From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 00:20:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010020.l910K4DA032414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 00:39:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010039.l910dB8a002197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-30 20:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: taipeifonts Short Description: Chinese bitmap fonts. Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 01:23:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010123.l911NBUY008030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-30 21:23 EST ------- picking this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 01:24:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] New: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/fedorainfinity-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/fedorainfinity-kdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Fedora Infinity KDM theme that is the default theme in Fedora 8. (I ported the GDM theme to KDM. To use, s/FlyingHigh/Infinity/g in the default kdmrc, for both the theme and the color scheme.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 01:40:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010140.l911eICo010839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-30 21:40 EST ------- you can install irctest and t under %doc. That additionally needs you to "chmod 644 irctest" in %prep section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 01:43:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010143.l911h2NW007339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-30 21:43 EST ------- Sure, i'll commit it right away. Would you like commit access to the various kde bits? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 02:39:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] New: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/AstroMenace/AstroMenace.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/AstroMenace/AstroMenace-1.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Space is a vast area, an unbounded territory where it seems there is a room for everybody, but reversal of fortune put things differently. The hordes of hostile creatures crawled out from the dark corners of the universe, craving to conquer your homeland. Their force is compelling, their legions are interminable. However, humans didn't give up without a final showdown and put their best pilot to fight back. These malicious invaders chose the wrong galaxy to conquer and you are to prove it! Go ahead and make alien aggressors regret their insolence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 02:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010257.l912vKUh016894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-09-30 22:57 EST ------- thanks Jens for the careful review, suggested changes were patched into the spec/srpm Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-4.src.rpm I prefer the current package name, it is indeed a pcf format font (the upstream package is a bdf source file, but when build the rpm, it was converted to pcf), so, wqy-unibit-fonts is more accurate than -bdf-. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 03:20:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010320.l913KYf4019988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-30 23:20 EST ------- OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - Package named correctly OK - Patches named correctly OK - Spec file named correctly to match base OK - License is valid OK - Licence field matches package OK *1 Licence file installed if supplied Not supplied OK - Spec file in American English OK - Source matches upstream (md5) bf04f2beb07b227a3e91536c5dbdb872 NA - Locales use %find_lang No locales OK - %clean is present and correct OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Specfile Legible OK - Builds in Mock F7-i386 NA - %post/%postun calls ldconfig for sh libs No libs NA - Owns directories it creates Does not create any directories OK - No duplicate files OK - Has %defattr and has correct permissions OK - Macros used consistantly NA - %doc does not affect runtime No documentation NA - Headers/static libs in -devel NA - .pc files in -devel NA - .so files in -devel NA - -devel requires base No devel files OK - Contains no .la libtool archive files OK - Does not own others files OK - .desktop files installed correctly OK - BuildRequires correct. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Package has rm -rf %{buildroot} at top of %install. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. F7-i386 OK - rpmlint output. W: no-documentation, ok as there is no documentation. NA - documentation in -doc package No documentation OK - final provides and requires are sane. OK - should have dist tag OK *1 should package latest version Upstream does not have version info, date used. Screensaver installs and works as expected (looks great too). *1 Should consider contacting upstream regarding including License text in release and to ask them to consider using a version number. That being said, *APPROVED* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 03:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010324.l913OFhg020230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-30 23:24 EST ------- IMO, you should consider placing the data files in a seperate -data package to help reduce large update downloads. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 03:21:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010321.l913LnG9020154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-30 23:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. c4ac50ae99a880704abfc62a64ed16aa flagpoll-0.9.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + package flagpoll-0.9.1-1.fc8 -> Requires: /usr/bin/python automake17 + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 03:27:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010327.l913RAPv024604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-30 23:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > 1) Good to use following syntax in SPEC > > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} for -devel and -tools sub packages. > > Fine, done. > > > 2) Use make %{?_smp_mflags} > > Should be ok, though I can't test it, done. > > > 3)Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) for all %files sections. > > Ok, can't find where this extra field is described, but it seems to be common > enough, done. You can find more info on this at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/developers-guide/ch-rpm-building.html > > New SPEC and SRPM: > http://fedorapeople.org/~bpostle/reviews/libpano13/libpano13.spec > http://fedorapeople.org/~bpostle/reviews/libpano13/libpano13-2.9.12-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 03:41:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010341.l913f49A026555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-09-30 23:41 EST ------- * The tarball issue: The different md5 sums are due to different versions of autoconf used to make configure in the source distributions included in the SRPM (there is a makefile target for building the RPMs). This has been corrected, and the source in the uploaded SRPM now has an md5sum matching that of the reference source distribution. * Sponsorship: Many thanks for the detailed advice. Once I've done as you suggest, I'll attach the relevant bug numbers to this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 03:43:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010343.l913he9w022788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-30 23:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > From reading the manual and going on what you are saying the mistake is using > *_CFLAGS at all. Not quite. There are 2 small bugs interacting at the same time. 1) By using *_CFLAGS, you are _overriding_ automake's default CFLAGS's behavior. What you intend to do is extending CFLAGS. To achieve this you need to add $(AM_CFLAGS) to *_CFLAGS. 2) Passing preprocessor flags though *CFLAGS. Autoconf and automake distinguish preprocessor flags from "-FLAGS". (CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS etc.) > Because -D is a pre-processor command it should be included in > the *_CPPFLAGS. Right. > The flags can be modified without causing problems so... > > TzClockCairo_CPPFLAGS = -DBUILDCAIRO > > ...is OK and follows the automake rules. Right. In particular, it avoids interferring with CFLAGS ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:06:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010406.l914606l025731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-01 00:05 EST ------- here comes my review Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 76b64d3e9bd9b9422bcb4dae4008555a libpano13-2.9.12.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + -devel and -tools subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + package libpano13-2.9.12-4.fc8 -> Provides: libpano13.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libjpeg.so.62 libpano13.so.0 libpng12.so.0 libpng12.so.0(PNG12_0) libtiff.so.3 libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + package libpano13-devel-2.9.12-4.fc8 -> Requires: libgcj-devel libjpeg-devel libpano13 = 2.9.12-3.fc8 libpano13.so.0 libpng-devel libtiff-devel zlib-devel + package libpano13-tools-2.9.12-4.fc8 -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libjpeg.so.62 libpano13 = 2.9.12-3.fc8 libpano13.so.0 libpng12.so.0 libtiff.so.3 libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010415.l914FaI2027002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-01 00:15 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:18:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226462] Merge Review: system-config-lvm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010418.l914I6iP031096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-lvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226462 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-01 00:18 EST ------- No permission to download SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:16:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] New: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/aget.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/aget-0.4-1.src.rpm Description: Aget is a multi-threaded download accelerator like Flashget. It supports HTTP downloads and can be run from the console. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:21:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010421.l914LbUk027888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-01 00:21 EST ------- cvsadmin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010438.l914cYsv001429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-01 00:38 EST ------- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312371] Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010438.l914cQxm030006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312371 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-01 00:38 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:54:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010454.l914s12w003634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-01 00:54 EST ------- First impressions. %{name} macro should be used in Source: URL. %{?dist} not used in Release: tag. (not mandatory or course, but can be useful) %{optflags} are not used in make. Patch file should be prefixed with the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:53:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010453.l914rEvi031962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 04:54:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 00:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010454.l914sDjF032006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-01 00:54 EST ------- Thanks for the update. AFAICS all issues have been addressed now and the package looks fine to me. :-) I think the changelog would be easier to read with the usual spaces between entries (like you also do for wqy-bitmap-fonts). Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 05:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 01:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010502.l9152b3a005005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-01 01:02 EST ------- Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure to request adding the module to cvs. Thank you for your contribution again to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 05:13:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 01:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010513.l915DCqr002247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-10-01 01:13 EST ------- thank you Jens! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 05:16:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 01:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010516.l915G95h002813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-10-01 01:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wqy-unibit-fonts Short Description: A dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage Owners: fangqq at gmail.com Branches: FC-5 FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: petersen at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 05:16:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 01:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010516.l915Ggc0006967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 fangqq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 06:04:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 02:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010604.l9164Uxi009210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 02:04 EST ------- Well, as xscreensaver maintainer: I checked tempest and it is found that tempest can be used for xscreensaver (as the upstream URL http://www.personal.utulsa.edu/~dan-guernsey/ says) , so this can also be used for gnome-screensaver. So I think supporting xscreensaver, gnome-screensaver as well as KDE is preferable. You can check how rss-glx (maintained by Nils Philippsen) deals these 3 screensavers. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/rss-glx/rss-glx.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 06:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 02:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010618.l916IQrD011134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-01 02:18 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Updated as per review http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/aget.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/aget-0.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 07:05:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 03:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010705.l9175Cdl021185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-10-01 03:05 EST ------- Built into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 07:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 03:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226466] Merge Review: system-config-printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010718.l917II89018724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-01 03:18 EST ------- With new updated SRPM, rpmlint on RPM gave me -------------------------------------------------- system-config-printer.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop ==> This can be ignored. system-config-printer.i386: E: no-binary ==> ok as we need system-config-printer-libs as i386 package and we can't use noarch type then in SPEC file. system-config-printer.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-printer ===> Is this(noreplace) not needed? system-config-printer.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm ==> Do you have any other workaround to avoid using rm? rpmlint on --libs RPM gave me --------------------------------------------------------- system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/system-config-printer-libs-0.7.74.3/pycups-1.9.27/examples/cupstree.py ===> any reason to have this as valid. I saw most of packages installing example files with 0644 mode. system-config-printer-libs.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-printer/cupshelpers.py 0644 ===> This MUST be solved. As you said its upstream. Can you provide a new SRPM with upstream fix? system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/newprinternotification.conf ===> Is this(noreplace) not needed? system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/system-config-printer-libs-0.7.74.3/pycups-1.9.27/examples/cupstree.py /usr/bin/python ===> ==> But user can use this with python command also right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 07:39:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 03:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010739.l917dxMO021449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-01 03:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > IMO, you should consider placing the data files in a seperate -data package to > help reduce large update downloads. Since the data files are already in a seperate tarbal upstream, I will even go as far as to say that you *must* put them in a seperate srpm. Then if we do bug / packaging fixes to the code the user doesn't need to redownload all the data again. Also I think you should package the other languages too (make all languages part of the data srpm please). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 08:07:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 04:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010807.l9187OsB030502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-01 04:07 EST ------- New version: * Mon Oct 1 2007 Hans de Goede 0.2.1-2 - Use default BuildRoot (bz 302091) - Don't ship README (no usefull info) (bz 302091) Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/londonlaw.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/londonlaw-0.2.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 08:59:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 04:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010859.l918x2nW005400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-01 04:59 EST ------- > ping; any status on this? We're getting late into the Fedora cycle... Unfortunately for the past 2-3 weeks my workstation has gone down with a faulty motherboard. I have got a laptop now and preparing a backup system, and am slowly catching up with the backlog. I have got some higher priority things to attend to (eg., updates for bouml) before I can attend to this. So I do not think I will be able to make it in time for Fedora 8. Can we have this as an 'enhancement' update for Fedora 8 and Fedora 7? Thanks for your understanding. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 09:35:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 05:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010935.l919ZFSa006413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-01 05:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flagpoll Short Description: Developers' tool for storing compilation information Owners: deji Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 09:43:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 05:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710010943.l919hYOD011496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 05:43 EST ------- A try to support xscreensaver, gnome-screensaver and kxs SRPM: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/tempest/tempest-0-0.2.20070929.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/tempest/tempest.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 10:38:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011038.l91AcHdC013890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-01 06:38 EST ------- BTW ver. 0.9.22 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 10:37:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011037.l91AbZs8013845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-01 06:37 EST ------- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 10:42:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011042.l91Ag2Wj018665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-01 06:42 EST ------- BTW ver. 7.10.2 is out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 11:20:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011120.l91BKG8i023426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 Bug 276961 depends on bug 292821, which changed state. Bug 292821 Summary: Update to 1.2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292821 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 11:18:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011118.l91BIi26019164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From kyrsjo at solution-forge.net 2007-10-01 07:18 EST ------- The links in comment #42 appear dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 11:17:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 07:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011117.l91BHUSD019121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-01 07:17 EST ------- Well this package has been the first one that I did, I was not used to the bioconductor.org website. In fact the version 1.6.0 is out as stable http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.0/bioc/html/maanova.html and the version 1.7.1 is out as devel but the release of the version 2.1 of bioconductor will happen in October 5th. http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.1/bioc/html/maanova.html >The test suite warns: >* checking for unstated dependencies in R code ... WARNING >'library' or 'require' calls not declared from: > snow >See the information on DESCRIPTION files in the chapter 'Creating R >packages' of the 'Writing R Extensions' manual. >I'm not sure what this means or if it's a problem. This warning appears because I put this in the spec %{__sed} -i -e 's/\r$//' %{packname}/DESCRIPTION I tried to avoid to package snow that is only suggested and not required (and depends also on a lot others packages that depend again on others packages (sometime the same). I tried to avoid to package snow but without removing the R CMD check which is on the %check. I will have a look on the description and contact upstream about the license. Thanks Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 12:19:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011219.l91CJYTj031427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 08:19 EST ------- This version still ships the README, probably just an oversight. Please fix that before import. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 12:24:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011224.l91COt3b032345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 08:24 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru, I'll look into that and support them too if possible. I also have several other screensavers waiting for review so I'll check those too. Marc, if you don't mind doing a quick check on the next update when I post it, just to make sure it stays "APPROVED", that would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 12:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011225.l91CP2oc028460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brlcad - BRL-CAD is a powerful constructive solid geometry modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-01 08:25 EST ------- Yes, but still in beta stage for tcl/tk 8.5... Anyway i've made a fully functionnal version but it is mostly unstable because of some hardcoded data path... I May start again for F-9 rawhide (with at least tcl/tk 8.5 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 12:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011232.l91CW6Cp029675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-01 08:32 EST ------- Looking into the code of the version 1.6.0 and 1.7.1 it appears that every where it is written : # copyright (c) 2001-2002, ... # written May, 2002 # Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (June, 1991) And the DESCRIPTION file says: License: GPL version 2 or later Then I will upload the version 1.6.0 with the corrected spec Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 12:36:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011236.l91Ca2RF030362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-01 08:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: londonlaw Short Description: Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 12:40:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011240.l91CeG7W002801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-01 08:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) > The links in comment #42 appear dead. No, its not dead; please try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 12:40:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011240.l91CefkO002902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-01 08:40 EST ------- sorry misread the files... I have mailed upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 12:59:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011259.l91CxmfH000984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 08:59 EST ------- Rex, now sip is updated (for rawhide/F-7, F-7 sip is perhaps waiting for being pushed), would you check if your PyQt srpm works with the newest sip? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 13:14:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011314.l91DEdf6003379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 Bug 190189 depends on bug 289321, which changed state. Bug 289321 Summary: sip: sipconfig.py includes wrong py_lib_dir (on 64bit archs) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289321 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 13:17:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011317.l91DHvvt008185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 09:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks Mamoru, I'll look into that and support them too if possible. > I also have > several other screensavers waiting for review so I'll check those too. If you ping me on those screensaver review requests, perhaps I can help you to support xscreensaver, gnome-screensaver as well as kxscreensaver. I want to get many screensaver hacks into Fedora as xscreensaver maintainer!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 13:28:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011328.l91DScbM005871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 09:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > If you ping me on those screensaver review requests, perhaps > I can help you to support xscreensaver, gnome-screensaver as well > as kxscreensaver. I want to get many screensaver hacks into Fedora > as xscreensaver maintainer!! No problem, I've put you in the CC field of the other screensaver reviews so you should be able to find them and see any comments when they get made. Additionally the BZ numbers are: BZ #313201 BZ #313211 BZ #313221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 13:47:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver for KDE simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011347.l91DlWhL012893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver for KDE simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 09:47 EST ------- Perhaps this can also support xscreensaver (so gnome-screensaver). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 13:53:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313211] Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011353.l91DrMJ5014024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313211 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 09:53 EST ------- This is for KDE screensaver only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 14:03:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 264641] Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011403.l91E3C9W016041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264641 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 10:03 EST ------- ping again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 14:11:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011411.l91EBPhW013953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2007-10-01 10:11 EST ------- Mamoru, I think I am all set now. AS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 14:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011434.l91EYP4P021070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 15:09:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011509.l91F9tn5027493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 11:09 EST ------- Okay, now I should be sponsoring you. Please proceed accoring to the "Join" wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 15:24:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011524.l91FOWHV029362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-10-01 11:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) I have updated the sources: http://theknight.co.uk/releases/tzclock-2.5.4-4.src.rpm This is a good learning experience! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 15:44:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011544.l91FiOCJ000906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2007-10-01 11:44 EST ------- Got it. So, here is a dumb question... well, another dumb question, from the wiki: To build Packages for Fedora Extras 6 or EPEL, you need Plague and for Fedora 7 and later (including devel) you need Koji. At work, I am on RHEL 5, my repos don't have koji, do I need F7 installed to use koji? Should I be able to grab the RPMs from a fedora repo, and install it on RHEL5... is that even recommended? Thanks, AS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 15:49:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 11:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011549.l91FnSRr004466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-01 11:49 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 16:05:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312371] Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011605.l91G5RCA007819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312371 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-01 12:05 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 16:15:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011615.l91GFKU4006644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 12:15 EST ------- Well, that is the first case! So I have only Fedora rawhide and don't have RHEL. However EPEL 5 seems to have koji http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/repoview/koji.html and perhaps you can use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 16:22:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver for KDE simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011622.l91GM8PI007895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver for KDE simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 12:22 EST ------- Would you check the following? http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/qstars/qstars-0.4-2.fc7.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/qstars/qstars.spec If your Kxscreensaver works well with the srpm above, I will proceed to review qstars. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 16:33:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011633.l91GX4DD009415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ansilva at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2007-10-01 12:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rpmrebuild Short Description: A tool to build rpm file from rpm database Owners: afsilva Branches: F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 16:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314161] New: Review Request: noip - Dynamic DNS client for no-ip.com Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314161 Summary: Review Request: noip - Dynamic DNS client for no-ip.com Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: brcha at gna.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://brcha.no-ip.org/repo/SPECS/noip.spec SRPM URL: http://brcha.no-ip.org/repo/SRPMS/noip-2.1.7-1.f7.src.rpm Description: This is the dynamic DNS update client for no-ip.com. When installed, you must first run /etc/init.d/noip config to configure the client and afterwards you may put it into the /etc/rc.d/rcX.d directory (chkconfig --levels 35 noip on). This spec is ported from PLD Linux, but the newer version is used than in PLD Linux. This is my first package and I would be grateful if somebody would like to be my sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 16:52:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314161] Review Request: noip - Dynamic DNS client for no-ip.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011652.l91Gq15b015616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: noip - Dynamic DNS client for no-ip.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314161 brcha at gna.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 16:54:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011654.l91Gs4kN013443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-01 12:54 EST ------- Chris, It seems you are not in cvsextras member and this is the first review request you submitted. Do you have any sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 16:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011658.l91GwcnC014307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From dlehman at redhat.com 2007-10-01 12:58 EST ------- - Use a URL for Source This will be decided by the details of the Fedora package hosting infrastructure. It may be a URL or it may be a tarball w/ revision control information as seen here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 - Fix URL When/if the package is accepted I will create a page on the Fedora wiki and reference it via URL in the spec file. No point in creating a dummy page since it is only temporary. - use smp_flags There is no need for mflags since there is no code to compile -- it is all python. I can add them if required, but it is not necessary. - Add comments to the ExcludeArch (I assume that there is no kdump support on this platforms so no bugreports needed) Fair enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 17:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011738.l91Hc9j2021137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-10-01 13:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) Hello, you are right this is my first review request and I don't have a sponsor. I have been a commercial coder for 20+ years working on nearly all the different PC OS's. I am currently developing telecommunications applications than run on Redhat EL. Hence my interest in Fedora and giving something back to the community. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 17:56:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011756.l91HuErL027110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From kyrsjo at solution-forge.net 2007-10-01 13:56 EST ------- Thanks, downloading now! It must have been my uni's firewall, which blocks FTP requests *silently* when you haven't logged into VPN properly... I forgot, and it looked like the server was down from my end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 18:02:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011802.l91I2dMl025317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-10-01 14:02 EST ------- In this case I can't approve this package because I'm not a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 18:32:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011832.l91IWWbv002750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mclasen at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-01 14:32 EST ------- look good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 18:34:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011834.l91IYC53003052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mclasen at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-01 14:34 EST ------- Matthias, want to have a look at this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 18:47:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011847.l91IlaPH006284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 14:47 EST ------- Here's the latest version. It's essentially indentical to Mamoru Tasaka's with some whitespace changes (easier on my eyes) and some minor alterations to the descriptions. Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/tempest.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/tempest-0-0.3.20070929.src.rpm If you could give it a quick glance over Marc and let me know if it's still approved. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver for KDE simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011905.l91J5sdD005585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver for KDE simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 15:05 EST ------- Thanks for that, it still works perfectly with KDE. Here's the latest version. I've just made a few whitespace changes and some minor changes to the descriptions, otherwise it's essentially identical to yours. Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/qstars.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/qstars-0.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:17:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011917.l91JHnlZ012616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 15:17 EST ------- Jason, I intend to review this in the next couple of days in return for Marc performing a review for me. I've assigned it to myself but as you've already made some suggestions, if you wish to perform a full review, of course feel free to assign it to yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:35:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011935.l91JZxpY016659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-01 15:35 EST ------- There is no shortage of things to review, so please do go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:40:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011940.l91JeJdM012575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-01 15:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:39:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011939.l91JdLW5012115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-01 15:39 EST ------- I suggest using the %bcond_with/%bcond_without macros. The autotools calls are unuseful now. RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -DLINT -Dlint" also is unused. The Url: is missing. You have forked ISC/BSD vixie cron. Now others, including other distros should also use the fork such that it becomes upstream vixie-cron. Did you contact the distros? Also did you advertise the fork on the relevant sites, like freshmeat? We really don't want to have a fedora/redhat only package. This is for upstream cron, but i say it here, since upstream is you: * You should replace the COPYING file with a file stating the license of most of the file, a MIT license. There is also a 2 clause BSD for popen.c. * You should reuse the doc/README file and remove what is said below To use this:... and replace with something relevant. Also change the url. You should also state clearly what you took as starting point. * you should move THANKS from doc/ to top directory. * the doc/FEATURES files should certainly be in the top directory. * in ChangeLog, the reference should certainly be to doc/CHANGES and not simply doc. Also there is a reference to a spec file, but no spec file. * In Makefile.am automake conditionals should be used to add conditionally the -lpam, -lselinux... Those conditionals should be set in configure.ac. * --with-etcdir seems strange to me. There is already sysconfdir? * selinux could be set in the default case on linux, but there should be a AC_ARG_WITH in linux too. Moreover it would be much better to have something like what is done for pam, that is autodetection of selinux libs. * also the audit stuff should be detected, not set unconditionally. * the unconditional AC_DEFINE are very strange. Either they should be in a header file, or a --enable-... should be added? * Use of AC_PREFIX_DEFAULT(/usr) is not a good idea in my opinion. Just leave it to autoconf. Same for CFLAGS and LDFLAGS. At least if you want to set LDFLAGS, verify that it is empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:42:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011942.l91JgJNj018068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-01 15:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011945.l91JjunN019086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-01 15:45 EST ------- I assume the ' in the Description was a typo? I added it without that in the Description. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011949.l91JncDK019507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-10-01 15:49 EST ------- I get this now when doing a mock build: make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libtune-0.13/db' SYMLINK include/base -> include/basedbs/base-2.6.21 SYMLINK include/distro -> include/distrodbs/distro-fc6.93 Combination fc/6.93 is not supported make: *** [include/distro] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libtune-0.13/db' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.61288 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011948.l91JmNZ4014351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-01 15:48 EST ------- http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools.spec http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools-3.3.1-5.fc8.src.rpm that should fix it, but I don't have a 64 bit system handy to verify -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:52:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011952.l91Jqdun015586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-01 15:52 EST ------- 2 notes for future requests: - Please use your fedora account name, not email address. - We no longer do FC-5 branches. FC-5 is end of life and no longer supported. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:58:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011958.l91JwQNt021646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mclasen at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-01 15:58 EST ------- License is still incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 19:57:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710011957.l91Jv1FR016730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(mclasen at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-01 15:57 EST ------- Looks good to me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:02:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012002.l91K2d09022494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-01 16:02 EST ------- fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:02:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290421] Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012002.l91K2lD3022558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290421 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 16:02 EST ------- * rpmlint: W: no-documentation OK as there is none/documentation in main TnL rpm * Package named correctly: YES * Patches named correctly: N/A * Spec file named correctly: YES * Licence(s) acceptable: YES * Licence field matches: YES * Licence file installed: NO (OK as not included upstream) * Spec file in American English: YES * Source matches upstream: YES * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: YES * %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: YES * Specfile legible: YES * Compiles and builds ok: YES * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A * Owns directories it creates: YES * Duplicate files: NO * Permissions set correctly: YES * Consistent macro use: YES * Separate -doc needed (for large docs): NO (no large docs) * %doc affects runtime: NO * Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: N/A * -devel requires base: N/A * Contains .la files: NO * Owns files it didn't create: NO * .desktop files included and installed correctly: N/A * Filenames valid UTF8: YES Looks good. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:17:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012017.l91KHnWh021341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-01 16:17 EST ------- Remi, will you continue the review now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:23:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251857] Review Request: figlet - ascii banner generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012023.l91KNJ3O027468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figlet - ascii banner generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251857 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-10-01 16:23 EST ------- Cheerfully withdrawn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012048.l91KmNwo031485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:46:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012046.l91KkSRF031395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2007-10-01 16:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libpano13 Short Description: Library for manipulating panoramic images Owners: bpostle Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012052.l91Kq44x032333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-01 16:52 EST ------- Fixed. http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/inchi-1.0.2-0.2.fc7.src.rpm http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/inchi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:55:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012055.l91KtRF2000497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 16:55 EST ------- * rpmlint: NO PROBLEMS * Package named correctly: YES * Patches named correctly: YES * Spec file named correctly: YES * Licence(s) acceptable: YES * Licence field matches: YES * Licence file installed: YES (OK as included upstream) * Spec file in American English: YES * Source matches upstream: YES * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: YES * %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: YES * Specfile legible: YES * Compiles and builds ok: NO [!! See below] * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A * Owns directories it creates: YES * Duplicate files: NO * Permissions set correctly: YES * Consistent macro use: NO [!! See below] * Separate -doc needed (for large docs): NO (no large docs) * %doc affects runtime: NO * Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: N/A * -devel requires base: N/A * Contains .la files: NO * Owns files it didn't create: NO * .desktop files included and installed correctly: YES * Filenames valid UTF8: YES 1. Macro use could improved by using %{name} on the source line and requires line to be consistent with your use elsewhere. 2. Does not compile properly due to missing buildrequires. You seem to be missing boost-devel It's worth mentioning but it segfaults for me on startup if /dev/dsp is in use. Otherwise it starts up correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:51:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012051.l91KptTe032251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-10-01 16:51 EST ------- ok, spec looks good. Package looks good. rpmlint clean. - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK - no output - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok (Bitstream Vera) - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Ok - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). Ok - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Ok (Upstream source is an unversioned zip file. The packager converts this to a date versioned tar.gz file and notes this in a comment above the source line) - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Ok - noarch - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Ok - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Ok - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Ok (no translations) - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Ok (No %{_libdir} libraries) - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Ok (package not relocatable) - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. Ok - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. Ok - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Ok - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Ok - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) Ok(no large docs) - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Ok - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Ok(No libraries) - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Ok (No static libraries) - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Ok (No pkgconfig) - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Ok (no libraries) - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Ok(No devel) - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Ok (No Libraries) - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Ok (no .desktop file) - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Ok - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. Ok - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Ok SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Ok - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 20:56:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012056.l91Ku00g027413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs- |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-10-01 16:55 EST ------- Ah, noticed two things: You need a Requires: fontconfig line since you call fc-cache Also the Source comment should be clearer stating that the archive comes in an unversioned zip package and that you convert it to a tar.gz and date stamp it. I'll approve for CVS. Please make these changes when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:05:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263181] Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012105.l91L5HWq028755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263181 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-01 17:05 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pecl-svn.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pecl-svn-0.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - removed license file - changed pecl name to lowercase-only - adapted fedora php packaging guidelines - removed redundant manual binary stripping - renamed patch0 - added missing dependency neon-devel -- I've been using this extension for a while and it works quite well for me, I'm using it in both standard and custom Phing tasks. Do you think it's not suitable for inclusion because of the apparently immature state it was left in once? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012118.l91LIF8p003558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235456] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012119.l91LJhqT003636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235456 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:20:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247557] Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012120.l91LKO3a031182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ice-dotnet - .Net runtime files for Ice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247557 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:20:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247268] Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012120.l91LKH5x031139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-proctor - Proctor is a tool for running unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247268 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:20:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248857] Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012120.l91LKeFt031235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: schedtool - A tool to query or alter process scheduling policy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248857 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:17:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012117.l91LHi7G030538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-01 17:17 EST ------- This one builds fine and rpmlint is clean. The issues I had are fixed. APPROVED Go ahead and apply for sponsorship and I'll take care of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:24:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012124.l91LOKD6004398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012122.l91LMCvp004244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 ------- Additional Comments From bernie at codewiz.org 2007-10-01 17:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > You need a Requires: fontconfig line since you call fc-cache Done. > Also the Source comment should be clearer stating that the archive comes in an > unversioned zip package and that you convert it to a tar.gz and date stamp it. Done. > I'll approve for CVS. Please make these changes when you check in. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:24:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012124.l91LOVJK031741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:43:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012143.l91LhSrr001682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 ------- Additional Comments From phil at sanslogic.co.uk 2007-10-01 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) Hi John, I've changed the License field to "GPLv2". Is there a preferred format? For example, GPL2 or GPLv2. > Skip the Requires: gd > 2, rpm automatically does the dep for libgd. Done and confirmed. Updated files are now here: Spec URL: http://www.firestorm.cx/files/fswebcam.spec SRPM URL: http://www.firestorm.cx/files/fswebcam-20070108-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 21:54:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012154.l91Ls8m6003008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 17:54 EST ------- Just noticed too, "non standard" buildroot. You should probably change this to: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 22:20:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012220.l91MKf99012062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 david at fetter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 22:26:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012226.l91MQe39007492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 18:26 EST ------- 1. It's usual to begin Patches at 0 and not 1. Not a problem but for the sake of commonality you might want to change it. 2. Patches should ideally include a brief descriptor in the filename, for example changing GREYCstoration-2.5.2.1.patch to GREYCstoration-2.5.2.1-dontstrip.patch 3. "non standard" buildroot. You should probably change this to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 4. Extraneous options in the %build section. Is there a reason why you're defining -DSUPPORT_LH7 -DMKSTEMP? 5. Your package will almost certainly fail to build on ppc64 and x86_64 because the makefile hard codes lib when they use lib64. One solution might be to use %ifarch statements and sed to substitute lib for lib64 where appropriate on 64bit archs. 6. Unnecessary options for %setup, just use: %setup -q 7. Unncessary buildrequire: gimp 8. Consider also installing GREYCstoration_gui.tcl with appropriate icon and in a sub package (eg GREYCstoration-gui) so it's not forced on anyone who just wants the command line or gimp version. 9. The makefile is broken with regards to parallel building. It doesn't cause the buildjob to fail but reverts to -j1 anyway. Probably because make doesn't realise it's calling itself. Ideally this should be fixed, but if not then drop %{?_smp_mflags} and add a comment in the SPEC about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 22:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012252.l91Mqli8010692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-10-01 18:52 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/perl-Net-IRC.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/perl-Net-IRC-0.75-2.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Oct 01 2007 Christopher Stone 0.75-2 - Add irctest and t/ to %%doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 22:59:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012259.l91MxZPX016704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-01 18:59 EST ------- I'm sponsoring you' there's no need for this ticket to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 23:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210758] Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012318.l91NIC69019262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210758 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mola.mp at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 23:19:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012319.l91NJG1S013705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-01 19:19 EST ------- 10. Oh and %{?dist} is not permitted in changelogs now AFAIK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 23:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012319.l91NJxbu013751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(thomas at apestaart.o | |rg) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 23:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226360] Merge Review: readahead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012322.l91NMRi8014287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readahead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226360 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-10-01 19:22 EST ------- Sorry, I was busy with some other stuff. > W: readahead conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/readahead.d/default.early > W: readahead conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/readahead.d/default.later Hmm... I'd like to keep these files updateable > W: readahead service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later > W: readahead service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early The "default-enabled" is expected behaviour. The problem with license is fixed in the latest package build (readahead-1.4.2-1.fc8). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 1 23:38:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710012338.l91NcpMW021879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-10-01 19:38 EST ------- Built fine for me in mock/x86_64/devel. However build ends with one warning (which might be caused by my local modifications to mock.config): + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf setools-3.3.1 + exit 0 error: Macro % has illegal name (%define) rpmlint has one minor complaint which you should fix before comitting to CVS: setools.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.3.1-4.fc8 3.3.1-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 00:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020004.l9204NBT019224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2007-10-01 20:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The place to look when deciding what to do with the Categories field in a > .desktop file is: http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Thanks, perfect... In fact, the latest version of one of the Fedora packages in my build environment is actually complaining about "Application" and stopping the build with an error :-) > Notice that there are main categories and sub categories. An application must > always have atleast one main category, and may have as many subcategories as one > one wants. > > In the case of audio applications, there also is this note in the table: > Audio An audio application Desktop entry must include AudioVideo as well > > So the minimal Categories field for an audio app is: > Categories=AudioVideo;Audio; > > Notice no Application!, Application is not a valid Category. > > If you want to further give hints for the menus what kind of application this is > , the following sub categories are candidates: > > Midi An app related to MIDI > Mixer Just a mixer > Sequencer A sequencer > Tuner A tuner > TV A TV application > AudioVideoEditing Application to edit audio/video files > Player Application to play audio/video files > Recorder Application to record audio/video files > > If that is not fine grained enough using X-foo Categories is a good solution. This is what I'm currently using (prepending "X-" to each, "_" is automatically changed to " " for the menu titles). Overlaps with the existing Freedesktop categories noted between square brackets: Audio_Tools Mixers [Mixer] Digital_Processing Drumming DSSI_Plugins Graphics_Apps Jack LADSPA_Plugins Lash MIDI [Midi] Miscellanea Multitrack Notation Players [Player] Programming Recorders [Recorder] Sequencers [Sequencer] Soundcard_Tools Editors Synthesis Trackers Video > As for adding some kinda finer grained menu for Audio stuff, take a look at the > games-menus package, that already does that for the Games menu. That's very good, I'll take a look and see how we could make that structure work for audio/music/midi apps. Do you think something like this would work for sooperlooper?: ---- # desktop file categories BASE="AudioVideo Audio" XTRA="X-Digital_Processing X-Jack X-MIDI Midi" ---- I erased Application, X-Fedora, etc and added Audio and Midi, but kept the X- tags I'm currently using so that the application stays in the proper place for users that have planetccrma-menus already installed. I could change planetccrma-menus to account for the overlap so that eventually something like "X-MIDI" can be dropped from the apps (and from planetccrma-menus or whatever it is called), and "Midi" used instead exclusively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 00:36:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314871] New: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alex at tvtransilvania.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/8/gimp-lqr-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/8/gimp-lqr-plugin-0.2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package is a plug-in for GIMP 2.2 and newer. It implements the algorithm described in the paper "Seam Carving for Content-Aware Image Resizing" by Shai Avidan and Ariel Shamir, which can be found at http://www.faculty.idc.ac.il/arik/imret.pdf This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 00:54:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] New: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: buytenh at wantstofly.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.wantstofly.org/~buytenh/tuncfg/tuncfg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.wantstofly.org/~buytenh/tuncfg/tuncfg-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains a utility for configuring the Linux TUN/TAP network driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 00:59:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020059.l920xRPt031693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 buytenh at wantstofly.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From buytenh at wantstofly.org 2007-10-01 20:59 EST ------- This is my first package. I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 01:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313211] Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020138.l921c9Gn003873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313211 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 01:39:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020139.l921dCdo003905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 01:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313201] Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020138.l921cROq030763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313201 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 02:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020201.l9221Ogr006730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mike at flyn.org) | ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-10-01 22:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new-1.3.11-2.fc8.src.rpm I'd like to get this thing approved. The objection regarding the configure/check warning is more appropriate to be submitted as a bug against new. I fail to see why this would be relevant to approving the package, other than violating Ralf's personal preferences. The message clearly says "warning," so it is obviously not fatal. I added --disable-static to my %configure line. As far as the name, new has been in development since 1999. It has been included in several distributions, including Fedora (I am only resubmitting it because the package was orphaned). No one has complained about the name until now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 02:02:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020202.l9222L9Z001426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-01 22:02 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 57587a48ddece7a995c6b138003ee798 Net-IRC-0.75.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01_minimal....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) + exit 0 + Package perl-Net-IRC-0.75-2.fc8 -> Provides: perl(Net::IRC) = 0.75 perl(Net::IRC::Connection) perl(Net::IRC::DCC) perl(Net::IRC::DCC::Accept) perl(Net::IRC::DCC::CHAT) perl(Net::IRC::DCC::Connection) perl(Net::IRC::DCC::GET) perl(Net::IRC::DCC::SEND) perl(Net::IRC::Event) perl(Net::IRC::EventQueue) perl(Net::IRC::EventQueue::Entry) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Select) perl(IO::Socket) perl(IO::Socket::INET) perl(Net::IRC::Connection) perl(Net::IRC::DCC) perl(Net::IRC::Event) perl(Net::IRC::EventQueue) perl(Net::IRC::EventQueue::Entry) perl(Socket) perl(Symbol) perl(strict) perl(subs) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 02:28:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020228.l922SbCD004959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-01 22:28 EST ------- The above url still has the wrong license. Forgotten push ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 03:38:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 23:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245488] Review Request: maradns - security-aware DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020338.l923cPAZ014663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maradns - security-aware DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245488 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-10-01 23:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/maradns.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/maradns-1.2.12.08-1.fc7.src.rpm Updated to 1.2.12.08 Converted non-UTF8-encoded files to UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 04:01:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020401.l9241TMC022587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-10-02 00:01 EST ------- Submitted to livna -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 04:02:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225895] Merge Review: icon-slicer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020402.l9242TSj017376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: icon-slicer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225895 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rstrode at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-02 00:02 EST ------- Ray, do any of the split art packages still BR icon-slicer ? If not, we should just drop it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 04:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294321] Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020405.l9245ib6023257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294321 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-10-02 00:05 EST ------- Submitted to Livna (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 05:33:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 01:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020533.l925Xo5I028621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-10-02 01:33 EST ------- what is your Fedora release number (lsb_release -r)? Is it 6.93? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 05:49:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 01:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020549.l925nD9D002957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-02 01:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) >The objection regarding the configure/check warning is more appropriate to be >submitted as a bug against new. I fail to see why this would be relevant to >approving the package, other than violating Ralf's personal preferences. The >message clearly says "warning," so it is obviously not fatal. A configure script's warning normally indicates that a package is missing something which will cause it to functionally regress. With you seemingly being the upstream, I would have expected you to improve this rpm or to improve upstream's sources. > As far as the name, new has been in development since 1999. It has been > included > in several distributions, including Fedora (I am only resubmitting it because > the package was orphaned). Shipped by you, seeminly maintained in Fedora by you. Last patch applied to CVS on 2007-08-14 by you, submitted for review by you on 2007-07-29, ... ?!? > No one has complained about the name until now. Well, the package name is non-critical. What is critical is shipping /usr/include/new and /usr/bin/new. This is very likely to clash with future development out of your control. To put it bluntly: It's a short-sighted design. I am inclined to think you only have been lucky to not see your package clash with other packages, because all other developers in 30 years of *nix history have avoided to implement "new" and thereby left a gap which you now are jumping into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 06:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020627.l926R8R8007731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-10-02 02:27 EST ------- Yes. I will work on it this week-end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 07:07:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 03:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020707.l9277Ilk012474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 03:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Do you think something like this would work for sooperlooper?: > > ---- > # desktop file categories > BASE="AudioVideo Audio" > XTRA="X-Digital_Processing X-Jack X-MIDI Midi" > ---- > > I erased Application, X-Fedora, etc and added Audio and Midi, but kept the X- > tags I'm currently using so that the application stays in the proper place for > users that have planetccrma-menus already installed. I could change > planetccrma-menus to account for the overlap so that eventually something like > "X-MIDI" can be dropped from the apps (and from planetccrma-menus or whatever it > is called), and "Midi" used instead exclusively. Sounds good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 07:15:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 03:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020715.l927FW6V008467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-02 03:15 EST ------- Just working through the review now and will post when done, but one issue crops up. The upstream name is sdl-asylum rather than asylum. On the one hand renaming the package to sdl-asylum would keep it inline with upstream and distinguished from the original Archimedes game of the same name. On the other hand it would at a glance appear to be an sdl addon package, although true sdl addons would use the underscore so the likelyhood of a name collision with an actual sdl addon is not an issue. What is the rationale behind the name choice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 08:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 04:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020808.l9288q6g015933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From kyrsjo at solution-forge.net 2007-10-02 04:08 EST ------- I got a SELinux denial when building (at the very end), but it seems to have finished OK (exit 0). Info from "setroubleshoot browser": Summary SELinux is preventing /sbin/ldconfig (ldconfig_t) "search" to src (src_t). Detailed Description SELinux denied access requested by /sbin/ldconfig. It is not expected that this access is required by /sbin/ldconfig and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to require additional access. Allowing Access Sometimes labeling problems can cause SELinux denials. You could try to restore the default system file context for src, restorecon -v src If this does not work, there is currently no automatic way to allow this access. Instead, you can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ Or you can disable SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended. Please file a bug report against this package. Additional Information Source Context: user_u:system_r:ldconfig_t Target Context: system_u:object_r:src_t Target Objects: src [ dir ] Affected RPM Packages: glibc-2.6-4 [application] Policy RPM: selinux-policy-2.6.4-43.fc7 Selinux Enabled: True Policy Type: targeted MLS Enabled: True Enforcing Mode: Enforcing Plugin Name: plugins.catchall_file Host Name: sinus Platform: Linux sinus 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686 i686 Alert Count: 1 First Seen: tir 02-10-2007 10:02:20 CEST Last Seen: tir 02-10-2007 10:02:20 CESTLocal ID: f9b885b4-1f4c-426d-bdef-50d6c2bec85e Line Numbers: Raw Audit Messages : avc: denied { search } for comm="ldconfig" dev=sda6 egid=0 euid=0 exe="/sbin/ldconfig" exit=-13 fsgid=0 fsuid=0 gid=0 items=0 name="src" pid=20162 scontext=user_u:system_r:ldconfig_t:s0 sgid=0 subj=user_u:system_r:ldconfig_t:s0 suid=0 tclass=dir tcontext=system_u:object_r:src_t:s0 tty=pts0 uid=0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 08:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 04:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020820.l928KtE7022995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-02 04:20 EST ------- % rpmlint gnome-doc-utils-0.12.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm gnome-doc-utils.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python gnome-doc-utils.noarch: W: invalid-license GFDL+ According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing the short name is GFDL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 08:59:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 04:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301711] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020859.l928xecu028310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301711 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-02 04:59 EST ------- Sorry for the late answear Review for release 0.1.beta4.fc8: * RPM name is OK * Source RMagick-2.0.0-beta4.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Build fine in mock fc8 x86_64 * rpmlint is quiet (from fc6 x86_64 targeted at fc8 built) * Installation/Uninstallation is fine * runtime test went fine (16 checks have been run) This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 09:42:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 05:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020942.l929gxXv002199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2007-10-02 05:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > http://hrozkovi.cz/boxes-1.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Most issues are fixed. In line 45, you should replace '%{_prefix}/bin' with '%{_bindir}'. Some minor remarks: - There's a full stop missing after the %description. - No need to put a '/' before %{_prefix} or similar paths. - Default permissions for directories are not set in %defattr (fourth arg). - The patch file contains a whitespace change. - The patch file is named 'fix_smp_flags' but also comments the strip command from the Makefile. > The only thing I could not reproduce was the error message " Alleged > system-wide config file '/usr/share/boxes' is a directory" .. could > you please retry? I've tested basic functionality of boxes on F7 i386 > and rawhide x86_64 and on both arches it runs fine... Using your latest specfile, the package runs fine on F7 i386 and F7 x86_64. (The problem lies in the Makefile: The sed command to patch src/boxes.h is only executed if there's something newer than src/boxes.h. So, changing GLOBALCONF via the make commandline only doesn't have any effect unless that sed command is forced to be executed, e.g. by touching or patching the Makefile, as you do now.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 09:43:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 05:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710020943.l929hsrB029902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-02 05:43 EST ------- I can take the review... I will consider the cflags discution solved... (mock testing in progress on fc6 and devel x86_64 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 10:03:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021003.l92A3G6c000326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2007-10-02 06:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > As boxes installs an elisp (.el) file, shouldn't it be packaged according to... > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/EmacsenAddOns?highlight=%28emacs%29 > You mean this section: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs#head-9ca98ccf54aba75a0bbda73be9e4706d61155d08 Following this would indeed require creating two subpackages, named boxes-emacs and boxes-emacs-el. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 10:34:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021034.l92AYW73009720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-10-02 06:34 EST ------- I have fixed points 1), 2) 3), 5) 6) 7) and 8). For point 9), the code is licensed under GPLv2+ and/or Artistic 1.0 (it can be seen in file LEGAL). So I select GPLv2+, is that OK? For point 4), I have included the following files: AUTHORS LEGAL COPYING README and LICENSE. Legal explains the dual licensing, LICENSE is the Artistic 1.0 license and COPYING is the GPL license. SPEC: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz.spec SRPM: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz-0.9-0.2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 10:44:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313201] Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021044.l92Aig8L006483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313201 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-02 06:44 EST ------- OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - Package named correctly NA - Patches named correctly No Patches OK - Spec file named correctly to match base OK - License is valid OK - Licence field matches package OK *1 Licence file installed if supplied OK - Spec file in American English OK - Source matches upstream (md5) dfc6780c196883f25ec01b4663dfaca3 NA - Locales use %find_lang No Locales OK - %clean is present and correct OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Specfile Legible OK - Builds in Mock F7-i386 NA - %post/%postun calls ldconfig for sh libs No sh libs NA - Owns directories it creates Creates no directories OK - No duplicate files OK - Has %defattr and has correct permissions OK - Macros used consistantly NA - %doc does not affect runtime No Docs NA - Headers/static libs in -devel NA - .pc files in -devel NA - .so files in -devel NA - -devel requires base No -devel OK - Contains no .la libtool archive files OK - Does not own others files OK - .desktop files installed correctly OK - BuildRequires correct. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Package has rm -rf %{buildroot} at top of %install. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. F&-i386 OK *2 rpmlint output. NA - documentation in -doc package No documentation OK - final provides and requires are sane. OK - should have dist tag OK - should package latest version *1 No License file included by upstream, consider contacting upstream about this. *2 Warnings as expected are explained in review. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 10:50:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313211] Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021050.l92AoIav007661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313211 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-02 06:50 EST ------- OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - Package named correctly NA - Patches named correctly No Patches OK - Spec file named correctly to match base OK - License is valid OK - Licence field matches package OK - Licence file installed if supplied OK - Spec file in American English OK - Source matches upstream (md5) dd9bf4afca5bdbb95b6ae4f5cbe515b7 NA - Locales use %find_lang No locales OK - %clean is present and correct OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Specfile Legible OK - Builds in Mock F&-i386 NA - %post/%postun calls ldconfig for sh libs No sh libs OK - Owns directories it creates OK - No duplicate files OK - Has %defattr and has correct permissions OK - Macros used consistantly OK - %doc does not affect runtime NA - Headers/static libs in -devel NA - .pc files in -devel NA - .so files in -devel NA - -devel requires base No devel OK - Contains no .la libtool archive files OK - Does not own others files OK - .desktop files installed correctly OK - BuildRequires correct. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Package has rm -rf %{buildroot} at top of %install. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. F&-i386 OK - rpmlint output. 1 Warning as explained in review. NA - documentation in -doc package OK - final provides and requires are sane. OK - should have dist tag OK - should package latest version APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 10:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:52:47 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230164=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt73usb-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2571W/RT2671_A/B/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021052.l92Aqlmi012505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 11:02:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021102.l92B2Sh2009394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-02 07:02 EST ------- Ref point 7, /usr/bin/gimptool-2.0 is required during the build of the gimp plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 11:05:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021105.l92B58FG010075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-02 07:05 EST ------- - Why ladspa-caps-plugins and not ladspa-caps ? Well, i don't meant to change that as others plugins are already built with this scheme... - Might be interesting to patch Makefile to have install -p -m 644 caps.rdf * Cflags are OK * directory ownership are OK * build in mock (tested for fc6 and devel on x86_64) Seems good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 11:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021129.l92BTagU013663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-02 07:29 EST ------- I don't knwo to request mhgui to be in the buildroot for F-7. I've send a mail to the rel-eng but didn't get any answears now... maybe i need to tag makehuman for F-7 first?... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 12:22:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021222.l92CMUbs021906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 08:22 EST ------- ping to rel-eng team again. Or it may be faster that you request to move mhgui from testing to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 12:26:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301711] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021226.l92CQU4c022610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301711 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 08:26 EST ------- Thanks! Request for CVS admin: ---------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-RMagick Short Description: Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails Owners: mtasaka Branches: devel InitialCC: (nobody) Cvsextras Commits: yes ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 12:30:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021230.l92CUYAO023135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 08:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > - Why ladspa-caps-plugins and not ladspa-caps ? > Well, i don't meant to change that as others plugins are already built with > this scheme... Well because it contains plugin for ladspa, notice how CAPS stands for the C* Audio *Plugin* Suite, so thats why we have plugins in the name, as for the order of ladspa-foo-plugins, well thats how things have been done in CCRMA for a while, so lets keep it like that. > * Cflags are OK > * directory ownership are OK > * build in mock (tested for fc6 and devel on x86_64) > > Seems good Good, so can it be approved then, or do you want a new version? And if you want a new version what do you want changed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 12:44:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021244.l92CiteT025204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 08:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Ref point 7, /usr/bin/gimptool-2.0 is required during the build of the gimp plugin. Interesting, I tried building it without gimp in mock and it built successfully. I'll double check that though, it was getting late :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 12:55:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021255.l92CtTr5027352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-02 08:55 EST ------- Well, that's a minor problem with timestamp: - Might be interesting to patch Makefile to have install -p -m 644 caps.rdf ... I expect if someone do a presto repository it can help to have timestamp not been changed at install time for data... But anyway as this is minor i can approve it now if you patch it before tagging... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 12:54:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021254.l92CswTg026922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 08:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The upstream name is sdl-asylum rather than asylum. The upstream name is asylum, the project name is sdl-asylum > What is the rationale behind the name choice? rpm name usually follow upstream names where practical, of course there's a whole host of exceptions but I don't think this falls into one. Secondly, as you mentioned calling it sdl-asylum made be a little confusion so IMHO asylum is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 12:58:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021258.l92CwXd4031783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 08:58 EST ------- OK, I will fix the timestamp before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313211] Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021301.l92D1VVw032592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313211 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 09:01 EST ------- Thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:01:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313201] Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021301.l92D1Jwm032545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313201 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 09:01 EST ------- Thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021303.l92D3MWc032746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-02 09:03 EST ------- ----------- This package (ladspa-caps-plugins) is APPROVED by me ---------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313201] Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021305.l92D5WLO029070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313201 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 09:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aasaver Short Description: A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium Owners: oddsocks Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313211] Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021306.l92D6SKF029276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313211 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 09:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kbiof Short Description: KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver Owners: oddsocks Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:11:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315351] New: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315351 Summary: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/superiotool.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/superiotool-0-0.1.20071002svn2816.fc7.src.rpm Description: User-space helper tool which allows you to detect which Super I/O you have on your mainboard, and it can provide detailed information about the register contents of the Super I/O. A small companion to flashrom but more highly tailored for developer's specific tasks. Easy to review though -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021320.l92DKCTZ003363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-02 09:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8 & comment #13) Issues fixed: - Patch file removed. As you said it is not required. - Destop Entry fixed As i'm not getting access to fedorapeople.org (don't know why), the updated links are: Spec file URL: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/sirius.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/sirius-0.8.0-9.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:19:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021319.l92DJJv8031310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(spr at astrax.fis.ucm | |.es) ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-02 09:19 EST ------- Hello Sergio, Sorry for delay of my response. Can you please re-upload the spec file and source rpm? Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:24:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021324.l92DOLi8003961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-02 09:24 EST ------- The Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=180345 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:28:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021328.l92DSeSt004662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-02 09:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) The group is "ok" i think. Otherwise rpmlint would have given errors. You may check it out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:42:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021342.l92Dg0x0006880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-02 09:42 EST ------- forgotton pull in the checkout dir on rstrode.fedorapeople.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:44:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225895] Merge Review: icon-slicer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021344.l92Diskj007103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: icon-slicer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225895 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-02 09:44 EST ------- the icon sheets/ icon slicer stuff was just plain weird. I packaged the icons split up from the get go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:41:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021341.l92DfUka002987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-02 09:41 EST ------- Since i'm not getting acces to fedorapeople.org now (don't know why), the updated links are: Spec file URL: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/gurlchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/gurlchecker-0.10.1-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:49:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021349.l92Dnaab004063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 09:49 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-caps-plugins Short Description: The C* Audio Plugin Suite Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 13:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290421] Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021350.l92DojEL004569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290421 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 09:50 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: TnL-data Short Description: Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 14:30:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021430.l92EUq7F011199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-02 10:30 EST ------- Looks fine. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 14:52:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246748] Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021452.l92Eqlck018532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ohm - open hardware manager (as to be used on OLPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246748 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 15:12:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315481] New: Review Request: AstroMenace-data - Astromenace data and language files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315481 Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace-data - Astromenace data and language files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/AstroMenace/AstroMenace-data.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/AstroMenace/AstroMenace-data-1.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package provides game data and English, German and Russian language files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 15:13:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021513.l92FDx1B019196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-02 11:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/AstroMenace/AstroMenace.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/AstroMenace/AstroMenace-1.2.0-2.fc7.src.rpm data package review:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 15:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021537.l92FbqQi027336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-10-02 11:37 EST ------- Yup: + lsb_release -r Release: 6.93 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 15:45:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021545.l92FjOLQ025119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-10-02 11:45 EST ------- And I do a fresh install of FC7, the command shows: [root at hp-bl460c-01 SPECS]# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) [root at hp-bl460c-01 SPECS]# lsb_release -r Release: 7 So the build system is in some way borked. Let me re-init the whole mock system and make sure I am not doing anything wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:01:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021601.l92G1bkH028012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-02 12:01 EST ------- Bernardo: Can you add a CVS template/request here when you are ready and set the fedora-cvs flag to ? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:04:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313201] Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021604.l92G4xl5031590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313201 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-02 12:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:07:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313211] Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021607.l92G7bwr028925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313211 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-02 12:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:10:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021610.l92GAYk2000497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-02 12:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:12:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301711] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021612.l92GC8ei000595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301711 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-02 12:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021608.l92G8jM2032370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: qstars - A |Review Request: qstars - A |screensaver for KDE |screensaver simulating |simulating planets and |planets and asteroids in |asteroids in space |space Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 12:08 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (qstars) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:13:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290421] Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021613.l92GDuXu029889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290421 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-02 12:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:16:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021616.l92GGdQs001530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-02 12:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021631.l92GVVxl000346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 12:31 EST ------- Well, now sirius review request is still under review, however I will sponsor you. Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:24:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021624.l92GOskg031564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 12:24 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=213661) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=213661&action=view) Modified tempest.conf for xscreensaver * A unneeded line is found in tempest.conf (for xscreensaver). Please use the new tempest.conf attached. Other things are okay. You can proceed to CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:44:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273301] Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021644.l92GiqdU005750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273301 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 16:55:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301711] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021655.l92GtnEK007783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301711 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 12:55 EST ------- Rebuilt on rawhide, closing. Thank you for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:04:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226466] Merge Review: system-config-printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021704.l92H45FJ009283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-10-02 13:04 EST ------- system-config-printer.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-printer ===> Is this(noreplace) not needed? I copied that from some other package that places a file in that directory. Changed. system-config-printer.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm ==> Do you have any other workaround to avoid using rm? The rm is necessary (it removes a cache file), and not dangerous. system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/system-config-printer-libs-0.7.74.3/pycups-1.9.27/examples/cupstree.py ===> any reason to have this as valid. I saw most of packages installing example files with 0644 mode. Okay, changed. system-config-printer-libs.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-printer/cupshelpers.py 0644 ===> This MUST be solved. As you said its upstream. Can you provide a new SRPM with upstream fix? New upstream packaged. system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/newprinternotification.conf ===> Is this(noreplace) not needed? Copied from another package that places a file in that directory. Changed, we'll see if anyone complains. http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer/system-config-printer-0.7.74.4-1.fc8.src.rpm http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer/system-config-printer.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:09:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021709.l92H9Y3n010310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-02 13:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) Yes I've already created a Fedora account (username: makghosh). There "cla_done" is approved. I have also added "cvsextras" and "fedorabugs" group whose role status now shows "unapproved". Is it ok or I've to do something more? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:17:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021717.l92HHsff011896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 13:17 EST ------- Okay, now I should be sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021718.l92HIRYU009636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021718.l92HILCb012005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:27:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021727.l92HRUUC013731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 lam at lac.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lam at lac.pl ------- Additional Comments From lam at lac.pl 2007-10-02 13:27 EST ------- What you're packaging is not exactly AstroMenace. You're packaging a fork based of an open portion of AstroMenace and that fork is called OpenAstroManace. Either package real AM (newer version is available already, without GAME_VERSION_ID/BUILD change, but with many code cleanups/changes), or change package name appropriately. I'm aware that at the moment both games don't differ (most changes in AM look to fix build warnings), but time will tell if the fork is successful. BTW, wasn't there a tendency to change package names to lower case (SysVinit->sysvinit and some others)? Even if not, both upstreams use low-case file names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:27:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021727.l92HRPa0011634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-02 13:27 EST ------- Thanks a lot!! And is Sirius ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021733.l92HXWjn012874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-02 13:33 EST ------- Based on the timing of the announcement on f-g-l and the dates on the sf.net files, I assumed the sf.net project was owned by Viewizard. If this is not the case, I can easily change sources to Viewizard's upstream. The only reason I went with sf.net was because I figured that way if something happened to Viewizard, I could keep the same URLs. I'd actually be happier using the Viewizard upstream, if for no other reason than to reward them for good behaviour in GPLing AstroMenace. I can also change to all lc. Opinions from the cc: gallery? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:36:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021736.l92Habtn015415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 13:36 EST ------- sirius is not yet okay, I will post the issues later. Anyway for this package (gurlchecker) follow the procedure written on Join wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:38:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021738.l92HcaIp013879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 13:38 EST ------- I agree that using viewwizard as upstream is better then using then openastromenace sf.net project, using all lc also gets a +1 from me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:45:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021745.l92HjpEU015349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-02 13:45 EST ------- I'll take this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:51:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021751.l92Hpuul018029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-02 13:51 EST ------- Using xdg-open would be better than htmlview: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00025.html http://scop.fedorapeople.org/patches/xdg-utils/system-config-samba.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:51:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021751.l92HpQPh016369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-02 13:51 EST ------- Using xdg-open would be better than htmlview: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00025.html http://scop.fedorapeople.org/patches/xdg-utils/system-config-nfs.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:52:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226472] Merge Review: system-config-users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021752.l92HqsAm016464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226472 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-02 13:52 EST ------- Using xdg-open would be better than htmlview: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00025.html http://scop.fedorapeople.org/patches/xdg-utils/system-config-users.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021750.l92HolaZ016221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-02 13:50 EST ------- Using xdg-open would be better than htmlview: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00025.html http://scop.fedorapeople.org/patches/xdg-utils/system-config-services.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:56:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021756.l92HuN2h019251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-02 13:56 EST ------- Oh, and it looks real nice btw. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 17:55:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021755.l92HtfYK019126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-02 13:55 EST ------- A few picky SHOULDS: 1. using %find_lang. I don't see any included translations, so I'd suggest removing the extra bloat wrt %find_lang. 2. use %defattr(-, root, root, -) and MUST: 3. License: GPLv2 but missing %doc COPYING Otherwise, it's simple/clean, fix at item #3 (I'll trust you to do that). APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:06:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021806.l92I6VqL021133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AstroMenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-02 14:06 EST ------- Ok, I'll get on that. FWIW, I don't see anything more recent than 1.2 on the Viewizrd site, and that's what oamenace is at. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:04:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021804.l92I4t0U020517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |314041 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:12:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021812.l92ICeJq022175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katzj at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-02 14:12 EST ------- Also, might be good to talk to jeremy about getting this put on http://git.fedoraproject.org/ with the other themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:10:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021810.l92IAW87019658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-02 14:10 EST ------- The theme doesn't use a logo, yea? Probably don't need the system-logos Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:38:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021838.l92IcJoo024599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 14:38 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I'll use the new tempest.conf before import -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:37:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021837.l92Ibm3e024508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 14:37 EST ------- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:40:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021840.l92Iewcu027186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-02 14:40 EST ------- > 1. using %find_lang. I don't see any included translations, so I'd suggest > removing the extra bloat wrt %find_lang. That one was lifted from the fedorainfinity-gdm-theme specfile (which I used as the template), maybe the %find_lang should be removed there too? > The theme doesn't use a logo, yea? Probably don't need the system-logos > Requires. Shouldn't the Requires go away in fedorainfinity-gdm-theme too then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:43:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290421] Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021843.l92IhYtl025556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290421 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 14:43 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:40:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021840.l92Ien7Z025263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 14:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tempest Short Description: An OpenGL screensaver for KDE Owners: oddsocks Branches: FC6 F7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:39:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021839.l92IdPIO024762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 14:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qstars Short Description: A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space Owners: oddsocks Branches: FC6 F7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:44:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021844.l92IigWx027644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:43:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021843.l92IhfCw027525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-02 14:43 EST ------- I'm also going to go ahead and put GPL+ into the License tag because that's what the GDM theme now has and I sure don't care about what version of the GPL my changes are used under. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:46:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021846.l92IkU2P026335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-02 14:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme Short Description: Fedora Infinity KDM theme Owners: kkofler,rdieter,than Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no (Oops, actually putting in a valid CVS request this time. I accidentally set the flag and then commented about other stuff.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:58:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021858.l92IwBGY028093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-02 14:58 EST ------- Just for reference, this is what I intend to commit: Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/fedorainfinity-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/fedorainfinity-kdm-theme-1.0.0-2.fc7.src.rpm - Change License tag to GPL+ as for the GDM theme - Drop unneeded Requires: system-logos - Pass all 4 arguments to %%defattr - Drop unneeded %%find_lang as there are no translations anyway - Add COPYING as %%doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 18:54:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021854.l92IsR8N027387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 14:54 EST ------- For -9: * Tarball itself ------------------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost sirius]$ ls -al *gz */*gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 1623435 2007-09-13 12:34 sirius-0.8.0-7.fc7/sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 1647269 2007-09-22 00:45 sirius-0.8.0-8.fc7/sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 1647346 2007-10-02 21:19 sirius-0.8.0-9.fc7/sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 1623435 2003-08-22 19:37 sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz [tasaka1 at localhost sirius]$ md5sum *gz */*gz e01d079ca62aa3cc85f542bb5e9389a5 sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz e01d079ca62aa3cc85f542bb5e9389a5 sirius-0.8.0-7.fc7/sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz 51b3e3ea619ef43bc5b6cfa9fbda1776 sirius-0.8.0-8.fc7/sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz 84b76cc383a42f8321ccf9c6245de8d0 sirius-0.8.0-9.fc7/sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------------------ - Well, the tarball differs between -7, -8, and -9. Don't modify tarball itself! tarball used in srpm must be the same with the source written in spec file. If you have to modify some files in the tarball, patch against those files or so. * Fedora specific compilation flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. You can check the fedora compilation flags by `rpm --eval %opflags For this package, configure.in contains unneeded line --------------------------------------------------------- CFLAGS="-g -O3" --------------------------------------------------------- This overrides CFLAGS value. To pass correct cflags for this package, --------------------------------------------------------- make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" --------------------------------------------------------- is needed (i.e. again add CFLAGS option). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021904.l92J4mKE030938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-02 15:04 EST ------- Not so quick... The license tag must be fixed here, it says "GPL+", but bluecurve.cpp actually specified version 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:09:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021909.l92J9Jtg031869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-02 15:09 EST ------- Hmmm, is it actually OK to label this, the GDM theme it's based on and all the other redhat-artwork splitoffs as GPL+? The GPL says if there's a reference to "GNU General Public License" without a version specified, then any version can be chosen, but here the only reference to the GPL is the included copy of the GPLv2, so what actually applies here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:33:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021933.l92JXRGQ001872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-02 15:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gurlchecker Short Description: A Gnome link validity checker Owners: makghosh Branches: F-7 InitialCC: makghosh, wtogami, mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:43:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226662] Merge Review: yelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021943.l92Jh0uu005937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226662 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:40:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021940.l92JejDn003366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-02 15:40 EST ------- updated to GPLv2 I think almost all the code copyright Red Hat, Inc. anyhow, so it probably doesn't really matter, but good to pick what works and be consistent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:43:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021943.l92JhgFK003687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(duffy at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-02 15:43 EST ------- Mo, what license is Fedora Infinity under? Is it based on another theme? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:43:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226401] Merge Review: scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021943.l92JhW3m003646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226401 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:45:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226336] Merge Review: pyorbit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021945.l92JjF0x006669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyorbit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226336 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:44:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226345] Merge Review: python-numeric In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021944.l92Ji3Vg006168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-numeric https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226345 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:48:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226329] Merge Review: pycairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021948.l92Jm48v007044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pycairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226329 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:48:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021948.l92Jm7B1007090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:44:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021944.l92JiqAF003903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226332] Merge Review: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021945.l92JjrBQ004328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226332 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:44:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226343] Merge Review: python-ldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021944.l92JiUAM003874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-ldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226343 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqI67005819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:51:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021951.l92Jppr7005615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2007-10-02 15:51 EST ------- theres a bug in the gnome-screensaver part atleast: cat /usr/share/applications/screensavers/qstars-gss.desktop |grep Name Name=tempest typical copy&paste error i guess. id recommend to look at the other files aswell (umm it still doesent work in gnome-screensaver for me though) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqCwQ005766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225832] Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92Jq77R005674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225832 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225739] Merge Review: evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqBRn005751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225739 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225740] Merge Review: evolution-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqD3t005780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225740 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqFDO005794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqUOG005968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225833] Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqHEF005806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225833 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225829] Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqJdW005833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225829 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225684] Merge Review: devhelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqP2R005891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: devhelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225837] Merge Review: gnome-spell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqMOd005848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-spell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225837 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225737] Merge Review: evolution-connector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqSxk005928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-connector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225737 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225871] Merge Review: gtkhtml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqOqQ005873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225871 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225834] Merge Review: gnome-python2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqWsq006013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225834 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225738] Merge Review: evolution-data-server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqNts005861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-data-server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225738 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225741] Merge Review: evolution-webcal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqQxq005903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-webcal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225741 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:52:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225876] Merge Review: gtkspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021952.l92JqRq9005915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225876 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |f7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 20:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022002.l92K2KLc010290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 16:02 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:59:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315481] Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021959.l92JxCpf009610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315481 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: AstroMenace-|Review Request: astromenace- |data - Astromenace data and |data - astromenace data and |language files |language files ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-02 15:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/astromenace/astromenace-data.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/astromenace/astromenace-data-1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 19:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 15:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710021959.l92JxBcc009569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: AstroMenace |Review Request: astromenace |- Hardcore 3D space shooter |- Hardcore 3D space shooter |with spaceship upgrade |with spaceship upgrade |possibilities |possibilities ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-02 15:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/astromenace/astromenace.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/astromenace/astromenace-1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Addressed, main and data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 20:01:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313211] Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022001.l92K1m5K007993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313211 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 16:01 EST ------- Imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 20:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313201] Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022002.l92K2DKH008040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313201 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 16:02 EST ------- Imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 20:04:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022004.l92K4eJM008252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kwizart at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 16:04 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 20:21:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022021.l92KL8lh011531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 16:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (umm it still doesent work in gnome-screensaver for me though) Then simply killing gnome-screensaver support is a best solution. Honestly saying, I don't care about gnome-screensaver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 20:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022035.l92KZMti013821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-02 16:35 EST ------- Well, maybe the simple "vroot.h" method used in qstars (which works with xscrensaver) no longer works with gnome-screensaver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 21:02:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022102.l92L27GH020360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 bruno at postle.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 21:01:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316141] New: Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine-6.1u2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: In a typical network that does not have distributed resource management software, workstations and servers are used from 5% to 20% of the time. Even technical servers are generally less than fully utilized. This means that there are a lot of cycles that can be used productively if only users know where they are, can capture them, and put them to work. Sun[tm] Grid Engine finds a pool of idle resources and harnesses it productively, so an organization gets as much as five to ten times the usable power out of systems on the network. That can increase utilization to as much as 98%. Sun Grid Engine software aggregates available compute resources and delivers compute power as a network service. I anticipate that this package will need a bit a work. However, at this point it would benefit the most from more people installing and testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 21:04:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022104.l92L4xKD018396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-02 17:04 EST ------- I finally found the time to do a new version, as discussed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/freecol.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/freecol-0.7.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 21:27:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022127.l92LRTQS024359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-10-02 17:27 EST ------- It was a borked. Now 'mock' builds on my machine. yeeey! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 21:56:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022156.l92LugIo026164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-02 17:56 EST ------- Ok, looks pretty good to me, just one non-cosmetic issue remains: As java-1.7.0-icedtea is required, shouldn't the startup script try to enforce that (or another Java >= 1.7 implementation)? Currently it picks the system default which is set by alternatives and may point to an incompatible JRE. No good ideas how to do that though, but maybe hardwiring to /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0 instead of letting that happen would be an improvement, WDYT? Then, a couple of cosmetic notes: freecol.desktop still has the Encoding key (dunno if it was intentionally left). Comment in the .desktop could be improved, eg. simply "Comment=Open Source version of Colonization" or "Comment=Colonize America". The startup script still references wstx, which will result in some error spewage on the console. Perhaps remove now and add back when/if the dependency on wstx is added back? GPL+ seems correct, although the manual (doc/FreeCol.tex) is GPLv2+. I suppose upstream's intention is GPLv2+ for the whole shebang, maybe notify them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 22:38:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022238.l92McNvq002346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-02 18:38 EST ------- also, still approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 23:02:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226108] Merge Review: lsof In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022302.l92N2gtu006165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lsof https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226108 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kzak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-10-02 19:02 EST ------- I've added a note about tarball & script to the lsof.spec file. See lsof-4.78-6.fc8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 23:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022310.l92NAXTg007386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |225196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 2 23:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 19:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710022349.l92Nnc6h009052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-02 19:49 EST ------- I've played around a bit and i can't get it to work with gnome either. There seems to be two issues, the first one is that gnome appears to need the binary to be in /usr/libexec/gnome-screensavers otherwise it doesn't bother to execute it. Secondly, it simply just doesn't appear to be compatible. I can actually get it to run but nothing is displayed. So for now I'll remove gnome support before import. It can always be added later if a fix/workaround is discovered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:41:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030041.l930fmH9019718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-10-02 20:41 EST ------- Could you please chmod +r gridengine.spec ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225739] Merge Review: evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930neKQ017167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225739 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930nia3017230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930nmsb017312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225740] Merge Review: evolution-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930njhq017243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225740 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226343] Merge Review: python-ldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930nkTD017272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-ldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226343 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226332] Merge Review: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930nvnH017446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226332 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225837] Merge Review: gnome-spell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930ntMH017420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-spell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225837 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225829] Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930nsTM017408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225829 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225738] Merge Review: evolution-data-server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930nuYv017434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-data-server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225738 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:49:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030049.l930nxXS017481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225871] Merge Review: gtkhtml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930o0Df017498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225871 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225741] Merge Review: evolution-webcal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930o2we017867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-webcal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225741 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225876] Merge Review: gtkspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930o2ec017881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225876 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225737] Merge Review: evolution-connector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930o5N0017929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-connector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225737 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226336] Merge Review: pyorbit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930o6XK017953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyorbit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226336 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226345] Merge Review: python-numeric In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930o8wA017985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-numeric https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226345 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226662] Merge Review: yelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930oC1A018047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226662 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225834] Merge Review: gnome-python2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930oDrv018059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225834 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 00:50:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226401] Merge Review: scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030050.l930oFIY018099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226401 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 03:42:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 23:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030342.l933gvvQ013788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-02 23:42 EST ------- 1)Only some files have included license text, not all(e.g. some .h files have missing license text in them). Your License should be "GPLv2" 2)new package gives rpmlint error as blitz-devel.i386: E: info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir You have /usr/info/dir or /usr/share/info/dir in your package. It will cause conflicts with other packages and thus is not allowed. Please remove it and rebuild your package. ===>you need to remove that file in %install step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 04:22:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 00:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226466] Merge Review: system-config-printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030422.l934MvtA012897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 00:22 EST ------- 1) I don't see any use of adding update-desktop-database as no MimeKey specified in any of installed desktop files. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef 2) macro usage is not consistent. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf Rest looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 06:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226435] Merge Review: startup-notification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030604.l9364CKI031564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: startup-notification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226435 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 02:04 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 624b42f1fac5a12c543a079e2cd3b366 startup-notification-0.9.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + libstartup-notification-1.0.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + package startup-notification-0.9-3.fc8 -> Provides: libstartup-notification-1.so.0 Requires: libICE.so.6 libSM.so.6 libX11.so.6 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libstartup-notification-1.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + package startup-notification-devel-0.9-3.fc8 -> Requires: libX11-devel libstartup-notification-1.so.0 pkgconfig startup-notification = 0.9-3.fc8 + Not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 06:08:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226435] Merge Review: startup-notification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030608.l9368uoh027347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: startup-notification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226435 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 02:08 EST ------- APPROVED. Kindly build package and CLOSE this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 06:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030635.l936ZUjb003035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 bernie at codewiz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bernie at codewiz.org 2007-10-03 02:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nafees-web-naskh-fonts Short Description: Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script Owners: bernie,johnp Branches: FC-7 InitialCC: bernie Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 06:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030639.l936doXg030819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 06:51:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030651.l936pDq7004759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: guelchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |guelchecker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 06:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 02:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226360] Merge Review: readahead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030652.l936qkLj032501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readahead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226360 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 02:52 EST ------- thanks for build. Still I see some more cleanups needed here. 1) Check initscript scriptlets given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-97754e2c646616c5f6222f0cfc6923c60765133e Can you please explain using triggerpostun instead postun? 