[Bug 237332] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 10 02:37:49 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for big numbers support -- SPONSOR NEEDED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237332
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-09 22:37 EST -------
As should be expected now, this needs BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker).
The test suite needs perl(Test) but I'm really not sure if the plan is to split
that off or not.
Really, that's the only issue I see with this package. Let me go over one more
tonight and then we can start getting some of these checked in.
* source files match upstream:
d709ce87110f0f1ab1c9d957f11239d5c4e411733b0e6ea08576720e1f147c80
Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum-0.03.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
Bignum.so()(64bit)
perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum) = 0.03
perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum::CTX)
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum = 0.03-2.fc7
=
libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
perl >= 0:5.005
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
perl(Carp)
perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Bignum)
perl(DynaLoader)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
[...]
ok 52
+ exit 0
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la droppings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list