but is not executable. - If this script is only sourced, then it should not have shebang - Otherwise (i.e. if this scripts can be executed directly), then it should be executable The latter: * Permission is incorrect (0755), which should be 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 16:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011657.l41Gv627031830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-01 12:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > E: kadischi non-executable-script /usr/share/kadischi/desktop/userhome.sh 0644 Actually, this script isn't used by kadischi, but a script which is called during the live environment of kadischi's output (the Live iso). Perhaps, kadischi could set the file permission of userhome.sh properly before copying it to the iso image. And hence, that might fix the rpmlint error. A Request for Enhancement to kadischi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:07:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011707.l41H7fPS000762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-01 13:07 EST ------- I didn't notice any problems, but I've taken the line removing the .la files out of the spec just in case. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/kio_p7zip.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/kio_p7zip-0.3.1-3fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:09:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011709.l41H9gXK001171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-01 13:09 EST ------- Okay; I wasn't sure, but I removed the line again. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/tastymenu.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/tastymenu-0.8-5fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:13:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011713.l41HDAVc001940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 13:13 EST ------- The new SRPM and SPEC are here: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.5-4.20070501.src.rpm About the rpmlint warnings and errors: I have removed and replaced the items mentioned from rpmlint in CVS, they keep inheriting the permissions it is complaining about. Kadischi already sets this files permissions to 755 after copying it to the LiveCD environment. So that RFE is not neccessary. About the Mock build errors: I am not certain I understand this one. >From the looks of it, this is an error in the pciutils-devel or pciutils package in Mock, since the reference of the error is like so: /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libpci.a(names.o): In function `pci_load_name_list': (.text+0x6e8): undefined reference to `gzopen' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libpci.a(names.o): In function `pci_load_name_list': (.text+0x781): undefined reference to `gzgets' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libpci.a(names.o): In function `.L174': (.text+0x886): undefined reference to `gzclose' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libpci.a(names.o): In function `.L174': (.text+0x8a8): undefined reference to `gzeof' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libpci.a(names.o): In function `.L174': (.text+0x945): undefined reference to `gzclose' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libpci.a(names.o): In function `.L174': (.text+0xd74): undefined reference to `gzopen' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libpci.a(names.o): In function `.L177': (.text+0xf17): undefined reference to `gzerror' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libpci.a(names.o): In function `.L177': (.text+0xf3a): undefined reference to `gzclose' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status libpci.a nor names.o is part of the Kadischi package, if -lz was added which made the package compile, I do believe this is an issue with Mock, not Kadischi. Can you clear this up and show me how -lz is needed in Kadischi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:25:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011725.l41HPwAK005657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-01 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > The URL is a pointer to the Wiki page on FedoraProject.org where it can be > retrieved using CVS. True. However I guess you misunderstood me for the %{?dist}, which confused Mamuro that you pulled the kadischi sources from the cvs. Your Release: should be Release: 3{alphatag}%{?dist} > Yes, System/Applications is correct to my knowledge, since there is no > development package associated with this package, nor is it built against in any form or fashion. It isn't an IDE for programming, or any sort of compiler. I chose System/Applications for kadischi for the same reason that Jasper explained. (In reply to comment #19) > ------------------------------------- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > foo/ > ------------------------------------- > this means the directory foo/ itself and all > files/directories/etc.. under foo/. In this case the %files section can be reduced to: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc FAQ README TODO COPYING CREDITS %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_libexecdir}/%{name} %{_sbindir}/%{name} %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/buildstamp %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/%{name}.conf %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz %{_mandir}/man5/%{name}.conf.5.gz > And mockbuild failed on FC-devel i386. The build log shows > that -lz is needed on some compiling. > libz-devel is missing as BR. Below is from the rpmbuild: [...] /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'userhome.desktop' '/var/tmp/kadischi-3.5-2.20070501cvs-root-chitlesh/usr/share/kadischi/desktop/userhome.desktop' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'userhome.sh' '/var/tmp/kadischi-3.5-2.20070501cvs-root-chitlesh/usr/share/kadischi/desktop/userhome.sh' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'install.desktop' '/var/tmp/kadischi-3.5-2.20070501cvs-root-chitlesh/usr/share/kadischi/desktop/install.desktop' [...] You can see that that the "-p" argument is missing which for preserving timestamps. Timestamps should be preserved. This can be done by using make INSTALL="install -p" DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install instead of make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} Another thing the package entails an empty folder: /usr/share/kadischi/patches Actually when I was maitaining kadischi with you, Jasper, this folder contained patches for kadischi itself. However for a user using kadischi it is useless. Please, correct me if that has changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:29:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011729.l41HTlXL007094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-01 13:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I haven't looked yet, but if this game points / uses Lucas Trademark PipeDream > anywhere, then the use of that TM in docs / credits / etc, must be removed. The few docs shipped do not have such references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:31:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011731.l41HVR7N007798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-05-01 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint is silent on this: good. > However: > configure: WARNING: > Building tdom without threads enabled, but building against a Tcl > that IS thread-enabled. > Is there a reason why threads are disabled? They weren't disabled explicitly. The default for this package is to build without threading enabled. I've added --enable-threads to the configure line to fix. > Also, it seems that RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used. Fixed as well: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tdom-0.8.0-2.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tdom.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:36:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011736.l41Ha76M009402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 13:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > About the Mock build errors: > I am not certain I understand this one. > From the looks of it, this is an error in the pciutils-devel or > pciutils package > in Mock, since the reference of the error is like so: > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > libpci.a nor names.o is part of the Kadischi package, > if -lz was added which > made the package compile, I do believe this is an issue with Mock, > not Kadischi. > Can you clear this up and show me how -lz is needed in Kadischi? zlib compression support is added from pciutils 2.2.4 (not available on FC-6 pciutils 2.2.3) and linkage against libz.so is needed to use libpci.a in pciutils (i.e. libpci.a uses libz.so, however as this is a static archive, linkage cannot be done beforehand). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:44:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011744.l41Hir0b011717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 13:44 EST ------- > libz-devel is missing as BR. > There is no libz-devel package in either Fedora Core 6 or the RAWHIDE tree that I can see. I've added -lz though to the linker flags, the new package with all changes is below. > Another thing the package entails an empty folder: > /usr/share/kadischi/patches > > Actually when I was maitaining kadischi with you, Jasper, this folder > contained patches for kadischi itself. However for a user using kadischi it is > useless. Please, correct me if that has changed. Originally this directory contained patches for Anaconda, which have since been merged into Anaconda. While the directory is not in use anymore, I can't simply delete it from CVS since I do not have cvsadmin priviliges. The new SRPM and SPEC are here: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.5-5.20070501cvs.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 17:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011750.l41Hocmn013028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-01 13:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > > libz-devel is missing as BR. > > > There is no libz-devel package in either Fedora Core 6 or the RAWHIDE tree that Sorry, its zlib-devel chitlesh(SPECS)[0]$rpm -ql zlib-devel | grep so /usr/lib/libz.so > Originally this directory contained patches for Anaconda, which have since been > merged into Anaconda. While the directory is not in use anymore, I can't simply > delete it from CVS since I do not have cvsadmin priviliges. But you can delete it from the rpm package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:04:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011804.l41I4H43014080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 14:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > About the rpmlint warnings and errors: > I have removed and replaced the items mentioned from rpmlint in CVS, they keep > inheriting the permissions it is complaining about. > Kadischi already sets this files permissions to 755 after copying it to the > LiveCD environment. So that RFE is not neccessary. Similar to comment 26, you can fix the permission in the spec file. You don't have to fix the permission in CVS. ---------------------------------------------------- %define alphatag %(date +%%Y%%m%%d)cvs ---------------------------------------------------- IMO this %alphatag should be hardcoded, i.e. you should write alphatag as 20070501cvs directly. When I rebuilt 20070501cvs srpm, the result binary rpms has 20070502cvs name because I live in Japan (UTC+0900) and currently it is May 2! So this results in different name binary rpms according to where rebuilder lives. (And I go to sleep for now...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:14:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232342] Review Request: mcs - A configuration file abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011814.l41IEGIF015320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcs - A configuration file abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232342 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-01 14:14 EST ------- Any reason why this review hasn't been closed yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:15:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011815.l41IFE4t015448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-01 14:15 EST ------- Any progress on the license issue? Perhaps we should ask Spot otherwise, he is sorta the authority on license issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232342] Review Request: mcs - A configuration file abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011819.l41IJbtU015732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcs - A configuration file abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232342 redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at camperquake.de 2007-05-01 14:19 EST ------- None. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:20:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011820.l41IKxN2015822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-01 14:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Image-Math-Constrain Short Description: Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011821.l41ILpkh015888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-01 14:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix Short Description: Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232036] Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011822.l41IMCd3015943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible Alias: perl-YAML-Tiny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-01 14:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-YAML-Tiny Short Description: Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:23:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011823.l41IN2Fe016032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-01 14:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-YAML-Syck Short Description: Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:24:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231085] Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011824.l41IO0gZ016087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231085 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-01 14:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule Short Description: Compiler for Perl 6 Rules Owners: steve at silug.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011838.l41Icgrk016937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 14:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Sorry for the obvious mistakes; they should all be fixed now. No need to apologize... that's what the peer reviews are for... more eyes, less errors. Now that gtk2-devel is in the BR, new files (and dependencies) are generated: rpm -qpl libopenraw-0.0.2-3.fc6.i386.rpm /usr/lib/libopenraw.so.1 /usr/lib/libopenraw.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/libopenrawgnome.so.1 <-- NEW FILE /usr/lib/libopenrawgnome.so.1.0.0 <-- NEW FILE /usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2 /usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/COPYING /usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/NEWS /usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/README /usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/TODO rpm -qpl libopenraw-devel-0.0.2-3.fc6.i386.rpm /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0 /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw-gnome /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw-gnome/gdkpixbuf.h <-- NEW FILE /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/consts.h /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/debug.h /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/io.h /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/libopenraw.h /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/thumbnails.h /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/types.h /usr/lib/libopenraw.so /usr/lib/libopenrawgnome.so <-- NEW FILE /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libopenraw-1.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libopenraw-gnome-1.0.pc <-- NEW FILE You now have gui dependencies. Do you intend to break the package into something like: libopenraw libopenraw-gnome libopenraw-devel or do you think that the majority of users of the package will want all the components even at the expense of pulling in gui components and all of their dependencies? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:44:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011844.l41Ii0kh017185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-01 14:43 EST ------- The "dangerous-command-in-%pre/%post" warnings are still there, rpmlint -I is not helpful. I have no idea on that one, so lets just ignore. I have a question about these though: W: kde-settings obsolete-not-provided kde-config W: kde-settings-kdm obsolete-not-provided kde-config-kdm Please let me know why those are not provided? Please also add a comment as outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-413e1c297803cfa9de0cc4c56f3ac384bff5dc9e and for good meausre add -q to %setup and remove tab in line 3. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 18:58:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011858.l41IwRIw018149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 14:58 EST ------- Missing call to update-desktop-database in %post and %postun. Missing Requires(post), Requires(postun) on desktop-file-utils Doesn't build in mock: g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o intro.o intro.cpp intro.cpp:13:20: error: GL/glu.h: No such file or directory make: *** [intro.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 19:18:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 15:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011918.l41JIGvD019349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-01 15:18 EST ------- > re: dangerous commands cp/mv are dangerous, period. We really ought to keep theme in the scriptlets for config migration from older packages/distro-releases. > Please let me know why those are not provided? Because the Provides are not needed? They are there only to provide an upgrade path for previous/existing kde-redhat users. We should be able to drop this cruft eventually. Spec URL: http://www.math.unl.edu/~rdieter/fedora/kde-settings.spec %changelog * Tue May 01 2007 Rex Dieter 3.5-20 - don't mix tab/spaces - %%setup -q -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 19:18:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 15:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011918.l41JIvOM019426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-01 15:18 EST ------- > Similar to comment 26, you can fix the permission in the spec > file. You don't have to fix the permission in CVS. I'm pretty sure this is outside the realm of SPEC file usage. I would rather have the permissions fixed within CVS, rather than have multiple perm lines in %files or have chmod hacks in the SPEC file. Also about the %[alphatag}, I read that the tagging must not be overridden by local build specifications. This is also how it shows on the wiki to provide a package from CVS. Here is the new SPEC file and SRPM: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.5-6.20070501cvs.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 19:19:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 15:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011919.l41JJ31W019432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-01 15:18 EST ------- Oops, truncated changelog: * Tue May 01 2007 Rex Dieter 3.5-20 - don't mix tab/spaces - %%setup -q - Source0 URL comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 19:23:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 15:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225904] Merge Review: iprutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011923.l41JNPrY019864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iprutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225904 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski at post.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 19:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 15:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705011923.l41JNjU9019932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - Config files for kde Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-01 15:23 EST ------- Okay, this looks good. See comment #8 and comment #11 for explanations of remaining issues. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 20:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232548] Review Request: gnome-yum - Graphical program for easier use the YUM install program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012002.l41K2bPq022635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - Graphical program for easier use the YUM install program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232548 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|bjohnson at symetrix.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 16:02 EST ------- I just noticed that this package is already in Fedora Extras but is orphaned. If you are interested in maintaining this package, please apply to take it over. Orphaned packages: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#head-1b21389180b4dc417a4e27c48f21e56a4d0b23d0 gnome-yum in CVS: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/gnome-yum/?root=extras Procedure to take over an orphan: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#head-69cb9bb585cb84895b1279c3cb3e5be4091c5078 Closing as Resolved -> NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 20:31:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012031.l41KVDI6024816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-01 16:31 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries, ldconfig not needed * Not relocatable 0 Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissable content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * .desktop file as required and properly installed MUST FIX ======== * /usr/share/pipepanic is not owned, change: %{_datadir}/%{name}/* under files to just %{_datadir}/%{name} Should FIX ========== * Drop " that is playable on Linux PCs and the Sharp Zaurus." from %description ofcourse it runs on linux, its a Fedora package, and that it also runs on the Zaurus is of 0 interest. * Set a window title, currently the window is untitled. I'll attach a patch for this. Notice that this patch also needs an icon file in bmp format installed as /usr/share/pipepanic/icon.bmp This file can be generated by the following obscure ImageMagick command, and yes the using of convert twice and the | is necessary: convert PipepanicIcon32.png bmp3:- | convert - -fill '#FF00FF' -opaque black -colors 256 -compress none bmp3:icon.bmp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 20:32:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012032.l41KWKVd024882@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-01 16:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153891) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153891&action=view) PATCH: set window title and icon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 20:44:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012044.l41KiA7P025652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 16:44 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 20:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012045.l41Kj1Sa025734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 16:44 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 20:54:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012054.l41KsLbX026713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2007-05-01 16:54 EST ------- Jeff: would you mind doing EPEL branches? If that's too much trouble, I'd gladly sign up for co-maintenance to take care of those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:11:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216355] Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012111.l41LB5Dq028512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skins - Collection of OSD skins for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216355 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-01 17:11 EST ------- Built for devel a week ago, repocopied to FC6 today, should appear in the next push along with a vdr revision which relocates themes to /var/lib/vdr/themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231670] Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLENk029162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231669] Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLYmE029223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231685] Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLQcV029208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231685 Bug 231685 depends on bug 231670, which changed state. Bug 231670 Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231680] Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLmHM029318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231680 Bug 231680 depends on bug 231679, which changed state. Bug 231679 Summary: Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231679 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231679] Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLkMv029288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231679 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231685] Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLkoH029282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231685 Bug 231685 depends on bug 231670, which changed state. Bug 231670 Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231685 depends on bug 231669, which changed state. Bug 231669 Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231681] Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLmFI029334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231681 Bug 231681 depends on bug 231670, which changed state. Bug 231670 Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231681 depends on bug 231669, which changed state. Bug 231669 Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231681 depends on bug 231675, which changed state. Bug 231675 Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231681 depends on bug 231679, which changed state. Bug 231679 Summary: Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231679 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231675] Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLiC0029257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 231675 depends on bug 231670, which changed state. Bug 231670 Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231675 depends on bug 231669, which changed state. Bug 231669 Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231681] Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLrr0029361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231681 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231683] Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLuxJ029374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231683 Bug 231683 depends on bug 231670, which changed state. Bug 231670 Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231683 depends on bug 231675, which changed state. Bug 231675 Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231683] Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLvru029382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231683 Bug 231683 depends on bug 231670, which changed state. Bug 231670 Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231683 depends on bug 231675, which changed state. Bug 231675 Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:21:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231681] Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012121.l41LLxnd029407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231681 Bug 231681 depends on bug 231670, which changed state. Bug 231670 Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231681 depends on bug 231669, which changed state. Bug 231669 Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231681 depends on bug 231675, which changed state. Bug 231675 Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231681 depends on bug 231679, which changed state. Bug 231679 Summary: Review Request: synce-serial - Serial connection support for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231679 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:22:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231670] Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012122.l41LM11N029421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 Bug 231670 depends on bug 231669, which changed state. Bug 231669 Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:22:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231670] Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012122.l41LM1lB029430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 Bug 231670 depends on bug 231669, which changed state. Bug 231669 Summary: Review Request: libsynce - Connection library for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231669 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231683] Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012122.l41LM5R3029445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231683 Bug 231683 depends on bug 231670, which changed state. Bug 231670 Summary: Review Request: librapi - Library to connect to Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231670 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231683 depends on bug 231675, which changed state. Bug 231675 Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 231683 depends on bug 231681, which changed state. Bug 231681 Summary: Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231681 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:22:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231680] Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012122.l41LM6YC029460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231680 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:22:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231681] Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012122.l41LM8vY029477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-kde - Connection service application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231681 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 231681 depends on bug 231680, which changed state. Bug 231680 Summary: Review Request: vdccm - Serial connection daemon for Pocket PC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231680 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:22:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231685] Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012122.l41LMQIw029522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcemirror - Remote display control for PocketPC devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231685 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:22:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231674] Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012122.l41LMfHv029586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231674 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:22:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231675] Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012122.l41LMrRA029633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librra - Connection to Pocket PC devices, part of SynCE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231675 Bug 231675 depends on bug 231674, which changed state. Bug 231674 Summary: Review Request: libmimedir - Library to parse MIME Directory Profile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231674 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:23:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218232] Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012123.l41LNXe4029761@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Math-Stats - Classes to calculate statistical parameters Alias: pear-Math-Stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218232 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:23:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197413] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - OO interface to PHP's cURL extension In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012123.l41LNc0I029792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Curl - OO interface to PHP's cURL extension Alias: php-pear-Net-Curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197413 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231683] Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012123.l41LNiEI029811@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncekonnector - Synchronization application for Pocket PC handhelds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231683 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:23:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221672] Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012123.l41LNmV9029831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-POP3 - Provides a POP3 class to access POP3 server Alias: pear-Net-POP3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221672 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225824] Merge Review: gnome-mime-data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012127.l41LRg5M030065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-mime-data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225824 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Bug 225824 depends on bug 227553, which changed state. Bug 227553 Summary: gnome-mime-data: change to noarch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227553 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:28:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231085] Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012128.l41LSBaR030095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231085 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012138.l41Lck3P030561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-05-01 17:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Jeff: would you mind doing EPEL branches? If that's too much trouble, I'd gladly > sign up for co-maintenance to take care of those. If you're willing to co-maintain, I'll take care of the initial setup. I don't run RHEL or CentOS so I'm unable to do testing/debugging on those platforms. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: bcfg2 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: jeff at ocjtech.us, icon at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:41:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012141.l41Lfgin030723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 21:42:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 17:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232036] Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012142.l41LgURe030802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible Alias: perl-YAML-Tiny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 22:12:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 18:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012212.l41MC6Jx032142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-01 18:12 EST ------- 1. Fixed 2. Not sure I agree on this. If this isn't considered a blocker I can't see any benefit in separating libguniqueapp that justify the extra effort. I don't want to maintain a rather obscure gnome library that hasn't seen upstream development for 7 months. Feel free to convince me that separating is the best solution however. 3. Upstream issue. I've queried upstream. I can't think of any good downstream solutions to this. Please help if you can. 4. See #3 5. Not needed for FC5+, IE: not needed 6. Fixed. Updated Spec: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/scratchpad.spec Updated SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/scratchpad-0.3.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 22:48:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 18:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238641] New: Review Request: QtCurve - KDE & Gtk2 Theme That Unifies Program Appearance Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238641 Summary: Review Request: QtCurve - KDE & Gtk2 Theme That Unifies Program Appearance Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com QtCurve is actually made up of three packages, so I'll post them one at a time. Description: QtCurve is a set of widget styles for KDE and Gtk2 based apps, based on Bluecurve. It allows for similar styles to be applied to both KDE and Gtk2-based apps, acheiving decent-looking style unity. KDE side Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/kde-style-qtcurve.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/kde-style-qtcurve-0.48.5-1fc6.src.rpm Gtk2 side Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/gtk-qtcurve-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/gtk-qtcurve-engine-0.48.5-1fc6.src.rpm Metapackage to install the aforementioned packages Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/qtcurve.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/qtcurve-0.48.5-1fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 22:58:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 18:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238643] New: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238643 Summary: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Declare-Constraints-Simple/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple-0.03-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple.spec Description: The main purpose of this module is to provide an easy way to build a profile to validate a data structure. It does this by giving you a set of declarative keywords in the importing namespace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 22:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 18:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238643] Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012259.l41Mx5ZB003697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238643 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-01 18:59 EST ------- This package is a new optional testing requirement of perl-Moose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 23:20:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012320.l41NKTpo005827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 19:20 EST ------- Not yet. Upstream said that they would add license text explicitly in the next version, however it seems that they don't want to release next version only for license text inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 23:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012345.l41Njr32007631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-01 19:45 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 1 23:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705012357.l41Nvco3008211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-01 19:57 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output: W: tastymenu dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/tastymenu/common ../common This is okay, package requires kdelibs which owns this file. - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license field matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - sources match upstream d58492c17fe97615e912d28399fce2ef tastymenu-0.8.tar.bz2 - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - locales handled properly - no shared library in default path - package not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates X package Requires packages to bring in all other used directories - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files - no static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library with suffix - no need for devel subpackage - package contains libtool archive This is a KDE package which is an exception to the .la requirement - contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages - contains proper %install - all filenames valid utf-8 ==== MUST FIX ===== - Add: Requires: kdebase This brings in the /usr/share/apps/kicker/applets/ directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 00:17:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 20:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020017.l420H148009469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-01 20:16 EST ------- Done. Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/tastymenu.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/tastymenu-0.8-6fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 00:31:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 20:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020031.l420V4rY009941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-01 20:31 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? For current spec file: * Versioning - I suggest again that the version of this spec/srpm should be 0.8.1.7. * Requires: --------------------------------------------- Requires(post): chkfontpath Requires(postun): chkfontpath --------------------------------------------- - If you add this Requires, then the check of the existence on the scriptlets: --------------------------------------------- [ -f %{_bindir}/mkfontdir ] && --------------------------------------------- is not needed because you explicitly "require" it. IMO the binaies --------------------------------------------- %{_bindir}/mkfontdir %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_sbindir}/chkfontdir --------------------------------------------- should be added as Requires(post) or/and Requires(postun), and all checking part "like [ -f <> ] && " should be removed. * Conflict - I still don't understand why you add the line --------------------------------------------- Conflicts: x11-font-wqy-bitmapfont --------------------------------------------- Are the rpm "x11-font-wqy-bitmapfont" ever shipped *on Fedora*? If not, then this line should be removed. * Provides: --------------------------------------------- Provides: wqy-bitmap-fonts = %{version}-%{release} --------------------------------------------- - This is not needed. This is automatically added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 01:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 21:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227228] Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020121.l421LfjK012302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227228 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-01 21:21 EST ------- Sorry for the late, Fix's coming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 02:17:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020217.l422Hrai014006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 22:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 2. Not sure I agree on this. If this isn't considered a blocker I can't see any > benefit in separating libguniqueapp that justify the extra effort. I don't want > to maintain a rather obscure gnome library that hasn't seen upstream development > for 7 months. Feel free to convince me that separating is the best solution however. Well the idea is to take the work off you to update with security or bug fixes, and save resources between packages, but if the project is a) not being used in other packages in fedora and b) not actively developed or maintained then it would probably not make a lot of sense. And no, it wouldn't be a blocker, especially in this case. > 3. Upstream issue. I've queried upstream. I can't think of any good downstream > solutions to this. Please help if you can. Well, after looking through the code and doing a little investigation, it appears that if it's going to get a .desktop entry, then some form of file-selector has to be implemented when it is run with no arguements. Unfortunately, I've never worked with gtk, so I don't know how myself. Seems like it would not be hard though. Not providing a .desktop entry for a gui app would break the packaging standards as it's required. However, we could argue to the packaging committe that it should be packaged as a "shell extension" (is that what's it's called in gnome?) only, but it seems dependent on the .desktop entry for that to work. Remove the .desktop entry and it no longer works by right-click on a file. > 5. Not needed for FC5+, IE: not needed My mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 02:19:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229440] Review Request: redhat-lsb - package for LSB comformance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020219.l422JCZ7014174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-lsb - package for LSB comformance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229440 llim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From llim at redhat.com 2007-05-01 22:19 EST ------- Oh..ok. I will try to find one. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 02:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020219.l422JxVe014312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-01 22:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Missing Requires(post), Requires(postun) on desktop-file-utils Someone reminded me today that this is deprecated, so never mind on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 02:50:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229440] Review Request: redhat-lsb - package for LSB comformance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020250.l422oMNu016190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-lsb - package for LSB comformance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229440 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-01 22:50 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 226363 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 02:50:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020250.l422oY6l016215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-01 22:50 EST ------- *** Bug 229440 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 02:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020253.l422rBmo016382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|llim at redhat.com |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:03:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221670] Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020303.l4233qLj016960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Alias: Net-UserAgent-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221670 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-01 23:03 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:05:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212856] Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020305.l4235R7v017046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class Alias: php-pear-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212856 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-01 23:05 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Pager New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:07:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020307.l4237228017131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: php-pear- |Review Request: php-pear- |Payment-Process - PEAR: |Payment-Process - Unified |Unified payment processor |payment processor Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-01 23:06 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Payment-Process New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:12:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020312.l423CiBM017436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-01 23:12 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, I was out on vacation... 1. ok. Looks good. 2.a. ok. Looks good. 2.b. ok. Looks good. 2.c. ok. Looks good. 2 (oops. I seem to have failed numbering here). ok. looks good. 3. That looks right to me on the desktop file install. 4. good. You seem to have removed the 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' from the top of %install. That needs to be there... Humm... the 0.8 version doesn't seem to build here in mock: + desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora --delete-original --dir=/var/tmp/repoman-0.8-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora /var/tmp/repoman-0.8-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora/repoman.desktop Error on file "/var/tmp/repoman-0.8-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora/repoman.desktop": Failed to open file '/var/tmp/repoman-0.8-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora/repoman.desktop': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.16798 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:13:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227228] Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020313.l423DbnO017490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GshutDown - Advanced shut down utility for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227228 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-01 23:13 EST ------- Fixed, SPEC:http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/SPECS/gshutdown.spec SRPM:http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/SRPMS/gshutdown-0.2-0.3.rc1.fc7.src.rpm LOG: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/Gshutodown-0.2-build.log * Tue May 01 2007 Xavier lamien - 0.2-0.3.rc1 - Fixed redundant BR and Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020340.l423e8JB018755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:40:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020340.l423enQk018816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020345.l423jrXN019102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-01 23:45 EST ------- So as this is Merge-review and not a new package as reported in bug 229440, there is no need of sponsoring here. Just a Formal official review and CLOSE this Review Request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:45:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020345.l423jsAj019112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-01 23:45 EST ------- That looks fixed to me... I think this should be good to go now, unless Matthais sees any further places for improvement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:54:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020354.l423sVBg019622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-05-01 23:54 EST ------- Hi, Deji - Please respond to Remi's comment #3 before I start a complete review. Not building with mock is OK, but avoiding --with-biarch is a problem. It would be much easier to have a biarch build that worked on x86_64 and ppc64 without needing to copy the 32-bit packages around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 03:54:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 23:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020354.l423sbus019648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-01 23:54 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d8b5c458439698187db0bfee672044ef Data-Visitor-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs t/base.................ok t/bugs.................ok t/callback.............ok t/callback_aliasing....ok t/circular_refs........ok t/globs................ok All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=64, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.30 cusr + 0.08 csys = 0.38 CPU) + Provides: perl(Data::Visitor) = 0.05 perl(Data::Visitor::Callback) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 04:04:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 00:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020404.l4244TQg020212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-02 00:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-Visitor Short Description: Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 04:04:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 00:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020404.l4244pYn020245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 04:23:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 00:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020423.l424NPwR021500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-02 00:23 EST ------- Sorry but my comment wasn't a question.... Building with mock, is, AFAIK, mandatory for the Extras build system. So the Deji's solution is problably a good one. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 04:24:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 00:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020424.l424OVio021573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-05-02 00:24 EST ------- One thing where I don't know if that's covered by the packaging guidelines: There's a circular dependency between widelands and widelands-data. Given that both come from the same source, I'd just include the data files with the main package and make it easy for the dependency solvers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 05:08:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 01:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020508.l4258gJm023302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-02 01:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > One thing where I don't know if that's covered by the packaging guidelines: > There's a circular dependency between widelands and widelands-data. Given that > both come from the same source, I'd just include the data files with the main > package and make it easy for the dependency solvers. The correct way, is drop the depends on widelands in -data as the -data package can sometimes be used standalone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 05:16:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 01:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020516.l425GdfT023734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-05-02 01:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > The correct way, is drop the depends on widelands in -data as the -data package > can sometimes be used standalone. As rapidly as the project is changing, I'd say using that data files from outside is not the road to sanity ;-). My opinion is still that the data subpackage should go for now. If needed, it can always -- and easily -- be resurrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 05:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 01:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020530.l425U3nP024593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 01:29 EST ------- You could try asking Spot if the mail from upstream that the license text will be added is enough for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 05:32:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 01:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020532.l425WcTV024790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 01:32 EST ------- Nice job, I was hoping someone would tackle this caml stuff, and here you are. I'll try todo some reviews on this, starting with the caml deps. If someone wants to beat me to it, thats fine. As long as I haven't assigned the bug to me, I haven't actually started reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 06:12:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 02:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020612.l426CVR6026194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-05-02 02:12 EST ------- No, building with mock is not mandatory. It would be nice, but it's not a showstopper. Having to combine packages built on separate architectures is more of a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 06:34:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 02:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020634.l426Y812026964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-02 02:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > You could try asking Spot if the mail from upstream that the license text will > be added is enough for now. Including a copy of this mail probably will be. The point behind all this is to shift responsibility and liability wrt. licensing to "upstream" to prevent harm from users and packagers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 06:35:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 02:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020635.l426ZnIa027010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-02 02:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > You now have gui dependencies. Do you intend to break the package into > something like: > > libopenraw > libopenraw-gnome > libopenraw-devel > > or do you think that the majority of users of the package will want all the > components even at the expense of pulling in gui components and all of their > dependencies? That is a good idea! I do not know of anything atm that could make use of libopenraw without the GNOME component, but I assume that it might be useful at some point (perhaps a ImageMagick-style application). Question: Should separate -devel packages be created for libopenraw and libopenraw-gnome, or is it enough to add a requirement for all components to the devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 06:42:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 02:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020642.l426gS5V027280@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-02 02:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > Question: Should separate -devel packages be created for libopenraw and > libopenraw-gnome, or is it enough to add a requirement for all components to the > devel package? It's up to you. I'd prefer seeing separate *-devel's and runtime packages for each of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 06:53:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 02:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020653.l426rfSA027569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 06:56:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 02:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020656.l426u0Pp027651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-02 02:55 EST ------- rpmlint on rpm package reported E: redhat-lsb statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 The package installs a statically linked binary or object file. Usually this is a packaging bug. If not, contact your rpmlint distributor about this so that this error gets included in the exception file for rpmlint and will not be flagged as a packaging bug in the future (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). E: redhat-lsb only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. W: redhat-lsb dangling-relative-symlink /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 ld-linux.so.2 The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: redhat-lsb dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig The relative symbolic link points nowhere. W: redhat-lsb dangling-relative-symlink /bin/mailx mail The relative symbolic link points nowhere. E: redhat-lsb zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 W: redhat-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-ia32 A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. E: redhat-lsb zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch W: redhat-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-noarch A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. E: redhat-lsb zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 W: redhat-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/graphics-3.1-ia32 A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. E: redhat-lsb non-readable /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). E: redhat-lsb non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/redhat_lsb_trigger.i386 0700 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. E: redhat-lsb zero-length /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch W: redhat-lsb non-conffile-in-etc /etc/lsb-release.d/core-3.1-noarch A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. W: redhat-lsb dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd ../../../sbin/chkconfig The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rpmlint on SRPM reported E: redhat-lsb hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: redhat-lsb hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: redhat-lsb hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: redhat-lsb hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/install_initd A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: redhat-lsb hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: redhat-lsb hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: redhat-lsb hardcoded-library-path in /lib/lsb A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. W: redhat-lsb macro-in-%changelog endif Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 07:56:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 03:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020756.l427u8Gw030654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-02 03:56 EST ------- I sent a mail to spot about license issue of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 09:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 05:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020904.l4294rYL003765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-02 05:04 EST ------- Also, I found tarball does not contain any license text file. SHOULD : - Use dist tag (however its not mandatory). - Use new buildroot variable. - Use macros under %files - Add README in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 09:07:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 05:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705020907.l4297FJV003943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-02 05:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=153923) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=153923&action=view) Modified SPEC I did some quick workaround for this SPEC. Still its having some problem as reported by rpmlint on SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 10:10:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 06:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021010.l42AA7Gq007634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-02 06:09 EST ------- Just another quick look, and only minor points : - Instead of using "-n varnish-libs" (and -devel), plain "libs" is shorter and more often used. - I maintain that --sbindir=/usr/sbin is redundant ;-) All the rest looks much better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 10:27:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 06:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021027.l42ARYEj008320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 Bug 233598 depends on bug 233597, which changed state. Bug 233597 Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 10:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 06:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233597] Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021027.l42ARWnS008304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment - Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233597 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-02 06:27 EST ------- Oh, indeed, my bad! It's all done now, and rebuilt. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 10:39:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 06:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167714] Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021039.l42AdrGL008731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-05-02 06:39 EST ------- I'm orphaning this, please, change the initial owner in owners.list . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 11:44:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 07:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021144.l42BigUu012033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From moritz at barsnick.net 2007-05-02 07:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) I don't want to be picky, but: > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes Shouldn't this imply: BuildRequires: pkgconfig >= 0.9.0 ?? Perhaps you might want to version the Requires: pkgconfig for -devel as well, dunno. *shrug* Note: This isn't a package specific requirement, but seems to be introduced by autoconf. The requirement or the versioning _may_ therefore be obsolete or quietly ignorable. pkgconfig interestingly _is not_ in the exception list for BRs: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList Re the versioning: The Fedora packaging guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/ wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0711805dd733fe3b31741e9d5236d72941a79d94) say: "First, if the lowest possible requirement is so old that nobody has a version older than that installed on any target distribution release, there's no need to include the version in the dependency at all." This may very much be the case for this pkgconfig version. :) Moritz, off to build his own gthumb with this lib, thanks for the package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 11:54:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 07:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] New: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mlichvar at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mlichvar/tmp/qsf.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mlichvar/tmp/qsf-1.2.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Quick Spam Filter (QSF) is an Open Source email classification filter, designed to be small, fast, and accurate, which works to classify incoming email as either spam or non-spam. To recognise spam, QSF strips the text out of the email (using MIME decoding and HTML stripping) and then splits it into tokens (words, word pairs, URLs, and so on). These tokens are then looked up in a database and analysed using the Bayesian technique to see whether the email should be classified as spam or not. QSF is designed to be run by an MDA, such as procmail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 12:36:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021236.l42CaB2S015955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-02 08:36 EST ------- Hello Bryan, Repeating what Remi has already confirm to you, building with mock IS MANDATORY for packages that will officially be in Fedora repos, because the build system depends on it. The problem you alluded to above doesn't exist. However if you own a x86_64 system and you want to build the complete package for yourself, do the following; i. Build the main package normally, i.e. rpmbuild --rebuild nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-1.fc7.src.rpm ii. mv /etc/rpm/platform{,.save} iii. 'setarch i386 pmbuild --rebuild nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-1.fc7.src.rpm' to build the i386 subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 12:56:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021256.l42CuUIp017483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-02 08:56 EST ------- I've uploaded new spec and srpm files that requires "file-devel" for releases after FC6 and "file" otherwise. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi-0.3.11-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 14:11:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] New: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-gcc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-gcc-4.1.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a Cross Compiling version of GNU GCC, which can be used to compile for the avr platform, instead of for the native %{_arch} platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 14:29:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021429.l42ETikH025933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-02 10:29 EST ------- Several questions based on visual inspection of the spec: * Why are you using "make all-gcc" and "make install-gcc" instead of "make all" and "make install"? * Did you consider to split gcc and gcc-c++? Mixing c and c++ into one package when many users of embedded system will only use c implies a pretty ugly package bloat on them. * If I am informed correctly (I am only semi-educated on the avr toolchain), the classical avr toolchain is based on avr-libc. This would imply to build GCC against avr libc instead of "no libc". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 14:41:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021441.l42EfA1x027282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 10:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Several questions based on visual inspection of the spec: > > * Why are you using "make all-gcc" and "make install-gcc" instead of "make all" > and "make install"? > Good question, I don't know my students wrote the initial version and used this. Unless they can give me a good reason I'll revert to the normal make targets. > * Did you consider to split gcc and gcc-c++? > Mixing c and c++ into one package when many users of embedded system will only > use c implies a pretty ugly package bloat on them. > I didn't think about this, a very good point I'll put them in a sub package. > * If I am informed correctly (I am only semi-educated on the avr toolchain), the > classical avr toolchain is based on avr-libc. This would imply to build GCC > against avr libc instead of "no libc". AFAIK the 2-stage building of gcc is not necessary for the AVR, none of the docs on compiling gcc for the AVR I could find talk about this. See for example: http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/install_tools.html Re-reading this page, I do notice that I forgot to add these 2 adviced configure flags: "--disable-libssp --with-dwarf2". Unless someone objects I'll add these, although I think --with-dwarf2 is only needed under windows for AVRStudio compatibility though, so I'm not sure if thats needed for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 14:44:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021444.l42EigjZ027846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 10:44 EST ------- Note to self, add this patch for support of latest avr's: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/devel/avr-gcc/files/patch-newdevices?rev=1.16;content-type=text%2Fplain And maybe other patches from: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/devel/avr-gcc/files/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 14:55:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 203520] Review Request: evolution-brutus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021455.l42EtAlI028767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-02 10:55 EST ------- Package built for all arches in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 14:59:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021459.l42Exv4P029229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-02 10:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > * If I am informed correctly (I am only semi-educated on the avr toolchain), the > > classical avr toolchain is based on avr-libc. This would imply to build GCC > > against avr libc instead of "no libc". > > AFAIK the 2-stage building of gcc is not necessary for the AVR, none of the docs > on compiling gcc for the AVR I could find talk about this. See for example: > http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/install_tools.html Well, normally, GCC checks for libc features and configures several of its internal components accordingly (esp. wrt. target libraries such as libstdc++). When none of the libc features can be found in libc, features will be disabled ("not found" == "not available") or be substituted ("not found" == "to be provided"). This issue often is referred to as "bootstrapping GCC". The standard way to work around this issue normally is to first build an "initial bootstrap c-only gcc", then use this to build libc and then to rebuild GCC. Another approach is "incrementally building", i.e. initially build a "bare metal/libc-less GCC" (Which is what you currently build). Install this, then build libc and then build a fullfledged GCC again. Afterwards, all subsequent builds of avr-gcc would have to "BuildRequire: avr-libc" and correctly receive the settings inside of avr-libc. i.e. I am having strong doubts on the way of building GCC as being described under the link above. > Re-reading this page, I do notice that I forgot to add these 2 adviced configure > flags: "--disable-libssp --with-dwarf2". Unless someone objects I'll add these, I don't know off-head (I could check the sources) if these are required by "plain avr" targets. Normally, if a target is properly implemented, none of them should be necessary, but GCC internally should choose the correct option by itself -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 15:17:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021517.l42FHNop030599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-02 11:17 EST ------- Building exposes one of my "very friends" of bugs in rpm: ... /usr/bin/strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file ... To work around this issue I am rewriting %__os_install_post. (Details to be found in my rtems*gcc*specs.). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 15:19:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021519.l42FJ2kk030723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 11:19 EST ------- Notice that the link above is THE install manual of THE libc for avr. Also avr has (rudimentary) C++ support, but no libstdc++ support. Its libc also has no threading support etc. This is a microcontroller environment with as little as 512 bytes of total RAM (not Kbytes but bytes! including space for the stack). Thus most of the gcc features which require libc support simply do not apply. Also see: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#avr And notice how it says: "Use `configure --target=avr --enable-languages="c"' to configure GCC." and how it refers too http://www.nongnu.org/avr/ for further information, which almost directly links to: http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/install_tools.html So I'm pretty sure (but not 100%) that this is correct. This is also how for example cdk4avr, which I've been using under Linux until now, does it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 15:35:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021535.l42FZ2Xb031985@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-02 11:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Notice that the link above is THE install manual of THE libc for avr. Also avr > has (rudimentary) C++ support, but no libstdc++ support. Well, normally, g++ is tied to libstdc++ and is useless without libstdc++. > Its libc also has no > threading support etc. That's clear. Threads are part of the OS, so there is no way to support them without OS. > This is a microcontroller environment with as little as > 512 bytes of total RAM (not Kbytes but bytes! including space for the stack). I know. > Thus most of the gcc features which require libc support simply do not apply. Probably such as g++. > Also see: > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#avr > And notice how it says: "Use `configure --target=avr --enable-languages="c"' This makes sense. AFAICT, c++ on the avr is not supported at all. Anyway, a bug in your package: ./avr-g++ -v -c tmp.cc -o tmp.o Using built-in specs. Target: avr Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.2/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-languages=c,c++ --target=avr --disable-nls --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info Thread model: single gcc version 4.1.2 /users/packman/src/rpms/SPECS/usr/bin/../libexec/gcc/avr/4.1.2/cc1plus -quiet -v -iprefix /users/packman/src/rpms/SPECS/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/ tmp.cc -quiet -dumpbase tmp.cc -auxbase-strip tmp.o -version -fno-rtti -fno-enforce-eh-specs -fno-exceptions -o /tmp/ccQf1d25.s ignoring nonexistent directory "/users/packman/src/rpms/SPECS/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2" ignoring nonexistent directory "/users/packman/src/rpms/SPECS/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/avr" ignoring nonexistent directory "/users/packman/src/rpms/SPECS/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/backward" ignoring nonexistent directory "/users/packman/src/rpms/SPECS/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/../../../../avr/sys-include" ignoring nonexistent directory "/users/packman/src/rpms/SPECS/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/../../../../avr/include" ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc/../../include/c++/4.1.2" ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc/../../include/c++/4.1.2/avr" ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc/../../include/c++/4.1.2/backward" ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/include" ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc/../../avr/sys-include" ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/lib/gcc/../../avr/include" #include "..." search starts here: #include <...> search starts here: /users/packman/src/rpms/SPECS/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/include End of search list. GNU C++ version 4.1.2 (avr) compiled by GNU C version 4.1.1 20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-51). GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=64 --param ggc-min-heapsize=64013 Compiler executable checksum: b37c1702f0f613ffe6c2ea8cd679740a /usr/lib/gcc/../../avr/bin/as -o tmp.o /tmp/ccQf1d25.s Note the c++ header search paths! These refer to the host's libstdc++'s headers, not the target ones. You want to use %configure --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs This will cause gcc to search for libstdc++ only on its internal search paths. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 17:26:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021726.l42HQ16p008341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-02 13:25 EST ------- Here are the new SPEC and SRPM files which fix the permissions errors/warnings from rpmlint: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.5-7.20070502cvs.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 17:27:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021727.l42HRwTA008557@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-02 13:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I don't want to be picky, but: > > > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > > Shouldn't this imply: > BuildRequires: pkgconfig >= 0.9.0 > ?? Since FC-5+ contains pkgconfig = 0.20, this would be an unnecessary versioning (as I see you point out as well towards the bottom of your msg). > Note: This isn't a package specific requirement, but seems to be introduced by > autoconf. The requirement or the versioning _may_ therefore be obsolete or > quietly ignorable. pkgconfig interestingly _is not_ in the exception list for > BRs: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FullExceptionList It is automatically pulled in because several of the other BRs require pkgconfig. While everyone tells me that I should just let this magic happen, I tend to agree with you and list stuff like this :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 17:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021731.l42HVIUw008823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-02 13:31 EST ------- spot replied: ------------------------------------------------ If you have a copy of upstream saying that the files are under the same license as the rest of MeCab, I would recommend that you included a copy of that email as a text file in the package until they update with the license texts included, but I think it is OK for Fedora as is. ~spot ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 17:58:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021758.l42HwabN010503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-02 13:58 EST ------- Some more enhancement suggestions: - Would it make sense for repoman to allow you to enable/disable plugins? - Could you look at adding support for the priorities plugin? http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities Just RFE's, nothing blocking this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:08:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021808.l42I8OpC011020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 14:08 EST ------- Well, thats means we can go ahead then, both fedora-review and fedora-cvs flags are set to +, so you should be able to import it right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:08:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021808.l42I8Zq3011048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-02 14:08 EST ------- Setting FE-NEEDSPONSOR since you don't have any FE packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:11:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021811.l42IB6EP011348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-02 14:11 EST ------- New version of spec file and source RPM available at ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/libopenraw. There is now a separate -gnome package, so it should now be possible to use libopenraw on X/GTK-less machines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021813.l42IDLGC011501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-02 14:13 EST ------- Nope. No reason not to. Bumped to 1.453, fixed missing BR. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-MIME-Creator-1.453-1.fc7.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/perl-Email-MIME-Creator.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:35:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021835.l42IZpsv012903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-02 14:35 EST ------- There is a failure in your build: man doc/quickref.1 | col -b | cat -s > doc/quickref.txt || : /bin/sh: man: command not found This is from a missing BR on man. Then you can add quickref.txt to the %doc entry. If you'd like, I can provide you will a preliminary review, but since you need a sponsor, I won't be able to do an approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:37:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021837.l42Ibktq013040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 14:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Thus most of the gcc features which require libc support simply do not apply. > Probably such as g++. > I tend to agree with you, but the avr-gcc developers have actually made it possible to write c++ code (with exceptions) even on the avr. Why? i don't know, but I do know some people are actually using this (some colleagues actually). So lets keep this in, but indeed put it in a sub-package > Note the c++ header search paths! These refer to the host's libstdc++'s headers, > not the target ones. > > You want to use > %configure --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs > Will do / add. (In reply to comment #5) > Building exposes one of my "very friends" of bugs in rpm: > ... > /usr/bin/strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file > ... > > To work around this issue I am rewriting %__os_install_post. > (Details to be found in my rtems*gcc*specs.). > This is the same as done in the sdcc spec, right? Then I'll try to add this "fix" to the avr-gcc specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:46:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021846.l42IkGrH013598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-02 14:46 EST ------- [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 29c0550e0320d53f2b9f933f0442ab17 MD5SUM upstream package: 29c0550e0320d53f2b9f933f0442ab17 [x] Latest version is packaged. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:56:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021856.l42IupB8014566@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 14:56 EST ------- Initial list with some things to fix after a quick initial look. - The main "%files" is missing a %defattr, this should be added as the first line after %files - %files-data can be written mich shorter, it can (and should be) as simple as: %files data %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING CHANGES.txt AUTHORS %{_datadir}/%{name} Also notice that %defattr is the first line after %files data, putting %defattr at the end has no effects as %defattr is only applied to files listed below it, but read on... - The data subpackage should require the main package, so that it gets removed with it, but read on... - The data package doesn't need to double some of the docs from the main package as it requires it, but read on... - However since the data is in the same upstream tarbal as the sources, and this cannot be in a seperate srpm there is no use (what so ever) in having it in a subpackage, so just completely remove the data sub-package, and add the single line "%{_datadir}/%{name}" to the main %files list - Please add an icon, just take any suitable graphics included and resize / edit it as nescesarry then install it under /usr/share/icons/hicolor//apps and add the necessary scripts to update the icon-cache. (See scriptlets wiki page) p.s. Do you still need a sponsor? Once this and the deps have been reviewed I can sponsor you if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 18:59:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021859.l42IxQ3a014738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 14:59 EST ------- Please update this to be inline with the proposed ocaml guidelines I've just CC-ed you on. This should fix the ocaml naming policy warning. Notice that I expect the main discussion on this proposal to happen on on fedora-devel-list which you can join now. Also you can be added to fedora-maintainers-list before being sponsored, just ask on the devel list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:00:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021900.l42J0qrB014831@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 15:00 EST ------- Please update this to be inline with the proposed ocaml guidelines I've just CC-ed you on. This should fix the ocaml naming policy warning. Notice that I expect the main discussion on this proposal to happen on on fedora-devel-list which you can join now. Also you can be added to fedora-maintainers-list before being sponsored, just ask on the devel list. Last please remove the -static provides, I think this is bogus for caml as this are not ordinary static libs. Also the guidelines proposal I just send should explain how / and why freetennis will not require camlSDL / camlimages and why this is not a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:04:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021904.l42J4f1E015383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:04:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021904.l42J4iIG015403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-02 15:04 EST ------- New version available at ftp://open-gnss.org/pub/fedora/postr/. I have backported the icons from the development branch of Postr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:09:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021909.l42J9rT0015747@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-02 15:09 EST ------- hi Mamoru I think I got some conflict info on version number and changelog, I hope Jens to help me clarify these issues. Seriously, I think either way works perfectly for me, and both are reasonable scheme as long as we are consistent in the future updates. ok, I updated the spec/srpm one more time Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.1-7a.src.rpm diff: http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?action=browse&diff=1&id=wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec&revision=10&diffrevision=9 I removed Conflict/Requires (I copied these from other examples, but I personally don't think they are necessary either, plus that x11-font-wqy-bitmapfont is not a Fedora package after all); the [-f ] conditions were removed and added dependences in Requires(post) and Requires(postun); added -m0755 for font directory as Yijun suggested; used (-,root,root,-) as default attributes. For version numbering scheme, I used the upstream number this time, following Mamoru's suggestion. To accommodate the requirements in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes I used a letter "a" after the release number to avoid confusions. Similarly, this tag is used in the changelog block. The next update will have 7b and so on. How does this sound to you? and Jens? by the way, I saw my Fedora account still shows "unapproved" for cvsextra, I am wondering if there is something else I should do to get access. thanks, looking forward to feedbacks. Qianqian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238643] Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021910.l42JADAj015783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238643 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:22:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021922.l42JMjAA016815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-02 15:22 EST ------- APPROVED by Trond Danielsen; package looks good to me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:23:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021923.l42JNQOZ016876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-02 15:23 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/pipepanic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/pipepanic-0.1.3-2.src.rpm Changelog: - Fixed package ownership of its datadir - Changed description - Added a patch by Hans de Goede to set a window title and icon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:33:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021933.l42JXghN017492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 15:33 EST ------- Looks good now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021934.l42JYN8B017596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-02 15:34 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 7eaf266174d4bf2b66f98db28c291b15 MD5SUM upstream package: 7eaf266174d4bf2b66f98db28c291b15 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:49:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238643] Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021949.l42Jnq4q019792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238643 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-02 15:49 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : abcd5e9f2dd034deed975601b38d684e MD5SUM upstream package: abcd5e9f2dd034deed975601b38d684e [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 19:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 15:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238388] Review Request: pidgin-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705021950.l42JoqwD019951@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-rhythmbox - Rhythmbox plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238388 michel.salim at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2007-05-02 15:50 EST ------- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 20:12:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022012.l42KC20d022166@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-02 16:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Initial list with some things to fix after a quick initial look. > > - The main "%files" is missing a %defattr, this should be added as the first > line after %files > > - %files-data can be written mich shorter, it can (and should be) as simple as: > > %files data > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc COPYING CHANGES.txt AUTHORS > %{_datadir}/%{name} > > Also notice that %defattr is the first line after %files data, putting > %defattr at the end has no effects as %defattr is only applied to files listed > below it, but read on... Okay shall do... > - However since the data is in the same upstream tarbal as the sources, and > this cannot be in a seperate srpm there is no use (what so ever) in having > it in a subpackage, so just completely remove the data sub-package, > and add the single line "%{_datadir}/%{name}" to the main %files list > Right, I'll do that (I'm going to wait until I can convince camlimages to build in mock though) > - Please add an icon, just take any suitable graphics included and resize / edit > it as nescesarry then install it under /usr/share/icons/hicolor//apps > and add the necessary scripts to update the icon-cache. (See scriptlets wiki > page) Okay > > > p.s. Do you still need a sponsor? Once this and the deps have been reviewed I > can sponsor you if needed. > Nope, I'm in cvsextras already (was sponsored by Kevin with package windowlab) and removed the FE-NEEDSPONSOR stuff already (anyway, how could I have approved your other package? ;)) > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 20:15:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022015.l42KF17L022284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-02 16:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-SimpleTable Short Description: Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 20:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022015.l42KF3IS022306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 20:17:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022017.l42KHbOe022435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-02 16:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Right, I'll do that (I'm going to wait until I can convince camlimages to build > in mock though) If you need help with this (I can always try) let me know. > > p.s. Do you still need a sponsor? Once this and the deps have been reviewed I > > can sponsor you if needed. > > > Nope, I'm in cvsextras already (was sponsored by Kevin with package windowlab) > and removed the FE-NEEDSPONSOR stuff already (anyway, how could I have approved > your other package? ;)) > > > True, back in the old days when we didn't use flags, anyone with bugzilla edit rights could approve a package. Also you're not in owners.list (I guess that windowlab isn't approved / imported into cvs yet?) or maybe I just haven't done a cvs update in my owners dir for a while.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 20:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022021.l42KLvdm022619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-02 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Right, I'll do that (I'm going to wait until I can convince camlimages to build > > in mock though) > > If you need help with this (I can always try) let me know. I think I've just got it, I'll leave it for now, and test in mock tonight (I need to leave for town in a few mins so yeah) > > > > p.s. Do you still need a sponsor? Once this and the deps have been reviewed I > > > can sponsor you if needed. > > > > > Nope, I'm in cvsextras already (was sponsored by Kevin with package windowlab) > > and removed the FE-NEEDSPONSOR stuff already (anyway, how could I have approved > > your other package? ;)) > > > > > > > True, back in the old days when we didn't use flags, anyone with bugzilla edit > rights could approve a package. Also you're not in owners.list (I guess that > windowlab isn't approved / imported into cvs yet?) or maybe I just haven't done > a cvs update in my owners dir for a while.... Quite possible, but the merge is happening now https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2007-April/msg02380.html > > > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 20:23:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022023.l42KN3TL022703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-02 16:23 EST ------- Oh, I meant to say as well, that I'll have updated packages in about 18 hours time (if camlimages keeps a sane head). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 20:33:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238643] Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022033.l42KXRYF023775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238643 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-02 16:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple Short Description: Declarative Validation of Data Structures Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 20:33:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238643] Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022033.l42KXni5023864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238643 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 21:18:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022118.l42LI9uI026429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-02 17:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Missing call to update-desktop-database in %post and %postun. According to ScripletSnippets we only need update-desktop-database only if a desktop entry has a MimeType key. This package's desktop file doesn't have a MimeType so we don't need update-... at all :) > Doesn't build in mock: BuildRequires: mesa-libGLU-devel fixes this issue. Package seems quite interesting so I'm probably going to review it. However, feel free to take it as long as it's not assigned to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 2 21:52:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705022152.l42LqvvH028298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-02 17:52 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: W: libopenraw-devel no-documentation W: libopenraw-gnome no-documentation W: libopenraw-gnome-devel no-documentation These are all ok. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL in package spec, but LGPL in package [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : eae40ecaa92f69d99b27ae3bad8aa8ae MD5SUM upstream package: eae40ecaa92f69d99b27ae3bad8aa8ae [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [!] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Package is LGPL licensed, not GPL 2. Please use wget -N or similar to download the source tarball so that the source timestamp is preserved. 3. /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0 is unowned an should be owned by libopenraw-devel (you can use %dir to do this) 4. Shouldn't package libopenraw-gnome-devel also require libopenraw-devel? === Final Notes === 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 03:47:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 23:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238641] Review Request: QtCurve - KDE & Gtk2 Theme That Unifies Program Appearance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030347.l433lB2n009710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: QtCurve - KDE & Gtk2 Theme That Unifies Program Appearance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238641 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-02 23:47 EST ------- Please submit each package in it's own review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 04:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238815] New: Review Request: kde-style-qtcurve - The KDE side of QtCurve Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238815 Summary: Review Request: kde-style-qtcurve - The KDE side of QtCurve Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/kde-style-qtcurve.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/kde-style-qtcurve-0.48.5-1fc6.src.rpm Description: QtCurve is a set of widget styles for KDE and Gtk2 based apps, based on Bluecurve. ?It allows for similar styles to be applied to both KDE and Gtk2-based apps, acheiving decent-looking style unity. This is the KDE side of QtCurve. It should be usable on its own, but is really designed to be used in combination with the Gtk2 side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 04:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238816] New: Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 Summary: Review Request: gtk-qtcurve-engine - The Gtk2 side of QtCurve Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/gtk-qtcurve-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/gtk-qtcurve-engine-0.48.5-1fc6.src.rpm Description: QtCurve is a set of widget styles for KDE and Gtk2 based apps, based on Bluecurve. It allows for similar styles to be applied to both KDE and Gtk2-based apps, acheiving decent-looking style unity. This is the Gtk2 side of QtCurve. It should be usable on its own, but is really designed to be used in combination with the KDE side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 04:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238817] New: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/specs/qtcurve.spec SRPM URL: http://crystalsanctuary.rpgsource.net/packages/source/qtcurve-0.48.5-1fc6.src.rpm Description: QtCurve is a set of widget styles for KDE and Gtk2 based apps, based on Bluecurve. It allows for similar styles to be applied to both KDE and Gtk2-based apps, acheiving decent-looking style unity. This package doesn't install anything; instead, it simply requires both the KDE and Gtk2 sides of QtCurve. Installing this package will install all of QtCurve (and all of it's dependencies). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 04:07:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238641] Review Request: QtCurve - KDE & Gtk2 Theme That Unifies Program Appearance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030407.l4347K4s010717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: QtCurve - KDE & Gtk2 Theme That Unifies Program Appearance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238641 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-03 00:07 EST ------- Okay, I did so. KDE side: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238815 Gtk2 side: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238816 Metapackage: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 04:13:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030413.l434DSQd011022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-03 00:13 EST ------- imo, this is is kinda pointless, but who am I to judge? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 04:13:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 00:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238641] Review Request: QtCurve - KDE & Gtk2 Theme That Unifies Program Appearance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030413.l434DwTa011077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: QtCurve - KDE & Gtk2 Theme That Unifies Program Appearance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238641 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 06:23:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 02:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030623.l436NfmT017745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-03 02:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > Doesn't build in mock: > > BuildRequires: mesa-libGLU-devel fixes this issue. > > Package seems quite interesting so I'm probably going to review it. However, > feel free to take it as long as it's not assigned to me. Thanks, I'll at that BR together with any other necessary changes once a full review is done, if you want a new version with the BR added before starting the review let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 06:24:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 02:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225765] Merge Review: fonts-japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030624.l436Oe4W017768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-japanese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225765 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version| |fonts-japanese-0.20061016- | |6.fc7 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-03 02:24 EST ------- CLOSING this bug for now as reviewed version fonts-japanese-0.20061016-6.fc7 of this package is already in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 06:26:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 02:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030626.l436Qil7017830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version| |hwbrowser-0.32-1.fc7 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-03 02:26 EST ------- CLOSING this bug for now as reviewed version hwbrowser-0.32-1.fc7 of this package is already in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 06:36:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 02:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030636.l436aFtb018022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-03 02:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > [...] > > === Issues === > 1. Package is LGPL licensed, not GPL FIXED. > 2. Please use wget -N or similar to download the source tarball so that the > source timestamp is preserved. FIXED. New source tarball downloaded. > 3. /usr/include/libopenraw-1.0 is unowned an should be owned by libopenraw-devel > (you can use %dir to do this) FIXED. > 4. Shouldn't package libopenraw-gnome-devel also require libopenraw-devel? FIXED. It should, so I have added it to the list of requirements. New versions are available at: http://libopenraw.freedesktop.org/download/libopenraw-0.0.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 06:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 02:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030657.l436vKHj018465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 02:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Not providing a .desktop entry for a gui app would break the packaging standards > as it's required. > > However, we could argue to the packaging committe that it should be packaged as > a "shell extension" (is that what's it's called in gnome?) only, but it seems > dependent on the .desktop entry for that to work. Remove the .desktop entry and > it no longer works by right-click on a file. But adding "Hidden=true" in the .desktop file will cause the mimetypes and such to be available but not allow it to be displayed in the menus, or to be enabled by the menu editors. That way, you'd either have to start it with "scratchpad file" or right click from a file menu and open with scratchpad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:09:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030709.l4379Cm0018855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 03:08 EST ------- [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL in package spec, but LGPL in package [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : eae40ecaa92f69d99b27ae3bad8aa8ae MD5SUM upstream package: eae40ecaa92f69d99b27ae3bad8aa8ae [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:09:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] New: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jnovy at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/schismtracker.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/schismtracker-0.5-0.1rc1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Schismtracker is a module tracker for the X Window System similar to the DOS program `Impulse Tracker'. Schismtracker can play/modify various sound formats such as MOD, S3M, XM, IT, 669 and others. The user interface is mostly text-based using SDL for graphical output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:22:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030722.l437MmtE019348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-03 03:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libopenraw Short Description: decode camera RAW files Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:26:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030726.l437QKZR019546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-03 03:26 EST ------- Following the spec directions for the bzr pull I get a mismatch in md5sums for the postr-icons.tar.gz: from bzr pull: 55230b0ae446905a554233b3e2411872 postr-icons.tar.gz from included tarball in postr-0.5-2.fc7.src.rpm 6dc9ac66f7f2a120e04e44938f384045 ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/postr-icons.tar.gz Can you double-check and see if you get the same result The md5sum for SOURCE0 looks good now a66f58dbdc5c1a1befd3fa9cee629b52 ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/postr-0.5.tar.gz -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030735.l437Z9p7019722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030738.l437c3SS019911@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-03 03:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Following the spec directions for the bzr pull I get a mismatch in md5sums for > the postr-icons.tar.gz: > from bzr pull: > 55230b0ae446905a554233b3e2411872 postr-icons.tar.gz > from included tarball in postr-0.5-2.fc7.src.rpm > 6dc9ac66f7f2a120e04e44938f384045 ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/postr-icons.tar.gz > > Can you double-check and see if you get the same result > > The md5sum for SOURCE0 looks good now > a66f58dbdc5c1a1befd3fa9cee629b52 ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/postr-0.5.tar.gz > > -jef > Now this is strange, there must be some tar-magic behind the scene that I do not understand: [trondd at localhost SPECS]$ bzr branch -r 126 http://burtonini.com/bzr/postr/postr.dev/ Branched 126 revision(s). [trondd at localhost SPECS]$ cd postr.dev/ [trondd at localhost postr.dev]$ tar czf postr-icons.tar.gz data setup.py [trondd at localhost postr.dev]$ md5sum postr-icons.tar.gz 48d0e5d3d231690ff51586ff5a0a172d postr-icons.tar.gz [trondd at localhost postr.dev]$ rm postr-icons.tar.gz [trondd at localhost postr.dev]$ tar czf postr-icons.tar.gz data setup.py [trondd at localhost postr.dev]$ md5sum postr-icons.tar.gz f3c4cb76eb6e157612a2f7104cecb0ea postr-icons.tar.gz I just don't get it; I get a different MD5SUM every time...?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:40:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030740.l437eYf5020062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:41:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030741.l437fLAq020143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:41:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030741.l437fXLD020196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:42:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030742.l437g2G1020302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:42:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030742.l437gOJ4020363@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:42:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030742.l437grCJ020418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:42:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030742.l437gtiN020436@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:43:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030743.l437hWLF020510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030744.l437iPRd020596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 07:47:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 03:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030747.l437llKn020916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-03 03:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pipepanic Short Description: A pipe connecting game Owners: musuruan at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 08:11:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 04:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236539] Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030811.l438BlrV023314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Alias: perl-Math-Vec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236539 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 04:11 EST ------- Maybe change the description to: "Object-Oriented Vector Math Methods in Perl" which is a little more descriptive (from the website) BuildRequires: perl is superflous because perl(Module::Build) will automatically pull it in If you want to enable the pod tests, you might want to: export TEST_POD_COVERAGE=1 export TEST_POD=1 ./Build test I believe the preferred license string is "GPL or Artistic" for dual GPL/Artistic packages. I will follow up with a review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 08:17:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 04:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030817.l438HrpZ023727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-03 04:17 EST ------- The GOOD + naming is good + specfile name matches base package name + Licensed as GPL and includes COPYING file accordingly + specfile written in english-ese and is legible + included source md5sum checks with upstream source as listed in SOURCE0 url a66f58dbdc5c1a1befd3fa9cee629b52 postr-0.5.tar.gz + builds on x86 fedora-development in mock + no locales + not relocatable + permissions seem to be okay + clean section is okay + consistent use of macros + permissible code and content + items in doc are not runtime necessary + gui, desktop file installation looks good + does not obviously own files from another package + install section looks good + No .la files + No devel subpackage + Need need to for shared libraries sciptlets + icon cache scriplet lets look good. rpmlint binary clean: postr-0.5-2.fc7.noarch.rpm E: postr only-non-binary-in-usr-lib this is bogus, an typical of python files due to module tree location. rpmlint srpm only minor warning: postr-0.5-2.fc7.src.rpm W: postr mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 46) Nuke the tabs in the whitespace of the desktop file install command and this goes away. Application appears to function for me as anticipated. Photos were uploaded, there was much rejoicing. The BAD - SOURCE1 instructions do not produce tarball with matching md5sum. Not sure what's going on here. I can confirm that repeated tar czf gives different md5sums. But tar cf gives me something reproducible. So if i decompress the included tarball I still get a md5sum on postr-icons.tar compared to the one i create with bzr and tar cf data setup.py. Double check to see if you can get consistent comparisons against the tar file instead of the tar.gz. - base package must own all directories it creates and directory ownership of parent directories is accounted for in package deps Problem: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps/ not owned by a required dep. Solution: adds Requires: hicolor-icon-theme Problem: /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/python is not owned by any package. Suggested Solution: make the nautilus-python package create and own this directory. Fix is outside the scope of this review. But if you can commit a fix to the python-nautilus package with this fix , it will clear up the issue here. -Requires Do you really want to pull in python-twisted or do you want to pull in only a subset of the twisted packages? Looking over the python code in postr it looks like you technically only need to require python-twisted-core and python-twisted-web, instead of the metapackage python-twisted. So overall, pretty close to being approvable... that gzip behavior seems odd to me. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 08:24:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 04:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030824.l438O3RH024200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-05-03 04:23 EST ------- Thanks for looking at this. I'm sponsored already, no need for FE-NEEDSPONSOR. The quickref.1 man page is packaged as qsf.1, packaging a plain text version of the man page probably isn't very useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 08:25:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 04:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030825.l438PO9O024381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 08:44:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 04:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030844.l438i3DZ025735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 04:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for looking at this. I'm sponsored already, no need for FE-NEEDSPONSOR. > > The quickref.1 man page is packaged as qsf.1, packaging a plain text version of > the man page probably isn't very useful. Excellent, then I will review it shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 09:06:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 05:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030906.l4396RDQ027598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-03 05:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > > rpmlint srpm only minor warning: > postr-0.5-2.fc7.src.rpm > W: postr mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 46) > Nuke the tabs in the whitespace of the desktop file install command and this > goes away. FIXED. > Application appears to function for me as anticipated. Photos were uploaded, > there was much rejoicing. > > The BAD > - SOURCE1 instructions do not produce tarball with matching md5sum. Not sure > what's going on here. I can confirm that repeated tar czf gives different > md5sums. But tar cf gives me something reproducible. > So if i decompress the included tarball I still get a md5sum on postr-icons.tar > compared to the one i create with bzr and tar cf data setup.py. Double check to > see if you can get consistent comparisons against the tar file instead of the > tar.gz. tar cf [...] produces consistent results, so this should be FIXED now. > > - base package must own all directories it creates and directory ownership of > parent directories is accounted for in package deps > > Problem: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps/ not owned by a required dep. > Solution: adds Requires: hicolor-icon-theme FIXED. > Problem: /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/python is not owned by any package. > Suggested Solution: make the nautilus-python package create and own this > directory. Fix is outside the scope of this review. But if you can commit a fix > to the python-nautilus package with this fix , it will clear up the issue here. This has already been reported to bz and fixed :). See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238591 > -Requires > Do you really want to pull in python-twisted or do you want to pull in only a > subset of the twisted packages? Looking over the python code in postr it looks > like you technically only need to require python-twisted-core and > python-twisted-web, instead of the metapackage python-twisted. I changed the requirements, and it works just fine. FIXED. > > So overall, pretty close to being approvable... that gzip behavior seems odd to me. Strange, but the uncompressed tar works... New versions at the same location as the previous ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 09:07:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 05:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030907.l4397Ei5027662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-03 05:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > I tend to agree with you, but the avr-gcc developers have actually made it > possible to write c++ code (with exceptions) Well, I would have to investigate in depth, but I am having really strong doubts on this - For avr-rtems, we disable c++. > > /usr/bin/strip: Unable to recognise the format of the input file > > ... > > > > To work around this issue I am rewriting %__os_install_post. > > (Details to be found in my rtems*gcc*specs.). > > > > This is the same as done in the sdcc spec, right? Yep, the variant in sdcc is a stripped down version of what I use for rtems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 09:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 05:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030930.l439UpfT029146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-03 05:30 EST ------- Hi Hans, as promised on the Freetennis bug, an update! Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages-2.2.0-5.src.rpm (They are uploading now) Changelog: * Thu May 03 2007 Nigel Jones 2.2.0-5 - Revert -4 changes - Remove excludedirs patch, replace with a sed - Provide html documentation generated from running ocaml-ocamldoc * Thu Apr 26 2007 Nigel Jones 2.2.0-4 - Add Provides: camlimages-static, and LICENSE to -devel docs * Thu Apr 12 2007 Nigel Jones 2.2.0-3 - Remove .a & .o files Some rationale: - Users don't care about the library references unless they are a developer, so I've placed them in -devel - I don't think it's worth adding a seperate -doc package (it's only 90KB) - rpmlint ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied should be ignored (it's actually ignored on F7, but showing on FC6 - The excludelibs patch was a waste of time, the sed is much better -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 09:45:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 05:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226363] Merge Review: redhat-lsb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030945.l439jGhl030204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From llim at redhat.com 2007-05-03 05:45 EST ------- Thanks I will have a look and build into the new system. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 09:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 05:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705030948.l439mdfP030419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-03 05:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages-2.2.0-6.src.rpm Just including *.*a instead of deleting, per Debian's suggestion, uploading as I type. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 10:06:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 06:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031006.l43A6fI9031091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ocamlSDL - |Review Request: ocaml-SDL - |OCaml bindings for SDL |OCaml bindings for SDL ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-03 06:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-SDL-0.7.2-4.src.rpm rpmlint clean! * Thu May 03 2007 Nigel Jones 0.7.2-4 - Rename per policy - Revert -3 changes - Add htmlref Same rationale for htmlref as in camlimages, except this time only 46K -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 10:43:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 06:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031043.l43AhphX032243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-03 06:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/freetennis.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/freetennis-0.4.8-2.src.rpm (Uploading now) Still rpmlint clean, changelog: * Thu May 03 2007 Nigel Jones 0.4.8-2 - Add freetennis.png and alter freetennis.desktop to show icon - Change builddep to ocaml-SDL-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 12:30:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 08:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031230.l43CUKFR004729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-03 08:30 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel i386 * BR: ok * No locales 0 No shared libraries, ldconfig not needed * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * no .desktop file needed MUST FIX ======== * Change Source0 from: http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ocamlsdl/ocamlsdl-0.7.2.tar.gz to the generic sf download url, and use %{version}: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ocamlsdl/ocamlsdl-%{version}.tar.gz * main package must require ocaml for /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs dir ownership * remove the unnecessary ldconfig %post(un) scripts, this are not normally libs and since they are not installed in a path searched by ldconfig, calling ldconfig is useless. Should Fix ========== * Stop the obfuscated double %setup usage, instead of the 2 lines you can just write: "%setup -q -n ocamlsdl-%{version} -a 1" * No need to write: %dir %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl/*.*a %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl/*.cmi %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl/*.cmx Instead you can just write: %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl If there were files there which you wouldn't include with the wildcards, then rpmbuild would refuse to build the rpm as there would be files in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, which aren't listed under any %files. * also please always make all your %files entries like this: %files %defattr(....) %doc ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 12:52:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 08:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031252.l43Cqimd006129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-03 08:52 EST ------- MUST: ===== 0 rpmlint output is: W: camlimages ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/dllci_freetype.so W: camlimages-devel ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/Makefile.config * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel i386 * BR: ok * No locales 0 No shared libraries, ldconfig not needed * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * no .desktop file needed MUST FIX ======== * rename to ocaml-images or ocaml-camlimages (will fix rpmlint warning, and the latter is consistent with PLD) * main package must require ocaml for /usr/lib/ocaml dir ownership * remove the unnecessary ldconfig %post(un) scripts, this are not normally libs and since they are not installed in a path searched by ldconfig, calling ldconfig is useless. * The .so files should be installed under /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs Should Fix ========== * Please just list all the features one after the other seperated with ',', I don't think all rpm (gui) tools will preserve your formatting, so better to not format at all. * Stop the obfuscated double %setup usage, instead of the 2 lines you can just write: "%setup -q -n camlimages-2.2 -a 1" * Once the .so files are under %{_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs, the files for %devel can be written as just "%{_libdir}/ocaml/camlimages/" * also please always make all your %files entries like this: %files %defattr(....) %doc ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 14:40:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 10:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238863] New: Review Request: avant-window-mananger - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238863 Summary: Review Request: avant-window-mananger - Fully customisable dock-like window navigator for GNOME Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/avant-window-navigator.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/avant-window-navigator-0.1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Avant Window Navgator (Awn) is a dock-like bar which sits at the bottom of the screen (in all its composited-goodness) tracking open window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 15:34:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 11:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031534.l43FYra8022065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-03 11:34 EST ------- Added patch for Hidden=true to .desktop file: SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/scratchpad.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/scratchpad-0.3.0-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 15:41:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 11:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031541.l43FfdWD022634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-03 11:41 EST ------- - MIME type associations missing from .desktop file, suggested: MimeType=audio/x-mod;audio/x-s3m;audio/x-stm;audio/x-it;audio/x-xm; Remember update-desktop-database too, see Packaging/ScriptletSnippets in Wiki - Menu entry icon missing - install a bunch of different sizes from icons/ subdirs to /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*? - What are the libXau-devel and libXdmcp-devel build dependencies used for? - Missing build dependencies: libXt-devel, libXxf86misc-devel, libXv-devel - %configure --disable-dependency-tracking for cleaner build output and possibly a slight build speedup? - Separate creation of the applications dir shouldn't be needed, I think desktop-file-install takes care of it. - Shouldn't COPYING.frag-opt and COPYING.libmodplug be included in %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 15:44:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 11:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031544.l43Fiosa022833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 16:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 12:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - KDE default configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031601.l43G1N2J024349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - KDE default configuration Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kde-settings|Review Request: kde-settings |- Config files for kde |- KDE default configuration Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-03 12:01 EST ------- SRPM: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SRPMS/kde-settings-3.5-20.fc7.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-settings Short Description: KDE default configuration Owners: rdieter at math.unl.edu,than at redhat.com Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 16:29:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 12:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031629.l43GTtDG026617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 12:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Added patch for Hidden=true to .desktop file: Ok, that does seem to work as expected now. Please add documentation why you are doing that to the spec. You can do that post-import. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 12ec467f5670150a79964c00f593157c MD5SUM upstream package: 12ec467f5670150a79964c00f593157c [x] Package functions as described. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 16:52:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 12:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031652.l43GqV9Q028197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 12:52 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 45926441d247f72778a01092f6a83743 MD5SUM upstream package: 45926441d247f72778a01092f6a83743 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Since the package has a test suite, I would highly recommend adding a %check section to the spec file with "make test" (use a conditional if you want, but deault to on for he buildsystem). You can add this post import. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031700.l43H0Tmk028857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-03 13:00 EST ------- Well, I must re-read the build procedure because currently I have not caught up with what is actually changed during plague -> koji buildsys change... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:02:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236539] Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031702.l43H2lwb029042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Alias: perl-Math-Vec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236539 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 13:02 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 96877cb54704426ce333b13a8380bfbf MD5SUM upstream package: 96877cb54704426ce333b13a8380bfbf [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Change license tag to "GPL or Artistic" 2. Use wget -N or equivalent to download source tarball and preserve timestamp. 3. Remove BR of perl, superflous since perl(Module::Build) will require perl. 4. Change description as shown in comment #1 === Final Notes === 1. Perhaps enable pod testing (see comment #1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:04:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031704.l43H4alQ029297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew.| |edu) | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-03 13:04 EST ------- No problem :) The author just released 0.03, explicitly downgrading the Getopt::Long requirement in Build.PL -- I think we're safe to proceed here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:10:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031710.l43HAKX7029903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 13:10 EST ------- If you don't mind, throw up a 0.03 srpm and I will mockbuild it and check the md5 sigs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:16:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031716.l43HGX82030270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-03 13:16 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-MooseX-Getopt-0.03-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-MooseX-Getopt.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:22:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031722.l43HM2G6030983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:23:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031723.l43HNXrc031223@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 13:23 EST ------- [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 4c925eaa9d071ff58b97ba26a5d29b18 MD5SUM upstream package: 4c925eaa9d071ff58b97ba26a5d29b18 All other issues went away :) ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031727.l43HRtQk032048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-03 13:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Getopt Short Description: Moose role for processing command line options Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:27:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031727.l43HRwba032089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:37:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031737.l43HbY70000921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-05-03 13:37 EST ------- I'll add the check, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:44:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031744.l43HiJa0002183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-03 13:44 EST ------- rpmlint output: E: hippo-canvas zero-length /usr/share/doc/hippo-canvas-0.2.13/AUTHORS E: hippo-canvas zero-length /usr/share/doc/hippo-canvas-0.2.13/README W: hippo-canvas-devel no-documentation W: hippo-canvas-python no-documentation Package name: ok Spec file name: ok Packaging guidelines: ok, just some cosmetic things: - Descriptions should be full sentences ending in a .. - Typo: "multipul" should be "multiple" License: ok, I assume. But I wonder why you need any of the "mugshot trademark" stuff in this package. Wouldn't it be easier to just make this straight GPL, since there is no actual "Mugshot" in this package, it is just a canvas... License file included: ok Spec file language and clarity: excellent Upstream source: ok Package build: Missing BRs: pygtk2-devel, pycairo-devel Relocatable: n/a Directory ownership: ok File lists: ok %clean section: ok Macro use: ok Content: ok Large docs: n/a %doc files: AUTHORS and README are empty, so either remove them or (better) put something in them. Headers: ok pc file: n/a shared libs: ok static libs: n/a -devel dependencies: ok .la file: ok .desktop files: n/a %install section cleans buildroot: ok filename encoding: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031750.l43Ho3Av003322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-05-03 13:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qsf Short Description: Quick Spam Filter Owners: mlichvar at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 17:51:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 13:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031751.l43Hp4WE003586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-03 13:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Email-MIME-Creator Short Description: Email::MIME constructor for starting anew Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 18:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031807.l43I7iQ4005320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-03 14:07 EST ------- Rafal, Ping? I can review this for you, but first please provide an updated spec / srpm for the latest upstream version (23 now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 18:09:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031809.l43I9tFL005687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-03 14:09 EST ------- Peter, ping? I'm willing to review this for you, but first please provide a new srpm based on the latest upstream release, using the included stratagus fork. Since this is clearly different (and becoming more different every release) from the stand-alone stratagus project, it is ok to include the private fork. Just like is done with many games which come with modded quake engines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 18:18:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031818.l43IIqri006438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-03 14:18 EST ------- Karol, I can do a full / official review on this if you want. I would appreciate it if you would review a (small) package of mine in return: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 About the -data package, NP is correct, when its in the same tarbal as the engine there is no use in having the data in a subpackage. If it was in a seperate tarbal then that would need to be in its own srpm, and those should circular depend on each other, so that if one gets removed the other also gets removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 18:21:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031821.l43ILCDV006695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-03 14:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Conflicts with xmlrpc-c-devel? > > Installing packages (4): > xmlrpc-epi-0.51-2 at x86_64 xmlrpc-epi-devel-0.51-2 at x86_64 > xmlrpc-epi-debuginfo-0.51-2 at x86_64 xmlrpc-epi-examples-0.51-2 at x86_64 > > 206.9kB of package files are needed. 730.5kB will be used. > > Confirm changes? (Y/n): y > > Committing transaction... > > error: file /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc.so from install of xmlrpc-epi-devel-0.51-2 > conflicts with file from package xmlrpc-c-devel-1.06.11-2.fc6 > Hmm, nasty. Well as xmlrpc-c is I would like to suggest that you rename the lib (and its soname to libxmlrpc-epi.so.X . Can you provide a new package with this fixed? Then I'll do a full review for you. I just rea today that mandrake wants to include the second life client in their next release and I want to beat them to it by having it readuy for Fedora 7 :) So let me know if you need any help with openjpeg or the client itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 18:21:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031821.l43ILIOh006714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 18:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031821.l43ILS4c006739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 18:48:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 14:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031848.l43ImKtk009629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-03 14:48 EST ------- Thanks for the comments, I've fixed most of these issues I believe, with the exception of the doc warnings for hippo-canvas-{devel,python}; just talked with Havoc about the LICENSE and we're going to make it plain LGPL I think. A new version should be uploaded now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 19:14:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 15:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705031914.l43JEdJV012045@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ville.skytta at iki.f | |i) ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-05-03 15:14 EST ------- First, thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > - MIME type associations missing from .desktop file, suggested: > MimeType=audio/x-mod;audio/x-s3m;audio/x-stm;audio/x-it;audio/x-xm; Ok, I also added the audio/x-669-mod and audio/x-mtm. > Remember update-desktop-database too, see Packaging/ScriptletSnippets in Wiki Done. > - Menu entry icon missing - install a bunch of different sizes from icons/ > subdirs to /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*? > Done. > - What are the libXau-devel and libXdmcp-devel build dependencies used for? ldd says schismtracker is dependent on them, so I listed them explicitely. > - Missing build dependencies: libXt-devel, libXxf86misc-devel, libXv-devel These seem to be brought by SDL-devel. > - %configure --disable-dependency-tracking for cleaner build output and possibly > a slight build speedup? Done. > - Separate creation of the applications dir shouldn't be needed, I think > desktop-file-install takes care of it. the useless install is now removed. > - Shouldn't COPYING.frag-opt and COPYING.libmodplug be included in %doc? Added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 21:08:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032108.l43L8Usa020582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(ville.skytta at iki.f| |i) | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-03 17:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) Please bump the release tag always when making changes to packages, even while they're in review. Makes it a less PITA to track progress and compare changes. Regarding the release tag, the common form for pre-release packages is eg. 0.X.rc1, not 0.Xrc1 as in this package. Not a big deal though, but I'd suggest changing it. > > - MIME type associations missing from .desktop file, suggested: > > MimeType=audio/x-mod;audio/x-s3m;audio/x-stm;audio/x-it;audio/x-xm; > Ok, I also added the audio/x-669-mod and audio/x-mtm. This seems to have slipped the SRPM build, there's no MimeType included in the *.desktop in it. > > - Menu entry icon missing - install a bunch of different sizes from icons/ > > subdirs to /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*? > Done. Ok, but %{_datadir}/icons/* results in ownership of a lot of dirs commonly owned by other packages. Does any of this package's dependencies bring in hicolor-icon-theme? If yes, the dir/file ownership should be changed to something like %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*x*/apps/%{name}.png "Icon=%{name}" or something similar should be added to the desktop file. gtk-update-icon-cache missing, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda > > - What are the libXau-devel and libXdmcp-devel build dependencies used for? > ldd says schismtracker is dependent on them, so I listed them explicitely. My ldd on FC6 x86_64 doesn't, and I don't see anything in the sources that would use them. Which distro version and arch did you use for building your package that shows those deps? Perhaps there's something causing unneeded lib dependency bloat there. > > - Missing build dependencies: libXt-devel, libXxf86misc-devel, libXv-devel > These seem to be brought by SDL-devel. Not on FC6 x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 21:09:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032109.l43L9sIn020659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-03 17:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > MUST FIX > ======== > * Change Source0 from: > http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ocamlsdl/ocamlsdl-0.7.2.tar.gz > to the generic sf download url, and use %{version}: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ocamlsdl/ocamlsdl-%{version}.tar.gz Done > * main package must require ocaml for /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs dir ownership Done > * remove the unnecessary ldconfig %post(un) scripts, this are not normally > libs and since they are not installed in a path searched by ldconfig, calling > ldconfig is useless. True, good point, done > > Should Fix > ========== > * Stop the obfuscated double %setup usage, instead of the 2 lines you can just > write: "%setup -q -n ocamlsdl-%{version} -a 1" I was fighting that one for a ittle while, thanks > > * No need to write: > %dir %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl > > %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl/*.*a > %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl/*.cmi > %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl/*.cmx > Instead you can just write: > %{_libdir}/ocaml/sdl > If there were files there which you wouldn't include with the wildcards, > then rpmbuild would refuse to build the rpm as there would be files in > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, which aren't listed under any %files. Which is handy, because the build won't complete if something changes for the worst (i.e. more unneeded output, but I see your point) > > * also please always make all your %files entries like this: > %files > %defattr(....) > %doc ... > > Done -- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-SDL.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-SDL-0.7.2-5.src.rpm In about 10 mins * Fri May 04 2007 Nigel Jones 0.7.2-5 - Minor fixups per review -- I've also added the ocaml dependency as suggested on Bug #235805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 21:16:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032116.l43LGZ7c020893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-03 17:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > MUST FIX > > ======== > > * remove the unnecessary ldconfig %post(un) scripts, this are not normally > > libs and since they are not installed in a path searched by ldconfig, calling > > ldconfig is useless. > True, good point, done While I said done, I omitted it from the srpm, I've removed it from my local copy, however. Would you like another upload? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 21:34:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226528] Merge Review: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032134.l43LYpkH021845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226528 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 21:35:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226528] Merge Review: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032135.l43LZcl2021904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226528 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dlutter at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 21:37:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226348] Merge Review: python-virtinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032137.l43Lbu4L021991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-virtinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226348 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dlutter at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 21:45:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032145.l43LjJes022454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-03 17:45 EST ------- 1. rpmlint returns [paczka at localhost ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/result W: taxipilot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: taxipilot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: taxipilot zero-length /usr/share/apps/taxipilot/game_data/game_data_tag 2. "Data files (maps, pixmaps, sounds) go in %{_datadir}/%{name} , not %{_datadir}/games/%{name} . According to the FHS, the use of /usr/share/games is optional, and we recommend not using it for consistency so that games are packaged like all other applications." In the rpm, datafiles are in /usr/share/apps. Please check it. 3. "Installed .desktop files MUST follow the [desktop-entry-spec], paying particular attention to validating correct usage of Name, GenericName, [Categories], [StartupNotify] entries." In .desktop is not defined GenericName and the shortcut is after installation in Games without any category, check it. 4. "- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec." There is %{_libdir}/libEXT_wavpo.la 5. Add NEWS to %doc, please. I did not check all require items, but these should be checked/fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 22:03:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226528] Merge Review: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032203.l43M3LnZ023239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226528 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-05-03 18:03 EST ------- Review is based on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/virt-manager/0.4.0/1.fc7/src/virt-manager-0.4.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Overall, specfile looks good, conforms with packaging guidelines rpmlint reports: W: virt-manager non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/virt-manager W: virt-manager non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/virt-manager.schemas W: virt-manager non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/virt-manager The pam.d file should be marked as %config(noreplace); the others seem ok W: virt-manager symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/virt-manager /usr/bin/consolehelper Easy fix E: virt-manager explicit-lib-dependency librsvg2 It seems that that is ok; AFAICT, rpm won't be able to find this dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 22:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032204.l43M4NkK023322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Alias: perl-Email-Reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 22:06:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226528] Merge Review: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032206.l43M66UA023397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226528 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-05-03 18:06 EST ------- Please make the two little changes mentioned above. With that APPROVED Don't forget to mark CLOSED RAWHIDE when the changed specfile has been committed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 22:25:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226348] Merge Review: python-virtinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032225.l43MPNpf024295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-virtinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226348 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-05-03 18:25 EST ------- Review based on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-virtinst/0.103.0/3.fc7/src/python-virtinst-0.103.0-3.fc7.src.rpm Specfile looks ok overall. Small comments - Not strictly necessary here, but we encourage people to use %global instead of %define in spec files (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define) - Source0 needs to be a complete URL to the released source tarball - Should the provide of virtinst be versioned ? rpmlint says: E: python-virtinst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtinst/ParaVirtGuest.py 0644 E: python-virtinst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtinst/DistroManager.py 0644 E: python-virtinst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py 0644 E: python-virtinst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtinst/FullVirtGuest.py 0644 E: python-virtinst non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtinst/util.py 0644 Strip the #!/usr/bin/python from those files; seems unnecessary, anyway W: python-virtinst obsolete-not-provided python-xeninst Should be fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 22:29:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032229.l43MTRBD024487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-03 18:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > MUST: > ===== > 0 rpmlint output is: > W: camlimages ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied > /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/dllci_freetype.so > W: camlimages-devel ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied > /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/Makefile.config Ignorable (it actually doesn't happen on a F7 box) > MUST FIX > ======== > * rename to ocaml-images or ocaml-camlimages (will fix rpmlint warning, and the > latter is consistent with PLD) I tend to disagree, but I'm going to hold off uploading an updated spec, so I can make a better judgement. > * main package must require ocaml for /usr/lib/ocaml dir ownership Done > * remove the unnecessary ldconfig %post(un) scripts, this are not normally > libs and since they are not installed in a path searched by ldconfig, calling > ldconfig is useless. Done > * The .so files should be installed under /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs Done > > > Should Fix > ========== > * Please just list all the features one after the other seperated with ',', I > don't think all rpm (gui) tools will preserve your formatting, so better to > not format at all. Done > > * Stop the obfuscated double %setup usage, instead of the 2 lines you can just > write: "%setup -q -n camlimages-2.2 -a 1" Per ocaml-SDL review, I had trouble getting to work, but done > > * Once the .so files are under %{_libdir}/ocaml/stublibs, the > files for %devel can be written as just "%{_libdir}/ocaml/camlimages/" Done > > * also please always make all your %files entries like this: > %files > %defattr(....) > %doc ... > Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 22:35:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238932] New: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238932 Summary: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lewk.org/python-decoratortools.spec SRPM URL: http://lewk.org/python-decoratortools-1.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Want to use decorators, but still need to support Python 2.3? Wish you could have class decorators, decorate arbitrary assignments, or match decorated function signatures to their original functions? Then you need "DecoratorTools" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 22:38:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229250] Review Request: koji - Build system tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032238.l43Mc1tR024891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koji - Build system tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229250 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-05-03 18:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: koji New Branches: FC-5 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 22:44:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 18:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229250] Review Request: koji - Build system tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032244.l43MiDXh025193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koji - Build system tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229250 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 3 23:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 19:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226348] Merge Review: python-virtinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705032325.l43NPdKb026310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-virtinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226348 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-05-03 19:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - Should the provide of virtinst be versioned ? Can't hurt. > W: python-virtinst obsolete-not-provided python-xeninst > Should be fixed python-xeninst _isn't_ provided, though. That API was 'import xeninst'. At this point, we can probably just drop the obsolete entirely, though. python-xeninst was the name before we made it more generic as virtinst. But that was only ever in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 00:29:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040029.l440TIEQ028069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-03 20:29 EST ------- Thanks for the review Mamoru. I have implemented your MUST FIX entries above and am communicating with the remind developers as to artwork that could be used for a tkremind icon. The www package I was not intending to include at all in the RPM. If you think I should, I suppose it should be a separate -www or -web subpackage. And I will work on getting sponsored as well. Thanks for your guidance! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 00:44:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040044.l440ixFw028389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 00:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040052.l440q4Te028596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 00:57:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237340] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040057.l440vX2h028842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237340 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040104.l4414WG5029249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:07:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040107.l4417Agt029408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:09:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040109.l4419fHw029516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:19:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - KDE default configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040119.l441JMmu029893@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - KDE default configuration Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-05-03 21:19 EST ------- Done. In koji, rdieter is the owner of the package. I'm not sure how to add than yet so Rex will have to do builds until someone figures it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:21:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040121.l441L7jx029994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Alias: perl-Email-Reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 Bug 234787 depends on bug 234786, which changed state. Bug 234786 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:20:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234786] Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040120.l441KuUV029969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Creator - Email::MIME constructor for starting anew https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234786 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-03 21:20 EST ------- Built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:22:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040122.l441MM2f030031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:26:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040126.l441QiqQ030135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:31:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238643] Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040131.l441VvVi030413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238643 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:36:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040136.l441abE3030538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:44:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238932] Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040144.l441iuvE030767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238932 ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-05-03 21:44 EST ------- First glance, this line looks suspect:: %dir %{python_sitelib}/peak/util/decorators.py* Usually I'd say that we should package peak in order to get the peak/util/ directory. But it appears that peak is serving as a namespace package for decoratortools so I'm not sure what the proper thing to do is. decoratortools doesn't acutally require anything else provided by peak, just the directory structure.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040154.l441sxFn031070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 01:57:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040157.l441vbVu031208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 02:12:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040212.l442CBLg031975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 02:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197420] Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - Unified payment processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040218.l442IQgU032376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Payment-Process - Unified payment processor Alias: pear-Payment-Process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197420 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 02:22:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040222.l442MrLU032607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 02:25:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040225.l442Pa0g032755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-05-03 22:25 EST ------- Erm... I think someone forgot to set the cvsadmin flag to done on this. If you still need something from CVS, just set the flag again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 03:07:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040307.l4437JGK002620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-03 23:07 EST ------- Yes, looks fine. Approved. I guess you need a sponsor now to get the package actually built. Of the desktop team, I know that at least alex is a sponsor, so you may want to ask him for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 03:16:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235471] Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040316.l443GsXb003156@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-API2 - Perl module for creation and modification of PDF files Alias: perl-PDF-API2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235471 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 23:16 EST ------- Building, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 03:33:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040333.l443Xvn6004105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Alias: perl-Email-Reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-03 23:33 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : ea39a4a73d0b8cc54a28d6e84327413e MD5SUM upstream package: ea39a4a73d0b8cc54a28d6e84327413e [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Missing BRs perl(Email::Simple), perl(Email::Simple::Creator), perl(Email::Date) === Final Notes === 1. Fix missing BRs post-import. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 03:43:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040343.l443hDAm004548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-03 23:43 EST ------- Imported and building. I think. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 03:43:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237739] Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040343.l443hWgt004571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed Alias: perl-File-Modified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 03:43:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040343.l443hhVF004584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 Bug 238211 depends on bug 237739, which changed state. Bug 237739 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Modified - Checks intelligently if files have changed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237739 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 03:46:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235960] Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040346.l443kICN004819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures Alias: perl-Data-Visitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-03 23:46 EST ------- Imported and building... thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 03:46:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 23:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040346.l443kKud004833@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 Bug 238233 depends on bug 235960, which changed state. Bug 235960 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Visitor - Visitor style traversal of Perl data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235960 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 04:18:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040418.l444IVm9006815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bos - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-05-04 00:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Peter, ping? Still here! > I'm willing to review this for you, but first please provide a new srpm based on > the latest upstream release, using the included stratagus fork. Since this is > clearly different (and becoming more different every release) from the > stand-alone stratagus project, it is ok to include the private fork. Just like > is done with many games which come with modded quake engines. OK. I'll do it in a couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 04:28:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238932] Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040428.l444ShRD007144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238932 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-05-04 00:28 EST ------- Oops, I didn't mean to put that %dir there. I removed it and updated the spec/srpm. As for the peak namespace, it would be nice to have something else provide the peak/util, but I don't really see it as too big of a deal -- however, I'm not on the packaging committee.. so it's your call :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 04:38:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040438.l444cidX007268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 00:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 1. rpmlint returns > [paczka at localhost ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/result > W: taxipilot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common > W: taxipilot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common > E: taxipilot zero-length /usr/share/apps/taxipilot/game_data/game_data_tag > As already expained in comments above, the dangling symlink warning is normal for KDE packages, the directory the link points to is provided by kdelibs > 2. "Data files (maps, pixmaps, sounds) go in %{_datadir}/%{name} , not > %{_datadir}/games/%{name} . According to the FHS, the use of /usr/share/games is > optional, and we recommend not using it for consistency so that games are > packaged like all other applications." > In the rpm, datafiles are in /usr/share/apps. Please check it. > Again, this is a KDE app, all kde apps have their data under %{_datadir}/apps/%{name} > 3. "Installed .desktop files MUST follow the [desktop-entry-spec], paying > particular attention to validating correct usage of Name, GenericName, > [Categories], [StartupNotify] entries." > In .desktop is not defined GenericName and the shortcut is after installation in > Games without any category, check it. > GenericName use is optional and doesn't make any sense for Games. The game ends up in the Games menu and not in a submenu, because non of the default KDE Games menu submenus make sense for it. If you install the games-menus package you will get more submenus under KDE and submenus under Games and then it will go under the "Action Games" submenu (best match) > 4. "- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be > removed in the spec." > There is %{_libdir}/libEXT_wavpo.la > There is a comment about this in the spec file: # .la file is included deliberately -> kde KDE needs .la files in certain cases. > 5. Add NEWS to %doc, please. > NEWS doesn't have any (relevant) content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 04:53:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040453.l444raJe007446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 00:53 EST ------- I can give you a (unofficial) review for your package, but you'll still need a sponsor to approve it for you since you are not already sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 05:52:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 01:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040552.l445qVFS009116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: camlimages -|Review Request: ocaml- |OCaml image processing |camlimages - OCaml image |library |processing library ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 01:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > MUST: > > ===== > > 0 rpmlint output is: > > W: camlimages ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied > > /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/dllci_freetype.so > > W: camlimages-devel ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied > > /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/Makefile.config > Ignorable (it actually doesn't happen on a F7 box) > > MUST FIX > > ======== > > * rename to ocaml-images or ocaml-camlimages (will fix rpmlint warning, and the > > latter is consistent with PLD) > I tend to disagree, but I'm going to hold off uploading an updated spec, so I > can make a better judgement. Okay, I've decided to change... ocaml-camlimages it is. Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-camlimages.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-camlimages-2.2.0-7.src.rpm * Fri May 04 2007 Nigel Jones 2.2.0-7 - Change to Makefile patch to move .so files to stublibs - Rename to ocaml-camlimages - Other changes per review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:04:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040604.l4464wlh009446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 02:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/freetennis.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/freetennis-0.4.8-3.src.rpm Only change is camlimages->ocaml-camlimages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:19:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040619.l446J3M2009648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-04 02:19 EST ------- Everything is good except for that blasted SOURCE1 the tar you include is not md5sum checking reliably against the bzr pull I do. I explode the tars and did md5sums on all the files and everything looks good. Are we running into a problem associated with differences in file permissions and ownership at the time of tar creation? I think I need to ask someone else what to do here. From the review guidance its clear what the intent is. I think maybe having the diffs/md5sums against the included files from the exploded SOURCE1 and the bzr branch comeback clean should be sufficient, but I want a second opinion. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040620.l446K5CQ009677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:20:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040620.l446Kwbb009703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:37:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040637.l446bfZj010102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:41:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040641.l446f5Mo010148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-04 02:40 EST ------- Quick pass over the spec file... You'll need to add the appropriate desktop-file-install call in the install section and add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:44:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040644.l446iMOW010273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ville.skytta at iki.f | |i) ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-05-04 02:44 EST ------- Updated. I'm using F7t4 on x86_64. Surprisingly it builds in mock successfully even without any deps to X, so that the SDL-devel BuildRequire seems to be sufficient. I put the updated packages to: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/schismtracker/ so that you can have a look also at the x86_64 binary built in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:46:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040646.l446kb6M010358@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 02:46 EST ------- If I read the comments correctly, all GPL compatability issues have been worked out. If that is the case, I will provide you with a review, just let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228214] Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040648.l446mN5m010437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228214 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjohnson at symetrix.com ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 02:48 EST ------- The srpm and spec links are broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040648.l446msdU010466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-04 02:48 EST ------- Oh and the URL and SOURCE tags need to be updated, same thing as we went through with pigment. www.fluendo.com -> elisa.fluendo.com Looks like elisa 0.1.6 is out according to the website. Do you want to bump up to 0.1.6 before i start the real review? http://elisa.fluendo.com/static/download/elisa/elisa-0.1.6.tar.gz -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 06:58:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040658.l446wPNk010778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-04 02:58 EST ------- Does python-setuptools need to be a Requires and a BuildRequires? The Requires seems odd to me. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 07:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 03:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040700.l4470PIh010842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 03:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > (In reply to comment #10) > > > MUST FIX > > > ======== > > > * remove the unnecessary ldconfig %post(un) scripts, this are not normally > > > libs and since they are not installed in a path searched by ldconfig, calling > > > ldconfig is useless. > > True, good point, done > While I said done, I omitted it from the srpm, I've removed it from my local > copy, however. Would you like another upload? No that won't be necessary, I'll trust you to remove this before import or building. All Must fix items fixed: approved One should still remaining though, the new recommended (per guideline) sourceforge download url now a days is: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ocamlsdl/ocamlsdl-%{version}.tar.gz Notice the downloadSSSSSSS and the removal of /sourceforge/ You might want to change this/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 07:00:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 03:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040700.l4470axa010864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 03:00 EST ------- I'll be happy to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 07:17:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 03:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040717.l447HufC011433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 03:17 EST ------- All Must and Should fix items addressed, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 07:36:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 03:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040736.l447aOns012181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 03:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > All Must and Should fix items addressed, approved. Thank you, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-camlimages Short Description: OCaml image processing library Owners: dev at nigelj.com Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 07:39:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 03:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040739.l447d1p2012331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 03:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > All Must fix items fixed: approved Thank you > > One should still remaining though, the new recommended (per guideline) > sourceforge download url now a days is: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ocamlsdl/ocamlsdl-%{version}.tar.gz > Notice the downloadSSSSSSS and the removal of /sourceforge/ > You might want to change this/ Done! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-SDL Short Description: OCaml bindings for SDL Owners: dev at nigelj.com Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 07:39:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 03:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040739.l447dYHw012406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 07:50:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 03:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040750.l447oQT3013227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-04 03:50 EST ------- The GOOD + naming is good + specfile name matches base package name + specfile written in english-ese and is legible + included source md5sum checks with upstream source as listed in SOURCE0 url 9b1bb4207f9c8a64609d1007420955ef revisor-2.0.1.tar.gz + builds on x86 fedora-development in mock + no locales + not relocatable + clean section is okay + consistent use of macros + permissible code and content + items in doc are not runtime necessary + does not obviously own files from another package + directory ownership of parent directories is accounted for in package deps. + No .la files + No devel subpackage + Need need to for shared libraries sciptlets + no need for scriptlets. The BAD - Licensed as GPL but COPYING file NOT included in docs!! - install section has a problem needs to include a desktop-file-install stanza to install the desktop file correctly, and require desktop-file-utils Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop ? permissions on pilgrim.py Is pilgrim.py meant to be run stand-alone as an executable. You should either strip the shell invocation at the top of the file or make it executable. The Suggestions: You can remove pam from the requires list, usermode requires pam. I know I know i suggested it originally, based on just the directory ownership crap. But taking a closer look the pam requires is redundant. I haven't actually used this yet. Is there a simple example walkthrough on usage? Like how to make a stupidly simple livedvd image or something, so I dont have to think about the package selection but I can test the wizard interface. rpmlint revisor-2.0.1-4.fc7.noarch.rpm E: revisor non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/revisor/pilgrim.py 0644 W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/pungi-fc6-i386.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/revisor-fc6-ppc.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/pungi-f7-i386.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/pungi-fc6-ppc.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/pungi-fc6-x86_64.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/revisor-fc6-x64_86.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/revisor-fc6-i386.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/sample-ks.cfg W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/revisor.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/revisor W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/revisor/conf.d/revisor-f7-i386.conf W: revisor non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/revisor -- warnings are bogus, might want to patch the pilgrim.py to either be executable or to strip the intepreter from the first line. rpmlint revisor-2.0.1-4.fc7.src.rpm W: revisor strange-permission revisor.spec 0600 -- not important, but you might consider making it world and group readable by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:02:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040802.l44825Du014474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kmatsui at t3.rim.or. | |jp) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 04:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:01:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040801.l4481sVn014322@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cbalint at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 04:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040802.l4482b1V014539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 04:02 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:03:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040803.l4483GYF014683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(daniil.ivanov at gmai | |l.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 04:03 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:03:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040803.l4483dd1014970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 04:03 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is clean * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel i386 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries, ldconfig not needed * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * no .desktop file needed MUST FIX ======== * Change Source0 to the generic sf download url, and use %{version} * Change "Categories=Game" to "Categories=Game;SportsGame;" in the .desktop file, so that it will show up under the Games->"Sport Games" submenu for people who have the games-menus package installed (try it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040803.l4483XjG014783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(paul_kunz at slac.sta | |nford.edu) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 04:03 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:06:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040806.l44862ee015232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 04:05 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040806.l4486kxI015338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(francesco at francesc | |o-laurita.info) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 04:06 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:09:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233426] Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040809.l44898wK015624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233426 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 04:09 EST ------- Would you restart to review this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:29:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040829.l448TC2e016955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kmatsui at t3.rim.or.| |jp) | ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-04 04:28 EST ------- Sorry for my long absence. I am now working to update mcpp from V.2.6.3 to V.2.6.4 which is a bug-fixed version of V.2. 6.3. I will select some packages and write pre-reviews in two or three days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:38:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233426] Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040838.l448cVC7017791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233426 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 04:38 EST ------- Sure, My old review still is (mostly) valid: MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines 0 License ok, but not included! * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * no .desktop file required Should FIX ======== * Include the (japanese I know, better then nothing) mail with from upstream stating that an proper license text will be added to the next version. No blockers -> approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:44:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040844.l448ibS8018202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 04:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/freetennis.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/freetennis-0.4.8-1.src.rpm Update to include MUST FIX items -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 08:57:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 04:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040857.l448vTG6019054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 04:57 EST ------- All MUST FIX items handled, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 09:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 05:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233426] Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040909.l44995i6019860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233426 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 05:08 EST ------- Thank you!! Now I am re-rebuilding mecab related packages to support ppc64... (In reply to comment #8) > Should FIX > ======== > * Include the (japanese I know, better then nothing) mail with from upstream > stating that an proper license text will be added to the next version. Will add on CVS. Request for CVS admin: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-mecab Short Description: Ruby binding for MeCab Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 09:14:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 05:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705040914.l449E5GQ020211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 05:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > All MUST FIX items handled, approved! > Thanks, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: freetennis Short Description: Tennis simulation game Owners: dev at nigelj.com Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 10:36:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 06:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041036.l44Aai3X023770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(ville.skytta at iki.f| |i) | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-04 06:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Updated. I'm using F7t4 on x86_64. Surprisingly it builds in mock successfully > even without any deps to X, so that the SDL-devel BuildRequire seems to be > sufficient. It is, but doing so leaves support for X, Xkb and Xv out (grep for USE_X in the source to see what that results in). Is this really desirable? If yes, X should be disabled explicitly by passing --without-x to configure for reproducible builds. Otherwise, adding the build deps mentioned in comment 1 would get all X support built in. The "too many dirs owned" problem mentioned in comment 3 persists. Now that the hicolor-icon-theme dep is there, the icon stuff in %files should be changed to eg. %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*x*/apps/%{name}.* "Name=Schism Tracker" would be better than "Name=Schismtracker" (to match the window title) in the .desktop file. .desktop Categories: Application (invalid) and X-Fedora (unused/unneeded) should be dropped, and "Audio" could be added in addition to "AudioVideo". http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 10:38:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 06:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041038.l44Ac1TG023845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-04 06:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > eg. %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*x*/apps/%{name}.* Hm, actually %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/%{name}.* so that it matches the scalable dir too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 10:44:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 06:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041044.l44AiMZ2024113@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 10:45:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 06:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233426] Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041045.l44AjQdE024155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233426 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 10:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 06:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041047.l44AlZnt024282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 11:26:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041126.l44BQcbH025781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 07:26 EST ------- Yes. All I need to do is construct a source tarball that doesn't include the conflicting material and add the explanation to the .spec. Shall I do that and let you start from there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 11:30:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233423] Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041130.l44BUbvq025950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mecab - Python binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233423 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 07:30 EST ------- Rebuilt on all branches, closing. Thank you for the review!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 11:31:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233426] Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041131.l44BVK8B025993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-mecab - Ruby binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233426 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-04 07:31 EST ------- Rebuilt on all branches, closing. Thank you for the review!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 11:32:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] New: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lindner at inuus.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.inuus.com/memcached.spec SRPM URL: http://www.inuus.com/memcached-1.2.2-1.src.rpm Description: memcached is a high-performance, distributed memory object cachingsystem, generic in nature, but intended for use in speeding up dynamicweb applications by alleviating database load. Available rpmbuild rebuild options : --with=threads - build a multiprocessor optimized memcached server ** Note -- need a sponsor, this is my first package for Fedora extras. Also note that this srpm contains items that will be committed to the 1.2.3 version of memcached. When we iron out the spec file I'll commit it to the upstream memcached tree and release 1.2.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 11:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238366] Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041133.l44BXAdN026065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 07:32 EST ------- Imported and build, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 11:33:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041133.l44BXMo6026085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 Bug 238367 depends on bug 238366, which changed state. Bug 238366 Summary: Review Request: autodownloader - GUI-tool to automate the download of certain files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238366 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 11:35:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 07:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041135.l44BZQkD026146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 lindner at inuus.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041206.l44C6XfT027722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ville.skytta at iki.f | |i) ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-05-04 08:06 EST ------- Ok, updated. I set the X dependencies to be optional and enabled them by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:08:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041208.l44C8fGf027810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 08:08 EST ------- Builds on FC-6, dependencies required for ppc64 on devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:20:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041220.l44CKQ2r028190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 08:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.2.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-beta2.2.2.src.rpm Spec and SRPM with the above issue addressed. Thanks in advance for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041225.l44CPHDM028457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-04 08:25 EST ------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. W: taxipilot dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common W: taxipilot symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/taxipilot/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common E: taxipilot zero-length /usr/share/apps/taxipilot/game_data/game_data_tag It can be ignored, but if taxipilot works without game_data_tag, you should delete it before finally release. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. + Package licensed under GPLv2 MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + included MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + md5sum: c8f5b5a7ca6ea0b3f42ecdef1620f7cb MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. + I check it under mock, fedora-devel-i386.core.cfg, and it built correct MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc N/A MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. I think the BRs are correct, because it built under mock and the package works after installation. MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. + MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) N/A MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. + MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. It works without .la files and I can't see any good reason to avoid deleting that file. MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. + Before approve, please write any good reason for avoid deleting the libtool archives form package and check working without game_data_tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:30:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041230.l44CU8t6028594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:32:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041232.l44CWJ9o028665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |karlikt at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-04 08:32 EST ------- I forgot to assign review request to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:40:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041240.l44Ce9Th028974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-04 08:40 EST ------- If it is needed, I can merge subpackage -data with "core" package. I will do it in the next release with other "review" changes (if they are needed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:43:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041243.l44Ch59m029142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 08:42 EST ------- rpmlint clean with one exception: [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/i386/goocanvas-devel-0.6-1.i386.rpm W: goocanvas-devel no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041247.l44ClXpg029354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-04 08:47 EST ------- I am very sorry for taking so long to followup. I have been too busy recently. (In reply to comment #40) > * Summary and %description could be localized Would be nice. You could add the Chinese description with: %description -l zh_CN for instance if you wish. (In reply to comment #41) > 1. We have been working on vector CJK fonts for two years, and we are expecting > our first release this year. Because we developed our vector fonts in a quite > general way, so, instead of generating a single font, you will find a families > of fonts. To keep things simple and easy to manage, a separate project folder > is highly desired Ok. I just wondering about the naming too: "wenquanyi/wqy-bitmapfont/" vs say "wqy-bitmapfont/" or "wenquanyi-bitmap/" or "wenquanyi/bitmap/", or even "wenquanyi/misc/" as Yuan Yijun suggested. I suppose "wqy/bitmap/" would make the connection with the package name clearer, but that is ok. > 6. for %ghost, I simply copied from fonts-japanese > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/fonts-japanese/fonts-japanese.spec?rev=1.25&view=markup I think it is good since fonts.dir is generated at install time. (In reply to comment #42) > * The font has BDF source so why not use that as Source0, and use bdftopcf to > generate PCF on the fly. Why not? Do you have a comment, Qianqian Fang? > * Keep old changelogs > I like old changelogs, especially for projects like WenQuanYi. :D It is ok to put a *summary* of upstream changes in the rpm changelog but the detailed upstream changes should be in the upstream changelog file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 12:50:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041250.l44CouLR029733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 08:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) Thanks for the review! > Before approve, please write any good reason for avoid deleting the libtool > archives form package As already explained in both the specfile and a comment, .la files should not be deleted from kde-libraries, for example see the output of: rpm -ql kdelibs | grep '\.la' Also see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 Which explicitly mentions an exception for kde packaghes. and check working without game_data_tag. Quoting myself from comment #2: > E: taxipilot zero-length /usr/share/apps/taxipilot/game_data/game_data_tag This file is needed and must stay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:02:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041302.l44D2YO6030823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-04 09:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.6-1.src.rpm Updated to 0.1.6 and changes the URLs. IIRC the runtime dependency on python-setuptools is needed, otherwise elisa will fail miserably (try it if you're unsure ;-)) As for the desktop file installation, I thought "processing" it was now only required if it wasn't a sane file to begin with (i.e. missing categories, lines, wrong encoding etc.)... did I make this up? :-/ Oh, and don't forget that coherence (bug #233596) still needs to be reviewed and imported before elisa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:08:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238691] Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041308.l44D8lt7031497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qsf - Quick Spam Filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238691 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:23:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041323.l44DNLdY000732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-04 09:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > * %doc should not contain INSTALL* Agreed. Better to remove them, since they are not really useful to users. (In reply to comment #43) > IMO the binaries > --------------------------------------------- > %{_bindir}/mkfontdir > %{_bindir}/fc-cache > %{_sbindir}/chkfontdir > --------------------------------------------- > should be added as Requires(post) or/and Requires(postun), > and all checking part "like [ -f <> ] && " should be removed. I think at least the fontconfig requires need not be required. See (Fonts section) and also . (In reply to comment #44) > ok, I updated the spec/srpm one more time > > Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec > SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.1-7a.src.rpm I am sorry about as stated earlier using the upstream -7 in the release can't not be done since you need to be able to bump the release number freely if you need to rebuild at any time. Additionally it is highly recommended to use the "%{?dist}" suffix in the release field. If you really have to keep the upstream -7a in the package version-release then I recommend adding it to the release field as a minor number: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines for detailed information and examples of this. But as I said before it would be much better for upstream to move to a simpler versioning scheme: like just "0.8.1.7". I don't know what the meaning of the "a" in "0.8.1-7a": I hope it was not added just for the purpose of this packaging. > the [-f ] conditions > were removed and added dependences in Requires(post) and Requires(postun); > For version numbering scheme, I used the upstream number this time, following > Mamoru's suggestion. To accommodate the requirements in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes > I used a letter "a" after the release number to avoid confusions. Similarly, > this tag is used in the changelog block. The next update will have 7b and so on. Please see my comments above. The package release field cannot equal such an upstream release number. > I saw my Fedora account still shows "unapproved" for cvsextra, I am > wondering if there is something else I should do to get access. Yes, please be patient. We are getting closer to completing the review. Also did you see comment 39: it would be good if you could try a pre-review of a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:27:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225795] Merge Review: ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041327.l44DRcrB001355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ghostscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225795 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium nsoranzo at tiscali.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nsoranzo at tiscali.it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:29:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041329.l44DTCLA001473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-04 09:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for the review! > > > Before approve, please write any good reason for avoid deleting the libtool > > archives form package > > As already explained in both the specfile and a comment, .la files should not be > deleted from kde-libraries, for example see the output of: > rpm -ql kdelibs | grep '\.la' > Also see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 > Which explicitly mentions an exception for kde packaghes. So I quote: [Comment from mschwendt: It is not that easy, unfortunately, to kill libtool dependency bloat this way. Some software needs libtool archives at ***RUN-TIME*** because it uses an old libltdl to dlopen DSOs or uses a broken libltdl (like KDE bug #93359).] If it doesn't need .la at run-time (works OK), it can be IMHO removed. If you think that the .la files are needed for working, Guidelines can be ignored. + > and check working without game_data_tag. > Quoting myself from comment #2: > > E: taxipilot zero-length /usr/share/apps/taxipilot/game_data/game_data_tag > This file is needed and must stay Ops, I overlooked it. Sorry :) + APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041341.l44DfeHR002226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 09:41 EST ------- Meets Package Naming Guidelines. Spec name is good. License OK, OK in spec and included. Spec in American English and legible. Source MD5 matches upstream Is there a reason you're not packaging 0.8? Compiles and builds on FC6/i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:43:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041343.l44DhbgG002456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-04 09:43 EST ------- (I would also recommend to upstream to version the top directory in the tarball btw.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041348.l44DmGFS002906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-04 09:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154121) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154121&action=view) wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec-2.patch Some suggested changes. Personally I would just drop the .7a from the release field and call it 0.8.1-3 but if you feel the distinction is important you can keep it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 13:56:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 09:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041356.l44DujEc003713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-05-04 09:56 EST ------- Updated to 0.8.23 Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2-0.8.23-1.src.rpm I have problems with campaign. First mission doesn't end. I'll ask upstream what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 14:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041402.l44E2Kxq003969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Alias: perl-Email-Reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-04 10:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Email-Reply Short Description: Reply to an email message Owners: tcallawa at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 14:14:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041414.l44EEBT5004641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 10:13 EST ------- Builds in mock, BuildRequires are OK. Locales handled properly. Runs ldconfig properly. Not relocatable. Directory handling is correct. No duplicate files. Permissions are correct, defattr line in place. Clean section correct and in place. Macros are consistent. Code, not content. No large docs. Headers are in -devel. pkgconfig Required, correctly. .so is in -devel. Correctly versioned -devel Requires for main package. All .la removed. Not a desktop application. No conflicting ownership. Install starts by clearing buildroot. All UTF-8 filenames. Except for -devel doc issue and possible version update, all MUSTS met. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 14:15:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041415.l44EFqxR004757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 10:15 EST ------- No weird scriptlets or file Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 14:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041427.l44ERWjT005816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 10:27 EST ------- Build fails as advertised in Spec. Why does this need to his a network resource to build? Can it not include a copy of what it needs in the source tarball? Could this also be updated to 0.8, like goocanvas? 0.8 is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 14:34:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041434.l44EYKNn006627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 10:34 EST ------- I resource it wants is defined in a file in pygobject, and is available. Do you know if this is a bug in pygobject, or is the build for pygoocanvas doing something incorrectly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 14:40:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041440.l44Eev6u007382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-04 10:40 EST ------- Upstream released 0.5.1 today: http://www.vandenoever.info/software/strigi/ This is required for KDE 4.0 alpha 1 (3.90.1). The KDE 3 Strigiapplet is no longer included in the Strigi tarball, but there's a strigiapplet-0.3.11 tarball for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 14:46:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 10:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041446.l44EkMjQ008019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 10:46 EST ------- Waiting for upstream to make some bug fixes. I've reported at least three issues upstream that I consider show stoppers: 1) configure with --disable-static will not build 2) compile with -DDEBUG will not build. 3) A segfault reported by Patrice that can not be adequately evaluated because of #2 I've been updating to cvs version (locally) whenever I see movement upstream, but so far none of these issues have been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041503.l44F3Snb009485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:14:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235790] Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041514.l44FEO7c010545@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Prototype - Create a CGI application by subclassing Alias: perl-CGI-Prototype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235790 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-04 11:14 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:15:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237742] Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041515.l44FFlHT010716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables Alias: Text-SimpleTable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-04 11:15 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:15:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041515.l44FFlDI010724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 Bug 238211 depends on bug 237742, which changed state. Bug 237742 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SimpleTable - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237742 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041522.l44FMZUn011369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-05-04 11:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > > I think at least the fontconfig requires need not be required. > See (Fonts section) > and also > . > This package contains a fontconfig config file, so it should require fontconfig to ensure directory ownership is correct. Am I right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:32:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237352] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041532.l44FWLL4012182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Getopt - Moose role for processing command line options Alias: perl-MooseX-Getopt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237352 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-04 11:32 EST ------- Imported and building... Thanks for the revieew! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:33:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238643] Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041533.l44FXeiV012278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Declare-Constraints-Simple - Declarative Validation of Data Structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238643 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-04 11:33 EST ------- Imported and build. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:40:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041540.l44FeR5j012902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 11:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > W: goocanvas-devel no-documentation > The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). > You have to include documentation files. There is no documentation relevent to the -devel package. (In reply to comment #2) > Is there a reason you're not packaging 0.8? Actually, yes, and I should have stated it when I submitted. This package set (goocanvas and pygoocanvas) were submitted as requirements for the Conduit (http://www.conduit-project.org/) package I was going to submit. Current release of conduit require goocanvas/pygoocanvas 0.6. There is a new release of Conduit that will be out this week that should run on 0.7 or 0.8, but I haven't had a chance to compile it yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:44:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041544.l44FiQNL013359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 11:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Could this also be updated to 0.8, like goocanvas? 0.8 is available. See reason I posted on bug #233340. (In reply to comment #2) > I resource it wants is defined in a file in pygobject, and is available. Do you > know if this is a bug in pygobject, or is the build for pygoocanvas doing > something incorrectly? It sounds like you're seeing an entirely different error than what I'm seeing. My reference was to the docbook compile grabbing URL resources (these can be included in the srpm I think, but I don't know how yet). Please paste your error here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041549.l44Fn0mU013638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 11:48 EST ------- Those explanations are both eminently reasonable. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:50:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041550.l44FoXJL013723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 11:50 EST ------- (./configure, et. al.) config.status: executing depfiles commands + make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pygoocanvas-0.6.0' Making all in demo make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pygoocanvas-0.6.0/demo' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pygoocanvas-0.6.0/demo' Making all in docs make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pygoocanvas-0.6.0/docs' /usr/bin/python -c 'import datetime; print datetime.date.today()' > reference/builddate.xml xsltproc --nonet --xinclude -o ../docs/html/ \ --path ../docs/reference:./reference \ --stringparam gtkdoc.bookname "pygoocanvas" \ --stringparam gtkdoc.version . \ /usr/share/pygobject/xsl/ref-html-style.xsl ./reference/pygoocanvas-ref.xml I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl warning: failed to load external entity "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl" compilation error: file /usr/share/pygobject/xsl/ref-html-style.xsl line 4 element import xsl:import : unable to load http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl make[2]: *** [build_stamp] Error 5 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pygoocanvas-0.6.0/docs' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pygoocanvas-0.6.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.92537 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.92537 (%build) [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:53:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236539] Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041553.l44FrqeI014124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Alias: perl-Math-Vec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236539 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2007-05-04 11:53 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Incorporated all feedback. Updates spec file and SRPM here: Spec URL: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/perl-Math-Vec.spec SRPM URL: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/perl-Math-Vec-0.04-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:54:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041554.l44FsRiK014155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 11:54 EST ------- checking for X... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for GConf... no checking for i686-redhat-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for APP... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 libglade-2.0 ) were not met. Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively you may set the APP_CFLAGS and APP_LIBS environment variables to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 15:55:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 11:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226475] Merge Review: SysVinit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041555.l44FtRUm014194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SysVinit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226475 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-05-04 11:55 EST ------- Fixed in -17. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:03:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041603.l44G3dvY014703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 clumens at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From clumens at redhat.com 2007-05-04 12:03 EST ------- David - I believe I've fixed the issues in comment #3. Want to check it out and do a new release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:09:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239043] New: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/libdc1394/libdc1394.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/libdc1394/libdc1394-2.0.0-0.1.rc5.src.rpm Description: Libdc1394 is a library that is intended to provide a high level programming interface for application developers who wish to control IEEE 1394 based cameras that conform to the 1394-based Digital Camera Specification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:15:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041615.l44GFkAL015346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 12:15 EST ------- I'm just getting started on this, so I'm not deep into it yet. Noticed this with rpmlint: W: autodir strange-permission autogroup.init 0755 W: autodir strange-permission autohome.init 0755 These are because your *init files are mode 0755. If you change those to 0644 this will go away. It should't affect the package otherwise because you install -m 0755 during the rpm build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041622.l44GMSOs015731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 12:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: goocanvas Short Description: A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing Owners: bjohnson at symetrix.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: bjohnson at symetrix.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:26:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041626.l44GQj3t016117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 12:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I/O error : Attempt to load network entity > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl > warning: failed to load external entity > "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl" > compilation error: file /usr/share/pygobject/xsl/ref-html-style.xsl line 4 > element import > xsl:import : unable to load > http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl Ok, yes this is the same error. Let me see if I can round up a docbook expert on how this is normally dealt with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:29:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041629.l44GToDl016472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-04 12:29 EST ------- Starting review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:33:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041633.l44GXcC5017329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-04 12:33 EST ------- I thought it was very odd. I can get to the chunk.xsl with a browser. Usually the answer to a "won't build without a network resource" question is "adjust your distcc config". ;) Hopefully we can get this cleared up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236539] Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041637.l44Gb3al018507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Alias: perl-Math-Vec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236539 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 12:37 EST ------- ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 16:52:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 12:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041652.l44Gq8hx019986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2007-05-04 12:52 EST ------- (Monthly status report as per comment #5) No new release since 0.5.0. I'm currently busy studying for exams which finish in June. Expect lots more work starting then. Any feedback for the 0.5.0 package? Aside: Last month I got pybackpack 0.5.0 sponsored into Debian unstable so hopefully I'll get some good contextual feedback from that and it'll mature better off the back of it. Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 17:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041711.l44HBaRc021346@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-04 13:11 EST ------- Thanks Kelvin for the heads-up. AFAIK, strigiapplet has always been in its own separate package. The latest release is up at; Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi-0.5.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 17:16:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236539] Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041716.l44HGP6P021752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Alias: perl-Math-Vec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236539 roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2007-05-04 13:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-Vec Short Description: Perl Math::Vec module Owners: roozbeh at farsiweb.info Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 17:25:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041725.l44HPFg8022337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-04 13:25 EST ------- informal review: 1. SHOULD remove BR: dbus-qt-devel (that's the qt3 dbus bindings, qt4 has integrated DBus binding support) 2. SHOULD add to -devel Requires: pkgconfig 3. cmake in fedora has been updated to include convenience rpm macros, so you can simplify it's usage, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 17:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041729.l44HTbiT022739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-04 13:29 EST ------- I believe the Qt 3 dbus-qt-devel is needed for the KDE 3 strigiapplet, but the regular strigi package shouldn't need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 17:32:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041732.l44HWEMF022986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-04 13:32 EST ------- Also IMHO the cmake BuildRequires should be: BuildRequires: cmake >= 2.4.5 because CMakeLists.txt says: CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.4.5 FATAL_ERROR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 17:39:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041739.l44HdCEj023600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-04 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > informal review: > > 1. SHOULD remove > BR: dbus-qt-devel > (that's the qt3 dbus bindings, qt4 has integrated DBus binding support) > strigi is also useful with qt3, i believe. > 2. SHOULD add to -devel > Requires: pkgconfig Will do. > > 3. cmake in fedora has been updated to include convenience rpm macros, so you > can simplify it's usage, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake The cmake rpm macro doesn't play nicely with strigi, the build fails somewhere along the way with it. I think it particularly has to do with the macro definning -DCMAKE-SHARED-LIBS=ON. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 17:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041751.l44Hp0pE024283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-04 13:50 EST ------- As far as I can tell, Qt3 programs like strigiapplet simply use Strigi over D-Bus, there's no check for Qt 3 anywhere in strigi, so it's not a BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 18:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 14:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041815.l44IFbYp026089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-04 14:15 EST ------- Thanks, I'll try to review widelands ASAP. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: taxipilot Short Description: Game where you pilot a taxi in space Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 18:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 14:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705041850.l44IoZ52028391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-04 14:50 EST ------- With corrections from comment #15 and #17, Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi-0.5.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:14:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239086] New: Review Request: pkinit-nss - PKINIT plugin for MIT Kerberos Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239086 Summary: Review Request: pkinit-nss - PKINIT plugin for MIT Kerberos Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nalin at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~nalin/pkinit-nss/fedora/pkinit-nss.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~nalin/pkinit-nss/fedora/pkinit-nss-0.6.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: PKINIT support for MIT Kerberos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:19:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] New: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Nmap-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module implements a interface to the information contained in an nmap scan. It is implemented by parsing the xml scan data that is generated by nmap. This will enable anyone who utilizes nmap to quickly create fast and robust security scripts that utilize the powerful port scanning abilities of nmap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239088] New: Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239088 Summary: Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/pbnj.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/pbnj-2.04-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: PBNJ is a suite of tools to monitor changes on a network over time. It does this by checking for changes on the target machine(s), which includes the details about the services running on them as well as the service state. PBNJ parses the data from a scan and stores it in a database. PBNJ uses Nmap to perform scans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:27:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239088] Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042027.l44KR2D9002238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239088 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239087 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:27:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042027.l44KR3QB002246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239088 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] New: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/ike-scan.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/ike-scan-1.9-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: ike-scan is a command-line tool that uses the IKE protocol to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:32:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] New: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/halberd.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/halberd-0.2.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Halberd discovers HTTP load balancers. It is useful for web application security auditing and for load balancer configuration testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:33:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239092] New: Review Request: fping - Ping hosts in parallel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239092 Summary: Review Request: fping - Ping hosts in parallel Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/fping.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/fping-2.4b2_to-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Fping is a ping like program which uses the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) echo request to determine if a host is up. fping is different from ping in that you can specify any number of hosts on the command line, or specify a file containing the lists of hosts to ping. Instead of trying one host until it timeouts or replies, fping will send out a ping packet and move on to the next host in a round-robin fashion. If a host replies, it is noted and removed from the list of hosts to check. If a host does not respond within a certain time limit and/or retry limit it will be considered unreachable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:47:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] New: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-libwhisker2.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-libwhisker2-2.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Libwhisker is a Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:48:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] New: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/nikto.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/nikto-1.36-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Nikto is a web server scanner which performs comprehensive tests against web servers for multiple items, including over 3300 potentially dangerous files/CGIs, versions on over 625 servers, and version specific problems on over 230 servers. Scan items and plugins are frequently updated and can be automatically updated (if desired). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:49:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042049.l44KnSjB003431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239096 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042049.l44Knci4003441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239097 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 20:57:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] New: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/DMitry.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/DMitry-1.3a-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: DMitry (Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool) is a UNIX/Linux command line program coded purely in C with the ability to gather as much information as possible about a host. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042103.l44L3wIj003939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |238907 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-04 17:03 EST ------- For lack of a better place... ocaml-SDL needs: 'lablgl' 'SDL_image-devel' 'SDL_ttf-devel' 'ocaml' 'SDL_mixer-devel' + their dependencies on ppc64 See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2189&name=root.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:30:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042130.l44LUOe1004917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-04 17:30 EST ------- As this is a BR of the KDE 4 packages I'm working on, I'm going to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:35:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042135.l44LZuin005118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-05-04 17:35 EST ------- I think there is a difference between "clone of MSN Messenger" and "IM which allows you talk with anyone using MSN". Just to be on the safe side, I would stick to the later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239107] New: Review Request: hping3 - Command-line oriented TCP/IP packet assembler/analyzer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239107 Summary: Review Request: hping3 - Command-line oriented TCP/IP packet assembler/analyzer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/hping3.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/hping3-20051105-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: hping is a command-line oriented TCP/IP packet assembler/analyzer. The interface is inspired to the ping(8) unix command, but hping isn't only able to send ICMP echo requests. It supports TCP, UDP, ICMP and RAW-IP protocols, has a traceroute mode, the ability to send files between a covered channel, and many other features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:45:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042145.l44LjWOG005686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-04 17:45 EST ------- Let's start with rpmlint output: >From rpmlint strigi-0.5.1-2.src.rpm: W: strigi non-coherent-filename strigi-0.5.1-2.src.rpm Probably due to no disttag in the SRPM name. Not a real problem. No output from rpmlint on strigi-0.5.1-2.fc6.i386.rpm and strigi-debuginfo-0.5.1-2.fc6.i386.rpm, that's good. On strigi-devel-0.5.1-2.fc6.i386.rpm, I get this: W: strigi-devel no-documentation Not a real problem, the documentation is in the main package. So the rpmlint output is OK, I need to do the manual verifications before I can approve this though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:46:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042146.l44LkSBs005754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 17:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/pygoocanvas.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/pygoocanvas-0.6.0-2.src.rpm * Fri May 04 2007 Bernard Johnson - 0.6.0-2 - enable docbook build This mock builds for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239110] New: Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239110 Summary: Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/firewalk.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/firewalk-5.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Firewalk is an active reconnaissance network security tool that attempts to determine what layer 4 protocols a given IP forwarding device will pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042153.l44LrBjj005988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-05-04 17:52 EST ------- Fine. $ rpmlint gedit-plugins-2.18.0-2.fc7.src.rpm W: gedit-plugins mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 13) $ rpmlint gedit-plugins-2.18.0-2.fc7.i386.rpm W: gedit-plugins incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.18.0.2 2.18.0-2.fc7 Upstream provides a shorter tar.bz2, too. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 21:55:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042155.l44LtIo1006072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-05-04 17:55 EST ------- Probably you are right, I think that ?clone? is not determining, since Gaim provides best _functionality_ at this moment on the protocol that emesene, now, really emesene is special by you friendly graphical interface, simple and fast. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 22:07:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 18:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042207.l44M7COZ006644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-04 18:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #48) thank you Jens, I think your edit of the spec file clarified most issues related to this package. My updated spec files is uploaded again at Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.1-3.src.rpm as you see, I removed "7a" tag, and use a single release number to reflect new builds for fedora. I think this scheme just make things clear. (just wonder, why %{?dist} did not show up in the release tag?) most of your edits were included in the new spec, except for the line "The Wen Quan Yi bitmap fonts include complete CJK Unified ..." in the description. I kept the word "CJK", because here "CJK Unified Ideograph" is a dedicated word for a specific Unicode zone (see http://www.unicode.org/charts/). please let me know your thoughts on this version. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 22:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 18:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042223.l44MNj2q007340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-04 18:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) >> * The font has BDF source so why not use that as Source0, and use bdftopcf to >> generate PCF on the fly. Why not? > Do you have a comment, Qianqian Fang? i thought about using bdf as source, however, I realized that in order to build font from the bdf package, I need to add dependence for bdf2pcf/bdftopcf, perl and make, and afraid of adding complexities for the script. Plus that, I have not uploaded the bdf files for 0.8.0-6 and 0.8.1-7 (due to laziness). So, the only update-to-date bdf you can download is our nightly-build bdf, which is updated everyday. I will make another spec to use bdf as source, I will upload it when it is done. we can choose one from the bdf/pcf versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 22:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 18:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042229.l44MTaUo007570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-04 18:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Let's start with rpmlint output: > > From rpmlint strigi-0.5.1-2.src.rpm: > W: strigi non-coherent-filename strigi-0.5.1-2.src.rpm > Probably due to no disttag in the SRPM name. Not a real problem. > Sorry that's caused by me renaming it while copying to the ftp server so as not to confuse some people who might want to build it on fc6 or earlier. Here is the actual srpm; SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi-0.5.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 22:50:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 18:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042250.l44MoKc9008058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-04 18:50 EST ------- Steve has been feeling a bit under the weather lately, and asked me to help out a bit. I've imported and kicked off builds for this package to remove it as a blocker to a number of other bugs. Feel better, Steve! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 22:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 18:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232036] Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042250.l44MoLfi008074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible Alias: perl-YAML-Tiny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 Bug 232036 depends on bug 232018, which changed state. Bug 232018 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 22:50:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 18:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042250.l44MoMTB008086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 Bug 235962 depends on bug 232018, which changed state. Bug 232018 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 22:50:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 18:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231085] Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042250.l44MoXG8008108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231085 Bug 231085 depends on bug 232018, which changed state. Bug 232018 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 23:03:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 19:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042303.l44N35lv008415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-04 19:03 EST ------- Imported and building... Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 23:03:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 19:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042303.l44N36Zu008428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 Bug 238233 depends on bug 235962, which changed state. Bug 235962 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 23:14:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 19:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239107] Review Request: hping3 - Command-line oriented TCP/IP packet assembler/analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042314.l44NExtD008733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - Command-line oriented TCP/IP packet assembler/analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239107 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 19:14 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2050 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 23:38:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 19:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239107] Review Request: hping3 - Command-line oriented TCP/IP packet assembler/analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042338.l44NcZKr009395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hping3 - Command-line oriented TCP/IP packet assembler/analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239107 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 23:40:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 19:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042340.l44NeKGc009431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-04 19:40 EST ------- MUST Items: + rpmlint output OK (see comment #22) + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License LGPL OK + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, Requires, BuildRequires, Summary, Description + no non-UTF-8 characters + relevant documentation is included + RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used + debuginfo package is valid + no static libraries nor .la files + no duplicated system libraries + no rpaths, at least on i386 (I ran strings on a few files) + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + desktop file is valid and installed correctly + no timestamp-clobbering file commands + _smp_mflags used + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + complies with all the legal guidelines MUST FIX: The License tag says "GPL", but the license is actually LGPL according to COPYING. + COPYING included as %doc + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + source matches upstream: MD5SUM: b976b4f3cf451fc53cd773c338d78994 SHA1SUM: 0bc32ab1668492ad44d061fd4d5753ec0344cb41 + builds on at least one arch (FC6 i386) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + all build dependencies listed in CMakeLists.txt are listed in BuildRequires, however: SHOULD FIX: openssl-devel is no longer required, please remove BR SHOULD FIX: expat-devel is not actually required either: CMakeLists.txt requires libxml2-devel, then goes on to require expat-devel OR libxml2-devel, so this actually means libxml2-devel is required and expat-devel is not really used (and rpm -q --requires strigi confirms that) + no translations in original tarball, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + ldconfig correctly called in %post and %postun + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) except for the following: MUST FIX: strigiclient.desktop is installed into /usr/share/applications/kde. This is owned by kdelibs, which is not a direct or indirect dependency of strigi. So this has to be fixed one way or the other. As Strigi is in no way a KDE app (strigiclient is a Qt 4 app), please simply install the .desktop file into /usr/share/applications instead. + no duplicate files in %files + permissions set properly + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible (%cmake macro does not work according to comment #18) + no non-code content + no large documentation files + %doc files not required at runtime + all header files in -devel + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + Requires: pkgconfig present + /usr/lib/*.so symlinks are correctly in -devel, however: MUST FIX: The .so files in /usr/lib/strigi are NOT symlinks, they're loadable plugins, so they must be in the main package, not the -devel package. + -devel requires %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + no .la files + the only GUI program in the package, strigiclient, has a .desktop file + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license already included upstream + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream + package builds in mock (or at least used to) according to comment #1 (I may run the current package through mock later, but that's best done once the redundant BRs are removed so we can be sure they really were redundant. ;-) ) + package builds successfully on my live system, and I checked for missing BRs (found none) + can't test non-i386 architectures, but all arches are supposed to be supported by upstream + package appears to work + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + .pc files are in -devel + no file dependencies Nitpicks: * The guidelines say the Summary should not end with a period. This, however, doesn't apply to the %description. The sentence at the end of your main package %description should end with a period. (The %description devel is not a complete sentence and thus should not end with a period though.) * Why did you set strigiclient.desktop to only get shown in KDE? * "accessesed" should read "accessed". * This one's a question more than a request to fix something: How is strigidaemon supposed to get run? Is this supposed to be done by the clients which need it (such as strigiapplet)? The strigiclient in any case doesn't offer to start the daemon, it just spits out warnings on the console when run without the daemon running, and some operations even crash in that case. Not that I personally care, I only need the indexers to build KDE 4 alpha 1 (used by the KDE 4 metadata classes), I hate background-indexing daemons, but people who actually want to use the daemon will need it started somehow. Please fix your License tag, install the .desktop file into just %{_datadir}/applications, move %{_libdir}/strigi/ from -devel to the main package and remove the redundant BRs, then I'll approve this. (Also please consider fixing the nitpicks, but those aren't blockers.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 4 23:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 19:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705042348.l44NmdYT009583@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-04 19:48 EST ------- Folks, here is the web calendar application included with remind: http://www.bludgeon.org/remind/calendar.html It requires that variables defining the server's latitude and longtitude be set to work properly. In my opinion, this application is somewhat silly and if it should be included, maybe should be done so under the documentation. I can package it up however and allow the user to define their lat/long via a file in /etc/sysconfig and update the CGI stuff to make use of this. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 00:29:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 20:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239119] New: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-C3-XS/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-C3-XS-0.02-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-C3-XS.spec Description: This contains XS performance enhancers for Class::C3 version 0.16 and higher. The main Class::C3 package will use this package automatically if it can find it. Do not use this package directly, use Class::C3 instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 00:31:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 20:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239119] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050031.l450V3Fp010295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Alias: perl-Class-C3-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Class-C3-XS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 00:40:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 20:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050040.l450e9Qw010471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-04 20:39 EST ------- I should qualify "used by the KDE 4 metadata classes": It's used by the file metadata classes in kdelibs/kfile. There's now additional metadata classes for RDF stuff (based on Redland and Soprano) in kdelibs/kmetadata, those are not related to Strigi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 02:39:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 22:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050239.l452dEN2013182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 22:39 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: W: autodir strange-permission autogroup.init 0755 W: autodir strange-permission autohome.init 0755 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 8cc947aa7507b65bb6b8e3ee95707e29 MD5SUM upstream package: 8cc947aa7507b65bb6b8e3ee95707e29 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [!] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Fix file permissions on init scripts in srpm. 2. Missing Requires on initscripts 3. Missing Requires(post) /sbin/chkconfig, Requires(preun) /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service, and Requires(postun) /sbin/service 4. Please source a source0 for sourceforge like this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SourceUrl?#head-27442167fe28eb345470e8db56716d62b508978c 5. You should not use %makeinstall unless you have a very good reason. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MakeInstall === Final Notes === 1. Your build root is the least preferable of the three allowed: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 I usually recommend the 2nd (show above as well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 02:42:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 22:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050242.l452gW1U013400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-04 22:42 EST ------- Your last posted SRPM URL does not exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 03:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 23:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050326.l453Q40Y015561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-04 23:25 EST ------- from a quick test here, all of bzr export/checkout/branch give you the files, but with the timestamp of "now" on your local machine. ;( So I don't think you will ever get them to match up correctly in a tar. It looks like for bzr downloads, we will need to have a guideline that requires you to md5sum each file. Looks like handling timestamps is a feature request for bzr on it's roadmap: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/bzr/+spec/export-original-timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 03:39:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 23:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050339.l453dWeA016139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-04 23:39 EST ------- APPROVED Okay I'm approving this. Please before you build (if you can figure out how to build in the new merged world ) update the spec to include an explicit instruction in the comment block telling people they will have to manually verify each file in the tarball since bzr does not preserve timestamps yet. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 04:14:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 00:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050414.l454E6CU017964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|peter at thecodergeek.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-05-05 00:14 EST ------- Hi, Hans. Schoolwork has caught up with me quicker than I expected it; and I simply don't have the time to do the review any longer. Sorry about this. :( I'd greatly appreciate someone picking up the review from 0.4.3-2 that Hans posted in comment #10. Moving myself to the CC. Thanks for your understanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 04:31:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 00:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050431.l454V07g018291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-05 00:30 EST ------- I'll review this this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 05:13:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 01:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050513.l455DlCB019241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-05 01:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > by the KDE 4 metadata classes), I hate background-indexing daemons, but people > who actually want to use the daemon will need it started somehow. > If there's a popular request for it, i can create an autostart desktop file to start the daemon along with the desktop session. Fixes from comment #24; Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/strigi/strigi-0.5.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 06:02:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 02:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050602.l4562USd020860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-05 02:02 EST ------- + All raised issues addressed: + License tag fixed + Unneeded BRs removed + .desktop file now in %{_datadir}/applications + %{_libdir}/strigi now in main package + typo and punctuation in %description fixed + No other changes to validate + Package still builds APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 08:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 04:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050812.l458Crwk025555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-05 04:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: postr Short Description: Flickr uploader Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 08:17:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 04:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050817.l458HDR7025838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-05 04:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gedit-plugins Short Description: Collection of plugins for gedit Owners: trond.danielsen at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 08:38:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 04:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705050838.l458c6r4027238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-05 04:38 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: widelands-data no-documentation * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel i386 * BR: ok 0 locales not handled properly * No shared libraries, ldconfig not needed * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions ok * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissable content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package not needed * .desktop file as needed MUST FIX ======== * You install pics/wl-logo-64.png as /usr/share/pixmaps/widelands.png, however installing icons under /usr/share/pixmaps is obsolete, it should go under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps * Add icon update cache code to %post and %postun, see scriptlets page on the wiki * Remove update-desktop-database from %post(un) this is only needed when you install a new mimitype * Remove "Version" and "TryExec" from the .desktop file. Version should be set to the actual package version, not 1.0 since thats kinda hard todo for this package and since Version isn't actually used by anything just remove it. TryExec isn't needed here. * Merge -data and main package into one, no need / use for a seperate package Should Fix ========== * You do %define buildnum 10 and then everywhere were you use it you write: build%{buildnum} why not just do: "%define build build10" and use %{build} where you now use build%{buildnum}? * Why define rel, why not just directly enter it in the release field? * I agree with your assesment made in comment #3 about the locale files being to generic named to go into the system dir, however they should still be marked %lang XX (just like config files should be marked %config) * It doesn't seem to properly pickup the system language set with LANG, translations do work when you change the language from the menu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 10:47:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 06:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237340] Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051047.l45AlGkf031531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-BeautifulSoup - HTML/XML parser for quick-turnaround applications like screen-scraping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237340 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 10:48:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 06:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051048.l45AmkNk031567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-05 06:48 EST ------- Sorry Mamoru and Pierre, I am very busy at this time and there was a security issue in dap-server. I'll try to progress on the week end but I cannot promise. About the review of the ruby packages, I am sorry, I don't know anything about ruby, I wouldn't make a good review ;-(. But tell me if you have other reviews. Lately I stopped completely looking at the 'extras' reviews and focus on 'core' reviews, but currently I have very little time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 11:10:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 07:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051110.l45BA5uu031891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-05 07:10 EST ------- Hi Paul, I'm not a sponsor, but will give you some initial comments: - Perl is on the exception list, so no need to Require it (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#Exceptions) - Since you have a BuildRequires on libevent-devel, rpm creates a Requires: libevent, so there's no need to specify that. - I would suggest building with --with=threads by default, most servers are multiproc nowadays. What do you think? - At least drop the --with=threads part from the description. It's not very for the end-user. - Replace %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d with %{_initrddir} - Be consistent with $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, use one or the other, not both - Replace $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version}/scripts/memcached.sysv with scripts/memcached.sysv in the %install section, there's no need to use $RPM_BUILD_DIR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 11:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 07:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051123.l45BNs6C032196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-05 07:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: strigi Short Description: A desktop search program for KDE Owners: dakingun at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 12:43:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235636] Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051243.l45ChPtc002103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pipepanic - A pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235636 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-05 08:43 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Built successfully. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 12:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051250.l45CoqaP002659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: poppler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-05-05 08:50 EST ------- There are a number of outstanding bugs against the poppler package which block this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 12:51:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] New: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/referencer/referencer.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/referencer/ Description: Referencer is a Gnome application to organise documents or references, and ultimately generate a BibTeX bibliography file. Its features include automatic metadata retrieval, smart web links, ability to import from BibTeX, Reference Manager and EndNote, and tagging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:16:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Class-Gomor.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Class-Gomor-1.01-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module is yet another class builder. This one adds parameter checking in new constructor, that is to check for attributes existence, and definedness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:19:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple-0.34-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple provides easy access to the SQLite databases using objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:21:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Pcap.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Pcap-0.14-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: perl-Net-Pcap provides Perl bindings to the LBL pcap(3) library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051321.l45DLlI4004591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-DBIx- |Review Request: perl-DBIx- |SQLite-Simple - Easy access|SQLite-Simple - Easy access |to SQLite databases using |to SQLite databases using |objects |objects BugsThisDependsOn| |239155 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:21:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051321.l45DLwgX004603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239156 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Write.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Write-1.00-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Net::Write provides a portable interface to open a network interface, and be able to write raw data directly to the network. It juste provides three methods when a Net::Write object has been created for an interface: open, send, close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:24:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051324.l45DOIsk004690@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239155, 239157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051324.l45DOJbO004698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239158 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:24:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051324.l45DOUKF004708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239158 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:27:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] New: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv4Addr.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Net::IPv4Addr provides functions for parsing IPv4 addresses both in traditional address/netmask format and in the new CIDR format. There are also methods for calculating the network and broadcast address and also to see check if a given address is in a specific network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:28:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051328.l45DSiEC004830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2007-05-05 09:28 EST ------- * package meets naming and packaging guidelines * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently * dist tag is present * build root is correct * license field matches the actual license * license is open source-compatible, license text included in package * latest version is being packaged * BuildRequires are proper * compiler flags are appropriate * %clean is present * package builds in mock (FC-6, i386) * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent * final provides and requires are sane * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't * no duplicates in %files * file permissions are appropriate * no scriptlets present * code, not content * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * no headers * no pkgconfig files * no libtool .la droppings APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:29:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239160] New: Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239160 Summary: Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv6Addr.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv6Addr-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Net::IPv6Addr checks strings for valid IPv6 addresses, as specified in RFC1884. You throw possible addresses at it, it either accepts them or throws an exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:29:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239160] Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051329.l45DTt0S004902@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239160 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239159 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:30:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051330.l45DU6jt004919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239160 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:30:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051330.l45DUPaI004935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gemi at bluewin.ch Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:31:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Libdnet.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Libdnet-0.01-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: perl-Net-Libdnet provides perl bindings to the dnet library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:32:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Packet.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Packet-3.25-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: perl-Net-Packet is a unified framework to craft, send and receive packets at layers 2, 3, 4 and 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] New: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv6Addr.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv6Addr-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Net::IPv6Addr checks strings for valid IPv6 addresses, as specified in RFC1884. You throw possible addresses at it, it either accepts them or throws an exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:35:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239160] Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051335.l45DZBTZ005037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239160 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-05 09:35 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 239163 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051335.l45DZM4K005051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-05 09:35 EST ------- *** Bug 239160 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051336.l45DaHXw005095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239162 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051336.l45DaHu5005087@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239158, 239161, 239163 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:36:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051336.l45DaS3W005107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239162 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:36:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051336.l45Dadh4005119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239162 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:41:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] New: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-SinFP.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-SinFP-2.06-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: SinFP is a full operating system stack fingerprinting suite which bypasses limitations that nmap has. This approach brings the era of OS fingerprinting on a per-TCP port basis, not on a per-host basis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:42:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051342.l45DgXd3005273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239164 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:42:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051342.l45DgYxm005281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239164 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:42:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051342.l45DgMhE005258@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239156, 239162 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051344.l45Di5U0005327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239163 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:44:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051344.l45Di4on005319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239159 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:44:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051344.l45DidpE005348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 stefmanos at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefmanos at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From stefmanos at gmail.com 2007-05-05 09:44 EST ------- Many apps that use libdc1394 (ie ekiga - pwlib) require the older (stable) version 1.2.1 Also it is useless (and corresponding apps like coriander) in current rawhide due to the new experimental ieee1394 stuck that does not provide the raw1394 & video1394 and the devices /dev/raw1394 & /dev/video1394/0... Also when i asked in the list about it i was given the following answer >Please DO NOT propagate RPMs before a final 2.0 release (it's fine to >use your own RPMs for internal purpose though). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 13:48:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 09:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239165] New: Review Request: tcptraceroute - A traceroute implementation using TCP packets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239165 Summary: Review Request: tcptraceroute - A traceroute implementation using TCP packets Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/tcptraceroute.spec SRPM URL: Message-ID: <200705051357.l45DvXVm005621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IServerd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|lemenkov at gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 14:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 10:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177204] Review Request: translate-toolkit - A collection of tools to assist software localization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051458.l45EwU5F006977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: translate-toolkit - A collection of tools to assist software localization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177204 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2007-05-05 10:58 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: translate-toolkit New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:11:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212856] Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051511.l45FBFEJ007328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Pager - Data paging class Alias: php-pear-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212856 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:11 EST ------- branched for EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220284] Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051514.l45FEZa1007394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:14 EST ------- cvs Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:27:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221670] Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051527.l45FRrOc007689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-UserAgent-Detect - Extract information from an HTTP user agent Alias: Net-UserAgent-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221670 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:27 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:41:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051541.l45Ff5iD007982@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:41 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:44:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225066] Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051544.l45FiZeN008122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugins - Collections of plugins for gedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225066 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:44 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:50:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051550.l45ForFs008245@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:50 EST ------- no need to add yourself as the initial cc as the owner you get all bugzilla mail. cvs is done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234787] Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051554.l45FsHkf008410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Reply - Reply to an email message Alias: perl-Email-Reply https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234787 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:54 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:56:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235191] Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051556.l45Fu45C008487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postr - Flickr uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235191 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:55 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 15:59:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 11:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051559.l45Fx3vF008599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 11:58 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 16:01:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 12:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239176] New: Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239176 Summary: Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.belegdol.republika.pl/rpmstuff/bodr.spec SRPM URL: http://www.belegdol.republika.pl/rpmstuff/bodr-6-1.src.rpm Description: The Blue Obelisk Data Repository lists many important chemoinformatics data such as element and isotope properties, atomic radii, etc. including references to original literature. Developers can use this repository to make their software interoperable. This package is required for the next version of gnome-chemistry-utils, which will be out soon. Package builds in mock (fc6/x86_64) and apart from one warning: W: bodr devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/bodr.pc rpmlint is silent. I think there is not much point moving the pkgconfig file to -devel subpackage, as it is only one file, not a library, and other gnome-chemistry-utils dependencies require pkgconfig anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 16:03:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 12:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236539] Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051603.l45G3RM7008728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Vec - Perl Math::Vec module Alias: perl-Math-Vec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236539 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 12:03 EST ------- i added fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com to the InitialCC list as all perl modules are cc'd there. cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 16:05:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 12:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051605.l45G5oWC008789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-05 12:05 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 17:06:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226182] Merge Review: nasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051706.l45H6Mxk010101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226182 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.98.39-5.fc7 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 13:06 EST ------- It looks like this is in rawhide now, so this bug should be closed. I'll go ahead and do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 17:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051749.l45Hn6vI011418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-05 13:48 EST ------- Roundcubemail claims to support sqlite databases, but I've been unsuccessful in getting it to work. In db.inc.php I have: $rcmail_config['db_dsnw'] = 'sqlite://./sqlite.db?mode=646'; and whenever I try to load roundcubemail, I get this in the log file: [05-May-2007 11:42:22 -0600] DB Error: DB Error: extension not found in /usr/share/roundcubemail/program/include/rcube_db.inc on line 105 Looking at the spec file for php, I'm actually quite confused as to whether sqlite support is even built into php. Can someone shed some light on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 18:19:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 14:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051819.l45IJJ4V012541@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-05 14:19 EST ------- Any issues left for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 18:19:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 14:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051819.l45IJaHK012562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-05 14:19 EST ------- Any issues left on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 18:47:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 14:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051847.l45IlRCd013099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-05 14:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154210) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154210&action=view) Fix remaining cosmetic issues Ok, 0.3 is looks good, approved. Remaining cosmetic issues to fix/consider before the first build: - rpmlint: W: schismtracker mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 43) - s/Skitta/Skytt?/ in the 0.5-0.3.rc1 changelog entry - Use "0%{!?_without_x:1}" instead of "%{WITH_X}" so X can be disabled using "rpmbuild --without x ...". Patch for these attached, gzipped so Bugzilla won't mangle UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 18:48:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 14:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051848.l45Im3Ln013127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 19:19:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] New: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394-1.2.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras rpmlint is silent enought on binaries and sources... As this spec files was taken from atrpms version. I will request Axel some advices about replacement policy for this package and his packaging scheme... For example, what is the aim for : %lib_package dc1394_control 13 ? Whereas libs are : [root at Kwizatz lib64]# ls -al total 84 drwxr-xr-x 2 builder builder 4096 mai 5 21:02 . drwxr-xr-x 8 builder builder 4096 mai 5 21:02 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 builder builder 27 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so -> libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 builder builder 27 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so.12 -> libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 builder builder 73168 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1 I was working on libdc1394(-1) before seen -2 from Matthias i would like to work with him in case we choose to provides a -2 version... See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239043 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 19:23:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239185] New: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/nbtscan.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/nbtscan-1.5.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: NBTscan is a program for scanning IP networks for NetBIOS name information. It sends a NetBIOS status query to each address in supplied range and lists received information in human readable form. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 19:26:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051926.l45JQ6iK014141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: bos - Real- |Review Request: boswars - |time strategy game using the|Real-time strategy game |Stratagus game engine |using the Stratagus game | |engine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 19:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705051953.l45Jri1d015185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-05 15:53 EST ------- Well i was also working on it at the same time but on libdc1394(-1) See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239184 I think that would be fine (as state by Stephanos) not to ship this version. But we can to make a dual installation for testing if needed... As such: i've noticed that svn trunk: "changed libdc1394.pc to libdc1394-2.pc to avoid pkg-config conflicts" that would be good to have svn snapshoot to integrate this change. only this binary (and i suppose libaries also) will conflict with -1: %{_bindir}/dc1394_vloopback We may uses suffix if needed... no need to changes about includedir as : -1 will have libdc1394 -2 will have dc1394 I wonder why libXext-devel was in -1 and not in -2 (will check for -1) I would suggest to rename this package to libdc1394_2 to avoid conflict... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 21:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226190] Merge Review: netatalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052109.l45L9uuf016965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: netatalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226190 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 17:09 EST ------- I checked what's in CVS currently; I'll check over the issues that popped up in the previous review. First, a few remaining rpmlint warnings: W: netatalk devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/netatalk-config Actually it's now in both packages, because this: %{_bindir}/* in the regular package pulls it in. An %exclude fixes it up; I moved the manpage over to -devel as well. E: netatalk wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/netatalk-2.0.3/ICDumpSuffixMap "perl" Still around. Not sure what's up here. I note this file is included as Source4, but it's also in contrib. My suggestion would be to drop Source4 and use the script from contrib, but fix up the line endings and #!perl call. E: netatalk wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/netatalk-2.0.3/ICDumpSuffixMap "perl" E: netatalk executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/atalk E: netatalk setuid-binary /usr/bin/afppasswd root 04755 E: netatalk non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/afppasswd 04755 W: netatalk conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/atalk W: netatalk incoherent-init-script-name atalk W: netatalk-devel no-documentation E: netatalk executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/atalk W: netatalk conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/atalk The guidelines have actually changed now; init scripts must not be marked as %config. E: netatalk setuid-binary /usr/bin/afppasswd root 04755 E: netatalk non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/afppasswd 04755 W: netatalk incoherent-init-script-name atalk W: netatalk mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 19) These are all OK. * Buildroot is fine now. (In any case, he buildroot guidelines ended up being considerably loosened since the the initial review was done.) * Dependencies look good. * ldconfig is now called as necessary. * We now have guidelines for static libraries; they should not be included at but if there is a justifiable reason for why they absolutely must be included, they must be in a -static subpackage and only then after approval of FESCO. I'll attach a patch which fixes these issues, but it also removes all of the static libaries and .la files. If you're convinced that they're necessary, you'll need to ask FESCO for an exception. I need to run now and it may be a couple of hours before I can get that patch uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 21:28:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239193] New: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ExtractUse/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.19-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec Description: Module::ExtractUse is basically a Parse::RecDescent grammar to parse Perl code. It tries very hard to find all modules (whether pragmas, Core, or from CPAN) used by the parsed code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 21:58:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052158.l45LwJpf017804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-05-05 17:58 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tdom Short Description: Tcl dom parser Owners: wart at kobold.org Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 22:29:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 18:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239092] Review Request: fping - Ping hosts in parallel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052229.l45MTW26018319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fping - Ping hosts in parallel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239092 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-05 18:29 EST ------- Already included in Fedora (Extras). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 22:54:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 18:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239199] New: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239199 Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Archive-Any/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Archive-Any-0.093-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Archive-Any.spec Description: This module is a single interface for manipulating different archive formats. Tarballs, zip files, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 22:55:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 18:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239199] Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052255.l45MtY6D018765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Alias: perl-Archive-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239199 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Archive-Any -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239200] New: Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239200 Summary: Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/onesixtyone.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/onesixtyone-0.3.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: onesixtyone takes a different approach to SNMP scanning. It takes advantage of the fact that SNMP is a connectionless protocol and sends all SNMP requests as fast as it can. Then the scanner waits for responses to come back and logs them, in a fashion similar to Nmap ping sweeps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:07:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052307.l45N7kId019025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-SinFP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:13:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052313.l45NDxk2019114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-05 19:13 EST ------- Hmmm, I swear I actually submitted it, but here it is again. No builddep on desktop-file-install breaks mock builds it seems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:20:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052320.l45NKNr5019228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Net-IPv4Addr Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:21:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052321.l45NLDxJ019263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-05 19:21 EST ------- Missing BR on perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) and perl(Test::More); License is (by convention) generally written as "GPL or Artistic", rather than the other way around. Make the above changes, and I'll approve :) + source files match upstream: 57aa8e28ebcd4c0c9f15792740e53d3c Net-IPv4Addr-0.10.tar.gz 57aa8e28ebcd4c0c9f15792740e53d3c ../Net-IPv4Addr-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate (noarch) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl=Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Net::IPv4Addr) = 0.10 perl-Net-IPv4Addr = 0.10-1.fc6 == requires /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Net::IPv4Addr) perl(strict) perl(vars) :lcheck is present and all tests pass + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052321.l45NLvHv019282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-IPv6Addr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052325.l45NP1G8019357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-Packet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:36:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052336.l45Naj8M019499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-05 19:36 EST ------- Updated SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv4Addr.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:43:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052343.l45NhC07019605@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-05 19:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scratchpad Short Description: Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:46:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052346.l45Nk0wk019678@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:49:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052349.l45Nnacf019746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-05 19:49 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:50:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212897] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052350.l45NowTE019781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data Alias: pear-Structures-DG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-05 19:50 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052352.l45NqGKR019819@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-05 19:52 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DaataSource-Array New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:53:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212919] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052353.l45NrJMh019855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject Alias: DG-DataSource-DO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212919 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-05 19:53 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:54:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052354.l45Nsc7N019899@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-05 19:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-IPv4Addr Short Description: Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:55:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052355.l45Nt4mQ019932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |DBIx-SQLite-Simple -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052354.l45NsxEc019917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 5 23:55:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 19:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705052355.l45Nto1a019972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Class-Gomor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 00:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 20:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208736] Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060009.l4609GAR020275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208736 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-05 20:09 EST ------- I'm interested as a newer pam_usb uses it to mount devices. I could co-maintain. + Builds in mock FC6 x86_64 + rpmlint complains: E: pmount setuid-binary /usr/bin/pumount root 04755 E: pmount non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/pumount 04755 E: pmount setuid-binary /usr/bin/pmount root 04755 E: pmount non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/pmount 04755 Expected as both are setuid root. This is intended for pmount to run as ordinary user. + clear Summary and %description + spec follows template + License GPL + Follows naming guidelines + URL + BuildRoot good + BuildRequires sane + use of %find_lang + use of macros + tested, mounts and umounts as user -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 00:14:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 20:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226190] Merge Review: netatalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060014.l460Ew5I020383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: netatalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226190 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 20:14 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154214) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154214&action=view) Patch fixing remaining review issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 00:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 20:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060022.l460MB9r020540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2007-05-05 20:22 EST ------- I need my version of busybox (fixed, well known without the bugs introduced by newer one ...). It's only a small package, I'm able to maintain that myself. I can change the name if that's an issue ;-) But I need full control on it. I continue to work with you, even if I find that a bit picky sometimes. the dist tag, contrary to what you say is not mandatory (Cf: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag?action=show&redirect=DistTag). But there was an error in my .spec I corrected now, so I should normaly use it correctly now. mindi should also now own /etc/mindi. Latest versions at: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora-extras/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 00:49:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 20:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060049.l460nGEM020998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-05 20:49 EST ------- How about splitting this into two source RPM packages? nspluginwrapper-i386.src.rpm nspluginwrapper-x86_64.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 01:40:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 21:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226191] Merge Review: netpbm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060140.l461ejWj021703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: netpbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226191 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 21:40 EST ------- After a long hiatus, I've found sime time to get back to this. The rpmlind issues are down to: W: netpbm invalid-license Assorted licenses, see /usr/share/doc/netpbm-10.35/copyright_summary E: netpbm configure-without-libdir-spec E: netpbm hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lib* All of which are OK. > The 10.35 code tarball is the last published netpbm tarball before the upstream > decided to change a release policy. The tarball comes with hpcd and jpeg2000 > support removed, so it's not the original one. The netpbmdoc tarball is > generated by my scripts from the html pages by makeman. This is the suggested > way how to get netpbm man pages by upstream. My point is that regareless of how the tarballs are generated, the method needs to be documented in the specfile and any scripts you use need to be included. Really, that and a little comment indicating that parallel make doesn't work are the only flaws I see with this package right now (unless I'm forgetting something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 01:44:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 21:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: perl-Newt (was: newt-perl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060144.l461iQ1e021800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Newt (was: newt-perl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 21:44 EST ------- Did this ever get in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 02:20:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 22:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060220.l462KgT3022335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nfs-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 22:20 EST ------- Wow, looks like I had planned to add more to this ticket and then promptly ran out of time for a couple of months. Here's where we're at. Some strange-permission warnings in the srpm, which should be OK. Several rpmlint issues with the built RPM: E: nfs-utils executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs E: nfs-utils executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfslock E: nfs-utils executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpcgssd E: nfs-utils executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpcidmapd E: nfs-utils executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpcsvcgssd W: nfs-utils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs W: nfs-utils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfslock W: nfs-utils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpcgssd W: nfs-utils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpcidmapd W: nfs-utils conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpcsvcgssd The current packaging guidelines indicate that init files should be executable and should not be marked %config. E: nfs-utils zero-length /var/lib/nfs/rmtab E: nfs-utils zero-length /var/lib/nfs/etab E: nfs-utils zero-length /var/lib/nfs/state E: nfs-utils zero-length /var/lib/nfs/xtab Generally we don't ship zero-length files, but I guess something has to be installed there and I'm not sure if the files can contain comments. E: nfs-utils setuid-binary /sbin/mount.nfs root 04755 E: nfs-utils setuid-binary /sbin/umount.nfs root 04755 E: nfs-utils setuid-binary /sbin/mount.nfs4 root 04755 E: nfs-utils setuid-binary /sbin/umount.nfs4 root 04755 E: nfs-utils non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/mount.nfs 04755 E: nfs-utils non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/umount.nfs 04755 E: nfs-utils non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/mount.nfs4 04755 E: nfs-utils non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/umount.nfs4 04755 E: nfs-utils non-readable /var/lib/nfs/state 0600 E: nfs-utils non-standard-uid /var/lib/nfs/statd rpcuser E: nfs-utils non-standard-gid /var/lib/nfs/statd rpcuser E: nfs-utils non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nfs/statd 0700 These are OK. E: nfs-utils explicit-lib-dependency libevent E: nfs-utils explicit-lib-dependency libgssapi I'm not sure I understand these. What's the point of putting just a library dependency in Requires(pre)? If something in %pre needs those libraries, won't it have its own dependencies? W: nfs-utils incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.12-4 1:1.0.12-4.fc7 rpmlint is complaining about not seeing the epoch inthe changelog entry I don't think this it's a big deal. W: nfs-utils dangerous-command-in-%pre mv I wonder if we still support upgrading from anything old enough to need that bit in %pre. It looks like FC4 still used "rpc.*" while FC5 uses "rpc*", so we probably still need it. W: nfs-utils dangerous-command-in-%preun userdel The guidelines for this aren't finished yet, but general sentiment is that we shouldn't delete service users. It's obvious if uninstalling the package would leave unowned files W: nfs-utils service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfslock W: nfs-utils service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpcidmapd W: nfs-utils service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rpcgssd Generally it's bad if merely installing a package results in a running service, but this is the nfs client and perhaps Red Hat has some other policy here. W: nfs-utils no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfslock I've always wondered why that script is missing reload. Honestly, besides those rpmlint bits and the above question about the nfs.doc tarball, I think this package is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 02:30:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 22:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229342] Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060230.l462UrxH022533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229342 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 22:30 EST ------- This should be closed if the package was built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 02:35:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 22:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060235.l462Zwd6022604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-05 22:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > How about splitting this into two source RPM packages? > nspluginwrapper-i386.src.rpm > nspluginwrapper-x86_64.src.rpm Hmm, seems a good idea but it's not really better than the present scenario, IMHO. The nspluginwrapper-i386.src.rpm so called will still have to be built in the 32-bit tree and the binary some-how copied over to the 64-bit tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 02:54:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 22:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060254.l462sGUC023071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 ------- Additional Comments From weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu 2007-05-05 22:54 EST ------- Yes, I would like that. Here are links to the latest files: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dfu-programmer/dfu-programmer-0.4.1-1.src.rpm?download http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dfu-programmer/dfu-programmer-0.4.1-1.spec?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 03:00:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060300.l4630Utx023154@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 ------- Additional Comments From weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu 2007-05-05 23:00 EST ------- Sorry, bad URLs before. These links should work after the spec file is propagated. http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dfu-programmer/dfu-programmer-0.4.1-1.spec?use_mirror=osdn http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dfu-programmer/dfu-programmer-0.4.1-1.src.rpm?use_mirror=easynews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 03:24:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226577] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060324.l463OrbG023518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226577 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 23:24 EST ------- Well, this the first driver (alphabetically) which will build on x86_64, so I figured I'd take a look. A cursory inspection only turns up two issues: W: xorg-x11-drv-apm invalid-license MIT/X11 which is kind of an odd way to state it, but I guess it's not incorrect. The other issue is ownership of /usr/lib64/xorg/modules and /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers. I thought there was a discussion at Fudcon about this between you and spot, but I paid only enough attention to look out for airborne furniture. Minor stuff: %define cvsdate xxxxxxx Not used in this spec, and aren't these things in git anyway? Jesse stuck in a weird changelog line: * Wed Jul 12 2006 Jesse Keating - sh: line 0: fg: no job control Looks like a script took a bit of a dump there. Umm, I guess that's about it. Needless to say, I have absolutely no way to test this; I'm not even sure what "apm" means in the context of video. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 03:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060340.l463eiER023744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-05 23:40 EST ------- I see you have done a review of my package. Please /msg XulChris on #fedora-devel, and we'll see about going through the process to get you sponsored. :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 03:59:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222575] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060359.l463xqKR023946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Alias: pear-ElementGrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 23:59 EST ------- Let me go ahead and ack this, since Sebastien isn't sponsored yet. Nothing from rpmlint; everything looks good. * source files match upstream: 26a09d192dfcc27a250b940943b02e0d1d0c59d0329a5350c915d41164e901ba HTML_QuickForm_ElementGrid-0.1.0.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. O latest version is 0.1.1. This came out way after you submitted the review; any reason for not packaging it instead? * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(HTML_QuickForm_ElementGrid) = 0.1.0 php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid = 0.1.0-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(HTML_QuickForm) >= 3.2.5 php-pear(HTML_Table) >= 1.7.5 php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; not test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. (/usr/share/pear/HTML/QuickForm is owned by a dependency) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 04:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 00:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060403.l4643Su1024062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 00:03 EST ------- Well, hey, the blocker bug is fixed now, so I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 04:41:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 00:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222575] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060441.l464fNx3024533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Alias: pear-ElementGrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-06 00:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid Short Description: Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 FC-5 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 04:56:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 00:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060456.l464uSuW024703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-06 00:56 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [!] Rpmlint output: W: dfu-programmer incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3.1-1 0.4.1-1.fc6 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 100113bd773ec1a6a6a0e67cde928b6e MD5SUM upstream package: 197e49052a305ee3677f2ef95a1390c9 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji dist-fc7 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. %changelog versions is not in sync with actual version. 2. Source0 should be a download URL. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SourceUrl#head-27442167fe28eb345470e8db56716d62b508978c 3. Normally, you'd want to use the equivalent of wget -N to download the source tarball, but since you'd upstream, you would want to do whatever you should to preserver the original timestamp to pack into the SRPM. 4. md5sum of the included tarball and the upstream tarball do not match. That's not good ;) === Final Notes === 1. If you are only supporting Fedora, you don't need to specify >= 0.1.10a for your libusb (FC5 is lowest supported and it's 0.1.11). If you want to support other distros or even EPEL, then you should leave it as is. 2. If your package requires kernel support at a specific version, you'd want to add that as a requirement as well. I don't have enough documentation to determine if that is the case or not. If you have any questions about these comments, let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:25:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212897] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060525.l465Pc3D025479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data Alias: pear-Structures-DG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-06 01:25 EST ------- branched for EL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212919] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060527.l465Rva1025586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-DataObject - DataSource driver using PEAR::DB_DataObject Alias: DG-DataSource-DO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212919 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-06 01:27 EST ------- EPEL branched -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:31:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060531.l465Vwm3025724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-06 01:31 EST ------- EPEL done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:35:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060535.l465ZDMZ025828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-06 01:35 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:35:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060535.l465ZwJe025866@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-06 01:35 EST ------- Here are a couple of the missing BRs: gtk2-devel, libglade2-devel, expat-devel with those listed, I still see these messages in the build log: checking for X... no checking for GConf... no You don't need the %post and %postun scriptlets because you're not installing any shared libraries. Your .desktop file is not installed correctly. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DesktopFiles %configure should be part of %build, not %prep Group: should probably be Applications/System -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:38:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222575] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060538.l465cPIn025971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Alias: pear-ElementGrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-06 01:38 EST ------- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:42:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060542.l465gEsu026046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-06 01:41 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060547.l465l3DN026164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-06 01:46 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 05:55:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 01:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060555.l465tfrU026302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-05-06 01:55 EST ------- http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/boswars.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/boswars.sh http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/boswars.desktop http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/boswars--SConstruct.diff http://www.boswars.org/releases/boswars-2.3-src.tar.gz Still using internal version of guichan and tolua instead of system ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060614.l466EZia026620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-05-06 02:14 EST ------- Nigel, please fill a new bug describing that problem and close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:16:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060616.l466GK53026673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 02:16 EST ------- Well, there's not much to this package. rpmlint is completely silent. A couple of minor issues: The indentation in %description looks a little odd. There's no need for the leading slash here: /%{_datadir}/php/magpierss/ I don't think these are blockers. * source files match upstream: 7cf9698ade1067d19c4c551529928b70bdc270fd7c450c4eba883a17ac4614c3 magpierss-0.72.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none needed) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-magpierss = 0.72-2.fc7 = php * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. /usr/share/php comes from php-common, which is a dependency of php. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060623.l466NRsX026793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 02:23 EST ------- I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060625.l466PrZJ026854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060626.l466QFd4026903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:26:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060626.l466QIFs026916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:26:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060626.l466QEOq026890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: FE-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:26:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060626.l466Qkia026979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-06 02:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Nigel, please fill a new bug describing that problem and close this one. There is no place to put it, well, not until the cvs/bugzilla sync starts again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:27:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199029] Review Request: jokosher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060627.l466RYRU027006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher Alias: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220381] Review Request: compat-flex - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060627.l466Rvup027058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-flex - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:28:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060628.l466SNh1027133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:29:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229440] Review Request: redhat-lsb - package for LSB comformance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060629.l466TXwJ027201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redhat-lsb - package for LSB comformance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229440 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229728] Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060629.l466TpSI027251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyml - Poly/ML compiler and runtime system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229728 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 06:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 02:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060653.l466r7G5027607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(ville.skytta at iki.f|fedora-cvs? |i) | ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-05-06 02:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: schismtracker Short Description: Sound module composer/player Owners: jnovy at fedoraproject.org Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 07:10:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 03:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060710.l467AfSX027925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-06 03:10 EST ------- Any chance you could you fix that yourself and then continue with the review? I think more things will come up and I don't want to have a zillion iterations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 07:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 03:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060711.l467BaU0027977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 03:11 EST ------- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. Source0 should be a URL; I used the usual http://dl.sf.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz so that I could grab the upstream source for comparison. The link to config.php looks a bit odd: /usr/share/tiquit/config.php -> ../../..//etc/tiquit/config.php %{_sysconfdir} includes a leading slash. Normally I'd ask if there's a nicer way to do this than via a symlink, but it's pretty obvious from the code that you'd have to patch every source file. Since this comes up locked down to localhost, it's probably worth adding a README.Fedora file containing information about why you've done that, what the user needs to in order to enable things, and if there's any mandatory configuration they need to do before turning it on. I'm not sure your dependency on php-gd does what you want it to. Note that it won't pull in a PHP interpreter, just php-common. I'm not sure why you have %dir %{tiquitdir} %{tiquitdir}/* instead of just %{tiquitdir} * source files match upstream: 1c7aefbde49ee7ee4f946d60218a9f19f5a5236df67f3e401ffa76f2ecfc563c tiquit-2.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none needed) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: config(tiquit) = 2.4-1.fc7 tiquit = 2.4-1.fc7 = config(tiquit) = 2.4-1.fc7 php-gd * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 07:12:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 03:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224254] Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060712.l467C7LE028033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Real-time strategy game using the Stratagus game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224254 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-06 03:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > > Still using internal version of guichan and tolua instead of system ones. Didn't we fix that already for the stand-alone stratagus, couldn't those patches be easily ported over? I think this is a blocker, so I would like to have this sorted out before doing a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 07:16:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 03:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060716.l467GXMc028155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-06 03:16 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cups-pdf New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 07:26:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 03:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060726.l467Qvj6028455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 03:26 EST ------- I'm thinking that it might not be such a good idea to ship an old beta instead of a CVS pull. In fact I'm not sure beta3 is even winnable (since you can't talk to Hawkwind.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 09:06:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 05:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194027] Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060906.l4696NMl028267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194027 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From redhat at grahams.idps.co.uk 2007-05-06 05:06 EST ------- I have a build on my FC6 x86 laptop but it just segfaults when you run it up. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 09:28:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 05:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060928.l469SORT029472@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-06 05:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I can package it up however and allow the user to define their lat/long via a > file in /etc/sysconfig and update the CGI stuff to make use of this. > > Thoughts? I leave it to how you think whether we should create www related subpackages. (In reply to comment #7) > Thanks for the review Mamoru. I have implemented your MUST FIX entries above Please provide the URL of new spec/srpm. > and am communicating with the remind developers as to > artwork that could be used > for a tkremind icon. Thank you (but this is not a blocker) > And I will work on getting sponsored as well. Thanks for your guidance! Usually you can do a pre-review of other peoples' review request to get sponsored (as commented in comment 6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 09:33:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 05:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060933.l469XlYe029786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-cvs?, fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-06 05:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: netgen Short Description: LVS netlist comparison tool Owners: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 09:38:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 05:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060938.l469cphF030019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-06 05:38 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint's output is clean - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 09:39:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 05:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705060939.l469dqrP030058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 11:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 07:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061101.l46B1tso031213@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From tokul at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-06 07:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Roundcubemail claims to support sqlite databases, but I've been unsuccessful in > getting it to work. > > In db.inc.php I have: > $rcmail_config['db_dsnw'] = 'sqlite://./sqlite.db?mode=646'; > > and whenever I try to load roundcubemail, I get this in the log file: > [05-May-2007 11:42:22 -0600] DB Error: DB Error: extension not found in > /usr/share/roundcubemail/program/include/rcube_db.inc on line 105 > > Looking at the spec file for php, I'm actually quite confused as to whether > sqlite support is even built into php. Can someone shed some light on this? > Please note that this is not roundcube or php support forum. Error message says that sqlite extension (http://www.php.net/sqlite) is not available. FC6 compiles PHP without sqlite support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 11:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 07:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194027] Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061107.l46B7tgR031369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: metisse - Experimental X desktop with OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194027 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-06 07:07 EST ------- The mains problems are that it Requires ffmpeg (not in Fedora) and maybe tinyvnc which cannot compile on x86. Maybe it can be changed into realvnc. I haven't worked on them since theses version Some users (and i) report it to work fine with my rpms... (no segfaults). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 12:35:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 08:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061235.l46CZFej000981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-06 08:35 EST ------- Thank you! Request for CVS admin: ----------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-amazon Short Description: Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 13:46:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 09:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208736] Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061346.l46Dk3SH003940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208736 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-06 09:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pmount Short Description: Enable normal user mount Owners: pertusus [ AT ] free.fr, jpmahowald [ AT ] gmail.com Branches: FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 13:47:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 09:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208736] Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061347.l46DlFes003981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208736 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-06 09:47 EST ------- I haven't asked for a EL-4 branch because I don't know if the dependencies are there. If somebody is interested, contact me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 14:37:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 10:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061437.l46Eb1o5004974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 15:09:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232165] Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061509.l46F9AQZ005765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files Alias: pear-File-Passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 15:29:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061529.l46FT009006159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2007-05-06 11:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > ok, looks like they both built successfully. Finally done with this bug. :-) Not yet ;) You haven't built it for development (Fedora 7). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 15:29:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239231] New: Review Request: siege - An http regression testing and benchmarking utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239231 Summary: Review Request: siege - An http regression testing and benchmarking utility Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/siege.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/siege-2.66-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Siege is an http regression testing and benchmarking utility. It was designed to let web developers measure the performance of their code under duress, to see how it will stand up to load on the internet. Siege supports basic authentication, cookies, HTTP and HTTPS protocols. It allows the user hit a web server with a configurable number of concurrent simulated users. Those users place the webserver "under siege." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 15:30:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239231] Review Request: siege - An http regression testing and benchmarking utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061530.l46FUEnS006220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: siege - An http regression testing and benchmarking utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239231 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 15:55:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061555.l46Ftjk6006665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-06 11:55 EST ------- Thanks for review. (In reply to comment #18) > MUST FIX > ======== > * You install pics/wl-logo-64.png as /usr/share/pixmaps/widelands.png, however > installing icons under /usr/share/pixmaps is obsolete, it should go under > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps Changed > * Add icon update cache code to %post and %postun, see scriptlets page on the > wiki Added > * Remove update-desktop-database from %post(un) this is only needed when you > install a new mimitype Removed > * Remove "Version" and "TryExec" from the .desktop file. Version should be > set to the actual package version, not 1.0 since thats kinda hard todo for > this package and since Version isn't actually used by anything just remove it. > TryExec isn't needed here. Done. > * Merge -data and main package into one, no need / use for a seperate package Done. > Should Fix > ========== > * You do %define buildnum 10 and then everywhere were you use it you write: > build%{buildnum} why not just do: "%define build build10" and use %{build} > where you now use build%{buildnum}? %define build_id build10 > * Why define rel, why not just directly enter it in the release field? fixed > * I agree with your assesment made in comment #3 about the locale files being > to generic named to go into the system dir, however they should still be > marked %lang XX (just like config files should be marked %config) It was a little problem, but now it is OK New URLs: http://karlik.nonlogic.org/widelands/widelands.spec http://karlik.nonlogic.org/widelands/widelands-0-0.3.build10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 16:06:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235527] Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061606.l46G6ARQ006929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pylibacl - POSIX.1e ACLs library wrapper for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235527 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-05-06 12:06 EST ------- I took a few days (2007-05-01 08:57:00), but it should be available now. Closing issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 16:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061625.l46GPr1d007359@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-05-06 12:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-magpierss Short Description: MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP Owners: stahnma at fedoraproject.org Branches: FC-6, F7, devel, EL4, EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 16:40:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061640.l46Ge4fH007675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-06 12:40 EST ------- Same as ruby-amazon, the folders samples and test were omitted. Their contents should be added to one or more sub packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 16:54:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239233] New: Review Request: compat-vips - compatibility version of VIPS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239233 Summary: Review Request: compat-vips - compatibility version of VIPS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/compat-vips.spec SRPM URL: http://www.spicenitz.org/fedora/compat-vips-7.10.21-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Compatibility version of VIPS. New upstream release of VIPS has new so version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 17:00:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 13:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061700.l46H0v4Z008139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS Alias: cups-pdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |cups-pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 17:22:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 13:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232165] Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061722.l46HM7Pl008713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files Alias: pear-File-Passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 13:21 EST ------- Builds fine and rpmlint is clean. Everything looks good, although I'm curious about the split of the -samba subpackage. The additional dependencies from php-pear-Crypt-CHAP only total about 200K, which isn't a really big deal but I guess it is nonzero. It looks like the code handles the missing Smb module well (raising an exception instead of just bombing) so I don't suppose it will hurt anything. But if you were trying to save folks from having to install samba, then there's not much point because even now the -samba module doesn't require samba (just a few encryption libs). You might also consider calling the subpackage "-Smb" since that's what the module itself is called. We don't really have any guidelines for this, so I suppose it's up to you. I don't see any blockers, though. Review: * source files match upstream: b01af05eb1c9714737ea5aba0b409c4dc6e6e62363a36a6c4b0a0d0048b69edb File_Passwd-1.1.6.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear-File-Passwd-1.1.6-1.fc7.noarch.rpm php-pear(File_Passwd) = 1.1.6 php-pear-File-Passwd = 1.1.6-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) php-pear-File-Passwd-samba-1.1.6-1.fc7.noarch.rpm php-pear-File-Passwd-samba = 1.1.6-1.fc7 = php-pear(Crypt_CHAP) >= 1.0.0 php-pear-File-Passwd = 1.1.6-1.fc7 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. /usr/share/pear/File is also owned by php-pear-File but it is not a dependency (and it doesn't need to be). * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, I'll leave it to you to decide whether you really need the subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 17:23:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 13:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061723.l46HNBfc008797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-06 13:23 EST ------- You should include perl(Test::More) as an explicit BR -- I'm not seeing it being pulled in by perl-Test-Pod (on my system at least). Taking care of the rpmlint warnings is trivial in %prep -- sed -i 's/\r//' samples/* -- so this should be taken care of as well. If Test::Pod::Coverage is available on the distros you're building for, its use is strongly encouraged as a matter of form, but I'm not insisting on it for reasons covered several times here and in other places :) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 17:46:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 13:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239234] New: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239234 Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/arp-scan.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/arp-scan-1.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: arp-scan is a command-line tool that uses the ARP protocol to discover and fingerprint IP hosts on the local network -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 17:57:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 13:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061757.l46HvfSM009744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:02:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061802.l46I2fuo009844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-06 14:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > You should include perl(Test::More) as an explicit BR -- I'm not seeing it > being pulled in by perl-Test-Pod (on my system at least). It should; see comment 6 for description of the dep chain. But I don't see it causing any harm and it's directly required, so will add. > Taking care of the rpmlint > warnings is trivial in %prep -- sed -i 's/\r//' samples/* -- so this should be > taken care of as well. The samples are not included, see comment 6 for the rationale. If you can think of where they could be useful when installed, let me know. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP Short Description: Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser Owners: ville.skytta at iki.fi Branches: InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:07:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061807.l46I7QlB009957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-06 14:07 EST ------- Missing BR's on perl(Test::More), perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::Pod), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) [though the last one isn't a blocker]. There's an examples/ directory, why not include it? For the purposes of this review, I've added it to %doc. Add examples/ to %doc and the missing BR's, and I'll approve :) +source files match upstream: 53f611cd26439fa35ce1e84d700d777a Class-Gomor-1.01.tar.gz 53f611cd26439fa35ce1e84d700d777a ../Class-Gomor-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. (noarch) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Class-Gomor-1.01-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Class::Gomor) = 1.01 perl(Class::Gomor::Array) = 1.01 perl(Class::Gomor::Hash) = 1.01 perl-Class-Gomor = 1.01-0.1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Gomor) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=16, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.60 cusr + 0.18 csys = 0.78 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232171] Review Request: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd - Class for managing SAMBA style password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061811.l46IBh3t010042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd - Class for managing SAMBA style password files Alias: pear-File-SMBPasswd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232171 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 14:11 EST ------- As usual, builds cleanly and rpmlint is silent. * source files match upstream: 93b1c58ea0576629c97a6eb6ab45b474191957866503760432721ea21dd7296d File_SMBPasswd-1.0.2.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(File_SMBPasswd) = 1.0.2 php-pear-File-SMBPasswd = 1.0.2-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(Crypt_CHAP) >= 1.0.0 php-pear(PEAR) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. /usr/share/pear/File is also owned by php-pear-File, but it's not a dependency and doesn't need to be. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:12:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211714] Review Request: perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array - C extension speeds perl-POE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061812.l46ICmUm010073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array - C extension speeds perl-POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211714 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 14:12 EST ------- Anything going on here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061814.l46IEfo7010108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 14:14 EST ------- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:16:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061816.l46IGXWS010152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-06 14:16 EST ------- * Subpackages: I think that booldnf and the library should be separated. In general only one should be needed. The library for C/C++ and booldnf to use it as a command, for example from other languages. It also solves a multilib issue. Now for the package names, it could also be: booldnf in boolstuff library in boolstuff-libs Just tell what you prefer. * I can't see what is wrong with /usr/include/boolstuff-0.1/boolstuff/BoolExpr.cpp? * Other issues are fixed in http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/boolstuff-0.1.11-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/boolstuff.spec - update to 0.1.11 - use a directory for in-source docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:19:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061819.l46IJ1eE010187@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-06 14:18 EST ------- Looks good now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:20:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061820.l46IKEFX010254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-06 14:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm thinking that it might not be such a good idea to ship an old beta instead > of a CVS pull. In fact I'm not sure beta3 is even winnable (since you can't > talk to Hawkwind.) I didn't know that. Strange they never did another beta then. I assume the game is fully playable with the CVS version? (or atleast it is as far as you know it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:25:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061825.l46IP781010403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-06 14:24 EST ------- Well: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-gettext-package.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-gettext-package-1.9.0-2.fc7.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------ * Mon May 7 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 1.9.0-2 - Create -doc subpackage For rpmlint: ------------------------------------------------ 1 W: ruby-gettext-package invalid-license Ruby License/LGPL 1 W: ruby-gettext-package-debuginfo invalid-license Ruby License/LGPL 2 E: ruby-gettext-package-doc zero-length /usr/share/doc/ruby-gettext-package-doc-1.9.0/samples/rails/public/favicon.ico 3 W: ruby-gettext-package-doc spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ruby-gettext-package-doc-1.9.0/test/test.sh 1 W: ruby-gettext-package-doc invalid-license Ruby License/LGPL ------------------------------------------------ 1: This type of dual license is very common for ruby related software 2: Well, I am not familiar with "ruby on rails" and I am not sure if I should (can) remove this file or not...... 3: This is okay because this script is actually executable and only /bin/sh dependency is added to -doc subpackage due to this permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:25:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061825.l46IPqZ9010426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-06 14:25 EST ------- Missing BR's on: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) rpmlint complains about tabs/spaces -- this should be an easy fix. Also, for a variety of reasons, this package should own the entire directory chain under %{perl_vendorlib}, e.g., not %{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/SQLite/* but just %{perl_vendorlib}/*. Correct the BR's, pacify rpmlint and correct %files and I'll approve :) + source files match upstream: 7375627800f0ef136eff5ef18c766c64 DBIx-SQLite-Simple-0.34.tar.gz 7375627800f0ef136eff5ef18c766c64 DBIx-SQLite-Simple-0.34.tar.gz.srpm + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. (noarch) + %clean is present. X rpmlint is silent (see below) + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple-0.34-1.fc6.src.rpm W: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) ** perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple-0.34-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(DBIx::SQLite::Simple) = 0.34 perl(DBIx::SQLite::Simple::Table) perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple = 0.34-1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Gomor::Array) perl(DBI) perl(DBIx::SQLite::Simple) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=8, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.50 cusr + 0.14 csys = 0.64 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:26:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061826.l46IQSwr010458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 14:26 EST ------- Anything happening here? David, do you have other packages up for review that we could look at? The issue is that folks need some way to guage your understanding of the packaging guidelines before you are given the power to commit things into Fedora CVS. Anything you can do to make that decision easier is appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:27:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061827.l46IRKvO010492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:29:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061829.l46ITBCk010527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-06 14:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: widelands Short Description: realtime-strategy game Owners: karlikt at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061829.l46ITFUB010551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-Libdnet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 18:31:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 14:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061831.l46IVhxP010629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 14:31 EST ------- I think the main developer got married and ended up without much time. However, there is still occasional development and there is talk of another beta. I used to occasionally follow development of xu4, but I hadn't paid much attention in some time. After seeing this ticket I happened to check their forum and the first thing there is a discussion about the Hawkwind problem. It seems it's commonly reported, and the solution is always to get the last daily snapshot. Unfortunately those are only for Windows and OSX, but they're just pulls from CVS. My understanding is that you can finish the game with the snapshots, but I haven't tried it. Perhaps I will, since it's been so long since I last played U4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 19:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 15:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] New: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/conduit.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/conduit-0.3.0-1.src.rpm Description: Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME which allows the user to take their emails, files, bookmarks, and any other type of personal information and synchronize that data with another computer, an online service, or even another electronic device. Conduit manages the synchronization and conversion of data into other formats. For example, conduit allows you to; * Synchronize your tomboy notes to a file on a remote computer * Synchronize your emails to your mobile phone * Synchronize your bookmarks to delicious, gmail, or even your own webserver * and many more... Any combination you can imagine, Conduit will take care of the conversion and synchronization. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 19:24:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 15:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061924.l46JOfxj011716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |233342 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 19:24:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 15:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061924.l46JOh0A011732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239236 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 19:27:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 15:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061927.l46JRila011815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-06 15:27 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 19:28:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 15:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705061928.l46JS6bZ011837@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 Bug 233342 depends on bug 233340, which changed state. Bug 233340 Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 20:24:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 16:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239193] Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062024.l46KOfNo013487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi BugsThisDependsOn| |239241 Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-06 16:24 EST ------- - Summary could be improved, how about appending " in Perl code" to it? - Rationale for including the t/ dir in docs? Doesn't look useful to me, neither does TODO. - The included cpan.pl example doesn't work (non-blocker, but nice if fixed): $ perl cpan.pl SGML-Parser-OpenSP Required option 'allow' is not provided for CPANPLUS::Backend::search by ANON at cpan.pl line 12 - perl-Pod-Strip's dependencies would be nice to have fixed before importing this, see bug 239241 (no changes needed in this package). Otherwise: $ perl -MModule::ExtractUse -e '' Base class package "Pod::Simple" is empty. (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Pod/Strip.pm line 6 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Pod/Strip.pm line 6. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Module/ExtractUse.pm line 6. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Module/ExtractUse.pm line 6. Compilation failed in require. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 20:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 16:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062050.l46Koc2K014095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-06 16:50 EST ------- Actually, I forget the name off the top of my head, but depending on how roundcube is coded, it may work with the PHP PDO SQLite package, already in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 20:50:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 16:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239193] Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062050.l46Koo4k014121@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Alias: Module-ExtractUse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |Module-ExtractUse ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-06 16:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - Summary could be improved, how about appending " in Perl code" to it? Not a problem. > - Rationale for including the t/ dir in docs? Doesn't look useful to me, > neither does TODO. This was actually discussed a little over at bug 235790. Basically, it boils down to: * tests can make good documentation (sometimes better than the actual docs) * people might actually want to test the package post-installation * it doesn't hurt anything :) > - The included cpan.pl example doesn't work (non-blocker, but nice if fixed): > $ perl cpan.pl SGML-Parser-OpenSP > Required option 'allow' is not provided for CPANPLUS::Backend::search by > ANON at cpan.pl line 12 I'll take a look at this -- so long as I don't have to introduce any new deps it would be nice to have it working :) > - perl-Pod-Strip's dependencies would be nice to have fixed before importing > this, see bug 239241 (no changes needed in this package). Otherwise: > $ perl -MModule::ExtractUse -e '' > Base class package "Pod::Simple" is empty. > (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.) > at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Pod/Strip.pm line 6 > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Pod/Strip.pm line 6. > Compilation failed in require at > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Module/ExtractUse.pm line 6. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Module/ExtractUse.pm line 6. > Compilation failed in require. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted. Ugh, messy. I suppose I could add a requires on perl(Pod::Simple) until it's fixed in perl-Pod-Strip; for the purposes of review at least. It's a beautiful day out here in San Francisco, and I'm being informed that I need to get outside :) I'll post an updated srpm later on... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 21:27:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062127.l46LREJG014912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-06 17:27 EST ------- Updated: SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Class-Gomor.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Class-Gomor-1.01-2.fc7.src.rpm Changes: - Add missing BRs - Add examples dir to %%doc rpmlint is silent here, but it was silent before as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 21:28:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062128.l46LS41m014960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-06 17:28 EST ------- Updated: SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Class-Gomor.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Class-Gomor-1.01-2.fc7.src.rpm Changes: - Add missing BRs - Add examples dir to %%doc rpmlint is silent here, but it was silent before as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 21:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062129.l46LTNVC015012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-06 17:29 EST ------- Bah! Ignore the last message: SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple-0.34-2.fc7.src.rpm Changes: - Add missing BRs - Fix %%files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 21:36:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239193] Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062136.l46LagBq015158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Alias: Module-ExtractUse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 Bug 239193 depends on bug 239241, which changed state. Bug 239241 Summary: perl-Pod-Strip: missing dependency on perl(Pod::Simple) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239241 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 21:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212897] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062150.l46LolTB015427@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data Alias: pear-Structures-DG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-06 17:50 EST ------- This was branched for both EL-4 and EL-5. I only requested an EL-5 branch. Can the EL-4 branch be removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 21:57:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 17:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062157.l46LvY7A015555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-06 17:57 EST ------- It appears this did not get branched correctly, I noticed a typo in the name from the original request, it should be: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array New Branches: EL-5 I apologize if this is what caused the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 22:12:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 18:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239247] New: Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239247 Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jgu.nonlogic.org/emacs-common-ebib.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.nonlogic.org/emacs-common-ebib-1.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: Ebib is a BibTeX database manager that runs in GNU Emacs and XEmacs. With Ebib, you can create and manage .bib-files, all within Emacs. It supports @string and @preamble definitions, multi-line field values, searching, and integration with Emacs' (La)TeX mode. Ebib provides the standard capabilities that one would expect from a BibTeX database manager: .bib files can be opened, modified (adding, deleting, modifying entries), searched, and saved. Obviously, it is also possible to start a new database from scratch. A nice property is the ability to copy single entries to another .bib file: this makes it possible to create a new .bib file from a subset of the entries of an existing database. This can be useful e.g. when you want to create a .bib file for a paper containing only the works cited in that paper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 22:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 18:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194280] Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062246.l46MkC3w016415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194280 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-06 18:46 EST ------- Any news on this package? Trying a build of the version in current (merged) cvs gives me: checking for glib-config... no checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no *** The glib-config script installed by GLIB could not be found *** If GLIB was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in *** your path, or set the GLIB_CONFIG environment variable to the *** full path to glib-config. checking for gtk-config... no checking for GTK - version >= 1.2.6... no *** The gtk-config script installed by GTK could not be found *** If GTK was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in *** your path, or set the GTK_CONFIG environment variable to the *** full path to gtk-config. checking whether to use kmdi lib from kdelibs... yes checking whether to use the knewstuff lib from kdelibs... yes checking for Java... find: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0/bin: No such file or directory checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config find: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0/bin: No such file or directory find: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0/bin: No such file or directory configure: error: libjvm.so not found under . Use --without-java. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.94340 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 22:55:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 18:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212897] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062255.l46MtPtt016600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid - A tabular structure for converting data Alias: pear-Structures-DG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212897 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 22:56:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 18:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212924] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062256.l46MuTTh016667@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-Array - DataSource driver using arrays Alias: pear-DG-Array https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212924 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:01:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215292] Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062301.l46N1r0F016789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cups-pdf - Extension for creating pdf-Files with CUPS Alias: cups-pdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215292 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:05:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208736] Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062305.l46N58E1016904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208736 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-06 19:05 EST ------- Please do not obfuscate addresses here. They are read by a script, so this slows things down considerably. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062306.l46N61Ga016927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-05-06 19:05 EST ------- OK, have put a "best of breeds" (mongrel?) spec file and src.rpm here: SPEC: http://jgu.nonlogic.org/emacs-bbdb.spec SRPM: http://jgu.nonlogic.org/emacs-bbdb-2.35-3.src.rpm See what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:17:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218226] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062317.l46NHTm0017077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query Alias: pear-DG-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218226 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-06 19:17 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212925] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062318.l46NIQWn017105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files Alias: pear-DG-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212925 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-06 19:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:19:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212898] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062319.l46NJNRR017135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager Alias: DG-Renderer-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212898 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-06 19:19 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:38:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062338.l46NcO7n017490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-06 19:38 EST ------- Is this really appropriate for EPEL? Do you intend on maintaining it for 6.5 years? branching only Fedora, if you *really* want it in EPEL do another fedora-cvs request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:45:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062345.l46NjYCa017691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 6 23:55:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705062355.l46NtcSK017878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 00:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 20:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070011.l470BOCV018208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 00:15:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 20:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070015.l470FoxP018287@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 01:32:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 21:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070132.l471WvZA019735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-06 21:32 EST ------- hi I compiled a new update using today's nightly-build as source (bdf file), I used 0.8.1-4 to name this package. Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-bdf.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.1-4.src.rpm using either the pcf version (0.8.1-3) or the bdf version (0.8.1-4) are fine to me, just want to note that the bdf version adds buildrequires to create the pcf files from bdf sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 03:53:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 23:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070353.l473rVRX023140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-06 23:53 EST ------- Let me take a look at a few of these packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 04:24:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070424.l474OPGq023588@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-05-07 00:24 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 04:39:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070439.l474dwQq023856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 00:39 EST ------- Not a very good start, I'm afraid. This one fails to build for me, and in a manner that makes me wonder if you tried to build the package yourself. First off, it should have BuildRequires: openssl-devel in order to bring the openssl headers necessary for compiling. Once that's done, the %files section of the spec is that from a noarch package, but this one is arch-specific. You need to delete the perl_vendorlib bit and replace it with: %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/Crypt/ The explicit dependency on openssl is unnecessary; rpm will automatically find a dependency on libcrypto.so.6, which happens to be satisfied by openssl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 04:43:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165932] Review Request: msmtp - An SMTP Client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070443.l474hmGl023993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - An SMTP Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165932 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |201449 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 00:43 EST ------- And eight months later this package still isn't in. I'm removing FE-ACCEPT and closing this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 04:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166919] Review Request: findlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070445.l474jBiR024071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: findlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166919 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 00:44 EST ------- Indeed, this review seems to be very dead. But now that ocaml is heating back up, perhaps it will be useful for someone. Blocking FE-DEADREVIEW and closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 04:54:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225718] Merge Review: eel2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070454.l474sl3Z024294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eel2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225718 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-07 00:54 EST ------- I'm sorry I almost forgot about this. All issues in comment #1 are now fixed; rpmlint is now silent on the srpm and the binaries (except for the ignorable one), and all packaged files are properly owned. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 04:55:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 00:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070455.l474tfMi024356@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpptasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 00:55 EST ------- It's been several months since the last comment; we have naming guidelines for jpackage stuff now and changes in a few other guidelines. Perhaps this review could move forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 05:01:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070501.l4751QZB024519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 01:01 EST ------- Any progress on this package? It's been nearly six months since the last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 05:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070511.l475BT9X024809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-07 01:11 EST ------- It's currently waiting on some fixes going into openmpi package to avoid file conflicts. I had a private discussion about the conflict and this review with the openmpi maintainer about a month ago, and he assured me he's working on a better solution than what I proposed then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 05:12:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177507] Review Request: pida In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070512.l475CRGD024846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 01:12 EST ------- It's been a really long time since anything happened with this ticket; what's up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 05:21:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070521.l475LwpP025222@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 01:21 EST ------- Cool; thanks for the update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 05:31:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070531.l475VTQI025634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 01:31 EST ------- Seems like an interesting package; I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 06:00:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 02:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070600.l4760M2Q026451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 02:00 EST ------- Not much to say here; a clean package which builds and runs fine. rpmlint has nothing to say. The only thing I can really say is that you're supposed to choose one of the defines at the top of the spec (in this case, the "sitelib" one) and then delete the other line and the comment. This isn't a big deal. It would be nice if upstream would consider including the license text. Right now the installed package contains nothing which actually indicates the licence; only the PKG-INFO and setyp.py files in the tarball have it. Perhaps you could ping them about it. * source files match upstream: 7c31ccd75cb9932150f699975f11f7750c13f8b6593db9c41b293d4408ce8474 halberd-0.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: halberd = 0.2.1-1.fc7 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; not possible to run tests without network access. Manual testing reveals no issues. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 06:06:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 02:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070606.l4766U7k026620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-07 02:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Please note that this is not roundcube or php support forum. Well, perhaps if I had written "roundcubemail RPM" claims to support sqlite... you'd have gotten what I meant. This is a package review. If the package has information that indicates that you can use sqlite and you in fact can not, then that will lead to a poor user experience (and many bug reports). And it is things like this, among many others, that I'm checking for. (In reply to comment #25) > Actually, I forget the name off the top of my head, but depending on how > roundcube is coded, it may work with the PHP PDO SQLite package, already in fedora. You may be right (PHP is definately not my expertise). However, everything that I've been able to read about the PDO sqlite extension implies that it's not a drop in replacement. Unless someone can show that it works with roundcubemail, I think we are going to have to assume that it does not. This is too bad, because it would be nice to have sqlite as the default out of the box experience. This would allow you to install the package and have it immediately work against an existing imap server without messing around with configuration files and setting up a mysql/pgsql database, which is quite a pain for this simple of an application. Unless it can be shown to work with sqlite, I think we should remove the example line in db.inc.php. There's no point in giving it as an example if it simply won't work. This also warrants a README.fedora file in %doc to explain database support available, lack of sqlite support, and basic instructions for settings up (or pointing to included docs - maybe the INSTALL file?) database support. Here are some things that I've noticed so far that need corrected: 1) /usr/share/roundcubemail/{CHANGELOG,INSTALL,LICENSE,README,UPGRADING} should be removed. 2) Rather than creating symlinks from /usr/share/roundcubemail to other directories, I think it would be more clear to edit the main.inc.php with the real paths. The indirection of symbolic links don't buy you anything. in %prep, for example: sed -i 's|temp/|/tmp/|' main.inc.php and again for log dir, and config (in program/include/main.inc) 3) I'm still looking into the security implications of having a static des_key. This might be a candidate for automatic generation in %post. 4) move SQL to %doc 5) /var/log/roundcubemail should have %attr(0775,root,apache), currently it is unwritable by apache process 6) Package should require httpd 7) Install *.dist files as regular config files, we know they have to be changed anyway at this point, and the error that roundcubemail reports with them installed or not installed is the same. 8) /etc/roundcubemail/* should be mode 640 (contain sensitive information) 9) would appreciate lines between changelog entries as it's easier to read :) 10) What's up with the versioning? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a 11) Need to investigate selinux policy for package. More to come later. You can rebuild the rpm with these changes or we can discuss anything here that you think is not appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 06:07:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 02:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070607.l4767kIX026670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-05-07 02:07 EST ------- Argh. So the upgrade to debian 4.0 on my server didn't go so well, among other things but I'm back in business again for now. http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/secondlife-1.15.0.2-1.src.rpm http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/secondlife.spec * Thu Apr 26 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.15.0.2-1 - New upstream. - Non-redistributable fonts are no longer included, substitute DejaVu LGC for now. Upstream pulled the fonts from the source tarball, so that's no longer a problem. I've patched it to use DejaVu Sans Condensed which matches the original font fairly well. The metrics on the mono font are still kind of off, but you really only see this if you use the debug panels. (ctrl-shift-[1-4]) Unfortunately its hardwired to require DejaVu LGC, full DejaVu would be better, for full unicode support but I figure LGC exists for a reason. I don't know if we should force everyone to install full DejaVu. We could set a fallback to full DejaVu if installed. This is all hacky, in the long run it would be nice if we could patch it to use fontconfig and/or pango or something... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 06:42:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 02:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070642.l476gi2R027592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-05-07 02:42 EST ------- Yeah I noticed spot fixed that in his package but I was getting confused as to why I wasn't hitting it and backburnered it in favor of other bugs. :) I'll fix this in the next round of compiles... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 07:59:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 03:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070759.l477xMBo031082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 tokul at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|tokul at users.sourceforge.net | ------- Additional Comments From tokul at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-07 03:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #24) > > Please note that this is not roundcube or php support forum. > > Well, perhaps if I had written "roundcubemail RPM" claims to support sqlite... > you'd have gotten what I meant. This is a package review. If the package has > information that indicates that you can use sqlite and you in fact can not, then > that will lead to a poor user experience (and many bug reports). And it is > things like this, among many others, that I'm checking for. Roundcube rpm does not claim that you can use sqlite. Upstream documentation does. rpm says "RoundCube Webmail is written in PHP and requires the MySQL database." If packager starts fixing upstream documentation without cooperation with upstream, he or she will have issues with package updates. RoundCube should work with mysql, mysqli, postgresql and sqlite, if your PHP install has required database functions. If developer removes remaining database specific function calls and turns on DB/MDB2 portability options, interface will work with all databases supported by Pear DB/MDB2. Pear DB/MDB2 libraries don't support PDO. If you want SQLite support without changes in Fedora's PHP packages, write PDO backend for roundcube. Your question does look like support question, because you haven't bothered to do basic PHP tests (see http://www.php.net/phpinfo) and ask on bugzilla how to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 09:36:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 05:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070936.l479a114007944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cbalint at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-05-07 05:35 EST ------- 7 day holiday. today i try repush. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 09:39:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 05:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070939.l479dk9u008168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-07 05:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394-1.2.1-2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras Iv'e made something quite stupid with the examples package. I hope this is less... Now it provides real examples binaries... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 09:40:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 05:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070940.l479eHhA008241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-07 05:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: halberd Short Description: Tool to discover HTTP load balancers Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 09:40:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 05:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705070940.l479ekQZ008290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 10:22:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 06:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071022.l47AMUF9009740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net | ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-07 06:22 EST ------- You should make sure there are no patent issues (IIRC there are). Check the mpeg-la patent portfolio and the upstream mailing lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 10:41:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 06:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071041.l47Afl1N010272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-07 06:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I might either have a different specfile for the devel tree or I'd use > conditionals like "%{fedora}" < "7" or something similar. > I haven't decided yet, but I guess I'll go with the former. This will actually be the best way for the review. (In reply to comment #14) > Package uses obsolete networking functions. Please update it to use the current > networking API. > > See the 'Example Server Code' section at > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/userapi-ipv6.html > Quite important in todays 'IPv6' Fedora, I've actually discussed this issue with David and I think it is something that should be concerntrated on. I've noticed that upstream have neither said yay or nay regarding IPv6, so it might be an idea to create a patch for this, and send upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 11:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071107.l47B7irK011055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 07:07 EST ------- Issues : 1. The file permissions in the srpm aren't an issue as long as proper permissions are set at prep/build/install time. IMHO this is an annoying rpmlint false positive check. 2. This is the first time I read about a requirement on "initscripts" :-/ (*) 3. Good catch. Fixed. 4. Source0 updated. 5. Good catch. Fixed. Buildroot : I prefer this one. Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/autodir/autodir.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/autodir/autodir-0.99.9-2.src.rpm * Mon May 7 2007 Matthias Saou 0.99.9-2 - Add missing scriplets requirements. - Update sf.net source URL. - Switch away from %%makeinstall. (*) I don't think this should be required, as it is a basic component of the system, assumed to be available at runtime. Install and remove time is a different matter, since we really do require bits of initscripts (chkconfig, service) to have the package properly installed and erased, especially for build chroots. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 11:11:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071111.l47BBmGn011179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 07:11 EST ------- Patents? Argh. FE-LEGAL? I just wanted this package to go into Fedora in order to be able to build VLC with direct DV camera streaming capabilities enabled. I don't really care if it's version 1.x or 2.x as long as it works, nor who maintains the package. Also, I proposed version 2.x since the home page states that it's the recommended version... which apparently isn't really the case, for binary packages at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 11:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071120.l47BKt7r011473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 07:20 EST ------- I've just sent an email to Andreas Kloeckner, the author, asking for license clarification, and if possible, to release a new version which would include the full exact BSD license the code is released under. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 11:21:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071121.l47BLj7E011518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 07:21 EST ------- Any results so far? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 11:23:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071123.l47BN9hx011627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 07:23 EST ------- Please note that the two patches I include have now been included upstream for the next Elisa release (the desktop files one in a better form, since a check still makes sense). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 11:58:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 07:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] New: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2-0.15-0.20070506.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: libssh2 is a library implementing the SSH2 protocol as defined by Internet Drafts: SECSH-TRANS(22), SECSH-USERAUTH(25), SECSH-CONNECTION(23), SECSH-ARCH(20), SECSH-FILEXFER(06)*, SECSH-DHGEX(04), and SECSH-NUMBERS(10). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 12:02:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239280] New: Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239280 Summary: Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/medusa-1.3-1.fc7.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/medusa.spec Description: Medusa is intended to be a speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer. The goal is to support as many services which allow remote authentication as possible. ncpfs module only builds on F7 and beyond, apr module doesn't work with apr1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 12:03:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239280] Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071203.l47C366X013773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239280 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 12:03:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071203.l47C36i9013781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239280 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 12:04:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071204.l47C49J7013847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libssh2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 12:31:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239282] New: Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239282 Summary: Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Christian.Iseli at licr.org QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.licr.org/pub/seaview.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.licr.org/pub/seaview-0.20070417-0.src.rpm Description: SeaView is a graphical multiple sequence alignment editor developed by Manolo Gouy. SeaView is able to read and write various alignment formats (NEXUS, MSF, CLUSTAL, FASTA, PHYLIP, MASE). It allows to manually edit the alignment, and also to run DOT-PLOT or CLUSTALW/MUSCLE programs to locally improve the alignment. Another bioinformatics tool. The code is under the GPL, though the author didn't include the GPL license itself in the source tarball (the source files are clearly marked though). Another minor annoyance is that there is no version info anywhere... so I used the date, which is what the OA seems to do as well. The code can optionnaly make use of the PDF-libs, but since this apparently can't go in Fedora, this package compiles using the PostScript output. Compiles in mock, has a clean rpmlint output, and WorksForMe(tm) :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 12:48:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071248.l47Cm6L9015415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 08:47 EST ------- It does for me as well. :) More to come. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 13:25:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 09:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071325.l47DPFbK018784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 09:25 EST ------- Fixed Source0. The symlink to the config is the result of the review for limph, which I also wrote, which uses the same sort or structure. This was suggested by the reviewer. Added tiquit-README.fedora. Is it OK if this is in /usr/share/doc, and not /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}? %doc won't take %SOURCE macros and this is the best solution I could find. Fixed the PHP Requires. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/tiquit/tiquit.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/tiquit/tiquit-2.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 13:41:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 09:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071341.l47DfcHW019624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 09:41 EST ------- Upon further investigation, it looks like RC only supports the SQLite2-supporting native PHP5 extension, not the SQLite3-supporting PDO extension provided by php-pdo. I'll add something to included documentation indicating a lack of SQLite support in Fedora, as well as the other issues, soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 13:44:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 09:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071344.l47Di7sV019780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-07 09:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Added tiquit-README.fedora. Is it OK if this is in /usr/share/doc, and not > /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}? No. > %doc won't take %SOURCE macros and this is > the best solution I could find. If you copy it into the the builddir, %doc will work. Normally, a cp %{SOURCE} . somewhere in %prep will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 13:57:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 09:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071357.l47DvaWJ020335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 09:57 EST ------- Addressed 1,4,5,6,7,8,9. Will look at 2. Will wait for advice on 3 and 11. 10. The versioning is admittedly odd. Shall I change to the linked format, 0.xyz? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:12:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] New: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libgii.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libgii-1.0.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Input library for GGI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:13:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071413.l47EDvjL021470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-07 10:13 EST ------- Yep, OK - Mock Build on FC-Devel (noarch package OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines ? - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License is MIT OK - License text is present in the package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 0cc1e8dbcb0d30a7cdce0bf64cb7b4ff Coherence-0.1.0.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - No Scriplets is required for this package. OK - %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - rpmlint is silent on both SRPM and RPM files. ------ Just one comment: Base package name is Coherence ( with an uppercase letter ) and your pre-built package name start with an lowercase letter. It doesn't match the packaging naming guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:23:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071423.l47ENHrO022201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-07 10:23 EST ------- Both could go in, as long as they don't conflict. I'll take care of this one, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:24:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071424.l47EOal2022369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-07 10:24 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:26:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071426.l47EQr0c022593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-07 10:26 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071431.l47EVWf7022953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 dcantrell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-05-07 10:31 EST ------- New release that to fix up remaining review issues: http://www.boston.burdell.org/repoman/RPMS/source/repoman-0.9-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.boston.burdell.org/repoman/RPMS/source/repoman.spec The RFEs posted here are all great ideas. I'd rather not post there here since this bug is just for the review though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:41:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071441.l47Ef9Fv023529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 10:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/Coherence/Coherence.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/Coherence/Coherence-0.2.1-2.src.rpm * Mon May 7 2007 Matthias Saou 0.2.1-2 - Rename coherence -> Coherence to match upstream and our naming guidelines. - Obsolete coherence < 0.2.1-2 but don't provide it since elisa's requirement has been updated to match the name change and nothing else requires it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:42:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071442.l47Eg50B023602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 10:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.6-2.src.rpm * Mon May 7 2007 Matthias Saou 0.1.6-2 - Change coherence requirement to Coherence to match package name change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 14:45:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071445.l47EjjTF023945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 10:45 EST ------- Well, currently they do conflict, and the first thing to do would be to check what Axel mentioned about possible patent issues... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 15:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071507.l47F7eo8025469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 11:07 EST ------- Fixed. Thanks. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/tiquit/tiquit.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/tiquit/tiquit-2.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 15:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071509.l47F9Ms1025619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-07 11:09 EST ------- Well i've tryed to check what Axel said about mpeg-la patent. I was searching into upstream ml but i didn't manage to do ... (webserver propose me to download the php search result file... i'll give a try later...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 15:47:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 11:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071547.l47Flxrl028192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-07 11:47 EST ------- Just for note: Rebuild for FC-6/5 is done. Rebuild for devel is currently stopped due to koji side problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 16:13:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 12:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071613.l47GDIGl029653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 16:38:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 12:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071638.l47Gc8H9031202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-07 12:38 EST ------- Update: New spec/SRPM location: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/remind/remind-03.00.24-2.src.rpm http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/remind/remind.spec I have decided to not build a -www subpackage at this point. I did include the www/ subdirectory as part of the documentation should individuals wish to make use of it. This version contains no official artwork as I have yet to receive feedback from the mailing list. I have also contacted the author directly. I think this could be added later if artwork is made available or is created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 16:42:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 12:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071642.l47GgQ99031664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-07 12:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > * Subpackages: > Now for the package names, it could also be: > > booldnf in boolstuff > library in boolstuff-libs > > Just tell what you prefer. I won't disagree with your naming for this package. > * I can't see what is wrong with > /usr/include/boolstuff-0.1/boolstuff/BoolExpr.cpp? I asked just because I don't usually see files named "*.cpp" as header files.. But it seems okay for this package. > * Other issues are fixed in > boolstuff-0.1.11-1.fc7.src.rpm Okay!! -------------------------------------------------- This package (boolstuff) is accepted by me -------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #4) > About the review of the ruby packages, I am sorry, I don't know > anything about ruby, I wouldn't make a good review ;-(. But tell > me if you have other reviews. Well, now 3 ruby modules packages are under review by Chitlesh GOORAH. I am still waiting for the following 3 packages: bug 237382 (alexandria) - blocked by bug 237380 (perhaps this will soon be accepted). While alexandira is a GNOME "application", it heavily depends on ruby... bug 233424 (perl-mecab) and bug 233425 (mecab-java) .. perl/java binding for MeCab. these don't depend on ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 16:47:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 12:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071647.l47GlnwB032067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-07 12:47 EST ------- + OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. ---- APROVED ---- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 16:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 12:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071650.l47GofEQ032189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(florin at andrei.myip | |.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:06:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071706.l47H6UoK000564@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-07 13:06 EST ------- Redundant Require: python-twisted-core is required by Coherence package which is required by elisa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:11:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071711.l47HBDB1000929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 13:11 EST ------- rpmlint clean. Meets Package naming guidlines. Good spec name. Meets Packaging guidelines. License OK. Spec is legible American English. Source matches md5. Compiles on FC6/i386. Mock, also. BRs are OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:21:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071721.l47HLLvM001885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-07 13:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Redundant Require: > > python-twisted-core is required by Coherence package which is required by elisa. I wouldn't consider this a redundant require, since Coherence requires twisted, but so does Elisa directly. If some day Coherence no longer requires it, or if Elisa no longer requires Coherence, I want the requirement from within Elisa to still be there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:21:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071721.l47HLawl001920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-07 13:21 EST ------- Good: + Namings seems ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream. Bad: - Mock build fails for berusky-1.1. aking all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/berusky-1.1/src' if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT 2d_graph.o -MD -MP -MF ". deps/2d_graph.Tpo" -c -o 2d_graph.o 2d_graph.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/2d_graph.Tpo" ".deps/2d_graph.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/2d_graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT animation.o -MD -MP -MF " .deps/animation.Tpo" -c -o animation.o animation.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/animation.Tpo" ".deps/animation.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/animation.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT berusky.o -MD -MP -MF ".d eps/berusky.Tpo" -c -o berusky.o berusky.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/berusky.Tpo" ".deps/berusky.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/berusky.Tpo"; exit 1; fi berusky.cpp:33:20: error: curses.h: No such file or directory if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wall -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT berusky_gui.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/berusky_gui.Tpo" -c -o berusky_gui.o berusky_gui.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/berusky_gui.Tpo" ".deps/berusky_gui.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/berusky_gui.Tpo"; exit 1; fi make[2]: *** [berusky.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/berusky-1.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/berusky-1.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 I assume, that you have to add ncurses-devel at an BR. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:22:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239336] New: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239336 Summary: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/thunderbird-enigmail.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/thunderbird-enigmail-0.95.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/thunderbird-enigmail-buid.log.gz Description: Enigmail is an extension to the mail client Mozilla Thunderbird which allows users to access the authentication and encryption features provided by GnuPG ---------- This specfile is mainly the thunderbird one with only enigmail stuff added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071732.l47HW65d002672@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 13:31 EST ------- No ldconfig necessary. Not relocatable. Creates no directories. No dupes, good permissions. Clean present and correct. Macros make sense. Code, not content. No large docs. Nothing in doc required at runtime. (Should the html files be in doc?) No headers or static libraries. No pkgconfig. No suffixed .so files. No -devel, or .la files. Not a GUI app. No ownership conflicts. install starts with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Filenames UTF8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:34:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071734.l47HYQdl002825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 13:34 EST ------- All MUSTs complete. All applicable SHOULDS that I can test are OK. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:44:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071744.l47Hi1tV003729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-07 13:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Roundcube rpm does not claim that you can use sqlite. Upstream documentation > does. rpm says "RoundCube Webmail is written in PHP and requires the MySQL > database." If packager starts fixing upstream documentation without cooperation > with upstream, he or she will have issues with package updates. Well, if it says it works with X but doesn't on Fedora that has to be fixed (doc fixes or code fixes). The following files say that it works with sqlite: CHANGELOG INSTALL db.inc.php These are some of the first files you're going to look at if you start setting it up. Therefore, my question was valid, because it does not work on fedora as advertised. > "RoundCube Webmail is written in PHP and requires the MySQL > database." Which is incorrect as well. > write PDO backend for roundcube. Note that no one here is a roundcube developer, but Fedora packagers. If Jon wants to write this, that would be great, but it's not required of him. > Your question does look like support question, because you haven't bothered to > do basic PHP tests (see http://www.php.net/phpinfo) and ask on bugzilla how to > do that. As a reviewer I can ask any question I want regarding the functionality of the package. I'm not reviewing php, I'm reviewing roundcubemail, so if it doesn't work as advertised, then I will ask why. (In reply to comment #28) > Upon further investigation, it looks like RC only supports the > SQLite2-supporting native PHP5 extension, not the SQLite3-supporting PDO > extension provided by php-pdo. I'm assuming that this functionality will not be available for the full release? (In reply to comment #29) > 10. The versioning is admittedly odd. Shall I change to the linked format, 0.xyz? Yes. roundcubemail-0.1-0.1.beta2.2.src.rpm ^ |--- increment this for releases When 0.1 is released, then the version-release becomes roundcubemail-0.1-1.src.rpm (increment the 0, drop the rest) What are your plans regarding packaging the language files? http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=139281&package_id=180282 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 17:58:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071758.l47Hw4h1004603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-07 13:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pygoocanvas Short Description: GooCanvas python bindings Owners: bjohnson at symetrix.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 18:07:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071807.l47I7vhm005804@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 14:07 EST ------- WRT SQLite support, I think editing the 3 relevant files and omitting mention of SQLite support is the sanest method of handling this. If you want, I can file a bug against PHP asking that SQLite2 functionality be compiled in and then split out in the a seperate package (a la mbstring or mysql). And, FWIW, I did verify all this using phpinfo(). :) I'll change the versioning. What part of that goes in the version tag and what in release? I've been playing with the sed scripts for log/config/tmp paths, and aside from breaking the app, it re-introduces several rpmlint errors. As for the language packs, I'm not sure how we handle that. Would they require seperate reviews, or could I combine with this SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 18:17:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071817.l47IH6mv006755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 14:17 EST ------- The symlink itself is fine; I was only commenting on the doubled slash in the target which is caused because %{_sysconfdir} includes a leading slash and you include one yourself, so two end up in the symlink. It's not a big deal; I guess it would be a problem if we ever got some sort of double-slash magic that some systems have. Fix it if you like. Anyway, the only real issues (no PHP interpreter in the dependency chain and lack of Fedora-specific setup documentation) has been fixed, so I'd say everything's good to go. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 18:17:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071817.l47IHVJg006785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-07 14:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > WRT SQLite support, I think editing the 3 relevant files and omitting mention of > SQLite support is the sanest method of handling this. Actually, just the README.fedora inclusion and then edit out the sqlite example ref in db.inc.php should be sufficient. > I'll change the versioning. What part of that goes in the version tag and what > in release? Version 0.1 Release 0.1.beta2.2 > I've been playing with the sed scripts for log/config/tmp paths, and aside from > breaking the app, it re-introduces several rpmlint errors. What are those? > As for the language packs, I'm not sure how we handle that. Would they require > seperate reviews, or could I combine with this SRPM? Depends on if you are going to include them as sourceX lines here and have a single package for review or submit them separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 18:30:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071830.l47IUgXH008439@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-07 14:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tiquit Short Description: A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 18:33:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071833.l47IXGMu008537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-07 14:33 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: goocanvas Sorry, FC-5 has some bugs in the BRs that make this package very hard to build. Given the limited life of FC-5 at this time, I will not be supporting it. Please remove FC-5 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 18:34:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071834.l47IYl13008609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mikeb at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mikeb at redhat.com 2007-05-07 14:34 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-krbV New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 FC-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 18:48:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071848.l47ImDVe010149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-07 14:48 EST ------- okay, The package python-tag (bug #228303) need to be accepted and imported first before approved this one. as it's a Require of elisa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 19:02:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071902.l47J27eu011075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-07 15:02 EST ------- As this is primarily (AFAIU) a framework/library package, shouldn't it be called python-Coherence? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 19:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071909.l47J9ukN012216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-07 15:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Actually, just the README.fedora inclusion and then edit out the sqlite example > ref in db.inc.php should be sufficient. I would just do this in %prep: sed -i '/sqlite/d' config/db.inc.php.dist Then add the README.fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 19:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225962] Merge Review: kde-i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071910.l47JAolB012300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kde-i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225962 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 19:11:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225966] Merge Review: kdesdk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071911.l47JB5u1012327@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdesdk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225966 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 19:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225968] Merge Review: kdewebdev In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071911.l47JBhnB012365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kdewebdev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225968 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 19:20:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239185] Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071920.l47JKceS013183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-07 15:20 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [ ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package : 4041d8f6b592fa310b8d3c79c56a2d3263dba82f [-] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:devel/x86_64 and devel/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64 and devel/i386 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x] File based requires are sane. === Issues === None ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 19:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071944.l47JiPQn016203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-07 15:44 EST ------- Colin, I'm willing to be your sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 19:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705071949.l47Jn2Lc017124@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mclasen at redhat.com |bdpepple at ameritech.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 20:15:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 16:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072015.l47KFFDb019335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-07 16:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Issues : > 1. The file permissions in the srpm aren't an issue as long as proper > permissions are set at prep/build/install time. IMHO this is an annoying rpmlint > false positive check. Well, not a false positive, because it is accurate. Annoying, yes, if you want to have executables. There are a few reasons to want 0644 on these files: 1) you might not be the maintainer for this some time in the future and someone else might wonder why you are shipping them +x even though rpmlint is complaining 2) there really is no reason to have them +x in this package since the %prep or %build section does not run them directly. > 2. This is the first time I read about a requirement on "initscripts" :-/ (*) I asked in #fedora-devel to make sure and was told that initscripts can not be implied to be installed on the system. > Buildroot : I prefer this one. OK with me then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 20:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 16:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072020.l47KKip7019724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-05-07 16:20 EST ------- Oh. I assumed f7 was going to include the newer version of rpm (your comment #10), but it looks like we're at 4.4.2. Anyway, built for f7, I'll send a request to rel-eng folks that it be included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 21:07:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072107.l47L7EPo023397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-07 17:07 EST ------- MD5Sums: 966b23b717fad5c6d3efaac199b64b93 hippo-canvas-0.2.17.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * No deprecated fields used * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Package rebuilds as non-root user * rpmlint only produces the following warnings that are fine: W: hippo-canvas-devel no-documentation W: hippo-canvas-python no-documentation +1 APPROVED & I'll sponsor you if no one else has yet. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-0dbf12f9c493a3f20fae545bb9c1396cb0a88053 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 21:35:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072135.l47LZBBE024745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-07 17:35 EST ------- Awesome Brian, thanks for the review. As I understand the process the next step is to make an account, which I have done. My username is 'walters'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 21:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072151.l47LpXx5025376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-05-07 17:51 EST ------- Thanks Ruben. I've applied your suggestions, including going with threads in the default build. New SRPM is at http://www.inuus.com/memcached-1.2.2-2.src.rpm updated spec is in the location specified above or in http://code.sixapart.com/svn/memcached/trunk/server/memcached.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 21:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] New: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Sys-Syscall.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Sys-Syscall-0.22-1.src.rpm Description: Use epoll, sendfile, from Perl. Mostly Linux-only support now, but more syscalls/OSes planned for future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 21:59:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 17:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072159.l47LxAF2025674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-07 17:58 EST ------- Colin, I've approved you for the cvsextras group, which should leave your at step 6 of here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b If you run into any problems, drop me a line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 22:21:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 18:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072221.l47ML7B4027028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 18:21 EST ------- I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 23:29:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 19:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230164] Review Request: rt71w-firmware - Firmware for RT71 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072329.l47NT4UX029089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt71w-firmware - Firmware for RT71 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 23:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 19:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072331.l47NVqgm029302@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-07 19:31 EST ------- There is a need to check the current status of a patent possibly inside libdc1394 Quote of Axel ...But I just checked the svn and the patents are even named in the source by their U.S. patent numbers, so it looks rather patent-encumbered to my non-lawyer eyes (unless the patents are ancient and expired - I didn't go as far as to check that, OTOH MPEG-LA claims to have a portfolio of active patents on 1394). ---/Quote -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 23:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 19:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072343.l47NhEhx029780@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-07 19:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Quote of Axel ...But I > just checked the svn and the patents are even named in the source by > their U.S. patent numbers, [...] Don't consider Axel authoritative in any way, he's not a lawyer or any close substitute. Just check out the code and make up your own mind, soureforge has a code searching facility, entering patent in there you get: http://sourceforge.krugle.com/kse/files?query=patent&project=%221394-based%20DC%20Control%20Library%22 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 7 23:53:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 19:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705072353.l47Nrftv030042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing Alias: perl-libwhisker2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-libwhisker2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 01:32:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080132.l481WhPa004273@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Sys-Syscall Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 01:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080138.l481cuaU004638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-07 21:38 EST ------- Changelog entry is a touch weird -- you should add your email addy, even if it's in format. Missing BR on perl(Test::More). Correct the above two and I'll approve :) + source files match upstream: a29b1ddd6fea9f7e11f0f82534d4204c Sys-Syscall-0.22.tar.gz a29b1ddd6fea9f7e11f0f82534d4204c ../Sys-Syscall-0.22.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. (noarch) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Sys-Syscall-0.22-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Sys::Syscall) = 0.22 perl-Sys-Syscall = 0.22-1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Config) perl(Exporter) perl(POSIX) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=23, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.21 cusr + 0.09 csys = 0.30 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 02:00:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080200.l4820UDq005963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|perl-libwhisker2 | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-07 22:00 EST ------- Looks clean, but there are a couple of problems: W: perl-libwhisker2 unversioned-explicit-obsoletes perl-libwhisker W: perl-libwhisker2 unversioned-explicit-provides perl-libwhisker When you obsolete a package in this manner, you need to use versioned provides and obsoletes. The simplest thing is to obsolete <= the current perl-libwhisker version, and provide current version+epsilon. libwhisker2-2.4-lw1bridge.patch basically adds a GPL license statement onto a file. While I agree that it's best if each source file contains the (abbreviated) license statement, this is generally something that upstream should be doing instead of package maintainers. There's a test suite, and it actually works fine, but because it uses fixed ports it's not really suitable for running within the buildsys. Stick this in a %check section to run it: cd t perl ./test.pl Still, it would need to be commented out in the spec or made conditional on a flag so the buildsys wouldn't break. There's a typo in the Source0: line; "wiretripnet" should be "wiretrip.net". I'm not sure why you have those BuildRequires:; the package seems identical without them. What you may need is some Requires: instead, because the built package doesn't end up with any. Oddly, though, the test suite still passes. * source files match upstream: 5d136f6de318e140a03f76a50392628ed7d00fbee297579ae29b81466f8c8e00 libwhisker2-2.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. ? BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has complaints about unversioned provides and obsoletes. ? the dependencies seem a bit light: perl(LW) perl(LW2) perl-libwhisker perl-libwhisker2 = 2.4-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(LW2) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is not present. There is a test suite, but it's not appropriate for running inside the buildsys. All tests pass when run manually. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 02:04:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239193] Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080204.l4824Qqi006340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Alias: Module-ExtractUse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-07 22:04 EST ------- * Mon May 07 2007 Chris Weyl 0.19-2 - enhanced %%summary - fix examples/cpan.pl SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.19-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 02:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pelliott at io.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/fc6/SRPMS/peless.spec.fc6 SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/fc6/SRPMS/peless-1.100-0.070507.src.rpm Description: Peless is a simple text file lister. It only displays files and never modifies them. It can display multiple files using a tabbed notebook, display international characters, and search the files for regular expressions or literal expressions. Users can choose the fonts used to display files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 02:54:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 22:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080254.l482sV7H010591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-07 22:54 EST ------- I'll take a look later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 03:04:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 23:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080304.l4834LVg011497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-07 23:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'll take a look later tonight. On second thoughts, you don't seem to be in FAS, so you'll need a sponsor (I'm not one), but here are a few notes: URL is meant to be the URL to upstream Source0: Should be a FQDN (i.e. http://www.foo.com/path/to/bar.tar.gz) Group: is incorrect, (check GROUPS in /usr/src/doc/rpm-%{ver} for valid groups) The BR doesn't seem to follow guidelines We don't use the Vendor tag anymore Ditto for Distribution and Prefix Summary is too simplistic _prefix, _sharedir etc are already defined as RPM macros. PLEASE read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join fully up to about Build System tools. If you want an example of a spec file that recently passed review check out: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/windowlab.spec http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-SDL.spec or have a look around the fedora CVS where there are plenty of well maintained SPEC files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 04:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 00:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080404.l4844hWS017151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-08 00:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > 11) Need to investigate selinux policy for package. I did just about everything I could with my setup and the only avc that I managed to generate was: audit(1178594537.211:25): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=31565 comm="httpd" dest=143 scontext=user_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:pop_port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket Not sure why it says pop_port_t when I'm using imap but it will need to cover ports 25, 143, 389, 465, 587, 993. Please open a bug on selinux-policy-targeted as a blocker for this bug. Ask for a policy update to fix this avc. Reference this bug and comment. CC me please. Also note that if you support sqlite at some point, it's likely that you're going to have to have more changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 04:16:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 00:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080416.l484GBUR018604@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-08 00:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > 3) I'm still looking into the security implications of having a static des_key. > This might be a candidate for automatic generation in %post. I hate putting complicated things in %post, but you should be able to do something like this: function makedesstr ( chars=(0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z ! @ \# $ % ^ \&) max=${#chars[*]} for i in `seq 1 24` do let rand=${RANDOM}%${max} str="${str}${chars[$rand]}" done echo $str ) sed -i "s/rcmail-\!24ByteDESkey\*Str/`makedesstr`/" /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php || : &> /dev/null -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 04:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 00:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080435.l484ZqAB021183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 04:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 00:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239282] Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080453.l484r70s022431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239282 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-08 00:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.licr.org/pub/seaview-0.20070417-0.src.rpm I can't find anything in the packaging guidelines that specifically address "no version", so I could be wrong when I say this... To me it seems pointless to prefix the date with a 0. in this case. You will never have a number low enough that upstream can't trump you and release something like 0.01 which would be < EVR than yours. I would think this would be the perfect case for an epoch if upstream gets a clue and versions the package at a later date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 05:01:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239199] Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080501.l4851ILr022870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Alias: perl-Archive-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239199 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 05:41:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080541.l485fBDl025437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-08 01:40 EST ------- The package from comment #6 seems to have all blockers I can see fixed. So, this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request once it's been imported and built. It looks like you added the RFE's from here to the TODO file, which is a fine place for them. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 05:44:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080544.l485i6a8025546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bjohnson at symetrix.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 05:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 01:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080545.l485jLCv025606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Net-Pcap Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 06:11:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080611.l486BrRC026413@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-08 02:11 EST ------- License tag is generally written as "GPL or Artistic", by convention. Missing br's on: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) As many of the tests skip themselves ("must be run as root"), I'd recommend adding t/ to %doc. (If you do this, rpmlint will generate an ignorable "perl-Net-Pcap doc-file-dependency perl(Socket)" warning.) All tests pass, but: t/10-fileno.........ok 1/21 unexpectedly succeeded Why is this test not failing, as it should? Is this a real problem or did upstream just forget to remove the "TODO" designation to this test? This package needs to own %{perl_vendorarch}/Net. %{perl_vendorarch}/Net/* in %files should just be %{perl_vendorarch}/Net. So, at the very least, we need to add the br's, figure out why that test isn't failing, change license to "GPL or Artistic", and correct %files. + source files match upstream: 80a4b62911cded1a011b897f735d445e Net-Pcap-0.14.tar.gz 80a4b62911cded1a011b897f735d445e ../Net-Pcap-0.14.