2) %files section should be like this %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,- ) %doc COPYING README lists/README.lists %{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/readahead.cron %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/readahead.conf %dir %{_sysconfdir}/readahead.d %{_sysconfdir}/readahead.d/default.early %{_sysconfdir}/readahead.d/default.later %{_sbindir}/readahead /sbin/readahead-collector -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 07:09:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030709.l93797IU006667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 07:08:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030708.l9378bjP006639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 03:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Ok, looks pretty good to me, just one non-cosmetic issue remains: > > As java-1.7.0-icedtea is required, shouldn't the startup script try to enforce > that (or another Java >= 1.7 implementation)? Currently it picks the system > default which is set by alternatives and may point to an incompatible JRE. No > good ideas how to do that though, but maybe hardwiring to /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.7.0 > instead of letting that happen would be an improvement, WDYT? > I already did that, see these 2 lines at the top of freecol.sh: " # freecol does not work with gcj JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-icedtea " > Then, a couple of cosmetic notes: > > freecol.desktop still has the Encoding key (dunno if it was intentionally left). > Oops, sorry about that, I did this yesterday evening when I was rather tired as I wanted to get it of my todo list and forgot about removing it. > Comment in the .desktop could be improved, eg. simply > "Comment=Open Source version of Colonization" or "Comment=Colonize America". > I like "Colonize America", I'll use that. > The startup script still references wstx, which will result in some error > spewage on the console. Perhaps remove now and add back when/if the dependency > on wstx is added back? > Same story again, late tired, will fix. > GPL+ seems correct, although the manual (doc/FreeCol.tex) is GPLv2+. I suppose > upstream's intention is GPLv2+ for the whole shebang, maybe notify them? I'll notify upstream about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 07:16:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030716.l937GNsN007806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 03:16 EST ------- Change Release line to Release: 2%{?dist} and Change defattr line to %defattr(-, root, root, -) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 07:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030722.l937MCIE008462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-03 03:22 EST ------- OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - Package named correctly OK - Patches named correctly OK - Spec file named correctly to match base OK - License is valid OK - Licence field matches package OK - Licence file installed if supplied OK - Spec file in American English OK - Source matches upstream (md5) e349a99bf099df818b0efc4f83359858 NA - Locales use %find_lang No locales OK - %clean is present and correct OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Specfile Legible OK - Builds in Mock F7-i386 NA - %post/%postun calls ldconfig for sh libs No sh libs OK - Owns directories it creates OK - No duplicate files OK - Has %defattr and has correct permissions ?? *2 Macros used consistently OK - %doc does not affect runtime NA - Headers/static libs in -devel NA - .pc files in -devel NA - .so files in -devel NA - -devel requires base No devel OK - Contains no .la libtool archive files OK - Does not own others files OK - .desktop files installed correctly OK - BuildRequires correct. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Package has rm -rf %{buildroot} at top of %install. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. F7-i386 OK *1 rpmlint output. NA - documentation in -doc package OK - final provides and requires are sane. OK - should have dist tag OK - should package latest version Move %doc to top of %files to aid readability *1 asylum.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/asylum 02755 asylum.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/asylum 0775 Both due to global hi-score table as explained above. *2 Not a blocker but definitely a suggestion. Some path details are "hardcoded" into the Makefile and makefile patch. While the location of /usr/bin /usr/share/asylum and /var/games/asylum are not likely to change anytime soon it would be more visible to make these changes with sed in the specfile making use of the available macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 08:25:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 04:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030825.l938P7xQ012601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|guelchecker |gurlchecker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 08:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 04:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030832.l938Wxas013659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 08:32:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 04:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030832.l938WRIK013607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 04:32 EST ------- and rpmlint gave me aget.i386: E: description-line-too-long Aget is a multi-threaded download accelerator like Flashget. It supports HTTP downloads and can be run from the console. ===>Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 08:35:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 04:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030835.l938ZFQl019672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030908.l9398pj3019080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-10-03 05:08 EST ------- 1) I have changed the License tag to GPLv2. 2) I don't see where in the specfile I'm including /usr/share/info/dir. This file doesn't appear in the manifest of blitz-devel (rpm -qlp yields only /usr/share/info/blitz.info.gz). Anyway, I have changed the line Requires: %{_infodir}/* to Requires: %{_infodir}/%{name} SPEC: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz.spec SRPM: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz-0.9-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:13:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030913.l939DjTB025058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-03 05:13 EST ------- For 3.3.1-5: * Dependency - For -devel subpackage ------------------------------------------------- Requires: setools = %{version}-%{release} ------------------------------------------------- This means -devel subpackage requires -libs, -libs-tcl, -gui, -console subpackages? * Desktop files - For example, /usr/share/applications/apol.desktop contains: ------------------------------------------------- Categories=Application;System;X-Red-Hat-Base; ------------------------------------------------- Here the categories "Application" "X-Red-Hat-Base" are deprecated and they should be removed. * Duplicate file entry You can check if duplicate file entry exists by checking "warning: File listed twice" message in build.log. - For -libs-python subpackage: -------------------------------------------------- %{pkg_py_lib}/ %{pkg_py_arch}/ -------------------------------------------------- This is the same directory on i386, x86_64 so these file entries are duplicate. The correct one is: -------------------------------------------------- %{pkg_py_lib}/ %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 %{pkg_py_arch}/ %endif -------------------------------------------------- - For -gui subpackage: -------------------------------------------------- %{tcllibdir}/apol_tcl/ %{tcllibdir}/apol_tcl/pkgIndex.tcl -------------------------------------------------- "%{tcllibdir}/apol_tcl/" entry contains "%{tcllibdir}/apol_tcl/pkgIndex.tcl" Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:19:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315351] Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030919.l939JpfI020821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315351 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 05:19 EST ------- Need some changes 1) Preserve timestamp by using -p option check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab 2) patch name should be superiotool-Makefile_cleanup.diff Remove extra hypen in patch name and apply patch in %setup as %patch -p0 -b .Makefile_cleanup 3) SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. 4) either use macros for all commands install,mkdir or remove macro use for rm, mkdir commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:29:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030929.l939TJEe027650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-03 05:29 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:30:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030930.l939UNCI028224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) | ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-10-03 05:30 EST ------- it's ok for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:35:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030935.l939Z0Ra028610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:34:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030934.l939Yrri023230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-03 05:34 EST ------- Well, what should we do with this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:43:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226360] Merge Review: readahead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030943.l939hWAR030129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readahead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226360 ------- Additional Comments From kzak at redhat.com 2007-10-03 05:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Can you please explain using triggerpostun instead postun? No :-) It's legacy from old versions. I think we needn't this trigger. So... removed. > 2) %files section should be like this Thanks! See & Try: readahead-1.4.2-2.fc8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 09:53:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315351] Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710030953.l939rSal031577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315351 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-03 05:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Need some changes > 1) Preserve timestamp by using -p option Done. > 2) patch name should be superiotool-Makefile_cleanup.diff > Remove extra hypen in patch name and apply patch in %setup as > %patch -p0 -b .Makefile_cleanup Done. > 3) SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. I'll drop a line to linuxbios-maillist later. > 4) either use macros for all commands install,mkdir or remove macro use for rm, > mkdir commands. Done. New svn. version 2818 (slightly changed output of ./superiotool -v command) http://peter.fedorapeople.org/superiotool.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/superiotool-0-0.2.20071003svn2818.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 10:21:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 06:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031021.l93ALkuJ030086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-03 06:21 EST ------- http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/aget.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/aget-0.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 10:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 06:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315351] Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031052.l93AqDMw001697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315351 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 06:52 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 02d6422ff79cb0a3cf69fab39b09c3f4 superiotool-2818.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package in source files. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + package superiotool-0-0.2.20071003svn2818.fc8 -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. SHOULD: You missed to remove make command macro. make sure to take care of that at time of cvs import. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 11:43:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 07:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031143.l93Bh8V0013474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 07:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 1d32390f5ea2ddd82dfbb1794cdfa92f aget-0.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 12:06:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226466] Merge Review: system-config-printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031206.l93C6vI0011821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-10-03 08:06 EST ------- Fixed in CVS. http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer/system-config-printer-0.7.74.4-1.0.0.1.fc8.src.rpm http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer/system-config-printer.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 12:42:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315351] Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031242.l93CgZTt016113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315351 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-03 08:42 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: superiotool Short Description: Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard Owners: peter Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: peter Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 13:02:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031302.l93D2SKR019061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 09:02 EST ------- New version with last issues fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/freecol.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/freecol-0.7.2-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 13:08:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031308.l93D8h5v020143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-03 09:08 EST ------- Of course, now it doesn't work: [limb at fawkes ~]$ astromenace --noAA --dir=/usr/share/astromenace/ AstroMenace 1.2 70914 VFS file was opened /usr/share/astromenace/gamedata.vfs Can't find VFS file /usr/share/astromenace/gamelang.vfs gamelang.vfs file not found or corrupted. There is no gamelang.vfs, but there wasn't in oamenace either and it worked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 13:29:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031329.l93DTrJG028472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-03 09:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aget Short Description: Console download accelerator Owners: sundaram Branches: F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 14:00:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031400.l93E0koC028520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-10-03 10:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-IRC Short Description: Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Owners: xulchris Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 14:08:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316881] New: Review Request: wavplay - Uncompressed wav file player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316881 Summary: Review Request: wavplay - Uncompressed wav file player Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/wavplay.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/testing/7/SRPMS/wavplay-1.4-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm Description: Uncompressed wav file player This package is still needed by some applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 14:12:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226435] Merge Review: startup-notification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031412.l93EC97d030580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: startup-notification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226435 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 14:27:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031427.l93ERmFk000975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-10-03 10:27 EST ------- As this route is proving hard I have added it to GnomeFiles: http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/TzClock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 14:30:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031430.l93EUCNR001718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 14:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031441.l93EfCqE003492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-10-03 10:41 EST ------- I used the Fedora build system and: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=181452 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 181452 build (dist-fc7, libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm): free 181452 build (dist-fc7, libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm): free -> open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 181455 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, i386): free 181453 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, ppc): free 181454 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, x86_64): free 181456 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) 181453 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, ppc): free -> open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) 181454 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, x86_64): free -> open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 181455 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, i386): free -> open (xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com) 181455 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, i386): open (xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 1 done 0 failed 181456 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 2 done 0 failed 181453 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 3 done 0 failed 181454 buildArch (libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 4 done 0 failed 181452 build (dist-fc7, libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 181452 build (dist-fc7, libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 14:47:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031447.l93ElM61008839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-10-03 10:47 EST ------- I tried FC8 but that didn't work that well: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=181477 FYI: FC8 is GA-ing on 8 November 2007, so I think making it build should also be addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 14:46:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031446.l93EkbKP008762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-10-03 10:46 EST ------- %bcond_with wasn't working for me. If you have experiences with this macro, I'd like to see patch of spec file. Why are autotools calls unuseful? URL has been added. Now are pam, selinux and audit optional. You've true with license, but I decided to change information files in other way. I can make an announcement on freshmeat, no problem. Thank you for your suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:06:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031506.l93F6eJs012714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031504.l93F4j5T008686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 11:04 EST ------- Rahul, Learn first how to use Bugzilla, at least how and when to set/reset flags. You reverted fedora-review+ flag set by me. Thanks mtasaka for correcting them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:05:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] New: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window- driven IM Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/centerim.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/centerim-20070625-1.fc7.i386/centerim-20070625-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Text mode menu- and window-driven IM CenterIM is a text mode menu- and window-driven IM interface that supports the ICQ2000, Yahoo!, AIM, MSN, IRC and Jabber protocols. A few random notes for reviewer: Please note that this package is based on existing CenterICQ package. rpmlint is quiet about the package. The ugly stable_ver and snapshot_ver macros will go away -- I'm in touch with usptream and will import the package only after the new stable version is out. I am aware of the fact that the package doesn't build in rawhide. This is due to the problem with curl. I filed a report (bug #316191) with a patch for it rather than doing a workaround (which would be ugly). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:10:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031510.l93FA8rY013767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225739] Merge Review: evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FI57C016564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225739 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FI5nj016576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225832] Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FI4ug016552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225832 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225740] Merge Review: evolution-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FI6IG016588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225740 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226343] Merge Review: python-ldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FI7Tr016600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-ldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226343 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FI8Sj016612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:09:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031509.l93F9Req013229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-03 11:09 EST ------- I looked at #314911, which ended up being tiny, and the only thing I saw was that it didn't use %dist in the Release. The package also doesn't match the upstream package (tuncfg vs. tun). Then I looked at #313361, which gets the errors: RPM build errors: user jbowes does not exist - using root group jbowes does not exist - using root user jbowes does not exist - using root group jbowes does not exist - using root File not found by glob: /var/tmp/python-zsi-2.0-1.fc8-root-root/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/*egg-info so the files in the srpm need to have their ownership fixed, and the files sections can be rewritten as: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc CHANGES README %{python_sitelib}/* %exclude %{python_sitelib}/ZSI/twisted %{_bindir}/* %files twisted %{python_sitelib}/ZSI/twisted Then the permissions on scripts need to be fixed: python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/dispatch.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/schema.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/writer.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/wstools/c14n.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TCnumbers.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/parse.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/auth.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/resolvers.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/wstools/__init__.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TCtimes.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/ServiceContainer.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/client.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TC.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/fault.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TCapache.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/generate/wsdl2dispatch.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/__init__.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/digest_auth.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TCcompound.py 0644 also the naming is different than the upstream (python-zsi vs. ZSI). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226329] Merge Review: pycairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIAmg016680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pycairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226329 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FICOT016717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225837] Merge Review: gnome-spell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIFi4016813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-spell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225837 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225833] Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FI9AC016627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225833 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225829] Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIEVx016777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225829 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226332] Merge Review: pygobject2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIHqZ016867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygobject2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226332 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIIUc016879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225738] Merge Review: evolution-data-server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIG4b016855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-data-server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225738 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225871] Merge Review: gtkhtml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIJsE016895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225871 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225741] Merge Review: evolution-webcal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIKUL016923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-webcal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225741 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225876] Merge Review: gtkspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIL8m016935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225876 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226336] Merge Review: pyorbit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FINNW016959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyorbit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226336 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225684] Merge Review: devhelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIKkt016911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: devhelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225737] Merge Review: evolution-connector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIMFV016947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-connector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225737 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIO7s016975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226662] Merge Review: yelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIRg0017015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226662 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226345] Merge Review: python-numeric In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIPXM016983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-numeric https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226345 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIQcS016999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226401] Merge Review: scrollkeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FISUX017041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scrollkeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226401 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225834] Merge Review: gnome-python2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031518.l93FIRlj017029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225834 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031520.l93FKq80017603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 11:20 EST ------- * Wed Oct 3 2007 Hans de Goede 070909-2 - Use %{name} everywhere for consistency - Add missing boost-devel BuildRequires - Exit gracefully when the game cannot open the soundcard - Use opengl-games-utils wrapper to show error dialog when DRI is missing Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/TnL.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/TnL-070909-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:35:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031535.l93FZHpa015739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-03 11:35 EST ------- sync'd my local rawhide mirror, testing builds now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031538.l93FcI3m020938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-03 11:38 EST ------- http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools.spec http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools-3.3.1-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:45:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031545.l93FjvpL022498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-03 11:45 EST ------- I set the flag on fedora-review instead of fedora-cvs accidently. Confusing docs don't help either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:48:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225737] Merge Review: evolution-connector (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031548.l93FmXGM017956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-connector (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225737 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: evolution- |Merge Review: evolution- |connector |connector (not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:49:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225739] Merge Review: evolution (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031549.l93FnKtt022864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225739 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: evolution |Merge Review: evolution (not | |started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:48:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225738] Merge Review: evolution-data-server (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031548.l93FmqH2022748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-data-server (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225738 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: evolution- |Merge Review: evolution- |data-server |data-server (not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:50:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225740] Merge Review: evolution-sharp (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031550.l93FoU2o023347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-sharp (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225740 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: evolution- |Merge Review: evolution- |sharp |sharp (not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031548.l93FmrmI022772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-03 11:48 EST ------- Oh, sorry for the noise about requiring icedtea/java-1.7 in the startup script, dunno how I managed to miss it. Even though I don't have a setup where I could actually test this package at runtime, 0.7.2-3.fc8 looks good and sufficiently similar to my earlier attempts at packaging freecol, so approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:51:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031551.l93Fpw45018773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gnome-pilot |Merge Review: gnome-pilot | |(not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:53:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225837] Merge Review: gnome-spell (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031553.l93Fr84N018872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-spell (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225837 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gnome-spell |Merge Review: gnome-spell | |(not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:50:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225741] Merge Review: evolution-webcal (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031550.l93ForLa018541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-webcal (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225741 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: evolution- |Merge Review: evolution- |webcal |webcal (not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:51:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225829] Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031551.l93FpWiD018735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225829 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gnome-pilot- |Merge Review: gnome-pilot- |conduits |conduits (not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:53:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031553.l93FrO2T018922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rvinyard at cs.nmsu.e | |du) ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-03 11:53 EST ------- libMini 8.4 stable (still no autotools support) Do you have recent email exchange with the author about merging your patches ? I wonder if your patch can allow cygwin build (maybe the problem to the merge ?!) I would be better to have them merged, but since the license is now here: the package can be acceptable... (even if you patch autotools) So i hope you can update the spec... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:56:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031556.l93FuAjw024454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: Pyrex |Merge Review: Pyrex (not | |started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031554.l93FsY1h023901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: libsoup |Merge Review: libsoup (not | |started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:55:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226336] Merge Review: pyorbit (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031555.l93FtmOZ024432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyorbit (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226336 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: pyorbit |Merge Review: pyorbit (not | |started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225876] Merge Review: gtkspell (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031554.l93FsC4C023877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225876 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gtkspell |Merge Review: gtkspell (not | |started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:53:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225871] Merge Review: gtkhtml2 (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031553.l93FrXrd023852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml2 (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225871 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gtkhtml2 |Merge Review: gtkhtml2 (not | |started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226343] Merge Review: python-ldap (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031556.l93FuZd0024530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-ldap (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226343 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: python-ldap |Merge Review: python-ldap | |(not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226345] Merge Review: python-numeric (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031557.l93Fv0IP024581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-numeric (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226345 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: python-numeric|Merge Review: python-numeric | |(not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:55:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226332] Merge Review: pygobject2 (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031555.l93FtBQp024298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygobject2 (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226332 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: pygobject2 |Merge Review: pygobject2 | |(not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226401] Merge Review: scrollkeeper (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031557.l93FvcBO019908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scrollkeeper (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226401 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: scrollkeeper |Merge Review: scrollkeeper | |(not started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 15:58:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031558.l93FwbW0024803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library Alias: libquikgrid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rvinyard at cs.nmsu.e | |du) ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-03 11:58 EST ------- Indeed, the license is there (update the license field to LGPLv2 ) Can you update the spec for version 5 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225832] Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0A8n020487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225832 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225739] Merge Review: evolution (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0BY5020500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225739 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225830] Merge Review: gnome-pilot (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0Cg3020513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225830 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0JO2020593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226329] Merge Review: pycairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0INW020581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pycairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226329 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226343] Merge Review: python-ldap (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0EUf020540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-ldap (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226343 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226046] Merge Review: libsoup (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0Ghp020552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsoup (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226046 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225740] Merge Review: evolution-sharp (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0DTk020527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-sharp (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225740 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225833] Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0Hw4020564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225833 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225837] Merge Review: gnome-spell (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0L0n020618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-spell (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225837 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225871] Merge Review: gtkhtml2 (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0P2Y020674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml2 (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225871 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225684] Merge Review: devhelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0QP7020691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: devhelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225738] Merge Review: evolution-data-server (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0MXo020631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-data-server (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225738 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225829] Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0KX0020606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-pilot-conduits (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225829 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226332] Merge Review: pygobject2 (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0NWp020644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygobject2 (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226332 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226339] Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0OjZ020657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: Pyrex (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226339 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225876] Merge Review: gtkspell (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0SOY020717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225876 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225741] Merge Review: evolution-webcal (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0Rml020705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-webcal (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225741 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0VKS020759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0Xou020784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226336] Merge Review: pyorbit (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0UHI020743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pyorbit (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226336 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225834] Merge Review: gnome-python2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0YoS020813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225834 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225737] Merge Review: evolution-connector (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0TWi020729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: evolution-connector (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225737 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226345] Merge Review: python-numeric (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0Wx0020768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-numeric (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226345 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226662] Merge Review: yelp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0Ysa020800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yelp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226662 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:00:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226401] Merge Review: scrollkeeper (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031600.l93G0Zg5020825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: scrollkeeper (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226401 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:05:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031605.l93G5acA026094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225833] Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031604.l93G4WS5025574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225833 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:04:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225832] Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031604.l93G48CU025556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225832 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:04:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225834] Merge Review: gnome-python2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031604.l93G4o0o021371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225834 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:06:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:06:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226662] Merge Review: yelp (not started) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031606.l93G6C8M021940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: yelp (not started) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226662 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: yelp |Merge Review: yelp (not | |started) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:14:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031614.l93GEoLb022924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-10-03 12:14 EST ------- Whoops, sorry about that. I've put updated versions there that build the drmaa java stuff too. Same release # at the moment, I'll start incrementing from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:19:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031619.l93GJHxb027866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From jean-pierre.dion at bull.net 2007-10-03 12:19 EST ------- Hi Konrad, Nadia will have a look at this ASAP to try make it fit for FC8 GA. jean-pierre -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031622.l93GMp89028593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|225196 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031624.l93GOrE8024613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-03 12:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > I looked at #314911, which ended up being tiny, and the only thing I saw was > that it didn't use %dist in the Release. The package also doesn't match the > upstream package (tuncfg vs. tun). > > Then I looked at #313361, which gets the errors: > ...... Please post your pre-review comments on those review requests, not on this review requests so that the submitter of those requests can check your comments and modify their srpms. After that, I will check your pre-review commentts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:47:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031647.l93GlWUI032391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bos at serpentine.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(bos at serpentine.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-03 12:47 EST ------- Ugh, still broken, must be something else now. Brian hasn't responded for 2+ mos, removing his review assignment so that someone else can step in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 16:57:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031657.l93GvhvI001437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-03 12:57 EST ------- (sorry, Bryan, my bad for the mispelling) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:01:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] New: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shenson at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/rats.spec SRPM URL: http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/rats-2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: RATS scans through code, finding potentially dangerous function calls. The goal of this tool is not to definitively find bugs (yet). The current goal is to provide a reasonable starting point for performing manual security audits. The initial vulnerability database is taken directly from things that could be easily found when starting with the forthcoming book, "Building Secure Software" by Viega and McGraw. RATS is released under version 2 of the GNU Public License (GPL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:12:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031712.l93HCprO031947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:10:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031710.l93HAxtg031765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-03 13:10 EST ------- Taking this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313361] Review Request: python-zsi - Libraries for developing web services in python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031710.l93HAUsV031734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zsi - Libraries for developing web services in python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313361 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-03 13:10 EST ------- I get build errors: RPM build errors: user jbowes does not exist - using root group jbowes does not exist - using root user jbowes does not exist - using root group jbowes does not exist - using root File not found by glob: /var/tmp/python-zsi-2.0-1.fc8-root-root/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/*egg-info so the files in the srpm need to have their ownership fixed, and the files sections can be rewritten with wildcard like: %{python_sitelib}/* %exclude %{python_sitelib}/ZSI/twisted so you can get all the files in the site lib, except for the part that goes in the twisted subpackage. Also you need to run rpmlint; I get permissions on scripts that need to be fixed: python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/dispatch.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/schema.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/writer.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/wstools/c14n.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TCnumbers.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/parse.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/auth.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/resolvers.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/wstools/__init__.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TCtimes.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/ServiceContainer.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/client.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TC.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/fault.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TCapache.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/generate/wsdl2dispatch.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/__init__.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/digest_auth.py 0644 python-zsi.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ZSI/TCcompound.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:17:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031717.l93HHrc5004788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-03 13:17 EST ------- done(In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #21) > > I looked at #314911, which ended up being tiny, and the only thing I saw was > > that it didn't use %dist in the Release. The package also doesn't match the > > upstream package (tuncfg vs. tun). > > > > Then I looked at #313361, which gets the errors: > > > ...... > > Please post your pre-review comments on those review requests, > not on this review requests so that the submitter of those > requests can check your comments and modify their srpms. > > After that, I will check your pre-review commentts. Comments added to the respective bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:14:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273301] Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031714.l93HExhm004172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-CSV - Class based CSV parser/writer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273301 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-03 13:14 EST ------- Package builds fine, rpmlint is clean. Actually, I'm a bit surprised that rpmlint doesn't complain about the duplicated dependency for perl(Text::CSV_XS). RPM finds one unversioned dependency itself, while you specify a versioned one. Frankly I'm not really sure how much of a problem this is. I know the same situation with Provides: is rather bad. Honestly I'd just drop the versioned dependency The oldest supported Fedora release has always had the required version of Test::CSV_XS so there shouldn't be any need for the versioned dependency. Oddly, RPM doesn't automatically find any dependency on Class:Accessor, but it's dependency detection is far from perfect. Review: * source files match upstream: bce148284947a2cf7375eac13260fbfe23cb6b8c215970e3af7049b36de5e354 Class-CSV-1.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires include a duplicate dependency: per(Class::CSV) perl(Class::CSV::Base) = 1.3 perl(Class::CSV::CSV_XS_Options) perl(Class::CSV::Line) perl-Class-CSV = 1.03-1.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Accessor) >= 0.18 X perl(Text::CSV_XS) X perl(Text::CSV_XS) >= 0.23 perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and the single included test passes: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:17:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313361] Review Request: python-zsi - Libraries for developing web services in python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031717.l93HHB1C000369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zsi - Libraries for developing web services in python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313361 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-03 13:17 EST ------- also I don't think this follows the naming conventions in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031715.l93HFm5A032630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-03 13:15 EST ------- I noticed that the %dist macro isn't being used in the revision, and the package name doesn't match the upstream (tuncfg vs. tun), please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines which has info on both of these points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:15:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031715.l93HFmaR032627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:20:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031720.l93HKLor001010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 13:20 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: freecol Short Description: The FreeCol multi-player strategy game Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:24:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031724.l93HOuWa005726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-03 13:24 EST ------- OK, patched that (similar prob as with the sip bug, dev's *assuming* python installed into prefix/lib): Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4-4.2-6.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Oct 03 2007 Rex Dieter 4.2-6 - 64bit QtDesigner patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 17:57:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031757.l93HvP5N006892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-03 13:57 EST ------- > You have them as BuildRequires but not Requires My mistakes, I forgot to add them at their place... There is the new SPEC and SRPM, however I still have no answer from either the maintainer of this package or the one of maanova... I have kept the license as LGPL for now.. SPEC: http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets.spec SRPM: http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets-1.14.0-6.fc6.src.rpm Thanks Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 18:13:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031813.l93IDnxM013226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-03 14:13 EST ------- probabably, sure. once pkg is imported, we (Kevin, Than, me) can/will request it via bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 18:14:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031814.l93IElrY009124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-03 14:14 EST ------- Assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 18:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031827.l93IRsqO015430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-03 14:27 EST ------- > via bodhi Via pkgdb, you mean, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 18:25:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031825.l93IPS0O015285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 18:26:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031826.l93IQPaq011237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-03 14:26 EST ------- I meant access to upstream too (the "themes" hosted projects) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 18:58:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031858.l93IwPJm019766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-03 14:58 EST ------- rpmlint spews a bunch of complaints because all of the .py* files are executable. Is there some reason they need to be? There's a test suite in the package and it seems to be runnable: %check export PYTHONPATH=./test python test/alltests.py Any reason why it isn't called? * source files match upstream: 49b75b85e3691e6e6a38d6372d0b7153efa929cf5df31abf1b612574c1b062f6 SQLAlchemy-0.3.10.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has complaints * final provides and requires are sane: python-sqlalchemy0.3-0.3.10-3.fc8.noarch.rpm python-sqlalchemy0.3 = 0.3.10-3.fc8 = python(abi) = 2.5 python-setuptools >= 0.6c3 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are all executable? * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Extra Eggs Guideline checks: * egg is built from source * egg doesn't download any dependencies during the build * EGG-INFO directory is included in package * compat package; easy_install -m is called in %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 19:09:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031909.l93J99Fk021348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 seg at haxxed.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) | ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2007-10-03 15:09 EST ------- It's needed for Second Life. I'm currently concentrating on OpenJPEG, but I've been busy with various RL issues. I'll get back to it... eventually. :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 19:59:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710031959.l93JxQiV025805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-03 15:59 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-3.fc7.src.rpm I have added a comment regarding the rpmlint error, and also mentioned emacs and vim-X11 as Requires. These are needed since the first time PIDA is run, it asks the user to select one of these two editors. Although it runs fine with GVim, it does not work well with the Emacs shipping with Fedora. Please advise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 20:24:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032024.l93KOSQJ029775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Sun Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-10-03 16:24 EST ------- Current qmaster install intructions: cd /usr/share/gridengine edit my_configuration.conf and and modify the ADMIN_HOST_LIST, SUBMIT_HOST_LIST, and EXEC_HOST_LIST as needed. ./install_qmaster -auto my_configuration.conf chkconfig sgemaster on service sgemaster start On exec hosts, a simple: chkconfig sgeexecd on service sgeexecd start should do the trick. Probably need to add this to /etc/services: sge_qmaster 6444/tcp Grid Engine Qmaster Service sge_qmaster 6444/udp Grid Engine Qmaster Service sge_execd 6445/tcp Grid Engine Execution Service sge_execd 6445/udp Grid Engine Execution Service You'll need to source /etc/profile.d/sge.sh or /etc/profile.d/sge.csh or get a new shell after installing the packages to set SGE_ROOT so the commands work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 20:34:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317321] New: Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317321 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-tap-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-tap-plugins-0.7.0-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: TAP-plugins is short for Tom's Audio Processing plugins. It is a bunch of LADSPA plugins for digital audio processing, intended for use in a professional DAW environment such as Ardour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 20:47:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232358] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032047.l93KlvDZ004590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232358 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 16:47 EST ------- Anthony, I understand / guess that you are awefully busy with other work. Since this bug isn't going anywhere fast, I'm closing it as a dead review and moving on with the new review request posted in bug 285331. I'll add you to the CC there, please drop a note there if you want to co-maintain this, then you can be added to the owners list when filing the CVS admin request for the CVS branch creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 20:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032048.l93KmFh2000931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 16:48 EST ------- Ok, bug 232358 isn't going anywhere fast, so I've closed it, and I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 20:57:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032057.l93KvSNO002330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-03 16:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) Issues resolved: > For -9: > > * Tarball itself The original tarball sirius-0.8.0.tar.gz is restored (md5sum: e01d079ca62aa3cc85f542bb5e9389a5). Also I have added a sirius-0.8.0-docs.patch to patch the required changes. > * Fedora specific compilation flags > - Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored. > You can check the fedora compilation flags by > `rpm --eval %opflags > > For this package, configure.in contains unneeded line > --------------------------------------------------------- > CFLAGS="-g -O3" > --------------------------------------------------------- > This overrides CFLAGS value. To pass correct cflags for > this package, > --------------------------------------------------------- > make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" > --------------------------------------------------------- > is needed (i.e. again add CFLAGS option). Added the CFLAGS option again to make tag for that useless line in configure.in. The updated links are: Spec URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sirius.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sirius-0.8.0-10.fc7.src.rpm The Koji scratch build is also successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=181839 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:03:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231861] Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032103.l93L3j1v006953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-03 17:03 EST ------- Ping on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032108.l93L8F0K007798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-03 17:08 EST ------- The BuildRoot tag is not right. I'll change it to BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) in the next spin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:12:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032112.l93LC6eh008814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-03 17:12 EST ------- License: GPL This is no longer valid. For this package the correct one is: License: GPL2+ Everything else seems fine to me. I'll approve this one you change the license tag. Thanks for the package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:11:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032111.l93LBniw008719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.23-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:11:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032111.l93LBmCe004667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-03 17:11 EST ------- jlint-1.23-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:17:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032117.l93LHavo010099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-03 17:17 EST ------- alex-2.1.0-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update alex' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:30:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032130.l93LUYEG007918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032145.l93LjwrW014450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-03 17:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Move %doc to top of %files to aid readability I prefer %doc near the bottom, for me thats more readable. It suits the logical order that I write specs. Installed files, doc files, ghosted files. Unless there's a requirement to change it, I'd rather leave as-is. > Not a blocker but definitely a suggestion. > Some path details are "hardcoded" into the Makefile and makefile patch. > While the location of /usr/bin /usr/share/asylum and /var/games/asylum are not > likely to change anytime soon it would be more visible to make these changes > with sed in the specfile making use of the available macros. Well as I need to patch the Makefile anyway, I don't see a great deal of advantage, otherwise it would make sense. It just turns it from a 1 stage process to a 2 stage process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032151.l93Lp8GN011160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-03 17:51 EST ------- Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/qstars.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/qstars-0.4-3.src.rpm Gnome support has been removed. I haven't bumped the EVR but can you give it a quick look to make sure its still OK. I guess the cvs flag got cleared because of additional comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 21:58:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032158.l93LwjcU016425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 17:58 EST ------- okay, I've done a full review: Must Fix: --------- * Doesn't build on devel (as already discussed by mail) I fixed thi by adding this line to %setup: sed -i 's/-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1//g' src/Makefile.* * Set vendor to Fedora when installing .desktop file * jack-rack.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/jack-rack-1.4.6/NEWS * License: should be GPLv2+ * .desktop file Categories, drop the Utility, what did CCRMA have here? If they had some special X-Foo entries, please preserve these. Should Fix: ------------ * Drop the "Encoding=.." from the ,desktop, this is deprecated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:06:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032206.l93M6hcD017832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 18:06 EST ------- I noticed that this seems kinda stuck and I would like to offer to help. The patch from comment #21 looks good, I haven't tried it, but it should work, If it doesn't then the used define probably isn't getting set correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:20:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032220.l93MKxfY015570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 mhalcrow at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mhalcrow at us.ibm.com 2007-10-03 18:20 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ecryptfs-utils New Branches: F-8 I request that ecryptfs-utils be included in Fedora 8. This supports the eCryptfs filesystem in kernel versions 2.6.19 and higher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032220.l93MKq1b015531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-03 18:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/TnL-070909-1.fc8.src.rpm The URL is incorrect but I pulled down what I assume to be the right RPM. The buildroot hasn't been changed, please fix that before import. Package APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:30:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032230.l93MUGh6016863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-03 18:30 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: TnL Short Description: Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:35:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225679] Merge Review: dejagnu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032235.l93MZsOB017815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dejagnu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225679 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-10-03 18:35 EST ------- I committed version cleaned up per your comments. The testsuite problem is twofold: first, dejagnu self-testing module was handling C++ streams erroneously, which was resolved with a simple patch; second, mock doesn't give terminal to testsuite when it needs one. This was resolved with an ugly convoluted setup involving screen and temporary file. I'd like you to re-review the package again if possible, and either recommend better alternative, or ack current approach. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:39:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032239.l93MdQeY018138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-10-03 18:39 EST ------- imported and built. thx all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:40:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032240.l93MeVOb018570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:40:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032240.l93MeWh3018603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 Bug 256481 depends on bug 254211, which changed state. Bug 254211 Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:45:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032245.l93MjdO1019243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-10-03 18:45 EST ------- Starting... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:50:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032250.l93MohIZ023937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-03 18:50 EST ------- well as I said, both are style choices. approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 22:49:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] New: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dlutter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-rpm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-rpm-1.2.3-1.src.rpm Description: Bindings for accessing RPM packages and databases from Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 23:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032305.l93N5YEh025905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-03 19:05 EST ------- Not sure if you were waiting for an answer to that. If so, yes I need sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 23:16:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032316.l93NGp7d023211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-03 19:16 EST ------- There's no need to use the old FE-NEW/FE-REVIEW/FE-ACCEPT blockers any longer; we have the fedora-review flag for that now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 23:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032325.l93NPr9e024343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-03 19:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-sqlalchemy0.3.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-sqlalchemy0.3-0.3.10-4.fc7.src.rpm > rpmlint spews a bunch of complaints because all of the .py* files are > executable. Is there some reason they need to be? > Nope. I seem to be running across a setuptools bug. Patch sent to the setuptools mailing list and workaround added to this package. > There's a test suite in the package and it seems to be runnable: > > %check > export PYTHONPATH=./test > python test/alltests.py > > Any reason why it isn't called? > Now calling the testsuite. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 23:42:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032342.l93NgFli030314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-03 19:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: asylum Short Description: SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes Owners: oddsocks Branches: FC6 F7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 23:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032340.l93NeSo3026180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-03 19:40 EST ------- Thanks very much for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 23:51:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032351.l93Np9WT031524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 23:53:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032353.l93NrX97027782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |317641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 3 23:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710032352.l93Nq8ep027651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-10-03 19:52 EST ------- Mike, as I understand it, ecryptfs-utils is already in F8; the request above will get you a branch specifically for F8 rather than leaving it in devel (which eventually will become F9 after everything gets cloned off to F8) [root at newbox v4l-dvb]# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 7.91 (Rawhide) [root at newbox v4l-dvb]# rpm -q ecryptfs-utils ecryptfs-utils-18-1.fc8 >From jkeating's fedora-devel note today, "If a package isn't branched yet, builds from devel/ continue to go to dist-f8." -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 00:40:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040040.l940erkG005352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-03 20:40 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 00:45:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040045.l940j38k005863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper Alias: Zim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-03 20:45 EST ------- Please branch for F-8 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 00:45:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040045.l940jKtm001844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper Alias: Zim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 01:29:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040129.l941T0mi010671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-03 21:28 EST ------- Qianqian, please import and build when you're ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 01:32:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317321] Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040132.l941WvLc007758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317321 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-03 21:32 EST ------- Like other ladspa plugins did you miss in SPEC to use system ladspa.h ================================================================== # we want to use the system ladspa.h rm ladspa.h =================================================================== Change defattr to %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:32:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040232.l942WjH6019560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:29:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040229.l942T8Nf018854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 ------- Additional Comments From buytenh at wantstofly.org 2007-10-03 22:29 EST ------- The tun package contains Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris kernel modules, and a Linux userland configuration utility called 'tuncfg'. I am not packaging any of the kernel modules (d'oh), so I have named the package after the only piece of the upstream tun package that I _am_ packaging, namely 'tuncfg'. The Release field doesn't contain %{?dist} because tuncfg doesn't depend on anything, so we can just use the very same binary package for every distro release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:37:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040237.l942bXm2020515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:36:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040236.l942aG8v020389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-10-03 22:36 EST ------- sorry for the delay. Package was imported to devel/F-7/F-6 and built with no problems. I also pushed the package for testing on bodhi system; if it turns out no other problem, I will push it to release. one side question: where can I find the "CVE" string for this package? it was asked on Bodhi new update page, I can not find it on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAF -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:35:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040235.l942ZKgx015982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040240.l942eieJ021364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:40 EST ------- done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:39:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040239.l942d1mt020732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-03 22:39 EST ------- Thanks! You don't need to worry about CVE for this update - it is for security updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:42:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040242.l942glR6017036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:45:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040245.l942jJAE022241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:49:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040249.l942nIOS022519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:50:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040250.l942o2Jl018109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From dimi at lattica.com 2007-10-03 22:50 EST ------- Folks, any news on this item? It's getting a bit long in the tooth... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:53:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215865] Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040253.l942rdME018731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Zim - Desktop wiki & notekeeper Alias: Zim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215865 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:51:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040251.l942pHw4018490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:51 EST ------- Yeah, unless you want a F-8 branch now so you can keep a stable version for F-8 and move forward with a test version in devel/rawhide, there is no need to request an F-8 branch now. All current devel packages will be branched for F-8 before release. Please reset the fedora-cvs flag if you want such a branch now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 02:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 22:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315351] Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040257.l942v6GW023904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315351 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-03 22:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 04:38:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 00:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040438.l944cokX032277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-04 00:38 EST ------- Looks good; no more spew from rpmlint and the tests run fine: Ran 700 tests in 32.227s APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 04:53:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 00:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257061] Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040453.l944rjcC005981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-04 00:53 EST ------- I don't think this is really the proper forum for doing a patent review; all we can do is review the packaging. If you want to pass this to Red Hat's lawyers before importing, that's up to you. In the meantime, this is a clean package; it builds fine and rpmlint is silent. There's not much to it, really. I guess you can handle not using the dist tag; I don't expect that this package will need to change often anyway. * source files match upstream: 5cd55fa974b06bf89ee128137a969e58a8c6ea1df20b100ddb6b23a58682bec8 osslsigncode-1.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: osslsigncode = 1.2-2 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I haven't a clue how to test this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 05:13:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 01:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226360] Merge Review: readahead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040513.l945D2UN004094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readahead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226360 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 01:13 EST ------- oops forgot to edit review template. * initscripts scriptlets are used in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 05:10:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 01:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226360] Merge Review: readahead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040510.l945A0eX003577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readahead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226360 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 01:10 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but NOT for RPM. readahead.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/readahead.d/default.early readahead.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/readahead.d/default.later readahead.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later readahead.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_later readahead.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early readahead.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/readahead_early These can be ignored for this package. + source files match upstream. b1b087681c06b66a4e4c7e944336db readahead-1.4.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + package readahead-1.4.2-2.fc8 -> Provides: config(readahead) = 1:1.4.2-2.fc8 Requires: /bin/bash /bin/gawk /bin/sh config(readahead) = 1:1.4.2-2.fc8 libaudit.so.0 libauparse.so.0 libblkid.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libext2fs.so.2 procps rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 05:37:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 01:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226466] Merge Review: system-config-printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040537.l945bQ1Q007086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 01:37 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but Not for RPM. system-config-printer.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop system-config-printer.i386: E: no-binary These messages can be ignored for this package. system-config-printer.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog ==> These can be corrected at time of cvs import. + source files match upstream. 20b18338b46531b1b28602deb44aa07d pycups-1.9.27.tar.bz2 a332f8598c0a4afcc72123856733e273 system-config-printer-0.7.74.4.tar.bz2 b265be98565333de000309e14deea408 system-config-printer.console f5be82be51135cf46de5955695f67c0d system-config-printer.pam + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists but --libs exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop files are handled correctly in Makefile only so no need to have dekstop-file-install called in SPEC. + package system-config-printer-0.7.74.4-1.0.0.1.fc8 -> Provides: config(system-config-printer) = 0.7.74.4-1.0.0.1.fc8 desktop-printing = 0.20-7.fc7 system-config-printer-gui = 0.6.152 Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python config(system-config-printer) = 0.7.74.4-1.0.0.1.fc8 dbus-x11 desktop-file-utils >= 0.2.92 pirut pygobject2 pygtk2 >= 2.4.0 pygtk2-libglade system-config-printer-libs = 0.7.74.4-1.0.0.1.fc8 usermode >= 1.37 + package system-config-printer-libs-0.7.74.4-1.0.0.1.fc8 -> Provides: config(system-config-printer-libs) = 0.7.74.4-1.0.0.1.fc8 cups.so pycups = 1.9.27 Requires: /usr/bin/env config(system-config-printer-libs) = 0.7.74.4-1.0.0.1.fc8 foomatic libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcups.so.2 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpython2.5.so.1.0 python python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI app. APPROVED. Remember-> rpmlint complained some more extra messages now system-config-printer.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog ==> These can be corrected at time of cvs import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 05:58:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 01:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040558.l945wJ3h015031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-04 01:58 EST ------- Chris, thanks for your patience. Please see . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040601.l9461ee9015675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:01:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040601.l9461B32015630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 02:01 EST ------- (Resetting cvs flag) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:00:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040600.l9460ZhB015559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 02:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/qstars.spec > SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/qstars-0.4-3.src.rpm > > Gnome support has been removed. I haven't bumped the EVR but can you give it a > quick look to make sure its still OK. I guess the cvs flag got cleared because > of additional comments. Okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:00:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040600.l9460Mpf009814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:17:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040617.l946HQo7017473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 02:17 EST ------- Well, * This package is okay * Your pre-review seems good for initial comments. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (setools) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:52:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040652.l946qvgE021499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 02:52 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] New: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rbhalera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: This is a font package for lklug fonts which support sinhala language of Srilanka. This package is being split up from fonts-sinhala to reflect the upstream package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:53:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040653.l946rtCD015790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 02:53 EST ------- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 06:49:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040649.l946nPQm015171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 02:49 EST ------- * Well, still installing libpythonplugin.so is not good. make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.2/designer' install -m 755 -p "libpythonplugin.so" "/usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer/libpythonplugin.so" install: cannot create regular file `/usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer/libpythonplugin.so': Permission denied make[1]: [install_target] Error 1 (ignored) cp -f -r /builddir/build/BUILD/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.2/designer/python /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer/ Here libpythonplugin.so is surely rebuilt, however make tries to install the plugin directly under %_libdir/qt4/plugins/designer, which must be %buildroot%_libdir/qt4/plugins/designer/ * Still fails on ppc64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=181782 Please mark ppc64 as ExcludeArch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 07:31:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 03:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040731.l947V94C020555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-04 03:31 EST ------- Updated after Spec cleanup: Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 07:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 03:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040742.l947ghgi021964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 03:42 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (sirius) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 07:45:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 03:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040745.l947ji6w022471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 03:45 EST ------- Please rebuild this on devel, F-7, EL-5, request to koji on F-7, and don't forget to close this bug when done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 08:12:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225655] Merge Review: coreutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040812.l948ChT8000326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: coreutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225655 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-04 04:12 EST ------- Shouldn't this bug be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 08:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040810.l948AlCs032643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-04 04:10 EST ------- This bug should certainly be closed. It would be nice to have consolekit support, though. Is it planned upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 08:09:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] New: Review Request: calmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 Summary: Review Request: calmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rbhalera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: The calmus-fonts package contains fonts for the display of Hebrew from the Culmus project. This package is being split from fonts-hebrew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 08:17:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040817.l948H7rf001165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 08:16:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040816.l948G1bC027668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-04 04:16 EST ------- You can close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 08:49:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040849.l948nF8D032520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-04 04:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > CVS done. Thanks a lot!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 08:54:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 04:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225655] Merge Review: coreutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040854.l948stWN000865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: coreutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225655 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6.9-6.fc8 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 09:07:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 05:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040907.l9497GX0008930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-04 05:07 EST ------- Some minor issues resolved: * rpmlint: the updated rpmlint gave errors for IS0-8859 encoding of NEWS, THANKS ------------------------------------------- $ file * | grep ISO NEWS: ISO-8859 English text THANKS: ISO-8859 English text ------------------------------------------- Fixed this using "iconv" and added a patch gurlchecker-0.10.1-docs.patch * Desktop entry: removed "Application" from category. I fixed this using the patch again. * Updated the license tag to GPLv2+ That's it!! The updated links are: Spec URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gurlchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gurlchecker-0.10.1-2.fc7.src.rpm The Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=182693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 09:55:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 05:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317321] Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710040955.l949toPo010605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317321 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-04 05:55 EST ------- Both fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-tap-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-tap-plugins-0.7.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 10:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 06:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317321] Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041023.l94ANoS1014785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317321 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 06:23 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. e3e13df63627dcf54d0a96f8125df9ee tap-plugins-0.7.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge ladspa-tap-plugins-0.7.0-4.fc8 -> Provides: tap-plugins = 0.7.0-4.fc8 tap_autopan.so tap_chorusflanger.so tap_deesser.so tap_doubler.so tap_dynamics_m.so tap_dynamics_st.so tap_echo.so tap_eq.so tap_eqbw.so tap_limiter.so tap_pinknoise.so tap_pitch.so tap_reflector.so tap_reverb.so tap_rotspeak.so tap_sigmoid.so tap_tremolo.so tap_tubewarmth.so tap_vibrato.so Requires: ladspa libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) librt.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 10:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 06:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041048.l94AmZwa024197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-04 06:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sirius Short Description: Othello game for GNOME Owners: makghosh Branches: F-7 InitialCC: makghosh, mtasaka, rishi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 10:51:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 06:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041051.l94ApgbQ024769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: calmus-fonts|Review Request: culmus-fonts |- Fonts for Hebrew |- Fonts for Hebrew from | |Culmus project ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-04 06:51 EST ------- There are some updates Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 11:02:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310631] Review Request: wmnd - A network monitoring dock app for WindowMaker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041102.l94B2lNM020510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmnd - A network monitoring dock app for WindowMaker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310631 sfernand at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 11:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041108.l94B8qf2021470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 07:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=215681) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=215681&action=view) Modified SPEC. Attached is some more fonts packaging cleanups to SPEC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 11:09:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041109.l94B9LQk027300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Keywords| |i18n Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 11:13:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041113.l94BDA26027949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-04 07:13 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 11:13:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041113.l94BDOWS028022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-04 07:13 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 11:21:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255461] Review Request: purple-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for libpurple, pidgin, and finch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041121.l94BLgbS023585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for libpurple, pidgin, and finch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255461 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pidgin- |Review Request: purple- |plugin_pack - A set of |plugin_pack - A set of |plugins for pidgin |plugins for libpurple, | |pidgin, and finch ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-10-04 07:21 EST ------- Updated. Will remove the BR on diffutils once the whole buildsystem issue is cleared up. http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/purple-plugin_pack/purple-plugin_pack.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/purple-plugin_pack/purple-plugin_pack-2.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 11:39:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225864] Merge Review: gstreamer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041139.l94BdWsx025924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gstreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225864 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:10:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041210.l94CAtf4004452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-04 08:10 EST ------- Working through those now, will have an update shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:10:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 274891] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041210.l94CAL4M004406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-04 08:10 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libedit New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041210.l94CAl77030935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-04 08:10 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-password-generator New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:16:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041216.l94CGV9f031805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243607 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-04 08:16 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gengetopt New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239901] Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041216.l94CGv5d031894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-04 08:16 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: corkscrew New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:27:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041227.l94CRCh6006877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 08:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jd New Branches: F-8 ====================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:30:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041230.l94CUoIq007502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-04 08:30 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: bouml New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:32:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041232.l94CWI0G001904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:35:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041235.l94CZRk0008282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From mbarabas at redhat.com 2007-10-04 08:35 EST ------- Version: 3.5.14-2 /sbin/ldconfig -p | grep lftp liblftp-tasks.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/liblftp-tasks.so.0 liblftp-jobs.so.0 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/liblftp-jobs.so.0 There are libraries in the standard paths: /usr/lib64/liblftp-*.so.0.0.0 and therefore rpmlint yells, when there are no ldconfig postin(un) calls. chkconfig is removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:54:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041254.l94Cs2Ps005179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-04 08:54 EST ------- OK, double-checked, my build.log contains that too, install -m 755 -p "libpythonplugin.so" "/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/designer/libpythonplugin.so" install: cannot create regular file `/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/designer/libpythonplugin.so': Permission denied make[1]: [install_target] Error 1 (ignored) ... it's just not a fatal error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:52:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041252.l94CqNp6005018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-04 08:52 EST ------- Crazy, something must be different in my mock setup, because I certainly don't see that, see http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/i386 http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/x86_64 guess I'm going to have to give koji scratch builds a try. Regardless, I hope that quirks between build environments isn't grounds for blocking the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:56:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041256.l94CuOOF012038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 12:55:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] New: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rbhalera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: The paktype-fonts package contains fonts for the display of Arabic from the PakType by Lateef Sagar. This package is split from fonts-arabic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 13:05:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041305.l94D5c1v013659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2007-10-04 09:05 EST ------- np, my wife just had our third son this week, so I am out this week. But I will work on this stuff on Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 13:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041306.l94D6XgQ007585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |automake16-1.6.3-14 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-10-04 09:06 EST ------- thanks, closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 13:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041318.l94DInlL009297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-04 09:18 EST ------- Updated once again: Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 13:30:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041330.l94DU4eA011306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 09:30 EST ------- Although make says it is not fatal, the fact that libpythonplugin.so is not installed correctly should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 13:34:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041334.l94DYAQN011849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-04 09:34 EST ------- Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 13:43:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041343.l94Dhcfe013302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-04 09:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4.spec SRPM URL: http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4-4.2-7.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Oct 04 2007 Rex Dieter 4.2-7 - fix QtDesigner plugin install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 13:52:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041352.l94DqJ8h020996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-04 09:52 EST ------- oh, and just added ExcludeArch: ppc64 for now, until I get a chance to take a closer look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 13:55:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041355.l94Dt9qX021705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-04 09:55 EST ------- ping, cvsadmins (see comment #8 )? Been a couple of days now, kde spin needs this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 14:35:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041435.l94EZwaX028680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-04 10:35 EST ------- No worries, if you need any help with the patches let me know. I can test it on a 64bit system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 14:34:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041434.l94EYYPL022070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-04 10:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qstars Short Description: A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space Owners: oddsocks Branches: FC6 F7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 14:43:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041443.l94EhYis029797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 10:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > That's it!! The updated links are: > Spec URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gurlchecker.spec > SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gurlchecker-0.10.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Well, there seems to be some issues on this srpm. Hope I may post what I found before I go to sleep... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 15:21:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041521.l94FL1fi031812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 11:21 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (PyQt4) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 15:25:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225679] Merge Review: dejagnu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041525.l94FPMdS006090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dejagnu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225679 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-10-04 11:25 EST ------- Well, using screen in build is pretty ugly, but I can't think of a simpler way how to provide a tty to the script. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 15:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041530.l94FUZYo007308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-04 11:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) Okay...I am waiting for it. Though I did a cvs-commit in devel, F-7 and Koji build ($ make build), I don't think it would create any problem. I can do that again for the updated release with all the issues fixed :-) Also i haven't put gurlchecker in bodhi as yet. It's better to do after the issues are fixed...right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 15:30:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225679] Merge Review: dejagnu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041530.l94FUH2V001203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dejagnu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225679 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 15:31:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041531.l94FVg8r001439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-04 11:31 EST ------- Rock, thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PyQt4 Short Description: Python bindings for Qt4 Owners: rdieter,than Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 16:32:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041632.l94GWUGP019581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-04 12:32 EST ------- I'd be happy to give this a formal review in the next few days here unless someone beats me to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 16:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041633.l94GXCtn013821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Also i haven't put gurlchecker in bodhi as yet. It's better to do after the > issues are fixed...right? Yes. Well, for 0.10.1-2: * Possibly missing BuildRequires - I usually checks possibly missing BuildRequres by highlighting "no" string on build.log. Then: ---------------------------------------------------------- 246 checking whether to use CROCO library (CSS2 w3c validation)... requested 247 checking for CROCO... no 248 libcroco-0.6.pc not found 249 configure: WARNING: You requested libcroco support, but it doesn't seem to be installed. 250 checking whether to use TIDY library (HTML w3c validation)... requested 251 checking for tidyCreate in -ltidy... no 252 configure: WARNING: You requested libtidy support, but it doesn't seem to be installed. 253 checking whether to use CLAMAV library (virii scan)... requested 254 checking for cl_loaddbdir in -lclamav... no 255 configure: WARNING: You requested libclamav support, but it doesn't seem to be installed. 256 checking whether to use GNUTLS library (HTTPS check)... requested ---------------------------------------------------------- Perhaps libcroco-devel, libtidy-devel, clamav-devel will enable these missing support. - Also please check if this is desired. ----------------------------------------------------------- 293 Generate GTK doc (gtkdoc) : no ----------------------------------------------------------- * Redundant Requires ----------------------------------------------------------- Requires: gnet2, gnutls ----------------------------------------------------------- - Usually these types of Requires are not needed. rpmbuild checks the dependencies for libraries and adds them to Requires automatically. For this package, you can see: ----------------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -q --requires gurlchecker | grep '\(gnet\|gnutls\).*so*' libgnet-2.0.so.0 libgnutls.so.13 libgnutls.so.13(GNUTLS_1_3) ----------------------------------------------------------- So the dependencies for libraries in gnet2, gnutls are added, which will pull gnet2 gnutls packages automatically. For example: ----------------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -q --whatprovides libgnet-2.0.so.0 gnet2-2.0.7-10.fc8 ----------------------------------------------------------- * Perl module BuildRequires - For perl module BuildRequires, don't write the names of rpms directly, but write the module names needed for rebuild. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl In short: "BuildRequires: perl-XML-Parser" must be "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)" * Desktop file - must be installed (checked) by desktop-file-install (BR: desktop-file-utils needed). * Timestamp - This package installs some files from tarball directly (ex. png files) and perserving timestamps on those files is recommended. Check if ------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------- works (this method usually works for recent Makefiles). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 16:43:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041643.l94GhGgQ015841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 12:43 EST ------- Frank, I approved PyQt4 review request (bug 190189) and Rex requested for CVS branch, so PyQt4 will be imported soon. After that would you recheck your spec/srpm file and post on this bug if your spec/srpm still works (for you)? (by the way I would appreciate it very much if you create srpm, too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 16:45:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041645.l94Gj0D9015992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-04 12:44 EST ------- One note: Currently PyQt4 has "Exclude: ppc64". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 17:31:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226120] Merge Review: make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041731.l94HVQir029441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226120 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-10-04 13:31 EST ------- I cleaned up the spec per your comments and committed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 17:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041732.l94HW6dq029507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-04 13:32 EST ------- fyi, I think I just fixed that too (in qt4, see bug #246324) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 17:54:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041754.l94HsJJR027745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 13:54 EST ------- thanks for updates. will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 17:58:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226404] Merge Review: sed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041758.l94HwEXE001380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226404 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-10-04 13:58 EST ------- Thanks for review. Tidied up version commited, not built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 18:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041802.l94I2K3F029474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 14:02 EST ------- thanks for updates. will do full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 18:02:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041802.l94I2A7K029432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 18:23:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041823.l94IN2P1032758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-04 14:23 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sirius New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 18:53:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] New: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/nget.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/nget-0.27.1-5.fc7.src.rpm Description: nget is a command line NNTP file grabber. It automatically pieces together multipart postings for easy retrieval, even substituting parts from multiple servers and newsgroups. Handles disconnects gracefully, resuming after the last part successfully downloaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 18:54:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041854.l94IsfhU005735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-04 14:54 EST ------- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=183243 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 19:18:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041918.l94JI9pc010663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-04 15:18 EST ------- The debuginfo package comes out empty. I believe this is because the makefile strips the binaries: /usr/bin/install -c -s -m 0755 nget /var/tmp/nget-0.27.1-5.fc8-u22592/usr/bin /usr/bin/install -c -s -m 0755 ngetlite /var/tmp/nget-0.27.1-5.fc8-u22592/usr/bin This must be corrected; unfortunately this package uses autotools so I've no idea how you'd go about doing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 19:34:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041934.l94JYDDn013881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From itamar at ispbrasil.com.br 2007-10-04 15:34 EST ------- 1.4.12 released -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 19:39:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710041939.l94JdRQT014900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-04 15:39 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 20:19:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319191] New: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319191 Summary: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glaxium.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glaxium-0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Glaxium is an OpenGL-based space-ship "shoot-em-up" styled game. It is designed to provide the same feel as the old 2D games of that type, but with 3D for the special effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 21:14:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710042114.l94LEEwR001010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-04 17:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-sqlalchemy0.3 Short Description: Modular and flexible ORM library for python Owners: toshio lmacken Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 23:22:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710042322.l94NMwDa019522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-04 19:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 23:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710042319.l94NJZxk018925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-04 19:19 EST ------- As was mentioned on irc, can you remove any reference to "Othello" "Othello is a registered trademark of Tsukuda Original, licensed by Anjar Co., copyright 1973, 1990 Pressman Toy Corporation." Please reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? once thats in place? Also, unless you plan on releasing a development/test version, do you really need a F-8 branch now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 23:34:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710042334.l94NYjau025140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-04 19:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 4 23:52:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313481] Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710042352.l94Nq1ae027494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aget - Console download accelerator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313481 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 00:02:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 20:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050002.l9502h9Q028939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-04 20:02 EST ------- A test on 64bit would be good thanks. I have patched the makefile to stop it calling itself, hopefully this should address point 9. http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/GREYCstoration-2.5.2-4.src.rpm * Thu Oct 04 2007 Marc Bradshaw 2.5.2-4 - Fixed Buildroot, Patch, Build and Setup - Added GUI - Added support for more image formats in Makefile - Fixed build on systems with lib64 GREYCstoration-gimp.i386: W: no-documentation GREYCstoration-gui.i386: W: no-documentation Expected as there is no documentation for those components. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 00:24:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 20:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050024.l950OO84031869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-04 20:24 EST ------- I'm afraid that I haven't seen your sponsorship request come across, and a search didn't turn up a Fedora Account System ID that looks like it might be you, even though on IRC you said you already had one. Perhaps I just missed it; what's your FAS ID? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 00:45:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 20:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050045.l950j8Un002507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-04 20:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #128) > 1.4.12 released Yep, saw the announcement but I probably won't have time to build it until this weekend. I didn't see any security-related fixes in the release notes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 01:52:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050152.l951qS1r010979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-04 21:52 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 01:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050152.l951q489006776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-04 21:52 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 02:23:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050223.l952NNXh011176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-10-04 22:23 EST ------- Pushed to all branches. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 02:32:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050232.l952WqoI017331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2007-10-04 22:32 EST ------- Hi, Can you follow the install procedure given here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#head-3e899702195642d7d12483e0d73451b70e8d3e9c This will allow the egg information to work in Fedora 8 and beyond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 02:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050248.l952mpoe015466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-10-04 22:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: silo Short Description: The SILO boot loader for SPARCs Owners: ausil spot pjones Branches: devel InitialCC: jima Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 02:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050251.l952pkqX016140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-04 22:51 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/nget.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/nget-0.27.1-6.fc7.src.rpm Removing the '-s' option to install in Makefile.in fixed the 'empty debuginfo' issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 02:57:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050257.l952vvEW018581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-10-04 22:57 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 03:34:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 23:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050334.l953YhoI026740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 23:34 EST ------- we don't need fonts.cache-1 file. Remove it and submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 03:34:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 23:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050334.l953Yn4D026806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 23:34 EST ------- we don't need fonts.cache-1 file. Remove it and submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 03:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 23:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050334.l953Yk1k026773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 23:34 EST ------- we don't need fonts.cache-1 file. Remove it and submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 03:46:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 23:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050346.l953kdQq028464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-04 23:46 EST ------- Also, Source URL should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{fontname}/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz Remove Source1 as upstream tarball already provides LICENSE-BITSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 06:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 02:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050606.l95661eN013880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-05 02:06 EST ------- Done. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fuse-python.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fuse-python-0.2-4.fc7.src.rpm I've got some things to discuss: * I changed %files section according to the Packaging/Python/Eggs from Jan's variant when all files to package were explicitly named to more simplified form %{python_sitearch}/* - which variant is preferrable? Personally I like Jan's idea about explicit naming of all files but in the above example they use short version: %{python_sitearch}/* * What macro should be used? python_sitearch or python_sitelib? What are differences between these macros and which is prefferable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 06:20:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 02:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050620.l956KSYm015859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-10-05 02:20 EST ------- OK, shortest form is OK. python_sitearch macro is for architecture dependent files. Your package contains an *.so module for python, which is architecture dependent, this means, that it is correctly packaged into python_sitearch. Please use %{__python} macro. BuildRequires: python-devel can be dropped, because it is required by setuptools. Tested build on fedora-devel and fedora7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 06:39:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 02:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050639.l956dTRp017917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-05 02:39 EST ------- Ok, cleaned a bit. About macros - I decided not to use them at all. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fuse-python.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fuse-python-0.2-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 07:03:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050703.l9573gYC021066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-10-05 03:03 EST ------- Fixed - added support for fc8. SPEC URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/specfiles/FE/FE-13-3/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/srpms/FE/libtune-0.13-3.fc7.src.rpm Alos Matt suggested that when a kernel release or distro is not supported we should link against a "default" tunables DB: will be working on that soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 07:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] New: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/unrar.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/unrar-0.0.1-1.20070515cvs.src.rpm Description: unrar is a free software RAR archive extractor. It uses the GPL'd UniquE RAR Library by Christian Scheurer and Johannes Winkelmann. unrar is a simple command-line front-end to this library, and can list and extract RAR archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 07:38:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050738.l957c6hF024871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-05 03:38 EST ------- Scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=183984 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 07:53:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 03:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050753.l957rpOf027319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-10-05 03:53 EST ------- For the package change request, are you supposed to open a new bugzilla? I am just going by this and am not 100% sure. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#other -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 08:14:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 04:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050814.l958EEuG030900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-05 04:14 EST ------- Jon, Any luck on getting the official Astromenace to run, iow any luck on getting past the error from comment #9? Need help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 08:32:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 04:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050832.l958WgoZ001915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-05 04:32 EST ------- Are we using full absolute source paths anywhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 08:31:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 04:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050831.l958VPFS001809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 oliver at linux-kernel.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 09:27:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 05:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050927.l959RqS9011031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-05 05:27 EST ------- unable to verify source integrity as URL https://sourceforge.net/projects/paktype/ showed some other source files and SRPM contains paktype-20061222.tar.gz Is this Red Hat maintained upstream? If yes then specify in SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 09:24:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 05:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710050924.l959OHLI009847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-05 05:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Are we using full absolute source paths anywhere? Check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL There you will find "For the Fedora packager, this means that sources used to build a package should be the vanilla sources available from upstream. To help reviewers and QA scripts verify this, the packager needs to indicate where a reviewer can find the source that was used to make the rpm." And if Red Hat is maintaining source as upstream then check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-413e1c297803cfa9de0cc4c56f3ac384bff5dc9e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 10:43:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 06:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051043.l95AhI59022404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Sirius - |Review Request: Sirius - |Othello game for GNOME |Reversi game for Gnome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 10:56:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 06:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051056.l95AuKaN023791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-05 06:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > As was mentioned on irc, can you remove any reference to "Othello" > "Othello is a registered trademark of Tsukuda Original, licensed by Anjar Co., > copyright 1973, 1990 Pressman Toy Corporation." I have removed reference to "Othello" from following places (Also I replaced Othello word with Reversi): * Summary of this bug * Specfile * Desktop entry of sirius updating the patch sirius-0.8.0-docs.patch Is it Okay? Then I can put "fedora-cvs?" again The updated links are: Spec URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sirius.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sirius-0.8.0-11.fc7.src.rpm The Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=184127 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 11:02:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 07:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051102.l95B2InC024729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-05 07:02 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sirius Updated Description: Reversi game for Gnome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 11:35:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 07:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226120] Merge Review: make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051135.l95BZgh3029864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226120 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-10-05 07:35 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 11:35:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 07:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051135.l95BZEtE029810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2007-10-05 07:35 EST ------- The existing one is fine. You should also be able to use pkgdb https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb to give cvs access to other maintainers if you prefer to keep ownership of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 11:52:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 07:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226404] Merge Review: sed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051152.l95BqNAd032748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226404 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-10-05 07:52 EST ------- gawk is no longer needed in buildrequires, please remove it in next commit. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 12:12:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226418] Merge Review: sharutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051212.l95CCvHC003303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sharutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226418 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-05 08:12 EST ------- Also make %{?_smp_mflags} should be used unless it doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 12:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226418] Merge Review: sharutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051211.l95CBTkx003250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sharutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226418 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-05 08:11 EST ------- Additionally some issues: .gz in install-info scriptlets should be removed. You can add INSTALL='install -p' or the like to keep the timestamps of the man pages. There are checks, they should certainly be run in %check with make check I don't think that the following line, in the description is useful: Install sharutils if you send binary files through e-mail. rpmlint is not silent: sharutils.src:10: W: prereq-use /sbin/install-info sharutils.src:158: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr sharutils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot The GNU shar utilities for packaging and unpackaging shell archives. sharutils.src: W: invalid-license GPL sharutils.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sharutils-4.6.3/TODO sharutils.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sharutils-4.6.3/THANKS sharutils.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot The GNU shar utilities for packaging and unpackaging shell archives. sharutils.i386: W: invalid-license GPL sharutils-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license GPL A suggestion: replace %defattr(-,root,root) with %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 12:20:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051220.l95CKG9f004889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-05 08:20 EST ------- I think if I patch Main.cpp to match Main.cpp from the fork, it'll work, because I found where it's more permissive than the official version. Problem is, I'm having trouble generating a patch, as the official Main.cpp has tons of odd characters. Any thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 12:27:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051227.l95CRlpS005807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 12:24:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 08:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226109] Merge Review: ltrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051224.l95COHeZ004964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ltrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226109 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-10-05 08:24 EST ------- Any update on the testsuite? Adding a comment that it's currently broken and keeping it disabled is ok with me. CC="%CC" isn't needed for %configure, it will use the environment variable. But that's nitpicking. Everything else looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 14:02:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051402.l95E2kAL022112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-10-05 10:02 EST ------- The development tree now has compiz 0.5.2. Stewart, do you still want to do the review? Otherwise, I can take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 14:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225679] Merge Review: dejagnu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051410.l95EAhC5023691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dejagnu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225679 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-10-05 10:10 EST ------- Ok, after a bit of thought, the screen hack can be replaced with script from util-linux-ng. It would look better in spec. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 14:49:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051449.l95EnV5c030992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 Bug 240373 depends on bug 190189, which changed state. Bug 190189 Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 14:49:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051449.l95EnT4M030941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |nobody at fedoraproject.org Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-05 10:49 EST ------- imported, initial builds done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 15:02:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051502.l95F2Nr4002387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 15:01:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051501.l95F1rrC002255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-05 11:01 EST ------- (Reopening to reassign) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 15:02:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051502.l95F2OXH002427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 Bug 240373 depends on bug 190189, which changed state. Bug 190189 Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 15:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051501.l95F1tVI002303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 Bug 240373 depends on bug 190189, which changed state. Bug 190189 Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 15:10:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226120] Merge Review: make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051510.l95FA71e002986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226120 pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |F 8 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-10-05 11:10 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 15:20:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226404] Merge Review: sed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051520.l95FKi1w005971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226404 pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |F 8 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-10-05 11:20 EST ------- Committed & built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 15:47:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051547.l95FlRN8010985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-05 11:47 EST ------- Probably some kind of encoding problem, if you can attach them both to this bug I'll take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:01:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226466] Merge Review: system-config-printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051601.l95G1i5J013012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7.74.4-2.fc8 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:17:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051617.l95GHQUc016469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-05 12:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=217681) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=217681&action=view) Original Main.cpp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051618.l95GI8tY016530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-05 12:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=217691) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=217691&action=view) openastromenace fork Main.cpp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:19:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051619.l95GJJ2l016699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-05 12:19 EST ------- There you are. I could probably just use the forked version of this file only, but I'd rather patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:29:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051629.l95GTQ7q019260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-05 12:29 EST ------- Just opened them elsewhere. That looks like Cyrillic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:37:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320421] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320421 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwrite at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051642.l95GgGji021787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243607 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 12:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:43:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:43:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051643.l95GhxIw020954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 12:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239901] Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051644.l95GiWHD022004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: corkscrew - Tool for tunneling SSH through HTTP proxies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239901 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 12:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:45:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247417] Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051645.l95GjhDW022549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bouml - UML2 tool box to specify and generate code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 12:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:46:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 274891] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051646.l95GkEAe021762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 12:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:45:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245649] Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051645.l95Gj9LE021514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-password-generator - Graphical secure password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 12:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:44:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320421] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051644.l95Gilre021126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320421 cwrite at mail.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: - | | ------- Additional Comments From cwrite at mail.ru 2007-10-05 12:44 EST ------- RPM packages have been made using nano rpm for Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051648.l95GmpRY022930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 12:48 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 16:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051656.l95Gunne023555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 12:56 EST ------- Looks good. cvs done. Did you really need a F-8 branch? Right now those are only for folks that need to have a stable version for F-8 and check in major changes for the next devel cycle. All packages will get a mass F-8 branch before release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 17:14:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 13:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051714.l95HEFZJ026414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-05 13:14 EST ------- Okay...F-7 branch will be fine for now. And you can give me the F-8 branch later as you say before F8 release :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 17:18:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 13:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051718.l95HIgW1028359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-05 13:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) Thanks a lot!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 17:43:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 13:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051743.l95HhjPd000491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #217681|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #217691|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-05 13:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=217761) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=217761&action=view) Patch bringing in the changes from the fork into the orig main.cpp I could generate a diff between the 2 just fine. Indeed they contain Cyrillic (probably Russian, seeing how there is a Russian translation) comments, but thats not the problem. The original one contains CRLF line endings for some lines, and normal LF only line endings on other, where as the fork only ahs the normal line endings. I've hand edited the diff to make it smaller, removing any changes resulting from the line ending differences. You may need to change these lines: --- Main.orig.cpp 2007-10-05 19:30:17.000000000 +0200 +++ Main.fork.cpp 2007-10-05 19:32:55.000000000 +0200 To something like: --- Astromenace-version/src/Main.orig.cpp 2007-10-05 19:30:17.000000000 +0200 +++ Astromenace-version/src/Main.fork.cpp 2007-10-05 19:32:55.000000000 +0200 So that you can use %patch -p1 as is normal. Note I gzipped the diff to make sure bugzilla doesn't mess with the line endings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 18:05:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051805.l95I54mH002799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-05 14:05 EST ------- I got it. Turns out the problem was PuTTY. Now that I'm using Gnome-terminal/FreeNX, it's displaying correctly. I'll try applying it and let you know what I find. Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 18:21:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051821.l95ILW1N005599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-05 14:21 EST ------- Ok just to let you know that I'm still looking at it but there's a few more issues. It does compile on 64bit archs now but not devel so there's some bug fixing to do, I'll look into that and figure out why. Secondly you're missing at least 1 requires but I'll post a more detailed finding shortly. Just keeping you posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 18:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051834.l95IY4bH007702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-05 14:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/astromenace/astromenace.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/astromenace/astromenace-1.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Patch applied, and it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 18:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320421] Review Request: cwrite - console editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051846.l95Ik7DA010942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwrite - console editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320421 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: cwrite - | |console editor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 18:45:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051845.l95IjL6W009832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 19:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] New: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 Summary: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca-0.4.0-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 19:43:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051943.l95JhBhV020639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |320741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 19:51:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051951.l95JpC2I021396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-05 15:51 EST ------- The package want to do: echo -e "\nladcca\t\t14541/tcp\t\t\t# LADCCA client/server protocol" >> /etc/ services; So I will need to fill a bug against setup, so it can be added... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 19:50:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051950.l95Jo50f021183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |285331 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 19:50:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051950.l95Jo4wh021154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |320661 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-05 15:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/jack-rack/jack-rack.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/jack-rack/jack-rack-1.4.6- 2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API There is another dependency with ladcca, But i don't know if it is required The others issues are solved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 19:57:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710051957.l95Jv2Sx023219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-10-05 15:57 EST ------- Not sure if I would like to see pulling in this one package pulling in emacs if I am going to us vim with it. Perhaps shipping a pida-vi and pida-emacs packages would be prudent. I'm not sure if Fedora has policy for handling this dependency situation but we should. However this should not be a blocker for getting pida into Fedora, only for future thought. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 20:11:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052011.l95KBEiS025649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-10-05 16:11 EST ------- I just rebuilt this on my F7 machine and ran: rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pida-0.5.1-3.fc7.i386.rpm pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/html/images 02755 pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs 02755 pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/html/images/icons/callouts 02755 pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/txt 02755 pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/html 02755 Looks like pida install is setting the set group guid flag. This is harmless but wrong and should be corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 20:09:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052009.l95K9xom025060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-05 16:09 EST ------- This is a clean package; I have only a couple of questions: Why do you rename "Changelog" to "ChangeLog"? Is there something wrong with the name upstream chose for this file? I see that you have a build dependency on cppunit so I figured you were trying to run the test suite; what you really need to run it is build dependencies on cppunit-devel and python, plus %check make test but unfortunately, while the test suite runs properly, some tests fail because subterfuge isn't there (and doesn't seem to be available in Fedora). It seems that it isn't as optional as the nget documentation seems to imply. So I guess there's no point in trying to run the test suite at this time, and so you should probably remove the cppunit build depdendency and add some commentary about the impossibility of running the test suite without subterfuge. * source files match upstream: 6ec0339c8e0e3e31504f5171f479f154d3c0ba2108377a0105fe4a5f5082ea69 nget-0.27.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires include unnecessary cppunit dependency. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: nget = 0.27.1-6.fc8 = libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libpcre.so.0()(64bit) libpcreposix.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) ? %check is not present; test suite doesn't seem to run properly. This should be documented. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. * statically links against uulib; properly BuildRequires: uulib-static -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 20:17:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052017.l95KHmaS025768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 20:29:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052029.l95KT4b8027884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 16:29 EST ------- Look for a full review in a few here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 20:32:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310631] Review Request: wmnd - A network monitoring dock app for WindowMaker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052032.l95KWHUB028984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmnd - A network monitoring dock app for WindowMaker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310631 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-05 16:32 EST ------- The source should be an url allowing to download the tarball. In that case, something along: http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/wmnd/releases/wmnd-%{version}.tar.gz At first sight the buildroot doesn't seems to be in the preferred ones. This package depends on trend, that doesn't seems to be in fedora http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/trend/ it would be nice to package it too. The CFLAGS are already set by %configure. You can use make install DESTDIR=... if you go that way, you could add INSTALL='install -p' on the make install command line to keep timestamp. And you'll have to remove the example config file that is better shipped as doc as you do. make %{?_smp_mflags} should be used unless it is broken. I suggest that you install the rpmdevtools package and have a look at the template in /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-minimal.spec Also some of the issue I post are explained in the guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines the package can use the snmp libs to have more functionalities. The README.Fedora doesn't seems to be useful to me, the dockapp will work out of the box as expected. It would be nice to ask the copyright holder of drivers.c to add a proper license notice. Not a blocker since it is clearly intended to be GPL. The license seems to me to be GPLv2+ and not GPLv2. rpmlint: wmnd.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog Suggestions: use %{_mandir}/man1/wmnd.1* to catch all the possible compressions (and no compression) replace %defattr (-,root,root) with %defattr (-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 20:30:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052030.l95KU0CJ027988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-10-05 16:29 EST ------- looking at the upstream tarball, all of their directories are setgid. I suggest doing a chmod on the whole expanded tree in the %install section and notifying upstream about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 20:35:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052035.l95KZ9rN029765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-05 16:35 EST ------- Weird; this package builds fine in mock but when I tried to build it on a rawhide machine outside of mock it failed: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /tmp/unrar-0.0.1 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/unrar-0.0.1-1.20070515cvs.fc8-root-tibbs/usr/bin/unrar Only dest dir longer than base dir not supported error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28856 (%install) I've no idea what's up there; perhaps something's gone wrong with that machine. It builds OK on an FC5 machine I have around. You should beware that livna already has a package named "unrar", and I would urge you to at least let them know that you plan to add a package with the same name. It has a much higher version number so I expect there to be some level of user confusion. It seems to me that because bundling libraries is generally a bad thing, it would make more sense if the "UniquE RAR Library" were packaged separately and this package just depended on it. Perhaps that will happen in the future. * source files match upstream: 08426f7eafda45cdea6e3928c232c3fc9f81fb5c754996acdfac9d0ece2bf439 unrar-free_0.0.1+cvs20070515.orig.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I tried it on a handy rar file and it seems to work fine. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 20:55:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052055.l95KtKbl000702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-05 16:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unrar Short Description: 3D Game of Foo Owners: sundaram Branches: F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 21:02:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052102.l95L2cuP002391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-05 17:02 EST ------- Correction in description New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unrar Short Description: RAR archive extractor Owners: sundaram Branches: F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 21:17:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052117.l95LHV88005228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 17:17 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License (GPLv2+) See below- License field in spec matches See below- License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: d37ae719280f654d5bad27fa23ce79bd safekeep-1.0.2.tar.gz d37ae719280f654d5bad27fa23ce79bd safekeep-1.0.2.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. What is the license here? The LICENSE file in the source says GPLv2.1 The spec has GPLv2+ The scripts themselves don't have any mention of a license. The web site says GPL http://safekeep.sourceforge.net/license.shtml Ideally can you get upstream to say if it's GPLv2 only, GPLv2+, or GPL+? A comment in the scripts themselves would be good. Also matching up so that all the above say the same thing would be good. 2. This is 1.0.2, but the website seems to have 1.0.1 as latest. Is this a preview release or they just haven't updated the web site yet? 3. rpmlint says: safekeep.src: W: strange-permission safekeep.spec 0600 safekeep-client.noarch: W: no-documentation safekeep-server.noarch: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/safekeep safekeep safekeep-server.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/safekeep safekeep safekeep-server.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/safekeep 0750 safekeep-server.noarch: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh safekeep safekeep-server.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh safekeep safekeep-server.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh safekeep-server.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh 0700 safekeep-server.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/safekeep/.ssh All can be ignored. 4. Perhaps you could include a README.fedora in the client subpackage explaining why it's currently empty? 5. The client subpackage has: Requires: openssh-server Requires: coreutils Requires: util-linux Are those really required? Why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 21:20:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052120.l95LK9rJ005431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-05 17:20 EST ------- > BuildRoot: %%{_tmppath}/... Should be BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 21:33:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052133.l95LXJrF007837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-05 17:33 EST ------- Ah. Great spot. I have fixed that now. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/unrar.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/unrar-0.0.1-2.20070515cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 22:03:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052203.l95M3RKM012239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-05 18:03 EST ------- If you don't mind I'll take it :) I got a 404 error with the SRPM above, I'll use this instead: http://devel.foss.org.my/~kagesenshi/repo/private/testing/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-0.5.2-0.1.fc7.src.rpm Let me know if I should be using another SRPM. + source files match upstream + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. - license field matches the actual license. "GPL" is no longer a vlid license. Please specify the version - See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing for more info. + license is open source-compatible, GPL License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. It isn't "silent", but the errors can be ignored. + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. - owns the directories it creates. It should own %{_datadir}/compizconfig and %{_libdir}/compizconfig + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + headers, pkgconfig files are in -devel package + no .la files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 22:03:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052203.l95M3PsH012210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-05 18:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > See below - License (GPLv2+) > See below- License field in spec matches > See below- License file included in package > Issues: > > 1. What is the license here? > The LICENSE file in the source says GPLv2.1 > The spec has GPLv2+ > The scripts themselves don't have any mention of a license. > The web site says GPL > http://safekeep.sourceforge.net/license.shtml > > Ideally can you get upstream to say if it's GPLv2 only, GPLv2+, or GPL+? > A comment in the scripts themselves would be good. > Also matching up so that all the above say the same thing would be good. > > 2. This is 1.0.2, but the website seems to have 1.0.1 as latest. > Is this a preview release or they just haven't updated the web site yet? The website itself needs to be updated. But sf.net project space has 1.0.2 listed as the most current release. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=185128 > 4. Perhaps you could include a README.fedora in the client subpackage > explaining why it's currently empty? Easily done. I'll get to it tomorrow. > 5. The client subpackage has: > Requires: openssh-server > Requires: coreutils > Requires: util-linux > > Are those really required? Why? okay.. the way this works is that the safekeep server process pulls updates from clients over ssh. The server sets up special ssh keys on the client specifically for this so the rdiff-backup process can be automated using passphrase-less ssh keys constrained to run only the rdiff-backup commands. So the client needs a running ssh server. I believe coreutils and util-linux are needed for helper commands that allow the server to interact with the client to setup the specialized ssh keys. I can dig into the code tomorrow and confirm the specifics of that. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 22:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052227.l95MRpJk016977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-05 18:27 EST ------- Wow, how'd I miss that one? Hmm, script checks that the components are there but doesn't care about syntactic bits like that. I guess I need to hack more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 22:34:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226179] Merge Review: MySQL-python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052234.l95MY4eN017322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: MySQL-python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226179 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora kylev at kylev.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kylev at kylev.com ------- Additional Comments From kylev at kylev.com 2007-10-05 18:34 EST ------- Caution: 1.2.2 has a bad bug that the author has not yet addressed. Please consider using my patch, otherwise connection.escape() doesn't work properly. The bug and a tested (by me) patch is here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1774101&group_id=22307&atid=374932 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 5 22:54:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710052254.l95MsKNm020313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-05 18:54 EST ------- Kevin, though "$ make tag" says that "sirius-0_8_0-11_fc8" and "sirius-0_8_0-11_fc7" tags are owned by me why is it that in Koji buildsystem [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4658] for all tags of sirius owner is orphan. Whereas for my other package gurlchecker, Koji buildsystem [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4605] says the dist-fc7 tag is owned by me. Also after "$ make build" was done, sirius is listed in "Your Recent Builds" in Koji but not there in "Your Packages". gurlchecker is there in "Your packages but not sirius. Is there something wrong? Please see to it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 00:01:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060001.l9601jik029778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-05 20:01 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 00:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060010.l960AlFP031342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-05 20:10 EST ------- Yeah, something didn't sync up right there. I think it's fixed now. Can you check koji and see if the problem is solved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 01:50:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 21:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060150.l961o1l4011189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-05 21:50 EST ------- Thanks for resuming this review I have changed the license tag and added created directories into %files SPEC: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig.spec SRPM: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-0.5.2-0.3.fc8.src.rpm btw .. I forgot to mention that i need a sponsor as this is my first package in Fedora repository .. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 03:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060305.l9635YJJ023048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-10-05 23:05 EST ------- Hi, I was unavailable for the last few days, and now here is the new set: Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby-0.5.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 03:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060351.l963pIZT028711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 bernie at codewiz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 04:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 00:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060417.l964H5LJ031918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s.adam at diffingo.com AssignedTo|s.adam at diffingo.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-06 00:17 EST ------- Well the package itself is ready to be imported, but I can't to sponsor you - I've unassigned the bug from myself and hopefully someone who can sponsor you will pick it up soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 04:22:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 00:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060422.l964MF5C032534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 04:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 00:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060426.l964Qljq001194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-06 00:26 EST ------- Yeah...Koji seems to work fine now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 05:39:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 01:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060539.l965dRJ1010211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-06 01:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Not sure if I would like to see pulling in this one package pulling in emacs if > I am going to us vim with it. Perhaps shipping a pida-vi and pida-emacs > packages would be prudent. On my Fedora 7 machine, PIDA does not work well with Fedora's Emacs. eg., on exiting Emacs, PIDA still needs a Ctrl-C to exit resulting in an ugly backtrace. >From the upstream PIDA lists, I understand that PIDA needs some features which are still in the Emacs CVS. So would it make sense to patch PIDA to run only with Gvim for the moment and remove Requires: emacs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 05:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 01:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060552.l965qhN8011622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-06 01:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > I just rebuilt this on my F7 machine and ran: > > rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pida-0.5.1-3.fc7.i386.rpm > > > pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/html/images 02755 Here is my rpmlint NEVRA and output: [rishi at freebook i386]$ rpm -q rpmlint rpmlint-0.81-1.fc7 [rishi at freebook i386]$ rpmlint pida-0.5.1-3.fc7.i386.rpm pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/optionsmanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/project/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/commander/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/grepper/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filemanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/statusbar/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/openwith/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowser/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/contexts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/rpc/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/help/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/appcontroller/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/bugreport/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/versioncontrol/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/editor/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/shortcuts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/sessions/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/buffer/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/notify/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/plugins/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/manhole/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filewatcher/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/vim/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/emacs/service.pida [rishi at freebook i386]$ I think I am using the most recent rpmlint package for Fedora 7. Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 06:23:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060623.l966N2Wq015723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-06 02:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > There is another dependency with ladcca, But i don't know if it is required > The others issues are solved Well, then we just need to get that reviewed first :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 06:27:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060627.l966RGTb015938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 06:26:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060626.l966QXAe016309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-06 02:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The package want to do: > echo -e "\nladcca\t\t14541/tcp\t\t\t# LADCCA client/server protocol" >> /etc/ > services; > So I will need to fill a bug against setup, so it can be added... Hmm, Then I gues we need a %post for now which does a grep for ladcca in /etc/services and if the grep fails, does the echo. Unless bug 230741 gets resolved before this review is complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 06:36:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060636.l966a70w017139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-06 02:36 EST ------- p.s. CCRMA pakcages can be found here: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/all/linux/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 06:35:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060635.l966ZiiJ017485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nando at ccrma.stanford.edu ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-06 02:35 EST ------- Hmm, I just noticed you didn't base this on the CCRMA package, please do a new pakcage based of the CCRMA one. The CCRMA one has a better patch for the deprecated jack API, and has a patch to no longer need the /etc/services entry, amongst other things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 08:34:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060834.l968YhL5000905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-06 04:34 EST ------- Luke: for me the patch works. What version of flac and flac-devel packages do you have? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 08:44:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060844.l968i0Ob002767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-06 04:43 EST ------- Another thing: # Conditionally apply patch to read ladspa plugins from lib64 dir. %ifarch x86_64 %patch1 -p0 %patch2 -p0 %endif Please never do this. Never make arch-specific patches: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-September/msg01518.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 08:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060848.l968mWi7003125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-06 04:48 EST ------- The License: tag is also not correct. GPLv2+ is the correct license here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 08:49:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060849.l968nVxb003219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-06 04:49 EST ------- The patch names should mention the version they were created against, like name-version-description.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 09:30:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 05:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060930.l969UxLr009526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-06 05:30 EST ------- This happens in hydrogen-0.9.3/plugins/wasp during the build ld -shared -o wasp_booster.so plugins/booster.o ld -shared -o wasp_noisifier.so plugins/noisifier.o ld -shared -o wasp_xshaper.so plugins/xshaper.o linking this way doesn't honor the Build id http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBuildId -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 09:32:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 05:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060932.l969WBA9009646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-06 05:32 EST ------- [root at gopher SPECS]# rpm -Uvh /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/hydrogen-0.9.3-7.1.fc8.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:hydrogen ########################## ( 60%) ########################################### [100%] /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60215: line 1: 29061 Segmentation fault (core dumped) update-desktop-database >&/dev/null [root at gopher SPECS]# Ayeeee :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 09:35:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 05:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060935.l969ZZOa010406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 qark at ospace.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(qark at ospace.net) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 09:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 05:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710060940.l969eh7T011179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-06 05:40 EST ------- The above is most likely not hydrogen's fault, I'll investigate that later... after the weekend. Below are patches I had to apply to hydrogen to get it built: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/patches/hydrogen/ I did not address all the issues mentioned above; just enough to get that built. Here's the SPEC file: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/hydrogen.spec Anthony: Are you still interested in finishing the package? Apart from the problems I made fixes for, are there any other outstanding problems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 10:39:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 06:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061039.l96AdMEs018317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-06 06:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Why do you rename "Changelog" to "ChangeLog"? Is there something wrong > with the name upstream chose for this file? ChangeLog seems to be the de-facto standard. Just some statistics from my Fedora 7 system: [rishi at freebook ~]$ find /usr/share/doc -name "ChangeLog" -print | wc -l 273 [rishi at freebook ~]$ find /usr/share/doc -name "Changelog" -print | wc -l 5 [rishi at freebook ~]$ find /usr/share/doc -name "CHANGELOG" -print | wc -l 5 Would it not be better to go with the more often used naming pattern? That would help in writing automated scripts, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 11:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 07:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061142.l96BgGta026518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ladcca - |Review Request: ladcca - |LAD Configuration and |Linux Audio Developer's |Connection API (LADCCA) |Configuration and Connection | |API ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-06 07:42 EST ------- Oups! ok! rebased on ccrma spec. I have a problem with this directory: %{_datadir}/dtds which package is supposed to own it ? I expect this is relevant to use it instead of %{_datadir}/ladcca/dtds, but i cannot produce rational for this... (it seems not specially hardcoded within the code, or didn't find it...) About /etc/services, I don't know if it is still required with Patch2 added... Currently /etc/services isn't modified by ccrma package. Anyway having this in post will lead to problems with selinux as I expect. A deeper look at the code seems to show that e2fsprogs in only used in config.guess... This doesn't seem relevant to add it. (only libuuid is searched in configure.ac) Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca-0.4.0- 3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 11:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 07:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061144.l96BiLXu026715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-06 07:44 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca-0.4.0- 3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 11:59:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 07:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061159.l96BxcuI028804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-06 07:59 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild is done and request for bodhi is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 12:03:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 08:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061203.l96C3A0j029381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-06 08:03 EST ------- g++ -c -pipe -g -w -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -D_REENTRANT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_SHARED -DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/mkspecs/default -I. -I. -Isrc -I/usr/lib/qt-3.3/include -o src/Button.o src/gui/widgets/Button.cpp src/AlsaMidiDriver.o: In function `alsaMidiDriver_thread(void*)': /builddir/build/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3/src/lib/drivers/AlsaMidiDriver.cpp:80: undefined reference to `Preferences::getInstance()' src/DiskWriterDriver.o: In function `DiskWriterDriver::getSampleRate()': /builddir/build/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3/src/lib/drivers/DiskWriterDriver.cpp:162: undefined reference to `Preferences::getInstance()' src/DiskWriterDriver.o: In function `diskWriterDriver_thread(void*)': /builddir/build/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3/src/lib/drivers/DiskWriterDriver.cpp:40: undefined reference to `Preferences::getInstance()' src/JackDriver.o: In function `JackDriver::init(unsigned int)': /builddir/build/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3/src/lib/drivers/JackDriver.cpp:242: undefined reference to `Preferences::getInstance()' /builddir/build/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3/src/lib/drivers/JackDriver.cpp:243: undefined reference to `Preferences::getInstance()' src/JackDriver.o:/builddir/build/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3/src/lib/drivers/JackDriver.cpp:392: more undefined references to `Preferences::getInstance()' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [hydrogenPlayer] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/hydrogen-0.9.3' make: *** [hydrogenPlayer] Error 2 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... In mock for FC7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 12:50:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 08:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061250.l96Coodn003231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-06 08:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) [...] > You should beware that livna already has a package named "unrar", and I would > urge you to at least let them know that you plan to add a package with the same > name. It has a much higher version number so I expect there to be some level of > user confusion. There will be even more confusion when the users find out that this unrar cannot unpack their rar archives, because the majority of what's out there is produced by rar-3.x, which this library cannot handle (it only supports compression algorithms of rar-2.9x or older). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 13:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 09:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269441] Review Request: dvgrab - A program to copy Digital Video data from a DV camcorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061310.l96DAivu006251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvgrab - A program to copy Digital Video data from a DV camcorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269441 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 13:25:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 09:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061325.l96DPDbU008359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-06 09:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Anthony: Are you still interested in finishing the package? Apart from the > problems I made fixes for, are there any other outstanding problems? I'm interested, but don't have time now. Could somebody else pick this up? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 13:32:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 09:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061332.l96DW401008939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-06 09:32 EST ------- This package opens all the RAR files that I could find so it is certainly useful for me. The spec is based on Ville's and on this package has been submitted here based on his request. Feel free to engage in a debate on list about the pros/cons of this software elsewhere and let's focus on packaging here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 13:59:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 09:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061359.l96DxpTM012245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-06 09:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > You should beware that livna already has a package named "unrar", and I would > urge you to at least let them know that you plan to add a package with the same > name. It has a much higher version number so I expect there to be some level of > user confusion. For this issue, how do you think about making this (Fedora's) new unrar have "Epoch 1"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 14:37:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061437.l96EbAfr017823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-06 10:37 EST ------- That's upstream's choice to make, though. (Remember our motto about how we stick close to upstream?) There are all sorts of things you could do to upstream documentation to make it more uniform, but in general we don't do that kind of thing unless there's a conflict with our guidelines. If you want to propose a guideline regulating the naming of the changelog file, feel free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 14:44:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] New: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/vpivaini/rpm/soppalusikka/vdr-skinsoppalusikka.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/vpivaini/rpm/soppalusikka/vdr-skinsoppalusikka-1.0.4-0.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The "Soppalusikka" is a standalone skin is based on "enElchi" text2skin addon. As this skin is a standalone plugin, you don't need text2skin at all to have an enElchi style skin on your VDR. This is my first package ever, so I need a sponsor. The .spec file has been based on the .spec file of vdr-femon packaged by Ville Skytt?. The upstream .tgz has some Finnish TV channel logos in it, but I've chosen to leave them out of the binary RPM, because the copyright situation is unclear. Upstream also ships some "symbol" images with the plugin, I have included those, because they are made by the plugin maintainer and should be under GPLv2. For some reason rpmbuild includes those symbol image files into the debuginfo package and I couldn't find a way to tell it to ignore them. Otherwise the debuginfo looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 14:46:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061446.l96EkZTg019127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 16:06:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 12:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061606.l96G6ts3029922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-06 12:06 EST ------- So now the first version, that can be build, via mock without help repos. SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-0.9-5.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 16:13:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 12:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061613.l96GDWFB030241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-06 12:13 EST ------- The Mandriva packager of skinsoppalusikka told me that I don't need to include the symbols as files into the packages, because they are compiled into the plugin file. Here's an updated SRPM: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/vpivaini/rpm/soppalusikka/vdr-skinsoppalusikka-1.0.4-0.2.fc7.src.rpm The .spec file from the first message is updated as well. The channel logo issue was discussed on #fedora-devel, I need to make a bash script that removes the channel logos from the .tgz and re-zips, since the logos can't be distributed even in the .srpm. I'll make yet another updated for that later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 16:18:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 12:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061618.l96GI8s1030963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-06 12:18 EST ------- Well, I have not checked your spec/srpm in detail, however * First make sure that your srpm can be rebuilt. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=185515 - Note: you can try to rebuild arbitrary srpm on koji as $ koji build --scratch Currently, can be either "dist-f9" "dist-f8" or "dist-fc7-updates-candidate". - Note: ruby-devel requires ruby-libs, but does not require ruby. * Take care of directory ownership issue. All the directories created by this package must be owned by this package. * ruby(abi) version dependency must be with equality, i.e. "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" (like python abi dependency). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby For consistency, usually I also adds. "BuildRequies: ruby(abi) = 1.8". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 16:30:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 12:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] New: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski-1.2.6-1.src.rpm Description: The Ski IA-64 user and system mode simulator originally developed by HP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 16:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 12:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319191] Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061649.l96Gnckf002482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319191 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gauret at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-06 12:49 EST ------- Review for release 1.fc7: * RPM name is OK * Source glaxium_0.5.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine (38 checks have been run) Needs work: * Please install at least a 48x48 icon (required by the spec, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html#install_icons) * Desktop file: the Icon tag should either use the full path to the icon or the icon name without extension (wiki:Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) Please fix these issues and you're good to go ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 17:16:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 13:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061716.l96HGYpk006300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-06 13:16 EST ------- For 0.5.2-0.3: * zero-length document - Please explain why you need zero-length documents ------------------------------------------------------- E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libcompizconfig-0.5.2/README E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libcompizconfig-0.5.2/ChangeLog ------------------------------------------------------- * undefined non-weak symbols ------------------------------------------------------- W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XStringToKeysym W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XKeysymToString ------------------------------------------------------- - As this srpm provides -devel subpackage, these undefined non-weak symbols cannot be allowed because this causes linkage failure. * Timestamp - To keep timestamps on xml and header files, I recommend ------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------- This method usually works on recent Makefiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 17:16:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 13:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061716.l96HG8OB006502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-06 13:16 EST ------- The undistributable channel logos have now been removed from the .srpm too. I added a script to download the upstream .tgz, remove the channel logos and repackage as .tar.bz2. The script is based on a similar script in the vdr-skins package. Everything in the skinsoppalusikka package is now distributable under the GPLv2. Updated SRPM: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/vpivaini/rpm/soppalusikka/vdr-skinsoppalusikka-1.0.4-0.3.fc7.src.rpm The .spec file from the first message is updated as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 18:23:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 14:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061823.l96INpLd014092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-06 14:23 EST ------- Result of rpmlint: I: ski-debuginfo checking I: ski-devel checking W: ski-devel no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. I: ski checking I: ski checking Result of scratch build in Koji - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=185594 . There is a failure on ppc64, but it will probably require access to such machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 18:56:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 14:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710061856.l96IuM7W018097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2007-10-06 14:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca.spec > SRPM URL: > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca-0.4.0-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm > Description: LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) LADCCA is obsolete, it has been replaced by LASH (Linux Audio Session Handler). LASH is already part of Fedora (moved from Planet CCRMA by Anthony Green). See: http://www.nongnu.org/lash/ (LASH does need to be updated, latest version is 0.5.3.) There is still software out there that uses LADCCA but it should be patched to use LASH instead (which is not too difficult). Thanks anyway (hint: there's a lot of software in Planet CCRMA that is waiting for someone to move it to Fedora - I posted a list to Fedora Devel a while back, and there's an ongoing effort to do just that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 20:04:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 16:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062004.l96K4YLb026248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-06 16:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Spec URL: > > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca.spec > > SRPM URL: > > http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/ladcca/ladcca-0.4.0-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm > > Description: LAD Configuration and Connection API (LADCCA) > > LADCCA is obsolete, it has been replaced by LASH (Linux Audio Session Handler). > LASH is already part of Fedora (moved from Planet CCRMA by Anthony Green). See: > > http://www.nongnu.org/lash/ > > (LASH does need to be updated, latest version is 0.5.3.) > > There is still software out there that uses LADCCA but it should be patched to > use LASH instead (which is not too difficult). > Ah, actually AFAIK Nicolas was packaging this for jack-rack which also / already uses lash, so I guess this isn't needed then and can be closed as not a bug and be made to block FE_DEADREVIEW. Nicolas, do you agree? If you do please post a new jack-rack to its review ticket too, then I'll approve that (assuming there are no further problems). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 20:19:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 16:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] New: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: osspkg at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/photo/imageinfo/imageinfo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/photo/imageinfo/imageinfo-0.05-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: ImageInfo computes and displays selected image attributes. It is similar in function to the ImageMagick "identify" utility, but provides a few additional attributes (such as details of embedded ICC profiles), and allows command line selection of the attributes to be computed, avoiding unnecessary computation and and allowing easier parsing of results when this utility is called from a script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 20:25:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 16:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062025.l96KPjfe028859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-10-06 16:25 EST ------- Please see bug number 321601, which is a new review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 20:42:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 16:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319191] Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062042.l96Kg9xE031026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-06 16:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Needs work: > * Please install at least a 48x48 icon (required by the spec, see > http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html#install_icons) I've had this discussion before, not sure if it was with you though. The spec says: "Minimally you should install a 48x48 icon in the hicolor theme." Notice the *should*, the spec also describes in much more detail how a toolkit / application should search for icons. There it says that if an icon of the proper size isn't found all other possible sizes should be searched, and the icon should then be software scaled to the desired size. So installing a 128x128 icon will work fine, and scaling it to 48x48 is useless (more then that it would loose details when a bigger icon is wanted), as any toolkit / app following the spec will do the scaling itself if needed. > * Desktop file: the Icon tag should either use the full path to the icon or the > icon name without extension (wiki:Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) > Fixed. Here is a new version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glaxium.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/glaxium-0.5-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 20:48:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 16:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062048.l96KmlZL031631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-10-06 16:48 EST ------- Looks like there just a couple of items that still need to be fixed. 1. Unnecessary requires on desktop-file-utils. 2. rpmlint produces the following errors which need to be fixed: oggconvert.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL oggconvert.noarch: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/oggconvert.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 22:52:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 18:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062252.l96MqKLC013474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-10-06 18:52 EST ------- The Requires for desktop-file-utils has been removed, license label fixed, and the desktop should be correct now. Spec URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/SPECS/oggconvert.spec RPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/noarch/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-12.fc7.noarch.rpm md5sum: f2bb1a3cefbe80b8f338fe0ad2dfa6aa sha1sum: 7640e94aedc2b24a0cca265e336c39487a6b30ff SRPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/SRPMS/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-12.fc7.src.rpm md5sum: b4c65f89b3935501377bcdc23342bb91 sha1sum: cb5354c1fa3539421e398b39dad70363c2fb1d92 This rpm are digitally signed and the GPG key is available, the instructions for my GPG key are at rpm.rgw-net.com (my first name is Neal) mock should build fine for this, aside from my GPG key if it isn't imported... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 23:23:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 19:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062323.l96NNXC0016816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-06 19:23 EST ------- Yes I agree! I was using because for jack-rack cannot enable lash if ladcca isn't used... But that was with lash 5.1 and we are at 5.3 now... We need to fill a bug to have it updated to F-8 at least (but problably others)... This package is now obsolete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 23:26:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 19:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062326.l96NQJkL017624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 Bug 320661 depends on bug 320741, which changed state. Bug 320741 Summary: Add support for ladcca client/server protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320741 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 23:24:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 19:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062324.l96NOsXE016902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|320661 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 6 23:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 19:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710062324.l96NOr2q016874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|285331 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:32:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] New: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-common.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-common-4.0.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Shoreline Firewall, more commonly known as "Shorewall", is a Netfilter (iptables) based firewall that can be used on a dedicated firewall system, a multi-function gateway/ router/server or on a standalone GNU/Linux system. The version 3 release series of Shorewall is already available in Fedora. With the release of version 4, upstream has added a new perl based rule compiler and completely changed the way the package is distributed. The shell-based and perl-based compilers are each distributed as individual tarballs, and files required to run shorewall with either compiler are packaged as a third tarball, shorewall-common. The shorewall-perl compilers is suggested for new installed systems and shorewall-shell is provided for backwards compatibility and smooth legacy system upgrades because shorewall perl is not fully compatible with all legacy configurations. This package contains the files required by shorewall-perl and shorewall-shell to run. You need to install the shorewall-perl and/or shorewall-shell package(s) for a functional firewall. shorewall-common is also required by shorewall-lite, a light-weight Shorewall version that will run compiled firewall scripts generated on a system with one of the compiler packages installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:36:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070036.l970af80025512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 20:36 EST ------- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-common-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm shorewall-common.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/shorewall The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. -->This one is bogus - the startup script has an empty entry for Default-Start. Removing the Default-Start entry makes the warning go away, but it is fine to have an empty one there. shorewall-common.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/shorewall While your daemon is running, you have to put a lock file in /var/lock/subsys/. To see an example, look at this directory on your machine and examine the corresponding init scripts. --> Also bogus - shorewall creates a lock file itself, there's no need for the startup script to generate one. shorewall-common.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name shorewall The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. --> Also bogus - this goes away if I rename the startup script shorewall-common, which is an awkward name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070040.l970e8FI025955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |robert at marcanoonline.com ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 20:40 EST ------- Added current shorewall package owner to cc. Robert - I'm not trying to usurp your package here, but I thought that because upstream has changed so much, and because Id done the packaging work for other reasons, it would be useful to put them into BZ for review. I am more than happy if you want to continue owning this package. Am also happy to co-maintain shorewall with you, if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:42:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] New: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-perl.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-perl-4.0.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Shoreline Firewall, more commonly known as "Shorewall", is a Netfilter (iptables) based firewall that can be used on a dedicated firewall system, a multi-function gateway/ router/server or on a standalone GNU/Linux system. The version 3 release series of Shorewall is already available in Fedora. With the release of version 4, upstream has added a new perl based rule compiler and completely changed the way the package is distributed. The shell-based and perl-based compilers are each distributed as individual tarballs, and files required to run shorewall with either compiler are packaged as a third tarball, shorewall-common. The shorewall-perl compilers is suggested for new installed systems and shorewall-shell is provided for backwards compatibility and smooth legacy system upgrades because shorewall perl is not fully compatible with all legacy configurations. This package contains the files for the perl-based rule compiler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070048.l970mpBD026387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 20:48 EST ------- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-perl-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm shorewall-perl.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(Shorewall::Ports) This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it once. --> This is bogus, and is caused by a problem with the way rpm generates automatic Provides. The package contains a perl script (buildports.pl) which parses /etc/services and /etc/protocols to generate a module Ports.pm. This is done at package build time. Because buildports.pl contains the text "package Shorewall::Ports;" which it echo's out to Ports.pm during generation, RPM believes that both Ports.pm and buildports.pl provide Shorewall::Ports. This could be solved by not including buildports.pl in the package, but this file has utility for people who make local mods to /etc/services or /etc/protocols. shorewall-perl.noarch: W: empty-%pre shorewall-perl.noarch: W: empty-%post shorewall-perl.noarch: W: empty-%preun --> These 3 can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070050.l970oHYN027138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 20:50 EST ------- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-perl-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm shorewall-perl.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(Shorewall::Ports) This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it once. --> This is bogus, and is caused by a problem with the way rpm generates automatic Provides. The package contains a perl script (buildports.pl) which parses /etc/services and /etc/protocols to generate a module Ports.pm. This is done at package build time. Because buildports.pl contains the text "package Shorewall::Ports;" which it echo's out to Ports.pm during generation, RPM believes that both Ports.pm and buildports.pl provide Shorewall::Ports. This could be solved by not including buildports.pl in the package, but this file has utility for people who make local mods to /etc/services or /etc/protocols. shorewall-perl.noarch: W: empty-%pre shorewall-perl.noarch: W: empty-%post shorewall-perl.noarch: W: empty-%preun --> These 3 can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:49:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070049.l970nk1m026458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 20:49 EST ------- Crap, please ignore Comment #3 - this was meant to go into the BZ for shorewall-perl (BZ #321711). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:54:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321721] New: Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321721 Summary: Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-shell.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-shell-4.0.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Shoreline Firewall, more commonly known as "Shorewall", is a Netfilter (iptables) based firewall that can be used on a dedicated firewall system, a multi-function gateway/ router/server or on a standalone GNU/Linux system. The version 3 release series of Shorewall is already available in Fedora. With the release of version 4, upstream has added a new perl based rule compiler and completely changed the way the package is distributed. The shell-based and perl-based compilers are each distributed as individual tarballs, and files required to run shorewall with either compiler are packaged as a third tarball, shorewall-common. The shorewall-perl compilers is suggested for new installed systems and shorewall-shell is provided for backwards compatibility and smooth legacy system upgrades because shorewall perl is not fully compatible with all legacy configurations. This package contains the files comprising the legacy shell based compiler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:55:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321721] Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070055.l970tIgb027866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321721 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 20:55 EST ------- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-shell-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm shorewall-shell.noarch: W: empty-%post shorewall-shell.noarch: W: empty-%preun shorewall-shell.noarch: W: empty-%postun --> These can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:57:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321721] Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070057.l970vHYZ027912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321721 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |robert at marcanoonline.com ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 20:57 EST ------- Added current shorewall package owner to cc. Robert - I'm not trying to usurp your package here, but I thought that because upstream has changed so much, and because Id done the packaging work for other reasons, it would be useful to put them into BZ for review. I am more than happy if you want to continue owning this package. Am also happy to co-maintain shorewall with you, if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 00:56:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 20:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070056.l970uqlV027575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |robert at marcanoonline.com ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 20:56 EST ------- Added current shorewall package owner to cc. Robert - I'm not trying to usurp your package here, but I thought that because upstream has changed so much, and because Id done the packaging work for other reasons, it would be useful to put them into BZ for review. I am more than happy if you want to continue owning this package. Am also happy to co-maintain shorewall with you, if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 01:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] New: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The Shoreline Firewall, more commonly known as "Shorewall", is a Netfilter (iptables) based firewall that can be used on a dedicated firewall system, a multi-function gateway/ router/server or on a standalone GNU/Linux system. The version 3 release series of Shorewall is already available in Fedora. With the release of version 4, upstream has added a new perl based rule compiler and completely changed the way the package is distributed. The shell-based and perl-based compilers are each distributed as individual tarballs, and files required to run shorewall with either compiler are packaged as a third tarball, shorewall-common. Version 3 however comprised only a single tarball, and so only a single package is required. In order to provide a clean upgrade route, shorewall-common creates a shorewall subpackage which requires shorewall-common, shorewall-perl and shorewall-shell. This is a tracking bug for the reviews of the other packages comprising version 4 of shorewall: shorewall-common review is BZ #321691 shorewall-perl review is BZ #321711 shorewall-shell review is BZ #321721 There is also shorewall-lite, a light-weight Shorewall version that will run compiled firewall scripts generated on a system with one of the compiler packages installed - I'll package this up in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 01:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070104.l9714mWr028677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |321691, 321711, 321721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 01:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321721] Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070104.l9714mfM028697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321721 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |321731 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 01:07:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070107.l9717hb3029330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |250641 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 01:04:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070104.l9714nZ3028721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |321731 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 01:04:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070104.l9714o28028745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |321731 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 01:06:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070106.l9716Bpb029260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |robert at marcanoonline.com ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-06 21:06 EST ------- Added current shorewall package owner to cc. Robert - I'm not trying to usurp your package here, but I thought that because upstream has changed so much, and because Id done the packaging work for other reasons, it would be useful to put them into BZ for review. I am more than happy if you want to continue owning this package. Am also happy to co-maintain shorewall with you, if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 01:09:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070109.l9719eeq028890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |247057 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 04:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 00:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070433.l974Xq28019332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-07 00:33 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/nget.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/nget-0.27.1-7.fc7.src.rpm Both issues addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 05:53:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 01:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070553.l975ruG4027710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 01:53 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild is done and request for bodhi is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 05:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 01:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070551.l975pXcm027626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 01:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > * The tarball issue: > The different md5 sums are due to different versions of autoconf > used to make configure in the source distributions included in > the SRPM (there is a makefile target for building the RPMs). This > has been corrected, and the source in the uploaded SRPM now has > an md5sum matching that of the reference source distribution. - Please upload a now srpm (with release number bumped). I want to check it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 06:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070604.l9764El6029067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(qark at ospace.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 06:02:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070602.l9762gXN028992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(steved at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 02:02 EST ------- Steve, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 06:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070611.l976BGOQ030337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 02:11 EST ------- * Rebuild failed on dist-f8, x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=185862 Note: From F-8+, popt is split out from "rpm" package. So from F-8+, a package which uses libpopt.so must have "BuildRequires: popt-devel". For example: ------------------------------------------------------------- %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 BuildRequires: popt-devel %endif ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 06:16:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070616.l976GcjA030931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 07:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 03:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070714.l977Ed6w004610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 03:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Because buildports.pl contains the text "package > Shorewall::Ports;" which it echo's out to Ports.pm during generation, RPM > believes that both Ports.pm and buildports.pl provide Shorewall::Ports. rpmbuild doesn't pick up automatic perl Provides from anything else than *.pm, see /usr/lib/rpm/{,redhat/}find-provides. In this case the dupe comes from Shorewall/FallbackPorts.pm, not buildports.pl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 07:39:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 03:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070739.l977dDSf007186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-10-07 03:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > You should beware that livna already has a package named "unrar", and I would > > urge you to at least let them know that you plan to add a package with the same > > name. It has a much higher version number so I expect there to be some level of > > user confusion. > > For this issue, how do you think about making this (Fedora's) new > unrar have "Epoch 1"? Using an Epoch seems like a big kludge. :| If we can get the Livna and Fedora maintainers cooperating about naming/versioning, we can skip the Epoch necessity altogether. Not sure how feasible such cooperation would be though, from a technical standpoint... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 07:41:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 03:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070741.l977fPQb007931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-07 03:41 EST ------- //// * undefined non-weak symbols ------------------------------------------------------- W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XStringToKeysym W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XKeysymToString ------------------------------------------------------- - As this srpm provides -devel subpackage, these undefined non-weak symbols cannot be allowed because this causes linkage failure. //// may i know how to resolve this?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 07:42:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 03:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070742.l977gvAk007841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|240373 | nThis| | BugsThisDependsOn| |240373 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 07:42:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 03:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070742.l977gsKl007820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|243501 | OtherBugsDependingO| |243501 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 07:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 03:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070745.l977jfCK008355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 03:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=218591) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=218591&action=view) rpmlint result for qtiplot 0.9-5 !. First for rpmlint issue: Please check your rpms by rpmlint for review. You can check many items by using rpmlint for - binary rpms - srpms - and for installed rpms. rpmlint results are attached. * devel-file-in-non-devel-package - Please check if symlinks %{_libdir}/lib*.so (not lib*.so.*) are really needed. * no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install - %install section must clean up %buildroot first. * mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs - Please check what this means by "$ rpmlint -I mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs". * wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding - This means that this file has windows-like end-of-line encoding. Fix this by "sed -i -e 's|\r||' " or dos2unix. * spurious-executable-perm - Fix the permission (usually should be 0644) * undefined-non-weak-symbol - /usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 has undefined non-weak symbol. ----------------------------------------------------- $ ldd -r /usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 > /dev/null undefined symbol: gsl_matrix_set (/usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0) undefined symbol: gsl_vector_set (/usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0) undefined symbol: gsl_vector_get (/usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0) ----------------------------------------------------- This can be ignored because this package does not provide -devel subpackage, however for this package this can be fixed by linking against libgsl.so. B. The rest issues: * Redundant BuildRequires - Remove redundant BuildRequires and reduce them. For example, PyQt4-devel Requires qt4-devel and sip-devel, so "BuildRequires: qt4-devel sip-devel" is not needed. (Please also check the rest BuildRequires!) - By the way I prefer to write one BuildRequires per one line because it is easier to read and also makes it easier to find the diff when BR changes. * Parallel make - Parallel make seems okay for this package http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=185870 * Desktop vendor prefix - Usually we make desktop file have vendor prefix "fedora". (check the subsection "desktop-file-install usage" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 07:55:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 03:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070755.l977t1jI009468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 03:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > //// > * undefined non-weak symbols > ------------------------------------------------------- > W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XStringToKeysym > W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XKeysymToString > ------------------------------------------------------- > - As this srpm provides -devel subpackage, these undefined non-weak > symbols cannot be allowed because this causes linkage failure. > > //// > > may i know how to resolve this?? "nm -D" shows that both symbols are provides by libX11.so, so linking against libX11.so should fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 07:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 03:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070755.l977tubY009801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 03:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > "nm -D" shows that both symbols are provides by libX11.so, so > linking against libX11.so should fix this. s/provides/provided/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 08:32:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 04:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070832.l978Wkhv012268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 04:32 EST ------- Some random comments: * I guess you wrote http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby ? Then please follow ruby guideline. - "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" is needed - Also I usually add "BuildRequies: ruby(abi) = 1.8" for consistency. - This package should provide "ruby(rpm) = %{version}-%{release}". * Change License tag http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines * Source must be given by full URL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Please use the requested buildroot (check the section "BuildRoot tag" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && is not needed * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * This does not be rebuilt on dist-f8. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=185877 On dist-fc7-updates-candidate, this can be rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=185880 At least "BR: popt-devel" is needed for F-8+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 08:41:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 04:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239280] Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070841.l978fpSY013909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239280 Bug 239280 depends on bug 239279, which changed state. Bug 239279 Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 08:41:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 04:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241078] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070841.l978fpmV013897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 Alias: perl-Net-SSH2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241078 Bug 241078 depends on bug 239279, which changed state. Bug 239279 Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 08:41:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 04:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070841.l978fo1H013857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(foolish at guezz.net)| ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 04:41 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new request. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 08:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 04:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239280] Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070842.l978gBRn013954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239280 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(foolish at guezz.net)| ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 04:42 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new request. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 08:45:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 04:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070845.l978j2tx014160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 04:45 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 08:46:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 04:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710070846.l978k8IA014497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ewan at macmahon.me.u | |k) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 04:46 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 10:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 06:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071033.l97AXAR4029412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lephilousophe at user| |s.sourceforge.net) | ------- Additional Comments From lephilousophe at users.sourceforge.net 2007-10-07 06:33 EST ------- Sorry for the delay... I was away from an internet connection for a long time... Anyway, I must admit that I resign : the package is too complex for me and it needs an integral rewrite of the buildchain. I think that's not to a package maintainer to do such things but main developers should switch to a more robust system. Moreover, Fedora isn't my main distribution anymore because I put Gentoo on my new laptop and I won't use my desktop PC as intensively as before. Sorry. Please put the according status to the bug as I am a bit lost with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 10:41:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 06:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071041.l97Afa0E030410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |321931 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-07 06:41 EST ------- Add a update request for lash! Can someone add a potential list of package that need a rebuild if we update it before F8 to be gold ? (rawhide installation not ready)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 11:06:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 07:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071106.l97B6fsB001541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-07 07:06 EST ------- "* Redundant BuildRequires - Remove redundant BuildRequires and reduce them. For example, PyQt4-devel Requires qt4-devel and sip-devel, so "BuildRequires: qt4-devel sip-devel" is not needed. (Please also check the rest BuildRequires!)" qt4-devel is needed, because no other devel package contains qt4-devel >= 4.2 Qt <4.2 will not work with this package so it can't removed. So here the next try: SRPM:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-0.9-6.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot.spec?use_mirror=osdn E: qtiplot library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 E: qtiplot library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 E: qtiplot library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 E: qtiplot library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 E: qtiplot no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 E: qtiplot no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 Are not errors in this case, because the libs are loaded by QLibrary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 11:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 07:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071153.l97Br3aP007504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nando at ccrma.stanford.edu ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-07 07:53 EST ------- Nicolas, Can you please post a proposal to update lash to the fedora-devel list? I think this needs to be discussed considering the fact that we are post test3. Don't get me wrong, I would really like to see this get in F-8 esp. with the CCRMA merger in mind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 11:58:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 07:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071158.l97BwIb4008358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 07:58 EST ------- Thanks Ville, that is really helpful. Clearly there's no point packaging FallbackPorts.pm, I'll remove that from the package. As an aside, I wonder if it would be better to generate Ports.pm on installation in the %post script, so that it takes into account any local modifications to /etc/{services,protocols}. OTOH, do people ever edit those files locally? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 12:11:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071211.l97CBfmv010317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 08:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > E: qtiplot library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 > E: qtiplot library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 > E: qtiplot library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 > E: qtiplot library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 > E: qtiplot no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 > E: qtiplot no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 > Are not errors in this case, because the libs are loaded by QLibrary Well, then are these libraries loaded with the name "libfitRational1.so.1.0.0" or so? Is this surely okay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 12:16:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071216.l97CGS8Q010708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 08:16 EST ------- Ah.. rather * qtiplot-0.9/fitPlugins/fitRational0/fitRational0.pro says: -------------------------------------------- target.path=/usr/lib$${libsuff}/qtiplot/plugins -------------------------------------------- Doesn't this mean that libfitRational0.so must be installed under %_libdir/%name/plugins ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 12:46:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071246.l97CkTgQ015153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-07 08:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) It will be work much easier, all files(excluded symlinks) will be load via QLibrary and checked for function signatures. For more read the Qt Doc and study the example that comes with it. http://doc.trolltech.com/4.3/qlibrary.html (In reply to comment #18) No the files can be placed anywhere, you must only tell the application in the config menu where to search for it. But I is possible(but not explicit needed) to generate an extra lib dir for the plug-ins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 12:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322061] New: Review Request: asunder - A graphical Audio CD ripper and encoder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322061 Summary: Review Request: asunder - A graphical Audio CD ripper and encoder Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mszpak at wp.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/asunder/asunder.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/asunder/asunder-0.9-1.src.rpm Description: Allows to save tracks from an Audio CD as WAV, MP3, OGG, and/or FLAC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 12:54:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 08:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071254.l97Cs3RI015617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 08:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > No the files can be placed anywhere, you must only tell the application in the > config menu where to search for it. > But I is possible(but not explicit needed) to generate an extra lib dir for the > plug-ins. Then IMO it is better that this package has its own plugin directory and all plugins for this package are moved into the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319191] Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071321.l97DLvu4020319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319191 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-07 09:21 EST ------- Fine by me. Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source glaxium_0.5.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:23:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322091] New: Review Request: proxyknife - Customizable multithreaded proxy hunter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322091 Summary: Review Request: proxyknife - Customizable multithreaded proxy hunter Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/proxyknife.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/proxyknife-1.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Proxyknife is a customizable multithread proxy hunter. It can help users behind strict firewall find suitable free proxies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:23:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322091] Review Request: proxyknife - Customizable multithreaded proxy hunter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071323.l97DNraM019974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxyknife - Customizable multithreaded proxy hunter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322091 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-07 09:23 EST ------- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=185912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319191] Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071330.l97DUZto020964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319191 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-07 09:30 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glaxium Short Description: An OpenGL space shooter Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071337.l97DblfM021893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-07 09:37 EST ------- Ok, but this can I do only next weekend. I will send it when it is ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:41:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071341.l97DfvMg022933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-10-07 09:41 EST ------- Sorry for not bumping the version number - I assumed it should stay the same since the fix just involved rebuilding the SRPM, with no changes to the spec file. A new spec http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/xml/xgrep/xgrep.spec and SRPM http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/xml/xgrep/xgrep-0.06-3.fc7.src.rpm have been uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:39:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071339.l97Dds3H022357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 09:39 EST ------- Packages can add stuff to those files in their scriptlets, IIRC at least something LTSP related did. If you decide to generate the file in %post, be sure to move the file somewhere in /etc or /var so it won't blow in in read-only /usr setups (%_netsharedpath), and probably mark as %ghost %config as well as decide what should happen to an existing Ports.pm on upgrades. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:38:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] New: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/enet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/enet-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: ENet is a relatively thin, simple and robust network communication layer on top of UDP (User Datagram Protocol). The primary feature it provides is optional reliable, in-order delivery of packets. ENet is NOT intended to be a general purpose high level networking library that handles authentication, lobbying, server discovery, compression, encryption and other high level, often application level or dependent tasks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:45:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322061] Review Request: asunder - A graphical Audio CD ripper and encoder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071345.l97DjaDW023622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asunder - A graphical Audio CD ripper and encoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322061 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-10-07 09:45 EST ------- And it's a desktop environment neutral. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322141] New: Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322141 Summary: Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/egoboo-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/egoboo-data-2.4.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Data files for the Egoboo RPG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:56:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322141] Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071356.l97DuMWO025038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322141 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-07 09:56 EST ------- egoboo itself is review bug 322161 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:54:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071354.l97DsAja024452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-07 09:54 EST ------- Thank you for reply. Please feel free to open a new review request when you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:56:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071356.l97Due2J024511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |322111 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:56:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071356.l97DueFD024531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |322161 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:55:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] New: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/egoboo.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/egoboo-2.4.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Egoboo is a top down rpg in the spirit of Nethack and other games of the Roguelike genre. It uses OpenGL graphics and will have randomly generated maps and customizable characters. The objective of the project is to bring the fun and depth of roguelike gameplay, kicking and screaming, into the third dimension. --- Reviewers note: this needs to following 2 packages which are still under review: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP - bug 322111 egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG - bug 322141 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 13:59:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071359.l97DxOOO025153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From dimi at lattica.com 2007-10-07 09:59 EST ------- > 1. What is the license here? GPLv2+. I'll try to add necessary notices. > 2. This is 1.0.2, but the website seems to have 1.0.1 as latest. > Is this a preview release or they just haven't updated the web site yet? Website needs an update. > 5. The client subpackage has: > Requires: openssh-server > Requires: coreutils > Requires: util-linux > > Are those really required? Why? Yes, they are. As Jeff explained, the client needs to be contacted by the server via SSH. It also may need su(1) to run the dump commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 14:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071410.l97EAUfp026510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 10:10 EST ------- What about to add tutorial.txt and design.txt into the devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 14:28:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071428.l97ESVmX029143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-07 10:28 EST ------- Good point, new version here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/enet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/enet-1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 14:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 10:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071451.l97Ep0UC031679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 10:50 EST ------- In the rare cases where I've needed unrar, this particular version of it has done the job just fine. I don't know what version of rar have those files been compressed with though. But anyway, I don't think Epoch would be a good solution as this one is allegedly an inferior implementation in functionality compared to the non-free one; just leave things as is. That way people who need the non-free unrar and use repositories that ship it can just upgrade to it and this package won't stand in the way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:08:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071508.l97F8amu001512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-07 11:08 EST ------- Now I have found some time to make this also ready:) Here the one SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-0.9-7.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:19:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071519.l97FJ8xB002913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 11:19 EST ------- Good work, just some minor remarks: - License should be GPL+, not GPLv2 as the sources or anything in the package doesn't specify a GPL version and in that case (per the GPL text itself, chapter 9 of GPLv2 COPYING) any version of GPL goes. - s/femon/skinsoppalusikka/ in vdr-skinsoppalusikka.conf's comments - The main vdr package already owns the /var/lib/vdr/themes dir, so the %dir entry for it should be removed from %files in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071523.l97FNiFf004047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 11:23 EST ------- Also, %{datadir} appears to be unused in this package so the %define for it can be dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:30:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071530.l97FUwcO005170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 11:30 EST ------- Everything looks good, but I cannot access the upstream's website, so you have to wait for the final word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:32:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071532.l97FWDg3005273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 11:32 EST ------- I cannot find any info about licensing. can you give some pointer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:29:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071529.l97FTVMg004368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 11:29 EST ------- Any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:39:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322141] Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071539.l97FdCtZ005722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322141 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:39:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071539.l97FdZSn006007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-07 11:39 EST ------- Other possibilities are to simply rename this package to "unrar-free" or to coordinate a rename of the livna package to "unrar-nonfree" with the Fedora release and simply not push this package to F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071547.l97FlZ5O007033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 11:47 EST ------- Sure, but I can't think of a reason offhand why someone would want both this and the nonfree unrar installed, nor what else the -free and -nonfree suffixes would be useful for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:54:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071554.l97Fs8a1007841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-07 11:54 EST ------- Well, the utility seems obvious to me: solves the issue of having a package in livna with the same name as a package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 15:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071554.l97FseOZ008030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-07 11:54 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback. I've fixed all of the issues mentioned (hopefully). See the spec file in the original message and http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/vpivaini/rpm/soppalusikka/vdr-skinsoppalusikka-1.0.4-0.4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 16:06:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071606.l97G6P46009702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-07 12:06 EST ------- Any news ? We are getting short to have it added in Fedora 8 !... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 16:06:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071606.l97G6x87009752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 12:06 EST ------- rpmlint is not silent I: egoboo checking E: egoboo invalid-desktopfile /tmp/egoboo-2.4.3-1.fc8.i386.rpm.20743/usr/share/applications/fedora-egoboo.desktop .desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate the desktop file is missing the required "Encoding" field [dan at eagle ~]$ desktop-file-validate /tmp/egoboo.desktop /tmp/egoboo.desktop: error: required key "Encoding" not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 16:17:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071617.l97GHl08011077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 12:17 EST ------- Maybe it's just me, but I don't think that's a problem that really needs to be solved in this particular case. And it's not even clear that an unrar package will be shipped in Livna after this is in Fedora (it's unmaintained there already). But if Livna drops it, Epoch bump would be appropriate here. Just my .02?, feel free to proceed as you wish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 16:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071625.l97GP2eZ012351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-07 12:25 EST ------- Looks good, approved and will sponsor; please proceed with the process described at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Remaining bits that can be addressed before the first build, no need to submit a new SRPM: - s/soppalusikka/skinsoppalusikka/ in vdr-skinsoppalusikka.conf :) - Bump release to 1%{?dist} for the first Fedora build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 17:09:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 13:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071709.l97H9TVU017662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-07 13:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I cannot find any info about licensing. can you give some pointer? If you download the windows .exe for 2.4.3 from http://sf.net/projects/egoboo and then run it through wine, you will be shown the GPL syring install and get a License.pdf in: ~/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/Egoboo\ Development\ Team/Egoboo/ which contains the GPL. Alternatively, if you go to http://sf.net/projects/egoboo -> dowloads -> show older releases and download 2.2.2 for Linux, you will find a gpl.txt (and the source code) in the tarbal. (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint is not silent > I: egoboo checking > E: egoboo invalid-desktopfile > /tmp/egoboo-2.4.3-1.fc8.i386.rpm.20743/usr/share/applications/fedora-egoboo.desktop > .desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate > > the desktop file is missing the required "Encoding" field > > [dan at eagle ~]$ desktop-file-validate /tmp/egoboo.desktop > /tmp/egoboo.desktop: error: required key "Encoding" not found > Then you are using an old desktop-file-utils Encoding has been deprecated and the latest desktop-file-utils complains if it is present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 17:43:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 13:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071743.l97HhOxm022558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-07 13:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdr-skinsoppalusikka Short Description: The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR Owners: vpv Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 18:11:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071811.l97IBQEH026497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 14:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > [dan at eagle ~]$ desktop-file-validate /tmp/egoboo.desktop > > /tmp/egoboo.desktop: error: required key "Encoding" not found > > > > Then you are using an old desktop-file-utils Encoding has been deprecated and > the latest desktop-file-utils complains if it is present. Yes, that the cause. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 18:14:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071814.l97IE9Os026615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 14:14 EST ------- Review: OK source files match upstream (no diff between the upstream rar archive and your tar.gz): b145050af8577bfba703235ef4a5383fe59c8029 egoboo-2.4.3.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license (GPL). OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream sources, but is in the data package (or preciselly in the windows installation package) and an older version of sources. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (development/i386). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates (there are none). OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app, desktop file is included. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 18:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071814.l97IEZI4026757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 18:26:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071826.l97IQTuR028391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver simulating planets and asteroids in space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-07 14:26 EST ------- Imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:33:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071933.l97JXfW6004546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-07 15:33 EST ------- Sorry for the delay on getting back to this... OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 15faa7ebd9791ade1a2f8181821ac259 rpm-4.4.2.2.tar.gz 15faa7ebd9791ade1a2f8181821ac259 rpm-4.4.2.2.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version 96 open bugs - check for outstanding bugs on package. Issues: 1. Due to the murky pile of licenses, perhaps we could get spot and/or fedora-legal-list to review things to make sure all is well? 2. Could you put in a full URL for the upstream Source? http://rpm.org/releases/rpm-4.4.x/rpm-4.4.2.2.tar.gz ? 3. Just out of curiosity, is popt going to get split out upstream as well? 4. Another idle thought: should /usr/src/redhat be changed? /usr/src/fedora? /usr/src/rpm? 5. Do we still need to ship static libs? 6. rpmlint says: First, there are 264 lines of 'non-standard-uid' or 'non-standard-gid' These can all be ignored in this case. Removing those results in just: a) rpm-apidocs.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/rpm-apidocs-4.4.2.2/apidocs/html/build_8c-source.html Suggest: run iconv on it? b) rpm-devel.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions rpm.i386: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /var/lib/rpm rpm.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm rpm.i386: W: percent-in-%post rpm-libs.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions rpm-libs.i386: W: no-documentation rpm-python.i386: W: no-documentation rpm.src:169: E: configure-without-libdir-spec rpm.src: W: strange-permission find-debuginfo.sh 0755 Suggest: Ignore. I'd just like to thank you for all the cleanup work you have done on this package. This spec is a vast amount better than the old one. Great work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:35:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071935.l97JZe7n005281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-07 15:35 EST ------- I've made a couple more fixes. Here are the new files: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/hydrogen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/hydrogen-0.9.3-8.fc8.i386/hydrogen-0.9.3-8.fc8.src.rpm The mock result with binary package and build log is here: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/hydrogen-0.9.3-8.fc8.i386/ The package builds correctly in mock in Fedora 7 and Rawhide on i386. rpmlint is all silent and I am not aware of any outstanding issues. Callum: could you please review the new packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071938.l97JcQHP005406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 15:38 EST ------- Please ask upstream about license version clarification - the windows installer displays GPL v3, but included in License.pdf is GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:38:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071938.l97JcHlJ005366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-07 15:38 EST ------- 1. You're missing a requires hicolor-icon-theme-0.10-2 for the gui package 2. You're missing a requires tcl for the gui package I'd normally expect a desktop-file-utils buildrequires but it appears OK as it must be being dragged in by another dependency. You're correct about gimp, it is needed. Apart from the issues above I have q query about the gui package, what's the rationale for installing it in the %{_datadir} rather than %{_bindir}? Apart from the above everything seems OK now. For some reason it does not build on x86_64-devel, see http://dribble.org.uk/buildlogs/GREYCstoration-2.5.2-4/8/x86_64/ It appears to be dragging in C code without an extern "C" macro but I have no idea where or why, it compiles fine on F7 and FC-6 for x86_64 and compiles fine in devel for i386. So we have two choices, you can either ask on one of the mailing lists for help from someone who knows a lot more about C++ than me, or (annoyingly!) we might have to excludearch: x86_64. Whatever option you'd rather go with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:40:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322141] Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071940.l97Jenc1006206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322141 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 15:40 EST ------- Review: OK source files match upstream (used instructions from the spec file, no diff between them): 252c09320cd355e8b8e6f27a728045c638f9dc48 egoboo-data-2.4.3.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license (GPL). OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (development/i386). OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets are present. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. This package is APPROVED. But clarify the GPL version with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:42:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071942.l97Jgwb7006337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-07 15:42 EST ------- Review: ?OK source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license (MIT). OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. ?OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (devel/i386). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets are present and they are correct. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK has installed headers in devel subpackage. OK no pkgconfig files. OK not a GUI app. This package is APPROVED, but I will recheck the source when upstream web site is working again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071957.l97JvxvQ008685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-07 15:57 EST ------- Thanks! I've send a mail to upstream to clarify the license version. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: egoboo Short Description: A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:58:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322141] Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071958.l97JwK77008450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322141 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-07 15:58 EST ------- Thanks! I've send a mail to upstream to clarify the license version. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: egoboo-data Short Description: Data files for the Egoboo RPG Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 19:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710071958.l97Jwk4B008815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-07 15:58 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: enet Short Description: Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 22:03:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 18:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072203.l97M3WL7025759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-07 18:03 EST ------- It seems it's a know bug (see bz#281751). Hopefully it will be solved soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 22:10:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 18:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322511] New: Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322511 Summary: Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/totem-xine.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/totem-xine-2.20.0-1.lvn8.src.rpm Description: Totem is simple movie player for the GNOME desktop. It features a simple playlist, a full-screen mode, seek and volume controls, as well as a pretty complete keyboard navigation. totem-xine is linked against xine-lib, unlike the Fedora package which is linked against gstreamer. rpmlint output: totem-xine.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided nautilus-media totem-xine.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/totem-handlers.schemas totem-xine.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/totem-video-thumbnail.schemas totem-xine.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/totem.schemas I've based this spec off Fedora's existing totem spec, so I figured it obsoletes nautilus-media without providing it for a reason. Same for the schemas, I figured without noreplace was best based on the existing totem spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072309.l97N9382002077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |281751 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:28:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072328.l97NSX9P004787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 Bug 321731 depends on bug 321691, which changed state. Bug 321691 Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:28:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072328.l97NSW2j004747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 19:28 EST ------- Following discussion with Robert, and also on #fedora-devel, consensus seems to be that it is better to have a single package with all tarballs. Therefore, I'm closing this review, and discussion of the multitarball package will continue in BZ #321731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:38:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072338.l97Nc4LH005425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 Bug 321731 depends on bug 321711, which changed state. Bug 321711 Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072338.l97Nc3T6005401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 19:38 EST ------- Following discussion with Robert, and also on #fedora-devel, consensus seems to be that it is better to have a single package with all tarballs. Therefore, I'm closing this review, and discussion of the multitarball package will continue in BZ #321731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:38:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072338.l97NcwnC006127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 Bug 321731 depends on bug 321721, which changed state. Bug 321721 Summary: Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321721 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:38:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321721] Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072338.l97Ncwh9006103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-shell - Shell-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321721 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 19:38 EST ------- Following discussion with Robert, and also on #fedora-devel, consensus seems to be that it is better to have a single package with all tarballs. Therefore, I'm closing this review, and discussion of the multitarball package will continue in BZ #321731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:37:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072337.l97NbVC3006040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 19:37 EST ------- Hi Ville - I can see a way of possibly doing that by having a symlink to /var/lib/shorewall-perl/Ports.pm in /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Ports.pm, and creating /var/lib/shorewall-perl/Ports.pm in %post on package install or upgrade. Would that be ok? However, I am sure there is some aspect of the issue I am missing, because doing an installation/upgrade of an rpm with a read only /usr wouldn't work anyway, and so I don't actually understand what is wrong with creating Ports.pm somewhere on /usr? [Please note, I'm not challenging what you say, as I am sure you're right, but there is something I am missing] However, this problem has seemingly larger scope. Take your LTSP example - if the user installs shorewall, and then LTSP which modifies /etc/{services,protocols}, the Ports.pm would then be incorrect until shorewall is upgraded again. The only way around that would be with triggers, which is... horrific... So all in all, I can't help thinking the simple solution of creating Ports.pm at build time from the build root /etc/{services,protocols} is probably as good as we can get. Shouldn't the LTSP packager be getting his changes to these files incororated into the setup package, rather than changing those files on package installation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:40:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072340.l97Ne1wJ005517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 19:40 EST ------- Following discussion with Robert, and also on #fedora-devel, consensus seems to be that it is better to have a single package with all tarballs. Therefore, I'm closing this review, and discussion of the multi-tarball package will continue in this bugzilla entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:48:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072348.l97Nmpj4006839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 19:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-4.0.4-1.fc7.src.rpm This is the combined tarball package. Plus it now contains the shorewall-lite functionality. The main package (shorewall) simply Requires the sub-packages shorewall-common, shorewall-perl and shorewall-shell. This is the pragmatic approach, aimed at not breaking existing installations that require the legacy shell compiler. The clued up user could install only shorewall-common and shorewall-perl or shorewall-shell if she only wanted one compiler. There is also a sub-package for shorewall-lite. Running rpmlint on the subpackages: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-common-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm shorewall-common.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/shorewall --> Bogus, as the Defaul-Start entry is empty shorewall-common.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/shorewall --> This is ok, as although the init file doesn't create a lockfile, shorewall itself does. shorewall-common.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name shorewall --> Irrelevant $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-perl-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm No warnings or errors $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-shell-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm shorewall-shell.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/shorewall-shell/prog.header 0644 --> prog.header has a hash-bang at the top, but isn't executable as this file is simply a template for shorewall to use when generating a shell script, and so it shouldn't be executeable. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-lite-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm shorewall-lite.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/shorewall-lite/Makefile --> A weird one. that Makefile is used by shorewall-lite and is intentionally put in /etc by upstream... not sure waht to do about this really. shorewall-lite.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/shorewall-lite --> bogus again - Default-Start is empty, Default-Stop has all runlevels. shorewall-lite.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/shorewall-lite --> Again, shorewall-lite handles lock file creation itself, there's no need for the init script to create one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 7 23:59:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710072359.l97NxoSm008262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 19:59 EST ------- A remaining question is what to do about Ports.pm. Please see BZ #321711 for a discussion about this. Synopsis: shorewall-perl requires the file: /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Ports.pm Ports.pm is built by buildports.pl which looks at entries in /etc/{services,protocols} and builds Ports.pm accordingly. /etc/{services,protocols} are part of the setup package. The current strategy in the spec file is that Ports.pm is created at package build time by Build:requiring the setup package. However, the following issues then arise: A) What if the user has modified locally /etc/{services,protocols} B) What if another package modifies /etc/{services,protocols} on package installation (Ville recalled that the LTSP stuff might do this) The only way around that would be to create Ports.pm on package installation. This could be done in %post, and indeed the upstream sample spec does just that. But, Ville also points out that creating files under /usr on package installation fails if /usr is read-only (but then again, so will package installation). So, then we'd have to do the building of Ports.pm under /var/lib/shorewall-perl, and package a symlink there from /usr/share/shorewall-perl. This is all do-able, but I can't help preferring the KISS approach of generating Ports.pm at package build time using /etc/{services,protocols} from the setup package. For case B above I would argue that the LTSP packager should have his changes to /etc/{services,protocols} incoorporated into the setup package files. ... Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 00:11:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080011.l980BXi1010713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 20:11 EST ------- Oops - in Comment #2, please ignore the part that reads "I'm closing this review"! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 00:21:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080021.l980L4JA011385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-07 20:21 EST ------- For background, the reason that Ports.pm is generated rather than direclty parsing /etc/{services,protocols} is given by upstream: 3) Previously, Shorewall-perl read /etc/protocols and /etc/services during compiler startup to build internal protocol and service tables. This had a fixed cost of up to one half second or more, depending on the speed of the system and the distribution (The /etc/services released with OpenSuSE 10.2 is over 14,000 lines!!) These tables are now initialized by the Perl compiler which speeds up compilation considerably. During installation, Shorewall generates the Perl module /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Ports.pm, using your /etc/protocols and /etc/services as input. To re-generate the module from those two files: 1. Backup your current /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Ports.pm file. 2. /usr/share/shorewall-perl/buildports.pl > \ /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Ports.pm Note: If the buildports.pl program fails to run to a successful completion during installation, a fallback version of module will be installed. That fallback module was generated from the /etc/protocols and /etc/services shipped with Ubuntu Feisty Fawn. Even if the buildports.pl program runs successfully, the fallback module is also installed as /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/FallbackPorts.pm. So if you encounter problems with the generated module, simply copy the fallback module to /usr/share/shorewall-perl/Shorewall/Ports.pm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 00:21:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322581] New: Package Updater crashes when selecting view updates or apply updates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322581 Summary: Package Updater crashes when selecting view updates or apply updates Product: Fedora Version: f8test3 Platform: ppc64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tj at cravey.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: The Package Updater pops up on the top right of the screen and says that there are 124 new updates. When I choose either to view the updates or apply the updates the Package Updater window pops up and then crashes. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 8 Test 3 How reproducible: Happens everytime I try to apply or view the available updates. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start Power Mac G5 in Fedora 8 Test 3 (ppc64) 2. Wait for updater to alert you that there are updates available. 3. Choose to view the available update or apply the updates. Actual results: Window titled Package Updater launches and immediate crashes with an error log. Expected results: Successful update of system. Additional info: The system is an Apple PowerMac G5 Single 1.8GHz with 1GB RAM. ------- Additional Comments From tj at cravey.net 2007-10-07 20:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=218951) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=218951&action=view) This is the output file from the crash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 00:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 20:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322581] Package Updater crashes when selecting view updates or apply updates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080045.l980jfFp014903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Updater crashes when selecting view updates or apply updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322581 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- |james.antill at redhat.com |review at redhat.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com Component|Package Review |pirut ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-10-07 20:45 EST ------- Reassigning to Pirut component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 03:21:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 23:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080321.l983LMLN003790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-07 23:21 EST ------- Maybe my indications on the license were not quite accurate. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ we reach (4) of the first question ("How do I figure out what version of the GPL/LGPL my package is under?") and so COPYING implies GPLv2+, if I'm not mistaken. Please update the License field to that in the next update. We should really make the version explicit in the README file say for the next release of Lohit fonts though (the .ttf files themselves just say GPL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 05:24:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080524.l985OgTY020149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-10-08 01:24 EST ------- REVIEW: * rpmlint : W: no-documentation * The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. * The spec file name match the base package * The package meet the PHP Packaging Guidelines (see below) * Fedora approved license (LGPLv2) * License field in the package spec file match the actual license * The spec file is written in American English * The spec file is legible * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source 87480d20b83be9ae859153539ec57c70 creole-1.1.0.tgz * build in mock (F-7, noarch) * All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires * no locales * no shared library files * package own all directories that it creates * Package don't own files or directories already owned by other packages * no duplicate files * Permissions on files are set properly * %clean section * package consistently use macros * The package contain code * no documentation * no library * no desktop file * %install, start with rm -rf %{buildroot} * All filenames are valid UTF-8 * scriptlets are sane* * Final Provides ok php-pear(pear.phpdb.org/creole) = 1.1.0 php-pear-creole = 1.1.0-5.fc8 * Final Requires /usr/bin/pear php-channel(pear.phpdb.org) php-cli >= 5.0.0 php-pear ** No test suite or example to run. There is actually no PHP Guidelines for non standard channel, but this spec conforms with other RPM. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 05:44:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080544.l985ik7d023167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-08 01:44 EST ------- Here is my review: Good: + meets packaging and naming guidelines + project is GPL + spec file is clearly written + source is pristine 5934c08d12407d8233416343cd73df24 gnome-doc-utils-0.12.0.tar.bz2 + lists buildrequires + file ownership looks good (except yelp problem mentioned also below) Needs attention: - rpmlint output gnome-doc-utils.src: W: invalid-license GFDL+ gnome-doc-utils.