[Bug 240287] Review Request: muParser - A fast math parser library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 17 04:45:12 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: muParser  - A fast math parser library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240287


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: muParser  - |Review Request: muParser  -
                   |A fast math parser library  |A fast math parser library
                 CC|                            |tibbs at math.uh.edu




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-05-17 00:45 EST -------
A few issues I found:

The compiler isn't called with the proper flags; I think it should suffice to
call make like:
  make CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags}

Loads of errors like the following:
  warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/muParser/html
which are due to the same directories being included multipe times in %files:
  %{_docdir}/%{name}
  %{_docdir}/%{name}/html
  %doc %{_docdir}/%{name}/html/*
It looks like you probably want to do the following at the end of %install
instead of copying the files into the buildroot:
  mv docs/html .
And then you can just have 
  %doc html
in %files which gets all of the html documentation under 
/usr/share/doc/muParser-devel-1.27/html.

Lots of rpmlint warnings:
   W: muParser wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding 
   /usr/share/doc/muParser-1.27/License.txt
And many others like it; these should be passed through tr or sed or dos2unix in
to clean them up.
  E: muParser library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libmuparser.so.0.0.0
You need
  %post -p /sbin/ldconfig


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list