[Bug 238373] Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue May 1 18:38:42 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-05-01 14:38 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Sorry for the obvious mistakes; they should all be fixed now.

No need to apologize... that's what the peer reviews are for...  more eyes, less
errors.

Now that gtk2-devel is in the BR, new files (and dependencies) are generated:

rpm -qpl libopenraw-0.0.2-3.fc6.i386.rpm 
/usr/lib/libopenraw.so.1
/usr/lib/libopenraw.so.1.0.0
/usr/lib/libopenrawgnome.so.1   <-- NEW FILE
/usr/lib/libopenrawgnome.so.1.0.0   <-- NEW FILE
/usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2
/usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/AUTHORS
/usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/ChangeLog
/usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/NEWS
/usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/README
/usr/share/doc/libopenraw-0.0.2/TODO

rpm -qpl libopenraw-devel-0.0.2-3.fc6.i386.rpm 
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw-gnome
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw-gnome/gdkpixbuf.h   <-- NEW FILE
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/consts.h
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/debug.h
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/io.h
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/libopenraw.h
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/thumbnails.h
/usr/include/libopenraw-1.0/libopenraw/types.h
/usr/lib/libopenraw.so
/usr/lib/libopenrawgnome.so   <-- NEW FILE
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libopenraw-1.0.pc
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libopenraw-gnome-1.0.pc  <-- NEW FILE

You now have gui dependencies.  Do you intend to break the package into
something like:

libopenraw
libopenraw-gnome
libopenraw-devel

or do you think that the majority of users of the package will want all the
components even at the expense of pulling in gui components and all of their
dependencies?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list