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python gnome-doc-utils.noarch: W: invalid-license GFDL+ gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: no-documentation gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/gnome-doc-utils.pc gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/xml2po.pc - /usr/share/gnome/help ownership: Dunno if it would make sense have a different package (like filesystem) to own this dir rather than yelp if it is problematic to require yelp? If GFDL is mentioned as an additional license for the .xml files then I think LGPL+ should also be mentioned for the .xsl files. The GFDL license is not included though, so since it is embedded I am not sure if it is strictly necessary to mention GFDL in the License field. Otherwise the package looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 05:54:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080554.l985ssHk024333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-08 01:54 EST ------- Some comments: - Can we move %build to between %prep and %install as usual? - The License field should be GPLv2+. - Is there a full url for the source? - If you like you could use %fontname in %setup too. Otherwise it looks ok to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 05:59:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080559.l985xBSZ025126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-08 01:59 EST ------- OK source files match upstream: c2e5a421ffbd35f58f60e730d678465a8c4a4b5b enet-1.1.tar.gz OK latest version is being packaged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 06:11:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] New: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi-0.70-0.1.rc1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi-build.log Description: GLPI is the Information Resource-Manager with an additional Administration- Interface. You can use it to build up a database with an inventory for your company (computer, software, printers...). It has enhanced functions to make the daily life for the administrators easier, like a job-tracking-system with mail-notification and methods to build a database with basic information about your network-topology. -- This is the Release Candidate of new 0.70 version. Database schema is freezed. I submit it to review. RC will be pushed to "testing", final version to "stable" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 06:10:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080610.l986ARfd026979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-08 02:10 EST ------- Almost okay. * Would you consider to set a icon for desktop file? Perhaps ./qtiplot_logo.png (size:128x128) can be used for the icon. * Still -debuginfo rpm produces many rpmlint complaint about "wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding" and "spurious-executable-perm". ! Note: files under %_prefix/src/%name in -debuginfo rpm are just copied from builddir. For example, currently rpmlint complain about -------------------------------------------------------------- qtiplot-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qtiplot-0.9/qtiplot/src/FitDialog.h -------------------------------------------------------------- This is because the permission of "qtiplot/src/FitDialog.h" in source tarball is incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 06:15:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080615.l986Fq05027544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-10-08 02:15 EST ------- Notes : 1/ I work with upstream on this project 2/ I use this version in production (large inventory : more than 30.000 PC now, target is 90.000) 3/ Some "plugins" (among the >50 available) will also be proposed to review Remi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 06:37:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080637.l986b5Ye030219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-08 02:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kazehakase New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 06:48:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 02:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080648.l986mc6b031729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-08 02:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > However, I am sure there is some aspect of the issue I am missing, because doing > an installation/upgrade of an rpm with a read only /usr wouldn't work anyway, > and so I don't actually understand what is wrong with creating Ports.pm > somewhere on /usr? [Please note, I'm not challenging what you say, as I am sure > you're right, but there is something I am missing] You're missing what %_netsharedpath does. For example %_netsharedpath /usr makes rpm not drop any files under /usr but just assume the files it'd drop there are already there (useful for eg. a central NFS-shared /usr - the server installs rpms with files there, clients install the same RPMs locally but don't touch anything in /usr). However, %_netsharedpath only affects files in package payloads, scriptlets need to be taken care of by packagers. > Shouldn't the LTSP packager be getting his changes to these files > incororated into the setup package, rather than changing those files on package > installation? Possibly (but that might be harder than it seems). But that's not my point, the point is that more that those files are marked as %config and thus supposedly... configurable, modifiable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 07:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 03:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321691] Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080722.l987MChh004329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-common - Common files for the shorewall firewall compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321691 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-10-08 03:22 EST ------- > This one is bogus - the startup script has an empty entry for Default-Start. > Removing the Default-Start entry makes the warning go away, but it is fine to > have an empty one there. correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 07:43:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 03:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080743.l987hpir007250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-08 03:43 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: vavoom New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 08:47:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 04:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322511] Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080847.l988lEPE018233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322511 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-08 04:47 EST ------- totem-xine package is already in Livna [1] and being merged into RpmFusion [2]. Please have a look: [1] http://livna-dl.reloumirrors.net/fedora/development/SRPMS/totem-xine-2.18.0-1.lvn7.src.rpm [2] http://lists.fedoraunity.org/pipermail/repo-merge-discussion/2007-October/000645.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 08:48:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 04:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080848.l988muNH018343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-10-02 10:12 EST ------- Hello Marek Sorry, the files are now reloaded. I don't know how they got lost :( ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-08 04:48 EST ------- Hello Sergio, I've review this package and everything is completely fine! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 09:05:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 05:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080905.l9895ndN021481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-10-08 05:05 EST ------- 1) I've requested legal to comment on the rpm license quite a while ago, haven't heard anything official back. The licensing is complex because of many bundled components but the murkiest part has to do with "lib subdirectory" dual licensing which doesn't really make sense these days. The "GPL/LGPL with exceptions" is about as close as it gets unless the actual license is changed which is another story... 2) The full URL added to cvs now, but it still uses macros for the %{name}-%{version} part, updating the version there manually only leads to stupid mistakes (been there... ;) 3) Yes, popt has been split out in upstream HEAD, but it'll stay in the 4.4.x branch to avoid large changes in maintenance versions. 4) /usr/src/redhat|fedora|packages|rpm needs to die as a concept, we don't want to encourage building packages as root. A saner default setup is needed but it's too late for F8. 5) AFAIK nothing in Fedora needs static rpm libs, guess they could go. 6) The rpmlint whining can indeed be ignored for most part. I'm curious about the file-not-utf8 complaint as doxygen (as of 1.5.2) is supposed to always create UTF-8 for html. The configure-without-libdir-spec is due to rpm configure messing with lib/lib64 itself, preventing the use of --libdir (it'll lead to things like /usr/lib6464 on multilib systems). Fixed in rpm.org HEAD but not going to happen for 4.4.x to avoid breaking legacy expectations in maintenance releases. The biggest remaining question is probably the use of rpm user+group for all sorts of files. Doesn't IMO make much sense, the only place where it might theoretically be useful is rpmdb itself but you can't install anything without being root so... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 09:17:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 05:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710080917.l989HJmd023612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-08 05:17 EST ------- Hello Lubomir, I agree with obsoleting CenterICQ in favor of CenterIM. The spec file seems correct (just update buildroot) and the package build correctly on F7. The problem with curl isn't fixed yet in rawhide. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 10:15:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225623] Merge Review: bootparamd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081015.l98AFeLR000328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bootparamd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225623 odvorace at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(odvorace at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From odvorace at redhat.com 2007-10-08 06:15 EST ------- Hi, > * Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines > (wiki: PackageNamingGuidelines) renamed source tarball so it matches upstream tarball and added correct upstream source tarball url > * BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot) corrected the BuildRoot > * Encoding should be UTF-8 removed invalid character from spec file > * The package should contain the text of the license > (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) the upstream package does not contain the text of the license so I can't add the license text to the tarball > * Scriptlets: missing "service" in %preun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) > * Scriptlets: missing "service" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) corrected scriptlets according to the ScriptletsSnippets RPMLINT: Source RPM: > W: bootparamd summary-ended-with-dot A server process which provides boot information to diskless clients. removed dot > E: bootparamd tag-not-utf8 %changelog removed invalid character from changelog > W: bootparamd no-url-tag there is no bootparamd page > W: bootparamd strange-permission bootparamd.init 0775 don't know what to do with that, many other services has the same problem > E: bootparamd non-utf8-spec-file bootparamd.spec removed invalid character from spec file > W: bootparamd prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig /etc/init.d removed prereq use and added correct requires according to the ScriptletsSnippets > E: bootparamd use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR removed usage of RPM_SOURCE_DIR > W: bootparamd mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 49, tab: line 1) using spaces rpmlint of bootparamd: > W: bootparamd summary-ended-with-dot A server process which provides boot information to diskless clients. removed dot > E: bootparamd tag-not-utf8 %changelog removed invalid character from changelog > W: bootparamd no-url-tag there is no bootparamd page > W: bootparamd conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/bootparamd > E: bootparamd executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/bootparamd /etc/rc.d/init.d/bootparamd is not a config file Cheers Ondrej -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 10:49:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081049.l98AndwZ004720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-08 06:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: centerim Short Description: Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Owners: lkundrak,awjb Branches: FC-6 F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 11:33:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 07:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081133.l98BXYlu010803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-08 07:33 EST ------- Would you update ImageInfo review (bug 321601) before I can approve this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 12:13:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081213.l98CDFVC018277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-08 08:13 EST ------- If 20061222 is our versioning of the source, then I suggest changing the tarball versioning to be closer to the original upstream version(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 12:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081254.l98CsYvO024904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-08 08:54 EST ------- Re License: BSD See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#3ClauseBSD Which matches: // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer // in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the // distribution. // * Neither the name of Industrial Light & Magic nor the names of // its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived // from this software without specific prior written permission. Re: iostream a standard C++ header, not to be confused with /boost/iostreams/detail/iostream.hpp I'll work to fixup the other MUST items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 12:58:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081258.l98CwPmP025944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-08 08:58 EST ------- Koji Build Done for devel and F-7 branch. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4658 Bodhi: I have put up sirius-0.8.0-11.fc7 in bodhi. I have pushed the put it up for testing but it's still pending. Please check it: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/pending/sirius-0.8.0-11.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:07:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081307.l98D7f7u027581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-08 09:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/ilmbase/ilmbase.spec SRPM URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/ilmbase/ilmbase-1.0.0-2.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Oct 08 2007 Rex Dieter 1.0.0-2 - update %%summary - -devel: +Requires: libGL-devel libGLU-devel - make install ... INSTALL="install -p" to preserve timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:14:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081314.l98DEaD2027469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:32:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315481] Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081332.l98DW2fD031483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315481 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-08 09:32 EST ------- Full review done (sources match upstream, license ok, everything else ok): Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:29:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081329.l98DTrXS030857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-10-08 09:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cpl Short Description: ES0 library for automated astronomical data-reduction Owners: sergiopr Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:31:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081331.l98DVeBG031428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-08 09:31 EST ------- Scott: thanks for the package, it looks very well. Here are some random things that would be nice to be looked at before this this gets approval: 25 RATS is released under version 2 of the GNU Public License (GPL). This is not necessary, License: tag is for this. 30 ./configure --prefix=/usr \ 31 --datadir=%{_datadir}/rats 32 33 %build 34 CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"; export CFLAGS Why not use the %configure macro? It would set the CFLAGS for you, and possibly correct libdir on 64 bit architectures, etc. 38 %install 39 [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Do not conditionally remove the build root. Just delete it, it is never root. 45 # rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT 46 # mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr 47 # make install prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT 48 # mv bin share $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/ Why is this commented? Why do you install stuff by hand instead of make install? It does not have to be wrong, just please always write comments in SPEC in case you do something nonstandard. 53 #make clean Also, never make useless comments like this. Just remove it. Also applies to what is below the %files section. 77 * Wed Sep 26 2007 Scott Henson 78 - 2.1-1: Initial packaged version The correct format of the changelog entry would be: 77 * Wed Sep 26 2007 Scott Henson - 2.1-1 78 - Initial packaged version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:31:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081331.l98DVc11030538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-08 09:31 EST ------- Full review done (sources match upstream, license ok, everything else ok), a couple of Should Fix's, but no blockers, so its approved! Should Fix: -Please always start the Name with a capital in the .desktop file, so: Name=Astromenace -Please use opengl-games-utils wrapper to check for missing DRI Add: "Requires: opengl-games-utils" Add to %install: "ln -s opengl-game-wrapper.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name}-wrapper" Add "%{_bindir}/%{name}-wrapper" to files Change the .desktop file Exec entry from "%{name}" to "%{name}-wrapper" -Once build please add this to the games-live .ks file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/GamesLive -Please change the default resolution to 640x480 (it defaulted to my desktop resolution). With my desktop resolution its unplayable with my somewhat under powered 3d card (intel 965) on 640x480 it rocks on at 15 fps! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:36:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081336.l98DaAls031259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-08 09:36 EST ------- RPMLint: > $ rpmlint /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rats-2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm > rats.src:32: E: configure-without-libdir-spec Just do a $ expand rats.spec >x; mv x rats.spec > rats.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11) This would be solved using the %configure macro, as I wrote in comment #2 > $ rpmlint /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/rats-2.1-1.fc8.i386.rpm > $ rpmlint /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/rats-debuginfo-2.1-1.fc8.i386.rpm > $ Fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322511] Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081347.l98DlDMx001387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322511 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-08 09:47 EST ------- I help maintain totem-xine at Livna, we thought Fedora would be a better place for it now that xine-lib had been moved into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:49:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081349.l98DnwJE001660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-08 09:49 EST ------- I can not compare the upstream version with the packaged at the time as the upstream web is not responding at the time. The patch rats-2.1-linux.diff doesn't seem right to me; 1.) files rats-2.1/lex.yy*.c are autogenerated. Why don't you regenerate them instead of patching? 2.) You seem to be patching unrelated issues in this one patch. Please eplit it into multiple patches. When I was talking about libdir in comment #2 and comment #3, I did not notice that the package doesn't make use of libdir. Please ingore it. Another bad thing in .SPEC: 8 URL: http://www.securesw.com/rats/rats-%{version}.tar.gz 9 Source0: rats-2.1.tar.gz The URL tag is for the web page of the software's author, Source0 is for URIs of the files. It should look like this instead: 8 URL: http://www.securesw.com/rats/ 9 Source0: http://www.securesw.com/rats/rats-%{version}.tar.gz Apart from these issues, the package meets the Packing Guidelines, and I will approve it when the issues are resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 13:54:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081354.l98DsupR002448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-08 09:54 EST ------- Why is the package still not available for FC-7? CVS has it but it doesn't seem to be available from the repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081430.l98EUpJc008306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-08 10:30 EST ------- Builds fine in mock for fedora-devel-i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:45:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322511] Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081445.l98EjYWt011485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322511 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-08 10:45 EST ------- Upstream has plans to make the engine selectable at runtime rather than compile time (gnome bz#459539), however for now I'm going to work on a parallel installable version since it shouldn't conflict totem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:46:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081446.l98Ek3ER011517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nando at ccrma.stanford.edu ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-08 10:46 EST ------- Fernando, this is moving to Fedora too, I guess you want to know, and maybe take a quick peek for any errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:45:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081445.l98EjCbq011329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|seg at haxxed.com |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-08 10:45 EST ------- Taking over as reviewer, since Callum is very busy with other stuff ATM AFAIK. I hope you don't mind Callum. Full review done (sources match upstream, license ok, everything else also checked), I've found a few items to fix: MUST FIX -------- - You currently pass LIBDIR=%{_libdir} to make but not to make install! I couldn't test this at a 64 bit machine atm, but either you should use it in both places or not all - Remove these obsolete or unneeded options when installing the .desktop file: --add-category X-Fedora \ --add-category AudioVideo \ --add-category Application \ - Add the following to remove the obsolete Application category that is in upstreams .desktop file: --remove-category Application \ - Remove "MimeType=text/xml" from hydrogen.desktop, thats way too generic! - Remove obsolete "Version=1.0" from hydrogen.desktop - No longer run update-desktop-database from %post[un] now the .desktop file no longer defines a MimeType - The update icon cache scriptlets should check the existence of gtk-update-icon-cache before calling it, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda SHOULD FIX ---------- - Add the following Categories from: http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html : Midi - Add the following X-foo categories, to mathc what CCRMA has so that this package will work with CCRMA's nested audio utilities menus: X-Drumming X-MIDI X-Jack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322511] Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081451.l98EpkEd012466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322511 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-10-08 10:51 EST ------- I'd be happy to have totem-xine and totem-gstreamer both built from the same source RPM, rather than having 2 different packages, which wouldn't share fixes, updates, etc. I'm not sure just how we'd handle that practically though. Maybe time would be better spent making the backend a runtime option as per upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:58:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081458.l98Ew8bD013424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-08 10:58 EST ------- SteGUI-0.0.1-12.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:54:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081454.l98EsqRq012606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ansilva at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:56:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081456.l98EueJS013198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-08 10:56 EST ------- R-DynDoc-1.14.0-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-DynDoc' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:58:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081458.l98Ew9ol013449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.0.1-12.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081455.l98EtbGA012264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-08 10:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Why is the package still not available for FC-7? > CVS has it but it doesn't seem to be available from the repos. Well, F-7 lzma is still in testing. I added a comment on bodhi to ask Patrice to request to move from testing to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:56:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081456.l98EuWuW012482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-08 10:56 EST ------- wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wqy-unibit-fonts' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 14:59:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081459.l98ExaN3013113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-08 10:59 EST ------- PyQt4-4.2-8.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update PyQt4' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 15:17:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081517.l98FHvfG016699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-08 11:17 EST ------- Sorry, I had mistakenly thought I approved this already. Everything looks good to me; APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 15:19:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081519.l98FJcc7016933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-10-08 11:19 EST ------- Thanks for pointing that out. Please see corrected spec http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/photo/imageinfo/imageinfo.spec and SRPM http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/photo/imageinfo/imageinfo-0.05-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 15:44:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081544.l98FiMLi021178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-08 11:44 EST ------- Much thanks for the comments! > - You currently pass LIBDIR=%{_libdir} to make but not to make install! > I couldn't test this at a 64 bit machine atm, but either you should use it in > both places or not all That is no longer needed, I just forgot it there. Makefiles use ${libdir} from autoconf and set -DLIBDIR for the ladspa plugins path via .pro files. > - Remove these obsolete or unneeded options when installing the .desktop file: > --add-category X-Fedora \ > --add-category AudioVideo \ > --add-category Application \ > - Add the following to remove the obsolete Application category that is in > upstreams .desktop file: > --remove-category Application \ > - Remove "MimeType=text/xml" from hydrogen.desktop, thats way too generic! > - Remove obsolete "Version=1.0" from hydrogen.desktop > - No longer run update-desktop-database from %post[un] now the .desktop file no > longer defines a MimeType > - Add the following Categories from: > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html : > Midi > - Add the following X-foo categories, to mathc what CCRMA has so that this > package will work with CCRMA's nested audio utilities menus: > X-Drumming X-MIDI X-Jack Changed the options to desktop-file-install, removed hydrogen-0.9.3-sound-category.patch patch. > - The update icon cache scriptlets should check the existence of > gtk-update-icon-cache before calling it, see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda I've modified the scriptlets accordingly. Here's the new package: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/hydrogen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/hydrogen-0.9.3-9.fc8.i386/hydrogen-0.9.3-9.fc8.src.rpm The mock build results: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/hydrogen-0.9.3-9.fc8.i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 15:55:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081555.l98FtkC3023215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: XGrep - A |Review Request: xgrep - A |grep-like utility for XML |grep-like utility for XML |files. |files. Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-08 11:55 EST ------- Well. * This package is okay * Your another review request (bug 321601) will perhaps be accepted soon ------------------------------------------------------- This package (xgrep) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 16:24:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081624.l98GOARQ027823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-08 12:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/shorewall-common-4.0.4-1.fc7.noarch.rpm > shorewall-common.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/shorewall > --> Bogus, as the Defaul-Start entry is empty Indeed, rpmlint bug (ditto the -lite one), now fixed in rpmlint upstream svn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 16:29:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081629.l98GTCbE029202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-08 12:29 EST ------- Is anything going to happen with this package? As far as I can tell, neither it nor uisp have ever even been built. Please give me an update; otherwise I'll go ahead and have this package removed from the CVS repository and package database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 16:44:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081644.l98GihYf031289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-08 12:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=219891) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=219891&action=view) build.c -> UTF-8 (In reply to comment #13) > I'm curious about > the file-not-utf8 complaint as doxygen (as of 1.5.2) is supposed to always > create UTF-8 for html. rpm's doxygen appears to be configured so that it is told that input source files are in UTF-8. However, the toplevel build.c contains some (partially corrupted) non-UTF-8 commentary which appears to be some strong words in Polish :) http://www.tranexp.com:2000/InterTran?url=http%3A%2F%2F&type=text&text=Kurwa%2C+durni+ameryka%26%23324%3Bce+sobe+zawsze+my%26%23347%3Bl%26%23261%3B%2C+%26%23380%3Be+ca%26%23322%3By+%26%23347%3Bwiat+m%F3wi+po+angielsku&from=pol&to=eng I don't think there's much doxygen can do about this, but if you want to keep that comment, here's a patch which I guess converts it to valid UTF-8 (gzipped so Bugzilla won't corrupt the patch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 16:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081649.l98Gnu6h032355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-10-08 12:49 EST ------- Hello, A few remarks : - you should use macros or commands everywhere (mkdir or %{__mkdir}) - Source0 is not correct The package build successfully. rpmlint is not clean, assuming for a webapp, 'non-standard-uid' and 'non-standard-dir-perm' can safely be ignored. Also, rpmlint complains about a 'zero-lenght' file. Regards, Johan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 16:58:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081658.l98Gw6AD001760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 17:16:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081716.l98HGI26005528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2007-10-08 13:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > Fernando, this is moving to Fedora too, I guess you want to know, and maybe take > a quick peek for any errors. _Thanks_ for the heads up. Looks fine so far (just took a quick look at the spec file), thanks for including the Planet CCRMA menu categories so that it meshes with the existing menus... one more for the migration! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 17:15:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081715.l98HFqs7005076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-08 13:15 EST ------- Well, actually this is rather a simple package. Now this package is okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (imageinfo) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 17:26:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081726.l98HQgGg007581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-10-08 13:26 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. - editor_plugin.js (zero-lenght) is required in tiny_mce_gzip.js (intended for extension) - Source0 URL fixed - macros fixed Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi-0.70-0.2.rc1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 17:38:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 323441] New: Review Request: trousers - The open-source TCG software stack Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=323441 Summary: Review Request: trousers - The open-source TCG software stack Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yoder1 at us.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://trousers.sf.net/trousers-0.3.1-1cvs.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://trousers.sf.net/trousers.spec Description: Trousers is an implementation of the Trusted Computing Group's Software Stack specification, created and maintained by IBM. Trousers consists of a library, libtspi.so, which communicates through RPC to a daemon, resident on the TPM chip's platform. The library can be used without the daemon for some tasks and so the package should be included for all architectures. For questions, please contact Kent Yoder at key at linux.vnet.ibm.com. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 17:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081743.l98HhRaU010414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 17:45:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081745.l98Hj93Z010942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |johan at x-tnd.be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:00:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081800.l98I09UN013962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-10-08 14:00 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and not RPMs but it is correct. + source file are ok. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + BuildRequires are proper. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + package runs correctly. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081822.l98IMCoK016746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-08 14:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322141] Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081827.l98IRt1C018090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322141 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-08 14:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081825.l98IP2vE017152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-08 14:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:28:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081828.l98ISDN5018123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-10-08 14:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glpi Short Description: Free IT asset management software Owners: remi Branches: devel, F-7, FC-6, EL-5, EL-4 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081829.l98ITbIH017656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-08 14:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315481] Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081833.l98IXC0Y018242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315481 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-08 14:33 EST ------- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: astromenace-data Short Description: astromenace data and language files Owners: limb Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:34:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081834.l98IY5nY018996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-08 14:34 EST ------- Thanks! Shoulds addressed. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: astromenace Short Description: Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities Owners: limb Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:44:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 323551] New: Review Request: esorex - EsoRex is the European Southern Observatory Recipe Execution Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=323551 Summary: Review Request: esorex - EsoRex is the European Southern Observatory Recipe Execution Tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/esorex.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/esorex-3.6.1-0.3.fc7.src.rpm Description: EsoRex is the ESO Recipe Execution Tool. It can list, configure and execute CPL-based recipes from the command line. One of the features provided by the CPL is the ability to create data-reduction algorithms that run as plugins (dynamic libraries). These are called recipes and are one of the main aspects of the CPL data-reduction development environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:46:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 323551] Review Request: esorex - EsoRex is the European Southern Observatory Recipe Execution Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081846.l98Ik4HY020163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esorex - EsoRex is the European Southern Observatory Recipe Execution Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=323551 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:46:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081846.l98Ik58I020278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |323551 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:47:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226109] Merge Review: ltrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081847.l98IlEnp020355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ltrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226109 pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |F-8 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-10-08 14:47 EST ------- I've taken a look at this. Testsuite failures are consistent in koji, and non-existent on "real" machines. I blame kernel version koji uses to do its thing, but that's basically a wild guess. I'm disabling the suite while still leaving it handy in spec for development purposes. The package has been built. Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:48:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081848.l98Imvq3021200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-08 14:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:54:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081854.l98IsEL5021358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-08 14:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:50:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 323551] Review Request: esorex - EsoRex is the European Southern Observatory Recipe Execution Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081850.l98IouDw021039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esorex - EsoRex is the European Southern Observatory Recipe Execution Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=323551 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-08 14:50 EST ------- I will take a look on this tomorrow. Thank you for submitting. I'm very interesting to help with any astronomical reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:57:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315481] Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081857.l98IvmCQ022086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315481 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-08 14:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 18:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081859.l98IxKhG022209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-08 14:59 EST ------- Sirius is now pushed for updates-testing in Bodhi https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sirius -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 19:15:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081915.l98JFSBd025104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2007-10-08 15:15 EST ------- Sorry I haven't responded, I didn't see the update. As for the upstream, securesw was bought out by fortify. I was contacting them with the Debian maintainer while I put the package together so that never got updated. The next version will have the corrected URL. I will take care of the other problems now as well. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 19:21:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081921.l98JL8tG026225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From raven at pmail.pl 2007-10-08 15:21 EST ------- Yep, that's in Polish. If you really want to know what exactly it is, it's something like that: "Fuck, dumb Americans always think the whole world speaks English" You should remove that, I guess. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 19:24:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322511] Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081924.l98JOvoD026685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: totem-xine - A movie player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322511 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-08 15:24 EST ------- Like Bastien said it would probably better to modify the current spec rather then two specs for the same package. I'll close this bug and report one against totem instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 19:33:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081933.l98JXuFE028368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2007-10-08 15:33 EST ------- A new verion is now avaliable at http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/Rats/. I believe all the above problems should be fixed. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 19:47:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710081947.l98Jlgaa030226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-08 15:47 EST ------- Latest version looks fine: Approved! Which brings us to the interesting question who will maintain it, may I suggest having both Anthony and Lubomir as owners / co-maintainers? And I think it would be good to have Fernando from CCRMA as co-maintainer too, for a grand total of 3 :) Note Fernando's account system name is nando. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 20:28:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710082028.l98KS7cw004248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-08 16:28 EST ------- Hans: This will be CVS extras writable, so who'll be a formal maintainer is not an issue at all. Anyways, I do not think I would want to maintain this, but as Anthony says he doesn't have time at the time I'd be glad to help with package mainteance tasks for now. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hydrogen Short Description: Advanced drum machine Owners: green,lkundrak,nando Branches: FC-6 F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 20:29:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710082029.l98KTutc004449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |316191 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 20:47:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710082047.l98KluVB007580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-10-08 16:47 EST ------- fc8 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=187351 shows this error: make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libtune-0.13/db' SYMLINK include/base -> include/basedbs/base-2.6.23 SYMLINK include/distro -> include/distrodbs/distro-fc7.92 Combination fc/7.92 is not supported make: *** [include/distro] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libtune-0.13/db' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14837 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 22:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710082250.l98MoqGg025857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-08 18:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-4.0.4-2.fc7.src.rpm * Mon Oct 8 2007 Jonathan G. Underwood - 4.0.4-2 - Add ghost files for /var/lib/shorewall/.modules and /var/lib/shorewall/.modulesdir - Fix ownership of /var/lib/shorewall-lite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 23:36:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710082336.l98NadjQ031421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-10-08 19:36 EST ------- My apologies for the shoddy initial submission and thanks for reviewing it anyway. I have addressed all the points you raised above; the specfile now works in my mock buildroots from RHEL-4 to rawhide Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-rpm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-rpm-1.2.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 23:47:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710082347.l98Nl9Dv032629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-08 19:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Also i haven't put gurlchecker in bodhi as yet. It's better to do after the > > issues are fixed...right? > Yes. > > > Well, for 0.10.1-2: > > * Possibly missing BuildRequires > - I usually checks possibly missing BuildRequres by highlighting > "no" string on build.log. Then: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > 246 checking whether to use CROCO library (CSS2 w3c validation)... requested > 247 checking for CROCO... no > 248 libcroco-0.6.pc not found > 249 configure: WARNING: You requested libcroco support, but it doesn't seem > to be installed. > 250 checking whether to use TIDY library (HTML w3c validation)... requested > 251 checking for tidyCreate in -ltidy... no > 252 configure: WARNING: You requested libtidy support, but it doesn't seem > to be installed. > 253 checking whether to use CLAMAV library (virii scan)... requested > 254 checking for cl_loaddbdir in -lclamav... no > 255 configure: WARNING: You requested libclamav support, but it doesn't seem > to be installed. > 256 checking whether to use GNUTLS library (HTTPS check)... requested > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Perhaps libcroco-devel, libtidy-devel, clamav-devel will > enable these missing support. > > - Also please check if this is desired. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > 293 Generate GTK doc (gtkdoc) : no > ----------------------------------------------------------- Fixed. BuildRequires: libcroco-devel, libtidy-devel, clamav-devel And also Generate GTK doc (no) is okay i think. Because in the spec file i have used: ---------------------------------------------- %configure --disable-gtk-doc ---------------------------------------------- This is due to if I just use "%configure", though gtk-doc is generated it returns with RPM buildroot error saying something like "following files are instaled but not contained in source package" listing all the gtk-doc html files > * Redundant Requires > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Requires: gnet2, gnutls > ----------------------------------------------------------- > - Usually these types of Requires are not needed. > rpmbuild checks the dependencies for libraries and adds them > to Requires automatically. > For this package, you can see: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > $ rpm -q --requires gurlchecker | grep '\(gnet\|gnutls\).*so*' > libgnet-2.0.so.0 > libgnutls.so.13 > libgnutls.so.13(GNUTLS_1_3) > ----------------------------------------------------------- > So the dependencies for libraries in gnet2, gnutls are > added, which will pull gnet2 gnutls packages automatically. > For example: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > $ rpm -q --whatprovides libgnet-2.0.so.0 > gnet2-2.0.7-10.fc8 > ----------------------------------------------------------- Fixed. Removed Requires: gnet2, gnutls > * Desktop file > - must be installed (checked) by desktop-file-install > (BR: desktop-file-utils needed). Fixed. > * Perl module BuildRequires > * Timestamp Fixed these too. They are repeatation of od errors...shouldn't have erred them. The updated links are: Spec URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gurlchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gurlchecker-0.10.1-3.fc7.src.rpm The Koji build task is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=187553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 8 23:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321711] Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710082346.l98NkCVQ032579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shorewall-perl - Perl-based compiler for Shoreline Firewall https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321711 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-08 19:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > > However, I am sure there is some aspect of the issue I am missing, because doing > > an installation/upgrade of an rpm with a read only /usr wouldn't work anyway, > > and so I don't actually understand what is wrong with creating Ports.pm > > somewhere on /usr? [Please note, I'm not challenging what you say, as I am sure > > you're right, but there is something I am missing] > > You're missing what %_netsharedpath does. For example %_netsharedpath /usr > makes rpm not drop any files under /usr but just assume the files it'd drop > there are already there (useful for eg. a central NFS-shared /usr - the server > installs rpms with files there, clients install the same RPMs locally but don't > touch anything in /usr). However, %_netsharedpath only affects files in package > payloads, scriptlets need to be taken care of by packagers. > Aha, crystal clear, thanks for taking the time to explain. > > Shouldn't the LTSP packager be getting his changes to these files > > incororated into the setup package, rather than changing those files on package > > installation? > > Possibly (but that might be harder than it seems). But that's not my point, the > point is that more that those files are marked as %config and thus supposedly... > configurable, modifiable. OK, I understand. I think in this case Ports.pm doesn't need %config though - it should certainly be in /var/lib/shorewall-perl but it isn't editable - it merely reflects local state. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 00:07:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090007.l9907mQl002659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-10-08 20:07 EST ------- Forgot to mention: the only warning I get from rpmlint is W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ruby-rpm-1.2.3/doc/refm.rd.ja Any idea what encoding that file is ? (I don't know any Japanese, so I won't know if I recoded anything right) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 01:40:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090140.l991eCwr014308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-08 21:40 EST ------- 1,2 Will fix. 3 I don't think we can rely on pulling it from another package randomly so I will add it to the buildrequires list. 4 Probably a senior moment, it should be bindir and I will change that. Strange that it should only be x86_64 devel. I say we post to the mailing list for help and excludearch if we draw a blank there. I will get a new release with the other fixes up and post to the ML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 03:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 23:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090340.l993eS94031747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From n3npq at mac.com 2007-10-08 23:40 EST ------- I quote from the review: OK - Spec in American English Some things never change ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 04:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 00:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090418.l994IRXh003484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 00:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 04:25:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 00:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090425.l994PCP5004312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 00:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 04:33:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 00:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090433.l994XLkr005257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 00:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 04:32:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 00:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240479] Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090432.l994W3pV005203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vavoom - Enhanced Doom, Heretic, Hexen and Strife source port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240479 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 00:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 04:30:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 00:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090430.l994UBsC004898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 00:30 EST ------- Perhaps it's worth pinging the fedora-devel and/or livna freeworld lists before importing this to see if anyone has any better solutions to co-existance of the two packages. Given comment #16 it sounds like it might not be in livna too much longer anyhow... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 04:37:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 00:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090437.l994bpHC006061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 00:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 05:14:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 01:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090514.l995ELvg010703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-09 01:14 EST ------- Uh, looking at the code in the SRPM, this appears to be the same code used in clamav. The legal status of that code is not clear to me. (In fact, I considered bringing this up with respect to clamav, but seeing the same code used in another package makes this all the more urgent.) The file headers say: "This code is based on the work of Alexander L. Roshal". But then isn't it a derived work of the original unrar sources? If it is, it's illegal to distribute this under the GPL as they're doing because the original unrar license is non-Free and not GPL-compatible. This (libclamav unrar) code also has a history of sharing the security vulnerabilities of the non-Free unrar, which also sounds unlikely for a truely independent implementation. See for example http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/473373/100/0/threaded . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:01:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090601.l9961fBx017458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-10-09 02:01 EST ------- OK, package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090601.l9961Smv017422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-09 02:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nget Short Description: Command line NNTP file grabber. Owners: rishi Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:17:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090617.l996HOQx019723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:16:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090616.l996Gdm0019658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-09 02:16 EST ------- >From http://www.unrarlib.org/faq.html Do you know that the license for the unrar sources from RARLab is not compatible with the GNU Public license? Yes, this is true. But we have the permission from Eugene Roshal to release unrarlib 0.4.0 under GPL and unrarlib-license. Note: this doen't mean that RAR is free now or you can use the unrar source from RARlabs under GPL. You are just allowed to use UniquE RAR File Library version 0.4.0 (unrarlib 0.4.0) under GPL. Does that answer you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:16:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090616.l996GWkb019502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-09 02:16 EST ------- Thanks Antony, Michael, Callum, Hugo, Till, Hans, Fernando and Kevin. The package was imported into CVS and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:21:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090621.l996LcIU020437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-09 02:21 EST ------- But this applies to the old RAR v2 only unrarlib. The RAR v3 decompression code has been added later by the clamav people, and it's that which I'm concerned about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090626.l996Qluu021189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-09 02:26 EST ------- Thanks Marek and Kevin, the package was imported into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:35:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090635.l996ZJtr022059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-09 02:35 EST ------- More details would be helpful. Which files implement RARv3 decompression in unrar that was added by Clamav developers? If this affects Clamav too, you file a bug report and mark that and this review against Fedora Legal or post to fedora-legal-list with the details. CC'ing Tom Callaway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 06:47:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 02:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090647.l996lg1n023745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-09 02:47 EST ------- All the files in http://cvs.gna.org/cvsweb/unrar/src/?cvsroot=unrar which have newly appeared with the "merge things from unrarlib sourceforge svn, the code comes from libclamav." commit are suspicious. libclamav's version of the code is here: http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/listing.php?repname=clamav-devel&path=%2Ftrunk%2Flibclamav%2Funrar%2F&rev=0&sc=0 First version: http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/listing.php?repname=clamav-devel&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fclamav-devel%2Flibclamav%2F&rev=1471&sc=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 07:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 03:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226109] Merge Review: ltrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090736.l997a6V0030496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ltrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226109 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-10-09 03:36 EST ------- Ok, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 07:39:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 03:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090739.l997dYRR030660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 03:39 EST ------- Well, for 1.2.3-2: * File dependency ----------------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: /usr/include/popt.h ----------------------------------------------------- - Because of a certain reason, we don't recommend to use this type of (Build)Requires (please check the section "File Dependencies" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines I don't know well about RHEL, however for fedora ----------------------------------------------------- %if 0%{?fedora} > 8 BuildRequires: popt-devel %endif ----------------------------------------------------- is recommended. * SourceURL - It seems that "20469" should be "26403" - However http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/26403/ruby-rpm-1.2.3.tgz seems different from the tarball in your srpm? ! Well, for rubyforge.org, the number like "26403" seems to change every time new version is released. * Encoding ----------------------------------------------------- Forgot to mention: the only warning I get from rpmlint is W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ruby-rpm-1.2.3/doc/refm.rd.ja Any idea what encoding that file is ? (I don't know any Japanese, so I won't know if I recoded anything right) ----------------------------------------------------- - This file is encoded in EUC-JP (well, I am a Japanese) (Many Japanese documents in *nix are encoded in EUC-JP or ISO-2022-JP, and many Japanese documents in M$ are encoded in SHIFT-JIS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 08:18:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 04:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090818.l998IfXx004806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 04:18 EST ------- For -3: * Documents - Maybe it may be preferable that "CONTRIBUTORS" file is added to %doc. Other things are okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 08:20:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 04:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090820.l998KE5x005333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-09 04:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fuse-python Short Description: Python bindings for FUSE - filesystem in userspace Owners: peter Branches: FC-6 F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 08:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 04:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090845.l998jqlv009540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-10-09 04:45 EST ------- What puzzles me most is this : Q: There is no way to create a RAR archive with the URARFileLib. When will you add a "create archive" function? A: Probably never. The license of the free unrar source code prohibits making a tool that can create RAR compatible archives. This restriction would be clearly incompatible with the GPL, so if the source code was released under "the GNU GPL with the restriction to not use the code to reverse engineer the process of creating rar archives", then we clearly have a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 09:13:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 05:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090913.l999DKNd014432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-09 05:13 EST ------- I don't see such a restriction listed out in the actual source code which is under plain GPL2 or later license. The copyright license in the source package has a higher legal value over any website. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 09:32:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 05:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090932.l999WVLe018224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-09 05:32 EST ------- I have discussed the whole buildports/Ports.pm issue with upstream maintainers, and a better way of dealing with this has been established which removes the need for Ports.pm and buildports - this will happen in the next release 4.0.5 in the very near future. So i see no point tackling the issue in this package currently. I think therefore there's nothing more to be done with this package, it's ready to go, subject to review. Technically, since shorewall exists already as a Fedora package it doesn't need a review, but in this case, with so many changes, it is probably adviseable to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 09:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 05:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090947.l999lhX8021078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-09 05:47 EST ------- Just a note, so this doesn't look stalled; we discussed the patch split on IRC and are waiting for a response from Debian patch maintainer. Also, Scott: Mentioning that the patch comes from Debian should be appropriate in patch's header. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 09:52:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 05:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710090952.l999qFGb021850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 Bug 285331 depends on bug 321931, which changed state. Bug 321931 Summary: please update lash to last version (5.3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321931 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 10:34:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 06:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091034.l99AYIDf027577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-09 06:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Add a update request for lash! > Can someone add a potential list of package that need a rebuild if we update it > before F8 to be gold ? (rawhide installation not ready)... lash has been updated to 0.5.3 in rawhide. I've also rebuilt all of my packages depending on lash (fluidsynth, seq24, vkeybd, dssi and zynaddsubfx). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 12:10:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091210.l99CAOtk008807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 08:10 EST ------- Nicolas can you do a new (and hopefully last) version against the new lash? Then I'll take a look at it and approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 12:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091217.l99CH5Lq010808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 Bug 322161 depends on bug 322111, which changed state. Bug 322111 Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 12:17:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322141] Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091217.l99CHIbF010845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo-data - Data files for the Egoboo RPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322141 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 08:17 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. Note F-7 update pushing is waiting for enet tagging into F-7 buildroot so that egoboo can be build and this can be pushed as an update bundle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 12:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322111] Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091217.l99CH5sT010782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: enet - Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322111 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 08:17 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. Note F-7 update pushing is waiting for enet tagging into F-7 buildroot so that egoboo can be build and this can be pushed as an update bundle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 12:16:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322161] Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091216.l99CGqDQ009839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: egoboo - A top down graphical (3D) RPG in the spirit of Nethack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322161 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 08:16 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. Note F-7 update pushing is waiting for enet tagging into F-7 buildroot so that egoboo can be build and this can be pushed as an update bundle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 13:48:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299171] Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091348.l99DmgwE025525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299171 dwalsh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwalsh at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2007-10-09 09:48 EST ------- Could someone review this package, as this is an interesting tool to help with development of SELinux policies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 14:30:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091430.l99EUMkU032528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-10-09 10:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > kaya.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 > The licensing page specifies "LGPLv2" even for 2.1. > > The headers are OK, although it would probably be cleaner if they were grouped > together in a subdirectory instead of strewn through /usr/lib/kaya. Done, > Binaries named /usr/bin/rekey and /usr/bin/xml2man seem destined to conflict > with something. /usr/bin/xml2man is present on macos and some Linux distros but > doesn't actually seem to be in Fedora. /usr/bin/rekey amazingly doesn't > conflict with anything. Still, both names are awfully generic for binaries that > are specific to this package. Is there any reasonable chance of getting them > renamed with a prefix like "kaya-"? I think, this is a design issue from the upstream and I don't try to make a rename, because I afraid to confused poeple who try to use the tutorials. Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.2.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 14:35:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202334] Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091435.l99EZ1XC000904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jetty5 - The Jetty Webserver and Servlet Container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-09 10:35 EST ------- I'm closing this. It was imported some time ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 14:38:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091438.l99Ecm4O001749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-10-09 10:38 EST ------- Finally getting around to addressing #3 (since you and I keep forgetting to file ExclusiveArch bugs): I looked at aboot, grub, and yaboot, and found none of them have bugs filed. I ran it by my sponsor (and the author of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures), Spot, and he agreed that there was no point in filing EA bugs. I think we can consider our bases covered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:09:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319191] Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091509.l99F9NqZ008680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319191 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 11:09 EST ------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:12:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301571] Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091512.l99FCMLI009447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301571 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 11:12 EST ------- Oops, forgot to close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:16:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226338] Merge Review: PyQt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091516.l99FGUTx010316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: PyQt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226338 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-09 11:16 EST ------- ping (3+ mos later...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:18:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091518.l99FIiY0009272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 11:18 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317321] Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091515.l99FFVTg008942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317321 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 11:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-tap-plugins Short Description: Tom's Audio Processing plugin Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091518.l99FIUpD010551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cpebenito at tresys.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 11:18 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:19:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091519.l99FJjqs009493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 11:19 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:25:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091525.l99FPwAD011007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ewan at macmahon.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(ewan at macmahon.me.u| |k) | ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-10-09 11:25 EST ------- The current state of play is that my Fedora account needs approval/sponsorship for the cvsextras and fedorabugs groups; once that's done I should be able to finish up here. I believe I've done the necessary things at my end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:36:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319191] Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091536.l99Fat6v014130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319191 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 11:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:39:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317321] Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091539.l99Fdngr014474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317321 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 11:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:42:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091542.l99FgEDb015195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 11:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > The current state of play is that my Fedora account needs approval/sponsorship > for the cvsextras and fedorabugs groups; once that's done I should be able to > finish up here. I believe I've done the necessary things at my end. Oh, I found your FAS in cvsextras request and indeed you've requested it on Oct 1st! Well, then to make this review proceed I will sponsor you. Please proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:43:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091543.l99FhdMo015520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 11:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:46:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091546.l99FkF0G015373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 11:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091558.l99FwkR2017646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 11:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme Short Description: Bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:59:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091559.l99FxvMb018540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 11:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-gtk-themes Short Description: Bluecurve GTK+ themes Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:02:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091602.l99G27wL019157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-metacity-theme Short Description: Bluecurve Metacity theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:02:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305641] Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091602.l99G2t7c018644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305641 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-xmms-skin Short Description: Bluecurve XMMS skin Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 15:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091559.l99FxKlK017756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 11:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-gdm-theme Short Description: Bluecurve-gdm-theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:00:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091600.l99G0Uax018315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-icon-theme Short Description: Bluecurve-icon-theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091601.l99G1V6B018541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-kde-theme Short Description: Bluecurve-kde-theme Owners: rstrode,davidz,than,rdieter,kkofler Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:07:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305701] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091607.l99G73JS019962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305701 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme Short Description: Fedora Flying High GDM theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:07:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091607.l99G7mK2020060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme Short Description: Fedora Flying High KDM theme Owners: rstrode,davidz,than,rdieter,kkofler Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:09:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091609.l99G936x020020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-icon-theme Short Description: fedora icon theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:08:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091608.l99G8cNT019930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-gnome-theme Short Description: Fedora GNOME theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:05:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305661] Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091605.l99G5H6g019532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305661 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedoradna-gdm-theme Short Description: FedoraDNA GDM theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:04:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305651] Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091604.l99G4gMg019092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305651 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme Short Description: fedorabubbles GDM theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305671] Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091606.l99G6FFZ019730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305671 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedoradna-kdm-theme Short Description: FedoraDNA KDM theme Owners: rstrode,davidz,than,rdieter,kkofler Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:10:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305761] Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091610.l99GAAP8020705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305761 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme Short Description: Fedora Infinity screensaver theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:10:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305771] Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091610.l99GAj2P020904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305771 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedoa-screensaver-theme Short Description: Fedora screensaver theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:09:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305751] Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091609.l99G9WLm020302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305751 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme Short Description: Fedora Infinity GDM theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:14:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307801] Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091614.l99GE9So021065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-gnome-theme Short Description: Bluecurve GNOME theme Owners: rstrode,davidz Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:12:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091612.l99GCxxu020975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-kwin-theme Short Description: Bluecurve KWin theme Owners: rstrode,davidz,than,kkofler,rdieter Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:13:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307171] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091613.l99GDZeT021195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307171 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-09 12:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluecurve-kdm-theme Short Description: Bluecurve KDM theme Owners: rstrode,davidz,kkofler,rdieter,than Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:15:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091615.l99GFeZc021607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-09 12:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-creole Short Description: A database abstraction layer for PHP5 Owners: akahl Branches: F-7 InitialCC: remi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:27:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091627.l99GRgnC023534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 12:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Then: (sorry, my comments follow:) Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:26:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091626.l99GQ0gt023380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 12:25 EST ------- Well, as no one is reviewing: For 2.5.4-4: * Timestamp - Please keep timestamps on installed files when possible (check the section "Timestamps" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) In short, when using "cp" or "install" command, please use "-p" option. * desktop-file-install vendor - We still recommend "fedora" vendor prefix ("desktop-file-install usage" section of the URL above). * macro - %_datadir/man should be %_mandir * %defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Then: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 16:59:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091659.l99GxRB1028463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 cpebenito at tresys.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cpebenito at tresys.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-09 12:59 EST ------- I have to have the fedora contributor license agreement reviewed first (happening for the last few days). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 17:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091738.l99HcI4u002530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 17:48:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317321] Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091748.l99HmoG0005354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-tap-plugins - Tom's Audio Processing plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317321 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 13:48 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 17:46:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091746.l99Hkakx005116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-09 13:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > 1,2 Will fix. Note, I wrote hicolor-icon-theme-0.10-2 which should of course just be hicolor-icon-theme (a cut n paste error) > 3 I don't think we can rely on pulling it from another package randomly so I > will add it to the buildrequires list. No problem. > 4 Probably a senior moment, it should be bindir and I will change that. Great! > Strange that it should only be x86_64 devel. I say we post to the mailing list > for help and excludearch if we draw a blank there. Sounds reasonble, I'll hang fire until you've made the post then. It might even be a "system" bug, but I'm reluctant to ever claim that as it's rarely ever the case. :-) > I will get a new release with the other fixes up and post to the ML. No probs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 17:54:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319191] Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091754.l99HsISF004951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glaxium - An OpenGL space shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319191 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-09 13:54 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 18:35:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091835.l99IZgXC013642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(steved at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-10-09 14:35 EST ------- Not sure what I need to do since I can not import the package ./common/cvs-import.sh libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Checking out module: 'libgssglue' cvs server: cannot find module `libgssglue' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules ERROR: "libgssglue" module does not exist in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 18:44:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091844.l99Iiiko012978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-10-09 14:44 EST ------- hum... Koji fails on : ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Welcome to Ocamlnet version 2.2.8.1 Checking for findlib... found Checking multi-threading support... posix (ok) Checking for PCRE... found Checking operating system... Linux This OS supports passing credentials over Unix domain sockets Building rpc-auth-local Checking for POSIX shared memory... not found Checking switches for tcl.h... not ok Please check -equeue-tcl-defs! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.82618 (%prep) ----------------------------------------------------------------- it's seem that some BR are missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 18:52:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091852.l99Iq7dt014311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-10-09 14:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > * desktop-file-install vendor > - We still recommend "fedora" vendor prefix > ("desktop-file-install usage" section of the URL above). Is there a macro that could be used to get the vendor (with a value of fedora)? I would like to have only one spec file for all distributions. I guess the other option is to add it to configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 19:31:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091931.l99JVkHg022826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2007-10-09 15:31 EST ------- New version avaliable. SRPM: http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/Rats/rats-2.1-3.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/Rats/rats.spec * Tue Oct 9 2007 Scott Henson - 2.1-3 - Break the monolithic patch into pieces - Build Clean, contains build cleanups and spelling corrections - Php, adds support for php3 and php4 files - Report, adds some html output cleanup - Lex, some lex bug fixes - GTK-Vuln, adds some gtk vulnerabilities - Also generate lex output files on each build. As for the Debian maintainer, the lex-yy*.c stuff just slipped in as a result of the Debian build process. I missed him calling make lex in the debian/rules file. I now call this in the spec, so its now building the lex files every time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 19:53:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 15:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710091953.l99JrCsj026319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2007-10-09 15:53 EST ------- The latest version doesn't work because the configure macro sets datadir to /usr/share and rats wants it at /usr/share/rats. I can do a configure myself, but then I get the following error. rats.src:40: E: configure-without-libdir-spec It appears above as well and I think you said I could ignore that since rats doesn't use lib. Is that right? Or shold I do something to take care of this? If I can just ignore it, new version: SRPM: http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/Rats/rats-2.1-3.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/Rats/rats.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 20:09:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092009.l99K9w8d029314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-09 16:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > * Documents > - Maybe it may be preferable that "CONTRIBUTORS" file is added to > %doc. Added "CONTRIBUTERS" in %doc Now hopefully its' okay... The updated links are: Spec URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gurlchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gurlchecker-0.10.1-4.fc7.src.rpm The Koji build task is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=188134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 20:44:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092044.l99Ki2oZ000849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen at gmail.com 2007-10-09 16:44 EST ------- I am truly sorry for the delay. Things have just been to busy lately, so these two fell to the back of my run-queue. But I imported and built both packages yesterday, so they should be on their way to the repos asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 20:45:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231814] Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092045.l99KjU89001370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avarice - Program for interfacing the Atmel JTAG ICE to GDB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231814 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 20:49:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231835] Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092049.l99KnMjR001636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: uisp - Universal In-System Programmer for Atmel AVR and 8051 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231835 trond.danielsen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:31:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092131.l99LVoRq008760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:31 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:32:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092132.l99LWQ6B008847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:32 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:31:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092131.l99LVf3j008719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:31 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:33:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305661] Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092133.l99LXYNu011977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305661 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:33 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:33:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305641] Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092133.l99LX73w011887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305641 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:33 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:32:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092132.l99LWHXJ011742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:32 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:32:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092132.l99LW7EM011664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:32 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:33:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305651] Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092133.l99LXGxX011923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305651 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:33 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:34:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305701] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092134.l99LY1Sa012076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305701 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:34 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:32:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092132.l99LWt6P011844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:32 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:34:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092134.l99LYnJr012466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:34 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092134.l99LYeD1012409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:34 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:35:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307801] Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092135.l99LZx0b012988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:35 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:35:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305771] Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092135.l99LZLPg012919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305771 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:35 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305751] Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092135.l99LZ5ec012867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305751 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:35 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:35:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307171] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092135.l99LZlW3009830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307171 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:35 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092135.l99LZSYh009715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:35 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:33:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305671] Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092133.l99LXj9S009052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305671 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:33 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:35:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305761] Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092135.l99LZCRq009572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305761 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:35 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092134.l99LYPeV009152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-09 17:34 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 21:51:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092151.l99LpGMj015515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-09 17:51 EST ------- Can we close this? It looks like the package has been built for F8 and pushed to the repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 22:03:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 18:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092203.l99M3C3F014342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-10-09 18:03 EST ------- Oops, sorry, forgot to close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 23:33:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092333.l99NXnFS028901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-09 19:33 EST ------- > It appears to be dragging in C code without an extern "C" macro It's actually doing the opposite, it's wrapping C++ stuff (templates and so) in extern "C". It might be a bug in one of the library headers you're using. Maybe a missing '}' somewhere? That would also explain the missing '}' reported at the end of the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 9 23:58:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710092358.l99NwLN0031781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-09 19:58 EST ------- Rex, do you want to update for F-8 ? Because I will be sort in time, so if you plan to update it, it should be fine to request a scratch build from koji...(as i'm not able to rebuild it quickly)... Install/Uninstall test (with -devel) will be required... (rpmlint on installed file, but seems corrected). >From the spec, I just wonder why you Requires mesa-libGL{,U}-devel in ilmbase-devel but not in BR ? And does it is LibGLU-devel or mesa-libGLU-devel (seems that the package is named mesa-libGLU-devel, maybe the compat-name will be dropped...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 00:15:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 20:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100015.l9A0FABJ031056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-09 20:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > > 1. What is the license here? > > GPLv2+. I'll try to add necessary notices. Okay can you roll up a 1.0.3 release with the correct copyright notices in the source code files? > Yes, they are. As Jeff explained, the client needs to be contacted by the > server via SSH. It also may need su(1) to run the dump commands. I'll have a short README.fedora ready to roll tonite that touches on this to put into the docs section of srpm which includes your new tarball. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 00:18:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 20:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100018.l9A0IBUQ001932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-09 20:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 01:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100146.l9A1kC2B013285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2007-10-09 21:46 EST ------- New version with fixes for what was discussed in irc. SRPM: http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/Rats/rats-2.1-5.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://sjhserv.net/~sjh/Rats/rats.spec * Tue Oct 9 2007 Scott Henson - 2.1-5 - Change the Makefile.in so we can use the configure macro - Rename all patches to .patch to be more standard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 01:53:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100153.l9A1rdOH010850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 21:53 EST ------- Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess . Next you have to do "CVSAdminProcedure". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 02:00:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 22:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100200.l9A20ZgC015057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 kai at bolay.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kai at bolay.de ------- Additional Comments From kai at bolay.de 2007-10-09 22:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > If there is a single user request for using alternatives I'll modify the > package. I'd like to use msmtp (or it's alternative (pun intended!) ssmtp or esmtp) on systems where no local users should receive mail. Instead all mail should go to a central server. So I would like the package to provide /usr/sbin/sendmail via the alternatives system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 02:09:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 22:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100209.l9A29Kq7012834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-09 22:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #23) > > > * desktop-file-install vendor > > - We still recommend "fedora" vendor prefix > > ("desktop-file-install usage" section of the URL above). > > Is there a macro that could be used to get the vendor (with a value of fedora)? I guess there is not. > I would like to have only one spec file for all distributions. Please don't stick to this idea. One more comment * %?dist tag in %changelog - Remove %?dist tag from %changelog. %?dist tag changes when Fedora version changes, which means that %changelog is changed when Fedora version changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 03:02:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 23:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100302.l9A32wgF021735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-09 23:02 EST ------- Reply from Mamoru Tasaka on the fedora-devel-list This srpm can be rebuilt on all arch, dist-f8. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=189122 I guess the build failure you saw is because your build used gimp 2.4.0 rc1. Update gimp to 2.4.0 rc3. (current rawhide Fedora's gimp is gimp-2.4.0-0.rc3.1.fc8). Similar discussion is found on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210#c9 Regards, Mamoru --- Ian, can you make the gimp update and confirm this fixes the issue. A new SRPM will be up shortly at http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/GREYCstoration-2.5.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 03:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 23:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100303.l9A33OCn024888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-10-09 23:03 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: empathy New Branches: F-8 I'd like to start building Empathy with its experimental VoIP support enabled for people to test/break/debug/etc. in order to have it as a potential feature for F9+. I'd like a branch for F-8 that can be kept "stable" please. :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 03:21:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 23:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100321.l9A3L0GQ024913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 osspkg at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-10-09 23:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imageinfo Short Description: Extract attributes of digital images Owners: brendt Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 03:22:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 23:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100322.l9A3Mt9L027855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 osspkg at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-10-09 23:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xgrep Short Description: A grep-like utility for XML files Owners: brendt Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 07:17:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100717.l9A7H5iE021399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-10 03:17 EST ------- Tadaa, the package is beuatiful; ready to go to CVS. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 07:31:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710100731.l9A7VM1j023272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-10 03:31 EST ------- esmtp uses the alternatives system and since there is now a rudimentary queue system, and esmtp can use a mda for local delivery, I have left the priority to 30. If msmttp uses the alternatives system, maybe it should use a lower level (unless there is local delivery at least). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 10:20:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 06:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101020.l9AAKaLa017666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-10 06:20 EST ------- Builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=189309 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=189308 Successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 10:32:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 06:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101032.l9AAW8rk019154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 gilboad at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |311871 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 11:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244547] Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101156.l9ABuZaD031118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244547 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-10 07:56 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 12:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101211.l9ACBacL000891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-10 08:11 EST ------- Okay. Please import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 13:43:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101343.l9ADh2Xu015984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-10 09:43 EST ------- Ok, I've gotten to the point for sponsoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 13:39:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291371] Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101339.l9ADdaZA018720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291371 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-10 09:39 EST ------- Well, general packaging guidelines are written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets If you have some questions about packaging issue, please check these URLs first. Some random notes for 0.11.2-4: * SourceURL - Source tarball must be written in full URL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * perl module BuildRequires - perl module BuildRequires must be written not by their rpm names but theire perl module names. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl In short, "BuildRequires: perl-XML-Parser" must be "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)". * Macros - Use macros when possible. /etc must be %_sysconfdir. * %makeinstall - Please don't use %makeinstall when possible (check the section "Why the %makeinstall macro should not be used" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) * desktop file - Desktop file must be installed by desktop-file-install (check the section "Desktop files" of the URL above) - Also, please consider below. ------------------------------------------------------------ ./teg.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" in group "Desktop Entry" has value "0", which is deprecated: boolean values should be "false" or "true" ------------------------------------------------------------ * gconf schemas file - Would you explain why you want to remove gconf schemas file installed under %_sysconfdir/gconf/schemas ? Also you may want to see general guideline to handle schemas file, in the section "GConf" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * update-desktop-database (check the section "desktop-database" of scriptlet wiki page) - update-desktop-database must be called when the desktop file has a MimeType key, but teg.desktop does not have. * Directory ownership issue - The directories created by this package must be owned by this directory. ! Example (note: This is a example. There are some directories which are not correctly owned by this package.) ------------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/pixmaps/teg_pix/color_player_black.png teg-0.11.2-4.fc8 [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/pixmaps/teg_pix file /usr/share/pixmaps/teg_pix is not owned by any package ------------------------------------------------------------ Here this package installs some file under %_datadir/pixmaps/teg_pix and those files are owned by this package. But the directory %_datadir/pixmaps/teg itself is not owned by this package. ! Note: When you write ------------------------------------------------------------ %files foo/ ------------------------------------------------------------ (where foo/ is a directory) in %files entry, this means the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/, while ------------------------------------------------------------ %files %dir foo/ ------------------------------------------------------------ means the directory foo/ only. * rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------------------ $ rpmlint teg teg.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/teg-0.11.2/README teg.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/teg-0.11.2/AUTHORS teg.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized teg is a clone of a clone of Risk ------------------------------------------------------------ - README, AUTHORS should be converted into UTF-8. - Summary must begin with capital letter. ! Note: "teg is" in summary is redundant. * Documents - It seems that there are some other files which I think should also be included as %doc, such as ------------------------------------------------------------ ChangLog PEOPLE ------------------------------------------------------------ Maybe "TODO" can also be included as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 13:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101348.l9ADmBxi020174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-10 09:48 EST ------- Now I should be sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 14:06:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299171] Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101406.l9AE6dFZ019775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299171 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-10 10:06 EST ------- Ah.. Please include the real tarball in srpm. Also please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 14:12:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101412.l9AECbsR020599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-10 10:12 EST ------- Hello Till, Sorry for the delay, I missed the mail from bugzilla about your update =( Next time, just bug me on IRC =) Few remarks that needs to be fixed, 1) Install this configuration file with fix permissions, which eliminate rpmlint error. install -D -m 644 %SOURCE1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/wyrdrc.local 2) I would also replace %{_mandir}/man1/wyrd.1.gz %{_mandir}/man5/wyrdrc.5.gz simply by %{_mandir}/man1/wyrd.1* %{_mandir}/man5/wyrdrc.5* 3) Use (noreplace) flag for the config file as well (conffile-without-noreplace-flag rpmlint) Please, fix/comment these issues. Thank you Till! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 14:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101415.l9AEFxfm024517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(opensource at till.na | |me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 14:27:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101427.l9AERoa4022931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(opensource at till.na| |me) | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-10 10:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > 1) Install this configuration file with fix permissions, which eliminate rpmlint > error. > > install -D -m 644 %SOURCE1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir}/wyrdrc.local Sure, I will do this. > 2) I would also replace > > %{_mandir}/man1/wyrd.1.gz > %{_mandir}/man5/wyrdrc.5.gz > > simply by > > %{_mandir}/man1/wyrd.1* > %{_mandir}/man5/wyrdrc.5* ok. > 3) Use (noreplace) flag for the config file as well > (conffile-without-noreplace-flag rpmlint) I do not want to do this, because the /etc/wyrdrc is a default config file that should not be touched by anybody, this is what /etc/wyrdrc.local is for, which is "noreplace". If someone does not want any change here, one can just copy /etc/wyrdrc to /etc/wyrdrc.local and remove the include wyrdrc.local command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 14:48:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] New: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Mulit-Dimensional Simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Mulit-Dimensional Simulator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paultcochrane at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds-1.6-3.src.rpm Description: XMDS is a code generator that integrates equations. You write them down in human readable form in a XML file, and it goes away and writes and compiles a C++ program that integrates those equations as fast as it can possibly be done in your architecture. This is a first submission to Fedora Extras, and I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 15:10:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291371] Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101510.l9AFA3Ae000452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291371 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-10 11:10 EST ------- Also, please note that the word "Risk" is trademarked in this context, and as such you should not mention it in the summary or description of your package, nor in things like the desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 17:01:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101701.l9AH10mv017370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-10 13:00 EST ------- We have released a new version of libvpd. The source rpm and spec file are available here: Spec URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM URL: http://superb-east.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd-1.3.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 17:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101703.l9AH3EIb014138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 ebmunson at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: lsvpd - A |Review Request: lsvpd - A |utility to list device Vital|utility to list device Vital |Product Data (VPD) |Product Data (VPD) |information. |information. ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-10 13:03 EST ------- We have released a new version of lsvpd. The new files are available here: Spec URL: http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/lsvpd.spec SRPM URL: http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/lsvpd-1.3.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 18:00:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101800.l9AI00XT023338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ebmunson at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |307901 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 18:00:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101800.l9AI00VM023318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 ebmunson at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |307891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 18:34:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101834.l9AIYril031769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-10-10 14:34 EST ------- terjeros at phys.ntnu.no what do you prefer? I normally do upstream development (I am co maintainer of upstream package) and am getting used to doing fedora. Do you want to be fedora maintainer and give me access rights or let me be fedora maintainer and give you access rights? It does not matter to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 18:49:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101849.l9AInSL4001753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-10-10 14:49 EST ------- > (I am co maintainer of upstream package) > and am getting used to doing fedora. That's great, we always need more people in Fedora. > Do you want to be fedora maintainer and give me > access rights or let me be fedora maintainer and give you access rights? Give me access rights and we are fine. Will you do the initial import or should I do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:14:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101914.l9AJE2G0005363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-10-10 15:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > > (I am co maintainer of upstream package) > > and am getting used to doing fedora. > > That's great, we always need more people in Fedora. > > > Do you want to be fedora maintainer and give me > > access rights or let me be fedora maintainer and give you access rights? > > Give me access rights and we are fine. Ok, I went to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/scsi-target-utils and checked the "group members can commit" and hit the "add myself to package" button and approved myself. If you go there and hit the "add myself to package" and request cvs and acls and the bugzilla and commit ones or whatever ones you want, I will approve them, or approve them yourself if you can. > > Will you do the initial import or should I do it? > Since you have the updated src rpm which fixes stuff in mine go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:24:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] New: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at leemhuis.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/kcbench.spec SRPM URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/kcbench-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Compiles a linux kernel to benchmark a system or test system stability. Notes: I use a simple kernel compile benchmark on a lot to test systems for speed and stability testing purposes. I thought it might be nice to put that script (actually it's a reworked version of a old script of mine that likely has some new bugs) into Fedora, as it might be of use for other people as well. The data-files needed will be submitted in a separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:24:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] New: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at leemhuis.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/kcbench-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/kcbench-data-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Linux Kernel sources to be compiled by kcbench to benchmark system performance or test system stability. Notes: * I plan to ship each firth linux version (2.6.{20,25,30,35,...}) -- that should be enough afaics. Everytime I do a update users of old versions will have to update the datafiles, even if nothing changed. This you be prevented by putting kcbench-data-2.6.{20,25,30,35,...} packages into the repo -- but I don't think that's worth the trouble, as a update should happen only once a year. * I chose to not install the datafiles in /usr/src as they might clash with other stuff there * rpmlint puts out lots of warnings a like "devel-file-in-non-devel-package" "version-control-internal-file" "non-executable-script" -- I think they can be ignored for the purpose of this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:25:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101925.l9AJP3I6007482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |326831 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101925.l9AJP28n007458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |326841 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-10 15:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > The data-files needed will be submitted in a separate package. Can be found in Bug 326841. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:32:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101932.l9AJWf4B005295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-10 15:32 EST ------- wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:34:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101934.l9AJY2JY008818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-10 15:34 EST ------- astromenace-1.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:32:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101932.l9AJWgSg008594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.1.0-4.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:34:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315481] Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101934.l9AJYHjW005644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315481 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-10 15:34 EST ------- astromenace-data-1.2-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313461] Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101934.l9AJY3Rm005582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace - Hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313461 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.2-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:34:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315481] Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101934.l9AJYJEN008883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astromenace-data - astromenace data and language files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315481 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.2-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 19:57:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177603] Review Request: libpri In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710101957.l9AJvveg009735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpri https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177603 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From will at netmindz.net 2007-10-10 15:57 EST ------- where have the SRPMS gone ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 20:02:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102002.l9AK22Mp014577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From will at netmindz.net 2007-10-10 16:02 EST ------- what happened to this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 20:07:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177603] Review Request: libpri In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102007.l9AK7SAQ015612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpri https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177603 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-10 16:07 EST ------- libpri is part of Fedora now so you should be able to find the SRPMs on your local Fedora mirror. Or you could install the libpri and libpri-devel packages directly using yum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 20:11:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102011.l9AKBBfo016325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-10 16:11 EST ------- kmods were never very well acceped (and now they are totally banned). It'll be better for everyone concerned for Digium to get the zaptel kernel modules included in the vanilla kernel. If you really need the Zaptel kernel modules right now you'll need to install them from source or obtain RPM packages from another source. The Zaptel userspace library is a part of Fedora and be obtained from the usual sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 20:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218768] Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102055.l9AKtCEJ020026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218768 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2007-10-10 16:55 EST ------- Anybody knows anything about poppler-qt4 in Fedora? Current poppler package in Rawhide does not seem to be build with Qt4 support (and I would love to test Okular...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 21:51:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102151.l9ALpDON028323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-10 17:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Ian, can you make the gimp update and confirm this fixes the issue. Success, the new version of Gimp did the trick. The local repo I use was still set to pull updates from the old devel path which change a few weeks ago so was consequently out of date. Thats been fixed :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 22:14:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102214.l9AMEHYn031654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-10 18:14 EST ------- * rpmlint: W: no-documentation No problem. * Package named correctly: YES * Patches named correctly: YES * Spec file named correctly: YES * Licence(s) acceptable: YES * Licence field matches: YES * Licence file installed: YES (and included upstream) * Spec file in American English: YES * Source matches upstream: YES (!! but see below) * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: YES * %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: YES * Specfile legible: YES * Compiles and builds ok: YES (mock/i386/x86_64 all releases) * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A * Owns directories it creates: YES * Duplicate files: NO * Permissions set correctly: YES * Consistent macro use: YES * Separate -doc needed (for large docs): N/A * %doc affects runtime: N/A * Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: N/A * -devel requires base: N/A * Contains .la files: NO * Owns files it didn't create: NO * .desktop files included and installed correctly: YES * Filenames valid UTF8: YES Ok there's only one thing I think you should fix. Please use the source zip file labelled as 2.5.2, it is identical to 2.5.2.1 which I believe is a phantom version accidentally uploaded by upstream. It will also alleviate the ugliness in the SPEC file in relation to the .1 suffix stuck on everything. Remember to strip it from your patch filename too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 22:20:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102220.l9AMKXTp000528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-10 18:20 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 22:22:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102222.l9AMMTG1004966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-10 18:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 22:23:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241792] Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102223.l9AMNR7m005032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Empathy - An instant messaging client built using Telepathy Alias: empathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-10 18:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 22:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102241.l9AMfRMS003664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-10 18:41 EST ------- The archives seem identical and it will clean the spec file a little. A new SRPM will be up shortly at http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/GREYCstoration-2.5.2-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 23:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102312.l9ANC0TG007731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From michael at laptop.org 2007-10-10 19:11 EST ------- Are there any other packaging bugs that I need to fix before this package can be approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 23:30:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102330.l9ANUInT010505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-10-10 19:30 EST ------- Ok looks good! Packages is APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 10 23:43:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710102343.l9ANhXF2012370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-10 19:43 EST ------- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: GREYCstoration Short Description: An image denoising and interpolation tool Owners: deebs Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 01:01:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110101.l9B11WN8023358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-10 21:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 01:47:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110147.l9B1lPjH029898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-10 21:47 EST ------- php-pear-creole-1.1.0-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 01:43:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 322781] Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110143.l9B1hv65029019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi - Free IT asset management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322781 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-10 21:43 EST ------- glpi-0.70-0.2.rc1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update glpi' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 01:47:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110147.l9B1lQjs029927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.1.0-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 01:45:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110145.l9B1jh4O029679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |2.1.1-9.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 01:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110145.l9B1jfiA000639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-10 21:45 EST ------- rpmrebuild-2.1.1-9.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 01:47:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110147.l9B1lIQ2000890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-10 21:47 EST ------- Thanks Kevin, Imported and Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 01:55:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110155.l9B1t6Wi031273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-10 21:55 EST ------- NEEDSWORK 1. BuildRequires: db43++-devel A package of this name doesn't exist in Fedora. Are you referring to db4-devel (which at least under FC7 contains libdb_cxx - FC8 applies a different package split)? 2. /bin/sh configure --prefix=%{_prefix}/ This way of invoking configure causes your package not to receive all required settings. Better use %configure, instead. 3. %files ... /usr/lib a) Normal packages must not own /usr/lib. They may only own files and directories below it. b) Your package ships libraries, but invokes configure improperly. If it did, these libraries would land in %{_libdir} (i.e. /usr/lib64 on x86_64), i.e. you should be using %{_libdir}/* instead. 4. Package ships static libs. The Fedora Packaging Guideline strongly discourage packager from doing so (append --disable-static to %configure). Should you nevertheless, feel not to be able to avoid shipping them, please move these static libs to a separate subpackage (*-static) 5. Package ships libtool archives. Shipping these is being frowned upon on Fedora. Please remove them. (In %install add something similar to rm %{_libdir}/*.la or add %exclude %{_libdir}/*.la to %files) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 05:01:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110501.l9B518hd002638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-11 01:01 EST ------- I finally found time to get back to this. rpmlint is indeed down to: emacs-bbdb-el.noarch: W: no-documentation which is fine. Looking through the source, a good portion of this is actually GPL+, but I'm no licensing expert so I can't really say if you need to mention that in your License: tag. I'm going to make the assumption that the package as a whole is GPLv2+. There are a few bits in here that aren't in the emacs guidelines, such as the handling of emacs packages without pkgconfig support. Should those make it into the guidelines? It looks like the emacs in F7 doesn't have pkgconfig support, so the guidelines seem to be missing support for, basically, all of the releases. Honestly, though, I see nothing wrong with this package. * source files match upstream: 3fb1316e2ed74d47ca61187fada550e58797467bd9e8ad67343ed16da769f916 bbdb-2.35.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: emacs-bbdb-2.35-8.fc8.noarch.rpm emacs-bbdb = 2.35-8.fc8 = /bin/sh emacs(bin) >= 22.1 emacs-bbdb-el-2.35-8.fc8.noarch.rpm emacs-bbdb-el = 2.35-8.fc8 = emacs-bbdb = 2.35-8.fc8 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I can't remember enough about emacs to be able to test this package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (info file registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED Since Jonathan's submitting this, I've removed FE-NEEDSPONSOR and I suppose it's ready to go. Do let me know if there's still a sponsorship issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 05:08:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110508.l9B58GQ8029499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-11 01:08 EST ------- FWIW, I think the DTD file for jack-rack should be moved from /usr/share/dtds to /usr/share/xml/jack-rack. See http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#AEN2007 and several other packages that install DTD files (like lash). Thanks for asking about this Nicolas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 06:49:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110649.l9B6noZg010917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-11 02:49 EST ------- Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 06:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110656.l9B6uwXN012213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-11 02:56 EST ------- Note: rawhide compiz is now upgrade to 0.6.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 07:04:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110704.l9B74bGY019569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-11 03:04 EST ------- Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 07:27:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 264641] Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110727.l9B7R5rQ016089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264641 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-11 03:27 EST ------- I will close this bug if no response from the reported is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 07:27:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110727.l9B7R6tx022543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-11 03:27 EST ------- I think we cannot directly use the upstream tarballs since they have multiple zip file separate license files instead of one tarball containing everything. Also the two fonts included here are having different versions. This may be a reason for having our own maintained tarball but use of 20061222 is not clear enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 07:34:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110734.l9B7YIZJ016866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-11 03:34 EST ------- Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 08:34:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] New: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy at smile.org.ua QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-alsa.spec SRPM URL: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-alsa- 1.0.15-0.1.rc2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Python binding for the ALSA library. There is native binding to ALSA is developed by ALSA team. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 08:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110851.l9B8pXFL028916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-11 04:51 EST ------- NB: Ville, is using xdg-open instead of htmlview something required by the packaging guidelines? Otherwise this would have warranted its own bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 08:50:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110850.l9B8o3kJ028675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-11 04:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Preliminary Review:- > > rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me > ------------------------------------- > system-config-nfs.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-nfs added version > system-config-nfs.src: W: invalid-license GPL checked and changed to GPLv2+ > system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-nfs/propertiesWindow.py > system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-nfs/system-config-nfs.glade > system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsServer.py > system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsExports.py > system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsServerSettings.py > system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-nfs/mainWindow.py made files be installed without executable bits set unless necessary > system-config-nfs.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.3.27 1.3.27-1.fc8 added (non-dist-tagged) releases to changelog entries > system-config-nfs.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL > system-config-nfs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-nfs idem > system-config-nfs.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/pam.d/system-config-nfs > system-config-nfs.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-nfs aded %config(noreplace) > -------------------------------------------------- > > also, > good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) changed > Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package > before actually committing in CVS. Package is building right now (this is a merge review). (In reply to comment #2) > Using xdg-open would be better than htmlview: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00025.html > http://scop.fedorapeople.org/patches/xdg-utils/system-config-nfs.patch xdg-open and htmlview are tried in this order, changed requirements suitably for Fedora >= 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 08:52:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110852.l9B8qTx7003267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-11 04:52 EST ------- Forgot this: the version building is system-config-nfs-1.3.29-1.fc8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 08:59:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110859.l9B8xXsZ004172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 09:21:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110921.l9B9LAp6007881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-10-11 05:21 EST ------- The way the package builds currently is that it takes the kernel release and distro release from what is installed on the machine we are building on: 1) kernel release comes from the kernel-headers installed package version and is passed to the make command as the KVERSION to build against. I think this part is OK since we have the right info in the mock environment. 