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. O license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + latest GA version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Net-Pcap-0.14-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Pcap.so()(64bit) perl(Net::Pcap) = 0.14 perl-Net-Pcap = 0.14-1.fc6 == requires /usr/bin/perl libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpcap.so.0.9.4()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::Interface) perl(IO::Socket) perl(Net::Pcap) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(strict) rtld(GNU_HASH) ** perl-Net-Pcap-debuginfo-0.14-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Pcap.so.debug()(64bit) perl-Net-Pcap-debuginfo = 0.14-1.fc6 == requires + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 11 tests and 83 subtests skipped. Files=24, Tests=500, 3 wallclock secs ( 1.44 cusr + 0.57 csys = 2.01 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 06:12:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080612.l486CvOF026474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-Write -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 06:16:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080616.l486GlFB026648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-08 02:16 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 8d578ba16de34b5cbebf6b767181b00d MD5SUM upstream package: 8d578ba16de34b5cbebf6b767181b00d [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji dist-fc7 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 06:31:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239199] Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080631.l486V0O2027069@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Alias: perl-Archive-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239199 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-08 02:30 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: None [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL or Artistic [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : ba6bf97e81669e7e371e35ffa11f83cb MD5SUM upstream package: ba6bf97e81669e7e371e35ffa11f83cb [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC-6 / i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Please clean up all that commented out cruft post-import. === Final Notes === 1. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 06:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239199] Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080645.l486jwhn027700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Alias: perl-Archive-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239199 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-08 02:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Archive-Any Short Description: Single interface to deal with file archives Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 06:46:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239199] Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080646.l486kAJQ027733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Alias: perl-Archive-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239199 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 07:18:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 03:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080718.l487IDaf028969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-08 03:18 EST ------- Hi Chris, thanks for the review. New version at http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Sys-Syscall.spec SRPM: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Sys-Syscall-0.22-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 07:23:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 03:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080723.l487N9Lo029236@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-08 03:23 EST ------- oops, ncurses isn't used in berusky, i'll remove it. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 07:29:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 03:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239282] Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080729.l487TEWY029495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239282 ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2007-05-08 03:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > To me it seems pointless to prefix the date with a 0. in this case. You will > never have a number low enough that upstream can't trump you and release > something like 0.01 which would be < EVR than yours. I would think this would > be the perfect case for an epoch if upstream gets a clue and versions the > package at a later date. This got me thinking, and I had another look at what we currently have in FC-6. I think it would actually make more sense to put zero as a version number, and follow the pre-release snapshot guidelines for the release number. This way, when upstream so decides, there is a very good probability that the version assigned will be higher than zero (0) and we avoid the epoch thing. Deal ? new SPEC: ftp://ftp.licr.org/pub/seaview.spec new SRPM: ftp://ftp.licr.org/pub/seaview-0-0.20070417.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 07:52:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 03:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080752.l487qUs1031104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 ------- Additional Comments From weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu 2007-05-08 03:52 EST ------- Thank you for reviewing my package. I think I've made the corrections to Issues 1 and 2. So for 3 and 4, should I build the distro tarball, copy it over to my SOURCES dir, then rpmbuild the rpm and upload the tarball, rpm & srpm to SF? Or did I not understand quite right? Thanks for the information in the final notes. I seem to have the good fortune of people from several distros using this code, so I'm going to leave it in. I don't know about any kernel requirements I have since I don't directly interact with the kernel. So from here, should I rev my project to 0.4.2 with the updates & re-post? Are there any actions I should take beyond that? Thanks, Wes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 08:26:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 04:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080826.l488QaCW002003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-08 04:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154318) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154318&action=view) fixes 'unexpected success' in maxconnect.t I'm not a sponsor either, but here are some more comments: 1) Package should Require initscripts 2) I suggest you turn on the make test portion (we like automated testing). To do this, you need to BuildRequire perl(Test::More). Then to make things sane in the test, you'll want to: # delete test that weren't written, and daemonize doesn't work in koji rm -f t/{binary-get,daemonize,lru,managed-buckets,multiversioning,slab-reassign,unixsocket}.t then apply the attached patch to fix one test that wasn't completed. (By the way, daemonize can be fixed by using a random port for testing) I also see that memcache-debug gets installed? Is that useful? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 08:28:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 04:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080828.l488S4bE002136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-08 04:28 EST ------- > As this is primarily (AFAIU) a framework/library package, shouldn't it be called > python-Coherence? Very good point. I actually think it would make most sense indeed, so I'm fine with renaming it once more ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 08:32:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 04:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080832.l488WiTQ002510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-08 04:32 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/ There's the berusky-1.1-2.src.rpm package with added patch for building in mock, it should fine work now. An updated spec file it there, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 08:41:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 04:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211761] Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080841.l488fXhl003270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dfu-programmer - USB DFU based programmer for Atmel chips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211761 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-08 04:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I think I've made the corrections to Issues 1 and 2. So for 3 and 4, should I > build the distro tarball, copy it over to my SOURCES dir, then rpmbuild the rpm > and upload the tarball, rpm & srpm to SF? Or did I not understand quite right? Unless I'm misunderstanding you, you'll want to: 1) update your spec file in your version control to add a new changelog line consistent with the version you are about to release (say 0.4.2-1) 2) make your tarball 3) make your rpm based off the spec you just updated when you are done, you should be able to extract the tarball from your srpm (rpm -ivh mypackage.src.rpm) and md5sum both that and the tarball that you you started with and they will be the same. As far as the timestamp, I'm assuming that sf.net respects preserving timestamps on upload. So then the tarball on your disk, in the srpm, and uploaded all have the same timestamp. > So from here, should I rev my project to 0.4.2 with the updates & re-post? Are > there any actions I should take beyond that? If you follow what I'm talking about go ahead, else if you want me to look at your spec file one more time, just post it here (go ahead an update with the changelog you're going to use for the next release first so I can see how it's going to be when you release it). Just attach it on this bug report if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 08:59:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 04:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080859.l488xwGE004697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-05-08 04:59 EST ------- Short updated. (And sorry for the week-long silence) I'm trying to get a working dbus wrapper for kdepin. Hopefully, I'll finish it by Friday and release a new SRPM. The reason for writing a wrapper (as opposed to doing it right [tm], and adding DBUS support for kdebluetooth itself) is rather simple. A. I'm a C programmer and I'm a rotten CPP programmer. B. I zero experience with QT; DBUS' API, as ugly as it looks seems to have a much lower learning curve. (At least to me) C. I'm basing my code around existing bluez-dbus wrappers. While I doubt that it'll be ready by F7/release, if someone picks up the review, it -should- be ready a couple of days following the release. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 09:37:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 05:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705080937.l489biXk008018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-08 05:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Any feedback for the 0.5.0 package? Working about the same as last release, as expected. > Aside: Last month I got pybackpack 0.5.0 sponsored into Debian unstable so > hopefully I'll get some good contextual feedback from that and it'll mature > better off the back of it. That should help. Here's a few things I noticed when I again recently looked at your spec file: 1) warning from rpm when building: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pybackpack/backuptool.py That's because of this line: %attr(755,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/backuptool.py take that out and either chmod it in %install after it's installed, or even better since you're upstream, fix the install script :) (does it even need to be executable?) 2) /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pybackpack/pybackpack_logo.png should go in /usr/share/pixmaps 3) /usr/share/applications/fedora-pybackpack.desktop specifies icon as "file-roller"? huh? 4) just replace all of this: %dir %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack %attr(755,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/backuptool.py %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.py %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.glade %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.pyc %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.png with this: %{python_sitearch}/* 5) you really don't want this: %ghost %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.pyo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 10:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 06:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081055.l48Aturj011289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-08 06:55 EST ------- Hi Rex, I'm happy to review the package, it might take a few days, but I'll gradually work over the package as and when I have the breaks to. I should have it done by the weekend though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 12:20:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] New: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: afb at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim.spec SRPM URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim-1.2.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: SLiM (Simple Login Manager) is a graphical login manager for X11. It aims to be simple, fast and independent from the various desktop environments. Screenshot: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim-fedora-login.jpg This is my first Fedora Extras package, sponsor needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 12:55:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237379] Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081255.l48Ctwt4016601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Alias: ruby-amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-08 08:55 EST ------- Rebuild for devel also done. Thank you for the review!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 12:56:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 08:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081256.l48Cu0u8016618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 Bug 237382 depends on bug 237379, which changed state. Bug 237379 Summary: Review Request: ruby-amazon - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237379 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 13:15:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] New: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhrozek at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gnetworkmonitor.sourceforge.net/rpm/gnome-network-monitor.spec SRPM URL: http://gnetworkmonitor.sourceforge.net/rpm/gnome-network-monitor-0.8-1.src.rpm Description: Gnome Network Monitor is a tool that allows monitoring of network activity on a system. Features: * Network statistics overview * Per-process overview of network traffic on your computer visually similar to top * Bandwidth usage with graphical histogram and other information about network interfaces such as IP address * Parsing of iptables log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 13:40:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081340.l48De7rg019306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 09:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: DMitry Short Description: DeepMagice Information Gathering Tool Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-6, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 13:40:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081340.l48Dedk3019330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 13:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081344.l48DiLFp019625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239436 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 13:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 09:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081345.l48Djl4d019755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-08 09:45 EST ------- Bug filed against s-p-t. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:04:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081404.l48E4YYs020792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 clumens at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From clumens at redhat.com 2007-05-08 10:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: repoman Short Description: Tool for configuring yum settings and repositories Owners: dcantrell at redhat.com,clumens at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:22:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081422.l48EMjtk022167@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2 Alias: perl-RPM2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |F7 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-05-08 10:22 EST ------- """ Package: perl-RPM2 NVR: perl-RPM2-0.67-2.fc7 User: jkeating Status: complete Tag Operation: tagged Into Tag: f7-final perl-RPM2-0.67-2.fc7 successfully tagged into f7-final by jkeating """ Ok, Jose, *now* can I close the bug? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:32:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081432.l48EWNEl023097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-08 10:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-Coherence/python-Coherence.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-Coherence/python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.src.rpm * Tue May 8 2007 Matthias Saou 0.2.1-3 - Rename Coherence -> python-Coherence to match our python naming guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:39:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081439.l48EdZe0023671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-08 10:39 EST ------- Regarding 1), I had already "chmod -x"'ed the files. 2) IRC is not a place to expect "official" answers. I've gone through all of the guidelines and found no mention of an initscripts requirement. The parent directory ownership guidelines might apply here, but again, this is a special case, since no working installed system can not have initscripts, since the Linux kernel package itself requires it. See also spot's answer on this : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-May/msg00028.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081445.l48Ejlh5024344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: coherence - |Review Request: python- |Python framework to |Coherence - Python framework |participate in digital |to participate in digital |living networks |living networks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:55:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081455.l48Etl8M025348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python- |Review Request: coherence - |Coherence - Python framework|Python framework to |to participate in digital |participate in digital |living networks |living networks ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-08 10:55 EST ------- Oh, i just forgot about python plugin/extension naming. indeed... Taking python naming guidelines into account, full review above doesn't change except the apropriate package name which be set now. Matthias, don't forget to change Elisa (bug #233598) Require name for Coherence, it's not actually done. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081456.l48EuZnK025434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 10:56 EST ------- Update: - Fix typo in Source0 url - Update lw1bridge patch to not include License info - Add explicit version to Provides and Obsoletes - Added tests, commented out - Cleaned up BuildRequires and Requires The Requires on openssl-perl and perl-Net-SSLeay I know are valid. The MD5 dependency I'm not sure about, but I think the LW2.pm actually does use it. Can you verify? Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-libwhisker2.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-libwhisker2-2.4-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:57:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229342] Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081457.l48EvpXh025596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nfs4-acl-tools - ACL utilities for NFSv4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229342 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 14:59:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081459.l48ExRat025722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 10:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-SQLite-Simple Short Description: Easy Access to SQLite databases using objects Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 15:00:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081500.l48F0m3Y025915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 11:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Gomor Short Description: Another class and object builder Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 15:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081515.l48FFCZ6027408@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: coherence - |Review Request: python- |Python framework to |Coherence - Python framework |participate in digital |to participate in digital |living networks |living networks ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-08 11:15 EST ------- Changing the summary back (again)... I guess it was a mistake... (?) As for Elisa's Coherence requirement, I'll update it now. I will also be requesting CVS module creation. Thanks Xavier for the review, and thanks Ville too for the last second insight! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 15:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081520.l48FKibd027697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Nmap-Parser Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 15:22:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081522.l48FMnCq027972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 15:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081531.l48FV6FK028354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-08 11:30 EST ------- Good: + Mock build works fine + Rpmlint is fine on source rpm + Rpmlint is fine on binary package + Start of application works fine. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. + License seems ok. Bad: - you should add a %build section in berusky-data - %{_docdir}/berusky-1.1/berusky should be %{_docdir}/berusky-1.1/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 15:44:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081544.l48FiN4u030019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-08 11:44 EST ------- God: + Naming seems ok. + License seems ok. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints on source rpm. W: slim strange-permission slim-update_slim_wmlist 0775 - Rpmlint complaints binary rpm W: slim dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/slim/themes/default/background.jpg ../../../backgrounds/images/default.jpg W: slim no-version-in-last-changelog W: slim conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/slim.conf - Tar ball doesn't maches with upstream tar ball. 1bf891f046014a03236c21ce6cbe455b ../SOURCES/slim-1.2.6.tar.gz (RPM) 7a98d588cb6778baefcaa368f3dfa2a4 slim-1.2.6.tar.gz (Upstream) - Mockbuild fails with errors: freetype2/config -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include -DPACKAGE=\"slim\" -DVERSION=\"1.2.6\" -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/slim\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -DHAVE_SHADOW -c main.cpp -o main.o /usr/bin/g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2/config -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include -DPACKAGE=\"slim\" -DVERSION=\"1.2.6\" -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/slim\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -DHAVE_SHADOW -c image.cpp -o image.o In file included from panel.h:28, from app.h:23, from main.cpp:12: input.h:17:25: error: X11/Xft/Xft.h: No such file or directory image.cpp: In member function 'bool Image::Read(const char*)': image.cpp:71: warning: ignoring return value of 'size_t fread(void*, size_t, size_t, FILE*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result panel.h:57: error: 'XftDraw' has not been declared panel.h:57: error: 'XftColor' has not been declared panel.h:57: error: 'XftFont' has not been declared panel.h:58: error: 'XftChar8' has not been declared panel.h:59: error: 'XftColor' has not been declared panel.h:71: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'XftFont' with no type panel.h:71: error: expected ';' before '*' token panel.h:72: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type panel.h:73: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type panel.h:74: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type panel.h:75: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type panel.h:76: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'XftFont' with no type panel.h:76: error: expected ';' before '*' token panel.h:77: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type panel.h:78: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'XftFont' with no type panel.h:78: error: expected ';' before '*' token panel.h:79: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'XftFont' with no type panel.h:79: error: expected ';' before '*' token panel.h:80: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type panel.h:81: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type panel.h:82: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'XftFont' with no type panel.h:82: error: expected ';' before '*' token panel.h:83: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type panel.h:84: error: 'XftColor' does not name a type make: *** [main.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95810 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 15:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081551.l48Fp8Ft030865@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-08 11:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > - Tar ball doesn't maches with upstream tar ball. > 1bf891f046014a03236c21ce6cbe455b ../SOURCES/slim-1.2.6.tar.gz (RPM) > 7a98d588cb6778baefcaa368f3dfa2a4 slim-1.2.6.tar.gz (Upstream) Upstream URL is a redirect HTML page, will see if I can get a direct link... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 16:11:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081611.l48GBCka001781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-08 12:11 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Rpmlint quite on source rpm. + Local build works fine. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Source0 contains not a full qualified URL. - %{?_smp_mflags} missing on make without any comment. - /usr/bin should be replace by %{_bindir} - /usr/sbin should be replace by %{_sbindir} - /ussr/share should be replace by %{_datadir} You can owned a whole directory, if the entry in the %file stanza end with a slash - Rpmlint complaints binary package: W: gnome-network-monitor no-documentation E: gnome-network-monitor script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnome-network-monitor/gnm.glade W: gnome-network-monitor conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/gnome-network-monitor W: gnome-network-monitor conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/gnome-network-monitor - Packages contains no docs. - Package doesn't contain a verbatin copy of the license text - Programm crashed after startup: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gnome-network-monitor/gnm.py:69: GtkWarning: gtk_widget_grab_default: assertion `GTK_WIDGET_CAN_DEFAULT (widget)' failed self.__xml_file = gtk.glade.XML(self.__glade_file, "gnome-network-monitor") Updating information Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/gnome-network-monitor", line 10, in ? gnm.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gnome-network-monitor/gnm.py", line 134, in run win = MainWindow() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gnome-network-monitor/gnm.py", line 97, in __init__ self.__iptables.parse_file() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gnome-network-monitor/iptables.py", line 145, in parse_file self.__insert_record(FwRecord(line)) # store them in the db File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gnome-network-monitor/iptables.py", line 32, in __init__ tup = time.strptime("%s %s %s"%(lfs[0], lfs[1], lfs[2]), "%b %d %H:%M:%S") File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/_strptime.py", line 293, in strptime raise ValueError("time data did not match format: data=%s fmt=%s" % ValueError: time data did not match format: data=May 7 19:08:04 fmt=%b %d %H:%M:%S -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 16:25:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081625.l48GPNUY002715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-08 12:25 EST ------- It may be nice to use a direct link in the Source0 stanza. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 16:28:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081628.l48GSfdm003008@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-08 12:28 EST ------- Fixed the Source0 URL and added libXft-devel, installing "mock" to test... Q1: Do I bump the release to 2 now, or will it still be at 1 until done ? Q2: Regarding the dangling symlink to the default background image, do we want it to use the default image as provided by SLiM instead ? (until a proper new Fedora theme can be made, using the GDM images) The default image looks like http://slim.berlios.de/images/slim01.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 16:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081644.l48Gi8px004136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-08 12:44 EST ------- I'll start the review in the mean time package pygoocanvas (bug # 233342) will be imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 16:51:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204166] Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081651.l48Gpv9d005019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xeuphoric - an X based Oric emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204166 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 16:56:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 12:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081656.l48GuUxM005487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-08 12:56 EST ------- Issues: The following is not useful: export CXXFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS If you use (like in the template) pure_install instead of install you won't need to remove $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_archlib}/perllocal.pod I think that the Requires: mecab = %{version} is not usefull, the soname dependency is enough. Otherwise the devel BuildRequires should also be versionned. ls -lR /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/MeCab.pm -r--r--r-- it is wrong, you can use what is in the template chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* Remarks: I would personally not use -f for rm and mv to have build breaking when things change. I also don't like the use of %relnumber and %mainver in my opinion the clutter the spec unnecessarily. Regarding the license it is now included in the tarball, so it is fine with me, even though it certainly lacks something in the README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:13:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] New: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/arping.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/arping-2.05-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The arping utility sends ARP and/or ICMP requests to the specified host and displays the replies. The host may be specified by its hostname, its IP address, or its MAC address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:14:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239471] New: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239471 Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/httptunnel.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/httptunnel-3.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: HTTPTunnel creates a bidirectional virtual data stream tunnelled in HTTP requests. The requests can be sent via a HTTP proxy if so desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081734.l48HYNvV008321@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-08 13:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: boolstuff Short Description: Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library Owners: pertusus[ AT ]free.fr Branches: FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: sarrazip[ AT ]sarrazip.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:34:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081734.l48HYTHj008339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-08 13:34 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Sources matches with upstream. + License seems ok. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. + Mock build works fine. + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm. Bad: - Local build fails with errors: sleep 3 In file included from arping-2/arping.c:48: /usr/include/libnet.h:87:2: error: #error "byte order has not been specified, you'll need to #define either LIBNET_LIL_ENDIAN or LIBNET_BIG_ENDIAN. See the documentation regarding the libnet-config script." arping-2/arping.c:94: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token arping-2/arping.c: In function 'do_libnet_init': arping-2/arping.c:128: error: 'libnet' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:128: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once arping-2/arping.c:128: error: for each function it appears in.) arping-2/arping.c:138: error: 'LIBNET_LINK' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c: In function 'pingmac_send': arping-2/arping.c:394: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'icmp' arping-2/arping.c:394: error: 'icmp' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:394: error: 'ipv4' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:394: error: 'eth' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:404: error: 'libnet' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:411: error: 'LIBNET_IPV4_H' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:412: error: 'LIBNET_ICMPV4_ECHO_H' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:424: warning: passing argument 9 of 'libnet_build_ipv4' makes pointer from integer without a cast arping-2/arping.c:424: warning: passing argument 10 of 'libnet_build_ipv4' makes integer from pointer without a cast arping-2/arping.c:424: error: too many arguments to function 'libnet_build_ipv4' arping-2/arping.c:435: error: too many arguments to function 'libnet_build_ethernet' arping-2/arping.c: In function 'pingip_send': arping-2/arping.c:462: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'arp' arping-2/arping.c:462: error: 'arp' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:462: error: 'eth' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:474: error: 'libnet' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:475: error: too many arguments to function 'libnet_build_arp' arping-2/arping.c:486: error: too many arguments to function 'libnet_build_ethernet' arping-2/arping.c: In function 'pingip_recv': arping-2/arping.c:547: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:565: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:575: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c: In function 'pingmac_recv': arping-2/arping.c:614: error: 'LIBNET_IPV4_H' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:616: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:617: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:619: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:623: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:634: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:636: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:640: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:645: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:649: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:655: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c:659: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type arping-2/arping.c: In function 'main': arping-2/arping.c:910: error: 'libnet' undeclared (first use in this function) arping-2/arping.c:983: warning: passing argument 1 of 'strdup' makes pointer from integer without a cast arping-2/arping.c:1023: warning: passing argument 1 of 'strdup' makes pointer from integer without a cast arping-2/arping.c:1128: error: too few arguments to function 'libnet_get_hwaddr' make: *** [arping-2/arping] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14424 (%build) - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS was not used during the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081738.l48HcgxO008711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-08 13:38 EST ------- I know that obfuscating mail addresses is problematic for those who create the branches, but otherwise bots could collect the mail addresses. Thanks for the review Mamoru, I'll happily review perl-mecab, but I can't review java-mecab since I don't know java any better than ruby. I'll see if I can review alexandria once the blocker is accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:41:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239474] New: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239474 Summary: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgarski at post.pl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fedora/libkdcraw.spec SRPM URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fedora/libkdcraw-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: libkdcraw is a C++ interface around dcraw binary program used to decode RAW picture files. The library documentation is available on header files. This library is used by kipi-plugins, digiKam and others kipi host programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239474] Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081743.l48HhRrc009071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239474 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-05-08 13:43 EST ------- I'm not sure about package group, maybe System Environment/Libraries is better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:44:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229323] Review Request: PgpoolAdmin - web-based pgpool administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081744.l48HiHff009132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PgpoolAdmin - web-based pgpool administration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229323 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-08 13:44 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 17:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 13:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239471] Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081749.l48HnmGI009406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239471 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-08 13:49 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream. * License seems ok. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint is quite for the source rpm. + Pacakge contains verbatin text of the license. + Mock build works fine. + Local start of the application works. + Local install und uninstall works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints binary package W: httptunnel incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0.8-1 3.3-1 Perhaps anone can check, if the compiled package works properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:07:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081807.l48I7kDq010975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-08 14:07 EST ------- I can take over. Downloading SRPM, SPEC. Downloading SPEC for vegastrike-data. Downloading SROM for vegastrike-daBUFFERING[---40%.....] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:11:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081811.l48IBQee011304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-08 14:11 EST ------- Thank you for initial comment! Updated: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/perl-mecab.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/perl-mecab-0.95-4.fc7.src.rpm ---------------------------------------------- * Wed May 9 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.95-4 - Correctly require version specified BuildRequires - Rewrite accroding to perl template ---------------------------------------------- I named this package as "mecab-perl" initially, so at first I didn't use perl template... (In reply to comment #5) > The following is not useful: > export CXXFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS Absolutely...... > If you use (like in the template) pure_install instead of install > you won't need to remove $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{perl_archlib}/perllocal.pod This time I borrowed many ideas from perl template. > I think that the > Requires: mecab = %{version} > is not usefull, the soname dependency is enough. Otherwise the > devel BuildRequires should also be versionned. Well, I thought that I required version specific BuildRequires (like python-mecab, etc..). Now requiring version > chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* Thanks. > I would personally not use -f for rm and mv to have build breaking > when things change. Well, this is a sort of my habit to use "-f" because I saw on some cases that "-f" is really required (one example is bug 225791). And.. while I don't know the reason, for directories recursive delete by "rm -r" occasionally hangs up when not using "-f" (would you know why?) > I also don't like the use of %relnumber and %mainver in my > opinion the clutter the spec unnecessarily. This is also my habit.. > Regarding the license This was discussed on bug 233423 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:12:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081812.l48ICt13011415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-08 14:12 EST ------- Doesn't build in mock x86_64/devel: make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libdc1394-1.2.1/examples' ... if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -Wunused -MT affine.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/affine.Tpo" -c -o affine.o affine.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/affine.Tpo" ".deps/affine.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/affine.Tpo"; exit 1; fi /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -Wunused -o dc1394_vloopback dc1394_vloopback.o affine.o -lm ../libdc1394/libdc1394_control.la -lraw1394 -lraw1394 mkdir .libs DIE_RPATH_DIE="/usr/lib64:$DIE_RPATH_DIE" gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -Wunused -o .libs/dc1394_vloopback dc1394_vloopback.o affine.o -lm ../libdc1394/.libs/libdc1394_control.so -lraw1394 ../libdc1394/.libs/libdc1394_control.so: undefined reference to `raw1394_set_iso_handler' ../libdc1394/.libs/libdc1394_control.so: undefined reference to `raw1394_stop_iso_rcv' ../libdc1394/.libs/libdc1394_control.so: undefined reference to `raw1394_start_iso_rcv' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:13:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081813.l48IDApp011460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-08 14:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Short Description: DeepMagice Information Gathering Tool s/DeepMagice/DeepMagic/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:17:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081817.l48IH8XE011918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-08 14:17 EST ------- Doesn't this conflict or at least cause lots of confusion with the arping tool included in iputils? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:20:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081820.l48IK8K6012160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-08 14:20 EST ------- Some comments about the specfile: 1. I don't like the name libdc1394-libs, seems redundant -> move libs back to main package and binaries to -tools 2. There are some Provides/Obsoletes -> what for? Attached patch addresses the above issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081821.l48ILUsf012376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-08 14:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154349) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154349&action=view) specfile fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:38:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239193] Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081838.l48Ic5m4013478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Alias: Module-ExtractUse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-08 14:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > - Rationale for including the t/ dir in docs? Doesn't look useful to me, > > neither does TODO. TODO is still included in -2. > * tests can make good documentation (sometimes better than the actual docs) I don't think that's the case in this package. > * people might actually want to test the package post-installation I'm pretty sure that people who install software from rpms don't expect to be able to do that, at least when not installing a *-test subpackage. I'm not saying it's necessarily a doomed idea, but should be discussed in distro wide context before starting to apply in packages here and there. > * it doesn't hurt anything :) * It does add files to the package payload that the overwhelming vast majority does not have use for. * Test suites are also often quick and dirty code which is not meant to be used as an example of anything. * Test suite code is not restricted to using the public API of the software; some features can be better tested using knowledge of module internals. We don't want anyone to use such code as an example how to use the packaged software. * Test suites have dependencies that the users need to take care of manually, or the package will be dependency bloated. Both are bad, and easily solved by not including the test suite. To summarize, I think including test suite code is acceptable if there's an upstream recommendation to use it as an example, upstream installs it too, and/or packaging test suites becomes a standard packaging practice (or there's a decision/consensus that things should move towards that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:40:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239480] New: Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239480 Summary: Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/penguin-command/penguin-command.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/penguin-command/penguin-command-1.6.11-1.src.rpm Description: Penguin Command is a clone of the classic "Missile Command" Game, but it has better graphics and music. The gameplay has only been slightly modified. Penguin Command is licensed under the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 18:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 14:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081849.l48In6h5014457@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-08 14:49 EST ------- After a cursory look at the code I haven't found anything complicated enough to be patentable. The same cannot be said about 2.x version, which seem to explicitly name at least one US patent. Nevertheless, I think 1.x is safe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 19:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 15:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081936.l48Ja6g1018787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 19:45:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 15:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238270] Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081945.l48Jjhgv019503@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 karlikt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From karlikt at gmail.com 2007-05-08 15:45 EST ------- Built for fc-6 and fc-7. Closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 19:47:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 15:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705081947.l48Jlv5P019790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 15:47 EST ------- A1: each time you modify the spec, the release should be incremented and the links to src.rpm and spec reposted here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:05:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082005.l48K5IOZ021531@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-08 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > missing BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel Ok. > Shared Objects are not versioned. I don't know what this means. I'm using standard autotools with libtool. Is there some libtool flag I need to pass in? > > with correct BuildRequires builds in mock. rpmlint is quiet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:16:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082016.l48KGcUs022806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-08 16:16 EST ------- I was typing this in before cweyl took this for review; hopefully the comments will still be useful. Some rpmlint complaints: E: perl-Nmap-Parser no-changelogname-tag The changelog is empty W: perl-Nmap-Parser spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05/README W: perl-Nmap-Parser spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05/LICENSE Executable README and LICENSE files? E: perl-Nmap-Parser wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05/README Perhaps this package came from DOS or something. All of the line endings need to be fixed up with a quick trip through tr or sed. W: perl-Nmap-Parser manifest-in-perl-module /usr/share/doc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05/MANIFEST The manifest file isn't to be packaged. W: perl-Nmap-Parser spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05/MANIFEST E: perl-Nmap-Parser wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05/MANIFEST Hmmm.... E: perl-Nmap-Parser script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Nmap/Parser.pm This shouldn't be executable. Or, if it needs to be executable, it needs to have the usual #!/usr/bin/perl as its first line. E: perl-Nmap-Parser wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Nmap/Parser.pm tr or sed again. Next, you'll need BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker,) perl(Test::More) so that your package will still build and run its tests once the perl-devel split from the main perl package is complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:19:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082019.l48KJA6c023181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-08 16:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > Shared Objects are not versioned. > > I don't know what this means. I'm using standard autotools with libtool. Is > there some libtool flag I need to pass in? /me reads info libtool - the -version-info flag - is this what you mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:29:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082029.l48KTDdh024873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 16:29 EST ------- Just a few comments, after a quick glance. Note that I cannot sponsor you, so I am not assigning the package to me. - BuildRoot is not one of the values imposed by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines - gcc-c++ is part of the default build env, so there is no need to BR it - % make and %install should start by cleaning the buildroot - you should use (if possible) parallel make for building; if SMP build is non-functional, this should be mentioned in the spec - mock build fails with: checking pci/pci.h usability... yes checking pci/pci.h presence... yes checking for pci/pci.h... yes checking for pci_alloc in -lpci... no configure: error: PCI utils library not found, please install pci-utils. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.22865 (%build) I admit I am surprised by this error, since according to the root.log both pciutils and pciutils-devel are installed. - please make sure that you do not need gettext as a BR (you seem to build translations and this is a BR for them) or add it if you do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:33:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082033.l48KXfDu025266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 16:33 EST ------- I apologize, I meant "%install and %clean should start by cleaning [...]", not "%make and %install [...]". In other words, you need to add a new section (%clean) and to add rm -fR %{buildroot} both to %clean and to %install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082038.l48KckXd025680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239490 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:47:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082047.l48KlP5k026171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-08 16:47 EST ------- okay, fixed at http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/ (packages berusky-1.1-3.src.rpm and berusky-data-1.0-3.src.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:48:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082048.l48KmXKO026276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwilson at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-05-08 16:48 EST ------- For F7, we've got a whole new firewire stack, and libraw1394 has been patched accordingly. Pretty sure libdc1394 is going to need similar love, or it has no hope of working in F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:51:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235694] Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082051.l48KpURK026595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235694 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwilson at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:53:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082053.l48KrZGJ026848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-08 16:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.01-2.src.rpm Problems all fixed. It did build just fine on my system, as I had openssl-devel installed (and you're right, it should have been listed) and perl_vendorarch is below perl_vendorlib, so the perl_vendorlib expression caught all the files anyway. I did change it to your recommended convention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:55:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082055.l48KtxS2027099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-08 16:55 EST ------- Thx for your quick reply! Here is the current spec file Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394-1.2.1-4.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras I've check the svn repository and version 1 changes are 6 months old whereas release tarball are more than one year old. I may do a snapshoot if needed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082057.l48KvKoD027340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-08 16:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.03-2.src.rpm - Add BuildRequire openssl-devel - Don't manually require openssl - Use vendorarch instead of vendorlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:57:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082057.l48KvhV6027496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-08 16:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum-0.03-2.src.rpm - Add BuildRequire openssl-devel - Don't manually require openssl - Use vendorarch instead of vendorlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:58:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082058.l48Kw2sb027554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-08 16:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.13-2.src.rpm - Add BuildRequire openssl-devel - Don't manually require openssl - Use vendorarch instead of vendorlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:58:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082058.l48KwTab027582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-08 16:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.24-2.src.rpm - Add BuildRequire openssl-devel - Don't manually require openssl - Use vendorarch instead of vendorlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:58:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082058.l48Kwn8o027611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-08 16:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.06-2.spec - Add BuildRequire openssl-devel - Don't manually require openssl - Use vendorarch instead of vendorlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 20:59:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 16:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082059.l48KxAkZ027635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-08 16:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4-2.src.rpm - Add BuildRequire openssl-devel - Don't manually require openssl - Use vendorarch instead of vendorlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:03:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082103.l48L3llE027895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-08 17:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA-5.44-2.src.rpm - Use vendorarch instead of vendorlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082111.l48LBEBD028372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-08 17:11 EST ------- A brief look into libdc1394-devel archives suggests that the API hasn't been finalized yet. And it should be possible to install it alongside libdc1394-1.x, like Nicolas suggests. Unfortunately, it appears to contain patent-encumbered code: dc1394/bayer.c: ... /* Edge Sensing Interpolation II from http://www-ise.stanford.edu/~tingchen/ */ /* (Laroche,Claude A. "Apparatus and method for adaptively interpolating a full color image utilizing chrominance gradients" U.S. Patent 5,373,322) */ void dc1394_bayer_EdgeSense(const uint8_t *restrict bayer, uint8_t *restrict rgb, int sx, int sy, int tile) ... Which is a simple interpolation algorithm. Software patents need to die! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235694] Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082126.l48LQ4ES029074@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235694 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-05-08 17:26 EST ------- Initial pass: 1) please use spaces instead of tabs 2) URL is wrong, should be http://sourceforge.net/projects/x3270 3) Source: is wrong, should be what's currently in URL 4) The Requires: on x3270 looks bad to me. Seems there ought to be a minimum required version as well, since I'm guessing x3270 1.0 won't actually work. The Reqs: x3270 <= %{version} is quite fragile, in that if the x3270 maintainer updates their package to the latest upstream x3270 3.3.5p6 and maintains their current versioning scheme, the deps of s3270 won't be satisfiable, as 3.3.5p6 is rpm-newer than 3.3.5, which is what %{version} currently gives. 5) the specified buildroot doesn't meet minimum requirements: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 6) the %description doesn't match upstream's latest. I'd suggest: x3270 is a suite of 3270 terminal emulation tools. s3270 is a scripting tool for writing screen-scraping applications. Includes IND$FILE support, DBCS, and more. 7) The install line for the s3270 binary uses -s, which strips the binary. Need to not do that so the binary can be stripped by the rpmbuild process and proper debuginfo packages built 8) There's actually make install and make install-man targets in the Makefile, which appear to have proper $DESTDIR support, I suggest investigating that instead of the numerous manual install calls. Seems there are a few bits more that make install installs also. 9) %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of just %defattr(-,root,root) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:29:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235694] Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082129.l48LTDBK029328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3270 - Scripted 3270 Emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235694 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-05-08 17:29 EST ------- For the Requires: bit, I'd actually suggest Requires: x3270 = %{version} and kick the x3270 maintainer to update to the latest and add a Provides: x3270 = %{major_version} where major_version is bit without the pX (3.3.5 in this case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082134.l48LY3Z7029783@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-08 17:34 EST ------- Sorry that you had to wait a long time. I'll make a full review within 24 hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:46:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082146.l48LkWK6030978@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-08 17:46 EST ------- I would prefer a patch applied over the tarball instead. Snapshots tend to be difficult to reproduce. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:50:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082150.l48Lo0S7031149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-05-08 17:49 EST ------- ...and its unlikely the svn repo has stuff to support the new firewire interfaces if there's been no change in 6 mo. I believe the stack is newer than that, and the patches to libraw1394 were done by krh, who also wrote the new kernel stack. Dunno if he's pushed them upstream or not... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:51:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082151.l48LpgXC031265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 17:51 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on:x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: rpmlint of ike-scan-1.9-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm: empty rpmlint of ike-scan-debuginfo-1.9-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm:W: ike-scan-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug /ike-scan-1.9/mt19937ar.c --> the file should be chmod-ed -x in %prep to make rpmlint happy [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: e973742c32c7b65fe134233482c94e3e94db3b32 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [!] Permissions on files are set properly. See issue 1 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 and devel/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64 and devel/i386 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. one source file (mt19937ar.c) is inherited from upstream with wrong permissions. fix is so simple that I suggest to do it. 2. Examining the build log, one can notice a warning that during the build an internal openssl set of functions is used and recommends using the openssl lib instead (for increased speed). I have tested and adding BR: openssl-devel + %configure --with-openssl still builds and runs OK. I suggest to use the attached patch to enable this feature. Not mandatory, of course but recommended. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 21:52:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 17:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082152.l48LqngD031307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 17:52 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154363) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154363&action=view) patch to enable usage of the openssl lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238932] Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082218.l48MIRKw032600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238932 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-05-08 18:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://lewk.org/python-decoratortools.spec SRPM URL: http://lewk.org/python-decoratortools-1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm * Tue May 8 2007 Luke Macken - 1.4-2 - Own the peak namespace, for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:29:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082229.l48MTAT6000435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 18:29 EST ------- Updated: - Don't package Manifest - Fix permissions - Fix end-of-line encoding - Add missing BRs Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Nmap-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05-2.fc7.src.rpm rpmlint is silent here now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:30:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082230.l48MU596000467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 18:30 EST ------- Yes, typo there. DeepMagic is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082236.l48MaZeX000712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 18:36 EST ------- It does. I wasn't aware of the conflict. Does this package even make sense considering the iputils arping tool is already available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:45:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082245.l48Mj4Px000963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 18:44 EST ------- Patch applied. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ike-scan Short Description: IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN servers Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:45:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082245.l48MjbSR000989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-08 18:45 EST ------- It depends on you. duplicate functionality is not an issue in Fedora. But it would certainly be better if the name was not arping, maybe synscan-arping or something else. And it shouldn't conflict with existing packages. It may also happen that it doesn't have exactly the same functionalities even though it has the same name in which case it could make sense to package it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:50:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239119] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082250.l48Moe0v001128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Alias: perl-Class-C3-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:51:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082251.l48MpPA4001189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |krh at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-08 18:51 EST ------- There is nothing more than we already have with libdc1394-1.1.0-clktck.patch. The other patch hasn't been merged upstream so i may remove it (it bring nothing new about what we want to care about, for sure...) cc krh since he may be the preferred person to have info about this... Until then, we may test it on FC-6... do this kernel change about 1394 are planned to be backported from F7 to FC-6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 22:57:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 18:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082257.l48MvdFM001370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 18:57 EST ------- Please do keep it, but change the name (I would go with arping-ng :) ). It has additional functionality, compared to the one already included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 23:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082315.l48NFaka001940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-08 19:15 EST ------- Hi Kelly, can you do a review of someone else's package and link to the bug # here? Want to make sure you know the review procedures and can do a capable review. :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 23:22:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082322.l48NMw2T002112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-08 19:22 EST ------- Renamed package to arping-ng, hopefully this avoids any conflicts: Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/arping-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/arping-ng-2.05-1.fc7.src.rpm Don't know what to do about the build failure though. Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 23:27:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082327.l48NRfHF002252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 19:27 EST ------- The correct srpm url is http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/arping-ng-2.05-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 23:28:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239119] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082328.l48NSaUq002294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Alias: perl-Class-C3-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-08 19:28 EST ------- Looks like a new version of this just came out today, but I don't think it will bother the packaging. I found it odd that the test suite is installed as documentation. I don't suppose it hurts anything and I suppose the code could be instructive. * source files match upstream: 7be7a6d69644dd2580d552b01ffcb388e82d203804090bb003b0728dcfbcb8d1 Class-C3-XS-0.02.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. O latest version is 0.03 * BuildRequires are proper (including new Perl bits) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: XS.so()(64bit) perl(Class::C3::XS) = 0.02 perl-Class-C3-XS = 0.02-1.fc7 = perl >= 0:5.008_000 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=18, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.19 cusr + 0.09 csys = 0.28 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. (documentation is a bit larger than the rest of the package, but then we're only talking about 20k). * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 23:41:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238932] Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082341.l48NfWmX002519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238932 toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |toshio at tiki-lounge.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com 2007-05-08 19:41 EST ------- Approved MD5Sums: 20789f305884614948f191ce7458d377 python-decoratortools-1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm Good: * rpmlint output: W: python-decoratortools invalid-license PSF or ZPL W: python-decoratortools invalid-license PSF or ZPL PSF is python software foundation license and ZPL is Zope Public License, both valid licenses for Fedora. * Package and spec follow the naming guidelines for Python Modules. * License filed matches the license of the package and is approved for Fedora. (Listed in the PKG-INFO file) * Source file matches upstream. * Builds to a noarch package on x86_64 FC6. * Successfully builds in mock. * No locale files. * Not a dynamic library. * Not relocatable. * Package owns all directories that it creates. Note that the %{python_sitelib}/peak directory structure is a namespace directory. Contrary to what I said earlier on IRC, this appears to be covered by this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership * No duplicate files. * Proper %clean. * Consistent use of macros. * Not a GUI app * Works for the simple examples included in the documentation. Minor: * License text is not included in the upstream package. Might want to ping upstream about including that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 23:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082341.l48NfZTw002535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 19:41 EST ------- Please don't forget to edit the description too, next time that you modify the spec. The application is still referred to as "arping". On my test computer the package built OK in mock, too. The only issue that I see (and it is a show stoper!) is that during compile the default Fedora compiler flags are ignored. Jochen, could you please explain what did you do when you obtained the build failure? By any chance, was it a rpmbuild -bb without having libnet-devel installed ? Once compiling in mock succeeds, other build failures should not be seen, AFAIK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 23:45:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082345.l48NjhqC002646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) Alias: arping-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |arping-ng ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 19:45 EST ------- Can't figure how to rename the bug ticket, so I am adding an alias. Sindre, please correct me if this was not your intent (given the rename of the spec & binary I assume it is). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 8 23:46:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 19:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping-ng - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705082346.l48NklrB002689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping-ng - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: arping - |Review Request: arping-ng - |Sends IP and/or ARP pings |Sends IP and/or ARP pings |(to the MAC address) |(to the MAC address) Alias|arping-ng | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-08 19:46 EST ------- OK, I need some sleep. Editing summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 01:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 21:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238932] Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090138.l491cINX005965@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238932 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-05-08 21:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-decoratortools Short Description: Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 Owners: lmacken at redhat.com,toshio at tiki-lounge.com Branches: FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: toshio at tiki-lounge.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 01:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 21:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090143.l491hEHZ006143@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-05-08 21:43 EST ------- > do this kernel change about 1394 are > planned to be backported from F7 to FC-6? Nope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 02:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 22:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090237.l492b3m1008499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-08 22:36 EST ------- I can try, but I'm not a real fantastic reviewer of other people's work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 02:37:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 22:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090237.l492be8D008568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-08 22:37 EST ------- I can try, but I'm not a real fantastic reviewer of other people's work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 02:51:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 22:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090251.l492pFCF009532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-08 22:51 EST ------- just go through the items listed here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines and mark off the items as you check them. see comment #24 for an example. click on the FE-NEEDSPONSOR link below to find a list of packages that probably have a couple errors in them. :) I try to do atleast 1 review for every package I submit. The more you do the better you get at it. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 03:17:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 23:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235804] Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090317.l493HURp011185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|238907 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-08 23:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > Nigel, please fill a new bug describing that problem and close this one. > There is no place to put it, well, not until the cvs/bugzilla sync starts again Okay, it's changed to an ExcludeArch, until at least ocaml can be updated. Bug #239517 is the one to see, but ocaml-SDL is built in FC6 and F7 so closing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 03:17:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 23:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090317.l493HspP011240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 Bug 235815 depends on bug 235804, which changed state. Bug 235804 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-SDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 03:18:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 23:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235805] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090318.l493Ii9s011304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-08 23:18 EST ------- Excluding arch ppc64 so it will build in F7 (already built on FC6), for those interested, the new bug is Bug #239518 Closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 03:18:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 23:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090318.l493Ikcu011320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 Bug 235815 depends on bug 235805, which changed state. Bug 235805 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 03:45:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 23:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235815] Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090345.l493joCj012778@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetennis - Tennis simulation game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-08 23:45 EST ------- Excluding arch ppc64 so it will build in F7 (already built on FC6), for those interested, the new bug is Bug #239521 Closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 05:53:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 01:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090553.l495raZe022175@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-09 01:53 EST ------- OK, builds fine and rpmlint is quiet. You don't need "BuildRequires: perl" but it doesn't hurt anything to have it. Note for others who may check for BuildRequires: needed for the perl-devel split: this module doesn't build like a regular module and has a custom Makefile.pl which doesn't make use of the regular Perl build infrastructure. Yes, this package does at least try to use MD5 at some point although it will use an internal implementation if the module isn't available. At least according to my reading of src/mdx.pl. The only issue at this point that concerns me is the name of the package. Our naming guidelines indicate that packages should be named according to how they're carried in CPAN, but of course this module isn't in CPAN. According to CPAN rules it wold be called perl-LW2, but that seems somewhat suboptimal as well. Frankly I favor the current naming, but before I approve I'll gather a couple of other opinions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 06:32:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] New: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/SPECS/gammu.spec SRPM URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/gammu-1.10.0-1.fc7.src.rpm MockLog: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/gammu-1.10.0-1-build.log Description: Gammu is command line utility and library to work with mobile phones from many vendors. Support for different models differs, but basic functions should work with majority of them. Program can work with contacts, messages (SMS, EMS and MMS), calendar, todos, filesystem, integrated radio, camera, etc. It also supports daemon mode to send and receive SMSes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 06:36:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] New: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/SPECS/python-gammu.spec SRPM URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/python-gammu-0.19-1.src.rpm MockLog: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/python-gammu-0.19-build.log Description: Python bindings for Gammu library. It currently does not support all Gammu features,but range of covered functions is increasing,if you need some specific, feel free to use bug tracking system for feature requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 06:36:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090636.l496asXt024553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 06:37:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090637.l496b5MG024576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239526 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 06:54:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239527] New: Review Request: wammu - Mobile Phone Manager Frontend - Gammu GUI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239527 Summary: Review Request: wammu - Mobile Phone Manager Frontend - Gammu GUI Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/fedora/SPECS/wammu.spec SRPM URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/wammu-0.19-1.fc7.src.rpm MockLog: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/wammu-0.19-build.log Description: Wammu is mobile phone manager running on Linux, Windows and possibly other platforms,where Gammu and wxPython works. The communication is made by Gammu library. Currently supported features: * complete support (can read/edit/delete/copy) for contacts, todo, calendar * can read/create/save/send/backup smses * sending files to phone (OBEX and Sony Ericsson phones only) * sms composer for multi part smses (currently only text and predefined bitmap/sound can be edited) * display message including pictures and ringtones playback * support for backup and import in various formats (vCard, iCalendar,...) * export messages to mail (IMAP4, maildir and mailbox storages are supported) * searching for phone * translated into several languages * rated as best on many software servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 06:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239527] Review Request: wammu - Mobile Phone Manager Frontend - Gammu GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090655.l496tOvX026002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wammu - Mobile Phone Manager Frontend - Gammu GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239527 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 06:55:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 02:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090655.l496tZ0m026019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239527 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 07:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 03:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090725.l497PVlS028600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-09 03:25 EST ------- Some remarks: * You are using "dos2unix" to convert files. Please use /usr/bin/dos2unix instead and add BuildRequires: /usr/bin/dos2unix * Please move file conversion and permission fixing to %prep instead of %install and fix the source files instead of the installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 07:41:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 03:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090741.l497fLBi029974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-09 03:41 EST ------- 0.8.1-4 with bdf looks ok, but please do not rename the spec file in the package. I guess wqy-bitmapfont-bdf-all-cvs20070506 is a cvs snapshot: I think it would be preferable to make the initial package with an official release. So IMHO best to use wqy-bitmapfont-pcf-0.8.1-7.tar.gz currently or wait for the next official release. (I see wqy-bitmapfont-ttf-0.8.1-7.tar.gz was also released.:) I don't think you need to buildrequire make or %{_bindir}/env. perl is also listed in . It is generally better to avoid using explicit file requires since for them yum may need to download filelists.xml.gz which is rather big. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 07:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 03:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090743.l497hJjE030176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-09 03:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154379) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154379&action=view) wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec-4.patch some more suggested fixes and cleanup One more update and I think I would like to proceed to the formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 08:26:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 04:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090826.l498QEVG003797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sander at hoentjen.eu ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2007-05-09 04:26 EST ------- I built .23 locally, and it doesn't show any campaign (while .21 does). I am running on x86_64. Other then that it is a very nice game! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 08:49:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 04:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090849.l498nNpC006807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-09 04:49 EST ------- like to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 08:51:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 04:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239527] Review Request: wammu - Mobile Phone Manager Frontend - Gammu GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090851.l498p9Kh007063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wammu - Mobile Phone Manager Frontend - Gammu GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239527 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 08:51:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 04:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090851.l498pilj007128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 09:10:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 05:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090910.l499AbNF009369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-09 05:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154382) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154382&action=view) mock-referencer-build.log I am not yet a package-maintainer. This is my "pre-review" to exercise reviewing. I checked this package as follows. rpmlint is silent on both of this SRPM and the generated binary package. package name: reference: OK. spec file name: reference.spec: OK. license: GPL: %license field matches the actual license, COPYING is listed in %doc, OK. spec file: written in English, legible: OK. upstream source: http://icculus.org/referencer/downloads/referencer-1.0.3.tar.gz: md5sum:1179e0eafc17ef130b8d669255bef0b3 source: referencer-1.0.3.tar.gz: md5sum:1179e0eafc17ef130b8d669255bef0b3, matches to the upstream source, OK. build: mock successfully built this package on fc-6/i386, see the attached build.log, OK. BuildRequires: poppler-devel libgnomeuimm26-devel boost-devel gcc-c++ gettext perl(XML::Parser) desktop-file-utils: all required packages are listed, so mock builds successfully, OK. locale handling: by %find_lang %{name}, not by %{_datadir}/locale/*: OK. %prefix: not used: OK. shared library problem: not installed: OK. ownership of directories and files: all listed under %doc, ${_bindir} and ${_datadir}: OK. owning directories created by other packages: none: OK. duplicate listing in %file: none: OK. %defattr: (-,root,root,-): OK. at the beginning of %install: rm -rf %{buildroot}: OK. %clean: rm -rf %{buildroot} OK. usage of macros: consistent: OK. desktop file: %{name}.desktop is installed with desktop-file-install in %install: OK. %post, %postun: update desktop database, mime database and icon cache: OK. This packaging seems to be complete! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 09:26:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 05:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090926.l499QDpt011006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-09 05:26 EST ------- I am not yet a package-maintainer. This is my "pre-review" to exercise reviewing. rpmbuild builds rpms successfully from the source with ddccontrol.spec, and rpm -i installs the generated binary rpms (libddccontrol, ddccontrol, ddccontrol-applet) successfully. mock, however, ends with errors. This is due to lack of gettext in BuildRequires. Adding this to the spec file, mock builds rpms successfully. rpmlint says on ddccontrol-0.4.2-1.fc6.src.rpm: --------------------start here--------------------- W: ddccontrol non-standard-group System/Configuration/Hardware The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". W: ddccontrol hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /var/tmp/%{name}-buildroot A path is hardcoded in your Buildroot tag. It should be replaced by something like %{_tmppath}/%name-root. E: ddccontrol no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". E: ddccontrol no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". W: ddccontrol no-%clean-section The spec file doesn't contain a %clean section to remove the files installed by the %install section. --------------------end here------------------------ rpmlint says on the generated ddccontrol-0.4.2-1.fc6.i368.rpm: (Hereafter, I remove the same message about grouping above.) --------------------start here--------------------- E: ddccontrol standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 This package owns a directory that is part of the standard hierarchy, which can lead to default directory permissions or ownerships being changed to something non-standard. E: ddccontrol setuid-binary /usr/bin/ddcpci root 04711 The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid root. E: ddccontrol non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/ddcpci 04711 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. W: ddccontrol incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.2-alt2 0.4.2-1.fc6 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. W: ddccontrol unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ddccontrol W: ddccontrol unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ddcpci W: ddccontrol unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gddccontrol W: ddccontrol one-line-command-in-%post #%update_menus You should use %post -p instead of using: %post It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the excecution of the scriptlet. W: ddccontrol one-line-command-in-%postun #%clean_menus You should use %postun -p instead of using: %postun It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the excecution of the scriptlet. --------------------end here------------------------ rpmlint says on the generated ddccontrol-applet-0.4.2-1.fc6.i368.rpm: --------------------start here--------------------- W: ddccontrol-applet no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. W: ddccontrol-applet unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ddccontrol/ddcc-applet --------------------end here------------------------ rpmlint says on the generated libddccontrol-0.4.2-1.fc6.i368.rpm: --------------------start here--------------------- W: libddccontrol no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. W: libddccontrol unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libddccontrol.so.0.0.0 --------------------end here------------------------ Refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Please rewrite the spec file first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 09:47:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 05:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705090947.l499lOod013435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-09 05:47 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM reports W: gammu mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. rpmlint on RPM reports W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. rpmlint on gammu-devel reports W: gammu-devel no-dependency-on gammu W: gammu-devel summary-not-capitalized gammu development files Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. W: gammu-devel non-standard-group Development/libraries The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". rpmlint on gammu-libs reports E: gammu-libs library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libGammu.so.1.0 This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. E: gammu-libs library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libGammu.so.1.0 This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. any reason to have separate -libs rpms? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 10:01:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 06:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091001.l49A17XQ014695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-09 06:00 EST ------- I have just written "pre-review" on the following two new packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 referencer: a Gnome application to organise documents or references https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 ddccontrol: control monitor parameters,like brightness and contrast Writing review is a hard task than I expected! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 10:26:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 06:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239234] Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091026.l49AQAwe016636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239234 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:09:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091109.l49B91Qw020428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-09 07:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154387) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154387&action=view) Modified SPEC I did some workaround for your SPEC to solve most of rpmlint errors and warnings. kindly update SPEC,bump release and provide a new SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:13:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239546] New: Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239546 Summary: Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/mdsplib/mdsplib.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/mdsplib/mdsplib-0.11-2.src.rpm Description: METAR is a French acronym for Aviation Routine Weather Report. It is the standard format for reporting meteorological conditions. As a free service, the National Weather Service continually updates a server with METARs from all over the world. The MDSP Library provides a programmer with two functions, the major one being DcdMETAR, which decodes a METAR into structures provided by the library. Also prtDMETR, which prints out a decoded METAR structure. -- Packager note : It would be best to have this package patched to generate a shared library instead of only the default static library. It's not trivial since it doesn't use libtool, but would make sense since this version has been the latest for over 5 years now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:14:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230549] Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091114.l49BEaeZ020921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230549 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239546 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-09 07:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine-0.6-2.src.rpm * Tue May 8 2007 Matthias Saou 0.6-2 - Enable weather now that mdsplib is built. And make this bug depend on bug #239546 (mdsplib review request). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:14:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239546] Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091114.l49BElwf020940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239546 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |230549 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091116.l49BGhLT021115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-09 07:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-Coherence Short Description: Python framework to participate in digital living networks Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:19:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091119.l49BJ0LC021521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-09 07:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.6-3.src.rpm * Tue May 8 2007 Matthias Saou 0.1.6-3 - Change Coherence requirement to python-Coherence to match package name change. - python-Coherence should be imported and built shortly. - python-tag is the only dependency left... I didn't hear back from the author yet :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:32:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091132.l49BWogG023080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 07:32 EST ------- Builds. rpmlint clean with one exception: W: vegastrike patch-not-applied Patch4: vegastrike-0.4.2-opengl-fix.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. Looks like the line including the patch needs to be commented out. Meets naming guidelines. Spec name is good. Meets packaging guidelines. (albeit with some interesting scriptlets) License is good, but COPYING needs to be included in %doc, along with AUTHORS, DOCUMENTATION, etc. Spec is legible American English. Source does not match upstream tarball, but there is no such thing, and spec includes tar.bz2 generation steps. Hence, no URL. Builds on fc6/i386. More coming. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:35:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091135.l49BZem2023303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-09 07:35 EST ------- Good question. I have a wxsvg package "in the pipe" too. If the initial reporter doesn't show any interest in getting the package in anymore, I think I'll be submitting mine directly. Current version here : http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/wxsvg/wxsvg.spec http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/wxsvg/wxsvg-1.0-0.2.b7.src.rpm I haven't looked at the packages from this bug, but the first major issue I do see is that the version is wrong, as this "b7" is a "beta7", not some post 1.0 release, as Michael already pointed out. It builds fine on FC6 x86_64 for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 11:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 07:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239234] Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091152.l49Bqb3Y025032@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239234 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-09 07:52 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. eb24303c6eb4d77c3abf23511efce642 arp-scan-1.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text COPYING is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Requires: /usr/bin/perl libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpcap.so.0.9 perl(Getopt::Std) perl(LWP::Simple) perl(LWP::Simple) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 12:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091202.l49C2DQf026132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-09 08:02 EST ------- I saw neither python-gammu nor wammu uses gammu-libs rpm. So is there any other package needs gammu-libs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 12:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239234] Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091224.l49CO73x027693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239234 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-09 08:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arp-scan Short Description: Scanning and fingerprinting tool Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 12:24:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091224.l49COoLM027779@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-09 08:24 EST ------- Updated: - Move end-of-line fix to %prep - Update dos2unix BR Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Nmap-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 12:43:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091243.l49ChqXJ029681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium dwmw2 at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com 2007-05-09 08:43 EST ------- Shouldn't this be based on the Fedora binutils package, but with the suitable target definition? I did specfiles based on Fedora's for cross-compilation (to i686) once upon a time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 12:58:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091258.l49CwfWH031836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 08:58 EST ------- I think the BRs are OK, but I'm building in mock to test. Taking awhile. .. No locales, shared libraries. Not relocatable. No ownership issues evident. Permissions, defattr OK. %clean present and correct. Macros look OK. No overly large docs. No header files or static libraries. No pkgconfig No versioned .so No devel package. No .la. Desktop file present and handled properly. No ownership conflicts. install begins with buildroot wipe. All UTF-8 filenames. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 13:01:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 09:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091301.l49D1uJm032325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-09 09:01 EST ------- Fedora's binutils spec is IMHO somewhat ugly/messy. If it turns out that this will become just as ugly/messy I might go that way. But for now I prefer to start clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 13:03:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 09:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091303.l49D3Gcg032600@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-09 09:03 EST ------- Also this is not for arm-linux-fedora, but for arm-linux, the first target I have in mind is my gp2x handheld game device. But I'm trying to make this more generic then that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 13:03:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 09:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091303.l49D3NJC032618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 09:03 EST ------- Mock builds fine. BRs are OK. All other MUSTS are met. Looks like it's just the %doc issue and the patch question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 13:08:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 09:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091308.l49D8K7F000885@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-09 09:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Also this is not for arm-linux-fedora, This would be arm-redhat-linux. > but for arm-linux, arm-linux is not useful, because there exist many flavors of "*-linux" toolchains and each vendor/distributor ships it's own variant of toolchains. > the first target I > have in mind is my gp2x handheld game device. But I'm trying to make this more > generic then that. This won't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:03:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239119] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091403.l49E3PhG005256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Alias: perl-Class-C3-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-09 10:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-C3-XS Short Description: XS speedups for Class::C3 Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239119] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091403.l49E3b5u005275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Alias: perl-Class-C3-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:06:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091406.l49E6ZKH005473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-09 10:06 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:16:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091416.l49EGBL9006159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-09 10:16 EST ------- Now that tibbs and Ralf have done the hard work, I'll post my review :) Note that you can also use sed itself to fix end-of-line-encoding warnings; "sed -i '/\r//' filename" will do it. I'm just pointing this out, it's certainly not a blocker to use dos2unix. + source files match upstream: 5d5f113a9d166b07e041a5dc52f9c3ee Nmap-Parser-1.05.tar.gz 5d5f113a9d166b07e041a5dc52f9c3ee ../Nmap-Parser-1.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. (noarch) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Nmap-Parser-1.05-3.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Nmap::Parser) = 1.05 perl(Nmap::Parser::Host) perl(Nmap::Parser::Host::OS) perl(Nmap::Parser::Host::Service) perl(Nmap::Parser::Session) perl-Nmap-Parser = 1.05-3.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Storable) perl(XML::Twig) perl(strict) perl(vars) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=171, 1 wallclock secs ( 1.07 cusr + 0.28 csys = 1.35 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:16:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091416.l49EGPRO006189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:30:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091430.l49EUStU007397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-09 10:30 EST ------- In %files, %{perl_vendorarch}/Net/* should be %{perl_vendorarch}/Net. Missing br's on: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) Fix those two items, and I'll approve. + source files match upstream: cec04f6a07cf9e9ec90077c7f3970ffc Net-Libdnet-0.01.tar.gz cec04f6a07cf9e9ec90077c7f3970ffc ../Net-Libdnet-0.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Net-Libdnet-0.01-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Libdnet.so()(64bit) perl(Net::Libdnet) = 0.01 perl-Net-Libdnet = 0.01-1.fc6 == requires libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdnet.so.1()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) ** perl-Net-Libdnet-debuginfo-0.01-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Libdnet.so.debug()(64bit) perl-Net-Libdnet-debuginfo = 0.01-1.fc6 == requires + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=59, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.26 cusr + 0.16 csys = 0.42 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:39:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091439.l49EduPo008081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-09 10:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Also this is not for arm-linux-fedora, > This would be arm-redhat-linux. > > > but for arm-linux, > arm-linux is not useful, because there exist many flavors of "*-linux" > toolchains and each vendor/distributor ships it's own variant of toolchains. > > > the first target I > > have in mind is my gp2x handheld game device. But I'm trying to make this more > > generic then that. > This won't work. > Hmm, I thought that with gcc-multilib, it should be possible to have 2 generic toolchains: arm-linux and arm-uclinux, so that atleast the toolchain could be shared. But I guess when you add things like g++ ABI, that then even that is not possible. So does this mean that it would be better to just do an arm-gp2x-linux toolchain then? That would actually make things quite a bit easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:52:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091452.l49EqUw7009216@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-09 10:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Looks like the line including the patch needs to be commented out. > It has this comment above it: # not applied as no longer needed, kept for reference Commenting it out will exclude it from the srpm and from cvs-import, which is not what I want. > License is good, but COPYING needs to be included in %doc, along with AUTHORS, > DOCUMENTATION, etc. > Good catch will fix. (In reply to comment #16) > Mock builds fine. BRs are OK. All other MUSTS are met. > > Looks like it's just the %doc issue and the patch question. See above, here is a new version with the %doc fixed: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vegastrike.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vegastrike-0.4.3-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 14:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 10:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091457.l49Ev0b5009626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 10:56 EST ------- Ok. Sounds reasonable. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 15:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091503.l49F3KF3010233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-09 11:03 EST ------- Thanks for the review!! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vegastrike Short Description: 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 15:15:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091515.l49FFkrB011438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 11:15 EST ------- My permission errors brought about by log/temp/config path changes: [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/noarch/roundcubemail-0.1-beta2.2.3.noarch.rpm E: roundcubemail non-standard-dir-perm /etc/roundcubemail 0640 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php.dist 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /var/log/roundcubemail apache A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users E: roundcubemail non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/roundcubemail 0775 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/httpd/conf.d/roundcubemail.conf 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). W: roundcubemail spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/roundcubemail-0.1/SQL/postgres.initial.sql The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php.dist 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). W: roundcubemail conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php.dist A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here W: roundcubemail conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php.dist A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 15:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091522.l49FM5tF012141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-09 11:22 EST ------- Updated: - Added missing BRs - Fixed %files list Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Libdnet.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Libdnet-0.01-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 15:26:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091526.l49FQOTl012755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-09 11:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Nmap-Parser Short Description: Parse nmap scan data with perl Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 15:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091557.l49FvIp4015776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-09 11:57 EST ------- REVIEW: * rpmlint is quiet !* missing BR: mesa-libGLU-devel * licensed under GPL license and its text's included * required %post(un) supplied * dist tag present !* no macros in Source0 tag * buildroot's fine * package doesn't create any new directories * proper permissions of all files * desktop file seems fine * %clean section is fine * source's md5sum is good, but !* curiously enough, its name is different than the offical one. Adding %{version} tag should fix that problem THINGS TO DO: - add missing BR: mesa-libGLU-devel - add at least %{version} to Source0 tag - upload proper source code file to srpm (current one has a wrong name) The last issue forces change of versioning. Probably you can just replace "-" with ".", but if aby other (better) ideas are very welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 15:58:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091558.l49Fwfna015850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-09 11:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hippo-canvas Short Description: Crossplatform canvas using cairo Owners: walters at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 16:05:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091605.l49G5BM0016418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-09 12:05 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 16:05:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091605.l49G5Vka016446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-09 12:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > The last issue forces change of versioning. Probably you can just replace "-" > with ".", but if aby other (better) ideas are very welcome. I should have written "but any other (better) ideas are very welcome" ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 16:08:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091608.l49G8Nav016697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-09 12:08 EST ------- Well, * mcpp packaging/performance is okay * For pre-reviewing: - for referencer, actually Deji Akingunola is a good packager and the spec file seems no problem at a glance (I didn't check in detail) - for ddccontrol, according to your comment the spec file seems to have many problem. I guess more problem may be found.... (for this package, I have not seen the spec file yet) (In reply to comment #16) > Writing review is a hard task than I expected! Perhaps. While I have reviewed about 140 packages and have submitted about 40 review requests, reviewing srpm was very difficult for me first. Okay!! ------------------------------------------------------ This package (mcpp) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------ Please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". I will receive a mail which notices that you need a sponsor and then I will sponsor you. NOTE: devel repository is currently under the way of the merge of Core and Extras and you may meet some trouble. If you have some trouble, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 16:18:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091618.l49GI6LX017115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 16:20:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091620.l49GKJFI017286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 16:47:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091647.l49Gl1pV019131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-09 12:46 EST ------- typos in #1 comment: package name: referencer, not reference spec file: referencer.spec, not reference.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 16:58:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 12:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091658.l49GwVgx019620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-09 12:58 EST ------- > If there's a popular request for it, i can create an autostart desktop file > to start the daemon along with the desktop session. If you do that, you should really split off a strigi-libs subpackage so merely installing my KDE 4 packages won't force in a daemon some users may not want. That's how beagle is packaged, too (as well as other stuff such as mysql), so it wouldn't be a first. Still, I think this (both the .desktop file and the strigi-libs subpackage) would be the best solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 17:01:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091701.l49H176i019785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-09 13:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sys-Syscall Short Description: Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Owners: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 17:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091705.l49H5tiL020068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-09 13:05 EST ------- Almost okay. One issue: * Timestamps - This package installs some files which were not built or modified during rebuilding (such as .png, .svg, .glade..) and keeping timestamps on these files is recommended. (actually for this package only 3 files are built or modified) For this package, please use the following: ----------------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -p" install ----------------------------------------------------------- Other things are okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 17:39:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091739.l49HdtTt022752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-09 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > E: roundcubemail non-standard-dir-perm /etc/roundcubemail 0640 This is probably an error in your spec file. You probably want this: %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} %attr(0644,root,apache) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/* > E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php.dist 0640 > E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /var/log/roundcubemail apache > E: roundcubemail non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/roundcubemail 0775 These are expected and can be safely ignored. > E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/httpd/conf.d/roundcubemail.conf 0640 There is no particular reason that that you can't have this as 0644. > W: roundcubemail spurious-executable-perm Change the mode on these files to 0644 with chmod or install -m in the %install section. > E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php.dist 0640 Expected. W: roundcubemail conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php.dist W: roundcubemail conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php.dist It's complaining that these files are not marked with %config(noreplace). However, I thought you said you were now installing them as /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php and /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php respectively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 17:47:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091747.l49Hlo7v023195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-09 13:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > %attr(0644,root,apache) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/* %attr(0644,root,apache) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 17:50:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091750.l49Ho0bJ023315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-05-09 13:49 EST ------- Axel is there any progress in maildrop package submit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 17:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091757.l49HvjR5023870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-09 13:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > > W: roundcubemail spurious-executable-perm > > Change the mode on these files to 0644 with chmod or install -m in the %install > section. Sorry for the followups, I missed a few things without looking at the spec. I don't think you need any executables in the source files, so you should be able to: In %prep (after %setup), run find . -type f -print | xarg chmod a-x Then all those %attr lines with %roundcubemail can be replaced by just: %{roundcubedir} because there won't be permissions to fix (that's causing duplicate file listings in the rpm anyway). These odd permissions should be reported upstream as "undesirable". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 17:58:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091758.l49HwwLx024018@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-09 13:58 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 17:59:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091759.l49HxiT3024083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-09 13:59 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:04:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091804.l49I4gp8024653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rds204 at zepler.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-09 14:04 EST ------- ping, Robert? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091806.l49I61WK024857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 14:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > (In reply to comment #38) > > %attr(0644,root,apache) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/* > > %attr(0644,root,apache) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/* Thanks, I intuited that. :) (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #38) > > > W: roundcubemail spurious-executable-perm > > > > Change the mode on these files to 0644 with chmod or install -m in the %install > > section. > > Sorry for the followups, I missed a few things without looking at the spec. I > don't think you need any executables in the source files, so you should be able to: > > In %prep (after %setup), run > > find . -type f -print | xarg chmod a-x > > Then all those %attr lines with %roundcubemail can be replaced by just: > %{roundcubedir} > because there won't be permissions to fix (that's causing duplicate file > listings in the rpm anyway). > > These odd permissions should be reported upstream as "undesirable". > That's great, but what's xarg? [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba roundcubemail.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91340 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + rm -rf roundcubemail-0.1beta2 + /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/roundcubemail-0.1beta2.2.tar.gz + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd roundcubemail-0.1beta2 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 500 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 500 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + find . -type f -print + xarg chmod a-x /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91340: line 37: xarg: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91340 (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91340 (%prep) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091806.l49I6lJB024905@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-09 14:06 EST ------- Wow..!! It seem that the link above point to the obsolete built package. here is the right below. SRPM: http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/temp/gammu-1.10.0-1.fc6.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint output from main package: -------------------------------------------------- W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data ------------------------------------------------------------- These files are examples script that the end-user can use for more accebilities in his action with the Gammu command line. These files shouldn't be removed from its default executable permission. These above warning are harmless and can be ignored. --- > I saw neither python-gammu nor wammu uses gammu-libs rpm. So is there any > other > package needs gammu-libs? > any reason to have separate -libs rpms? As the upstream/developer mentioned for the build, the package can be build with or without share libraries where share libraries could be use with other applications that aim to work with gammu-libs for developing (such as framework, plugin, GUI, ...). In this case, no...detached libs is not a bad thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:08:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091808.l49I8Nkn025010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-09 14:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > That's great, but what's xarg? xargs... sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091822.l49IMpDH026299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 14:22 EST ------- Ok, that works for perms, save the non-standard warnings. Still breaks the app, Error 500, though. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.3.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-beta2.2.3.src.rpm Still haven't addressed the DES issue, will soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:47:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091847.l49Ill7b028237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-09 14:47 EST ------- http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-2488 "The IAX2 channel driver (chan_iax2) in Asterisk before 20070504 does not properly null terminate data, which allows remote attackers to trigger loss of transmitted data, and possibly obtain sensitive information (memory contents) or cause a denial of service (application crash), by sending a frame that lacks a 0 byte." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:52:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239480] Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091852.l49Iqd98028551@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239480 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: penguin- |Review Request: penguin- |command - Open source arcade|command - Open source arcade |game |game Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-09 14:52 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + tar ball maches with upstream + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm + Package contains verbatin copy of the license + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm + Package contains verbatin copy of the license. + License is ok. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Mockbuild works fine. Bad: - Pleae use the -p flag of install to preserve the timestamp of the installed artworks I have APPROVE you and hope, that you may fix the install request before you checkin your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:53:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091853.l49IrfxM028635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-09 14:53 EST ------- The build on x86_64 failed. I thought you tested it under x86_64? http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-6-extras/33099-netgen-1.3.7-7.fc6/ however, I've some segmentation fault when using netgen with my netlists. So I'll be working on finding more why and what is failing to contact upstream. Though netgen is important for my daily work, I prefer not to have a broken netgen on fedora repositories. So I'll take my time before closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 18:55:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239480] Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091855.l49It3WU028735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239480 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+, needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-09 14:55 EST ------- Sory, unfortunately I have set the wrong flag (fedora-cvs instead of fedora-review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 19:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091903.l49J3KeW029193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 15:03 EST ------- Added your DES suggestion, got this: W: roundcubemail percent-in-%post E: roundcubemail shell-syntax-error-in-%post Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.4.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-beta2.2.4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 19:28:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091928.l49JSJRS031252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-09 15:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154419) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154419&action=view) cleanups and fixes > Ok, that works for perms, save the non-standard warnings. Still breaks the app, > Error 500, though. Here is a diff against your spec in comment #43. It has misc cleanups and fixes. rpmlint output, all expected: E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php apache E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php 0640 E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /var/log/roundcubemail apache E: roundcubemail non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/roundcubemail 0775 E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php apache E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php 0640 W: roundcubemail incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-beta2.2.3 0.1-0.1.beta2.2.fc6 (last line will be fixed when you update the changelog) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 19:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091934.l49JY4xk031751@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-09 15:33 EST ------- Here it is http://dl.atrpms.net/all/maildrop-2.0.3-2.at.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/maildrop.spec But I think I'm supposed to reopen a new bugzilla ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 19:51:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091951.l49JpEb2000839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-09 15:51 EST ------- A definite improvement. I can use the app as installed. Now it's just the non-standard rpmlint errors and the following from the DES scriptlet on %post: [root at zanoni limb]# rpm -Uvh roundcubemail-0.1-beta2.3.noarch.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:roundcubemail warning: /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php created as /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php.rpmnew warning: /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php created as /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php.rpmnew ########################################### [100%] /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.92232: line 10: syntax error near unexpected token `let' /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.92232: line 10: ` let rand=${RANDOM}%${max}' error: %post(roundcubemail-0.1-beta2.3.noarch) scriptlet failed, exit status 2 Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.5.spec SRPM URL:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-beta2.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 19:57:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239480] Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705091957.l49JvPPB001372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239480 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-05-09 15:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: penguin-command Short Description: Open source arcade game Owners: rafalzaq at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092003.l49K3Aql001788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:03:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212898] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092003.l49K3qJT001825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-Pager - Renderer driver using PEAR::Pager Alias: DG-Renderer-Pager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212898 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:05:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212925] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092005.l49K5FOq001988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-RSS - DataSource driver using RSS files Alias: pear-DG-RSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212925 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:06:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218226] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092006.l49K6GeZ002152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-MDB2 - DataSource driver using PEAR::MDB2 and an SQL query Alias: pear-DG-MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218226 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:07:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233340] Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092007.l49K7d9n002348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goocanvas - A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233340 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092013.l49KDcKJ003080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:15:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238932] Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092015.l49KFB5Z003266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238932 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:16:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239480] Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092016.l49KGJG9003388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239480 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:17:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092017.l49KHcuW003533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:18:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239234] Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092018.l49KIs1w003753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239234 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239199] Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092019.l49KJeOH003857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Alias: perl-Archive-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239199 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092020.l49KKioB004035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092021.l49KLvOR004285@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:24:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092024.l49KOKCg004674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:26:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092026.l49KQ3WR004897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-09 16:26 EST ------- It is a futile effort. Also note, your address is not obfuscated in the spec files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:27:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092027.l49KRZLL005026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235741] Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092027.l49KRv6O005097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hippo-canvas - Crossplatform canvas using cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235741 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:28:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092028.l49KSaLq005178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:30:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092030.l49KUQGw005554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:32:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092032.l49KWEAC005835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092033.l49KXwAt006140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:34:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092034.l49KYxKJ006249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092035.l49KZ9Di006276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-09 16:35 EST ------- Right, bit I could have obfuscated it and there was also Pierre address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:37:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092037.l49KbweU006484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092040.l49KeiYk006641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-09 16:40 EST ------- OK, I've thought about it some more and I'm happy with the current naming. libwhisker2 is the name that upstream users and that people would expect to find this package under, we can't guess at what CPAN would name the module since it accepts module names that are not identical to the name of the topmost defined package, and the expected Perl library provides perl(LW2) are still there for automatic dependencies. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:40:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239119] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092040.l49KeohQ006668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Alias: perl-Class-C3-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:41:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092041.l49KfmXc006762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-09 16:41 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * name is right * follows guidelines * free software licences, included. Files are generated using SWIG, so there may be an issue with GPL/LGPL since the swig template is missing and proper license headers are missing, and no word about license in the README. However mecab is also packaged and people can go to the website so it is likely to be right as said in other reviews. * match upstream b924751bf58d7d6c4f3b6b5bbe8e1640 mecab-perl-0.95.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: MeCab.so perl(MeCab) perl(MeCab::DictionaryInfo) perl(MeCab::Node) perl(MeCab::Path) perl(MeCab::Tagger) perl(MeCabc) * %files section right APPROVED About -f, for directories, indeed you need the -f, but my comments were for %{__mv} -f test.pl.utf8 test.pl || \ %{__rm} -f test.pl.utf8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:42:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092042.l49KgbWi006844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:51:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092051.l49KpHgs007454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-09 16:51 EST ------- Wasn't able to get "mock" running (not enough disk space, I think) But uploaded the other changes that I made yesterday, as release 2: Spec URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim.spec SRPM URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim-1.2.6-2.fc7.src.rpm By the way it seems that PAM support is not enabled yet in SLiM, but might as well include the pam files and other infrastructure ? http://developer.berlios.de/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=1979&group_id=2663 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 20:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092054.l49KsHWl007680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-09 16:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154428) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154428&action=view) diff against comment #46 Please note your version-release is still wrong. Your releases should be going like this: roundcubemail-0.1-0.1.beta2.2 roundcubemail-0.1-0.2.beta2.2 roundcubemail-0.1-0.3.beta2.2 roundcubemail-0.1-0.4.beta2.2 etc and when 0.1 is released: roundcubemail-0.1-1 I think the percent-in-%post is a false positive, but I'll look into it further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 21:02:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092102.l49L2ZgT008062@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-09 17:02 EST ------- Without further progress, will be closed in 1 week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 21:20:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092120.l49LKpRB008994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-09 17:20 EST ------- > I agree the plugin should be named audacious-plugin-itouch. > But to do this, I must modify the source tarbal, and repackage > it. Do I have the right to do that? Nah, you don't have to. %setup accepts a switch, -n, which allows for changing the exact name of the folder in the source tarball. In this case, simply change to this: %setup -q -n audacious-itouch-%{version} Quick Review (not official): Since I can't download the source, this is just going to be a quick runthrough. MUST Items: - rpmlint gives no errors. - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The package is licenced under an open-source licence (GPL). - Licence info included in %doc. - Spec file named %{name}.spec. - Spec file written in en-US and is legible. - The package compiles on i386. - Build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires properly. - No locales in the package. - ldconfig isn't called, but the library is not located in the standard linker path. - Package is not relocatable. - Package owns all directories it creates. - Permissions on files are set properly. - Package has a proper %clean section. - Spec file uses consistent macros. - Package contains permissible content. - All files in %doc are not necessary for program application. - .la files are properly removed. - Package does not create it's own directories. - Package runs %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of install. - All filenames are valid UTF-8. Possible problems: - As mentioned before, the package should probably be called audacious-plugins-itouch. - The Source entry is actually a 404 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 21:22:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092122.l49LMTwe009136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-09 17:22 EST ------- Done. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/process_bug.cgi#c8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 21:26:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239119] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092126.l49LQaAB009438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-XS - XS speedups for Class::C3 Alias: perl-Class-C3-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239119 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-09 17:26 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 21:30:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239199] Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092130.l49LUbnI009561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-Any - Single interface to deal with file archives Alias: perl-Archive-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239199 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-09 17:30 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 21:50:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092150.l49LoJbv011147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-09 17:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-Libdnet Short Description: Perl Interface to libdnet Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 22:02:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 18:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092202.l49M263U011987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-09 18:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Regarding 1), I had already "chmod -x"'ed the files. I didn't have time to take a look at the latest srpm before I commented. > 2) IRC is not a place to expect "official" answers. I've gone through all of the > guidelines and found no mention of an initscripts requirement. The parent > directory ownership guidelines might apply here, but again, this is a special > case, since no working installed system can not have initscripts, since the > Linux kernel package itself requires it. See also spot's answer on this : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-May/msg00028.html You will not find an official answer on #fedora-devel or the mailing list because there is none. I'm not going to hold up your package since this issue is not mandated either for or against by the guidelines of the FPC. Please follow the thread that you started and if strong opinions weigh in on either side, take it into consideration and make appropriate changes post-import. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 22:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 18:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092218.l49MIUEO012852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-09 18:18 EST ------- Thank you. Request for CVS admin: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-mecab Short Description: Perl binding for MeCab Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 22:46:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 18:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092246.l49MkVno014112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 22:50:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 18:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092250.l49MovSs014313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-09 18:50 EST ------- Sorry, I saw the cascading build failures and misinterpreted them. Indeed, perl_vendorlib would have pulled in all of the files, but would also have had you owning the perl_vendorarch directory, which would have been problematic. Things look better now. I note that Source0: seems wrong. You have http://search.cpan.org/authors/id/I/IR/IROBERTS/Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-%{version}.tar.gz but that only results in an error. CPAN indicates it should be http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/T/TT/TTAR/Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-%{version}.tar.gz I've used the latter so that I can fetch the upstream sources. You'll need to add BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::More) to cope with the perl-devel split. (See the end of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl. Actually, Test::More is still in the base Perl package but I'm not sure if the plans are to keep it there.) * source files match upstream: 83c1c438ef394fb9c9925805a07dce9865794e79df8ca19686c8548cd99fca97 Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.01.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires missing * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: AES.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::AES) = 0.01 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES = 0.01-2.fc7 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.008005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 23:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 19:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092318.l49NInmX015242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-09 19:18 EST ------- I'd like to look into this because I think it may be useful for a network configuration I'm investigating, but I'm concerned about the above reports and I also note that there's a 0.9 version out there currently. The package does build, but the install is a bit confused: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.80770: line 3: fg: no job control error: %post(nss-mdns-0.8-2.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 A few other comments: rpmlint wants the summary capitalized, but I wouldn't capitalize it in this situation either. You need Requires(pre): /sbin/ldconfig You could just use %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig or add Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig You really shouldn't use %makeinstall unless make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install doesn't work. I can't say that I'm confortable with automatically adding the library to nsswitch.conf, but I suppose the point is that it needs no configurarion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 23:26:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 19:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092326.l49NQkdT015525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-09 19:26 EST ------- Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 9 23:44:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 19:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705092344.l49Niog9016140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 00:01:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233342] Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100001.l4A01XQE016570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 00:01:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100001.l4A01sCA016590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 Bug 239236 depends on bug 233342, which changed state. Bug 233342 Summary: Review Request: pygoocanvas - GooCanvas python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233342 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 00:30:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100030.l4A0U0b0017629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-09 20:29 EST ------- Buildrequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) is needed to cope with the perl-devel split. I don't see any other requirements in Makefile.PL or the test suite. However, there's one very significant problem with this package: I can find no statement of the license anywhere. You've indicated "GPL or Artistic"; I'm curious where that comes from. Unfortunately packages with no license statements are simply not acceptable as-is; we at least need an email from the author indicating the license the package is under. * source files match upstream: eff9477303a70308596c0b41623294f9584855270ad9997a06354d6d6f9e87e8 Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. ? license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: Random.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Random) = 0.03 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random = 0.03-2.fc7 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: 1..1 ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 00:32:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100032.l4A0Wako017694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 00:53:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 20:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238932] Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100053.l4A0rsJn018161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decoratortools - Use class and function decorators -- even in Python 2.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238932 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-05-09 20:53 EST ------- Imported, tagged and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 01:52:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 21:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100152.l4A1qPrH019858@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 02:09:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 22:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100209.l4A2926n020540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-09 22:08 EST ------- ping? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 02:37:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 22:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100237.l4A2bn8m022271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-09 22:37 EST ------- As should be expected now, this needs BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker). The test suite needs perl(Test) but I'm really not sure if the plan is to split that off or not. Really, that's the only issue I see with this package. Let me go over one more tonight and then we can start getting some of these checked in. * source files match upstream: d709ce87110f0f1ab1c9d957f11239d5c4e411733b0e6ea08576720e1f147c80 Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum-0.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: Bignum.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum) = 0.03 perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum::CTX) perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum = 0.03-2.fc7 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum) perl(DynaLoader) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: [...] ok 52 + exit 0 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 02:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 22:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100245.l4A2ju5f022813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 03:00:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 23:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100300.l4A30QV3023781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From abartlet at redhat.com 2007-05-09 23:00 EST ------- Looking over http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines I see a few things: The licence versions should be spelled out more clearly. rpmlint passes with no errors The Source0 should be a full URL I'll look at more later, but for now it compiles (with a disturbing nubmer of warnings) on FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 03:11:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 23:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100311.l4A3BwN0024552@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-09 23:11 EST ------- As discussed in the past, it may be impossible to ship this in Fedora or RHEL signed because that is in conflict with our licenses and guarantees of reproducibility. The resulting software would not be "Free". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 04:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 00:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222575] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100426.l4A4Q4G0028575@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid - Meta-element which holds any other element in a grid Alias: pear-ElementGrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222575 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 00:26 EST ------- 0.1.1 pushed, thanks for the reviews! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 04:50:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 00:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100450.l4A4osiF028983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-05-10 00:50 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.4-2.fc6.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.4-2.fc6.src.rpm * Wed May 9 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 1.4.4-2 - Add a patch to fix CVE-2007-2488/ASA-2007-013 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 05:22:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100522.l4A5Mjb4029938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-10 01:22 EST ------- Source0: URL is incorrect; should be http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/T/TJ/TJMATHER/Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-%{version}.tar.gz I find it useful to run spectool -g just to make sure that the Source URLs in the spec can be fetched without error. Blah BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) blah. Annoying, isn't it? But as soon as F7 branches, perl will lose the perl-devel dependency things packages that don't pull in all of their build-time requirements will break, so we're trying to catch them all in review and prevent pain later. And again I'm not sure whether you'll need perl(Test) or not. You get better test coverage if you have a build-time dependency on perl(Digest::SHA1). The package itself doesn't use it, but one of the tests does. * source files match upstream: f786a76441106a6ce3de4d153bddd3fc0a8a90657b2cb6778aa362e4e7d66cef Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.13.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: DSA.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::DSA) = 0.13 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA = 0.13-2.fc7 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DynaLoader) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: (with a build dependency on Digest::SHA1 added) All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=115, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.62 cusr + 0.18 csys = 0.80 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 06:53:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 02:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237883] Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100653.l4A6reCp032185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SGML-Parser-OpenSP - Perl interface to the OpenSP SGML and XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237883 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-10 02:53 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 07:18:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 03:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100718.l4A7IACj000680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-10 03:18 EST ------- Package name: PASS (pykdeextensions) License: PASS (LGPL) Spec Legible: PASS (en_US) md5sum matches: NT rpmlint clean: FAIL Builds correctly: PASS (i386) RPaths removed: FAIL Spec has %clean: PASS Macro use consistant: PASS Contains code/content: PASS -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: PASS -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: NA Contains %doc: PASS Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: NA No duplicate ownerships: PASS rm -rf %{buildroot}: PASS RPM uses valid UTF-8: PASS %defattr is set: PASS No duplicate %files: PASS Not relocatable: PASS Calls ldconfig: PASS Supports Locales: NA BR's are correct: NT NA - Not Applicable NT - Not Tested rpmlint on build RPMS: E: pykdeextensions non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/kdedistutils.py 0644 E: pykdeextensions non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/qtuicompiler.py 0644 E: pykdeextensions zero-length /usr/share/doc/pykdeextensions-0.4.0/NEWS E: pykdeextensions binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/libpythonize.so.0.0.0 ['/usr/lib'] E: pykdeextensions-devel non-executable-script /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeapp/src/prefdialog.py 0644 rpmlint on SRPM: W: pykdeextensions patch-not-applied Patch1: pykdeextensions-0.4.0-rpath.patch Happy to ignore the patch-not-applied, NEWS could nearly be removed though. Other notes: rpm -qlp produced: /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeapp/AUTHORS /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeapp/COPYING /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeapp/INSTALL /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeapp/MANIFEST.in /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeutility/AUTHORS /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeutility/COPYING /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeutility/INSTALL /usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeutility/MANIFEST.in I assume the files are needed... In summary: If you can fix the rpath and non-executable-script's I'll run I final test in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 08:30:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 04:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100830.l4A8UJ9d005895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-10 04:30 EST ------- Right, I know this may be the first reject in a while so I'm gonna split this into two parts, jargon and some rationale, BUT... although Autodownloader in principal is still okay, on extra consideration of the PackagingGuidelines and quick discussions with a couple of other contributors (including other Games SIG people) I don't feel comfortable setting the flag to +, in actual fact, per PackageReviewProcess (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess) I'm closing the bug as WONTFIX and setting fedora-review as - Just some quick rationale: * Although the data files can be freely downloaded, they cannot be freely distributed per the licensees email * The agreement to allow distribution via his site only was given in 1997, I believe that Copyright law gives content 50 years before released out of copyright (and even then there are ways of extending the claim) * While per the autodownloader review I'm happy with files been placed in the users directory but it's the fact that the game won't start without the user agreeing is in my opinion bad The next stage in my opinion is to take this up with fedora-devel/maintainers or even fedora-legal, maybe even FESCo in the end. I'd be happy to review once again if/when the bug gets reopened. If it's any consolation, I have fully checked the package and would have normally been happy to approve, but legal gets in the way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 08:32:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 04:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100832.l4A8WpEG006119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-10 04:32 EST ------- Oh, an addition to the rationale: The data would typically be okay under the binary firmware provision in the ReviewGuidelines, but the non-redistribute part of the author/distributors agreement is the gotcha. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 08:37:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 04:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100837.l4A8b0WF006391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-10 04:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: autodir Short Description: Creates user directories on demand Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 09:10:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 05:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100910.l4A9ACfd009070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-10 05:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > The build on x86_64 failed. I thought you tested it under x86_64? > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-6-extras/33099-netgen-1.3.7-7.fc6/ I did test it on x86_64, but I am indeed the one to blame here. Yum installs both tcl.i386 and tcl.x86_64, so when building the package, netgen would find the i386 libraries. This, however, is not the case when building in mock. Then only the x86_64 libs are installed. By adding --with=tcllibs=%{_libdir} and --with-tklibs%{_libdir}, the package also builds in mock. Sorry for my lack of attention to details, I hope my review skills will improve over time! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 09:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 05:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100911.l4A9BGlW009232@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 05:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Right, I know this may be the first reject in a while so I'm gonna split this > into two parts, jargon and some rationale, > > BUT... although Autodownloader in principal is still okay, on extra > consideration of the PackagingGuidelines and quick discussions with a couple of > other contributors (including other Games SIG people) I don't feel comfortable > setting the flag to + It would have been nice if I was involved in these discussions. Are there any logs of them, any other reasons mentioned in the discussions not mentioned in comment #7 ? If I understand correctly this boils down too: > * While per the autodownloader review I'm happy with files been placed in the > users directory but it's the fact that the game won't start without the user > agreeing is in my opinion bad > The rest I agree with and is why autodownloader was written to begin with. So if I understand correctly the only real issue is, that the xu4 engine is not usable without any data files. Don't we ship players / libs for a gazillion other file formats too, I'm sure most of them are not usefull without actual data files, and that we do not ship data files in all supported formats. I fail to see the difference. For example we also ship libsidplay and the xmms-sid plugin, where as I'm sure we do not ship any .sid files. Both are useless without any .sid files still we ship them. Anyways I'll contact Spot about this, and then escalate as needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 09:14:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 05:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100914.l4A9E3Kt009459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 05:13 EST ------- p.s. Also I have announced the idea of autodownloader a long time ago, and there wasn't any real objection (nor any real support), see this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-August/msg00558.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 09:34:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 05:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100934.l4A9YSrb011220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-10 05:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Right, I know this may be the first reject in a while so I'm gonna split this > > into two parts, jargon and some rationale, > > > > BUT... although Autodownloader in principal is still okay, on extra > > consideration of the PackagingGuidelines and quick discussions with a couple of > > other contributors (including other Games SIG people) I don't feel comfortable > > setting the flag to + > It would have been nice if I was involved in these discussions. Are there any > logs of them, any other reasons mentioned in the discussions not mentioned in > comment #7 ? The discussions were quick "oh, by the way, whats your opinion on this compared with that" (this been the review, that been the guidelines) otherwise. > If I understand correctly this boils down too: > > * While per the autodownloader review I'm happy with files been placed in the > > users directory but it's the fact that the game won't start without the user > > agreeing is in my opinion bad > > > The rest I agree with and is why autodownloader was written to begin with. So if > I understand correctly the only real issue is, that the xu4 engine is not usable > without any data files. Don't we ship players / libs for a gazillion other file > formats too, I'm sure most of them are not usefull without actual data files, > and that we do not ship data files in all supported formats. I fail to see the > difference. > For example we also ship libsidplay and the xmms-sid plugin, where as I'm sure > we do not ship any .sid files. Both are useless without any .sid files still we > ship them. I think you'd find the difference is that xu4 cannot START without the files, by all means you can start xmms with the -sid plugin, and you can sure build programs with libsidplay. > Anyways I'll contact Spot about this, and then escalate as needed. As I've stated autodownloader is fine, it can even be used by independant packages, but we are talking about xu4 here, and the data files, do not meet the packaging guidelines, the game will not start/work at all without them. Until the guidelines are changed to suit this, or there is a consensus, OR someone from fedora-legal states that it's okay, I'm not changing position on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 09:41:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 05:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100941.l4A9fxbU011886@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2007-05-10 05:41 EST ------- Thanks Bernard. Some of the issues raised with the spec file/installer have been addressed already and I'll make a note to see to the others for the next release. As for the desktop icon being file-roller, it's been that way since I started working on pybackpack. I'll see if I can get a more suitable icon drawn up, or find a stock "backup" icon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 09:48:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 05:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705100948.l4A9m44N012266@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 05:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I think you'd find the difference is that xu4 cannot START without the files, > by all means you can start xmms with the -sid plugin, and you can sure build > programs with libsidplay. well, you cannot start a cmdline sid player either without any sid files, still I'm sure that that would be fine, but this is pointeless, as said I've asked Spot who usually takes the decisions about thie kinda licensing related stuff. (Although there is no licensing problem here, as we are not distributing anything other then GPL code). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 10:29:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 06:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101029.l4AATham014284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-10 06:29 EST ------- Ok so new SRPM gave me following rpmlint warnings which can be ignored as I saw some core packages are also allowing following rpmlint warnings W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp /bin/sh An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. But I think you should solve follwoing easily W: gammu mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Ok so no problem for -libs subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 11:05:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 07:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101105.l4AB5pJP015642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-10 07:05 EST ------- ohh I saw above warnings for FC6 packages and they got removed in devel branch. So you also need to solve rpmlint warnings chmod 644 to docs/examples/ppp and docs/examples/fax -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 11:25:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 07:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101125.l4ABP6Qq016404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-10 07:25 EST ------- Contacted upstream. " First, and just to be clear: I'm just the current maintainer of Net::Pcap, I didn't wrote most of the XS code so there may be some bugs and it may be hard for me to correct them as I barely speak XS. What I really did with Net::Pcap was to improve the documentation, rewrite a full test suite, and implement the recent libpcap features. The unexpected success is quite expected: the tests are marked as TODO because the results don't always correspond to what I expect (or strangely produce good results where I expected them not to). AFAICT, these small discrepancies are present since a very long time but only appear now because I wrote the code to fully test Net::Pcap. As nobody have ever shown up asking for this, this means that either no one has noticed or that no one is using Net::Pcap :-) To sum up, unless you have some copious spare time to spend chasing this bug, I'd suggest to simply ignore it for now. Don't hesitate to ask me if you have other questions or tell how I can ease your packaging work. Regards -- S?bastien Aperghis-Tramoni" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 11:33:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 07:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222888] Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101133.l4ABXcME016800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tiquit - A PHP5-compatible help desk incident tracking/knowledgebase system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222888 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-10 07:33 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 11:40:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 07:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233596] Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101140.l4ABeRGc016999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 11:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 07:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101140.l4ABeSDI017011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 Bug 233598 depends on bug 233596, which changed state. Bug 233596 Summary: Review Request: python-Coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233596 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 12:15:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101215.l4ACFIri019230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-10 08:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.6.spec SRPM URL:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-0.1.beta2.2.src.rpm Fixed versioning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 12:22:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101222.l4ACMtCb019488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-10 08:22 EST ------- No news from the author yet. I've looked around, and Debian has recently included the package, addding a copy of the BSD license to it. So I just did the same. Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-tag/python-tag.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-tag/python-tag-0.91-2.src.rpm * Thu May 10 2007 Matthias Saou 0.91-2 - Include BSD license text, copied from the debian package (Debian #417372). - Include minor patch for upstream 0.92 backports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 12:36:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230549] Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101236.l4ACawD5020171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230549 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-10 08:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine-0.6.6-1.src.rpm * Thu May 10 2007 Matthias Saou 0.6.6-1 - Update to 0.6.6 by including the official patch (no full sources available). - Remove no longer needed (and possibly incorrect anyway) install patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 12:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101245.l4ACjl40020509@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-10 08:45 EST ------- The translations are 8k a piece and there are 23 of them. Is there any point to not including them in the base package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 12:56:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101256.l4ACuOBb021406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-05-10 08:56 EST ------- http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver.spec http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver-4.10.2-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 12:57:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201502] Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101257.l4ACvppo021611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PhpDocumentor Alias: phpDocumentor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201502 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2007-05-10 08:57 EST ------- Yep, just waiting for the dust from the merge to settle. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 12:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 08:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101258.l4ACwMhB021705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-05-10 08:58 EST ------- - Solved all mentioned issue in the thread, except ruby build (that one need investigation). - New upstream release is just bugfix, it not affect way of packing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 13:38:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101338.l4ADcnV0025123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-05-10 09:38 EST ------- As discussed we will ship an unsigned jar in Fedora. This is adequate for use in an SSL context but it will fail as a JCE provider. The license is the Mozilla tri-license. I used the same license string as the existing NSS and NSPR packages (MPL/GPL/LGPL) There is no tar file that I could find so I updated the spec to include instructions on pulling it from CVS. I also added some information on why the jar can't be signed. Spec URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rcritten/jss.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rcritten/jss-4.2.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 13:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101346.l4ADkRnS025649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-10 09:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.7.spec SRPM URL:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-0.2.beta2.2.src.rpm Added langpacks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 13:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101351.l4ADp0xK025863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 09:50 EST ------- Rebuild finished. I will check new rpms later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 13:52:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237170] Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101352.l4ADqAGI025943@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: repoman - Tool for configuring yum(8) settings and repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237170 clumens at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 13:54:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101354.l4ADsL6u026049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 09:54 EST ------- Hmm, I've been thinking and reading about this some more, and can someone please tell me where in the guidelines it says that an oss program that requires some content to be usefull, may only be included when that content can be included too? The only thing close to this I can find is the shareware section of the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9188d8409f09df3a87140acc70b20b5b2d6890b0 Notice that that says: "In this case, the gamedata files can be packaged and included in Fedora, as long as the files meet the requirements for binary firmware." Notice the "can be packaged", nowhere does it say that it must be packaged, or that opensource engines like doom, without content, are not permissable. If you think it says so, please quote the part where it does. The only other sections that comes close is emulators, and that doesn't apply here, as this is clearly as much an emulator as the doom engine is an emulator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 14:15:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101415.l4AEFBKw027843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 fabrice at bellet.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fabrice at bellet.info 2007-05-10 10:15 EST ------- Yes. Back from vacation. FlightGear has been successfully build for FC-6 and devel. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 14:18:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101418.l4AEID9r028452@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | Alias| |xu4 Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 10:18 EST ------- 17:17:33 @ XulChris | so what is the case with u4? it has a binary blob that is freely available but non-distributable? 17:17:39 G | However, it is worth noting that some non-executable content exists that is required to make Open Source applications functional. An example of this would be open sourced game engines, such as Doom, Heretic, and Descent. These game engines come with freely distributable shareware gamedata files. 17:17:45 G | In this case, the gamedata files can be packaged and included in Fedora, as long as the files meet the requirements for binary firmware. 17:18:01 @ XulChris | right but the u4 data doesnt fall into that category AFAIK 17:18:21 G | problem here, it's not "freely distributable" it's "freely avaliable if you get it from upstream" 17:18:47 @ XulChris | ok yea 17:19:09 G | upstream for datafiles is also 10 years old 17:19:17 @ XulChris | so you cannot include the binary blob as a package, but i see no problem including a downloader to download it from upstream and installing it 17:19:17 G | so the chances of contacting them are slim i think 17:21:14 G | right, but god knows what section says that a package must be usable as is (i think) 17:25:04 @ XulChris | well, there is nothing illegal about distributing GPL software even if its unusable :) 17:25:42 @ XulChris | if origin systems wants to slap the dmca on redhat im sure they will just remove the package 17:26:12 fedorared | can you distribute a link to something you can't get anywhere else? I think so, but of course IANAL. 17:26:46 G | I'm gonna post to fedora-legal later tonight I think 17:26:58 G | is there a tracker bug for pack reviews forwarded to -legal? 17:27:30 @ XulChris | yes FE-LEGAL i believe, have to check Here is the log from the Games channel, notice that nobody actually said this shouldn't be packaged and I actually say "there is nothing illegal about it". In my opinion, this package is perfectly fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 14:39:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101439.l4AEdOlw030383@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dev at nigelj.com |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 10:39 EST ------- oops, I actually didn't mean to reset the flags. My initial reaction was to just reset the flags and do the review myself, I forgot to change the flags back though. Since they have been changed, I guess I'll go ahead and re-assign it to me and do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 14:42:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101442.l4AEgYG0030580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 10:42 EST ------- ==== MUST FIX ==== - Add Requires: desktop-file-utils Everything else looks okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 14:43:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101443.l4AEhVcV030673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 10:43 EST ------- er that should be BuildRequires, but you know that ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 14:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101450.l4AEo3ND031134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 10:50 EST ------- ==== SHOULD FIX ==== please also add a comment in spec why you use %{makeinstall} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 14:59:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101459.l4AEx0Hd031883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-10 10:58 EST ------- You know, some time ago I would have objected to this package for precisely the reason that Nigel did, but then the decision was made to include Codec Buddy, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureCodecBuddy, which exists only to download non-free (but zero cost) content in precisely the same manner that autodownloader+xu4 does. So now I really don't know where the line should be drawn. I suppose if you actually had to go out and buy something in order to make xu4 useful then that would be unacceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 15:30:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239480] Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101530.l4AFUbk1002127@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: penguin-command - Open source arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239480 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-05-10 11:30 EST ------- Thanks for review. Built for fc6 and fc7. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 15:40:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101540.l4AFeGDC002729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 11:40 EST ------- Well, for 4.10.2-1: * Dependency for main package: - Well, for unknown reason I didn't notice, however none of 4 subpackages have no dependency for main (mapserver) package. Please check if this is correct. IMO at least perl/python/java binding subpackage should have the release number dependent dependency for main package (i.e. should have: "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%[release}"). * Source - The URL of the source returns "not found". Maybe: http://download.osgeo.org/mapserver/mapserver-4.10.2.tar.gz ? * (minor) Macros - /usr/sbin/ can be replaced with %{_sbindir} (preferred) - And in the line "mkdir -p %{buildroot}/etc/php.d" /etc should be %{_sysconfdir} Other things are okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 15:41:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101541.l4AFf4XE002834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 krh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fenlason at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From krh at redhat.com 2007-05-10 11:41 EST ------- Adding Jay to the Cc list. Upstream libdc1394 2.0 (soon to be released) supports the new firewire stack in rawhide. We should package the 2.0 version instead. But I'm guessing that there's an interest in having this working with libdc1394 1.x, but that should be possible too, we just have to backport the support from the 2.0 version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 15:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101543.l4AFhJmv003046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 11:43 EST ------- Well, would you modify your spec/srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 15:52:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101552.l4AFqqSp003815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-05-10 11:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Well, for 4.10.2-1: > > * Dependency for main package: > - Well, for unknown reason I didn't notice, however > none of 4 subpackages have no dependency for main > (mapserver) package. Please check if this is correct. updated. php one not require this, it embed everything inside that apache module, so thats exception. > > IMO at least perl/python/java binding subpackage should > have the release number dependent dependency for main > package (i.e. should have: > "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%[release}"). yes updated. > > * Source > - The URL of the source returns "not found". Maybe: > http://download.osgeo.org/mapserver/mapserver-4.10.2.tar.gz ? umm, updated. (they changed truely) > > * (minor) Macros > - /usr/sbin/ can be replaced with %{_sbindir} (preferred) > - And in the line "mkdir -p %{buildroot}/etc/php.d" > /etc should be %{_sysconfdir} updated every places. > > Other things are okay. Thank you Tasaka ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 15:53:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101553.l4AFraED003878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-05-10 11:53 EST ------- http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver.spec http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver-4.10.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 15:59:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101559.l4AFx964004370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 11:59 EST ------- Only checked by diff. The last issue (minor) is the line: ---------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README COMMITERS GD-COPYING HISTORY.TXT %doc INSTALL MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT %doc rfc symbols tests %doc fonts %{_bindir}/shp2img %{_bindir}/shptree %{_bindir}/sortshp %{_bindir}/tile4ms /usr/sbin/mapserv <----- THIS LINE (please use macro) ------------------------------------------------ Please fix in CVS. Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (mapserver) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 16:00:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101600.l4AG0YD0004459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-10 12:00 EST ------- Hi Kristian! As i known some projects that use libdc1394-1 aren't currently aware about -2 API. So indeed that would be fine to have a -1 release unless upstream can support -2 API... Asking to do so about videolan... Others projets may also be concerned... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 16:04:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101604.l4AG4R0u004788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-05-10 12:04 EST ------- http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver.spec http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/mapserver-4.10.2-3.fc7.src.rpm Minor todo for my list: - When pdflib is in fedora enable mapserver against it. - When ming is in fedora enable mapserver against it. - Fix and enable ruby also in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 16:05:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101605.l4AG5H0W004860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 16:09:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101609.l4AG9NDl005021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 ------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com 2007-05-10 12:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mapserver Short Description: Environment for spatially-enabled internet applications Owners: cbalint at redhat.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 16:10:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101610.l4AGA5M9005067@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: clutter-gtk |Review Request: clutter-gtk |- basic GTK clutter widget |- basic GTK clutter widget Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 12:09 EST ------- Perhaps this can be approved with some few fixes (if any) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 16:54:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101654.l4AGsVNd007508@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-10 12:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > As for the desktop icon being file-roller, it's been that way since I started > working on pybackpack. I'll see if I can get a more suitable icon drawn up, or > find a stock "backup" icon. You already include pybackpack_logo.png. All you have to do is point the .desktop file to that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:03:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101703.l4AH3uTF008122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-10 13:03 EST ------- Ping, Johan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:14:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101714.l4AHEaPH008919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 13:14 EST ------- * Should/Must fix ! Suggestion or something else ? Question For 0.1.0-1: ! Redundant dependencies (NOT A BLOCKER) - gtk2-devel is required by clutter-devel (as clutter-devel requires gdk-pixbuf-2.0.pc). So "(Build)Requires: gtk2-devel" can be removed. However for this package I don't force you to remove "gtk2-devel" because clutter-gtk.pc explicitly requires gtk+-2.0.pc. * File/directory ownership issue - The following directories are already owned by other packages and should not be owned by these packages. -------------------------------------------------------- /usr/include/clutter-0.2 owned by clutter-devel -------------------------------------------------------- * Documentation - The following files should not be installed as documentation -------------------------------------------------------- INSTALL - this file is needed for people who want to install this software by themselves and is not needed for rpm management. -------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamps - This package installs some files which are not built or modified during rebuild (header file and documentation), and keeping timestamps on these files is highly recommended. For this package, please use the following: -------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" -------------------------------------------------------- ? License (NOT A BLOCKER) - Well, actually COPYING file declares that this is licensed under GPL, however all sources are licensed under LGPL and license.html also says this is LGPL-licensed. Would you ask which license is correct? (either is okay so this is not a blocker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:23:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101723.l4AHNdPx009617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 13:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > You know, some time ago I would have objected to this package for precisely the > reason that Nigel did, but then the decision was made to include Codec Buddy, > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureCodecBuddy, which exists only to > download non-free (but zero cost) content in precisely the same manner that > autodownloader+xu4 does. So now I really don't know where the line should be > drawn. I suppose if you actually had to go out and buy something in order to > make xu4 useful then that would be unacceptable. Funny that you mention that, actually CodecBuddy is worse, and crosses a line which I would never cross with any use of autodownloader: 1) It downloads non-free code!, not content but code! 2) It only does that for mp3, for for example divx, it takes you to a place where you can buy non free codecs for this from fluendo. So to quote you: 'I suppose if you actually had to go out and buy something in order to make xu4 useful then that would be unacceptable' That actually happens with CodecBuddy! (AFAIK). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:32:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101732.l4AHWmP8010796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 13:32 EST ------- Sorry to interrupt. I have not read the previous discussion in detail, however my recognition is that the problem with this package is: * the package xu4 _itself_ has no license problem * to use xu4 actually, xu4 needs some data and one (who uses xu4) has to download the data from some URL * And the license of the data is in question Okay? If so, this is exactly the case of "xtide" package which I maintain and was reviewed by Patrice Dumas. If my recognition is correct, please check the comment by Patrice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626#c32 and what we actually did in /usr/share/doc/xtide-common-2.9.3/README.fedora (in xtide-common rpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:42:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101742.l4AHgLSE011569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Sorry to interrupt. I have not read the previous discussion > in detail, however my recognition is that the problem with > this package is: > > * the package xu4 _itself_ has no license problem > * to use xu4 actually, xu4 needs some data and one (who > uses xu4) has to download the data from some URL > * And the license of the data is in question > Correct, except that the license is not in question, it can be freely and legally downloaded, but may not be (re)distributed. > Okay? > If so, this is exactly the case of "xtide" package which > I maintain and was reviewed by Patrice Dumas. > If my recognition is correct, please check the comment by Patrice > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626#c32 > and what we actually did in > /usr/share/doc/xtide-common-2.9.3/README.fedora (in xtide-common > rpm). Correct, this is the same. Except I created a python gtk gui app todo the downloading, which will explain to the user that a download is necessary, why and asks his permission todo the actual download. You may want to check this package out. The autodownloader app used is configurable through a config file, so it may be of use (userfriendlier, works interactively even when launched from the menu) to the xtide case too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:46:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101746.l4AHkZX1012085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-10 13:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #47) > I think the percent-in-%post is a false positive, but I'll look into it > further. FYI, it is a false positive: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239611#c1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:56:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101756.l4AHuKPv012795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 13:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > Sorry to interrupt. I have not read the previous discussion > > in detail, however my recognition is that the problem with > > this package is: > > > > * the package xu4 _itself_ has no license problem > > * to use xu4 actually, xu4 needs some data and one (who > > uses xu4) has to download the data from some URL > > * And the license of the data is in question > > > > Correct, except that the license is not in question, it can be freely and > legally downloaded, but may not be (re)distributed. For xtide, the data can be downloaded _freely_, however (as Patrice and me wrote in README.fedora) "their license restricts commercial redistribution and selling" so we judged that the data part cannot be included into Fedora. So from your comment this package is exactly the case of xtide. > > > Okay? > > If so, this is exactly the case of "xtide" package which > > I maintain and was reviewed by Patrice Dumas. > > If my recognition is correct, please check the comment by Patrice > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626#c32 > > and what we actually did in > > /usr/share/doc/xtide-common-2.9.3/README.fedora (in xtide-common > > rpm). > > Correct, this is the same. Except I created a python gtk gui app todo the > downloading, We simply added a bash shell script to help to download the data from the URL (/usr/sbin/xtide-get_harmonics-data.sh in xtide-common) . IMO this is also the same with xtide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:56:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101756.l4AHuawf012848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-10 13:56 EST ------- Somewhere you've got some bad mojo going on. Either cut & paste or transferring your spec files or something. Note the control characters (^S and ^M) in the lines below and the fact that the `` characters have been stripped from the original script. for i in ^Seq 1 24; do sed -i "s/rcmail-\!24ByteDESkey\*Str/^Makedesstr/" /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php || : &> /dev/null -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 17:57:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101757.l4AHvXwu012915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 13:57 EST ------- IN SHORT I see no problem with this package (xu4) judged from what I read in previous comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:14:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101814.l4AIEg5H014086@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-10 14:14 EST ------- Hey, folks, I just ran this by FESCo and the general agreement is that everything's good here. There might have been issues if Hans hadn't done such a complete job with autodownloader; it's key for some folks that users are informed as to what they're downloading and given the option not to do anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:27:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101827.l4AIR9M6015225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-10 14:27 EST ------- Looks like joe was converting the `S and `M into control chars. I was able to correct it with Emacs. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.8.spec SRPM URL:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-0.3.beta2.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:32:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101832.l4AIWg5v015868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-10 14:32 EST ------- MUST Items: - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds successfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:34:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226725] Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101834.l4AIYOaE016001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netgen - LVS netlist comparison tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226725 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-10 14:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Sorry for my lack of attention to details, I hope my review skills will improve > over time! You have done a great review. Your contribution to Fedora Electronics' world is admirable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:34:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101834.l4AIYsr1016048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:36:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101836.l4AIatO1016298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 14:36 EST ------- Thank you!! Request for CVS admin: ----------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-gettext-package Short Description: Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:37:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101837.l4AIbaJw016421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-05-10 14:37 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk-0.1.0-2.src.rpm Changelog: - INSTALL removed from docs - fix make install for keeping timestamps - fix files section - changed license for LGPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:43:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101843.l4AIhGe1017097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 14:43 EST ------- For -2: This time %{_includedir}/clutter-0.2/clutter-gtk/ is not owned by any package and this directory should be owned by -devel package. Pleasse fix this (you can attach spec file) and I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:51:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101851.l4AIpNPZ018134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 14:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Hey, folks, I just ran this by FESCo and the general agreement is that > everything's good here. There might have been issues if Hans hadn't done such a > complete job with autodownloader; it's key for some folks that users are > informed as to what they're downloading and given the option not to do anything. Thank you FESco! I'm also very happy with the positive words about autodownloader as that involved quite some work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:55:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101855.l4AItYov018386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2007-05-10 14:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > You already include pybackpack_logo.png. All you have to do is point the > .desktop file to that. I did consider that but I concluded that the icon doesn't scale down very well, it doesn't convey the function of the menu entry well enough (looks like a game about putting snakes in bags or something) and I'd rather do it well than kludge it. Could be just me being a perfectionist but there we go :) I've asked the pybackpack mailing list for their artistic ideas as my pybackpack time is better spent coding and fixing the more urgent bugs so I'll get a new icon one way or another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 18:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101857.l4AIvIHB018598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-10 14:57 EST ------- "fedora" should not be used as vendor I haven't mock the package yet, however under F7: ... install alexandria-C.omf /usr/share/omf/alexandria /usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied ... W: alexandria non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/alexandria.schemas I think this rpmlint issue can be ignored considering the fact that other files under the /etc/gconf/schemas/ folder bears the same rpmlint issue. Any Gnomer to point out how or what should be done if not ignored. [chitlesh at goorah SPECS]$ rpm -qf /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-terminal.schemas gnome-terminal-2.18.0-1.fc7 [chitlesh at goorah SPECS]$ rpmlint gnome-terminal W: gnome-terminal non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-terminal.schemas [chitlesh at goorah SPECS]$ rpm -qf /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-power-manager.schemas gnome-power-manager-2.18.2-2.fc7 [chitlesh at goorah SPECS]$ rpmlint gnome-power-manager W: gnome-power-manager non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-power-manager.schemas Just for the sake of katapult, is it possible for you to ship a 128x128 icon as well so as alexandria's icon on katapult looks beautiful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101905.l4AJ5DH7019631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 15:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Updated to 0.8.23 > > Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2.spec > SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2-0.8.23-1.src.rpm > > I have problems with campaign. First mission doesn't end. I'll ask upstream > what's going on. Hmm, I've just compared you're package with the mandrake package hosted on the homepage, and I noticed that mandrake uses autoreconf -f -i, you could try adding that to end of %prep instead of this hack: %{__sed} -i '1871d' configure touch -c -r aclocal.m4 configure configure.in You can also try commenting %patch0, the mandrake srpm doesn't have any patches. Maybe that will fix things. As said I would be happy to review this, but if it doesn't work, its little good. If all else fails downgrade to .22 or .21 Some other initial review remarks: Merge the -data package into the main, having a seperate data package when its in the same srpm is of no use. Move the icon from /usr/share/pixmaps to /usr/share/icons/hicolor//apps and add iconcache update scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101906.l4AJ6Iss019854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-10 15:06 EST ------- > Also about the %[alphatag}, I read that the tagging must not be overridden by > local build specifications. This is also how it shows on the wiki to provide a > package from CVS. what kind of local build specifications ? Actually, what is asked is to have the date hardcoded, because there is a difference between : * cvs checkout and * rpm build Thus with your 3.5-7.20070502cvs spec file, when I build the rpm it will entail the date of build but not the date of cvs checkout. Example : if I rpmbuild --rebuild kadischi-3.5-7.20070502cvs.fc6.src.rpm the output rpms will be: Wrote: /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/kadischi-3.5-7.20070510cvs.fc7.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/kadischi-debuginfo-3.5-7.20070510cvs.fc7.i386.rpm You can clearly see the difference over here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:20:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101920.l4AJKfF5022054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-05-10 15:20 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk-0.1.0-3.src.rpm Changelog: - fix devel files section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101925.l4AJPVSH022444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 15:25 EST ------- Okay!! ------------------------------------------------------- This package (clutter-gtk) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:30:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101930.l4AJUvir022889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-05-10 15:30 EST ------- If you need a better icon feel free to use http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:34:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101934.l4AJYfGD023240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 15:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > THINGS TO DO: > - add missing BR: mesa-libGLU-devel Done > - add at least %{version} to Source0 tag > - upload proper source code file to srpm (current one has a wrong name) Source0 url fixed and changed to use %{name} and %{version}. I started this packaged based on a srpm send to me by someone who had read on my wikipage that I was interested on this, he renamed the tarbal (and I didn't check). > The last issue forces change of versioning. Probably you can just replace "-" > with ".", but if aby other (better) ideas are very welcome. The fix is easy, the real version is 1.0, the added -1 in the src tarbal is because upstream uses binary rpms as their primary distribution method, and they don't know what the release field is for, so they add it to their source tarbals too. I've seen this confused behaviour by other upstreams too, for example with blobwars. New version with all this fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/machineball.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/machineball-1.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101942.l4AJghMB023827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-05-10 15:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clutter-gtk Short Description: basic GTK clutter widget Owners: allisson at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:48:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101948.l4AJmQjq024308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-10 15:48 EST ------- Thank you for initial comment. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/alexandria.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/alexandria-0.6.1-3.fc7.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------ * Fri May 11 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.6.1-3 - This time completely disable scrollkeeper-update - Create 128x128 icon also (In reply to comment #2) > "fedora" should not be used as vendor As far as I see on "desktop-file-install usage" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines, it still recommends to use fedora as vendor_id ------------------------------------------------------ If upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as . ------------------------------------------------------- > install alexandria-C.omf /usr/share/omf/alexandria > /usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update > Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied > Cannot write to log file: /var/log/scrollkeeper.log : Permission denied This time I nuked this message by creating symlink. > > W: alexandria non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/alexandria.schemas > I think this rpmlint issue can be ignored considering the fact Actually we usually ignore this rpmlint for gconf schemas files. > Just for the sake of katapult, is it possible for you to ship a 128x128 icon > as well so as alexandria's icon on katapult looks beautiful. For now I just created 128x128 icon by ImageMagick convert because I could not find some larger icon in tarball or alexandria homepage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:51:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101951.l4AJpidx024482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 19:54:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705101954.l4AJsBOM024664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 20:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102000.l4AK0DWa025158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 20:00:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102000.l4AK0pqa025224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-10 16:00 EST ------- actually, CVS is screwing up right now, need to try this again later -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 20:16:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232792] Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102016.l4AKG6kS026625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapserver - Environment for building spatially-enabled internet applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232792 cbalint at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 20:42:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237813] Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102042.l4AKgrcH028250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taxipilot - Game where you pilot a taxi in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237813 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 16:42 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 20:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 16:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102043.l4AKhi6D028342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-05-10 16:43 EST ------- Spec: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.2.spec Tarball: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.2.tar.gz SRPM: http://revisor.fedoraunity.org/releases/revisor-2.0/revisor-2.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm The only error I get with rpmlint is on the SRPM which still reports strange-permission (I don't know how to solve that) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:27:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102127.l4ALRKSo000314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2007-05-10 17:27 EST ------- I have a few other PEAR packages that I can give the once over and post for review as well if it will help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222598] Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102133.l4ALXqGw000681@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library Alias: php-pecl-radius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222598 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 17:33 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pecl-radius New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:34:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102134.l4ALYSKS000714@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-10 17:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Adding Jay to the Cc list. Upstream libdc1394 2.0 (soon to be released) > supports the new firewire stack in rawhide. We should package the 2.0 version > instead. That might be a problem. A cursory look at the code reveals a patented algorithm, see bug 239043. I've blocked FE-Legal on that. > But I'm guessing that there's an interest in having this working with > libdc1394 1.x, but that should be possible too, we just have to backport the > support from the 2.0 version. That would be best, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:34:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102134.l4ALYu6D000764@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 17:34 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pecl-xdebug New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:36:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102136.l4ALaAMj000841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-10 17:36 EST ------- Okay enterprise linux stuff straightened out now :) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-channel-phpunit New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:36:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102136.l4ALaKoJ000857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-05-10 17:36 EST ------- Thanks Bernard! Suggestions incorporated into 1.2.2-3 http://www.inuus.com/memcached-1.2.2-3.src.rpm http://www.inuus.com/memcached.