[Bug 237373] Review Request: mcpp - Alternative C/C++ preprocessor

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mcpp -  Alternative C/C++ preprocessor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237373


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-05-09 12:08 EST -------
Well,

* mcpp packaging/performance is okay
* For pre-reviewing:
  - for referencer, actually Deji Akingunola is a good packager
    and the spec file seems no problem at a glance (I didn't
    check in detail)
  - for ddccontrol, according to your comment the spec file
    seems to have many problem. I guess more problem may be
    found.... (for this package, I have not seen the spec file yet)

(In reply to comment #16)
> Writing review is a hard task than I expected!
Perhaps. While I have reviewed about 140 packages and
have submitted about 40 review requests, reviewing srpm
was very difficult for me first.

Okay!!
------------------------------------------------------
   This package (mcpp) is APPROVED by me
------------------------------------------------------

Please follow:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
from "Get a Fedora Account". I will receive a mail which notices
that you need a sponsor and then I will sponsor you.

NOTE: devel repository is currently under the way of the merge
      of Core and Extras and you may meet some trouble. If you
      have some trouble, please let me know.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.