2) distro release is computed in the Makefile (if not passed to the Makefile) and is the result of an "lsb_release -r". I think the problem comes from this 2nd part: we should also provide the distro release to the make command in the spec file. Now, can you please confirm what I say after: the %{?dist} tag is THE way we have to know what distro release target we are building for. Or is there a more secure way to know the target we are building for? As soon as I get your answer, I'll send you the fix: it should only be a small change in the spec file. Thanks, Nadia -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 09:29:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110929.l9B9TtHv009118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-11 05:29 EST ------- 1)Good to add test directory to %doc 2) Also, I think good to use only LGPLv2 as __init__.py lacks copyright code. whereas I have seen few packages installed on my system which have copyright in __init__.py evenif its empty code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 09:34:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110934.l9B9Yied009849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-11 05:34 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts-1.0-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 09:42:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710110942.l9B9gg8G004346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-11 05:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Looking through the source, a good portion of this is actually GPL+, but I'm no > licensing expert so I can't really say if you need to mention that in your > License: tag. I'm going to make the assumption that the package as a whole is > GPLv2+. > I will check this once more and confirm the licensing. [snip] > Since Jonathan's submitting this, I've removed FE-NEEDSPONSOR and I suppose it's > ready to go. Do let me know if there's still a sponsorship issue. This really depends on Tom (Tromey). Tom has previously said he's happy for me to be the package owner, and that is fine with me. On the other hand if Tom wanted to use this package in order to become sponsored (though with such an "old hand" I wonder if sponsorship is necessary), that is fine as well, and I'm happy to be a co-maintainer. Unless Tom replies to the contrary, I'll import the package into CVS at the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 10:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111032.l9BAWxoG011243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 10:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 323551] Review Request: esorex - EsoRex is the European Southern Observatory Recipe Execution Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111032.l9BAWxeX011263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: esorex - EsoRex is the European Southern Observatory Recipe Execution Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=323551 Bug 323551 depends on bug 305281, which changed state. Bug 305281 Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 10:42:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248301] Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111042.l9BAgw2r012778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lzma - lzma compression tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248301 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-11 06:42 EST ------- Ping ^2 - What needs to happen to make this package finally be released? Keeping a package "> 2" months in testing is non-reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 10:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111054.l9BAsCmg020626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at redhat.com 2007-10-11 06:54 EST ------- Static libs and the lovely Polish comment :) removed in 4.4.2.2-2 (next rawhide push) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 12:21:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111221.l9BCLIfB001974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-11 08:21 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/jack-rack/jack-rack.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/jack-rack/jack-rack-1.4.6-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API So I moved the dsdt dir to %{_datadir}/xml/jack-rack/dtds (same as lash do now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 12:37:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111237.l9BCbgmO030145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-11 08:37 EST ------- Looks fine now: approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 12:51:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111251.l9BCp4WS032355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-11 08:51 EST ------- thx for the review: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jack-rack Short Description: Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API Owners: kwizart nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 12:58:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111258.l9BCwGbv007807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-11 08:58 EST ------- 1. I was thinking about it. And I almost agree with you. 2. __init__.py is quite empty. I think the License tag should derived from the real code. Anyway, I'll write to Jaroslav about this misspelling (and I save License tag while now). New SRPMS: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-alsa-1.0.15- 0.2.rc2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 13:02:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320661] Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111302.l9BD2dSm008657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladcca - Linux Audio Developer's Configuration and Connection API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320661 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 14:03:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111403.l9BE3SNj011847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat.com 2007-10-11 10:03 EST ------- Yes, please go for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 14:06:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111406.l9BE6t7I012812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-11 10:06 EST ------- > I just wonder why you Requires mesa-libGL{,U}-devel in > ilmbase-devel but not in BR ? I checked all the buildtime scripts/makefiles, and it's not used there. > And does it is LibGLU-devel or mesa-libGLU-devel libGLU-devel is preferred, mesa-libGLU-devel Provides it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 14:09:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218768] Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111409.l9BE9xbn013153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poppler-extras - PDF rendering library extras (qt/qt4) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218768 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-11 10:09 EST ------- Laurent, see bug #327691 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:18:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111518.l9BFIBFx022562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-11 11:18 EST ------- No, xdg-open is not packaging guidelines material at the moment. Nevertheless it's something I'd point out during a review of any package where applicable. Thanks for using it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:39:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111539.l9BFdRM5026256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:38:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111538.l9BFcx8V026194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:39:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111539.l9BFdpV7032236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111547.l9BFlYMM001337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|266841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111547.l9BFlXZQ001312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|266841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:47:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111547.l9BFlViD001288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|266801, 266821 | ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-11 11:47 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-propel.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-propel-1.2.1-4.fc7.src.rpm Changes: - merged in all metapackages (thus removed bug dependencies) - consequently adapted macros for all shell operations - s/%{buildroot}/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277921] Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111549.l9BFn0tV028104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277921 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-11 11:49 EST ------- ! Well, actually I don't know how to use this package and I don't know well about Java, however anyway I will try to review this. * CLASSPATH - I don't know what CLASSPATH does, however many other review requests seem to set CLASSPATH as "" (e.g. bug 251428). Would you try that? * Timestamp - When using "install" or "cp" command, add "-p" option to keep timestamps. * Misc rpmlint issues ---------------------------------------------------------------- jgoodies-forms.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 65, tab: line 59) jgoodies-forms.src: W: strange-permission jgoodies-forms-build.patch 0600 jgoodies-forms.src: W: strange-permission forms-1_1_0.zip 0600 jgoodies-forms.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/jgoodies-forms-1.1.0/docs/tutorial/introduction.html jgoodies-forms.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/jgoodies-forms-1.1.0/docs/reference/colsandrows.html jgoodies-forms.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/jgoodies-forms-1.1.0/docs/reference/cells.html ---------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: - Unify indentation. Please use spaces or tabs, not both - Change the permission of the files in srpm to 0644. - Change the encodings of HTML files to UTF-8. ! Note: When changing the encodings of HTML files into UTF-8, you also have to change the string of "charset". For example, /usr/share/doc/jgoodies-forms-1.1.0/docs/tutorial/introduction.html contains the line: ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:50:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111550.l9BFomBe001974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-11 11:50 EST ------- *** Bug 266821 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:51:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111551.l9BFpG2F002137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-11 11:51 EST ------- *** Bug 266801 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111550.l9BFolTh001949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-11 11:50 EST ------- Merged in as package in php-pear-propel (Bug 266841). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 266841 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:51:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111551.l9BFpF8Q002112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-11 11:51 EST ------- Merged in as package in php-pear-propel (Bug 266841). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 266841 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111556.l9BFunDI002997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:59:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305671] Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111559.l9BFx63m003289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305671 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:55:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111555.l9BFtTCI002784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:58:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305751] Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111558.l9BFwIRD003140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305751 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:58:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305701] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111558.l9BFwwEv003249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305701 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:58:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111558.l9BFwmUY003184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:58:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305761] Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111558.l9BFwCYN003106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305761 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:56:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305591] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111556.l9BFuoni003035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 Bug 305591 depends on bug 305581, which changed state. Bug 305581 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:58:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111558.l9BFwT8l029505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111558.l9BFwcbw029539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:59:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305641] Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111559.l9BFxdcw029645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305641 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:02:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111602.l9BG2UoF030326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:02:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305771] Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111602.l9BG2elS030381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305771 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:59:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305651] Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111559.l9BFxVjK029599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305651 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111602.l9BG23S2030238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(duffy at redhat.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305661] Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111559.l9BFxLJN003362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305661 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307171] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111602.l9BG2MVv004253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307171 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307801] Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111602.l9BG2DFW004216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 15:59:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111559.l9BFxlNp003616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:10:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111610.l9BGAnUw005615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:11:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111611.l9BGB4gT005746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:30:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111630.l9BGUoQa002446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-11 12:30 EST ------- If Tom needs sponsorship, he need only apply and I'll be happy to click the appropriate button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 16:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111647.l9BGlh1V005075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mgarski at post.pl) ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-10-11 12:47 EST ------- Good: + Mock build for Devel and F-7 works fine (x86_64, ppc64) + Package meets naming and packaging guideline + Spec file matches with package base name + Spec file have consistant macro ussage + Version is GPLv2 + Spec is in English + Spec is legible + Tarball matches with upstream (md5sum: 33c3b0ae46772dec3142e35c30401a27) + Package has correct buildroot + Package has no redundant BuildRequires + Package has no sub packages + Local build works fine. + Package has %defattr and proper permissions + Package has a proper %clean section + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of the %install section + %doc file don't affect runtime + Package contains no duplicated files + Package doesn't own file from other packages + %changeLog section is correct. + Locdl install and uninstall works fine. + Application has proper menue item + Application started without a crash + Rpmlint don't complaints the binary and debuginfo rpm Bad: - License Tag says GPLv2+ - Duplicate BuildRequires: pkgconfig (by gtk2-devel), glib2-devel (by gtk2-devel), gtk2-devel (by libglade2-devel), zlib-devel (by openssl-devel) - Rpmlint complaints on source rpm: $ rpmlint linuxdcpp-1.0.0-1.fc7.src.rpm linuxdcpp.src:25: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build FAKE_ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 17:02:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277931] Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111702.l9BH28cH007162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277931 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-11 13:02 EST ------- For 2.1.4-1: * rpmlint issue, timestamps - Fix these like bug 277921. * License - Would you clarify the license of src/core/com/jgoodies/looks/common/ExtBasicCheckBoxMenuItemUI.java ? This file says: ---------------------------------------------------------- /* * Copyright (c) Sun Microsystems. * * JGoodies Note: I've added this copyright to clarify * that this code has been developed and published by Sun. */ ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 17:33:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111733.l9BHXvPY018515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-10-11 13:33 EST ------- > If you go there and hit the "add myself to package" and request cvs and acls > the bugzilla and commit ones or whatever ones you want, I will approve them, > or approve them yourself if you can. Seems like you have to approve. > Since you have the updated src rpm which fixes stuff in mine go ahead. Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 17:36:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111736.l9BHa53P013538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-11 13:36 EST ------- I have posted the new spec file to sourceforge at the above link. Please make sure that the changes I made take care of the issues you listed. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 17:56:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111756.l9BHu907016410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-10-11 13:56 EST ------- The build fails on ppc in mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=191584&name=build.log Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 19:00:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111900.l9BJ0WJc026195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-11 15:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 18:59:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] New: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silfreed at silfreed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony-0.11-2.src.rpm Description: This software will allow you to program your Logitech Harmony universal remote control. $ rpmlint RPMS/harmony-*0.11-2* SRPMS/harmony-0.11-2.src.rpm harmony.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/harmony-0.11/examples/Connectivity.EZHex harmony.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/harmony-0.11/examples/Update.EZHex harmony.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/harmony-0.11/examples/Update.EZHex harmony.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/harmony-0.11/examples/LearnIr.EZTut harmony.src: W: non-coherent-filename harmony-0.11-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 19:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111907.l9BJ7T5X027357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |189696 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 19:05:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111905.l9BJ5rdE027098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 19:06:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111906.l9BJ6hhD000854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-10-11 15:06 EST ------- OK, it don't build in rawhide at all (not even i386), however it build just fine in F-7. Something in toolchain (gcc, glibc or glibc-headers etc) in rawhide must have broken tgt. It might be glibc-headers, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189696 Will have to wait to see what drepper says. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 19:37:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710111937.l9BJb20C005253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 ralston at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ralston at pobox.com 2007-10-11 15:37 EST ------- I've incorporated the comments here into updated SPEC/SRPM files: Spec URL: http://www.l33tskillz.org/RPMs/perl-Encode-Detect.spec SRPM URL: http://www.l33tskillz.org/RPMs/perl-Encode-Detect-1.00-2.fc7.src.rpm (The spectool and cpanspec tools were very helpful; I didn't know about cpanspec until I read about it in the Perl Packaging wiki page.) I've also added fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com to the CC list, as per the Perl Packaging wiki page. (The user 'perl-sig' threw an error in Bugzilla, so I used the expanded address.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 19:57:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328261] New: Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328261 Summary: Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/netembryo.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/netembryo-0.0.4-0.1.20071011git.src.rpm Description: Netembryo is a network abstraction library (originated from an old wrapper socket) plus some misc utility functions used as foundation for feng, libnemesi, felix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] New: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libnemesi.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libnemesi-0.6.2-0.1.20071011git.src.rpm Description: Libnemesi let you add multimedia streaming playback in your applications in a quick and straightforward way. This software, derived from the experience matured with NeMeSi is fully compliant with IETF's standards for real-time streaming of multimedia contents over Internet. libnemesi implements RTSP ? Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RFC2326) and RTP/RTCP ? Real-Time Transport Protocol/RTP Control Protocol (RFC3550) supporting the RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control (RFC3551). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:00:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112000.l9BK0lLV009351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |328261 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:00:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328261] Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112000.l9BK0mCq009373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328261 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |328291 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112003.l9BK3M4v005005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 shenson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:06:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112006.l9BK6hSC010687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2007-10-11 16:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rats Short Description: Rough Auditing Tool for Security Owners: shenson Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112014.l9BKENkw006839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-11 16:14 EST ------- Hey Kevin, Can you add an Obsoletes: redhat-artwork-kde to this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:15:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112015.l9BKFI66007411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mgarski at post.pl) | ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-10-11 16:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Bad: > - License Tag says GPLv2+ Yes it's GPLv2+, because if you look at the source files you will notice: "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." > - Duplicate BuildRequires: pkgconfig (by gtk2-devel), > glib2-devel (by gtk2-devel), gtk2-devel (by libglade2-devel), > zlib-devel (by openssl-devel) IMHO it's duplicate but correct see bug #178031 comment #7 (this stuff is checked by scons). > - Rpmlint complaints on source rpm: > $ rpmlint linuxdcpp-1.0.0-1.fc7.src.rpm > linuxdcpp.src:25: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build FAKE_ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" Fixed. http://mgarski.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp-1.0.0-2.fc7.src.rpm http://mgarski.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:25:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328411] New: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328411 Summary: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/archimedes.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/archimedes-0.7.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Archimedes is a package for the design and simulation of submicron semiconductor devices. It is a 2D Fast Monte Carlo simulator which can take into account all the relevant quantum effects, thank to the implementation of the Bohm effective potential method. The physics and geometry of a general device is introduced by typing a simple script, which makes, in this sense, Archimedes a powerful tool for the simulation of quite general semiconductor devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:29:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112029.l9BKT1Ox014763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-10-11 16:29 EST ------- OK MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package Just a few warnings: harmony.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/harmony-0.11/examples/Connectivity.EZHex harmony.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/harmony-0.11/examples/Update.EZHex harmony.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/harmony-0.11/examples/Update.EZHex harmony.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/harmony-0.11/examples/LearnIr.EZTut OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec? OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NOK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Well, i18n English at least as that's the only thing I can be judge of OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible? OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Builds on current x86_64 rawhide in mock ? MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture? Not tested on exotic arches OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires? Builds on current x86_64 rawhide in mock N/A MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly? N/A MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files? N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable? N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates? OK MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. NOK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly? You rely entirely on upstream not messing up premissions. With such a simple package you can do better: please use a generic %defattr(0644, root, root, 0755) at the start of %files and then %attr the single binary so it's executable OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. NOK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. Skip the examples N/A MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage? OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application? N/A MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files? N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1)? N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package? N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. N/A MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,? OK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages? OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. N/A SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream? N/A SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations? OK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Builds on current x86_64 rawhide in mock ? SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. /usr/sbin/harmony --get-time Harmony Control 0.11 Copyright 2007 Kevin Timmerman and Phil Dibowitz This software is distributed under the GPLv3. Requesting Identity: *********************done Model: Logitech Harmony 885 (Espresso) Firmware Version: 4.0 Hardware Version: 2.1 Config Flash Used: 23% (443 of 1920 KiB) The remote's time is currently 2007/10/11 Thu 22:22:12 +0 This bit is working at least N/A SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane? N/A SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase? N/A SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin,? %<--------------------------------------- Additionnal freeform comments and requests: ? please remove the commented Epoch ? it'd nice to use the buildroot preferred variant of the day ? it'd nice to respect the ordering and whitespacing of the fedora templates in rpmdevtools ? please install the file yourself instead of relying on complex make install argument passing (it's one file! install is simpler and safer!) ? please sprinkle the spec with ??? where appropriate so Logitech has no cause to complain ? please include and install an udev/hal/policykit config file so harmony device nodes are owned by the current GUI user and the utility needn't be run by root from /usr/sbin ? PackageReviewProcess asks to check other stuff like trademarks, and trademarks are clearly a concern for this package. This alone would cause the review to fail. I'll let the review run till this is corrected, as there's no need to involve legal in such a clear-cut case ? The examples should probably be dropped ? they're not really useful to end-users as upstream's readme explicitely states. Plus if they've been downloaded from logitech's site they legal status may be murky -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 20:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112041.l9BKfCCu017456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-11 16:41 EST ------- Yes, I'll do that. It's not ideal because this will also remove stuff like Bluecurve which will have to be reinstalled by hand if the users want it, but that's the nature of package splits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 21:27:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112127.l9BLRD1X024634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-11 17:27 EST ------- The packages are built in Koji, I guess closing this as NEXTRELEASE is the right thing to do? I'll try to push the package into F-7 with Bodhi next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 21:37:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313431] Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112137.l9BLboH7026019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-kdm-theme - Fedora Infinity KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313431 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-11 17:37 EST ------- Obsoletes: redhat-artwork-kde added in fedorainfinity-kdm-theme-1.0.0-3.fc8, built for dist-f8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 22:54:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112254.l9BMs0U6004092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-11 18:54 EST ------- imageinfo-0.05-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 22:52:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112252.l9BMq6DJ003830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-11 18:52 EST ------- nget-0.27.1-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nget' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 22:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112253.l9BMril4004048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-11 18:53 EST ------- xgrep-0.06-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xgrep' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 11 22:55:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710112255.l9BMtY7N031662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-11 18:55 EST ------- fuse-python-0.2-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fuse-python' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 00:51:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] New: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/bal.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/babl-0.0.15-0.1.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm Description: Babl is a dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library. It provides conversions between the myriad of buffer types images can be stored in. Babl doesn't only help with existing pixel formats, but also facilitates creation of new and uncommon ones. NOTE: This software, babl and gegl (that I'll also be submitting for review) are both currently alpha quality software under development. However, they are both needed to build/run the latest version of another package I maintain, gnomes-scan. The last version of gnome-scan without these dependencies doesn't build successfully on current rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 00:56:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] New: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl-0.0.13-0.1.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm Description: GEGL (Generic Graphics Library) is a graph based image processing framework. GEGLs original design was made to scratch GIMPs itches for a new compositing and processing core. This core is being designed to have minimal dependencies. and a simple well defined API. NOTE: This software, gegl and babl(also submitted for review) are both currently alpha quality software under development. However, they are both needed to build/run the latest version of another package I maintain, gnomes-scan. The last version of gnome-scan without these dependencies doesn't build successfully on current rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 01:44:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328261] Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120144.l9C1iSkx021032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328261 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-11 21:44 EST ------- preliminary review -> rpmlint gave me netembryo.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.4-0.1 0.0.4-0.1.20071011git The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. netembryo-devel.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized netembryo development library and headers Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. mock build went fine for i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 02:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120252.l9C2qmYD030912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Alias: px-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 ------- Additional Comments From jkubin at redhat.com 2007-10-11 22:52 EST ------- Sorry for delay ... Some bugs has been fixed, package is available here: http://bx.cz/px-0-9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 03:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120308.l9C38kR6005783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-11 23:08 EST ------- you miss to add following line to %prep chmod -x test/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 03:15:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120315.l9C3F6HW002021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-11 23:15 EST ------- I think License file is GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 03:18:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120318.l9C3ImlA007294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-11 23:18 EST ------- I think this package should have license GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 03:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120316.l9C3GvNQ007142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tagoh at redhat.com Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-11 23:16 EST ------- Should we use upstream Source or internal tarballs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 03:19:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120319.l9C3JlEk002414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bert at freudenbergs. | |de) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-11 23:19 EST ------- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 03:52:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120352.l9C3qYQX006550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-11 23:52 EST ------- I have updated the package http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-0.6.0-1.5615ca.fc8.src.rpm - added builddep libX11-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 04:02:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120402.l9C42AFw007981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 00:02 EST ------- mock build went fine. some warnings I got from rpmlint are => libnemesi.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.2-0.1 0.6.2-0.1.20071011git The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. libnemesi-devel.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized nemesi development library and headers Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 04:07:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120407.l9C47JJK013750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-12 00:07 EST ------- I've updated the package to 0.6.0 branch SRPM: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0-1.c4e49d.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 04:31:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120431.l9C4VPUj015356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 04:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120438.l9C4cucR017954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-12 00:38 EST ------- "license.txt" clearly says "version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version". But I am not sure where that file comes from (see below)? We still need a source url, and now I noticed thatthe tarball seemd to be created by us. It would be better to use upstream files directly IMHO, but they don't seem to release a .ttf file? Can we build http://sinhala.cvs.sourceforge.net/sinhala/sinhala/fonts/lklug.sfd with fontforge at buildtime? Rahul, I suggest adding a reference to this review bug in the changelog too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 04:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328951] New: Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328951 Summary: Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rbhalera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: This package contains fonts for the display of Arabic from the King Abdulaziz City for Science & Technology(kacst). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 05:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120503.l9C53KkK021166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-12 01:03 EST ------- The license is certainly GPLv2 according to the COPYING file provided in the upstream cvs. http://sinhala.cvs.sourceforge.net/sinhala/sinhala/COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 05:00:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] New: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/ccsm/ccsm.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/ccsm/ccsm-0.6.0-1.34443b.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity though plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains a gui configuration tool to configure Compiz plugins and the composite window manager. Other: I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 05:14:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120514.l9C5E3fM022519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-12 01:14 EST ------- BTW, just found .ttf file available as well from upstream. http://sinhala.sourceforge.net/files/lklug.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 05:15:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120515.l9C5F5ce020944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-12 01:15 EST ------- Yes, LICENSE says: "This package is distributed under the terms of GNU General Public License version 2 (see file GNU-GPL)." (the intention might have been GPLv2+ but that is not clearly stated). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 05:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328261] Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120520.l9C5KtN7023810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328261 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 01:20 EST ------- Also, good to add test directory to %doc of -devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 05:47:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120547.l9C5lr1L025296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com 2007-10-12 01:47 EST ------- why compiz-bcop is needed to build this? Is compiz-bcop a devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 05:49:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120549.l9C5neWn025443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala(si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-12 01:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > The license is certainly GPLv2 according to the COPYING file provided in the > upstream cvs. > http://sinhala.cvs.sourceforge.net/sinhala/sinhala/COPYING Yes and that file also says "version 2 or later", hence GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 05:56:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120556.l9C5uLLO028609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-12 01:56 EST ------- yup .. compiz-bcop is needed to build compiz plugins .. and libcompizconfig is a compiz plugin and a configuration backend -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 06:07:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120607.l9C67vON027955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 06:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120608.l9C68Wl3028064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 06:11:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120611.l9C6Bx67028651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-12 02:11 EST ------- I think our own tarball until our fixes are merged upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 06:21:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120621.l9C6LmCf030051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-10-12 02:21 EST ------- Built for rawhide and F-7. Pushed to F-7 testing by bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 06:36:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120636.l9C6ab9n031938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-12 02:36 EST ------- Yep, that's correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 06:51:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 02:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120651.l9C6pExb001558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-12 02:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=225181) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=225181&action=view) Patch for libX11.so linkage fix For 0.6.0-1.5615ca * Undefined non-weak symbols - Still these symbols exist. ----------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# rpm -q libcompizconfig libcompizconfig-0.6.0-1.5615ca.fc8 [root at localhost ~]# rpmlint libcompizconfig libcompizconfig.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XStringToKeysym libcompizconfig.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XKeysymToString [root at localhost ~]# ldd -r /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 >/dev/null undefined symbol: XStringToKeysym (/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0) undefined symbol: XKeysymToString (/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0) ----------------------------------------------------- Only installing libX11-devel will not solve this issue. You have to patch against Makefile.in so that libcompizconfig.so is linked against libX11.so. * Source - The tarball in your srpm was not found on the URL written as source0. * Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL , section "Using Revision Control" * Also, if this tarball is a "pre-release", please also check the section "Non-Numeric Version in Release" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 07:00:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120700.l9C70NDU004419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |247408 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 07:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120700.l9C70Owh004448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |328981 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 07:37:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120737.l9C7buN6008080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr Summary|Review Request: babl - A |Review Request: babl - A |dynamic, any to any, pixel |dynamic, any to any, pixel |format conversion library |format conversion library ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-12 03:37 EST ------- For the url, you should use, such that it is easier to check your source: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 and not use a inexistent source url. Do you intend to add this package to another branch than devel? I propose the following to ship the html docs: rm -rf __package_docs mkdir -p __package_docs cp -pr docs __package_docs mv __package_docs/docs __package_docs/html rm -rf __package_docs/html/tools __package_docs/html/.svn __package_docs/html/graphics/.svn rm __package_docs/html/Makefile* __package_docs/html/graphics/Makefile* and add %doc __package_docs/html You could use make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install INSTALL='install -p' to keep timestamps Suggestion: use rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la to be noticed when .la files aren't shipped anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 08:24:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120824.l9C8OlOE016221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 bert at freudenbergs.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(bert at freudenbergs.| |de) | ------- Additional Comments From bert at freudenbergs.de 2007-10-12 04:24 EST ------- I've just been busy with Real Coding so not much time for house keeping here. Will get back to this ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 08:47:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120847.l9C8lxfd020352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-12 04:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) Oh, my mistake, sorry. Now fixed. Updated SRPM: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-alsa-1.0.15- 0.3.rc2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 08:46:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120846.l9C8kYeX020191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-12 04:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Preliminary Review:- > > rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me > ------------------------------------- > system-config-samba.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-samba fixed > system-config-samba.src: W: invalid-license GPL fixed > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaParser.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaUserWin.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaBackend.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaDefaults.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/mainWindow.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/basicPreferencesWin.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaUserData.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/smb.conf.template > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/addUserWin.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/shareWindow.py > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/system-config-samba.glade > system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaToken.py fixed > system-config-samba.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libuser-python What's that supposed to mean? (ignored) > system-config-samba.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.52 1.2.52-1.fc8 fixed > system-config-samba.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL idem > system-config-samba.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-samba It doesn't provide "redhat-config-samba" -> ignored > system-config-samba.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/pam.d/system-config-samba > system-config-samba.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-samba fixed > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > also, > 1) packaging guidelines suggests use of make as > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e no really benefit in parallel build, but still: fixed > 2) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) fixed system-config-samba-1.2.55-1.fc8 with these changes is building right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 08:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120857.l9C8vuru023810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-12 04:57 EST ------- Imported and built for F-8 Fernando, if you want to build it for F-7, I will do it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 09:10:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120910.l9C9ALZU026168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 05:10 EST ------- Also, Good to add examples to %doc of -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 09:14:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120914.l9C9EWrl025083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 05:14 EST ------- Do you want to use disttag? Its not mandatory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 09:15:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328261] Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120915.l9C9FkD0025648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328261 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 05:15 EST ------- Do you want to use disttag? Its not mandatory but good to use them in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 09:21:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120921.l9C9LDu9027968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 05:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 3f3153bf5f4d5627655dbbbd71537f1e pyalsa-1.0.15rc2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package python-alsa-1.0.15-0.3.rc2.fc8 -> Provides: alsacard.so alsacontrol.so alsahcontrol.so alsamixer.so Requires: libasound.so.2 libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.3) libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 09:31:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120931.l9C9Vh5n028514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-12 05:31 EST ------- I'll fix the changelog. Examples contain only code and the resulting binaries are installed in %{_bindir}. I'll add the disttag, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 09:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120933.l9C9XwfK030105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 05:33 EST ------- Thanks for updates. Current CVS package build fine in mock i386 but rpmlint gave me system-config-nfs.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-nfs/exports.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. system-config-nfs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-nfs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. Also, Is there any need to use following in SPEC? ExclusiveOS: Linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 09:41:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120941.l9C9fcFn031590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 05:41 EST ------- I am bit confused whether we really need Requires(post): hicolor-icon-theme Requires(postun): hicolor-icon-theme because http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda suggests no such usage of Requires needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 09:56:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710120956.l9C9uJka001216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 05:56 EST ------- 1) I got following in mock build error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/system-config-samba 2) Is there any need to use following in SPEC? ExclusiveOS: Linux 3) I am bit confused whether we really need Requires(post): hicolor-icon-theme Requires(postun): hicolor-icon-theme because http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda suggests no such usage of Requires needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:02:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121002.l9CA2xaA000644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 06:02 EST ------- Dunno what happened at my machine I got following Processing files: system-config-samba-1.2.55-1.fc8 error: File not found: /var/tmp/system-config-samba-1.2.55-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/bin/system-config-samba Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.87231 Will check again CVS and try to build it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:04:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121004.l9CA4ZZ3000745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-12 06:04 EST ------- Thank you for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:12:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121012.l9CACMHS002116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 06:12 EST ------- Ok when I re-checkout CVS I got it working fine in mock build. Will you please reply to comment #4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121018.l9CAInJc002988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-12 06:18 EST ------- Freeze in 5 days... Do you mind we can update it for F-8 ? Did you tested the new OpenEXR with SeLinux set to Strict on rawhide? (I may be able to do this if you request a sratch build for rawhide on koji) We will short in time to report problem? What do you mind ? Do you have a list of packages that will need a rebuild ? Did you warned maintainers about the potential update ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:21:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121021.l9CALGM9005019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Requiest: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 06:21 EST ------- heh. How can this review request be completed? Don't you want to build package? create CVS module? I wonder howcome this package will appear in CVS/rawhide? Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess . Next you have to do "CVSAdminProcedure". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:37:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121037.l9CAbOnf005787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-12 06:37 EST ------- F-8 can/should wait. This can go into devel(F-9) branch initially. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:37:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121037.l9CAbSYk005818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:36:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121036.l9CAasWZ007114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Requiest: python-alsa|Review Request: python-alsa |- Python binding for the |- Python binding for the |ALSA library |ALSA library ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-12 06:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-alsa Short Description: Python binding for the ALSA library Owners: andriy Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 10:42:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121042.l9CAgVsg006563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Alias: px-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-12 06:42 EST ------- Josef -- you still didn't fix some of what did I mention in comment #3, namely: (In reply to comment #3) > * Source: %{name}.tar.gz -- it would be great if the source code tarball name > contained the version. Even better if it you made it available for download > somewhere in Internet (people.redhat.com?) As far as I know you are the upstream of the package -- it shouldn't be hard for you to do the change. > * Prefix: %{_datadir}/px -- please note that making relocatable packages is > discouraged. See paragraph "Relocatable packages" in the Guidelines [1] Either clarify why do you need a relocatable package or remove this. > * The changelog time stamp lines should end with complete version-release pair, > e.g. 0-1, 0-2, 0-3 in your case. Each changelog entry should correspond to a > revision. Your package's version is 0, not 0.0. It would be great if you chose some sane versioning scheme and mentioned the version in the source tarball name. I see you changed the tarball without changing name -- please never do that. Apart from that I found another problem: 33 %files ... 38 %{prefix} Please don't do this -- enumerate just the files and directories your package creates and owns. You can even use wildcards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 11:24:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329291] New: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Product: Fedora Version: f8test3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/debootstrap.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/debootstrap-0.3.3.2etch1-1.fc8.i386/debootstrap-0.3.3.2etch1-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock results: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/debootstrap-0.3.3.2etch1-1.fc8.i386/ Description: Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system debootstrap is used to create a Debian base system from scratch, without requiring the availability of dpkg or apt. It does this by downloading .deb files from a mirror site, and carefully unpacking them into a directory which can eventually be chrooted into. This might be often useful coupled with virtualization techniques to run Debian GNU/Linux guest system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 11:30:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329291] Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121130.l9CBUpSQ013237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Alias: debootstrap-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-12 07:30 EST ------- rpmlint results: debootstrap.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/debootstrap This is just fine -- we install no binary libraries in /usr/lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 11:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329291] Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121143.l9CBhR4R015724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Alias: debootstrap-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-12 07:43 EST ------- It seems to me that using the lenny or sid version would be better. In my opinion, and in general, the kind of things in unstable match better with the innovative aspect of fedora. In devel the build fails: MAKEDEV -d dev std ptmx make: MAKEDEV: Command not found That's because MAKEDEV is in root path. You didn't built as root, did you? I got inspiration from Suse in the package I did here to workaround this issue: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/debian/ to workaround this issue, maybe you could have a look. Also I install stuff in %{_datadir} to conform with the FHS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 12:01:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 324111] Split gdata python module to a proper package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121201.l9CC1nZb018783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Split gdata python module to a proper package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324111 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |329331 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 12:01:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] New: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,walters at redhat.com +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #324111 +++ Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/python-gdata/python-gdata.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/python-gdata/python-gdata-1.0.8-1.src.rpm Description: This is a Python module for accessing online Google services, such as: - Blogger - Calendar - Picasa Web Albums - Spreadsheets - YouTube - Notebook -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 12:24:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121224.l9CCO9S8020519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 08:24 EST ------- rpmlint gave me python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/apps/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/spreadsheet/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/docs/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/base/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/atom/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/docs/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/atom/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/calendar/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/spreadsheet/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/test_data.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/apps/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/base/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/calendar/service.py 0644 If this is of noarch type then do we still need following in SPEC ? %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 12:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121230.l9CCU34U022613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-12 08:30 EST ------- Good to add tests directory as %doc Also, are files under samples are also examples? If yes you can also add them to %doc. I think neither they are used in build nor they are installed. remember to run rpmlint on rpms before providing update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 12:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121233.l9CCXCoM022845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-12 08:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-bbdb Short Description: A contact management utility for use with Emacs Owners: jgu Branches: F-7 InitialCC: tromey at redhat.com) Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 12:34:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121234.l9CCYO2B021724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-12 08:34 EST ------- Tom - I've taken the liberty of adding you to the inital-cc list. Once you're sponsored and have a FAS username, we can add that to package owners. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 12:57:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121257.l9CCvCi9025435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-12 08:57 EST ------- ------------ This package (ilmbase) is APPROVED by me ------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 13:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121303.l9CD3K4l027396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-12 09:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ilmbase Short Description: Abstraction/convenience libraries Owners: rdieter1 Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 13:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121326.l9CDQ4Tr030942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-12 09:26 EST ------- So I can go ahead and follow the import instructions on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join ? I successfully checked out the setools module, since it already exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 13:34:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121334.l9CDYi56031128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-12 09:34 EST ------- Follow the procedure written on Join wiki. Next you have to set up client tools and request CVS admin procedure because now the owner of setools is not you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:12:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121412.l9CECIhG004130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-12 10:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > For the url, you should use, such that it is easier to check > your source: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 > > and not use a inexistent source url. > Fixed > Do you intend to add this package to another branch > than devel? > Maybe F-7. I already got a request to update gnome-scan there to the latest. > I propose the following to ship the html docs: > I did this in a slightly different way. Thanks. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/bal.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/babl-0.0.15-0.2.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:14:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121414.l9CEEKnh004258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-12 10:14 EST ------- Modified the spec not to point to an inexistent source url. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl-0.0.13-0.2.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:34:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121434.l9CEYM0F007551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-12 10:34 EST ------- There is a dot missing at the end of the devel %description. Also the timestamps are still not kept. As above, I propose: make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install INSTALL='install -p' The changelog entry is not very clear in my opinion: - Remove the use of inexistent source (from package reviews) I would suggest something along: - clarify how the source may be generated and don't mention the fact that the sources were inexistent, since the source were not really inexistent the url was. It is only a suggestion and not a big deal. As for shipping babl svn snapshot in F-7 I think that it should be avoided, unless there are severe regression/bugs or there are wonderful new functionalities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121449.l9CEn43G010404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 osspkg at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121448.l9CEmW6a010327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-12 10:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > There is a dot missing at the end of the devel %description. > Will add it. > Also the timestamps are still not kept. As above, I propose: > make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install INSTALL='install -p' > I don't see why its necessary, the packaging guildeline say to do it, when the copy command is used. There's no mention of doing it for make install. > The changelog entry is not very clear in my opinion: > - Remove the use of inexistent source (from package reviews) A typo, should have been 'inexistent source url'. Will fix. > > As for shipping babl svn snapshot in F-7 I think that it > should be avoided, unless there are severe regression/bugs or > there are wonderful new functionalities. Actually, there are 'wonderful new functionalities' in latest gnome-scan (at least according to the author), and it depends the svn version of babl and gegl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321601] Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121448.l9CEmWge010035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ImageInfo - Extract attributes of digital images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321601 osspkg at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:51:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329291] Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121451.l9CEpgrk011161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Alias: debootstrap-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-12 10:51 EST ------- Patrice: Thanks for your comment. Please don't confuse unstable with innovative. If there are any things that work better in "unstable" that you miss in etch version, feel free to tell me, I'd gladly either backport the patch or move to unstable branch. Also, I didn't notice that MAKEDEV does reside in /sbin as I include sbin also in my regular path. I also built in mock, which also seems to includ /sbin in PATH. I'll fix that do say either /sbin/MAKEDEV or /dev/MAKEDEV in next revision. Which one do you suggest? When it comes to FHS, I've already considered that. Here's what FHS says: > /usr/lib includes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that are not > intended to be executed directly by users or shell scripts. [22] Only these two files don't comply: /usr/lib/debootstrap/arch and /usr/lib/debootstrap/devices.tar.gz. I've choosen to leave them in /usr/lib do avoid deviation from the upstream. If there are still strong objection against this I will move them to /usr/share instead. Though I found no particular bits in your package that I'd find usable for this one, I'd be glad if you comaintained the package once it is approved. I'll spin updated packages once I get feedback on the outstanding questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121452.l9CEqLNb011228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-12 10:52 EST ------- Well, I must say that there are some issues to fix on 1.2.1-1 spec/srpm. Please check the following URLs for general packaging procedure. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag A. Description stage * Please explain why you want to introduce seemingly-redundant macros like %name, %version, ..... etc * Please consider to use %?dist tag. * Please follow the BuildRoot format requested for Fedora. * Remove redundant BuildRequires - For example, libGLU-devel requires libGL-devel, so "BuildRequires: libGL-devel" can be removed - Remove BuildRequires listed on "Exceptions" list on "Guidelines" wiki. - Also I suggest to write one BuildRequires per one line because * it makes easier to read * it makes easier to find out the difference when BuildRequiers changes. * Check the missing BuildRequires - This srpm cannot be rebuilt. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=191544 At least libogg-devel is missing from BuildRequires. B. %prep/%build/%install stage * Support parallel make if possible, otherwise write as a comment which tells that this package cannot support parallel make. * Don't use %makeinstall unless it cannot be avoided. * Desktop files must be installed by "desktop-file-install" (BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils is needed). - I don't think the Category "X-MandrivaLinux-MoreApplications-Games-Arcade" is needed. - The category "MoreApplications" is not valid. ----------------------------------------------------------- error: value "Game;ActionGame;MoreApplications;X-MandrivaLinux-MoreApplications-Games-Arcade;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "MoreApplications" ----------------------------------------------------------- * When using "cp" or "install" command, add "-p" option to keep timestamps. * Consider to install pixmaps image data under %_datadir/icons/hicolor/??x??/apps and call gtk-update-icon-cache (please check the section "GTK+ icon cache" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) C. %files section * Make it sure that all directories created by this package are owned by this package. For example, %_datadir/adanaxisgpl/ itself is not owned by any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 14:54:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121454.l9CEsprH010997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-12 10:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > Also the timestamps are still not kept. As above, I propose: > > make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install INSTALL='install -p' > > > I don't see why its necessary, the packaging guildeline say to do it, when the > copy command is used. There's no mention of doing it for make install. It is an obvious deficiency of the guidelines. It is obviously better to keep timestamps for all the files that are not generated (and sometimes it is also better to have relevant timestamps on generated files, in case of multiarch packages sharing those files). > > The changelog entry is not very clear in my opinion: > > - Remove the use of inexistent source (from package reviews) > A typo, should have been 'inexistent source url'. Will fix. Ok. > > As for shipping babl svn snapshot in F-7 I think that it > > should be avoided, unless there are severe regression/bugs or > > there are wonderful new functionalities. > Actually, there are 'wonderful new functionalities' in latest gnome-scan (at > least according to the author), and it depends the svn version of babl and gegl. Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 15:08:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121508.l9CF8TBT013672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 cpebenito at tresys.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-12 11:08 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: setools Updated Fedora Owners: pebenito,dwalsh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 15:36:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329291] Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121536.l9CFaBuj017691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Alias: debootstrap-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-12 11:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Patrice: Thanks for your comment. Please don't confuse unstable with innovative. > If there are any things that work better in "unstable" that you miss in etch > version, feel free to tell me, I'd gladly either backport the patch or move to > unstable branch. I don't confuse those, believe me. It is only a rule of thumb that works for most of the packages I have seen that are in debian and in fedora (in fedora devel). Otherwise said in general stuff in debian stable is often too old for fedora devel. In the debootstrap I packaged there were configs for more distros (I guess they are for ubuntu), that would be nice to have. > Also, I didn't notice that MAKEDEV does reside in /sbin as I include sbin also > in my regular path. I also built in mock, which also seems to includ /sbin in > PATH. I'll fix that do say either /sbin/MAKEDEV or /dev/MAKEDEV in next > revision. Which one do you suggest? /sbin/MAKEDEV But what about the comment from Suse: # the .deb is used to get the devices tarball as Debian # may expect other devices as MAKEDEV generates... Also when I tried that, I got an error saying something along 'only root can create special devices'. But apparently this is not the case now. Maybe because of the way you invoke it. If your method really works, indeed it is better than my kludge. I looked at the resulting tarballs, they are very different. But it may be because mine is devices-std.tar.gz and yours is devices.tar.gz. > When it comes to FHS, I've already considered that. Here's what FHS says: > > > /usr/lib includes object files, libraries, and internal binaries that are not > > intended to be executed directly by users or shell scripts. [22] > > Only these two files don't comply: /usr/lib/debootstrap/arch and > /usr/lib/debootstrap/devices.tar.gz. I've choosen to leave them in /usr/lib do > avoid deviation from the upstream. If there are still strong objection against > this I will move them to /usr/share instead. The files in lib/debootstrap are not object files, libraries, or internal binaries, they are scripts functions, and script 'configurations' and the devices tarball. All these are better in %_datadir. > Though I found no particular bits in your package that I'd find usable for this > one, I'd be glad if you comaintained the package once it is approved. No problem, I'd be happy to do that. I already have too much packages so I did not want to be the primary maintainer, but no problem to be co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 15:55:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329291] Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121555.l9CFtQTo021143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Alias: debootstrap-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-12 11:55 EST ------- In fact, unless I am wrong the device-std.tar.gz is used in debootstrap, the devices.tar.gz is used for debootstrap-udeb. see Makefile: install-allarch: install install -m 0644 devices-std.tar.gz \ $(DSDIR)/devices.tar.gz install-arch: install install -m 0755 pkgdetails $(DSDIR)/ install -m 0644 devices.tar.gz $(DSDIR)/ install -m 0644 debootstrap-arch $(DSDIR)/arch and debian/rules: $(MAKE) install-allarch DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/debootstrap $(MAKE) install-arch DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/debootstrap-udeb So for debootstrap you should do make install-allarch DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT It could also be possible to build a debootstrap and a debootstrap-udeb package, but in my opinion they should be named like in debian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 16:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121602.l9CG2Dme022287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-12 12:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony-0.11-3.src.rpm $ rpmlint RPMS/harmony-*0.11-3*.rpm SRPMS/harmony-0.11-3.src.rpm harmony.src: W: non-coherent-filename harmony-0.11-3.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 12 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.11-3 - removing examples from docs - installing binary by hand to bindir instead of sbindir - removed commented epoch - added ? where appropriate - reordered elements of spec file; updated buildroot - added udev rules for creating symlinks with nicer names - added pam_console perms for setting devices to current user %<--------------------------------------- Most issues raised should be addressed. Do you have any examples for PolicyKit? I'm only running F-7 here, so it's difficult for me to built a correct PolicyKit file for this software. This is my first attempt at writing udev rules/pam_console perms, so I might have gotten something wrong here; additional checks here would be appreciated. I'm still working with upstream to convince them that the name is potentially a trademark problem and find an acceptable name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 16:25:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121625.l9CGPxGU025752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2007-10-12 12:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Imported and built for F-8 > Fernando, if you want to build it for F-7, I will do it... It'd be great if you could do that... I guess fc6 is out of the loop, right? I'm still supporting it so if you can't build for that I'll build from your .src.rpm here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 16:35:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121635.l9CGZAs7027094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-12 12:35 EST ------- Ok, doing for FC-6 also... Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jack-rack New Branches: FC-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 16:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121652.l9CGqLGM029216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-10-12 12:52 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: telepathy-gabble New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 16:52:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121652.l9CGqw6K029857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-10-12 12:52 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: telepathy-glib New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 16:51:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121651.l9CGpeu2029737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-10-12 12:51 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-telepathy New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 16:54:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121654.l9CGstVu029539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From karl at nncc.info 2007-10-12 12:54 EST ------- The modifications mentioned here have been done in a new build of the package, however using the system libslab.so.0 makes GNOME main menu crash. So using --force to overwrite the libs left by gnome-control-center. I think libslab should be split off into a separate package in order to allow easy replacement of it using obsoletes in this package. The updated package will be uploaded soon, I'll post the relevant URLs here when done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:03:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121703.l9CH3P0v031483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-12 13:03 EST ------- Some cleanups. Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony-0.11-4.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 12 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.11-4 - including license.txt in doc - switching defattr from (-, root, root, -) to (0644, root, root, 0755) and attr(0755) the binary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:27:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121727.l9CHRBbY002763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121733.l9CHX6VG003548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:36:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121736.l9CHaVBM003846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:36 EST ------- Can we get an official ack here from dwalsh? Also, did you want to take over both F-7 and devel branches? or just devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:42:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242790] Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121742.l9CHgA1T004680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-glib - glib binding for the Telepathy D-Bus protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242790 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205031] Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121741.l9CHfeAX004993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-telepathy - Python libraries for Telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205031 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:41:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204417] Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121741.l9CHfAkx004938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-gabble - A Jabber/XMPP connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204417 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:40:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121740.l9CHeX6Q004782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:39:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121739.l9CHdtAJ004376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:39 EST ------- We can't add arbitrary email addresses to InitialCC. It must be a Fedora Account system account name. ;( cvs done. (except for the cc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:44:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121744.l9CHiQEa005188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 13:44 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 17:54:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329291] Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121754.l9CHsWJo006611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Alias: debootstrap-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-12 13:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > In the debootstrap I packaged there were configs for > more distros (I guess they are for ubuntu), that would be nice > to have. Fair enough. Bumped to latest 1.0.3. > But what about the comment from Suse: > # the .deb is used to get the devices tarball as Debian > # may expect other devices as MAKEDEV generates... > > Also when I tried that, I got an error saying something along > 'only root can create special devices'. But apparently this > is not the case now. Maybe because of the way you invoke it. I do it in fakeroot, as you might have noticed. I chose it because it is the way debian does it. > The files in lib/debootstrap are not object files, libraries, or > internal binaries, they are scripts functions, and script > 'configurations' and the devices tarball. All these are better > in %_datadir. Right. Done. (In reply to comment #5) > In fact, unless I am wrong the device-std.tar.gz is used in > debootstrap, the devices.tar.gz is used for debootstrap-udeb. Right. devices-std is meant to be used when bootstraping debian installations from within OS, rather than from installer. The collection of devices generated by our MAKEDEV, is a bit different from what Debian uses, but after playing a bit with it an comparing results I decided to leave it as it is. Though our one has more devices and but lacks some, I believe that the the lacking ones weren't instlalled purposefully, just by coincidence of being in Debian MAKEDEV's "std". In any case, they don't deny the complete /dev from being populated after the bootstrap -- the installed system does contain MAKEDEV in any case. > So for debootstrap you should do > make install-allarch DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Also right. Fixed. > It could also be possible to build a debootstrap and a > debootstrap-udeb package, but in my opinion they should be > named like in debian. No need for -udeb. We are not a debian installer. I also turned the package into noarch. I'm not completly sure whether the all of the devices in the tarball are arch independent, as they are generated by arch dependent MAKEDEV, but I believe it to have no impact (as ones used during bootstrap are most likely common for different archs and after bootstrap populating /dev with more useful content is advisable in any case.). I'll eventually test this on ppc. So far tested with etch/i386, sid/i386 and gutsy/i386 and confirmed to work. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/debootstrap.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/debootstrap-1.0.3-1.fc8.noarch/debootstrap-1.0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock results: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/debootstrap-1.0.3-1.fc8.noarch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 18:35:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121835.l9CIZVWt013342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-12 14:35 EST ------- With fixes from comment #3, Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/bal.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/babl-0.0.15-0.2.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 18:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121848.l9CImLxf015045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-12 14:48 EST ------- Added scripts to generate udev rules and PolicyKit rules. If we know someone we could CC to check over the PolicyKit rules, I'd appreciate it. Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony-0.11-6.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 12 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.11-6 - generating udev rules at build time - updated udev rules to include more devices - generating and packaging PolicyKit rules * Fri Oct 12 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.11-5 - fixing udev rules path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 19:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121902.l9CJ2M3C017515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 19:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121906.l9CJ61dI017753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-12 15:06 EST ------- Tyler, are you still interested in continuing with the review? Any thing that I should fix in the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 19:05:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121905.l9CJ5Hb4017509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-12 15:05 EST ------- Fixed broken .fdi file due to copy/paste typo. Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony-0.11-7.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 12 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.11-7 - fixed typo in harmony-gen-policykit-rules.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 19:09:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121909.l9CJ9C0C018586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 ------- Additional Comments From andy.southgate at mushware.com 2007-10-12 15:09 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I'll get on to those fixes as soon as I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 19:14:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121914.l9CJExa2019581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-12 15:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/harmony/harmony-0.11-8.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 12 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.11-8 - moving udev/PolicyKit generation from install to build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 19:43:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121943.l9CJhdtD022900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 15:43 EST ------- Excellent work. So, really the last issue outstanding that I see is to get the licensing all figured and checked. I'll see we can have spot check... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 19:46:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710121946.l9CJkwnI023544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |?, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-10-12 15:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgssglue Short Description: Renaming libgssapi to libgssglue Owners: steved at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: steved at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 20:06:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122006.l9CK6xV0026804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-12 16:06 EST ------- fuse-python-0.2-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 20:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122008.l9CK86HB026868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-12 16:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) Real closed request ticket. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=193050 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 20:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122007.l9CK708a027325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.2-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 20:08:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329291] Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122008.l9CK8Tn5027065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: debootstrap - Bootstrap a basic Debian GNU/Linux system Alias: debootstrap-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329291 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-12 16:08 EST ------- Isn't it a typo in debootstrap-1.0.3-devices.patch should be dev instead of dir? That's quite strange that it worked... Maybe the devices may be created on the fly anyway? Also there is a path in the debootstrap script, DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=/usr/lib/debootstrap In my spec I did: sed -i.datadir -e 's:DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=/usr/lib/debootstrap:DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=%{_datadir}/%{name}/:' debootstrap I also used fakeroot in my tests, if I recall well but I must have done something wrong as indeed files are created and though they don't look like special files, they are, I even checked. rpmlint says: debootstrap.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 13) debootstrap.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/debootstrap.8.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 20:21:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122021.l9CKLuRZ029099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-10-12 16:21 EST ------- Ok, this ones seems good except for the problem name Do get davidz to check your rules are in good taste though. All I can tell is they work ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 20:35:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122035.l9CKZBZA031119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-12 16:35 EST ------- There is a typo in the %changelog, as rpmlint shows: babl.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.15-0.3.svn20071011 0.0.15-0.3.20071011svn.fc8 What is exactly the use of /usr/lib/babl-0.0/CIE-Lab.so /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gegl-fixups.so /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gggl-lies.so /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gggl.so /usr/lib/babl-0.0/naive-CMYK.so They don't look like library to link against, but rather like dlopened extensions. Is it the case? In that case they should be in the main package, unless they are examples that shouldn't be shipped. And since gggl stuff seems to be GPLv2+, the version should be updated. What about adding: %check make check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 21:11:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122111.l9CLBVJH003417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-12 17:11 EST ------- Sorry for being so slow with this; I keep running out of time. The rpmlint complaints are all OK; all the .c and .h files are the point of this package, which isn't used to develop anything. I do wonder about the necessity of packaging the Documentation directory if the whole point is to provide a controlled set of kernel sources to compile. I guess it's only a few hundred files out of more than 22000 but it's not really relevant to the purpose of this package. One question I have is where the actual dependencies for compiling the kernel source are going to come from. This package has no dependency on make or the C compiler, and it doesn't look like the kcbench package does, either. Should each of the data packages have dependencies on what they need in order to build? (They could have minimum gcc release requirements, for example, although I doubt a Fedora release would ever violate them unless gcc 5.9 fails to compile 2.6.20 ten years from now.) * source files match upstream: 2c14ada1ac7d272e03b430d3a530d60fc9ec69cc8252382aa049afba7d2b8558 linux-2.6.20.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. ? final dependencies might be incomplete kcbench-data-0.1-1.noarch.rpm kcbench-data = 0.1-1 = kcbench kcbench-data-2.6.20 = 0.1-1 kcbench-data-2.6.20-0.1-1.noarch.rpm kcbench-datafiles = 0.1-1 kcbench-data-2.6.20 = 0.1-1 = /bin/bash /bin/sh /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/python kcbench-data = 0.1-1 perl >= 1:5 perl(File::Find) perl(strict) * nothing to %check. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 21:15:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122115.l9CLFcKU004641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-12 17:15 EST ------- This a trivial single shell script installed into %{_bindir}. I'm not even sure what the point in running through a review checklist would be. The package builds and installs fine (with the dependencies in a local repo). rpmlint complains about the lack of documentation, which is honestly valid; a quick readme might be nice. The only thing I can see as a problem is that you can install this and then not be able to run it because of missing dependencies. I know it checks for some things it needs, but I think it's better to have those in the dependency list since otherwise installing this package is pointless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 21:43:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122143.l9CLhnWb007922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-12 17:43 EST ------- Please check your Provides/Obsoletes. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d in particular, I don't think .fc7 should be in there. cvs done. (note also that Short Description: should be the package short description, and that Owners: should be your fedora account name). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 22:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122247.l9CMlHwM016119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |4Suite ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-12 18:47 EST ------- I just received the answer from the developer. He said : "The license of the whole package is LGPL. If part of the code is used outside of the package, I need to be contacted. Hope this helps." Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 23:17:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122317.l9CNHH3B019747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xmds - the |Review Request: xmds - the |eXtensible Mulit-Dimensional|eXtensible Multi-Dimensional |Simulator |Simulator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 12 23:53:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710122353.l9CNrHU7024301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|4Suite |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-12 19:53 EST ------- Well, that's not very specific as to things like the version of the LGPL. I guess we can say LGPL+ to allow any version, but please also include your correspondence with the author as a text file in the package. With those changes I believe I'd approve this package, but I'm trying to make sure and can't seem reach www.pingoured.fr to get the updated spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 00:08:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330311] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330311 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: osspkg at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/perl-Class-Date.spec SRPM URL: http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/perl-Class-Date-1.1.9-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module is intended to provide a general-purpose date and datetime type for perl. You have a Class::Date class for absolute date and date-time, and have a Class::Date::Rel class for relative dates. This package is rpmlint clean, and build in mock with no problems. I have attempted to translate the source license "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself" into one of the available options for the spec file license field, but comments from an experience Perl module packager would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 01:48:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243571] Review Request: python-mechanoid - Python Programmatic Web Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710130148.l9D1m1cM004784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mechanoid - Python Programmatic Web Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243571 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-12 21:48 EST ------- ping? It appears that the source has never been imported into the cvs repository or built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 02:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227115] Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710130252.l9D2qcB9013073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227115 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-12 22:52 EST ------- ping? It looks like this packages was branched in cvs in March and warren set the cvs done flag to "+" but it has not been imported into the cvs repository or built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 05:56:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710130556.l9D5ujiD002098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-13 01:56 EST ------- Sorry for the inconvenience the server has been deplaced and I have tried to have it working yesterday but could not manage to do it. I will contact you on irc once it is back. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 08:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 04:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227048] Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710130833.l9D8XTAG021208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-13 04:33 EST ------- ping? This package was approved and a cvs branch was created for it but the source was never checked into the repository or a package built. You can go ahead and do this if you'd like; it's all set up and awaiting your initial checkin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 09:11:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710130911.l9D9BmVB026851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 Bug 276961 depends on bug 292821, which changed state. Bug 292821 Summary: Update to 1.2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292821 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 12:49:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131249.l9DCna9R022897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-13 08:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > What is exactly the use of > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/CIE-Lab.so > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gegl-fixups.so > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gggl-lies.so > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gggl.so > /usr/lib/babl-0.0/naive-CMYK.so > You're correct, they are extension. I've put them in the main package. > They don't look like library to link against, but rather like > dlopened extensions. Is it the case? In that case they should be > in the main package, unless they are examples that shouldn't be > shipped. And since gggl stuff seems to be GPLv2+, the version > should be updated. I dont understand what you mean by the last sentence. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/bal.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/babl-0.0.15-0.4.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 12:52:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131252.l9DCqeNt023597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-13 08:52 EST ------- With a couple of fixes; Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl-0.0.13-0.3.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 12:54:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250943] Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131254.l9DCsqB1023792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250943 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |green at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-13 08:54 EST ------- I think the license should probably be BSD (from reading the style sheet contents). Thanks for submitting this. I'll do a full review this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 13:10:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131310.l9DDAEU7026324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |green at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-13 09:10 EST ------- Thanks for submitting this. These rpmlint warnings should be cleaned up... # rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/x3d-dtd-schema-3.0-1.noarch.rpm W: x3d-dtd-schema wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/x3d-dtd-schema-3.0/x3d-schema-changelog.txt W: x3d-dtd-schema wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/x3d-dtd-schema-3.0/x3d-dtd-changelog.txt I'll do a full review this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:28:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131428.l9DEStOb004222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-10-13 10:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=226431) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=226431&action=view) SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] New: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: attached SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mcepl/task_193178/syncevolution-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: syncevolution is designed to provide a SyncML client that can connect to and sync with various SyncML-based servers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:32:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131432.l9DEWhvK004813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2007-10-13 10:32 EST ------- I'm currently thinking I should probably change the package name here to push the '3.0' into package name and just use a date as the version (like I already do for x3d-xsl). There will be 3.1, 3.2, etc. releases of these DTDs; and they should not obsolete one another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:36:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131436.l9DEa0PO005353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-10-13 10:35 EST ------- Forget it, this is better: Spec URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/syncevolution.spec SRPM URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/syncevolution-0.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:41:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315351] Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131441.l9DEf6uF006155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315351 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:39:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328411] Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131439.l9DEdO5C005615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328411 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-13 10:39 EST ------- Well, review finished... - spec/srpm no problem - tarball matches with upstream - build okay http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=192736 - can be installed - seems to work well ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (archimedes) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131452.l9DEqk8o007439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-13 10:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint complains about the lack of documentation, which is honestly valid; > a quick readme might be nice. Added > The only thing I can see as a problem is that you can install this and then not > be able to run it because of missing dependencies. I added make, binutils and gcc (without version, as those currently in Fedora -- that should work fine) Did some small improvements to the kcbench script itself while at it as well. Spec URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/kcbench.spec SRPM URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/kcbench-0.1-2.src.rpm SRPM DIFF URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/DIFFS.fdr/kcbench.rpmdiff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:51:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131451.l9DEprJk007383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 10:51 EST ------- The source should be an url to the upstream source. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL You should also certainly have a look at the guidelines if you haven't already: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines A buildrequires for fftw is missing. It seems to be fftw2-devel, more precisely. loadxsil.m shouldn't be in %_bindir, it may better be in %doc since there is no specific directory for matlab scripts currently in fedora. Docs are missing. Without doc, the package is not very useful. There is an example directory, it should be shipped in %doc. Also the manual would be a must, if it is covered by a free documentation license. scilab and matlab are not part of fedora. But unless I am wrong, the .dat created by xsil2graphics -s are simple ascii output file that may be used with any plotting program? Maybe this could be said somewhere? In summary it is unneeded to repeat the package name. Unless I am wrong, xsil2graphics and loadxsil are useful by themselves, maybe they could be in a subpackage, since as far as I can tell from a quick browsing, there aren't many other xsil tools. I suggest using %dist since this is a binary package. Also why use a release of 3 in the submission, why not begin with 1? It seems to me that a requires on gcc-c++ would be in order, since it is called during model compilation. Same for fftw2-devel. Is libxmds.a meant to be used separately from xmds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:58:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235637] Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131458.l9DEwhbD008263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smstools - Send and receive short messages through GSM modems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235637 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-13 10:58 EST ------- Ping #3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 14:58:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131458.l9DEw96u008222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-13 10:58 EST ------- thx for reviewing (In reply to comment #1) > Sorry for being so slow with this; I keep running out of time. np -- I've been using a similar script for years without even actually thinking about submitting it to Fedora > I do wonder about the necessity of packaging the Documentation directory [...] I had thought about that as well and first wanted to exclude it, and then thought "better leave it". I now excluded it again. Should it ever be needed I'll include it. > One question I have is where the actual dependencies for compiling the kernel > source are going to come from. This package has no dependency on make or the C > compiler, and it doesn't look like the kcbench package does, either. Forget that (or better: seems I deleted it again, as I think I added it once) > Should > each of the data packages have dependencies on what they need in order to build? What's currently in Fedora is sufficient and... > (They could have minimum gcc release requirements, for example, although I > doubt a Fedora release would ever violate them unless gcc 5.9 fails to compile > 2.6.20 ten years from now.) ...when it stops remains to be seen. Thus I didn't add any versions to the requires. Added a small readme to this package as well. --- Spec URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/kcbench-data.spec SRPM URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/kcbench-data-0.1-2.src.rpm SRPM DIFF URL: http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/DIFFS.fdr/kcbench-data.rpmdiff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 15:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131501.l9DF1ems008719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 11:01 EST ------- In general %check is after %install. Just a suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 15:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131503.l9DF3Kr2009049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-13 11:03 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 15:01:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131501.l9DF11xB008838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 11:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > shipped. And since gggl stuff seems to be GPLv2+, the version > > should be updated. > > I dont understand what you mean by the last sentence. The gggl code, that makes /usr/lib/babl-0.0/gggl.so, for example, is covered by the GPLv2+. If the babl library dlopens gggl.so, then the whole is covered by the GPLv2+. So license should be GPLv2+. If the extension is not used in the default case, maybe the best would be to have License: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ I haven't seen in the doc something clear about enabling or disabling the extensions, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 15:11:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328411] Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131511.l9DFBUOD010193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328411 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-13 11:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: archimedes Short Description: 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices. Owners: rishi Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 15:16:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 315351] Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131516.l9DFG7Xg010923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: superiotool - Simple program for detecting Super I/O on your mainboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=315351 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 16:04:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 296161] Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131604.l9DG4iPS017147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296161 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-13 12:04 EST ------- Well, for general packaging issues, please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Some random comments for 2.3.3-2: * Please write the full URL of Source1. Otherwise write as a comment where you found Source1. * Please follow the buildroot tag required for Fedora. * Please check the license. COPYING.GNU is GPL+. * Use macros correctly. /usr/share must be %_datadir, for example. * stripping binaries by yourself is forbidden because this makes debuginfo rpm useless. * Please choose whether you choose macros or native commands For example, while you use %__install, you also use perk (can be %__perl), make (can be %__make) and so on. * Please avoid %makeinstall if possible - For this package, adding 'INSTALL="install" -p' option to "make install" is preferable because this keeps timestamps on almost all instaled files. * When you use "install" or "cp" command, use "-p" option to keep timestamps. * Desktop files must be installed by "desktop-file-install" (BR: desktop-file-utils is needed) - Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 16:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177512] Review Request: mysql-connector-net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131630.l9DGU2A4020876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-connector-net https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177512 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-13 12:30 EST ------- ping? I see that the directory structure for this has been created in cvs but there aren't any spec/source files present or packages built in the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 16:46:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131646.l9DGkr6N023067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2007-10-13 12:46 EST ------- I am sorry, but I am not going to be able to finish this review as I have had to be out of town for a family emergency and I am not sure when I will be able to get back to my PCs. I am very sorry about this, can someone else please take this and finish up the review. I am not sure how to put this review back in the queue, so if someone can help me with that I would appreciate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 17:05:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131705.l9DH5e0K025615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-13 13:05 EST ------- ping? A branch for this has been created in the repository by there is no source present and it looks like the package has never been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 17:11:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131711.l9DHBFIV026315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-13 13:11 EST ------- ping? The branch has been created but the source package still hasn't been imported or built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 17:24:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131724.l9DHOOpB027900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(andreas.bierfert at l | |owlatency.de) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-13 13:24 EST ------- Well, more than 3 months has passed without any review, so: Would you still want to have this package reviewed? If so, I will try to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 17:32:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131732.l9DHWkVc029205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 ------- Additional Comments From noah at coderanger.net 2007-10-13 13:32 EST ------- I know, my return to school has made finding time to do this hard. I will try to get to it next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 17:36:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] New: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lokthare at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/gbrainy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/gbrainy-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: gbrainy is a brain teaser game and trainer to have fun and to keep your brain trained. It is written for GNOME using Mono, C# and Cairo. This package is the first package that i submit therefore i need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 19:26:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710131926.l9DJQddN011726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tyler.l.owen at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-13 15:26 EST ------- I am reassigning this to 'nobody' in view of Tyler's comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 20:00:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] New: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/testing/fedora-devel/k12ltsp/SRPMS/ltsp-config-dhcp.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/testing/fedora-devel/k12ltsp/SRPMS/ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 20:19:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] New: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/testing/fedora-devel/k12ltsp/SRPMS/nbd.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/testing/fedora-devel/k12ltsp/SRPMS/nbd-2.9.7-1.src.rpm Description: Network Block Device -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 20:37:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132037.l9DKbW6E021597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-10-13 16:37 EST ------- New packages: http://hrozkovi.cz/boxes.spec http://hrozkovi.cz/boxes-1.1-3.fc7.src.rpm I tried to address the issues pointed out in comment #5, hope everything is packaged according to the Guidelines now.. > Some minor remarks: > - There's a full stop missing after the %description. > - No need to put a '/' before %{_prefix} or similar paths. > - Default permissions for directories are not set in %defattr (fourth arg). > - The patch file contains a whitespace change. The above should be fixed. > - The patch file is named 'fix_smp_flags' but also comments the strip command from the Makefile. I've renamed the patch and added a comment to the specfile describing what it really does. After some thinking, I decided that it would be wisest to drop the Emacs helper for now. I don't use Emacs myself, so I don't understand half of the terms used in the Emacs guidelines and frankly, I'm not all that much willing to learn how Emacs and its add-ons work, not to mention lisp. Maintaining something you don't use is bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 20:52:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132052.l9DKq5lZ023517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 16:52 EST ------- I don't see the interest of of this package as a package. Indeed the init file duplicates the dhcp init file, and the conf file is an example so don't need to be shipped in the filesystem (and would better be in %doc than in /etc). It seems to me that it would be better to add that file in the dhcp %doc instead than doing a specific package. The only drawback I see would be that a release must either wait for a dhcp release or force a dhcp release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:14:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132114.l9DLEgdj026224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 17:14 EST ------- Historically K12LTSP shipped with a stock config file like this. We will do so only to allow a quick migration into Fedora. Later we plan on using management interfaces to configure it instead, so we don't rely upon inflexible stock configs like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:26:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132126.l9DLQpf7027546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 17:26 EST ------- If it is only temporary, then adding the config file in %doc in dhcp seems even more relevant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:24:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132124.l9DLOtW4027602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 17:24 EST ------- If simple_test is shipped, it seems to me that the sources for nbd-tester-client should also be shipped (nbd-tester-client.c cliserv.h). I think that the check could be added: %check make check Reading the README, it looks like some special devices should be created. Should it be left to the user, will the devices be created on the fly, or should they be created in a post-script? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:34:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] New: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhrozek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hrozkovi.cz/flawfinder.spec SRPM URL: http://hrozkovi.cz/flawfinder-1.27-2.src.rpm Description: Flawfinder scans through C/C++ source code, identifying lines ("hits") with potential security flaws. By default it reports hits sorted by severity, with the riskiest lines first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132141.l9DLfeRq029950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 17:41 EST ------- The license seems to me to be GPL+ The server and the client should certainly be in different packages, especially since according to the README they shouldn't be installed on the same computer. You could consider adding %dist. rpmlint relevant complaint: nbd.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:47:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132147.l9DLlL2t030247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-13 17:47 EST ------- Please branch for F-8 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:47:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132147.l9DLleAS030264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 Alias: perl-Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-13 17:47 EST ------- Please branch for F-8 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132149.l9DLn8dR030348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 17:49 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltsp-config-dhcp-0-2.fc8.src.rpm Some minor cleanups and thinko corrections, listed below. diff -u ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8.orig/ltsp-config-dhcp.spec ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8/ltsp-config-dhcp.spec --- ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8.orig/ltsp-config-dhcp.spec 2007-10-13 14:33:25.000000000 -0400 +++ ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8/ltsp-config-dhcp.spec 2007-10-13 17:42:04.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,19 +1,22 @@ -Name: ltsp-config-dhcp -Version: 0 -Release: 1%{?dist} -Summary: Default configuration for LTSP5 - -Group: System -License: GPL -Source0: ltsp-dhcpd.conf -Source1: ltsp-dhcpd.init -BuildArch: noarch +Name: ltsp-config-dhcp +Version: 0 +Release: 2%{?dist} +Summary: Default configuration for LTSP5 dhcpd + +Group: System Environment/Daemons +License: GPL+ or ISC +# LTSP is all GPL +Source0: ltsp-dhcpd.conf +# Copied from dhcp-3.0.6 and slightly modified, ISC licensed +Source1: ltsp-dhcpd.init +BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Requires: dhcp >= 3.0 %description -Default configurations for LTSP5 +Default configuration for LTSP5 dhcpd +Highly recommended that you check/edit the network information before running! %prep @@ -36,6 +39,8 @@ %changelog +* Sat Oct 13 2007 Warren Togami 0-2 +- minor cleanups + * Sat Oct 13 2007 Eric Harrison - first build - diff -u ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8.orig/ltsp-dhcpd.conf ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8/ltsp-dhcpd.conf --- ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8.orig/ltsp-dhcpd.conf 2006-03-30 21:55:17.000000000 -0500 +++ ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8/ltsp-dhcpd.conf 2007-10-13 17:42:08.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,7 +1,4 @@ -# Sample configuration file for ISCD dhcpd -# -# Don't forget to set run_dhcpd=1 in /etc/init.d/dhcpd -# once you adjusted this file and copied it to /etc/dhcpd.conf. +# Sample configuration file for K12LTSP dhcpd # default-lease-time 21600; diff -u ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8.orig/ltsp-dhcpd.init ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8/ltsp-dhcpd.init --- ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8.orig/ltsp-dhcpd.init 2007-10-12 01:32:07.000000000 -0400 +++ ltsp-config-dhcp-0-1.fc8/ltsp-dhcpd.init 2007-10-13 17:42:08.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ #!/bin/sh # ### BEGIN INIT INFO -# Provides: dhcpd-ltsp +# Provides: ltsp-dhcpd # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: 0 1 6 # Should-Start: @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ RETVAL=$? [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ] && return $RETVAL - echo -n $"Starting $prog: " + echo -n $"Starting ltsp-$prog: " daemon $dhcpd $DHCPDARGS 2>/dev/null RETVAL=$? echo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 21:59:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132159.l9DLxErC031905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 17:59 EST ------- > If it is only temporary, then adding the config file in %doc > in dhcp seems even more relevant. We cannot lose the ability for this to work out-of-the-box as existing K12LTSP users expect. Sure this is problematic for other users, but then other users shouldn't install this package. The ltsp* prefix should be a big clue. Package is APPROVED with the above changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 22:08:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132208.l9DM8Cdk000837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 18:08 EST ------- [builder2 at newcaprica x86_64]$ rpmlint nbd-2.9.7-1.x86_64.rpm nbd.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nbd-2.9.7/simple_test nbd.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 1) OK to ignore the first warning. 2) Highly recommended that you include the V-R after your name in each changelog entry. It would look like this: * Sat Oct 13 2007 Eric Harrison 2.9.7-1 - update to 2.9.7 3) Change the license to "GPL+". 4) Add %{dist} to the end of your Release tag. With these minor changes this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 22:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132213.l9DMD9AW001304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 18:13 EST ------- I made other comments above that are worth discussing or taking into account. That way to handle reviews is just plain unacceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 22:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132210.l9DMAXL1001390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 18:10 EST ------- That is not a way to handle reviews. There is a discussion it should hold the approval. Remember, please, that there is community in Fedora. What happens if the dhcp and the ltsp-dhcp services are started simultaneously? In my opinion, this is plain wrong to have ltsp-dhcpd.conf used without user edition. It is an example file, it is not an out-of-the-box install. No K12LTSP user should expect to have a config file with specific defaults (as opposed to generic defaults) set up as it is the case here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 22:33:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132233.l9DMXEJk004379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 18:33 EST ------- Patrice, I understand your concerns. Let me try to explain our goal here. A config file like this has been distributed for out-of-the-box usage for 6+ years in the K12LTSP distro. Modern Edubuntu distributes exactly this way as well. Most users of K12LTSP today are using this configuration unmodified. We are fully aware that this package is inflexible and possibly conflicting. Despite these shortcomings, we cannot afford to make everything perfect before inclusion in Fedora. Our intent is to include basic functionality quickly, in order to lower the barrier of entry of other people to contribute to its design and improvement. Despite not being perfect, it would be prudent to allow this in because: - Prior to Fedora inclusion none of this is tracked in any source control, making entry to development difficult and confusing. With Ubuntu and every several other distros already integrated with LTSP-5, this is a sorely needed catalyst to keep Fedora relevant to LTSP users. - This package does not cause problems for non-LTSP users, even if they installed the package by accident because it is not enabled by default. Please just let this go. It doesn't harm anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 22:42:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132242.l9DMgnLD005266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 18:42 EST ------- > The server and the client should certainly be in different > packages, especially since according to the README they > shouldn't be installed on the same computer. I disagree that it is necessary to split this package. It would be overly pedantic to do so. It is certainly not harmful to have both installed on the same system but to use only one or the other. On a more general level, we really want to avoid gratuitous package splits, as every additional package slows down every yum transaction. This is a tiny and simple package with no real benefit in splitting. > Reading the README, it looks like some special devices should > be created. Should it be left to the user, will the devices be > created on the fly, or should they be created in a post-script? Please leave this to the user for now. nbd can be used in many different ways. LTSP specifically creates devices on-the-fly for an arbitrary number of clients, so it is wrong for the nbd base package to make any assumptions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 22:46:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132246.l9DMkwaj005851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-13 18:46 EST ------- Hi Patrice, the K12LTSP user very much expects to have a config file with specific defaults set up. This is to support diskless workstations, DHCP is required (with specific parameters) for the workstations to boot. (see http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/IntegratingLtsp) The dhcp & ltsp-dhcp services use the same lock file, same leases file, etc. You cannot run both at the same time. Warren: this will not cause a conflict. Note that package will only be installed if the (soon to be uploaded) ltsp5 packages are installed. It is disabled by default, it will have no impact unless it is explicitly installed and enabled. It will not run at the same time as dhcp started with a different conf file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 23:12:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132312.l9DNCvdP009555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 19:12 EST ------- Going ahead with import and build of nbd because this is seemingly less controversial than Bug #330921, and I have only a few hours remaining to train Eric Harrison on using the fedora CVS and buildsys before I fly out. If there are further concerns about the package we can address it after initial import. Eric does need practice on updating an existing package and requesting builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 23:25:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132325.l9DNPQVQ011104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-13 19:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nbd Short Description: Network Block Device user-space tools Owners: eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 13 23:52:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710132352.l9DNq7am014828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 19:52 EST ------- The config file will be much more generic if the group example is commented out. Now in order to work out of the box there needs to be a dependency on a package setting up /lts/vmlinuz.ltsp /lts/pxe/pxelinux.0 /opt/ltsp/* Also it would be much better, in my opinion, to add a README file explaining what is going on with this package. Something along: This package sets up a preconfigured dhcp server for ltsp. Beware that, contrary to the policy used in most of the distribution, the dhcp server is started in the default case. You should edit /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf if your network doesn't match 192.168.0.0, or your router, dns, nfs hasn't the 192.168.0.255 ip address. Please also note that the dhcp server using the regular /etc/dhcp.conf cannot be started at the same time than the dhcp server in that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:01:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140001.l9E01sxQ016021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(andreas.bierfert at l| |owlatency.de) | ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-10-13 20:01 EST ------- If you are willing to that be great. I mean its a low profile package so should not pose any problem but at lest to me it is quiet practical. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140003.l9E03wrE016272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 20:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > If there are further concerns about the package we can address it after initial > import. Ok. > Eric does need practice on updating an existing package and requesting > builds. That's not very right, since all the fedora contributors should be treated equally, but not a big deal either. (In reply to comment #5) > > The server and the client should certainly be in different > > packages, especially since according to the README they > > shouldn't be installed on the same computer. > > I disagree that it is necessary to split this package. It would be overly > pedantic to do so. It is certainly not harmful to have both installed on the > same system but to use only one or the other. > > On a more general level, we really want to avoid gratuitous package splits, as > every additional package slows down every yum transaction. This is a tiny and > simple package with no real benefit in splitting. I didn't said it was a must. The yum transaction slowing is not a good reason in my opinion, if this is a concern, then we won't be able to scale anyway. However it is true that splitting a package like this one has advantages and disadvantages: Advantages: * since only one of both should be installed, it reduces the size of an installation. Of course this is by a small amount, but for this specific software one could imagine setups where size matters. * having things that are not useful not installed makes administration simpler. Disadvantages: * more complexity at the packaging level * 2 packages, so the user has to know that the package is split (although the names should be pretty straightforward to find out) It seems to me that from a user point of view, having a split package is better in that case (and in all the client/server cases, in my opinion). In the end, leaving it to the packager seems right to me, still this has to be discussed. > Please leave this to the user for now. nbd can be used in many different ways. > LTSP specifically creates devices on-the-fly for an arbitrary number of > clients, so it is wrong for the nbd base package to make any assumptions. Fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:05:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140005.l9E05663016548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 20:05 EST ------- And it would also be nice to have that kind of text in the %description, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:07:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140007.l9E077sd016915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 20:07 EST ------- Good idea about additional warnings and a README. The dependencies are currently in churn, we will add dependencies when we have a better idea how all the pieces fit together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140010.l9E0AXSE017415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2007-10-13 20:10 EST ------- Re: the rpmlint warnings, is it appropriate to process the files with dos2unix? Or is some other mechanism preferred? A bit more about additional DTD versions... There are now, in addition to the 3.0 DTDs, 3.1 DTDs; and 3.2 DTDs are forthcoming. The Web3D Consortium packages these separately. Should we compile them into a single RPM package (i.e., "x3d-dtd-schemas"), or provide them in separate packages (i.e., "x3d-dtd-schemas30", "x3d-dtd-schemas31", etc.)