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:45:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102145.l4ALjU1U001607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-10 17:45 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:46:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233782] Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102146.l4ALkN02001648@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:46:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102146.l4ALkjWX001688@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 Bug 233783 depends on bug 233782, which changed state. Bug 233782 Summary: Review Request: vegastrike - 3D OpenGL spaceflight simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233782 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:47:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235370] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102147.l4ALluVb001749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235370 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-10 17:47 EST ------- Yes, if you have other things you'd like to get included, please go ahead and submit them. It makes it much easier for us if we have several things to go over, even though packaging PEAR modules is mostly mechanical. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:58:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102158.l4ALwiMY002182@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-10 17:58 EST ------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 21:58:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102158.l4ALwtU5002199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 Bug 206871 depends on bug 228186, which changed state. Bug 228186 Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 22:26:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102226.l4AMQ3PV003669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-10 18:26 EST ------- Huh ? here is my rpmlint output (mock build) for devel branch: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [lxtnow at Herlzeiled]# rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core/result/gammu-1.10.0-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The same from fc6. >> So you also need to solve rpmlint warnings >> chmod 644 to docs/examples/ppp and docs/examples/fax The files which're included in docs/examples/ppp and docs/examples/fax are (as i said above) examples script that the end-user or advanced user. see comment #5 for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 10 22:44:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705102244.l4AMiKju004264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lennart at poettering.de ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-10 18:44 EST ------- Lennart, do you want to take this over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 00:07:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 20:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110007.l4B07HFH006468@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-10 20:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154507) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154507&action=view) a few more cleanups and fixes against comment #53 I'll start your official review shortly since things look pretty good at this point. Included is a patch with a few more cleanups to make things look nicer and a few corrections. You still need to write the README.fedora regarding the database availability and sqlite (already referenced it in my diff :). I believe you can now reduce your roundcubemail.conf file to this, as the other restrictions are not necessary now that those paths are not accessible in the web hierarchy: # # Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client # Alias /roundcubemail /usr/share/roundcubemail Order Deny,Allow Deny from all Allow from 127.0.0.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 00:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 20:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110016.l4B0GhAA006705@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-10 20:16 EST ------- Works by me (though it would make me nervous if I were to be using this module...). Now we only have the remaining issues to address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 00:25:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 20:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110025.l4B0Pj8H006935@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-10 20:25 EST ------- The man pages look to be more along the lines of developer documentation. Would they be better off in the -devel subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 01:05:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110105.l4B157VX008179@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From abartlet at redhat.com 2007-05-10 21:04 EST ------- The comment in the spec file about the unsigned JAR should indicate that this optional extra step is only required for proprietory JREs. Walking down the checklist again: Shouldn't this package run ldconfig, as it places a file in ${_libdir}? If not (is this library only ever dlopen()ed?), perhaps this should be documented in the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 01:13:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110113.l4B1DXar008324@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-10 21:13 EST ------- I'll fix the above issue in CVS. There is a more important issue however with this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kadischi/Documentation#head-df51ce5d2556a74228a37c021481b062363ba6ff Paul Jones has told me this is fine in the short term, compiling the twi binaries statically, but we need to find a long term solution. Do you have any ideas? I'm also talking this over with other Fedora Contributors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 01:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110133.l4B1XT9k008737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-10 21:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Huh ? > > here is my rpmlint output (mock build) for devel branch: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [lxtnow at Herlzeiled]# rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core/result/gammu-1.10.0-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm > W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/startppp > W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxsend > W: gammu spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive > W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/gprs > W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/statsppp > W: gammu spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/ppp/data > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > The same from fc6. > Strange you are not getting any rpmlint warning for doc-file-dependency? > > >> So you also need to solve rpmlint warnings > >> chmod 644 to docs/examples/ppp and docs/examples/fax > > The files which're included in docs/examples/ppp and docs/examples/fax > are (as i said above) examples script that the end-user or advanced user. > see comment #5 for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 01:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110134.l4B1Y4SM008760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-10 21:33 EST ------- yes indeed...(was still working on it but was still failling on icc_examin on devel). But I can compile it on FC-6 (x86_64 binaries are in the same directory) So still searching for missing BR... This would help also to have lcms >= 1.16 in FC-6! I have rebuild lcms from rawhide... Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/cinepaint/cinepaint.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/cinepaint/cinepaint-0.22.0-2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images I wonder why this "checking for Python library... Not found" Do python have a pkg-config package ? Seems not... I'm working on gltt and ftgl but theses are optionnal (i can built it with them on FC-6 - spec are in the same dir for now. But they not working... - WIP) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 03:15:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110315.l4B3FpBi015172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2007-05-10 23:15 EST ------- I even asked on #fedora-devel and got similar answer that it's best not to have things in examples executable - it can create false deps and in your case its giving rpmlint warnings as W: gammu doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gammu-1.10.0/examples/fax/faxreceive /bin/sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 04:29:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239761] New: Review Request: python-IPy - Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239761 Summary: Review Request: python-IPy - Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Matt_Domsch at dell.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/extras/python-IPy/python-IPy.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/extras/python-IPy/python-IPy-0.53-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: IPy is a Python module for handling IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks in a fashion similar to perl's Net::IP and friends. The IP class allows a comfortable parsing and handling for most notations in use for IPv4 and IPv6 Addresses and Networks. Mirrormanager uses IPy for doing netblock math to return a site-local mirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 04:37:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110437.l4B4bhfq019148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-11 00:37 EST ------- Rebuilding done. Thank you for reviewing this package. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 07:49:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 03:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110749.l4B7nTek026299@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-11 03:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm thinking that it might not be such a good idea to ship an old beta instead > of a CVS pull. In fact I'm not sure beta3 is even winnable (since you can't > talk to Hawkwind.) Okay, this new version is based on CVS now (In reply to comment #16 and #18) > ==== MUST FIX ==== > - Add Requires: desktop-file-utils Fixed > ==== SHOULD FIX ==== > please also add a comment in spec why you use %{makeinstall} Fixed New version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xu4.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/xu4-1.1-0.1.20070510.fc7.src.rpm Notice that this now has version 1.1, as that is how the CVS tree identifies itself in the games about box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 08:20:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 04:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239770] New: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gsm.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/gsm-1.0.12-2.src.rpm Description: libgsm, an implementation of the European GSM 06.10 provisional standard for full-rate speech transcoding, prI-ETS 300 036, which uses RPE/LTP (residual pulse excitation/long term prediction) coding at 13 kbit/s. GSM 06.10 compresses frames of 162 13-bit samples (8 kHz sampling rate, i.e. a frame rate of 50 Hz) into 260 bits; for compatibility with typical UNIX applications, our implementation turns frames of 160 16-bit linear samples into 33-byte frames (1650 Bytes/s). The quality of the algorithm is good enough for reliable speaker recognition; even music often survives transcoding in recognizable form (given the bandwidth limitations of 8 kHz sampling rate). The interfaces offered are a front end modelled after compress(1), and a library API. Compression and decompression run faster than realtime on most SPARCstations. The implementation has been verified against the ETSI standard test patterns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 08:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 04:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110822.l4B8MBWR029298@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|228186 |239770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 08:22:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 04:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110822.l4B8MP6e029316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |206871 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 08:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 04:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705110822.l4B8MSg3029333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|206871 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 11:46:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] New: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/rott.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/rott-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is the icculus.org Linux port of Apogee's classic 3d shooter Rise of the Triad, which has been released under the GPL by Apogee. This version is enhanced with the "high" resolution rendering from the winrott port. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 12:01:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111201.l4BC1DI3008916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-11 08:00 EST ------- Applied the above. I bow to your superior script-fu. :) Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.9.spec SRPM URL:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-0.4.beta2.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 13:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239800] New: php-pear maintainer updates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239800 Summary: php-pear maintainer updates Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jorton at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 13:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239800] php-pear maintainer updates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111318.l4BDIWrd014423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php-pear maintainer updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239800 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at timj.co.uk Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-05-11 09:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear Updated Fedora Owners: jorton at redhat.com,rpm at timj.co.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] New: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/agistudio/agistudio.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/agistudio/agistudio-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: AGI (Adventure Game Interpreter) is the adventure game engine used by Sierra On-Line(tm) to create some of their early games. QT AGI Studio is a program which allows you to view, create and edit AGI games. This can use either NAGI or Sarien as a testing interpreter. I will be submitting NAGI for review also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:12:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] New: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi-0.1-2002114.src.rpm Description: NAGI is an interpreter for AGI games, such as the early Space Quest, Leisure Suit Larry and King's Quest games. This can run content created with agistudio, which is also up for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:15:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111415.l4BEFB67018983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-11 10:15 EST ------- >From rpmlint 0.80-1 changelog: - Filter messages about doc file dependencies on /bin/sh. FWIW, I don't think a dependency on /bin/sh is anything to worry about, doc or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:34:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111434.l4BEYLHu020431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-11 10:34 EST ------- Updated: - Add missing BR - Chance License to GPL or Artistic - Update %%files - Include t/ in %%doc Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Pcap.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Pcap-0.14-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:44:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111444.l4BEicjN021381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-11 10:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mcpp Short Description: Alternative C/C++ preprocessor Owners: kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111445.l4BEjwCu021434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-11 10:45 EST ------- It seem that the tagpy-LISENCE file is included in srpm file but not installed from built rpm package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:46:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111446.l4BEkwgP021490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-11 10:46 EST ------- I botched the last one: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple Short Description: Easy Access to SQLite databases using objects Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaboutbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111453.l4BErBN7022191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-11 10:53 EST ------- D'oh! :-) Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-tag/python-tag.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/python-tag/python-tag-0.91-3.src.rpm * Fri May 11 2007 Matthias Saou 0.91-3 - Actually include LICENSE file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:54:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111454.l4BEsG85022421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-11 10:54 EST ------- nice... i'll check this out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 14:54:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111454.l4BEsmnX022513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:04:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111504.l4BF4H39023165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net BugsThisDependsOn| |228186 Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-05-11 11:04 EST ------- Moving the tools is fine and should have been done long ago. Based on looking at a unified diff against the previous package from the %changelog: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:04:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228186] Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111504.l4BF4JLh023186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - Shared libraries for GSM speech compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228186 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239770 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111505.l4BF5sQc023366@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-11 11:05 EST ------- it seem that pygoocanvas isn't included yet in branch, to check mock build. i'll re-try this night or tommorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:13:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111513.l4BFDNNP023768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-11 11:13 EST ------- This package is required by "oreon". Hopes to see it approved soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239185] Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111515.l4BFFsxp023980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-11 11:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nbtscan Short Description: Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows Networks Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaboutbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:16:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111516.l4BFGiQw024134@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-11 11:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-libwhisker2 Short Description: Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaboutbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:20:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111520.l4BFKoRC024399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-11 11:20 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230549] Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111520.l4BFKqxN024409@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230549 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-11 11:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/oxine/oxine-0.6.6-2.src.rpm * Fri May 11 2007 Matthias Saou 0.6.6-2 - Fix black screen problem by requiring xine-lib-extras, where xineplug_decode_image.so is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111522.l4BFM5hq024512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-11 11:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > The fix is easy, the real version is 1.0, the added -1 in the src tarbal (...) Right. The easiest solutions are the best ones ;) I like the package now and nothing stands in the way to approve it. The game looks quite nice, but it's a pity that there's no AI mode ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227500] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111525.l4BFPVqE024863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227500 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From robert at marcanoonline.com 2007-05-11 11:25 EST ------- Can somebody help to finish this review... TIA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:29:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111529.l4BFT6P0025339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-11 11:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-Pcap Short Description: Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jaboutbo at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111534.l4BFY4To025695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-11 11:34 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:40:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111540.l4BFe03x026201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-11 11:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: machineball Short Description: A futuristic ball game with simple rules Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 15:59:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111559.l4BFxRJV027927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-11 11:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > From rpmlint 0.80-1 changelog: > - Filter messages about doc file dependencies on /bin/sh. > > FWIW, I don't think a dependency on /bin/sh is anything to worry about, doc or not. hmm. I was expecting something similar. Today was so busy working day that I couldn't got time to upgrade rpmlint on FC6 machine. So new version was already available. Ok why don't you try to move then executable scripts to /etc then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 16:12:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 12:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111612.l4BGCxY5028812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-11 12:12 EST ------- You can grab the buildsys rpms here: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-6-extras/pygoocanvas/0.6.0-2.fc6/ or for F7 here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=6421 I'm leaving town May 12 and will not be able to do any updates until May 21 so take your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 17:07:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111707.l4BH7g7p031986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-05-11 13:07 EST ------- So(In reply to comment #31) > > All that needs to be done here is to build the package with 'make tag build' in > package directory and close this bug as Resolved: RAWHIDE > Who has that privilage to do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 17:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111721.l4BHLllJ000526@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-11 13:21 EST ------- All issues have been corrected. The new SPEC and SRPM are located here: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.6-2.20070511cvs.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 17:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111729.l4BHTpaJ001026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-11 13:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gsm Short Description: GSM speech compressor library Owners: rpm at greysector.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 17:32:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111732.l4BHWbYc001190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-11 13:32 EST ------- Thank you, Michael. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 17:43:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223557] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111743.l4BHhS2M001800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223557 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-11 13:43 EST ------- No response, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 18:44:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111844.l4BIiCBo005863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squirrelmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium eric.eisenhart at sonoma.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric.eisenhart at sonoma.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 18:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 14:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111850.l4BIoqnt006877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-11 14:50 EST ------- Well, I use rawhide and so I have not checked on FC-6. On rawhide, 0.22.0-2 contained several problems. ----------------------------------------------------------- * Compilation - Actually > yes indeed...(was still working on it but was still > failling on icc_examin on devel). This needs a patch (Patch0) * Directory ownership issue - Some directories were owned properly. * Undefined non-weak symbols - Some libraries in cinepaint contained undefined non-weak symbols. This cannot be accepted for a package which provides -devel subpackage because leaving these symbols leads to linkage failure * Unnecessary/missing (Build)Requires * Unnecessary %Requires(postun) etc * Use of binaries for priviledged user - Binaries for priviledged user (i.e. binaries under /sbin /usr/sbin etc..) must be specified by full path. Otherwise, calling these binaries fails on sudo user, for example. * More pkgconfig .pc file fix was needed * More proper fix for rpath was recommended - i.e. don't use chrpath when possible * Unneeded autoconf call * Timestamp keeping * desktop file fix * Requires: - What does "Requires: freefont" mean?? On my system no package provides freefont. * Build log should be more verbose ----------------------------------------------------------- I hope I fixed the issues above. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/cinepaint.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/cinepaint-0.22.0-3.fc7.src.rpm mock build on FC-devel i386 is successful. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-cinepaint.log Please check if my spec/srpm is what you expect. If you notice something, please fix/modify my spec/srpm and upload your spec/srpm ----------------------------------------------------------- NOTE There are still some items I have to check for this package. My package may have some problem, so please check my spec/srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 19:13:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705111913.l4BJDui0008082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2007-05-11 15:13 EST ------- http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/dwarves/rpm/SRPMS/ is being kept frequently updated with git snapshots. I've addressed most of the above problems. Now waiting for a new round of review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 20:30:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112030.l4BKU1cc013657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-11 16:29 EST ------- ==== REVIEW GUIDELINES ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file legible - sources match upstream # diff -ubBr /home/fedora/rpmbuild/SPECS/u4/ /home/chris/cvs/u4/ - package successfully compiles on x86_64 FC6 - all build dependencies in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create are brought in through Requires - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files - no static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library with suffix - no need for devel subpackage - no libtool archives - contains proper .desktop file - does not own files or directories owned by other packages - contains proper install - all filenames utf-8 ==== SHOULD FIX ==== - spec comments should show how to check out code from the cvs on or before the date of cvsdate. I think cvs ... -D %{cvsdate} might work. **** APPROVED **** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 20:34:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112034.l4BKYJDi013937@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-11 16:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xu4 Short Description: Ultima IV recreated Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 20:48:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220862] Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112048.l4BKm29N015023@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpunit - Add phpunit channel to pear Alias: channel-phpunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220862 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 20:49:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196749] Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112049.l4BKnAeJ015095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-xdebug - PECL package for debugging PHP scripts Alias: php-pecl-xdebug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196749 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 20:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222598] Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112050.l4BKoqxD015159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-radius - Radius client library Alias: php-pecl-radius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222598 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 20:53:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112053.l4BKrH5X015331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 20:55:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112055.l4BKt80f015471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:05:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112105.l4BL5E9p015879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:14:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112114.l4BLEsmP016506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:16:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112116.l4BLG5gu016666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112120.l4BLK5bu016876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:33:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112133.l4BLX9ep017418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:38:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] New: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/powertop.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/powertop-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: powertop is a tool that monitors kernel wakeups and accounts them to userspace processes. You can use this information to find out why your CPU isn't able to go to sleep, and therefore why your battery life is so bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:40:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112140.l4BLe428017653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:41:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112141.l4BLfErW017700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:42:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239185] Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112142.l4BLgHir017754@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:43:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112143.l4BLh9kC017812@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239800] php-pear maintainer updates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112146.l4BLkRxB018038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php-pear maintainer updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239800 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:46:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] New: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/liberation-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/liberation-fonts-0.1-5.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Liberation Fonts are intended to be replacements for the three most commonly used fonts on Microsoft systems: Times New Roman, Arial, and Courier New. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:48:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112148.l4BLmlIC018162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-11 17:48 EST ------- Just FYI, the font config configuration that we are planning for the liberation fonts is to add them to the lists of metrically equivalent fonts in /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-aliases-fedora.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:55:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112155.l4BLtEe2018528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-11 17:55 EST ------- ^^.... Well, In addition/resume to the full review above: + OK -- Lisence is BSD OK -- Lisence file included in package ============ *APPROVED* ============ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 21:55:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112155.l4BLti7Y018559@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-11 17:55 EST ------- ^^.... Well, In addition/resume to the full review above: + OK -- Lisence is BSD OK -- Lisence file included in package ============ *APPROVED* ============ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 22:01:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112201.l4BM1wWD018790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-05-11 18:01 EST ------- Checked against http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines, and OK for all MUST points. Detail from rpmlint: - rpmlint powertop-1.0-1.fc7.i386.rpm: W: powertop no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 22:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112206.l4BM61GW018912@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 22:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112210.l4BMAiJk019511@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 22:27:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112227.l4BMRmAe020137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-11 18:27 EST ------- okay, i'll check this out. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 23:08:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 19:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] New: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Eclipse Checkstyle plug-in integrates the Checkstyle Java code auditor into the Eclipse IDE. The plug-in provides real-time feedback to the user about violations of rules that check for coding style and possible error prone code constructs. Note that you will need this script to build the tar: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/checkout_and_build_tarball.sh This is my first package and am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 23:09:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 19:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112309.l4BN9q4I021207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 23:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 19:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112353.l4BNrBon022122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-11 19:52 EST ------- This package has a prereq on Math::Base85, but Math::Base85 is currently not available in the fedora collection. This is needed both for certain features of this module as well as to fully enable the test suite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 23:56:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 19:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239193] Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112356.l4BNusci022172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Alias: Module-ExtractUse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-11 19:56 EST ------- Apologies for taking so long -- it's been a busy week and I wanted to make sure I put appropriate thought into this. (In reply to comment #4) > TODO is still included in -2. This is something I'd prefer to leave in, so I don't inadvertently leave it out in a future release. I don't have a particularly strong feeling about it, however, so I'll drop it. > > * tests can make good documentation (sometimes better than the actual docs) > > I don't think that's the case in this package. I actually found t/80_failing.t quite useful in understanding that the parser will not correctly pick up either 'use constant' or 'use base' constructs. This isn't in the documentation, and saved me some pain. > > * people might actually want to test the package post-installation > > I'm pretty sure that people who install software from rpms don't expect to be > able to do that, at least when not installing a *-test subpackage. I'm not > saying it's necessarily a doomed idea, but should be discussed in distro wide > context before starting to apply in packages here and there. Well, it's processes like this that allow us to have the experience to be able to comment on such distro-wide proposals. I know I'm varying from the beaten path here, but it seems like an avenue worth exploring, and am willing to be flexible as we go along. > > * it doesn't hurt anything :) > > * It does add files to the package payload that the overwhelming vast majority > does not have use for. Technically speaking, 99% of what's in %doc right now the "vast majority" has no use for. Heck, even the minority of fedora packagers probably don't have much use for it. > * Test suites are also often quick and dirty code which is not meant to be > used as an example of anything. Sometimes. But some of them are quite excellent -- see, e.g., Moose, Class::MOP, POE, WWW::Myspace, etc -- and even the "quick and dirty ones" serve their purpose. > * Test suite code is not restricted to using the public API of the software; > some features can be better tested using knowledge of module internals. We > don't want anyone to use such code as an example how to use the packaged > software. I'm not making any judgements as to how people should or shouldn't use software. If someone wants to go off and do things the Wrong Way, then a) it doesn't matter if the test suite is installed or not and b) they're going to do it anyways. Enabling people to test their installed s/w isn't going to impact that. > * Test suites have dependencies that the users need to take care of manually, > or the package will be dependency bloated. Both are bad, and easily solved > by not including the test suite. Hm. To date, I've been filtering any additional dependencies the suites introduce.... I'm not entirely convinced that this is a bad thing, but it sounds like an argument for a -test subpackage. > To summarize, I think including test suite code is acceptable if there's an > upstream recommendation to use it as an example, upstream installs it too, > and/or packaging test suites becomes a standard packaging practice (or there's a > decision/consensus that things should move towards that). Upstream actually has recommended it in several cases I know (Moose being one), and others it just makes sense. I also believe, given the small amount of additional work needed to enable it, enabling people to test installed software with the _same_ test suite we used during build is a Good Thing. Also, as spot pointed out in an email in fedora-perl-devel recently, "Blanket policies help me sleep easier at night." I'd rather package test suites up consistently rather than make a subjective judgment call as to their "worth". I know this is a relatively new idea, but I think it's worth exploring. It's flexible processes (like the review process) that allow us to gain experience with various approaches along these lines, rather than waiting/expecting a directive to be handed down from upon high. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 11 23:59:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 19:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705112359.l4BNxPi9022221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-11 19:59 EST ------- Yeah, there's no documentation yet. Once there is I'll be happy to add it, but for now it's just "run me and find what's broken". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120004.l4C04Wad022338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-11 20:04 EST ------- Still need to be reviewed (just a lil' up) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:16:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120016.l4C0GXnN022543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-05-11 20:16 EST ------- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - OK - License field in spec matches - OK - License file included in package - *** *** should include COPYING in doc - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK - Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A - BuildRequires correct - OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. - N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A - .la files are removed. - N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. - see above - final provides and requires are sane: - OK SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - didn't test - Should build on all supported archs - tested on i386 - Should function as described. - OK - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - N/A - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - OK Other things noted - could use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120018.l4C0ICw4022579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-11 20:18 EST ------- Why is this a review request? linuxwacom has been in core since forever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:30:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] New: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Math-Base85.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Math-Base85-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: RFC 1924 describes a compact, fixed-size representation of IPv6 addresses which uses a base 85 number system. This module handles some of the uglier details of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:31:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120031.l4C0VB5n022813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-11 20:31 EST ------- Builds in mock for all rhel arches, btw. Though I doubt it'll do anything useful on s390x... Updated spec and srpm in same place as before. Added COPYING to %doc, patched CFLAGS to be overridable by the build system and set it to equal RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:31:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120031.l4C0VScL022840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239895 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:31:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120031.l4C0VJOO022821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Math-Base85 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:31:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120031.l4C0VTGR022850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Math-Base85 OtherBugsDependingO| |239163 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:36:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120036.l4C0a4hf022922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-05-11 20:35 EST ------- Seems OK to me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 00:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120049.l4C0nm1I023262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-11 20:49 EST ------- Taking for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 02:37:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 22:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120237.l4C2bLuC006093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-11 22:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: powertop Short Description: Power consumption monitor Owners: ajackson at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 02:41:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 22:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120241.l4C2fduV006404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ajackson at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-11 22:41 EST ------- As of 0-24: % rpmlint i386/*.rpm W: dwarves no-version-in-last-changelog E: dwarves only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ctracer/ctracer_relay.c W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ctracer/ctracer_relay.h W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ctracer/ctracer_jprobe.c W: dwarves-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog W: libdwarves1 no-version-in-last-changelog W: libdwarves1 no-documentation W: libdwarves1-devel no-version-in-last-changelog The one error is unpleasant. Any reason why that stuff's not in /usr/share? systemtap has similar code in its directories in /usr/share, so even though it technically violates one of the MUSTS in the review guidelines I think there's a good case for it. Also, if the SRPM is intended to be the preferred distribution format, then you need to note that in a comment above Source0. Otherwise passes all MUSTS as far as I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 03:32:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237380] Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120332.l4C3WqRp009144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-11 23:32 EST ------- Rebuild done on all branches, closing Thank you for review!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 03:32:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 23:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120332.l4C3Wrfv009163@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 Bug 237382 depends on bug 237380, which changed state. Bug 237380 Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 04:19:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 00:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120419.l4C4J2Tm010867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 06:11:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 02:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239901] New: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=corkscrew.spec SRPM URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=corkscrew-2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Corkscrew is a tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. It has been tested with the following HTTP proxies : * Gauntlet * CacheFlow * JunkBuster * Apache mod_proxy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 06:21:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 02:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120621.l4C6L0Ji013206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-12 02:20 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC6 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /var/log/roundcubemail apache E: roundcubemail non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/roundcubemail 0775 E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php apache E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/roundcubemail/main.inc.php 0640 E: roundcubemail non-standard-gid /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php apache E: roundcubemail non-readable /etc/roundcubemail/db.inc.php 0640 W: roundcubemail percent-in-%post [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL Packager has properly generated a custom tarball removing code that conflicts with GPL license. [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : ac64aea002c4951b1a3005fe966082bf roundcube_arabic-0.1-beta2.tar.gz c1d4e21cd1280a3f5f06892ddcd5f1b9 roundcube_armenian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 7817973ca9f280ee60980668401bf7f8 roundcube_brazilian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz fc98428238cb77af3c8f336aadc4168d roundcube_catala-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 71490edf78375bd273f1326d77d3e449 roundcube_chinese-0.1-beta2.tar.gz eb389dc044924b476a67cf7be2109714 roundcube_chinese-big5-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 7252bc28846db945500ea45071f08012 roundcube_czech-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 77202ea30056a63ff208cdade1eef279 roundcube_danish-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 0b94ca8e149a443ab42bbb96b9c149df roundcube_dutch-0.1-beta2.tar.gz b23398f6df2767c192f7498b6197ed3a roundcube_estonian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 62963ef840c6f9f104119870a7486e19 roundcube_hungarian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz f5641dc92c9c76b7d3dd9da5656aae94 roundcube_italiano-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 323ae63d544f0febf72418d0b44967ff roundcube_japanese-0.1-beta2.tar.gz ba62761bbee19a8d91a1796fa4bb297a roundcube_latvian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 50d48afe8cfee6b5db4a20eeaafd1fbf roundcubemail-0.1beta2.2.tar.gz e72c13a77dde332b07417e41fbdd6434 roundcube_norwegian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 5455303054e3fcd70d38a9e2c01e9fa3 roundcube_polish-0.1-beta2.tar.gz fe38f58dadeb05806320d7ddadabb000 roundcube_portuguese-0.1-beta2.tar.gz f91874d95f46c830837335c5b33ef8b9 roundcube_romanian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 2e071a52d3ffdb4707a062d740f85691 roundcube_serbian-0-1-beta2.tar.gz 6e021e49da6f64506b305bcd01c2e9c9 roundcube_slovak-0.1-beta2.tar.gz f577b2cce8dd031f427b5f3f343649f3 roundcube_swedish-0.1-beta2.tar.gz c28485169c7127b5f17584e6fe175280 roundcube_turkish-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 25289980efaf7c655028e4ce889764cd roundcube_vietnamese-0.1-beta2.tar.gz MD5SUM upstream package: ac64aea002c4951b1a3005fe966082bf roundcube_arabic-0.1-beta2.tar.gz c1d4e21cd1280a3f5f06892ddcd5f1b9 roundcube_armenian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 7817973ca9f280ee60980668401bf7f8 roundcube_brazilian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz fc98428238cb77af3c8f336aadc4168d roundcube_catala-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 71490edf78375bd273f1326d77d3e449 roundcube_chinese-0.1-beta2.tar.gz eb389dc044924b476a67cf7be2109714 roundcube_chinese-big5-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 7252bc28846db945500ea45071f08012 roundcube_czech-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 77202ea30056a63ff208cdade1eef279 roundcube_danish-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 0b94ca8e149a443ab42bbb96b9c149df roundcube_dutch-0.1-beta2.tar.gz b23398f6df2767c192f7498b6197ed3a roundcube_estonian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 62963ef840c6f9f104119870a7486e19 roundcube_hungarian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz f5641dc92c9c76b7d3dd9da5656aae94 roundcube_italiano-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 323ae63d544f0febf72418d0b44967ff roundcube_japanese-0.1-beta2.tar.gz ba62761bbee19a8d91a1796fa4bb297a roundcube_latvian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz e72c13a77dde332b07417e41fbdd6434 roundcube_norwegian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 5455303054e3fcd70d38a9e2c01e9fa3 roundcube_polish-0.1-beta2.tar.gz fe38f58dadeb05806320d7ddadabb000 roundcube_portuguese-0.1-beta2.tar.gz f91874d95f46c830837335c5b33ef8b9 roundcube_romanian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 47f2fc3fc5e0b3325ca3c3a360011a03 roundcube_russian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 2e071a52d3ffdb4707a062d740f85691 roundcube_serbian-0-1-beta2.tar.gz 6e021e49da6f64506b305bcd01c2e9c9 roundcube_slovak-0.1-beta2.tar.gz f577b2cce8dd031f427b5f3f343649f3 roundcube_swedish-0.1-beta2.tar.gz c28485169c7127b5f17584e6fe175280 roundcube_turkish-0.1-beta2.tar.gz 25289980efaf7c655028e4ce889764cd roundcube_vietnamese-0.1-beta2.tar.gz roundcube source tarball is a custom tarball [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: FC6 / i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Please use wget -N or equivalent to download source files and preserve timestamps. 2. Missing the russian langpack. 3. I see that there is also a log directory listed in main.inc.php so the same sed to fix the logs/ dir should be applied there. 4. I don't think your logrotate is right. The conf file is to rotate a file called "logfile", but at least on my system, the only logfile created is "errors". Please check. 5. This line: %dir %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/roundcubemail should not have a %dir because it is a file. === Final Notes === 1. Once the selinux policy is updated for bug #239436, you'll want to add a Conflicts: selinux-policy-targeted < version_it_was_fixed_in. You can do this post import. Get those minor issues listed fixed and I'll approve your package. Please note I'll be traveling for the next ten days or so. Expect my responses to be very slow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 06:40:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 02:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220706] Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120640.l4C6eP6U013469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxwacom-0.7.6_3-3.1.i386.rpm - with wacomcpl tool, man page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220706 ------- Additional Comments From marcel at meverhagen.nl 2007-05-12 02:40 EST ------- A smal part of the linuxwacom driver was in. But without the admin tools needed to get the hardware to work. This review is about a linuxwacom rpm with the admin tools and the support for the features of the hardware included. I will make a fc7 rpm a few days after the fc7 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 08:06:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 04:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239906] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239906 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Ping.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Ping-2.4.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Ping-build.log Description: OS independet wrapper class for executing ping calls -- This extension is required by "oreon" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 08:41:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 04:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120841.l4C8fkAM023945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 08:51:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 04:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238367] Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120851.l4C8p3Rk024488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-12 04:51 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 08:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 04:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238562] Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120851.l4C8pIhn024554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: machineball - A futuristic ball game with simple rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238562 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-12 04:51 EST ------- Thanks for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 09:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 05:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120919.l4C9JESN026194@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-05-12 05:19 EST ------- Formal review: ? MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. OK $ rpmlint /srv/rpm/liberation-fonts-0.1-5.fc7.nim.* W: liberation-fonts incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-5 0.1-5.fc7.nim - Just a dist/changelog clash, ignored ? MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK ? MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}? OK ? MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK ? MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license? OK ? MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NOK - As the license is not vanilla GPL v2, GPL field is misleading ? MUST: If ? text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. NOK 1. Don't do that: install -m 0644 License.txt %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/fonts/liberation 2. The license text does not seem UTF-8 encoded ? MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK ? MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK ? MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source? NOK 1. Please add a source URL to the package 2. Make sure the archive name and content match the signed archive on the RH page 3. For fonts tar.bz2 is probably a better idea than tar.gz ? MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms? OK ? MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an? N/A ? MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires? OK ? MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly? N/A ? MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files? N/A ? MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable? N/A ? A package must own all directories that it creates? OK ? MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK ? MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly? OK - though a %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) would be nicer ? MUST: Each package must have a %clean section? OK - please move the clean section to its usual place after %install ? MUST: Each package must consistently use macros? OK - please define and use fontdir and fontconfdir as in other font packages (dejavu-lgc?) ? MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content? OK ? MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage? N/A ? MUST: If a package includes something as %doc? OK ? MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A ? MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A ? MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc)? N/A ? MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix? N/A ? MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages? N/A ? MUST: Packages containing GUI applications? N/A ? MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages? OK ? MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}? OK ? MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK ? SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream? NOK 1. The license text is partial: it describes the exception but not the main license. A GPL text should be joined to the package ? SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations? N/A ? SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK ? SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. I pass, but that's a noarch package ? SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described? OK ? SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. NOK Please use : %post if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts fi %postun if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts fi fi like in other font packages (or request them fixed if %{_bindir} is NOK) ? SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel? N/A ? SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase? N/A ? SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin? N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 09:35:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 05:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120935.l4C9ZH4a026674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239911 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 09:41:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 05:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120941.l4C9fPWS026813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-05-12 05:41 EST ------- Freeform review additions: - please also use -m 0755 at directory install time - it would be nice if the metadata declaration order followed the official Fedora template - please add a FAQ or at least the contact in charge of liberation fonts as the referenced site has limited info and no contact information. In particular everyone involved in FLOSS fonts would like to know the rationale behind GPL choice when the painfully achieved consensus was to go OFL for all projects - please drop a fontconfig configuration file in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ containing at least the "assign generic names" bit of the dejavu-lgc one. After distussion on IRC with behdad the right prio is probably between dejavu-lgc and other fonts (595 unless dejavu-lgc moves to 58) - relying on /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-aliases-fedora.conf means Conflicting with fontconfig packages that do not include liberation info (major PITA). Consider working with behdad to split this file in font-specific ones (/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-001-fedora-helvetica-alias-liberation.conf, /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-002-fedora-helvetica-alias-nimbus.conf etc) so next time a new font package can just drop his own file there instead of relying on a fontconfig update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 09:50:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 05:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120950.l4C9op0q027065@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|239911 | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-12 05:50 EST ------- Fine! About freefont I have exluded %exclude %{_datadir}/fonts/FreeSans.ttf This file (path is little different) is provided by freefont package ls -al /usr/share/fonts/freefont/FreeSans.ttf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 514280 jan 26 2006 /usr/share/fonts/freefont/FreeSans.ttf Checking the buildir show that it bundled with icc_examin so ls -al ./plug-ins/icc_examin/icc_examin/FreeSans.ttf -rw-r--r-- 1 builder builder 236376 avr 30 2005 ./plug-ins/icc_examin/icc_examin/FreeSans.ttf At this time i'm not sure if the font is found at runtime (for icc_examin at least) About rpath There is some remaining rpath whenever libtool is patched. They come from /usr/bin/fltk-config See line 91 : DSOLINK="-Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib64" (on x86_64) I think that would be better to solve the issue from fltk itself first... Added %{python_sitelib}/* (needed on x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 09:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 05:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705120953.l4C9rDsi027173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |150225 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-05-12 05:53 EST ------- ? needs more work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 10:05:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 06:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121005.l4CA5quI027470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-12 06:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) Well, > About freefont > I have exluded %exclude %{_datadir}/fonts/FreeSans.ttf > This file (path is little different) is provided by freefont package > ls -al /usr/share/fonts/freefont/FreeSans.ttf > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 514280 jan 26 2006 /usr/share/fonts/freefont/FreeSans.ttf > Ah, okay. Actually "freefont" package is found in (ex)Extras. You can add this is Requires. > > About rpath > There is some remaining rpath whenever libtool is patched. They come from > /usr/bin/fltk-config > See line 91 : DSOLINK="-Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib64" (on x86_64) > > I think that would be better to solve the issue from fltk itself first... Yes. Reporting to fltk (as you did) is preferable. > Added %{python_sitelib}/* (needed on x86_64) Well, on x86 and ppc, %python_sitelib and %python_sitearch is the same and leaving both with simple glob cause a complaint about duplicate file entry. So would you do the following? * use %ifarch trick * or specify file/directory name more specificly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 11:13:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 07:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121113.l4CBDMUA028757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-05-12 07:13 EST ------- A few small changes -- more unit tests added upstream, removed tabs from spec file. rpmlint now runs clean on src and i386 rpms... http://www.inuus.com/memcached-1.2.2-4.src.rpm http://www.inuus.com/memcached.spec Not sure if there's much more I can do.. I believe this spec file should be good to go.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 11:45:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 07:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239918] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239918 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Traceroute.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Traceroute-0.21.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Traceroute-build.log Description: OS independet wrapper class for executing traceroute calls -- Here is another "oreon" requires (the lastest I think) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 11:53:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 07:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121153.l4CBrbsR030046@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-05-12 07:53 EST ------- I'll take this one. I won't have time to do a full review until Monday but here are a few quick thoughts based on a glace at the specfile: - remove Epoch - change Group to something else (yes, I know the eclipse package has that one but run rpmlint on your SRPM and you'll see the W: Wrong Group (or whatever) ... paste the group error message into rpmlint -I and you'll see acceptable groups. Just pick one as the Group tag is currently not used for anything useful but this way we can shut up rpmlint.) - remove BuildArch - change the BuildRoot to match the Fedora Guidelines (that may not longer be a mandatory requirement ... just check the guidelines) - I think a lot of your BuildRequires can go away if you pick something like eclipse-pde since it'll bring in most of the others ... building in mock will help flush out problems here - we'll have to get some better way to include the Eclipse jars since the names are so fragile. For SWT especially you'll have to use a symlinked one (I think we ship one) and not the x86_64-only one. - we should add the gcj bits like aot-compile at the end of %install and then the bits in %files ... but that can easily be added later Like I said, I'll do a full review on Monday. I'll assign to myself then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 12:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 08:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121222.l4CCMKa3030802@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2007-05-12 08:22 EST ------- How about disabling sendfile for now? http://projects.linpro.no/pipermail/varnish-misc/2007-May/000412.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 12:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 08:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121230.l4CCUfK7030997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org 2007-05-12 08:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > So(In reply to comment #31) > > > > > All that needs to be done here is to build the package with 'make tag build' in > > package directory and close this bug as Resolved: RAWHIDE > > > > Who has that privilage to do that? Guillaume does. If both of you would like, I could add Konrad as a co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 12:58:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 08:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121258.l4CCwCcu032144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2007-05-12 08:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > How about disabling sendfile for now? > http://projects.linpro.no/pipermail/varnish-misc/2007-May/000412.html sorry about that one, wrongz bz :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 14:26:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] New: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/xournal.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/xournal-0.3.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Xournal is an application for notetaking, sketching, keeping a journal and annotating PDFs. Xournal aims to provide superior graphical quality (subpixel resolution) and overall functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 15:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121519.l4CFJEm8005192@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-05-12 11:19 EST ------- New version is available : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/kftpgrabber/kftpgrabber.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/kftpgrabber/kftpgrabber-0.8.1-1.src.rpm - Updated to version 0.8.1 - I've removed the libs subpackage As for the INSTALL file, I really don't know if it should be removed or not, so I let it for the devel package for the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 15:34:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121534.l4CFYX0I005546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-05-12 11:34 EST ------- * Sat May 12 2007 Peter Lemenkov 0-4.20040120cvs - Fixed the only warning - Changed naming according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/transset.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/transset-0-4.20040120cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 15:59:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236422] Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121559.l4CFxNP5006290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236422 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-12 11:59 EST ------- Will review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 15:59:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 11:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225299] Merge Review: automake15 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121559.l4CFxmCG006311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225299 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO CC| |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 16:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 12:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235731] Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121611.l4CGB9LT006736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openbsd-malloc - Alternative malloc() implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235731 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-05-12 12:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. MUSTFIX: > > This spec doesn't apply $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. It compiles and places its files > directly into */BUILD. > > One way to approach this: > %setup -c -T Done. > > 2. Is there an agreement with the glibc developers upon using the name > libmalloc.*? To me, this name appears as too general. Renamed. > 3. http://mr.himki.net/index-alloc.html109 is in a Cyrillan written language > (Russian?). An English version would be helpful, because except of the source > code there doesn't seem to be any other documentation. OK, I'll try to add something more valuable docs. > 4. The source file seems to be intended to be used as a preloaded module: > I am not sure if packaging it as a library is a wise decision. Hmmm. Are any recomendations about handling of preloaded libraries? http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/openbsd-malloc-0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 16:25:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 12:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121625.l4CGPUCt006989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-12 12:25 EST ------- Konstantin, are you still planning on building this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 16:49:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 12:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121649.l4CGnBoq007442@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_evasive - Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 icon at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2007-05-12 12:49 EST ------- It's build for apache-2.0 systems, which pretty much means EL-4. It doesn't work under apache-2.2 at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 17:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 13:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239369] Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121718.l4CHILwb008200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syscall - Access system calls that Perl doesn't normally provide access to Alias: perl-Sys-Syscall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239369 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 18:32:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 14:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239933] New: Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239933 Summary: Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Danga-Socket.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-Danga-Socket-1.57-1.src.rpm Description: This is an abstract base class for objects backed by a socket which provides the basic framework for event-driven asynchronous IO, designed to be fast. Danga::Socket is both a base class for objects, and an event loop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 19:31:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 15:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705121931.l4CJVGTP011987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-05-12 15:31 EST ------- updated spec: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle.spec updated srpm: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-4.fc7.src.rpm - i believe i implemented all of your suggestions and they successfully built in mock with fedora-devel-x86_64-core and fedora-devel-i386-core configurations. - i couldn't find any symlinked jars to use, so i used a wildcard (*) where the architecture specific bit of the eclipse jar is. - it would be very nice to be able to write less brittle eclipse plugin specfiles. symlinks might be one way to do it, and wildcards might be another alternative. are there other options? if we can settle on the best way to do it we should document that methodology in a "Packaging of add-ons for Eclipse" or similar wiki page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 20:10:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 16:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] New: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/oyranos/oyranos.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/oyranos/oyranos-0.1.7-2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) Well same case for cinepaint, there is still some rpath issues ( fltk is guilty...). But the remaining rpath might not be caused by fltk... I think some data (specially thoses provided in standard_profiles/eci/ ) might not be bundled into the package because license isn't compatible for fedora inclusion... This is the fist package (i known ) that uses elektra. I'm not sure how key should be registred/unregistred... (get inspired from the Makefile install_usersettings section ) TODO: .desktop file remove remaining rpath check various licenses for compatibility. This package is a cinepaint dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 20:10:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 16:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122010.l4CKAwC9013788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239911 OtherBugsDependingO| |225522 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 20:11:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 16:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122011.l4CKB03W013824@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239936 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 20:11:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 16:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208736] Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122011.l4CKBmjO013938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pmount - Enable normal user mount https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208736 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-12 16:11 EST ------- Thanks for the review and the branching, sorry for the obfuscation, but email address shouldn't be visible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 21:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207896] Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122148.l4CLmFGH015666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astyle - Source code formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207896 ------- Additional Comments From haircut at gmail.com 2007-05-12 17:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154591) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154591&action=view) specfile for v1.20.2 I needed a specfile for 1.20.2 (the current release), so I made one. Hope this helps. The Makefile patch no longer works, so I removed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 21:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122148.l4CLmWkT015711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 Bug 239936 depends on bug 239911, which changed state. Bug 239911 Summary: rpath issue with fltk (need to fix from FC-6 to devel...) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239911 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 22:43:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122243.l4CMhhlF016845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-12 18:43 EST ------- 2. The license text does not seem UTF-8 encoded This seems a bit picky, considering we are talking about a single copyright sign. 1. Please add a source URL to the package 2. Make sure the archive name and content match the signed archive on the RH page 3. For fonts tar.bz2 is probably a better idea than tar.gz Can't really do that, since the upstream tarball is missing the License.txt file, afaics. I'll see what I can do. gz vs bz2 is an upstream choice and pretty irrelevant to this review. 1. The license text is partial: it describes the exception but not the main license. A GPL text should be joined to the package I'll pass this on. If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. NOK The current scriptlets are copied verbatim from the guidelines. If you are not satisfied with them, lobby for a change of the guidelines. - please move the clean section to its usual place after %install - it would be nice if the metadata declaration order followed the official Fedora template Don't include irrelevant nitpicky details here, please. - please add a FAQ or at least the contact in charge of liberation fonts as the referenced site has limited info and no contact information. In particular everyone involved in FLOSS fonts would like to know the rationale behind GPL choice when the painfully achieved consensus was to go OFL for all projects Not a topic for the package review. You already brought this up on the mailing lists, which is a much better forum than this bug. - please drop a fontconfig configuration file in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ containing at least the "assign generic names" bit of the dejavu-lgc one. After distussion on IRC with behdad the right prio is probably between dejavu-lgc and other fonts (595 unless dejavu-lgc moves to 58) Thats possible - relying on /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-aliases-fedora.conf means Conflicting with fontconfig packages that do not include liberation info (major PITA). Why do you think so ? That does not follow at all. Consider working with behdad to split this file in font-specific ones (/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-001-fedora-helvetica-alias-liberation.conf, /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-002-fedora-helvetica-alias-nimbus.conf etc) so next time a new font package can just drop his own file there instead of relying on a fontconfig update Pleaes file a separate fontconfig bug if you think you have a working scheme that is sufficiently better than what we have now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 22:47:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] New: Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 Summary: Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libgii.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libgii-1.0.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit rpmlint silent VirtualGL is a project that based upon turbojpeg that requires a special icc compiler. Then there is no need to include it yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 22:50:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238348] Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122250.l4CMo19D017144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238348 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-12 18:49 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a few. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 22:50:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122250.l4CMoB0n017160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239303 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 22:50:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122250.l4CMoB4w017172@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239939 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 22:53:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239940] New: Review Request: libgiigic - LibGIIGIC is a ggi library at the top on LibGII Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239940 Summary: Review Request: libgiigic - LibGIIGIC is a ggi library at the top on LibGII Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libgiigic.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libgiigic-1.1.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: LibGIIGIC is a ggi library at the top on LibGII Check theses packages firt: BR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239303 BR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 23:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239943] New: System Install Packages locks up. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239943 Summary: System Install Packages locks up. Product: Fedora Core Version: test4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lsatenstein at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: root 3953 3950 2 19:23 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/python -tt /usr/sbin/system-install-packages /root/Desktop/kernel-xe n-2.6.20-2925.8.fc7.i686.rpm Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: As of May 12th updates, this is BROKEN Steps to Reproduce: 1. find an rpm file, right click with mouse (GNOME), Blank panel will be presented, with no activity, save for a wait message. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 23:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238348] Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122336.l4CNaWAo018384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238348 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-12 19:36 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 85701b960da6bb10762b460c23b84c15 verve-plugin-0.3.5.tar.bz2 85701b960da6bb10762b460c23b84c15 verve-plugin-0.3.5.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Should the "Requires: xfce4-panel >= 4.4.0" be 4.4.1, since we know that in fc6/devel/f7 at least it will be built against 4.4.1, so perhaps it should require at least that version? No big deal, since 4.4.0 and 4.4.1 should be pretty much the same for xfce4-panel-devel, but just thought I would mention it. Not a blocker. As hard as I may try I can't see anything blocking this package. ;) This package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request once it's been imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 23:45:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238349] Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122345.l4CNjFLj018547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238349 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-12 19:45 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a few. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 12 23:50:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238349] Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705122350.l4CNomHX018798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238349 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-12 19:50 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License(GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: fc9828001674e7428ef4023e4a320c87 xfce4-places-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2 fc9828001674e7428ef4023e4a320c87 xfce4-places-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Same minor non blocking comment about the Requires for xfce4-panel being 4.4.0. If we know we are building against 4.4.1, shouldn't we require that? Shouldn't matter much however. I see no blockers, this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this review request once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 00:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 20:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130054.l4D0sYUa019984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 00:57:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 20:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130057.l4D0v8GE020096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kanarip at kanarip.com |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-12 20:57 EST ------- Approved review tickets should be assigned to who actually approved the package. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 01:08:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 21:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130108.l4D18Xjw020333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 01:37:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 21:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130137.l4D1bjxO020700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-12 21:37 EST ------- Ok. So when I use "locate INSTALL" on FC6 system I got many packages using INSTALL. Will review this on Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 01:49:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 21:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130149.l4D1nk18020928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-12 21:49 EST ------- Well, ----------------- %install section ----------------- cp help/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/help cp -r template/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/template -------------------------------------------------------------------- You SHOULD keep timstamps on template and help files (included sub-directories) and paste right permission on them, so the use of 'install [option]' is more suitable, just like below: install -p -m 0664 help/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/help install -p -m 0664 template/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/template ------------------------------------------------------- install -m 755 -d template %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/template install -m 755 -d help %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/help Those above can be improved : install -D (or mkdir -p) %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/template install -D (or mkdir -p) %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/help --------------------------------------------------------------- cp -a src/app_icon.xpm %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/%{name}.xpm Use 'install -p -m 0664' instead of 'cp -a' the use of -a option isn't necessary (is the same as -dpR where not really needded) ------------------- >From %files section -------------------- i think that the help files should be installed in /usr/share/doc/[package_name] sub-directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 02:12:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 22:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130212.l4D2COrc021303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-12 22:12 EST ------- Ok requesting you to remove INSTALL as it really increases unnecessary files count on system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 02:19:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 22:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130219.l4D2JBIY021419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-12 22:19 EST ------- Builds on F7. rpmlint: E: surfraw no-binary E: surfraw-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package Need to fix: only sh scripts, make noarch Wrong license. COPYING (which you should include in %doc) indicates public domain links, screen, lynx, and w3m are mentioned in the config and description. Did you want to Require these? Are we going to assume users already have these installed or can figure out how to? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 02:35:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 22:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130235.l4D2ZhZo021759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 ------- Additional Comments From livinded at deadbytes.net 2007-05-12 22:35 EST ------- Spec URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/specs/surfraw/surfraw.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/srpms/surfraw-1.0.7-2.src.rpm Added dependencies for lynx, links, screen, and w3m. Changed the license to Public Domain. Added COPYING into the doc directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 03:38:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 23:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130338.l4D3cSV9022846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-12 23:38 EST ------- - please drop a fontconfig configuration file in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ containing at least the "assign generic names" bit of the dejavu-lgc one. After distussion on IRC with behdad the right prio is probably between dejavu-lgc and other fonts (595 unless dejavu-lgc moves to 58) 595 is not going to work though, since it sorts before 59- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 05:27:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 01:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130527.l4D5RCeq024856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-13 01:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/hostapd/hostapd.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/hostapd/hostapd-0.6-0.6.20070510.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: User space daemon for access point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 06:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 02:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232171] Review Request: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd - Class for managing SAMBA style password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130615.l4D6F9kF025765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd - Class for managing SAMBA style password files Alias: pear-File-SMBPasswd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232171 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-13 02:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd Short Description: Class for managing SAMBA style password files Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 08:01:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 04:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130801.l4D81GZD029003@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-05-13 04:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > 2. The license text does not seem UTF-8 encoded > > This seems a bit picky, considering we are talking about a single copyright sign. I reserve the right to be picky for highly visible packages where RH is the upstream :) > 1. Please add a source URL to the package > 2. Make sure the archive name and content match the signed archive on the RH page > > Can't really do that, since the upstream tarball is missing the License.txt > file, afaics. I'll see what I can do. Please do. > 3. For fonts tar.bz2 is probably a better idea than tar.gz > gz vs bz2 is an upstream choice and pretty irrelevant to this review. RH is the upstream there > 1. The license text is partial: it describes the exception but not the main > license. A GPL text should be joined to the package > > > I'll pass this on. > > > If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. NOK > > The current scriptlets are copied verbatim from the guidelines. > If you are not satisfied with them, lobby for a change of the > guidelines. OK. It sucks guidelines differ from what our main font packages do in practice > - please move the clean section to its usual place after %install > - it would be nice if the metadata declaration order followed the official > Fedora template > > Don't include irrelevant nitpicky details here, please. I wouldn't mind it that much if people were not likely to take this spac as a template later. But that's up to you. > - please add a FAQ or at least the contact in charge of liberation fonts as the > referenced site has limited info and no contact information. In particular > everyone involved in FLOSS fonts would like to know the rationale behind GPL > choice when the painfully achieved consensus was to go OFL for all projects > > Not a topic for the package review. You already brought this up > on the mailing lists, which is a much better forum than this bug. That's your choice. Right now you're the only identified contact so prepare for direct questions if you release the package as-is. > - relying on /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-aliases-fedora.conf means Conflicting with > fontconfig packages that do not include liberation info (major PITA). > > Why do you think so ? That does not follow at all. The main feature of the packages is fonts that alias ms core fonts. If we allow install on fontconfig-enabled system that do not have this aliasing, users won't get the expected feature (and I'm sure our marketing people will make enough noise users will expect it). Given we do not make font packages depend on fontconfig that's a Conflict > Consider working with behdad to split this file in font-specific ones > (/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-001-fedora-helvetica-alias-liberation.conf, > /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-002-fedora-helvetica-alias-nimbus.conf etc) so next time a > new font package can just drop his own file there instead of relying on a > fontconfig update > > Pleaes file a separate fontconfig bug if you think you have a working scheme > that is sufficiently better than what we have now. already done (bug #239913) but liberation fonts is the first package that clearly needs this (In reply to comment #6) > - please drop a fontconfig configuration file in /etc/fonts/conf.d/ containing > at least the "assign generic names" bit of the dejavu-lgc one. After distussion > on IRC with behdad the right prio is probably between dejavu-lgc and other fonts > (595 unless dejavu-lgc moves to 58) > > 595 is not going to work though, since it sorts before 59- Yes that's a hack and people tend to get their hacks wrong. 605 then (and moving lgc would be much cleaner) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 08:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 04:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130820.l4D8KtRr030810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 jfrieben at hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfrieben at hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jfrieben at hotmail.com 2007-05-13 04:20 EST ------- The package name should probably follow the notation already used for other compatibility packages such as "compat-gcc-34-g77-3.4.6-7.i386.rpm". One could thus imagine something something like: "compat-cernlib-34-g77-2006-6.fc7.src.rpm" . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 09:34:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 05:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130934.l4D9YigI002570@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-13 05:34 EST ------- The 34 is because the gcc version is 3.4 which is not the latest. Here the cernlib version is the latest, so I think that no number should appear in the name. As for adding compat in front of the name, why not. I'll do a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 09:38:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 05:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705130938.l4D9cs7i002700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-05-13 05:38 EST ------- Done, INSTALL is removed, I'll remove it from all other packages I will build from now :) Here is the last version package : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/kftpgrabber/kftpgrabber.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/kftpgrabber/kftpgrabber-0.8.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 11:02:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 07:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238348] Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131102.l4DB2xpx004312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238348 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-05-13 07:02 EST ------- > 1. Should the "Requires: xfce4-panel >= 4.4.0" be 4.4.1, since > we know that in fc6/devel/f7 at least it will be built against 4.4.1, > so perhaps it should require at least that version? I usually tend to require one version below the one in the repo (if possible), to avoid yum from running when it can't find when the latest version (e. g. because mirrors are not in sync). But I can change it to 4.4.1, the required packages are in the repo for quite a while. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-verve-plugin Short Description: A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel Owners: fedora at christoph-wickert.de Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: kevin at tummy.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 11:06:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 07:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238348] Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131106.l4DB6Rcb004410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238348 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 11:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 07:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238349] Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131111.l4DBBSTH004525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238349 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-05-13 07:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Same minor non blocking comment about the Requires for xfce4-panel being 4.4.0. > If we know we are building against 4.4.1, shouldn't we require that? same as in bug #238348 comment #3 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-places-plugin Short Description: Places menu for the Xfce panel Owners: fedora at christoph-wickert.de Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: kevin at tummy.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 11:55:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 07:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] New: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lukasim at atlas.cz QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses.spec SRPM URL: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: This ruby extension makes most functions, constants, and external variables of the C library ncurses accessible from the Ruby programming language. ---- This is my first package and i am newbie. So i need sponsor... There is some about this package http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora.htm . Thanks a lot for any hint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 12:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131223.l4DCNs2E006664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 12:28:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131228.l4DCSawC006776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 08:28 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR. I am sponsoring Matsui-san) Please close this as NEXTRELEASE when rebuild on devel and FC-6 is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 12:36:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131236.l4DCaOlY007025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 08:36 EST ------- Well, I am in the sponsor members, however now I am currently reviewing about 15 review requests so I may not be able to review this soon if you want me to review this. However, as I have several ruby module related packages, I suggest you to see some of my ruby related packages for example. They are: bug 236491, bug 236492, bug 237379, bug 237380, bug 237381 Also please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 12:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131242.l4DCgD8X007205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 08:42 EST ------- And also check for general packaging points: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 12:59:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131259.l4DCxI6d008390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 08:59 EST ------- One more comment: ---------------------------------------------------- [isimluk at bw rpm]$ rpmlint RPMS/i386/ncurses-ruby-1.1-1.i386.rpm W: ncurses-ruby unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ncurses_bin.so I've googled, but result is that it should be striped automaticaly. :( Thx for help. ---------------------------------------------------- Have binary stripped by rpmbuild requires that the binary should have executable permission. Check if this binary (ncurses_bin.so) has 0755 permission correctly (if not, please change the permission in the spec file properly) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 12:59:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 08:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131259.l4DCxe2b008434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|low |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 13:10:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131310.l4DDANTL009450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-13 09:10 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 13:12:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239770] Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131312.l4DDCqAD009625@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-13 09:12 EST ------- Fixed a problem with parallel make and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 13:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131312.l4DDCrKD009646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 Bug 206871 depends on bug 239770, which changed state. Bug 239770 Summary: Review Request: gsm - GSM speech compressor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239770 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 13:14:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131314.l4DDEqCX009890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 13:41:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239963] New: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-IO-AIO.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-IO-AIO-2.33-1.src.rpm Description: This module implements asynchronous I/O using whatever means your operating system supports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 13:49:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131349.l4DDn5L2010850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-13 09:49 EST ------- Hello Tasaka-san, Thank you for sponsoring me! On cvs, koji has successfully built the package in "devel" branch. But, plague-client fails in "FC-6" branch for some reason, the server says "Insufficient privilege". (??) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 13:56:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221675] Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131356.l4DDuuMJ011013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zd1211-firmware - Firmware for wireless devices based on zd1211 chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221675 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 13:57:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236976] Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131357.l4DDvEGO011077@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-imlib2 - The Kaa Media - imlib2 binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236976 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:03:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131403.l4DE3lxZ011220@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 10:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Hello Tasaka-san, > > Thank you for sponsoring me! > > On cvs, koji has successfully built the package in "devel" branch. But, > plague-client fails in "FC-6" branch for some reason, the server says > "Insufficient privilege". (??) Well, first would you update common/ and mcpp/ again? If you still fail to send a queue for plague, please try to wait another one hour. If you still fails, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131415.l4DEFmSI011485@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 10:15 EST ------- Please close when rebuld is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:16:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131416.l4DEGDba011518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 10:16 EST ------- Please close when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:24:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131424.l4DEO9DO011687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-13 10:24 EST ------- Thanks, I've followed the path and I've uploaded new spec and source rpm. I'm not sure if i should increase %release number, but think not. --- ncurses_bin.co had 0755 permission, so warning stays. [rpmbuild at bw ~]$ ls -la /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ncurses_bin.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 296835 kv? 13 15:47 /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ncurses_bin.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:26:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131426.l4DEQoWM011760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 10:26 EST ------- Well, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes ---------------------------------------------------- Increase the "Release" tag every time you upload a new package to avoid confusion. The reviewer and other interested parties probably still have older versions of your SRPM lying around to check what has changed between the old and new packages; those get confused when the revision didn't change. ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:28:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131428.l4DESOv9011806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 10:28 EST ------- And please write in the %changelog what you changed briefly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:36:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236366] Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131436.l4DEanUL011980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gtk - basic GTK clutter widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236366 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:44:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131444.l4DEi0dJ012267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-13 10:43 EST ------- Here it is. I also synced with the main cernlib http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/compat-cernlib-g77-2006-9.fc7.src.rpm http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/compat-cernlib-g77.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:49:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131449.l4DEnlNQ012390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-13 10:49 EST ------- Thanks for the review Mamoru, indeed it is built. I had a look at alexandria, but I am not sure that I can review it given my low ruby skills. I'll see what I can do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:50:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230710] Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131450.l4DEo7LC012425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 14:58:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 10:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236422] Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131458.l4DEwNJT012599@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 10:58 EST ------- For 0.1.1-1: * Requires/BuildRequires - clutter-devel requires gtk2-devel and then glib2-devel, so in this case explicit requirement of gtk2-devel or glib2-devel is not needed. - clutter-gst-devel requires (not "BuildRequire"s) gstreamer-plugins-base-devel which is pulled by "Requires: gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10" in pkgconfig .pc file. * Timestamps - Similarly to clutter-gtk, please add 'INSTALL=%{__install} -p" to "make install". * Documentation - INSTALL is not needed. * License - This is LGPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 15:07:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131507.l4DF7put012839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rayvd at bludgeon.org | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 11:07 EST ------- Still I am waiting for you to do a pre-review of some other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 15:09:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131509.l4DF9duw012944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dgoodwin at dangerous | |lyinc.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 11:09 EST ------- ping? If you don't have any packages else to submit, you can do a pre-review of other persons' review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 15:10:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131510.l4DFAvX9013006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From jfrieben at hotmail.com 2007-05-13 11:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The 34 is because the gcc version is 3.4 which is not the latest. > Here the cernlib version is the latest, so I think that no number > should appear in the name. As for adding compat in front of the > name, why not. I'll do a try. The actual version of "gcc" which "compat-gcc-34-g77-3.4.6-7" is referring to is "3.4.6". However, all compilers of the "3.4.x" series are binary compatible. That's, I guess, why "34" is mentionned in the first place. It does not refer to version "3.4.0". It simply drops the minor version ["6"] which is irrelevant. If you omit "34" in the package name, it is not clear against which version the "cernlib" package has been compiled. E.g., it could have been built against some "3.2.x" version which is not compatible with "3.4.x" at the binary level! For this reason, I strongly support the inclusion of "34" in the package name as had been done in the case of "compat-gcc-34-g77-3.4.6-7". Thanks! ^^ ^^^^^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 15:36:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232165] Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131536.l4DFaSoS013479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files Alias: pear-File-Passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-13 11:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-File-Passwd.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-File-Passwd-1.1.6-2.src.rpm %changelog * Sun May 13 2007 Christopher Stone 1.1.6-2 - Include samba extension as default for Fedora - Exclude samba extension from Enterprise Linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 15:37:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239968] New: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239968 Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: livinded at deadbytes.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/specs/mdbtools/mdbtools.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/srpms/mdbtools-0.5-5.src.rpm Description: The MDB Tools project is a effort to document the MDB file format used in Microsoft's Access database package, and to provide a set of tools and applications to make that data available on other platforms. Specifically, MDB Tools includes programs to export schema and data to other databases such as MySQL, Oracle, Sybase, PostgreSQL, and others. Also included is a SQL engine for performing simple SQL queries. The 0.5 release includes an updated GUI interface (screenshot is available here). A sparse but functional ODBC driver is included as well. MDB Tools currently has read-only support for Access 97 (Jet 3) and Access 2000/2002 (Jet 4) formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 15:40:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232165] Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131540.l4DFe0Zh013614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files Alias: pear-File-Passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-13 11:39 EST ------- Can you please check this updated spec file, I'm not sure if I did this right: %if !0%{?rhel} ...etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 15:46:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131546.l4DFkFeA013930@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-13 11:46 EST ------- Ok, I've backup... SPEC-2: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses.spec SRPM-1: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-1.src.rpm SRPM-2: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-2.src.rpm I've tried striped ncurses_bin.so explicitly, but it has no result. Thanks for patience with me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 16:31:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131631.l4DGV1OB014888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 12:30 EST ------- Well, for 1.1-2: * parallel make and fedora specific compilation flags - Supporting parallel make is needed when possible (please check: the section "Parallel make" of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) - For ruby, fedora specific compilation flags seems to be used automatically, however IMO using these flags explicitly is recommended. Because of the reasons above, please use for make line: ----------------------------------------------------- make %{_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fPIC" ----------------------------------------------------- * Timestamp - For files which are not built or modified during rebuild, keeping timestamps on those files is recommended. To keep timestamp, the following method works for this package. ------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------ * debuginfo permission - The created debuginfo rpms bears the following rpmlint: ------------------------------------------------------- W: ruby-ncurses-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/ncurses-ruby-1.1/ncurses_wrap.c -------------------------------------------------------- This means that the permission of this file (ncursrs_wrap.c) is incorrect. Fix the permission of this file to 0644 (i.e. add the following to %prep stage:) -------------------------------------------------------- chmod 0644 ncurses_wrap.c --------------------------------------------------------- * License - License text and the source files actually say that this is licensed under LGPL, not GPL * Documentation - Please add "THANKS" to %doc - Please consider examples/ directory to %doc (in that case, you have to change the permission of all files under examples/ directory to 0644). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 16:34:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131634.l4DGYYTm014944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 12:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I've tried striped ncurses_bin.so explicitly, but it has no result. This seems to be fixed?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 16:39:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232165] Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131639.l4DGdDtK015098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files Alias: pear-File-Passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-13 12:39 EST ------- Nevermind, I just got thl's email and did an EL-5 mock build, everything looks okay. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-File-Passwd Short Description: Manipulate many kinds of password files Owners: chris.stone at gmail.com Branches: EL-5 FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 16:40:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131640.l4DGe2xS015142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-13 12:40 EST ------- Well, is it possible that you disable oyranos support for now? Actually I am now reviewing about 15 review requests (and potentially more), so if you want me to review oyranos also, it may take *very* long... And I don't want to wait until the review of oyranos is done (perhaps by other reviewer) if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 17:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] New: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/JSON-XS/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-JSON-XS-1.21-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-JSON-XS.spec Description: This module converts Perl data structures to JSON and vice versa. Its primary goal is to be correct and its secondary goal is to be fast. To reach the latter goal it was written in C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 17:20:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131720.l4DHKaH7016252@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-JSON-XS ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-13 13:20 EST ------- In the next "not minor" release of perl-JSON, this module will be transparently usable as the backend of JSON, much as Readonly::XS is to Readonly or Class::C3::XS is to Class::C3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 17:43:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131743.l4DHhA5F016983@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-13 13:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-tag Short Description: Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 17:53:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131753.l4DHrLRF017155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-05-13 13:53 EST ------- Ok, I've corrected these points, added desktop-file install and %post/%postun macros for the icons to be correctly applied after install. New URLs are : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/klear/klear.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/klear/klear-0.6.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 18:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131806.l4DI6kcv017407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-13 14:06 EST ------- Ok i understand But since Fedora 7 is in development freeze i don't know if we should planned to release it after Fedora 7 Final is here? Cinepaint is missing from Fedora indeed . But it would be better to have also oyranos, since this will provide a better support for icc profiles... For now there is still issues with rpath (but since a fixed version of fltk will be avaible i will try to see if this is better...) Do you mind we can test cinepaint and have enought time to add it to the collection ? For Fedora 6 there is still a need to update lcms >= 1.16 I would like to do so... Asking someone else for reviewing oyranos... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 18:09:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233455] Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131809.l4DI9lmJ017502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autodir - Creates user directories on demand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-13 14:09 EST ------- I still need to fix some build requirements for old branches, but all recent branches have now been built. Thanks for the review, Bernard! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 18:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131834.l4DIYtWA017913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-13 14:34 EST ------- Hey Thomas. I see 1.0.6 is out. Does it address the issues above? Can you update your package to 1.0.6 and we can see where we stand? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 18:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131845.l4DIjr6O018368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-13 14:45 EST ------- Good: + Local build works fine. + Mock build works fine. + Local install and uninstall works fine. Bad: - If I start the applicate, I will got a error message about a misssing channels.conf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 18:54:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 14:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131854.l4DIshlF018639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-13 14:54 EST ------- You mean you'd like the cernlib package to be named compat-cernlib-2006-g77-2006-9 ??? There is no specific binary incompatibility between the different cernlib versions, and there may be binary incompatibility within a version. Moreover the binary incompatibilities are in the sonames. This is very unlike a compiler where the version may be meaningful in term of binary incompatibility. Given the nature of the cernlib since it is not actively developed anymore, the binary incompatibility could certainly only come from the packaging. As a side note, in fact the current cernlib-g77 is binary incompatible with the previous version -- not only because of the use of gfortran -- but also because some code has been removed because it was already in other libs. I haven't changed the soname already because I was waiting for the debian move, seems that it has happened. So it seems that you are somehow right that I will need a compat package, and I'll certainly call it compat-cernlib-2005-g77-2006-9 but it will be in another submission... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 19:19:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131919.l4DJJSbB019621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-13 15:19 EST ------- I am interested in reviewing oyranos, however I have very little time currently so it would certainly not be before 2 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 19:22:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131922.l4DJMYSl019791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-05-13 15:22 EST ------- I fixed everything except for macro file. Can you please specify what's wrong with the macro? Here is my macro: # #Macros file for RPM package, created by Anton Kuznetsov # # %packager Anton Kuznetsov %distribution Fedora 6 %vendor Anton Kuznetsov %_home /home/akuznets %_topdir /home/akuznets/rpm %_tmppath /home/akuznets/rpm/tmp %_builddir /home/akuznets/rpm/tmp %_rpmtopdir /home/akuznets/rpm/%{name} %_sourcedir %{_rpmtopdir} %_specdir %{_rpmtopdir} %_rpmdir /home/akuznets/rpm/RPMS %_srcrpmdir /home/akuznets/rpm/RPMS %_rpmfilename %%{NAME}-%%{VERSION}-%%{RELEASE}.%%{ARCH}.rpm %_signature gpg %_gpg_path /home/akuznets.gnupg %_gpgbin /usr/bin/gpg %_gpg_name Anton Kuznetsov Thanks, Anton -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 19:56:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705131956.l4DJufR3021335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-05-13 15:56 EST ------- I fixed everything except for macro file. Can you please specify what's wrong with the macro? Here is my macro: # #Macros file for RPM package, created by Anton Kuznetsov # # %packager Anton Kuznetsov %distribution Fedora 6 %vendor Anton Kuznetsov %_home /home/akuznets %_topdir /home/akuznets/rpm %_tmppath /home/akuznets/rpm/tmp %_builddir /home/akuznets/rpm/tmp %_rpmtopdir /home/akuznets/rpm/%{name} %_sourcedir %{_rpmtopdir} %_specdir %{_rpmtopdir} %_rpmdir /home/akuznets/rpm/RPMS %_srcrpmdir /home/akuznets/rpm/RPMS %_rpmfilename %%{NAME}-%%{VERSION}-%%{RELEASE}.%%{ARCH}.rpm %_signature gpg %_gpg_path /home/akuznets.gnupg %_gpgbin /usr/bin/gpg %_gpg_name Anton Kuznetsov Thanks, Anton -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 20:09:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 16:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705132009.l4DK9vaT021894@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-13 16:09 EST ------- I've uploaded new version (corrected by comment #8): SPEC: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses.spec SRPM: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-3.src.rpm But ncurses_bin.so is still not striped. Now, I keep reading wiki... Thanks a lot for ^ these posts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 20:42:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 16:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] New: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ants.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ants-1.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A game inspired by the game Lemmings. You take command in the game of a bunch of small ants and have to guide them around in levels. Since the ants walk on their own, the player can only influence them by giving them commands, like build a bridge, dig a hole or redirect all penguins in the other direction. The goal of each level is to reach the exit, for which multiple combination of commands are necessary. The game is presented in a 2D site view. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 22:26:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705132226.l4DMQPfw025098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-13 18:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim.spec SRPM URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim-1.2.6-3.fc7.src.rpm Changed the background image from Fedora default back to SLiM default, added some more build dependencies, added a README and fixed "console". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 13 23:30:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 19:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705132330.l4DNUgkN026191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2007-05-13 19:30 EST ------- If the preferred place is /usr/share, then I'll change it. I guess I can also cut a 1.0 version and put it in my kernel.org area and refer to it in the Source: tag. Will do that and report here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 01:22:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140122.l4E1MND7029663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium AssignedTo|majain at redhat.com |smohan at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bugzilla at redhat.com 2007-05-13 21:22 EST ------- User majain at redhat.com's account has been closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 01:45:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140145.l4E1j06q030211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-13 21:44 EST ------- Imported and built for F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 01:59:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 21:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236422] Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140159.l4E1xqaB030558@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236422 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-05-13 21:59 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gst/clutter-gst.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.allisson.eti.br/clutter-gst/clutter-gst-0.1.1-2.src.rpm Changelog: - INSTALL removed from docs - fix make install for keeping timestamps - changed license for LGPL - Fix requires/buildrequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 02:26:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140226.l4E2Q5Kw031560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dgoodwin at dangerous| |lyinc.com) | ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-05-13 22:26 EST ------- Just went to submit comments for surfraw, but mistakenly had the tab open for a couple days while working on it here and there. When I submitted someone had beaten me to it, found all the same problems, and the package maintainer has already made adjustments. Will try again this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 02:28:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140228.l4E2SK6Z031685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-05-13 22:28 EST ------- I guess I was thinking there would be a more formal review than that. Sorry if that was the review in total. The KDE packages can be this way from what I have read in packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 02:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140238.l4E2cYu7032054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-13 22:38 EST ------- and I was thought you will update SPEC as suggested in comment #1 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 02:39:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140239.l4E2dq5j032107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-13 22:39 EST ------- and remove INSTALL file also from %doc. update new SPEC and submit new links here for SPEC and SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 03:47:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 23:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140347.l4E3l585001532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-13 23:47 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. 56610fd3e2e7f092b7d8eed10d3e5d36 kftpgrabber-0.8.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text COPYING is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + scriptlets are used. + Provides: kftpimportplugin_filezilla3.so kftpimportplugin_gftp.so kftpimportplugin_kftp.so kftpimportplugin_ncftp.so libkftpinterfaces.so.0 + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 03:49:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 23:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140349.l4E3n9n5001641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-13 23:49 EST ------- make test gave me t/01use.....................................................ok t/02pod.....................................................skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required t/03podcoverage.............................................skipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 required t/c3_mro....................................................skipped all skipped: This test requires Class::C3 and t/optional_http-server-restart..............................skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Devel required t/optional_http-server......................................skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Devel required t/optional_lighttpd-fastcgi-non-root........................skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Devel required t/optional_lighttpd-fastcgi.................................skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Devel required t/optional_memleak..........................................skipped all skipped: set TEST_MEMLEAK to enable this test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 04:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 00:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140406.l4E46wcq001997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-14 00:06 EST ------- Ok. Taking your comment #5 as basis Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. but those warnings can be ignored. + source files match upstream url 7732cf48a1593164bcf6710bda41e6c8 gammu-1.10.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + gammu.pc file present. + -devel and -libs subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gammu-libs Provides: libGammu.so.1 + Requires: /bin/sh bluez-utils libGammu.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypt.so.1 libcrypto.so.6 libm.so.6 libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15(libmysqlclient_15) libnsl.so.1 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libssl.so.6 libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 05:27:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 01:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140527.l4E5RMLs004530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2007-05-14 01:27 EST ------- Oops, sorry for the delay... I will build the package with 'make tag build' and close the bug. If Konrad agree to be a co-maintainer it's ok for me with great pleasure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 05:45:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 01:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140545.l4E5jKX1005262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From jfrieben at hotmail.com 2007-05-14 01:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > You mean you'd like the cernlib package to be named > compat-cernlib-2006-g77-2006-9 ??? No, I meant to name it "compat-cernlib-34-g77-2006-9" which refers to the compiler release (3.4.x) against which it is built. Compatibility libraries in "Fedora" usually carry labels like "296", "33" or "34" (as in this case) to distinguish the underlying "gcc" version unambiguously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 05:58:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 01:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239943] System Install Packages locks up. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140558.l4E5wLft005696@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: System Install Packages locks up. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239943 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|System Install Packages |System Install Packages |locks up. |locks up. Component|Package Review |pirut AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 05:58:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 01:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140558.l4E5wmtZ005730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-14 01:58 EST ------- So this package is also having similar rpmlint output like gammu have. Got spurious-executable-perm and doc-file-depencecy with rpmlint 0.80 version. Any comments on why both warnings should be ignored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 06:41:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 02:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140641.l4E6fJX8006707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 08:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 04:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140813.l4E8Dqpp012270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-14 04:13 EST ------- It is not really built against gcc-3.4.x, the C compiler used is the latest C compiler. It is only g77 which comes from gcc-3.4.x. And (to my knowledge) g77 hasn't have binary incompatibilities for a long time. So I can't see a reason to have a reference to the g77 version, a reference to g77 seems enough to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 09:19:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 05:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705140919.l4E9Jmhv018473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-05-14 05:19 EST ------- Jochen, thanks for a quick response! The updated packages are at: http://gnetworkmonitor.sourceforge.net/rpm/gnome-network-monitor.spec http://gnetworkmonitor.sourceforge.net/rpm/gnome-network-monitor-0.9-1.src.rpm 1) These were packaging bugs and were fixed. Thanks for pointing them out! >- Source0 contains not a full qualified URL. >- /usr/bin should be replace by %{_bindir} >- /usr/sbin should be replace by %{_sbindir} >- /ussr/share should be replace by %{_datadir} >- Rpmlint complaints binary package: >- Packages contains no docs. 2) I'm not sure I completely understand these comments: >- %{?_smp_mflags} missing on make without any comment. Does this flag make sense for a pure python package? I haven't seen it with other similar programs (I was largely inspired by system-config-* and setroubleshooter's spec files) > You can owned a whole directory, if the entry in the %file stanza end with a > slash 3) >- Package doesn't contain a verbatin copy of the license text Is this a requirement? The tarball contains license text. Not the RPM, but the specfile says it's GPL..is it really necessary to have a GPL text for every package on the system? 4) >- Programm crashed after startup: I filed your traceback as bug #1718208 at SF.net, it should be fixed now. Can you please re-try? Does it crash even if you select "Run unprivileged" from the usermode dialog Again, thanks for jumping on this review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 11:17:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 07:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] New: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~georgiou/ruby-shadow/ruby-shadow.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~georgiou/ruby-shadow/ruby-shadow-1.4.1-1.FC6.src.rpm Description: ruby bindings for shadow password access (getspnam et al). Needed for puppet (already in extras) to manage local accounts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 13:50:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141350.l4EDoFVK000728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-05-14 09:50 EST ------- These were both already mentioned in the spec but I made them more explicit. Spec URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rcritten/jss.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rcritten/jss-4.2.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 14:24:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141424.l4EEOGY7004120@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-14 10:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I've uploaded new version (corrected by comment #8): > SPEC: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses.spec > SRPM: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-3.src.rpm > > But ncurses_bin.so is still not striped. I don't understand what problem you are still seeing now. For me this binary is stripped *at last* and rpmlint don't complain about stripping. Actually ncurses_bin.so must _NOT_ be stripped at %install stage. When ncurses_bin.so *has 0755 permission correctly*, /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh and /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress should automatically strip the binary and create debuginfo rpm. So "%install -s" should be %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 14:40:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141440.l4EEeCdC005715@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-14 10:40 EST ------- As I maintain several ruby modules, I make a quick comment. * Are you sure that this is _truly_ licensed under public domain? (Well, actually many packages created by Japanese developer have no license documents or have some original license texts and each time I want to package into rpm style, I have to ask the developer and someone else about the license......) * I strongly think that BuildRequires should also have "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" because you can rebuild this under ruby 1.9 (when ruby 1.9 rpm is out) but it is wrong because the rebuilt rpm should require ruby 1.9, not 1.8 * Fedora's default encoding is UTF-8 and please change the encoding of README.euc to UTF-8 (and rename it). * Compiler flags are wrong (do not honor fedora specific). --------------------------------------------------------------- + make gcc -I. -I. -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux -I. -DHAVE_GETSPENT -DHAVE_SGETSPENT -DHAVE_FGETSPENT -DHAVE_SETSPENT -DHAVE_ENDSPENT -DHAVE_LCKPWDF -DHAVE_ULCKPWDF -fPIC -c shadow.c gcc -shared -L"/usr/lib" -o shadow.so shadow.o -lruby -lpthread -ldl -lcrypt -lm -lc + exit 0 --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 14:58:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141458.l4EEwvID007428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:11:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141511.l4EFBBdn008736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-05-14 11:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > Oops, sorry for the delay... I will build the package with 'make tag build' and > close the bug. If Konrad agree to be a co-maintainer it's ok for me with great > pleasure. Wooho! err, The answer is 'Yes'. Thank you :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:12:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141512.l4EFCWL0008809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-14 11:12 EST ------- New version: * Mon May 14 2007 Hans de Goede 4.1.2-3 - Use normal make / make install instead off make all-gcc / make install-gcc - Add --disable-libssp to the configure flags, freebsd ports, the avrlibc docs, and debian package all do this, and ./configure does not do this automaticly - Add --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs, as we don't want gcc/g++ to be looking in the default include/lib paths - Add --with-system-zlib and zlib-devel BR - Add 2 usefull patches from freebsd ports collection - Split g++ off into a seperate package - Add special script/workaround to avoid debuginfo generation for non native libs Get it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-gcc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-gcc-4.1.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141515.l4EFFgPd009044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-14 11:15 EST ------- Why did you changed the background image back to the default? I think, if this should be a package for Fedora, it should use the Fedora background image. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:20:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141520.l4EFKIEK009418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232165] Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141521.l4EFLJsk009711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files Alias: pear-File-Passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:25:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141525.l4EFPDmO010200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-14 11:25 EST ------- 1) to avoid the "dangling symlink" in rpmlint 2) to provide proper Fedora themes later on I "borrowed" the setup from the wdm package where it uses the default desktop background for the login page as well. But the login themes for GDM/KDM does not use the desktop background, instead they use a different image of the same theme. Besides, Xfce does not use a Fedora icon but the Xfce icon for the menu. And IceWM does not use the Fedora icon or theme either, it uses a plain IceWM icon. So I wasn't sure whether it should be a) a straight packaging or b) themed for Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:27:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232171] Review Request: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd - Class for managing SAMBA style password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141527.l4EFRM5Q010382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd - Class for managing SAMBA style password files Alias: pear-File-SMBPasswd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232171 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:29:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238348] Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141529.l4EFTDAK010506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238348 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141529.l4EFTncu010608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-14 11:29 EST ------- http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/wdm-fedora-login.jpg http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/gdm-fedora-login.jpg http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/kdm-fedora-login.jpg Easy enough to change the theme back with a release 4, I made some typos in the README file anyway. It would be nice to know whether it worked with mock, though ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:30:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238349] Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141530.l4EFUBDI010651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238349 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:31:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236422] Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141531.l4EFVKKu010736@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236422 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-14 11:31 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------- This package (clutter-gst) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141539.l4EFdJOm011325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-14 11:39 EST ------- Skipping the "TEST_MEMLEAK" tests is deliberate -- there's an odd one-off bug that seems to impact one of the tests (and that particular set of tests is being rewritten for the next release); a cpan bug has been filed against this. Similarly, skipping the Catalust::Devel tests is deliberate; Catalyst::Devel requires Catalyst::Runtime, so to try to BR Catalyst::Devel will create a circular builddep. See also http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=27123. Test::Pod, ::Coverage, and Class::C3 have been added. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.7007-3.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Runtime.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 15:40:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 11:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141540.l4EFevV7011462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-14 11:40 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail.10.spec SRPM URL:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/extras/roundcubemail/roundcubemail-0.1-0.5.beta2.2.src.rpm Fixed the above, leaving only the selinux bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 16:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141614.l4EGEfl6014250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-14 12:14 EST ------- Fixed, but the build dies on: install -p -m 0644 template/logdir template/object template/picdir template/snddir template/src template/viewdir template/vol.0 template/words.tok /var/tmp/agistudio-1.2.3-2-root-limb/usr/share/agistudio/template install: omitting directory `template/src' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.67653 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.67653 (%install) I'm using install -p -m 0644 template/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/agistudio/template Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 16:29:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228303] Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141629.l4EGTS2Y015627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 16:29:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141629.l4EGTTba015652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 Bug 233598 depends on bug 228303, which changed state. Bug 228303 Summary: Review Request: python-tag - Python bindings for TagLib to read and write music files tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228303 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 16:32:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141632.l4EGWOVH015928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-14 12:32 EST ------- All dependencies are now in Fedora (python-tag has just been rebuilt). It's definitely time for a complete review now... feel free! :-) (Note that I also have another "Media Center" package waiting for a review : oxine, based on the xine lib, bug #230549) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 16:45:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141645.l4EGjv0i016869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-14 12:45 EST ------- Well, good to know. > (Note that I also have another "Media Center" package waiting for a review : > oxine, based on the xine lib, bug #230549) I'll check it out. Starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 16:47:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230549] Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141647.l4EGltFg017183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oxine - Lightweight, purely OSD based xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230549 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 16:48:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239546] Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141648.l4EGmCnV017271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239546 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 17:23:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141723.l4EHN6du021470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-14 13:23 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. 1) I will ask just to make sure, the README says "License: Free for any use with your own risk!". Looking again it seems that the debian package has the program with a Ruby/GPL license which is strange. 2) Thinking about it you are right. Although "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" wi ll not solve the problem. Lets say that we have ruby 1.9 as the standard package and ruby 1.8 installed as ruby1.8 by a compat package. The require will pull in ruby1.8 but the package will still be build with 1.9. I'll add the buildrequire but if we are going to have compat packages for ruby in the future this we need something else. 3) Is it OK to rename it to README.jp (after it's converted in utf8)? 4) I missed this somehow, I'll fix it before the next update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 17:31:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141731.l4EHVsVA022451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-14 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Ok i understand > But since Fedora 7 is in development freeze i don't know if we should planned to > release it after Fedora 7 Final is here? Cinepaint is missing from Fedora indeed > . But it would be better to have also oyranos, since this will provide a better > support for icc profiles... > > For now there is still issues with rpath (but since a fixed version of fltk will > be avaible i will try to see if this is better...) > > Do you mind we can test cinepaint and have enought time to add it to the > collection ? Well, perhaps I don't understand what you mean here. Your intention is that you want to import this into Fedora after Fedora 7 is released? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 17:43:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141743.l4EHhfcx024224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-14 13:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for the comments. > > 1) I will ask just to make sure, the README says "License: Free for any use with > your own risk!". Okay. We can regard this as public domain. > 2) Thinking about it you are right. Although "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" wi > ll not solve the problem. Lets say that we have ruby 1.9 as the standard package > and ruby 1.8 installed as ruby1.8 by a compat package. The require will pull in > ruby1.8 but the package will still be build with 1.9. I'll add the buildrequire > but if we are going to have compat packages for ruby in the future this we need > something else. Truly for ruby BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" does not prevent this package from being rebuilt by ruby 1.9...... > 3) Is it OK to rename it to README.jp (after it's converted in utf8)? Okay. > 4) I missed this somehow, I'll fix it before the next update. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141818.l4EIIQAA027047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-14 14:18 EST ------- Further Clarification regarding signing of JSS JARs. Due to Fedora's reproducibility requirements, we are unable to ship signed JAR's in Fedora as it would no longer be reproducible FOSS. Software shipped within Fedora does not need JSS to be signed, so we are OK this regard. If 3rd party software requires a signed JSS JAR, then another copy would need to be packaged and distributed by that third party. That 3rd party JSS jar should be capable of installation in parallel with the Fedora JSS without conflicting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:24:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141824.l4EIOBiS027612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-05-14 14:24 EST ------- A signed package is really a super-set of this one so I think a properly signed version could Obsolete this one rather than installing in parallel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236422] Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141829.l4EITFeI028343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236422 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-05-14 14:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clutter-gst Short Description: ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer Owners: allisson at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:37:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141837.l4EIbhlC028864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 Bug 225575 depends on bug 239436, which changed state. Bug 239436 Summary: AVC generated for web imap client in review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239436 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:42:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141842.l4EIgfgg029269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-14 14:42 EST ------- Thaks; I've uploaded 1.1-4 SPEC: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses.spec SRPM: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-4.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There is also not signed temporally RPM for demonstrate this: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-4.i386.rpm ---- >> rpmlint -i ruby-ncurses-1.1-4.i386.rpm W: ruby-ncurses unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ncurses_bin.so ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon May 14 2007 Simon Lukasik - 1.1-4 - Rewrite "install -s" to "install" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:44:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239943] System Install Packages locks up. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141844.l4EIibKd029735@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: System Install Packages locks up. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239943 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|test4 |devel Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-05-14 14:44 EST ------- Can you strace the process to see what it's doing? Also, are there any errors in your ~/.xsession-errors? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:46:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141846.l4EIkdFe029924@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-14 14:46 EST ------- How about deciding upon exactly how a proper signed package would replace this package now? Theoretical Packages ==================== jss-4.2.9-7.el6 JSS for RHEL6 unsigned jss-4.2.9-7.el6.SIGNED Same thing, except with SIGNED appended to end of the Release tag. This would "win" rpmvercmp and replace the unsigned version. This package has an additional virtual provides. Provides: jss(SIGNED) That way other packages that require jss(SIGNED) can Require it by name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:57:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141857.l4EIvivw030846@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-14 14:57 EST ------- New spec and srpm up at Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/liberation-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/liberation-fonts-0.1-6.fc7.src.rpm I ended up using just 59-liberation-fonts.conf, which sorts correctly wrt to 59-dejavu, and avoid any wierd 3digit games. We should just move dejavu to a lower number at some point. The new upstream tarball should hopefully be in place later today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 18:58:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141858.l4EIwvNn031024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-05-14 14:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > - i believe i implemented all of your suggestions and they successfully built in > mock with fedora-devel-x86_64-core and fedora-devel-i386-core configurations. Great! I'll start the review now. > - i couldn't find any symlinked jars to use, so i used a wildcard (*) where the > architecture specific bit of the eclipse jar is. %{_libdir}/eclipse/eclipse/swt-gtk-3.2{,.2}.jar > - it would be very nice to be able to write less brittle eclipse plugin > specfiles. Agreed, but most don't have this problem if they use PDE build. > symlinks might be one way to do it, and wildcards might be another > alternative. are there other options? Other than PDE build, I can't think of anything OTTOMH. > if we can settle on the best way to do > it we should document that methodology in a "Packaging of add-ons for Eclipse" > or similar wiki page. Agreed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 19:12:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141912.l4EJCC9H000645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-14 15:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > >> rpmlint -i ruby-ncurses-1.1-4.i386.rpm > W: ruby-ncurses unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ncurses_bin.so Not reproducible for me (i.e. when I rebuilt from srpm, binary is actually stripped at last). Would you attach your full log when you rebuild your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 19:29:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141929.l4EJT1Ru002433@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-05-14 15:28 EST ------- I like it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 19:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141941.l4EJfuHO004107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-14 15:41 EST ------- In fact, latest word back is: "Those tests are all optional and are intended only for developers, so it doesn't really matter that they require Catalyst::Devel . . . that's why there is code in each optional test to require an environment variable to run them." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 19:42:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141942.l4EJgnx3004306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-14 15:42 EST ------- >From selinux bug: All mail ports are grouped under a single type name of pop_port_t. You need to turn on the policy boolean httpd_can_network_connect setsebool -P httpd_can_network_connect=1 Should I do this in %post? I don't see any other webapps in fedora doing this. I would have thought Squirrelmail might, but it doesn't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 19:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705141948.l4EJmpkM005203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-14 15:48 EST ------- Still needs to be set BuildArch: noarch Now it Requires three different browsers. They all do the same thing, so you are not missing anything if you pick one and don't Require the others. The config file mentions all though. Your choice. As it is now the config file requires user editing to select a browser or it'll error. Which is fine, as a comment in /etc/surfraw.conf says "text browser users can work it out how to change it." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 20:14:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142014.l4EKEYPq007984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 20:24:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142024.l4EKO93A008970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-14 16:24 EST ------- License tag should be "GPL or Artistic". Perversely enough, this package does not need a br on perl(Test::More) *sigh* There's a RFC included in the package. Why not add it to %doc? Update the license tag, drop the br on perl(Test::More), add the rfc to %doc and I'll approve :) + source files match upstream: 3a2914651dc680fd22661f35213211d3 Math-Base85-0.2.tar.gz 3a2914651dc680fd22661f35213211d3 Math-Base85-0.2.tar.gz.srpm + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. (noarch) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Math-Base85-0.2-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Math::Base85) = 0.2 perl-Math-Base85 = 0.2-1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Math::BigInt) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) + %check is present and all tests pass + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 20:34:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142034.l4EKYLIa009742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rayvd at bludgeon.org| |) | ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-14 16:34 EST ------- I have one in mind and will do the pre-review shortly! Was gone over the weekend unfortunately. Thanks for following up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 20:44:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142044.l4EKi41p010968@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-14 16:44 EST ------- Sure, there is log: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-4.rebuild.log In ~/.rmpmacros nothing smells. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 20:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142048.l4EKmBLh011360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-14 16:48 EST ------- You should have a look at Bug 228110 I personally think that it is better to use a background from the fedora artwork which nicely changes between releases, but I don't think it is very important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 22:00:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142200.l4EM0MC6016876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 18:00 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.13-3.src.rpm - BuildRequire perl(Test) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Digest::SHA1) and perl(File::Temp) - Fixed source code URL (sorry for the delay on a response; I was out of town at the end of last week)\ There was a number of other modules in some of the packages (including this one) that the test system requires. It's unclear what the policy is on these (like File::Temp). So... I've added the other needed module as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 22:01:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142201.l4EM1MHA016972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 18:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum-0.03-3.src.rpm * Mon May 14 2007 Wes Hardaker - 0.03-3 - BuildRequire perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 22:01:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142201.l4EM1w3X017011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 18:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.03-3.src.rpm * Mon May 14 2007 Wes Hardaker - 0.03-3 - BuildRequire perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 22:02:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142202.l4EM2UoH017141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 18:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES-0.01-3.src.rpm * Mon May 14 2007 Wes Hardaker - 0.01-3 - BuildRequire perl(Test::More), perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 22:05:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142205.l4EM5MkU017379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-05-14 18:05 EST ------- Thanks for the great submission! There are just a few minor things to clean up before this can be approved. They are listed below on lines beginning with 'X'. The lines beginning with '*' are fine and the ones beginning with '?' indicate that I have a question. As we discussed on IRC, it would be nice to move to PDE Build at some point but I couldn't get it work in my first few attempts. Ben: can you take a look at this SRPM with the soon-to-be-attached .spec patch to see what I did wrong with my package-build call? Thanks. MUST: * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - can we include the fetching script in the SRPM directly? - I don't think we need the cvs login command and without it it can work headless - if you use cvs export instead of cvs co it won't include the CVS directories - I can't do an md5sum match on my own generated tarball but let's see if I can after we swith to cvs export X skim the summary and description for typos, etc. - you use both "plugin" and "plug-in" - I'd prefer if we had just one but I'm not going to dictate what you use :) * buildroot fine * %{?dist} used appropriately X license text included in package and marked with %doc - you should mark the license file(s) with %doc since they're included * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on srpm gives no output ? changelog should be in one of these formats: - I think rpmlint might be complaining about the changelog (see below) due to the epoch * Packager tag not used * Vendor tag not used * Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * no PreReq X specfile is legible - it would be nice if we could use wildcards instead of hard versions for Eclipse plugin dependencies - it would be nice if we could use -D-style properties instead of patching the .properties or build.xml files directly - please put a little comment above each patch explaining the reasoning behind it - it would be nice if we didn't have to explicitly refer to /usr/share/eclipse but instead could pass it in; perhaps via a -D property X package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 - I had to change the eclipse-pde BR to be >= 3.2.2-whatever. After that, things were fine * BuildRequires are proper - you don't really need all of the BuildRequires as "higher" packages will bring some of them in, but they aren't hurting anything * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary X make sure lines are <= 80 characters - most of the lines that are longer could be split with line-continuation \'s * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible * no static libs, no rpath, no config files * not a standalone GUI app * no -devel sub-package necessary X macros used appropriately and consistently - you use %{buildroot} and ${TOPDIR} - it would be nice to stick with one style * %makeinstall not used * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no locale data * no use of cp so no need to worry about cp -p * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package should probably not be relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * there should be no %files duplicates * file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime * not a webapp * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs $ rpm -qp --requires rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-4.fc7.i386.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh antlr checkstyle = 0:4.1 checkstyle-optional = 0:4.1 eclipse-platform >= 1:3.2 jakarta-commons-beanutils jakarta-commons-logging java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.33 java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.33 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdl.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcj_bc.so.1 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libz.so.1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) $ rpm -qp --provides rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-4.fc7.i386.rpm CheckstylePlugin.jar.so NLS.jar.so eclipse-checkstyle = 4.0.1-4.fc7 X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs W: eclipse-checkstyle no-documentation - this can be fixed by marking at least the license file(s) W: eclipse-checkstyle dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[antlr].jar /usr/share/java/antlr.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[antlr].jar /usr/share/java/antlr.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[commons-logging].jar /usr/share/java/commons-logging.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[commons-logging].jar /usr/share/java/commons-logging.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[commons-beanutils-core].jar /usr/share/java/commons-beanutils-core.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[commons-beanutils-core].jar /usr/share/java/commons-beanutils-core.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[checkstyle-optional-4.1].jar /usr/share/java/checkstyle-optional-4.1.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[checkstyle-optional-4.1].jar /usr/share/java/checkstyle-optional-4.1.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[checkstyle-4.1].jar /usr/share/java/checkstyle-4.1.jar W: eclipse-checkstyle symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle_4.0.1/[checkstyle-4.1].jar /usr/share/java/checkstyle-4.1.jar - I think these are okay to ignore W: eclipse-checkstyle incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:4.0.1-4 4.0.1-4.fc7 - see my comment above SHOULD: X package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc - needs to be marked with %doc * package should build on i386 * package should build in mock - I didn't try myself but Rob says it does for him -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 22:34:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142234.l4EMYDkL018499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-05-14 18:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154694) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154694&action=view) specfile patch to use package build instead of canned ant file Ben: this is the output of rpmbuild run on Rob's specfile when patched with the attached patch. preGenerate: [exec] preparing files in /home/andrew/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1/CheckstylePlugin for buildfile generation ... [exec] making the 'features' and 'plugins' directories [exec] making symlink: /home/andrew/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1/CheckstylePlugin/build/features/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle -> /home/andrew/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1/CheckstylePlugin/feature [exec] making symlink: /home/andrew/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1/CheckstylePlugin/build/plugins/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle -> /home/andrew/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1/CheckstylePlugin/ [exec] done allElements: init: generateScript: [eclipse.buildScript] Some inter-plug-in dependencies have not been satisfied. [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.cdt.source.linux.gtk.x86: [eclipse.buildScript] Host plug-in org.eclipse.cdt.source_3.1.2.200702271925 has not been found. [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.cdt.core.linux.x86: [eclipse.buildScript] Host plug-in org.eclipse.cdt.core_[3.1.2,4.0.0) has not been found. [eclipse.buildScript] Bundle org.eclipse.pde.build: [eclipse.buildScript] Another singleton version selected: org.eclipse.pde.build_3.2.1.r321_v20060823 postGenerate: clean: allElements: init: cleanElement: [echo] /home/andrew/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1/CheckstylePlugin/build/features/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle BUILD FAILED /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml:24: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml:67: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/templates/package-build/customTargets.xml:80: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/templates/package-build/customTargets.xml:33: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/templates/package-build/customTargets.xml:17: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.2.1.r321_v20060823/scripts/genericTargets.xml:57: The following error occurred while executing this line: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/andrew/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1/CheckstylePlugin/build/features/com.atlassw.tools.eclipse.checkstyle/build.xml (No such file or directory) Total time: 5 seconds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 22:35:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142235.l4EMZA8p018555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkonrath at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-05-14 18:35 EST ------- Sorry, I forgot to actually CC Ben. Ben: please take a look at the previous comment/attachment and the comment before that (the top of the review). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 22:59:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142259.l4EMxXno019380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-14 18:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154695) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154695&action=view) mock build log of ruby-ncurses-1.1-4 on FC-devel i386 Umm... I attached the rebuild log done by mock on FC-devel i386 (mock is in Extras). Here you can see the line: --------------------------------------------- + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/ncurses-ruby-1.1 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/ruby-ncurses-1.1-4.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ncurses_bin.so 318 blocks ---------------------------------------------- Perhaps you disabled to create debuginfo rpm somewhere. Please enable to create debuginfo rpm and retry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 14 23:21:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 19:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705142321.l4ENLn36020304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-05-14 19:21 EST ------- http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/kflickr-0.8-2.src.rpm http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/kflickr.spec I think having the INSTALL file as part of the %doc is normal. (on rawhide) $ find /usr/share/doc -name INSTALL |wc -l 69 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 00:03:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150003.l4F03DS2021633@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 ------- Additional Comments From livinded at deadbytes.net 2007-05-14 20:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/specs/surfraw/surfraw.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/srpms/surfraw-1.0.7-3.src.rpm Added BuildArch to build as noarch and removed dependencies again for the text browser as I don't want all three installed and I'm sure other users don't either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 00:28:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150028.l4F0SFpB022693@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-14 20:28 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if any response from the reporter is gained within one week http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 00:36:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150036.l4F0arGp023030@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 20:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.24-3.src.rpm - BuildRequire perl(Test) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum) - Fixed source code URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 00:37:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150037.l4F0bi0H023076@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 20:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.06-3.spec - BuildRequire perl(Test::More) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) - Fixed source code URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 00:38:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150038.l4F0cEiX023128@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 20:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4-3.src.rpm - BuildRequire perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) - Fixed source code URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 00:39:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150039.l4F0d0av023186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 20:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA-5.44-3.src.rpm - BuildRequire a slew of modules needed for testing/building -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 00:42:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150042.l4F0gC5w023326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-14 20:42 EST ------- (oh, and I'll work on the license issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 01:08:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150108.l4F18o9Q024382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-14 21:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/kflickr-0.8-2.src.rpm > > http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/kflickr.spec > > I think having the INSTALL file as part of the %doc is normal. > > (on rawhide) > $ find /usr/share/doc -name INSTALL |wc -l > 69 > Yes. I agree still many packages are using INSTALL and I bet most of them must be Core packages which never gone under review. If you see most of extras package should not be having INSTALL. Basically INSTALL file is used by those who want to install tarball manually and not from any rpm format binary. If we are providing rpms then our SPEC file contains all information how/where to install on system. Thats why 69 count is unnecessary files on system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 01:34:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150134.l4F1YNVg025259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-14 21:34 EST ------- Upstream tarball is in place now: https://www.redhat.com/f/fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf-2.tar.gz I've updated the packages to point to that url: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/liberation-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/liberation-fonts-0.1-7.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 01:38:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] New: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl-2.1.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl.spec Description: OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 By default shared libs are disabled onlystatic is build Needed for cinepaint (optionnal) A quick rebuilt of cinepaint show that it detect it... rpmlint is silent - not tested in mock for now... Might do some cleanup - Create Demos subpackage if needed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 01:39:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150139.l4F1dKQp025474@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-14 21:39 EST ------- Hello A quick search for ftgl show this review report... Might be interrested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/240090 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 01:44:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150144.l4F1ihE0025683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-14 21:44 EST ------- A clean package; The only question I have is why you didn't include the "eg" directory as documentation. I guess it only holds a benchmark. * source files match upstream: dc574ce851b8334d29dac844eec5a74b88f985c1b76e389a1e8a7407dd81c4b0 JSON-XS-1.21.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream (COPYING just says "same as Perl") * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: XS.so()(64bit) perl(JSON::XS) = 1.21 perl-JSON-XS = 1.21-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=16, Tests=24726, 4 wallclock secs ( 3.14 cusr + 0.23 csys = 3.37 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 02:00:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150200.l4F20ilC026269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-14 22:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > A clean package; The only question I have is why you didn't include the "eg" > directory as documentation. I guess it only holds a benchmark. Purely an oversight on my part; I'll include it in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 02:02:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150202.l4F221r4026309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-14 22:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-JSON-XS Short Description: JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 02:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150202.l4F223nv026335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 02:12:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150212.l4F2CArP026775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-14 22:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/cinepaint/cinepaint.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/cinepaint/cinepaint-0.22.0-4.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images We are two days ago the deep freeze (planned thurday) I don't think we could do cinepaint to be added to the collection before thurday (if ever it is good enought) This version has oyranos and ftg disabled for now: ftgl : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/240090 full changelog was missing: * Mon May 14 2007 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.22.0-4 - Add post & postun - Add patch to prevent ld skipping incompatible on lib64 - Rebuild with new fltk prevent some rpath problems ---- - fixed rpath (not tested in mock for now - but mock doesn't detect rpath as rpmbuild do...) - the new build of fltk get the thing easier but we still need to patch libtool...This may lead to link system libraries instead of thoses that are building... (Have to check with mock for this - not done for now...) - About lib64 patch : i wonder if it is possible to disable the need of autoconf by diff-ing the autoconf output with unpatched builddir ?!... Quick rebuild of oyranos and ftgl seems to gives good result... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 02:29:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239963] Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150229.l4F2TKb3028251@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 03:34:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 23:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150334.l4F3Y28P000499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-14 23:33 EST ------- As package is having circular deps on -Devel package, make test easily skipped -devel tests as seen in given below make test output. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2d4d22d4153b49d64ed715bfd81d809d Catalyst-Runtime-5.7007.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/01use.t t/02pod.t t/03podcoverage.t t/c3_mro.t t/custom_live_component_controller_action_auto_doublebug.t t/live_component_controller_action_action.t t/live_component_controller_action_auto.t t/live_component_controller_action_begin.t t/live_component_controller_action_chained.t t/live_component_controller_action_default.t t/live_component_controller_action_detach.t t/live_component_controller_action_end.t t/live_component_controller_action_forward.t t/live_component_controller_action_global.t t/live_component_controller_action_index.t t/live_component_controller_action_inheritance.t t/live_component_controller_action_local.t t/live_component_controller_action_multipath.t t/live_component_controller_action_path.t t/live_component_controller_action_private.t t/live_component_controller_action_regexp.t t/live_component_controller_action_streaming.t t/live_component_controller_args.t t/live_engine_request_body.t t/live_engine_request_cookies.t t/live_engine_request_headers.t t/live_engine_request_parameters.t t/live_engine_request_uploads.t t/live_engine_request_uri.t t/live_engine_response_cookies.t t/live_engine_response_errors.t t/live_engine_response_headers.t t/live_engine_response_large.t t/live_engine_response_redirect.t t/live_engine_response_status.t t/live_engine_setup_basics.t t/live_engine_setup_plugins.t t/live_fork.t t/live_loop.t t/live_plugin_loaded.t t/live_priorities.t t/live_recursion.t t/optional_http-server-restart.t t/optional_http-server.t t/optional_lighttpd-fastcgi-non-root.t t/optional_lighttpd-fastcgi.t t/optional_memleak.t t/optional_stress.t t/optional_threads.t t/unit_controller_config.t t/unit_controller_namespace.t t/unit_core_action_for.t t/unit_core_component.t t/unit_core_component_layers.t t/unit_core_component_loading.t t/unit_core_log.t t/unit_core_merge_config_hashes.t t/unit_core_mvc.t t/unit_core_path_to.t t/unit_core_plugin.t t/unit_core_uri_for.t t/unit_core_uri_for_action.t t/unit_load_catalyst_test.t t/unit_utils_load_class.t t/unit_utils_prefix.t t/unit_utils_request.t t/01use.....................................................ok t/02pod.....................................................ok t/03podcoverage.............................................ok t/c3_mro....................................................ok t/custom_live_component_controller_action_auto_doublebug....ok t/live_component_controller_action_action...................ok t/live_component_controller_action_auto.....................ok t/live_component_controller_action_begin....................ok t/live_component_controller_action_chained..................ok t/live_component_controller_action_default..................ok t/live_component_controller_action_detach...................ok t/live_component_controller_action_end......................ok t/live_component_controller_action_forward..................ok t/live_component_controller_action_global...................ok t/live_component_controller_action_index....................ok t/live_component_controller_action_inheritance..............ok t/live_component_controller_action_local....................ok t/live_component_controller_action_multipath................ok t/live_component_controller_action_path.....................ok t/live_component_controller_action_private..................ok t/live_component_controller_action_regexp...................ok t/live_component_controller_action_streaming................ok t/live_component_controller_args............................ok t/live_engine_request_body..................................ok t/live_engine_request_cookies...............................ok t/live_engine_request_headers...............................ok t/live_engine_request_parameters............................ok t/live_engine_request_uploads...............................ok t/live_engine_request_uri...................................ok t/live_engine_response_cookies..............................ok t/live_engine_response_errors...............................ok t/live_engine_response_headers..............................ok t/live_engine_response_large................................ok t/live_engine_response_redirect.............................ok t/live_engine_response_status...............................ok t/live_engine_setup_basics..................................ok t/live_engine_setup_plugins.................................ok t/live_fork.................................................ok t/live_loop.................................................ok t/live_plugin_loaded........................................ok t/live_priorities...........................................ok t/live_recursion............................................ok t/optional_http-server-restart..............................skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Devel required t/optional_http-server......................................skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Devel required t/optional_lighttpd-fastcgi-non-root........................skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Devel required t/optional_lighttpd-fastcgi.................................skipped all skipped: Catalyst::Devel required t/optional_memleak..........................................skipped all skipped: set TEST_MEMLEAK to enable this test t/optional_stress...........................................ok t/optional_threads..........................................ok t/unit_controller_config....................................ok t/unit_controller_namespace.................................ok t/unit_core_action_for......................................ok t/unit_core_component.......................................ok t/unit_core_component_layers................................ok t/unit_core_component_loading...............................ok t/unit_core_log.............................................ok t/unit_core_merge_config_hashes.............................ok t/unit_core_mvc.............................................ok t/unit_core_path_to.........................................ok t/unit_core_plugin..........................................ok t/unit_core_uri_for.........................................ok t/unit_core_uri_for_action..................................ok t/unit_load_catalyst_test...................................ok t/unit_utils_load_class.....................................ok t/unit_utils_prefix.........................................ok t/unit_utils_request........................................ok All tests successful, 8 tests skipped. Files=66, Tests=2683, 101 wallclock secs (74.57 cusr + 4.61 csys = 79.18 CPU) + Provides: perl(Catalyst) = 5.7007 perl(Catalyst::Action) perl(Catalyst::ActionChain) perl(Catalyst::ActionContainer) perl(Catalyst::AttrContainer) perl(Catalyst::Base) perl(Catalyst::Build) perl(Catalyst::Component) perl(Catalyst::Controller) perl(Catalyst::DispatchType) perl(Catalyst::DispatchType::Chained) perl(Catalyst::DispatchType::Default) perl(Catalyst::DispatchType::Index) perl(Catalyst::DispatchType::Path) perl(Catalyst::DispatchType::Regex) perl(Catalyst::Dispatcher) perl(Catalyst::Engine) perl(Catalyst::Engine::CGI) perl(Catalyst::Engine::FastCGI) perl(Catalyst::Engine::HTTP) perl(Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::Restarter) perl(Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::Restarter::Watcher) perl(Catalyst::Exception) perl(Catalyst::Exception::Base) perl(Catalyst::Log) perl(Catalyst::Model) perl(Catalyst::Request) perl(Catalyst::Request::Upload) perl(Catalyst::Response) perl(Catalyst::Runtime) perl(Catalyst::Test) perl(Catalyst::Utils) perl(Catalyst::View) + Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(CGI::Simple::Cookie) perl(Carp) perl(Catalyst::Action) perl(Catalyst::ActionChain) perl(Catalyst::ActionContainer) perl(Catalyst::Controller) perl(Catalyst::DispatchType::Default) perl(Catalyst::DispatchType::Index) perl(Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::Restarter) perl(Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::Restarter::Watcher) perl(Catalyst::Exception) perl(Catalyst::Log) perl(Catalyst::Request) perl(Catalyst::Request::Upload) perl(Catalyst::Response) perl(Catalyst::Utils) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Data::Inheritable) perl(Class::Inspector) perl(Config) perl(Data::Dump) perl(Devel::InnerPackage) perl(Errno) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Modified) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Spec::Unix) perl(File::stat) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTTP::Body) perl(HTTP::Date) perl(HTTP::Headers) perl(HTTP::Request) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Select) perl(IO::Socket) perl(IO::Socket::INET) perl(Module::Build) perl(Module::Pluggable::Object) perl(NEXT) perl(Path::Class) perl(Path::Class::Dir) perl(Path::Class::File) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Socket) perl(Text::Balanced) perl(Text::SimpleTable) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(Tree::Simple) perl(Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByPath) perl(Tree::Simple::Visitor::FindByUID) perl(URI) perl(URI::QueryParam) perl(attributes) perl(base) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 03:36:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 23:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150336.l4F3amHu000841@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-14 23:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Runtime Short Description: Catalyst core modules Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 03:36:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 23:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150336.l4F3aoiT000873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:38:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236422] Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150438.l4F4ckM4003402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236422 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:39:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232165] Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150439.l4F4d6Cs003428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Passwd - Manipulate many kinds of password files Alias: pear-File-Passwd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232165 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-15 00:39 EST ------- Build on all branches succeeded, thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:39:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150439.l4F4dhoR003479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:40:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150440.l4F4eRFY003529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:44:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150444.l4F4iDn9003785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-05-15 00:44 EST ------- Ok, removed INSTALL file. http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/kflickr-0.8-3.src.rpm http://www.stahnkage.com/rpms/kflickr.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:44:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239963] Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150444.l4F4iSAQ003830@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 00:44 EST ------- For some reason the server at rubenkerkhof.com sends spec files with Content-Type: text/html, which makes it a bit more difficult than usual to inspect them. The package itself is fine. * source files match upstream: aa513866389ca768822ec2866500ccc2c85a7ce4f49a816be90e40d28f604259 IO-AIO-2.33.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream (COPYING file just says "same as Perl"). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper: As far as I know, the Test module is still in the base perl package. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: AIO.so()(64bit) perl(IO::AIO) = 2.33 perl-IO-AIO = 2.33-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(base) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=63, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.17 cusr + 0.10 csys = 0.27 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150445.l4F4jufl003928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-15 00:45 EST ------- Baiscally INSTALL COPYING AUTHORS NEWS are files which are having generic contents as they got created with auto* commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:49:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150449.l4F4nQ1w004151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 mlum at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlum at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mlum at redhat.com 2007-05-15 00:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jss Short Description: Java Security Services (JSS) is a java native interface which provides a bridge for java-based applications to use native Network Security Services (NSS). Owners: rcritten at redhat.com,mlum at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 FC-7 InitialCC: nkwan at redhat.com,richm at redhat.com,nkinder at redhat.com,mharmsen at redhat.com,sparkins at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 04:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240094] New: Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240094 Summary: Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/winpdb.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/winpdb-1.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Winpdb is an advanced python debugger, with support for smart breakpoints, multiple threads, namespace modification, embedded debugging, encrypted communication and speed of up to 20 times that of pdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:00:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150500.l4F5008V004488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 00:59 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:17:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150517.l4F5HHw0005384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 01:17 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! Release note people: This might be worth noting, if release notes aren't frozen yet :) With this package, the core Catalyst MVC web framework runtime is in Fedora... There's more to go, of course, but the core is there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:17:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150517.l4F5HIIY005403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 Bug 238238 depends on bug 238211, which changed state. Bug 238211 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:17:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150517.l4F5HJ3T005416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 Bug 238236 depends on bug 238211, which changed state. Bug 238211 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:17:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150517.l4F5HLoa005435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 Bug 238233 depends on bug 238211, which changed state. Bug 238211 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:17:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238237] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple - Make serving static pages painless In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150517.l4F5HMnu005447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple - Make serving static pages painless https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238237 Bug 238237 depends on bug 238211, which changed state. Bug 238211 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:24:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150524.l4F5OI4N005877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-15 01:24 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint is NOT silent RPM. + source files match upstream. cdda0c42b8e492a1c762014187dbfe63 kflickr-0.8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text COPYING is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + scriptlets are used. + Provides: libkflickrpart.so + Requires: kdebase >= 3.4 libDCOP.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgcc_s.so.1 libkdecore.so.4 libkdeui.so.4 libkio.so.4 libkparts.so.2 libm.so.6 libqt-mt.so.3 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:29:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150529.l4F5TKhQ006185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 01:29 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader-0.14-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader.spec Prevent test needing network access from running inside mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 05:44:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 01:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150544.l4F5ip1P007594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-15 01:44 EST ------- I got following message in build.log But I assume its harmless Cannot determine perl version info from lib/Catalyst/Plugin/ConfigLoader.pm Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c74052aa2f09d5044eb37aa34a1b89a5 Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader-0.14.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/01-use.t t/10-live_auto.t t/20-mock_load.t t/98-pod_coverage.t t/99-pod.t t/01-use.............ok t/10-live_auto.......t/10-live_auto.t does not exist t/20-mock_load.......ok t/98-pod_coverage....ok t/99-pod.............ok All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=11, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.54 cusr + 0.09 csys = 0.63 CPU) mv 10-live_auto.t t/ exit 0 + Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader) = 0.14 + Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Catalyst) perl(Config::Any) perl(Data::Visitor::Callback) perl(NEXT) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 06:33:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 02:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150633.l4F6XMbu009174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-15 02:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154717) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154717&action=view) mock build log of cinepaint-0.22.0-4 on FC-devel i386 I just tried mockbuild on FC-devel i386, but it failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 06:56:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 02:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150656.l4F6ukok009813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ksh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tsmetana at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 06:59:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 02:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150659.l4F6xmnO009878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mailman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tsmetana at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226209] Merge Review: nut In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150701.l4F71tes009949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226209 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tsmetana at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:03:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226317] Merge Review: procinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150703.l4F73Dxx010019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: procinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226317 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tsmetana at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:04:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226319] Merge Review: procps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150704.l4F747jx010049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: procps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226319 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tsmetana at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:08:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240094] Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150708.l4F781ck010202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240094 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:11:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225977] Merge Review: ksh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150711.l4F7Bg1b010480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ksh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tsmetana at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:13:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150713.l4F7D3TY010555@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-15 03:13 EST ------- There is a ftgl package on Planet CCRMA, you may want to have a look at it. Also there are debian, suse and mandriva packages, although they may be less interesting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:17:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240094] Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150717.l4F7HX2l010852@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240094 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-15 03:17 EST ------- first few comments 1) Build is failing. Add desktop-file-utils as BR 2) You don't need any requires Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils 3) May I know why update-desktop-database scriptlet is needed? 4) How about adding new directory named winpdb to %{python_sitelib} and install all *.py and *.pyc there? 5) Do we need any License file to be added in this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150718.l4F7II97010971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: smartmontools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tsmetana at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:47:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226192] Merge Review: net-snmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150747.l4F7likY012461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: net-snmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226192 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium rvokal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rvokal at redhat.com)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:47:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150747.l4F7lqOg012494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lcms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-05-15 03:47 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lcms Updated Fedora Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de, kwizart at gmail.com Handing over lcms maintainership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226192] Merge Review: net-snmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150751.l4F7pIwv012854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: net-snmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226192 jsafrane at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO CC| |jsafrane at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:51:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226214] Merge Review: openldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150751.l4F7pnY9012919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226214 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jsafrane at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsafrane at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:52:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226560] Merge Review: xinetd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150752.l4F7qHvm012986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xinetd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226560 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jsafrane at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsafrane at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 07:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 03:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225808] Merge Review: gmime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150752.l4F7qMCg013025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225808 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-05-15 03:52 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gmime Updated Fedora Owners: alexl at redhat.com, fedora at leemhuis.info Adds Thorsten Leemhuis as comaintainer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 08:00:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225874] Merge Review: gtk-sharp2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150800.l4F80beh013870@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtk-sharp2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225874 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-05-15 04:00 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gtk-sharp2 Updated Fedora Owners: alexl at redhat.com, lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 08:01:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225862] Merge Review: gsf-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150801.l4F81I6h013990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsf-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225862 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium alexl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2007-05-15 04:01 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gsf-sharp Updated Fedora Owners: alexl at redhat.com, lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 08:39:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150839.l4F8d6a1018104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-05-15 04:39 EST ------- n liberation-fonts-0.1-7.fc7.src.rpm: ? MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NOK I still feel declaring GPL when it's GPL v2 + additional terms is not right. I'd like the confirmation of someone closer to FESCO on this before acking ? MUST: If ? text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK ? MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source? OK ? SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream? OK ? SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. OK To sum up, I still see two blockers: 1. the license field bit 2. fontconfig coordination. We can't push a font package hipped as core fonts replacement if the associated required fontconfig plumbing is missing. I'm pretty sure we have a "package works as advertised" MUST rule somewhere. Long-term fix is the 30-aliases file split + a rule file provided by this package. Short-term solutions lack appeal. Though since liberation fonts should end up at the top of their respective aliases list dumping a rule file at 29 or 31 may work. I'll settle with seeing a fontconfig package with updated 30-aliases queued for F7. Also I don't like the abandonware feeling of a package with no identified contact on its web site or in %doc. Though the packager and whoever @rh goes to the next text summit is going to take the blame, and I suppose I can let it pass. It's still a bad example to give, especially for internally-produced stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 08:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150851.l4F8pew3019300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 04:51 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~georgiou/ruby-shadow/ruby-shadow.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~georgiou/ruby-shadow/ruby-shadow-1.4.1-2.FC6.src.rpm Things left to do: confirm license. I would also like to find a better way to handle the abi issue, I don't think that adding "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" is the right way for a binary package, we need to somehow detect the abi we are building with and require that. This is an issue for all binary ruby packages though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 09:22:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 05:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150922.l4F9MEqP021938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 05:22 EST ------- Looking at what the rpm requires I get this: $ rpm -q --requires ruby-shadow ... libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) ruby(abi) = 1.8 ... So we already require the 1.8 abi indirectly through libruby.so.1.8 right? This way we will get the right requires even if we build with another version of ruby and ruby(abi) = .. is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 09:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 05:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150933.l4F9XEBw022803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-15 05:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Looking at what the rpm requires I get this: > $ rpm -q --requires ruby-shadow > ... > libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) > ruby(abi) = 1.8 > ... > > So we already require the 1.8 abi indirectly through libruby.so.1.8 > right? I know it already, however this works only for ruby module packages containing binary modules linked with libruby.so.