[Bug 235925] Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 24 20:13:53 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
Alias: dnssec-tools

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925





------- Additional Comments From paul at xelerance.com  2007-05-24 16:13 EST -------
Three issues left:

1) There seems to be a missing DESTDIR or buildroot argument, as mock building
reveals attempts to install in the real /

make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dnssec-tools-1.2/validator'
creating directory /etc/dnssec-tools/
mkdir /etc/dnssec-tools
mkdir: cannot create directory `/etc/dnssec-tools': Permission denied
creating directory /usr/include/validator/
mkdir /usr/include/validator
mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/include/validator': Permission denied
/usr/bin/install -c libval-config /usr/bin
/usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/bin/libval-config':
Permission denied
make[1]: *** [localinstall] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dnssec-tools-1.2/validator'
make: *** [subdirinstall] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88153 (%install)


RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88153 (%install)

Error building package from dnssec-tools-1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm, See build log
ending
done

2) add OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the --with-perl-build-args

3) Some cosmetics:
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';'
+find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';'

Other then that, rpmlint is quiet (apart from dnssec-libs not having a %doc
section, which is okay). Let me know when I can try an updated package again.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list