[Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue May 8 09:37:44 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-05-08 05:37 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Any feedback for the 0.5.0 package?

Working about the same as last release, as expected.
 
> Aside: Last month I got pybackpack 0.5.0 sponsored into Debian unstable so
> hopefully I'll get some good contextual feedback from that and it'll mature
> better off the back of it.

That should help.

Here's a few things I noticed when I again recently looked at your spec file:

1) warning from rpm when building:
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pybackpack/backuptool.py

That's because of this line:
%attr(755,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/backuptool.py

take that out and either chmod it in %install after it's installed, or even
better since you're upstream, fix the install script :) (does it even need to be
executable?)

2) /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pybackpack/pybackpack_logo.png
should go in /usr/share/pixmaps

3) /usr/share/applications/fedora-pybackpack.desktop specifies icon as
"file-roller"?  huh? 

4) just replace all of this:
%dir %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack
%attr(755,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/backuptool.py
%{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.py
%{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.glade
%{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.pyc
%{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.png

with this:
%{python_sitearch}/*

5) you really don't want this:
%ghost %{python_sitearch}/pybackpack/*.pyo


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list