*. So that we require to add "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" is to make sure that this method works for as many (including noarch, arch-dependent) packages as possible. You can see the same phenomenon on python replated packages, where "Requires: python(abi) = 2.5" is automatically added even to arch-dependent packages. [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -q --requires python-imaging libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libfreetype.so.6 libjpeg.so.62 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpython2.5.so.1.0 <======================== libz.so.1 python(abi) = 2.5 <======================== rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) and we want to apply this python method to ruby module packages _manually_ (we cannot do this automatically now because rpmbuild does not handle ruby abi for now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 09:43:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 05:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705150943.l4F9hmAu023513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-15 05:43 EST ------- By the way, are you sponsored? It seems that this is your first submission of package review request...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 10:00:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151000.l4FA0XLP024486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 06:00 EST ------- The _manually_ is the part that I don't like :) What I was really saying was that we should handle ruby in rpmbuild instead of doing things manually. What I should have asked is if anyone is working in adding this to rpmbuild, the manual way will cause us problems when we upgrade ruby, the noarch rpms will still build but they'll require the wrong abi :( If nobody is looking at adding ruby support in rpmbuild I'll have a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 10:04:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151004.l4FA4OtV024785@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 06:04 EST ------- No I am not sponsored yet. It is indeed my first submission :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 10:06:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151006.l4FA6uW2024895@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-15 06:06 EST ------- Yeah, I don't disagree that ruby abi detection must be done by rpmbuild, not manual treatment *in the future*.... But hacking rpm itself is actually beyond my skill and also I cannot tell when automatical ruby abi detection will be added into rpm, and Fedora release. So if you can try "rpm" hacking, I am surely appreciated!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 10:13:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151013.l4FAD6Dg025048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-15 06:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > No I am not sponsored yet. It is indeed my first submission :) Well, okay. as far as I saw your bugzilla entry I can judge that I can sponsor you. I will review this after I take a bath (I live in Japan). Setting once to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. When I receive a mail that you need a sponsor, I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 10:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238518] Review Request: weechat - Terminal based IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151043.l4FAhauS026131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Terminal based IRC client Alias: weechat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238518 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-15 06:43 EST ------- This package has already submitted in bug 235679 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 10:56:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236422] Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151056.l4FAumA0026653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gst - ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236422 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-05-15 06:56 EST ------- Build ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=6589 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-6-extras/33336-clutter-gst-0.1.1-2.fc6/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 11:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151110.l4FBADhx027329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 07:10 EST ------- Thanks, What do you think about this change? Requires: ruby(abi) = %(%{_bindir}ruby -e "puts RUBY_VERSION.sub(/(\d+\.\d+).*/,'\1')") The regexp could be improved I imagine but it can not be worst than just using "1.8" and we can get away with the BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 11:27:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151127.l4FBRI8r028218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-15 07:27 EST ------- Well, if you do so, perhaps it is better that you define the macro %ruby_abi (for example) such as %define ruby_abi and use: Requires: ruby(abi) = %ruby_abi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 11:36:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151136.l4FBawK9028546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 07:36 EST ------- Yes you are right. I just noticed that the library doesn't work while using Fedora's CFLAGS, time to do some debugging I am afraid :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 12:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151215.l4FCF9Qt030916@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-05-15 08:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kflickr Short Description: an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. Owners: mastahnke at gmail.com Branches: FC-6, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 12:23:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151223.l4FCN8FL031417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-15 08:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I just noticed that the library doesn't work while using Fedora's CFLAGS, time > to do some debugging I am afraid :( Are there any short examples which brings up the problems you are meeting? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 12:30:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151230.l4FCUJPn031900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-15 08:30 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 12:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151238.l4FCcq6M032463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-15 08:38 EST ------- The package needs review and approval first mlum please do not request cvs before package is approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 12:52:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151252.l4FCq5b1001149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 08:52 EST ------- require 'shadow' under x86_64 was enough to cause a core dump. The cause was the the struct defines used 0 instead of NULL. I uploaded a newer version with the fix. Spec URL: http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~georgiou/ruby-shadow/ruby-shadow.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~georgiou/ruby-shadow/ruby-shadow-1.4.1-3.FC6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 12:59:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151259.l4FCxkrh002195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 08:59 EST ------- Version 1.4.1-4 uploaded in the same location with a much cleaner rubi_api macro as suggested by lutter (ruby -rrbconfig -e "puts Config::CONFIG['ruby_version']") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 13:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151301.l4FD1OOl002392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faucamp at csir.co.za ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-15 09:01 EST ------- I really want to review (and play!) this, but autodownloader keeps failing on me, with imho an incorrect error message (the files get downloaded about halfway, and it then jumps to the 2nd mirror, the same happens, and the download fails with a message "File 1rott13.zip not found on server(s)."). I realize this issue might not be specific to this package (your xu4 package works great, btw :-) ). I just need to find some time to debug AutoDL and identify this properly... any pointers? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 13:18:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151318.l4FDIlL2004543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-15 09:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154732) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154732&action=view) mock build log of ruby-shadow-1.4.1-4 on FC-devel i386 It seems that ruby_abi must be written explicitly... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 13:43:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151343.l4FDh27K006398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-05-15 09:43 EST ------- The problem is that ruby is not in the build root by default, so that when mock looks at the specfile to find the BR's, ruby_abi has no value and expands to nothing, yielding a syntactically incorrect specfile. Either the macro needs to be changed to have a value even if there is no ruby, or 'ruby(abi) = 1.8' should be hardcoded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 13:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151349.l4FDnWjX006776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 09:49 EST ------- You are not uptodate... [mclasen at localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg f7-final fontconfig Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- fontconfig-2.4.2-3.fc7 f7-final mclasen [mclasen at localhost ~]$ rpm -q --changelog fontconfig | head -2 * Fri May 11 2007 Matthias Clasen - 2.4.2-3 - Add Liberation fonts to 30-aliases-fedora.conf I have changed the license field to say "GPL + font exception" now. Check it out at the same place, release -8. > Also I don't like the abandonware feeling of a package with no identified > contact on its web site or in %doc. Thankfully package review is not about the dislikes and feelings of the reviewer, but about packaging standards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 14:07:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151407.l4FE75wo008349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-05-15 10:07 EST ------- Ok, approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 14:10:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151410.l4FEAj1s008792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-15 10:10 EST ------- I didn't found SRPMS for planetccrma: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fedora/linux/planetccrma/6/SRPMS/ is empty... But i noticed that they do not have x86_64 RPMS for ftgl... I will try to see for others distrib but i only knwo how to "spy" gentoo ebuild for now.. ( http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-libs/ftgl/files/ ) which didn't seems to contains only fixes for ftgl.pc.in (but not the Requires field) and gcc4.1 patch as i've done... More precisely ftgl is needed by icc_examin inside cinepaint... ./FTGLDEMO fails: (tested on x86_64 - not sure if this is only because of arial.ttf i do not have...) [builder at Kwizatz demo]$ ./FTGLDemo freeglut (lt-FTGLDemo): Unable to create direct context rendering for window 'FTGL TEST' This may hurt performance. Failed to open font /usr/share/fonts/truetype/arial.ttf --- builder at Kwizatz demo]$ ldd FTGLDemo not a dynamic executable --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 14:16:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232171] Review Request: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd - Class for managing SAMBA style password files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151416.l4FEGPsT009263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-SMBPasswd - Class for managing SAMBA style password files Alias: pear-File-SMBPasswd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232171 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-15 10:16 EST ------- Build for all branches successful, thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 14:25:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151425.l4FEPAtL009976@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 10:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: liberation-fonts Short Description: Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts Owners: mclasen at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 14:47:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151447.l4FElLd5012249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From patrick.pichon at laposte.net 2007-05-15 10:47 EST ------- I have discussed with my friend and he is having difficulties with the 'the generated debuginfo package is empty' He has no clue on what should be done. On the other side he is also short of time, so if you can recommend update to the .spec he might be able to take them. On the with_gui option by default, this is valid only if you have a GTK environment, so I think it is more reasonable to have by default only without_gtk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 14:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151449.l4FEn3Ot012460@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From patrick.pichon at laposte.net 2007-05-15 10:49 EST ------- Here is an updated version of the .spec more in line with Fedora Packaging requirements http://ezix.org/project/browser/packages/lshw/development/src/lshw.spec.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 14:54:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151454.l4FEsft2013362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-15 10:54 EST ------- I will try to look at it as soon as my time permits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 15:08:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151508.l4FF8aWq015243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-15 11:08 EST ------- Indeed. This work with rpmbuild on my system (i've installed cinepaint) commenting out: #sed -i.rpath 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool This allow to build icc_examin but rpath remains present for plugins, libs and python_libs (icc_examin seems not to contain rpath ?!...) Still searching for a proper fix... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 15:44:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151544.l4FFijRO018621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 11:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader Short Description: Load config files of various types Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 15:44:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151544.l4FFilqY018647@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:00:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Data-Accessor/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Data-Accessor-0.03-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Data-Accessor.spec Description: Class::Data::Accessor is the marriage of Class::Accessor and Class::Data::Inheritable into a single module. It is used for creating accessors to class data that overridable in subclasses as well as in class instances. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:08:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240169] New: Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240169 Summary: Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/fedora/llvm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/fedora/llvm-1.9-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, runtime, and idle-time optimization of programs from arbitrary programming languages. It currently supports compilation of C and C++ programs. The compiler infrastructure includes mirror sets of programming tools as well as libraries with equivalent functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:10:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240169] Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151610.l4FGAPUG021301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240169 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-05-15 12:10 EST ------- The llvm package includes a build of gcc. Because both llvm and gcc are compilers, expect lots of warnings from rpmlint :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151610.l4FGAmS9021402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:28:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151628.l4FGSB1I022635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-15 12:28 EST ------- sorry for my late reply. I have been working on tuning the fontconfig file to optimize the performance, for a new release for the upstream. However, that seems need more work than I thought. So, I will stay with what have been used for this package. I used pretty much the entire spec file from Jens, except that I bump the release number to 5 and keep the cvs source. I wish we can put a new official release out in the next couple of weeks, but even not, the cvs version is fine and the file headers are identical to the 0.8.1-7 release. Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/08src/wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.1-5.src.rpm Jens, you suggested me doing a review for a new package as practics, should I just pick one and post my suggestions in their review thread? or post it here? thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:34:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] New: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.mugshot.org/extras/bigboard/source/bigboard.spec SRPM URL: http://download.mugshot.org/extras/bigboard/source/bigboard-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: Bigboard is a sidebar and application launcher that works with mugshot.org to provide an online experience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:38:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151638.l4FGcTuH023494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #153413|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2007-05-15 12:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154749) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154749&action=view) .spec file changes to handle winbindd --> winbind renaming More robast way. Always check for old name in the %post section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:40:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] New: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-TabularDisplay/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1.22-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-TabularDisplay.spec Description: Text::TabularDisplay simplifies displaying textual data in a table. The output is identical to the columnar display of query results in the mysql text monitor. For example, this data: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:47:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151647.l4FGl8n9024173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240177 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:47:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] New: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record- oriented files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-RecordParser/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-RecordParser-v1.2.1-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Text-RecordParser.spec Description: This module is for reading record-oriented data in a delimited text file. The most common example have records separated by newlines and fields separated by commas or tabs, but this module aims to provide a consistent interface for handling sequential records in a file however they may be delimited. Typically this data lists the fields in the first line of the file, in which case you should call bind_header to bind the field name (or not, and it will be called implicitly). If the first line contains data, you can still bind your own field names via bind_fields. Either way, you can then use many methods to get at the data as arrays or hashes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:51:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151651.l4FGpUWw024749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lcms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-15 12:51 EST ------- Thx for doing this! For now i haven't seen a FC-6 branch when doing cvs co lcms I would like to update FC-6 from current devel (with no changes since this will lead to broken upgrade path...) Do adread agree with this ? (I explain that it is safe here : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/236067 ) lcsm 0.16 is also marked stable on their website... Should we ask for package maintainers to confirm and/or test a 0.16 package for lcms ? I don't think that is necessary... 1.17 is unstable for now and i will work on it after F7 is out... (for F8 rawhide) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 16:53:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] New: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: frank-buettner at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt-5.0.1-1.fc6.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn Description: The Qwt library contains GUI Components and utility classes which are primarily useful for programs with a technical background. Beside a 2D plot widget it provides scales, sliders, dials, compasses, thermometers, wheels and knobs to control or display values, arrays, or ranges of type double. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:00:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238211] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151700.l4FH0XGP025495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Runtime - Catalyst core modules Alias: Catalyst-Runtime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238211 ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2007-05-15 13:00 EST ------- The release notes beats are open on the wiki for editing by the community. You should probably put this in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/PackageNotes ... See if this fits into a listed category, otherwise add one at the bottom for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:11:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151711.l4FHB18v026390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 13:10 EST ------- Small things: - People want a full source url - Why do you have to set GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL if the package does not contain gconf schemata anyway ? - python packages are supposed to define some python_sitearch thing up top -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151726.l4FHQlHd028147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-05-15 13:26 EST ------- updated spec: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle.spec updated srpm: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-5.fc7.src.rpm - sticking with ant for now since i can't get pde build to work - some lines just won't go shorter than 80 characters - ignoring rpmlint symlink warnings since i think build-jar-repository is the way to go - built in mock fedora-devel-i386-core.cfg fedora-devel-x86_64-core.cfg - works in eclipse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:26:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151726.l4FHQrVm028183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-15 13:26 EST ------- Well, I've also made mock rebuild... without problems. There is log: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-4.mock.log ncurses_bin.so has been striped (in mock). But I can't find where I disabled creating debuginfo. I use fc6, because of my internet connection (and near new release of Fedora) I have no updates. Maybe it's the point. I am looking forward to fc7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:39:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239963] Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151739.l4FHdn26029015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-15 13:39 EST ------- Thanks for the review Jason, >> For some reason the server at rubenkerkhof.com sends spec files with >> Content-Type: text/html, which makes it a bit more difficult than usual to >> inspect them. Fixed, AddType text/plain .spec :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:42:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239963] Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151742.l4FHgJUL029137@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-15 13:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IO-AIO Short Description: Asynchronous Input/Output Owners: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:43:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151743.l4FHhI8p029362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-05-15 13:43 EST ------- Could we have branches for FC6 too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:46:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151746.l4FHkenn029745@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 13:46 EST ------- Please don't forget to close this bug once the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 17:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151751.l4FHpIi2030278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 13:51 EST ------- Please don't forget to close this bug once the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:00:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151800.l4FI0bmR031142@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From ssorce at redhat.com 2007-05-15 14:00 EST ------- dmitry I will consider this for inclusion after F7 is released, as we are in deep freeze I guess we have no other choice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:22:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151822.l4FIMgWI032629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support -- SPONSOR NEEDED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 14:22 EST ------- I was out of town over the weekend as well, so no worries. Unfortunately it's not really clear just what is going to be split out of the main Perl package. It may end up that all core modules are split out; this would make it a simple matter to update them separately and all packages should already have all of the runtime dependencies sorted anyway. But the build-time dependencies would have to be added manually. Currently, all I know is that perl(CPAN), perl(ExtUtils::Embed), perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::Harness), perl(Test::Simple) and perl(Test::More) are split out as of F7, but the base perl package contains a dependency on them so that all Perl packages don't break. This will go away immediately after F7 branches. I don't know if perl(Test) is being split; currently it isn't but I suppose it should be given the other modules that are split. I don't think anything else is being split at this time, although certainly adding those dependencies doesn't actually hurt anything and I'm not going to block because of them. So we're good at this point; go ahead and apply for sponsorship and I'll take care of that. Once that's done, you'll be able to set the fedora-cvs flag and get your packages checked in and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:23:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151823.l4FINUoP032744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Crypt-|Review Request: perl-Crypt- |OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL |OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL |bindings for DSA support -- |bindings for DSA support |SPONSOR NEEDED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:24:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151824.l4FIORvL000342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Crypt-|Review Request: perl-Crypt- |OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl |OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl |OpenSSL bindings for big |OpenSSL bindings for big |numbers support -- SPONSOR |numbers support |NEEDED | OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 14:24 EST ------- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:28:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151828.l4FIS9HH000612@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Crypt-|Review Request: perl-Crypt- |OpenSSL-Random -- Perl |OpenSSL-Random -- Perl |OpenSSL bindings for Random |OpenSSL bindings for Random |Number support -- SPONSOR |Number support |NEEDED | OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 14:28 EST ------- This package is fine now except for the license issue; it is sufficient to obtain a simple email from the author stating the license terms (even "same as Perl" is fine) as long as you include the text of that email in the package as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151829.l4FITnN8000762@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Crypt-|Review Request: perl-Crypt- |OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL |OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL |bindings for AES support -- |bindings for AES support |SPONSOR NEEDED | OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 14:29 EST ------- Source URL is fine now, and the build-time dependencies look good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:31:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] New: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/dgae/dgae.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/dgae/dgae-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: A short, public domain AGI game for use with (requiring) nagi. Help DG to seek out his twin brother's stick. This game is a public domain: you can look out the codes and make your own AGI game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:32:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151832.l4FIWJgP000925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:32:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151832.l4FIWL80000956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240194 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] New: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/sergueis-destiny/sergueis-destiny.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/sergueis-destiny/sergueis-destiny-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: An AGI game requiring nagi. A bad wizard Blackmagic has cast his evil spell to the peaceful village Jolimy. 50 years later, an apprentice sorcerer Serguei must break the Blackmagic's spell and free Jolimy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:35:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151835.l4FIZViH001274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |239812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 18:35:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151835.l4FIZWEg001305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240195 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:07:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151907.l4FJ7jOU004800@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jwb at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jwb at redhat.com 2007-05-15 15:07 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: bugzilla New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Received private email asking for EPEL bugzila packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:10:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151910.l4FJAFnX005161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-15 15:10 EST ------- New files uploaded that fix those issues: http://download.mugshot.org/extras/bigboard/source/bigboard.spec http://download.mugshot.org/extras/bigboard/source/bigboard-0.3.1.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:15:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151915.l4FJFwr7005909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 musuruan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-15 15:15 EST ------- I just had a glance at the spec file. Here it is what I noticed: 1. Do not use dos2unix. Use sed: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-41d4336fa1af8d74500eb89d3a22410cccc4117d 2. Release tag is not compliant with guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-e104844825856d7c45f2f0241586985c0495966b 3. the pwd command in %prep was probably there after some testing and should be removed Andrea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:17:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Base/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Base-0.03-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Base.spec Description: This module implements a simple base class from which other modules can be derived, thereby inheriting a number of useful methods such as new(), init(), params(), clone(), error() and debug(). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151918.l4FJIIJI006269@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Class-Base -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:19:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188359] Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151919.l4FJJ5f2006332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bugzilla - bug tracking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188359 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151919.l4FJJERs006445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 15:19 EST ------- I was typing this up but someone else submitted comments first. Here's what I had written: This is assigned but the fedora-review tag is unset. Is someone reviewing this? The build fails for me on x86_64: + make -f Makefile.linux gcc -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -DRAD_LINUX -DRAD_WARN -c base.c -o base.o In file included from base.c:7: agi.h:5:21: error: SDL/SDL.h: No such file or directory (and cascading failures) Looks like a build depndency on SDL-devel is missing. Adding that gets things building. The Version and Release are a bit off. First, isn't this version 2.06? The upstream web seem to call it that. If so, release should probably be just "1". If you're using some sort of prerelease snapshot then you'd have a release of "0.1.2002114%{?dist}", but I'm not sure what's up there. The tarball unpacks into multiple directories, but you have setup cd into one of them (src) and then escape from that directory to get to the others. That's kind of bad form and will leave things laying around in the buildroot after the package has built. I suggest using something like %setup -qc ${name}-%{version} to keep everything tidy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151922.l4FJMpoI007106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:46:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151946.l4FJktb5010515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 15:46 EST ------- Another clean package, as usual. * source files match upstream: 64fa385358889ec8b77fe7cbccb996fecf3ac1cb0ed566d6dc5e79f771392891 Class-Base-0.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Class::Base) = 0.03 perl-Class-Base = 0.03-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass, 93 tests passed, verified by inspection. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:57:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151957.l4FJvTk9011656@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-15 15:57 EST ------- Fixed 1 and 3 from #1, and SDL BR. The name of the upstream source uses the date, not the version. I will switch it to the version. Xavier Lamien has assigned it to himself, and possibly just forgot the flag. He's also reviewing agistudio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:59:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151959.l4FJxI5Z011969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 15:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Base Short Description: Useful base class for deriving other modules Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 19:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705151959.l4FJxKOM011995@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:03:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152003.l4FK3LE1012431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 ------- Additional Comments From akontsevich at mail.ru 2007-05-15 16:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Please rewrite the spec file first. You said it to me? I think I can do it but I do not know when ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152005.l4FK5DcU012573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:14:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233244] Review Request: libiptcdata - IPTC Metadata library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152014.l4FKEsFw013325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libiptcdata - IPTC Metadata library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233244 dcm at acm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dcm at acm.org 2007-05-15 16:14 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libiptcdata New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:20:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152020.l4FKKxwJ013840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-05-15 16:20 EST ------- Thanks for making the changes! (In reply to comment #7) > - sticking with ant for now since i can't get pde build to work That's cool. > - some lines just won't go shorter than 80 characters Understood. > - ignoring rpmlint symlink warnings since i think build-jar-repository is the > way to go Agreed. > - built in mock fedora-devel-i386-core.cfg fedora-devel-x86_64-core.cfg Great. > - works in eclipse Works for me, too. I can't duplicate the md5sum of the tarball, but the contents are the same. I'm not going to hold up the review on this, but I'm curious as to why they're not the same. There is just one more thing: remove the epoch from your changelog entries to shut rpmlint up. Once that's done, this will be ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:51:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152051.l4FKpKp8017513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-15 16:51 EST ------- I see, is one of the following acceptable then? Requires: ruby(abi) = %{?ruby_abi:mock} Requires: ruby(abi) = %{?ruby_abi:1.8} or go back to Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 (and reenable BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8) They are listed in order of preference but I can live with any of them :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:56:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152056.l4FKul1n017945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 16:56 EST ------- I only have one question: The tests seem to need perl(Test) while you have a build-time dependency on perl(Test::More). At this point I'm not sure what the plan is, but as is I'd wager that you have the wrong BuildRequire there. Since we chatted about this on IRC, I'll go ahead and approve this and you can check in with the quick fix. * source files match upstream: 87856a053cccba8059c194da15300271ea800ab37c44e01f34612be4da962317 Text-TabularDisplay-1.22.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream (GPL statement is in the code itself) * latest version is being packaged. ? BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Text::TabularDisplay) = 1.22 perl-Text-TabularDisplay = 1.22-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(integer) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=83, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.20 cusr + 0.14 csys = 0.34 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152057.l4FKvue8018136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 16:57 EST ------- Looking good at first glance. The only thing I see right now is that shouldn't include .la files. I'll go over the checklist later tonight or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:58:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152058.l4FKww4q018189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 16:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-TabularDisplay Short Description: Display text in formatted table output Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:59:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152059.l4FKx0W2018215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 20:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152059.l4FKx58p018243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:11:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152111.l4FLBf9A019980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 17:11 EST ------- I note that 0.04000 (for whatever reason) came out a few days before you submitted your review. It looks like the build process is a bit different in the new version, too. I can go ahead and run a quick review on this version but I can also review an updated version if you like. Note that CPAN says "GPL and Artistic" but the code itself says just "Artistic": This module is free software. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the terms of the Perl Artistic License (see http://www.perl.com/perl/misc/Artistic.html) You might as well go ahead and add BR: perl(Test::Spelling) so you can run all of the tests. Or am I looking at the new version? Yes, I'm in the wrong tree, sorry. The new version has more tests. * source files match upstream: package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. X latest version is being packaged. ? BuildRequires are proper (Test::Spelling is useful for the new vesion) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Class::Data::Accessor) = 0.03 perl-Class-Data-Accessor = 0.03-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=21, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.12 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.16 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:11:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152111.l4FLBipU020006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 17:11 EST ------- The package needs to own /usr/lib/bigboard and /usr/share/bigboard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152118.l4FLICkF020695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-05-15 17:18 EST ------- SPEC URL problem: You don't have permission to access /apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/PyQt4.spec on this server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152121.l4FLLPN6020964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:23:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238348] Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152123.l4FLNLO3021343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-verve-plugin - A comfortable command line plugin for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238348 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238349] Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152124.l4FLOFhe021426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-places-plugin - Places menu for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238349 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:25:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239933] Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152125.l4FLPPeL021476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239933 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 17:25 EST ------- This is failing for me because perl-Sys-Syscall hasn't been pushed. I guess it didn't get tagged for F7. I stuffed it in a local repository and things build fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:32:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239933] Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152132.l4FLW4LN021979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239933 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 17:32 EST ------- My only suggestion is that you include the examples directory as %doc. I don't think this is a blocker, though. * source files match upstream: 919be5206f5e9dbff4a825a5bea3ed9f223629c2e969360a6228a929c838c7f5 Danga-Socket-1.57.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Danga::Socket) = 1.57 perl(Danga::Socket::Timer) perl-Danga-Socket = 1.57-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Errno) perl(POSIX) perl(Socket) perl(Sys::Syscall) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(fields) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=59, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.28 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152143.l4FLhNYv023052@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 17:43 EST ------- COPYING says "see LICENSE", but there is no LICENSE file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:46:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152146.l4FLkiS0023261@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-15 17:46 EST ------- Synced with the F7 version: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/compat-cernlib-g77-2006-11.fc7.src.rpm In this version the soname of libpawlib-lesstif is rightly bumped, so the compat-cernlib-g77-2006-9.fc7 package provides libpawlib-lesstif.so.3 while there was libpawlib-lesstif.so.2 in FC-6. So I will submit a compat package, named for example compat-cernlib-g77-pawlib-lesstif2 which will consist only of libpawlib-lesstif.so.2 and will be linked against the compat-cernlib-g77 package. But first this package needs to be accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:50:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152150.l4FLoEvK023488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 17:50 EST ------- Why does main.py live under /usr/libexec ? Can't that live under /usr/share, too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:51:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152151.l4FLp6KD023567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-05-15 17:51 EST ------- Source RPM passes rpmlint OK, but there are problems with the binary packages: $ rpmlint /home/bos/downloads/RPMS/x86_64/PyQt4-4.2-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm E: PyQt4 non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PyQt4/uic/pyuic.py 0644 E: PyQt4 script-without-shebang /usr/bin/pyuic4 E: PyQt4 binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PyQt4/QtDesigner.so ['/home/bos/downloads/BUILD/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.2/qpy/QtDesigner'] The first of these is a non-problem, but the second two are definitely issues. You can use chrpath to remove the rpath from the shared object if necessary. I'm attaching the rpmlint warnings for the -devel package, because they're voluminous. Some of them can be ignored (the dependency on /usr/bin/env), but the spurious perms should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152151.l4FLpegR023635@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-05-15 17:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154779) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154779&action=view) rpmlint output for PyQt4-devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:55:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152155.l4FLtFxA024095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 17:55 EST ------- The packaging guidelines have a stupid rule about "every gui app needs a desktop file" - you should just put a comment in the spec stating that bigboard does not need one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 21:59:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239901] Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152159.l4FLxqan024424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 17:59 EST ------- The package builds fine; rpmlint says: W: corkscrew summary-ended-with-dot Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. Should be a trivial fix. Note that Source0: should be a URL, so that spectool, for example, can download the source. You must include the license text (COPYING) and really should include the rest of the included documentation (AUTHORS, ChangeLog, TODO) as %doc. INSTALL and NEWS are generic and content-free so there's no need to include them. Have you investigated how other distros package this program? Debian includes a manpage and a couple of bugfix patches. When packaging software like this that hasn't been touched in years, it's always worth looking at other distros to see how they're handling bugfixes and such. Finally, are you sponsored? A quick search didn't turn you up as the owner of any other packages. If you don't have a sponsor, you'll need to add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the "Bug 239901 blocks" field and point out reviews that you've done or other packages you've submitted so that the sponsors will have enough information to decide whether they would like to sponsor you. Here's a review: * source files match upstream: 0d0fcbb41cba4a81c4ab494459472086f377f9edb78a2e2238ed19b58956b0be corkscrew-2.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text included in source but not in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint * final provides and requires are sane. O %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Reviewer has no means to test this software. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 22:21:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 18:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152221.l4FMLNDv025349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-15 18:21 EST ------- -------------------- >From %install stage. ------------------- you forgot to install the desktop file by using desktop-file-install command and add desktop-file-utils as BR. ------------------- >From desktop file. ------------------- you SHOULD Remove Application, X-Ximian-Main and X-Red-Hat-Base from Categories entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 22:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 18:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239918] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152234.l4FMYkRV026002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239918 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 22:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 18:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152248.l4FMmRN4026504@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-15 18:48 EST ------- Squish squish, squish, (skip), squish. On the libexec thing...it's an artifact of the current build/run system which I am a bit loath to touch again. Basically I had a lot of trouble getting things so they could easily run both installed and uninstalled. New files uploaded: http://download.mugshot.org/extras/bigboard/source/bigboard-0.3.2.tar.gz http://download.mugshot.org/extras/bigboard/source/bigboard.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 22:53:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 18:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239918] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152253.l4FMrjM7026674@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239918 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 18:53 EST ------- I suggest changing the %description to: OS independent wrapper class for executing traceroute calls. to fix a misspelling and add a period. I think this package should have a runtime depdency on traceroute; otherwise I'm not sure what the point is. * source files match upstream: a3a25932b9e81ebbec7f12035859bbd336d0b334d0c8bca5b15386a672c45463 Net_Traceroute-0.21.1.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. ? specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(Net_Traceroute) = 0.21.1 php-pear-Net-Traceroute = 0.21.1-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 22:56:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 18:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152256.l4FMuuJn026845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 18:56 EST ------- I think there's a conspiracy whereby CPAN authors wait until after I've packaged a module before they release an update. :) Anyways, new packages follow. Note that one of the author tests fails: pod_spelling.t, on "runtime". Due to this, I've left TEST_AUTHOR undefined... I'm open to taking a different approach, however. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Data-Accessor-0.04000-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Class-Data-Accessor.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 23:12:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239906] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152312.l4FNCGEV027193@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239906 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 23:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239906] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152327.l4FNRsVK027532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239906 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 19:27 EST ------- I suggest changing %description to: OS independent wrapper class for executing ping calls. to correct a misspelling and add a period. I think this package should have a depdendency on iputils (for /bin/ping). Otherwise I don't see how it could perform its function. rpmlint complains: W: php-pear-Net-Ping incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4.1-1 2.4.1-1.fc7 The package version is 2.4.1 but the (only) changelog entry refers to 1.4.1. Probably just a typo. There is a basic test included which can easily be run at build time with: %check cd tests php test_result_parsers.php * source files match upstream: 17a169c66b5a9f3cd71126d16efcd92c75f9116243a6fcf9732d6f2d6ca0811d Net_Ping-2.4.1.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint. ? final provides and requires: php-pear(Net_Ping) = 2.4.1 php-pear-Net-Ping = 2.4.1-1.fc7 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear X %check is not present, but there's a runnable test suite. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 23:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152348.l4FNmGKu028048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 19:48 EST ------- I suppose you could just cat "runtime" onto the list of stopwords at the end of pod_spelling.t if your really wanted to run that test. Or just delete that test if you don't. The license is still off, though. Otherwise I think this package is fine; I'll trust you to fix the license and leave it up to you to do what you wish with the tests. APPROVED, just change to License: Artistic when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 15 23:54:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705152354.l4FNsfqM028225@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 19:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) > I used pretty much the entire spec file from Jens, except that I bump the > release number to 5 and keep the cvs source. I wish we can put a new official > release out in the next couple of weeks, but even not, the cvs version is fine > and the file headers are identical to the 0.8.1-7 release. OK, I will take a detailed look soon. > Jens, you suggested me doing a review for a new package as practics, should I > just pick one and post my suggestions in their review thread? or post it here? Yes please, if you can post your unofficial "pre-review" in their review bug and just mention the bug number here that would be just fine, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 00:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160017.l4G0HZnh029115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-15 20:17 EST ------- I copied perl-Text-TabularDisplay-1.22-1.fc7.noarch.rpm into a local RPM and tried to build this, but the tests failed due to a lack of IO::Scalar. I added the appropriate BR and things build fine. rpmlint complains: E: perl-Text-RecordParser zero-length /usr/share/doc/perl-Text-RecordParser-v1.2.1/t/data/empty I guess if you're going to include the test suite as %doc you have little choice but to ship that file. Since the only issue is that missing BR:, I'll go ahead and approve and you can add it when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: ba4075a4493b196eaddfa7a9425e9edfa794e7eadbeb3c75eb18bb04f2c0b19c Text-RecordParser-v1.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires missing IO::Scalar. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly O rpmlint has only ignoreable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Text::RecordParser) = 1.2.1 perl(Text::RecordParser::Tab) = 1.0.0 perl-Text-RecordParser = v1.2.1-1.fc7 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(English) perl(File::Basename) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::Scalar) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(List::Util) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Readonly) perl(Text::ParseWords) perl(Text::RecordParser) perl(Text::TabularDisplay) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(version) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=193, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.67 cusr + 0.55 csys = 2.22 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, but of course you'll need to add BR: perl(IO::Scalar) in order to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 00:24:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240243] New: Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240243 Summary: Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/gpsdrive/gpsdrive.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/gpsdrive/gpsdrive-2.09-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Gpsdrive is a map-based navigation system. It displays your position on a zoomable map provided from a NMEA-capable GPS receiver. The maps are autoselected for the best resolution, depending of your position, and the displayed image can be zoomed. Maps can be downloaded from the Internet with one mouse click. The program provides information about speed, direction, bearing, arrival time, actual position, and target position. Speech output is also available. MySQL is supported. NOTES: - There's one rpmlint error left: E: gpsdrive incorrect-locale-el /usr/share/locale/gr/LC_MESSAGES/gpsdrive.mo Should this locale be removed? Not sure... - The package creates 2 libraries. I am removing the .so's for now, since they would be the only thing in a devel subpackage and nothing I can see ever links against this package. - The package has a check for gcc-3 and fails if it's not found. As far as I can see as long as you don't tell it to do any of the gcc3 optimizations, it compiles and works fine with gcc4. I have patched out the check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 00:38:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160038.l4G0cpuI029953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 20:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-RecordParser Short Description: Read record-oriented files Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 00:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160038.l4G0cqk5029977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 00:39:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160039.l4G0dkL2030016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 20:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Data-Accessor Short Description: Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 00:39:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160039.l4G0dleK030040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 01:57:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 21:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160157.l4G1v379000384@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-15 21:57 EST ------- I think we need to have a LICENSE file in the rpm e.g. %doc LICENSE Other than that, it's good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 02:42:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 22:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160242.l4G2gOnj003147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-15 22:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The license is still off, though. Nuts, I should know better than to try to do these things as I'm headed towards a meeting. In any case, the differing terms stem from Makefile.PL defining the license as perl. I've opened a RT bug and will update the license tag to just 'Artistic' pre-import. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=27146 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 03:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160301.l4G31OhZ004475@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-15 23:01 EST ------- I was hoping to see you at the KDE SIG meeting today, pop in IRC when you have some free time and msg me and we'll get you set up with sponsership! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 03:02:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239901] Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160302.l4G32HQf004578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 03:10:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160310.l4G3A7tv005051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 03:31:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160331.l4G3VZQj006611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-15 23:31 EST ------- You didn't set fedora-cvs to ?, but judging by the above comments and fedora-review set to +, I'm following through with your CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 03:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160347.l4G3lY66007640@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-15 23:47 EST ------- I'm fine with things staying in libexec. Going thru the checklist now: - rpmlint is silent - package name is ok - spec file name is ok - packaging guidelines are met - license: GPL, ok - license tag ok - license text included in %doc - spec file written in excellent, legible language - upstream source ok - locale handling n/a - shared libs n/a - not a relocatable package - directory ownership: still missing /usr/share/bigboard/stocks - no duplicate files - file permissions: ok - %clean section: ok - consistent macro use: ok - package content: ok - large documentation: n/a - %doc sanity: ok - headers: n/a - static libs n/a - pkgconfig files: n/a - shared libs: n/a - la files: ok - desktop file: ok - ownership: ok - %install cleans buildroot, ok - filenames: ok still waiting for my mock build to complete... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 03:54:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160354.l4G3so3N008130@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 03:56:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238237] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple - Make serving static pages painless In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160356.l4G3uXW3008293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Static-Simple - Make serving static pages painless https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238237 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 03:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160356.l4G3udqp008316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 04:02:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160402.l4G42XaY008808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review-, fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-16 00:02 EST ------- I found some small issues with the review i started on it. as rich says LICENSE file should be included Requires: nss >= 3.11.4 Requires: nspr >= 4.6.4 are not needed rpm detects the Requires itself. Requires: java libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libnspr4.so()(64bit) libnss3.so()(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.10.2)( 64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.2)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.3)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.4)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.5)(64bit) libnss3.so(NSS_3.6) (64bit) libplc4.so()(64bit) libplds4.so()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit ) libsmime3.so()(64bit) libsmime3.so(NSS_3.2)(64bit) libsmime3.so(NSS_3.3) (64bit) libssl3.so()(64bit) libssl3.so(NSS_3.2)(64bit) nspr >= 4.6.4 nss >= 3.11.4 rtld(GNU_HASH) builds in mock on devel x86_64 rpmlint is quiet i would like to see sparc64 added to the %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 ia64 s390x line fix these small issues and ill approve jss -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 04:02:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160402.l4G42r83008909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 04:02:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160402.l4G42ikS008869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-16 00:02 EST ------- mock build completed successfully, so BRs are ok, too The only remaining issue is the unowned directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 04:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160403.l4G43E2g008991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 04:10:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160410.l4G4AnRB009305@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-16 00:10 EST ------- With the timestamp changes, Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/referencer/referencer.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/referencer/referencer-1.0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 04:24:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160424.l4G4OwEl009862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-16 00:24 EST ------- add TEST_POD BR for make test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 04:26:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160426.l4G4QmsD009917@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-16 00:26 EST ------- Anything happening here? It's a always a good idea to respond to reviewer comments as quickly as possible, but it's especially important if you require sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 04:30:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239200] Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160430.l4G4Uud5010171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239200 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 05:15:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 01:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160515.l4G5Fu19011381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-16 01:15 EST ------- make test failed in mock as PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01use............ok t/02subreq.........Can't locate HTTP/Request/AsCGI.pm in @INC (@INC contains: t/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest-0.11/blib/lib /builddir/build/BUILD/Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest-0.11/blib/arch /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Catalyst/Test.pm line 112. # Looks like your test died before it could output anything. dubious Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) DIED. FAILED tests 1-9 Failed 9/9 tests, 0.00% okay t/03pod............ok t/04podcoverage....ok Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/02subreq.t 255 65280 9 18 200.00% 1-9 Failed 1/4 test scripts, 75.00% okay. 9/12 subtests failed, 25.00% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26634 (%check) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26634 (%check) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 06:00:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 02:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239200] Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160600.l4G60mUc013407@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239200 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-16 02:00 EST ------- Builds fine for me; rpmlint has only one complaint: W: onesixtyone incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.32-1 0.3.2-1.fc7 Looks like its just a typo in the changelog entry. The compiler isn't called with the proper set of flags. You need to change your make line to: make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} * source files match upstream: 450806718f72a75ea108e3675ca7856f15c518fcf517df68483c486c39910d02 onesixtyone-0.3.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). X compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X debuginfo package is empty due to the lack of proper compiler flags. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manual testing shows that everything works fine. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 06:52:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 02:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160652.l4G6qa97015190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-16 02:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > I see, is one of the following acceptable then? > > Requires: ruby(abi) = %{?ruby_abi:mock} > Requires: ruby(abi) = %{?ruby_abi:1.8} %{?ruby_abi:mock} means * when ruby_abi is defined, the output is "mock" * when ruby_abi is not defined, the output is nothing. So Requires: ruby(abi) = %{?ruby_abi:mock} means * when ruby_abi is defined, this is Requires: ruby(abi) = mock * when ruby_abi is not defined, this is a error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 08:16:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 04:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239933] Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160816.l4G8GP47021054@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239933 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-16 04:16 EST ------- Thanks again Jason. I've included the examples in %doc. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Danga-Socket Short Description: Event loop and event-driven async socket base class Owners: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 08:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 04:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160818.l4G8IWvc021211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-16 04:18 EST ------- ping. any update here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 08:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 04:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218599] Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160832.l4G8WxDk022529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klibido - NNTP (Usenet) file grabber for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218599 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-16 04:32 EST ------- Again, a new (hopefully more reliable) host... *sigh* Please excuse the spec file naming, the asp-based host seems to have an issue with .spec file extensions. Spec URL: http://www4.webng.com/faucamp/rpm/klibido_spec.txt SRPM URL: http://www4.webng.com/faucamp/rpm/klibido-0.2.5-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 08:58:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 04:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160858.l4G8wrsb025188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-16 04:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Please rewrite the spec file first. > You said it to me? I think I can do it but I do not know when ;) Hello Aleksey, Though I am not yet a package-maintainer, I think that you would do better to revise your package on several points, and the package will get closer to the Fedora guidelines by the expected revisions. This bugzilla still lacks an assignee. However, you can revise the package anytime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 09:25:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 05:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160925.l4G9PGqu027382@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2007-05-16 05:25 EST ------- Sorry, must have missed this being approved. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-NetAddr-IP Short Description: Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Owners: andreas at bawue.net Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 09:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 05:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705160952.l4G9q8bH028347@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-16 05:52 EST ------- Hmm, I think this is possibly due to an overzealous timeout setting in autodownloader, can you try changing line 218 of: /usr/share/autodl/AutoDL.py from: socket.setdefaulttimeout(5) to socket.setdefaulttimeout(10) Or maybe an even higher value (in seconds) ? Thanks! I would be much obliged if you could test this soon, so that hopefully I can get this fixed before thursday's freeze. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 10:18:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 06:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239918] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161018.l4GAIv4w029798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239918 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-16 06:18 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Traceroute.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Traceroute-0.21.1-2.fc8.src.rpm %changelog * Wed May 16 2007 Remi Collet 0.21.1-2 - From review, change description - add Requires: traceroute About "macros used". Spec file use new macros provided by php-pear since 1.4.9-1.2 (/etc/rpm/macros.pear). Can you detail me what you are not sure about ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 10:42:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 06:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240287] New: Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240287 Summary: Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: frank-buettner at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/muParser.spec?use_mirror=dfn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/muParser-1.27-1FC5.src.rpm?use_mirror=dfn Description: Many applications require the parsing of mathematical expressions. The main objective of this project is to provide a fast and easy way of doing this. muParser is an extensible high performance math parser library. It is based on transforming an expression into a bytecode and precalculating constant parts of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 10:59:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 06:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239906] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161059.l4GAxb9N031613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239906 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-16 06:59 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Ping.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-Net-Ping-2.4.1-2.fc8.src.rpm %changelog * Wed May 16 2007 Remi Collet 2.4.1-2 - From review, correct typo. - add Requires: /bin/ping - add simple test in %%check I requires /bin/ping rather than iputils after asking #fedora-devel. I don't really prefer one solution to another. It will work even if ping gets moved to another package. When packaging pear stuff, most often, tests must be run after installing the package (doesn't run in Buildroot, even with R changed to BR). Running tests after installation allow to be more complete (need configuration change, databse...), ex running /usr/share/doc/php-pear-Net-Ping-2.4.1/examples/example.php. But, of course, i agree to include test when exists and works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 11:22:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 07:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161122.l4GBMaGg000757@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium tuju at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuju at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 11:33:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 07:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161133.l4GBX1Ds001286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 11:41:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 07:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161141.l4GBfomp001733@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-16 07:41 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------------- This package (referencer) is APPROVED by me. --------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Deep freeze for Fedora 7 is set as Thursday (on American time, perhaps). If you want to make this packaged included into initial Fedora 7 release, you have to * rebuild this on koji * send a main to rel-eng to make the build on koji tagged with f7-final -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 11:50:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 07:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161150.l4GBoWOC002516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-16 07:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: referencer Short Description: A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome Owners: dakingun at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:08:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161208.l4GC8ox3003959@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-16 08:08 EST ------- This doesn't seem to come with any data files. It was my understanding that the games should be "free-standing", ie. at least playable from the package itself. Otherwise, I don't see any reasons we wouldn't add Quake3 to the list... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:16:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161216.l4GCGE98004312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-16 08:16 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161218.l4GCIHJS004470@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-16 08:18 EST ------- Please provide the src.rpm and spec in a downloadable format. I've tried to find out how to download them from trac but I did not discover the right buttons to press. wget http://ezix.org/project/browser/packages/lshw/development/src/lshw.spec.in gives some useless html stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:35:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161235.l4GCZNTl005565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-05-16 08:35 EST ------- Alive and well. I'm doing my best to get a release out before the weekend. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:37:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229123] Review Request: yum-arch - Extract headers from rpm in a old yum repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161237.l4GCb895005712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-arch - Extract headers from rpm in a old yum repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229123 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-16 08:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: yum-arch New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:37:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228212] Review Request: perl-Proc-Daemon - Run Perl program as a daemon process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161237.l4GCbvUf005758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Proc-Daemon - Run Perl program as a daemon process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228212 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-16 08:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Proc-Daemon New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:38:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217225] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161238.l4GCcjjB005823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217225 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-16 08:38 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Apache-DBI New Branches: EL-5 EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:40:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225771] Merge Review: fribidi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161240.l4GCemQB005953@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fribidi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225771 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:42:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212984] Review Request: openoffice.org-langpack-ar-dict - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161242.l4GCgt3n006089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-langpack-ar-dict - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212984 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2007-05-16 08:42 EST ------- please reconsider and do a hunspell-ar package instead of a openoffice.org-langpack-ar-dict package. You can find many good examples, e.g. the hunspell-es one is a good fit for a hunspell-ar package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:55:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161255.l4GCt4Sn007277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-16 08:55 EST ------- The freestanding rule was really invented for more troublesome stuff were there is a reverse engineered (and thus not approved by the original copyright holders) engine. If this type of engine doesn't come with any free data, one could say that its only use is using it to circumvent the copy protection in the original games, which is considered a legal liability, this is also know as the emulator clause in _the_ guidelines. Similar cases to rott have already been discussed and approved by FESco, see for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 Which itself contains links to another package doing the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:55:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161255.l4GCtHq9007342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-16 08:55 EST ------- rpmlint is clean, with one exception: W: ants-level-editor no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. But, then, I don't see any docs specific to it, so never mind. Meets package naming guidelines. Spec name is good. Meets Packaging Guidelines. License was originally unspecified, but license-info includes dialog with upstream who declared it Public Domain. Spec is legible American English. Sources md5 match. Builds on i386/FC6 and in mock, as well. BRs are OK. No locales, shared libraries or static libraries. Not relocatable. Owns created directories. No listed duplicates. Permissions/defattrs correct. %clean present and correct. Good macros. Code, not content. No large docs or runtime doc deps. No headers or .pc. No -devel. No .la. .desktop is good. However, might not a .desktop for -level-editor be helpful? No ownership conflicts. Install begins by whacking buildroot. All filenames UTF-8. All MUSTS met, save the .desktop question. Also, package runs and has no wierd file deps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:57:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161257.l4GCvdoH007561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-16 08:57 EST ------- Well, 1.1-4 spec/srpm itself is okay. (In reply to comment #16) > But I can't find where I disabled creating debuginfo. Please "attach" the result of ----------------------------------------------------------------- $ for f in `rpm --showrc | sed -n -e 's|^macrofiles[ \t][ \t]*: ||p' | sed -e 's|:| |'` ; do if [ -f $f ] ; then echo "$f::" ; grep debug $f ; echo ; fi ; done ----------------------------------------------------------------- (This is one line) Well, ----------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 12:57:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161257.l4GCvqfu007618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-05-16 08:57 EST ------- I've updated the spec and the srpm: http://gnetworkmonitor.sourceforge.net/rpm/gnome-network-monitor.spec http://gnetworkmonitor.sourceforge.net/rpm/gnome-network-monitor-0.9.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:00:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239800] php-pear maintainer updates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161300.l4GD03Ea007927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php-pear maintainer updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239800 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-16 09:00 EST ------- (Closing for now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:07:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161307.l4GD7PQ3008908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-05-16 09:07 EST ------- The Requires: are there because we need a minimum level of NSS and NSPR, not just any old version. I included the 3 license files and added sparc64. If the current Requires line is ok I'll upload a fixed spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:13:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] New: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: frank-buettner at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qt4-qwtplot3d.spec?use_mirror=dfn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qt4-qwtplot3d-0.2.6-1FC5.src.rpm?use_mirror=dfn Description: QwtPlot3D is not a program, but a feature-rich Qt/OpenGL-based C++ programming library, providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:14:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161314.l4GDEnHY009638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-16 09:14 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-Log New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:15:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161315.l4GDFRRf009710@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-16 09:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) Ok, it does seem to be a timeout issue combined with my questionable network connection. Increasing the timeout threshold makes things a bit better, but it might be a good idea to have some form of "download resume" option (like wget's -c option) - maybe urllib.urlretrieve() can be replaced with a call to wget? But this is a discussion for another bugzilla, I think. :-) As far as reviewing the package goes, a few points: * The program crashes on startup on my machine (FC6/i386 dual core) if the SRPM is rebuilt as-is; will attach the output (backtrace) shortly. After removing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS from the EXTRAFLAGS parameter to make, it builds and runs fine. my RPM_OPT_FLAGS: -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables * It looks like you are missing some useful %doc entries: rott/13todo.txt (highlights some bugs/missing features in port) rott/cmdline.txt (provides command line options) rott/hacker.txt (useful for creating custom maps) rott/wad.txt (useful for creating custom content) * I have my doubts about the "rott-registered" package: it doesn't feel "polished", in that it is a standalone installable "game package", yet it does not create a suitable menu entry, or provide some assistance with actually getting the game to work (the way rott-shareware does). Also, I'm not too sure about Fedora's legal view on this (rott-registered) - since you need proprietary, non-freely downloadable content for it to work. This would be the case with Quake 3 mentioned in comment #3 above, as well. My personal feeling on rott-registered is to either polish it up to provide the same level of "user friendliness" as rott-shareware (and maybe make it Conflict with rott-shareware if needed), or drop it. (In reply to comment #3) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Meeting-20070510 As I said above though, I'm not sure about the "registered" stuff, though. Maybe provide a "codec buddy"-like popup message with 3D Realms's "buy rott" URL? (they actually still sell it, believe it or not) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:17:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161317.l4GDHjZp009936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-16 09:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154819) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154819&action=view) rott crash output with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS enabled -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:21:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161321.l4GDLqeN010354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-16 09:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Similar cases to rott have already been discussed and approved by FESco, see for > example: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 > Which itself contains links to another package doing the same. Didn't know that, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:42:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161342.l4GDgrqA012108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-16 09:42 EST ------- Francois, About autodownloader, how much must you increase the timeout to make it reliable (in most cases atleast), then I can issue an updated version with a better timeout setting. Also I'm sure upstream (http://sf.net/projects/autodownloader) would be happy to take a patch for a resume button on the download gui. About the crash problem, can you please: 1) install the -debuginfo package together with the rott-shareware package from the same build 2) cd ~/.rott 3) gdb `which rott-shareware` 4) set args window 5) run 6) bt And then attach the output of the bt command? Thanks! Bastien, I know you already have quite a few packages, but maybe you can package quake3io yourself? Or atleast do an initial srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 13:44:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161344.l4GDiSx3012221@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-16 09:44 EST ------- p.s. About the -registered package, I understand. But I think its only fair towards both Apogee and to registered rott owners to provide this as service. Perhaps I should add an URL to the %description of the apogee webshop? And/or a readme with this info? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 14:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167990] Review request: cvsutils - CVS Utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161441.l4GEfRXR030161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: cvsutils - CVS Utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167990 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-16 10:41 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cvsutils Updated Fedora Owners: dev at nigelj.com,rc040203 at freenet.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 14:41:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161441.l4GEfoxC030195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-16 10:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154827) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154827&action=view) gdb bt of rott startup crash (In reply to comment #8) > Francois, > > About autodownloader, how much must you increase the timeout to make it reliable > (in most cases atleast), then I can issue an updated version with a better > timeout setting. 15 seconds, first mirror fails fairly reliable (3drealms), but the second one works fine. > > Also I'm sure upstream (http://sf.net/projects/autodownloader) would be happy to > take a patch for a resume button on the download gui. Cool, I'll look into whipping up something. > > And then attach the output of the bt command? Thanks! > Done. > > Bastien, > > I know you already have quite a few packages, but maybe you can package quake3io > yourself? Or atleast do an initial srpm? > Matthias Saou already has a working Quake3 RPM in FreshRPMs, maybe just prod him to include it in Fedora? http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/fedora/linux/6/quake3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 14:42:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240323] New: Review Request: telepathy-salut - Link-local XMPP telepathy connection manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240323 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-salut - Link-local XMPP telepathy connection manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/telepathy-salut.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/telepathy-salut-0.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: telepathy-salut is a Telepathy connection manager for link-local XMPP. Normally, XMPP does not support direct client-to-client interactions, since it requires authentication with a server. This package makes it is possible to establish an XMPP-like communications system on a local network using zero-configuration networking. Note there is a newer version of telepathy-salut, but it depends on telepathy-glib which isn't in Fedora yet since that package has some issues that need to be worked out before submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 14:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240323] Review Request: telepathy-salut - Link-local XMPP telepathy connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161443.l4GEhTQ2030353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-salut - Link-local XMPP telepathy connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240323 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-16 10:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154828) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154828&action=view) Mock build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 14:46:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240324] New: Review Request: telepathy-idle - IRC connection manager for Telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240324 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-idle - IRC connection manager for Telepathy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at ameritech.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/telepathy-idle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/telepathy-idle-0.0.5-1.src.rpm Description: A full-featured IRC connection manager for the Telepathy project. Note there is a newer version of telepathy-idle, but it depends on telepathy-glib which isn't in Fedora yet since that package has some issues that need to be worked out before submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 14:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240324] Review Request: telepathy-idle - IRC connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161447.l4GElDdS030704@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-idle - IRC connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240324 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-16 10:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154829) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154829&action=view) Mock build log for telepathy-idle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 14:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161451.l4GEp8Ds031949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-16 10:51 EST ------- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221163 * If you have a special reason to use qt4, not qt3, then the most file names should be renamed to avoid conflict of qt3 version qwtplot3d, or explicit conflict must be used. * Otherwise, this bug must be closed as a duplicate of above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 15:02:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161502.l4GF2feE000577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-16 11:02 EST ------- afaict, it looks like qwtplot3d can be built for/against both qt3/qt4. If that is the case, then Frank can/should work with the current maintainer of qwtplot3d to get the qt4 bits built/included too. Both qt3/qt4 builds seem to use identical libnames, which would appear to be problematic for apps that use qwtplot3d. ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 15:04:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161504.l4GF4q6G000821@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-05-16 11:04 EST ------- Yes, the package that shut use this package require qwtplot3d build again Qt4. This will be submitted soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 15:06:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161506.l4GF6cS0000963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-16 11:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154830) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154830&action=view) Test patch fixing the backtrace Francois, can you try again with this patch added to the build? It looks like I just was lucky that my username "hans" is very short :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 15:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161524.l4GFOJBb003041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From patrick.pichon at laposte.net 2007-05-16 11:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154834) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154834&action=view) lshw.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 15:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161524.l4GFOrZg003102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From patrick.pichon at laposte.net 2007-05-16 11:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=154835) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154835&action=view) rpm source package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 15:29:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161529.l4GFTQYu003371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From patrick.pichon at laposte.net 2007-05-16 11:29 EST ------- The correct path to get the .spec.in is : http://ezix.org/source/packages/lshw/development/src/lshw.spec.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 15:37:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161537.l4GFbnN6003980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-16 11:37 EST ------- thanks, it'll likely be a few days (at least) before I get to updating anything here (working on F7 kde stuff), so any other feedback, MUST blockers you find in the meantime would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:01:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161601.l4GG17i8006047@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-16 12:01 EST ------- You are right of course, %{ruby_abi} is always defined anyway from this: %{!?ruby_abi: %define ruby_abi %(...)} when ruby is not found it is defined as "". If we want a work around for mock then this should do it (I did checked mock this time) %if "%{ruby_abi}" == "" %define ruby_abi mock (or 1.8) %endif Maybe it's more pain than it's worth, I am not sure I like this solution either. Any preferences? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:09:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] New: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SQL-Translator/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-SQL-Translator-0.08-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-SQL-Translator.spec Description: This documentation covers the API for SQL::Translator. For a more general discussion of how to use the modules and scripts, please see SQL::Translator::Manual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:09:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161609.l4GG9oTx007443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240333 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:09:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161609.l4GG9ql5007478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240333 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:11:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161611.l4GGB06j007617@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-SQL-Translator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161614.l4GGEpaX007948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-16 12:14 EST ------- squish! http://download.mugshot.org/extras/bigboard/source/bigboard.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161616.l4GGGbAc008097@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-16 12:16 EST ------- Looks good now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:17:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161617.l4GGHv1I008237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-16 12:17 EST ------- Excellent job - the patch works great. I've given some thought about the rott-registered package, and I agree with your views in comment #9 about it - especially the "registered users" bit. But still, I feel we should add a wrapper startup script for rott to present a simple popup with content installation/purchase instructions if the data files are not present... something simple like kdialog/zenity would work nicely. And it would be necessary to add a "ROTT Registered" (or similar) menu entry, just so that everything is nicely integrated. And... I have to ask this question: do you think we should ask for spot's (or even FESCo's) view on the -registered package? I'm leaning towards "no, let's finish the review", but I don't want to step on any toes... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 16:36:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161636.l4GGaUkK009836@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-16 12:36 EST ------- IMO for now writing 1.8 explicitly is the simplest. This is only a workaround by the time rpmbuild supports ruby abi detection and for now I can't find a smart solution...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 17:11:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239193] Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161711.l4GHBMps013378@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-ExtractUse - Find out what modules are used Alias: Module-ExtractUse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239193 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-16 13:11 EST ------- I would like to see public discussion on fedora-packaging about installing test suite code that upstream does not install before approving this package. While I don't think it's a good thing to do usually in the first place, and even less so in the main package, I won't try to block this one as long as there are no guidelines about it - so if someone wants to have this package in before the above discussion takes place or there's a conclusion, feel free to reassign and complete the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 17:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161719.l4GHJF5v014533@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-16 13:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > squish! > > http://download.mugshot.org/extras/bigboard/source/bigboard.spec The following directries don't seem to be owned?? (on i386) /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bigboard/httplib2/ /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bigboard/keybinder/ /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bigboard/libbig/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 17:25:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161725.l4GHPN4l015295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-16 13:25 EST ------- Mamoru - fixed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 17:26:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161726.l4GHQvmM015494@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-16 13:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bigboard Short Description: Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org Owners: walters at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 FC-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 17:29:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161729.l4GHTxaT015805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-16 13:29 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: liberation-fonts New Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 17:31:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161731.l4GHV4eM015972@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-16 13:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > And... I have to ask this question: do you think we should ask for spot's (or > even FESCo's) view on the -registered package? I'm leaning towards "no, let's > finish the review", but I don't want to step on any toes... Spot makes decisions on licensing, there is no licensing issue here (the code is 100% GPL, the data isn't shipped) as for FESco, I don't think its necessary for them to get involved either. The package as a whole is ok, that we agree on. The -registered sub package is just a special compiled version. I could take all the ifdef's and change it to a runtime variable, with a cmdline switch like it is already for example for doom (prboom), would I then need to back out the runtime registered support too? Should we remove doom registered support from prboom? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 17:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161741.l4GHfOrE016772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-16 13:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Mamoru - fixed! Seems okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 17:43:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174288] Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161743.l4GHh6KZ016875@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174288 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lukasim at atlas.cz ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-16 13:43 EST ------- Hello, I am not sure: Is this bug alive, please??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 18:07:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161807.l4GI7bVx018795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-16 14:07 EST ------- > you forgot to install the desktop file by using desktop-file-install > command and add desktop-file-utils as BR. I'd prefer avoiding this. If the desktop file is sane enough and already provided, it's fine to install it directly. > you SHOULD Remove Application, X-Ximian-Main and X-Red-Hat-Base from > Categories entry Sure, I'll patch all this out. One interesting thing is that the current rhythmbox, gnome-cd and gnome-volume-control desktop files on my FC6 system contain the exact same lines. Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/elisa/elisa-0.1.6-4.src.rpm * Wed May 16 2007 Matthias Saou 0.1.6-4 - Patch desktop file to remove useless bits (Version and extra Categories). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 18:25:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161825.l4GIPcWD020677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-16 14:25 EST ------- >Please "attach" the result of >----------------------------------------------------------------- >$ for f in `rpm --showrc | sed -n -e 's|^macrofiles[ \t][ \t]*: ||p' | sed -e 's|:| |'` ; do if [ -f $f ] ; then echo "$f::" ; grep debug $f ; echo ; fi ; done >----------------------------------------------------------------- So here is, but there is nothing like "%debug_package %{nil}" or so on ------------------------------------------------------------------ /usr/lib/rpm/macros:: # Path to script that creates debug symbols in a /usr/lib/debug %__debug_install_post \ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh %{_builddir}/%{?buildsubdir}\ # Template for debug information sub-package. %debug_package \ %global __debug_package 1\ %package debug\ %description debug\ This package provides debug information for package %{name}.\ package or when debugging this package.\ %files debug -f debugfiles.list\ # glibc-debug>glibc-devel %{?__debug_package:%{__debug_install_post}}\ ----------------------------------------------------------------- >When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other >person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report >so that I can check your comments or review request. It may takes some time... But I'll work on it. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Otherwise thank you for this info, it is really useful... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 18:29:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226338] Merge Review: PyQt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161829.l4GITEbW020998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: PyQt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226338 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-16 14:29 EST ------- Than, are you going to implement items from comment #1 (post merge), so we can put PyQt-qscintilla to rest? If so either preserve the -qscintilla/-qscintilla-devel subpkgs, or add Obsoletes: %{name}-qscintilla > %{version}-%{release} Provides: %{name}-qscintilla = %{version}-%{release} and add to -devel Obsoletes: %{name}-qscintilla-devel > %{version}-%{release} Provides: %{name}-qscintilla-devel = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 18:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225993] Merge Review: libc-client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161830.l4GIUf6m021118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libc-client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225993 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-16 14:30 EST ------- a moment of silence for libc-client.... closing. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 18:31:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227241] Review Request: kde-settings - KDE default configuration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161831.l4GIVQHQ021185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-settings - KDE default configuration Alias: kde-settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227241 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-16 14:31 EST ------- doh, forgot to close this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 19:45:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161945.l4GJjC7m029035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-05-16 15:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I can't duplicate the md5sum of the tarball, but the contents are the same. I'm > not going to hold up the review on this, but I'm curious as to why they're not > the same. the cvs export seems to use the current time for directories it creates, but maintains timestamps for the files it creates. i do not know how to fix this. > There is just one more thing: remove the epoch from your changelog entries to > shut rpmlint up. Once that's done, this will be ready to go. oops, that should be fixed now. http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle.spec http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-checkstyle/eclipse-checkstyle-4.0.1-6.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 19:46:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161946.l4GJktH1029227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-05-16 15:46 EST ------- All MUST FIX items fixed, package looks good. **** APPROVED **** Feel free to ping me on IRC if you have any questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 19:51:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705161951.l4GJpOdD029670@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-05-16 15:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I can't duplicate the md5sum of the tarball, but the contents are the same. > > [...] > > the cvs export seems to use the current time for directories it creates, but > maintains timestamps for the files it creates. i do not know how to fix this. Okay, don't worry about it. > > There is just one more thing: remove the epoch from your changelog entries to > > shut rpmlint up. Once that's done, this will be ready to go. > > oops, that should be fixed now. Great, thanks. APPROVED! I believe the next step is you need to set the fedora-cvs flag to ?. Thanks, Rob. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:04:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] New: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: frank-buettner at gmx.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot.spec?use_mirror=dfn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-0.9_rc1-1FC5.src.rpm?use_mirror=dfn Description: Scientists often need to use data analysis and plotting software. For Windows systems there is a well known and widely used software called Origin, which is not free, of course. The purpose of this project is to develop a free (open source), platform independent alternative to Origin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:05:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162005.l4GK5wi8030921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |240180, 240287, 240308 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:06:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162006.l4GK62Rl030981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240373 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:05:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240308] Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162005.l4GK5xnf030940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qwtplot3d - Providing essentially a bunch of 3D-widgets for programmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240308 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240373 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:06:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240287] Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162006.l4GK60jY030961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240287 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240373 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:10:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162010.l4GKAFEC031443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-05-16 16:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > > Great, thanks. APPROVED! > > I believe the next step is you need to set the fedora-cvs flag to ?. Thanks, Rob. i get this error when i try to set that flag: Flag Modification Denied You tried to request fedora-cvs. Only an authorized user can make this change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:17:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190101] Review Request: php-pear-Log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162017.l4GKHgVI031929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Log Alias: php-pear-Log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190101 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:22:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239906] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162022.l4GKMaHv032184@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239906 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-16 16:22 EST ------- Well, file dependencies in /bin are fine according to the guidelines. (There are several directories for which they are OK, but outside of those yum has to fetch additional dependency information which makes things slow.) I know that most PEAR modules don't have tests which are runnable at build time, but I happened to notice that this one could be run which is why I pointed it out. Everything looks good to me now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:23:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217225] Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162023.l4GKNJFk032274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-DBI - Initiate a persistent database connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217225 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:25:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229123] Review Request: yum-arch - Extract headers from rpm in a old yum repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162025.l4GKPeF7032464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-arch - Extract headers from rpm in a old yum repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229123 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-16 16:25 EST ------- also branched for EL-4 because I am sure it would be useful to people there too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:25:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239918] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162025.l4GKPnp5032502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239918 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-16 16:25 EST ------- My comment about "otherwise I'm not sure what the point is" was merely noting that if you don't have a traceroute dependency (and the system doesn't happen to have traceroute already installed) then this module is essentially useless. But since you added the dependency, everything's fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:27:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233244] Review Request: libiptcdata - IPTC Metadata library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162027.l4GKR35K032641@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libiptcdata - IPTC Metadata library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233244 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:28:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236177] Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162028.l4GKSxuH000419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-NetAddr-IP - Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets Alias: perl-NetAddr-IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236177 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:29:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162029.l4GKTi8F000496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:30:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162030.l4GKUbrr000562@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:31:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162031.l4GKVACA000630@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:32:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239933] Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162032.l4GKW298000771@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Danga-Socket - Event loop and event-driven async socket base class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239933 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:32:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239963] Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162032.l4GKWqP6000844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-AIO - Asynchronous Input/Output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239963 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:34:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162034.l4GKYK0P000994@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Crypt-|Review Request: perl-Crypt- |OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL |OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL |bindings for RSA support -- |bindings for RSA support |SPONSOR NEEDED | OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:34:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162034.l4GKYXiJ001042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Crypt-|Review Request: perl-Crypt- |OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl |OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl |OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 |OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 |support -- SPONSOR NEEDED |support OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:34:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162034.l4GKYmBX001133@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Crypt-|Review Request: perl-Crypt- |OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL|OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL |bindings for X509 support --|bindings for X509 support |SPONSOR NEEDED | OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:35:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162035.l4GKZE26001190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl |perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl |support for SHA digests -- |support for SHA digests |SPONSOR NEEDED | OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:35:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162035.l4GKZRkA001253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Net- |Review Request: perl-Net- |DNS-SEC -- Perl support for |DNS-SEC -- Perl support for |DNSSEC -- SPONSOR NEEDED |DNSSEC OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162035.l4GKZSmc001277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:36:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162036.l4GKaNsq001373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:37:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162037.l4GKb0Fa001432@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:37:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162037.l4GKbhA2001498@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:40:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162040.l4GKeVnt001752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:42:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162042.l4GKgWuj001908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-16 16:42 EST ------- The spec provided by the link in comment #12 contains the string @VERSION@ instead of the current version, which makes it unusable. I have built in mock the src.rpm from comment #11 and I have found the following issues: - the release field does not use %dist. It is not mandatory and you are allowed to not use it, but in this case it would be useful to provide a reason for avoiding to use it - Source 0 is not available (http://www.ezix.org/software/files/lshw-0.20070516152048.tar.gz) Please fix the path. - /usr/bin/install is part of the default buildroot, no need to specifically request it via BR - timestamps of the files included (docs mostly) are not preserved; usually this can be solved using "cp -p" or "install -p", as needed (for instance you could probably add INSTALL="%__install -p" to the make commands ) - the generated debuginfo rpm is empty. You should patch the Makefiles and remove the references to strip. In addition to that, at the first glance it looks like the "STRIP=/bin/true" lines from %install are useless - the changelog has not been updated to reflect the current version of the spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:43:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:43:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225981] Merge Review: lcms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162043.l4GKhxmO002208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lcms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225981 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225874] Merge Review: gtk-sharp2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162044.l4GKi5ni002248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtk-sharp2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225874 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:44:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225808] Merge Review: gmime In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162044.l4GKiGXV002276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225808 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:44:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225862] Merge Review: gsf-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162044.l4GKiTHu002330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsf-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225862 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 20:44:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162044.l4GKiiZ8002355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-16 16:44 EST ------- Here is a new version, changes: - Add desktop entry and userfriendly launcher script for registered package - Add a patch fixing crashes with "long" usernames Go get it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/rott.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/rott-1.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 21:05:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162105.l4GL5guG004673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-16 17:05 EST ------- When I get a response, I'll do so (or better yet... hopefully he'll republish it). thanks for the note about email verification being ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 21:07:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162107.l4GL7RAS004784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-16 17:07 EST ------- account created on my side, FYI. FYI, the wiki instructions still say to use "cvsextras" (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join step 4) which is a bit confusing post merge. I assumed that was still the proper thing to do, but either way I'd change the text of the instructions to say it's still the correct process even post merge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 21:11:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162111.l4GLB51F005095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-16 17:11 EST ------- Sponsorship should be done now, but it may take an hour or so to propagate. The group is still cvsextras but will be renamed soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 21:20:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162120.l4GLKdgZ005827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-16 17:20 EST ------- Have you applied for cvsextras access? See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Once you've been sponsored into the cvsextras group, you'll gain the permissions necessary to set flags on bugzilla tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162308.l4GN8W8g012228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From lyonel at ezix.org 2007-05-16 19:08 EST ------- * The .spec file link of comment #12 is a *template* .spec file, that means that @VERSION@ is replaced at release time by proper version number. -> wontfix * %dist is Fedora-specific -> wontfix * only released versions are made available, therefore Source0 doesn't exist for snapshots -> wontfix * /usr/bin/install build requirement will be removed * good point about timestamps, this will be fixed * 'stripping' of executables needs some rework * changelog will only be updated for released versions -> wontfix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:32:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240166] Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162332.l4GNWHPh013274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Data-Accessor - Inheritable, overridable class and instance data accessor creation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240166 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-16 19:32 EST ------- License tag updated; imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:37:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162337.l4GNbAA9013467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-16 19:37 EST ------- Imported and building. As always, thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:37:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162337.l4GNbT9p013505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 Bug 240177 depends on bug 240174, which changed state. Bug 240174 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:37:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240174] Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162337.l4GNbSsc013487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-TabularDisplay - Display text in formatted table output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240174 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162341.l4GNfeq4013597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-16 19:41 EST ------- Added missing br; imported and building. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:41:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162341.l4GNffgl013609@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 Bug 240333 depends on bug 240177, which changed state. Bug 240177 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:44:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162344.l4GNijA4013727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-16 19:44 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:44:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162344.l4GNikVh013739@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 Bug 240333 depends on bug 240207, which changed state. Bug 240207 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:50:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238230] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162350.l4GNotjm013909@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Action-RenderView - Sensible default end action for view renders https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238230 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-16 19:50 EST ------- Pod tests fail at the moment, hence we're not running the author tests. See also http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=27167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238233] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162353.l4GNriG8013991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-16 19:53 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238238] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162353.l4GNriEd014004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Devel - Catalyst Development Tools Alias: perl-Catalyst-Devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238238 Bug 238238 depends on bug 238233, which changed state. Bug 238233 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader - Load config files of various types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238233 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162354.l4GNse7g014049@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-16 19:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tastymenu Short Description: KMenu replacement Owners: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 16 23:56:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705162356.l4GNuPjG014157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-16 19:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kio_p7zip Short Description: Kio-slave for reading 7zip files Owners: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: lightsolphoenix at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 00:41:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240391] New: Review Request: testoob - Advanced unit testing framework for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240391 Summary: Review Request: testoob - Advanced unit testing framework for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dangerouslyinc.com/rpm/testoob/testoob.spec SRPM URL: http://dangerouslyinc.com/rpm/testoob/testoob-1.13-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Testoob is an advanced unit testing framework for Python. It integrates effortlessly with existing PyUnit (module ?unittest?) test suites. rpmlint output: (dev at kramer)[~/rpmbuild/SRPMS] % rpmlint testoob-1.13-1.fc7.src.rpm (dev at kramer)[~/rpmbuild/SRPMS] % (dev at kramer)[~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch] % rpmlint testoob-1.13-1.fc7.noarch.rpm E: testoob non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/testoob/compatibility/trace.py 0644 (dev at kramer)[~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch] % The script in question has an opening line of #!/usr/bin/env python but is not executable in the upstream source. If this is a problem I can submit a patch to the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 00:42:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170042.l4H0gxSX015535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-05-16 20:42 EST ------- Submitted a new review request for testoob in bug 240391. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 02:00:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170200.l4H20iNE018181@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-05-16 22:00 EST ------- NSS has versioned symbols so the minimum version is set when something is built against it so Dennis is right, we don't need Requires. Spec URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rcritten/jss.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/built/rpm_review/rcritten/jss-4.2.4-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 03:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170325.l4H3P0Rb027107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-16 23:24 EST ------- Issues fixed I approve JSS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 03:28:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170328.l4H3SriU027361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-16 23:28 EST ------- Here is the formal review. Good: - rpmlint is clean - package naming is in line with other fonts packages - spec has same name - meets packaging guidelines - licensed under GPL 2 - package includes COPYING file - spec file is legible - md5sum matches upstream tarball on Sourceforge 5055fdfb725da7e5a2a71765d9535419 wqy-bitmapfont-bdf-all-cvs20070506.tar.gz - package is noarch and builds successfully on my pre-F7 machine - package lists build dependencies - owns its own directories - filelist is correct - has %clean - macros used consistently - font content is permissible - cleans when doing %install - scriptlets are sane I have tested the font package lightly. The current fontconfig file seems less intrusive than before. The only obvious affect I notice on a Japanese desktop now is the "middle dot"(?) glyph used for password input is now changed to wider smaller dotted glyph. Package satisfies all MUST requirements. Thank you very much for contributing this package to Fedora. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 03:47:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170347.l4H3luvO028527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-16 23:47 EST ------- Just a small thing but I noticed some trailing whitespace in some lines of the spec file. It would be good to remove them before importing the package to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 03:56:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170356.l4H3uBmL029201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 mlum at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mlum at redhat.com 2007-05-16 23:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jss Short Description: Java Security Services (JSS) is a java native interface which provides a bridge for java-based applications to use native Network Security Services (NSS). Owners: rcritten at redhat.com,mlum at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 FC-7 (IIRC, there is a branch for FC-7 on 5/17?) InitialCC: nkwan at redhat.com,richm at redhat.com,nkinder at redhat.com,mharmsen at redhat.com,sparkins at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 04:10:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239154] Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170410.l4H4AKLa029822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: referencer - A document organiser and bibliography manager for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239154 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-17 00:10 EST ------- Package built for devel and FC-6, thanks to Kiyoshi Matsui and Mamoru Tasaka for the reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 04:17:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170417.l4H4HdKQ029974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-17 00:17 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 04:22:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170422.l4H4MOwb030101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-17 00:22 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 04:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170424.l4H4OJOA030201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-17 00:24 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 04:45:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240287] Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170445.l4H4jCbJ030827@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240287 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: muParser - |Review Request: muParser - |A fast math parser library |A fast math parser library CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-17 00:45 EST ------- A few issues I found: The compiler isn't called with the proper flags; I think it should suffice to call make like: make CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} Loads of errors like the following: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/muParser/html which are due to the same directories being included multipe times in %files: %{_docdir}/%{name} %{_docdir}/%{name}/html %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}/html/* It looks like you probably want to do the following at the end of %install instead of copying the files into the buildroot: mv docs/html . And then you can just have %doc html in %files which gets all of the html documentation under /usr/share/doc/muParser-devel-1.27/html. Lots of rpmlint warnings: W: muParser wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/muParser-1.27/License.txt And many others like it; these should be passed through tr or sed or dos2unix in to clean them up. E: muParser library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libmuparser.so.0.0.0 You need %post -p /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 04:51:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 00:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170451.l4H4pMhn031095@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-17 00:51 EST ------- i think that what im refering to is `-version-number MAJOR[:MINOR[:REVISION]]' If OUTPUT-FILE is a libtool library, compute interface version information so that the resulting library uses the specified major, minor and revision numbers. This is designed to permit libtool to be used with existing projects where identical version numbers are already used across operating systems. New projects should use the `-version-info' flag instead. the .so should be .so.1.1.0 not .so.0.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 05:38:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229123] Review Request: yum-arch - Extract headers from rpm in a old yum repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170538.l4H5cMiW001458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-arch - Extract headers from rpm in a old yum repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229123 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-17 01:38 EST ------- Warren, thanks for the job, but CentOS-4 comes with yum 2.4 which still provide yum-arch. RHEL-4 doesn't provide yum, but it will be usefull (yum-2.4 available on Dag repository). So i will not build "yum-arch" for EL-4. I think we need probably need yum in EPEL. What do you think ? Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 05:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239906] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170548.l4H5mFEk001857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239906 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-17 01:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Net-Ping Short Description: Execute ping Owners: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Branches: devel FC-5 FC-6 EL-5 (FC-7 ???) InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 05:49:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226391] Merge Review: scim-bridge In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170549.l4H5nvbc001889@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-bridge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226391 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 01:49 EST ------- (The scim website has been back up for a while now btw.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 05:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226391] Merge Review: scim-bridge In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170550.l4H5oPX4001927@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-bridge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226391 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 01:50 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-bridge New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 05:52:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170552.l4H5q6fG002042@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-17 01:52 EST ------- >> why don't you try to move then executable scripts to /etc then? Well, that implies to prevent from .rpmsave and .rpmnew and coulb be not the right things to do for exemple script. I think that /usr/share/doc/[packane_name_version] is more appropriate. (in reply to comment #13) is that missing something in this full review or if it's done, don't forget to set review flag to +. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 05:52:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239918] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170552.l4H5qY4Y002091@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239918 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-17 01:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Net-Traceroute Short Description: Execute traceroute Owners: Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Branches: devel FC-6 FC-5 EL-5 (FC-7 ??) InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 05:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226397] Merge Review: scim-qtimm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170552.l4H5qbKL002108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-qtimm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226397 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 01:52 EST ------- Thanks - closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 05:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226397] Merge Review: scim-qtimm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170553.l4H5r3C4002153@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-qtimm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226397 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 01:53 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-qtimm New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 06:01:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228212] Review Request: perl-Proc-Daemon - Run Perl program as a daemon process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170601.l4H61hFr002406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Proc-Daemon - Run Perl program as a daemon process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228212 Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 06:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170616.l4H6GvON002938@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-17 02:16 EST ------- The plague server has finally built mcpp package! There were some troubles in building this package on the servers of Fedora-project. 1. The plague server did not allow to enque building of this package for some reason, saying "Insufficient privileges". 2. I sent an e-mail to rel-eng at fedoraproject.org and requested tagging 'f7-final' to this package. The e-mail was, however, returned from the redhat mail server on error for some reason, saying "User unknown". 3. I tried to subscribe fedora-maintainers ML. The ML, however, did not respond to me for some reason. Then, my sponsor Mamoru Tasaka contacted to one of the Fedora administrators, and all the troubles above have been dissolved. Now, I close this bugzilla changing the "resolution" to NEXTRELEASE. Many thanks to Mamoru Tasaka! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 06:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170618.l4H6IHQi002998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-17 02:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) >> why don't you try to move then executable scripts to /etc then? > > Well, that implies to prevent from .rpmsave and .rpmnew and coulb be not the > right things to do for exemple script. OK. > > I think that /usr/share/doc/[packane_name_version] is more appropriate. > > > (in reply to comment #13) > is that missing something in this full review or if it's done, don't forget to > set review flag to +. ;-) That was done deliberately to first get some reply on above question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 06:18:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170618.l4H6IoZY003034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373 kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 06:42:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232623] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170642.l4H6g2hO003666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232623 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-17 02:41 EST ------- ping? I'm assuming this bug is closable now...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 06:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226392] Merge Review: scim-chewing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170643.l4H6hTr1003728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-chewing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226392 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 02:43 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-chewing New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 06:48:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170648.l4H6moMX003881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-17 02:48 EST ------- Assigning to myself; will do a formal review shortly... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 06:49:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170649.l4H6nVou003960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |faucamp at csir.co.za -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240287] Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170713.l4H7DqBE004816@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240287 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-05-17 03:13 EST ------- So fixed. The new URLs: SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/muParser-1.27-2.fc6.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/muParser.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226390] Merge Review: scim-anthy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170713.l4H7Dtum004847@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-anthy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226390 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 03:13 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-anthy New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:16:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226394] Merge Review: scim-m17n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170716.l4H7GSwP005070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-m17n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226394 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 03:16 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-m17n New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:17:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226398] Merge Review: scim-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170717.l4H7HkeA005190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226398 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226398] Merge Review: scim-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170718.l4H7IRlX005238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226398 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 03:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-sinhala New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226396] Merge Review: scim-pinyin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170719.l4H7JxxF005336@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-pinyin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226396 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:21:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226393] Merge Review: scim-hangul In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170721.l4H7LTth005448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-hangul https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226393 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-17 03:21 EST ------- ackage Change Request ====================== Package Name: scim-hangul New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:22:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170722.l4H7M63V005513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-17 03:22 EST ------- >> I'd prefer avoiding this. If the desktop file is sane enough and already >> provided, it's fine to install it directly. By using this command you make the desktop file available on the GNOME/KDE/SFCE menu (and/or panel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:30:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229591] Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170730.l4H7UmIU005793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-17 03:30 EST ------- If Source0 only exists for snapshots, then do not submit for review source rpms which rely on them. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-c17fb8c1ce9be40da720a2b25d1e2a241062038f and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL. Same goes for Changelog (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213 for details). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:41:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170741.l4H7fHev006264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-17 03:41 EST ------- > > I'd prefer avoiding this. If the desktop file is sane enough and already > > provided, it's fine to install it directly. > > By using this command you make the desktop file available on the GNOME/KDE/SFCE > menu (and/or panel). Hum, I really don't think desktop-file-install has aything to do with this. Maybe you're thinking of other tools like update-desktop-database and others, run from scriplets, which do some "magic"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170741.l4H7fuAV006337@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-17 03:41 EST ------- On the -registered issue: Good point in comment #13, I agree, and its good to have it in writing for future reference. Proceeding with review: MUST items: * rpmlint is silent on all binary and -debug packages * rpmlint output for src.rpm: W: rott patch-not-applied Patch99: rott-1.0-registered.patch -- This patch is applied during %build for the special -registered package; this is clearly commented in the spec * package is named well * spec file is named well * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package license is GPL, COPYING file included * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * spec file is written in American English and legible * package source md5sum matches upstream source: c1c6cbecf00f2229cf2e0053334dcfc1 rott-1.0.tar.gz * package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (PPC not tested) * BuildRequires are good * Requires are good * package handles locales properly (no locales) * package has no need for %post and %postun sections * package is not relocatable * package owns directories it creates * no duplicate entries in %files * file permissions are good * proper %clean section * spec file macros are used consistently * package contains only GPL'ed code, not content * no -doc, -devel subpackages necessary X- some docs are missing (see comment #5) * contents in %doc not required for runtime functionality of application * .desktop files present and properly handled SHOULD items: * package builds in mock (fc6/i386) * package functions properly on i386 and x86_64 Worth special mention: * the packager has taken every precaution and put a lot of effort into handling the (non-shipped) content required for both binary packages in order to improve end-user experience Hans, please just add the missing documentation files before importing the package. Other than that, everything looks fine. ------------------------- This package is APPROVED. ------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:50:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170750.l4H7oVZ8007149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-17 03:50 EST ------- What about this point from comment #17? > - Asterisk shouldn't run as root by default IMHO. If it's a QoS related > decision, it should be up to the user/admin to switch to using root. I've checked the 1.4.4 packages, and asterisk still defaults to running as root. While looking at this, I also noticed that the init script includes a commented out configuration section even though it supports setting all the options by creating an /etc/sysconfig/asterisk file. Since no configuration changes should be made inside the init script itself (this is now a policy), I'd suggest : - Installing a default /etc/sysconfig/asterisk file - Moving the "configuration" section from the init script to that file Also, unless it's absolutely impossible to run asterisk as non-root (which I doubt, since all my installs run as the asterisk user), I'd suggest having the /etc/sysconfig/asterisk file default to switching to the asterisk user and group, with a comment saying that by commenting out the entries, asterisk would run as root, that it might be useful in some setups, but that it also involves a higher risk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:56:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170756.l4H7utOZ007921@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-17 03:56 EST ------- Well, * This package (wuja) is okay. * For testoob, it is almost okay. - NOTE: for testoob, E: testoob non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/testoob/compatibility/trace.py 0644 means: - If this script is to be sourced, then this script should not have shebang - Otherwise (i.e. this script can be executed by user, for example), then this should have executable permission (normally 0755). For me this seems the latter case (i.e. permission should be changed to 0755) because of the comments on this script. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (wuja) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------- Please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". I will receive a mail which notices that you need a sponsor and then I will sponsor you. NOTE: Deep freeze for Fedora 7 is set as Thursday (on Boston time, perhaps). If you want to make this packaged included into _initial_ Fedora 7 release, you have to * rebuild this on koji * send a main to rel-eng to make the build on koji tagged with f7-final within TODAY! (Of course there is a way to include this package into Fedora 7 after Fedora 7 is released when the procedure didn't in time). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/DevelFreezePolicy http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoshBoyer/MergeHOWTO If you have some questions, please let me know! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:57:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170757.l4H7vUAn008040@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-17 03:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Hans, please just add the missing documentation files before importing the package. > Will do, and many thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rott Short Description: Rise of the Triad Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 07:58:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 03:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170758.l4H7wtbP008200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-05-17 03:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kftpgrabber Short Description: FTP client for K Desktop Environment Owners: johan at x-tnd.be Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: johan at x-tnd.be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 08:03:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 04:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222594] Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170803.l4H83LJn009116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 08:03:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 04:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233244] Review Request: libiptcdata - IPTC Metadata library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170803.l4H83oYX009202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libiptcdata - IPTC Metadata library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233244 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 08:48:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 04:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226396] Merge Review: scim-pinyin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170848.l4H8m78L013506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-pinyin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226396 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 09:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 05:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705170915.l4H9F9NP015621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-17 05:15 EST ------- Some more remarks: 1. License in not GPL as stated in the spec file. It's released under the X11 license. 2. A desktop file is missing. Is there a good reason? nagi must be run only from command line? (yes, I still hadn't time to run it...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 11:29:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171129.l4HBTLAA024161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 07:29 EST ------- >From #3: Fixed version. >From #4: 1. Ah, so it is. Oops. :) 2. Correct, command line only. In the games I've packaged thus far that are in review, I've included a desktop file that calls a wrapper script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 11:31:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171131.l4HBVZVh024379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 07:31 EST ------- Forgot links to new SRPM, Spec. But, rpmlint gives: W: nagi invalid-license X11 The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Academic Free License", "Adaptive Public License", "Apache License", "Apache Software License", "Apple Public Source License", "Artistic", "Attribution Assurance License", "BSD", "Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License", "CDDL", "CPL", "CUA Office Public License", "EU DataGrid Software License", "Eclipse Public License", "Educational Community License", "Eiffel Forum License", "Entessa Public License", "Fair License", "Frameworx License", "GPL", "LGPL", "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer", "IBM Public License", "Intel Open Source License", "Jabber Open Source License", "Lucent Public License", "MIT", "CVW License", "Motosoto License", "MPL", "NASA Open Source Agreement", "Naumen Public License", "Nethack General Public License", "Nokia Open Source License", "OCLC Research Public License", "Open Group Test Suite License", "Open Software License", "PHP License", "Python license", "Python Software Foundation License", "QPL", "RealNetworks Public Source License", "Reciprocal Public License", "Ricoh Source Code Public License", "Sleepycat License", "Sun Industry Standards Source License", "Sun Public License", "Sybase Open Watcom Public License", "University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License", "Vovida Software License", "W3C License", "wxWindows Library License", "X.Net License", "Zope Public License", "zlib/libpng License", "Creative Commons Attribution", "Creative Commons Attribution- NoDerivs", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial", "Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike", "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike", "Design Public License", "GFDL", "LaTeX Project Public License", "OpenContent License", "Open Publication License", "Public Domain", "Ruby License", "SIL Open Font License", "Charityware", "Commercial", "Distributable", "Freeware", "Non-distributable", "Proprietary", "Shareware", "Redistributable, no modification permitted". If the license is close to an existing one, you can use ' style'. Which one should I use? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 11:37:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171137.l4HBb1u3024684@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 07:36 EST ------- Disregard, MIT works just fine. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi-2.06-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 12:22:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171222.l4HCMu7Y028041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-17 08:22 EST ------- Instead of using %{__sed} you should use sed, for constistency with how you wrote make, rm, install, etc. I think you shouldn't use the original debian names for the patches, but rename them the fedora way (i.e. adding the version). You may optionally track the fact that these patches (and Source1) comes from Debian with some comment lines or a line in the changelog (that maybe useful for you and others to remember where these originated). There is no configure, so why adding this comment line? #./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=%{_mandir} --libdir=%{_libdir} In the %install section: mkdir -p %{buildroot} is not needed. Just create the directory you need before installing something there. Therefore, before: install -D -m755 ../bin/nagi %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/nagi add the following line (as you have done in the rest of this section): mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_bindir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 12:39:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171239.l4HCd40X028888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 08:39 EST ------- Corrected the sed, configure, mkdir issues. Where is the patch naming convention documented? If it isn't, what should it look like? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 13:01:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171301.l4HD1qDk030834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-17 09:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Where is the patch naming > convention documented? If it isn't, what should it look like? I can't search for it right now, but if we trust my memory :-) you should use the following syntax: name-version-patch_description.patch Please note that version should not be written as %{version}, since you could reuse it in a newer release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 13:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171323.l4HDNoOw000945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-05-17 09:23 EST ------- Why compile support for esound? I even wonder why we need arts support after 2002 or 2003 (I can't remember exactly when alsa introduces support for software mixing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 13:26:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171326.l4HDQ5vO001118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ekiga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 13:36:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171336.l4HDa4GB001844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 09:36 EST ------- Fixed. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi-2.06-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 14:05:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 10:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171405.l4HE5HQk003900@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-17 10:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > i think that what im refering to is > > `-version-number MAJOR[:MINOR[:REVISION]]' ... > numbers are already used across operating systems. New projects > should use the `-version-info' flag instead. > > the .so should be .so.1.1.0 not .so.0.0.0 The description says "New projects should use the -version-info flag instead." I see a real mix of usage in /usr/lib - some libs use -version-number, some use -version-info, some are just .so with no version (or version in the name e.g. libnspr4.so). Is there a page on the fedoraproject wiki that describes library naming and versioning conventions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 15:37:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171537.l4HFbEg9011960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-17 11:37 EST ------- New version with level-editor .desktop file here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ants.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ants-1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm I'll try to start reviewing your AGI stuff tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 15:49:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171549.l4HFnRvr013219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat.com 2007-05-17 11:49 EST ------- Hey! This is just a notice that with the new boost release, and after fedora 7 gets out the door, I intend to start hacking on this stuff again, with the goal of merging in as much of Patrice's work, then moving to the boost-1.34 codebase and that work from january on the srpms, and then rebasing f7 for this new version of boost. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 15:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171553.l4HFr7vx013825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 11:53 EST ------- Ah, much more elegant. APPROVED. Thanks for the tit-for-tat. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 16:13:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171613.l4HGD2tC018463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-17 12:13 EST ------- I've split out strigi-libs sub-package from the main package and included an autostart desktop file for strigidaemon in the main package. Package has been built for devel and FC-6. Thanks to all that contributed to the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 16:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171619.l4HGJhT9019148@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-17 12:19 EST ------- Shouldn't %{_datadir}/strigi/ also be in -libs? Or is that data really not needed for the libs to work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 17:16:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171716.l4HHGAiM024845@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-17 13:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ants Short Description: Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 17:18:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171718.l4HHIl56025145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-17 13:18 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: I am now sponsoring) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 17:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171725.l4HHPJkk026014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-17 13:25 EST ------- one more ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:09:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171809.l4HI986T031550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-17 14:09 EST ------- I just compiled this for the dgae review, which led to me noticing the following: MUST FIX: use and honor $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:17:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171817.l4HIHXGQ032360@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-17 14:17 EST ------- One more note: --------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -qn src %build ......... sed -i 's/\r//' ../license.txt sed -i 's/\r//' ../readme.html ......... %files %defattr(-,root,root) %doc ../license.txt ../readme.html ......... ----------------------------------------------------------- This situation cannot be accepted. When I rebuild this srpm, license.txt, readme.txt are left undeleted under BUILD/ directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:27:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171827.l4HIRFib001075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-17 14:27 EST ------- The libtool doc is wrong. The versioning scheme implemented by -version-info not only doesn't match how ELF works, it doesn't match how _any_ extant executable format works. It's a fiction. Use -version-number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:29:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171829.l4HIT0md001147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-17 14:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Shouldn't %{_datadir}/strigi/ also be in -libs? Or is that data really not > needed for the libs to work? No, I don't think the fieldproperties are required for the libs to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171829.l4HITNbd001224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-17 14:29 EST ------- And. * Please keep timestamps For install, please use "install -p" (check the "Timestamps" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171835.l4HIZSUb001829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-17 14:35 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: E: dgae zero-length /usr/share/dgae/snddir This is "normal" for this package and can be ignored * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream (as explained in the comment) * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissable content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * .desktop file as required and properly installed Must FIX ======== * The URL field is invalid, change it to: http://membres.lycos.fr/agisite/agisite.htm * Drop the bogus " dg" argument to %setup * readme.txt is not in UTF-8 , this fixes it: iconv -f IBM850 -t UTF8 readme.txt > readme.txt.tmp mv readme.txt.tmp readme.txt Should fix ========== * Change the last line of dgae-wrapper.sh from 'nagi' to 'exec nagi "$@"' the exec removes a useless bash instance from memory (since the script does nothing after the nagi line, bash can just be replaced with nagi instead of nagi running under bash. the "$@" passed any cmdline args given to the script to nagi (although it seems that nagi takes no cmdline args??). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:37:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171837.l4HIbnIS002050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:39:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171839.l4HIdq40002198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 14:39 EST ------- Fixed OPT_FLAGS (I think), build path issue and timestamps. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/nagi/nagi-2.06-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:46:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171846.l4HIkjSq003151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 14:46 EST ------- Fixed all the musts and shoulds above. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/dgae/dgae.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/dgae/dgae-1.1-2.src.rpm I'll apply these to serguei's destiny where applicable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:50:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171850.l4HIo5Zk003308@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-17 14:50 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is empty * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines 0 License NOT ok! * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream (as explained in the comment) * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissable content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * .desktop file as required and properly installed Must FIX ======== * The readme says this game is freeware, not public domain, freeware is an ambigous term, please contact upstream for clarification, this is a blocker! * Drop the bogus " sergueis-destiny" argument to %setup * sergeui.txt is not in UTF-8 , this fixes it: iconv -f IBM850 -t UTF8 sergeui.txt > tmp mv tmp sergeui.txt Should fix ========== * Change the last line of dgae-wrapper.sh from 'nagi' to 'exec nagi "$@"' the exec removes a useless bash instance from memory (since the script does nothing after the nagi line, bash can just be replaced with nagi instead of nagi running under bash. the "$@" passed any cmdline args given to the script to nagi (although it seems that nagi takes no cmdline args??). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:53:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171853.l4HIrN0G003486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-17 14:53 EST ------- looks good, approved! (atill has to wait for nagi though. Xavier seems to be somewhat slow there, maybe you should ping him asking him to step down if he doesn't have the time, you can tell him you have another reviewer ready to go :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 18:53:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171853.l4HIrj3T003569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 14:53 EST ------- Fixed all of the above save the License blocker. Will investigate. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/sergueis-destiny/sergueis-destiny.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/sergueis-destiny/sergueis-destiny-1.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 19:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171901.l4HJ1S1u004728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-17 15:01 EST ------- Posted to forum: http://www.agigames.com/forum/index.php?topic=10514.msg89361#msg89361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 19:34:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] New: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vavoom.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vavoom-1.23-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Vavoom is an enhanced open-source port of Doom. Allowing you to play not only the classic 3D first-person shooter Doom, but also the Doom derived classics Heretic, Hexen and Strife. Compared to the original games it adds extra features such as translucency and freelook support and ofcourse the capability to play these classics under Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 19:48:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225979] Merge Review: lam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705171948.l4HJm0Q4009513@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225979 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-05-17 15:47 EST ------- A newer version of lam that corrects a problem in the lam.pc and lam.module files has been built. A few other tidy-ups happened as well. As for the use of the alternatives system, I'm currently working with upstream for openmpi and mvapich to work out a system that is acceptable to both of them. Once that system is finalized, I'll update lam to match. And, I agree, the alternatives method, while usable, is not really optimal for mpi stacks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 20:28:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172028.l4HKSkY8013304@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-17 16:28 EST ------- New version, with several bug fixes and review issues addressed. Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Source tarball: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.1.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 20:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172055.l4HKtg2r014987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 20:57:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172057.l4HKvE2G015149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239906] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172100.l4HL0uTL015388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Ping - Execute ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239906 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:05:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172105.l4HL5kmG015928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 ------- Additional Comments From akontsevich at mail.ru 2007-05-17 17:05 EST ------- No changes had been made to its spec? Some CVS, SVN? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:09:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239918] Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172109.l4HL9x0k016089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-Traceroute - Execute traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239918 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172110.l4HLAicr016146@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:11:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172111.l4HLBJHd016188@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:12:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172112.l4HLCBxY016265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:34:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240497] New: Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest-1.14.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Non-parametric bootstrap and permutation resampling-based multiple testing procedures for controlling the family-wise error rate (FWER), generalized family-wise error rate (gFWER), tail probability of the proportion of false positives (TPPFP), and false discovery rate (FDR). It is my first package I am seeking for a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:37:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172137.l4HLbbK8018257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: R-multtest |Review Request: R-multtest |1.14.0 - Resampling-based |1.14.0 - Resampling-based |multiple hypothesis testing |multiple hypothesis testing |library |library OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:45:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240500] New: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240500 Summary: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Biobase-1.14/R-Biobase.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Biobase-1.14/R-Biobase-1.14.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Description: Functions that are needed by many other packages or which replace R functions This is my second package submited here. It is needed for my first package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:45:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240500] Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172145.l4HLjMHM019105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240500 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 21:58:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172158.l4HLw65g020011@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-05-17 17:58 EST ------- Happy May 17, it's the Norwegian Constitution Day! varnish-1.0.4 is on the stairs, banging at the door. Adding 1.0.3 to Fedora, and then upgrade directly afterwards seems a little unnecessary, so I'll wait a few days before the final commit. Till then, please have a look at this build, based on the svn 1.0 branch. It's pretty close to what the final 1.0.4 will look like. Changes in the rpm package are as follows. Comments are very welcome. * The included vcl config has changed name (upstream change) * varnishlog is now able to daemonize properly, has got an init script and a logrotate script * The sysconfig file has changed a bit (to the better), and is now more or less in sync with the Debian defaults file. Varnish' init script is changed to reflect this. * pidfile support in the init scripts and other cosmetic changes src.rpm: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/fedora-extras-commit/varnish-1.0.svn-20070517.src.rpm specfile: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/fedora-extras-commit/varnish.spec Ingvar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 22:12:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172212.l4HMCthh020586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-05-17 18:12 EST ------- Seems I'm not authorized to set fedora-cvs flag on this ticket yet. Spoke to #fedora-devel, they think it may be a synchronization issue so I will try again later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 22:42:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172242.l4HMgSKj021758@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 17 22:43:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705172243.l4HMhb03021805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-05-17 18:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wuja Short Description: Google Calendar integration for the GNOME desktop. Owners: dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 00:08:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 213657] Review Request: openib - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705180008.l4I08JZx025597@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openib - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213657 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED Summary|Review Request: openib - |Review Request: openib - |Upstream OFED package to |Upstream OFED package to |support InfiniBand hardware |support InfiniBand hardware ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-05-17 20:08 EST ------- Dropping this review request in preference to separate InfiniBand packages instead of this monolithic, huge package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 03:10:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705180310.l4I3AqWR005037@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-17 23:10 EST ------- source files match upstream: 3f3aedc553e9f4eb9c0a1e9e6e047bf4 adminutil-1.1.1.tar.bz2 3f3aedc553e9f4eb9c0a1e9e6e047bf4 ../SOURCES/adminutil-1.1.1.tar.bz2 package meets naming and versioning guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. LGPL License text included in package. latest version is being packaged. compiler flags are appropriate. %clean is present. package builds in mock ( devel x86_64). package installs properly debuginfo package looks complete. rpmlint says W: adminutil-devel no-documentation owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no libtool .la droppings. not a GUI app. Needs work: final provides and requires are sane: all devel packages with .pc packages need to Requires: pkgconfig pkgconfig should not be BuildRequires it is provided by the devel packages that are BuildRequires and provide .pc files i filed bug# 240516 # cyrus-sasl-devel is required because mozldap uses it BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel mozldap-devel should require it if this is the case. Fix these small issues and i will approve adminutil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 03:32:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239884] Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705180332.l4I3WUKB006534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liberation-fonts - Fonts to replace commonly used Microsoft Windows Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239884 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE CC| |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 03:46:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705180346.l4I3kZ8P007563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-17 23:46 EST ------- thank you so much Jens. I am so glad to get my first Fedora package approved. I am also appreciated for your patience going thought all these details, and forgive my slowness in learning. I saw the cvsextras group in my account was approved, so, I will upload the package in the next couple of days after examining every detail (and remove the extra trailing space as well). again, thank you, and Ingvar, Mamoru, Zheng and Yijun. I hope you don't mind me bothering with more questions in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 09:54:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 05:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223586] Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705180954.l4I9ssfk027601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: strigi - A desktop search program for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223586 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-18 05:54 EST ------- I guess we'll see, if it breaks KDE 3.90.1, I'll just file a separate bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 10:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 06:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226338] Merge Review: PyQt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181055.l4IAtVIG030209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: PyQt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226338 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2007-05-18 06:55 EST ------- it seems the CVS has problem i cannot connect to CVS server. I will add the change in CVS when CVS works again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 11:45:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181145.l4IBjApF001354@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-18 07:45 EST ------- Xavier, if you'd like, Hans has expressed an interest in carrying on with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 11:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 07:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181148.l4IBmdkO001694@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-05-18 07:48 EST ------- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 12:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240543] New: Review Request: dsmidiwifi - remote controll midi with your Nintendo DS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240543 Summary: Review Request: dsmidiwifi - remote controll midi with your Nintendo DS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/dsmidiwifi.spec SRPM URL: http://www-users.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de/~tmaas/fedora/repo/dsmidiwifi-1.01a-1.src.rpm Description: An application that runs on the computer and forwards the MIDI messages received via Wifi to MIDI applications. Mainly used by Nintendo DS homebrew applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 12:46:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 08:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181246.l4ICkpTs004971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-18 08:46 EST ------- Reply on forum: http://www.agigames.com/forum/index.php?topic=10514.msg89362#msg89362 Well, that's it then. Withdrawing review, closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 13:09:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181309.l4ID9XRv007950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-18 09:09 EST ------- Hmm, this is not a problem "Freeware means free of cost but cannot be edited without my permission", content does not have to be modifiable, as long as its distributable. What is a problem is this: "There is something to tell you before include Serguei's destiny in your site. Serguei's destiny uses agipal, an agi hack let you to custom the 16 colors. Nagi does not support agipal (unless I missed the last version). The screen will shake forever." But maybe some other agi player supports it? What really is a problem is this: "Yes. You can put Serguei's destiny in your site but not in package with Fedora." I think there might be some communication problem here, assuming the agipal problem can be fixed, you could try explaining that a fedora package is just another sort of zip file and that the contained files will not be modified. Another option for this and other freeware agi games would be to make an agi-freeware-installer package which contains .desktop files and .sh wrappers and uses autodownloader to download the files when the games are first started from the menu. Do "yum install xu4" and then start Ultima 4 from the menu, or take a look at the rott and vavoom reviews (linked to from the Games SIG page) for some more info about / examples of autodownloader usage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 13:24:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] New: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-findlib.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-findlib-1.1.2pl1-1.src.rpm Description: Findlib is a fundamental OCaml tool for building OCaml packages. (This is my first ever Fedora package, so go easy ..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 14:25:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181425.l4IEP9Tc016038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-18 10:25 EST ------- Hmm, I can't get to either of your .specs. . . I'll try xu4. My new forum post: http://www.agigames.com/forum/index.php?topic=10514.msg89364#msg89364 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 14:34:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181434.l4IEYMhj017198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-18 10:34 EST ------- autodownloader is elegant, but I think unneccesary in this case. With AGI, data and logic are intertwined. I think if I can convince him that we won't modify it, we're in the clear. Might have to write up some license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 14:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] New: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-calendar-1.10-1.src.rpm Description: This is a Fedora package for Julien Signole's OCaml calendar library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 15:04:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181504.l4IF4Dud020543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 ------- Additional Comments From kmatsui at t3.rim.or.jp 2007-05-18 11:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > No changes had been made to its spec? Some CVS, SVN? Hello Aleksey, What do you mean? Anyway, a new Fedora package must be reviewed, must be revised to conform to the Fedora packaging guidelines, and must be approved by an assignee. Then, it will be permitted to put in Fedora's cvs. About this process, refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join I recommend you first to revise the package, then upload it as an attachement to this page as the current one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 15:12:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181512.l4IFC1ZZ021344@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-18 11:11 EST ------- New spec and rpm uploaded. I switched back to hard coding 1.8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 15:12:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181512.l4IFC3rW021377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-18 11:12 EST ------- ( Just a fix as a f8 branch is now created) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wuja Short Description: Google Calendar integration for the GNOME desktop. Owners: dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com Branches: FC-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 15:29:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196601] Review Request: python-vobject - A python library for manipulating vCard and vCalendar files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181529.l4IFTjqg022876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vobject - A python library for manipulating vCard and vCalendar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196601 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-05-18 11:29 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-vobject Updated Fedora Owners: jbowes at redhat.com, dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 15:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181558.l4IFwUvA027521@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-18 11:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dgae Short Description: a short AGI adventure game Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 16:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240324] Review Request: telepathy-idle - IRC connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181652.l4IGqh1R032585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-idle - IRC connection manager for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240324 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-18 12:52 EST ------- Hello; Firstly this is my first attempt to review so something can be convoluted. In this case correct me please. Version 0.0.5 isn't the newest. Here is 0.1.0: http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-idle/telepathy-idle-0.1.0.tar.gz Otherwise, check for telepathy-idle-0.0.5-1: (looks fine) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK, clear * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK, I think so. * MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. OK; LGPL * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK; LGPL 2.1, February 1999 * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK; COPYING * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK; 4e782df6d3858b4886d3a23be475c17e * MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK; i386 * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK; no ExcluseArch meanwhile; No notice from upstream. * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. OK * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK * MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. OK * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK * MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK * MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK; * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK; There is no header files in telepathy-idle package. * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Ok * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK; Not devel * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK; No GUI. * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK; simple ASCII --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 17:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181706.l4IH6FfB001082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-18 13:06 EST ------- Any progress? I have a new package depending on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 17:22:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181722.l4IHMOvB002185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-18 13:22 EST ------- rathann, could you fix the liblapack.so conflict between lapack and atlas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 17:26:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240594] New: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240594 Summary: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/cmigemo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/cmigemo-1.3-0.1.c_MIT.fc7.src.rpm Mock build log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-cmigemo.log Description: C/Migemo is a C interface of Ruby/Migemo, a Japanese incremental search tool by Romaji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 17:35:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181735.l4IHZTHq003444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-18 13:35 EST ------- >When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other >person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report >so that I can check your comments or review request. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240324 Hello, I've tried to post comment review package, but it's monotonous, i can't find any problem. So I still continue (it may also take while) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 17:40:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181740.l4IHexle004867@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-18 13:40 EST ------- >Hello, I've tried to post comment review package, I am sorry; it makes no sense. It should be: I've tried to post comment to review package process, (^ I believe it's better) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 17:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181748.l4IHmEoP005822@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-18 13:48 EST ------- There's no conflict. atlas' lapack is in a different directory (%{_libdir}/atlas/ IIRC). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 18:28:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181828.l4IISX4r009518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-18 14:28 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------ This package (ruby-shadow) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a stage, you will submit a request which tells sponsor members that you need a sponsor. After you do so, please let me know on this bug for confirmation. Then I will sponsor you. Note: now Fedora 8 branch is created, the valid branches on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure is: FC-5, FC-6, F7 and devel. If you have some questions, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 18:28:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181828.l4IISksF009722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-18 14:28 EST ------- Well, * For ruby-ncurses itself: - For commands, please choose to use either command name or macros for consistency. For example, current spec file uses both "chmod" and "%{__chmod}". And where "make" is written directly, "%{__rm}" is used with macro... If you want to use macros as possible (for commands), please change "make" to "%{__make}", "chmod" to "%{__chmod}", and INSTALL="install -p" to INSTALL="%{__install} -p". (Of course make %{__install} is wrong) * For review - Well, the review request you chose seems easy, but I will trust you. Okay!! ------------------------------------------------------ This package (ruby-ncurses) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a stage, you will submit a request which tells sponsor members that you need a sponsor. After you do so, please let me know on this bug for confirmation. Then I will sponsor you. Note: now Fedora 8 branch is created, the valid branches on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure is: FC-5, FC-6, F7 and devel. If you have some questions, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 18:44:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181844.l4IIivFD011106@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-18 14:44 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 18:56:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240607] New: Review Request: pidgin-guifications - Guifications notification plugin for Pidgin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240607 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-guifications - Guifications notification plugin for Pidgin Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stu at nosnilmot.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nosnilmot.com/fedora/pidgin-guifications.spec SRPM URL: http://nosnilmot.com/fedora/pidgin-guifications-2.14-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Update of the gaim-guifications package to new upstream release & rename for the change in name of Gaim -> Pidgin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 19:07:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240607] Review Request: pidgin-guifications - Guifications notification plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181907.l4IJ78uq012859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-guifications - Guifications notification plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240607 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-18 15:07 EST ------- rpmlint is clean, spec looks good. APPROVED and I'm branching in FC-6 (for later), F-7 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 19:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240607] Review Request: pidgin-guifications - Guifications notification plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705181913.l4IJDYAL013283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-guifications - Guifications notification plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240607 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-18 15:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-guifications Short Description: Guifications Plugin for Pidgin Owners: rvokal at redhat.com,stu at nosnilmot.com,wtogami at redhat.com Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 20:01:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] New: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stu at nosnilmot.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nosnilmot.com/fedora/purple-galago.spec SRPM URL: http://nosnilmot.com/fedora/purple-galago-0.5.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: gaim-galago renamed to purple-galago (as agreed with upstream) and patched to work with libpurple (usable by any libpurple based client such as Pidgin or Finch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 20:09:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182009.l4IK9D0b018999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(stu at nosnilmot.com) ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-18 16:09 EST ------- Not quite a minimal buildroot error during autoreconf... Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3462 + umask 022 + cd /home/builder2/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/builder2/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf gaim-galago-0.5.1 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/builder2/rpmbuild/SOURCES/gaim-galago-0.5.1.tar.bz2 + tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd gaim-galago-0.5.1 ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 502 = 0 ']' ++ /usr/bin/id -u + '[' 502 = 0 ']' + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + echo 'Patch #0 (gaim-galago-purple.patch):' Patch #0 (gaim-galago-purple.patch): + patch -p1 -b --suffix .purple -s + autoreconf -f configure.ac:67: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE ../../lib/autoconf/specific.m4:331: AC_GNU_SOURCE is expanded from... /usr/share/aclocal/lock.m4:29: gl_LOCK_EARLY_BODY is expanded from... /usr/share/aclocal/lock.m4:22: gl_LOCK_EARLY is expanded from... /usr/share/aclocal/lock.m4:248: gl_LOCK is expanded from... /usr/share/aclocal/intl.m4:162: gt_INTL_SUBDIR_CORE is expanded from... /usr/share/aclocal/intl.m4:25: AM_INTL_SUBDIR is expanded from... /usr/share/aclocal/gettext.m4:57: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is expanded from... configure.ac:67: the top level configure.ac:67: warning: AC_RUN_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE configure.ac:67: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE ../../lib/autoconf/specific.m4:331: AC_GNU_SOURCE is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8451: gl_LOCK_EARLY_BODY is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8444: gl_LOCK_EARLY is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8670: gl_LOCK is expanded from... aclocal.m4:857: gt_INTL_SUBDIR_CORE is expanded from... aclocal.m4:720: AM_INTL_SUBDIR is expanded from... aclocal.m4:97: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is expanded from... configure.ac:67: the top level configure.ac:67: warning: AC_RUN_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE configure.ac:67: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE ../../lib/autoconf/specific.m4:331: AC_GNU_SOURCE is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8451: gl_LOCK_EARLY_BODY is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8444: gl_LOCK_EARLY is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8670: gl_LOCK is expanded from... aclocal.m4:857: gt_INTL_SUBDIR_CORE is expanded from... aclocal.m4:720: AM_INTL_SUBDIR is expanded from... aclocal.m4:97: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is expanded from... configure.ac:67: the top level configure.ac:67: warning: AC_RUN_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE configure.ac:67: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE ../../lib/autoconf/specific.m4:331: AC_GNU_SOURCE is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8451: gl_LOCK_EARLY_BODY is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8444: gl_LOCK_EARLY is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8670: gl_LOCK is expanded from... aclocal.m4:857: gt_INTL_SUBDIR_CORE is expanded from... aclocal.m4:720: AM_INTL_SUBDIR is expanded from... aclocal.m4:97: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is expanded from... configure.ac:67: the top level configure.ac:67: warning: AC_RUN_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE configure.ac:67: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE ../../lib/autoconf/specific.m4:331: AC_GNU_SOURCE is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8451: gl_LOCK_EARLY_BODY is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8444: gl_LOCK_EARLY is expanded from... aclocal.m4:8670: gl_LOCK is expanded from... aclocal.m4:857: gt_INTL_SUBDIR_CORE is expanded from... aclocal.m4:720: AM_INTL_SUBDIR is expanded from... aclocal.m4:97: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is expanded from... configure.ac:67: the top level configure.ac:67: warning: AC_RUN_IFELSE was called before AC_GNU_SOURCE configure.ac:67: required file `./config.rpath' not found autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.3462 (%prep) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 20:09:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182009.l4IK9VqJ019060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-18 16:09 EST ------- It seems that you approved me already while bugzilla was down, thanks. Let me have a look at the docs and I'll fill the template for the branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 20:22:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] New: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/pixman.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/pixman-0.9.0-0.20070518.src.rpm Description: pixman is the common rendering code from cairo and the X server, but now it's a real shared library. Note: we don't actually need this in the OS yet, right now this is just to have a place to point people who are looking for builds. X server in git requires this, so. Built RPMs also available from http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 20:38:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182038.l4IKcfXq021708@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-18 16:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wqy-bitmap-fonts Short Description: WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts Owners: fangqq at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 20:39:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182039.l4IKdQ8m021787@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 fangqq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 20:48:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182048.l4IKm3he023569@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-05-18 16:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-checkstyle Short Description: Checkstyle plugin for Eclipse Owners: rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu,overholt at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 20:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 16:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182059.l4IKxL3a024538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |227583 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 21:01:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182101.l4IL14mq024772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-18 17:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wqy-bitmap-fonts Short Description: WenQuanYi Bitmap Chinese Fonts Owners: fangqq at gmail.com Branches: FC-5,FC-6 InitialCC: petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 21:06:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182106.l4IL6i4h025250@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240441 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 21:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182123.l4ILNsE8026538@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |150226 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-18 17:23 EST ------- Renaming and replacement of gaim-galago is necessary for F7 for upgrade path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 21:29:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182129.l4ILTKiB027020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-18 17:29 EST ------- I've already submitted a patch upstream to rename the package. I just haven't had time to backport it to Fedora yet. (It shouldn't take much effort, and I can probably get to it sometime this weekend). http://trac.galago-project.org/attachment/ticket/134/purple.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 21:51:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182151.l4ILpij8028528@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-05-18 17:51 EST ------- http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg2-0-0.7.20070427.src.rpm http://rpm.greysector.net/extras/ekg2.spec How about now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 23:17:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182317.l4INHYOk032479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-18 19:17 EST ------- Hi Richard, I'll do a prereview in a day or so, as it's your first package I'm going to assume you don't have CVS access (I've set the review to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR) so I won't be able to actually approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 23:43:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182343.l4INhqgp001022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-18 19:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gammu Short Description: Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones Owners: lxtnow at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 23:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231085] Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182356.l4INunlg001361@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231085 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-18 19:56 EST ------- Imported, builds requested, etc. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 23:57:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232036] Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182357.l4INvH3Y001394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible Alias: perl-YAML-Tiny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-18 19:57 EST ------- Imported, builds requested, etc. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 23:58:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182358.l4INw462001426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-18 19:58 EST ------- Imported, builds requested, etc. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 18 23:58:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705182358.l4INwRbq001473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-18 19:58 EST ------- Imported, builds requested, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 00:14:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 20:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] New: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-Dist-Build/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.05-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build.spec Description: CPANPLUS::Dist::Build is a distribution class for Module::Build related modules. Using this package, you can create, install and uninstall perl modules. It inherits from CPANPLUS::Dist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 00:44:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 20:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190044.l4J0icHb002643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 stu at nosnilmot.