[Bug 241550] New: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 28 00:59:11 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550
Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering
framework for UNIX operating systems
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net
QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi-0.77-0.1.20070527cvs.fc6.src.rpm
Description:
The ERESI Reverse Engineering Software Interface is
a unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX
operating systems based on the Executable & Linking
Format (ELF) such as Linux, BSD, Solaris, IRIX, and BeOS.
It has a command line interface that make it useful
remotely, and can generate graph images from code
analysis on demand. It has a real dedicated reverse
engineering language that makes it scriptable and
adaptable to the precise needs of the users. ERESI
contains more than 10 innovative and exclusive features
that turns it into an environment of choice for the
instrumentation, analysis, debugging, tracing, hooking,
or simply integrity checking and events logging of binary
programs.
This package can be tied with BR#241526 because with upstream version, the compilation needs asm/atomic.h file. I removed the related include and it seems to work.
I tried to follow reviewing process and I think it folows rules.
It's my first package so I need someone to sponsor me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list