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(stu at nosnilmot.com)| ------- Additional Comments From stu at nosnilmot.com 2007-05-18 20:44 EST ------- New SPEC file: http://nosnilmot.com/fedora/purple-galago.spec New SRPM file: http://nosnilmot.com/fedora/purple-galago-0.5.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Instead of trying to autoreconf during build, use a patch to generated auto* files from a known working FC6 system. Builds in mach (mock can't make usable buildroots for me at the moment) with fedora-devel buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 01:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 21:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240635] New: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240635 Summary: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/mash.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/mash-0.1.8-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: mash is a tool that queries a koji buildsystem for the latest RPMs for any particular tag, and creates repositories of those RPMs, including any multlib RPMs necesary. This is what we're using to build rawhide trees. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 01:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 21:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190113.l4J1DLwh003444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-18 21:13 EST ------- APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: purple-galago Short Description: Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients Owners: bpepple at fedoraproject.org,stu at nosnilmot.com,wtogami at redhat.com Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 03:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 23:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] New: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/URI-Fetch/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-URI-Fetch-0.08-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-URI-Fetch.spec Description: URI::Fetch is a smart client for fetching HTTP pages, notably syndication feeds (RSS, Atom, and others), in an intelligent, bandwidth and time saving way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 03:18:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 23:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190318.l4J3Ifv5008390@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-URI-Fetch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 04:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 00:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190429.l4J4TNbf010878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xournal - |Review Request: xournal - |Take notes, sketch and |Take notes, sketch and |annotate PDFs |annotate PDFs Alias| |xournal ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-05-19 00:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/xournal.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/xournal-0.3.3-2.fc7.src.rpm Added gnome and kde mime support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 05:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 01:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239901] Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190551.l4J5pjYu013079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-05-19 01:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The package builds fine; rpmlint says: > W: corkscrew summary-ended-with-dot Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. > Should be a trivial fix. Fixed. > Note that Source0: should be a URL, so that spectool, for example, can download > the source. Fixed. > You must include the license text (COPYING) and really should include the rest > of the included documentation (AUTHORS, ChangeLog, TODO) as %doc. Done. > Have you investigated how other distros package this program? Debian includes a > manpage and a couple of bugfix patches. I have imported the online manual page, and some modifications to README and corkscrew.c from Debian. I have also put in a patch for a typo in README. > Finally, are you sponsored? A quick search didn't turn you up as the owner of > any other packages. If you don't have a sponsor, you'll need to add > FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the "Bug 239901 blocks" field and point out reviews that > you've done or other packages you've submitted so that the sponsors will have > enough information to decide whether they would like to sponsor you. No. I am not sponsored and have not yet reviewed any packages for Fedora since I am very new to packaging myself. My involvement with Fedora till now has been in the form of bug reports and a successful Summer of Code proposal (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SummerOfCode/2007/DebarshiRay). Apart from Fedora I contribute to GNU too. NB: The modified SRPM and SPEC file are available at the links mentioned in the initial review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 05:59:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 01:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] New: (Renamed Package) Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 Summary: (Renamed Package) Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter at thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/SPECs/pidgin-libnotify.spec SRPM URL: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/SRPMs/pidgin-libnotify-0.12-6.fc7.src.rpm As I discussed with Warren Togami via IRC earlier this evening, this is the new package for the libnotify plugin now that Gaim has been renamed to Pidgin. I've emailed the upstream author to ask him about the rename again. It builds fine in mock; and works just fine with Pidgin 2.0.0-3.fc7 from my testing. Rpmlint is silent on both the source and binary RPMs. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 06:51:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 02:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] (Renamed Package) Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190651.l4J6paF2014125@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: (Renamed Package) Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-19 02:51 EST ------- ? While you renamed the package name to pidgin-libnotify, why did you leave the name of the module as gaim-libnotify.so and gettext .mo files as gaim-libnotify?? * Why do you have this package provide "gaim-libnotify = 0.12-6", not gaim-libnotify = %{version}-%{release}" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 06:52:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 02:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190652.l4J6qtmf014189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|(Renamed Package) Review |Review Request: pidgin- |Request: pidgin-libnotify - |libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin |Libnotify Pidgin plugin |plugin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 07:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 03:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190713.l4J7Dp1W014700@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-19 03:13 EST ------- * And also check documentation. At least the contents of README should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 07:43:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 03:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190743.l4J7hXFS015548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-05-19 03:43 EST ------- Sorry, forgot to update URLs: SPEC: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout.spec SRPM: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout-0.2.114.svn162-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 07:52:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 03:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190752.l4J7qQSf016338@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-05-19 03:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ? While you renamed the package name to pidgin-libnotify, > why did you leave the name of the module as gaim-libnotify.so > and gettext .mo files as gaim-libnotify?? The current patch merely fixes it to build against the new API of Pidgin/Libpurple. The output shared library and gettext modules are not renamed because it did not seem necessary to do so to provide the functionality of the plugin (and would increase the amount of downstream patching for an insignificant benefit). > * Why do you have this package provide "gaim-libnotify = 0.12-6", > not gaim-libnotify = %{version}-%{release}" ? Hmm. I don't remember why I hardcoded those. :) Fixed in 0.12-7, and the files are on my webspace: Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/SPECs/pidgin-libnotify.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/SRPMs/pidgin-libnotify-0.12-7.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #2) > * And also check documentation. At least the contents > of README should be fixed. I didn't include the README because it contains nothing relevant to this package, just a brief description (which the RPM information already contains) and some generic build instructions (which are unnecessary for end-users): "gaim-libnotify About ===== Gaim-libnotify provides a libnotify interface to Gaim INSTALL ======= ./configure --with-gaim=PATH/TO/GAIM make make install" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 07:52:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 03:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190752.l4J7qiZk016387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin Alias: pidgin-libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pidgin-libnotify -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 07:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 03:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190753.l4J7r7pC016461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin Alias: pidgin-libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237264 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 08:15:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 04:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190815.l4J8FnXX018769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin Alias: pidgin-libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-19 04:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > ? While you renamed the package name to pidgin-libnotify, > > why did you leave the name of the module as gaim-libnotify.so > > and gettext .mo files as gaim-libnotify?? > > The current patch merely fixes it to build against the new API of > Pidgin/Libpurple. Okay. > > * Why do you have this package provide "gaim-libnotify = 0.12-6", > > not gaim-libnotify = %{version}-%{release}" ? > > Fixed in 0.12-7, and the files Confirmed. > (In reply to comment #2) > > * And also check documentation. At least the contents > > of README should be fixed. > > I didn't include the README Actually... Okay. -------------------------------------------- This package (pidgin-libnotify) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 08:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 04:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190829.l4J8Tnp7021691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin Alias: pidgin-libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-05-19 04:29 EST ------- Yay; thanks, Mamoru Tasaka! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-libnotify Short Description: Libnotify Pidgin plugin Owners: peter at thecodergeek.com Branches: F-7 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 09:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 05:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239901] Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705190947.l4J9lZi0025380@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-19 05:47 EST ------- Please increment sa release field (and create a new src.rpm) each time you modify the spec file. It makes easier for reviewers (and potential sponsors) to track the evolution of the package. Of course, a change log entry should also be added with each release bump. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 10:32:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 06:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705191032.l4JAWjRi026345@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-19 06:32 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 11:21:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 07:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705191121.l4JBLeK1028026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-19 07:21 EST ------- I'm assuming you mean this CVS repo? http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/core.shtml In any case, no I don't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 11:24:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 07:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705191124.l4JBOkhC028149@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-19 07:24 EST ------- I was really refering to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 12:45:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 08:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240652] New: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240652 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-pcre.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-pcre-5.11.4-1.src.rpm Description: PCRE-OCaml is a wrapper around the popular PCRE library. It is fairly fundamental as lots of OCaml libs and programs depend on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 13:07:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 09:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705191307.l4JD7NpD032520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 13:53:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 09:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] New: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-extlib.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-extlib-1.5-1.src.rpm Description: OCaml ExtLib contains additions to the standard library. It is quite a fundamental OCaml package on which other libraries and programs depend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 14:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 10:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705191456.l4JEudCI003603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-19 10:56 EST ------- A couple of questions: * Location of scripts - Do the 4 bash scripts have to be located under %_bindir? It seems that these scripts are to be used to download some game data and are to be called normally from GNOME menu. IMO these scripts should be located under %_libexecdir/%name, for example. I don't want to have some base directory (such as %_bindir) polluted by scripts for temporal use. * URL - Could you specify the URL of the "Source"s (especially of some png files) as possible? - Also, could you provide the URL of the licenses of game data written on autodlrc files (if I understand autodlrc correctly)? Rather, can't these autodlrc files be created automatically from license text and some other needed information? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 15:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 11:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705191504.l4JF4Wtb003851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-19 11:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155047) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155047&action=view) mock build log of vavoom-1.23-1 on FC-devel i386 And mockbuild failed on FC-devel i386. By the way, I would appreciate it if you would review my review request (bug 240594) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 15:55:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 11:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187313] Review Request: perl-Authen-Radius In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705191555.l4JFtAWR005373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Authen-Radius Alias: perl-Authen-Radius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187313 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Authen-Radius -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 20:25:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 16:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705192025.l4JKPlws014020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-19 16:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > A couple of questions: > > * Location of scripts > - Do the 4 bash scripts have to be located under %_bindir? > It seems that these scripts are to be used to download > some game data and are to be called normally from GNOME > menu. > IMO these scripts should be located under %_libexecdir/%name, > for example. I don't want to have some base directory (such > as %_bindir) polluted by scripts for temporal use. > They are not for temporal use, they invoke autodownloader only once, but after that they are still needed to pass the necessary magick cmdline options to vavoom to make it play doom, or heretic or hexen or strife. And since some people like launching stuff from the cmdline instead of digging through layers of menus, the should be in %{_bindir} so that people can type doom-shareware on the cmdline, instead off having to remember to invoke "vavoom -iwaddir ~/.vavoom/doom-shareware -doom" Also these scripts do not add any overhead as they end with an exec. > * URL > - Could you specify the URL of the "Source"s (especially > of some png files) as possible? doom-logo.png was taken from a doom-sharware package created by Wart, you would have to ask him. tux-b2f.png was created by my from the well known born to frag tux image. through the use of gimp to downsize and make it transparent, see: http://images.google.nl/images?q=tux+born+2+frag > - Also, could you provide the URL of the licenses of game > data written on autodlrc files (if I understand autodlrc > correctly)? This are the licenses of the to be downloaded files. The heretic and hexen texts can be founds in the zips downloaded (see autodlrc files for their url's), and are a verbatim copy and paste except for some whitespace changes. The doom license text is a verbatim copy and paste of the debian copyright file: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/d/doom-wad-shareware/doom-wad-shareware_1.9-1.1/doom-wad-shareware.copyright The latest doom shareware zip no longer includes this text (vendor.doc) I assume this is an oversight on ID's side. I don't know where debian got this text from, presumably from an older shareware version. The text is very similar to the heretic license text and thus seems genuine to me, I trust Debian on this (no reason not to really). > Rather, can't these autodlrc files be created automatically > from license text and some other needed information? > Thats possible, but I don't see the use of this, it will just generate a lot of work to get this right. (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=155047) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155047&action=view) [edit] > mock build log of vavoom-1.23-1 on FC-devel i386 > > And mockbuild failed on FC-devel i386. > Ah, my bad, here is a fixed version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vavoom.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vavoom-1.23-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 20:59:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 16:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705192059.l4JKxIOu014610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-19 16:59 EST ------- Hello, > - For commands, please choose to use either command name or > macros for consistency. Ok, I've chosen macros, but If there isn't(ruby, find) can I define it? Like: ------------------------------------------ #defined simillary as __perl %define __ruby /usr/bin/ruby # (...) %{__ruby} extconf.rb # I haven't done it (for the present) ------------------------------------------ Release 1.1-5 uploaded: SPEC: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses.spec SRPM: http://www.rootshell.be/~isimluk/fedora/ruby-ncurses-1.1-5.src.rpm * Sat May 19 2007 Simon Lukasik - 1.1-5 - Rewrite: rest of commands to macros ------------------------------------------ > This package (ruby-ncurses) is APPROVED by me Thanks. ------------------------------------------ > - Well, the review request you chose seems easy, Yes, I know, I think I should increase level gradually not by one step... ------------------------------------------ >After you do so, please let me know on this bug for confirmation. My fedora username is "isimluk". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 22:52:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 18:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705192252.l4JMqC8m016795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-19 18:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-shadow Short Description: Ruby bindings for shadow password access Owners: k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F7 devel InitialCC: k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 19 23:57:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 19:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705192357.l4JNvTKe018072@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-19 19:57 EST ------- The URLs above do not seem valid, the site is not accessible. Could you please take care of that, Nicolas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 00:09:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 20:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200009.l4K09Bvm018297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-19 20:09 EST ------- Well... indeed my website is down (isp server side). I really hope this can be solved quickly Until then, here is the SRPMS: http://kwizartchitecture.free.fr/fedora/6/SRPMS/lcdproc-0.5.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm And the spec file from my personnal workstation (mean not always online - but often ) SPECS: http://kwizart.hd.free.fr/SPECS/browser/SPECS/lcdproc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 00:19:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 20:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200019.l4K0J82x018434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-19 20:19 EST ------- I've mirrored both files on my personal server, which is more or less always online, just in case someone wishes to do a review and your site(s) are not available. http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/lcdproc/lcdproc.spec http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/lcdproc/lcdproc-0.5.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Nicolas, let me know if you do not agree with this and I'll remove them at once. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 01:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 21:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200114.l4K1EZXn019295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-19 21:14 EST ------- Just a few notes, before a more comprehensive review: - version 0.5.2 has been released by upstream a couple of weeks ago. any reason to not update the rpm, too ? - the following quote from the spec does not seem right: %makeinstall make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Since the whole ./configure process is done twice, it looks like the first line is just a leftover from a previous version or something... - I'd say the file CREDITS should also be included as %doc - I get a lot of warnings during configure: checking for libg15render.h... no configure: WARNING: The g15driver needs libg15render.h checking for main in -lirman... no configure: WARNING: The irman driver needs the irman library. checking for main in -llirc_client... no configure: WARNING: The lirc driver needs the lirc client library checking for vga.h... no configure: WARNING: The svga driver needs vga.h and vgagl.h checking for main in -lftdi... no configure: WARNING: The ula200 driver needs the ftdi library ... and others. They look to me like missing build requires, or at least screaming for a couple more packages needed. I do not know about some of them, but lirc at least is available in Fedora, any reason to not use it? - rpmlint has a small cosmetic complaint: W: lcdproc mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) - however rpmlint of lcdproc is a bit more serious: W: lcdproc service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/lcdproc --> please fix that, a one line sed to patch the script should do it W: lcdproc no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/lcdproc --> can be ignored, but it would be nice to update the initscript instead W: lcdproc service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/LCDd W: lcdproc no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/LCDd -->same as above - the postuninstall scriptlet is not particulary friendly. Shouldn't the service be stopped prior to deleting it? - I did not look very attentive, but there seem to exist some additional docs and programs/examples available (and built by the make scripts). Any particular reason to not include those (eventually as separate packages) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 01:21:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 21:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200121.l4K1LWUi019411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-19 21:21 EST ------- Well thx for you interest! I was working on 5.2 and noticed some of theses errors.. I will update another version tomorrow.. thx Nicolas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 03:59:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 23:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239901] Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200359.l4K3xdcv021814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-05-19 23:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Please increment sa release field (and create a new src.rpm) each time you > modify the spec file. I thought that was only necessary after the package actually got into the repositories. I was wrong. Here is the new and renamed SPEC: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=corkscrew-2.spec Here is the new and renamed SRPM: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=corkscrew-2.0-2.fc7.src.rpm Please note that I have renamed the SPEC file just to avoid replacing the older one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 05:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 01:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200550.l4K5ojgV023772@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-20 01:50 EST ------- MUSTFIX: * package doesn't honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS Override CC at configuration time to achieve this: CC="%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \ ... configure ... * You are patching GCC, i.e. shipping a modified GCC. It's GCC convention to alter the id strings (c.f. gcc -v) to denote that your GCC is not the FSF's GCC. c.f. gcc/version.c [In my packages, I am changing VERSUFFIX] CONSIDER: * You are using monolytic gcc tarball. Using the gcc-core and gcc-g++ tarballs instead cuts down the size of *.src.rpm and diskspace required to build by several GBs. * You are applying patches to GCC. This can kills critical timestamps. To be on the safe side, you should run contrib/gcc_update inside of the expanded GCC source tree. * smp-flags. In general, building GCC is not smp-safe. However, you are only building a subset from GCC which is likely not to suffer from such issues, so this might not hit or apply to this package. * Check and consider to remove /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.1.2/install-tools /usr/libexec/gcc/avr/4.1.2/install-tools Normally, these are not useful for embedded cross-compilers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 06:00:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 02:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240594] Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200600.l4K6045F023920@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240594 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-20 02:00 EST ------- http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/cmigemo.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/cmigemo-1.3-0.2.c_MIT.fc7.src.rpm ---------------------------------------------------- * Sun May 19 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 1.3-0.2.c_MIT - 64 bits fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 06:36:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 02:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200636.l4K6aDS3024342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-20 02:36 EST ------- Assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 06:36:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 02:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200636.l4K6ad3B024391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 06:55:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 02:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200655.l4K6tLoe024627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-20 02:55 EST ------- Something went wrong with this (new) package causing it not to get an F-7 branch Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ants New Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 06:56:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 02:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200656.l4K6uoPl024677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-20 02:56 EST ------- Something went wrong with this (new) package causing it not to get an F-7 branch Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rott New Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 08:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 04:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200833.l4K8XTC0029638@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-20 04:33 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------- This package (vavoom) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 08:47:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 04:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705200847.l4K8lCWn030703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-20 04:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vavoom Short Description: Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:05:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206871] Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201205.l4KC58v9004854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ekg2 - Multi-protocol instant messaging and chat client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206871 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-20 08:05 EST ------- I like it now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:29:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214893] Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201229.l4KCT1rn005323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sipp - SIP test tool / traffic generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214893 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-05-20 08:28 EST ------- > * Package README.txt, MEDIA.txt, and the contents of the pcap > directory as %doc. Done. I packaged pcap and its contents in %{_datadir}. > * The code is not built using the standard compiler flags. Modifying > the build section to look like this will build the package with the > proper flags: Done. http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/sipp.spec http://lemenkov.googlepages.com/sipp-2.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:30:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196601] Review Request: python-vobject - A python library for manipulating vCard and vCalendar files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201230.l4KCUrhd005375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-vobject - A python library for manipulating vCard and vCalendar files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196601 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-20 08:30 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:34:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] New: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: belegdol at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.belegdol.republika.pl/rpmstuff/goffice04.spec SRPM URL: http://www.belegdol.republika.pl/rpmstuff/goffice04-0.4.0-1.src.rpm Desription: Support libraries for gnome office This is a parallel installable package based on one made by Hans de Goede. It packages 0.4.0 version, needed by new gchemutils and is intended to be obsoleted by normal goffice once other dependent software gets ready for the new API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201234.l4KCYtE6005473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:39:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201239.l4KCd0XU005591@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:44:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201244.l4KCipSH005740@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-20 08:44 EST ------- (The Fedora 7 cvs branch dir is called F-7 btw.) added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201255.l4KCtJsc006499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-20 08:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-ncurses Short Description: A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces Owners: lukasim at atlas.cz Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 12:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201257.l4KCvKc9006632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 13:09:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201309.l4KD90Tt007438@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-20 09:08 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizartchitecture.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/lcdproc/lcdproc-0.5.2-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm SPECS: http://kwizartchitecture.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/lcdproc/lcdproc.spec Description: LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD There is others BR that are not present in Fedora yet, indeed. I May take a look on these, but this is not the first topic on my TODO list. lcdproc can be used for freevo (currently testing on my test repository) Since i do not own such lcd screen i'm not able to test it.. I will provide it on my repository until someone report it work fine... Feel free to enahance this spec file... (about doc , i'v installed them but not uses a separate sub-package, this could be done eventually - examples are installed in bindir but they uses name that are too generics, there is maybe a need to rename them...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 13:12:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201312.l4KDCCbW007659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-20 09:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155060) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155060&action=view) F7 x86_64 mock build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 13:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201318.l4KDIU9O007855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-20 09:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Ok, I've chosen macros, but If there isn't(ruby, find) can I define it? Like: > ------------------------------------------ > #defined simillary as __perl > %define __ruby /usr/bin/ruby > # (...) > %{__ruby} extconf.rb > > # I haven't done it (for the present) You don't need to define %__ruby, just using raw "ruby" is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 13:20:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240594] Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201320.l4KDKNiv007903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240594 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-20 09:20 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: cmigemo-devel no-documentation * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream (as explained in the comment) * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * ldconfig run for shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissable content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * no .desktop file needed Must FIX ======== * Don't add tools/migemo.vim.dir sed command backup file to %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 13:21:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201321.l4KDLGAk007949@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-20 09:21 EST ------- Any news on the next all clean data release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 13:35:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201335.l4KDZQjA008228@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-20 09:35 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: W: goffice04-devel no-documentation * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * ldconfig properly run for shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel package as needed * no .desktop file needed Should FIX ========== The changelog says: "- Updated to 0.8.0" this should ofcourse be: "- Updated to 0.4.0" No blockers -> Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 13:37:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240594] Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201337.l4KDb5eh008286@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240594 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-20 09:37 EST ------- Thank you for initial comments. (In reply to comment #2) > Must FIX > ======== > * Don't add tools/migemo.vim.dir sed command backup file to %doc Okay. http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/cmigemo.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/cmigemo-1.3-0.3.c_MIT.fc7.src.rpm http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/cmigemo-1.3-0.2-0.3.diff ------------------------------------------------------- * Sun May 20 2007 Mamoru Tasaka - 1.3-0.3.c_MIT - Don't create unnecessary document backup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 13:59:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201359.l4KDxSZC008719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-20 09:59 EST ------- (in reply to comment #19) surely...^^ Well, OK - Mock : Built on FC6 en F-7 (i386 and x86_64) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is LGPL OK - License match extras packaging policy licenses allowed OK - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: c9ce0b7b3519577b5f460b20c42e04c9 elisa-1.6.0.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version ------------------------------------------------ Rpmlint output: ------------------------------------------------ OK - silent on both srpm and rpm. ============== ** APPROVED ** ============== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 14:05:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 10:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228212] Review Request: perl-Proc-Daemon - Run Perl program as a daemon process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201405.l4KE5kel008934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Proc-Daemon - Run Perl program as a daemon process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228212 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-20 10:05 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 14:21:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 10:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201421.l4KELgiT009270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-20 10:21 EST ------- added by cvsadmin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 14:25:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 10:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240594] Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201425.l4KEP6hG009434@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240594 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-20 10:25 EST ------- All Must fix items fixed: approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 14:25:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 10:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201425.l4KEPStp009463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-20 10:25 EST ------- just a typo install -p -Dm 0644 template/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/template instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 14:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 10:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240594] Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201442.l4KEg7S6009829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240594 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-20 10:42 EST ------- Thank you! Request to CVS admin ---------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cmigemo Short Description: C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 15:00:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201500.l4KF0aas010234@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-20 11:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155061) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155061&action=view) improved specfile New version with all items from comment #11 fixed. Go get it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-gcc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-gcc-4.1.2-4.fc8.src.rpm Erm, or that is were it should be but atrpms seems down, attaching the new spec instead. Ralf your thorough and professional input is much appreciated! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 15:03:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240693] New: Review Request:
- Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240693 Summary: Review Request:
- Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/Perlbal.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/Perlbal-1.58-1.src.rpm Description: Perlbal is a single-threaded event-based server supporting HTTP load balancing, web serving, and a mix of the two. Perlbal can act as either a web server or a reverse proxy. One of the defining things about Perlbal is that almost everything can be configured or reconfigured on the fly without needing to restart the software. A basic configuration file containing a management port enables you to easily perform operations on a running instance of Perlbal. Perlbal can also be extended by means of per-service (and global) plugins that can override many parts of request handling and behavior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 15:06:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240693] Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201506.l4KF6ecN010435@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Perlbal - Reverse-proxy load balancer and webserver Alias: Perlbal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240693 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |Reverse-proxy load balancer |Reverse-proxy load balancer |and webserver |and webserver | Alias| |Perlbal ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-20 11:06 EST ------- The dependencies (perl-IO-AIO, perl-Danga-Socket) are in extras, but still in the needsign queu for devel, so if you review this, you might want to drop them in a local repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 15:58:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201558.l4KFwYwY011540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-05-20 11:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: goffice04 Short Description: GOffice support libraries Owners: belegdol at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 15:59:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201559.l4KFxD4v011573@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 16:40:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 12:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201640.l4KGebUP012649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdpro - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-20 12:40 EST ------- Not very important but we have a duplicate BR: libX11-devel (by xosd-devel), libXext-devel (by xosd-devel). Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: empty for all packages [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 924fca84eb5a07464a3d38df86d9a4427fd06dd7 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [! ] Package functions as described. See Note 1 [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. === Final Notes === 1. I have not the ability to actually test the program for the simple reason that I do not have access to the required hardware. 2. Acording to the build log, there are some unfulfilled dependencies. However none of the needed resources seem to be available in Fedora, so unless someone adds packages with them, the situation is as good as it could be. 3. Given the rather large number of files, I would split the developer-guide and the user-guide to a separate -doc package. However, I would not consider this as a blocker, because the mere size is small. I see no blockers so I unless someone else sees something I've missed, I approve this package. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 17:29:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201729.l4KHT03H014198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-20 13:28 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package: gnu-smalltalk Updated Fedora Ownders: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 17:31:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201731.l4KHVhiD014357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-20 13:31 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: highlight Updated Fedora Ownders: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 17:33:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201733.l4KHXRZN014447@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174952 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-20 13:33 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lightning Updated Fedora Ownders: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de,lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 17:43:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232585] Review Request: telescope_server - Opensource Telescope control servers to interface with stellarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201743.l4KHhq7N014803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telescope_server - Opensource Telescope control servers to interface with stellarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232585 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-20 13:43 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: stellarium Updated Fedora Ownders: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de,kwizart at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 18:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201807.l4KI70Hd015219@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 18:32:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240699] New: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240699 Summary: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-MogileFS-Client.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-MogileFS-Client-1.07-1.src.rpm Description: This module is a client library for the MogileFS distributed file system. The class method 'new' creates a client object against a particular mogilefs tracker and domain. This object may then be used to store and retrieve content easily from MogileFS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 19:15:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201915.l4KJF1Wp017107@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ingvar at linpro.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-05-20 15:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: varnish Short Description: Varnish is a high-performance HTTP accelerator Owners: ingvar at linpro.no Branches: FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 19:25:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201925.l4KJPFbK017448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ------- Additional Comments From ingvar at linpro.no 2007-05-20 15:25 EST ------- varnish-1.0.4 released. Package updated. See comment #17 for changes in the rpm packages. src.rpm: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/fedora-extras-commit/varnish-1.0.4-2.src.rpm specfile: http://users.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/fedora-extras-commit/varnish.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 19:45:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201945.l4KJjAov018159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 19:46:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705201946.l4KJkBOo018230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-20 15:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-ncurses Short Description: A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces Owners: lukasim at atlas.cz Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 20:14:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705202014.l4KKEX6q019440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 22:57:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240705] New: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240705 Summary: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/yafray/yafray.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/yafray/yafray-0.0.9-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm Description: Yet Another Free RAYtracer The question does libs it requires symlinks i don't knwo how yafray is uses inside blender (testing for now...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 23:21:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240699] Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705202321.l4KNLqul023283@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system Alias: perl-MogileFS-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240699 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-MogileFS-Client ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-20 19:21 EST ------- I'm thinking this isn't quite right. [cweyl at zeus MogileFS-Client-1.07]$ make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00use........ok t/10-basics....skipped all skipped: No mogilefsd process running on 127.0.0.1:7001 All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.25 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.31 CPU) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 23:29:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdproc - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705202329.l4KNT8sU023388@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdproc - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: lcdpro - |Review Request: lcdproc - |LCDproc displays real-time |LCDproc displays real-time |system information on a 20x4|system information on a 20x4 |backlit LCD |backlit LCD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 23:29:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdproc - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705202329.l4KNTVev023420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdproc - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-20 19:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lcdproc Short Description: LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 23:29:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240699] Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705202329.l4KNTXJd023440@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system Alias: perl-MogileFS-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240699 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-20 19:29 EST ------- Scratch that, I was thinking MogileFS::Admin->new() was kicking off a daemon. *sigh* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 23:37:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240243] Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705202337.l4KNb1l6023707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240243 jeremy at hinegardner.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jeremy at hinegardner.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-05-20 19:36 EST ------- I'll be happy to review gpsdrive. Look for the formal review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 20 23:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705202353.l4KNr7pB023948@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-05-20 19:53 EST ------- I assume that Adam is talking with uptstream about some issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 00:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 20:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240243] Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705210043.l4L0haLF025254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240243 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-05-20 20:43 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistent macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: eaa52cb220f3d10312a1046dd47126bb gpsdrive-2.09.tar.gz (upstream) eaa52cb220f3d10312a1046dd47126bb rpmbuild/SOURCES/gpsdrive-2.09.tar.gz OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. (not needed) OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. ISSUE (1) - rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should function as described. (program launched ok) OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should function as described. (program launched ok) OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. rpm lint output E: gpsdrive incorrect-locale-el /usr/share/locale/gr/LC_MESSAGES/gpsdrive.mo It appears that gpsdrive is shipping the Greek messages using the ISO country code for Greece ('gr') instead of the ISO 639 locale code for the greek language ('el'). I would consider this an upstream bug, but if you want to fix it in the rpm that's fine and then lodge the issue upstream that would allow the Greek language Fedora users to use gpsdrive. I don't know much about I18N in C programs, but would moving the gr.po and gr.pmo files to el.po and el.pmo respectively after the man page conversion to UTF-8 fix this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 06:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 02:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705210649.l4L6n6t2004581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 08:00:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240699] Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705210800.l4L80cma008992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Client - Client library for the MogileFS distributed file system Alias: perl-MogileFS-Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240699 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-21 04:00 EST ------- I was thinking that myself, but it's trying to connect to a mogilefs server on localhost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 08:09:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705210809.l4L89CLP010271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-21 04:09 EST ------- I would have continued the review, but ATM, http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede seems to be inaccessible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 08:35:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705210835.l4L8ZT6f012750@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-21 04:35 EST ------- * MUST/Should fix ? Question ! Suggestion/Note/etc For 0.3.3-2: * macros - Please choose to either use or not use macros for commands. For example, you use %{__install} instead of "install", while you use "make" "rm" "mkdir -p" "ln -s" "cat" directly. * Timestamps - Keep timestamps on files which are not created or modified during rebuild. * Please use %{__install} with "-p" option. * For this package, the following usage can save timestamps of many files. ---------------------------------------------------------- %{__make} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" ---------------------------------------------------------- * Desktop file - Both category "Application" "X-Fedora" are now deprecated and should be removed. ! Create text files by %{__cat} vs add as Source - Would you consider to add text files as Source, not to create them by cat command at install stage? Adding text files as Source prevents timestamps of those files from being changed for each rebuild. ! Possible mistake in the future - The build log says: ------------------------------------------------------------------ gcc -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\""/usr//locale"\" ------------------------------------------------------------------ Currently this package does not have any gettext .mo files so this is not a problem, however when any .mo files are added in the future, please fix this so that "PACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR" correctly points to %{_datadir}/locale. * Substantially duplicate files - The files under (doc)/manual.html, (doc)/pixmaps/ and those under %{_datadir}/%{name}/html-doc/, %{_datadir}/%{name}/pixmaps/ are the same and either of them (perhaps formar) should be removed. * Unnecessary scriptlets - The following is not needed because the commands in the scriptlets are called with || : ----------------------------------------------------------------- Requires(post): desktop-file-utils >= 0.8 Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils >= 0.8 ----------------------------------------------------------------- * Source URL - Specify the URL of Source1/2, otherwise write as a comment how you created Source1/2. * configure call - During the build, configure is called twice. Please call one time (According to autogen.sh, this may be solved by setting NOCONFIGURE). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 08:47:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705210847.l4L8ltAf013636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-21 04:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: elisa Short Description: Media Center Owners: matthias at rpmforge.net Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 08:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705210855.l4L8tVCp014242@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 04:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I would have continued the review, but ATM, > http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede seems to be inaccessible. I know :( I hope Axel will fix this soon. Thats why I attached the specfile, the sources can be get with spectool -g, and the patches are unchanged from the previous SRPM (if you still have that) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 10:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 06:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225633] Merge Review: bzip2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211039.l4LAdHkg019723@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bzip2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225633 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-21 06:39 EST ------- Any comment on future sonames handlings? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 10:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 06:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211041.l4LAf8lf019825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-21 06:41 EST ------- Also I won't make shipping the api doc a must but I really can't understand why you don't want it, since the devel package is nearly unuseful without api documentation. It could be in a separated -doc subpackage, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 11:11:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 07:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211111.l4LBBMaU021556@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-05-21 07:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155086) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155086&action=view) Latest RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 11:12:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 07:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211112.l4LBCVD6021650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 gnome at dux-linux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(gnome at dux- | |linux.org) | ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-05-21 07:12 EST ------- [@laptop FEDORA]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mrxvt-05b-1.i386.rpm E: mrxvt description-line-too-long Mrxvt (previously named materm) is a lightweight, powerful multi-tabbed terminal emulator for the X window system. mrxvt is based on rxvt version 2.7.11 CVS and aterm. Mrxvt aims to be fast, lightweight and independent of standard toolkits or desktop environments (e.g. Gnome / KDE). W: mrxvt incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.2-1 05b-1 W: mrxvt unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/mrxvt W: mrxvt wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mrxvt/scripts/mrxvt.vbs W: mrxvt non-standard-dir-in-usr man W: mrxvt non-standard-dir-in-usr etc The above is the most recent rpmlint output. I checked out the latest svn source and built another rpm. The first two errors are easy to fix. Since this is my first "formal" rpm and everyone became interested really quickly after such a lull... :-) I will strive to determine how I should fix the remaining three errors. Ideas/suggestions are definitely welcome!!! You can find the latest rpm build in the attachment above this post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 11:31:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 07:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239546] Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211131.l4LBVD2W022527@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239546 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-21 07:31 EST ------- starting review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 11:32:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 07:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240243] Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211132.l4LBWUKO022602@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240243 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-05-21 07:32 EST ------- Including _that_ "INSTALL" document in %doc is of no use for RPM package users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 12:29:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211229.l4LCTjbt026473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-21 08:29 EST ------- We cannot check what is the problem until the spec/srpm is provided. Please provide the URL where we can download your newest srpm (and please don't "attach" srpm to bugzilla) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 12:51:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211251.l4LCpEk7027658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-05-21 08:51 EST ------- I will implement the suggestions Jeremy suggested this evening once I get home from work and will provide a URL for the spec and srpm. Again, sorry for the wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 13:02:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211302.l4LD254i028796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 09:02 EST ------- That didn't help. Here's the current spec. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/agistudio/agistudio.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 13:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211302.l4LD2MFj028848@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-21 09:02 EST ------- re: ping ? Callum, any news from upstream ? if not, what about svn trunck ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 13:49:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211349.l4LDnN59000340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-21 09:49 EST ------- Is this bug waiting for new features like PAM or ConsoleKit to be added to SLiM upstream properly ? Or is it just waiting on default panel theming, because that's pretty trivial to change back... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 13:51:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211351.l4LDpFaT000441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-05-21 09:51 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/glob2/glob2-0.8.21-1.src.rpm I've downgraded glob2 to 0.8.21. I've also moved -data package into the main and moved icons to the right place. Patch1 must be as is. I've tried other methods but without success. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 14:32:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211432.l4LEWCC9004522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-05-21 10:32 EST ------- Move the big docu to an noarch file, so save much space on the repo mirrors. new files: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-0.9_rc1-2.fc6.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 15:19:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 11:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226222] Merge Review: oprofile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211519.l4LFJklq008204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: oprofile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226222 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From wcohen at redhat.com 2007-05-21 11:19 EST ------- Going through the list on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Results of rpmlint $ rpmlint oprofile-0.9.2-8.fc8.src.rpm W: oprofile buildprereq-use qt-devel W: oprofile buildprereq-use libxslt W: oprofile buildprereq-use docbook-style-xsl W: oprofile buildprereq-use docbook-utils W: oprofile buildprereq-use elinks W: oprofile buildprereq-use gtk2-devel W: oprofile buildprereq-use automake W: oprofile buildprereq-use binutils-devel W: oprofile mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 76, tab: line 83) Need static package. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. There is a GUI application for OProfile which doesn't follow the following - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 15:30:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 11:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211530.l4LFUk7u009248@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-21 11:30 EST ------- New version, fixes issues mentioned in comment#8 Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.1-2.src.rpm Source tarball: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.1.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 16:04:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226037] Merge Review: libpfm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211604.l4LG4n6A012798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libpfm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226037 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From wcohen at redhat.com 2007-05-21 12:04 EST ------- Someone else needs to go review of this. However, there are some minor corrections looking through the checks on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines: $ rpmlint libpfm-3.2-0.061205.1.fc8.src.rpm W: libpfm summary-not-capitalized a performance monitoring library for Linux/ia64 W: libpfm no-url-tag W: libpfm buildprereq-use ncurses-devel W: libpfm redundant-prefix-tag W: libpfm rpm-buildroot-usage %build make PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=%{buildroot} LIBDIR=%{_libdir} W: libpfm patch-not-applied Patch1: libpfm-compat.patch W: libpfm patch-not-applied Patch2: libpfm-3.2-showreginfo.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 16:16:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211616.l4LGGs1k013539@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|CANTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 12:16 EST ------- Got it worked out: http://www.agigames.com/forum/index.php?topic=10514.msg89372#msg89372 I'll work up some text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 16:23:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211623.l4LGNchg013880@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 12:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Got it worked out: > http://www.agigames.com/forum/index.php?topic=10514.msg89372#msg89372 Good > I'll work up some text. Yes, thats needed, and then get the author to ok it, it needs to say that: "the game maybe freely redistributed", with ofcourse the authors conditions: "no modification", and "must be distributed in a zip/package file by itself" and then he must ack this. Whats in the forum is hopefull, but not good (clear) enough IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 16:33:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226293] Merge Review: pfmon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211633.l4LGXpkQ014603@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pfmon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226293 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From wcohen at redhat.com 2007-05-21 12:33 EST ------- Someone else needs to do the review. However, there are a couple things that can be fixed based on rpmlint: $ rpmlint pfmon-3.2-0.061205.1.fc8.src.rpm W: pfmon summary-not-capitalized a performance monitoring tool for Linux/ia64 W: pfmon no-url-tag W: pfmon hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /var/tmp/pfmon-root W: pfmon buildprereq-use elfutils-devel W: pfmon buildprereq-use binutils-devel W: pfmon buildprereq-use libpfm >= 3.2-0.061205 W: pfmon buildprereq-use libpfm-devel >= 3.2-0.061205 W: pfmon rpm-buildroot-usage %build make PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=%{buildroot} \ Have fixes for all of the above warnings with the exception of the rpm-buildroot-usage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 16:42:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211642.l4LGg3lL015204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin Alias: pidgin-libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 16:43:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211643.l4LGhlEp015548@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 12:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155111) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155111&action=view) Proposed agi game license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211717.l4LHHZGd018813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211719.l4LHJZOI019020@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174952 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:23:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232585] Review Request: telescope_server - Opensource Telescope control servers to interface with stellarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211723.l4LHNBdx019332@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telescope_server - Opensource Telescope control servers to interface with stellarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232585 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:25:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211725.l4LHPKUg019692@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:26:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211726.l4LHQZsm019807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:27:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdproc - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211727.l4LHRQv4019897@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdproc - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:28:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211728.l4LHSpCA020000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:29:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211729.l4LHTAna020068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:30:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211730.l4LHULiC020160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211731.l4LHVWR9020253@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211731.l4LHVqq0020311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:32:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211732.l4LHWlDX020389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:34:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211734.l4LHYFjc020577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:36:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211736.l4LHaNxr020727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:39:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240594] Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211739.l4LHd7vc021016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240594 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:39:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211739.l4LHdj5v021075@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:39:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211739.l4LHdwkH021195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:42:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226390] Merge Review: scim-anthy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211742.l4LHggMC021738@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-anthy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226390 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:59:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231984] Review Request: Vym - View Your Mind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211759.l4LHx2SS023103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Vym - View Your Mind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231984 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 13:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: vym New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 17:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231746] Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211759.l4LHxKZb023147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 13:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ettercap New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:03:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211803.l4LI3ZQg023317@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-05-21 14:03 EST ------- Hans, would you like to comantain this package with me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:15:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211815.l4LIFQIL024659@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-21 14:15 EST ------- No, We diskussed about the Fedora specific customization of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211819.l4LIJbT1024838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-21 14:19 EST ------- I haven't had the opportunity to do new Fedora themes for Slim (based on the gdm originals), so either we go with the desktop background or the upstream original. I didn't get mock installed, so if you could test it again it'd be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:22:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211822.l4LIMU3q025101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 14:22 EST ------- Pinged upstream, it's coming, I'm waiting on an ETA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:23:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240793] New: Review Request: libhdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240793 Summary: Review Request: libhdhomerun - tools for the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/packages/libhdhomerun/libhdhomerun.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/packages/libhdhomerun/libhdhomerun-0.0-0.1.20070512.fc7.src.rpm Description: libhdhomerun contains development headers for applications wishing to interface with the Silicon Dust HDHomeRun, as well as an HDHomeRun configuration/firmware update utility. (no firmware included, just the utility to push it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:23:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235637] Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211823.l4LINtEr025281@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235637 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-21 14:23 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:23:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211823.l4LINv7F025313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 14:23 EST ------- Hmm. Hans, if you have the time, since he hasn't started anything formal yet, you have my blessing to take over. Xavier, feel free to jump back in if you get a chance. Of if you have anything you need reviewed yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:24:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211824.l4LIO1dG025357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-21 14:23 EST ------- Q: Should we remove the PAM files, until upstream releases pam support properly ? (currently it's only available as an experimental patch and a subversion branch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:25:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211825.l4LIPqO0025543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 14:25 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:33:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211833.l4LIXd5B026189@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|bjohnson at symetrix.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co| |m) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 18:45:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230275] Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211845.l4LIjEoO027161@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230275 ingvar at linpro.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239892] Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211903.l4LJ3sKu029530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-checkstyle - a checkstyle plugin for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239892 rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:17:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211917.l4LJHXO1031080@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-05-21 15:17 EST ------- This is built and tagged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:23:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211923.l4LJNP3M031842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-21 15:23 EST ------- If the pam support is what will be upstream later I think there is no problem in shipping it, even though it is experimental. It is more or less mandatory for integration in fedora. Moreover, I expect the slim users not to be average users. If the overall design may not be included, then I think it is better not to ship it and wait a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211930.l4LJUpeS032516@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-21 15:30 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: purple-galago Updated Fedora Owners: bdpepple at ameritech.net,stu at nosnilmot.com,wtogami at redhat.com Correct e-mail address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:40:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211940.l4LJepW3001328@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 15:40 EST ------- Looks good, no we only need the upstream author to ok it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:41:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211941.l4LJfEtB001482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 15:41 EST ------- s/no/now/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211943.l4LJhirV001964@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-21 15:43 EST ------- Sorry, I just got back in town. I posted an additional comment regarding the selinux issues on bug #239436 regarding selinux issues, but these are IMHO not enough to warrant holding up the package approval. Please follow that bug an implement any suggestions post import. 47f2fc3fc5e0b3325ca3c3a360011a03 roundcube_russian-0.1-beta2.tar.gz ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:44:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211944.l4LJihUe002288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 15:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Hans, would you like to comantain this package with me? Sure, that sounds like a good plan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:45:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236297] Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211945.l4LJjNca002399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xoo - Xoo is a graphical wrapper around xnest. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236297 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(paul at xelerance.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-21 15:45 EST ------- ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:47:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211947.l4LJl6f9002851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 15:47 EST ------- No problem, thanks for the review! I'll keep an eye on the selinux bug. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: roundcubemail Short Description: A browser-based multilingual IMAP client Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231536] Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211949.l4LJnm1g003319@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231536 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at ameritech.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240705] Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211951.l4LJpXOO003590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240705 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-21 15:51 EST ------- good: + Naming seems ok + Tar ball matches with upstream. + License seems ok. + Rpmlint of source package ok + Rpmlint ok for debuginfo. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Mock build works fine for FC6 and F7 (x86_64) Bad: - Rpmlint complaints binary package: rpmlint yafray-0.0.9-1.x86_64.rpm E: yafray zero-length /usr/share/doc/yafray-0.0.9/NEWS W: yafray non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gram.yafray E: yafray zero-length /usr/share/doc/yafray-0.0.9/COPYING W: yafray incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.9-2 0.0.9-1 E: yafray invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so libyafraycore.so E: yafray invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libyafrayplugin.so libyafrayplugin.so - Rpmlint complaints on installed package: rpmlint yafray E: yafray zero-length /usr/share/doc/yafray-0.0.9/NEWS W: yafray non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gram.yafray E: yafray zero-length /usr/share/doc/yafray-0.0.9/COPYING W: yafray incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.9-2 0.0.9-1 E: yafray invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libyafrayplugin.so libyafrayplugin.so W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafrayplugin.so /lib64/libdl.so.2 W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafrayplugin.so /lib64/libpthread.so.0 W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafrayplugin.so /lib64/libm.so.6 E: yafray invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so libyafraycore.so W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so dlsym W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so dlerror W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so dlopen W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so dlclose W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so /usr/lib64/libImath.so.4 W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so /usr/lib64/libIex.so.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:51:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211951.l4LJpfQi003652@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-05-21 15:51 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: goffice04 Updated Fedora Owners: belegdol at gmail.com,j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:52:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211952.l4LJqG9m003770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 15:52 EST ------- Ok'd by author: http://www.agigames.com/forum/index.php?topic=10514.msg89374#msg89374 Addressed. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/sergueis-destiny/sergueis-destiny.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/sergueis-destiny/sergueis-destiny-1.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240614] Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211954.l4LJsCej004088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-galago - Galago feed plugin for libpurple IM clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240614 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:56:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231536] Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211956.l4LJu4Ta004211@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231536 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:56:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211956.l4LJugAx004260@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 19:59:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217262] Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705211959.l4LJx0pn004479@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tdom - DOM parser for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217262 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-05-21 15:58 EST ------- Removing FE-NEW blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 20:46:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212046.l4LKkVqi008594@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-21 16:46 EST ------- I've build package for F-7 and devel branches. Others will be added as soon as possible. Closing as NEXTRELEASE... Once more Thanks. :) PS: Build itself is magic... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 20:52:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239954] Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212052.l4LKqfsE008896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ncurses - A module for ruby applications for using ncurses interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239954 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 20:56:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231536] Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212056.l4LKugPZ009119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231536 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-21 16:56 EST ------- MD5Sums: c8470e586c5face7f9be09decbe20398 muinescrobbler-0.1.8.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * License matches tarball * Upstream source tarball verified * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Package builds fine in Mock. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * tarball contains no pre-compiled dll's * Follows mono packaging guidelines and uses %{_libdir} * these rpmlint errors can be ignored since it's a mono package: E: muine-scrobbler no-binary E: muine-scrobbler only-non-binary-in-usr-lib E: muine-scrobbler-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 21:04:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240807] New: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807 Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at brouhaha.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/fc6/asl/asl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/fc6/asl/asl-1.42-0.8.bld55.src.rpm Description: AS is a portable macro cross-assembler for a variety of microprocessors and controllers. Although it is mainly targeted at embedded processors and single-board computers, you also find CPU families that are used in workstations and PCs in the target list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 21:05:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240807] Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212105.l4LL5Aw9009666@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807 eric at brouhaha.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 21:06:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/xorg-x11-drv-vermilion.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/xorg-x11-drv-vermilion-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Xorg driver for Intel Vermilion chips. Apparently this is used in some new mobile platforms. Don't have the hardware to test yet, but someone surely does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 21:18:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212118.l4LLIsb7010465@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 17:18 EST ------- Must FIX ======== * Change license field to: "Redistributable, no modification permitted" * Add a comment to the top of sergueis-destiny-README.fedora explaining that "permission was given by the author to (re)distribute it under the conditions below", and add a link to the forum discussion. * Rename sergueis-destiny-README.fedora to something with "license" in the name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 21:29:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212129.l4LLToSe011276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) | ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-05-21 17:29 EST ------- I just submitted a bunch of patches yesterday, they may have been waiting on that. I have a package based on SVN, however the ABI has sort of broken due to a bunch of stuff for Cinema4k being added to the encoder parameter structure. Upstream tried to prevent it, but on Fedora, it still crashes apps with "stack smashing detected". Not sure how to deal with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 21:36:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212136.l4LLacK3011611@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 17:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > I just submitted a bunch of patches yesterday, they may have been waiting on > that. I have a package based on SVN, however the ABI has sort of broken due to a > bunch of stuff for Cinema4k being added to the encoder parameter structure. > Upstream tried to prevent it, but on Fedora, it still crashes apps with "stack > smashing detected". Not sure how to deal with this. The only way to solve this is to give the new version a new soname (preferably working with upstream), and then do a compat package for the old version, if the new version is still API compatible, the compat package doesn't need a parallel installable -devel and thus should be easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 21:57:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212157.l4LLvQe1013135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 17:57 EST ------- build for future F-8 F-7 and FE-6, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:10:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212210.l4LMAgYq014323@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2007-05-21 18:10 EST ------- sorry for not opening a new bug, but I cannot find where to file for rott. I think rott-shareware should have a Requires on autodownloader I just installed rott (from koji): $ rpm -q rott-shareware rott-shareware-1.0-2.fc7.1 $ rott-shareware /usr/bin/rott-shareware: line 10: /usr/share/autodl/AutoDL.py: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212210.l4LMAoEg014375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-21 18:10 EST ------- Did you mean for t/ to be included in %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:19:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212219.l4LMJleh015089@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 18:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > sorry for not opening a new bug, but I cannot find where to file for rott. > > I think rott-shareware should have a Requires on autodownloader > I just installed rott (from koji): > $ rpm -q rott-shareware > rott-shareware-1.0-2.fc7.1 > $ rott-shareware > /usr/bin/rott-shareware: line 10: /usr/share/autodl/AutoDL.py: No such file or > directory > Good catch! Thanks, a new version with this fixed (1.0-3.fcX) is now building for fc6 fc7 and fc8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:22:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233783] Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212222.l4LMMnb8015682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vegastrike-data - Data files for Vega Strike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233783 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 18:22 EST ------- Build now and copied to FC-6, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:32:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240705] Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212232.l4LMWEQl017483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240705 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-21 18:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/yafray/yafray.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/yafray/yafray-0.0.9-2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Yet Another Free RAYtracer Sorry i may have uploaded the wrong file... All errors are removed but some warnings remain: (on installed files) rpmlint yafray W: yafray incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.9-2 0.0.9-2.kwizart.fc6 W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so.0.0.9 dlsym W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so.0.0.9 dlerror W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so.0.0.9 dlopen W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so.0.0.9 dlclose W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so.0.0.9 /usr/lib64/libImath.so.4 W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so.0.0.9 /usr/lib64/libIex.so.4 W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafrayplugin.so.0.0.9 /lib64/libdl.so.2 W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafrayplugin.so.0.0.9 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafrayplugin.so.0.0.9 /lib64/libm.so.6 Searching about a proper fix from here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-05/msg00034.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:36:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212236.l4LMaE4P017766@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785 sander at hoentjen.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sander at hoentjen.eu ------- Additional Comments From sander at hoentjen.eu 2007-05-21 18:36 EST ------- great, and thanks for all the fedora games ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:43:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:43:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212243.l4LMhxDS018320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 18:43 EST ------- Atrpms is back, so you can get the latest version here, as promised earlier: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-gcc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-gcc-4.1.2-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212245.l4LMjXLb018515@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-21 18:45 EST ------- Build for FE-6 F-7 and the new devel, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 22:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212255.l4LMtCCX018988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-21 18:55 EST ------- Yep -- I'm finding tests make useful documentation (among other things), and generally think it's nice to be able to run the same test suite post-installation that a package was built with. This is a recent change of direction for me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 21 23:13:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705212313.l4LND6dc019838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-05-21 19:13 EST ------- I've completly missed this BZ. Let me take a look at those RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 00:13:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 20:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220013.l4M0DoKj023689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-21 20:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.04-1.src.rpm - Update to upstream 0.4 with proper license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 00:16:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 20:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236849] Review Request: lcdproc - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220016.l4M0GCgt023742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdproc - LCDproc displays real-time system information on a 20x4 backlit LCD https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236849 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 00:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 20:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220058.l4M0wDHQ025021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-21 20:58 EST ------- hi Jens I followed the CVS admin page (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingCvsFaq) and built the package for FC-6/F-7 branches on cvs, however, I did not find information on how these new packages are downloaded or found by end users. I used yumex or yum, it did not list the wqy-bitmap-fonts-0.8.1-6.fc6 in the output. what will happen after the new package being built on cvs? thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 01:04:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220104.l4M14UY8025379@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-05-21 21:04 EST ------- Have you done make tag and make build? If you received the build success email, it will shown in yum automatically two or three days later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 01:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240642] Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220127.l4M1RWZ2026565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-libnotify - Libnotify Pidgin plugin Alias: pidgin-libnotify https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240642 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 01:57:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220157.l4M1vMP0028314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-21 21:57 EST ------- Addressed: Spec:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/sergueis-destiny/sergueis-destiny.spec SRPM:http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/sergueis-destiny/sergueis-destiny-1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 02:03:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240243] Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220203.l4M235KD028522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsdrive - A GPS based navigation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240243 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-21 22:03 EST ------- In reply to comment #2: Thanks for the review. Alas, just moving the po files doesn't seem to fix things. Looks like I am going to have to patch the auto* files to get it to know about 'el' instead of 'gr'. ;( Will try and get that sorted out soon. In reply to comment #3: Yeah, sorry I missed that. Next version will not ship the useless INSTALL file. :( Hopefully I will have a new version soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 02:04:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220204.l4M24ImZ028576@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-21 22:04 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 02:09:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220209.l4M29AuA028840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-05-21 22:09 EST ------- I can see devel branch has been built http://kojiweb.fedoraproject.org/packages/wqy-bitmap-fonts/ but not FC-6 branch. Who remembers the URL of build.log? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus says "it's not available in devel or release", I wonder if you have successfully tagged it for FC-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 02:29:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220229.l4M2T48L030374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-05-21 22:29 EST ------- OK I've tried to implement a few things Jeremy suggested but I'm running into some issues... You can find the latest build, spec file and desktop file here... http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/FEDORA/mrxvt/current/ latest rpmlint... [@laptop FEDORA]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mrxvt-05b-1.i386.rpm E: mrxvt description-line-too-long Mrxvt (previously named materm) is based on rxvt version 2.7.11 CVS and aterm. mrxvt aims to be independent of a user's desktop environment. W: mrxvt wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mrxvt/scripts/mrxvt.vbs W: mrxvt non-standard-dir-in-usr man W: mrxvt non-standard-dir-in-usr etc I took the latest svn snapshot from sourceforge and built this rpm, but it still has some problems... In particular I think the files in /share and /doc need to be moved around (those are the src tree modifications I alluded to earlier). Due to my inexperience with rpm building and the sparse (somewhat unreliable) info on building them on the fedora wiki, I'm not comfortable recommending these changes to the maintainer without specific reasons; I've conversed with the maintainer once and only hinted that the source tree might require changes -- beyond that I've been busy with school and now am on summer break, and ready to further that discussion with him. Any ideas? suggestions? Thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 02:29:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220229.l4M2TBnO030437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-21 22:29 EST ------- This needs to go now that you fixed mozldap-devel # cyrus-sasl-devel is required because mozldap uses it BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel pkgconfig should not be a Requires of the main package but of the -devel package no need to BR pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 02:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220248.l4M2msk5031881@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-21 22:48 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License(GPL) See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 45a66691aa3b22996862e3e5bac4289c haproxy-1.2.17.tar.gz 45a66691aa3b22996862e3e5bac4289c haproxy-1.2.17.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. You might ask upstream to include a copy of the GPL and the other odd license? Not a blocker. 2. What parts of the code are under the odd MIT-like O'Reilly license? It might be good to list them. Also, I can't find mention of this license in the code anywhere. Where is it stated? 3. rpmlint says: E: haproxy non-standard-uid /var/lib/haproxy haproxy E: haproxy non-standard-gid /var/lib/haproxy haproxy These can be ignored. Not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 02:53:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225810] Merge Review: gnome-applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220253.l4M2rqAa032355@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225810 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Bug 225810 depends on bug 203554, which changed state. Bug 203554 Summary: a -devel package should be split + missing requires https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203554 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 02:55:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240594] Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220255.l4M2t77u032462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmigemo - C interface of Ruby/Migemo Japanese incremental search tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240594 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-21 22:55 EST ------- Rebuilt for all branch, closing. Thank you for your review!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 03:05:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240635] Review Request: mash - tree creation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220305.l4M35DY5001115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240635 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-21 23:05 EST ------- Here's a review: OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag ? - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Cosmetic/nonblocker: Summary: Buildsystem -> tree converter seems a bit terse... perhaps: Summary: Koji buildsystem to yum repository converter ? 2. ChangeLog and README are 0 length. Should they be shipped? Should they have content? 3. The Source0 URL doesn't seem to work. Seems to have lots of older versions, but not this one. Perhaps it should point to the hosted site? 4. The URL seems to give: Environment not found 5. rpmlint says: E: mash non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mash/multilib.py 0644 E: mash non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mash/config.py 0644 E: mash non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mash/__init__.py 0644 Should these have no #! line? or should they be 755? E: mash zero-length /usr/share/doc/mash-0.1.8/ChangeLog E: mash zero-length /usr/share/doc/mash-0.1.8/README See comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 03:35:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225646] Merge Review: cman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220335.l4M3ZPIM003264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225646 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|915resolution |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 03:36:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220336.l4M3au95003375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-21 23:36 EST ------- yes, I did "make tag/make build", everything looks alright, got "successful" emails too. so, I guess what I need to do is a little bit patience and wait for a couple of days :) the devel branch is now mapped to fc8, I am building it right now, should be done in a couple of minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 03:59:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220359.l4M3xTW9005191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239968] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220401.l4M41N7s005397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239968 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-22 00:01 EST ------- looks like this is your first package submission to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:09:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220409.l4M49RdN006068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-22 00:09 EST ------- mock build is fine for i386 but ----------------------------------------------------- rpmlint complains on SRPM as => I: pixman checking W: pixman mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. rpmlint output on pixman RPM => W: pixman no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. E: pixman library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libpixman.so.0.0.0 This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. E: pixman library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libpixman.so.0.0.0 This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. rpmlint outout on -devel rpm => W: pixman-devel summary-not-capitalized pixman development package Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220413.l4M4DkVw006155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-22 00:13 EST ------- hey whats reason behind opening same package review request twice? Closing this duplicate bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 239939 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:13:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220413.l4M4DlDP006174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 Bug 239939 depends on bug 239303, which changed state. Bug 239303 Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-22 00:13 EST ------- *** Bug 239303 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:16:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220416.l4M4GwNK006271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:16:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220416.l4M4Gx3v006289@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 Bug 239939 depends on bug 239303, which changed state. Bug 239303 Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|DUPLICATE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:17:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220417.l4M4HdkN006343@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-22 00:17 EST ------- oh just found its confusion of your packages ending gii and ggi. You submitted same links in 2 review requests. looks here you need to submit actual libgii package links not libggi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:24:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239968] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220424.l4M4OMU6006644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239968 ------- Additional Comments From livinded at deadbytes.net 2007-05-22 00:24 EST ------- sponsorship would help that along... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 04:38:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220438.l4M4cD8L007013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?, needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 05:48:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 01:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220548.l4M5mMag009467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 05:53:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 01:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220553.l4M5rb1K009596@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-22 01:53 EST ------- Also it will be good to add disttag though its not mandatory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 05:54:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 01:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220554.l4M5sRIh009639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-22 01:54 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. e002b3b3b7fae2b2558fe7ac854359b7 libgii-1.0.2.src.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Provides: config(libgii) = 1.0.2-1.fc7 file.so keytrans.so libgg.so.1 libgii.so.1 linux_evdev.so linux_joy.so linux_kbd.so linux_mouse.so lk201.so mouse.so null.so save.so spaceorb.so stdin.so tcp.so SHOULD: Ask upstream to include License text file in tarball. There is already one packaging draft submitted on how to request upstream to include license in their tarballs. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 06:12:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 02:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240635] Review Request: mash - tree creation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220612.l4M6Cd5v010441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240635 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-05-22 02:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > > 1. Cosmetic/nonblocker: > Summary: Buildsystem -> tree converter > seems a bit terse... perhaps: > Summary: Koji buildsystem to yum repository converter > ? OK, will fix. > 2. ChangeLog and README are 0 length. Should they be shipped? *shrug*, that's an upstream issue. > Should they have content? Yeah, they should. I need to get a format out of git log that I can stand to read. > 3. The Source0 URL doesn't seem to work. Seems to have lots of older versions, but > not this one. Perhaps it should point to the hosted site? Should be fixed. Also, see next answer... > 4. The URL seems to give: > Environment not found Yeah, I need to get Jesse to set up the trac bits. > 5. rpmlint says: > E: mash non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mash/multilib.py 0644 > E: mash non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mash/config.py 0644 > E: mash non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mash/__init__.py 0644 > > Should these have no #! line? or should they be 755? Probably one or the other. I'll look at taking the #! out of them. Doesn't affect anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 06:36:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 02:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235573] Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220636.l4M6aLDT011183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: websec - Web page monitoring software with highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235573 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-05-22 02:36 EST ------- /me wonders what a "Package Change Request" for highlight has to do with websec /me chooses to not care and just closes the bug again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 08:19:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 04:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220819.l4M8JiMG018315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-22 04:19 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libggi.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libggi-2.2.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit Oups! Indeed... Same directory... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 08:27:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 04:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220827.l4M8R6XD020838@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-22 04:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgii Short Description: Input library for GGI Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 08:30:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 04:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220830.l4M8UP8Q021129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From stefan at eijk.nu 2007-05-22 04:30 EST ------- The Mandriva asterisk packages run as non-root. Feel free to check & see how they did it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 08:32:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 04:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220832.l4M8WGYs021430@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-22 04:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim.spec SRPM URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim-1.2.6-4.fc7.src.rpm - changed background back to the Fedora default desktop again - left the PAM files in (unused), should they be useful later Screenshot: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim-fedora-login.jpg Except for "missing features" like themes and buttons and PAM and ConsoleKit, I don't think there are any more RPM problems. Going back to "GDM Lite" for use with Xfce myself, I think... Like http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/gdmlite-fedora-login.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 08:34:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 04:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233598] Review Request: elisa - Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220834.l4M8YxVG021621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa - Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233598 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-22 04:34 EST ------- The devel branch has been rebuilt, others are following now :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 08:35:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 04:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228299] Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220835.l4M8Z3FW021669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-metar - Coded METAR weather reports parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228299 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 08:37:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 04:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220837.l4M8bIun021823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-22 04:37 EST ------- *-4 looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 09:46:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 05:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705220946.l4M9kt6u027171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-22 05:46 EST ------- License has been requested and is now added to upstream cvs repository! It will be bundled with next release... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 12:08:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221208.l4MC8YLY002212@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Bug 225984 depends on bug 203574, which changed state. Bug 203574 Summary: remove liblftp-jobs.so and liblftp-tasks.so for internal libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203574 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 12:49:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239978] Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221249.l4MCnI82005598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ants - Guide your ants safely home before they drop of the cliff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239978 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-22 08:49 EST ------- Build for FC-6 F-7 and devel, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 12:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221251.l4MCpIVZ005753@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-22 08:51 EST ------- Looks fine now: approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 12:53:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221253.l4MCrLwA005961@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-22 08:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avr-gcc Short Description: Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 12:54:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 08:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221254.l4MCs4m5006140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-22 08:54 EST ------- Oops forgot fedora-cvs flag, cvs-admins see comment above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:00:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221300.l4MD0N9s006997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-22 09:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sergueis-destiny Short Description: An AGI adventure game Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:10:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221310.l4MDAwUN008500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-22 09:10 EST ------- Oops: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: roundcubemail Short Description: A browser-based multilingual IMAP client Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221313.l4MDDcLA009151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lxtnow at gmail.com |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-22 09:13 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is silent * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * no .desktop file required Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:15:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221315.l4MDFiC4009454@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-22 09:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nagi Short Description: An interpreter for AGI games Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Many thanks, Hans. :) (gets out back-scratcher) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:21:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221321.l4MDLNp1010254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 09:21 EST ------- Cvs is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:26:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221326.l4MDQN5F011202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 09:26 EST ------- Cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221331.l4MDVIuj011643@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2007-05-22 09:31 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jss New Branches: FC-7 This package was approved during the FC-7 freeze and a build had not been done in devel. When the branch and tagging happened no FC-7 branch was created, I presume because it hadn't been built yet. So it essentially has skipped FC-7 and has just FC-6 and FC-8 tags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:31:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221331.l4MDVk7F011770@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 09:31 EST ------- Cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:36:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221336.l4MDaPp4012254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 09:36 EST ------- Cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 13:51:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221351.l4MDptqq014546@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-22 09:51 EST ------- MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: This is "normal" for this package and can be ignored * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * No shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code and permissable content * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * no -devel package needed * .desktop file as required and properly installed Should FIX ========== * Change not working Source0 URL from: http://globulation2.org/releases/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz to the new / working: http://dl.sv.nongnu.org/releases/glob2/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz No blockers, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 14:30:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221430.l4MEUMht018399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 10:29 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Rpmlint quite on source rpm. + Local build works fine. + License seems ok. + Mock build works fine. + Local install + Package contains verbatin copy of the license + Rpmlint quite on installed package. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints on binary package: rpmlint slim-1.2.6-4.x86_64.rpm W: slim dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/slim/themes/default/background.jpg ../../../backgrounds/images/default.jpg *** May be continue on next comment *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 14:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221439.l4MEdJxX019203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 10:39 EST ------- Continuation of comment #16: God: + Local install and uninstall works fine. Suggested Enhancedments: * After Login, the background image should stay active like on kdm. * On KDE I have got an error message about an none starting sound system. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 14:41:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225925] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221441.l4MEfWJd019418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jakarta-commons-dbcp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225925 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 10:41 EST ------- Please close this bug after building the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 14:42:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225248] Merge Review: ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221442.l4MEgbgS019525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225248 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 10:42 EST ------- Please close this bug after building the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 14:43:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225628] Merge Review: bsh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221443.l4MEhFh6019636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bsh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225628 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 10:43 EST ------- Please close this bug after building the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 14:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221456.l4MEuZFf021262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 10:56 EST ------- Unfortunately I have found a important error in your package: Please make sure, that the directory %{_datadir}/slim is owned by your package. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 14:58:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226270] Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221458.l4MEwtrX021571@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-DNS Alias: perl-Net-DNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226270 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 10:58 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint quite on source package. + Rpmlint quite on binary package. + Rpmlint quite on debuginfo package. + Local install/update of package works fine. + Build on Mock works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231536] Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221505.l4MF5sEU022582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231536 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-22 11:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: muine-scrobbler Short Description: Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:07:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221507.l4MF7hd6022814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 11:07 EST ------- Excluse me for the delay. I have make a text with a mock build and can tell you, that you don't need pkgconfig as a BR for the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:09:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221509.l4MF97if022901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-22 11:09 EST ------- Bad URLs. Real ones are: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/vermilion/xorg-x11-drv-vermilion.spec http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/vermilion/xorg-x11-drv-vermilion-1.0.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:06:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221506.l4MF6qiR022651@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-22 11:06 EST ------- Updated: - Add rfc1924.txt to %doc - Remove unnecessary BR - Fix license tag Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Math-Base85.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Math-Base85-0.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:10:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221510.l4MFAPHe023093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-22 11:10 EST ------- In case anyone's wondering, the 'no-wfb' patch disables the code path that goes through the wfb rendering core, which doesn't exist in xserver 1.3. It'll pop into existence in 1.4 though. As a side effect, the driver only works at 24bpp until wfb exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:11:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221511.l4MFBVa1023233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-22 11:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155166) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155166&action=view) diffs Does this look ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:12:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239200] Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221512.l4MFCLFK023389@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239200 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-22 11:12 EST ------- Updated: - Change make to really call proper flags Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/onesixtyone.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/onesixtyone-0.3.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221515.l4MFFmcN023853@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:15:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221515.l4MFFtxo023871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:16:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239185] Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221516.l4MFG7HR023888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:20:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221520.l4MFK3R3024126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 11:19 EST ------- Good: + Local install and uninstall works fine. + in.libidentd was dynamicly linked agains libident.so + Mockbuild works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:21:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236977] Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221521.l4MFL32Y024214@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236977 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 11:21 EST ------- Please close this bug after building the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:25:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231536] Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221525.l4MFPK0F024734@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231536 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 11:25 EST ------- I assumed you wanted an F-7 branch here too... don't forget to do that! :) CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:25:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221525.l4MFPjBS024789@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 11:25 EST ------- Question: Why I could find the RPM SPEC files on %{_datadir}/berusky? Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:27:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236977] Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221527.l4MFR3EP025078@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kaa-metadata - The Kaa Media - metadata binding for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236977 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:38:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221538.l4MFc8F7026108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-22 11:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim.spec SRPM URL: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/xfce/slim-1.2.6-5.fc7.src.rpm Comment #20: now fixed, in release 5 Comment #18: unfortunate side effect -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:39:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] New: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail-0.7.0-1.src.rpm Description: Archivemail is a tool written in Python for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes. It can move messages older than the specified number of days to a separate mbox format mailbox that is compressed with gzip, or optionally just delete old email. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:39:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221539.l4MFdtj0026293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 11:39 EST ------- God: + Local build works fine. + Local start works fine. + Local install/uninstall workd fine. + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm. + Ronlint is quite on binary rpm. + Mock build works fine. Bad: + Tar ball doesn't matches with upstream. + Inconsistent use of buildroot Use of buildroot is not consistant (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:42:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: perl-Newt (was: newt-perl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221542.l4MFgTJw027027@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Newt (was: newt-perl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-05-22 11:42 EST ------- Nope. I guess we need to treat this as a new package? Here's the SRPM with the perl-devel BR added: http://people.redhat.com/jorton/perl-Newt-1.08-16.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Newt Short Description: Owners: jorton at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:45:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221545.l4MFjkKZ028034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-22 11:45 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221552.l4MFqD7g029872@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-22 11:52 EST ------- A couple of suggestions before we get started here. 1) I would remove all remnants of the svn directory structure immediately after unpacking the archive. That will relieve you from jumping through extra hoops like: find plugins -type f -not -regex '.*\.svn\/.*' 2) It would probably be easier to set the file modes and clean up the shebang and \r from files as the next step. I see you are setting the mode (sometimes redundantly) in multiple locations. 3) You makefile should not copy the .po or .pot files to the buildroot. That will also make these lines unnecessary: %{_datadir}/locale/po/fr/LC_MESSAGES/jbrout.po %{_datadir}/locale/po/jbrout.pot 4) Why no %doc: #%doc changelog.txt readme.txt SciTE.properties -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 15:52:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226196] Merge Review: perl-Newt (was: newt-perl) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221552.l4MFqnMk030227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Newt (was: newt-perl) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226196 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 11:52 EST ------- Not sure if you needed an F-7 branch for this or not, I assumed not. Also, please remember to fill in the Short Description field on CVS new package requests. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 16:28:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221628.l4MGSD9Q003313@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2007-05-22 12:28 EST ------- [acme at filo pahole]$ rpmlint rpm/RPMS/i386/* W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/dwarves/runtime/ctracer_relay.c W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/dwarves/runtime/ctracer_jprobe.c W: dwarves devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/dwarves/runtime/ctracer_relay.h W: libdwarves1 no-documentation [acme at filo pahole]$ Now I'm doing the last tests and will report soon when I have everything ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 16:28:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221628.l4MGSsOx003405@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-22 12:28 EST ------- Well, I saw your spec file and actually there are many points to be fixed. (In reply to comment #12) > I'm not comfortable recommending these > changes to the maintainer without specific reasons; I don't see the reason for now why upstream should change directory tree of installation... For me every files are installed into where Fedora rpm packaging expects *when I compiled mrxvt correctly*. For this (mrxvt) it is actually due to the rpm packaging issue that files are not installed into the correct directories. So, first check the following wiki page first: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines and follow fedora rpm packaging way. And you can start from the spec file which already exists in Fedora, for example: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/xterm/xterm.spec?root=core -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 16:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221636.l4MGaHcW003991@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-22 12:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA Short Description: Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support Owners: wjhns174 at hardakers.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 16:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221648.l4MGmnjw004950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 12:48 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 16:58:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221658.l4MGwqMd005683@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2007-05-22 12:58 EST ------- OK, new spec file at: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/dwarves/rpm/dwarves.spec New src.rpm at: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/acme/dwarves/rpm/SRPMS/dwarves-1.0-1.src.rpm And the 1.0 tarball is at: http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/dwarves-1.0.tar.bz2 Please let me know if there is still any problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 17:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221718.l4MHIbVB007662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 Bug 225984 depends on bug 203574, which changed state. Bug 203574 Summary: remove liblftp-jobs.so and liblftp-tasks.so for internal libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203574 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 17:20:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221720.l4MHKX9t008001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 13:20 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + License seems ok. + Tar ball matches with upstream + Rpmlint is quite on source package + Rpmlint is quite on binary package + Pakcage contains verbain copy of the license text + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Strangs Build stanza: You make a 'chmod 0644' on setup.py and test_archivmail.py, but you didn't call any of this python scripts. - Calling of the text script shows following error message: python test_archivemail.py The archivemail script needs to be called 'archivemail.py' and should be in the current directory in order to be imported and tested. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 17:25:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240705] Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221725.l4MHPPED008645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240705 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > W: yafray undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so.0.0.9 dlclose > W: yafray unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafraycore.so.0.0.9 > /usr/lib64/libImath.so.4 Please report this issue to the upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 17:27:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221727.l4MHR0qf008791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-22 13:26 EST ------- I've chmod-ed those scripts because they're part of the upstream tarball but are extraneous in an rpm install, and rpmlint complained about unnecessarily executable docs. Should I provide a patch to test_archivemail.py so that it can be used as-is after the rpm is installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 17:34:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240705] Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221734.l4MHY5PF009584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240705 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 13:34 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint is quite on binary packages + Package contain verbain copy of the license test. + Start yafray from command line without arguments without a crash. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 17:35:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221735.l4MHZc50009755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-22 13:35 EST ------- Yes, this will be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 17:51:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221751.l4MHp7tl011129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-22 13:51 EST ------- Hmm, my python-fu has been defeated. What if, instead, I put test_archivemail.py in /usr/bin alongside archivemail and ln -s archivemail archivemail.py? It makes test_archivemail.py happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 18:31:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221831.l4MIVfkl014015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-05-22 14:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glob2 Short Description: An innovative RTS game Owners: rafalzaq at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 18:44:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240705] Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221844.l4MIiHgk014797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240705 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-22 14:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yafray Short Description: Yet Another Free RAYtracer Owners: kwizart at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 18:47:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221847.l4MIl2ll015035@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-22 14:47 EST ------- Here's a review: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. ? - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. See below - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Non blocker. Might ask upstream to include that this is released under the MIT license in the COPYING file instead of that saying it's just a stub file. 2. Non blocker. rpmlint says: W: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 12) Fix if you get a chance. 3. Shouldn't this package "Require: hwdata" ? It puts a file under /usr/share/hwdata/videoaliases/ which hwdata owns. Or does this get pulled in from some dependency of xorg-x11-server-Xorg? 4. Doesn't build on ppc32. I get: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/xorg -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -MT vermilion.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/vermilion.Tpo -c vermilion.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/vermilion.o vermilion.c: In function 'VERMILIONKernelOpen': vermilion.c:380: warning: ignoring return value of 'fgets', declared with attribute warn_unused_result vermilion.c:916:2: error: #error VERMILIONReadMemory and VERMILIONWriteMemory only work on little endian make[2]: *** [vermilion.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xf86-video-vermilion-1.0.0/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xf86-video-vermilion-1.0.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8790 (%build) Does this hardware exist on ppc? Perhaps ppc/ppc64 should also be excluded? 5. I wasn't yet able to verify the md5 on the sources. Will do that later today once freedesktop is back up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 18:51:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221851.l4MIpYPq015374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 18:55:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221855.l4MIt0iQ015542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 14:54 EST ------- Perhaps we should close this ticket and let whoever wishes to submit it in the future do so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 18:55:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174288] Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221855.l4MItlpM015658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174288 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 14:55 EST ------- I'll close this ticket in one week if there is no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 18:59:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176109] Review Request: pytraffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221859.l4MIxYJF015797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytraffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176109 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 14:59 EST ------- So it's been well over a year now. I think it's high time that this bug is closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:13:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221913.l4MJDWof016781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 15:13 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:17:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240705] Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221917.l4MJHLxN017227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240705 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 15:17 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:20:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221920.l4MJKa4V017490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-22 15:20 EST ------- How about putting installing the "archivemail" file as /usr/share/archivemail/archivemail.py (chmod 644), then writing a small Python wrapper script to import that module and run the main() method? Something like: ------------ #!/usr/bin/python if __name__ == '__main__': import sys sys.path.insert(0, '/usr/share/archivemail') from archivemail import main main() ------------ Not only will this solve your test_archivemail.py problem (with _little_ tweaking), it doesn't clutter up /usr/bin and would actually give you a (very) small performance boost as the Python interpreter will only parse and process the text of your small startup script but will use the precompiled byte-code .pyc file of archivemail, rather than having to re-parse this large file every time it's executed. Also, is it actually necessary to package the project's unit tests in the final binary RPM? If I wanted that, i would go for the src.rpm, but maybe that's just me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:24:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221924.l4MJOPeV018239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-22 15:24 EST ------- Oops, I forgot to mention, of course the wrapper script should then be called "archivemail" and installed to /usr/bin, chmod 755... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:45:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221945.l4MJjbhc021019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rayvd at bludgeon.org ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-22 15:45 EST ------- This is a pre-review: Encountered the following under MUST: MUST: Packaging Guidelines * I get the following when trying to install the RPM: error: Failed dependencies: perl(LW) is needed by nikto-1.36-1.noarch I notice Nikto itself provides an LW.pm -- should this be installed and a Provides line created? I can only find perl-libwhisker2 (which provides LW2.pm) in Fedora. Output of rpmlint: % rpmlint -i -v nikto-1.36-1.fc6.noarch.rpm I: nikto checking % echo $? 0 Under SHOULD: No issues. I was able to successfully build the package under mock. Everything else appears to check out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:48:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221948.l4MJml3P021462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-22 15:48 EST ------- Note that the rpmlint output does not indicate any issues, I was merely including it in the review as suggested by the Review Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221949.l4MJn0IU021563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-22 15:48 EST ------- I have done a pre-review of a Fedora Extras candidate package here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:50:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221950.l4MJoCq6021685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-22 15:50 EST ------- Question for reviewer: I intended this package initially for EPEL; what is the proper way to get the package included in both fedora-extras and EPEL? Should I create a separate bugzilla for EPEL inclusion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:56:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177507] Review Request: pida In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221956.l4MJuAVf022459@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(che666 at gmail.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:06:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222006.l4MK6jka023471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From mspevack at redhat.com 2007-05-22 16:06 EST ------- Can we PLEASE do whatever it takes to get this thing through review and into the Fedora repo BEFORE the F7 release? (meaning, ASAP) People are going to be looking for it. Let's make sure they can have it. We've spent lots of time and energy building it and promoting the hell out of it. It would be a shame if people can't find and use it. We're going to have a feature article in RH Magazine that talks about Revisor, and we made a big deal about it in the press interviews that are ongoing and all F7 release material. What's the biggest hold up? I assume between Jef, Steffan, and Jeroen, we can get this thing done. You three have enough combined brainpower to make Zod himself nervous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 19:57:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 15:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705221957.l4MJvJOH022665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 15:57 EST ------- Is anything happening with this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:12:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222012.l4MKCmi7024387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 16:12 EST ------- Well, when this package is approved and you make the CVS request, you can request EPEL branches but nothing requires that you branch for released Fedora versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:10:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222010.l4MKA7aa023677@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-22 16:10 EST ------- Disregard question. Appears I should let the remind package out into the fedora-extras "wild" for some time for testing, then resubmit to EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222018.l4MKIWgC024716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-22 16:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 2. Non blocker. rpmlint says: > W: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: > line 12) > Fix if you get a chance. Fixed. > 3. Shouldn't this package "Require: hwdata" ? It puts a file under > /usr/share/hwdata/videoaliases/ which hwdata owns. Or does this get pulled in > from some dependency of xorg-x11-server-Xorg? % rpm -q --whatrequires hwdata pciutils-2.2.3-4 usbutils-0.71-2.1 kudzu-1.2.64-2 isdn4k-utils-3.2-54.fc7 rhpxl-0.43-1.fc7 system-config-display-1.0.51-1.fc7 None of those are in the dep chain for Xorg, afaik. None of the other drivers are requiring on hwdata yet, but they're all languishing in mergereview so that's not really an excuse. Fixed. > 4. Doesn't build on ppc32. I get: > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/xorg -O2 -g -pipe -Wall > -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > -m32 -MT vermilion.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/vermilion.Tpo -c vermilion.c -fPIC > -DPIC -o .libs/vermilion.o > vermilion.c: In function 'VERMILIONKernelOpen': > vermilion.c:380: warning: ignoring return value of 'fgets', declared with > attribute warn_unused_result > vermilion.c:916:2: error: #error VERMILIONReadMemory and VERMILIONWriteMemory > only work on little endian > make[2]: *** [vermilion.lo] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xf86-video-vermilion-1.0.0/src' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/xf86-video-vermilion-1.0.0' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8790 (%build) > > Does this hardware exist on ppc? Perhaps ppc/ppc64 should also be excluded? I'm not even close to sure. I think it's x86 only for now. Changed to ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}, might add x86_64 if the need presents itself. I suspect this is in-chipset hardware so would never need to be added to anything but intel chipsets. Updated: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/vermilion/xorg-x11-drv-vermilion.spec http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/vermilion/xorg-x11-drv-vermilion-1.0.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:20:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222020.l4MKKs3c025094@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 16:20 EST ------- All that's necessary is for Jef to verify that the issues he saw have been fixed and give his approval. Then the process of getting it branched, checked in and built can happen. I'm happy to tale a look if Jef is on vacation or something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237333] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222023.l4MKNoVf025620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:23:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222023.l4MKNpHS025645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 Bug 237338 depends on bug 237333, which changed state. Bug 237333 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for DSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237333 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222025.l4MKP0fG025744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-22 16:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum Short Description: Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support Owners: wjhns174 at hardakers.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:26:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222026.l4MKQbpI025884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-22 16:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES Short Description: Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support Owners: wjhns174 at hardakers.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:26:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195645] Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222026.l4MKQe2n025933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rasqal - RDF query library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195645 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222029.l4MKTFCH026218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-22 16:29 EST ------- Ping? We need this package for KDE 4 (as a dependency of Soprano which is a dependency of Nepomuk), so it would be nice if it could get in sooner rather than later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 20:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 16:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222036.l4MKaWeZ026854@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 16:36 EST ------- So, is anything happening here? It's been over ten months since the last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 21:24:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 17:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222124.l4MLOqnS030781@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2007-05-22 17:24 EST ------- As I understand it Mr. Tibbitts is going to take Revisor to a nice Indian restaurant, only 6 blocks from here, so I'm gonna stand-by online and wait for the ping ;-) Thank you Mr. Tibbitts! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 21:26:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 17:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239303] Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222126.l4MLQVmT030860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 21:26:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 17:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222126.l4MLQWuD030873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 Bug 239939 depends on bug 239303, which changed state. Bug 239303 Summary: Review Request: libgii - Input library for GGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239303 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 21:26:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 17:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222126.l4MLQrnU030925@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-22 17:26 EST ------- IMHO, putting the headers in /usr/include: 1. is upstream's call to make, 2. doesn't violate any guidelines, 3. doesn't cause any real problems (see the next paragraph for why) and 4. can be easily changed in an update (if/when upstream changes it). Therefore, I don't see this as a good reason to block the review. Moreover, looking at the actual names of the headers, the only ones which don't have an rdf_* prefix are librdf.h and redland.h, both of which have practically zero chance to conflict with another package (redland being the project name and librdf being the name of the shared object it ships), making this a strictly academic issue. Therefore, please don't let this hold back this package. If you really can't get over yourself to approve it without this change, I will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 21:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 17:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197488] Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222127.l4MLRpZo030980@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uread - Utilities for unformatted fortran files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-22 17:27 EST ------- I should contact upstream and ask for a versionned tarball, but I have other priorities. I think it could be left open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 22:02:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 18:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222202.l4MM22qq001357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 18:02 EST ------- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 22:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 18:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222202.l4MM2Dn5001419@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-22 18:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 22:32:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 18:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222232.l4MMW5JY003807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-22 18:32 EST ------- I once recheck this review request (remind) in this afternoon (in Japan: UTC + 9h = EST + 13h) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:03:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222303.l4MN3jv4005268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-22 19:03 EST ------- Built in all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222304.l4MN4NaY005312@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-22 19:04 EST ------- Built in all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:05:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222305.l4MN555a005373@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-22 19:05 EST ------- Built in all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:05:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240195] Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222305.l4MN57bl005421@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sergueis-destiny - Serguei's Destiny, an AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 Bug 240195 depends on bug 239812, which changed state. Bug 239812 Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:05:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240194] Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222305.l4MN59dg005451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dgae - DG, a short AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240194 Bug 240194 depends on bug 239812, which changed state. Bug 239812 Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:26:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222326.l4MNQ6qI006431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-22 19:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.2-1.src.rpm This updates the code to the parent released 1.2 which fixes a number of minor issues here too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:26:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222326.l4MNQvU5006542@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:49:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222349.l4MNnNO8007090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 stefan-r-rhbz at s5r6.in-berlin.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefan-r-rhbz at s5r6.in- | |berlin.de ------- Additional Comments From stefan-r-rhbz at s5r6.in-berlin.de 2007-05-22 19:49 EST ------- Perhaps add to the description in the package spec that IIDC (Instrumentation & Industrial Digital Camera) is for, well, industrial cameras and some webcams, not for DV cameras (camcorders). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:49:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237330] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222349.l4MNnTG3007155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-AES -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for AES support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237330 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222349.l4MNnuNl007202@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 22 23:49:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237338] Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705222349.l4MNnvt7007227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DNS-SEC -- Perl support for DNSSEC Alias: perl-Net-DNS-SEC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237338 Bug 237338 depends on bug 237332, which changed state. Bug 237332 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:04:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230004.l4N04UUL007883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(andreas at bawue.net) ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-22 20:04 EST ------- Ping? Is there any update regarding the status of ngircd? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:05:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230005.l4N05vip007957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-22 20:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-Base85 Short Description: perl extension for base85 numbers Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:08:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230008.l4N089If008160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-22 20:08 EST ------- LW.pm is provided by the libwhisker2 package via a compability bridge. LW is discontinued and LW2 is recommended by upstream. Nikto will work just fine with the LW2 LW1 compability bridge. How to solve this package wise I don't know though. Suggestions welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240705] Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230018.l4N0IU61008514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yafray - Yet Another Free RAYtracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240705 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230021.l4N0LpTC008608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-22 20:21 EST ------- Options I see: * Modify perl-libwhisker2 to include the LW1 compatability bridge. Perhaps as a -compat sub-package -- perl-libwhisker2-compat * Patch nikto to use LW2 calls (might be too much work) * See if nikto upstream would release a version for LW2 specifically * Create a perl-libwhisker package using the last stable version of LW.pl I like option #3 best, but probably not realistic. :-) Option 1 would be my choice. You'd have to work with the maintainer of that package however. Option #4 might be doable as well, but if LW1 is retired, do we really want to bring it into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239525] Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230033.l4N0X6YN008990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:33:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230033.l4N0X7iF009009@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 Bug 239526 depends on bug 239525, which changed state. Bug 239525 Summary: Review Request: gammu - Command Line utility and Libraries to work with mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239525 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:35:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230035.l4N0Z3ww009064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-22 20:35 EST ------- alright i on it ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:41:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230041.l4N0ft4u009278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jspaleta at gmail.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 20:41 EST ------- OK, assigning to me with visions of real, hot vindaloo (as opposed to "painful for a Yankee, boring for a Texan" Boston-style vindaloo). I'm going to build on top of Jef's review here, check the issues he raised and trust him for the rest. Just let me run this through mock.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:46:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230046.l4N0kxE4009488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-22 20:46 EST ------- those are exemples script which could be check for extras use (such as manage smsbackup). upstream isn't more explicit about them... :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 00:59:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 20:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230059.l4N0xnd2009962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-22 20:59 EST ------- I'm the maintainer of perl-libwhisker2. It already contains the compability bridge in the base package. See #239096 and let's continue discussion about changes to the perl-libwhisker2 there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:08:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230108.l4N18Nwi010300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-22 21:08 EST ------- but here rpmlint is showing doc-file-dependency warning... Is gammu-python really using these scripts or its for end-user to explicitly use them? if that is then you can chmod 644 to those scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230110.l4N1AlsY010376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230110.l4N1Am3W010394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 Bug 239156 depends on bug 239155, which changed state. Bug 239155 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:10:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230110.l4N1Anog010406@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 Bug 239158 depends on bug 239155, which changed state. Bug 239155 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230115.l4N1FsQE010711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:15:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230115.l4N1FtmP010725@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 Bug 239158 depends on bug 239157, which changed state. Bug 239157 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:16:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230116.l4N1GEtk010817@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:16:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230116.l4N1GFrI010829@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 Bug 239097 depends on bug 239096, which changed state. Bug 239096 Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:17:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230117.l4N1HEbi010877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:17:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230117.l4N1HFhD010896@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 Bug 239163 depends on bug 239159, which changed state. Bug 239159 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:17:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239160] Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230117.l4N1HGVD010908@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239160 Bug 239160 depends on bug 239159, which changed state. Bug 239159 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:17:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230117.l4N1HWlP010932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:17:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239088] Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230117.l4N1HXXm010950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239088 Bug 239088 depends on bug 239087, which changed state. Bug 239087 Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:19:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239234] Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230119.l4N1JCeK010996@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239234 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230122.l4N1MSgB011207@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-22 21:22 EST ------- Found this as a result of a review on nikto (#239097). They LW1 compatability bridge does not appear to be being installed correctly: # rpm -ql perl-libwhisker2.noarch /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/LW2.pm /usr/share/doc/perl-libwhisker2-2.4 /usr/share/doc/perl-libwhisker2-2.4/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/perl-libwhisker2-2.4/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/perl-libwhisker2-2.4/README /usr/share/man/man3/LW2.3pm.gz (Note: this is from FC6, but I think the same would occur in FC7) Building from the .spec file I see the following: Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.98077 + umask 022 + cd /net/leoray/leoray1/users/ray5147/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd libwhisker2-2.4 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /var/tmp/perl-libwhisker2-2.4-2-root-ray5147 + mkdir -p /var/tmp/perl-libwhisker2-2.4-2-root-ray5147/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 + mkdir -p /var/tmp/perl-libwhisker2-2.4-2-root-ray5147/usr/share/man/man3 + make install DESTDIR=/var/tmp/perl-libwhisker2-2.4-2-root-ray5147 export DESTDIR perl Makefile.pl install LW2.pm installed to /var/tmp/perl-libwhisker2-2.4-2-root-ray5147/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 LW2.3pm installed to /var/tmp/perl-libwhisker2-2.4-2-root-ray5147/usr/share/man/man3 perl Makefile.pl install_compat Error: bad build command 'install_compat' The solution is to use this libwhisker2-2.4-lw1bridge.patch file instead of the one in the SRPM: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/perl-libwhisker2/libwhisker2-2.4-lw1bridge.patch The only difference being that we use "perl Makefile.pl install_lw1" as per the documentation instead of "perl Makefile.pl install_compat" Once I make this change I now see the LW v1 compatability bridge installed correctly and can use the nikto package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:30:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230130.l4N1Uwnq011746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 rmo at sunnmore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rmo at sunnmore.net ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2007-05-22 21:30 EST ------- I guess the spec should also BR perl(HTTP::Request::AsCGI) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230135.l4N1ZrSi012002@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:35:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230135.l4N1Zs4v012015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 Bug 239162 depends on bug 239161, which changed state. Bug 239161 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:36:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230136.l4N1aAAx012044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 21:36 EST ------- OK, that didn't take long. You're right, rpmlint is now silent except for: W: revisor strange-permission revisor.spec 0600 which I don't think is a blocker, but should be easily fixed by just "chmod 644 revisor.spec". It shouldn't make much difference once it gets checked into CVS anyway. There is a copy of the license in the tarball; that needs to be included in the final package as %doc. As Jef pointed out above, I see no mention of desktop-file-install; you'll need to add BR: desktop-file-utils and then something like this in %install: desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \ --delete-original \ --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/foo.desktop The package installs fine on a handy rawhide system, shows up in the KDE menu and starts without problems. I note, though, that the menu entries do nothing for me, and if I select "Rescue Image" as the type of media to compose, I get an error dialog telling me "No media selected". I'd wager that these are not issues related to packaging and so aren't blockers, but you may know better than I. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:36:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230136.l4N1aFW3012070@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:36:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230136.l4N1aFdr012082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 Bug 239164 depends on bug 239156, which changed state. Bug 239156 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 01:43:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230143.l4N1hV7e012254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 21:43 EST ------- Cool. Now, since there's a license file in the upstream source, it needs to be included in the package. Just add "LICENSE" after "%doc Changes" in your %files section. Other than that, this package is good to go; I'll go ahead and approve and trust you to add the LICENSE file when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 02:20:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 22:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239200] Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230220.l4N2Kv6l013997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239200 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 22:20 EST ------- Well, I thought that work, and indeed I thought I tried it, but the makefile doesn't pass CFLAGS and I get this: gcc -o onesixtyone onesixtyone.c which results in a busted debuginfo package, no optimization and a binary built with none of the necessary security flags. A quick tweak to the Makefile gets things building OK; I'll attach a patch. You just need to apply it in %prep and the Makefile should pick up CFLAGS and build things properly. Let me know if you need info on doing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 02:23:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 22:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239200] Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230223.l4N2NZ6q014203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239200 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-22 22:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155221) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155221&action=view) onesixtyone-makefile.patch Just add Patch0: onesixtyone-makefile.patch under Source0:, and then %patch0 at the end of %prep. That should get things building properly, or at least it seems to work for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 03:17:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 23:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230317.l4N3HTPa017755@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-22 23:17 EST ------- 2. ok. looks good. 3. ok. looks good. 4. ok. Note that it did build just fine on x86_64 here, but I don't know if the hardware appears there or not. 5. I was able to get thru to freedesktop.org now, and verify the md5sum (which checks out fine). 3a45adbfbcae487cf04dbcd089533c3d xf86-video-vermilion-1.0.0.tar.bz2 3a45adbfbcae487cf04dbcd089533c3d xf86-video-vermilion-1.0.0.tar.bz2.1 I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 03:18:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 23:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230318.l4N3Idar017863@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From mspevack at redhat.com 2007-05-22 23:18 EST ------- Thanks Jason. Looks like we should be able to get this thing into CVS pretty easily at this point, which is going to be great. All you, Jeroen! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 03:20:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 23:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230320.l4N3KTu1017977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |163779 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-22 23:20 EST ------- Good: rpmlint clean License: public domain BuildArch: noarch source archive matches proper file ownership BuildRoot %clean section use of macros APPROVED I will sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 03:47:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 23:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230347.l4N3lK4M019901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-22 23:47 EST ------- Yes thats it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 04:19:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 00:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238236] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230419.l4N4JD7s021410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest - Make subrequests to actions in Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238236 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-23 00:19 EST ------- Yep :) Sorry, this one fell under the radar for a while there.. SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest-0.11-2.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-SubRequest.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 04:48:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 00:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230448.l4N4mxTI022025@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 05:54:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 01:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230554.l4N5sjrh024386@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 01:54 EST ------- * For remind 03.00.24-2: - Doc dependency rpmlint ---------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost remind-03.00.24]$ rpmlint remind W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/moon W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/hebdate W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/sunset W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/sunrise W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/calps W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/rem2html W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/hebps W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/sunrise.rem-DIST W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/cal_dispatch-DIST W: remind spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/hebhtml W: remind incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.00.24-2 03.00.24-2.fc7 W: remind doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/rem2html perl(Getopt::Long) W: remind doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/remind-03.00.24/www/rem2html /usr/bin/perl -------------------------------------------------------------- - Documentation files should not have executable permission. Please change the permission to 0644. = For your pre-review - There is some perl specific way to describe spec file, however for now it is okay. So, please fix doc dependency rpmlint for remind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 06:28:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 02:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230628.l4N6SFtl025601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 ------- Additional Comments From livinded at deadbytes.net 2007-05-23 02:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: surfraw Short Description: Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web Owners: livinded at deadbytes.net Branches: FC-6 FC-7 InitialCC: livinded at deadbytes.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 06:30:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 02:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230630.l4N6UUD4025682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-23 02:30 EST ------- Setting fedora-cvs to ? (livinded's bugzilla access hasn't synced yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 06:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 02:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230643.l4N6hTDE026190@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-05-23 02:43 EST ------- Is there any way to skip building -devel subpackage? If yes and we'll skip -devel, aren't we still need pkgconfig to do the build (yes, we need, because the build step is common for both packages). That said, is there any point in having BuildRequires for subpackages, at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 07:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 03:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230715.l4N7FVmm027417@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-23 03:15 EST ------- Ehh, okay, I can remove them. But please, attach ALL your objections at once and I'll fix them all, otherwise this package never goes to distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 07:33:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 03:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230733.l4N7X9t3028063@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-23 03:33 EST ------- okay, spec files were removed from binary package (berusky-1.1-4.src.rpm) fixed at http://people.redhat.com/stransky/berusky/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 07:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 03:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230753.l4N7r3m4029627@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 03:53 EST ------- Well, I want to close this bug if new spec/srpm is not uploaded within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 07:53:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 03:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230753.l4N7rmOt029727@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 03:53 EST ------- Well, I want to close this bug if new spec/srpm is not uploaded within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 07:54:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 03:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174288] Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230754.l4N7sKXn029808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174288 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 07:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 03:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230755.l4N7tVRp029942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 03:55 EST ------- Similar to bug 174289, I want to close this bug if new spec/srpm is not uploaded within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 08:17:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 04:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235672] Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230817.l4N8HKFi032437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zope3 - Zope 3 web application server framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235672 ------- Additional Comments From eugene_beast at mail.ru 2007-05-23 04:17 EST ------- Binary packages are also available: http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-3.3.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-instance-3.3.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-doc-3.3.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm http://217.117.89.14/zope3/zope3-devel-3.3.1-1.fc6.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 08:52:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 04:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705230852.l4N8qPQw002876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-23 04:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Good: > + Tar ball matches with upstream. > > Bad: > - You have put the BuildRequires to pkgconfig to the main package, but the > BuildRequires is required for the devel subpackage. BuildRequires are not for the main or the devel package, they are for the source package. Here indeed pkgconfig is not needed as a BuildRequires because the libnfnetlink libs is found with: AC_CHECK_LIB(nfnetlink, nfnl_subsys_open, AC_MSG_RESULT(found), AC_MSG_ERROR([libnfnetlink 0.0.16 or later needed])) AC_CHECK_HEADER([libnfnetlink/linux_nfnetlink.h], [AC_MSG_RESULT([found])], [AC_MSG_ERROR([libnfnetlink 0.0.16 or later needed])]) In general it is better to use pkgconfig instead, if available (it is better for multilibs, for dependencies and allows to have different subdirectories for different versions). So it would be better, in my opinion, to have something along: PKG_CHECK_MODULES([NFNETLINK],[libnfnetlink >= 0.0.16],, [ AC_CHECK_LIB(nfnetlink, nfnl_subsys_open, [NFNETLINK_LIBS=-lnfnetlink AC_MSG_RESULT(found)], AC_MSG_ERROR([libnfnetlink 0.0.16 or later needed])) AC_CHECK_HEADER([libnfnetlink/linux_nfnetlink.h], [AC_MSG_RESULT([found])], [AC_MSG_ERROR([libnfnetlink 0.0.16 or later needed])]) ]) And in src/Makefile.am, replace -lnfnetlink with NFNETLINK_LIBS, and add NFNETLINK_CFLAGS to AM_CFLAGS This is to be tested, and for upstream, of course. Also in top level Makefile.am LINKOPTS = -lnfnetlink is unuseful Also in src/Makefile.am AM_CFLAGS = -fPIC -Wall is wrong, since -fPIC is added if needed by libtool and -Wall is not portable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 09:05:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 05:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] New: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/calcurse.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/calcurse-1.8-1.src.rpm Description: Calcurse is a text-based calendar and scheduling application. It helps keep track of events, appointments, and everyday tasks. A configurable notification system reminds the user of upcoming deadlines, and the curses based interface can be customized to suit user needs. rpmlint clean, noarch package. N.B. I'm sure someone wants to tell me "but the URL is wrong" as the comment in the spec file says, rpmbuild throws a fit when there is a ? after the /, I'm going to try and find out if there is a fix or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 11:01:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231536] Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231101.l4NB1IMH011139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: muine-scrobbler - Audioscrobbler plugin for Muine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231536 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 07:01 EST ------- Build fails on ppc and x86_64 in koji. Suggestions welcome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 11:06:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239200] Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231106.l4NB6Q4T011520@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239200 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 07:06 EST ------- Updated: - Added patch Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/onesixtyone.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/onesixtyone-0.3.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 11:41:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231141.l4NBfbAb013697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-23 07:41 EST ------- It looks like the comments from Micha? Bentkowski indicate that lapack/atlas are sharing (virtual?) Provides, but are not compatible. See also comment #13. If atlas-devel/lapack-devel are interchangable forget my comment :) Quentin, any chance you'd find some time for reviewing? Or are you waiting to see whether this package is GPL compatible (bug #234191), as otherwise it is of no use to octave? If you don't want to review with the current license or until bug #234191 is resolved otherwise, then perhaps someone else would like to? Rathann, maybe? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 11:46:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231146.l4NBkxtj014262@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 07:46 EST ------- patch applied and package rebuilt in koji for devel, which is F8. The F7 branch is missing from all my packages, I'm looking into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 11:47:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231147.l4NBlLDb014311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 11:47:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 07:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231147.l4NBlMMF014330@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 Bug 239097 depends on bug 239096, which changed state. Bug 239096 Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 12:55:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 08:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231255.l4NCtxXa019986@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-05-23 08:55 EST ------- I hope I fixed it. New SRPM is on http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout-0.2.114.svn172-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 13:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231301.l4ND1NQV020490@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-23 09:01 EST ------- That didn't work, it said it needed archivemail to be called archivemail.py. When I renamed it that, it still failed, with a whole slew of errors. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail-0.7.0-1.src.rpm Maybe it'd be better just to put the test_archivemail in /usr/bin with archivemail.py and be done with it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 13:48:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231348.l4NDmxsd024607@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-23 09:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > That didn't work, it said it needed archivemail to be called archivemail.py. > When I renamed it that, it still failed, with a whole slew of errors. It works just fine. Your "slew of errors" all have to do with the file location and execution permission of the archivemail.py file. Comment #5 was just an _example_. You still need to patch both archivemail.py (one-liner) and test_archive.py (one-liner + simple sed substitution) to work with these new file locations and permissions. I'll attach example patches shortly. > Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail.spec > SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail-0.7.0-1.src.rpm > > Maybe it'd be better just to put the test_archivemail in /usr/bin with > archivemail.py and be done with it? No. One of the main tasks of a package maintainer is to make sure their packages integrate well with the rest of the distribution; anyone armed with google can roll their own RPMs, but that does not make them Fedora maintainers. Cluttering up /usr/bin with pointless symlinks is bad. Also, in general your average end-user isn't interested in unittests; I'm not even convinced they should be shipped in the binary RPM... but putting them under %docs at least gives intereste people (aka developers) the option of using them, I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:02:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231402.l4NE2L7V025773@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-23 10:02 EST ------- New version, fixes issues mentioned in comment#10 Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.1-2.src.rpm Source tarball: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.1.tar.bz2 Ready to import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:02:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231402.l4NE2qNH025906@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-23 10:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > It works just fine. Ah, I misunderstood. I told you, my python is not nearly so developed as my PHP or even my C++. :) > > No. One of the main tasks of a package maintainer is to make sure their packages > integrate well with the rest of the distribution; anyone armed with google can > roll their own RPMs, but that does not make them Fedora maintainers. Cluttering > up /usr/bin with pointless symlinks is bad. Agreed, and I was not proposing to use symlinks, I was proposing to move the test_ script there directly. > Also, in general your average end-user isn't interested in unittests; I'm not > even convinced they should be shipped in the binary RPM... but putting them > under %docs at least gives intereste people (aka developers) the option of using > them, I suppose. Which is why I put it in %doc in the first place (which would still be my preference). I was thinking I could put it in put with a note detailing how a user could get the test script to work, namely copy it and the main script to the same place and run. Given the Python shipped in Fedora, it should be working from the get-go once the rpm is installed. Hence my use of the word 'extraneous in Comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:17:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231417.l4NEHKv6026960@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-23 10:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155242) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155242&action=view) Example of proposed modifications to the archivemail package Ok, I've created a tar.gz file containing an example archivemail startup script, a patch for test_archivemail.py, and the spec file that ties all this stuff together, heavily commented (based on your original spec file). The resulting RPM install and runs fine. You can use the command "python /usr/share/doc/archivemail-0.7.0/test_archivemail.py" to run the unit tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:25:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225010] Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231425.l4NEPXit028159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glob2 - An innovative RTS game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225010 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-05-23 10:25 EST ------- Thanks for review. Tagged and built. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:29:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231429.l4NETls2028654@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 10:29 EST ------- * What are the lines of "BuildRequires" on -devel package? * Is this package parellel make unsafe? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:31:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231431.l4NEVYGd028851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-23 10:31 EST ------- Mid-air collision! :-) (In reply to comment #9) > Agreed, and I was not proposing to use symlinks, I was proposing to move the > test_ script there directly. Fair enough, but I don't think its necessary to expose the unittests to all end-users; to put in bluntly: they don't do anything useful[1] > Which is why I put it in %doc in the first place (which would still be my > preference). Mine too, in this case. :-) > I was thinking I could put it in put with a note detailing how a > user could get the test script to work, namely copy it and the main script to > the same place and run. Yes, very good idea. But if you apply my proposed changes, no copying/renaming is required, only a simple Readme.tests (or whatever) saying pretty much what I said in the last paragraph of comment #10. > Given the Python shipped in Fedora, it should be > working from the get-go once the rpm is installed. Hence my use of the word > 'extraneous in Comment #2. Yes. Btw, I also removed some unecessary %doc entries (maifest, setup.py, etc) - these are required for application installation, which is RPM's job. Jochen: By the way, are you reviewing this package? If so, please assign the bug to yourself to avoid confusion (I noticed the flag when I was about to do this... :-) ) [1] except if you are debugging/developing, which normal users of the app won't be doing ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231435.l4NEZ94r029349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-23 10:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > * What are the lines of "BuildRequires" on -devel package? They are the packages required to build the adminutil-devel package? > * Is this package parellel make unsafe? Not that I know of. Why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:41:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231441.l4NEfndD030098@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-23 10:41 EST ------- Many thanks to Ralf for the review! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:42:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238705] Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231442.l4NEgjkp030265@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at avr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238705 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-23 10:42 EST ------- p.s. Changing assignee to ralf for proper bookkeeping of who did which reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:47:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231447.l4NElOeD030826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 10:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > * What are the lines of "BuildRequires" on -devel package? > They are the packages required to build the adminutil-devel package? There seems to be some confusion. "BuildRequires" is the packages which are required to rebuild this (adminutil) package and they should be written at the part of the summary of main package (as you wrote them). There is no need to write duplicate BuildRequires. What is actually needed is to write "Requires" for -devel package. For example, adminutil.pc.in contains the line: ----------------------------------------------- Requires: nspr, nss, svrcore, mozldap, icu ----------------------------------------------- This means -devel package should have "Requires" (not BuildRequires) nspr-devel, nss-devel, ........ Check the section "Requires" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > > > * Is this package parellel make unsafe? > > Not that I know of. Why? Please refer to the section "Parallel make" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 14:58:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231458.l4NEwSs3032275@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-23 10:58 EST ------- Look nice. As a hint, if a entry in the file stanza ends with a slash, the directory will be owned to the package and all files and subdirectories will be recursivly included in the package. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231500.l4NF0fqK032411@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-23 11:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155254) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155254&action=view) spec file diffs Do these diffs address the issues in comment #16? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231503.l4NF3OcN000441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:03 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple Short Description: Easy Access to SQLite databases using objects Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:03:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231503.l4NF3P56000456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 Bug 239164 depends on bug 239156, which changed state. Bug 239156 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:04:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231504.l4NF4SaQ000590@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 Bug 239162 depends on bug 239161, which changed state. Bug 239161 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:04:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231504.l4NF4Rop000578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:04 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-Libdnet Short Description: Perl Interface to libdnet Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:06:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239234] Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231506.l4NF6ADo000752@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239234 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:06 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arp-scan Short Description: Scanning and fingerprinting tool Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:06:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239185] Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231506.l4NF6mAo000793@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:06 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arp-scan Short Description: Scanning and fingerprinting tool Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:07:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231507.l4NF7DCe000839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:07 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Nmap-Parser Short Description: Parse nmap scan data with perl Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:07:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231507.l4NF7jOp000936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:07:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239088] Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231507.l4NF7lPe000955@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239088 Bug 239088 depends on bug 239087, which changed state. Bug 239087 Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:08:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231508.l4NF89aa001000@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:08 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ike-scan Short Description: IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN servers Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231508.l4NF8MXw001036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-23 11:08 EST ------- Thank you for your fix. There was no other objectives which block the approvement of your package, so your package is APPROVED !!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231508.l4NF8jVR001101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:08 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: halberd Short Description: Tool to discover HTTP load balancers Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:09:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231509.l4NF9P1D001183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:09 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: halberd Short Description: Tool to discover HTTP load balancers Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:10:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231510.l4NFABbF001331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:10 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: DMitry Short Description: DeepMagic Information Gathering Tool Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-6, EL-4, EL-5, F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:10:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231510.l4NFAZv1001400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:11:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231511.l4NFBSuK001568@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-23 11:11 EST ------- OK, you are right, so I can APPROVED your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:12:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231512.l4NFCU2v001856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-23 11:12 EST ------- Great, Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:12:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231512.l4NFCZoo001877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 11:12 EST ------- F7 branch was never created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scratchpad Short Description: Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:13:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231513.l4NFDdYr002082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-05-23 11:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > > 1. You might ask upstream to include a copy of the GPL and the other odd license? > Not a blocker. I'll send upstream a note and see if he'll put a COPYING or the like in the source distribution. Along with a manifest of which files are under which license. The source code files which are GPL say so in the boiler plate at the top of the .c files. > 2. What parts of the code are under the odd MIT-like O'Reilly license? > It might be good to list them. Also, I can't find mention of this license in the > code > anywhere. Where is it stated? The .c files that are under the MIT-like license from O'Reilly say in the header at the top of the file that they are copied from Mastering Algorithms in C by Kyle Loudon. It gives the ISBN number and a link to the book's page on O'Reilly. I wondered about what license these files were under so I downloaded the original examples .tgz from O'Reilly where these files came from and read the license in there. So no, the license is not specifically mentioned in haproxy itslf, but the source code that is from the Loudon Book is duely noted. All in all, each .c file in haproxy says where it came from, who wrote it, and if its under GPL it states that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:15:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231515.l4NFFu7X002272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 11:15 EST ------- I cannot check if your comment 17 is sufficient until I can rebuild this package with mock successfully. However, I have one question about if -devel package should have "Requires: icu". Would you explain why this is needed? ("Requires: icu" in pkgconfig .pc file is satisfied with libicu-devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:17:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231517.l4NFHKZX002402@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-23 11:17 EST ------- Very nice. I added the readme and fixed a permissions issue with the new source file. The only rpmlint warning is about the test script not being executable, which is expected. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail-0.7.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:18:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231518.l4NFI7G6002449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-23 11:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155258) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155258&action=view) removed requires: icu Removed Requires: icu Does this look ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:25:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231525.l4NFPCnS003374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 11:25 EST ------- Wow, this review has gone 18 months with no comment. Is anything happening here? Are all parties still interested in this review? I don't even think the upstream project is still called "gruler" these days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:26:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174952] Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231526.l4NFQPIB003629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174952 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 11:26 EST ------- I'm not sure why this ticket is still open, but I'll set the review flag so that it doesn't show up in the "to be reviewed list". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:43:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231543.l4NFh5id005502@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 11:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155265) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155265&action=view) rpmlint for (installed) adminutil Still not enough * undefined non-weak symbols - libadmsslutil.so.1.1.1 contains undefined non-weak symbols. This is not allowed for packages to provide -devel subpackages because linkage against this library fails due to these symbols. * Timestamps - -devel package contains many header files (i.e. text files which are not created or modified during rebuild) and keeping timestamps on these files are recommend. Please use: --------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" --------------------------------------------------- * macros consistency - Please determine to use macros or not to use macros for binaries. Please don't use both "rm" and "%{__rm}" If you want to use %{__rm}, please also use %{__make}, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:43:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232855] Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231543.l4NFhgxb005610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: surfraw-1.0.7-1 - Shell Users Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232855 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-23 11:43 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:43:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231543.l4NFhlWX005645@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-23 11:43 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 15:51:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231551.l4NFpnSH006744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 11:51 EST ------- One question: Is the license of lib/libadminutil/acclanglist.c compatible with LGPL (not GPL) ? What does the following mean? (sorry, I am not legal specialist) ------------------------------------------------- Non-GPL Code permitted under this exception must only link to the code of this Program through those well defined interfaces identified in the file named EXCEPTION found in the source code files (the "Approved Interfaces"). -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 16:46:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231646.l4NGkdgT011217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 12:46 EST ------- Well, I have not checked this in detail, however -4 seems good. I will review this fully later (however as I live in Japan (UTC + 9h), I once go to sleep...) Some questions: ? Would you explain why you removed memcached-debug? As this is a sponsor-needed ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 17:15:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231715.l4NHFrfg013445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-23 13:15 EST ------- Good: + Naming seems ok. + Rpmlint is quite for source rpm. + Rpmlint is quite for binary rpm. + Rpmlint is quite for debuginfo rpm. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text. + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Startup of the application works without a crash. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Source0 is not a full qualified URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 17:16:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231716.l4NHGRrf013499@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 17:41:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231741.l4NHfkEp016768@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-23 13:41 EST ------- << install -p -Dm 0644 template/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/template >> cp -pr template/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/template fixes it. Any problem with this? It's the empty template/src that's the problem, but it needs to be there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:07:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231807.l4NI7940019775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-23 14:07 EST ------- Yeah, sorry. I lost the energy to complete this.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:22:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232036] Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231822.l4NIMDdB020939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible Alias: perl-YAML-Tiny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-23 14:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-YAML-Tiny New Branches: F-7 This is going to need a F-7 branch in order to avoid upgrade problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:23:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231823.l4NINJ2B021071@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jonathansteffan at gmail.com 2007-05-23 14:23 EST ------- For a note about "W: revisor strange-permission revisor.spec 0600": revisor.spec is generated by autmake. If there is anyone that knows how to fix this, we are more then willing to fix it. I just have not figured out how. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:24:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231824.l4NIO5U1021160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-23 14:24 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-YAML-Tiny New Branches: F-7 This is going to need a F-7 branch in order to avoid upgrade problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231824.l4NIOFtW021226@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jonathansteffan at gmail.com 2007-05-23 14:24 EST ------- s/autmake/automake/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231825.l4NIPJTf021290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-23 14:25 EST ------- Oops, let's try that again. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-YAML-Syck New Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:26:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231085] Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231826.l4NIQK4k021395@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231085 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-23 14:26 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule New Branches: F-7 This is going to need a F-7 branch in order to avoid upgrade problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:27:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231827.l4NIRN7D021560@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-23 14:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Image-Math-Constrain New Branches: F-7 This is going to need a F-7 branch in order to avoid upgrade problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:28:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231828.l4NIS4Ue021642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-05-23 14:28 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix New Branches: F-7 This is going to need a F-7 branch in order to avoid upgrade problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231839.l4NIdo05023117@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-23 14:39 EST ------- Note needing to br pkgconfig directly is caused by a packaging bug in openssl. Filed at bug 241031. There appears to be an "example" directory as well. Would this make sense to include as %doc in -devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:40:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231840.l4NIeOBn023208@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jonathansteffan at gmail.com 2007-05-23 14:40 EST ------- Alphonse, Sorry, I have not had much free time for Xgl. I'll spend a little time on it today and build on rawhide. I wont be able to test the packages as I don't have a rawhide machine with ATi hardware (that is not virtual.) I will, however, put them up for download. I am going to also work to update the source version we are building from. I will also take a look at system-config-xselector and see what magic it provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:51:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231851.l4NIpwxI024675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 14:51 EST ------- rpmlint is complaining about the spec that's in the SRPM, not anything generated by the build process, but I guess you could be building the SRPM with rpmbuild -ts on the tarball. To add to oddness, though, the spec in the tarball has mode 664. In any case, it's really not a big deal. The other issues are much more interesting, but should also be much easier to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:54:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204493] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231854.l4NIsdSw025066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-DOM - Perl interface to Mozilla DOM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204493 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 14:54 EST ------- It seems to me that this ticket (and its dependencies) should just go away since Mozilla is long gone, and once xulrunner comes into the distro hopefully this module or something like it can be supportable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:59:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231859.l4NIxAI7025484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | AssignedTo|Jochen at herr-schmitt.de |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 14:59 EST ------- No comments in six months; it's dfinitely time for a new reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 18:59:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231859.l4NIxDt0025544@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 19:10:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] New: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tom at moertel.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/6/SPECS/R-Matrix.spec SRPM URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/6/SRPMS/R-Matrix-0.9975-1.src.rpm Description: I have packaged a number of CRAN packages for the R statistical-computing system. See the following for the full list: http://blog.moertel.com/articles/2007/04/25/new-fedora-core-rpms-for-cran-packages After discussions about the packages on the fedora-r-devel-list, I am submitting them for review, starting with R-Matrix. For background, please see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-r-devel-list/2007-April/msg00003.html If there are any problems with this package's spec, they are likely to exist in my other packages as well, so I would like to flush them out with an initial submission before submitting the rest. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to improve my packaging technique. Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 19:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231928.l4NJSIqx027907@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tom at moertel.com 2007-05-23 15:28 EST ------- Please note that this is my first package submission, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 19:30:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231930.l4NJUEPV028238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 tom at moertel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 19:30:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231930.l4NJUVNg028290@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-23 15:30 EST ------- Couple of minor items: You probably want to have: BuildRequires: libgfortran-devel (you're linking to it) The BuildRequires: R is correct, but BuildRequires: R-devel may be needed for other CRAN packages (if they're looking for libR.pc), and it will drag in R as a dependency. Might not be a bad idea to script it that way to be safe. You need to mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/R/library before running R CMD INSTALL into it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 19:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705231934.l4NJYeMP029033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-23 15:34 EST ------- Also: [spot at localhost ~]$ rpmlint /home/spot/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-Matrix-0.9975-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm /home/spot/rpmbuild/SRPMS/R-Matrix-0.9975-1.fc7.src.rpm /home/spot/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/R-Matrix-debuginfo-0.9975-1.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: R-Matrix devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/R/library/Matrix/include/Matrix.h W: R-Matrix devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/R/library/Matrix/include/Matrix_stubs.c W: R-Matrix devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/R/library/Matrix/include/cholmod.h W: R-Matrix incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-1 0.9975-1.fc7 The devel files look like they belong in a -devel subpackage. The changelog entry needs to be corrected, your script seems to be spitting out a generic one that doesn't match the package version (and is omitting your name). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:24:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232024.l4NKOq2Z001119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-23 16:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Couple of minor items: > > You probably want to have: BuildRequires: libgfortran-devel (you're linking to it) libgfortran-devel doesn't exist as such, it is linked automatically in when linking with gcc -lgfortran/gfortran. A BuildRequires: gcc-gfortran is missing however. Also looking at the log, it seems that during the link gcc is used and there is a -lgfortran. In my recalling this is not what should be done, instead gfortran should be used during the link and -lgfortran should be omitted. This may be for upstream, or a R bug, however, I don't know exactly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232031.l4NKVWNO001631@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-23 16:31 EST ------- Good: + Testscript run fine. + Local install and uninstall works fine. Bad: - Script in %{_docdir} contains a shebang line at the first line. This coused the rpmlint meessage you refered. So please remove this shebang line from the script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:34:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232034.l4NKY9cR001993@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-23 16:34 EST ------- As soon as I can see, we need to create a seperate mpfr package. Such a package doesn't exist in Fedora nowaday, becouse it was a integrated part of the gmp package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:41:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240500] Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232041.l4NKfGAL003293@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240500 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-23 16:41 EST ------- R CMD CHECK fails here: You forgot to run R CMD check. I added: %check cd ..;%{_bindir}/R CMD check %{packname} But when I did that, R CMD check failed: + /usr/bin/R CMD check Biobase * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory '/home/spot/rpmbuild/BUILD/Biobase.Rcheck' * using R version 2.5.0 (2007-04-23) * checking for file 'Biobase/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * this is package 'Biobase' version '1.14.0' * checking package dependencies ... ERROR Packages required but not available: tkWidgets Looks like this package really needs tkWidgets as a Requires (and a BuildRequires, for the check). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:44:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] New: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/blobAndConquer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/blobAndConquer-0.90-1.src.rpm Description: With the apparent defeat of Galdov and the reclaiming of the Fire, Time, Space and Reality Crystals the Blobs' battle was only just beginning. Bob had rescued many Blobs and fought many battles, but now he had an ever bigger task ahead of him. The Blobs' homeworld is still littered with the alien forces and Bob once again makes it his task to lead the counter attack. But even without Galdov the aliens are still extremely well organised... They're Ready. Will You Be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:44:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226256] Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232044.l4NKiJGY004118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226256 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-23 16:44 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 237337 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232044.l4NKiL6j004155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-23 16:44 EST ------- *** Bug 226256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232047.l4NKljnl004769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-23 16:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Many thanks, Hans. :) (gets out back-scratcher) Well, you can return the favor by reviewing blobAndConquer, see bug 241069 And let me know if you need any help with agistudio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232051.l4NKpIXq005024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-23 16:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155295) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155295&action=view) more diffs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:53:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232053.l4NKrH4T005249@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-23 16:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Still not enough > * undefined non-weak symbols > - libadmsslutil.so.1.1.1 contains undefined non-weak > symbols. This is not allowed for packages to provide > -devel subpackages because linkage against this > library fails due to these symbols. Fixed - added linkage against libadminutil.la > * Timestamps > - -devel package contains many header files (i.e. text > files which are not created or modified during rebuild) > and keeping timestamps on these files are recommend. > Please use: > --------------------------------------------------- > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" > --------------------------------------------------- Done. > * macros consistency > - Please determine to use macros or not to use macros > for binaries. Please don't use both "rm" and "%{__rm}" > If you want to use %{__rm}, please also use %{__make}, > for example. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 20:54:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232054.l4NKsZtc005424@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-23 16:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > One question: > Is the license of lib/libadminutil/acclanglist.c > compatible with LGPL (not GPL) ? What does > the following mean? (sorry, I am not legal specialist) Sorry. That file was copied from Fedora Directory Server to adminutil. I have modified the license to use LGPL instead of the FDS license (GPL + exception). This is ok since we (Red Hat) control the copyright. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:00:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232100.l4NL0vw5006160@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-23 17:00 EST ------- I have create a mpfr-package, which you may find at: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/mpfr/mpfr.spec http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/mpfr/mpft-2.2.1-1.src.rpm It will be nice, if you can take the maintainership for this package, becouse then you can best organiz the spit of gmp into the two seperate packages gmp and mpfr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:13:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232113.l4NLDSVU007404@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-05-23 17:13 EST ------- OK, I have been conversing with the upstream maintainer about bbdb and VM - he is upstream maintainer of both. He has this to say regarding building of bbdb and VM: "At least BBDB requires VM at built time as it uses VM macros. If you built without VM sources then the ELCs will contain functions calls where macros should be used and thus it will fail, i.e. they are broken! IMHO for VM it is the same just the other way around. This is no problem if your distro is using binary packages with precompiled ELCs. Then the package maintainer needs to care for correct compilation, but the user is not forces to install both packages." And so that means that there's a chicken and egg issue with building these packages because bbdb needs a BuildRequires: emacs-vm-el and vm needs a BuildRequires: emacs-bbdb-el. I am unsure how to deal with that, I shall ask on the maintainers list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226256] Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232116.l4NLGboO007675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226256 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|DUPLICATE | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-23 17:16 EST ------- Not a dupe, Digest-SHA and Digest-SHA1 are different things: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Digest-SHA/ http://search.cpan.org/dist/Digest-SHA1/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:23:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232123.l4NLNBb1008170@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-23 17:23 EST ------- Hi Jochen! (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Source0 is not a full qualified URL. Per my first message there is a reason behind this. (In reply to comment #0) > N.B. I'm sure someone wants to tell me "but the URL is wrong" as the comment in the spec file says, rpmbuild throws a fit when there is a ? after the /, I'm going to try and find out if there is a fix or not. #Real SourceURL is: http://culot.org/cgi-bin/get.cgi?%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz #but the ? annoys rpmbuild Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz The issue that this fixes is that if you do not do that, rpmbuild will try and extract get.cgi?calcurse-1.8.tar.gz, not a good result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:26:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232126.l4NLQ2ex008412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tom at moertel.com 2007-05-23 17:26 EST ------- Tom "spot" Callaway: Is the preferred way of placing devel files in a -devel subpackage documented anywhere? (I didn't see anything on the topic in the Packaging Guidelines.) If there is a preferred way of doing it, I'd rather not guess what it is. :) Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:32:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232132.l4NLW3h7008842@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-23 17:32 EST ------- 1. ok. Sounds good. 2. ok. I looked, but didn't see those headers for some reason. ;( I found them now... makes sense to me. One thing that bothers me about that license... the part that says: " This code # is under copyright and cannot be included in any other book, # publication, or educational product without permission from # O'Reilly & Associates." Is Fedora a "educational product" ? Could it be considered such? FYI, the entire thing reads: The source code on this disk can be freely used, adapted, and redistributed in source or binary form, so long as an acknowledgment appears in derived source files. The citation should list that the code comes from the book "Mastering Algorithms with C" by Kyle Loudon, published by O'Reilly & Associates. This code is under copyright and cannot be included in any other book, publication, or educational product without permission from O'Reilly & Associates. No warranty is attached; we cannot take responsibility for errors or fitness for use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:35:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240635] Review Request: mash - tree creation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232135.l4NLZEeh009001@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240635 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-05-23 17:35 EST ------- 0.1.9 uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:37:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232137.l4NLbmkb009271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-23 17:37 EST ------- Asking the FSF for an opinion on that "unique license". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:45:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232145.l4NLjaB0009720@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-23 17:45 EST ------- Heh. I'm apparently doing this piecemeal. Release is also off, it should be: 0.1.%{checkoutdate}%{?dist} not 0.%{checkoutdate}.1%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:48:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195647] Review Request: redland In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232148.l4NLmtRJ009936@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-23 17:48 EST ------- In reply to comment #19: If you will read my comment #13, you will see that I was not intending to block this package based on the include file issue. I simply wanted Thomas to check with upstream and see if they would be willing to make that change in a timely manner. Thomas? Any word from upstream? In any case can you update to 1.0.6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:50:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232150.l4NLoIiS009997@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-05-23 17:50 EST ------- I talked to Bill Nottingham on IRC about this issue. He thinks it is fine to have both emacs-vm and emacs-bbdb built in the buildsystem without the circular BuildRequires, and then once packages exist, add in the BuildRequires and rebuild both packages. So, issue resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:53:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232153.l4NLrAmp010469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-23 17:53 EST ------- Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 21:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232158.l4NLwujM010732@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.14.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-05-23 17:58 EST ------- The spec file has been changed to include the section %check Then the news src.prm is http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest-1.14.0-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232203.l4NM3sgk011031@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-23 18:03 EST ------- People who bootstrap these packages on new archs or derivative distros would probably appreciate a comment in the specfile(s) explaining the scenario. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:07:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241075] New: Review Request: redet - Regular expression development and execution tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241075 Summary: Review Request: redet - Regular expression development and execution tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/redet.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/redet-8.22-1.src.rpm Description: Redet is a tool for developing and executing regular expressions using any of more than 50 search programs, editors, and programming languages, intended both for developing regular expressions for use elsewhere and as a search tool in its own right. Additional features include persistent history, extensive help, a variety of character entry tools, and the ability to change locale while running. rpmlint is clean, builds in mock and is tested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:10:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241076] New: Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for redet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241076 Summary: Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for redet Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/redet-doc.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/redet-doc-8.21-1.src.rpm Description: Documentation for the regular expression development and execution tool (redet). A nice simple documentation package, rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:10:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241075] Review Request: redet - Regular expression development and execution tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232210.l4NMAfqA011642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redet - Regular expression development and execution tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241075 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241076 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:10:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241076] Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for redet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232210.l4NMAerr011624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for redet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241076 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |241075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:17:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241078] New: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241078 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-SSH2/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-SSH2-0.10-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Net-SSH2.spec Description: Net::SSH2 is a perl interface to the libssh2 (http://www.libssh2.org) library. It supports the SSH2 protocol (there is no support for SSH1) with all of the key exchanges, ciphers, and compression of libssh2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:17:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232217.l4NMHvjs011940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241078 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241078] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232218.l4NMIWtM012022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 Alias: perl-Net-SSH2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241078 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-SSH2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:19:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] New: Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 Summary: Review Request: R-Dyndoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Dyndoc/R-DynDoc.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Dyndoc/R-DynDoc-1.14.0-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: A set of functions to create and interact with dynamic documents and vignettes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:28:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241081] New: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: This package contains tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 22:35:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] New: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets-1.14.0-2.fc6.src.rpm Description: Widgets to provide user interfaces. tcltk should have been installed for the widgets to run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 23:04:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 19:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232304.l4NN4JBD014374@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-23 19:04 EST ------- Updated - Fix release tag - Move manpages to -devel package - Add Examples dir to -devel package SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2-0.15-0.2.20070506.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 23:36:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 19:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232336.l4NNaQjV015862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-23 19:36 EST ------- nope but, the use of install from spec file is more appropriate. ------------------------------------ Other things should be fix: ------------------------------------ * From source0 tag you should set %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz instead. to improve future update. * You should add help files in %{_docdir}. this should be included in the package. (juste add help/* in docs field) * You should add relnotes files too in %{_docdir}, it's a ChangeLog-like and should be included. * i can see in package that NEW and README files are included but where did you get them, no see in the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 23 23:43:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 19:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705232343.l4NNh7qU016240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-23 19:43 EST ------- That issue should now be fixed. http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/remind/remind-03.00.24-3.src.rpm http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/remind/remind.spec I will read up on the perl specific requirements for spec files as well. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 00:03:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240003.l4O03R4e017004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-23 20:03 EST ------- typo: remove field "from source0" and 2 last SHOULD fix sentence from this review. sorry i mixed up with another review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 00:11:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240011.l4O0Bmbx017476@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-23 20:11 EST ------- Well, OK - Mock : Built on FC6 en F-7 (i386 and x86_64) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is GPL OK - License match extras packaging policy licenses allowed OK - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: c9ce0b7b4519597b5f480b20c42e04c9 conduit-0.3.0.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version ------------------------------------------------ Rpmlint output: ------------------------------------------------ OK - silent on srpm NO - not silent on rpm package E: agistudio zero-length /usr/share/agistudio/template/snddir this error is harmless but need to be fix as the file is h=just a template and contains nothing, it can be remove from pakcage. * From source0 tag you should set %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz instead of static basename and version. to improve future update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 00:18:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240018.l4O0I4Tq017646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-23 20:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random Short Description: Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support Owners: wjhns174 at hardakers.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 00:56:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 20:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240056.l4O0u8FQ018992@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-23 20:56 EST ------- It's typically for end-user and sure these can be set to 0644. i actually fix that but i need to import first new gammu release before add the updated release of python-gammu which require gammu-1.10.7 to be able to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 01:46:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 21:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240146.l4O1kZmm020873@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From qspencer at ieee.org 2007-05-23 21:46 EST ------- I was going to take a look at it, but the most recent SRPM link is broken: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/arpack-2.1-6.at.src.rpm The spec is still there, but since there are patches are other local source files, I thought it would be easier to review the SRPM. Having said that, I don't have a lot of time to do this, so if someone else wants to take it, they can. If not, I'll try to get it done soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 01:51:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 21:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240151.l4O1pvg1021105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 21:51 EST ------- I guess I'll just close this ticket. But it's probably a useful utility, so please do consider submitting ScreenRuler in the future. Perhaps it will have better luck than this package did. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:01:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240201.l4O21I1r021534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 22:01 EST ------- Well, it's been almost two weeks; what's up? I see this blocks OLPCTracker, but I don't know if that makes it extra-important or not. I'm happy to see this review through if someone wants to drive the submission; othewise I guess this ticket should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:01:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240201.l4O21xsi021626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-23 22:01 EST ------- Rebuilt 0.9.20-2 on devel x86_64, it doesn't generate debuginfo. >From mock's build.log: extracting debug info from /var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc Failed to write file: invalid section entry size eu-strip: while writing '/var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc.d ebug': invalid section entry size extracting debug info from /var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/lazarus/lazarus Failed to write file: invalid section entry size eu-strip: while writing '/var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/lazarus/lazarus.debug': invalid section entry size extracting debug info from /var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/lazarus/startlazarus Failed to write file: invalid section entry size eu-strip: while writing '/var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/lazarus/startlazarus.debug': in valid section entry size extracting debug info from /var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/lazarus/lazbuild Failed to write file: invalid section entry size eu-strip: while writing '/var/tmp/lazarus-0.9.20-2.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/lazarus/lazbuild.debug': invali d section entry size 0 blocks I would appreciate at least a comment in the spec that indicates stripping seems to be broken on x86_64. rpmlint: W: lazarus invalid-license GPL, MPL and modified LGPL W: lazarus-debuginfo invalid-license GPL, MPL and modified LGPL Ignore, Accepting this license. W: lazarus setup-not-quiet Optional. W: lazarus mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) Fix please. E: lazarus non-executable-script /usr/lib64/lazarus/debian/prerm.ex 0644 E: lazarus non-executable-script /usr/lib64/lazarus/debian/postinst.ex 0644 E: lazarus non-executable-script /usr/lib64/lazarus/debian/init.d.ex 0644 E: lazarus non-executable-script /usr/lib64/lazarus/debian/emacsen-remove.ex 0644 E: lazarus non-executable-script /usr/lib64/lazarus/debian/emacsen-install.ex 0644 E: lazarus non-executable-script /usr/lib64/lazarus/debian/postrm.ex 0644 E: lazarus non-executable-script /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/install/cross_unix/debian_crosswin32/postrm 0644 E: lazarus non-executable-script /usr/lib64/lazarus/debian/preinst.ex 0644 We're not doing debs, remove directory please. E: lazarus zero-length /usr/lib64/lazarus/components/codetools/examples/scanexamples/empty.inc E: lazarus zero-length /usr/lib64/lazarus/lcl/interfaces/carbon/carbonimages.lrs Ignore. E: lazarus devel-dependency gdk-pixbuf-devel Ignore, required to use lazarus. W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/lazarus W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/startlazarus W: lazarus unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/lazarus/lazbuild E: lazarus-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package The mentioned strip problem. Please document in the spec. E: lazarus statically-linked-binary /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc Given it's pascal and you indicated these are static, ignore. Ran lazarus, seemed OK from a cursory glance. Doesn't use %find_lang, but it's a bunch of .po files dropped in a dir lazarus uses. Ignore. tools/install/rpm comes with some older spec templates. What to do about them, given that's not the .spec we are using? Good: Follows naming guidelines Licenses Source matches Builds on x86_64 Owns all directories, no duplicate files Uses macros %defattr good %clean good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:05:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240205.l4O25439021878@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpptasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 22:05 EST ------- Or perhaps not. I'll go ahead and close this ticket in one week if there's no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177401] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter for ClamAV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240205.l4O25W1s021922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter for ClamAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177401 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-23 22:05 EST ------- It's been about a year since anything happened here. I'll fix up the flags but if this submission isn't going anywhere then this ticket should be closed, and indeed I'll close it if there's no response soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186452] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240207.l4O270Zg022004@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186452 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:07:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220637] Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240207.l4O27XZ7022131@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-livecd - This package defines the contents of Fedora live CD's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220637 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232043] Review Request: ruby-gnomevfs - A ruby binding of GnomeVFS-2.0.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240207.l4O27sBa022206@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gnomevfs - A ruby binding of GnomeVFS-2.0.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232043 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:16:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237355] Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240216.l4O2GxML023230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kflickr - an easy to use photo uploader for flickr written for KDE. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237355 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:17:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225447] Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240217.l4O2Hfm9023307@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magpierss - MagpieRSS is an RSS parser written in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225447 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:38:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240635] Review Request: mash - tree creation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240238.l4O2coZ3024707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240635 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-23 22:38 EST ------- 1. ok. looks good. 2. ok. Changelog is still 0 length, so it seems pointless to ship it, but I suppose if it starts getting populated upstream it could eventually be useful. 3. ok. looks good: 4559a0a48ac05d3c0e6946cf8f933dab mash-0.1.9.tar.gz 4559a0a48ac05d3c0e6946cf8f933dab mash-0.1.9.tar.gz.1 4. Yeah, still showing a 404 there. ;( 5. ok. Those look good, but rpmlint now says: E: mash zero-length /usr/share/doc/mash-0.1.9/ChangeLog W: mash strange-permission mash.spec 0600 Can you fix the URL and make the .spec 644 before importing? provided you do that this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this one the package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:44:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240635] Review Request: mash - tree creation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240244.l4O2i7ao025177@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240635 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-05-23 22:44 EST ------- I'll just point the URL to my people page for now. The spec is 0644 in the tarball ; rpmbuild -ta is doing something strange. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240635] Review Request: mash - tree creation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240246.l4O2kC0n025350@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240635 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-05-23 22:46 EST ------- Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mash Short Description: Koji buildsystem to yum repo converter Owners: notting at redhat.com Branches: devel F-7 InitialCC: jkeating at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 02:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 22:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240247.l4O2lYYw025444@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-23 22:47 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. Same error, but at least has lib64... make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-tools-1.2.3/create-native-map/src' /usr/bin/gmcs -d:TRACE -debug+ -out:/usr/lib64/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe -target:exe -r:Mono.Posix.dll ./creat e-native-map.cs ./MapAttribute.cs ./create-native-map.cs(387,22): warning CS0169: The private method `MapUtils.GetPropertyValueAsBool(object, string)' is never used ./create-native-map.cs(1042,15): warning CS0169: The private method `HeaderFileGenerator.WriteParameterDeclaration(System.Ref lection.ParameterInfo)' is never used error CS0016: Could not write to file `/usr/lib64/create-native-map/create-native-map.exe', cause: Could not find a part of the path "/usr/lib64/create-native-map". Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 2 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 03:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 23:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240322.l4O3MZxF027839@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-23 23:22 EST ------- * Well, I checked the URL and for this case it is not a problem. This type of URL problem (i.e. the "correct" URL contains some formats which rpmbuild cannot treat correctly) became a matter of argument (but I don't remember when and at which mailing list for now...) and the conclusion was "That is okay. Write the correct URL as a comment and use the tarball (if needed, renamed) name to Source." * By the way ------------------------------------------------------- %configure CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} ------------------------------------------------------- Is "CFLAGS" in the second line needed? (%configure sets CFLAGS before ./configure is called) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 03:37:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 23:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240337.l4O3bI9C028691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2007-05-23 23:37 EST ------- OK, so what is the next step? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 04:07:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 00:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] New: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/perl-IO-LockedFile/perl-IO-LockedFile.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/perl-IO-LockedFile/perl-IO-LockedFile-0.23-1.src.rpm Description: In its simplistic use, the IO::LockedFile class gives us the same interface of the IO::File class to files with the unique difference that those files are locked using the flock mechanism. Yet, the class provides us with the ability to use other schemes then flock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 04:41:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 00:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240441.l4O4fFbZ031318@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-24 00:41 EST ------- New version. Kills rpaths dead. Looking for reviewer. http://fedorared.org/repos/rpmbuild/SPECS/gnome-compiz-manager.spec http://fedorared.org/fedora/review/gnome-compiz-manager-0.9.14-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 05:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240500.l4O50u7k031998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-24 01:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * Well, I checked the URL and for this case it is not a > problem. This type of URL problem (i.e. the "correct" URL > contains some formats which rpmbuild cannot treat correctly) > became a matter of argument (but I don't remember when > and at which mailing list for now...) and the conclusion was > > "That is okay. Write the correct URL as a comment and > use the tarball (if needed, renamed) name to Source." This was the same opinion I got from two maintainers on IRC > > * By the way > ------------------------------------------------------- > %configure > CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} > ------------------------------------------------------- > Is "CFLAGS" in the second line needed? (%configure sets > CFLAGS before ./configure is called) I think I found in this case it was needed, I'll double check before the package is entered into CVS though, but I seem to recall that it was needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 05:27:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241097] New: Review Request: Extension for the GNU Readline/History library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241097 Summary: Review Request: Extension for the GNU Readline/History library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu/perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.16-1.src.rpm Description: Term::ReadLine::Gnu (TRG) is an implementation of the interface to the GNU Readline Library. This module gives you input line editing facility, input history management facility, word completion facility, etc. It uses the real GNU Readline Library and has the interface with the almost all variables and functions which are documented in the GNU Readline/History Library. So you can program your custom editing function, your custom completion function, and so on with Perl. TRG may be useful for a C programmer to prototype a program which uses the GNU Readline Library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 05:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] New: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at brouhaha.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/fc6/lcdtest/lcdtest.spec SRPM URL: http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/fc6/lcdtest/lcdtest-1.06-1.src.rpm Description: lcdtest is a utility to display LCD monitor test patterns. It may be useful for adjusting the pixel clock frequency and phase on LCD monitors when using analog inputs, and for finding pixels that are stuck on or off. lctest uses the SDL library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 05:48:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240548.l4O5mMPF001534@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 eric at brouhaha.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 06:01:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 02:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240601.l4O61RCa001850@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tom at moertel.com 2007-05-24 02:01 EST ------- I have revised the spec at the aforelinked-to location to fix the problems noted earlier. Note that the -devel package is built for the same arch as the main pacakge, but it contains only .c and .h files, so rpmlint complains that it should be built as noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 06:09:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 02:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240609.l4O69xJP002014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tom at moertel.com 2007-05-24 02:09 EST ------- Note: I also updated the package to the recently released upstream version, 0.99875-1. The corresponding SRPM can be downloaded here: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/6/SRPMS/R-Matrix-0.99875-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 06:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 02:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240613.l4O6DtEj002129@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-24 02:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > ------------------------------------------------ > Rpmlint output: > ------------------------------------------------ > OK - silent on srpm > NO - not silent on rpm package > > E: agistudio zero-length /usr/share/agistudio/template/snddir I think you have the wrong package here :) > * From source0 tag > > you should set %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz instead of static basename and version. > to improve future update. Ok, easy enough. Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/conduit.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/conduit-0.3.0-3.src.rpm * Thu May 24 2007 Bernard Johnson - 0.3.0-3 - change source0 url to use %%name and %%version macros * Sun May 06 2007 Bernard Johnson - 0.3.0-2 - change gmail icon from internet-mail (tango icon) to email (bluecurve icon) so it will display -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 06:17:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 02:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] New: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/dwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/fedora/dwatch-0.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Dwatch (Daemon Watch) is a program that watches over other programs and performs actions based on conditions specified in a configuration file. See dwatch.conf for an example of what the file might look like. Dwatch is meant to be run from cron at regular intervals. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 06:47:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 02:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240647.l4O6lCm5003197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-24 02:47 EST ------- Hi, just an outsiders comment on something you may want to consider when imported, I think that the summary should be something like "A synchronization solution for GNOME" My rational is, instead of seeing: Name : conduit Summary : Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME on an rpm -qi I'd see: Name : conduit Summary : A synchronization solution for GNOME Essentially it's just redundancy in words, but (surprisingly) makes it easier to read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 07:51:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 03:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240751.l4O7p5GH006580@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 03:51 EST ------- Well, * Patching Makefile.am requires - to call "autoreconf" in %build stage - to add "Requires: libtool" - And please write "Patch0: ..." and "%patch0 ....." * For Requires problem of mozldap-devel against cyrus-sasl-devel, please see my comment (bug 240516 comment 2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 07:51:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 03:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240751.l4O7pTpL006689@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |240516 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 08:08:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240808.l4O88YMD009116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-24 04:08 EST ------- There is no '.at' anymore in the package name, e.g. it's plain http://dl.atrpms.net/all/arpack-2.1-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 08:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216734] Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240810.l4O8AmA1009396@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-compiz-manager - compiz configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216734 djuran at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From djuran at redhat.com 2007-05-24 04:10 EST ------- I assume you didn't mean to close the bug... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 08:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240819.l4O8JEEW010310@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-24 04:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) >> %configure >> CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Is "CFLAGS" in the second line needed? (%configure sets >> CFLAGS before ./configure is called) >I think I found in this case it was needed, I'll double check before the > package is entered into CVS though, but I seem to recall that it was needed. It is not needed. %configure is enough Remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 08:33:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240833.l4O8XMmh011929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-24 04:33 EST ------- Please add BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) Without it, this package doesn't build without it once the perl-split is introduced back. APPROVED, provided you apply the change above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 08:48:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240848.l4O8mHDN013301@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-24 04:48 EST ------- Hi Eric there are a few problems with the spec, but luckily they are easy to fix - BuildRoot should have one of the values listed at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 - The spec must include a %clean section. Please add %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT after the %install section - Using %defattr(-,root,root,-) is saner Please also note that SDL-devel is already pulled in by SDL_image-devel, so there is no need to BR it. And now the sad part: mock build (building for F7/x86_64) fails with the following error: + scons destdir=/var/tmp/lcdtest-1.06-build bindir=/usr/bin mandir=/usr/share/man/man1 scons: Reading SConscript files ... : SConsEnvironment instance has no attribute 'MergeFlags': File "SConstruct", line 139: exports = {'env' : env}) File "/usr/lib/scons/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 581: return apply(method, args, kw) File "/usr/lib/scons/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 508: return apply(_SConscript, [self.fs,] + files, {'exports' : exports}) File "/usr/lib/scons/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 239: exec _file_ in stack[-1].globals File "src/SConscript", line 67: env.MergeFlags (os.environ ['CFLAGS']) error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.75447 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.75447 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 08:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240848.l4O8mZnB013329@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dgoodwin at dangerous | |lyinc.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 04:46 EST ------- Please try to rebuild this on devel and F-7 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 08:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240850.l4O8oAMk013491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 04:50 EST ------- NOTE: python-elementtree is NO for F-7+ https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-December/msg00250.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-December/msg00279.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 08:57:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705240857.l4O8v55Q014205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-24 04:57 EST ------- Build fails in FC6, too. Also, I have just noticed that you do not use %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 10:17:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 06:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241017.l4OAHx1q019855@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-24 06:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: berusky Short Description: A sokoban clone Owners: stransky at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: berusky-data Short Description: A data file for Berusky Owners: stransky at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 11:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 07:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241144.l4OBi8ev026922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 11:51:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 07:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241151.l4OBpDbq027825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-24 07:51 EST ------- Complains about the shebang in /usr/share/archivemail/archivemail.py, fixed that too. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/archivemail/archivemail-0.7.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 12:01:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223592] Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241201.l4OC1Eiv028589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wuja - Gnome desktop applet for integration with Google calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223592 dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(dgoodwin at dangerous| |lyinc.com) | ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2007-05-24 08:01 EST ------- Built a couple days ago but forgot to close ticket, setting as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 12:01:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241201.l4OC1HwM028619@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dwatch - A |Review Request: dwatch - A |program that watches over |program that watches over |other programs |other programs AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 12:11:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241211.l4OCBs9S029748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-05-24 08:11 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing the package again. Both issues should be fixed now. The updated packages are located at: http://gnetworkmonitor.sourceforge.net/rpm/gnome-network-monitor.spec http://gnetworkmonitor.sourceforge.net/rpm/gnome-network-monitor-0.9.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 12:12:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241212.l4OCCRQa029801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-24 08:12 EST ------- Added help/*. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/agistudio/agistudio.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/agistudio/agistudio-1.2.3-2.src.rpm And, for future reference: 1. Wake up 2. Caffeine 3. Work on Fedora 4. ??? 5. Profit!!! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 12:13:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241213.l4OCDO4p029929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From lennart at poettering.de 2007-05-24 08:13 EST ------- To say the least, Ulrich Drepper is not exactly a fan of seeing this integrated into the default Fedora install. In a recent chat on IRC that I had with him he raised a few issues he has with nss-mdns which I cannot really "fix". (As a side note: I am upstream of nss-mdns) Firstly, he believes that mDNS might be a waste of power and traffic and wants to see a big field test in Westford. I believe this is a big waste of time and resources, and is nothing I can organize from Hamburg/Germany. Also it is somewhat redundant, because Apple reports some scalability numbers for mDNS which have been generated by such a field test. (please also note that nss-mdns by itself doesn't impose any traffic on the net. Avahi does that and unless you actually look some kind of .local domain lookup nss-mdns will not add to that in any way) Secondly, Fedora uses nscd by default. Running nscd and nss-mdns together doesn't make too much sense if you use the "reload" option in nscd.conf. However that option is used by default and Ulrich appears not to be interested in finding a way to disable this option for mDNS lookups. Then, he thinks that mDNS is braindead because the cacheing protocol works differently from classic DNS. Leaves me speachless ... He apparently also thinks that Avahi is not a good thing either, but is OK with it in the default install as long as he may shut it down easily. The argument that nss-mdns is disabled at the same time as avahi is shut down he doesn't really accept, citing that the tiny bit of CPU time that is wasted when the nss-mdns module checks whether avahi is around is too much. (which btw is rather contradictorily, since nscd optimizes that away anyway) This is all very unfortunate. I am not sure what we can do about this. But as a total newcomer to Red Hat and Fedora I don't feel I am in a position to to fight this through -- at least for now. Maybe when I have a better insight into how Fedora and everything works I will give it another try. What we can do of course is getting nss-mdns into Fedora, but only as an optional package. To get this working cleanly the package would have to patch nsswitch.conf and nscd.conf on installing -- which is rather ugly. It's better than nothing, but not exactly the fullfillment of the promise of "zero configuration". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 12:26:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241226.l4OCQb7r031467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-24 08:26 EST ------- (in reply to comment #9) hi Mamoru, could you be more explicit, cause for now, the only reason for why it isn't included is just because the version 1.2.6-5 requires python-abi-2.4 which is not included/released yet. note that many of other package (such as alacarte) require python-abi-2.4 and hasn't been remove from repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 12:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 08:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241097] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241246.l4OCkCos000792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241097 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Extension |Review Request: perl-Term- |for the GNU Readline/History|ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for |library |the GNU Readline/History | |library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 13:04:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241304.l4OD4lDa003971@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-24 09:04 EST ------- Builds OK on FC6/i386. This is the only rpmlint message: [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/i386/blobAndConquer-0.90-1.i386.rpm W: blobAndConquer devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/blobAndConquer/data/gameDefs/defines.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. . . .which you've adequately explained. I still think it's odd, but that's upstream. :) Package name/spec name OK. Meets Packaging guidelines. License OK and included. Spec is legible American English. Source MD5 matches. TBC. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 13:24:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241324.l4ODO2Oo006088@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - Conduit is a synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 09:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) Perhaps I don't understand what you want to say, however for F-7 and FCC-devel, there is no pythoon-elementtree rpm and no package provides python-elementtree. cElementTree.so module in python-elementtree has been renamed to _elementtree.so module in python rpm (F7 python is 2.5) and to use _elementtree, some code change will be perhaps needed for conduit. ------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/python2.5/lib-dynload/_elementtree.so python-2.5-12.fc7 ------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 13:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241328.l4ODSH0H006455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-24 09:28 EST ------- MUSTFIX: Missing desktop-file-utils BR. No locales or shared libraries. Directory ownership OK. No duplicate files. Perms good. %clean correct. Macros are sane. Code, not content. No large docs. No runtime doc deps. One header file, see above. OK. No static libs. No pkgconfig. No -devel pacakge or .la. .desktop file present and well handled, once desktop-file-utils BR is resolved. No ownership conflicts. %install starts with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. All filenames UTF-8. All musts met but the BR issue. Builds in mock with BR issue fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:17:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241417.l4OEH69A011375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-24 10:17 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint quite on binary RPM. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:17:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241417.l4OEHL4N011449@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(k.georgiou at imperia | |l.ac.uk) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 10:17 EST ------- Please try to rebuild this package on koji and plague buildsys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:17:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241417.l4OEHk39011574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-05-24 10:17 EST ------- the first thing I did this morning is to do a yum update, and a yum search, excitingly, the package shows up in fc6 repository today, install it with no problem on my FC-6, so happy! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:21:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241421.l4OELwsR012198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-24 10:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: archivemail Short Description: A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Great, thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:23:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241423.l4OENbS1012445@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-24 10:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Well, > > * Patching Makefile.am requires > - to call "autoreconf" in %build stage > - to add "Requires: libtool" > - And please write "Patch0: ..." and "%patch0 ....." I will commit the changes upstream (I am the upstream maintainer), so no patch required. There is a shell script called autogen.sh which makes sure the system has the correct version of the autotools before running autoreconf. > > * For Requires problem of mozldap-devel against cyrus-sasl-devel, > please see my comment (bug 240516 comment 2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:34:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241434.l4OEYHMv013722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241434.l4OEYAMp013661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 10:34 EST ------- One more comments: ------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost Reviewing]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/LOCALRPMS/SRPMS/remind-03.00.24-3.fc7.src.rpm W: remind macro-in-%changelog check W: remind macro-in-%changelog files -------------------------------------------------- Please use %%check, %%files in %changelog description. Other things are okay. --------------------------------------------------- This package (remind) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a stage, you will submit a request which tells sponsor members that you need a sponsor. After you do so, please let me know on this bug for confirmation. Then I will sponsor you. If you have some questions, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:42:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241442.l4OEgZ2Y014420@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(k.georgiou at imperia| |l.ac.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-24 10:42 EST ------- Sorry I was away until last night, I'll have a go today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:43:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241443.l4OEhl4e014595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-24 10:43 EST ------- FYI, upstream bug report: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1670422&group_id=49630&atid=456910 I have included this patch for the initial import. Introduces no problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:55:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241455.l4OEtcpB016064@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-24 10:55 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm. + Rpmlint is quite on debuginfo rpm. + License seems ok. + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text. Bad: - I have some problem of using of the programm I thought, that the programm will read /etc/dwatch.conf and start or restart the given progamm, if the conditions specified in the configuration file will met. Unfortunately, I can't see anv effect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 14:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241456.l4OEunX7016204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-05-24 10:56 EST ------- Tasaka-san: memcached-debug is of interest to developers working on the memcached code base. Thus it was removed from the general RPM. The people who need this will also need to source to work with it. The -v flags are sufficient for end-users. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:13:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241513.l4OFDHlE018537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-24 11:13 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:13:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241513.l4OFDKWP018574@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-24 11:13 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:13:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240635] Review Request: mash - tree creation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241513.l4OFDTEf018618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mash - tree creation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240635 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-24 11:13 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:13:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241513.l4OFDbM9018662@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-24 11:13 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241097] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241522.l4OFMCZS020026@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu - Extension for the GNU Readline/History library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241097 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-24 11:22 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint quite on source rpm. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quite on binary rpm Bad: - String message from rpmlint on debuginfo package (no blocker) E: perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu-debuginfo script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/Term-ReadLine-Gnu-1.16/Gnu.xs I have an isue on start the following test script: use Term::ReadLine; $term = new Term::ReadLine 'ProgrammName'; while ( defined ($_ = $term->readLine('Prompt>'))) { print $_; } I will got the following error: Cannot do `readLine' in Term::ReadLine::Gnu at test2.pl line 3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:40:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241540.l4OFeuBT021998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 11:40 EST ------- Well, one critical issue: * Source differ: ---------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost memcached]$ ls -la */*gz -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 166201 2007-05-03 08:22 downloaded/memcached-1.2.2.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 177272 2007-05-12 19:58 memcached-1.2.2-4.fc7/memcached-1.2.2.tar.gz [tasaka1 at localhost memcached]$ md5sum */*gz a08851f7fa7b15e92ee6320b7a79c321 downloaded/memcached-1.2.2.tar.gz 5e1e7ee5a3834e7b600e722389b7f385 memcached-1.2.2-4.fc7/memcached-1.2.2.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------------ - The tarball you included in your srpm differs from which I downloaded from the URL specified by your spec file as Source0. Did you apply a patch locally and repackage? If so, please don't do it and anyway use upstream tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:52:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237331] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241552.l4OFq5TJ023093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-24 11:52 EST ------- w00t. done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:52:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241552.l4OFq7eE023147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 Bug 237334 depends on bug 237331, which changed state. Bug 237331 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for Random Number support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237331 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:52:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241552.l4OFqeoH023215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 11:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > Well, > > > > * Patching Makefile.am requires > > - to call "autoreconf" in %build stage > > - to add "Requires: libtool" > > - And please write "Patch0: ..." and "%patch0 ....." > > I will commit the changes upstream (I am the upstream maintainer), > so no patch > required. There is a shell script called autogen.sh which > makes sure the system > has the correct version of the autotools before running autoreconf. Okay. Then if you release new tarball (1.1.2), it is not a problem. > > * For Requires problem of mozldap-devel against cyrus-sasl-devel, > > please see my comment (bug 240516 comment 2) So please add "BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel" to this package (adminutil). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:55:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241555.l4OFtrtI023618@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 11:55 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response from reporter (submitter) is received in one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 15:58:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241558.l4OFwYcO023962@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 11:58 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 16:04:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241604.l4OG4oee024540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-24 12:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > (In reply to comment #25) > > > Well, > > > > > > * Patching Makefile.am requires > > > - to call "autoreconf" in %build stage > > > - to add "Requires: libtool" > > > - And please write "Patch0: ..." and "%patch0 ....." > > > > I will commit the changes upstream (I am the upstream maintainer), > > so no patch > > required. There is a shell script called autogen.sh which > > makes sure the system > > has the correct version of the autotools before running autoreconf. > > Okay. Then if you release new tarball (1.1.2), it is not a problem. Is it necessary to re-version from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2? 1.1.1 has not yet been officially released. I'd like to get all of these changes for fedora extras into 1.1.1. > > > * For Requires problem of mozldap-devel against cyrus-sasl-devel, > > > please see my comment (bug 240516 comment 2) > So please add "BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel" to this package > (adminutil). But I thought since adminutil does not use any cyrus-sasl include files nor link directly to any cyrus-sasl libs, it doesn't need BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 16:09:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241609.l4OG9LjW025399@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 12:09 EST ------- Well, first update the URL and your source. The URL seems to be changed to http://emesene-im.com.ar/forum/index.php and the version 230507 seems released?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 16:22:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241622.l4OGMuh2026577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #27) > > (In reply to comment #26) > > > (In reply to comment #25) > > Okay. Then if you release new tarball (1.1.2), it is not a problem. > > Is it necessary to re-version from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2? 1.1.1 has not yet been > officially released. I'd like to get all of these changes for fedora extras > into 1.1.1. I didn't know it... > > > > > * For Requires problem of mozldap-devel against cyrus-sasl-devel, > > > > please see my comment (bug 240516 comment 2) > > So please add "BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel" to this package > > (adminutil). > > But I thought since adminutil does not use any > cyrus-sasl include files nor link > directly to any cyrus-sasl libs, it doesn't need > BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel? Then please fix configure or the option of configre. Actually the lastest tarball I have locally checks the existence of sasl.h and mock build fails without cyrus-sasl-devel. ----------------------------------------------------- configure: checking for sasl... checking for --with-sasl... no checking for --with-sasl-inc... no checking for --with-sasl-lib... no checking for sasl.h... no configure: error: sasl not found, specify with --with-sasl. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.16648 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.16648 (%build) --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 16:26:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241626.l4OGQ3sh026999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 12:26 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 16:27:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210423] Review Request: snitch - a powerful packet-shaping utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241627.l4OGRUeF027237@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: snitch - a powerful packet-shaping utility Alias: volp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210423 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(wcervini at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 12:27 EST ------- Closing as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 16:33:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241633.l4OGX8NM027826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 12:33 EST ------- If no response from initial reporter is received within a week, * Matthias, if you are still interested in being a maintainer of this package, we regard you as the submitter of this review request, okay? * Otherwise I will close this as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 16:37:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 12:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241637.l4OGb8NX028311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-24 12:37 EST ------- Yup, I'm still interested :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:10:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241710.l4OHAKXr000730@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-24 13:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - I have some problem of using of the programm > > I thought, that the programm will read /etc/dwatch.conf and start or restart the > given progamm, if the conditions specified in the configuration file will met. > > Unfortunately, I can't see anv effect. Can you post your /etc/dwatch.conf file and try running 'dwatch -v -d' and post the output. I've found that dwatch is fairly sensitive to white space, but running this should provide the output as to what it's trying to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:12:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241712.l4OHC7Ek001038@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-24 13:12 EST ------- New version with the BR fixed here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/blobAndConquer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/blobAndConquer-0.90-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:19:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241719.l4OHJ5Ke002229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From lindner at inuus.com 2007-05-24 13:19 EST ------- Okay then. I have upstream control. I'll 1.23 pushed out and repackage. I was just hoping I could get consensus on the spec file so I could ship that with memcache itself. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:19:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns - glibc plugin for .local name resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241719.l4OHJBQM002278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns - glibc plugin for .local name resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 13:19 EST ------- All I can say is that if Ulrich wants to block this package from Fedora completely, he needs to comment on this bug and state his reasons for the record. Otherwise, can someone get to the issues in comment #24 and we can move forward with getting this in? The issue of what gets included by default is something to be discussed elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:28:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241728.l4OHSDdQ004164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |F-7 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-05-24 13:28 EST ------- The above indicates the package passed the review. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:40:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241262] New: Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241262 Summary: Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/libpciaccess/libpciaccess.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/libpciaccess/libpciaccess-0.8-0.20070524.src.rpm Description: libpciaccess is an OS-independent abstraction layer for accessing PCI devices. The X server will eventually depend on this, as well as several other projects if I have my way. No upstream release tarball anywhere yet, hence the git snapshot in the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:45:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241745.l4OHj05j005979@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-24 13:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion Short Description: Xorg driver for Intel Vermilion chipset Owners: ajackson at redhat.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:47:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241747.l4OHloLp006414@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 13:47 EST ------- Well, it's been more than another week. I'll close this bug soon if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:54:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241754.l4OHsPom006877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 13:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > I was just hoping I could get consensus on the spec file so I could ship that > with memcache itself. Well, some upstream tends to release new tarball during review request every time the spec file is modified, however it ignores people not using rpm packaging manager. So if you want to fix just spec file only during review request, please fix the spec file for Fedora only and don't change upstream tarball unless some other issues to be fixed are found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:55:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241755.l4OHtWqI006988@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 13:55 EST ------- I don't see an APPROVED or the fedora-review flag set to '+'. Ralf, were you actually reviewing this? If not, I can do a quick runthrough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:58:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241758.l4OHwHK4007403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-24 13:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > mock build is fine for i386 but > ----------------------------------------------------- > rpmlint complains on SRPM as => > I: pixman checking > W: pixman mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 3) > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a > cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Fixed. > rpmlint output on pixman RPM => > W: pixman no-documentation > The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). > You have to include documentation files. ... if they exist, yes. But there's no upstream documentation to include. The package guidelines do not say you must have docs, only that relevant docs must be included if they exist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-9bbfa57478f0460c6160947a6bf795249488182b > E: pixman library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libpixman.so.0.0.0 > This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing > a call to ldconfig. > > E: pixman library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libpixman.so.0.0.0 > This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing > a call to ldconfig. > > rpmlint outout on -devel rpm => > W: pixman-devel summary-not-capitalized pixman development package > Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. All fixed. I usually leave disttag off until initial import, if for no other reason than cvs-import.sh would historically not expand disttag properly on initial import, so I had to edit the spec after import anyway. Will certainly use once it's in CVS though. New spec and srpm, with all above addressed plus updated snapshot: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/pixman.spec http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/pixman/pixman-0.9.0-20070524.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:58:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230738] Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241758.l4OHwb0E007441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request - jwm - Very light window manager Alias: jwm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230738 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mystheme at free.fr) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 13:58 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from submitter within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 17:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225716] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241759.l4OHxjrT007563@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-24 13:59 EST ------- So, yes, I'm for real. I'm aware of the Pictures folder, but I wanted to make something so other people could get a set of Frog pictures as a screensaver. This is freely redistributable content which enhances the Fedora user experience. New SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/gnome-screensaver-frogs/gnome-screensaver-frogs-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm New SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/gnome-screensaver-frogs/gnome-screensaver-frogs.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 18:08:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225716] Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241808.l4OI88ml008451@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-screensaver-frogs - GNOME Screensaver Slideshow of Frogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225716 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-24 14:08 EST ------- I totally forgot to make the fixes you pointed out. New SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/gnome-screensaver-frogs/gnome-screensaver-frogs-0.2-2.src.rpm New SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/gnome-screensaver-frogs/gnome-screensaver-frogs.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 18:16:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238379] Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241816.l4OIGl1O009233@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Emesene - Emesene is an MSN Messenger client written in python and GTK Alias: Emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2007-05-24 14:16 EST ------- yes, only that the URL is very speed down, the version 230507 it's being implemented and tested, and later included into bugzilla link but not included without testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 18:19:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241819.l4OIJj1b009482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-24 14:19 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 18:30:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226256] Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241830.l4OIUstg010749@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226256 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-24 14:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155380) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155380&action=view) Fixes for found issues - BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) missing - "Changes" is not in UTF-8 - Some rpmlint warnings A patch fixing those issues as well as a sync with the latest rpmdevtools perl spec template is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 18:32:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226256] Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241832.l4OIWedo010931@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-SHA1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226256 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 18:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226577] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241839.l4OIdN7R011341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226577 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-24 14:39 EST ------- Alliance ProMotion. You don't have one, no one does. Even _I_ don't, and I've got nearly everything. I was eventually convinced of the directory ownership thing; server owns, drivers don't. The license should be "MIT" instead, and the cvsdate thing was just boilerplate from the initial creation. The changelog thing, yeah, bad script, not my fault. Fixed all but the changelog thing in 1.1.1-4 since I don't know what %revision that corresponded to. Once this passes review I'll mass-update all the other drivers, which should make subsequent reviews more automatic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 18:41:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226577] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241841.l4OIfstE011649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226577 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 14:41 EST ------- I'll take a closer look later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 18:53:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241853.l4OIrFVK013230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-24 14:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > > But I thought since adminutil does not use any > > cyrus-sasl include files nor link > > directly to any cyrus-sasl libs, it doesn't need > > BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel? > > Then please fix configure or the option of configre. > Actually the lastest tarball I have locally checks the existence of > sasl.h and mock build fails without cyrus-sasl-devel. > ----------------------------------------------------- > configure: checking for sasl... > checking for --with-sasl... no > checking for --with-sasl-inc... no > checking for --with-sasl-lib... no > checking for sasl.h... no > configure: error: sasl not found, specify with --with-sasl. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.16648 (%build) Ok. This is the problem. The actual package with just the shared libs does not need sasl to build, because it doesn't build an executable. However, a developer may build tests, and since the tests are executables, they must be linked against sasl: gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/psetread tests/psetread-psetread.o ./.libs/libadmsslutil.so /share/adminutil/built/.libs/libadminutil.so -L/usr/lib64/dirsec -L/usr/lib64 ./.libs/libadminutil.so -lplc4 -lplds4 -lnspr4 -lssl3 -lnss3 -lsoftokn3 -lssldap60 -lldap60 -lprldap60 -lldif60 -licui18n -licuuc -licudata -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/home/rich/11srv/lib /usr/lib64/libldap60.so: undefined reference to `sasl_client_step' ... /usr/lib64/libldap60.so: undefined reference to `sasl_encode' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [psetread] Error 1 So I suppose the real solution here will be to add another configure option e.g. --enable-tests. Then I'll have to see if there is some way I can conditionally include the m4/sasl.m4 file in configure.ac. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 19:04:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241904.l4OJ4gqZ014247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-24 15:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools-1.2-1.src.rpm fix url typos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 19:21:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] New: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc-1.4.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: AVR Libc is a Free Software project whose goal is to provide a high quality C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers. AVR Libc is licensed under a single unified license. This so-called modified Berkeley license is intented to be compatible with most Free Software licenses like the GPL, yet impose as little restrictions for the use of the library in closed-source commercial applications as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 19:31:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241931.l4OJVrZk017294@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: arm-linux- |Review Request: arm-gp2x- |binutils - Cross Compiling |linux-binutils - Cross |GNU binutils targeted at |Compiling GNU binutils |arm-linux |targeted at arm-linux ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-24 15:31 EST ------- After much study of this I have come to the conclusion, that it indeed is a bad idea to try an make a generic toolchain. So now we've been working on a toochain specific for the gp2x handheld console (arm linux glibc inside) as that is what I have and want to develop for. Here is a new version of arm-gp2x-linux-binutils for review: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-binutils.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-binutils-2.17-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 19:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241933.l4OJXAWO017423@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lukasim at atlas.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 19:39:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705241939.l4OJd4iS018012@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 lukasim at atlas.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-24 15:39 EST ------- * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK, clear * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK * MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. OK; GPL * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK; GPL 2, June 1991 * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK; COPYING * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK; md5 - c7c7f89d6dac502ad31d12198a8836c1 * MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK; i386 * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK; no ExcluseArch meanwhile; no notice from upstream. * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. OK * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK * MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. OK * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK * MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK * MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK; There is no header files in telepathy-idle package. * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Ok * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK, *.so here are symlinks * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK; Not devel * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK; No GUI. * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK ----------------------------------------------------------- APPROVED ----------------------------------------------------------- Looks fine; Maybe in description/summary there can (not must, I think) be something about curses(or terminal) environment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 20:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242013.l4OKDrrW021199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-24 16:13 EST ------- Three issues left: 1) There seems to be a missing DESTDIR or buildroot argument, as mock building reveals attempts to install in the real / make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dnssec-tools-1.2/validator' creating directory /etc/dnssec-tools/ mkdir /etc/dnssec-tools mkdir: cannot create directory `/etc/dnssec-tools': Permission denied creating directory /usr/include/validator/ mkdir /usr/include/validator mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/include/validator': Permission denied /usr/bin/install -c libval-config /usr/bin /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/bin/libval-config': Permission denied make[1]: *** [localinstall] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dnssec-tools-1.2/validator' make: *** [subdirinstall] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88153 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88153 (%install) Error building package from dnssec-tools-1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm, See build log ending done 2) add OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the --with-perl-build-args 3) Some cosmetics: -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' Other then that, rpmlint is quiet (apart from dnssec-libs not having a %doc section, which is okay). Let me know when I can try an updated package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 20:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242015.l4OKFa0N021365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at xelerance.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 20:43:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242043.l4OKhA00023016@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-24 16:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155392) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155392&action=view) diffs Add --enable-tests configure option. By default this is on. If enable-tests is on, then sasl will be used, otherwise, sasl will not be used. However, for rpm packaging, we don't care about the tests, so we use --disable-tests, which skips the sasl stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 20:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242043.l4OKhEDT023056@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-24 16:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IO-LockedFile Short Description: Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms Owners: paul at xelerance.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: paul at xelerance.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 20:46:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242046.l4OKk3aq023200@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-24 16:46 EST ------- Just to clarify, the changes are made in: Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/perl-IO-LockedFile/perl-IO-LockedFile.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/perl-IO-LockedFile/perl-IO-LockedFile-0.23-2.src.rpm Thanks Ralf! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 21:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242104.l4OL4NOH024357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-24 17:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > *** Bug 226256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** That was a mistake, since that was perl-Digest-SHA1, not perl-Digest-SHA. I'll pick up the review for this though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 21:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242112.l4OLC0e5025263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-05-24 17:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155394) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155394&action=view) Fixes wrong encoding in documentation. The problem with the PDF and the PS output is related to some non-unicode chars in several parts of the code. The attached patch fixes these issues. I also had to remove %{_smpflags} to make the package build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 21:16:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242116.l4OLGmUi025942@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-24 17:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 21:20:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190090] Review Request: ocrad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242120.l4OLKhXG026394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 17:20 EST ------- So, it's been almost a full year since the last comment on this ticket. Is anything happening here? I will close this ticket soon if there is no response from the submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 21:21:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242121.l4OLL2nj026441@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-24 17:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=155394) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155394&action=view) [edit] > Fixes wrong encoding in documentation. > > The problem with the PDF and the PS output is related to some non-unicode chars > in several parts of the code. The attached patch fixes these issues. Ah thanks, we do need to add a BR: tetex-latex then, but thats ok I guess. I do have the feeling that having both ps and pdf is a bit overkill though, what do you think? Maybe put the html, ps and pdf in a -docs sub package and only keep the man pages in the main package? > I also had > to remove %{_smpflags} to make the package build. My bad, I put %_smp_mflags -j1 in my ~/.rpmmacros to compile some heavy c++ code (using lots of memory) and never changed it back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 22:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242204.l4OM4WOv030257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-24 18:04 EST ------- 1) description cuts word in two "Stan- dard". Can you change the formatting of that? 2) %{__perl} needs to get OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" 3) installed binary does not work: # shasum /usr/bin/shasum read() on unopened filehandle at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Digest/base.pm line 24. OK rpmlint is clean OK package properly named OK licence is opensource and matches upstream, copliant with legal req. OK license included in %doc OK spec file uses american english and is legitable OK upstream sources matches md5sum of source in srpm. OK packages builds on x86_64/i385 OK BuildRequires correct, package builds in mock OK no direct /locale/ use OK no use of ldconfig needed OK not relocatable OK no duplicate files or bad permissions (rpmlint is quit) OK files section has defattr. OK consistent use of macros OK clean removes buildroot OK no large docs in package OK doc doesnt affect runtime OK no headers outside -devel package OK no static libs OK dependancies on itself OK no libtool *.la files OK no GUI files OK does not own other packages' files OK cleans buildroot before install OK valid UTF-8 Can you see what the deal with 3) is? And fix 1) and 2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 22:11:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242211.l4OMBdtD030458@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-24 18:11 EST ------- Thank you Mamoru. I'd already applied for 'fedorabugs' in the account system before. I was unable to remove and re-add it to send out notification emails. I did add 'cvsextras' however and noted that the notification for that went out. My FAS account name is 'rayvd' Thanks again for your assistance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 22:16:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232737] gnome-launch-box: Funky application launcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242216.l4OMGX18030634@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-launch-box: Funky application launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232737 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-24 18:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-launch-box Short Description: Funky application launcher Owners: bnocera at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 22:20:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] New: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBI-Dumper/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-DBI-Dumper.spec Description: Dumps data from a select statement into an output file. dbidumper tries to mirror the functionality and behavior of sql*loader. The control file syntax is similar, and DBI::Dumper utilizes a subset of the sql*loader options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 22:20:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242220.l4OMKaPO030777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-DBI-Dumper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 22:33:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 18:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242233.l4OMX0nI031381@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 18:32 EST ------- It's been four months since Warren added his question and in that time there's been no response. I think it's about time to close this ticket; I'll do so soon if there's no further comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 23:01:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242301.l4ON10Mu000496@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: conduit - |Review Request: conduit - A |Conduit is a synchronization|synchronization solution for |solution for GNOME |GNOME ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-24 19:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I think that the summary should be something like "A synchronization solution > for GNOME" Noted to be fixed for next release. (In reply to comment #11) > Perhaps I don't understand what you want to say, > however for F-7 and FCC-devel, there is no pythoon-elementtree > rpm and no package provides python-elementtree. If I understand the thread you pointed to, I should be able to: %if 0%{?fedora} && "%fedora" < "7" Requires: python-elementtree %endif > cElementTree.so module in python-elementtree has been > renamed to _elementtree.so module in python rpm > (F7 python is 2.5) and to use _elementtree, some code change > will be perhaps needed for conduit. I had a short conversation with the developers and they indicated that it was developed with 2.5 in mind: [0x100] yes, we are developing on Feisty which has python 2,5 as default. elementtree is identical on both 2.4 and 2.5, but the include is from a different area - so we have try except clauses to pull in the correct version any changes have not impacted us, tho feisty devs indicated that all we needed to change was the include. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 23:19:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242319.l4ONJ08a001173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 23:19:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242319.l4ONJXe3001196@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-24 19:19 EST ------- built in devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 23:39:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242339.l4ONdMqf001775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-24 19:39 EST ------- I am a bit lost with this failure http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=16950&name=build.log Notice the following: rm -rf /var/tmp/ruby-shadow-1.4.1-5.fc7-root-kojibuilder ... /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/var/tmp/ruby-shadow-1.4.1-5.fc7-root-kojibuilder/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/powerpc-linux': File exists Any ideas? Can I start another build without increasing the spec release number? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 24 23:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705242349.l4ONn4kB002204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-24 19:49 EST ------- Great! (Closing this out.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 01:09:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 21:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183256] Add requires and provides filtering to the Perl template In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250109.l4P199iU004717@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Add requires and provides filtering to the Perl template https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183256 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords| |FutureFeature Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 21:09 EST ------- This has been sitting open for some time, but frankly cpanspec does all of the filtering necessary so there's little reason to have it in the suggested template. I'll close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 02:25:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250225.l4P2PRR4008834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 22:25 EST ------- Just a note that cpanspec (or one of the module routines it calls) is actually hyphenating the %description automatically, and that is indeed a proper hyphenation of the word "standard". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 02:53:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241319] New: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://submind.verbum.org/download/hotwire.spec SRPM URL: http://submind.verbum.org/download/hotwire-0.450-1.src.rpm Description: Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 03:02:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250302.l4P32Wws011341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-24 23:02 EST ------- I received an updates SRPM via IRC. Here's a quick recap of the IRC discussion for the record: The desktop file gets installed properly, although desktop-file-install does emit a warning: /var/tmp/revisor-2.0.2-3.fc7-root/usr/share/applications/fedora-revisor.desktop: warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry specification. Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development", "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System", "Utility" instead I don't think this is a big deal, although it would be good to fix at some point. Either "Development" or "System" seem OK to me. The COPYING file still doesn't get included in the package. All you need to do is change: %doc README NEWS AUTHORS to %doc README NEWS AUTHORS COPYING in your %files section. That should be it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 03:42:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 23:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250342.l4P3ga4f013984@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-24 23:42 EST ------- I saw the build log and it seems that this is a parallel make problem. Try to remove %{_smp_mflags} from ----------------------------------------------------------- make %{?_smp_mflags} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install ----------------------------------------------------------- You have to bump release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 04:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250410.l4P4AmnY015657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-25 00:10 EST ------- OK, I've received an updated package via IRC. rpmlint is silent except for the aforementioned strange-permission warning on the spec which isn't a blocker. The desktop-file-install issue is fixed. COPYING is included in the package. So we're done. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 05:02:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226577] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250502.l4P52tnI017197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226577 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-25 01:02 EST ------- OK, I pulled the latest source and built. This BS rpmlint complaint squeaked in: W: xorg-x11-drv-apm mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 3) I usually just ignore these. Blame Jesse for the bogus changelog, I guess. It's certainly not anything to block on. I recall from the vermillion review that you decided these drivers should grow a dependency on hwdata. At first I was going to complain about the COPYING file not getting into the final package, but then I read the file: This is a stub file. This package has not yet had its complete licensing information compiled. so I don't suppose there would be much point. I'm kind of surprised xorg-x11-server-sdk doesn't have a dependency on pkgconfig. It looks like it should, since it included a .pc file. That would mean that you don't need to have the separate build-time dependency in all of these drivers. So really this is fine except for /usr/share/hwdata/videoaliases being unowned. * source files match upstream: 09d7e6cf30b94f141f8ebe2560b301a058f645e74108edc28c908e750865dcec xf86-video-apm-1.1.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignoreable errors. * final provides and requires are sane: apm_drv.so()(64bit) xorg-x11-drv-apm = 1.1.1-4.fc7 = xorg-x11-server-Xorg >= 1.0.99.901 * %check is not present; not possible to automatically test, and hardware to test this is hard to come by in any case. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X places a file in /usr/share/hwdata/videoaliases but doesn't own it or depend on anything that does. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 05:04:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211714] Review Request: perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array - C extension speeds perl-POE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250504.l4P547ZI017259@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array - C extension speeds perl-POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211714 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-25 01:04 EST ------- It seems not. I'll close this ticket if there is no response soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 05:05:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219036] Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250505.l4P557bS017316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Roman - Roman module from CPAN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219036 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-25 01:05 EST ------- I guess not; I'll close this bug soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 05:24:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250524.l4P5OhWk018429@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-05-25 01:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: weechat Short Description: Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client Owners: i at stingr.net Branches: F-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 05:38:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 01:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250538.l4P5cXfD019155@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-25 01:38 EST ------- (in reply to comment #3) Require: initscripts is not really necessary. It's a base package, and on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ Extras/FullExceptionList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 06:00:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 02:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250600.l4P60XFv019862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 ------- Additional Comments From jonathansteffan at gmail.com 2007-05-25 02:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: revisor Short Description: Fedora "Spin" Graphical User Interface Owners: jonathansteffan at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 06:37:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 02:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250637.l4P6bZCq021122@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-25 02:37 EST ------- Hans, could you elaborate this change: * Thu May 24 2007 Hans de Goede 2.17-1 - Revert to GNU 2.17 release as using GNU releases are better for non linux targets You revert to using the FSF sources, nevertheless you call this target "*-linux"? What kind of target is this? Which libc is going to be used? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 06:41:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 02:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250641.l4P6fhvV021369@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 02:41 EST ------- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 07:43:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 03:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250743.l4P7h4nE024339@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-25 03:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Hans, could you elaborate this change: > > * Thu May 24 2007 Hans de Goede 2.17-1 > - Revert to GNU 2.17 release as using GNU releases are better for non linux > targets > > You revert to using the FSF sources, nevertheless you call this target "*-linux"? > Yes, my bad, thats a copy and paste error from the avr-binutils spec. After much experimenting and researching what others did, I ended up using FSF binutils-2.16.1 as that is what all other available preconfigured toolchains for this target use. However 2.16 has a bug which causes ar and ranlib to fail when compiled with -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=2, which is fixed in binutils 2.17 . Since the other available toolchains use FSF binutils and since 2.16 was giving me some problems, I decided to go to FSF 2.17 > What kind of target is this? Which libc is going to be used? The gp2x is a handheld game console, with an arm processor and Linux inside. The Linux inside uses glibc. See: http://wiki.gp2x.org/wiki/Main_Page http://www.gp2x.com/ I've found 2 working preconfigured toolchains for this: * http://open2x.org Uses: gcc-4.1.1 binutils-2.16.1 glibc-2.3.5 + linuxthreads I'm modeling my current Fedora attempts after their work, I'm using: gcc-4.1.2 binutils-2.17 glibc-2.3.6 + linuxthreads * gp2xdev-20060525.tar.bz2 Which can be downloaded here (60 Mb!!): http://archive.gp2x.de/cgi-bin/cfiles.cgi?0,0,0,0,14,1609 This is a huge tarball with pre-patched sources, just type make to get things going. I've been doing diffs against pristine upstream sources to see what they have patched. They are mostly using the same patches as open2x. Since open2x distributes the patches seperately, and in general since open2x is an alive project unlike this, I've decided to base my Fedora attempts on the open2x stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 08:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 04:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250802.l4P824Ml026642@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-25 04:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Hans, could you elaborate this change: > > > > * Thu May 24 2007 Hans de Goede 2.17-1 > > - Revert to GNU 2.17 release as using GNU releases are better for non linux > > targets > > > > You revert to using the FSF sources, nevertheless you call this target "*-linux"? > > > > Yes, my bad, thats a copy and paste error from the avr-binutils spec. After much > experimenting and researching what others did, I ended up using FSF > binutils-2.16.1 as that is what all other available preconfigured toolchains for > this target use. However 2.16 has a bug which causes ar and ranlib to fail when > compiled with -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=2, which is fixed in binutils 2.17 . I know :) I had a patch for my rtems binutils packages when binutils-2.16 was current. Jakub had a different one. > Since the > other available toolchains use FSF binutils and since 2.16 was giving me some > problems, I decided to go to FSF 2.17 OK with me. There is nothing wrong with using FSF source on linux targets, I just wanted to know, because diverging from "nominal upstream" can cause nasty incompatiblities. (Note: binutils-2.16 and binutils-2.17 aren't necessarily compatible). > * http://open2x.org > I'm modeling my current Fedora attempts after their work, I'm using: > gcc-4.1.2 > binutils-2.17 > glibc-2.3.6 + linuxthreads OK, that's what I wanted to know. It means naming the target *-linux is legitimated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 08:10:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 04:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234749] Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250810.l4P8AL4W027928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arm-gp2x-linux-binutils - Cross Compiling GNU binutils targeted at arm-linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234749 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-25 04:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (Note: binutils-2.16 and binutils-2.17 aren't necessarily compatible). > Well sofar I haven't seen any problems (but we're not very far yet). What do you advice, knowing that others who have build a toolchain for the gp2x all use 2.16.1 ??? Also could you take a quick look at our gcc-stage1 spec, and tell if we are atleast going in the right direction? Notice that this is a use once throw away spec, to get an arm-gp2x-linux-gcc in the buildsys to build arm-gp2x-linux-glibc, once the glibc is there a real/normal gcc spec will be used to build the "final" gcc (I'm planning on renaming the stage1 spec and keep it in CVS for future reference). The spec is here: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-gcc.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/arm-gp2x-linux-gcc-4.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 09:00:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 05:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250900.l4P90HR0032278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 ------- Additional Comments From richard at rsk.demon.co.uk 2007-05-25 05:00 EST ------- >From the FAQ :- >Q: When will linux-wlan-ng be merged into the mainline kernel? > > Short answer: Never. > > First, the linux-netdev people will soundly reject this driver. > I don't begrudge them for this; indeed in their position I'd do > exactly the same. It's a sound engineering decision. > > linux-wlan-ng is obselete, and effort spent fixing it is better > spent elsewhere. You can't even buy the hardware any longer. > ... It's never going to be easy to maintain this package, so I'd vote to close this one. Richard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 09:50:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 05:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225227] TEST Merge Review: foomatic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250950.l4P9oUgc003397@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: TEST Merge Review: foomatic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225227 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-05-25 05:50 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 225768 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 09:50:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 05:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225768] Merge Review: foomatic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250950.l4P9oVSK003416@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: foomatic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225768 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-05-25 05:50 EST ------- *** Bug 225227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 09:53:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 05:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250953.l4P9rQoe003626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-05-25 05:53 EST ------- I am terribly sorry for not updating this BZ earlier. This won't happen again. I have made the suggested modifications to the spec file and created a new source rpm. The revised files are at the available at the above locations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 09:55:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 05:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705250955.l4P9tqtH003796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 ------- Additional Comments From mkpai at redhat.com 2007-05-25 05:55 EST ------- A clarification is in order here. The spec file is at http://people.redhat.com/mkpai/.SPEC/perl-Callback.spec The souce rpm is at http://people.redhat.com/mkpai/.SRPM/perl-Callback-1.07-1.src.rpm . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 10:41:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251041.l4PAf7a9005495@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 rds204 at zepler.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rds204 at zepler.net)| ------- Additional Comments From rds204 at zepler.net 2007-05-25 06:41 EST ------- Hello. Apologies for the long absence. The continuous barrage of non-gerbv related stuff that I've had to do since filing this review request has not yet stopped. If someone else wants to submit a review request for it, then I'm not stopping them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 10:49:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251049.l4PAnvYK006096@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 10:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238518] Review Request: weechat - Terminal based IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251050.l4PAoLD0006132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Terminal based IRC client Alias: weechat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238518 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-25 06:50 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 235679 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 10:50:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251050.l4PAoMcO006158@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |coryc257 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-25 06:50 EST ------- *** Bug 238518 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 10:55:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 06:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235136] Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251055.l4PAtwJl006632@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235136 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-25 06:55 EST ------- Hi Damien, Spec file looks good (quick look), expect a full review shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 12:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 08:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241279] Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251224.l4PCOTLi012637@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-25 08:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=155394) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155394&action=view) [edit] > Fixes wrong encoding in documentation. > > The problem with the PDF and the PS output is related to some non-unicode chars > in several parts of the code. The attached patch fixes these issues. I also had > to remove %{_smpflags} to make the package build. Thanks! Here is a new version with pdf docs and smpflags removed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc-1.4.6-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 12:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 08:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251230.l4PCUZUB012887@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jbowes at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 12:33:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 08:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188138] Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251233.l4PCXUkM013195@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium gdeschner at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |samba-bugs-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 12:38:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 08:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251238.l4PCc73T013537@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 ------- Additional Comments From lukasim at atlas.cz 2007-05-25 08:38 EST ------- Hello, I know it's late, but for next time: In spec file: > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-buildroot Should be: BuildRoot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) It's recommended, see also: "Build root tag" in Fedora wiki http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 13:06:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240877] Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251306.l4PD6mns016796@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archivemail - A tool for archiving and compressing old email in mailboxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240877 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-25 09:06 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 13:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:50:49 -0400 Subject: needinfo requested: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251350.l4PDon14021561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Bug 234667: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Component: Package Review Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo has asked Fedora Package Reviews List for needinfo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 13:50:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251350.l4PDoovM021579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 acme at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 13:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232737] gnome-launch-box: Funky application launcher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251352.l4PDqhSa021685@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-launch-box: Funky application launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232737 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-25 09:52 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 13:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251352.l4PDqkIx021716@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-25 09:52 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 13:53:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251353.l4PDrbEn021814@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-25 09:53 EST ------- Much better. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 14:00:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251400.l4PE0U8d022377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-25 10:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I don't see an APPROVED or the fedora-review flag set to '+'. Ralf, were you > actually reviewing this? Technically yes, formally no. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 14:27:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251427.l4PERFP5024553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-05-25 10:27 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [?] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [!] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/hotwire-0.450-1.src.rpm E: hotwire no-changelogname-tag W: hotwire redundant-prefix-tag W: hotwire setup-not-quiet E: hotwire no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/hotwire-0.450-1.noarch.rpm W: hotwire no-documentation E: hotwire no-changelogname-tag [!] Package is not relocatable. [!] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [!] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [!] Package must own all directories that it creates. [!] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === Issues === 1. name, version, and release macros will be defined by Name, Version, and Release fields, so you don't need to explicitly define them. 2. A more appropriate Group could be used. 3. BuildRoot should be chosen from one of the options in the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 4. Relocatable packages are discouraged, so Prefix can be ommitted. 5. Vendor should not be set. 6. COPYING and README should be included as docs 7. A changelog should be included in the spec file. 8. The package should include BuildRequires: python-devel 9. The BuildRequires: on pygtk2-devel is unnecessary 10. The package should require python. 11. The package should own hotwire and hotwire_ui python site-packages dirs. 12. The python sitelib macro could be used, as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#head-875cc97c2232a5b3ceda75ea41eed525da7d3929 Please fix the above issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 15:04:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251504.l4PF4Jld027215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-25 11:04 EST ------- I guess my feeling is that hyphenationof words was obsoleted by "word wrap" on modern computers. It's not that we're stuck typing a word halfway, realising we ran out of space on that line and we couldn't delete the letters. I've grown very unaccustomed to hyphernation in the digital age, it gives me a full reading stop for my brain to figure it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 15:15:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192436] Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251515.l4PFFthO028335@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-server-Xgl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-05-25 11:15 EST ------- FYI, the sources have not be changed, you don't have to re-checkout it. I send you the last SRPM (with your last modifications) on your private mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 15:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251536.l4PFaZq8030999@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 11:36 EST ------- Well, I want to check if your patch in comment 31 works on mockbuild, however it seems that all my domestic mirrors (i.e. mirror servers in Japan) don't work well now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 15:40:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239176] Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251540.l4PFecaJ031348@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239176 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-05-25 11:40 EST ------- Let's do it. - md5sums are ok: 7719e785e1f416179de85c7a7f889eb1 - package successfully builds in mock - the only issue can be found here is libdir match in .pc file. But it's going to be got rid so everyting is ok. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 16:17:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] New: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.hadess.net/tmp/codeina/codeina.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hadess.net/tmp/codeina/codeina-0.10.0.1-0.20070525.170400.src.rpm Description: Codeina installs codecs from the Fluendo webshop for GStreamer. Based on ThomasVS' package, with today's SVN snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 16:32:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251632.l4PGWJDL005295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-25 12:32 EST ------- There is a very minor issue with this package, but it doesn't hold up approval. - rpmlint says you've got mixed spaces and tabs, look at line 29. Fix that item before requesting builds, and we're good. Nice work with the -devel package. Good: - rpmlint checks return: W: R-Matrix mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 29, tab: line 5) W: R-Matrix-devel no-documentation E: R-Matrix-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Safe to ignore the Error (all R packages do that), and the no-docs in -devel. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (Distributable) OK, text in package, matches source (code is a mix of MIT, GPL, LGPL, documented in spec) - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files APPROVED. I'll also sponsor you, thanks for your good work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 16:36:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251636.l4PGaDAC005464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-05-25 12:36 EST ------- Yes everything works fine now, all packages are build now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 16:38:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239176] Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251638.l4PGcNbw005547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239176 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-05-25 12:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bodr Short Description: Blue Obelisk Data Repository Owners: belegdol at gmail.com Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 16:38:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239176] Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251638.l4PGctEO005585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239176 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 16:45:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251645.l4PGj9Xr005998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 12:45 EST ------- Good to hear! Now closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:03:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239176] Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251703.l4PH31GY006699@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239176 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-25 13:02 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251719.l4PHJVJG008082@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 13:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155467) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155467&action=view) mock build log for -3 Okay, patch on comment 31 seems okay for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:28:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251728.l4PHSRmg009066@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:29:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251729.l4PHT1F6009198@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:32:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251732.l4PHWiae009425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-25 13:32 EST ------- Updated SRPM and spec file: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-findlib-1.1.2pl1-2.fc6.src.rpm http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-findlib.spec Note! These depend on the ocaml find-requires and find-provides scripts. See here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg01693.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251733.l4PHXx4Y009636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-25 13:33 EST ------- Updated SRPM and spec file: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-calendar.spec http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-calendar-1.10-2.fc6.src.rpm Note! These depend on the ocaml find-requires and find-provides scripts. See here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg01693.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:34:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251734.l4PHY11c009661@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 13:33 EST ------- Chitlesh, are you insterested in being the maintainer of this package (gerbv)? If you are not, or any response cannot be gained within one week from anyone, I will once close this bug as NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:34:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240652] Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251734.l4PHYYrB009851@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240652 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-25 13:34 EST ------- Updated SRPM and Spec files: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-pcre.spec http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-pcre-5.11.4-2.fc6.src.rpm Note! These depend on the ocaml find-requires and find-provides scripts. See here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg01693.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:34:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251734.l4PHYqD7009891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-25 13:34 EST ------- I'm not sure what the point of setting needinfo to a mailing list is, but I can give you some references. First, were you sponsored in the account system? (Even RH employees need this.) I don't see your address as the owner of any existing Fedora packages. If not, you'll need sponsorship before you can continue. Setting aside the issue of sponsorship, you are at step 8 of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess So the next step would be to make a CVS request as detailed in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:35:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240655] Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251735.l4PHZQrc010050@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-extlib - OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240655 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-25 13:35 EST ------- Updated SRPM and Spec files: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-extlib.spec http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-extlib-1.5-2.fc6.src.rpm Note! These depend on the ocaml find-requires and find-provides scripts. See here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg01693.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251735.l4PHZqDA010105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rvinyard at cs.nmsu.e | |du) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 13:35 EST ------- Rick, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:39:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251739.l4PHdL51010426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 jonathansteffan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251739.l4PHdNbu010463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rvinyard at cs.nmsu.e | |du) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 13:39 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251740.l4PHeiO0010578@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rvinyard at cs.nmsu.e| |du) | ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-05-25 13:40 EST ------- Sorry about the delay... this week has been more hectic than I anticipated. I'll have a full review in the next day or two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:46:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251746.l4PHkGa0010826@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 13:46 EST ------- ping again? I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response can be received in one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 17:54:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 13:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251754.l4PHstD3011151@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(akontsevich at mail.r | |u) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 13:54 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 18:08:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251808.l4PI8A4w012180@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 14:08 EST ------- I have not checked in detail, however this seems to work on python 2.5 when I drop Requires: python-elementtree (on FC-devel, almost equal to F-7) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 18:20:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239968] Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251820.l4PIKFpo013034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdbtools - tools for extracting things from Access databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239968 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 14:20 EST ------- It seems that you are now sponsored (bug 232855)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 18:20:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236488] Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251820.l4PIKWXM013068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236488 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 14:20 EST ------- It seems that you are now sponsored (bug 232855)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 18:28:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251828.l4PISsTV013791@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-25 14:28 EST ------- Awesome, thanks a lot for the review. Looking at this I realized I uploaded a much older, broken version of the spec file; some of this was already fixed. I just now fixed the rest of these issues I believe. Except - do I really need to require python if I'm already requiring pygtk? New versions uploaded, if you could take a look again I'd appreciate a ton. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 18:29:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251829.l4PITgrW013876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-25 14:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: blobAndConquer Short Description: Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 18:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] New: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silfreed at silfreed.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qgis/qgis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qgis/qgis-0.8.0-3.src.rpm Description: Quantum GIS (QGIS) is a user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System (GIS) that runs on Linux, Unix, Mac OSX, and Windows. QGIS supports vector, raster, and database formats. QGIS is licensed under the GNU General Public License. QGIS lets you browse and create map data on your computer. It supports many common spatial data formats (e.g. ESRI ShapeFile, geotiff). QGIS supports plugins to do things like display tracks from your GPS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 18:51:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251851.l4PIpWXI015306@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 19:08:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251908.l4PJ8Njx016398@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2007-05-25 15:08 EST ------- Everything looks great. The only minor issue is that the desktop file uses the deprecated 'Application' category. As far as requiring python goes, I mentioned it because hotwire does install into dirs owned by python, but I'll leave the choice to you. So, barring the desktop file issue, this package is approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 19:10:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251910.l4PJAjZq016598@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-05-25 15:10 EST ------- Hi Chris, This is my first review of a perl package, so I'd prefer if someone more experienced would have a look as well. But anyway, here we go: * RPM name is OK * Source DBI-Dumper-2.01.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK Notes: - What is grammar.prd, and does it need to be in the docs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 19:17:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251917.l4PJHu2B017103@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-25 15:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hotwire Short Description: Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators Owners: walters at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 FC-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 19:48:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705251948.l4PJmi1g018989@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-25 15:48 EST ------- I'd agree to review that and I am agreeing with Enrico in that case. However now the guideline explicitly requires to ask FESCO to link statically, so I'll ask FESCO on behalf of Enrico. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 20:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252002.l4PK2be5019763@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-05-25 16:02 EST ------- Sorry, my bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 20:13:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252013.l4PKDlDg020240@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-25 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Chitlesh, are you insterested in being the maintainer > of this package (gerbv)? Actually I would love to. But however, there isn't any upstream for this package to fix the following bugs from comment #2: > * In build log: > > gerbv.c:1526: warning: call to __builtin___snprintf_chk will > always overflow destination buffer > > > * Gerber file format support fails to load test files. > > * Drill file format support crashes with buffer overflow. > > * Passing files at the command-line results in 100% buffer > overflow crash: > > *** buffer overflow detected ***: gerbv terminated > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib/libc.so.6(__chk_fail+0x41)[0x87c161] > /lib/libc.so.6[0x87bba3] > /lib/libc.so.6(__snprintf_chk+0x37)[0x87ba87] > gerbv[0x8055686] > gerbv[0x805625a] > /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x12a5e1] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 20:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252024.l4PKOT5g020663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-25 16:24 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 20:24:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252024.l4PKOXDk020695@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-25 16:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 20:24:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236642] Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252024.l4PKOdLg020729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Revisor - Revisor GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236642 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-25 16:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 20:31:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252031.l4PKVCnU020981@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-25 16:31 EST ------- grammar.prd is the grammar Parse::RecDescent definition used by DBI::Dumper. I figured it might be useful to someone wanting to take a deeper look at things... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 21:56:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 17:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252156.l4PLuVXg026443@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-05-25 17:56 EST ------- bump -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 23:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 19:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235293] Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252303.l4PN3fh6029136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2007-05-25 19:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155491) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155491&action=view) cvs commit log New version, should be the final one Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.1-3.src.rpm Source tarball: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/adminutil-1.1.1.tar.bz2 I'm going to be out next week. Margaret, if this is approved, can you do the cvs-import and create the branches? Or someone else? Otherwise, it will have to wait until the 5th at the earliest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 25 23:37:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 19:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705252337.l4PNbpN5030041@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-25 19:37 EST ------- Some initial comments: First please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Then: * Please write all BuildRequires in main section. * %makeinstall is highly forbidden. * stripping binaries is strictly forbidden to create debuginfo rpm * For python/test_export.py, verify which is proper, to make this script have executable permission, or to remove shebang. * Fix directory ownership. For example, %{_libdir}/%{name} is not owned by any package. * Shipping static archive is highly forbidden unless you have some reasonable reason. * Also shipping libtool archive is highly forbidden. * %defattr(-, root, root, -) is recommended * Using disttag is recommended I just glanced at your spec file and I didn't try to rebuild this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 01:09:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 21:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260109.l4Q19xde032505@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 ------- Additional Comments From eric at brouhaha.com 2007-05-25 21:09 EST ------- Thank you for reviewing my package. I have updated the spec based on the review, and made the new spec and SRPM available: Spec URL: http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/fc6/lcdtest/lcdtest.spec SRPM URL: http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/fc6/lcdtest/lcdtest-1.06-3.src.rpm I build with mock on FC6. Apparently the reason it failed to build for you is that it is dependent on SCons >= 0.97, which was just updated in FE6 recently. I have added that version dependency to the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 01:49:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 21:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241099] Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260149.l4Q1nfj3001147@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lcdtest - utility to display monitor test patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241099 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-25 21:49 EST ------- Excellent, things are almost fine. Some cosmetic fixes are needed to make rpmlint happy: Source RPM: W: lcdtest summary-not-capitalized displays monitor test patterns ->Obvious fix W: lcdtest rpm-buildroot-usage %build destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ ->Ignorable, scons needs this W: lcdtest macro-in-%changelog _smp_mflags ->use %% instead of % W: lcdtest mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11) ->please stick with either spaces or tabs, if possible rpmlint of lcdtest: W: lcdtest summary-not-capitalized displays monitor test patterns -> will be fixed in the same time with the src.rpm Except for the above (and the fact that scons-0.9.7 has not yet been pushed in devel) everything seems fine, including using the program on FC6/x86_64. Have you not have been in the position of needing a sponsor I would have approved the package. here comes a formal review, to help potential sponsors: GOOD - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream, is latest version, SHA1SUM is 9da6385dad834ae8073bb0ef7620e32122cec4d9 - package compiles on FC6 (x86_64) [*] - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file NEEDSWORK - cosmetic changes of spec, see on top of this comment [*] as of 25.05.2007, needed BR scons>=0.9.7 is not yet available in devel, probably due to F7 freeze -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 02:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 22:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240616] Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260212.l4Q2C0Yr001784@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixman - pixel manipulation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240616 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-05-25 22:11 EST ------- W: pixman incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.0-0.20070518 0.9.0-0.20070524 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 05:09:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260509.l4Q59bu0008805@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-26 01:09 EST ------- Chitlesh asked me to look into the snprint issue: This patch should fix it: --- src/gerbv.c~ 2007-05-26 06:33:50.000000000 +0200 +++ src/gerbv.c 2007-05-26 06:33:50.000000000 +0200 @@ -1523,7 +1523,7 @@ /* * Show progress in status bar */ - snprintf(screen.statusbar.msgstr, MAX_STATUSMSGLEN, + snprintf(screen.statusbar.msgstr, MAX_ERRMSGLEN, "%d %s...", i, screen.file[i]->basename); update_statusbar(&screen); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 05:28:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260528.l4Q5ScP1009928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 01:28 EST ------- OK, this package is pretty much OK but I just want to run the static library by FESCo so that these merge reviews get the same treatment that any other package would get. Some other comments: Source: should be a URL, probably http://dl.sf.net/flex/flex-%{version}.tar.bz2 This package has a build-time dependency on "info" but I don't see why a text-mode info browser would be useful for the build process. I'll get back as soon as FESCo has a chance to discuss the static library issue. * source files match upstream: 53b56a62ea9409b99b7a0ac4a5204fac16ca7eaf39b9374164c346d6badc6914 flex-2.5.33.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. ? Not sure what BuildRequires: info is for. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. O rpmlint warnings are OK (static library OK pending FESCo ack). * final provides and requires are sane: flex = 2.5.33-7.fc7 = /bin/sh /sbin/install-info m4 * %check is present and all tests pass: Tests succeeded: 40 Tests FAILED: 0 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (install-info) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers present, in base package because this package is only useful for development. * no pkgconfig files. ? static libraries present; FESCo ack pending. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 05:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260538.l4Q5c3tC010655@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 05:48:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260548.l4Q5mmJK010903@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-26 01:48 EST ------- * compiler flags are appropriate. gcc ... -I/usr/include ... This -I/usr/include is a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 05:57:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260557.l4Q5vrE2011119@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 01:57 EST ------- You hadn't mentioned that before. Please explain for the record, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 06:16:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 02:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260616.l4Q6GBFw011463@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 02:16 EST ------- I put the dependencies in a local repo so I could get this built. It will be nice when rawhide is rawhide again. I note that 0.25 has come out since you submitted this review. (It never fails.) I don't think it will significantly affect the packaging, but I note that the author has added a LICENSE file which you will need to package. I'll proceed to review 0.24 but if you'd like me to review a 0.25 package as well, just post it and I'll do so. * source files match upstream: 5de946bf19cd96317418a422a44cb0ebea6e17e42ef1485489e67df0a6acb259 Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.24.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (including all modules used by the tests) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: RSA.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA) = 0.24 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA = 0.24-3.fc7 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Random) perl(DynaLoader) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=137, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.20 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.23 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 06:18:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 02:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260618.l4Q6ImHn011507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-26 02:18 EST ------- Done so many times before ;) 1. /usr/include the system header directory and is on a compiler's internal include file search path. It should never be explicitly passed. Packages requiring -I/usr/include are broken "by definition" and are likely to be badly designed. 2. In this particular case, the culprit is toplevel Makefile.am appending @includedir@ to AM_CPPFLAGS: AM_CPPFLAGS = ... -I at includedir@ This is abuse of the autotools - @includedir@ is a destination directory (a directory where files are supposed to be installed to). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 08:39:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 04:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237416] Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705260839.l4Q8de07017665@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Berusky - 2D logic game based on an ancient puzzle Sokoban. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237416 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-05-26 04:39 EST ------- build is done, closing and thanks to all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 10:52:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 06:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] New: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ocamlnet.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ocamlnet-2.2.7-1.src.rpm Description: ocamlnet is a comprehensive library of network protocols and RFC implementations for OCaml. The library homepage is here: http://www.ocaml-programming.de/programming/ocamlnet.html This is a first go at packaging the library, and I haven't included some of the more complex and esoteric features yet (specifically, lablgtk2 and SSL support). Note that nethttpd has a different license from the rest of the library, which is why I split it out into its own RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 11:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 07:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241473] New: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241473 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ssl.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ssl-0.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: ocaml-ssl contains SSL bindings for OCaml. The original package can be found here: http://savonet.sourceforge.net/wiki/Savonet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 11:26:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 07:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232434] Review Request: FileZilla 3 - fast FTP and SFTP client with a lot of features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261126.l4QBQWhe025217@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FileZilla 3 - fast FTP and SFTP client with a lot of features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232434 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-26 07:26 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla-3.0.0-0.1.beta8.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla.spec Summary: FTP client and server with lots of useful features and an intuitive interface -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 11:57:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 07:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261157.l4QBvEHN026391@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-26 07:57 EST ------- Nigel Jones pointed out a missing builddep. This version just adds that builddep (m4): http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-findlib-1.1.2pl1-3.src.rpm http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-findlib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 12:04:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 08:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241069] Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261204.l4QC4M2L026595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blobAndConquer - Blob Wars 2: Blob And Conquer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241069 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-26 08:04 EST ------- Thanks all, imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 12:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 08:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241475] New: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241475 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ulex - OCaml lexer generator for Unicode Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ulex.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ulex-0.8-1.src.rpm Description: ocaml-ulex is a lexer generator for Unicode. See: http://www.cduce.org/download.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 12:54:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 08:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261254.l4QCsAqT028108@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-26 08:54 EST ------- *** Bug 239545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 13:07:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 09:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241476] New: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-pxp.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-pxp-1.2.0test1-1.src.rpm Description: PXP is a validating XML parser library for OCaml. Main site is: http://www.ocaml-programming.de/packages/ (scroll down a bit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 13:31:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 09:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240652] Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261331.l4QDVhGd029767@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pcre - Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240652 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-26 09:31 EST ------- Updated SRPM and Spec files: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-pcre.spec http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-pcre-5.11.4-3.fc6.src.rpm I updated these so that it puts the stub library in stublibs. It also removes the need for the two patches from Debian which were in earlier versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 14:26:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 10:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241483] New: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241483 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-expat - OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-expat.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-expat-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: This is a wrapper around the expat library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 14:49:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 10:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241486] New: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241486 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-curl - OCaml Curl library (ocurl) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-curl.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-curl-0.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: ocurl is a wrapper around the CURL library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 15:37:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] New: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/cduce.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/cduce-0.4.2-1.src.rpm Description: CDuce is an XML-oriented functional language. http://cduce.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 16:03:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 12:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200918] Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261603.l4QG3aYC001974@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pgadmin3-admin81 - Server instrumentation for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200918 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org CC| |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-26 12:03 EST ------- Anything happening here? Reverting to FE-NEW, someone else can pick this up if they want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 16:48:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 12:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261648.l4QGm3Se003135@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 12:48 EST ------- But, pedantry aside, can you point to any problems that this causes which are worse than the possible fixes (of patching it out of Makefile.am and running the autotools or patching it out of the generated Makefile)? Because in the absense of any actual breakage, I'm inclined to simply suggest that this issue be reported to upstream for fixing there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 17:12:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 13:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261712.l4QHC56J003653@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-26 13:12 EST ------- Some fixes: - Remove --with-compile-warnings=no, and add patch to fix the warning (fixed upstream) - Add README.licence file, with the comments from comment 3 - Add untested patch to use the new serial service (means that we shouldn't need to have users add "-x" to the hcid line). Untested, but compiles. Will need to wait until bluez-utils 3.11 gets into devel. Updated packages at: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs2-obexftp/gnome-vfs2-obexftp-0.2-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs2-obexftp/gnome-vfs2-obexftp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 17:54:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 13:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240808] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261754.l4QHstue005033@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-vermilion - Intel Vermilion driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240808 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-26 13:54 EST ------- Imported, closing. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 18:44:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 14:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261844.l4QIiq83006585@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|ajackson at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|needinfo?(fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 18:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 14:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236041] Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261846.l4QIkkFT006657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236041 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(pjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-26 14:46 EST ------- Don't worry about this one, I need to do some serious surgery here first. I'll file a new bug when I have something usable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 19:13:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167253] Review Request: cernlib - CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261913.l4QJDEYi008775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib - CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167253 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-26 15:13 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cernlib Updated Fedora CC: kmccarty [ AT ] princeton.edu This is the cernlib debian maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 19:14:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226577] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261914.l4QJEG4M008835@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226577 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-26 15:14 EST ------- I fixed xorg-x11-server-sdk 1.3.0.0-6 to Requires: pkgconfig, so now this driver doesn't have to. Also added a requires on hwdata. So, 1.1.1-5 should be golden. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 19:51:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705261951.l4QJpaKn010139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-05-26 15:51 EST ------- This still has a use even with pungi available? This is one bash script and is not arch dependent, make it BuildArch: noarch. Which will also get rid of the empty debuginfo problem. I think it would be good practice to Require the things it uses, so people can install it and have it just work. anaconda, anaconda-runtime, createrepo, and mkisofs come to mind. There is no URL or Source URL in the spec. I assume this srpm is the sources of this thing. Does this have a version number? The rpm says 1.0.0 but the only version in the sources, in the comment of the script, is 0.7. %files needs a %defattr statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 20:10:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262010.l4QKAsJW010915@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 16:10 EST ------- I guess that SRPM URL should be http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.06-3.src.rpm instead. This fails to build for me on x86_64 with current rawhide; the tests fail due to a lack of Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. I added a build-time dependency and everything builds fine. There's some oddness in the way this thing builds. It ends up -I/usr/local/ssl/include and -I/usr/local/include on the gcc command line; the former comes from the INC line in Makefile.PL, which is ill-advised. For whatever reason, the '-L/usr/local/ssl/lib' in LIBS doesn't make it onto the link line, although of course the '-lcrypto' does. I'm not sure where '-I/usr/local/include' is coming from; I'll have to check into it. Obviously this doesn't break anything for a mock build because there will never be anything in /usr/local there, but it cold cause reproducibility problems for users who may have whatever junk in there. Since it's pretty trivial to either patch it out or run a bit of Perl to just delete the offending INC line. The README file is a bit funny. It's so plainly useless that I'm not sure it's worth actually including it in the package. Review: * source files match upstream: 4514f2637c651242c2d2ebe974b167fe907eb514ec79e4683d951a40f50267d2 Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.06.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper (needs perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA)). ? compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: PKCS10.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::PKCS10) = 0.06 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 = 0.06-3.fc7 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) perl >= 0:5.008000 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass (once the proper BR: is added): All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.18 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.18 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 20:11:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262011.l4QKB8Kq010950@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 20:20:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226577] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262020.l4QKKmfd011165@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226577 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 16:20 EST ------- Yes, indeed, I think everything's good now. APPROVED Just ping (email, IRC, whatever) when you think the other drivers are ready and I'll start going through them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 20:54:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262054.l4QKshiJ012048@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 16:54 EST ------- This ticket has some odd flags; it shouldn't block FE-NEW, and it should be at least in the ASSIGNED state until it's actually impolrted and built. I'll fix them up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 20:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262059.l4QKxBbn012315@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-26 16:59 EST ------- owners.list updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 20:59:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240689] Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262059.l4QKxO4P012353@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: goffice04 - GOffice support libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240689 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262100.l4QL0Puo012431@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262110.l4QLAhGT012932@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 17:10 EST ------- Actually '-I/usr/local/include' comes from Perl itself; run 'perl -V|grep cflags' to see it. So that's certainly not something you need to worry about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:16:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262116.l4QLGit2013164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-26 17:16 EST ------- Thanks. Might that be why it's still waiting for CVSAdmin? I've got several other CVSAdmin requests waiting since Monday or Tuesday, though, and others submitted since then that were completed very quickly, so I really have no idea what's going on. :) I think it was blocking FE-NEW since when I submitted it, we weren't using flags yet. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:18:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262118.l4QLI6G4013243@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 17:18 EST ------- Not much to say here; everything looks good. The only oddify is this: Checking if your kit is complete... Warning: the following files are missing in your kit: inc inc/Module inc/Module/Install Please inform the author. Except that those are actually there, as directories. I don't think directories are supposed to be listed separately in the manifest but I'm not really certain. Perhaps it's worth passing that on to upstream. * source files match upstream: a10433ff68b70687bac6832d5814db730147d3dc0cbf3e61c08a0711851c879e Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: X509.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::X509) = 0.4 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 = 0.4-3.fc7 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=10, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.07 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.10 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262120.l4QLK5Fn013292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 17:20 EST ------- I can't say that I disagree, my point was only that you'll probably see it in many cpanspec-generated specfiles. Of course, the packager is free to reformat the %description text as they wish, including removing such hyphenation if they like. BTW, Paul, were you actually reviewing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262137.l4QLbMr0013765@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262150.l4QLon9j014102@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 17:50 EST ------- This package is under the Artistic license only and not both it and the GPL as you indicate. You need to add build dependencies on perl(Test), perl(Test::Pod) and perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) so that the tests will run. I'd suggest packaging the included examples as documentation. Some folks have also been packaging the tests as documentation, but in this case I don't see how those tests could possibly be useful as docs. Review: * source files match upstream: b31718768fbe43c78183fd2e45f83dee87b77f60075130e00ed87df96f9bec0b Net-Write-1.00.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field doesn't match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. X some BuildRequires are missing. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Net::Write) = 1.00 perl(Net::Write::Layer) perl(Net::Write::Layer2) perl(Net::Write::Layer3) perl(Net::Write::Layer4) perl-Net-Write = 1.00-1.fc7 = perl(Carp) perl(Class::Gomor::Array) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::Socket) perl(Net::Pcap) perl(Net::Write::Layer) perl(Socket) perl(Socket6) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) X %check is present but some tests are skipped due to missing dependencies. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:55:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262155.l4QLtUSS014218@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 21:59:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262159.l4QLxhM6014469@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2007-05-26 17:59 EST ------- I've just released 0.5.1. New package available from: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack.spec http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.5.1-1.fc7.src.rpm http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.5.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm I've cleaned up the spec file according to Bernard's comment #8. It now doesn't require any patches and it puts the logo png in /usr/share/pixmaps/ I haven't got a new icon yet but I've asked fedora-artwork about it (thanks for the advice, Rahul). This review has been going on for quite a while now. If you could give me a good idea of how close I am to getting it right I'd be most grateful. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 22:17:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262217.l4QMH40l014883@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-26 18:17 EST ------- I think you also need a build dependency on Test::More, although I guess the tests are disabled by default so perhaps there's no point in that. I've no idea if you could have a conditional build dependency. I ran the tests manually and they ran fine. Review: * source files match upstream: e395289713e509a323fd1d44cfc58785a45e661a64ca3f9c7ff9a046105012a8 URI-Fetch-0.08.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (perhaps Test::More if the tests were enabled) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(URI::Fetch) = 0.08 perl(URI::Fetch::Response) perl-URI-Fetch = 0.08-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::ErrorHandler) perl(Compress::Zlib) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(URI) perl(URI::Fetch::Response) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) * %check is present, but tests are necessarily disabled. All tests pass when run manually: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=88, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.30 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.36 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 22:22:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262222.l4QMMcQH015029@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 22:23:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262223.l4QMNlSg015079@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-26 18:23 EST ------- Updated: - Add examples dir as documentation - Add missing BRs for tests - Fix licensing Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Write.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-Write-1.00-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 22:40:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262240.l4QMexWK015467@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 paul at xelerance.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at xelerance.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 22:41:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262241.l4QMfViE015507@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com 2007-05-26 18:41 EST ------- Yes I am. I've assigned the item to me and added the ? review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 22:47:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262247.l4QMlEv1015584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 22:50:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262250.l4QMoEMQ015644@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-05-26 18:50 EST ------- Patrice, I'll add this to CVS first, then will fix the issues you've mentioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 26 22:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705262251.l4QMpIlv015691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-05-26 18:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnetfilter_log Short Description: Netfilter logging userspace library Owners: i at stingr.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 01:21:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 21:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270121.l4R1LK8T018164@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-26 21:21 EST ------- Updated upstream patches, so updated packages: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs2-obexftp/gnome-vfs2-obexftp-0.2-4.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs2-obexftp/gnome-vfs2-obexftp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 02:36:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270236.l4R2aofu019497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 22:36 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 02:46:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270246.l4R2k5b1019697@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-05-26 22:46 EST ------- Thanks for the comments; I believe I've addressed your initial concerns and updated files are here: Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qgis/qgis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qgis/qgis-0.8.0-4.src.rpm > * Please write all BuildRequires in main section. Moved. > * %makeinstall is highly forbidden. Updated to `make DESTDIR=%{builddir} install` > * stripping binaries is strictly forbidden to create debuginfo > rpm Removed and enabled build of debuginfo package. > * For python/test_export.py, verify which is proper, > to make this script have executable permission, or > to remove shebang. I'm working with upstream to resolve this: http://lists.qgis.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2007-May/thread.html They currently say this test script should be executable. > * Fix directory ownership. For example, %{_libdir}/%{name} is > not owned by any package. I believe this should be fixed. Let me know if I missed any directories. > * Shipping static archive is highly forbidden unless you have > some reasonable reason. > * Also shipping libtool archive is highly forbidden. These are the .a and .la files, correct? They have been removed. > * %defattr(-, root, root, -) is recommended Fixed. > * Using disttag is recommended Added to Release. I also found some source files that were being pulled into the debuginfo package and were marked executable. I'm not familiar with the debuginfo packages so I'm not sure if something's being built incorrectly for them, but I went ahead and made the source files non-executable and notified upstream (http://lists.qgis.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2007-May/001930.html) Also below is the rpmlint reports: rpmlint -vi RPMS/qgis-*0.8.0-4* SRPMS/qgis-0.8.0-4.src.rpm I: qgis checking I: qgis-debuginfo checking I: qgis-devel checking W: qgis-devel no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. I: qgis-grass checking W: qgis-grass no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. I: qgis-theme-nkids checking W: qgis-theme-nkids no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. I: qgis checking E: qgis hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/qt4/bin A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. I'm not sure how to deal with the "hardcoded-library-path". It was a bit of a hack for me to get this package to work with the qt4 libraries for FC6; I'm not sure if there's any documentation on how to improve this or not. -Doug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 02:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 22:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270255.l4R2tVam019864@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-05-26 22:55 EST ------- Right; that %makeinstall fix was `make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install`; that's what I get for not copy/pasting. -Doug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:03:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226391] Merge Review: scim-bridge In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270303.l4R33ikq020013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-bridge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226391 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:03 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226392] Merge Review: scim-chewing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270306.l4R36wxG020090@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-chewing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226392 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:06 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:10:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226393] Merge Review: scim-hangul In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270310.l4R3AMfd020162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-hangul https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226393 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:10 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:13:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226394] Merge Review: scim-m17n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270313.l4R3DbkX020241@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-m17n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226394 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:13 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:18:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226397] Merge Review: scim-qtimm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270318.l4R3IJsJ020334@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-qtimm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226397 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:18 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226398] Merge Review: scim-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270320.l4R3KiiO020448@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scim-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226398 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:20 EST ------- There is no Sinhala support in RHEL 4, so probably no point to add this at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230262] Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270327.l4R3RkL4020595@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jss - Java Security Services (JSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230262 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:27 EST ------- The Fedora 7 branch is called F-7 Branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231085] Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270330.l4R3U2Kr020668@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule - Compiler for Perl 6 Rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231085 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:30 EST ------- branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231746] Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270334.l4R3YkNh020840@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ettercap - Network traffic sniffer/analyser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231746 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:34 EST ------- el branches made -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270340.l4R3e8sJ020975@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:40 EST ------- branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:45:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231984] Review Request: Vym - View Your Mind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270345.l4R3jECZ021230@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Vym - View Your Mind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231984 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:45 EST ------- el branches done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:52:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232018] Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270352.l4R3qOn8021377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper Alias: perl-YAML-Syck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:52 EST ------- branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:54:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232036] Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270354.l4R3s1rx021462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Tiny - Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible Alias: perl-YAML-Tiny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232036 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:53 EST ------- branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 03:59:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 23:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232816] Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270359.l4R3xrnh021592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnetfilter_log - Netfilter logging userspace library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232816 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-26 23:59 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:02:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234939] Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270402.l4R42Ir0021711@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Affix-Infix2Postfix - Perl extension for converting from infix notation to postfix notation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234939 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:02 EST ------- branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:03:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234940] Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270403.l4R43a59021857@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Image-Math-Constrain - Scaling math used in image size constraining (such as thumbnails) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234940 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:03 EST ------- branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:14:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270414.l4R4E05Q022176@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-27 00:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155515) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155515&action=view) mock build log of qgis 0.8.0-4 on F-7 i386 Much improvement! But still I have not tried to install this as mock build fails. * Mockbuild failed as attached. First check BuildRequires. * Requires: /sbin/ldconfig is not needed. * Some directories are still not owned (e.g. %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:18:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270418.l4R4IM1B022291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-27 00:18 EST ------- One more notes: (In reply to comment #2) > I: qgis checking > E: qgis hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/qt4/bin > A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, > /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. > > > I'm not sure how to deal with the "hardcoded-library-path". It was a bit of a > hack for me to get this package to work with the qt4 libraries for FC6; I'm > not sure if there's any documentation on how to improve this or not. Use %{_libdir} instead of /usr/lib. on x86_64/ppc64 arch, qt4 moc (and others) are under /usr/lib64/qt4/bin/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:21:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270421.l4R4LYVZ022370@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:21 EST ------- F-7 branch added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:23:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270423.l4R4N4A6022455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-27 00:23 EST ------- One more comment: -------------------------------------------- checking python/Python.h usability... no checking python/Python.h presence... no checking for python/Python.h... no -------------------------------------------- I guess this package should require "BuildRequires: python-devel" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:26:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270426.l4R4QaBj022543@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:26 EST ------- F-7 branch added Please close if packages have already been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:31:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239091] Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270431.l4R4VZP2022675@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halberd - Tool to discover HTTP load balancers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239091 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:31 EST ------- Please do not reopen a Review bug for a cvs request, it should left in its final closed state. CVS Admins are notified of the cvs flag. F-7 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:33:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239089] Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270433.l4R4XGkj022724@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ike-scan - IKE protocol tool to discover, fingerprint and test IPsec VPN se rvers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239089 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:33 EST ------- Closing back to state before cvsadmin request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:35:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270435.l4R4ZXI6022769@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:35 EST ------- Changing state back to how it was before cvs request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:35:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239088] Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270435.l4R4ZYBv022809@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239088 Bug 239088 depends on bug 239087, which changed state. Bug 239087 Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:41:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239096] Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270441.l4R4fg4v022963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:41 EST ------- You mean: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-libwhisker2 New Branches: F-7 Again, please do not reopen Package Review's for CVS Requests, since they are handled by the fedora-cvs flag not bug state. F-7 branch edded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:41:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270441.l4R4fh1r022987@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 Bug 239097 depends on bug 239096, which changed state. Bug 239096 Summary: Review Request: perl-libwhisker2 - Perl module geared specificly for HTTP testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239096 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:44:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239100] Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270444.l4R4ifW3023081@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: DMitry - Deepmagic Information Gathering Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239100 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:44 EST ------- added F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:46:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270446.l4R4klVh023144@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:46 EST ------- F-7 added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:46:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270446.l4R4kmQP023162@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 Bug 239164 depends on bug 239156, which changed state. Bug 239156 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:49:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270449.l4R4neRT023238@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:49 EST ------- F-7 added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:49:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270449.l4R4neBm023256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 Bug 239162 depends on bug 239161, which changed state. Bug 239161 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:53:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239185] Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270453.l4R4r92E023341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbtscan - Tool to gather NetBIOS info from Windows networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239185 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:53 EST ------- F-7 added Please be careful with the Package Name when requesting branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 04:55:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 00:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239234] Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270455.l4R4tEmM023394@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - Scanning and fingerprinting tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239234 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 00:55 EST ------- added F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 08:34:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 04:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270834.l4R8Yv1F031462@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-27 04:34 EST ------- I also packaged that locally and this is better than my packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 08:53:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 04:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705270853.l4R8r10G032629@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-27 04:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > But, pedantry aside, Pedantry? This is a stupid upstream bug, this package's maintainer (@RH) should contact upstream to have it fixed. > can you point to any problems that this causes which are > worse than the possible fixes Install an alternative GCC to /usr/local, cross-build the package and building this package with go up in smoke. > (of patching it out of Makefile.am and running the > autotools or patching it out of the generated Makefile)? Because in the absense > of any actual breakage, I'm inclined to simply suggest that this issue be > reported to upstream for fixing there. Right, it doesn't affect building the rpm inside of the buildsystem. But it can affect users rebuilding the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 11:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 07:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271106.l4RB6Xqh005891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Fedora at FamilleCollet.com, | |Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-27 07:06 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xchat Updated Fedora Owners: caillon at redhat.com, Fedora at FamilleCollet.com Remi Collet wants to comaintain X-Chat: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg01226.html and the current owner Christopher Aillon is OK with it: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg01204.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 11:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 07:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241530] New: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - Central control for Telepathy connection manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241530 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - Central control for Telepathy connection manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/telepathy-mission-control.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/telepathy-mission-control-4.22-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Mission Control, or MC, is a Telepathy component providing a way for "end-user" applications to abstract some of the details of connection managers, to provide a simple way to manipulate a bunch of connection managers at once, and to remove the need to have in each program the account definitions and credentials. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 11:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 07:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271133.l4RBXW0A006461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-27 07:33 EST ------- Don't try to use this just yet, it causes kernel oopses on all the systems I've tried it on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 12:06:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 08:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205755] Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271206.l4RC6UOf007682@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elsa - manages group of processes and allows accounting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 ------- Additional Comments From guillaume.thouvenin at bull.net 2007-05-27 08:06 EST ------- I tried a 'make tag build' but it failed. I got yhe following error: guill at fermat:~/tmp/elsa/devel$ make tag build cvs tag -c elsa-1_4-2_fc8 ERROR: Tag elsa-1_4-2_fc8 has been already created. The following tags have been created so far elsa-1_4-2:devel:thouveng:1169564002 elsa-1_4-2_fc8:devel:thouveng:1180267354 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 Any idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 12:20:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 08:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] New: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/angrydd/angrydd.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.nonlogic.org/fedora/angrydd/angrydd-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: In Angry, Drunken Dwarves (ADD), you are an angry, drunken dwarf. Why are you so angry? Who knows. But you've decided to take your aggression out on other dwarves, by dropping gems on their heads. Lots of gems. ADD is a member of the classic "falling blocks" puzzle game family, similar to the Capcom game Puzzle Fighter. The goal of the game is to build large gems by matching up colors, then break them, raining more gems down onto your opponent. The first person whose field fills up, loses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 12:34:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 08:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271234.l4RCYcE0008500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 prarit at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From prarit at redhat.com 2007-05-27 08:34 EST ------- No longer an issue -- jkeating's pungi does all of this. P. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 12:38:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 08:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239176] Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271238.l4RCcH06008650@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodr - Blue Obelisk Data Repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239176 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 14:02:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271402.l4RE2u7p011608@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-05-27 10:02 EST ------- Sorry fot the delay new spec: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/bandsaw/bandsaw.spec new srpm: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/bandsaw/bandsaw-0.3.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 14:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271403.l4RE3288011646@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-27 10:03 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xchat Updated Fedora Owners: caillon at redhat.com, Fedora at FamilleCollet.com, Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Change of plan: Remi suggests that I should be a third comaintainer, and I'm OK with that, so please add me too while you are at it. ;-) Christopher Aillon said in the mail I quoted above that he'd be OK with any comaintainer, so I guess he won't object to 2 comaintainers either. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 14:10:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235203] Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271410.l4REAabn011869@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebluetooth: The KDE Bluetooth Framework (take/2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235203 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2007-05-27 10:10 EST ------- OK. The wrapper (bluez_pinhelper) seems to be working just fine. (AFAICS) It is a rather generic wrapper (it can be used with 'zenity' and 'dialog' to create script based passkey dialog-boxes) and as such, I'm currently looking to get it included upstream into bluez-utils. The updated kdebluetooth RPM requires the new bluez_pinhelper package, which will be submitted later today/tomorrow. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 15:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 11:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271506.l4RF6XbF013203@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551 jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 15:15:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 11:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271515.l4RFFqEm013478@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-27 11:15 EST ------- > Must Fix: > * Package should have ownership of %{_libdir}/xchat Matthias Clasen fixed this in 1:2.6.6-9. Brian, can he consider this approved/resolved now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 15:16:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 11:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226551] Merge Review: xchat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271516.l4RFGjgL013529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xchat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226551 ------- Additional Comments From Kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-05-27 11:16 EST ------- I mean: Brian, can _we_ consider this approved/resolved now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 15:41:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 11:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271541.l4RFfwdM014118@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-05-27 11:41 EST ------- pypar2 is approved since comment #39. Maxime, what blocks you from importing it into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 16:20:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 12:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271620.l4RGKWO5014890@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-27 12:20 EST ------- Duplicate functionality is not an blocking issue -- but sure decreases the incentive to submit and maintain a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 16:39:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 12:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271639.l4RGdXj6015325@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-27 12:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Pedantry? Yes, indeed, pedantry. > This is a stupid upstream bug, this package's maintainer (@RH) should > contact upstream to have it fixed. Gee, that's exactly what I wrote. Thanks for backing me up! I'll approve this package once FESCo acks the static library issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 17:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 13:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271741.l4RHf1t3017116@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(redhat at flyn.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 17:51:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 13:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271751.l4RHpMhL017362@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-27 13:51 EST ------- I'll add Test::More in wrapped in a conditional construct. It works if you're very careful with spacing, e.g. %{?foo:BuildRequires... not %{?foo: BuildRequires... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 17:51:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 13:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271751.l4RHpcNm017418@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-27 13:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-URI-Fetch Short Description: Smart URI fetching/caching Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 17:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 13:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271751.l4RHpeM8017455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 18:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 14:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190997] Review Request: linux-wlan-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705271808.l4RI8pVt017963@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-wlan-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190997 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 208686 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-27 14:08 EST ------- Please remember to fix up the blockers when you close tickets like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 20:12:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 16:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705272012.l4RKCJq0021592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 ------- Additional Comments From prarit at redhat.com 2007-05-27 16:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Duplicate functionality is not an blocking issue -- but sure > decreases the incentive to submit and maintain a package. True :), but I'm willing to surrender to pungi :) P. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 21:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 17:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705272155.l4RLtbX1024015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-27 17:55 EST ------- "Artistic or GPL" should be "GPL or Artistic". Missing BRs on: perl(Math::Base85) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) Package should have an explicit "Requires: perl(Math::Base85)" as the dep is not being picked up automagically. There are a number of rfc docs included. Why not add these to %doc? Make the above changes, and I'll approve. :) + source files match upstream: cd06f0422ddb3ac119e2ef1e27aa9339 Net-IPv6Addr-0.2.tar.gz cd06f0422ddb3ac119e2ef1e27aa9339 Net-IPv6Addr-0.2.tar.gz.srpm + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate (noarch) + %clean is present. + package installs properly + rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Net-IPv6Addr-0.2-1.fc6.noarch.rpm == rpmlint == provides perl(Net::IPv6Addr) = 0.2 perl-Net-IPv6Addr = 0.2-1.fc6 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Net::IPv4Addr) perl(strict) perl(vars) + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=287, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.70 cusr + 0.20 csys = 0.90 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 22:31:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 18:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705272231.l4RMVTCR024774@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-05-27 18:31 EST ------- Since I plan to use the g77 compiled utilities, to solve (temporarily) Bug 241416, I dropped the compat prefix. In any case it isn't really needed in my opinion. Otherwise it is synced with devel. http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/cernlib-g77-2006-15.fc8.src.rpm http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/cernlib-g77.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 27 22:37:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 18:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705272237.l4RMb6VM024946@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241416 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 00:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280016.l4S0GvD3026624@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-05-27 20:16 EST ------- added FC-6 and F-7 branches (fc5 is now in maintenance mode) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 00:45:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] New: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/pixie/pixie.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/pixie/pixie-2.1.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: 3D renderer Renderman compliant rpmlint complaint about non-executable scripts and wrong script interpreter about shaders but theses files aren't mean to be executed... tested in mock Fedora Core 6 on x86 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 00:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] New: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi-0.77-0.1.20070527cvs.fc6.src.rpm Description: The ERESI Reverse Engineering Software Interface is a unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems based on the Executable & Linking Format (ELF) such as Linux, BSD, Solaris, IRIX, and BeOS. It has a command line interface that make it useful remotely, and can generate graph images from code analysis on demand. It has a real dedicated reverse engineering language that makes it scriptable and adaptable to the precise needs of the users. ERESI contains more than 10 innovative and exclusive features that turns it into an environment of choice for the instrumentation, analysis, debugging, tracing, hooking, or simply integrity checking and events logging of binary programs. This package can be tied with BR#241526 because with upstream version, the compilation needs asm/atomic.h file. I removed the related include and it seems to work. I tried to follow reviewing process and I think it folows rules. It's my first package so I need someone to sponsor me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 00:59:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240639] Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280059.l4S0xYt9028278@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-URI-Fetch - Smart URI fetching/caching Alias: perl-URI-Fetch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240639 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-27 20:59 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 00:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 20:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280059.l4S0xjS0028314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium eric at brouhaha.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at brouhaha.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 01:00:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280100.l4S10NPe028393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 01:21:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280121.l4S1Lsce029111@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-05-27 21:21 EST ------- http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/xmlrpc-epi.spec http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/xmlrpc-epi-0.51-3.src.rpm * Sat May 26 2007 Callum Lerwick 0.51-3 - Rename the library so we don't conflict with xmlrpc-c. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 01:24:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] New: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jspaleta at gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/safekeep.spec SRPM URL: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/safekeep-1.0.0-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: SafeKeep is a client/server backup system which enhances the power of rdiff-backup with simple, centralized configuration. Note for reviewers: The safekeep-server package creates a user named safekeep with the home directory /var/lib/safekeep with special ownership and permissions inside which ssh keys are kept. rpmlint flags this an an errenously flags this as an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 03:53:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 23:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280353.l4S3rov5032687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-27 23:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > %if 0%{?fedora} && "%fedora" < "7" > Requires: python-elementtree > %endif I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it. I think you may want to consider building your cases around the dist macro in the buildsystem. Or you can forgo the use of if statements altogether if you are willing to maintain different specfiles for different branches. You can first submit the necessary specfile that works for F-7 and development without the elementree requires and making sure the python requirement is versioned such that python >= 2.5. Once past review you build agaimst development, then against F-7 using this submitted specfile. Then after the development and F-7 packages are built, you can put a modified spec in the FC-6 and older branches which requires python 2.4 and python-element tree. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 04:43:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 00:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280443.l4S4hgfX001486@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-28 00:43 EST ------- I note the following bit from the test run: t/02_CPANPLUS-Dist-Build..............print() on unopened filehandle STDERR at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/CPANPLUS/Error.pm line 186. print() on unopened filehandle STDERR at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/CPANPLUS/Error.pm line 186. This doesn't seem to bother anything, though. Might be worth reporting upstream. I know you like to package the test suites, but I'm really starting to wonder whether it's actually a good idea to package a bunch of empty directories and some tarballs in the documentation. The extra bits are, however, small and shouldn't hurt anything. Review: * source files match upstream: 5cc954024402675a5ab50dae6ec8b1c3c92fd561e593b024a7fc1da726ea5d84 CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.05.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(CPANPLUS::Dist::Build) = 0.05 perl(CPANPLUS::Dist::Build::Constants) = 0.01 perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build = 0.05-1.fc7 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(CPANPLUS::Error) perl(CPANPLUS::Internals::Constants) perl(CPANPLUS::inc) perl(Config) perl(Cwd) perl(File::Spec) perl(FileHandle) perl(IPC::Cmd) perl(Locale::Maketext::Simple) perl(Module::Build) >= 0.28 perl(Module::Load::Conditional) perl(Params::Check) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=43, 2 wallclock secs ( 1.76 cusr + 1.12 csys = 2.88 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 04:50:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 00:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226809] Merge Review: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280450.l4S4ohk6001639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-sinhala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226809 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-28 00:50 EST ------- I've no idea why this is still open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 05:00:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 01:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189010] Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280500.l4S50nJM002006@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pybaz - Python library bindings for the GNU Arch/Bazaar RCS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189010 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-28 01:00 EST ------- This has been in needinfo state since March. Any chance of anything happening here? I'm sure someone on fedora-devel would be willing to provide a place to put these files if that's all that's holding up this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 05:15:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 01:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280515.l4S5FEYP002519@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-28 01:15 EST ------- Was there ever any resolution to this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 06:58:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 02:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280658.l4S6wQt4005808@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl CC|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 07:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 03:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280734.l4S7Y46V007680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-05-28 03:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155533) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155533&action=view) PATCH: fix 64 bit warnings MUST: ===== * rpmlint output is: * Package and spec file named appropriately * Packaged according to packaging guidelines * License ok * spec file is legible and in Am. English. * Source matches upstream * Compiles and builds on devel x86_64 * BR: ok * No locales * ldconfig properly run for shared libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns / or requires all dirs * No duplicate files & Permissions * %clean & macro usage OK * Contains code only * %doc does not affect runtime, and isn't large enough to warrent a sub package * -devel as package needed * no .desktop file required Must Fix: --------- * Main package group should be System Environment/Libraries, Development/Libraries is only for -devel sub packages. * There are a few 64 bit related warning, please apply the attached patch to fix this. Also in general you may want to take a stab at fixing some of the other compiler warnings, esp. the missing prototypes ones. * Change license to BSD-ish (it isn't the real BSD license) Should Fix: ----------- * Change Source0 URL from: Source0: http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/xmlrpc-epi/xmlrpc-epi-%{version}.tar.gz To the (new guidelines adviced one): http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Notice that the current one doesn't work for me (spectool -g) * Move NEWS to main package %doc, remove now empty %doc from devel * remove empty %doc from examples %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 07:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 03:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280735.l4S7ZMuV007748@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 03:35 EST ------- Does the patch by Ralf work for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 08:16:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 04:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280816.l4S8GY7R012582@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-28 04:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build Short Description: Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 08:16:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 04:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280816.l4S8Gaet012614@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 08:23:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 04:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221054] Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705280823.l4S8N1aC013288@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gerbv - A gerber file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221054 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-05-28 04:23 EST ------- Yes, Thanks Ralf, the patch works. However now, file -> "open project" fails to open examples provided by this package. But if one open a project file or a gerbv file from the konsole, gerbv opens it successfully. I'll dig later on. PS: I'm in examination period for the following two weeks. I might not answer my mails during that interval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 10:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 06:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281044.l4SAimWl022861@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-05-28 06:44 EST ------- I need to make an updated package. The md5 module is either removed in the current upstream release or will be. Haven't decided whether to link against readline or not. (Really, it needs some code reworking so that the library and the command-line tool aren't so intertwined -- there's no reason at all for the *library* to need readline.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 11:23:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 07:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227066] Review Request: jarjar-0.6-2jpp - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281123.l4SBNZ1L024990@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jarjar-0.6-2jpp - Jar Jar Links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227066 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lephilousophe at users.sourcefo | |rge.net ------- Additional Comments From lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-28 07:23 EST ------- Release tag has %(dist) in place of %{dist} RPMLint report : W: jarjar non-standard-group Text Processing/Markup/XML W: jarjar mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 83) Mock can't find asm2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 11:24:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 07:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235136] Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281124.l4SBO6hb025028@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235136 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-28 07:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Spec file looks good (quick look), expect a full review shortly Errr... Seems I lied here, I've been rushed off my feet with an exam, I've got a draft review ready though (on another installation). One issue that I can remember is the source0 url needs to be altered to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz No need to bump for this at the moment, please wait for my full review in a couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 12:00:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 08:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281200.l4SC0ldR026871@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-28 08:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > LW.pm is provided by the libwhisker2 package via a compability bridge. LW is > discontinued and LW2 is recommended by upstream. Nikto will work just fine with > the LW2 LW1 compability bridge. How to solve this package wise I don't know > though. Suggestions welcome. You don't have to do anything, it's fine; yum is smart enough to figure out which package provides perl(LW) (...which would be "perl-libwhisker2"). Ray: If you try to install the package with yum localinstall , you'll see what I mean. :-) >From a (very) quick look-over I can only spot one error in the spec: You do not need "Requires: perl-libwhisker" - again, RPM and yum does this automatically. If Ray doesn't grab this one, I'll give it a full review in a few hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 12:04:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 08:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281204.l4SC4fTa027036@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-28 08:04 EST ------- Updated: - Fix license - Add explicit Requires on perl(Math::Base85) - Add missing BRs Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv6Addr.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/perl-Net-IPv6Addr-0.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 12:19:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 08:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226142] Merge Review: mikmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281219.l4SCJgxc027628@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mikmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226142 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Bug 226142 depends on bug 223711, which changed state. Bug 223711 Summary: mikmod: non-failsafe install-info use in scriptlets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223711 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281312.l4SDC0JU030703@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-28 09:11 EST ------- RPMLint output : W: ftgl mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 20) Mock output : + chrpath --delete /var/tmp/ftgl-2.1.2-1.fc6-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/FTGLDemo open: No such file or directory The file isn't installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225522] Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281344.l4SDiW8U031888@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cinepaint - CinePaint is a tool for manipulating images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225522 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 09:44 EST ------- Please update the status of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:45:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229154] Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281345.l4SDjZ8Q031944@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konwert - Converter of character encodings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229154 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 09:45 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received on this bug within ONE WEEK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281347.l4SDl3fV032015@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 09:46 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:48:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281348.l4SDmIYR032085@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 09:48 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:49:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] New: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/qfaxreader/qfaxreader.spec SRPM URL: http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/qfaxreader/qfaxreader-0.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: QFaxReader is a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes. * Handle multi page monochrome/color tiff/fax files * Correctly display fax images in any resolution * Printing fax files (multiple pages per sheet capability) * Image transformation (rotate left, rotate right, vertical flip) * Arbitrary zoom fax images (with fit height/width support) * Sidebar with easy navigation through directories * AutoRefresh + notification for new facsimiles * Aliases database for replacing faxes id's with real name * Export in all formats which your QT have support * Fullscreen mode * CID support mock build for fc6/x86_64 + build.log are available at http://wdl.lug.ro/linux/rpms/qfaxreader/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:50:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227309] Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281350.l4SDoCbF032174@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 09:50 EST ------- Any news on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:51:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211336] Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281351.l4SDpg3p032257@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adesklets - A simple architecture for desktop applets Alias: adeskets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211336 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(luya_tfz at thefinalz | |one.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 09:51 EST ------- Please update the status of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:57:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281357.l4SDvB8r032471@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 09:57 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received within a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281357.l4SDvGuw032510@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lephilousophe at users.sourcefo | |rge.net ------- Additional Comments From lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-28 09:57 EST ------- RPMLint output is empty Compiles under mock fc6-i386 URL of the package is bad : cf http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 13:59:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 09:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190090] Review Request: ocrad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281359.l4SDxcJV032587@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 09:59 EST ------- I will close this bug if no response is received within a week from comment 3 (i.e. by 5/31) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 14:00:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233850] Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281400.l4SE0YnL032639@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - POP3 interface to webmails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233850 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 10:00 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 14:03:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227309] Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281403.l4SE3RRA032728@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 tom at dbservice.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From tom at dbservice.com 2007-05-28 10:03 EST ------- 179 is the latest version of trunk (main development branch). It works reasonably well and I need no need for an update. It will take some more time to merge the branch with the trunk, don't count on that it will happen anytime soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 14:27:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281427.l4SERjs0001759@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-05-28 10:27 EST ------- Hi Axel, may sincere apologies for the delays. I've been using your VTK package for a few weeks and it appears to function nicely for me. Here is a quick review: GOOD: + source matches upstream -- sha1sum: 0a574f481c65a3d188c48dfc4e284aa8f70bad84 vtk-5.0.2.tar.gz.1 0a574f481c65a3d188c48dfc4e284aa8f70bad84 vtk-5.0.2.tar.gz + spec is correctly named, legible, and appears to meet the guidelines + license OK and correctly included + package builds in mock on FC6-x86_64 using the one small change: %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch ... + proper use of ldconfig + dir ownership looks OK + proper use of %clean in spec and at start of %install + proper use of -devel, -examples, etc. + no *.la NEEDSWORK: + Please put the /usr/include/* files in /usr/include/vtk/* or a similar location since some have rather generic names (e.g., "internal") and there are a large number of them + rpmlint reports a number of warnings/errors and they are attached: + it would be nice to remove a lot of the unnecessary executable permissions + the "vtk hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/*" looks fine to me -- its just brain-dead parsing from rpmlint Please consider the /usr/include/vtk subdir and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 14:28:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281428.l4SESdQr001856@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-05-28 10:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155546) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155546&action=view) rpmlint output rpmlint output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 14:50:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281450.l4SEowOT002904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 14:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281452.l4SEqll6002969@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |faucamp at csir.co.za -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 15:39:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 11:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281539.l4SFdtur004790@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-28 11:39 EST ------- Ok, doing review: MUST items: * rpmlint is silent * package and spec file are named well * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package contains code licensed under the GPL, license file included * package contains code NOT licensed under the GPL. The following is the license contained in the *.db files: # This file may only be distributed and used with the full Nikto package. # This file may not be used with any software product without written permission from CIRT, Inc. # (c) 2001-2007 CIRT, Inc., All Rights Reserved. # By sending any database updates to CIRT, Inc., it is assumed that you # grant CIRT, Inc., the unlimited, non-exclusive right to reuse, modify and relicense the changes. IMO this is acceptable, since the content (the plugin db's) are freely distributable along with (and for use with) the nikto package (however, IANAL), but it does impact the license of RPM as a whole (see next point) X* "License" field in spec is MOSTLY correct (applies to code, not the content) !* license file is included in %doc (might want to add a second one, see NOTES below) * spec file is written in American English and legible * package source md5sum matches upstream source: d70107deb225489ecf20e2b46684674e nikto-1.36.tar.bz2 * package is noarch, builds successfully * BuildRequires are good X* Unnecessary "Requires" entry (see comment #6) * package handles locales properly (no locales) * package has no need for %post and %postun sections * package is not relocatable * package owns directories it creates * no duplicate entries in %files * file permissions are good * proper %clean section * spec file macros are used consistently !* package contains GPL'ed code a content under a different license * no -doc, -devel subpackages necessary X- some docs are missing (see NOTES below) * contents in %doc not required for runtime functionality of application SHOULD items: * package builds in mock (fc6/i386) * package functions properly NOTES: Patches: Do note that the "nikto-1.36-config.patch" patch hardcodes the package's config file location. There at least needs to be a comment about this in the spec; if someone moved %{_sysconfdir} they would want to know why the package won't work anymore... What I would recommend, however, is removing the patch, and replacing it with sed scripts in %prep, making use of RPM's macros. For example, the following line (if used in %prep) would do what the first entry in the patch does, except that the package just needs to be rebuilt (without modification) if any dir locations ever change: sed -i "s:$CFG{configfile}=\"config.txt\":$CFG{configfile}=\"%{_sysconfdir}/nikto/config\":" nikto.pl Docs: Maybe include the READE_plugins.txt file? It might be outdated, but its the only plug-in documentation in the package... License: As the content is licensed under a GPL-incompatible license, and CIRT only allows for the distribution of the necessary plugin content along with the FULL nikto package, you will have to change the "License" field of the RPM to something like "Custom, see LICENSE.txt" (or whatever file is appropriate). Also, I would recommend adding a "database-license.txt" (or something similar) file containing the license information to %doc (the license is in the header of each .db file). rpmlint is going to moan about such a "custom" License field entry, but it's unavoidable here. Other than these points, the package looks good. Fix the mentioned issues (or argue against them ;-) ), and I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 15:45:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 11:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240090] Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281545.l4SFjiOG005123@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ftgl - OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240090 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-28 11:45 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl-2.1.2-2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ftgl/ftgl.spec Description: OpenGL frontend to Freetype 2 fixed I've checked the ftgl package from debian here: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/ftgl/ftgl_2.1.2-3.diff.gz There is nothing more than the ftgl-2.1.2-Glyph-g++_41.patch (well also config.sub and config.guess updates which do not seems really needed for us - probably k_BDS stuff)... Setting a right font in FTGL/demo/FTGLDemo.cpp allow to uses the FTGLDemo which run fine if direct rendering is enabled on the system (and without direct rendering also...) Built in mock on x86_64 and i386 on Fedora 6 (log are in the same directory) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 16:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 12:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281602.l4SG2M72005884@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-28 12:02 EST ------- Thanks, would you like to also review bug #199406? It's rather trivial (just the data files to vtk). Here's what the specfile changes look like, the build will follow shortly: --- vtk.spec.org 2007-04-16 19:48:30.000000000 +0200 +++ vtk.spec 2007-05-28 18:01:54.000000000 +0200 @@ -4,3 +4,3 @@ -%{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} +%{!?python_sitearch:%global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} @@ -9,3 +9,3 @@ Version: 5.0.3 -Release: 17%{?dist} +Release: 18%{?dist} License: BSD-like @@ -108,2 +108,5 @@ +# Remove executable bits from sources +find . -name \*.c -or -name \*.cxx -or -name \*.h | xargs chmod -x + # Save an unbuilt copy of the Example's sources for %doc @@ -133,3 +136,3 @@ -DVTK_INSTALL_BIN_DIR:PATH=%{_bindir} \ - -DVTK_INSTALL_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=%{_includedir} \ + -DVTK_INSTALL_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=%{_includedir}/vtk \ -DVTK_INSTALL_LIB_DIR:PATH=%{_libdir} \ @@ -316,3 +319,3 @@ %{_libdir}/vtk-5.0/doxygen -%{_includedir}/* +%{_includedir}/vtk %{_libdir}/*.so @@ -363,2 +366,6 @@ %changelog +* Mon May 28 2007 Axel Thimm - 5.0.3-18 +- Move headers to %%{_includedir}/vtk. +- Remove executable bit from sources. + * Mon Apr 16 2007 Axel Thimm - 5.0.3-17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 16:06:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 12:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281606.l4SG6eVl006059@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-28 12:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/oyranos/oyranos.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/oyranos/oyranos-0.1.7-3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) Some updates (remaining rpaths) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 16:10:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 12:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281610.l4SGAoO5006340@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 17:02:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236162] Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281702.l4SH2f9S007825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kadischi - Fedora based LiveCD/LiveDVD creation utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236162 ------- Additional Comments From jasperhartline at adelphia.net 2007-05-28 13:02 EST ------- Package has been rebuilt. The SRPM and SPEC files are here: http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi.spec http://autopsy.podzone.org/~autopsy/kadischi-3.6-3.20070528cvs.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 17:03:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229490] Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281703.l4SH3Jb9007879@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pypar2 - graphical frontend to par2cmdline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229490 ------- Additional Comments From maxime.carron at fedoraproject.org 2007-05-28 13:03 EST ------- My email address. I created my bugzilla account with the @fp.org email address. This mail doesn't correspond with the email address in my account settings. Hence I can't upload files. In addition, i'm looking for a new mail service. Then i'll reset my account, ... Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 17:26:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/maildrop.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/maildrop-2.0.3-2.src.rpm Description: maildrop is the mail filter/mail delivery agent that's used by the Courier Mail Server. This is a standalone build of the maildrop mail filter that can be used with other mail servers. maildrop is a replacement for your local mail delivery agent. maildrop reads a mail message from standard input, then delivers the message to your mailbox. maildrop knows how to deliver mail to mbox-style mailboxes, and maildirs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 17:26:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281726.l4SHQmQm008843@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ndbecker2 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-28 13:26 EST ------- *** Bug 188477 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 17:26:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281726.l4SHQj2X008788@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2007-05-28 13:26 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 241596 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 17:27:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281727.l4SHRu1A008939@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |filtering abilities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 17:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281750.l4SHonDS009589@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-28 13:50 EST ------- I have solved the problem described in comment #2. Good: + Package contains the verbaatin text of the license. + Mock build works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 17:55:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 13:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281755.l4SHtGi6009721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-28 13:55 EST ------- Updated: - Remove libwhisker Requires - Replace configfile patch with sed magic - Update License - Add database-license.txt and README_plugins.txt to %doc Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/nikto.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/nikto-1.36-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 18:10:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281810.l4SIAQ51010270@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-28 14:10 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 18:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241597] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241597 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Tidy/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-HTML-Tidy-1.08-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-HTML-Tidy.spec Description: HTML::Tidy is an HTML checker in a handy dandy object. It's meant as a replacement for HTML::Lint. If you're currently an HTML::Lint user looking to migrate, see the section "Converting from HTML::Lint". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 18:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241597] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281822.l4SIMKTR010610@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object Alias: perl-HTML-Tidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241597 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-HTML-Tidy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 18:36:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281836.l4SIaxlM011199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 19:12:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 15:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705281912.l4SJCU63012272@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-28 15:12 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155554&action=view) Example sed inline script to fixup paths in nikto's default config file Ok, almost there... However, the sed one-liner in comment #7 was just an example - you'll need to call sed on "config.txt" as well in order to "re-create" the effects of the "nikto-1.36-config.patch" patch. Because config.txt is a user-editable configuration file, this isn't a big issue, although we probably want to enable nikto to use nmap by default (esp. considering it's listed in Requires, and the -2 release isn't using it by default). I have attached a text file with a 2-liner sed script that adds the "missing" changes from nikto-1.36-config.patch. Please add it, and then I'll do a final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191603] Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282018.l4SKIUE8015276@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rsnapshot -- rsync-based filesystem snapshots https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191603 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2007-05-28 16:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rsnapshot New Branches: EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:20:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210790] Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282020.l4SKK0FQ015377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dar - Collection of scripts for making/restoring CD/DVD backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210790 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2007-05-28 16:19 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dar New Branches: EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:20:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282020.l4SKKv3j015480@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2007-05-28 16:20 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sec New Branches: EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:23:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240500] Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282023.l4SKNIIM015626@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240500 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-05-28 16:23 EST ------- The package tkWidgets and his dependences has been submit to bugzilla there: R-DynDoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 R-widgetTools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 R-tkWidgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 Thanks for your help :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282027.l4SKRXTN015775@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-28 16:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-IPv6Addr Short Description: Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:39:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282039.l4SKdqvg016183@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-28 16:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tastymenu New Branches: FC-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:41:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282041.l4SKfD1W016264@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-05-28 16:41 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kio_p7zip New Branches: FC-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282051.l4SKpeZo016669@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:52:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282052.l4SKqBFg016729@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282057.l4SKvKIo016901@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-28 16:57 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:59:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238235] Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282059.l4SKx6xv016957@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TastyMenu - KMenu replacement aiming to provide the maximum usability Alias: tastymenu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238235 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-28 16:59 EST ------- cvs done Please note the Fedora 7 branch is F-7 not FC-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 20:59:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238499] Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282059.l4SKxZZX017022@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kio_p7zip - Kio-slave for viewing 7zip files using p7zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238499 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-28 16:59 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:03:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282103.l4SL36bt017168@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-28 17:03 EST ------- cvs done. I also created a F-7 branch also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282103.l4SL3fGo017197@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-28 17:03 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-IPv4Addr Short Description: Perl extension for manipulation IPv4 addresses Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:03:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282103.l4SL3gEE017215@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 Bug 239163 depends on bug 239159, which changed state. Bug 239159 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:03:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239160] Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282103.l4SL3gXf017227@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239160 Bug 239160 depends on bug 239159, which changed state. Bug 239159 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:09:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282109.l4SL9qR8017535@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-28 17:09 EST ------- branched for F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:17:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282117.l4SLH8hY017706@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lists at forevermore.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2007-05-28 17:17 EST ------- You still never answered my question. If *you* already maintain your own courier packages, why not use those instead of going through this whole review process? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:46:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282146.l4SLkTYp018810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-28 17:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > cvs done. > > I also created a F-7 branch also Thanks. Looks like it's time to update my branch-request script :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:48:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282148.l4SLm8NL018844@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-28 17:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build Short Description: Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS Owners: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Branches: FC-5, FC-6, devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:48:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282148.l4SLm9p6018862@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282148.l4SLmpki018898@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-28 17:48 EST ------- *sigh* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 21:53:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240633] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282153.l4SLrN9j019013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build - Module::Build extension for CPANPLUS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240633 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-28 17:53 EST ------- Imported and building. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 22:17:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 18:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282217.l4SMHt17019660@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-05-28 18:17 EST ------- Please branch for F-7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 28 22:31:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 18:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227066] Review Request: jarjar-0.6-2jpp - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705282231.l4SMVdeX020115@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jarjar-0.6-2jpp - Jar Jar Links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227066 dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2007-05-28 18:31 EST ------- This bug should actually be closed. jarjar was being brought in as an indirect dependency of maven. However, in the interest of time, that was worked around by disabling a test case back then. Since this was never followed up, review for jarjar should be re-opened/redone when those tests are re-enabled in maven. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 00:16:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290016.l4T0GVAt022484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-28 20:16 EST ------- Doug, could you please close this ticket when you have 30 secs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 00:18:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226230] Merge Review: parted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290018.l4T0I58g022529@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: parted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226230 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-28 20:18 EST ------- David, could you please close this ticket when you can spare 30 secs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 00:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226670] Merge Review: zisofs-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290023.l4T0NiNU022687@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zisofs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226670 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-28 20:23 EST ------- Harald, could you please close this bug when have 30 secs to spare ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 00:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226134] Merge Review: mdadm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290034.l4T0Yerh022934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mdadm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226134 dledford at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2007-05-28 20:34 EST ------- Sure, didn't know I was supposed to ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 00:52:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290052.l4T0qd09023365@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-28 20:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dwatch Short Description: A program that watches over other programs Owners: bjohnson at symetrix.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 00:53:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 20:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290053.l4T0rETj023400@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-28 20:53 EST ------- Forgot to flip the flag: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dwatch Short Description: A program that watches over other programs Owners: bjohnson at symetrix.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 01:02:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 21:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235555] Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290102.l4T12nCq023657@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: transset - Simple program to toggle Translucency property https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235555 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-28 21:01 EST ------- Just a quick glance (well, no so quick in fact) - minor problem: there are lots of duplicate BR: xorg-x11-proto-devel (by libX11-devel), pkgconfig (by libX11-devel), libX11-devel (by libXrender-devel), libXfixes-devel (by libXcomposite-devel) - the build log shows that compiler flags are not taken into account: + /usr/bin/make cc `pkg-config --cflags xcomposite xfixes xdamage xrender` -c transSet.c cc `pkg-config --cflags xcomposite xfixes xdamage xrender` -c dsimple.c cc -o transset transSet.o dsimple.o `pkg-config --libs xcomposite xfixes xdamage xrender` -lm + exit 0 - is the application a GUI ? If so, it should have a desktop file - I've tried to use it, but since there is no documentation, no man pages, nothing... I could not. Or maybe I could, but I did not know that until I read the sources. Whatever argument I pass to the application, it just echoes it and then sits until Ctrl-C is pressed: [wolfy at wolfy64 tmp]$ ./transset 1 got arg 1 d is 1 [wolfy at wolfy64 tmp]$ ./transset 12 got arg 12 d is 12 As upstream does not provide docs, I suggest creating a Readme.fedora file and include in it the comment from the beginning of transSet.c. Or add the first line of that comment to %Description. Just waiting for a mouse click without any useful output was not helpful and I doubt that users will have the patience to read the source code as I did. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 02:23:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 22:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199406] Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290223.l4T2NLVV027540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtkdata - Example data file for VTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199406 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-05-28 22:23 EST ------- GOOD: + spec is simple, legible, follows naming guidelines, etc. + rpmlint reports only a few ignore-able warnings: W: vtkdata no-%prep-section W: vtkdata no-%build-section W: vtkdata no-documentation + builds in mock on FC6 x86_64 + permissions and dir ownership looks good to me + license matches that of VTK -- good NEEDSWORK: + the srpm in comment #8 seems to be a broken link so I could not verify that source matches upstream -- but I do not consider that to be a blocker as I was able to build a working package from the spec file (which was not a broken link) In regards to comment #6, I don't think it matters whether the directory is versioned or not. If Axel would like to version it then I think that's OK -- I just don't see how it voilates any of the guidelines or does any real harm. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 02:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 22:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290247.l4T2lmQK029060@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lists at forevermore. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-28 22:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > You still never answered my question. What is your question? > If *you* already maintain your own > courier packages, I don't maintain any courier related packages for now. > why not use those instead of going through this whole review > process? So I don't understand for now what you want to say. Generally, a review request is closed after inactivity of one month and one week. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews Again setting NEEDINFO. I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received within a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 03:24:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 23:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241624] New: Review Request: perl-GD-Barcode - Create barcode image with GD Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241624 Summary: Review Request: perl-GD-Barcode - Create barcode image with GD Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/GD-Barcode/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GD-Barcode-1.15-1.fc6.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-GD-Barcode.spec Description: GD::Barcode is a subclass of GD and allows you to create barcode images with GD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 03:40:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 23:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290340.l4T3e60Q000372@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 lists at forevermore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lists at forevermore.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From lists at forevermore.net 2007-05-28 23:40 EST ------- Mamoru, the question was directed at Michael, who is the one reviewing this package. Please read the ticket history for context. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 03:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 23:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239526] Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290359.l4T3xKvn001623@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gammu - Python bindings for Gammu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239526 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-28 23:59 EST ------- Well, Here is the updated release 0.20 with its fix. you'll find out srpm, spec and build.log files from link below. http://download.tuxfamily.org/lxtnow/extras/gammu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 04:25:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239546] Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290425.l4T4PXAY002267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mdsplib - METAR Decoder Software Package Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239546 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-29 00:25 EST ------- Well, OK - Mock : Built on FC6 en F-7 (i386 and x86_64) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is LGPL OK - License match extras packaging policy licenses allowed OK - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: c529c07675431f50c517921db6fdd122 mdsplib-0.11.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - extras BuildRequires not required for this package. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version ------------------------------------------------ Rpmlint output: ------------------------------------------------ OK - silent on both srpm and rpm. ----------------------------- sub-package: ---------------------------- just a comment: Why don't create directly the -devel package instead. Does this package plan to contains more than headers files in future release ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 04:37:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290437.l4T4bLCL002593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-29 00:37 EST ------- (in reply to comment #10) caffeine, humm.... ^^ Well, OK - Mock : Built on FC6 en F-7 (i386 and x86_64) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is GPL OK - License match extras packaging policy licenses allowed OK - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: b262d55b1285967923598e53fb93fe62 agistudio-1.2.3.tar.gz OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - BuildRequires isn't redundant. OK - %build and %install stages is correct and work. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. OK - Should function as described. OK - Should package latest version ------------------------------------------------ Rpmlint output: ------------------------------------------------ OK - silent on SRPM NO - not silent on RPM package E: agistudio zero-length /usr/share/agistudio/template/snddir this error is harmless but need to be fix as the file is just a template and contains nothing, it can be remove from package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 04:44:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705290444.l4T4iQZB002742@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-29 00:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #12) > > %if 0%{?fedora} && "%fedora" < "7" > > Requires: python-elementtree > > %endif > > I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it. +1 > Once past review you build agaimst development, then against F-7 using this > submitted specfile. Then after the development and F-7 packages are built, you > can put a modified spec in the FC-6 and older branches which requires python 2.4 > and python-element tree. I think this, it's a better approach but... note that some user work with python-2.5 on fc-6 maybe think about setting up obsolete packages action (?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 10:50:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 06:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234711] Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291050.l4TAoENL024567@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234711 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-05-29 06:50 EST ------- * Thu May 29 2007 Damien Durand - 0.5.1-3 - Fix setup part, rename to drapes New spec: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/drapes/drapes.spec New srpms: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/drapes/drapes-0.5.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Is it ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 11:20:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 07:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225575] Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291120.l4TBKaji025919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roundcubemail - Round Cube Webmail is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225575 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 07:20 EST ------- Thanks all, imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 11:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 07:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241654] New: Review Request: ipcalc - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 Summary: Review Request: ipcalc - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhrozek at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.volny.cz/jhrozek/ipcalc/ipcalc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.volny.cz/jhrozek/ipcalc/ipcalc-0.41-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: ipcalc takes an IP address and netmask and calculates the resulting broadcast, network, Cisco wildcard mask, and host range. By giving a second netmask, you can design subnets and supernets. It is also intended to be a teaching tool and presents the subnetting results as easy-to-understand binary values. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 12:05:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240571] Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291205.l4TC5CKk028859@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-calendar - Objective CAML library for managing dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-29 08:05 EST ------- Updated SRPM and spec file: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-calendar.spec http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-calendar-1.10-3.src.rpm This version removes a Debian patch to handle DISTDIR, which is not actually necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 12:14:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalc - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291214.l4TCECaM029426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalc - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-29 08:13 EST ------- Fedora already includes an ipcalc utility (in initscripts). Trying to install another application with the very same name (and location, /bin/ipcalc) will lead to confusions and conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 12:35:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241656] New: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241656 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-csv - OCaml library for reading and writing CSV files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-csv.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-csv-1.1.6-1.src.rpm Description: This is an OCaml library for reading and writing CSV (comma-separated values) files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 12:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalc - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291238.l4TCcYvr032410@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalc - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-05-29 08:38 EST ------- Ouch, you are right, I was not aware of the initscripts ipcalc.. One minor thing, this ipcalc installs its binary into /usr/bin/ipcalc, not /bin/ipcalc, so these two would not slap on one another, but one would have to invoke the binary with full path, which is quite ugly.. Would renaming of the package/binary be allowed? If not, I'm OK with withdrawing this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 12:40:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalc - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291240.l4TCePWN032484@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalc - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-05-29 08:40 EST ------- Sure, renaming is fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 12:55:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 08:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291255.l4TCtPSC001284@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 08:55 EST ------- It actually can't be removed from the package. When you try to create a game from template and snddir isn't there, it fails "Can't read snddir in template directory /usr/share/agistudio/template 1". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 13:11:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291311.l4TDBAJD002874@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-05-29 09:11 EST ------- It is now more than 1 year since I proposed adding this package and posted an RPM for review. Since there has been no progress, I propose to resubmit this. Here is an updated package: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/maildrop-2.0.4-1.fc7.src.rpm https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/maildrop.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 13:19:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291319.l4TDJm0V003606@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|jbowes at redhat.com |walters at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 13:25:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291325.l4TDPOT8003970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 13:26:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188477] Review Request: maildrop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291326.l4TDQ5kT004021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188477 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora_extras at normalesup.org 2007-05-29 09:26 EST ------- Neal, this bug is closed (duplicate) since *yesterday*, when Axel Trimm has submitted bug #241596. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 13:26:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226357] Merge Review: rdate In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291326.l4TDQEZj004073@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rdate https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226357 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium pknirsch at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2007-05-29 09:26 EST ------- * Remove the dot at the end of Summary line. Fixed * It seems that there is no upstream. No URL is given, and the Source address doesn't work either. So I can't check that this is the same as the upstream source. (BLOCKER) There is no real upstream anymore except the tarball from sopwith (Elliot Lee) * Change BuildRoot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Fixed * Use the option %{?_smp_mflags} for make. Fixed * Don't use %makeinstall, if possible. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#MakeInstall Fixed * Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) Fixed * Consider using %{?dist} in Release tag. Fixed * The binary file 'rdate' is installed with permission 555 in the Makefile. It should be 755. This can be fixed either by patching the Makefile or by explicitly changing the permission in the %install or %files section. (BLOCKER) Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 13:27:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291327.l4TDRhej004185@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 09:27 EST ------- rpmlint clean. package/spec names OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 13:35:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291335.l4TDZIC4004922@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ipcalc - A |Review Request: ipcalculator |utility for computing |- A utility for computing |broadcast, network, mask, |broadcast, network, mask, |and host ranges |and host ranges ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-05-29 09:35 EST ------- Renamed: http://www.volny.cz/jhrozek/ipcalc/ipcalculator.spec http://www.volny.cz/jhrozek/ipcalc/ipcalculator-0.41-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 13:53:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291353.l4TDrpYp006514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 09:53 EST ------- >From COPYING: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- death.wav: Copyright 2003 Manuel Moss (http://armagetron.sf.net/) break.wav: Copyright 2003 John-Paul Gignac (http://pathological.sf.net) gameover.wav: Copyright 2002 Pete Shinners (http://www.pygame.org) pickaxe.svg: Copyright 2004 Jenn Hartnoll diamond1.svg: Copyright 2004 Michael Urman Character portraits: Copyright 2004 Jessi Silver intro.ogg: Copyright 2004 Brendan Becker single.ogg, versus-1.ogg: Copyright 2005 Ben Zeigler clicked.wav, rotate.wav, select-confirm.wav, select-move.wav, and tick.wav: Released into the public domain. If this is not allowed in your jurisdiction, you may freely copy, distribute, modify, and distribute modified versions of these files, for any purpose. All else: Copyright 2004 Joe Wreschnig Unless otherwise noted above, all material (source code, documentation, and game data) is licensed under the GNU GPL version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation, copyrighted by the owners credited above. The full text of the license follows. -------------------------------------------------------- What is the redistributability* of the Copyrighted audio files? We see who the owners are but not whether they may be included or not. Are they all GPL, and the copyright notices are just supplying attribution? Otherwise meets packaging guidelines. *Note: this may not actually be a word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 14:01:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291401.l4TE15JS006891@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-05-29 10:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > One more comment: > > -------------------------------------------- > checking python/Python.h usability... no > checking python/Python.h presence... no > checking for python/Python.h... no > -------------------------------------------- > > I guess this package should require "BuildRequires: python-devel" The spec already defines this and it looks like it was installed when you tried to build it under mock. Can you attach the config.log from the build? On my system: -------------------------------------------- checking for main in -lpython2.4... yes checking python2.4/Python.h usability... yes checking python2.4/Python.h presence... yes checking for python2.4/Python.h... yes results of the Python check: Binary: python2.4 Library: python2.4 Include Dir: /usr/include/python2.4 Have python: -------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 14:25:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291425.l4TEPSij009810@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-29 10:25 EST ------- Oh, no... I have to point out two things: * On F-7, python is 2.5. ------------------------------------------------- checking for python build information... checking for python2.4... no checking for python2.3... no checking for python2.2... no checking for python2.1... no checking for python... python checking for main in -lpython... no checking python/Python.h usability... no checking python/Python.h presence... no checking for python/Python.h... no results of the Python check: Binary: python Library: no Include Dir: no Have python: ---------------------------------------------------- * /usr/include/python2.5/Python.h is now in python-devel, not in python rpm (On <= FC-6, Python.h was in python rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 14:35:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291435.l4TEZAt0011093@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-29 10:35 EST ------- Marcel tells me that it would be a much better idea to use RFCOMM sockets directly rather than relying on the serial service, as rfcomm sockets are more reliable than rfcomm ttys, and this would avoid people being able to muck about with the devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 14:46:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291446.l4TEk4UG012368@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 10:46 EST ------- Spec is legible, American English. md5 source matches. Compiles/installs/runs on FC6/i386, noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 14:48:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226230] Merge Review: parted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291448.l4TEmjaT012561@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: parted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226230 dcantrell at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c| |om) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 14:55:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291455.l4TEtfd6012945@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 10:55 EST ------- BuildRequires are fine, builds in mock fc-6. No locales. No shared or static libraries. Not relocatable. Owns all created dirs. No duplicates or permission issues. %files begins with defattr. %clean present and correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 14:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291458.l4TEwksV013204@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 10:58 EST ------- Macros look good. Code, not content. No large docs. No headers. No pkgconfig files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:05:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291505.l4TF5eTh013799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-29 11:05 EST ------- Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ocamlnet.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ocamlnet-2.2.7-3.src.rpm Updated to remove empty file rpc-generator/dummy.mli, which Gerd Stoplmann assures me is not needed. Please note that rpmlint issues some warnings here: (1) devel-file-in-non-devel-package: see Bug 241471. (2) unstripped-binary-or-object: you mustn't try to strip OCaml bytecode binaries, because stripping them removes the bytecode, and they no longer run. (3) configure-without-libdir-spec: irrelevant because this isn't an autoconf-generated configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:15:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291515.l4TFFlEQ014691@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-29 11:15 EST ------- Well, Ok - Taking in account the comment from [comment #12] about rpmlint error. this last one can be ignored : snddir is mandatory for the game. ============== ** APPROVED ** ============== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:28:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291528.l4TFShUE015622@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 11:28 EST ------- Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: agistudio Short Description: AGI integrated development environment Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291534.l4TFY3DP016141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-05-29 11:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > * On F-7, python is 2.5. Okay; I'll work with upstream to get python 2.5 supported in the configure script and add a patch in the meantime. > * /usr/include/python2.5/Python.h is now in python-devel, > not in python rpm (On <= FC-6, Python.h was in python rpm) At least on my updated FC-6 system, Python.h is in python-devel. Looking back at the python-devel package that shipped with FC-5, Python.h is also there. -Doug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:40:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238994] Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291540.l4TFeepb016815@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-29 11:40 EST ------- A few comments : - You could be a little more consistent in your spec wrt "%{name}" vs. "memcached" usage. For instance, the init script is included as "memcached" but the scriplets control the service as "%{name}". - Would you consider replacing the current empty OPTIONS with "-l 127.0.0.1" in order to "secure" default installations? - As already mentioned the "Requires: initscripts" is useless since "Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig" already makes sure it'll be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:45:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291545.l4TFjGw3017297@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-29 11:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291545.l4TFjLPL017331@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-29 11:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291552.l4TFqhbB018024@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |236775 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-29 11:52 EST ------- Hrm, we missed actually adding the BR's after the merge. :( Harold, if you can add me as comaintainer (and add me to pkg.acl), I can help out here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 15:54:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291554.l4TFs2Kl018255@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 seefeld at sympatico.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ON_DEV Flag|needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico.| |ca) | ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2007-05-29 11:54 EST ------- What is the procedure to submit a not-yet-released package for testing ? I'm still looking into finishing up synopsis-0.9.1 (in particular any changes required in order to become a fedora citizen), yet it seems I have to submit an official (released) package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 16:12:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291612.l4TGClWk020157@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-05-29 12:12 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: W: alexandria non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/alexandria.schemas This is acceptable. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. Not included in alexandria distribution [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : 8f81822ba7a2cef2ce0b8f7d472f59737127d6c926853f4a4e288e11fdf8cf7f MD5SUM upstream package: 8f81822ba7a2cef2ce0b8f7d472f59737127d6c926853f4a4e288e11fdf8cf7f [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: Why: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. This is only a suggested item, not a required. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: 05/20/2007, Fedora development [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. rpmlint has warning output that is a known false positive. === Final Notes === 1. It might be nice to leverage the alexandria.desktop translations for Non-English languages. However, this isn't a requirement that would stop approval. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 16:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291619.l4TGJeuT020813@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-29 12:19 EST ------- What is a problem is that I have completely forgotton the status of this review request. Even if you are trying to publish 0.9.1 formal tarball, unless you upload some "current status of tarball (i.e. some rc tarball)" and make srpm/spec file, I cannot do any check. So would you update the "current" rpm (using some rc tarball) so that someone (including me) can check it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 16:27:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291627.l4TGRqFb021506@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-29 12:27 EST ------- Thank you for the review! Well, then would you set the fedora?review tag to + (plus)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 16:39:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291639.l4TGd4hR022136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 16:56:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241696] New: Review Request: ocaml-lablgtk2 - LablGTK2 is is an Objective Caml interface to gtk+-2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241696 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-lablgtk2 - LablGTK2 is is an Objective Caml interface to gtk+-2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-lablgtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-lablgtk2-2.6.0_20060908-1.src.rpm Description: LablGTK2 is is an Objective Caml interface to gtk+-2. This is an enhanced version of the package already found in Fedora (called lablgtk), updated to match the packaging guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml I've also updated to the latest CVS version of lablgtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 16:56:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241697] New: Review Request: ocaml-lablgl - LablGL is an OpenGL interface for Objective Caml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241697 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-lablgl - LablGL is an OpenGL interface for Objective Caml Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-lablgl.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-lablgl-1.02-11.src.rpm Description: LablGL is an OpenGL interface for OCaml. This is an enhanced version of the package already found in Fedora (called lablgl), updated to match the packaging guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 16:57:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291657.l4TGvplR023934@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-29 12:57 EST ------- Thank you. Request for CVS admin: ----------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: alexandria Short Description: Book collection manager Owners: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Branches: devel F-7 FC-6 FC-5 InitialCC: (nobody) ----------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 17:05:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239811] Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291705.l4TH55xd024497@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agistudio - AGI integrated development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239811 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 13:05 EST ------- Imported and build. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 17:08:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291708.l4TH8JXE024713@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-05-29 13:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ocamlnet.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-ocamlnet-2.2.7-4.src.rpm Updated to support ocaml-lablgtk2 package (see bug 241696). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 17:14:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291714.l4THEY23025140@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 13:14 EST ------- No devel package or .la archives. .desktop present and good, save s/Built/Build/ in description. No ownership conflicts. %install begins by wiping buildroot. Filenames are all UTF-8. MUSTs look OK, except for license question and .desktop typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 17:18:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291718.l4THIudI025536@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-29 13:18 EST ------- Avoid using an obsoletes. Obsoletes should really only be used if the package name changes are if the package is re-divided into subpackages. If people recompile python2.5 for themselves then its their responsibility to make sure all the python modules they use will continue to work in their non-fedora packaged python install. If people pull python2.5 from f7 or development, then they should pull updates for the python based software as well to ensure that the python2.4 to python2.5 transition works for everything. As a maintainer you should be concerned with making sure the update paths for the rpm packages from fedora release to fedora release work. Well thoughtout use a the dist macro in the release field may help keep the update paths in order even if the spec files are divergent. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 17:26:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227066] Review Request: jarjar-0.6-2jpp - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291726.l4THQ8la026314@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jarjar-0.6-2jpp - Jar Jar Links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227066 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-29 13:26 EST ------- Please keep the blockers accurate when closing review tickets like this, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 17:30:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205620] Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291730.l4THUV7O026928@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora Extras: Package Review Request: buildos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205620 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 18:04:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235962] Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291804.l4TI4v9R030139@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Any - Load configuration from different file formats, transparently Alias: perl-Config-Any https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235962 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 18:05:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291805.l4TI5hEI030267@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 18:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291809.l4TI9uUx030518@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-05-29 14:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qgis/qgis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qgis/qgis-0.8.0-5.src.rpm Changelog: * Tue May 29 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.8.0-5 - fixing more directory owernship (themes, themes-default) - fixing qt4 hardcoded lib path - removing Requires ldconfig - adding BuildRequires sqlite-devel - adding patch for supporting python 2.5 in configure script (In reply to comment #4) > * Mockbuild failed as attached. First check BuildRequires. > * Requires: /sbin/ldconfig is not needed. > * Some directories are still not owned > (e.g. %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/) I removed the Requires for ldconfig and fixed directory ownership for %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/ and %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/default/. (In reply to comment #5) > Use %{_libdir} instead of /usr/lib. on x86_64/ppc64 arch, > qt4 moc (and others) are under /usr/lib64/qt4/bin/ Fixed. This seems to fix the rpmlint error as well. $ rpmlint -v RPMS/qgis-*0.8.0-5*.rpm SRPMS/qgis-0.8.0-5.src.rpm I: qgis checking I: qgis-debuginfo checking I: qgis-devel checking W: qgis-devel no-documentation I: qgis-grass checking W: qgis-grass no-documentation I: qgis-theme-nkids checking W: qgis-theme-nkids no-documentation I: qgis checking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 18:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239110] Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291825.l4TIPd8C031877@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239110 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-29 14:25 EST ------- Rpmlint clean. Package/spec meet naming guidelines. Meets packaging guidelines. License is OK. Spec in legible American English. Source MD5 matches. Builds on FC6/i386, and in mock. BuildRequires are OK. No libraries of any kind. Not relocatable. Owns all created directories. No duplicate files, bad permissions, has a correct defattr. %clean present and correct. Code, not content. No large docs, headers, or -devel packages. No pkgconfig files. More to come. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 18:26:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291826.l4TIQ9lC031940@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-29 14:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155615) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155615&action=view) mock build log of qgis 0.8.0-5 on F-7 i386 Mock build still fails on F-7 i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 18:28:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241597] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291828.l4TISo2N032084@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object Alias: perl-HTML-Tidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241597 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-29 14:28 EST ------- Not assigning to myself because I (still) think that including the test suite code in the main package is not a good idea, but here's some notes: make test fails at least in a devel x86_64 mach buildroot, and apparently for someone else too: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=26875 "validation" is misleading in Summary; tidy is not a validator. "checking" and/or "cleanup" would be more accurate. Cosmetic: could use perl in %prep for all in-place edits - now there's one sed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 18:46:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291846.l4TIkpqe000621@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-05-29 14:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qgis/qgis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qgis/qgis-0.8.0-6.src.rpm Changelog: * Tue May 29 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.8.0-6 - adding BuildRequires bison, flex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 19:26:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291926.l4TJQ1hv003295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-29 15:25 EST ------- Well, koji does not accept my build queue. ----------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost devel]$ LANG=C make build Created task: 19954 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19954 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 19954 build (dist-f8, devel:alexandria-0_6_1-3_fc8): free 19954 build (dist-f8, devel:alexandria-0_6_1-3_fc8): free -> open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) 19955 buildSRPMFromCVS (devel:alexandria-0_6_1-3_fc8): free 19955 buildSRPMFromCVS (devel:alexandria-0_6_1-3_fc8): free -> open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) 19955 buildSRPMFromCVS (devel:alexandria-0_6_1-3_fc8): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 19954 build (dist-f8, devel:alexandria-0_6_1-3_fc8): open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildError: package alexandria not in list for tag dist-f8 0 free 0 open 1 done 1 failed make: *** [koji] Error 1 --------------------------------------------------------------- CVS admin, what should I do for this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 19:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705291934.l4TJYRt6003929@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lephilousophe at users.sourcefo | |rge.net ------- Additional Comments From lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-29 15:34 EST ------- Package doesn't follow guidelines : -http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-5d1681fa7cf3714ad490fbf7c095a0cfe16da27f -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 20:00:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241262] Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292000.l4TK0KYE006446@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241262 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |belegdol at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 20:15:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292015.l4TKFvAU007970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-29 16:15 EST ------- First look: - packaging guidelines strongly encourage a full source url - shouldn't the python stuff go in /usr/lib/python2.5 ? - either way, as long as it lives in libdir, the package cannot be noarch There are also some missing dependencies, apparently: [mclasen at dhcp83-186 devel]$ codeina GTK Accessibility Module initialized Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/codeina", line 101, in _run_codeina() File "/usr/bin/codeina", line 89, in _run_codeina from codeina import main File "/usr/lib/codeina/python/codeina/main.py", line 36, in from codeina import configure, check, install, myutils, productlist File "/usr/lib/codeina/python/codeina/install.py", line 32, in import myutils File "/usr/lib/codeina/python/codeina/myutils.py", line 29, in from xdg import BaseDirectory ImportError: No module named xdg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 20:26:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239474] Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292026.l4TKQTsj009099@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239474 ------- Additional Comments From lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-29 16:26 EST ------- - Bad Source0 URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 - Package summary ends with a period - Missing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NOT in BuildRequires - Builds on mock fc6-i386 - Rpmlint complains (I don't really know if it is important) : W: libkdcraw-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 20:31:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 16:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292031.l4TKVp5K009977@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rvinyard at cs.nmsu.e| |du) | ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-05-29 16:31 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback. This should have everything fixed. Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/xournal.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/xournal-0.3.3-3.fc7.src.rpm Changelog: - Changed all commands to macros - Removed icon sources and create icons in spec from xournal icon - Added 64x64 and 128x128 icons - Consolidated icon directories with wildcards - Added timestamp preservation to install - Removed desktop categories Application and X-Fedora - Added NOCONFIGURE to autogen.sh to stop auto-conf from running twice - Removed desktop-file-utils post and postun requires - Removed manual from doc section; it is already installed by the package - Changed xournal.desktop, xournal.xml and x-xoj.desktop from here documents to files - Add ImageMagick buildrequires for convert command - Separated BuildRequires into one per line for easier reading - Added PACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR CFLAG to configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 21:23:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239474] Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292123.l4TLNmp8015019@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239474 ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-05-29 17:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > - Bad Source0 URL: Done > - Package summary ends with a period I don't see any period in summary > - Missing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS AFAIR %configure use %{optflags} > - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for > directory ownership and usability). NOT in BuildRequires Done > - Rpmlint complains (I don't really know if it is important) : > W: libkdcraw-devel no-documentation No that's not important Spec URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fedora/libkdcraw.spec SRPM URL: http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/fedora/libkdcraw-0.1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 22:09:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292209.l4TM9v4U018426@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-29 18:09 EST ------- Sorry, we had a holiday weekend here. I'll be taking the next step(s) in the next day or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 22:35:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239236] Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292235.l4TMZo5V019592@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conduit - A synchronization solution for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239236 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-29 18:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #12) > > %if 0%{?fedora} && "%fedora" < "7" > > Requires: python-elementtree > > %endif > > I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it. > > I think you may want to consider building your cases around the dist macro in > the buildsystem. Can you explain further how this is better handled by dist macros? Are you talking about using something like: %{?fc6: Requires: python-elementtree} > Or you can forgo the use of if statements altogether if you are willing to > maintain different specfiles for different branches. You can first submit the > necessary specfile that works for F-7 and development without the elementree > requires and making sure the python requirement is versioned such that python >= > 2.5. When at all possible, I'd rather maintain the same spec file across multiple branches, especially when those changes are small and can be easy conditionalized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 22:39:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292239.l4TMdW0i019712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-29 18:39 EST ------- The locale files are still not being processes correctly. I believe the .po files are not needed at all. The .mo files should be picked up by %find_lang and installed in /usr/share/locale. Look at the files that are being packages: rpm -qpl jbrout-0.2.114.svn172-2.fc6.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 22:41:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292241.l4TMfLmU019786@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-05-29 18:41 EST ------- SPEC: http://jgu.nonlogic.org/emacs-bbdb.spec SRPM: http://jgu.nonlogic.org/emacs-bbdb-2.35-4.src.rpm * Tue May 29 2007 Jonathan G. Underwood - 2.35-4 - Add BuildRequires: emacs-vm-el - Add macro to determine emacsversion at package build time - Add Requires emacs-common >= emacsversion - Add notes about bootstrapping with VM to top of spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 29 23:21:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705292321.l4TNLC49020919@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-29 19:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > First look: > > - packaging guidelines strongly encourage a full source url No releases done yet, so no URL. > - shouldn't the python stuff go in /usr/lib/python2.5 ? I'd rather it went in /usr/share altogether actually. > - either way, as long as it lives in libdir, the package cannot be noarch So I should move the python code to /usr/share (there's no compiled bits). > There are also some missing dependencies, apparently: > > [mclasen at dhcp83-186 devel]$ codeina > ImportError: No module named xdg Yeah, it's missing pyxdg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 02:53:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 22:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225244] Merge Review: amtu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300253.l4U2rQvQ027425@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: amtu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225244 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-29 22:53 EST ------- Since this is approved and released, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 03:07:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226453] Merge Review: system-config-boot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300307.l4U37Dva028083@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-boot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226453 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-29 23:07 EST ------- Sorry for the delay in looking back at this. About the point #3, we are supposed to file a bug on excluding other primary arches. This allows folks interested in those arches to see items they might want to work on fixing. So, I think it might be good to have a ppc bug filed blocking the ppcexcludearch blocker, so ppc hackers might add yaboot support. Other platforms aren't primary arches, so I don't think we need to worry about them right now. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-ExcludeArch-ppc I guess removing the %{?dist} from the changelog is cosmetic, but if you get a chance it should be easy to do. Provided you file that bug and fix the dist the next time you need to push a update I will go ahead and approve this now. Feel free to close this rawhide once those things are done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 03:22:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226513] Merge Review: units In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300322.l4U3McK8029034@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: units https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226513 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-29 23:22 EST ------- Closing this since it's been checked in and shipped a while back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 03:24:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300324.l4U3OAPU029173@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-29 23:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155656) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155656&action=view) mock build log of qgis 0.8.0-6 on F-7 i386 Still fails with perhaps another reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 03:33:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232585] Review Request: telescope_server - Opensource Telescope control servers to interface with stellarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300333.l4U3X9NP029860@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telescope_server - Opensource Telescope control servers to interface with stellarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232585 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-29 23:33 EST ------- Shouldn't this review request be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 03:33:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194280] Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300333.l4U3XLiY029892@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194280 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-29 23:33 EST ------- So whats the state of this package? 3.5.6-1 is in f7. 3.5.6-3 is the latest in CVS, and it doesn't build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 03:36:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194280] Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300336.l4U3aVj6030191@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194280 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-29 23:36 EST ------- clearly it does (or did at one time) build, else it wouldn't be in the distro. Are you using a clean build environment, like mock? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 03:37:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194280] Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300337.l4U3bpmo030316@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194280 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-29 23:37 EST ------- Hrm, or residual breakage due to gcc-java/libgcj changes. regardless, it'll get sorted out when kde-3.5.7 hits the streets (soon). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 03:42:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232585] Review Request: telescope_server - Opensource Telescope control servers to interface with stellarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300342.l4U3gmAO030798@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telescope_server - Opensource Telescope control servers to interface with stellarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232585 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-29 23:42 EST ------- You'll see from the bug activity that it was closed... the package change request from comment 7 re-opened the ticket. I don't know exactly why a change request for stellarium was put into the telescope-server review ticket. The request has been processed... so the bug can be re-closed. Feel free to slap Jochen around with a wet trout for re-opening a review ticket assigned to you. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 04:13:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 00:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300413.l4U4D7Ji000393@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-30 00:13 EST ------- After some disussion with other FPC folks, I realized that recent changes to the static library packaging guidelines require only that linking against static libraries receive a FESCo ack. Which means we'll have to look at getting some sort of blanket exception for flex-using applications, but which means that this package is fine. One additional thing I noticed which should be fixed: the package isn't built with parallel make. Is there a reason why it isn't? I built on an 8-way machine with parallel make turned on and it went fine; the build completed and the test suite passed with no problems. But if there is a reason why parallel make isn't supported, it needs to be commented in the spec. Really, that's all; I'll trust you to fix up the make bit. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 04:50:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 00:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234711] Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300450.l4U4o5Y2001481@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234711 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-05-30 00:50 EST ------- Here's the good news, everything I found the first time looks good. Here's the bad news, this is a mono application... you need to add an additional Requires: gnome-sharp gnome-sharp will pull in mono-core and also gtk-sharp2. I'm pretty sure from testing on my system that this application doesn't need mono-web or another mono component beyond mono-core, I'm going to approve this. Please make sure you add the requires for gnome-sharp to the specfile before you build this in the koji buildsystem. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 04:53:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 00:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235136] Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300453.l4U4rAIV001584@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235136 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-30 00:53 EST ------- Package name: OK (lostirc) License: OK (GPL) Spec Legible: OK (en_US) md5sum matches: OK (501cd56bc0740d599540fb415718b939) rpmlint clean: OK Builds correctly: OK (i386 x86_64) Spec has %clean: OK Macro use consistant: OK Contains code/content: OK -doc subpackage: NA -devel subpackage: NA -static subpackage: NA pkgconfig depend: OK (See notes) Contains %doc: OK (AUTHORS COPYING NEWS README) Library suffix: NA No .la files: NA Use desktop-file-install: OK No duplicate ownerships: OK rm -rf %{buildroot}: OK RPM uses valid UTF-8: OK %defattr is set: OK No duplicate %files: OK Not relocatable: OK Calls ldconfig: NA Supports Locales: OK BR's are correct: OK MUST FIX: * pkgconfig depend: >From ./configure: checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for GLIBMMDEPS_CFLAGS... -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include checking for GLIBMMDEPS_LIBS... -L/lib -lglibmm-2.4 -lgobject-2.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lglib-2.0 checking for GTKMMDEPS_CFLAGS... -I/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/gtkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/gdkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/pangomm-1.4 -I/usr/include/atkmm-1.6 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 checking for GTKMMDEPS_LIBS... -L/lib -lgtkmm-2.4 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdkmm-2.4 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lcairomm-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -latkmm-1.6 -latk-1.0 -lpangomm-1.4 -lglibmm-2.4 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 You should add a BR for pkgconfig N.B. as gtkmm24-devel requires glib2-devel which inturn requires pkgconfig it's up to you, I'd nearly be tempted to leave it out. * Source URL needs to be changed (per Comment #2) * A FYI: I tried building for EPEL but it failed, you may wish to consider talking to the gtkmm maintainer and asking if they'd like to consider building for EPEL if you wish to see you package included. (Not required to get in Fedora though) Overall, great package... APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 05:08:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 01:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300508.l4U58Yhj002224@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-30 01:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/calcurse.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/calcurse-1.8-2.src.rpm I'm not actually sure where the CFLAGS make came from, but when I was test building it was needed, but it builds okay still so here is an updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 05:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 01:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225758] Merge Review: flex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300539.l4U5dbfD003746@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-30 01:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > After some disussion with other FPC folks, I realized that recent changes to the > static library packaging guidelines require only that linking against static > libraries receive a FESCo ack. Which means we'll have to look at getting some > sort of blanket exception for flex-using applications, You should understand that flex package is devel package and must contain a libfl* to work correctly. However, in libfl* is such kind of trivial, that it hasn't seen any changes for years and is very unlikely to see any changes ever. Furthermore, libfl is almost never used by real world applications, because they typically replace it. I.e. the correct way to ship flex is to package "a libfl*" into flex. If it's libfl.a, so be it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 07:16:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 03:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300716.l4U7GVEa007412@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-30 03:16 EST ------- Fix the license and the summary Revoking APPROVAL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 08:43:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 04:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705300843.l4U8hZgB014998@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-05-30 04:43 EST ------- and also the %description ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 10:36:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 06:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241262] Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301036.l4UAa5gM022159@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241262 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-05-30 06:36 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint is not silent on the devel package. Complains about no documentation, but this can be ignored. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package name - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must matches the actual license - MIT - MUST: License is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file is written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. - MUST: Package builds and compiles on fc6/i386 - MUST: Did not find compile failures - MUST: Buildrequires are fine - MUST: Locale does not apply - MUST: ldconfig is used properly - MUST: Non-relocatable - MUST: No dirs created - MUST: No duplicates in %files - MUST: Correct permissions - MUST: %clean section present - MUST: Consistent use of macros - MUST: Package contains code - MUST: No large documentation - MUST: No %doc runtime dependency - MUST: Header files are in a -devel package. - MUST: No static libs - MUST: pkgconfig requires correct - MUST: .so file in -devel - MUST: Correct NVR requires for devel - MUST: No libtool archives - MUST: Not a GUI app - MUST: No overlapping ownership - MUST: Correct buildroot cleanup - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: License is present as a separate file - SHOULD: Package builds in mock (fc6/i386) - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane - SHOULD: NVR dependencies correct - SHOULD: pkgconfig files are in -devel Things to correct: - please change package release to 0.1.%{gitdate}git%{?dist}, as per [1] - please read [2] to check how to state the source url precisely - a minot thing: please align -devel requires with the lines above them Other than that, the package looks fine to me. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-cfd71146dbb6f00cec9fe3623ea619f843394837 [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL?highlight=%28sourceurl%29#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 10:39:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 06:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libgii - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301039.l4UAdYDv022239@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libggi - GGI|Review Request: libgii - GGI |(General Graphics Interface)|(General Graphics Interface) |toolkit |toolkit Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-30 06:39 EST ------- I'm starting the review for this one :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 10:51:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 06:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libgii - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301051.l4UApwBn022803@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-30 06:51 EST ------- Preliminary comments : - Why run autogen.sh when no Makefile.* or configure.* have been patched? Does it fix something? If it does, please consider adding a comment in the spec file. - Passing "--libdir=%{_libdir}" to %configure is redundant. - Why build require Glide3-devel but pass --disable-glide to %configure? Again, a spec file comment would be nice if anything is known to be broken. - Why explicitly call "gmake"? RH/Fedora always has GNU make as "make". - Maybe ChangeLog.1999 could be omitted. Might be the reason why upstream split the ChangeLog in two in the first place (360kB saved upon installation). - INSTALL suggests that --enable-threads might be useful. - Also from INSTALL, might be worth looking at : "Use --disable-internal-xf86dga if you are having problems compile/running the DGA target. This will cause the target to use the system's DGA protocol implementation instead of rolling its own." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 10:54:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 06:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libgii - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301054.l4UAsctS022876@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - GGI (General Graphics Interface) toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-30 06:54 EST ------- Oh, blockers now : The package does not own %{_libdir}/ggi/ and the devel package does not own %{_includedir}/ggi/. Please replace the lines : %{_libdir}/ggi/* %{_includedir}/ggi/* With : %{_libdir}/ggi/ %{_includedir}/ggi/ Or (but it's longer) : %dir %{_libdir}/ggi/ %{_libdir}/ggi/* %dir %{_includedir}/ggi/ %{_includedir}/ggi/* You'll also need to add : %dir %{_sysconfdir}/ggi/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 11:25:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 07:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301125.l4UBPc9k024171@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-30 07:25 EST ------- I've mentioned that the code should be moved to the python directories, or $(datadir) upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 11:39:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 07:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239110] Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301139.l4UBdAf4024586@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239110 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-30 07:39 EST ------- No .desktop file needed. No ownership conflicts. Install cleans buildroot. All UTF-8 filenames. All MUSTS met. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 11:47:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 07:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239474] Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301147.l4UBlxuB025282@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239474 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 12:18:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301218.l4UCINiJ026956@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-05-30 08:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: k3b Updated Fedora Owners: harald at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 12:22:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libgii - General Graphics Interface toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301222.l4UCMPuY027136@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgii - General Graphics Interface toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libgii - GGI|Review Request: libgii - |(General Graphics Interface)|General Graphics Interface |toolkit |toolkit ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-05-30 08:22 EST ------- ok thx for the review! I will update to release 3 soon (missed to update to release 2) fixed some directfb adn glide3 includes... It seems that if directfb and directfb-internal are added to extra include, it will break the build. Some ld skipping incompatible are still present on the log I think this is minor... ?! Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libggi.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libggi-2.2.2-3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: General Graphics Interface toolkit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 12:37:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241387] Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301237.l4UCbCoh028178@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: codeina - GStreamer Codec Installation Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241387 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-30 08:37 EST ------- Ok, I'll run down the review checklist once there is a srpm with these issues fixed (well, the source url thing was already explained away) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 12:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301239.l4UCdoia028303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-05-30 08:39 EST ------- Ralf did you really review this? the summary and description are not at all correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 12:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] New: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content- management platform Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal/drupal.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal/drupal-5.1-1.src.rpm Description: Equipped with a powerful blend of features, Drupal can support a variety of websites ranging from personal weblogs to large community-driven websites. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 13:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241758] New: Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241758 Summary: Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/xar/xar.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/xar/xar-1.5-1.src.rpm Description: The XAR project aims to provide an easily extensible archive format. Important design decisions include an easily extensible XML table of contents for random access to archived files, storing the toc at the beginning of the archive to allow for efficient handling of streamed archives, the ability to handle files of arbitrarily large sizes, the ability to choose independent encodings for individual files in the archive, the ability to store checksums for individual files in both compressed and uncompressed form, and the ability to query the table of content's rich meta-data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 13:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241262] Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301318.l4UDIU6I031797@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241262 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-05-30 09:18 EST ------- Ah, one more thing. Please add AUTHORS, ChangeLog, NEWS and README to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 13:29:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241532] Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301329.l4UDTwLe000613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: angrydd - Falling blocks game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241532 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 13:30:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241761] New: Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241761 Summary: Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/professor-is-missing.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/professor-is-missing-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: In this little game, for a mysterious reason, the Professor is disaspeared in Africa. As Eric, you must find a way to go to Africa to find out the For background on licensing and 0-length file issues, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 13:47:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301347.l4UDltvM002141@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-30 09:47 EST ------- New packages. This doesn't rely on the RFCOMM or Serial services from bluez-utils, so it should be mergeable in F7 and devel. http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs2-obexftp/gnome-vfs2-obexftp-0.2-5.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs2-obexftp/gnome-vfs2-obexftp.spec * Wed May 30 2007 - Bastien Nocera - 0.2-5 - Use rfcomm sockets instead of the RFCOMM and/or Serial services (faster, cleaner, more robust), rmeove bluez-utils requirement - Assume an empty version in the obex FTP listing is still fine - Remove obsolete obex://rfcommX/path/to/file URI support OK to merge? To test: # Replace 00:00:00:00:00 with the bluetooth address of a mobile phone nautilus obex://[00:00:00:00:00]/ # Should list all the "known" devices around, seen, bonded, used nautilus obex:/// -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 13:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301355.l4UDtgTl003254@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-30 09:55 EST ------- Updated the package, same actual code, just updated the changelog and the name of the patch. s/gnome-vfs2-obexftp-use-new-serial-service-2.patch/gnome-vfs2-obexftp-use-rfcomm-sockets.patch/ and added: - List all known devices in obex:/// not just bonded ones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 14:05:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301405.l4UE55qg004145@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-30 10:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Ralf did you really review this? Yes, but ... > the summary and description are not at all > correct. ... apparently I missed to look carefully enough into the descriptive stuff. ... in former times, somebody could have already fixed this ... now, thanks to the RH take over of Extras it's impossible ... In future, I'll be more carefully about which packages to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 14:21:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301421.l4UELHe9005291@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-30 10:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155686) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155686&action=view) mock build log of xournal 0.3.3-3 on F-7 i386 This time you can see as in attached build log: * -DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR is not fixed. * Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 14:33:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241761] Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301433.l4UEXii8006428@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241761 ------- Additional Comments From musuruan at gmail.com 2007-05-30 10:33 EST ------- 404: files not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 14:39:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226022] Merge Review: libgpod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301439.l4UEdqvR006799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libgpod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-30 10:39 EST ------- Approved, so closing now. Todd has commit rights. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 14:50:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239110] Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301450.l4UEokPc007970@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239110 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-30 10:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: firewalk Short Description: Active reconnaissance network security tool Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: EL-4 EL-5 FC-6 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 15:12:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241761] Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301512.l4UFCQqC011271@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241761 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-30 11:12 EST ------- Whoops. :) Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/professor-is-missing/professor-is-missing.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/professor-is-missing/professor-is-missing-0.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 15:50:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239474] Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301550.l4UFoRli014577@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239474 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-05-30 11:50 EST ------- Built in mock, rpmlint clean (except for W: libkdcraw-devel no-documentation). my only suggestions would be to add to %configure: --enable-new-ldflags --disable-warnings Otherwise, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 16:43:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301643.l4UGhfwo018530@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-30 12:43 EST ------- Should add a TODO file: - filter to only show obex transfer enabled devices in obex:/// (but only from cache!) - deal nicely with adapters being removed/added, right now it hangs listings or copies - make delete while creating thumbnails work (concurrency--) But it worked well enough for me to copy plenty of photos from my phone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 16:46:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301646.l4UGkDw8018620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lephilousophe at users.sourcefo | |rge.net ------- Additional Comments From lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net 2007-05-30 12:46 EST ------- Paths don't use macros Build failed on mock fc6/i386 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/src' /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic alias.ui -o alias.h make[2]: *** No rule to make target `alias.h', needed by `all'. Stop. make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl alias.h alias.ui -o alias.cpp /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/moc alias.h >> alias.cpp make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/qfaxreader-0.3.1/src' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:27:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301727.l4UHRCdB021461@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-30 13:27 EST ------- rpmlint output: Package name: ok spec name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: there is a clarification of the current status in README.license, which is good; we should really get upstream to clarify this though. license field: follows the discussion earlier in this bug, ok license files included: ok spec file language: excellent spec file legibility: had no problems upstream source: ok buildable: complete buildrequires: locale handling: n/a shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: %clean: ok macro use: ok package contains code: ok large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a .pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a -devel package: n/a .la files: ok desktop files: n/a directory ownership again: still ok %install cleaning buildroot: ok utf8 filenames: ok suggestions: - use %{?dist} - require perl(XML::Parser), which is the more perl-correct version of that requires - Would be nice if the %description mentioned Bluetooth. - Might also be nice if the description did _not_ mention Midnight Commander... - The capitalization of ObexFTP should be consistent between summary and description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241791] New: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - An account handler component for Telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241791 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - An account handler component for Telepathy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at lovesunix.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lovesunix.net/fedora/telepathy-mission-control.spec SRPM URL: http://lovesunix.net/fedora/telepathy-mission-control-4.22-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Mission Control, or MC, is a telepathy (chat and voip framework) component providing a way for "end-user" applications to abstract some details of low level telepathy components such as connection managers. This is needed for Empathy which will be submitted as well -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] New: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at lovesunix.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lovesunix.net/fedora/empathy.spec SRPM URL: http://lovesunix.net/fedora/empathy-0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Empathy consists of a rich set of reusable instant messaging widgets, and a GNOME client using those widgets. It uses Telepathy and Nokia's Mission Control, and reuses Gossip's UI. The main goal is to permit desktop integration by providing libempathy and libempathy-gtk libraries. libempathy-gtk is a set of powerful widgets that can be embeded into any GNOME application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241791] Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - An account handler component for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301731.l4UHVq08022126@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - An account handler component for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241791 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241792 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:36:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241761] Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301736.l4UHaHZX022487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: professor-is-missing - An AGI adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241761 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-05-30 13:36 EST ------- Fixed ridiculous .desktop typo: Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/professor-is-missing/professor-is-missing.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/professor-is-missing/professor-is-missing-0.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:37:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301737.l4UHbI1k022550@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-30 13:37 EST ------- rpmlint (upstream development version): gnome-vfs2-obexftp.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/obex-module.conf Any particular reason for not making that noreplace? About %description: is this really split from the main gnome-vfs package? Looks like a separate package, ditto upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:39:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241791] Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - An account handler component for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301739.l4UHd2nN022707@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - An account handler component for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241791 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-30 13:39 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 241530 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241530] Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - Central control for Telepathy connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301739.l4UHd3LC022731@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - Central control for Telepathy connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241530 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at lovesunix.net ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-30 13:39 EST ------- *** Bug 241791 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:39:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301739.l4UHd4LQ022756@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 Bug 241792 depends on bug 241791, which changed state. Bug 241791 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - An account handler component for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241791 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:39:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241530] Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - Central control for Telepathy connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301739.l4UHdUVE022799@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - Central control for Telepathy connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241530 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241792 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 17:39:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301739.l4UHdVQY022823@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 bdpepple at ameritech.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |241530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 18:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301845.l4UIjXfp029456@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-30 14:45 EST ------- my mock build failed with configure.ac:20: warning: macro `AM_DISABLE_STATIC' not found in library configure.ac:21: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library configure.ac:13: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 I guess we are missing some BuildRequires: libtool, automake -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 18:49:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241804] New: Review Request: audio-entropyd - Generate entropy from audio output Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241804 Summary: Review Request: audio-entropyd - Generate entropy from audio output Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/audio-entropyd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/audio-entropyd-1.0.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Audio-entropyd generates entropy-data for the /dev/random device. Note that the service is enabled by default. Since this daemon needs no configuration, I say that people installing it want it to be running by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 19:13:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301913.l4UJDQcI031664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2007-05-30 15:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: remind Short Description: A sophisticated calendar and alarm program Owners: rayvd at buldgeon.org Branches: FC-6 EL-4 EL-5 F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 19:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301913.l4UJDkAZ031718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 rayvd at bludgeon.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 19:19:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240094] Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301919.l4UJJHip032229@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: winpdb - An advanced python debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240094 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-30 15:19 EST ------- 1. Whoops. 2. You're right. 3. It isn't. 4. Can't do it. Then we'd have to patch winpdb to look in a different place, and it seems to be a non-trivial patch. I'd rather not maintain it. 5. Nope. All of the .py files have a full copy of the GPL in their header already. New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/winpdb.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/winpdb-1.1.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 19:52:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239474] Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705301952.l4UJq6tn002522@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239474 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-05-30 15:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libkdcraw Short Description: A library for decoding RAW picture files Owners: mgarski at post.pl Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: rdieter at math.unl.edu, gauret at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 20:03:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239336] Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302003.l4UK37xC003532@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239336 martin.sourada at seznam.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.sourada at seznam.cz ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-05-30 16:03 EST ------- After quick look on your spec one question came in mind. I have no experience with packaging plugins for thunderbird/firefox but is it really needed to build whole thunderbird aside? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 20:44:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241758] Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302044.l4UKi7HP006828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241758 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-30 16:44 EST ------- Good: + Rpmlint quite on source rpm. + Sources matches with upstream. + License ok. + Naming ok. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint quite on xar main package. + Rpmlint quite on debuginfo package. + Package contains varbatin copy of the license text. + Local install and uninstall works fine + Local test of the application works fine. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Bad Buildroot: BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Duplicate BuildRequites: Duplicate BuildRequires: zlib-devel (by libxml2-devel) - xar-devel contains no docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 21:16:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302116.l4ULG6NB008581@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-05-30 17:16 EST ------- I forgot about optflags when I messed with CFLAGS. This one has it fixed, along with a specific override for PACKAGE_DATA_DIR as well that will always map to a proper Fedora directory. Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/xournal.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/xournal-0.3.3-4.fc7.src.rpm Changelog: - Added optflags and PACKAGE_DATA_DIR to CFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 21:45:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302145.l4ULjWVE011277@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maxx at krakoa.dk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 21:51:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231859] Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302151.l4ULpSha011620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scratchpad - Spatial text editor for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231859 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:09:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302209.l4UM91k2012453@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-30 18:09 EST ------- Is %prep the right place for this sed magic? Updated: - Add sed magic to really replace nikto-1.36-config.patch Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/nikto.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/nikto-1.36-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302209.l4UM9MZx012483@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:09:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302209.l4UM9NJN012501@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 Bug 239163 depends on bug 239159, which changed state. Bug 239159 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:09:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239160] Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302209.l4UM9NP1012514@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-et-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239160 Bug 239160 depends on bug 239159, which changed state. Bug 239159 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:26:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239895] Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302226.l4UMQEGe013357@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, Alias: perl-Math-Base85 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302226.l4UMQFFI013375@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 Bug 239163 depends on bug 239895, which changed state. Bug 239895 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Base85 - perl extension for base 85 numbers, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239895 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:26:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239163] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302226.l4UMQWIW013403@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses Alias: perl-Net-IPv6Addr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:26:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239162] Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302226.l4UMQXQb013415@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Packet - A framework to easily send and receive frames from layer 2 to la yer 7 Alias: perl-Net-Packet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239162 Bug 239162 depends on bug 239163, which changed state. Bug 239163 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv6Addr - Perl module to check validity of IPv6 addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239163 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:49:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302249.l4UMnDWb014109@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-30 18:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > license: there is a clarification of the current status in README.license, > which is good; we should really get upstream to clarify this though. I'm not sure what more can be done. Each piece of code making up the package is under a specific licence, or dual-licenced. Linking (at build-time or run-time) against the other libraries restrict that dual-licencing. I believe that stating that each piece of code retain their licence, and that the whole package, as a binary, when run, is of GPL licence should be enough. > suggestions: > - use %{?dist} Done. > - require perl(XML::Parser), which is the more perl-correct version of > that requires Done (although a number of other packages just require perl-XML-Parser...) > - Would be nice if the %description mentioned Bluetooth. Done. > - Might also be nice if the description did _not_ mention Midnight > Commander... Yeah, this is broken. Done. > - The capitalization of ObexFTP should be consistent between summary > and description Done. (In reply to comment #13) > rpmlint (upstream development version): > gnome-vfs2-obexftp.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/obex-module.conf > Any particular reason for not making that noreplace? It's not really a config file, it's a file that advertises a particular plugin as supporting a specific gnome-vfs scheme. Nobody ever changes this. > About %description: is this really split from the main gnome-vfs package? Looks > like a separate package, ditto upstream. It's not, fixed. (In reply to comment #14) > my mock build failed with > > configure.ac:20: warning: macro `AM_DISABLE_STATIC' not found in library > configure.ac:21: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library > configure.ac:13: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL > If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. > See the Autoconf documentation. > autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 > > I guess we are missing some > > BuildRequires: libtool, automake automake was already there. I added libtool, hope this is enough to fix the problem. * Wed May 30 2007 - Bastien Nocera - 0.2-6 - Fix description, this package isn't split from gnome-vfs2 - Add the dist to the release - Use the "perl correct" build requires for intltool's dependencies - Add missing BRs for the autoreconf - Add TODO file http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs2-obexftp/gnome-vfs2-obexftp-0.2-6.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-vfs2-obexftp/gnome-vfs2-obexftp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 22:54:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239336] Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302254.l4UMsblV014349@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239336 webmaster at aus-city.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |webmaster at aus-city.com ------- Additional Comments From webmaster at aus-city.com 2007-05-30 18:54 EST ------- There may have been a bug, but its gone now let me explain. I installed the thunderbird 2.0 directly from the development repository on two fc6 servers, both use enigmail (gnupgp). There is no problem at all. However - when you first run thunderbird, it goes through its update checks (much like if you updated firefox from 1 to 2) and then it complains that enigmail 0.94 is not compatible. You then highlight it and click find update (its all part of the update check screen), it goes and puts in enigmail 0.95 and it all works just perfectly. Perhaps the enigmail update was not ready back then, but I assure you it all works 100% and so much better than thunderbird 1.5 and I have not had a single problem. I send and receive lots of emails a day. So its definitely not a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 23:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239156] Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302316.l4UNGvKj015292@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-SQLite-Simple - Easy access to SQLite databases using objects Alias: DBIx-SQLite-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239156 Bug 239156 depends on bug 239155, which changed state. Bug 239155 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 23:16:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302316.l4UNGwO5015311@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 Bug 239158 depends on bug 239155, which changed state. Bug 239155 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 23:16:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239155] Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302316.l4UNGuui015274@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Gomor - Another class and object builder Alias: perl-Class-Gomor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239155 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-30 19:16 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Gomor Short Description: Another class and object builder Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 23:19:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239157] Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302319.l4UNJAwH015482@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Alias: perl-Net-Pcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-30 19:19 EST ------- Seems the F7 branch wasn't created during merge, please add it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-Pcap Short Description: Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 23:19:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239158] Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302319.l4UNJBqT015500@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Write - A portable interface to open and send raw data to network Alias: perl-Net-Write https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239158 Bug 239158 depends on bug 239157, which changed state. Bug 239157 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Pcap - Interface to pcap LBL packet capture library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239157 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 23:26:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705302326.l4UNQ6q1016152@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 23:30:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241834] New: Review Request: Desktop built around web sites and online services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241834 Summary: Review Request: Desktop built around web sites and online services Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.mugshot.org/online-desktop/sources/online-desktop.spec SRPM URL: http://download.mugshot.org/online-desktop/sources/online-desktop-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: The "online desktop" is a flavor of the GNOME desktop built around web sites and online services. This package contains a grab-bag of integration points with various sites and services, such as mailto: handlers, .desktop files, and so forth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 30 23:31:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 19:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241835] New: Review Request: bottlerocket - Utilities to use the FireCracker X10 kit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241835 Summary: Review Request: bottlerocket - Utilities to use the FireCracker X10 kit Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/zcat/bottlerocket.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/zcat/bottlerocket-0.04c-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: BottleRocket is a command-line interface for Unix systems to use the FireCracker kit. It is easy to use, has all of the major (non-gui) functionality of the Windows interface, is easy to call from scripts and the backend code is made to be easily linked into other programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 00:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241530] Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - Central control for Telepathy connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310047.l4V0lj0j019918@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-mission-control - Central control for Telepathy connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241530 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-05-30 20:47 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this and empathy. Mock's grabbing some build roots now; and I'll post a full review shortly. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 00:58:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310058.l4V0w7r3020247@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com Alias| |empathy ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-05-30 20:58 EST ------- Hi, David. I'd be happy to review this for you. However, someone with proper sponsorship permissions will need to sponsor you into the Account System groups when it is done (if you're not already sponsored). Before I push this through a mock build though, I see some things in the spec file that seem wrong: (1) Your desktop-file-install invocation puts the .desktop file into the autostart directory; meaning that it will be started at every desktop session. It'd be better, I believe, if you install it to the global %{_datadir}/applications directory. In that way, the user can choose to add it to their session startup as normal if they wish. ( (2) Your %files listing makes the package own everything in %{_datadir}/empathy/, but not the directory itself. If you change that to the directory (remove the asterisk), then rpm-build will automagically know to own that directory and everything it contains, recursively. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 01:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310124.l4V1OJG8021658@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mcepl at redhat.com | ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-05-30 21:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > If you change that to the directory (remove the asterisk), then rpm-build will > automagically know to own that directory and everything it contains, > recursively. That should be "remove the slash", right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 01:57:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 21:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310157.l4V1vJWj023051@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2007-05-30 21:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I'd be happy to review this for you. However, someone with proper sponsorship > permissions will need to sponsor you into the Account System groups when it is > done (if you're not already sponsored). Peter, I'm willing to do the final review for this, and be David's sponsor. I probably won't be able to get to it until tomorrow evening though. :) BTW, telepathy-mission control needs to be reviewed and approved first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 02:08:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310208.l4V28x42024104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-05-30 22:08 EST ------- [in reply to comment #1] +1 -- Avoid to use as more possible a mirror url from sourceforge website. So, the use of "source0: download.sourceforge.net/pixie/Pixie-2.1.1.tgz" is more appropriate. ;) ------------------------------------- Starting review.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 02:18:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240807] Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310218.l4V2Ifwl024777@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 02:56:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241834] Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310256.l4V2uUNR027326@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241834 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Desktop |Review Request: online- |built around web sites and |desktop - Desktop built |online services |around web sites and online | |services -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:07:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl-0.9 - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310307.l4V37COo028320@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl-0.9 - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: ppl-0.9 - A | | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:18:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310318.l4V3IGNY029013@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-05-30 23:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > If you change that to the directory (remove the asterisk), then rpm-build will > > automagically know to own that directory and everything it contains, > > recursively. > > That should be "remove the slash", right? Not necessarily. The trailing slash when listed in the %files is only aesthetic AFAIK. rpm-build will still know it's a directory through the magic of ... file magic! :) (In reply to comment #3) > > I'd be happy to review this for you. However, someone with proper sponsorship > > permissions will need to sponsor you into the Account System groups when it is > > done (if you're not already sponsored). > Peter, I'm willing to do the final review for this, and be David's sponsor. I probably won't be able to get to it until tomorrow evening though. :) > BTW, telepathy-mission control needs to be reviewed and approved first. I like that plan. :D I'll do the review for mission-control, then; and when I'm done I can do a preliminary review of this and leave the final YEA/NAY up to you. Thanks, Brian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:30:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187282] Review Request: sax2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310330.l4V3UFuE029868@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sax2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187282 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-30 23:30 EST ------- Ping Marcus. Do you still wish to submit this package? If so can you post an updated version? If not, can we close this request? If I don't hear anything in a week, I will close this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:35:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310335.l4V3ZnZW030263@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-30 23:35 EST ------- Ping Christian. Are you still interested in submitting this package? If so, can you address the build failure in comment #2 and upload a new version? John: If you are reviewing this, please set the fedora-review flag to ? If I don't hear anything I will close this review in 1 week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:38:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310338.l4V3cmHq030487@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-30 23:38 EST ------- David: Are you reviewing this package? I am going to go ahead and set the fedora-review flag to ? thinking that you are doing so. If you aren't could you set it back to " " and reassign it to nobody at fedoraproject.org so someone else could move it forward? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:38:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171597] Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310338.l4V3cxnB030671@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spandsp - A DSP library for telephony https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171597 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:39:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177603] Review Request: libpri In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310339.l4V3d1LH030721@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpri https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177603 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:39:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177584] Review Request: zaptel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310339.l4V3d4rr030795@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177584 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload - Firmware download to EZ-USB devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310348.l4V3mbDn031673@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware download to EZ-USB devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: fxload- |Review Request: fxload - |2002_04_11.spec |Firmware download to EZ-USB | |devices CC| |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-30 23:48 EST ------- Ping Neal. Do you still want to submit this package? The URLs in the initial submission give me a 'no route to host' error. If you do, please upload current versions again, and I can try and get a ruling on the licence. If I don't hear from you in 1 week, I will close this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:53:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310353.l4V3rtp2032104@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-30 23:53 EST ------- Hey Christopher. I am assuming you are reviewing this package... I am setting fedora-review flag to ? If this is incorrect, please set it back to " " and reassign to nobody at fedoraproject.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 03:56:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241262] Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310356.l4V3uX41032309@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241262 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-05-30 23:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Ah, one more thing. Please add AUTHORS, ChangeLog, NEWS and README to %doc. NEWS and README are empty. That seems unnecessary. I'll happily add them once they have content though. New URLs: http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/libpciaccess/libpciaccess.spec http://people.redhat.com/ajackson/libpciaccess/libpciaccess-0.8-0.1.20070530.src.rpm I added the git checkout instructions as a script since they're ugly to emit inline. The only tricky part is the bit where it removes .git/ before compressing, since that's just wasteful to include in srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 04:00:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 00:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310400.l4V400JK032540@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|Package Review |p0rn-comfort AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 04:04:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 00:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310404.l4V443hA000376@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|p0rn-comfort |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 04:26:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 00:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310426.l4V4QVfj001021@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-31 00:26 EST ------- Packages build nicely now, all BRs are there, and rpmlint only warns about the non-config file in /etc, which is fine, I think. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 05:04:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 01:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241834] Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310504.l4V54fmu002112@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241834 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-05-31 01:04 EST ------- First impressions: - I question the wisdom of calling the script "godmode", but thats up to you. - Package can't be noarch if it installs stuff in libdir. If it is pure python, it should probably live in datadir - Is somebody packaging python-dbus ? I don't have that on my system, and yum seems unable to find it. On the other hand, I do have dbus-python... - Is the split into tons of subpackages beneficial here ? What is gained ? Also, it seems to counteract the idea of making online-desktop a meta-package that pulls in everything thats needed for GOD. - Is there a bigboard dependency missing ? See previous point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 05:08:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 01:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241847] New: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241847 Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/frets/glew.spec SRPM URL: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/frets/glew-1.4.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The OpenGL Extension Wrangler, GLEW for short, is a library that handles initiliazation of OpenGL extensions in a portable and simple way. Once the program initializes the library and checks the availability of extensions, it can safely call the entry points defined by the extension. Currently GLEW supports almost all the extensions found in the OpenGL extension registry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 05:14:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 01:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310514.l4V5EdAC002387@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-31 01:14 EST ------- I've no idea why the Component changed like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 05:31:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 01:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241847] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310531.l4V5Vp4t003246@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241847 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-05-31 01:31 EST ------- This is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419 Please coordinate with the OP of 229419 and close one of these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 06:18:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 02:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310618.l4V6I1Rm005058@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-05-31 02:17 EST ------- Putting the .desktop file in autostart is upstream behavior, in an effort to stick as close to upstream as possible that is what I would like to continue doing. There is a decent argument to be made for starting your IM client with your session instead of by demand, it's an always on kind of thing and it seems a better plan to me to work on addressing cases where we do not wish to be present online such a meetings by way of integration with presence frameworks like Galago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 07:28:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 03:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239097] Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310728.l4V7SdF8007491@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nikto - Web server scanner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239097 faucamp at csir.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From faucamp at csir.co.za 2007-05-31 03:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Is %prep the right place for this sed magic? Yes, because we are essentially just applying an "in-line" patch :-). The sed magic modifies (i.e. patches or "prepares") the package content for compilation (it is not actually being built yet) and installation (obviously it's not being installed yet either). In this case, "compilation" is not applicable, so %build is empty, but patching a file using sed is not equivalent to "building" it. Anyhow, on with the review: + Good points from comment #7 still apply, except: + rpmlint output isn't silent, but OK: W: nikto invalid-license Custom, see LICENSE.txt -- This is expected, due to the fact that the code is GPL, but the .db content isn't. (see comment #7) + Requires are good + License is good (code under GPL and content freely distributable with this program) + License field gives appropriate license information + %docs are good + program installs and runs fine Everything looks fine. ------------------------- This package is APPROVED. ------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 07:30:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 03:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239336] Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310730.l4V7UBgr007680@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239336 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at seznam.cz 2007-05-31 03:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > After quick look on your spec one question came in mind. I have no experience > with packaging plugins for thunderbird/firefox but is it really needed to build > whole thunderbird aside? Hm... I answered myself after a bit more digging in the spec and enigmail homepage... Yes, and No. We do not need whole thunderbird, only part of it. So the question now is: does the patches to thunderbird affect the enigmail build? Apart from this question your spec file looks pretty good, only I don't see there any documentation, but that's probably OK, as there isn't any in upstream tarball either, but there is also no licence in separate file, you should query upstream about that, I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 08:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 04:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310833.l4V8Xw0o014722@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-31 04:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-vfs2-obexftp Short Description: ObexFTP over Bluetooth support for GNOME Owners: bnocera at redhat.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 08:45:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 04:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241262] Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310845.l4V8jZCv015807@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpciaccess - abstraction layer for PCI access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241262 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-05-31 04:45 EST ------- I am getting 404 error on the srpm. Otherwise, spec looks fine to me, just don't forget to update the %changelog section. It is not a blocker, so APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 09:06:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 05:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241758] Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705310906.l4V96vRB017913@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241758 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-05-31 05:06 EST ------- - Buildroot : "should", not "must", I'm getting tired of this one :-/ - Duplicate buildrequires : Not really. The package checks explicitly for both, it's not if it was only relying on libxml2 and indirectly on zlib. I see no harm or problems in having both, and prefer like this in case the software switches to some other xml library in the future, which doesn't pull in zlib. - I don't recall any policy making docs mandatory in devel packages. You're probably relying on rpmlint output. The xar sources don't contain any API docs, so the devel package doesn't either. Thanks for taking the time to review, and so quickly too :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 10:35:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 06:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload - Firmware download to EZ-USB devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311035.l4VAZDpt023593@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware download to EZ-USB devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-05-31 06:35 EST ------- I no longer have any personal interest in this - but I can make the package available to anyone who wants it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 11:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 07:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311106.l4VB6Kdo024834@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org 2007-05-31 07:06 EST ------- OK. I've followed the guidelines and built new rpms. Please find the new rpms, spec file, and desktop file here: http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/FEDORA/mrxvt/0.5.2-1/ Also, here is the latest rpmlint: [a at laptop mrxvt_devel]$ sudo rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mrxvt-0.5.2-1.i386.rpm W: mrxvt incoherent-version-in-changelog 1 0.5.2-1 W: mrxvt wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mrxvt/scripts/mrxvt.vbs W: mrxvt non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mrxvt/mrxvtrc.sample W: mrxvt non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mrxvt/mrxvtrc W: mrxvt non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mrxvt/submenus.menu W: mrxvt non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mrxvt/default.menu I believe the changelog version warning is OK considering the sources are for 0.5.2 and we don't have a minor release number (Am I incorrect?). The end-of-line-encoding is because it's a visual basic script -- this should be fine b/c it shouldn't kill the build process, correct? The non-conffile errors...is that a big deal??? considering a user should know where to grab example configuration information? I know it doesn't conform to the LSB. Is there a precedent for including this? or should they be moved? If they need to be moved, can someone suggest a proper location? As always, thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 12:44:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311244.l4VCiq3e030744@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-31 08:44 EST ------- Seeing as I'm submitted the mission control and was about to submit an Empathy package before David beat me to the punch, I'd like to do both Empathy and mission-control as a co-maintainership with David. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 13:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229419] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311338.l4VDcIA4003055@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-31 09:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155814) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155814&action=view) Patch to make Makefile use DESTDIR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 13:40:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311340.l4VDegFA003371@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat.com 2007-05-31 09:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155815) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155815&action=view) nspluginwrapper.spec patch I think the basic idea of building the package with --without-biarch is sound. But I have a few comments: 1) %ifarch ppc64 || x86_64 is wrong syntax, %ifarch takes a list of arches, so %ifarch ppc64 x86_64. Still better to create a rpm macro so that it can be easily changed. 2) by default nspluginwrapper strips the files, so nspluginwrapper-debuginfo is (almost) empty 3) x86_64 or ppc64 mozilla plugins go into /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/ rather than /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ 4) on ppc I'm not sure it is a good idea to only ship the variant where 64-bit nspluginwrapper runs 32-bit nspluginviewer, if you have 32-bit firefox (does ppc64 firefox already work, it has been certainly always broken in FC6), then you might on the other side be interested in running 64-bit ppc plugins in 32-bit firefox 5) the symlink the spec file created was broken 6) after this package hits fedora, it might make sense to clean up some of the scripts and programs, either the scripts are overly portable (testing for non-linux OSes all the time), distro specific (mkruntime script) or handle many Linux distros (see get_system_mozilla_plugin_dir) but not Fedora resp. RHEL - that means unneeded stats of /etc/SUSE-release etc. and likely wrong paths in the end anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 14:06:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229419] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311406.l4VE6P9j005488@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229419 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-31 10:06 EST ------- Not a review, some points: Don't use %makeinstall, use patch attached above and make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT New release 1.4.0 is out, update your package License should be changed to "Assorted licenses, see %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/copyright_summary" and copyright_summary needs to be created, using the debian copyright info as a starting point makes sense. Maybe creating a -doc subpackage makes sense, the source tarball has a doc dir with html documentation that can be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 14:18:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239474] Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311418.l4VEI3AV006455@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkdcraw - A library for decoding RAW picture files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239474 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-31 10:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 14:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235802] Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311418.l4VEI8wL006492@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remind - Sophisticated calendar and alarm program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235802 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-31 10:18 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 14:18:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239110] Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311418.l4VEINAj006547@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firewalk - Active reconnaissance network security tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239110 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-31 10:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 14:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225957] Merge Review: k3b In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311418.l4VEIUTO006579@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: k3b https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225957 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-31 10:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 14:18:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311418.l4VEIbbV006636@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-05-31 10:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 14:31:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311431.l4VEVddV008199@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-05-31 10:31 EST ------- OK, I don't see any blockers remaining so it's: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 14:55:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199405] Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311455.l4VEtwaF011698@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high level 3D visualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 15:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311502.l4VF2KZn012613@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-05-31 11:02 EST ------- Committed and built in F-7 and devel. I'll need to build for FC6 and probably push through the updates system for F7, but it's all there. Thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 15:24:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311524.l4VFOej6014300@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-05-31 11:24 EST ------- I was talking to Matej about doing a small Telepathy team so we could get better coverage of the Telepathy packages in Fedora, but that sound like a good idea to you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 15:33:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311533.l4VFXbK4014649@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-31 11:33 EST ------- Please close this bug after the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 15:35:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311535.l4VFZAVe014712@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 11:35 EST ------- Okay! ------------------------------------------------- This package (xournal) is APPROVED by me. ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 15:39:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237382] Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311539.l4VFdZNZ015105@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alexandria - Book collection manager Alias: alexandria https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237382 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 11:39 EST ------- Well, now I could rebuild alexandria on koji. Built on devel, F-7, FC-6. (I have forgotton that ruby-gnome2 is not shipped on FE-5, so this package won't be pushed on FE-5) Closing as NEXTRELEASE. Thank your for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 15:43:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311543.l4VFh3uG015464@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-31 11:43 EST ------- Good: + Sources matches with upstream. + Local build works fine. For the not qualified Source0 expression, I can make an exception, becouse you wrote, that this couse an issue. It may be nice, if you can submit a bug report agains the rpm package. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 16:00:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241903] New: Review Request: etherbat - Ethernet topology discovery Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241903 Summary: Review Request: etherbat - Ethernet topology discovery Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/etherbat/etherbat.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/etherbat/etherbat-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Etherbat performs Ethernet topology discovery between 3 hosts: the machine running Etherbat and two other devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 16:14:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311614.l4VGETDD018010@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 12:14 EST ------- Well, much improvement!! However, still some points to be fixed. * %changelog - Please use changelog properly. i.e. If you change/modify spec file/srpm, write a brief summary in %changelog (see specs of other packages for example) - And please increment release number when you modify spec file with version unchanged. * sourceURL - For Source0, please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Unused definition - Please remove unused definition. It doesn't seem that %x11_app_defaults_dir is used anywhere. * Parallel make - Please support parallel make when possible (please check the section "Parallel make" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * attr - Usually, %attr(755,root,root) for binary should not be needed when installation is done properly. * Directory ownership - Please own directories which are created by this package and are not owned by other packages. For example, this package should own directory %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} * Macros - Please use macros. %{_sysconfdir} for /etc, for example. * noreplace for config files - For config files, please use %config(noreplace) * documentatin directory - Documentations should be under %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 16:16:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311616.l4VGG1UF018186@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caillon at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-05-31 12:16 EST ------- Yo Caillon, these suggestions might be useful for your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 16:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241101] Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311648.l4VGmGLD020933@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwatch - A program that watches over other programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241101 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-31 12:48 EST ------- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:15:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311715.l4VHFPM1023132@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-05-31 13:15 EST ------- We've independently been working on this package. My requirements have been: - Each arch builds separately (no need to do 32 bit builds on 64 bit) - If you want to run 32 bit plugins, you install the 32 bit version. - If you want to run 64 bit plugins, you install the 64 bit version. It is currently in a working state, but needs some cleaning up still before it's pushed out. I expect to push out an srpm and spec next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311723.l4VHNwkB023904@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-05-31 13:23 EST ------- Thanks a lot Jakub. Before I post a new srpm with your modifications, i have a couple of questions. Firstly, is there any particular reason you remove %{_bindir}/nspluginwrapper from the file list? Most documentations on how to use the wrapper refers to it. Secondly, the symlink in the spec file you referred to doesn't seem broken, rpmlint was quiet about it. But rpmlint returned an error for the symlink with your change; >> [deji at agape ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.4-2.fc7.src.rpm E: nspluginwrapper hardcoded-library-path in ../../lib/%{name}/%{_arch}/%{_os}/npwrapper.so << -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241834] Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311727.l4VHRXKU024553@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241834 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-31 13:27 EST ------- godmode: well it will be invoked from a menu entry in the next version, I don't really see it as the primary interface. noarch: under discussion python-dbus: hm, not sure how that typo slipped by; fixed subpackages: the core package is everything needed, but you can install the extra packages for the individual sites you use like gmail/google-reader to add desktop entries for them. We may actually just punt on the whole desktop file thing and generate menu entries inside the bigboard panel. bigboard: fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:33:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311733.l4VHXmbc025268@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2007-05-31 13:33 EST ------- > ../../lib/%{name}/%{_arch}/%{_os}/npwrapper.so Also, the above path stuff is broken. We can do better here than hard coding arch info in paths. I've got fixes for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:38:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234721] Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311738.l4VHcBaM025828@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sakura - A terminal emulator based on GTK+ and VTE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234721 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 13:38 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:44:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241758] Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311744.l4VHip98026466@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241758 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-05-31 13:44 EST ------- Ok, for the Buildroot I have consult the packaging guildline and have find out, that you specified Buildroot is ok. So, becouse there are no open topics noew, I can approve your package. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:56:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234711] Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311756.l4VHu66p027523@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234711 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-05-31 13:56 EST ------- Fixed Spec: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/drapes/drapes.spec SRPMS: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/drapes/drapes-0.5.1-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:56:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311756.l4VHuKOr027620@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(mola.mp at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 13:56 EST ------- Declaring the switch of the submitter ============================================= Well, then: (In reply to comment #12) > Current version here : > http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/wxsvg/wxsvg.spec > http://ftp.es6.freshrpms.net/tmp/extras/wxsvg/wxsvg-1.0-0.2.b7.src.rpm A quick check: * For source, - For URL, please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL (Now the traffic is very heavy!!) - By the way, the newest seems 1.0b7"_3"?? IMO release number of fedora rpm should contain "b7_3", not only "b7". * For timestamp: - Please use (for this package): ----------------------------------------------------- %{__make} install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -p" ----------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps especially on header files. = mockbuild okay for F-devel i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 17:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210823] Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311756.l4VHunu7027719@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxsvg - wxSVG is C++ library to create, manipulate and render SVG files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210823 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234711] Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311804.l4VI4jFw028554@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234711 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-05-31 14:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drapes Short Description: A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop Owners: splinux at fedoraproject.org Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: splinux25 at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:06:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311806.l4VI6JOI028776@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 174290, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 14:06 EST ------- All close!! Please submit *a new review* request when you want to resubmit this package. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311806.l4VI6KVe028806@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|174289 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:07:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174288] Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311807.l4VI78Fb028941@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Hspell-gui is a graphical front end to hspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174288 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Keywords|FutureFeature | Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 14:07 EST ------- All close!! Please submit *a new review* request when you want to resubmit this package. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:07:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174290] HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311807.l4VI7E3h029044@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: HDate-applet is an applet to show the hebrew date (calendar) using the libhdate library and the gnome-2.0 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174290 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG BugsThisDependsOn| |174289 OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 14:07 EST ------- All close!! Please submit *a new review* request when you want to resubmit this package. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:07:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174289] LibHdate is a small C, C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311807.l4VI7FgO029068@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: LibHdate is a small C,C++ library for Hebrew calendar and dates, holidays, and reading sequence. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174289 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |174290 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:08:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 174286] hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311808.l4VI8CUV029205@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: hocr is a set of Hebrew character recognition utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174286 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Keywords|FutureFeature | Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(kaplanlior at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 14:08 EST ------- All close!! Please submit *a new review* request when you want to resubmit this package. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:10:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239924] Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311810.l4VIALe6029437@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xournal - Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Alias: xournal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239924 rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2007-05-31 14:10 EST ------- Thanks for the review and all the help. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xournal Short Description: Take notes, sketch and annotate PDFs Owners: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:10:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234711] Review Request: drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311810.l4VIAYYj029473@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drapes - A wallpaper manager application for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234711 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: desktop- |Review Request: drapes - A |drapes - A wallpaper manager|wallpaper manager |application for the GNOME |application for the GNOME |desktop |desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190090] Review Request: ocrad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311818.l4VIInSW030201@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(krzyko at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 14:18 EST ------- Closing as NOTABUG. Please file a new review request if someone wants to repackage this software. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:20:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222618] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311820.l4VIKDdO030341@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet Alias: llk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222618 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 14:19 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the submitter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:22:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225114] Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311822.l4VIMcqk030664@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jamin - JACK Audio Mastering interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|needinfo?(florin at andrei.myip| |.org) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 14:22 EST ------- Closing as NOTABUG. Please file a new review request if someone wants to repackage and resubmit this software. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311848.l4VImpTx032512@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-05-31 14:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=155834) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155834&action=view) config log for qgis-0.8.0-6 on F-7 i386 I attach config.log created by mockbuild of qgis-0.8.0-6 on F-7 i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 18:49:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235136] Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311849.l4VIngpp032601@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235136 ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-05-31 14:49 EST ------- fixed Spec: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/lostirc/lostirc.spec Srpms: http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/lostirc/lostirc-0.4.6-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 19:01:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238248] Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311901.l4VJ1JWA001114@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ddccontrol - TFT monitor parameters control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238248 akontsevich at mail.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(akontsevich at mail.r| |u) | ------- Additional Comments From akontsevich at mail.ru 2007-05-31 15:01 EST ------- Status? Searching time to fix spec to conform to the Fedora packaging guidelines ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 19:01:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211214] Review Request: mod_revocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311901.l4VJ1nrE001209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_revocator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211214 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241927 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 19:18:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload - Firmware download to EZ-USB devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311918.l4VJINrG003101@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - Firmware download to EZ-USB devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-05-31 15:18 EST ------- ok. I will go ahead and close this, and if someone would like to resubmit it, they can contact you for a copy of the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 19:31:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235136] Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311931.l4VJVrO2004392@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lostirc - Simple IRC client for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235136 splinux25 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From splinux25 at gmail.com 2007-05-31 15:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lostirc Short Description: Simple IRC client for X11 Owners: splinux at fedoraproject.org Branches: FC-6 FC-7 InitialCC: splinux25 at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 19:36:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231005] gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705311936.l4VJaboZ004718@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-vfs2-obexftp: ObexFTP filesystem support for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231005 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-05-31 15:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > Any particular reason for not making that noreplace? > It's not really a config file, it's a file that advertises a particular plugin > as supporting a specific gnome-vfs scheme. Nobody ever changes this. Ok, any reason for including it as a %config file rather than just a normal one? (If that's the right thing to do, please ignore rpmlint if it whines about it.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 20:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312007.l4VK70fu008737@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2007-05-31 16:06 EST ------- Sounds like a good idea. I'm in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 20:15:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240942] Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312015.l4VKFQsO009333@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calcurse - Text-based personal organizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240942 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-05-31 16:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > It may be nice, if you can submit a bug report agains the rpm package. I agree, I will do that over the weekend New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: calcurse Short Description: Text-based personal organizer Owners: dev at nigelj.com Branches: FC-6 FC-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 20:36:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241403] Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312036.l4VKav1D011947@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qgis - A user friendly Open Source Geographic Information System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241403 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-05-31 16:36 EST ------- Thanks for the config.log. It looks like my quick patch to enable python 2.5 support didn't work out quite right, so I'll have to look into a couple options. I checked with upstream to see how they would like to enable python 2.5 support and found out that they've switched to cmake for their next version so python support should be alright (https://svn.qgis.org/trac/ticket/720). Right now I think there's a couple options: 1) continue trying to get python 2.5 support working - this should be easier for me now that F7 is released. 2) drop python support for F7 for now. 3) wait for the next version. I'm going to start with option #1, but I'll have to get an F7 box setup here or get my laptop upgraded first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 20:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239336] Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312044.l4VKim0L012663@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239336 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-31 16:44 EST ------- The thunderbird patches are probably not needed for enigmail, bug i prefer to use "exactly" the same build tree than thunderbird to avoid any problem. And this way the spec is simpler to maintain ;) For the License, i probably could add : http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.txt But, this information is available in the "About" option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 20:47:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239336] Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312047.l4VKlTJK012825@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239336 ------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com 2007-05-31 16:47 EST ------- I'm waiting for the review before editing the spec, quite long to build :( I also have to add the es-ES langpack which is now available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 21:03:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241757] Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312103.l4VL3JND013966@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal - An open-source content-management platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241757 ------- Additional Comments From sebastien.prudhomme at gmail.com 2007-05-31 17:03 EST ------- + build of the SRPM + rpmlint on SRPM and RPM + source is the one on www.drupal.org + license GPL + install and uninstall of the RPM + README.fedora explains how to finish the installation - group Applications/System seems not appropriate: perhaps Applications/Publishing? - doc in /usr/share/doc/drupal-5.1 should not be duplicated in /usr/share/drupal - apache should be restarted after installation to load drupal.conf: %postun /sbin/service httpd condrestart > /dev/null 2>&1 || : - perhaps install the cron job (as said in INSTALL.txt)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 21:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312127.l4VLR8Mh015792@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 17:27 EST ------- The 0.25 actually comes from a license requirement. One of his other modules had no requirement at all and was needed. He updated this one as well just to add the license file (though the pod already had it noted, so it worked for fedora with 0.24 anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 21:33:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312133.l4VLXikW016450@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 17:33 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.25-1.src.rpm Turns out there was a bug fix in 0.25 too, so it's probably better to run with it than the 0.24. Could you double check this and we can call it good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 21:48:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241834] Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312148.l4VLm84T017256@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: online-desktop - Desktop built around web sites and online services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241834 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-31 17:48 EST ------- New files: http://download.mugshot.org/online-desktop/sources/online-desktop-0.2.1.tar.gz http://download.mugshot.org/online-desktop/sources/online-desktop.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 21:48:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237335] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312148.l4VLmhwT017303@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for PKCS10 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237335 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 17:48 EST ------- SRPM: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10-0.06-4.src.rpm Spec: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10.spec - added a build requirement for Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA - fix hard-coded include/library paths in the Makefile.PL - unmodified template README removed from install - Reverse terms in license to match perl rpm exactly Fixed the Makefile with a patch in the end... I did remove the template README; you're right it's useless (the install stuff would have been useful to someone *not* using an RPM... But aside from that.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 21:52:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312152.l4VLqWLc017525@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 17:52 EST ------- FYI, upstream notified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 21:55:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312155.l4VLt0xl017686@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 17:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Short Description: Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 Support Owners: wjhns174 at hardakers.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 22:35:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226904] Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312235.l4VMZbvH019295@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmpdclient - MPD client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226904 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-31 18:35 EST ------- I don't see any problems with the rpmlint warnings. find-debuginfo.sh has decided they are source and need to be in the -debuginfo subpackage, and I certainly wouldn't want to remove them. Any chance you could perhaps flesh out the summary a bit and maybe define "MPD" in the %description? I would suggest something like: Summary: Easy to use MPD client written in Qt4 %description A very advanced and easy to use MPD (Music Player Daemon) client written in Qt4. You will need a running MPD instance running somewhere on your network in order to make use of this software. Other than that, this package looks good. I'll go ahead and approve it and you can provide something more descriptive when you check in. Review: * source files match upstream: 4d01940020414cb5c16299dd03f32bc00daa2defc7805348b71ef7ff42d2c5d2 qmpdclient-1.0.7.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summary is OK. X description is a bit lacking. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has only ignoreable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: qmpdclient = 1.0.7-1.fc7 = /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (gtk-update-icon-cache). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. * desktop file present: looks OK and is installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 22:47:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 18:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312247.l4VMlxq0020364@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-05-31 18:47 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: bigboard New Branches: F7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:03:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312303.l4VN3IBN021342@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-31 19:03 EST ------- CVS done. It may take a bit before Koji is syncronized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:03:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312303.l4VN3ZnS021377@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 19:03 EST ------- 1) done 2) done 3) ugh. It's taken me a bit, but I'd lay down money that you have a conflicting Digest/SHA.pm somewhere on your system. Probably in site_perl. I actually had the same issue on one system, and it turns out that my installed site_perl version is missing a glob line that the real version has. The instant I removed the conflicting site_perl version the problem went away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:05:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312305.l4VN5Ifq021701@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 19:05 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Digest-SHA-5.44-4.src.rpm * Thu May 31 2007 Wes Hardaker - 5.44-4 - fix description clause to remove hyphenation - pass optimization flags to Makefile.PL * Mon May 14 2007 Wes Hardaker - 5.44-4 - Reverse terms in license to match perl rpm exactly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237337] perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312306.l4VN6wEx021760@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 19:06 EST ------- BTW, I agree: hyphenation shouldn't be done in general any longer. Though it doesn't really matter. I did remove it from the spec file (but Jason is right, it came from pod output) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:11:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312311.l4VNBKHU022209@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:20:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241076] Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for redet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312320.l4VNKkdO022477@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for redet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241076 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241075] Review Request: redet - Regular expression development and execution tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312321.l4VNLpAf022565@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redet - Regular expression development and execution tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241075 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:33:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312333.l4VNXeQS022954@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-05-31 19:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > This review has been going on for quite a while now. If you could give me a good > idea of how close I am to getting it right I'd be most grateful. Well, actually the review hasn't started :) We're just giving you informal comments to help you along. You'll need a sponsor to pick you up and review and approve your package. There is really nothing I see that I would consider a blocker in getting your package in. Your packaging is mostly sane, although I haven't rigorously reviewed it to meet the guidelines. My suggestion would be to post to the fedora-devel mailing list that you're looking for a sponsor for you and a formal review for your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:43:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240171] Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312343.l4VNhL4W024801@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bigboard - Sidebar application launcher using mugshot.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240171 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-31 19:43 EST ------- Note: It's "F-7". Also, please don't reopen tickets just to make CVS requests. Branch created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 31 23:48:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 19:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200705312348.l4VNmtkl025014@bugzilla.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2007-05-31 19:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools-1.2-2.src.rpm All 3 issues should be fixed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.