? Another issue... While the Consortium fixes bugs in these DTDs in their revision control, they do not appear to think it necessary to provide updated packages with the fixes. My current strategy is to apply patches with the updates to the packaged DTDs. Painful, but I don't have a better idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:16:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140016.l9E0GZuE018057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 20:16 EST ------- It would seem acceptable to me with some kind of explanation as I propose above and the group stuff commented out of the config file. I also think that it shouldn't be added to another fedora version than devel before appropriate requires are there. Even if it is broken in devel, it is not a real issue and indeed helps people to be able to test other packages in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:19:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140019.l9E0JDXt018237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-13 20:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Re: the rpmlint warnings, is it appropriate to process the files with dos2unix? > Or is some other mechanism preferred? I personally prefer sed -i -e 's/\r//' myfile to avoid adding another build dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:26:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140026.l9E0Q8sG019522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-13 20:26 EST ------- nbd going into F-7 and devel was because it is a tiny and known good component independent from K12LTSP. The rest of LTSP, I'm generally in agreement. We will definitely be testing these pieces in devel before pushing them back into a stable release. Only known-working sets of packages will hit a stable release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:39:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140039.l9E0dCPY020819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-13 20:39 EST ------- 'ello? Can I get a package reviewer in the hizzous? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 00:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140044.l9E0iPnS021499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 01:00:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140100.l9E10dIv023932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 01:09:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] New: Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 Summary: Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smilner at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/tmp/python-pp.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/tmp/python-pp-1.4.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: pp is a python module which provides mechanism for parallel execution of python code on SMP (systems with multiple processors or cores) and clusters (computers connected via network). [steve at psycho SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-pp-1.4.5-1.fc7.noarch.rpm [steve at psycho SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 02:46:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140246.l9E2kKlC004742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-10-13 22:46 EST ------- Two things: - Files in %{_bindir} should not have .py extension, so that they won't be byte-compiled. The byte-compiled files should be excluded: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python - The if-block you have in %install tried to move files from /usr/bin to %{_bindir}, which in all Fedora/RHEL installs I've seen are the same place? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 02:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140255.l9E2tMCd005837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 02:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140255.l9E2tuvj005897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 02:58:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140258.l9E2wqJJ006155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 03:16:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140316.l9E3Gd6k008450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-13 23:16 EST ------- Do you want to use dist tag? mock build went fine for i386. but build.log showed /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found I think may be you need to add BR:python? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 03:31:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140331.l9E3VLku010381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-13 23:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm currently thinking I should probably change the package name here to push > the '3.0' into package name and just use a date as the version (like I already > do for x3d-xsl). There will be 3.1, 3.2, etc. releases of these DTDs; and they > should not obsolete one another. I think it would also be reasonable to put them all in one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 03:33:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140333.l9E3XhkG010409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-13 23:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > There are now, in addition to the 3.0 DTDs, 3.1 DTDs; and 3.2 DTDs are > forthcoming. The Web3D Consortium packages these separately. Should we compile > them into a single RPM package (i.e., "x3d-dtd-schemas"), or provide them in > separate packages (i.e., "x3d-dtd-schemas30", "x3d-dtd-schemas31", etc.)? (I should have read all your comments before responding!) I like the idea of putting them all in one package. > Another issue... While the Consortium fixes bugs in these DTDs in their revision > control, they do not appear to think it necessary to provide updated packages > with the fixes. My current strategy is to apply patches with the updates to the > packaged DTDs. Painful, but I don't have a better idea. That sounds fair to me. This kind of behaviour is quite common. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 03:36:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251282] Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140336.l9E3ak8r011043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-dtd-schema - X3D DTDs and schemata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251282 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-13 23:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Re: the rpmlint warnings, is it appropriate to process the files with dos2unix? > > Or is some other mechanism preferred? > > I personally prefer > sed -i -e 's/\r//' myfile > to avoid adding another build dependency. And the packaging guidelines specially ask people not to use dos2unix... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 04:54:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140454.l9E4sZpt020863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 04:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140455.l9E4tgcW021244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-14 00:55 EST ------- will officially review it tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 04:59:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140459.l9E4xuLJ021554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-14 00:59 EST ------- 1) Do you like to prefer to use disttag? 2) good to have defattr usage as defattr(-, root, root, -) mock build went fine for i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 05:07:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140507.l9E57SEr022809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-14 01:07 EST ------- your SOURCE URL should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sync4jevolution/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 06:40:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188601] Review Request: ltsp-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140640.l9E6ex5m002260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188601 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188611 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 08:54:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710140854.l9E8sRqX017584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-14 04:54 EST ------- Both URLs result in PAGE UNAVAILABLE This URL you typed is unavailable at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 10:40:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 06:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141040.l9EAeKPB032312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-10-14 06:40 EST ------- http://hrozkovi.cz/flawfinder.spec http://hrozkovi.cz/flawfinder-1.27-3.fc7.src.rpm * Sat Oct 13 2007 Jakub Hrozek 1.27-3 - fix the dist tag - fix build requires - fix the Source URL to point to SF.net Thanks for looking at my package, Parag! I fixed the problems you found and also the Source0 URL; it wasn't pointing nowhere before but the project is hosted on SF.net, so this is more aligned with the Guidelines.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 11:02:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141102.l9EB2N3C002613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-14 07:02 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 50fff67dd439f42b785577ed8b3a3f7d flawfinder-1.27.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 11:52:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141152.l9EBqwHD009070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-10-14 07:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flawfinder Short Description: Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws Owners: jhrozek Branches: F-7 InitialCC: n/a Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 13:21:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 09:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141321.l9EDLTUY021170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-14 09:21 EST ------- Well * SourceURL - I recommend to use %name and %version macro, like ------------------------------------------------------------- Source0: http://icculus.org/openbox/2/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------------- With this, you probably don't have to change SourceURL when new version is released. * License policy has changed. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - In short, you must specify the version of GPL. For this package this is "GPL+" (i.e. any version of GPL) because no version is specified on source codes. * Change %changelog entry like -------------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Jun 03 2007 Andreas Bierfert - 1.5-1 - initial version -------------------------------------------------------------- Other things are okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (docker) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 13:55:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 09:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141355.l9EDte3h025702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-10-14 09:55 EST ------- Updated src.rpm is at http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/syncevolution-0.6-2.fc8.src.rpm (SPEC file is at the same place). Package was fully build on all four platforms in koji (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=194312). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 14:14:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141414.l9EEEYBE028336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-10-14 10:14 EST ------- Just change of the koji URL -- it is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=194329 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 14:45:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 10:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141445.l9EEjocx032561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 15:32:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141532.l9EFWbvA005645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-10-14 11:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: docker Short Description: KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application Owners: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 15:33:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141533.l9EFXMm0006088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-10-14 11:33 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I will take care of the changes before the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 16:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291371] Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141621.l9EGLUOH012437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291371 ------- Additional Comments From cheese at nosuchhost.net 2007-10-14 12:21 EST ------- thanks for your input. created new files, but i'm not yet satisfied, and will them release later for inspection. concerning schema-files: i could not figure what they where for, and teg seems to work correct without them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 18:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141825.l9EIPsWA028831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239428 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 18:24:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141824.l9EIOq77028418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-10-14 14:24 EST ------- Looks fine, you are APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 18:38:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141838.l9EIc2XX029785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-10-14 14:38 EST ------- Updated ... Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/tmp/python-pp.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/tmp/python-pp-1.4.5-2.fc7.src.rpm [steve at psycho SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-pp-1.4.5-2.fc7.noarch.rpm [steve at psycho SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 18:55:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141855.l9EItdL2032306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ewan at macmahon.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-10-14 14:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gimp-resynthesizer Short Description: Gimp plugin for texture synthesis Owners: ewan Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:06:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141906.l9EJ6RM6001308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-10-14 15:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: linuxdcpp Short Description: Direct Connect client Owners: mgarski Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:18:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141918.l9EJIw3G002692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-14 15:18 EST ------- You can put it on your fedorapeople.org page, mail it to me or just attach the spec here if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:26:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141926.l9EJQEKC004197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Alias: gurlchecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-14 15:26 EST ------- Koji Build: Done [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4605] Bodhi Update: Pushed to testing [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2007-2505] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:33:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141933.l9EJXJIH004667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 15:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:36:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141936.l9EJaE6L005567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 15:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:38:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141938.l9EJcisw005473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 15:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:40:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328411] Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141940.l9EJedw0006026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328411 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 15:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:42:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141942.l9EJg1mc006402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 15:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:43:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141943.l9EJhwNC006546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 15:43 EST ------- This cvs request seems to already have been processed. Please reset if you need further cvsadmin action. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:46:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205321] Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141946.l9EJkL4Q006850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose - Complete modern object system for Perl 5 Alias: perl-Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205321 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 15:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 19:46:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239973] Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710141946.l9EJkxj2007252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-XS - JSON serialising/deserialising, done correctly and fast Alias: perl-JSON-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239973 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 15:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 20:17:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142017.l9EKHenf011263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-14 16:17 EST ------- Imported and built for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 20:22:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142022.l9EKMQmQ011981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-14 16:22 EST ------- Server is back and the new rpm to :) SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets-1.14.0-7.fc6.src.rpm Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 20:27:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142027.l9EKRx4m012618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-14 16:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sirius Updated Fedora CC: makghosh, mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 20:39:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142039.l9EKdATi013764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-14 16:39 EST ------- Kevin, debarshi told me about removing him from CC of this package. So I put up the package change request :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 20:46:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328411] Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142046.l9EKk0Lc015118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328411 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 20:48:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142048.l9EKmIpR015294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-10-14 16:48 EST ------- Thanks. Build in devel and F-7 tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 20:47:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142047.l9EKlO03015256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew.| |edu) | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-14 16:47 EST ------- Yes, and updated. * Sun Oct 14 2007 Chris Weyl 0.08001-1 - updated to 0.08001 - update license tag - nix errant perl(Producer::BaseTest) provides - make description useful :) - we now skip Template::Toolkit tests correctly, so stop disabling them http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-SQL-Translator-0.08001-1.fc7.src.rpm http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-SQL-Translator.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 21:12:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142112.l9ELCSAZ018416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-14 17:12 EST ------- The rt bug comments from the author tell us what the license is, namely, under the same terms as perl itself. He has also committed to including a statement to that effect in the next release of the distribution. I've updated the rpm to include a "COPYING.fedora" with the information from and a link to the licensing bug on rt.cpan.org. http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-2.fc7.src.rpm http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBI-Dumper.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 22:21:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] New: Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 Summary: Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-ltspswapd/ltsp-ltspswapd.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-ltspswapd/ltsp-ltspswapd-0-20071014cvs.fc8.src.rpm Description: Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 22:28:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241078] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142228.l9EMSpLj028141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 Alias: perl-Net-SSH2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241078 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-14 18:28 EST ------- Updated for libssh 0.17, though the review this package depends on seems to be dead. Sigh. http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Net-SSH2-0.10-2.fc7.src.rpm http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Net-SSH2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 23:40:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142340.l9ENeqik005796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-14 19:40 EST ------- Updated Spec/SRPM incorporating all suggestions: Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-config-dhcp/ltsp-config-dhcp.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-config-dhcp/ltsp-config-dhcp-0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 23:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142338.l9ENcqId005234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-14 19:38 EST ------- This package needs cvs to be Requested by the Reporter. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 23:49:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - radeonhd driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - radeonhd driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd.spec SRPM URL: http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-1.1.1-0.3.20071014git.fc8.src.rpm Description: radeonhd driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets This package is still very much a work in progress. You may experience * regressions * bugs * errors * broken displays and other undesirable phenomena. radeonhd mailing list: http://lists.opensuse.org/radeonhd/ radeonhd source code: http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 23:57:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142357.l9ENvEP7007942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xo | |rg-x11-drv-radeonhd/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 23:56:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142356.l9ENuMmR007858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xorg-x11- |Review Request: xorg-x11- |drv-radeonhd - radeonhd |drv-radeonhd - driver for |driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx|AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets |Chipsets | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 23:55:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - radeonhd driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142355.l9ENtTlZ007613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - radeonhd driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2007-10-14 19:55 EST ------- On my machine, I have three options to run X11: 1. svga driver (open source, sloooow, leaves text console unusable) 2. fglrx driver (closed source, 3D support, mostly hangs on suspend/resume) 3. radeonhd (open source, 2D only, mostly survives suspend/resume) Given radeonhd's current status of not even having had the first release, this package would probably not be a good candidate to be shipped on Fedora CDs for some time to come. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 14 23:58:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710142358.l9ENwh0L008065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2007-10-14 19:58 EST ------- A "self-review" of the package is contained in http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/COMMENTS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 00:51:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150051.l9F0pPv5015494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution Alias: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-14 20:51 EST ------- Please branch for F-8. Thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 01:24:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194566] Review Request: 915resolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150124.l9F1OYVL019133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: 915resolution Alias: 915resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194566 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-14 21:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 02:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150222.l9F2MKWn027024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-10-14 22:21 EST ------- Hi Alexandru, As I am unable to sponsor you this is an informal (and incomplete) review but does hi-light some issues which need to be fixed. ?? - Meets Packaging Guidelines. ?? - Package named correctly NA - Patches named correctly OK - Spec file named correctly to match base OK - License is valid OK - Licence field matches package OK - Licence file installed if supplied OK - Spec file in American English ?? - Source matches upstream (md5) NO * Locales use %find_lang OK - %clean is present and correct OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Specfile Legible NO * Builds in Mock NA - %post/%postun calls ldconfig for sh libs OK - Owns directories it creates OK - No duplicate files NO * Has %defattr and has correct permissions NO * Macros used consistently OK - %doc does not affect runtime NA - Headers/static libs in -devel NA - .pc files in -devel NA - .so files in -devel NA - -devel requires base OK - Contains no .la libtool archive files OK - Does not own others files NA - .desktop files installed correctly NO * BuildRequires correct. ?? - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Package has rm -rf %{buildroot} at top of %install. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT used instead ?? - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. ?? - rpmlint output. NA - documentation in -doc package ?? - final provides and requires are sane. OK - should have dist tag ?? - should package latest version Comments and Suggestions. Summary Field should not be in camel caps, in my opinion it would be better as "Liquid rescale plug-in for the GIMP" or something more descriptive like "Content-aware resizing plug-in for the GIMP" The description does not state what the plugin actually does. Please use the ${name} macrom in the Source0: URL: %defattr MUST be at top of %files section Group: would be better as Applications/Multimedia There is a typo in the URL field. Package fails to build in mock. Please see http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/review/gimp-lqr-plugin/ for build logs Please see the Locale section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -Marc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 02:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] New: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/mknbi/mknbi.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/mknbi/mknbi-1.4.4-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: Utility for creating network bootable images Slightly funky package in that it will only build on i386, but runs on all arches (perl script executables). There was an old Fedora Extras 4 package for mknbi & I also took a look at the syslinux package which has similar build/install oddities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:05:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150305.l9F35NXh000306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-14 23:05 EST ------- The "slight funkiness" could be problematic, because this package will only appear in the i386 repository due to the presence of ExclusiveArch:. I don't know if that's an issue for you. syslinux builds on x86_64 just fine and of course isn't applicable on ppc, sparc or alpha in any case. At first glance, %{_libdir}/mknbi looks to be unowned. Why not just have that directory in your %files section instead of listing all of the files underneath it separately? Honestly, barring some other reason for listing everything out, your %files section could be as simple as: %files %{_libdir}/mknbi/ %{_bindir}* %{_mandir}/man1/* %doc COPYING LOG README spec.txt but of course that's up to you. Regardless of what you do, you must still own %{_libdir}/mknbi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:17:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150317.l9F3HA80003079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-14 23:17 EST ------- OK, looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:17:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150317.l9F3H0LL001774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-14 23:16 EST ------- Looks good to me; frankly I don't know exactly what is required to build a kernel, but the Fedora pakage specifies a bit more than just make, gcc and binutils: module-init-tools patch >= 2.5.4 bash >= 2.03 sh-utils tar bzip2 findutils gzip m4 perl make >= 3.78 diffutils gawk gcc >= 3.4.2 binutils >= 2.12 redhat-rpm-config I can't say how much of that is specific to the Fedora kernels, though. Still, I'm sure if anything turns up missing then you can just add it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150327.l9F3RviH004460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-14 23:27 EST ------- Yes, that is a problem. Ideally this package would be available on all arches. It builds boot images for i386 diskless clients, it is a quite reasonable use-case to want to build an boot image for an i386 client from a sparc server, for example. Any suggestions on getting the fedora build system to generate i386 assembly code within a noarch package? As for the *spec, it originated from upstream (http://downloads.sourceforge.net/etherboot/mknbi-1.4.4-1.src.rpm). It passed rpmlint, so I thought I'd just leave it. Might as well clean it up while fixing %{_libdir}/mknbi... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:33:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330311] Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150333.l9F3Xo8Q005142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Alias: perl-Class-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330311 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Class-Date AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-14 23:33 EST ------- Note that the first 5 lines are canonically done in %prep, not build. This package needs to own all directories it creates under %{perl_vendorarch}, e.g. %{perl_vendorarch}/Class/Date.p* %{perl_vendorarch}/Class/Date Should properly be %{perl_vendorarch}/* in %files Move prep content from %build to %prep, update %files, and I'll approve :) + source files match upstream: 12f21e05e46d05fd0339f1c02b9b3318 Class-Date-1.1.9.tar.gz 12f21e05e46d05fd0339f1c02b9b3318 Class-Date-1.1.9.tar.gz.srpm + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text not included in package. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock (7/x86_64). + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Class-Date-1.1.9-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Date.so()(64bit) perl(Class::Date) = 1.1.9 perl(Class::Date::Const) perl(Class::Date::Invalid) perl(Class::Date::Rel) perl-Class-Date = 1.1.9-1.fc6 == requires perl >= 0:5.005_03 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Date::Const) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Time::Local) perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) ** perl-Class-Date-debuginfo-1.1.9-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Date.so.debug()(64bit) perl-Class-Date-debuginfo = 1.1.9-1.fc6 == requires + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=175, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.25 cusr + 0.10 csys = 0.35 CPU) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. X owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] New: Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-utils/ltsp-server-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-utils/ltsp-server-utils-0-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:54:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150354.l9F3s7O2006429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-14 23:54 EST ------- You should preserve timestamp check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:57:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150357.l9F3vfPj008452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-14 23:57 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. - rpmlint complains follwing messages pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/optionsmanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/project/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/commander/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/grepper/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filemanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/statusbar/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/openwith/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowser/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/contexts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/rpc/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/help/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/appcontroller/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/bugreport/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/versioncontrol/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/editor/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/shortcuts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/sessions/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/buffer/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/notify/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/plugins/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/manhole/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filewatcher/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/vim/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/emacs/service.pida But these messages can be ignored here. + source files match upstream. d24bbdc2c07172062cf55dffe58c85f6 PIDA-0.5.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + update-desktop-database and gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + Package pida-0.5.1-3.fc8 -> Requires: /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python emacs gazpacho hicolor-icon-theme libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 python-kiwi rtld(GNU_HASH) vim-X11 Provides: moo_stub.so + GUI App. APPROVED. Anyway, I am approving this review with assumption that you will take case of comment #32 while importing package in CVS. I have check this package in rawhide and it worked fine for me on i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 03:58:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150358.l9F3weFW007101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-14 23:58 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but NOT for RPM. syncevolution.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6-1 0.6-2.fc8 => Add correct version as 0.6-2.fc8 while importing package in CVS. + source files match upstream. ad208478fa8d3ef05f89295e8f71b0f8 syncevolution-0.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package syncevolution-0.6-2.fc8 -> Requires: /usr/bin/perl curl evolution libORBit-2.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcppunit-1.12.so.0 libcurl.so.4 libdl.so.2 libebook-1.2.so.9 libecal-1.2.so.7 libedataserver-1.2.so.9 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgconf-2.so.4 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgnome-2.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libpopt.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) librt.so.1 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libxml2.so.2 perl(encoding) perl(integer) perl(strict) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. SHOULD: Check with upstream for "make check" step. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:07:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150407.l9F47YkY009789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 00:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6046ef235c9c9e61b1c4e67e3027298b madan.ttf + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + font is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:14:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150414.l9F4EXHh010587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 00:14 EST ------- ohh. Just found that provided SPEC in comment #16 is missing %prep while reviewing this package I have it already added on my system so mock build went fine. Rahul, you missed comment #12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150417.l9F4HZcj009560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-15 00:17 EST ------- directory ownership fixed & *spec have been cleaned up. I pulled the exclusivearch & tried building it on a x86_64 box w/o joy: first32.c:1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set make: *** [first32.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:26:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150426.l9F4Q3pd012354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 00:26 EST ------- rpmlint gave me paktype-fonts.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/paktype-fonts-2.0/PakTypeNaqsh-readme.txt The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). use iconv command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:36:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150436.l9F4avn2012143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 00:36 EST ------- and similarly SOURCE md5sum is also wrong in my review post. It should be read as d78a34b1d46dcfa74ff64e78dcc1fc31 Madan.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:40:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150440.l9F4eqYM012660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mbarnes at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:48:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150448.l9F4mY9x013586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-15 00:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > OK, looks good to me. APPROVED thx tibbs New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kcbench-data Short Description: Kernel sources to be used by kcbench Owners: thl Branches: F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:51:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150451.l9F4pndP015775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:53:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331691] New: Attempt to view updates and it errors out Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331691 Summary: Attempt to view updates and it errors out Product: Fedora Version: f8test3 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: valstara at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. OS pulled updates and just attempted to view them 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: ------- Additional Comments From valstara at yahoo.com 2007-10-15 00:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=226901) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=226901&action=view) Error information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:51:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150451.l9F4pV3s014194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-15 00:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Looks good to me; frankly I don't know exactly what is required to build a > kernel, but the Fedora pakage specifies a bit more than just make, gcc and > binutils: > module-init-tools > patch >= 2.5.4 > bash >= 2.03 > sh-utils > tar > bzip2 > findutils > gzip > m4 > perl > make >= 3.78 > diffutils > gawk > gcc >= 3.4.2 > binutils >= 2.12 > redhat-rpm-config > > I can't say how much of that is specific to the Fedora kernels, though. I'd say everything except make, gcc and binutils. Well, in fact module-init-tools might be needed if one compiles a kernel with modules -- but kcbench doesn't do that. > Still, I'm sure if anything turns up missing then you can just add it. Sure! > APPROVED thx tibbs New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kcbench Short Description: Kernel compile benchmark Owners: thl Branches: F-7, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 04:54:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331691] Attempt to view updates and it errors out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150454.l9F4sdm1014435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Attempt to view updates and it errors out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331691 ------- Additional Comments From valstara at yahoo.com 2007-10-15 00:54 EST ------- Immediate error when attempting to review updates and then application closes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 05:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331691] Attempt to view updates and it errors out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150503.l9F53mBK015718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Attempt to view updates and it errors out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 01:03 EST ------- why this bug is reported against package review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 05:45:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] New: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config/ltsp-server-config.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config/ltsp-server-config-0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts This package is probably going to be the bulk of the work of merging the base of LTSP5/K12LTSP into Fedora. The included reconfiguration scripts are dirty deeds done dirt cheap. In the long run, they should all be replaced & wrapped up in shiny GUIs. But, for now, you may be surprised at how well this works. Everything in this package is turned off by default. The magic only happens if you run this script: /usr/share/ltsp5/ltsp-initialize -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 06:04:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331691] Attempt to view updates and it errors out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150604.l9F64VbU025949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Attempt to view updates and it errors out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331691 valstara at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |up2date -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 06:15:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150615.l9F6FsDM027615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-15 02:15 EST ------- Parag, I see %prep is present in SPEC provided in comment 16, but only empty. The license file is no more provided with this package since upstream does not provide the one. What exactly did I miss in comment 12? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 06:16:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150616.l9F6GY0C026472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 06:30:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150630.l9F6URKW028270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 02:30 EST ------- sure. Mock build gave me + install -m 0644 -p '*.ttf' /var/tmp/madan-fonts-1.0-5.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/fonts/madan install: cannot stat `*.ttf': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.47557 (%install) This mean you missed to add in %prep cp -p %{SOURCE0} . Empty %prep mean above install command will not find which *.ttf file to install. Empty %prep will successfully run rpmbuild on SPEC outside mock. But when built in mock it failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 06:35:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150635.l9F6ZFHt029980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 02:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Parag, > I see %prep is present in SPEC provided in comment 16, but only empty. The > license file is no more provided with this package since upstream does not > provide the one. What exactly did I miss in comment 12? I missed to say that replace SOURCE1 with SOURCE0 and add that line in %prep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 07:57:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150757.l9F7verD008880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmoskovc at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-10-15 03:57 EST ------- adding the new owner of openobex to CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 07:56:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150756.l9F7u72X008756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-15 03:56 EST ------- You have forgotten to add the README. In my opinion it would be better to call it, in SOURCE, with a prefix such as not to mix it with other README file that could be there, like ltsp-config-dhcp-README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 08:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150845.l9F8j1Ol016275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-15 04:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Preliminary Review:- > > rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me > ------------------------------------- > system-config-services.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes serviceconf > system-config-services.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes > redhat-config-services added versions > system-config-services.src:168: W: macro-in-%changelog _bindir quoted macro ("%%{_bindir}") > system-config-services.src: W: summary-not-capitalized system-config-services is > an initscript and xinetd configuration utility > system-config-services.src: E: description-line-too-long system-config-services > is a utility which allows you to configure which services fixing this now would break specspo translations -> we'll have to postpone that until after F8 is out > system-config-services.src: W: invalid-license GPL changed license tag to GPLv2+ > system-config-services.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/system-config-services-0.9.10/html/legalnotice.html recoded documentation to UTF-8 > system-config-services.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-services/servicemethods.py > system-config-services.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/share/system-config-services/checklist.py installed files with correct permissions > system-config-services.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized system-config-services > is an initscript and xinetd configuration utility > system-config-services.noarch: E: description-line-too-long > system-config-services is a utility which allows you to configure which services idem > system-config-services.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.10 > 0.9.10-1.fc8 added release to changelog versions > system-config-services.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL > system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided serviceconf > system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-services idem > system-config-services.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/pam.d/serviceconf > system-config-services.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/pam.d/system-config-services > system-config-services.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/security/console.apps/serviceconf > system-config-services.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-services used %config(noreplace) > also, > 1) packaging guidelines suggests use of make as > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e used "make %{?_smp_mflags}" > 2) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) used "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" > Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package > before actually committing in CVS. merge review... (In reply to comment #2) > Using xdg-open would be better than htmlview: fixed system-config-services-0.9.13-1.fc8 is building right now with these changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 08:49:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150849.l9F8nowe015322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-10-15 04:49 EST ------- Fedora packaging recommends using $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, but as far I can see, the Makefile ignores it and forces usage of specific values for CFLAGS. Is it intentional / needed ? This breaks compiling with the exact error you have seen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:06:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150906.l9F96PpB018026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 05:06 EST ------- rpmlint on new version gave me system-config-services.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-services/nonblockingreader.py 0644 ===> do you want to keep this script as non-executable? system-config-services.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized system-config-services is an initscript and xinetd configuration utility system-config-services.noarch: E: description-line-too-long system-config-services is a utility which allows you to configure which services ==> Above 2 messages are ok then as they may break po translations. system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided serviceconf system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-services -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:08:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150908.l9F98hNK018095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-15 05:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Thanks for updates. > Current CVS package build fine in mock i386 but rpmlint gave me > system-config-nfs.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/system-config-nfs/exports.py 0644 > This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for > executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If > the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, > otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. removed exports.py (very old test script which should have been removed for a long time) > system-config-nfs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-nfs > If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package > must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause > unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible > replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. This is the case. > Also, > Is there any need to use following in SPEC? > ExclusiveOS: Linux Not that I knew. Removed. (In reply to comment #8) > I am bit confused whether we really need > Requires(post): hicolor-icon-theme > Requires(postun): hicolor-icon-theme > > because > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda > suggests no such usage of Requires needed. removed hicolor-icon-theme requirement, calling gtk-update-icon-cache with full path system-config-nfs-1.3.30-1.fc8 is building with these changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:13:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150913.l9F9DHqr018704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-10-15 05:13 EST ------- Built for devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=195102 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:14:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150914.l9F9ErPa018778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-15 05:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > 2) Is there any need to use following in SPEC? > ExclusiveOS: Linux Removed. > 3) I am bit confused whether we really need > Requires(post): hicolor-icon-theme > Requires(postun): hicolor-icon-theme > > because > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda > suggests no such usage of Requires needed. removed hicolor-icon-theme requirement, calling gtk-update-icon-cache with full path system-config-samba-1.2.56-1.fc8 is building with these changes right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:21:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150921.l9F9LK7O019992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 05:21 EST ------- update license to GPLv2. rest is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:23:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150923.l9F9N8cH020097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 05:23 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but NOT for RPM. paktype-fonts.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/paktype-fonts-2.0/PakTypeNaqsh-readme.txt This can be ignored as iconv is failing to convert this document. + source files match upstream url cd75bd7fa714f307d25407a61f8bc43c paktype-20061222.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:28:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150928.l9F9SSf1022210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-15 05:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > rpmlint on new version gave me > system-config-services.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/system-config-services/nonblockingreader.py 0644 > ===> do you want to keep this script as non-executable? The file can be called directly to do some tests, but I've removed the shebang line as it's not essential (far from it) that it is directly callable. > system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided serviceconf > system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-services As it's not a command line compatible replacement, "Provides:" lines for the old tools aren't added. system-config-services-0.9.14-1.fc8 is building right now with this change -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150941.l9F9fRcN024190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-15 05:41 EST ------- Also ltspswapd.init lacks a lsb init header. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150939.l9F9dvm8022276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-15 05:39 EST ------- The version/release of the package isn't right, have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-cfd71146dbb6f00cec9fe3623ea619f843394837 Regarding the name, why not simply ltspswapd? For the source url, it is almost right, but please have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for an even better style. I don't think that %{_localstatedir}/opt/ is the right var directory for the swap files. Maybe %{_localstatedir}/lib/ or %{_localstatedir}/spool (with appropriate subdirectories), but /opt in general should always be left empty by rpm installations. You should use the -p switch to install, to keep timestamps, like install -p -m 0644 %{SOURCE1} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd The Source3 file is a bit strange. Isn't it a remnant of something else? Suggestion: the %{_*dir} marcos already have a leading /, so it is not needed in ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/, or in /%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 09:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710150951.l9F9pjAh025434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-15 05:51 EST ------- Updated. Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 10:04:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151004.l9FA4s2w025352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 06:04 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4dff942d859b9cac569d791c664e66a5 culmus-0.101.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 10:11:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151011.l9FABstC027769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-10-15 06:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: syncevolution Short Description: SyncML client for evolution Owners: mcepl Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 10:39:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151039.l9FAd8rg031352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 06:39 EST ------- warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/system-config-nfs/pixmaps/system-config-nfs.png You need to remove following line from %files in SPEC %{_datadir}/%{name}/pixmaps/system-config-nfs.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 10:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151053.l9FArDCD000631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-15 06:53 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts-1.0-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 10:48:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 06:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151048.l9FAmVXO032533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 06:48 EST ------- you missed same icons thing here also => http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda suggests no such usage of Requires needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:03:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151103.l9FB31Zx001904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 07:03 EST ------- Re-APPROVED above SRPM. you can now request CVS branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:01:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151101.l9FB1n4X001841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 07:01 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but Not for RPM. system-config-samba.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libuser-python system-config-samba.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-samba These messages can be ignored for this package. + source files match upstream. c91e38a742e012aa55f0eb8f8436ec58 system-config-samba-1.2.56.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop files are handled correctly. + package system-config-samba-1.2.56-1.fc8 -> Provides: config(system-config-samba) = 1.2.56-1.fc8 Requires: /usr/bin/python config(system-config-samba) = 1.2.56-1.fc8 libuser-python pygtk2 pygtk2-libglade python samba samba-common usermode >= 1.36 xdg-utils + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:04:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151104.l9FB4kHB032714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 07:04 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:08:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151108.l9FB8GwJ000954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:07:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151107.l9FB7YWn000887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-15 07:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: madan-fonts Short Description: Font for Nepali language Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:12:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151112.l9FBCaTM003226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 07:12 EST ------- with latest SRPM I got build error as error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:12:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151112.l9FBCthm003277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:10:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151110.l9FBAAgi003028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-15 07:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: paktype-fonts Short Description: Fonts for Arabic from PakType Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:12:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151112.l9FBCTBZ001577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-15 07:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: culmus-fonts Short Description: Fonts for Hebrew language from Culmus project Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 11:54:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328951] Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151154.l9FBsLCu006614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328951 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 07:54 EST ------- rpmlint on rpm gave me kacst-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/kacst-fonts-1.6.2/LICENSE.TXT Add following in SPEC BuildRequires: dos2unix find . -not -name \*.ttf -type f -exec dos2unix -k {} \; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 12:06:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328951] Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151206.l9FC6h6Z010539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328951 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-15 08:06 EST ------- Updated. Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 12:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328951] Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151213.l9FCD9Sq011423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328951 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 08:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3f914b65dc4e0cc7b30e1d6b263f1d16 kacst_fonts_1.6.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 12:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328951] Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151225.l9FCP0Lh011434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328951 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-15 08:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kacst-fonts Short Description: Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 12:31:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151231.l9FCVmRD012820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 08:31 EST ------- mock build showed me warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/encodings.dir warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.alias warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-1 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-2 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-3 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-4 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-5 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-6 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-7 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-8 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.cache-9 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.scale This is really very HUGE package. here's what rpmlint gave me xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A set of 100dpi resolution fonts for the X Window System. xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-100dpi xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A set of 75dpi resolution fonts for the X Window System. xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-75dpi xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic /usr/share/X11/fonts/cyrillic xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Cyrillic fonts for X. xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-cyrillic-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-cyrillic-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-cyrillic xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-TTF /usr/share/X11/fonts/TTF xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-OTF /usr/share/X11/fonts/OTF xorg-x11-fonts-ethiopic.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A set of 100dpi ISO-8859-1 fonts for X. xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-100dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-ISO8859-14-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-ISO8859-14-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-ISO8859-14-100dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-ISO8859-14-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-ISO8859-14-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-14-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-ISO8859-14-75dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-ISO8859-15-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-ISO8859-15-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-ISO8859-15-100dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-ISO8859-15-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-ISO8859-15-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-ISO8859-15-75dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A set of 75dpi ISO-8859-1 fonts for X. xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-75dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A set of 100dpi Central European language fonts for X. xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-ISO8859-2-100dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A set of 75dpi Central European language fonts for X. xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-ISO8859-2-75dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi:unscaled:pri=30 /usr/share/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-ISO8859-9-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-ISO8859-9-100dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-ISO8859-9-100dpi xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi:unscaled:pri=20 /usr/share/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-ISO8859-9-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-ISO8859-9-75dpi-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-75dpi.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-ISO8859-9-75dpi xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-misc:unscaled:pri=10 /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-misc:unscaled:pri=10 /usr/share/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized misc bitmap fonts for the X Window System xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-base-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-base-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-misc.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-base xorg-x11-fonts-syriac.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-syriac.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-OTF /usr/share/X11/fonts/OTF xorg-x11-fonts-syriac.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-syriac.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-syriac-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-syriac.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-syriac-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-syriac.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-syriac xorg-x11-fonts-truetype.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-truetype.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-TTF /usr/share/X11/fonts/TTF xorg-x11-fonts-truetype.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-truetype.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-truetype-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-truetype.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-truetype-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-truetype.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-truetype xorg-x11-fonts-Type1.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-fonts-Type1.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1 xorg-x11-fonts-Type1.noarch: W: invalid-license Various licenses xorg-x11-fonts-Type1.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-base-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-Type1.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-base-fonts xorg-x11-fonts-Type1.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided fonts-xorg-base -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 12:34:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151234.l9FCYCRu014854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 08:34 EST ------- Is it possible to split this package in small packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 13:24:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151324.l9FDOk9t022753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2007-10-15 09:24 EST ------- I have just uploaded an updated package for the current git snapshots, as that requires less patches than yesterday. Index: http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/ SPEC: http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd.spec SRPM: http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-1.1.1-0.4.20071015git.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 13:46:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151346.l9FDkFDH026187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2007-10-15 09:46 EST ------- Yes this is acked by me. He can take over f7 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 13:48:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151348.l9FDmYTx024975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at leemhuis.info Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 13:50:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151350.l9FDoIVt025599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-15 09:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > you missed same icons thing here also => > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda > suggests no such usage of Requires needed. > removed hicolor-icon-theme, gtk2 requirements, calling gtk-update-icon-cache with full path system-config-services-0.9.15-1.fc8 is building right now with this change -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 14:03:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151403.l9FE3T8w027516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 10:03 EST ------- Any progress on this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 14:14:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151414.l9FEEMaX030716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 10:14 EST ------- any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 14:13:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151413.l9FEDPeJ030615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-15 10:13 EST ------- If this is built already can we have this review CLOSED? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 14:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151415.l9FEFx9T031330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-15 10:15 EST ------- oops - Chris changed his webhost recently, IIRC. Mr. Weyl, can you give better URLs? I don't have the packages anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 14:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151430.l9FEU2jJ000783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-15 10:30 EST ------- * driverdir defined, but not used (there are two places where it could be used); * why "%define date %(TZ=UTC date +%Y%m%d)"? That will produce a incorrect alphatag tomorrow (e.g. according to release it will be 20071016, but the sources are still those from 20071015) * you shound include the xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-snapshot.sh script * why "Version: 1.1.1"? [...] (II) Module radeonhd: vendor="AMD GPG" compiled for 1.3.0, module version = 0.0.1 [...] * is "BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)" officially accepted these days? Looks to me like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/BuildRoot is still a draft... * I'd say trim the description and put" * regressions * bugs * errors * broken displays " in one line; I'd also say that the link to the source code doesn't make much sense in the description * why the "-n xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd" for %files? * don't use ".fc8" in changelog, as rpmlint will complain if one builds the package on F7 * "ExcludeArch: s390 s390x" not actually needed, but won't hurt Looks fine otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 14:53:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151453.l9FErHTN004339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-10-15 10:53 EST ------- When I check the package out and do a 'make i386' It hangs after the following error messages rpmq: no arguments given for query rpmq: no arguments given for query Any idea as to what he problem could be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 14:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151459.l9FExgvp005150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2007-10-15 10:59 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I'll address all your points here: * Removed driverdir definition. * Any timezone is arbitrary. I chose to use the canonical timezone instead of "the one the current packager happens to reside in". Is that wrong? * Why Version: 1.1.1? Because the upstream package says so. I am going to take that upstream. My guess is this will change to 0.0.1. * Buildroot definition: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 I quote: "If unsure, simply pick [the one with mktemp]." That looks to me like "officially accepted". * Description shortened. * %files now without -n * Removed .fc8 from %changelog entries. * "ExcludeArch: s390 s390x" was copied from xorg-x11-drv-ati, so I guessed it made sense. I think I'll keep it. The new 0.5.20071015git package addresses these things: http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd.spec http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-1.1.1-0.5.20071015git.fc8.src.rpm I will upload a 0.6 when I have talked with upstream about Version: 1.1.1 vs. 0.0.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:03:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151503.l9FF3VBr003904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dovecot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tjanouse at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tjanouse at redhat.com 2007-10-15 11:03 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dovecot New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231861] Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151502.l9FF2Dap003777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 tjanouse at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tjanouse at redhat.com 2007-10-15 11:02 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cyrus-imapd New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:06:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151506.l9FF6jVD006588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:06 EST ------- You don't appear to have anything checked in yet? The Makefile looks for a *.spec file to see what it's making, and I don't see one in cvs. You should be able to use the 'cvs-import.sh' script to just import a src.rpm, or manually 'cvs add' and 'cvs commit' a .spec, sources and .cvsignore files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151513.l9FFDqL9005587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dlutter at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 11:13 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:15:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151515.l9FFFIQf008172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 11:15 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:16:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151516.l9FFG7CO006407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 11:16 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:16:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331691] Attempt to view updates and it errors out In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151516.l9FFG4UY006289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Attempt to view updates and it errors out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331691 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:17:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151517.l9FFHIcH006543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(johnp at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 11:17 EST ------- Any good from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:15:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151515.l9FFFiVs006249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-15 11:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > * Any timezone is arbitrary. I chose to use the canonical timezone instead of > "the one the current packager happens to reside in". Is that wrong? Not the timezone itself is the problem -- that "date +%Y%m%d" is executed each time when the rpms get build. Thus when I rebuild xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-1.1.1-0.5.20071015git.fc8..rpm today it will stick to that name; but if I rebuild it in 24hours from now I'll afaics will get xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-1.1.1-0.5.20071016git.fc8..rpm -- but that's misleading, is still contains the snapshot from 20071015. You need to hardcode the version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151522.l9FFMpaF009190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(chris at theknight.co | |.uk) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 11:22 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:26:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151526.l9FFQwv7010006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dovecot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:26 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:24:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151524.l9FFO2hq009405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(frank- | |buettner at gmx.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 11:24 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:23:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151523.l9FFNkBS009338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(devrim at commandprom | |pt.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 11:23 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231861] Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151529.l9FFTFer010241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:31:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151531.l9FFVB7J008952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:31 EST ------- Thanks. Sorry for the delay, just wanted to make sure everything was good. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:35:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151535.l9FFZpYx011444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:33:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151533.l9FFXmLN010897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-15 11:33 EST ------- (Chris, see above comments) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:36:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151536.l9FFawUQ009699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:39:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151539.l9FFdrLp011817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328951] Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151541.l9FFfYo3012332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328951 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312371] Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151542.l9FFgpaI010417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312371 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-15 11:42 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: vdr-ttxtsubs New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:47:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151547.l9FFlsTE011104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:44:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151544.l9FFiUR5010523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:50:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151550.l9FFoao0013709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-15 11:50 EST ------- http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-5358 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151549.l9FFncQK013204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 15:53:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151553.l9FFrOub011851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Reversi game for Gnome Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 11:53 EST ------- Looks like this request was already done via the web interface? Please reset if you need any cvsadmin action. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151607.l9FG7t2n016102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-15 12:07 EST ------- Sorry about that :) http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-VCS-LibCVS-1.0002-1.fc6.src.rpm http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-VCS-LibCVS.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312371] Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151606.l9FG6k62015986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312371 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 12:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:04:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151604.l9FG4iSa015388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-10-15 12:04 EST ------- I built the new SRPM 5 days ago, but forgot to report here: New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby-0.5.1-2.f7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:12:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151612.l9FGCIIt016835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-10-15 12:12 EST ------- ah... I thought "cvs done." meant that you already did the import... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151611.l9FGB9cf014767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-15 12:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > warning: File listed twice: > /usr/share/system-config-nfs/pixmaps/system-config-nfs.png > > You need to remove following line from %files in SPEC > %{_datadir}/%{name}/pixmaps/system-config-nfs.png fixed. Note that I found that the hicolor-icon-theme requirement is needed because I ship files beneath /usr/share/icons/hicolor, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-a5931a7372c4a00065713430984fa5875513e6d4 I'll re-add it for this and my other packages that have such icons like this ("uncolored", i.e. without pre/post/preun/postun): Requires: hicolor-icon-theme system-config-nfs-1.3.31-1.fc8 is building with these changes right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:18:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151618.l9FGI0fX017672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:22:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151622.l9FGM3N9016210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-15 12:22 EST ------- I talked to spot and he indicated that what I wrote above is incorrect; we should not just assume LGPL+ unless we have no other choice. So since the author is responding, we need to ask him what version of the LGPL this package is under. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:23:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151623.l9FGN0rl016256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(frank- | |buettner at gmx.net) | ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-15 12:22 EST ------- pong:) I can only work on it next weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231861] Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151645.l9FGjXiv019469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 tjanouse at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:45:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231861] Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151645.l9FGjIrk019444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861 tjanouse at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tjanouse at redhat.com 2007-10-15 12:45 EST ------- Lubo, Thanks for your comments and sorry for the delay. Me not like reviews, you know. I did a few changes as you suggested: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd.spec?root=extras&r1=1.32&r2=1.33 And I have a few comments: Ad 2). I'd like to leave the HTML docs in the main package, but you may try to convince me. I don't think we should delete the HTML manpages though, because they are linked from the HTML docs. Ad 3). As you pointed out, there are no shared libs in the package. libcyrus is intended to be linked statically and that's what is in the -devel subpackage. Ad 4). I fixed these and about 1 other, will maybe fix others later. There has been a change in the License field since, re-review this, please. And, the most important thing: This package has a whole lot of files in /usr/lib/cyrus-imapd, regardless of the architecture. This used to be a reason for marking it multiarch and warning about multiarch collisions. It's been added to a list of exceptions since then. But the question remains -- should I leave it that way, or should I make some effort to move those to /usr/libexec (or something similar)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 16:57:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330661] Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151657.l9FGv8q7023400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330661 mcepl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:14:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151714.l9FHE3ZI023930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-10-15 13:14 EST ------- Nope. The theora guys are stumped too, but the movie comes out wrong. The static graph side of things works, though. It's just the animated movies that don't have a solution at this point. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:25:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151725.l9FHPgp7027788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-15 13:25 EST ------- >> The tex files (especially the .sty) should be below >> /usr/share/texmf instead of in /usr/share/dblatex I'm not sure about this one. Is this a fedora requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:30:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 332851] New: Review Request: Batik - toolkit for apps that use SVG Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332851 Summary: Review Request: Batik - toolkit for apps that use SVG Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: langel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://toolshed.yyz.redhat.com/~langel/batik/batik.spec SRPM URL: http://toolshed.yyz.redhat.com/~langel/batik/batik-1.7-1.src.rpm I just finished packaging batik, and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. Description: Batik is a Java-based toolkit for applications or applets that want to use images in the Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) format for various purposes, such as display, generation or manipulation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:31:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 332861] New: Review Request: xmlgraphics-commons - library of components used by batik and fop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332861 Summary: Review Request: xmlgraphics-commons - library of components used by batik and fop Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: langel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://toolshed.yyz.redhat.com/~langel/xmlgraphics-commons/xmlgraphics-commons.spec SRPM URL: http://toolshed.yyz.redhat.com/~langel/xmlgraphics-commons/xmlgraphics-commons-1.2-1jpp.src.rpm I just finished packaging xmlgraphics-commons and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. Description: Apache XML Graphics Commons is a library that consists of several reusable components used by Apache Batik and Apache FOP. Many of these components can easily be used separately outside the domains of SVG and XSL-FO. You will find components such as a PDF library, an RTF library, Graphics2D implementations that let you generate PDF & PostScript files, and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:32:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 332871] New: Review Request: fop - XSL print formatter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332871 Summary: Review Request: fop - XSL print formatter Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: langel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://toolshed.toronto.redhat.com/~langel/fop/fop.spec SRPM URL: http://toolshed.toronto.redhat.com/~langel/fop/fop-0.94-1.src.rpm I just finished packaging fop and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. Description: Apache FOP (Formatting Objects Processor) is a print formatter driven by XSL formatting objects (XSL-FO) and an output independent formatter. It is a Java application that reads a formatting object (FO) tree and renders the resulting pages to a specified output. Output formats currently supported include PDF, PS, PCL, AFP, XML (area tree representation), Print, AWT and PNG, and to a lesser extent, RTF and TXT. The primary output target is PDF. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:38:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151738.l9FHcN49027685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 13:38 EST ------- Please check your packages by rpmlint before submitting to review request. For 0.5.2-1: * Dependency between subpackags - Please check the dependency between subpackages of this srpm - xmlroff should have "libfo = %{version}-%{release}" - libfo-devel should have "libfo = %{version}-%{release}". * Requires - Would you explain why libfo-devel should require libxslt-devel? * ldconfig - Please call ldconfig for libraries under %_libdir on scriptlets. * Documents - The dependency order is that xmlroff requires libfo. So if only libfo is installed, no documents (COPYING, AUTHORS and so on) are installed, which is not proper. * Directory ownership - Please check the owner of %_datadir/xml . On my system, -------------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -qf /usr/share/xml xml-common-0.6.3-21.fc8 libglade2-2.6.2-3.fc8 -------------------------------------------------------- However xmlroff requires neither of these packages. * pkgconfig .pc file - should be installed in -devel package. - And the package containing .pc file must have "Requires: pkgconfig". * Timestamp - To keep timestamps, please use ------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for recent Makefiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 332871] Review Request: fop - XSL print formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151748.l9FHmrgD031061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fop - XSL print formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332871 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-10-15 13:48 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227055 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227055] Review Request: fop-0.20.5-9jpp - XSL-driven print formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151748.l9FHmsWs031081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fop-0.20.5-9jpp - XSL-driven print formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227055 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-10-15 13:48 EST ------- *** Bug 332871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:50:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 332851] Review Request: Batik - toolkit for apps that use SVG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151750.l9FHoVCY029646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Batik - toolkit for apps that use SVG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332851 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-10-15 13:50 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 227040 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 17:50:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227040] Review Request: batik-1.6-2jpp - Scalable Vector Graphics for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151750.l9FHoWod029668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: batik-1.6-2jpp - Scalable Vector Graphics for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227040 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2007-10-15 13:50 EST ------- *** Bug 332851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151802.l9FI23RG001282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |182235 OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:00:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151800.l9FI07a1000579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-10-15 14:00 EST ------- Bert says in an e-mail: This doesn't work because I cannot sign the CLA on behalf of Viewpoints. I'm only a consultant for them, not a legal representative. I have explained the reasoning for the CLA but have also heard whole companies can sign a CLA which may alleviate Bert's burden. Kicking to FE-Legal so that they can explain more and give Bert options. This is also an issue with bug #247983 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:01:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151801.l9FI1Yh0001027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-10-15 14:01 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mod_extract_forwarded New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:06:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227040] Review Request: batik-1.6-2jpp - Scalable Vector Graphics for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151806.l9FI6RKj003148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: batik-1.6-2jpp - Scalable Vector Graphics for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227040 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2007-10-15 14:06 EST ------- Updated to the new upstream release: http://langel.fedorapeople.org/batik/batik-1.7-1.src.rpm http://langel.fedorapeople.org/batik/batik.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:07:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 332861] Review Request: xmlgraphics-commons - library of components used by batik and fop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151807.l9FI7RPp003333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlgraphics-commons - library of components used by batik and fop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332861 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2007-10-15 14:07 EST ------- Publicly visible links: http://langel.fedorapeople.org/xmlgraphics-commons/xmlgraphics-commons-1.2-1jpp.src.rpm http://langel.fedorapeople.org/xmlgraphics-commons/xmlgraphics-commons.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151803.l9FI3bF1002048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandprom| |pt.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 14:03 EST ------- Well, would you recheck your srpm so that it can be rebuilt? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=195921 Some quick notes: * "Requires: postgresql-libs" should usually not needed as rpmbuild checks and adds libraries' dependencies. * %{ruby_sitearch} is owned by ruby-libs so this package should not own this directory * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227055] Review Request: fop-0.20.5-9jpp - XSL-driven print formatter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151805.l9FI5YV9001006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fop-0.20.5-9jpp - XSL-driven print formatter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227055 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2007-10-15 14:05 EST ------- Updated to the new upstream release: http://langel.fedorapeople.org/fop/fop.spec http://langel.fedorapeople.org/fop/fop-0.94-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:00:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151800.l9FI0rcj031320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-10-15 14:00 EST ------- Bert says in an e-mail: This doesn't work because I cannot sign the CLA on behalf of Viewpoints. I'm only a consultant for them, not a legal representative. I have explained the reasoning for the CLA but have also heard whole companies can sign a CLA which may alleviate Bert's burden. Kicking to FE-Legal so that they can explain more and give Bert options. This is also an issue with bug #247984 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151822.l9FIMRSe007142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-10-15 14:22 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #10) > Well, would you recheck your srpm so that it can be rebuilt? > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=195921 This is not plruby's problem -- This is a problem of PostgreSQL (AFAICS it cannot be built on ppc, will ping upstream), right? > * %{ruby_sitearch} is owned by ruby-libs so this package should not > own this directory Ok, fixed. > * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Ok done. Will upload the new SRPM soon. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151823.l9FINjeD005470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-15 14:23 EST ------- What does this do that network boot support in mkinitrd doesn't? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:31:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151831.l9FIVqk6008786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-10-15 14:31 EST ------- New spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby-0.5.1-3.f7.src.rpm Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:29:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151829.l9FITuuV006382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 kaboom at oobleck.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaboom at oobleck.net ------- Additional Comments From kaboom at oobleck.net 2007-10-15 14:29 EST ------- It makes images that can be booted by etherboot or similar - rom boot loaders embedded on the NIC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151835.l9FIZrwU009626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 14:35 EST ------- I have not checked -3, however (In reply to comment #11) > Hi, > > (In reply to comment #10) > > Well, would you recheck your srpm so that it can be rebuilt? > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=195921 > > This is not plruby's problem -- This is a problem of PostgreSQL (AFAICS it > cannot be built on ppc, will ping upstream), right? I doubt it. Rebuild fails even on i386. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=196241 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:38:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151838.l9FIcWRX007792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 14:38 EST ------- And please check this comment. (In reply to comment #10) > * "Requires: postgresql-libs" should usually not needed as rpmbuild > checks and adds libraries' dependencies. Also, %defattr is not yet fixed (note: as rebuild fails, I did only quick check and did not review this srpm fully). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151841.l9FIfZsq010701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-15 14:41 EST ------- it seems that my server has some trouble.. These address should be working: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets.spec http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets-1.14.0-7.fc6.src.rpm I will send a new email to the author about the version of the LGPL used here. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:43:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151843.l9FIheCG008617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-15 14:43 EST ------- The NBI images are a container wrapping the vmlinuz/initramfs generated by mkinitrd. PXE can boot the files generated by mkinitrd, but Etherboot/Netboot/etc need some extra glue (and can only tftpboot 1 file, you cannot fetch separate kernel & initramfs files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:47:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151847.l9FIllEA011557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Harmony - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-15 14:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Ok, this ones seems good except for the problem name Haven't heard from upstream since I emailed them on Friday; that was after an initial email and response that made it sound like upstream wasn't too concerned with renaming the project. Their only suggestion was to call the package "harmonyremote", but I explained in my response how that probably wouldn't be sufficient. > Do get davidz to check your rules are in good taste though. All I can tell is > they work ;) Sent an email; I don't see him on IRC right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:43:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151843.l9FIhLnk010892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2007-10-15 14:43 EST ------- Ah, right. So... we need a static date in the spec file, which must be consistent with the time when the snapshot was baked into a tarball. Is having the snapshot script update the "%define date" line of the spec file after successful generation of a snapshot tarball considered bad style? :-) It now is "sh foo-snapshot.sh --update-spec". Also, the snapshot tarballs are now called something like "xf86-video-radeonhd-0.0.1-20071015git.tar.bz2". http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd.spec http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-0.0.1-0.6.20071015git.fc8.src.rpm The version is hardcoded at 0.0.1 now. Upstream has two build systems (automake and imake/xmkmf), so they can't just set the version according to configure.ac. Anyway, upstream cannot go much below 0.0.1 for too long, so we can use our hardcoded 0.0.1 for the time being. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151849.l9FIn8N8009918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-15 14:49 EST ------- thx everyone; imported and build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:45:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151845.l9FIjeWY009499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-10-15 14:45 EST ------- Hi, (In reply to comment #14) > And please check this comment. > (In reply to comment #10) > > * "Requires: postgresql-libs" should usually not needed as rpmbuild > > checks and adds libraries' dependencies. I'm inclined to leave it there. > Also, %defattr is not yet fixed It is. Maybe your browser cached the old one. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:49:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326841] Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151849.l9FInMZc009953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-15 14:49 EST ------- thx everyone; imported and build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:49:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326831] Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151849.l9FInNuH009982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcbench - Kernel compile benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326831 Bug 326831 depends on bug 326841, which changed state. Bug 326841 Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:56:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151856.l9FIu20G013029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-15 14:56 EST ------- I just received the answer " > Could yo tell me which version of the LGPL license is used for this > >library ? Most BioC libraries are going to be licensed under "The Artistic License, Verison 2.0". I am going to change the license to that soon." Should we changed it now ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 18:55:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183097] Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151855.l9FIt0Em011169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183097 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-10-15 14:54 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rogue New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 19:19:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165935] Review Request: tcllib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151919.l9FJJQVe016651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcllib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165935 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2007-10-15 15:19 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tcllib New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 19:28:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151928.l9FJSB1w018197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-15 15:28 EST ------- Either wait for him to make a new release under Artistic 2.0, or use "LGPLv2+" until he releases a new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 19:26:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330951] Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151926.l9FJQaE4016420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nbd - Network Block Device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330951 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 19:26:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151926.l9FJQp8C016472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-15 15:26 EST ------- This is like some kind of bad joke. I honestly don't know if we can change the license tag now, without some statement from the author that he has relicensed the current version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 19:28:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151928.l9FJSIE5016580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-15 15:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > >> The tex files (especially the .sty) should be below > >> /usr/share/texmf instead of in /usr/share/dblatex > > I'm not sure about this one. Is this a fedora requirement? No, but it is necessary for proper integration to have .sty located where they can be found by the usual mechanisms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 19:47:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151947.l9FJl7rZ021264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-15 15:47 EST ------- In addition to the README, -hasn't the 192.168.0.255 ip address. +hasn't the 192.168.0.254 ip address. You probably mean this in the %description? Make these changes and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 19:55:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710151955.l9FJt9LY022548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-15 15:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > -hasn't the 192.168.0.255 ip address. > +hasn't the 192.168.0.254 ip address. > > You probably mean this in the %description? Indeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 20:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152004.l9FK4WYo022243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-15 16:04 EST ------- Please see: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex-0.2.7-9.fc7.src.rpm https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex.spec I think I addressed all the above, except for the thing about 'which'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 20:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152013.l9FKDh30025059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 chris at theknight.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(chris at theknight.co| |.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-10-15 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) Sorry for the slow reply. I did find a vendor in one of the macros but it was set to Readhat. Maybe one day all the distro's could get together to come up with standard macros so that a common spec file would be possible. Anyway I have uploaded a new spec file: http://tzclock.org/releases/tzclock.spec There is still one dist in the change log to stop a warning from rpmlint. Other wise all your suggestions are in there. Thank you for looking, Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 20:23:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152023.l9FKNvw0027135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-15 16:23 EST ------- I think that we should wait a bit before adding the branch, it is even less clear that this package is needed now that I had a look at ltsp-server-config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 20:37:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183097] Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152037.l9FKbN3M029215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rogue - text-based adventure game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183097 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 16:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 20:38:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165935] Review Request: tcllib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152038.l9FKc9mj027555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcllib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165935 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 16:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 20:39:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152039.l9FKd7as027636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-15 16:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 21:17:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152117.l9FLHFpH001943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-15 17:17 EST ------- I have various problems when trying to test that package (source0 instead of source4, wrong files list). Is there a version that can be built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 21:20:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152120.l9FLKqh1004261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-15 17:20 EST ------- Also maybe there are duplicate bits with system-config-netboot, this package should certainly be taken into account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 21:29:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152129.l9FLTf6K005260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-15 17:29 EST ------- PyQt4-4.2-8.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 21:31:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152131.l9FLVfEb006112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-15 17:31 EST ------- xgrep-0.06-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 21:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328411] Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152131.l9FLVWv3006065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328411 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-15 17:31 EST ------- archimedes-0.7.0-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update archimedes' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 21:29:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152129.l9FLTgcT003984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |4.2-8.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 21:30:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152130.l9FLUsUw004476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-15 17:30 EST ------- python-alsa-1.0.14-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-alsa' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 21:45:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152145.l9FLjEaN006800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-15 17:45 EST ------- I would go for the second solution and wait the new release to change the license tag. To change the license tag I "just" have to make a new release, isn't it ? (and as I actually package only the "stable" libraries from bioconductor, the new release will be in some months) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 15 23:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710152352.l9FNqh1V023770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-15 19:52 EST ------- It builds a little better when I remember to push my local repository... Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config/ltsp-server-config.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config/ltsp-server-config-0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 00:33:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330311] Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160033.l9G0XpxR029413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Alias: perl-Class-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330311 ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-10-15 20:33 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Please see new spec http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/perl-Class-Date.spec and SRPM http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/perl-Class-Date-1.1.9-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 00:56:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330311] Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160056.l9G0uHI7031629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Alias: perl-Class-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330311 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-15 20:56 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 01:09:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160109.l9G194vW000577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-15 21:09 EST ------- Yes, it does appear to fit well within ltsp-server-config. I'll did a new build of ltsp-server-config that includes the contents of this package. SPEC/SRPM links added to bz#331731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 01:14:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160114.l9G1EDXG001176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-15 21:14 EST ------- as per comments in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 created a new branch which includes ltsp-dhcpd configurations. Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config-with-dhcp/ltsp-server-config.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config-with-dhcp/ltsp-server-config-0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 01:40:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160140.l9G1egsI004506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries Alias: perl-Gnome2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-15 21:40 EST ------- A couple comments, just from giving the spec a once over :) Perl deps are specified by module, rather than by the name of the package that provides the required module. e.g., where your package buildrequires perl-Gtk2, it should buildrequire perl(Gtk2) instead. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Perl#requiresandprovides There will also be additional BR's you'll need as a result of the core perl split. (e.g. perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(Test::More), etc, depending on the package itself.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 02:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160220.l9G2K527010355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-15 22:20 EST ------- I think strictly the License should be noted as GPL (as mentioned in comment 6) since no version information is provided in the distribution. So better to fix that before importing to cvs, IMHO. I hope upstream will include a license file in a future release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 02:28:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160228.l9G2S587011442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-15 22:28 EST ------- -3 again failed to be rebuilt. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=197311 Please make it sure that your srpm can be rebuilt. As I said in comment 7, you can check your srpm by koji beforehand whether your srpm can be rebuilt correctly. > > Also, %defattr is not yet fixed > > It is. Maybe your browser cached the old one. Please check %doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 02:39:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160239.l9G2dcmr013130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |333371 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 02:44:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160244.l9G2itut014022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-15 22:44 EST ------- Unfortunately, I don't have time to submit/maintain libssh2 properly at the moment... but I do have an updated spec/package for libssh2 out at: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/libssh2-0.17-1.fc7.src.rpm http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/libssh2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 02:52:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330311] Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160252.l9G2qYX6015503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Alias: perl-Class-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330311 osspkg at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-10-15 22:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Date Short Description: Class for easy date and time manipulation Owners: brendt Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 03:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160303.l9G332kd017117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 03:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160303.l9G33E6N016025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 03:02:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160302.l9G32s4o015943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 03:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160303.l9G33MQl017240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 03:08:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160308.l9G38xMp018220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-15 23:08 EST ------- I am beginning to reconsider splitting ltsp-dhcpd into its own service script. Even though it is possible for us to make ltsp-dhcpd and dhcpd run concurrently on different network interfaces, how often would that functionality be needed? Also, how would it be an easier/better than putting the configs for both network interfaces into a single dhcpd.conf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 03:27:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160327.l9G3RAm0019825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-15 23:27 EST ------- My old package added/removed "-cf /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf" in /etc/sysconfig/dhcpd in %post/%postun. It worked, but strikes me as horribly wrong - how many would think of looking in /etc/sysconfig/dhcpd to figure which conf file dhcpd is using? Breaking it out as a separate init script at least makes it a bit more obvious what is going on... %post CF_OPTION="-cf /etc/dhcpd-k12ltsp.conf" CONF_FILE="/etc/sysconfig/dhcpd" if [ -f $CONF_FILE -a -f /etc/dhcpd-k12ltsp.conf ] then # change dhcpd.conf.k12ltsp to dhcpd-k12ltsp.conf perl -i -p -e "s,dhcpd.conf.k12ltsp,dhcpd-k12ltsp.conf," $CONF_FILE if [ "x`grep -- -cf $CONF_FILE`" = "x" ] then . $CONF_FILE NEWARGS="$DHCPDARGS $CF_OPTION" perl -i.ltsp -p -e "s,DHCPDARGS=.*,DHCPDARGS=\"$NEWARGS\"," $CONF_FILE fi fi %postun CF_OPTION="-cf /etc/dhcpd-k12ltsp.conf" CONF_FILE="/etc/sysconfig/dhcpd" if [ -f $CONF_FILE ] then if [ "`grep -- -cf $CONF_FILE`" ] then . $CONF_FILE NEWARGS="`echo $DHCPDARGS | sed -e \"s,$CF_OPTION,,g\"`" perl -i.ltsp -p -e "s,DHCPDARGS=.*,DHCPDARGS=\"$NEWARGS\"," $CONF_FILE fi fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 03:32:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160332.l9G3WMht020424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: lklug-fonts |Review Request: lklug-fonts |- Font package for |- Font package for Sinhala |Sinhala(si_LK) language |(si_LK) language ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-15 23:32 EST ------- I understand that upstream are not interested in accepting patches from Fedora/Red Hat unfortunately so I think we have to keep our own source/ tarball for now. Can we include the .sfd file in the srpm for now until finds a new home? It would be good to clarify the original of the license.txt file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 03:47:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] New: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit-0.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: PackageKit is a D-Bus abstraction layer that allows the session user to manage packages in a secure way using a cross-distro, cross-architecture API. There are a few rpmlint errors: """ PackageKit.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/backend.py 0644 """ fixed upstream """ PackageKit.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/frontend.py 0644 """ fixed upstream """ PackageKit.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/packagekit/reference.html PackageKit.i386: W: non-standard-dir-in-var db """ These two issues aren't fixed yet. I'll look into them later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 04:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160409.l9G49592007196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 00:09 EST ------- mock build failed with following log checking for SQLITE... configure: error: Package requirements (sqlite3) were not met: No package 'sqlite3' found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 04:15:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] New: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit-0.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: packagekit-gnome provides session applications for the PackageKit API. There are several utilities designed for installing, updating and removing packages on your system. This requires PackageKit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 04:26:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160426.l9G4Qj4F011100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |333471 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 04:25:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160425.l9G4PLId010594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-16 00:25 EST ------- Thanks for the quick feedback - new srpm and spec file are here now: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit-0.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 04:26:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160426.l9G4QiR7011079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |333451 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-10-16 00:26 EST ------- Setting PackageKit bug dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 04:34:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333491] New: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marc at mwiriadi.id.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.mwiriadi.id.au/fedora-spec/preload/preload.spec SRPM URL: http://www.mwiriadi.id.au/fedora-spec/preload/preload-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: preload runs as a daemon and gathers information about processes running on the system and shared-objects that they use. This information is saved in a file to keep across runs of preload -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 04:56:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226472] Merge Review: system-config-users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160456.l9G4uNRi017334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226472 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 00:56 EST ------- rpmlint on current CVS checkout and built version system-config-users-1.2.71-1.fc8 gave me system-config-users.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-users/system-config-users.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 05:18:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160518.l9G5I3rw019816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 01:18 EST ------- Kindly update release tag each time you give here updated SPEC and SRPM. You may like to use make as make %{?_smp_mflags} Above SRPM gave me mock build error You need to add BuildRequires: NetworkManager-glib-devel, PolicyKit-devel, libtool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 05:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160521.l9G5LlBl020512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 01:21 EST ------- ping? any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 05:20:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160520.l9G5Kexe020443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 01:20 EST ------- ping? any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 05:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226467] Merge Review: system-config-rootpassword In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160519.l9G5JeiM019142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-rootpassword https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226467 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 01:19 EST ------- Ping? any updated ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 05:23:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160523.l9G5NeHG020631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 01:23 EST ------- Also, I can't see any man file getting installed as can be seen from build.log File not found by glob: /var/tmp/PackageKit-0.1.0-2.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man1/*.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 05:34:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160534.l9G5YVcP021931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 01:34 EST ------- With above changes I got mock build successfully for i386 but build.log showed me warning: File listed twice: /etc/dbus-1/system.d/PackageKit.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 05:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160540.l9G5ehaJ022085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 01:40 EST ------- COPYING seems like GPLv2, you still want to have license tag as GPL+? I think my comments are over now, You can update SPEC and provide new SRPM for further review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 06:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160600.l9G60TBJ025817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lizhang at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 06:19:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160619.l9G6J8Q1027714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-16 02:19 EST ------- ping ? Psi 0.11 is out and I need qca-ossl to upgrade... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 06:19:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160619.l9G6JUUP026809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-16 02:19 EST ------- ping ? Psi 0.11 is out and I need qca2 to upgrade... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 06:43:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160643.l9G6hIMm030634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-16 02:43 EST ------- Updated license tag and to 1.007. http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Template-Alloy-1.007-1.fc7.src.rpm http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Template-Alloy.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 07:56:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160756.l9G7ucD8008718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 03:56 EST ------- It would be much better, in my opinion, to unpack the archive in %prep and then do a cp -a in %install. That way it is possible to look at the archive content and also do corrections (patches, moving things around), it is especially importantn for people wanting to customize their system. I also propose to put things in the directory making use of the rpm macros. I post a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 07:57:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160757.l9G7vqNS007508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 03:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=228351) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=228351&action=view) unpack in build directory and honor macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160806.l9G86Ssv009407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 04:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > I am beginning to reconsider splitting ltsp-dhcpd into its own service script. > Even though it is possible for us to make ltsp-dhcpd and dhcpd run concurrently > on different network interfaces, how often would that functionality be needed? Certainly never, but (unless I misunderstood things) ltsp-dhcpd and dhcpd won't run concurrently but dhcpd configuration is left to the user while ltsp-dhcpd configuration is already setup. > Also, how would it be an easier/better than putting the configs for both network > interfaces into a single dhcpd.conf? How would you achieve that off the box? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:09:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160809.l9G891at009560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 04:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > My old package added/removed "-cf /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf" in /etc/sysconfig/dhcpd > in %post/%postun. It worked, but strikes me as horribly wrong - Not only, but also config files should never ever be modified by %post and the like scripts. They are under the user responsibility (through a GUI or vi). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160818.l9G8ILWZ011195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 04:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=228381) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=228381&action=view) in ltsp-swapfile-delete add a variable for swap directory This allows to modify easily the directory with a sed command (for example using rpm macros, but not only). I also changed the shebang since this script seems to be perfect sh to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:22:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160822.l9G8MtlI011897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 04:22 EST ------- In ltsp-swapfile-delete, I think it would be better to use netstat -natup to avoid listing the unix domain sockets. Missing related requires: tmpwatch iputils (or /bin/ping) and net-tools (or /bin/netstat). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:29:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226472] Merge Review: system-config-users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160829.l9G8T2Za012765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226472 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-10-16 04:29 EST ------- should be fixed in system-config-users-1.2.72-1.fc8 which is building right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:29:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160829.l9G8TqUu013993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 04:29 EST ------- For iptables, I think that it would be much better to interact with the iptables maintainer such that he modifies the main iptables script such that * it honors TRUSTED_ETH * it sources /etc/sysconfig/$IPTABLES-ltsp if the file exists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:50:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160850.l9G8o0UW016431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 04:49 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but Not for RPM. system-config-services.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized system-config-services is an initscript and xinetd configuration utility system-config-services.noarch: E: description-line-too-long system-config-services is a utility which allows you to configure which services => As maintainer wants to do this after F8 release, its ok to approve with these messages. system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided serviceconf system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-services =>These messages can be ignored for this package. + source files match upstream. 766381ad64cfe423c3821c66dc19e224 system-config-services-0.9.17.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop files are handled correctly. + package system-config-services-0.9.17-1.fc8 -> Provides: config(system-config-services) = 0.9.17-1.fc8 Requires: /sbin/chkconfig /usr/bin/python config(system-config-services) = 0.9.17-1.fc8 hicolor-icon-theme pygtk2 pygtk2-libglade python >= 2.3.0 rhpl usermode >= 1.36 usermode-gtk xdg-utils + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160857.l9G8vjTA019025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 04:57 EST ------- ltspfs-insecure should be a config script to be run by the admin (or part of the main cionfig script) and not an init script. init.d/ltsp-swapfile-delete shouldn't be automatically started since there is already the cron.daily script that should take care of stale files, and therefore the choice should be left to the user. The READMES should be in %doc. ltsp-initialize should be in %_bindir. I propose adding an /etc/sysconfig/ltsp5 file with LTSP_DEV="eth0" LTSP_DEFAULTIP="192.168.0.254" LTSP_DEFAULTMASK="255.255.255.0" and source it in the beginning of ltsp-initialize. It seems to me that ltsp-dhcpd.conf should be taken from /usr/share/ltsp5/ by dhcpd-update if there is no /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf file, that way nothing would be installed prior from ltsp-initialize being called. This would solve the generality issue I pointed out in the ltsp-dhcp review. In that case the comment in spec file should be shortened. it would be nice to provide scripts like those used for other display managers for the 2 other dm of fedora wdm and slim. Not a blocker, and certainly a job for the dm packagers (I am the wdm packager...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226472] Merge Review: system-config-users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160857.l9G8vx7O019110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226472 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 04:57 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but Not for RPM. system-config-users.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-users =>These messages can be ignored for this package. + source files match upstream. 7219d727a99e5c8388d631509e8118ef system-config-users-1.2.72.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop files are handled correctly. + package system-config-users-1.2.72-1.fc8 -> Provides: config(system-config-users) = 1.2.72-1.fc8 Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/pgrep /usr/bin/python config(system-config-users) = 1.2.72-1.fc8 cracklib-python hicolor-icon-theme libuser-python >= 0.56 pygtk2 pygtk2-libglade python >= 2.0 rhpl rpm-python usermode >= 1.36 xdg-utils + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:57:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160857.l9G8vrQn019084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 04:57 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but Not for RPM. system-config-nfs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-nfs These messages can be ignored for this package. + source files match upstream. 8dae249bcc43a43603f3386d1761b786 system-config-nfs-1.3.32.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop files are handled correctly. + package system-config-nfs-1.3.32-1.fc8 -> Provides: config(system-config-nfs) = 1.3.32-1.fc8 Requires: /usr/bin/python config(system-config-nfs) = 1.3.32-1.fc8 hicolor-icon-theme nfs-utils pygtk2 pygtk2-libglade python >= 2.0 rhpl usermode >= 1.36 xdg-utils + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 09:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160900.l9G90O4i019811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 05:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=228431) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=228431&action=view) add a variable for the ltsp dir in ltsp.conf-update for easy change -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 08:59:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160859.l9G8xPtG019259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 04:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=228421) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=228421&action=view) use a variable for the ltsp dir in exports-update for easy change -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 09:00:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226472] Merge Review: system-config-users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160900.l9G90odh018395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226472 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 09:03:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160903.l9G93P8B018691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 05:03 EST ------- Also maybe there shouldn't be a requires for gdm, but for any xdmcp display manager, and a virtual provides added for display managers that have xdmcp possibilities? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 09:08:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160908.l9G98lIO021171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 05:08 EST ------- Also it seems to me that ltsp-dhcpd shouldn't be enabled in the default case, but instead the same system that for other services should be used (in fact this is already the case, so the only remaining things to do are to remove the default starts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 09:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710160942.l9G9gG3s027107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |stransky at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-10-16 05:42 EST ------- Taking the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:03:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161003.l9GA3FPl028553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tcp_wrappers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 tjanouse at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tjanouse at redhat.com 2007-10-16 06:03 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tcp_wrappers New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:15:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161015.l9GAFE2O030548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 06:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Taking the bug. sorry? I saw that https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/system-config-soundcard you are owner for this package. Then how can you take this bug(which is Package review actually) As you are the owner for package, I guess you can't assign and review this package. If that was the case then maintainers could have assigned their own packages to them and we should not need any review for existing core packages. I have not seen such case till date since Merge-Review got opened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:15:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161015.l9GAFFPj030575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-10-16 06:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint gave me > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/apps/service.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/spreadsheet/service.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/docs/__init__.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/base/service.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/atom/__init__.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/__init__.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/docs/service.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/atom/service.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/calendar/__init__.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/spreadsheet/__init__.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/service.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/test_data.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/apps/__init__.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/base/__init__.py 0644 > python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/calendar/service.py 0644 Those are completely bogus. We have #!/usr/bin/python up there, for use in the unit tests. They're not any useful for run-time. > If this is of noarch type then do we still need following in SPEC ? > %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} Removed. (In reply to comment #2) > Good to add tests directory as %doc > Also, are files under samples are also examples? If yes you can also add them to > %doc. I think neither they are used in build nor they are installed. > > remember to run rpmlint on rpms before providing update. samples added, the tests are unit tests, that wouldn't be useful at all, unless you wanted to develop python-gdata. Updated: http://www.gnome.org/~hadess/python-gdata/python-gdata-1.0.8-2.fc8.src.rpm http://www.gnome.org/~hadess/python-gdata/python-gdata.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:22:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161022.l9GAMmqr001145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-10-16 06:22 EST ------- And who is supposed to do that changes in the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:21:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161021.l9GAL0D3001079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ewan at macmahon.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-10-16 06:20 EST ------- Thanks everyone, it's built and in the repository now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:28:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161028.l9GASbjK032347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 06:28 EST ------- Preliminary review => 1)I will suggest to have this package named as gnome-PackageKit. 2) Use of make should be as given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 3) defattr should be defattr(-,root,root,-) 4) Remove following line from SPEC from %files section %{_datadir}/gnome-packagekit/pk-*.glade 5)You should install all .desktop files as given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:42:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161042.l9GAgaDm002331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 06:42 EST ------- Ofcourse Package maintainer as reviewer is not have acls to commit review changes. I think you missed to read this page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess?highlight=%28reviewprocess%29#head-9d19338d8d18adb89c7e596350c5bfae03f9ec45 There we can find that review process initial steps written as 1. Set the fedora-review flag to ? 2. Assign the bug to yourself. 3. Review the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161052.l9GAqbFh005915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-16 06:52 EST ------- Looks good now; rpmlint warns: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-debuginfo.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-debuginfo-0.0.1-0.6.20071015git.fc7.x86_64.rpm But that can be ignored. APPROVED Just one final question -- what about the "conntest" tool? Shouldn't we ship that as additional package in case users want to help the developers? Or should those users build it own their own? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 10:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161057.l9GAvKgQ004866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-10-16 06:57 EST ------- Okay, I'll assign the bug back to you when I do that changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 11:14:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] New: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/minihallib OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy at smile.org.ua QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-minihallib.spec SRPM URL: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-minihallib-0.1.7- 1.fc7.src.rpm Decription: Python threaded library to handle HAL devices and their events. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 11:38:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161138.l9GBcoYK010394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 07:38 EST ------- mock build went fine for i386 rpmlint complained python-minihallib.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minihallib/HALEventerThread.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. python-minihallib.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minihallib/HALManager.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 11:40:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161140.l9GBeXxs012897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-16 07:40 EST ------- done SRPM: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-0.6.0-0.2.20071011git5615ca.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 11:49:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161149.l9GBnhr1011951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-10-16 07:49 EST ------- New specfile and src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/harald/downloads/system-config-network/system-config-network-1.4.4-1.fc8/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 11:52:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161152.l9GBqqoh012614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 07:52 EST ------- 1) For setuptools look at its packaging guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs 2) Remove CFLAGS as this package is not compiling anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 11:54:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] New: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xgrav/xgrav.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xgrav/xgrav-1.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: X-Grav simulates the effect of gravity, collisions, heat dissipation and a simple chemical reaction. The simulation is in no way meant to be realistic but rather a toy with which you can create stars, planets and even simple solar systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 11:54:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161154.l9GBsVeA014624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 07:54 EST ------- Thanks for understanding Package review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 12:04:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161204.l9GC4TN2016211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 08:04 EST ------- Thanks for updates. With updated SRPM I got following rpmlint messages system-config-network.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4.4 1.4.4-1.fc8 system-config-network.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rp3 system-config-network.src: W: strange-permission system-config-network.spec 0600 otherwise package looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 12:06:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161206.l9GC6ZaN014941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-10-16 08:06 EST ------- Fixed SPEC: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz.spec SRPM: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz-0.9-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 12:20:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161220.l9GCKdH0019528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-10-16 08:20 EST ------- system-config-network.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4.4 1.4.4-1.fc8 - minor lazyness, b/c this is upstream and releases are normally not incremented system-config-network.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rp3 - The rp3 interface is not provided, but rp3 is obsoleted nevertheless system-config-network.src: W: strange-permission system-config-network.spec 0600 - will go away, if I build the package in the Fedora infrastructure (this was, make dist && rpm -ta ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 12:53:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161253.l9GCrP1m022497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr Summary|Review Request: xgrav - A |Review Request: xgrav - A |simple physics simulation |simple physics simulation |for a large number of |for a large number of |particles |particles ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 08:53 EST ------- Instead of patching the Makefile to add RPM_OPT_FLAGS, I suggest overwriting LINUX_CFLAGS, like make LINUX_CFLAGS="-c $RPM_OPT_FLAGS `pkg-config --cflags sdl` -DWITH_ROOTWINDOW" You could also override LINUX_LDFLAGS with LINUX_LDFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS `pkg-config --libs sdl` -lGL `pkg-config --libs x11` -lm" zlib-devel isn't directly used, so if you override the LDFLAGS as I suggest above you can remove that dependency. Please add a comment stating where the png file comes from. In the .desktop file you don't need to add the .png to the icon name (it is a suggestion). Also it would be nice to honor rpm macros in the desktop file and therefore do something like sed 's;/usr/share;%_datadir;' %{SOURCE1} > xgrav.desktop and then run desktop-file-install on xgrav.desktop. To keep timestamps, you should use install -p in install -p -m 644 example* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/xgrav You should use %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 12:58:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 332861] Review Request: xmlgraphics-commons - library of components used by batik and fop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161258.l9GCw3nQ023246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlgraphics-commons - library of components used by batik and fop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332861 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2007-10-16 08:58 EST ------- the src rpm link is incorrect in the last comment. it is here: http://langel.fedorapeople.org/xmlgraphics-commons/xmlgraphics-commons-1.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 13:14:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161314.l9GDEnjR027066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-16 09:14 EST ------- Builds, local F7 and mock rawhide. rpmlint: vecmath1.2-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm Everything else looks OK on review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 13:31:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161331.l9GDV1I8029729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-16 09:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xgrav/xgrav.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xgrav/xgrav-1.2.0-2.fc7.src.rpm Addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 13:50:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161350.l9GDoSen032669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-16 09:50 EST ------- Please, review temporary package: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-minihallib-0.1.7- 2.0.120asp.src.rpm Note: it is contained modified tarball. I'll put these changed into upstream under version 0.1.8 after you reference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:07:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161407.l9GE7lTZ001261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-16 10:07 EST ------- I spoke via email to Eugene Roshal about this issue. He was unaware that clamav had used derived code from their implementation in clamav, under the GPL license, and stated that he did not grant them permission to do so. He said that the only way he was willing for such code to be used was with a clause like the following: "The unRAR sources cannot be used to re-create the RAR compression algorithm, which is proprietary. Distribution of modified unRAR sources in separate form or as a part of other software is permitted, provided that it is clearly stated in the documentation and source comments that the code may not be used to develop a RAR (WinRAR) compatible archiver." Unfortunately, such a restriction conflicts directly with the GPL, and is a showstopper. This code cannot go into Fedora as is. All RAR v3.x support would need to be stripped out, before it could be considered. Given that most RAR files are RAR v3, that severely limits the usefulness of this application. In addition, we will need to strip the RAR v3 code out of clamav. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:12:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161412.l9GECdpN003612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-16 10:12 EST ------- Have you contacted ClamAV upstream about this already? I'm sure Sourcefire, the company which now provides the infrastructure for ClamAV and bought most of the copyrights, will want to know they're distributing illegal code... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161414.l9GEENrM003863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 mattdm at mattdm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-10-16 10:14 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: calc New Branches: F-8 Please branch for F-8. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:17:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] New: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/perl-Digest-CRC.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/perl-Digest-CRC-0.10-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Digest::CRC module calculates CRC sums of all sorts. It contains wrapper functions with the correct parameters for CRC-CCITT, CRC-16 and CRC-32. rpmlint errors: perl-Digest-CRC.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Digest/CRC/CRC.bs I'm not sure if this file is needed, might have to consult a perl expert. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:18:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161418.l9GEIcW3004547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-16 10:18 EST ------- I just sent them an email (I have a friend who's one of the clamav developers), and I'm about to poke the clamav maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:24:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161424.l9GEOY9b005427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-16 10:24 EST ------- Bug opened against clamav: 334371 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:25:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161425.l9GEPkxn005947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-16 10:25 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-phing.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-phing-2.3.0-0.1.RC1.fc7.src.rpm Changelog: - new release candidate version - consequently adapted macros for all shell operations - sanitized requires - switched build root macro style - additional s/\r\n/\n/g fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:24:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161424.l9GEOs85003570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Alias: perl-Digest-CRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Digest-CRC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:24:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161424.l9GEOTOi003536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-10-16 10:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/perl-Digest-CRC.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/perl-Digest-CRC-0.10-2.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Oct 16 2007 Christopher Stone 0.10-2 - Remove zero length files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:26:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161426.l9GEQqjt004110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-16 10:26 EST ------- Thanks spot for looking into this. Closing this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:40:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161440.l9GEevox008301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Alias: perl-Digest-CRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 belegdol at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |belegdol at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-10-16 10:40 EST ------- License is OK (Public Domain) Builds in mock Directory ownership OK Meets naming and packaging guidelines Dist tag present Packages latest version MD5 sums match: 2a065f4081fd923f2245e66597befcfb Buildroot correct APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 14:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161453.l9GEr2AR008367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-16 10:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Builds, local F7 and mock rawhide. > rpmlint: > vecmath1.2-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm > This is normal, all java packages use this maghick to properly handle the javadoc symlinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 15:13:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161513.l9GFDUlQ013614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-16 11:13 EST ------- Ok. I've rechecked the new package by rpmlint. I consider is now good. I've put last release here: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-minihallib-0.1.8- 1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 15:15:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161515.l9GFFq1L012885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-16 11:15 EST ------- All right then. :) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 15:22:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161522.l9GFMhRY014198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-16 11:22 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vecmath1.2 Short Description: Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: devel only InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 15:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161542.l9GFg8mU017963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-16 11:42 EST ------- For 0.6.0-0.2.20071011git: * License - After I rechecked the whole files in tarball, I noticed that libini.so is licensed under GPLv2+. Also, "COPYING" file in libcompizconfig rpm is GPL. So: * Change License tag to "LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+". * Add a comment in the spec file like: --------------------------------------------------------- Group: System Environment/Libraries # backends/libini.so is GPLv2+, other parts are LGPLv2+ License: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ --------------------------------------------------------- * Add "LICENSE.gpl" "LICENSE.lgpl" to %doc When you have done the fixes above, I guess I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 15:55:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161555.l9GFtWJY021652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2007-10-16 11:55 EST ------- Hi Patrice, Thanks for reviewing this submission! :-) (In reply to comment #1) > The source should be an url to the upstream source. > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL I've updated this in the .spec and uploaded the files again: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds-1.6-3.src.rpm > A buildrequires for fftw is missing. It seems to be fftw2-devel, > more precisely. Added. > loadxsil.m shouldn't be in %_bindir, it may better be in > %doc since there is no specific directory for matlab scripts > currently in fedora. I've added a patch which stops loadxsil.m from being installed in %_bindir and added code to put it into %_docdir > Docs are missing. Without doc, the package is not very useful. > There is an example directory, it should be shipped in %doc. > Also the manual would be a must, if it is covered by a free > documentation license. They're actually in a separate part of the repository. Should they be a separate package? Say xmds-doc? I've added the example xmds files, but I'm not 100% sure if I've done things correctly. > scilab and matlab are not part of fedora. But unless I am > wrong, the .dat created by xsil2graphics -s are simple ascii > output file that may be used with any plotting program? Maybe > this could be said somewhere? Actually the output should work fine with Octave which is properly free. In the current svn version of xmds we've got R and Gnuplot output working as well, however, Octave should work "out of the box" with this version of xmds. > In summary it is unneeded to repeat the package name. Oops, I just realised I missed this. The package still needs more review, so I'll fix this with the next set of problems which I'm sure about to turn up... > Unless I am wrong, xsil2graphics and loadxsil are useful by > themselves, maybe they could be in a subpackage, since > as far as I can tell from a quick browsing, there aren't many > other xsil tools. Atm they only make sense with xmds. AFAIK xsil is a format which isn't likely to stick around much longer, so having separately packaged tools isn't going to be worth the effort, I think. > I suggest using %dist since this is a binary package. Also > why use a release of 3 in the submission, why not begin with > 1? That's because this is xmds version 1.6 revision 3. Am I supposed to do this another way? Is the revision number the number of the xmds.spec file or something? > It seems to me that a requires on gcc-c++ would be in > order, since it is called during model compilation. Same > for fftw2-devel. Added these dependencies to the new .spec file. > Is libxmds.a meant to be used separately from xmds? Um, no. Should we be putting this somewhere else? Thanks again for your help! Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 16:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330311] Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161600.l9GG0DwC021342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Alias: perl-Class-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330311 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-16 12:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 16:02:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161602.l9GG2E0H021533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-16 12:02 EST ------- Should this package really be named 'vecmath1.2' and not just 'vecmath'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 16:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161603.l9GG3fFu022678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tcp_wrappers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-16 12:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 16:07:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161607.l9GG7p6U023340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-16 12:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 16:07:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161607.l9GG7r4a022508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-16 12:07 EST ------- Well, ! From next time, please make srpm and post the URL for the srpm. * %{?dist} tag in the last %changelog entry is actually not needed. When you rebuild your srpm by mock or on koji, the rpmlint should disappear. So as tzclock package itself is okay, I will wait for your pre-review or another review request as I said in comment 24. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 16:14:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161614.l9GGEfFE024794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tcp_wrappers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 tjanouse at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ | ------- Additional Comments From tjanouse at redhat.com 2007-10-16 12:14 EST ------- Thanks for your review and sorry for the delay. I incorporated your suggestions: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/tcp_wrappers/devel/tcp_wrappers.spec?r1=1.33&r2=1.34 Please note that at least the License field has changed since the time you reviewed it. The tcpd binary was 711 since/because of this changelog entry: * Tue May 16 2000 Chris Evans - Make tcpd mode -rwx--x--x as a security hardening measure I changed it to 755, since even suid binaries are no longer non-readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 16:51:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161651.l9GGpTTm030524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-16 12:51 EST ------- ok .. i've added the changes from comment 17 http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/libcompizconfig/libcompizconfig-0.6.0-0.3.20071011git5615ca.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 16:49:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161649.l9GGnlwu029926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-16 12:49 EST ------- Made sense to me, as the 1.2 refers to a Java3D spec version, not an application version. On the other hand, does this help it avoid a collision? Is there a version of vecmath that supports another version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 17:02:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161702.l9GH2NEc032474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-16 13:02 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (libcompizconfig) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 17:16:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161716.l9GHGOoj002056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-16 13:16 EST ------- This is the name upstream uses, also notice that this is vecmath1.2 version 1.14, where else should I put the 1.2? Also notice that as is it works rather nice for the .spec file, Source0 = %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz, and no -n to %setup is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 17:41:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161741.l9GHf52Z006012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-16 13:41 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback - applied your fixes here: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit-0.1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit.spec Also, there's still some rpmlint output: PackageKit.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/backend.py 0644 PackageKit.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/frontend.py 0644 PackageKit.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/packagekit/reference.html PackageKit.i386: W: non-standard-dir-in-var db I'm working with upstream to fix these issues - they should all be fixed in the next release. Finally, the license should be GPLv2+ - most of the source files state this explicitly, a few are unclear. This should also be fixed in the next upstream version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 17:47:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161747.l9GHlstJ007292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-16 13:47 EST ------- You might want to look at these pages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/TGApps http://www.advogato.org/person/badger/diary/46.html They're non-binding at this point.. Just some things that I thought about and arrived at when packaging the pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 17:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] New: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/phasex.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/phasex-0.11.1-1.src.rpm Description: PHASEX is an experimental JACK audio / ALSA MIDI softsynth for Linux with a synth engine built around flexible phase modulation and flexible oscillator/LFO sourcing. Modulations include AM, FM, offset PM, and wave select. PHASEX comes equipped with a 12db/octave filter with two distortion curves, a stereo crossover delay and chorus with phaser, ADSR envelopes for amplifier and filter, realtime audio input processing capabilities, and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 18:35:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161835.l9GIZMnV015605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-16 14:35 EST ------- > How would you achieve that off the box? You don't. It certainly requires manual configuration if you want such an advanced setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 18:51:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294001] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161851.l9GIpCYp018293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 ------- Additional Comments From martin at gamesplace.info 2007-10-16 14:51 EST ------- > gcc-c++ (in standard build environment) The build environment which I use does not ship with it by default. Except updated .spec soon ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 18:53:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161853.l9GIr7PD018378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-16 14:53 EST ------- Some random notes for 0.3-1: * Requires ------------------------------------------------------ Requires: mono-core >= 1.1.7 Requires: libgnome >= 2.2 Requires: gtk-sharp2 >= 2.8 Requires: cairo >= 1.2 Requires: intltool ------------------------------------------------------- - Why is intltool needed (not for BuildRequires but for Requires)? - Other Requires are not needed. rpmbuild automatically checks the dependencies of libraries installed in the rpm and also mono related dependencies, then adds them to the Requires of binary rpm. * Mono related packaging issue - Currently mono is available on ppc64, so "ExcludeArch: ppc64" is needed - Debuginfo rpm is empty. This is expected because gbrainy rpm does not contain any ELF binary. In this case, you must prevent debuginfo rpm from being created by adding "%define debug_package %{nil}" (and also adding a comment in spec file why this is needed: please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo ) * SourceURL - I recommend to use %{name} and %{version} macro in SourceURL because with this you probably need not change SourceURL when new version is released. * perl module BuildRequires - must be written by the module names, not by rpm names (ref: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl ) In short, "BuildRequires: perl-XML-Parser" must be "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)". * Some notes in %prep/%build/%install section - The following line -------------------------------------------------------------------- sed 's/\/usr\/\/usr/\/usr/' %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/src/gbrainy > tmp mv -f tmp %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/src/gbrainy -------------------------------------------------------------------- can be -------------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i -e 's|/usr/usr|%{_prefix}|' src/%{name} -------------------------------------------------------------------- * You can use "-i" (in place) option of sed * You can choose the separator for sed. * The working directory at this stage is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}. * Timestamps - Please use -------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" -------------------------------------------------------------------- This will save timestamps on most files to be installed (I guess). This method usually works for recent Makefiles. * GTK+ icon cache - Icon cache must be updated for icons under %_datadir/icons/hicolor. Please check the section "GTK+ icon cache" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 18:57:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161857.l9GIva58019072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2007-10-16 14:57 EST ------- Thanks for review and approval. Upstream argued not to ship conntest. I'd argue that in the current state of affairs, running conntest only makes sense if you really run the very latest version - i.e. directly from git. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 18:58:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161858.l9GIwFaI019147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2007-10-16 14:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd Short Description: Xorg X11 radeonhd driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets Owners: ndim,ajax Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 19:12:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710161912.l9GJCGdo021742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 20:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162013.l9GKDpBP030581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-16 16:13 EST ------- Thanks again for the nice review: 1) Nope. The upstream tarball is named gnome-packagekit, and in the absence of any guidelines or consistancy for naming gnome addons, I'd rather just match the upstream tarball. 2) Oops...fixed. 3) Fixed 4) Fixed 5) Fixed Also, fixed the License tag: GPLv2+ http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit-0.1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 20:52:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162052.l9GKqht3004202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 16:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > The source should be an url to the upstream source. > > See: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > > I've updated this in the .spec and uploaded the files again: > > Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds.spec > SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds-1.6-3.src.rpm This is not right. You should increment the release number of your .src.rpm each time you post a fixed version (except maybe in very specific cases). The meaning of the release is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-5ea39bbc33cf351b41b51325ac3527eff4c58dac In general there is a difference between the 'upstream release' and the package release. there may be many package release for one upstream release. In fact it seems that you should release xcmds-1.6.3 Having Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.tar.gz is necessarily wrong, since the %{release} should never appear in upstream sources. Part of the confusion comes from the fact that you are both packager and upstream. This is a situation that I dislike, I prefer when both roles are clearly separated. > > loadxsil.m shouldn't be in %_bindir, it may better be in > > %doc since there is no specific directory for matlab scripts > > currently in fedora. > > I've added a patch which stops loadxsil.m from being installed in %_bindir and > added code to put it into %_docdir Your patch is wrong since it modifies Makefile.am only, it should also modify Makefile.in. Also it should not be removed, but noinst, like (if I recall well) noinst_SCRIPTS = loadxsil.m Also (this is just a suggestion, contrary to most of what I say otherwise in the review which are issues blocking the inclusion of the package), I suggest the following format for patch: Patch0: xmds-1.6-loadxsil_nobin.patch and %patch0 -p0 -b .loadxsil_nobin (as a side note, using -b loadxsil.m is a bit.... strange...) > > Docs are missing. Without doc, the package is not very useful. > > There is an example directory, it should be shipped in %doc. > > Also the manual would be a must, if it is covered by a free > > documentation license. > > They're actually in a separate part of the repository. Should they be a > separate package? Say xmds-doc? If you want, but, in that case I think that the main package should depend on the doc package. Doing that, in general is wrong, but this is a special package, see below. > I've added the example xmds files, but I'm not 100% sure if I've done things > correctly. Indeed it is not correct. You should make use of %doc. rpmbuild will take care to install correctly all the files and directories specified as %doc. In your case, should be along %doc examples/ source/loadxsil.m README AUTHORS NEWS COPYING > Actually the output should work fine with Octave which is properly free. In the > current svn version of xmds we've got R and Gnuplot output working as well, > however, Octave should work "out of the box" with this version of xmds. Ok. Worth saying somewhere in the description or the like. > > Unless I am wrong, xsil2graphics and loadxsil are useful by > > themselves, maybe they could be in a subpackage, since > > as far as I can tell from a quick browsing, there aren't many > > other xsil tools. > > Atm they only make sense with xmds. AFAIK xsil is a format which isn't likely > to stick around much longer, so having separately packaged tools isn't going to > be worth the effort, I think. Right. > > I suggest using %dist since this is a binary package. Also > > why use a release of 3 in the submission, why not begin with > > 1? > > That's because this is xmds version 1.6 revision 3. Am I supposed to do this > another way? Is the revision number the number of the xmds.spec file or something? Indeed. You are using it as a minor version number, but it is wrong the minor version number should be in the version of your upstream archive. > > It seems to me that a requires on gcc-c++ would be in > > order, since it is called during model compilation. Same > > for fftw2-devel. > > Added these dependencies to the new .spec file. After rereading the configure.in, it seems that fftw3 can be used instead, it would be better to use fftw3. > > Is libxmds.a meant to be used separately from xmds? > > Um, no. Should we be putting this somewhere else? Well, this package is very different from most of the packages in fedora. Indeed it is a code generator, compiler driver. So it is more like a preprocessor or a compiler than like a application or a library. For libraries there is a systematic split of the package in 2, the shared library in the main package, which is installed when something linked against the library is installed, and the -devel subpackage which holds the .so symbolic link, the header files, the api description. But xmds doesn't fit well in this scheme, the library is more like an internal library. Similarly the package is useless without documentation, like a library without api description. In my opinion it should be treated like a devel package, like binutils, or cpp. You should also read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 although I think that it doesn't apply here. 2 suggestions: * use wildcards for man pages to catch different or no compression: %{_mandir}/man1/xmds.1* * use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 21:01:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162101.l9GL1FBX005122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 17:01 EST ------- The %build section is a bit broken. There are 2 make invocations and LINUX_LDFLAGS is not used. I think that it should be: make LINUX_CFLAGS="-c $RPM_OPT_FLAGS `pkg-config --cflags sdl` -DWITH_ROOTWINDOW" LINUX_LDFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS `pkg-config --libs sdl` -lGL `pkg-config --libs x11` -lm" All on one line. I don't remember if putting the variables in the environment works, I think it doesn't. The timestamp for the source file isn't kept. You can use wget -N or spectool -g or similar curl option. Quite strangely, the stamp is only 4 seconds different from upstream... Source match upstream: 2214b0591ced40f27e00accdb8fa8f41 xgrav-1.2.0.tgz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 21:13:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162113.l9GLDCZ9006408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-16 17:13 EST ------- Does the new spec file address the issues you brought up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 21:12:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162112.l9GLC5iY006342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-16 17:12 EST ------- Whoops, not enough caffiene. :) Addressed. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xgrav/xgrav.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xgrav/xgrav-1.2.0-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 21:10:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162110.l9GLAhcH006942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-16 17:10 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: vdr New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 21:32:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162132.l9GLWJH3009015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-16 17:32 EST ------- I'll pick up the review. Wait a little... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 21:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162133.l9GLXqHj009652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-16 17:33 EST ------- I'll pick up the review. Wait a little... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 21:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162137.l9GLbqSd009830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-10-16 17:37 EST ------- An updated build that should meet http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/EclipsePlugins is available here: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit.spec http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-4.el5.src.rpm this version builds fine in mock for rawhide and epel5. however, when i submit to my local koji instance i get check-buildroot errors, like so: + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot Binary file /var/tmp/eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-4.el5.stl-Gf1632/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/gcj/eclipse-anyedit/de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools_1.8.2.zip.so.debug matches Found '/var/tmp/eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-4.el5.stl-Gf1632' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10769 (%install) thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 21:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162156.l9GLunr9013473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 22:22:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190343] Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162222.l9GMMAGe016518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDR - Video Disk Recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190343 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-16 18:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 22:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162221.l9GMLPbL017158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-16 18:21 EST ------- I see. It just seemed odd to have a package with . in the name, hopefully it won't cause any issues with yum or rpm behavior. There is already at least one other package like that however, so I don't think it will. Sorry for the delay here. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 23:07:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162307.l9GN7btQ022864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 19:07 EST ------- %{_bindir}/xgrav is listed twice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 23:15:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162315.l9GNFUwE024044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Alias: perl-Digest-CRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-10-16 19:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Digest-CRC Short Description: Generic CRC functions Owners: xulchris Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 23:20:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162320.l9GNK444024658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Alias: perl-Digest-CRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 23:23:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162323.l9GNNAU1024897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-16 19:23 EST ------- Updated based on your comments Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd.spec SPRM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd-0-0.1.20071016cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 23:42:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162342.l9GNgO1k027409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2007-10-16 19:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/gbrainy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/gbrainy-0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Oct 16 2007 Jean-Fran?ois Martin 0.3-2 - Build and BuildRequires corrections - Exclude ppc64 arch - Don't create the debuginfo which is useless - Refresh the icon-cache after install and uninstall - Various cleaning in the spec I have change the spec with suggestions made by Mamoru Tasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 16 23:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710162344.l9GNi82s026516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-16 19:44 EST ------- You should change the LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH in ltspswapd.sysinit, something along sed -e 's;LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH=.*;LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH=%{swapdir};' %{SOURCE1} > ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd (and if you are pedantic about timestamps, like I do) touch -r %{SOURCE1} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd No need for /sbin/service in Requires(post) In the cvs checkout command there should be a switch that makes sure that the cvs version is the same one than the one in the rpm. %{_localstatedir}/lib/ltsp/ is unowned. Does ltspswapd really requires nbd? It looks like it has its own nbd-server implementation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 00:49:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170049.l9H0nheu003052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-10-16 20:49 EST ------- Please branch for F-8. Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 01:34:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170134.l9H1Ymfi007669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-16 21:34 EST ------- Spec: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.13-1.fc7.spec SRPM: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/asterisk-1.4.13-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 02:20:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170220.l9H2Kss6013955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-16 22:20 EST ------- I have added myself into cvsextras and fedorabugs group.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 03:24:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170324.l9H3OiF4023398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 23:24 EST ------- Thanks. 1) I found problem in mockbuild => RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/PackageKit-0.1.0-2.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/man/man1/*.1.gz This is happening because of missing BR: docbook-utils in SPEC. 2) After adding missing BR when I mock build it went fine. But rpmlint complained PackageKit.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/backend.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. PackageKit.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/packagekit/frontend.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. ===> Once you fix this in upstream. Kindly provide new SRPM for review with fixes mentioned in this comment. PackageKit.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/packagekit/reference.html The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> You need to use iconv command on that file. Not needed in SPEC as you are upstream you can release new tarball with this fix. PackageKit.i386: W: non-standard-dir-in-var db Your package is creating a non-standard subdirectory in /var. The standard directories are: account, lib, cache, crash, games, lock, log, opt, run, spool, state, tmp, yp, www, ftp ==> This looks fake warning as /var/db is already owned by filesystem package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 03:41:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170341.l9H3fsI0025749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 23:41 EST ------- Package looks ok. waiting for PackageKit updates now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 03:59:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170359.l9H3xUXH028542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-16 23:59 EST ------- Build log from new SRPM showed warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/minihallib Use only %{python_sitelib}/* in %files as suggested in sample SPEC given in eggs guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 04:07:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170407.l9H47u5C028693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 00:07 EST ------- Comment #5 - patch applied Comment #7 - excellent suggestion. I prefer to edit files in /etc/sysconfig/ rather than elsewhere in /etc/, so I changed this to the attached ltsp-swapfile-delete.patch Comment #8 - applied Comment #9 - perhaps we should suggest this as a use case for a general purpose enhancement, a la /etc/iptables.d/ (or does such a mechanism already exist? A quick search turned up nothing of interest) Comment #10 - the LTSP client swap files are invalid if the client disconnects (which is guarrented to be the state if the server is booting up), and as such it is safe to remove all of the LTSP client swap files. I'm ok with letting the cron.daily script take care of this, but it make sense to me if they are cleared out when the server boots. Yes, I agree that it is obvious that the docs should be in %doc ;-) How about %_sbindir for ltsp-initialize. /etc/sysconfig/ltsp5 sounds good to me. *EXCELLENT* idea on having ltsp_initialize create /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 04:05:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170405.l9H450HU029147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 00:05 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=229461) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=229461&action=view) ltsp-swapfile-delete.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 04:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170410.l9H4Aiin029307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 00:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=229471) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=229471&action=view) Comments #11 & #12, this makes more sense to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 04:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170424.l9H4OJUh030728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 00:24 EST ------- rpmlint gave me blitz.src:101: W: macro-in-%changelog name Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 04:28:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170428.l9H4SNum031334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 00:28 EST ------- comment 10: if ltsp-initialize is moved to /usr/sbin/, someone is more likely to find it by accident and run it to see what it does ("./ltsp-initialize -h" is not an unreasonable use-case). I changed this command to require a "-y" flag, otherwise it spits out a warning & exit 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 04:39:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170439.l9H4dKEm000838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 00:39 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is Not silent for SRPM but Not for RPM. system-config-network.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4.4 1.4.4-1.fc8 => I hope you will take care this message while building package next time. system-config-network.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rp3 =>This messages can be ignored for this package. system-config-network.src: W: strange-permission system-config-network.spec 0600 => I hope you will take care this message while building package next time. + source files match upstream. 9566acdbecea85601ecc39c71a3e24fa system-config-network-1.4.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop files are handled correctly. + package system-config-network-1.4.4-1.fc8 -> Provides: internet-config = 0.40-2.1 isdn-config = 0.18-10.70.1 redhat-config-network = 1.4.4 Requires: /usr/bin/python gnome-python2 gnome-python2-canvas pygtk2 pygtk2-libglade system-config-network-tui = 1.4.4-1.fc8 usermode + package system-config-network-tui-1.4.4-1.fc8 -> Provides: config(system-config-network-tui) = 1.4.4-1.fc8 netcfg = 2.36-3p.1 netconf = 0.1-1.1 redhat-config-network-tui = 1.4.4 Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/python config(system-config-network-tui) = 1.4.4-1.fc8 initscripts >= 0:5.99 kudzu newt-python pciutils python rhpl >= 0:0.193 rpm-python usermode + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 04:44:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170444.l9H4iJj8000716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 00:44 EST ------- comment 10: I changed /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables-ltsp to source /etc/sysconfig/ltsp5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:01:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170601.l9H61K8U010586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 02:01 EST ------- change BASE="X-Fedora Application AudioVideo Audio" to BASE="AudioVideo Audio" Reference: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DesktopFiles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:04:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170604.l9H64opS010729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 02:04 EST ------- and rpmlint complained phasex.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==> use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' phasex.spec" for desktop file verification you can even check desktop file as ==>desktop-file-validate phasex.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:04:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170604.l9H64p5C011179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 02:04 EST ------- I'm making a lot of mistakes, so I'm stopping here. I believe all of the patches & changes have been made, with the exception of the %doc changes. These build and they pass rpmlint (with the previously noted exception). SPEC: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config/ltsp-server-config.spec SRPMS: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config/ltsp-server-config-0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:09:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170609.l9H69CXH011358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-17 02:09 EST ------- I've fixed this issue here: ftp://toaster.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/extras/python-minihallib-0.1.8- 2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:12:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] New: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davidz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gnome-device-manager-review/gnome-device-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gnome-device-manager-review/gnome-device-manager-0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GNOME Device Manager is an application that provides a view of the various devices connected to the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:14:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170614.l9H6EGA6012457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-10-17 02:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Matthias said he was willing to review this one.. it's a non-essential packager > and probably won't be in the default install for F8. Uh, I meant s/package/packager/ - no offense meant to Matthias! Sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:13:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170613.l9H6D01j012398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 davidz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: gnome- |Review Request: gnome- |device-manager - Graphical |device-manager - Graphical |Device Manager Application |Device Manager Application ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-10-17 02:12 EST ------- Matthias said he was willing to review this one.. it's a non-essential packager and probably won't be in the default install for F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:13:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170613.l9H6DbL1012021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 davidz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:20:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170620.l9H6KlQZ013182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-17 02:20 EST ------- Ok, I understand. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170621.l9H6LS3k013234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-17 02:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > You might want to look at these pages: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/TGApps > http://www.advogato.org/person/badger/diary/46.html > > They're non-binding at this point.. Just some things that I thought about and > arrived at when packaging the pkgdb. Looks very good to me, it makes it looks much better than all the code located under python site libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:30:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170630.l9H6Unls014673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 02:30 EST ------- You don't need to set fedora-review? flag It should be set by reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:39:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170639.l9H6d5oB015064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-17 02:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Does the new spec file address the issues you brought up? Nope, because you don't seem to have updated the spec. Please increment the release-tags of a spec and provide direct links to this spec and an updated *.src.rpm built from it each time you change something in your spec. Otherwise reviewers will not be able to tell if you actually changed something and if they are looking at the correct file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:42:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170642.l9H6gL0h015612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 02:42 EST ------- 1) Build.log showed me checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool => You have missing BR: perl(XML::Parser) 2) missing ldconfig scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 06:46:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170646.l9H6k9V1016484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 02:46 EST ------- 3)Now building again after adding missing BR, I saw warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/gnome/help/gnome-device-manager/C warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/gnome/help/gnome-device-manager/C/figures warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/gnome/help/gnome-device-manager/C/figures/gnome-device-manager.png warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/gnome/help/gnome-device-manager/C/gnome-device-manager.xml warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/gnome/help/gnome-device-manager/C/legal.xml warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/omf/gnome-device-manager/gnome-device-manager-C.omf 4) you missed defattr(-,root,root,-) for -libs and -devel. 5)You may like to use make as make %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:12:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170712.l9H7CbR8019526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-17 03:12 EST ------- Is there any specific reason that configuration file is /etc/sysconfig/ltsp5 as opposed to merely ltsp? We don't usually have version specific configuration file names and it would be problematic for documentation if we have to change all the references when ltsp 6 rolls out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:11:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170711.l9H7BDhK019742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ltsp- |Review Request: ltspswapd - |ltspswapd - Daemon that uses|Daemon that uses nbd to |nbd to provide swap space |provide swap space for LTSP |for LTSP thin clients |thin clients -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:21:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170721.l9H7LGC9020912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |184925 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170727.l9H7RtsC021871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 03:27 EST ------- Now I should be sponsoring you. Please proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:29:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170729.l9H7TdOY021973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 03:29 EST ------- (removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170728.l9H7SjT7021915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 03:28 EST ------- (removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170755.l9H7tgWU026336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:56:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 318191] Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170756.l9H7uNaC026417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paktype-fonts - Fonts for Arabic from PakType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=318191 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:56:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328951] Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170756.l9H7ugmg026462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kacst-fonts - Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328951 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 07:55:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317901] Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170755.l9H7tAOD026271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: culmus-fonts - Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317901 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 08:01:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277921] Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170801.l9H81KgM027266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277921 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-10-17 04:01 EST ------- I've addressed all of your issues: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-forms.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-forms-1.1.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 08:00:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277931] Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170800.l9H803nF027067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277931 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-10-17 04:00 EST ------- Okay, I've addressed all of your comments. I emailed the developer last night about the license of that one file and will update when I hear back, but I made the rest of the changes. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-looks.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-looks-2.1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 08:01:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170801.l9H81UR8027274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-17 04:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcompizconfig Short Description: Configuration backend for compiz Owners: izhar Branches: F-7 InitialCC: izhar Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 08:18:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170818.l9H8IgXx030310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 04:18 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 815cf1a0c7d289f6f9bafc504066a308 minihallib-0.1.8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package python-minihallib-0.1.8-2.fc8 -> Requires: dbus-glib >= 0.62 dbus-python >= 0.62 hal >= 0.5.6 python(abi) = 2.5 + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 08:31:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170831.l9H8Vj4k032579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-17 04:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-minihallib Short Description: Library to handle HAL devices and events Owners: andriy Branches: F-7 FC-6 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 08:35:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170835.l9H8ZY7x000804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tla at rasmil.dk ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-17 04:35 EST ------- Robin: Adding this to %install chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/packagekit/*.py should silence the E: non-executable-script errors. It can be removed when next upstream tarball is released with the right file permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 08:37:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170837.l9H8bgJZ001295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2007-10-17 04:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > The source should be an url to the upstream source. > > > See: > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > > > > I've updated this in the .spec and uploaded the files again: > > > > Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds.spec > > SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds-1.6-3.src.rpm > > This is not right. You should increment the release number of your > .src.rpm each time you post a fixed version (except maybe in very > specific cases). The in the urls numbers happen to be the same this time as it's my third go at this :-) > Part of the confusion comes from the fact that you are both > packager and upstream. This is a situation that I dislike, I > prefer when both roles are clearly separated. Yes, it can be somewhat confusing. I'm hoping that the next xmds release will be easier to package. Hopefully we can merge some of your comments into the trunk and so make both of our lives easier. > > > loadxsil.m shouldn't be in %_bindir, it may better be in > > > %doc since there is no specific directory for matlab scripts > > > currently in fedora. > > > > I've added a patch which stops loadxsil.m from being installed in %_bindir and > > added code to put it into %_docdir > > Your patch is wrong since it modifies Makefile.am only, it should > also modify Makefile.in. Also it should not be removed, but noinst, > like (if I recall well) > noinst_SCRIPTS = loadxsil.m Corrected. I've also added a patch for Makefile.in. I *believe* this patch works, as it is a bit of a hack; unfortunately the last person to release xmds had a much older version of the autotools package than I do and consequently the changes between the different autogenerated Makefile.in's makes the differences not patch cleanly. The patch I've supplied should work I hope. Like I mentioned above, hopefully the next release of xmds will be easier to package. > Also (this is just a suggestion, contrary to most of what I say > otherwise in the review which are issues blocking the inclusion of > the package), I suggest the following format for patch: > > Patch0: xmds-1.6-loadxsil_nobin.patch > > and > > %patch0 -p0 -b .loadxsil_nobin > > (as a side note, using -b loadxsil.m is a bit.... strange...) this is a consequence of me not knowing completely what I'm doing :-( Anyway, this issue should be corrected in this update. > > > Docs are missing. Without doc, the package is not very useful. > > > There is an example directory, it should be shipped in %doc. > > > Also the manual would be a must, if it is covered by a free > > > documentation license. > > > > They're actually in a separate part of the repository. Should they be a > > separate package? Say xmds-doc? > > If you want, but, in that case I think that the main package should > depend on the doc package. Doing that, in general is wrong, but > this is a special package, see below. I've added the pdf docs (which is all that gets released now; we used to release the LaTeX sources as well... Maybe it'd be better to merge the two back together again). > > I've added the example xmds files, but I'm not 100% sure if I've done things > > correctly. > > Indeed it is not correct. You should make use of %doc. > rpmbuild will take care to install correctly all the files > and directories specified as %doc. In your case, should be along > > %doc examples/ source/loadxsil.m README AUTHORS NEWS COPYING Corrected in this update. > > Actually the output should work fine with Octave which is properly free. In the > > current svn version of xmds we've got R and Gnuplot output working as well, > > however, Octave should work "out of the box" with this version of xmds. > > Ok. Worth saying somewhere in the description or the like. I've added a small change mentioning Octave in the README file. I hope this is sufficient. In the current xmds trunk there is more reference to Octave, but for this package I don't know if the extra effort is worthwhile. Maybe I'm just hoping that xmds-1.6-4 will get released sometime soon.... > > > It seems to me that a requires on gcc-c++ would be in > > > order, since it is called during model compilation. Same > > > for fftw2-devel. > > > > Added these dependencies to the new .spec file. > > After rereading the configure.in, it seems that fftw3 > can be used instead, it would be better to use fftw3. This means, unfortunately, that one can't use MPI (fftw2 handles MPI, but not fftw3, although it's coming). Actually, this leads me to a point I'd not thought about until just now. MPI is optional in xmds, but it needs to be turned on at configure time. How does one handle this in a package such as rpm? Should two packages be maintained? One with MPI support and one without? > > > Is libxmds.a meant to be used separately from xmds? > > > > Um, no. Should we be putting this somewhere else? > > Well, this package is very different from most of the packages > in fedora. Indeed it is a code generator, compiler driver. > So it is more like a preprocessor or a compiler than like > a application or a library. > > For libraries there is a systematic split of the package > in 2, the shared library in the main package, which is > installed when something linked against the library is installed, > and the -devel subpackage which holds the .so symbolic link, > the header files, the api description. > > But xmds doesn't fit well in this scheme, the library is > more like an internal library. Similarly the package is useless > without documentation, like a library without api description. > In my opinion it should be treated like a devel package, like > binutils, or cpp. Does this mean that I need to add something like: %package devel Provides: xmds-static = %{version}-%{release} to the spec file? > You should also read > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 > although I think that it doesn't apply here. Read this, and I agree, I don't think it applies in this (rather odd) case. (to be honest, I don't know why we use a library at all, that was added long after my time, I've just only recently become involved in a more maintenance capacity). > 2 suggestions: > > * use wildcards for man pages to catch different or no compression: > %{_mandir}/man1/xmds.1* > > * use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root). Both added in this update. Again: many thanks for your feedback!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 08:44:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170844.l9H8if0D001964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 04:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > comment 10: > > if ltsp-initialize is moved to /usr/sbin/, someone is more likely to find it by > accident and run it to see what it does ("./ltsp-initialize -h" is not an > unreasonable use-case). I changed this command to require a "-y" flag, otherwise > it spits out a warning & exit 1 Agreed, this is safer. Although in the unix philosophy you are not meant to do mistakes, I agree that it is right. (In reply to comment #21) > Is there any specific reason that configuration file is /etc/sysconfig/ltsp5 as > opposed to merely ltsp? We don't usually have version specific configuration > file names and it would be problematic for documentation if we have to change > all the references when ltsp 6 rolls out. Between ltsp releases there are lots of changes, so it is not obvious that /etc/sysconfig/ltsp5 will be suitable for ltsp6. Currently we support ltsp4 with ltsp-utils, and the design of ltsp5 and ltsp4 are very different. Also quite different were the design of ltsp3 and ltsp4. And in general there are years between releases. Moreover we should certainly maintain different ltsp releases in parallel, as long as they are maintained upstream (currently it seems that ltsp4 and ltsp5 are maintained). In fact I think that we could even try to ensure that the paths are version specific such that it will be possible to install in parallel ltsp5 and ltsp6. It is not obvious either, especially for the client nfs root, but this should be considered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 09:14:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170914.l9H9EJQA006773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-10-17 05:14 EST ------- Gosh, packaging is full of traps... Fixed SPEC: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz.spec SRPM: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/blitz-0.9-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 09:21:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170921.l9H9LHDT008363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-17 05:21 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: SRPM URL: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 09:22:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170922.l9H9Mims008698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 05:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Yes, it can be somewhat confusing. I'm hoping that the next xmds release will > be easier to package. Hopefully we can merge some of your comments into the > trunk and so make both of our lives easier. Sometimes it happens that upstream sources cannot be packaged as-is and that the reviewing process points out issues in upstream and that a new version is needed for proper packaging. > Corrected. I've also added a patch for Makefile.in. I *believe* this patch > works, as it is a bit of a hack; unfortunately the last person to release xmds > had a much older version of the autotools package than I do and consequently the > changes between the different autogenerated Makefile.in's makes the differences > not patch cleanly. To mitigate this issue, you can use older autotool versions. There are many autoconf and automake version in fedora, and using the one that matches helps doing patches that can be reviewed. > The patch I've supplied should work I hope. Like I > mentioned above, hopefully the next release of xmds will be easier to package. I am beginning to think that a new release will be a requirement, but it is not completly obvious either. > I've added the pdf docs (which is all that gets released now; we used to release > the LaTeX sources as well... Maybe it'd be better to merge the two back > together again). What is the license of the pdf? > sufficient. In the current xmds trunk there is more reference to Octave, but > for this package I don't know if the extra effort is worthwhile. Maybe I'm just > hoping that xmds-1.6-4 will get released sometime soon.... Hoping that it will be named xmds-1.6.4 .... > This means, unfortunately, that one can't use MPI (fftw2 handles MPI, but not > fftw3, although it's coming). Right, this is a good reason to keep fftw2. > Actually, this leads me to a point I'd not > thought about until just now. MPI is optional in xmds, but it needs to be > turned on at configure time. How does one handle this in a package such as rpm? > Should two packages be maintained? One with MPI support and one without? In general it is best to have all the possible features. But in the case of mpi, this is really 2 different programs, so there is a need for a separated subpackage. You can have a look at paraview which has a separated paraview-mpi subpackage. The -mpi subpackage may be added later. > Does this mean that I need to add something like: > > %package devel > Provides: xmds-static = %{version}-%{release} > > to the spec file? No, the library should be in the main package. What would be better, however, would be to install the library in a subdirectory, such that it is not in the linker path. So install it in %{_libdir}/xmds/lib....a and modify apropriately the link command. Similarly, the include files should be in a %{_includedir} subdirectory. > be honest, I don't know why we use a library at all, that was added long after > my time, I've just only recently become involved in a more maintenance capacity). Having code generated and an internal library seems completely right to me. There is another example in fedora, this is what gcc does. You should also read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 09:58:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710170958.l9H9wngt014044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From dbond at nrggos.com.au 2007-10-17 05:58 EST ------- Why 192.168.0.x as a default network? Why not ask a question like which net device will the clients be attached and derive the correct network? The server should be using static rather than dhcp addresses so the right network configuration is in /etc/sysconfig/networking-scripts/ifcfg-ethx... or it can be read from the output of ifconfig if it was dhcp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 10:11:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171011.l9HAB5Zo015965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-17 06:11 EST ------- Thanks. Updated files here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/phasex.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/phasex-0.11.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 10:09:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171009.l9HA9qZG015467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-17 06:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xgrav/xgrav.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xgrav/xgrav-1.2.0-4.fc7.src.rpm Fixed. But if the binary is built twice and listed twice, isn't the package just that much BETTER? ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 10:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171011.l9HABOHk016483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 06:11 EST ------- thanks. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 031df2816c73e2d3bd6d667bbac19eca blitz-0.9.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + blitz.pc files are present. + -devel,-docs subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig and install-info scriptlets are used. + package blitz-0.9-3.fc8 -> Provides: libblitz.so.0 Requires: libblitz.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libm.so.6 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + package blitz-devel-0.9-3.fc8 -> Requires: blitz = 0.9-3.fc8 libblitz.so.0 pkgconfig + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 10:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171029.l9HATFdh018730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-10-17 06:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: blitz Short Description: C++ class library for matrix scientific computing Owners: sergiopr Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 10:38:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171038.l9HAcVfr020213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 06:38 EST ------- *This package contains Red Hat maintained internal tarball* *License for this package is cvs checkout from upstream * Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e49de1140705e0ee97d851165516192c lklug-0.2.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package which is from upstream CVS checkout. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 10:52:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171052.l9HAqNdn022568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-10-17 06:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lklug-fonts Short Description: Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 11:14:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171114.l9HBEJA0024791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 11:25:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171125.l9HBPiNu026699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-17 07:25 EST ------- cvsadmin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 11:50:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171150.l9HBoQUZ030404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|253387 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 12:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171239.l9HCdoCq006304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 08:39 EST ------- Having an interface to the configuration used by ltsp5 would be nice, be it a simple shell script, a full featured gui or a curse interface, but it seems to me that separating configuration in text files should be the only prerequisite. A simple shell script that sources /etc/sysconfig/ltsp5, proposes to change the values, rewrite the file and launch ltsp-initialize could be nice, but not a requirement in my opinion. As for eth0 being 192.168.0.x it is because it is the most common setup (terminals in a private class C network). Unless I am wrong, ltsp-initialize reads /etc/sysconfig/networking-scripts/ifcfg-ethx: # Source the network configuration . /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-$DEV -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 13:48:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171348.l9HDmem9016370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From tom at compton.nu 2007-10-17 09:48 EST ------- If mapnik is going to use the system copy of dejavu instead of it's own then the setting of fontscollectionpath in paths.py in the python binding should probably be changed as well so that it points at /usr/share/fonts/dejavu or it won't register any fonts by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 13:59:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171359.l9HDx2pG018109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From mblinn at gmail.com 2007-10-17 09:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > As for eth0 being 192.168.0.x it is because it is the most > common setup (terminals in a private class C network). > > Unless I am wrong, ltsp-initialize reads > /etc/sysconfig/networking-scripts/ifcfg-ethx: > > # Source the network configuration > . /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-$DEV It'd be great if -initialize took multiple NICs/subnets into account. On larger installations (like mine) you have more than one subnet of thin clients on more than one NIC. Personally I'm using .0.x and .1.x but it would be nice if a multi-NIC setup wasn't a long and involved kludge process that required you to work around automated settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 14:43:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171443.l9HEhCe7025191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-17 10:43 EST ------- Tim - thanks - I'm going to see today when Hughsie wants to release 0.1.1 - if it's soon enough (like in a day or two), I might just wait for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 15:57:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171557.l9HFvMSq004450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-17 11:57 EST ------- > It'd be great if -initialize took multiple NICs/subnets into account. Our goal for now is to get the basic functionality into rawhide. We cannot accommodate all needs with this initial goal. We will likely look at supporting your case in a later step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 15:55:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171555.l9HFt137004026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 11:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > It'd be great if -initialize took multiple NICs/subnets into account. On larger > installations (like mine) you have more than one subnet of thin clients on more > than one NIC. Personally I'm using .0.x and .1.x but it would be nice if a > multi-NIC setup wasn't a long and involved kludge process that required you to > work around automated settings. If you can do patches that allow multi-nic setup, I think that'd be great, maybe they could be in the variable like LTSP_DEV=eth1,eth2 However at some point it becomes necessary to do things manually, generality is not always achievable without harmful complexity. But I guess that it should be up to Eric to determine whether this is bloat or useful feature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:01:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171601.l9HG14sT006399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-17 12:01 EST ------- A couple comments from looking at the spec file: Perl deps are specified by module, rather than by the name of the package that provides the required module. e.g., where your package buildrequires perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker, it should buildrequire perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) instead. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Perl#requiresandprovides There look to be a number of files ripe for inclusion in %doc, namely README, Change*, HACKING.dkim, scripts/, t/, etc, etc; why not include those in %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:12:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171612.l9HGCKRt008075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-10-17 12:12 EST ------- That's because the plugin is not jarred, there is two workaround available in the above draft, just choice one of them ;). FYI, plugin compiled using a feature.xml are automatically jarred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:20:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171620.l9HGK2PQ008149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-17 12:20 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:28:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171628.l9HGSold010791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Alias: perl-Digest-CRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-17 12:28 EST ------- cvs done. Julian: I assume you meant to set fedora-review to + in comment #2? If for some reason you didn't, let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:31:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171631.l9HGV9P7010690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-17 12:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:32:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171632.l9HGWZ0a010776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-17 12:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:34:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221669] Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171634.l9HGYGuC011609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Deluge - A Python BitTorrent client with support for UPnP and DHT Alias: deluge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-17 12:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:38:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171638.l9HGcf4f011772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-17 12:38 EST ------- thanks kevin btw, i just noticed compiz-bcop is only available @ devel branch , so i guess the F-7 branch is not needed ( sorry~ ).. am i just required to ignore it? .. or are there some procedure i need to follow to cleanup that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:41:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] New: Review Request: kreetingkard - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:43:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171643.l9HGhjis013328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |kreetingkard - |greeting card writing | |software for KDE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 12:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/kreetingkard/kreetingkard.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/kreetingkard/kreetingkard-0.7.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji rebuild result: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=200518 Description: KreetingKard is a tool for making Japanese greeting cards. It allows you to make greeting cards easily by choosing a template and changing the words. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:49:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171649.l9HGnADJ014142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 12:49 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * follow guidelines * free software license * match upstream 2214b0591ced40f27e00accdb8fa8f41 xgrav-1.2.0.tgz * use macros * files section right * build and works on devel APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 16:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171650.l9HGoHYb014605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 12:50 EST ------- You can just ignore F-7 branch then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:01:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171701.l9HH1Ba5015004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |336401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:01:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171701.l9HH1C7c015029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |336421 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:00:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] New: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/kreetingkard_templates/kreetingkard_templates.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/kreetingkard_templates/kreetingkard_templates-0.2.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji build result on dist-f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=200534 Description: KreetingKard is a tool for making Japanese greeting cards. It allows you to make greeting cards easily by choosing a template and changing the words. This package contains some template files for KreetingKard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171700.l9HH0DrM016042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-17 13:00 EST ------- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xgrav Short Description: A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles Owners: limb Branches: FC-6 F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:09:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171709.l9HH9War015884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-17 13:09 EST ------- What release note do you want to include and why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:12:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171712.l9HHC0ER016455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_note|fedora-cvs? |? | ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-17 13:11 EST ------- Oh, I guess you wanted to request CVS flag and not release note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:15:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171715.l9HHFARf016977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-17 13:15 EST ------- Yeah, sorry, finger failure. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171715.l9HHF9TW018510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171715.l9HHFCKY018555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 Bug 247408 depends on bug 247406, which changed state. Bug 247406 Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:22:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277921] Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171722.l9HHMWIb019528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277921 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 13:22 EST ------- Diff of spec file between 1 and 2 shows: ---------------------------------------------------------- %clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +# rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ---------------------------------------------------------- Please don't remove this line. Other things are okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (jgoogies-forms) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:24:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277931] Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171724.l9HHOo6N019790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277931 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 13:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Okay, I've addressed all of your comments. I emailed the developer last night > about the license of that one file and will update when I hear back, but I made > the rest of the changes. > > http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-looks.spec > http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-looks-2.1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm Well, I have not checked this spec/srpm, however if upstream doesn't to respond to you quickly, would you check if this package can be used without the file under issue? (I don't know how to use this package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 17:48:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171748.l9HHmOru023601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-17 13:48 EST ------- Here is the updated srpm with the spec file. SPEC: http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM: http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd-1.3.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 18:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171802.l9HI2Mar023761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 14:02 EST ------- For 0.3-2: * Redundant (Build)Requires: - "BuildRequires: mono-core" is not needed. mono-devel requires this - "Requires: gtk-sharp2" and "Requires: cairo" are also not needed. This package requires 'mono(gtk-sharp)' (please check by "rpm -q --requires gbrainy") and this dependency should pull these dependency. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 18:06:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171806.l9HI6NZf026610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-17 14:06 EST ------- Sorry, please replace with below: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 18:19:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171819.l9HIJpmc028633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Alias: perl-Digest-CRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2007-10-17 14:19 EST ------- Sure. I just haven't done a review for a while and forgot that step. Package is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 18:24:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171824.l9HIO5Zf029359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-17 14:24 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: sofia-sip New Branches: F-8 There's an update that I'd like to get into rawhide without messing up F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 18:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180299] Review Request: pitivi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171827.l9HIR81k030134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pitivi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180299 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-17 14:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pitivi New Branches: F-8 Would like to upgrade rawhide to new unstable version but be able to keep stable version in F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 18:31:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299171] Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171831.l9HIVWUn028295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299171 ------- Additional Comments From dsugar at tresys.com 2007-10-17 14:31 EST ------- Ok, I have updated the SRPM to include the .tar.gz file of the source. But I am still pulling the source directly from the SVN tree and I'm hoping this is ok. I'm doing it this way because the version number comes from stuff specified in eclipse and this make it so that the versions don't get out of sync between the rpm and the eclispe plugin. URLs list above are updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:06:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171906.l9HJ6LVn001203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-10-17 15:06 EST ------- oops that url should be: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-5.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:05:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171905.l9HJ5eNr004115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-10-17 15:05 EST ------- i thought .zip was close enough, but apparently not. :) installing as .jar does fix the problem. thanks for your patient advice! http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit.spec http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-4.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:16:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171916.l9HJGd0W002929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 cpebenito at tresys.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-17 15:16 EST ------- Committed, and build completed successfully. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=200716 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21498 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:38:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171938.l9HJcvVH008875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-17 15:38 EST ------- Hmm, couldn't we atleast have a version in Fedora for handling rar v2 files, because AFAIK unless some special options are checked, rar v3 still produces files compatible with rar v2, iow it never uses the new rar v3 algorithm's unless explicitly told too. I understand that the clamav rar implementation is a no go, but what about libunrar, if they got permission to release things unfer the GPLv2, then that should be in the clears, right? Then an unrar based of that without any of the clamav "fixes" should be fine too, right? Then we can also fix the name conflict be calling this unrarv2 both the package and the binary, and teach things which want to use it like mc to first try unrar and only if that is not present try unrarv2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:48:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171948.l9HJm1cp010799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-17 15:48 EST ------- Ok, I've done Parag and a few of my own cleanup to the spec, and I'll base the review on that cleaned up spec/srpm, which I'll attach below. rpmlint output: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/gnome-device-manager-*.i386.rpm gnome-device-manager-devel.i386: W: no-documentation gnome-device-manager-libs.i386: W: no-documentation Package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: followed license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: american english readability: excellent upstream sources: ok buildable: yes ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: handled properly shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a headers: ok static libs: n/a pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel package: ok libtool archives: ok directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171948.l9HJmdFx007744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-17 15:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=230341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=230341&action=view) good spec Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:48:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335641] Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171948.l9HJmtfQ007795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-device-manager - Graphical Device Manager Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335641 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:50:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171950.l9HJo4hK008199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-10-17 15:50 EST ------- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/bodhi-0.3.2-1.fc8.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/bodhi.spec ? Added COPYING file ? bodhi-server now installs to /usr/share/bodhi ? configuration lives in /etc/bodhi.cfg ? unittests are no longer included ? Requires: yum-utils >= 1.1.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 19:53:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710171953.l9HJrJgO008636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-17 15:53 EST ------- Yep. You could do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 20:00:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172000.l9HK033e013230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 16:00 EST ------- perl(NetAddr::IP) is automatically detected. You can remove most of the %description, and README.ltsp-config-dhcp What about putting etc/sysconfig/ltsp5 content in etc/ltsp.conf? Maybe call that file etc/ltsp5.conf? Also I suggest adding LTSP_SWAP_DIR= maybe depending on LTSP_DIR In ltsp-dhcpd-create you should not use .rpmsave. Also you should either %ghost %{sysconfdir}/ltsp-dhcpd.conf or, even better, something along %config(noreplace) %verify(not size mtime md5) %{sysconfdir}/ltsp-dhcpd.conf And in general, in the scripts I don't think that using .rpmsave is right. No init service should be enabled by default, since they are enabled by ltsp-initialize. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 20:19:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172019.l9HKJ3pg016007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-17 16:19 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 20:37:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172037.l9HKbghp015799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 16:37 EST ------- (in reply to comment #22) Note that thin-clients often long out-live the server. Newer versions of the software do not always work with the older clients. The way this has been historically dealt with was by allowing multiple versions of the LTSP software to be installed. /opt/ltsp4/, /opt/ltsp5/, /tftpboot/ltsp5/, etc. (in reply to comment #23 & friends) 192.168.0.254 is the upstream LTSP default. As noted in comment #25, the scripts will automagically change this if the network range is different. Yes, I'd love to see this re-written & a shiny gui wrapper added. But that is not my skill set, some else will get to do that enhancement. *cough* *cough* anyone want to maintain a shiny new package or two? (in reply to comment #28) agreed that the configs should consolidated into one file. I started working on that last night before I fizzled out. Working on it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 20:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247894] Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general linear hypotheses R Package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172059.l9HKxKNh018774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multcomp - Simultaneous inference for general linear hypotheses R Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247894 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-10-17 16:59 EST ------- Built (finally). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 21:08:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172108.l9HL892p020208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-10-17 17:08 EST ------- We have to patch every program that calls unrar which includes many graphical archive managers like file roller and ark? That doesn't sound like a good idea to me. If the stripped down version of unrar can still open majority of the rar files, I can continue with importing and maintaining this which I assume is basically sticking with the same version but we need to find a way to have both the free and the non-free versions co-exist without patching all the other programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 21:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172109.l9HL95Yg020348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 17:09 EST ------- Fixed README. Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-utils/ltsp-server-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-utils/ltsp-server-utils-0-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 21:37:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172137.l9HLbpja024975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-17 17:37 EST ------- This has been removed from the cvs repository for now. If you do come up with a plan to include only OSS pieces in Fedora, please make a new cvsadmin request to re-add the package. Rahul, could you add something to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems to explain the situation with this library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 21:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172144.l9HLi84H025717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2007-10-17 17:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/gbrainy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/gbrainy-0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Oct 17 2007 Jean-Fran?ois Martin 0.3-3 - BuildRequires and Requires corrections -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 21:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172157.l9HLvIRW030101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2007-10-17 17:57 EST ------- Give a wrong URL for the src.rpm, sorry. * SRPM URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/gbrainy-0.3-3.fc7.src.rpm According to the review guidelines, I must put here that if this package is accepted, it should marked as blocking of FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 to simplified the tracking of this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 22:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172211.l9HMB9p5029596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-10-17 18:11 EST ------- Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? :) I'd greatly appreciate a formal review of this. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 22:22:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172222.l9HMMO88001256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 18:22 EST ------- SPEC: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config/ltsp-server-config.spec SRPMS: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-config/ltsp-server-config-0-5.fc8.src.rpm I believe I have all of the changes applied. Now off to do functional testing. If you are going to test these, note this bug that wtogami found today: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 22:27:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172227.l9HMRDA7001896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-17 18:27 EST ------- Formal review follows. MUST items: - rpmlint not silent - is it necessary to place libqca.prl in /usr/lib? + package meets naming and packaging guidelines + specfile is properly named + package meets Packaging/Guidelines + package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + spec file written in American English + spec file legible + sources match the upstream source 7e90a314fc12beb1ba6bdbbfb007d0b4 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qca-2.0.0-beta7.tar.bz2 + package builds file (powerpc) + all build dependencies listed in BuildRequires + package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun + package owns all created directories + package not contains any duplicate files in the %files listing. + permissions on files sets properly + package has a %clean section + package uses macros consistently + package contains code or permissable content + header files are in a -devel package + package contains no static libs + package does not contain any .la libtool archives + not a GUI app + all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8 Please resolve or explain issue with rpmlint - that's a last stop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 17 23:14:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710172314.l9HNEPTd004795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 19:14 EST ------- The services are all enabled, they shouldn't: iptables-ltsp ltspfs-insecure ltsp-dhcpd ltsp-swapfile-delete For iptables, please contact the maintainer and direct him to that report. usr/share/ltsp5/config/ltsp-dhcpd.conf is executable, it shouldn't. in ltsp-dhcpd-create why cat and not cp? ltsp-dhcpd.conf reappeared in etc/ the following directories are unowned: /tftpboot/ltsp5/pxe/pxelinux.cfg /tftpboot/ltsp5/pxe/ instead of the install for pxelinux.0, I suggest a ln -s, such that the new file is used upon syslinux update. Using /opt or /var/opt in the default case seems wrong to me. these directories should not be touched by the rpm, even indirectly. In my opinion putting in /var/lib would be better. (in /var/lib/ltsp5/swapfiles and /var/lib/ltsp5/i385...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:11:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180299] Review Request: pitivi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180011.l9I0B625015407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pitivi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180299 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-17 20:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:12:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222475] Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180012.l9I0CKJ2015463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sofia-sip - Sofia SIP User-Agent library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222475 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-17 20:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:11:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180011.l9I0B37T015256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-17 20:11 EST ------- > If the stripped down version of unrar can still open majority of the rar > files The problem is, it can't. :-( The only reason this version of unrar can decompress most RAR files is that very RARv3 code which has the licensing issues. Most RAR archives these days are v3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:18:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180018.l9I0Ihn3016252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-17 20:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:17:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180017.l9I0HTEB016193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 20:17 EST ------- (in reply to comment #31) At least iptables-ltsp (until an alternative is implemented) and ltsp-dhcpd need to be started by default if the server is configured to boot thin clients. I'll contact the iptables maintainer usr/share/ltsp5/config/ltsp-dhcpd.conf fixed. I changed ltsp-dhcpd-create to cat because I was going to make it a template and run it through sed (i.e. cat ltsp-dhcpd.conf.template | sed s/IP/$IP/ > /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf), but got side-tracked fixing other bugs. I added an empty file in etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf because %{ghost} & friends were complaining that the file did not exist. I need to read up on the docs on that one, I'm obviously doing something wrong. /tftpboot/ltps5/pxe fixed. tftpd chroots into /tftpboot/, a symlink will not work. Jim McQuillian @ LTSP contacted the LSB long ago asking for assistance on where to place the ltsp root. They settled on /opt/. I just checked and both Ubuntu and Debian are currently using /opt/ for their ltsp5 implementations. I didn't see where they are putting the swap files. I'll get to that shortly. That said, I'm not particularly attached to /opt/, but it is nice to be consistent with everyone else. I just pushed out an update with a bunch of scripting fixes. I'll push out all of the above changes here shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180021.l9I0LQAn013730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 20:21 EST ------- Maybe this should be merged in the ltsp-server-config package? There are once again config which is common with the other package, I think that it should be common. where is ltsp-client? I think that there should be support for all architectures right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180022.l9I0MISW013799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 20:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > (in reply to comment #31) > > At least iptables-ltsp (until an alternative is implemented) and ltsp-dhcpd need > to be started by default if the server is configured to boot thin clients. But they will once the script has been run. They really shouldn't be started at install time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:26:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180026.l9I0QcIT014421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 20:26 EST ------- I originally had ltsp-server-config & ltsp-server-utils in a single ltsp-server package. I thought it would be easier for people to get their heads around them if they were spit into to different packages. I'm game for merging them back into one. I'll open a review for ltsp-client - I have not cleaned that one up at all yet. Warren was looking at it, I'll ping him to see if he has done any of the grunt work yet. As for ltsp-server-utils, here is a bug fix, /etc/sysconfig/ltsp-build-client pointed to the wrong kickstart file Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-utils/ltsp-server-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server-utils/ltsp-server-utils-0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:24:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180024.l9I0OcWb016959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-17 20:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > (in reply to comment #31) > > I changed ltsp-dhcpd-create to cat because I was going to make it a template and > run it through sed (i.e. cat ltsp-dhcpd.conf.template | sed s/IP/$IP/ > > /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf), but got side-tracked fixing other bugs. Ok, you can leave the cat. > tftpd chroots into /tftpboot/, a symlink will not work. Right. This deserves a comment in the spec file. > Jim McQuillian @ LTSP contacted the LSB long ago asking for assistance on where > to place the ltsp root. They settled on /opt/. I just checked and both Ubuntu > and Debian are currently using /opt/ for their ltsp5 implementations. I didn't > see where they are putting the swap files. I'll get to that shortly. That said, > I'm not particularly attached to /opt/, but it is nice to be consistent with > everyone else. I am not sure about that. I'll send a mail tomorrow to the packaging list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 00:38:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336911] New: Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336911 Summary: Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-client/ltsp-client.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-client/ltsp-client-0.0.0-19.k12ltsp.f8.src.rpm Description: Linux Terminal Server Project client programs NOTE: this package has not seem much love yet. It has been known to build & work. It is required to test https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 & https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 01:20:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180120.l9I1KMZd023781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 21:20 EST ------- ltsp-client: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336911 Here is what the merged ltsp-server-utils & ltsp-server-config looks like (it builds, but is untested): Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server/ltsp-server.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server/ltsp-server-0-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 01:44:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180144.l9I1ig9b026411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-17 21:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > (in reply to comment #31) > > But they will once the script has been run. They really shouldn't > be started at install time. I have the dreadful feeling that I'm missing something ;-) I just looked over this several times, and I don't see where they are being started at install time. The only place that /sbin/service or /sbin/chkconfig appears is ./usr/share/ltsp5/scripts.d/17-enable-services, which is executed by /usr/sbin/ltsp-initialize -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 01:48:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180148.l9I1mcmR024407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-17 21:48 EST ------- bug 247406 closed today's update: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:12:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180212.l9I2CZWX027514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:29:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319031] Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180229.l9I2TLIR032495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nget - Command line NNTP file grabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319031 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-17 22:29 EST ------- nget-0.27.1-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:27:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180227.l9I2RuX7032293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-17 22:27 EST ------- today's update http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/ccsm/ccsm-0.6.0-0.2.20071018gita7fa7d.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:30:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180230.l9I2U9II030359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.0.14-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:30:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 327351] Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180230.l9I2U7xw000669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsa - Python binding for the ALSA library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327351 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-17 22:30 EST ------- python-alsa-1.0.14-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:29:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180229.l9I2TnF7032710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Alias: perl-Digest-CRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-17 22:29 EST ------- perl-Digest-CRC-0.10-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:30:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330311] Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180230.l9I2UXln000705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Alias: perl-Class-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330311 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-17 22:30 EST ------- perl-Class-Date-1.1.9-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334331] Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180229.l9I2TpFt032739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-CRC - Generic CRC functions Alias: perl-Digest-CRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334331 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.10-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 02:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330311] Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180245.l9I2jlvR000420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Date - Class for easy date and time manipulation Alias: perl-Class-Date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330311 osspkg at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 03:42:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180342.l9I3g9Pn008846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-17 23:42 EST ------- I really don't see any use of installing desktop file twice. I guess there is no use of installing desktop file /usr/share/phasex/phasex.desktop I suggest following patch which will remove extras source1 --- phasex.spec 2007-10-18 09:00:26.000000000 +0530 +++ phasex-modified.spec 2007-10-18 08:59:56.000000000 +0530 @@ -2,14 +2,13 @@ Name: phasex Version: 0.11.1 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} Summary: PHASEX -- Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment Group: Applications/Multimedia License: GPLv2 URL: http://sysex.net/phasex/ Source0: http://sysex.net/phasex/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -Source1: %{name}.desktop BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: glibc-devel >= 2.3.0 @@ -56,7 +55,10 @@ desktop-file-install --vendor %{desktop_vendor} \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ `for c in ${BASE} ${XTRA} ; do echo "--add-category $c " ; done` \ - %{SOURCE1} + $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/phasex/%{name}.desktop + +rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/phasex/phasex.desktop + %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : @@ -87,7 +89,6 @@ %{_datadir}/phasex/pixmaps/* %{_datadir}/phasex/sys-midimaps/* %{_datadir}/phasex/sys-patches/* -%{_datadir}/phasex/phasex.desktop %{_datadir}/applications/%{desktop_vendor}-phasex.desktop %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/phasex-icon.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 04:29:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180429.l9I4T8Qb017416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-18 00:29 EST ------- Please branch for EL-4, EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 04:53:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317851] Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180453.l9I4rsSx018233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lklug-fonts - Font package for Sinhala (si_LK) language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317851 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 05:14:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180514.l9I5E1eB023329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|s.adam at diffingo.com |ivazqueznet at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 05:47:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180547.l9I5lALt026261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 01:47 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but not for RPM. python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/apps/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/spreadsheet/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/docs/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/base/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/atom/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/docs/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/atom/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/calendar/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/spreadsheet/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/service.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/test_data.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/apps/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/base/__init__.py 0644 python-gdata.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gdata/calendar/service.py 0644 ==> But these looks false messages. Ignored. + source files match upstream. b6f6aa192446047d8045d3c30345f1ef gdata.py-1.0.8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. SHOULD: Remove CFLAGS as this is python package and no compilations is happening that needs CFLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 05:52:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180552.l9I5qVcg027205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 01:52 EST ------- Kushal, Can you update package if you are feeling ok now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 05:54:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180554.l9I5s0xe029780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 01:53 EST ------- can you please give updates SPEC so that I will finish this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 06:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180606.l9I66F7e031785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 02:06 EST ------- rpmlint gave me -------------------------------------------------------------------------- system-config-language.noarch: W: no-documentation system-config-language.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/firstboot/modules/language.py /usr/share/system-config-language/language_gui.py system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/gui_install.py system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/gui_progress.py system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/gui_detailsDialog.py system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/tui_install.py system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/language_tui.py system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/locale-list system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/gui_errors.py system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/lang_dict.py system-config-language.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.12 1.2.12-1.fc8 system-config-language.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-language.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-language system-config-language.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided locale_config system-config-language.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/system-config-language system-config-language.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-language system-config-language.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-language system-config-language.src:21: W: prereq-use gtk2 >= 2.6 system-config-language.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes locale_config system-config-language.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install system-config-language.src: W: invalid-license GPL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- also, 1) update buildroot tag as given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 2) packaging guidelines suggests use of make as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 3) missing buildroot cleanup in %install. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-6c809b2e945ca78ae25d040f250be60f73181ef0 4) any reason for not using macros in %files section 5) Any reason for commenting %doc COPYING? 6) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 06:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180621.l9I6LrEd003115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-18 02:21 EST ------- Well now gbrainy itself is okay. So I will wait for - your pre-review of other persons' review requests - or your another review request as I wrote as comment 4. (In reply to comment #6) > According to the review guidelines, I must put here that if this package is > accepted, it should marked as blocking of FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 to simplified the > tracking of this issue. Well, you have to create a new bug which tells that gbrainy does not support ppc64 and make the bug block bug 238953 after this review is accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 06:31:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180631.l9I6V0P3004285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-10-18 02:30 EST ------- lizhang is now the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 06:40:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180640.l9I6e3HE006106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-10-18 02:40 EST ------- Thank you for review. P.S. koji logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=201599 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 06:57:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180657.l9I6vlGd008505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: desktop-file-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 06:57:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180657.l9I6v457008477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: desktop-file-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 02:57 EST ------- 1) packaging guidelines suggests use of make as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 2) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) 3) Do you want to solve following rpmlint messages? desktop-file-utils.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided desktop-file-validator desktop-file-utils.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes desktop-file-validator 4) I saw new upstream release. you will like to update source. Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 07:43:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180743.l9I7hbKf011069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-18 03:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > > If the stripped down version of unrar can still open majority of the rar > > files > > The problem is, it can't. :-( > > The only reason this version of unrar can decompress most RAR files is that > very RARv3 code which has the licensing issues. Most RAR archives these days > are v3. Hmm, Has anyone actually tested this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 07:52:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180752.l9I7qua9012572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 03:52 EST ------- They have lines like: # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # chkconfig: 2345 98 92 rpmlint warns about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 07:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180757.l9I7vG4d016617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 03:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Jim McQuillian @ LTSP contacted the LSB long ago asking for assistance on where > to place the ltsp root. They settled on /opt/. I just checked and both Ubuntu > and Debian are currently using /opt/ for their ltsp5 implementations. Do you have an url (or maybe you kept the mail privately)? I tried hard but didn't find the response of the lsb/fhs... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:07:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180807.l9I873LC015683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-18 04:07 EST ------- The new file has been uploaded: There are the new SPEC http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets.spec SRPM http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-tkWidgets/R-tkWidgets-1.16.0-1.fc6.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:04:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337361] New: Review Request: paperkey - An OpenPGP key archiver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337361 Summary: Review Request: paperkey - An OpenPGP key archiver Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tmz at pobox.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pending/paperkey/paperkey.spec SRPM URL: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pending/paperkey/paperkey-0.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A reasonable way to achieve a long term backup of OpenPGP (GnuPG, PGP, etc) keys is to print them out on paper. The reasoning behind this is that paper and ink has amazingly long retention qualities - far longer than the magnetic or optical means that are generally used to back up computer data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:09:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337361] Review Request: paperkey - An OpenPGP key archiver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180809.l9I89jSx018858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paperkey - An OpenPGP key archiver Alias: paperkey-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337361 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |163776 nThis| | Alias| |paperkey-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:14:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336911] Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180814.l9I8ECq9016587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336911 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 04:14 EST ------- lbuscd should be packaged separatly, especially since the server side seems to need it too, and at the latest version. Same for pci_scan. And maybe for lbe, but a proper source is missing for lbe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:28:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180828.l9I8SiqA019101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-10-18 04:28 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-gdata Short Description: A Python module for accessing online Google services Owners: hadess Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:31:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180831.l9I8VHvf019752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-utils - LTSP5 server-side utilities for thin-client chroots/boot images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 04:31 EST ------- Timestamps on README should be kept, with cp -p %{SOURCE1} . in %install, sysconfdir should be treated like other dirs (my bad), (and same for var): mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} cp -a etc/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} Still unowned directories /tftpboot/ltsp5/pxe/ /var/opt/ltsp5/ Requires on /sbin/restorecon missing. Both ltsp-update-kernels and ltsp-build-client should be arranged to be able to build more than one arch (maybe by being wrapped in another script). It seems to me that ltsp-initialize should call ltsp-build-client and ltsp-update-kernels. A dot at the end of the %description is missing. Also the pxelinux.0 should have a -p and a comment explaining why it is not possible to have a link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:36:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336911] Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180836.l9I8aSHC020569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336911 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:34:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180834.l9I8Yftj020004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 04:34 EST ------- Now that there is a central configuration for ltsp5, I think that that package should use it too. It means that the config file won't be there is ltsp-server isn't installed, but this should never happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:38:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180838.l9I8cj2N023672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ltsp-server-|Review Request: ltsp-server |utils - LTSP5 server-side |- LTSP5 server-side |utilities for thin-client |configurations and setup |chroots/boot images |scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:41:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180841.l9I8f070024297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 04:40 EST ------- Warren, maybe you could unset the review flag? It will be a bit confusing, otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:40:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180840.l9I8e7gB024202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 04:40 EST ------- *** Bug 330921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:40:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330921] Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180840.l9I8e6Ak024168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-config-dhcp - DHCP configuration files for LTSP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330921 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 04:40 EST ------- Closing this bug as a duplicate since it is now merged in ltsp-server. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 331651 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:45:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180845.l9I8jus3022251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |system-config-nfs-1.3.32- | |1.fc8 Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 04:45 EST ------- Closing this review as Approved package is already built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:48:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180848.l9I8m9u4022461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |system-config-services- | |0.9.17-1.fc8 Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 04:48 EST ------- Closing this review as Approved package is already built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:45:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226472] Merge Review: system-config-users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180845.l9I8jIng022194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226472 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |system-config-users-1.2.72- | |1.fc8 Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 04:45 EST ------- Closing this review as Approved package is already built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180847.l9I8lmdv025310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |system-config-samba-1.2.58- | |1.fc8 Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 04:47 EST ------- Closing this review as Approved package is already built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 08:50:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 04:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226360] Merge Review: readahead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180850.l9I8owZV023152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readahead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226360 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |readahead-1.4.2-2.fc8 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 09:01:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180901.l9I919uI024744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 05:01 EST ------- Shouldn't vnc-ltsp-config also be merged in this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 09:04:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180904.l9I94kJ3024972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 05:04 EST ------- You should %ghost %{_sysconfdir}/ltsp-dhcpd.conf (I am not sure that it is right, but I guess so). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 09:13:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180913.l9I9DTeH029641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 05:13 EST ------- /usr/share/ltsp5/config/ltsp-dhcpd.conf is still executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 09:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 05:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710180910.l9I9AUq5029331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-18 05:10 EST ------- X. Could not rebuild the srpm on a system without TurboGear installed (used by setup.py) so TurboGear should be a BuildRequires. X. Rpmlint is not silent rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-server-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch.rpm TurboGearrpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-server-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch.rpm [tim at localhost ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-server-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch.rpm bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bodhi/bodhi/tools/dev_init.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bodhi/bodhi/tools/test-bodhi.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bodhi/bodhi/tools/pickledb.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bodhi/bodhi/tools/bodhi-client.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bodhi/bodhi/tools/init.py 0644 can be fixed by adding chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/%{name}/bodhi/tools/*.py to %install * rpmlint silent on SRPM & bodhi-client. If these issues are fixed, i will approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 11:55:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181155.l9IBtcKm018693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-18 07:55 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] New: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-channel-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-channel-symfony-1.0.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package adds the symfony channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:11:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337801] Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181211.l9ICBoQR020924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |337791 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:11:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181211.l9ICBoEp020948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |337801 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:11:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337801] New: Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337801 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-pake.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-pake-1.1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: pake is a PHP5 project build system with capabilities similar to make. pake has the following features: - pakefiles (pake?s version of Makefiles) are completely defined in standard PHP5 syntax. No XML files to edit. No quirky Makefile syntax to worry about (is that a tab or a space?) - users can specify tasks with prerequisites - pake is lightweight. It can be distributed with other projects as a single file. Projects that depend upon pake do not require that pake be installed on target systems pake is heavily based on rake, a similar system for ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:29:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181229.l9ICTUYF023172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-10-18 08:29 EST ------- I got this message this morning, which doesn't make sense to me: setools has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc64: setools-libs - 3.3.1-6.fc8.ppc64 requires libstdc++.so.6 Please resolve this as soon as possible. It does have c++, so this dependency makes sense. I don't see how the build could have succeeded if libstdc++ didn't exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:39:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181239.l9ICdFwh024533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-18 08:39 EST ------- Well, although F8 freeze has already come, I hope ccsm (and then also this package) can be included before F8 is released. My comments for 0.6.0-0.2.XXXXXX * Seemingly too long name - rpmlint complains that the name of binary rpms are too long. -------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint *rpm compizconfig-python.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.0-2.20071018git0e80b1 0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8 compizconfig-python-debuginfo.i386: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet compizconfig-python-debuginfo-0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8.i386.rpm compizconfig-python-devel.i386: W: no-documentation compizconfig-python-devel.i386: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet compizconfig-python-devel-0.6.0-0.2.20071018git0e80b1.fc8.i386.rpm $ rpmlint -I filename-too-long-for-joliet filename-too-long-for-joliet : This filename is too long to fit on a joliet filesystem (limit is 64 unicode chars). -------------------------------------------------------------- Please consider to shorten the rpms' name. * .pc file - Is this .pc file (and then -devel subpackage) really needed? * -devel package does not contain any libraries or header files * This file does not seem to be used to rebuild ccsm. ! COPYING - Well, the source codes are actually under LGPLv2+, however COPYING file is GPL. The license tag can be LGPLv2+, however please ask the developer to change COPYING file (this is not a blocker). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:48:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181248.l9ICmS8t028380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-18 08:48 EST ------- This message means - that some libraries in setools-libs.ppc64 is linked with libstdc++.so.6 (i.e. 32bit libstdc++.so.6), not libstdc++.so.6()(64bit). - i.e. _perhaps_ some 32bit rpms got mixed when rebuilding setools on ppc64 It is very strange that this error does not seem to have occurred on x86_64 build. This may mean some mistakes in some other rpms, or yum's fault, or koji's fault, or something else. You may want to ask for rel-eng team about what is happening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:52:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181252.l9ICqSaQ026619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-18 08:52 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-propel.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-propel-1.2.1-5.fc7.src.rpm Changes: - made runtime subpackage the main package instead - fixed package ownerships - fixed template script execution permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 12:57:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181257.l9ICvBO9027426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-18 08:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I really don't see any use of installing desktop file twice. I guess there is > no use of installing desktop file /usr/share/phasex/phasex.desktop Thanks. Here are the new files... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/phasex.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/Fedora/phasex-0.11.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 13:02:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181302.l9ID2PlI030967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2007-10-18 09:02 EST ------- Do you also plan to add the desktop specific backends like gconf? That seems like it would make the most sense since default compiz uses gconf under gnome at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 13:28:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337801] Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181328.l9IDSWPH000650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |266941 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 13:28:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181328.l9IDSXO9000675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |337801 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 14:17:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181417.l9IEH70B010157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-18 10:17 EST ------- It was in August 2001. Most of the LSB/FHS list archives for 2001 appear to be missing. Maybe jam at ltsp.org still has the lsb/hfs response. Here is part of the discussion: http://www.redhat.com/archives/k12ltsp-list/2001-August/msg00003.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 14:28:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181428.l9IESPBk009873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-18 10:28 EST ------- // * .pc file - Is this .pc file (and then -devel subpackage) really needed? * -devel package does not contain any libraries or header files * This file does not seem to be used to rebuild ccsm. // ure right, the .pc file is not needed anymore (it was needed by the configure script before, thats where that BuildDep came from) so, should I merge this file with the main package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 14:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181431.l9IEVX4s012672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-18 10:31 EST ------- Spec is broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 14:51:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181451.l9IEpKc1016588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-18 10:51 EST ------- Simply removing .pc file is better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 14:50:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181450.l9IEorDO016388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-18 10:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > Spec is broken. Actually... Chris, please fix this line (I should have noticed this mistake during review, argh...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 43 Group: System Environment/Libraries 44 Requires: libselinux >= %{selinux_ver} libsepol >= %{sepol_ver} sqlite >= %{sqlite_ver} libstdc++.so.6 45 BuildRequires: flex bison pkgconfig ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The line 44 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 15:02:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181502.l9IF2KYw016096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-18 11:02 EST ------- the .pc file might be used by some other softwares to detect the existence of compizconfig-python .. (like what ccsm done before) .. hurm .. so, just ignore that for now and add later in case somebody filed a bug?? .. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 15:03:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181503.l9IF3Hu8016258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-18 11:03 EST ------- s/"in case"/"after"/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 15:10:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181510.l9IFASWc019791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-18 11:10 EST ------- IMO if some package needs compizconfig-python, then the package should check by python -c "import compizconfig" for example, not by this useless .pc file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 15:47:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181547.l9IFljbS024713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-18 11:47 EST ------- I found that one. I'll contact Jim directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 16:02:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181602.l9IG2eWj027402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-10-18 12:02 EST ------- I needed ccsm today and recompiled the srpm; worked fine, but it seems the BR on intltool is superfluous (intltool is needed, but included) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 16:33:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336911] Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181633.l9IGXVSE032542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336911 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-18 12:33 EST ------- Upstream said that lbussd is no longer used. Does this mean we don't need lbuscd as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 16:35:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181635.l9IGZtEw002924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-10-18 12:35 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: blitz New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: rmyers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 16:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338341] New: laptop-mode-tools please Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338341 Summary: laptop-mode-tools please Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://samwel.tk/laptop_mode/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cje at btinternet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com can we have laptop-mode-tools in the main fedora repo please? they provide a fedora rpm spec file and it's previously been packaged by DAG repos. i'm testing it (the latest, non-DAG one) on F8T3 on a few laptops and a couple of desktops. all good so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 16:49:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/epia/F7/SPECS/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/epia/F7/SRPMS/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.900-6.fc7.src.rpm Description: Driver for VIA IGPs including CLE266, KM400, KN400, KM400A, P4M800, CN400, PM800, PN800, PM880, K8M800, CN700, VM800, P4M800Pro, CX700, P4M890, K8M890, P4M900 and VN896 with support for hardware MPEG2 acceleration for most of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 16:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181650.l9IGoqvT005492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xorg-x11- |Review Request: xorg-x11- |drv-openchrome - Driver for |drv-openchrome - Driver for |VIA IGPs |VIA IGPs ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2007-10-18 12:50 EST ------- Sorry, I forgot to mention this is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 16:55:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181655.l9IGtGfh006447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-18 12:55 EST ------- How do you intend to handle any potential conflicts with xorg-x11-drv-via? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 17:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181708.l9IH8FJo008505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2007-10-18 13:08 EST ------- It doesn't conflict with xorg-x11-drv-via and can be installed in parallel. The driver name is openchrome, so switching from one driver to the other is just a matter of changing the driver name in xorg.conf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 17:11:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181711.l9IHBkFH009167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-10-18 13:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > How do you intend to handle any potential conflicts with xorg-x11-drv-via? Also, there shouldn't be conflicts, because the via driver should go away. It's unmaintained and terrible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 17:32:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181732.l9IHW2Ei012645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-10-18 13:32 EST ------- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/bodhi-0.3.2-2.fc8.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/bodhi.spec * Thu Oct 18 2007 Luke Macken - 0.3.2-2 - Add TurboGears to BuildRequires - Make some scripts executable to silence rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 17:47:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181747.l9IHl97I015443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-18 13:47 EST ------- The qt4-devel package also places a few .prl files in /usr/lib. Since qca2 is a qt4 extension, and that's what the make install does, I just followed the standard here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 19:08:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181908.l9IJ8w5r028808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-18 15:08 EST ------- Moving stuff around in %check breaks rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit builds. I don't agree with shipping test suite code in docs without a good, per-package, documented reason - that has been discussed in other bugs already so I have no interest in discussing it again but will just leave rest of the review in case someone who doesn't consider it a blocker appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 19:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181930.l9IJUf1Q032278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-18 15:30 EST ------- Ok, I understand. The package is APPROVED. I'll review qca-ossl asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 19:43:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338681] New: Review Request: eboard - ICS chess board interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338681 Summary: Review Request: eboard - ICS chess board interface Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jorton at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/eboard/eboard.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/eboard/eboard-1.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: eboard Internet chess board interface -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 19:56:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710181956.l9IJuGRM004189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-18 15:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qca2 Short Description: Qt Cryptographic Architecture Owners: abompard Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 20:09:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710182009.l9IK9hcQ006316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-18 16:09 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hedgewars New Branches: F-8 Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 21:08:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710182108.l9IL83db015910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-10-18 17:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > OK, I have finally understood your comment 14 point 5, but the question is > whether we should do this at all? Do we have to have one unified .mo file in > %{_datadir} or is the current scattered solution good enough? (something about > "Don't fix it when it works.") IMHO, it needs to be done. The developer docs also seem pretty clear on using %find_lang to process the translations. If you don't use %find_lang, any new translations added to the package will not be automatically added. If you wish, solicit opinions on the -devel mailing list and let's get some input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 21:11:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710182111.l9ILBXPt016111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 bjohnson at symetrix.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(bjohnson at symetrix.| |com) | ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com 2007-10-18 17:11 EST ------- I just moved, and all my computer -devel equipment is still packed away. I'll also be out of the country in two days. I expect to either resume work on this package or drop it completely when I get back and get unpacked (approx 3 weeks). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 21:14:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710182114.l9ILEOIZ016746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gridengine -|Review Request: gridengine - |Sun Grid Engine - |Grid Engine - Distributed |Distributed Computing |Computing Management |Management software |software ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-10-18 17:14 EST ------- * Thu Oct 18 2007 - Orion Poplawski - 6.1u2-2 - Cleanup arch handling - Install qevent http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine-6.1u2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 23:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710182308.l9IN867Q000605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-18 19:08 EST ------- Ok, done http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-python/compizconfig-python-0.6.0-0.3.20071018git.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 23:05:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710182305.l9IN5b3i000523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 18 23:10:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710182310.l9INA9Fk000605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2007-10-18 19:10 EST ------- This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 00:07:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190007.l9J076hW008167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 ------- Additional Comments From andy.southgate at mushware.com 2007-10-18 20:07 EST ------- Here are the updated .spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.mushware.com/files/adanaxisgpl-1.2.3-1.fc7.spec SRPM URL: http://www.mushware.com/files/adanaxisgpl-1.2.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 01:12:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190112.l9J1C6Rp016553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-18 21:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I needed ccsm today and recompiled the srpm; worked fine, but it seems the BR on > intltool is superfluous (intltool is needed, but included) I have removed the unnecessary buildreqs .. http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/ccsm/ccsm-0.6.0-0.3.20071018gita7fa7d.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > Do you also plan to add the desktop specific backends like gconf? That seems > like it would make the most sense since default compiz uses gconf under gnome at > least. bug 339021 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 01:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] New: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-backend-gconf/compizconfig-backend-gconf.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-backend-gconf/compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.6.0-0.1.20071019git.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Fusion Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity through plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains the Gconf backend for libcompizconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 01:43:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190143.l9J1hFPl019879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-10-18 21:43 EST ------- Functionality wise, it seems to work for 2D and some 3D. Still crashes the X server if you try and enable compiz, much like via. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 03:07:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190307.l9J37GZZ001740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 23:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. 27109ee65fe21bac1530518b436aa8b3 phasex-0.11.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + Desktop files installed correctly. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets used. + Package phasex-0.11.1-3.fc8 -> Requires: alsa-lib >= 0.9.0 glibc >= 2.3.0 gtk2 >= 2.4.0 jack-audio-connection-kit >= 0.99.0 libX11.so.6 libasound.so.2 libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libjack.so.0 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.3) librt.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 03:42:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226361] Merge Review: readline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190342.l9J3gY9h006040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226361 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-18 23:42 EST ------- 1)rpmlint complained on RPM readline-devel.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/readline-devel-5.2/rl-fgets.c The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). 2) defattr usage should be defattr(-,root,root,-) 3) Good to follow Texinfo scriptlet given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-47896da5fb2662d75deefeb9ba75145a398515db 4) Do we need static package here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 03:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190345.l9J3jXDW006585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-18 23:45 EST ------- http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server/ltsp-server.spec SRPMS: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server/ltsp-server-0-8.fc8.src.rpm - make a LTSP_VERSION variable in the shell scripts - move swap files from /var/opt/ltsp5/ to /var/lib/ltsp5/ - remove Default-Start entries from etc/init.d/* - use TMP rather than TEMPDIR - make sure that /etc/exports has '/opt/ltsp5 *(ro,async)', then we do not have to worry about the network or the client arch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 04:16:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190416.l9J4G0jH011854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-19 00:15 EST ------- - fix LTSP_SWAP_DIR path http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server/ltsp-server.spec SRPMS: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server/ltsp-server-0-9.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 04:25:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190425.l9J4PHBb012855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-19 00:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd.spec SPRM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd-0-0.3.20071016cvs.fc8.src.rpm - source /etc/ltsp5.conf to find swap directory - require /etc/ltsp5.conf - move /var/opt/ltsp5 to /var/lib/ltsp5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 04:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190429.l9J4TFQN013393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 ------- Additional Comments From sds at gnu.org 2007-10-19 00:29 EST ------- gdbm is a small and useful package and I really see no reason not to offer it. GNU CLISP 2.42 just added an interface to gdbm. is there a way to vote for gdbm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 05:14:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190514.l9J5EMqm019907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-19 01:14 EST ------- Looks good. * rpmlint silent APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 05:47:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190547.l9J5l444024506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 01:47 EST ------- Okay to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 05:46:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190546.l9J5kPBY024467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-19 01:46 EST ------- MUSTFIX: * Hard-coded /usr/lib in %files Use %{_libdir} instead, otherwise your package will not build on multilib'ed platforms. * Package installs autoheader (config.h) You must not install autoheaders. autoheaders are not designed to be installed. This package's config.h (correctly) is only being used locally and not being used by public headers, so simply taking it out of *_HEADERS in your Makefile.am would fix this issue. * rpmlint libvpd-debuginfo-1.3.5-2.fc7.i386.rpm libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/logger.cpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/libvpd-1/component.hpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/vpddbenv.cpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/dataitem.cpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/vpdretriever.cpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/libvpd-1/vpddbenv.hpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/libvpd-1/vpdretriever.hpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/component.cpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/libvpd-1/dataitem.hpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/libvpd-1/logger.hpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/vpdexception.cpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/libvpd-1/lsvpd.hpp libvpd-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libvpd-1.3.5/src/libvpd-1/vpdexception.hpp The permissions on these files are bogus. chmod -x them. * rpmlint libvpd-1.3.5-2.fc7.i386.rpm libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/Source.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/component.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/system.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/vpdretriever.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/dataitem.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/lsvpd.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/debug.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/vpdexception.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/lsvpd_error_codes.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/config.h libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/logger.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/vpddbenv.hpp libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libvpd_cxx.so libvpd.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/libvpd-1/helper_functions.hpp Please split this package into a *-devel subpackage (libvpd-devel) and a run time package (libvpd) * rpmlint libvpd-1.3.5-2.fc7.i386.rpm libvpd.i386: E: no-changelogname-tag Please add changelog entries. * rpmlint libvpd-1.3.5-2.fc7.i386.rpm libvpd.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL Fedora wants you to use LGPLv2+ (Your package is licensed LGPL 2.1 or any later) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 07:59:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190759.l9J7xdS7009366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2007-10-19 03:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Functionality wise, it seems to work for 2D and some 3D. Still crashes the X > server if you try and enable compiz, much like via. Yup, but this is not a bug in openchrome driver, it's mesa that is at fault here. The unichrome DRI is known to be buggy, especially on K8M800. Mileage will vary depending on the chipset. It's not that bad at least with CLE266 and KM400A. I don't own any of the other chipsets, so I can't really comment for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 08:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 04:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190856.l9J8udcC019566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 04:56 EST ------- For 1.2.3-1: * Source tarball - Tarball in your srpm does not match the tarball downloaded from upstream: ------------------------------------------------------- 20015891 2007-10-19 08:24 adanaxisgpl-1.2.3-1.fc7/adanaxisgpl-1.2.3.tar.gz 20015932 2007-10-19 09:32 adanaxisgpl-1.2.3.tar.gz 4a199ac0da9468d6b622af53d2189015 adanaxisgpl-1.2.3-1.fc7/adanaxisgpl-1.2.3.tar.gz 2a0b49cb7c2b13b6272420983279288f adanaxisgpl-1.2.3.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------- * Redundant BuildRequires - Still some BuildRequires are redundant. autoconf, automake - Please explain why these are needed. This spec file does not call autoconf or automake. binutils <- gcc requires this glibc-devel <- gcc requires this libGLU-devel <- freeglut-devel requires this SDL-devel <- SDL_mixer-devel requires this * Timestamp - To keep timestamps, please use the following -------------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" CPPROG="cp -p" install -------------------------------------------------------- For recent Makefiles, adding 'INSTALL="install -p"' will usually save timestamps on installed files. However as this Makefile uses install-sh, 'CPPROG="cp -p"' is also needed. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 09:08:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190908.l9J98gBH021335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-19 05:08 EST ------- Jim answered me and I sent a mail on the devel list. There are comments in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 that are still not taken into account... Regarding the %ghost, I think that it is wrong to just have it %ghost, since if it was modified by the user it should be kept upon removing the package, with .rpmsave. So at least it should be %config(noreplace). Just a suggestion, but I find %changelogs much more readable with an empty line between each date. Also ltsp-server.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9 0-9.fc8 rpmlint finds some issues in init scripts: ltsp-server.noarch: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ltsp-swapfile-delete ltsp-server.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ltsp-swapfile-delete ltsp-server.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ltsp-swapfile-delete Also you should add scriptlets as in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-a6d7a1ed9d77dbb8d4af067378a79b838aebb20a Unowned directories: /var/lib/ltsp5/ /etc/ltsp-client/ Also maybe /etc/ltsp-client could be /etc/ltsp5/, or /etc/ltsp and other config stuff could be in here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 09:20:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190920.l9J9KVT4023381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-19 05:20 EST ------- I think that it is wrong to require /etc/ltsp.conf. A user may want to use ltspswapd alone. Therefore, I think that %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd should still used, but only if there is no /etc/ltsp5.conf. And it should be said in a comment in %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd. The corresponding code in init file would be # Source ltspswapd configuration. [ -f /etc/sysconfig/ltspswapd ] && . /etc/sysconfig/ltspswapd [ -f /etc/ltsp5.conf ] && . /etc/ltsp5.conf A dot is missing at the end of the %description a -r or similar for the cvs command is also still missing. Only a suggestion, but in general the %define are put at the very beginning of the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 09:24:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710190924.l9J9ORT2024522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-19 05:24 EST ------- I've never unserstood, if that was important if the reviewer need to close to NextRelease the review request himself (I think not but...) In others terms I let you close this bug, Rex! Hu!, we get it in! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 11:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191115.l9JBFDIw008456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-19 07:15 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: liquidwar New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 12:14:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] New: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/tcputils/tcputils.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/tcputils/tcputils-0.6.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a collection of programs to facilitate TCP programming in shell-scripts. There is also a small library which makes it somewhat easier to create TCP/IP sockets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 12:44:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191244.l9JCiSXp020527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 08:44 EST ------- Allisson, I would appreciate it if you would review my review request bug 336401 and bug 336421 . (bug 336421 depends on bug 336401. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 12:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191247.l9JClXwC020098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 12:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191252.l9JCq44c020940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2007-10-19 08:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: phasex Short Description: PHASEX -- Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment Owners: green Branches: FE-6 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 13:00:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191300.l9JD0rra023575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |allisson at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 13:00:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191300.l9JD0Emp023449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |allisson at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 13:06:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191306.l9JD6YvV024590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-10-19 09:06 EST ------- Will review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 13:06:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191306.l9JD6oLh024643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-10-19 09:06 EST ------- Will review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 13:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191347.l9JDlh6O029652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 09:47 EST ------- For 0.6.0-0.1.XXX: * Redundant BuildRequires - Some BuildRequires are redundant. * glib2-devel <- GConf2-devel requires this * gettext-devel - This doesn't seem to be needed. Mockbuild succeeds without this. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=202832 * Documents - "INSTALL" file should be removed. This is for people who want to compile and install this package by themselves and not needed for rpm users. - "AUTHORS" file is useless for this package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 14:07:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277921] Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191407.l9JE7v7a001258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277921 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-10-19 10:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jgoodies-forms Short Description: Java layout framework Owners: mef Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 14:30:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191430.l9JEUXUc005119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-10-19 10:30 EST ------- Usually the maintainer does it, but for all practical purposes, it doesn't matter who/how, as long as it gets done. ): Closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 14:29:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191429.l9JETmhH003819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 10:29 EST ------- For 0.6.2-1 * Timestamps - For this package, ------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------ works to keep timestamps on man files. For this package it is really preferable because these man files are written more than 10 years ago. - Also you may want to keep timestamps on the tarball in your srpm. You can use "wget -N", for example. ! %attr ------------------------------------------------------- %attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man1/... ------------------------------------------------------- - While this is not a problem, I prefer to change the permission of files before %install section ends and not to use %attr when possible, i.e. ------------------------------------------------------- %install ....... chmod 0644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/* ------------------------------------------------------- However this is not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 14:45:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191445.l9JEjVor006597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-19 10:45 EST ------- The next PK upstream release should be early next week. I'll wait for that, which fixes the above issues, adds some nice new functionality, and fixes several more bugs. Then I'll resubmit it for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 15:12:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 264641] Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191512.l9JFCMJI011703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264641 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(ianburrell at gmail.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 11:12 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 15:13:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191513.l9JFDdR4011267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(andreas.bierfert at l | |owlatency.de) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 11:13 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild is done and request for koji is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 15:18:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191518.l9JFIt5K012814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From dyoung at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-19 11:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd-0-0.4.20071019cvs.fc8.src.rpm - source /etc/sysconfig/ltspswapd, then /etc/ltsp5.conf in initscript - read-only checkout from CVS - fix description, move %%define to top -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 15:28:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191528.l9JFSZKI014670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-10-19 11:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bodhi Short Description: A modular framework that facilitates publishing software updates Owners: lmacken Branches: EL-5 FC-6 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: toshio, timlau Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 16:15:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191615.l9JGFA3u022567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 Bug 312701 depends on bug 281751, which changed state. Bug 281751 Summary: python crashes when sending an empty string to some Tkinter widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281751 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 16:26:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191626.l9JGQpuH024325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From dlehman at redhat.com 2007-10-19 12:26 EST ------- New spec and SRPM w/ license GPL2+: http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump.spec http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 16:27:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191627.l9JGRaXX024360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-10-19 12:27 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/tcputils/tcputils.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/tcputils/tcputils-0.6.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Changes - Keep timestamps on man files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 16:26:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] New: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: i at stingr.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com I'm going to replace old conntrack package with this one. Spec URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/7/SPECS/conntrack-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/7/SRPMS/conntrack-tools-0.9.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The conntrack-tools package contains two programs: - conntrack: the command line interface to interact with the connection tracking system. - conntrackd: the connection tracking userspace daemon that can be used to deploy highly available GNU/Linux firewalls and collect statistics of the firewall use. conntrack is used to search, list, inspect and maintain the netfilter connection tracking subsystem of the Linux kernel. Using conntrack , you can dump a list of all (or a filtered selection of) currently tracked connections, delete connections from the state table, and even add new ones. In addition, you can also monitor connection tracking events, e.g. show an event message (one line) per newly established connection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 16:46:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191646.l9JGkGTT026238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-10-19 12:46 EST ------- mockbuild OK rpmlint OK general spec file OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 16:56:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191656.l9JGuD54028912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 12:56 EST ------- Thank you for a quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kreetingkard Short Description: Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 16:57:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 340011] New: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=340011 Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lokthare at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/pyrenamer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/pyrenamer-0.4.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: With pyRenamer you can change the name of several files at the same time easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 17:02:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191702.l9JH2jeh028628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 13:02 EST ------- Okay, approved. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (tcputils) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 17:07:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191707.l9JH7PDg030520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-19 13:07 EST ------- For clarity, please insert a newline between each changelog entry. You can go back and add it after-the-fact in the next srpm. --- etc/rc.d/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd.orig 2007-10-19 13:04:51.000000000 -0400 +++ etc/rc.d/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd 2007-10-19 13:05:05.000000000 -0400 @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ # # The fields below are left around for legacy tools (will remove later). # -# chkconfig: - 65 35 +# chkconfig: - 98 35 # description: dhcpd provides the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) \ # server # processname: dhcpd Please change the startup priority of ltsp-dhcpd to 98. This will allow smoother testing of KVM guest-as-client by starting up after libvirtd had started the network. This should also be a safe change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 17:08:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191708.l9JH8R9G030701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-10-19 13:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcputils Short Description: Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts Owners: allisson Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 17:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191713.l9JHDhlq031504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 17:28:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191728.l9JHShKl001310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-19 13:28 EST ------- * Wed Oct 17 2007 Eric Harrison 0.6 - typo in ltsp-initialize & gdm.conf-update change syslog to rsyslog You might want to change this back to syslog, and add a conditional to the script that handles either syslog or rsyslog depending on what is installed. This might allow these ltsp* packages to work on both F7 and F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 17:30:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191730.l9JHU6DS000408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-19 13:30 EST ------- [root at newcaprica noarch]# rpm -ivh ltsp-server-config-0-6.fc8.noarch.rpm --nodeps Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /etc/cron.daily/ltsp-swapfile-delete from install of ltsp-server-config-0-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package ltsp-server-0-9.fc8 file /etc/ltsp5.conf from install of ltsp-server-config-0-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package ltsp-server-0-9.fc8 file /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables-ltsp from install of ltsp-server-config-0-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package ltsp-server-0-9.fc8 file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ltsp-dhcpd from install of ltsp-server-config-0-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package ltsp-server-0-9.fc8 file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ltsp-swapfile-delete from install of ltsp-server-config-0-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package ltsp-server-0-9.fc8 file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ltspfs-insecure from install of ltsp-server-config-0-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package ltsp-server-0-9.fc8 file /usr/sbin/ltsp-initialize from install of ltsp-server-config-0-6.fc8 conflicts with file from package ltsp-server-0-9.fc8 Huh? Was this packaged merged into ltsp-server? Only ltsp-server-utils was mentioned in the changelog of ltsp-server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 17:59:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191759.l9JHxwrG004705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server-config - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-19 13:59 EST ------- *** Bug 331651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 18:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191801.l9JI1SYC005303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ltsp-server-|Review Request: ltsp-server |config - LTSP5 server-side |- LTSP5 server-side |configurations and setup |configurations and setup |scripts |scripts ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-19 14:01 EST ------- Looks like we are getting out of sync. I closed #331651 as a dup, since most of the comments are on this bz#. rpm -e ltsp-server-config ltsp-server-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 17:59:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331651] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191759.l9JHxvba004676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651 eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|188611 | nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-19 13:59 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 331731 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 18:23:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191823.l9JINFM5009354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From dimi at lattica.com 2007-10-19 14:23 EST ------- I have just released 1.0.3 with a few fixes and the license added to the source files. I've also updated the website to reflect the new release too. Please let me know if there are any other outstanding problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 19:22:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191922.l9JJML8f030485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-19 15:22 EST ------- Given that the blocker is fixed, installed this on a clean system but now it won't run: File "/usr/share/PySolFC/pysol.py", line 29, in from pysollib.main import main File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pysollib/main.py", line 43, in from util import DataLoader File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pysollib/util.py", line 65, in from mfxutil import Image File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pysollib/mfxutil.py", line 60, in import ImageTk ImportError: No module named ImageTk I think a dependency is missing but it's not immediately clear to me what it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 19:52:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710191952.l9JJq3ga009124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-19 15:52 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi-1.4.4-5.fc8.src.rpm * Fri Oct 19 2007 Warren Togami 1.4.4-5 - Not noarch - Fix build and make ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 - more cleanups This builds i386 binaries within the x86_64 package, similar to how we package memtest86+. noarch was not a good choice for this package because it clearly contained architecture specific bytecode, and wouldn't run at all on PPC for example. rpmlint mknbi-1.4.4-5.fc8.i386.rpm mknbi.i386: E: no-binary mknbi.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib No idea what these errors are about. Any ideas? [builder1 at newcaprica SRPMS]$ rpmlint mknbi-1.4.4-5.fc8.src.rpm mknbi.src:30: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make BUILD_ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" PREFIX=%{_prefix} Not harmful... mknbi.src:43: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/mknbi/ This is necessary due to i386 binaries in the x86_64 package. Any objections to approving this? Any other suggestions for improvement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 20:10:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192010.l9JKABuD012167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-19 16:10 EST ------- Regarding $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, we shouldn't use it here. This is essentially boot loader code, and we want to avoid surprises. It also isn't helpful to have a debuginfo package, because how are you going to debug it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 20:19:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192019.l9JKJD3o011985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-19 16:19 EST ------- OK, the missing dependency is python-imaging-tk. I'm about to head home from work; I'll finish up this review as soon as I make it home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 20:27:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192027.l9JKRD49015230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-19 16:27 EST ------- Fixed - New SRPM: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 20:52:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192052.l9JKqQkM020780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-10-19 16:52 EST ------- New upstream version (which solves the libhach issue): - 0.16.8.10 - libhack has moved to e16 subdir Updated package here: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.orgke16/e16.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-0.16.8.10-1.fc7.src.rpm BTW: any progress on the license issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 20:53:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192053.l9JKrbKr022637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-19 16:53 EST ------- + desktop-file-install --vendor system --delete-original --dir /var/tmp/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-2.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications --add-category X-Red-Hat-Base /var/tmp/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-2.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/system-config-kdump.desktop /var/tmp/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-2.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/system-config-kdump.desktop: error: value "System;Application;SystemSetup;GTK;X-Red-Hat-Base;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "SystemSetup" desktop-file-install created an invalid desktop file! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4980 (%install) Whoa, one more thing. This is on fc8 ^^^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 21:01:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192101.l9JL12nD023916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-10-19 17:01 EST ------- > SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.orgke16/e16.spec Sorry, it's SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 21:18:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192118.l9JLIQhk024325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-19 17:18 EST ------- Here is the updated spec file and SRPM SPEC: http://easynews.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd-1.3.5-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 22:01:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 340011] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192201.l9JM1Wxu003898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=340011 lokthare at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 22:51:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192251.l9JMpMAb010687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(dlutter at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-10-19 18:51 EST ------- I have addressed the first two issues. Spec: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-rpm.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-rpm-1.2.3-3.src.rpm > Well, for 1.2.3-2: > > * File dependency > ----------------------------------------------------- > BuildRequires: /usr/include/popt.h > ----------------------------------------------------- Fixed. > * SourceURL > - It seems that "20469" should be "26403" > - However > http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/26403/ruby-rpm-1.2.3.tgz > seems different from the tarball in your srpm? > ! Well, for rubyforge.org, the number like "26403" > seems to change every time new version is released. Yeah, rubyforge has this annoying habit of inserting a random number into the URL. Fixed. > * Encoding > ----------------------------------------------------- > Forgot to mention: the only warning I get from rpmlint is > W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ruby-rpm-1.2.3/doc/refm.rd.ja > > Any idea what encoding that file is ? (I don't know any Japanese, so I won't > know if I recoded anything right) > ----------------------------------------------------- > - This file is encoded in EUC-JP (well, I am a Japanese) > (Many Japanese documents in *nix are encoded in EUC-JP or > ISO-2022-JP, and many Japanese documents in M$ are encoded > in SHIFT-JIS). recode EUC-JP..UTF-8 refused to work on this file. For now, it's unchanged. not sure if it's readable for a Japanese reader. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 19 23:40:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710192340.l9JNeu0k016808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-19 19:40 EST ------- Okay the licensing situation looks clear to me now. I'm adding a README.fedora document which reads: Safekeep is designed such that the same script can be used on both the backup server (which initiates backups from clients), as well as on individual clients to handle client specific tasks such as dedicated ssh key generation and client-side backup processes such as dump. As a result, on Fedora safekeep is packaged in such a way that Fedora clients which want to communicate with a safekeep managed backup server can choose to install the safekeep-client subpackage to ensure correct safekeep client configuration. This safekeep-client subpackage does not itself install any additional files at this time. But it does ensure that the correct client side applications are in place for safekeep managed backup services. It is recommended that all computers acting as safekeep clients install the safekeep-client subpackage, even though at this time it is technically optional if the necessary components such as an ssh server, coreutils and util-linux are installed correctly on the client Fedora system. In future version of safekeep the safekeep-client package may become necessary for correct client operation. Any objections to the text? -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 00:05:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200005.l9K05PiE021059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-19 20:05 EST ------- New spec and srpm with README.Fedora addition: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.3/safekeep.spec http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.3/safekeep-1.0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm No significant differences in the spec since the last 1.0.2 spec other than the addition of the Fedora README and the Licensing clarification as per the reviewers comments. Binaries built against devel located in: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.3/devel/ no new rpmlint issues. Balls in the reviewers court now. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 00:19:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200019.l9K0JkqY022388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-19 20:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > - read-only checkout from CVS It is not what I asked for, I asked for the -r option of checkout: -r rev Check out revision or tag. (implies -P) (is sticky) You can also use -D. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 00:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200045.l9K0jq00024974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-19 20:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) Maybe %attr(-,root,root) /usr/lib/mknbi/ could be instead %{_prefix}/lib/mknbi/ > [builder1 at newcaprica SRPMS]$ rpmlint mknbi-1.4.4-5.fc8.src.rpm > mknbi.src:30: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make BUILD_ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" > PREFIX=%{_prefix} > > Not harmful... This should be fixed. Also you could do something along make BUILD_ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" PREFIX=%{_prefix} \ RPMVERSION="$RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION" INSTALL='install -p' install to keep timestamps. (In reply to comment #9) > Regarding $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, we shouldn't use it here. This is essentially boot > loader code, and we want to avoid surprises. It also isn't helpful to have a > debuginfo package, because how are you going to debug it? i don't see why the normal $RPM_OPT_FLAGS shouldn't be used. For the debuginfo, isn't it possible to use some virtualization to debug? I suggest using %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 02:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200225.l9K2P1Qo004087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-19 22:25 EST ------- errr .. (noobie question) am i supposed to set the fedora-review flag to + myself??? .. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 02:29:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200229.l9K2TBNI004783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-19 22:29 EST ------- All issues I saw are solved with the package from comment #29. Thanks for the great work... this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. Also, since rdiff-backup is available in EPEL, do consider EPEL-4 and EPEL-5 branches if it otherwise works there. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 02:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200255.l9K2tCVA008805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-19 22:55 EST ------- > i don't see why the normal $RPM_OPT_FLAGS shouldn't be used. > For the debuginfo, isn't it possible to use some virtualization > to debug? Just to be sure I asked about this earlier today. Think about it: During the boot loader the filesystem with debuginfo isn't even mounted yet. We would have to ship unstripped binaries for any chance of debugging in qemu or something, but eve then it is doubtful that it would work. If somebody really wants to debug mknbi, it should be done with a custom build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 03:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200319.l9K3JZ2F012192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-19 23:19 EST ------- removed the redundant BR & unneeded docs http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-backend-gconf/compizconfig-backend-gconf-0.6.0-0.2.20071019git.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 03:25:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304391] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200325.l9K3PxaP013707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304391 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 03:42:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200342.l9K3go5b014925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From dimi at lattica.com 2007-10-19 23:42 EST ------- Good stuff guys, thanks a lot for the prompt response! Please let me know if there's anything else that I need to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 03:44:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200344.l9K3iMX3015455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-19 23:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > errr .. (noobie question) am i supposed to set the fedora-review flag to + > myself??? .. You should not do that. I can reassign this bug to myself, however I want to wait what Ignacio says one more day before doing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 03:45:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200345.l9K3jvjI015376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 06:11:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200611.l9K6Bvbo000794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-20 02:11 EST ------- rpmlint messages on RPM conntrack-tools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/conntrack-tools-0.9.5/examples/sync/nack/script_backup.sh conntrack-tools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/conntrack-tools-0.9.5/examples/sync/nack/script_master.sh conntrack-tools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/conntrack-tools-0.9.5/examples/sync/persistent/script_master.sh conntrack-tools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/conntrack-tools-0.9.5/examples/sync/persistent/script_backup.sh ==>The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. conntrack-tools.i386: W: invalid-license GPL ==> I think license for this package should be GPLv2 conntrack-tools.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) ==>The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. will you update package solving above messages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 06:52:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200652.l9K6qXE4005681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ivazqueznet at gmail.com |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 07:29:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200729.l9K7TGWY009081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 03:29 EST ------- -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (compizconfig-python) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 07:31:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200731.l9K7VcOK009647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 03:31 EST ------- Note: Perhaps F-8 branch will be created soon, so when you request CVS branch, please also request to create F-8 branch. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg01515.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 07:37:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200737.l9K7bOQO010371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-20 03:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compizconfig-python Short Description: Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System Owners: izhar Branches: F-8 Devel InitialCC: izhar Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 07:37:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 03:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200737.l9K7bXJG010417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind Alias: wyrd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |wyrd Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-20 03:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wyrd Short Description: A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind Owners: till Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 08:24:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200824.l9K8Oloo017166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-10-20 04:24 EST ------- Well, # Exclude Arch ppc and ppc64 in spec file as guile-gnome-platform which's an dependence not build/and not available on ppc/pcc64 in order to build gwave. Otherwise, its'll fails. as happened here -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=202780 # Remove guile-cairo-devel from BR, guile-gnome-platform already requires guile-cairo-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 09:51:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710200951.l9K9pXoN030218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(andreas.bierfert at l| |owlatency.de) | ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-10-20 05:51 EST ------- Sorry had no time this week. I changed the stuff but I don't have commit access on the branches however that comes... initial import worked fine ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 10:07:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201007.l9KA7PMq032261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 06:07 EST ------- Currently CVS commit is prohibited for almost all people. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg01515.html Perhaps there will be another information when CVS commit is again allowed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 10:32:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343741] New: Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 Summary: Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mpg at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/sugar-base.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/sugar-base-0.1-0.3.20071016git7364e0078e.src.rpm Description: The base libary for Sugar, the user interface of the One Laptop Per Child project. It provides helpers for the development of services and activities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 10:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201055.l9KAtJkx005318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 06:55 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (compizconfig-backend-gconf) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 11:30:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201130.l9KBUgux009422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 07:30 EST ------- For 0.6.0-0.3.XXXX: ! rpmlint issue: ------------------------------------------------------- # rpmlint ccsm ccsm.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ccm/Constants.py 0644 ccsm.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ccm/Conflicts.py 0644 ccsm.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ccm/Settings.py 0644 ccsm.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ccm/Widgets.py 0644 ccsm.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ccm/Window.py 0644 ccsm.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ccm/Utils.py 0644 ccsm.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ccm/Pages.py 0644 ccsm.noarch: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/ccsm.desktop -------------------------------------------------------- * non-executable-script - These files have shebangs but do not have executable permissions. So either - remove shebangs from these files (for this package, this should be applied) - or set executable permissions on these files. * invalid-desktopfile - First, desktop file must be installed by desktop-file-install (BR: desktop-file-utils is needed). Please refer to the section "Desktop files" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines You can use "--delete-original" option - And this desktop file is invalid. -------------------------------------------------------- # desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/ccsm.desktop /usr/share/applications/ccsm.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated /usr/share/applications/ccsm.desktop: error: value "Compiz;Settings;DesktopSettings;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "Compiz" -------------------------------------------------------- Here "Encoding" entry can be there, however "Compiz" category is invalid and this should be removed (you can use "--remove-category" option). ! setup.py - Not a blocker, however I prefer "python setup.py build", for example. * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that all directories created by this package are correctly owned by this package. -------------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/ccsm/ %{_datadir}/ccsm/images/ %{python_sitelib}/ccm/ -------------------------------------------------------- ! Note: When you write -------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_datadir}/ccsm/ -------------------------------------------------------- This contains the directory %_datadir/ccsm itself and all files/directories under %_datadir/ccsm, while when you write -------------------------------------------------------- %files %dir %{_datadir}/ccsm/ -------------------------------------------------------- This contains the directory %_datadir/ccsm only. * Documents - As said in another review request, "INSTALL" file is usually not needed. * Calling update-desktop-database - is needed when desktop files to be installed in this package have Mimetype keys (c.f. section "desktop-database" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 11:50:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201150.l9KBoO5f011778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 07:50 EST ------- Okay. (In reply to comment #6) > > * Encoding > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Forgot to mention: the only warning I get from rpmlint is > > W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ruby-rpm-1.2.3/doc/refm.rd.ja > > > > Any idea what encoding that file is ? (I don't know any Japanese, so I won't > > know if I recoded anything right) > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > - This file is encoded in EUC-JP (well, I am a Japanese) > > (Many Japanese documents in *nix are encoded in EUC-JP or > > ISO-2022-JP, and many Japanese documents in M$ are encoded > > in SHIFT-JIS). > > recode EUC-JP..UTF-8 refused to work on this file. For now, it's unchanged. not > sure if it's readable for a Japanese reader. Well, actually I have never used recode.. I usually use iconv like: ---------------------------------------------------------------- iconv -f EUC-JP -t UTF-8 refm.rd.ja > refm.rd.ja.tmp && \ ( touch -r refm.rd.ja refm.rd.ja.tmp ; mv -f refm.rd.ja.tmp refm.rd.ja ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This packge (ruby-rpm) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 11:57:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201157.l9KBvUTE012747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 07:57 EST ------- Closing as this package is already in rawhide tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 11:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 296161] Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201159.l9KBx58o012828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296161 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 07:59 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 12:42:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226281] Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201242.l9KCgXHP017875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226281 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-20 08:42 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)drop "|| :" from %check 3)rpmlint only complained -> perl-TermReadKey.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 12:50:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226280] Merge Review: perl-String-CRC32 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201250.l9KCoCId018967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-String-CRC32 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226280 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-20 08:50 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9b241bc4a482a3aa59fbb1429bc30546 String-CRC32-1.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/crc....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=27, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.01 CPU) + Package perl-String-CRC32-1.4-3.fc8 -> Provides: CRC32.so perl(String::CRC32) = 1.4 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 12:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226283] Merge Review: perl-URI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201257.l9KCv9aw019936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-URI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226283 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 12:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 08:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226283] Merge Review: perl-URI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201256.l9KCud2n019908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-URI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226283 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-20 08:56 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)drop "|| :" from %check 3) make test output skipped one test t/urn-isbn.......skipped all skipped: Needs the Business::ISBN module installed I think you need to add that(Business::ISBN) perl module as BR 4)rpmlint complained -> perl-URI.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-URI-1.35/Changes The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> Use iconv command perl-URI.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==> Use sed perl-URI.src: W: strange-permission filter-requires-perl-URI.sh 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. ==> This can be Ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 13:18:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201318.l9KDIYPa022449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-20 09:18 EST ------- So here the fixed one. SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-0.9-8.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 15:01:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201501.l9KF1DwK002545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-10-20 11:01 EST ------- mockbuild OK rpmlint OK general spec file OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 15:19:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201519.l9KFJiQC004491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 11:19 EST ------- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kreetingkard_templates Short Description: Template files for KreetingKard Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 15:24:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201524.l9KFOoAx004560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2007-10-20 11:24 EST ------- It's been more than two months since I submitted the review request. I even forgot about it. Can some one review the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 15:35:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] New: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silfreed at silfreed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qlandkarte/qlandkarte.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qlandkarte/qlandkarte-0.5.3-2.src.rpm Description: Provides a GUI to visualize data from GPS device's tracks and maps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 16:17:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201617.l9KGHQbS011310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 16:17:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201617.l9KGHCgC011272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-20 12:17 EST ------- One thing need fixing. - Desktop icon (qtiplot_logo.png) must be installed under %_datadir/pixmaps/. This works for me. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (qtiplot) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------------- Info: For http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure , F-8 branch will come soon https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg01515.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 16:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201640.l9KGeh63015008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-20 12:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=233471) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=233471&action=view) update fro the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 16:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201640.l9KGe8m6014863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-20 12:40 EST ------- - License tag should be GPLv2+, the source files contain "version 2 or any later" - missing BuildRequires: proj-devel libusb-devel (+desktop-file-utils) - as it is a GUI application a desktop file must be provided - the parallel make command should be "make %{?_smp_mflags}" - QLANDKARTE_LIBDIR (defined in QLandkarte/common) is used for plugins and they must be installed in %{_libdir}/..., so hardcoding /usr/lib/ works only for 32-bit architectures - QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE (defined in QLandkarte/common) set to -O3 overrides Fedora's default level (-O2) - in the %files section the %{_libdir}/%{name} directory is not owned, you can use it as it includes the *.so too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 16:41:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201641.l9KGfPgh014419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-20 12:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=233481) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=233481&action=view) desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 16:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201647.l9KGl37X015850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-20 12:47 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=233491) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=233491&action=view) patch for the spec file to fix the issues with QLandkarte/common update QLandkarte/common after unpacking the sources in %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 17:24:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201724.l9KHOLJg019713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-20 13:24 EST ------- fixed with: install -m 0644 -p qtiplot_logo.png $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/pixmaps/qtiplot_logo.png %{_datadir}/pixmaps/* New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qtiplot Short Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting Owners: frankb Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: frankb Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 18:16:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201816.l9KIG2Hu026489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-20 14:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compizconfig-backend-gconf Short Description: GConf backend for compizconfig Owners: izhar Branches: F-8 Devel InitialCC: izhar Cvsextras Commits: extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 18:23:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201823.l9KINAN5027215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 19:07:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710201907.l9KJ71Ba032279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rstrode at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-20 15:07 EST ------- Note there is no redhat-artwork package anymore (see bug 305441). You'll need to change the Requires to one of the split packages. wrt to comment 9, you probably want Categories to just be: Categories=System;Settings; in the .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 20:37:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710202037.l9KKb6Hn010569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-20 16:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: safekeep Short Description: client/server backup system using rdiff-backup Owners: jspaleta Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes Note: I'm requesting F-8 to cover my bases, because I'm not sure if F-8 branching completed or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 21:45:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710202145.l9KLj59v018348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-20 17:45 EST ------- conntrack-tools-0.9.5-2 at the same place but I don't really want to "fix" the 1st set of warnings, because they are, well, executable script examples, which I put in %doc by intention. Of course, if you insist, I can chmod 644 them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 22:17:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338341] laptop-mode-tools please In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710202217.l9KMHWXC022163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: laptop-mode-tools please https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338341 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-20 18:17 EST ------- Unfortunately it seems there's no package being presented for review here, so this really isn't appropriate for a package review ticket. We really need both a package ready for review and someone willing to maintain the package. Perhaps you could add your suggested package to the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 20 23:47:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304391] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710202347.l9KNlNXM031219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304391 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2007-10-20 19:47 EST ------- - package name follows guidelines : OK - spec file name follows guidelines : OK - Release: follows guidelines for a pre-release : OK - Summary: ends with a dot and is probably too long : NOK suggestion : Summary: Pidgin plugin for xfire network - Source URL is good and tarball match upstream : OK - License: is correct, is allowed in Fedora and match sources : OK - Text of license is packaged : OK - BuildRoot: is correct : OK - Typos in Description : s/incrimenting/incrementing/ This package not supported by the official Xfire team : missing 'is' and missing period. - Static libs are removed : OK - Macros are used consistently : OK - Don't package INSTALL file, it's empty : NOK - Don't package NEWS file, it's mostly empty and point to CHANGELOG - BuildRequires: and Requires: are correct : OK - Spec file is legible : OK - Builds fine on i386 : OK - Rpmlint output will be clean once you've removed the empty INSTALL file and fixed the Summary: This is not a fully valid review, as I'm also looking for a sponsor, but I hope it helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 02:07:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210207.l9L274bV016090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-20 22:07 EST ------- thank you .. i was wondering which action should be taken on the non-executable-script error rpmlint is now silent upstream just released official tarball half an hour ago http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/ccsm/ccsm-0.6.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 05:56:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210556.l9L5uAIb009967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 01:56 EST ------- 2 things need fixing ? %exclude %{_datadir}/applications/ccsm.desktop - Check if this is really needed. "desktop-file-install --delete-original" should remove this file. * Icon path - I tried 0.6.0-1 of ccsm, then I noticed that none of the icons appear on ccsm dialog. The following line of Constants.py needs fixing. ------------------------------------------------------------- 52 # Paths 53 # !! 54 DataDir = "/usr/local/share" 55 IconDir = DataDir+"/icons/hicolor/scalable" 56 PixmapDir = DataDir+"/ccsm/images" 57 ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 06:39:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210639.l9L6dOWo012762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus Alias: ndesk-dbus-glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 Bug 245492 depends on bug 245491, which changed state. Bug 245491 Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 06:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210639.l9L6dNTR012734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-10-21 02:39 EST ------- Okay, I got the personal issues that caused me to abandon Fedora contribution worked out, as nobody has expressed an interest in this package in my regretable absence I'm picking it up again. ndesk-dbus will be required to build the dependencies for Banshee in the near future so we'll probably need to put this in the repos anyways soon. According to the rules since 3 months has passed it has to undergo a new review. Changes: * Build this as noarch since that upstream recommended this. * No longer orphan dbus-sharp, they should be able to peacefully coexist and this part was causing considerable problems, including but not limited to breaking Blam! Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-0.5.2-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 06:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210640.l9L6ehRJ013198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus Alias: ndesk-dbus-glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-10-21 02:40 EST ------- Okay, I got the personal issues that caused me to abandon Fedora contribution worked out, as nobody has expressed an interest in this package in my regretable absence I'm picking it up again. ndesk-dbus-glib will be required to build the dependencies for Banshee in the near future so we'll probably need to put this in the repos anyways soon. According to the rules since 3 months has passed it has to undergo a new review. Changes: * Build this as noarch since that upstream recommended this. Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-glib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-glib-0.3-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 06:56:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210656.l9L6uDWp016448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-21 02:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > 2 things need fixing > > ? %exclude %{_datadir}/applications/ccsm.desktop > - Check if this is really needed. > "desktop-file-install --delete-original" should remove > this file. yes .. as it desktop-file-install creates a new .desktop file with the name fedora-ccsm.desktop (vendorID "fedora") and it does not replace ccsm.desktop > > * Icon path > - I tried 0.6.0-1 of ccsm, then I noticed that none of > the icons appear on ccsm dialog. > > The following line of Constants.py needs fixing. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 52 # Paths > 53 # > !! 54 DataDir = "/usr/local/share" > 55 IconDir = DataDir+"/icons/hicolor/scalable" > 56 PixmapDir = DataDir+"/ccsm/images" > 57 > ------------------------------------------------------------- seems like the remove shebang patch somehow causes this .. anyway, patched setup.py to make /usr as the default prefix .. the icons appears working at my side from the below SRPM .. http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/ccsm/ccsm-0.6.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 07:02:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210702.l9L7291o015650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-10-21 03:02 EST ------- Yay! I'll let the mock builds go overnight and post another review for this and the glib package first thing tomorrow morning. :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 07:04:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210704.l9L74IWe015762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 03:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) The correct one is: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install \ --vendor="fedora" \ --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ --remove-category="Compiz" \ --delete-original \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/ccsm.desktop ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 07:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210703.l9L73ORx015705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 03:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > 2 things need fixing > > > > ? %exclude %{_datadir}/applications/ccsm.desktop > > - Check if this is really needed. > > "desktop-file-install --delete-original" should remove > > this file. > > yes .. as it desktop-file-install creates a new .desktop file with the name > fedora-ccsm.desktop (vendorID "fedora") and it does not replace ccsm.desktop Oh, I meant ----------------------------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install \ --vendor="fedora" \ --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ --remove-category="Compiz" \ --delete-original $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/ccsm.desktop ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 07:54:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710210754.l9L7skMC021793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 03:54 EST ------- * What I always cannot find out is under what license x11iraf is released. Would you please verify? * I just tried to rebuild but it failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=203879 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 12:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211201.l9LC1NSm017393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-10-21 08:01 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: docker New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 12:17:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211217.l9LCHgw8019230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-21 08:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=233601) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=233601&action=view) patch supposed to fix the spec file issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 12:16:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211216.l9LCGkpr019185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-21 08:16 EST ------- *-3 doesn't build at all: ... + chmod 644 '/usr/include/libvpd-1/*.hpp' chmod: cannot access `/usr/include/libvpd-1/*.hpp': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6235 (%install) Seems to me, as if you mis-read my remark on "broken permissions". The issue is the _source files_ carrying bogus permissions inside of the upstream tarball, not them carrying bogus permissions after installation. To fix this, either upstream will want to fix the tarball, or you will want to chmod -x them in %prep. Also, there more minor issues with your spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 12:15:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211215.l9LCFFVo018168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-21 08:15 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qt4-qsa Remove Branches: devel It can be removed for F-9 and higher, because it have reach it's EOL. And the script function is available since Qt 4.3. So it will be only need until F-8, to get old code working and give the developers some time to adapt her code to Qt 4.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 13:29:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211329.l9LDTUSm027364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 14:55:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211455.l9LEtKtx004957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-21 10:55 EST ------- ok done http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/ccsm/ccsm-0.6.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 15:22:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211522.l9LFMjxl008034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |328771 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 15:22:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211522.l9LFMkcl008058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |328781 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 15:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] New: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: i at stingr.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/7/SPECS/fprobe-ulog.spec SRPM URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/7/SRPMS/fprobe-ulog-1.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: fprobe-ulog - libipulog-based tool that collect network traffic data and emit it as NetFlow flows towards the specified collector. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 15:59:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211559.l9LFxE5r012950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 11:59 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (ccsm) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:22:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211622.l9LGMtoY015106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:22 EST ------- All packages have now been branched for F-8, so this request should be done. Feel free to reset fedora-cvs flag if you need anything futher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:23:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211623.l9LGNr9C015799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:23 EST ------- Please follow the package end of life procedure for the devel branch: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:25:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216354] Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211625.l9LGPXFC015554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liquidwar - Multiplayer wargame with liquid armies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216354 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:25 EST ------- All packages have now been branched for F-8, so this request should be done. Feel free to reset fedora-cvs flag if you need anything futher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:31:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211631.l9LGVvAG016948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:29:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211629.l9LGTrUH015830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211634.l9LGYRfu017105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:34:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211634.l9LGYos9017144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-21 12:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ccsm Short Description: Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project Owners: izhar Branches: F-8 Devel InitialCC: izhar Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:38:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211638.l9LGcKQ2017775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211642.l9LGg8mx017610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:43:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237738] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211643.l9LGhpRK018451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Dump - Pretty printing of data structures Alias: perl-Data-Dump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237738 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:44:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211644.l9LGi45L018481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 12:44 EST ------- One thing I forgot to mention: ( Please fix when you commit to CVS ) * ExcludeArch - Although this package is noarch, as this package depends on compizconfig-python, please write in your spec file: "ExcludeArch: ......". Ref: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00262.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:49:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211649.l9LGndvj019109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:53:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211653.l9LGrAhM018853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind Alias: wyrd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 16:58:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211658.l9LGwucE020281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 12:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:03:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211703.l9LH3VI7020046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 13:03 EST ------- Mass branching for F-8 has happened, so this package should be already branched. Feel free to reset fedora-cvs if you need further cvsadmin action. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:07:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344551] New: Review Request: qt-recordmydesktop - KDE Desktop session recorder with audio and video Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344551 Summary: Review Request: qt-recordmydesktop - KDE Desktop session recorder with audio and video Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: foolish at guezz.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/qt-recordmydesktop.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/qt-recordmydesktop-0.3.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Graphical KDE frontend for the recordmydesktop desktop session recorder. recordMyDesktop is a desktop session recorder for linux that attempts to be easy to use, yet also effective at it's primary task. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:08:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277921] Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211708.l9LH85Fx020687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277921 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 13:08 EST ------- Mass branching for F-8 has happened, so I assume you wanted a F-8 branch as well. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:10:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211710.l9LHArJv021128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 13:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:13:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211713.l9LHDeVb022103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 13:13 EST ------- mass branching for F-8 has happened, so I assumed you also wanted a F-8 branch. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:16:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211716.l9LHGDnD021836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 13:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:20:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211720.l9LHKwwH023289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 13:20 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211729.l9LHTNAv023178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 13:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:32:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211732.l9LHWVWZ023755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 13:32 EST ------- mass branch for F-8 has happened, so I assumed you wanted an F-8 branch as well. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:38:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336401] Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211738.l9LHcxvn025309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 13:38 EST ------- All done. Thank you for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:39:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211739.l9LHd0lu025337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 Bug 336421 depends on bug 336401, which changed state. Bug 336401 Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard - Japanese greeting card writing software for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336401 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:42:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211742.l9LHgQ33025900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-10-21 13:42 EST ------- Well F-8 branch is done but there still is no F-8 branch ;) I guess this package was victim to some intermediate not-by-any-magic covered black hole... Please add the F-8 branch when you have time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:39:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336421] Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211739.l9LHdb07024578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kreetingkard_templates - Template files for KreetingKard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336421 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 13:39 EST ------- All done. Thank you for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211740.l9LHehPj024975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-10-21 13:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > cvs done. Kevin, could you please create an F-8 branch as well? I created my request before the freeze... Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-gdata New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 17:59:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211759.l9LHxvD9026928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-10-21 13:59 EST ------- python-gdata-1.0.8-3.fc9 built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 18:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211804.l9LI4j6I028266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind Alias: wyrd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-21 14:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > cvs done. I cannot find a wyrd bugzilla component, is this a bug or do I have to wait longer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 18:15:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211815.l9LIFYs3029210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 14:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 18:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211826.l9LIQlan030707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-21 14:26 EST ------- Well, I guess since this package was built after the freeze, it's not in F-8, so no F-8 branch was made for it. I have branched it for F-8. You will need to talk to releng to add it to F-8 at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 19:01:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211901.l9LJ1AXs002976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |344661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 19:00:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211900.l9LJ0rT3002920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |344681 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 19:01:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211901.l9LJ1TqB003022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |344641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 18:59:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211859.l9LIxwbe001730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-21 14:59 EST ------- import done. Build for devel and F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 19:15:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191589] Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211915.l9LJFoNF004798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-10-21 15:15 EST ------- done. dead.package file add and send the mail to rel-eng at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 19:24:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211924.l9LJOQkn004735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind Alias: wyrd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-21 15:24 EST ------- Due to the heavy load imposed by the script that syncs packages to bugzilla, this script is only run every six hours. I'll take a look at the code in the future to see if there's any way we can bring down the load and thus run it more frequently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 19:38:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710211938.l9LJc7ue007278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-10-21 15:38 EST ------- Done in F8 and devel. Thanks Kevin and Parag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 20:08:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245560] Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212008.l9LK8uv0010958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: docker - KDE and GNOME2 system tray replacement docking application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245560 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-10-21 16:08 EST ------- Thanks for your help. I will build an ask releng to add it to F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 20:30:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212030.l9LKU6SM013722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-10-21 16:30 EST ------- Mock builds are successful (F7 and Devel, x86_64); and the spec looks clean. rpmlint is mostly silent, with a false only-non-binary-in-usr-lib (see below). Most of the package looks good (see above for full review), but Mono packages should not be noarch. Please revert that change, and this package is tentatively approved. Same thing for the glib package, too; though a full review of that is in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 20:41:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212041.l9LKfx1q015060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-10-21 16:41 EST ------- I beg to differ as upstream filed a bug against the previous package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247629 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 21:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212103.l9LL3waO016487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-10-21 17:03 EST ------- After a bit of debating on Jabber, Peter convinced me that upstream is wrong and the packaging guidelines are right. This is once again ExcludeArch ppc64. I'm closing #247629 once the package gets into the repos. Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-0.5.2-8.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 21:07:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212107.l9LL75FY017126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus Alias: ndesk-dbus-glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-10-21 17:07 EST ------- Revert noarch change to confort to the guidelines, Upstream 0 : Peter Gordon 1 Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-glib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/ndesk-dbus-glib-0.3-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 21:10:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212110.l9LLAusO018573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-21 17:10 EST ------- Yes, thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 21:10:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212110.l9LLAvqh018602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 Bug 289701 depends on bug 289681, which changed state. Bug 289681 Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 21:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212133.l9LLXxXe020019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-10-21 17:33 EST ------- Okay let's request a F-8 branch and get rocking again Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: ndesk-dbus Short Description: Managed C# implementation of DBus Owners: dnielsen Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 23:03:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212303.l9LN38rJ030618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-10-21 19:03 EST ------- Imported into cvs. I'm going to do some testing and make sure the client actually works with our production instance before I build. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 23:44:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212344.l9LNivmj003012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-21 19:44 EST ------- Okay. For this bug I will close for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 23:44:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212344.l9LNixM4003034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 Bug 243501 depends on bug 240373, which changed state. Bug 240373 Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 21 23:59:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710212359.l9LNxXU5005516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-10-21 19:59 EST ------- Is there anything else that needs updated? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 01:43:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339631] Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220143.l9M1hoV6018057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcputils - Utilities for TCP programming in shell-scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339631 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2007-10-21 21:43 EST ------- All done, thank you for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 05:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220539.l9M5dJas018026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 01:39 EST ------- Too bad when I got home my Internet connection had crapped out. It's not much better now but I got through long enough to have a longer look at this. Looks like you need to s/imageing/imaging/ in your spec. You could probably drop some of the manual dependencies (at least python-imaging and tkinter) if you wanted, but it's not a big deal. Unfortunately the bug that was blocking this has been closed but the fix hasn't been pushed yet, and it hasn't been fixed for F8 either. I expect that the F7 fix will be pushed before this package, but I don't know about F8. Not a blocker, but perhaps you could consider having this package provide "pysol" since that's the name of the executable it provides and it would make it a bit easier on people looking for a pysol package. I can see a few reasons why you might not want to do this, though, so I'll leave it up to you. rpmlint says: PySolFC.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pysollib/games/siebenbisas.py 0644 which I don't see as a problem; it's just the usual "anything python starts with a shebang even if it's not an executable" disease which python programmers seem to acquire. I never ran through my checklist, so: * source files match upstream: 768dd5be8ec1f0d8f62792e712a177bdae8e01993a12f2c84fe1c9c56f17daee PySolFC-1.1.tar.bz2 (downloaded manually because sourceforge is sucking as usual) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: PySolFC = 1.1-2.fc8 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 python-imaging python-imaging-tk tcl tile tix tk tkinter * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. Manually tested with fixed python. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * desktop file present and installed properly. * locale files handled properly. APPROVED; just fix the "imageing" bit before you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 05:42:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243571] Review Request: python-mechanoid - Python Programmatic Web Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220542.l9M5gNsi019468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mechanoid - Python Programmatic Web Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243571 ------- Additional Comments From jafo at tummy.com 2007-10-22 01:42 EST ------- Thanks for the ping. I've gotten it built and it's ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 06:10:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220610.l9M6Adtd023559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 02:10 EST ------- BTW, one thing I notice after looking closely at the file list is the presence of "COPYRIGHT" files in each of the cardset directories. There are many ways to deal with these: Leave them where they are and mark them as %doc (thus making the %files list hideous). Rename them all to files named after the cardset and put them into docdir. Leave them alone. I prefer the third option, simply because everything else is useless complexity for no gain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 06:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220631.l9M6VXGS027060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 02:31 EST ------- This has the same issue with COPYRIGHT files that the main package has, and again I'm all for leaving them where they are so that the COPYRIGHT file lives with the specific data that it applies to. Normally these copyright bits would be inside of the file they apply to, but that's not possible. There's a single overarching COPYING file which is marked as %doc as appropriate. I know this is is backwards from the normal case, but if you expect this package to be rebuilt only occasionally, you might consider getting rid of dist tag. That lets you get away without ever rebuilding your package unless its necessary and people won't be confused by seeing an F8 package on their F11 machine. It's up to you. * source files match upstream: 11ea07ccdecbfc2b5e574b7bbee9724239a8ed3e3e6a0f4abe066038e2a7b21b pysol-music-4.40.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: PySolFC-music = 4.40-1.fc8 = PySolFC = 1.1 pygame * things work fine in manual testing. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 06:54:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226262] Merge Review: perl-Inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220654.l9M6skll029993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 02:54 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)drop "|| :" from %check 3)you may like to use disttag 4)rpmlint only complained -> perl-Inline.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==>Use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-Inline.spec" 5) I saw that make test skipped one test t/05files.....skipped all skipped: no reason given ==> Does this mean this package is any missing BR to make this test work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 07:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226279] Merge Review: perl-Socket6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220705.l9M75WUV031568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Socket6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226279 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 03:05 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 35e4bb7e09ca3154a44bcaa8959780a2 Socket6-0.19.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/use....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU) + Package perl-Socket6-0.19-4.fc8.1 -> Provides: Socket6.so perl(Socket6) = 0.19 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) SHOULD: Don't think need to use Release as "4%{?dist}.1" Instead keep it simple "4%{?dist}" APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 07:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226284] Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220721.l9M7LP4E002422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226284 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 03:21 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)drop "|| :" from %check 3)you may like to keep simple disttag as "2%{dist}" only. 4)rpmlint only complained -> perl-XML-Dumper.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==> Use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-XML-Dumper" perl-XML-Dumper.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Dumper-0.81/README The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> use iconv command -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 07:24:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220724.l9M7OH4o002574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove Alias: perl-XML-Grove https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 03:24 EST ------- 1)you may like to use disttag 2)rpmlint only complained -> perl-XML-Grove.noarch: E: invalid-version 0.46alpha The version string must not contain the pre, alpha, beta or rc suffixes because when the final version will be out, you will have to use an Epoch tag to make the package upgradable. Instead put it in the release tag like 0.alpha8.1. ==> You need to follow solution for this error. perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: invalid-license Artistic ==> Use GPL+ or Artistic perl-XML-Grove.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(XML::Grove) This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it once. ==> In this case I think you need to remove unwanted provides. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl perl-XML-Grove.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 15) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==> Use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-XML-Grove" 3) make test is failing in mock build as PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/factory....ok t/grove......FAILED tests 3-4 Failed 2/5 tests, 60.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/grove.t 5 2 40.00% 3-4 Failed 1/2 test scripts, 50.00% okay. 2/10 subtests failed, 80.00% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 + : + exit 0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 07:31:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226286] Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220731.l9M7Va5Z003948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226286 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 03:31 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 2:5.8.0 2)drop "|| :" from %check 3)you may like to use disttag 4)you may like to use Source URL as http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/P/PH/PHISH/XML-LibXML-Common-%{version}.tar.gz 5)rpmlint only complained -> perl-XML-LibXML-Common.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==>Use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-XML-LibXML-Common.spec" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 09:04:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226287] Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220904.l9M944c8020634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226287 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 05:04 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 2:5.8.0 2)drop "|| :" from %check 3)you may like to use simple disttag like "2%{?dist}" 4)you may like to use Source URL as http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/P/PA/PAJAS/XML-LibXML-%{version}.tar.gz 5)rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me-> perl-XML-LibXML.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-LibXML-1.62001/Changes The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> Use iconv command on that file perl-XML-LibXML.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun perl perl-XML-LibXML.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger perl ==>rpmlint suggested not to use perl command but is this some kind of workaround for some problem? 6)make test skipped one test => t/11memory....................ok 26/26 skipped: developers only (set MEMORY_TEST=1 to run these tests) make test should run all tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 09:17:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226289] Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220917.l9M9HlSn023571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226289 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 05:17 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 2:5.8.0 2)you may like to use disttag 3)rpmlint on RPM gave me -> perl-XML-Parser.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Parser-2.34/samples/REC-xml-19980210.xml The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> use iconv command in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 09:17:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220917.l9M9Hdpv023110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 05:17 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 09:36:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220936.l9M9aMHn027565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 05:36 EST ------- 1)mock build went fine. But I saw rpmlint on RPM reported perl-SGMLSpm.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog control 1.03ii-16.2.1 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. ==> remove string " sh: line 0: fg: no job control" from chnagelog perl-SGMLSpm.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL ==> this looks to me as GPLv2 AND rpmlint on SRPM reported perl-SGMLSpm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==>Use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-SGMLSpm.spec" 2) You can add disttag (not mandatory) 3) drop "|| :" from %check 4) mock build worked for me after remove BR: perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 09:50:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220950.l9M9oGMP028707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-22 05:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > And since gggl stuff seems to be GPLv2+, the version > > should be updated. > > I dont understand what you mean by the last sentence. Rereading myself, I just used version instead of license! Should have been: And since gggl stuff seems to be GPLv2+, the License should be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 09:58:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710220958.l9M9wEvg030789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 mpg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:02:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221002.l9MA2kWC031519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:04:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221004.l9MA4RiI030616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- |ovasik at redhat.com |package-review at redhat.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-10-22 06:04 EST ------- Oops, I was trying to reassign this to the new package owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:05:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226248] Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221005.l9MA5xqd031114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226248 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 06:05 EST ------- 1) 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 2:5.8.0-61 2) defattr usage should be defattr(-,root,root,-) 3) make test output is PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00-basic......ok 2/12 skipped: Test::Pod not installed on this system t/01-connect....ok 7/8 skipped: nothing listening on localhost:443 t/02-live.......# config on linux # ssl OpenSSL 0.9.8 in /usr # lib -L/usr/lib -lssl -lcrypto -lgcc # inc -I/usr/include/openssl # cc gcc ok 1/4 skipped: Cannot load prerequisite modules LWP::UserAgent HTTP::Request All tests successful, 10 subtests skipped. ==> all test should be successful -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:23:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226249] Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221023.l9MANX7f002028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226249 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 06:23 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)you may like to use disttag 3)rpmlint only complained -> perl-Date-Calc.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==>Use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-Date-Calc.spec" ===> I think you can add following to SPEC chmod 644 examples/*.{pl,cgi} tools/*.pl after adding that rpmlint mesasges got reduced to perl-Date-Calc.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-Date-Calc-5.4/EXAMPLES.txt The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). perl-Date-Calc.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Date-Calc-5.4/tools/compile.sh The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. perl-Date-Calc.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Date-Calc-5.4/tools/compile.bat This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. perl-Date-Calc.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-Date-Calc-5.4/CREDITS.txt The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). perl-Date-Calc.i386: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(Date::Calc) This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it once. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226251] Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221048.l9MAmEIY004681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL Alias: perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226251 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 06:48 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)you may like to use disttag like only "2%{?dist}" 3)rpmlint only complained -> perl-DBD-MySQL.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-DBD-MySQL-4.005/ChangeLog The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> Use iconv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:50:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226246] Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221050.l9MAoMpo006190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226246 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 06:50 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:54:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226244] Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221054.l9MAs8d7005563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226244 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 06:54 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2) make test output is PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01pod............skipped all skipped: Skipping author tests t/03yaml...........skipped all skipped: Skipping author tests t/04boilerplate....skipped all skipped: Skipping author tests t/10basic..........ok t/11basic..........ok 1/55 skipped: Object::Deadly not installed All tests successful, 3 tests and 1 subtest skipped. ==> All tests should be successfull -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:59:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226252] Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221059.l9MAxISF006467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226252 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 06:59 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)you may like to use simple disttag as "5%{?dist}" only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 10:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226255] Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221059.l9MAxKm5006484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226255 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 06:59 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)you may like to use disttag 3)rpmlint only complained -> perl-Digest-HMAC.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==>Use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-Digest-HMAC.spec" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 11:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221131.l9MBV6J9012037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-10-22 07:31 EST ------- Ok, thanks for review, there were no bugs against this package, so I haven't found some of those errors earlier: 1)sh:line 0 string will be removed - error caused by JKeating script in last build 2)License should be GPLv2+ as there is nowhere written that the license is exactly GPLv2 3)dist tag will be added 4)I think whole %check section is not necessary, so will be deleted 5)BR for perl will be removed as not necessary Corrected version built as perl-SGMLSpm-1.03ii-16.3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 11:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221150.l9MBoHBK013940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 07:50 EST ------- Thanks for quick update. Still I can see rpmlint on SRPM as perl-SGMLSpm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Also, It will be good to add documentations. Can you also add those files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 13:09:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221309.l9MD97Ub027140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-22 09:09 EST ------- Thanks, I've updated the spec file. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/bal.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/babl/babl-0.0.15-0.5.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 13:14:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221314.l9MDEKMY028122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-10-22 09:14 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 13:21:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221321.l9MDLZjI031203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-10-22 09:21 EST ------- ok, indents will be fixed and COPYING and README file shipped. I think this is enough, there is more documentation in the tarball, but I don't want to increase size of package too much. What do you think about that? (I will wait with koji build for a while to prevent more unnecessary commits and builds) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 13:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221344.l9MDiPfp001354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-22 09:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qlandkarte/qlandkarte.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qlandkarte/qlandkarte-0.5.3-3.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Oct 22 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.5.3-3 - spec file patches and desktop file by Dan Horak GPLv2+ desktop file use sed to cleanup problems in makefile additional BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 14:30:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] New: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jnovy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/libmikmod/libmikmod.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/libmikmod/libmikmod-3.1.11-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: mikmod comes with a libmikmod library, which is installed into a buildroot and mikmod is linked against it. This causes there are direct links to buildroot in the mikmod executable what prevents mikmod to be successfuly build -> rhbz#339881. General solution is to package libmikmod separately, so that mikmod could BR it and also other users could use libmikmod as soon as it's packaged separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 14:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221440.l9MEeSYx012856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 14:59:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221459.l9MExJPf015721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:14:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221514.l9MFEAb5019994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-10-22 11:14 EST ------- Too late for Fedora 8... ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225620] Merge Review: bluez-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221515.l9MFF33j020229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bluez-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225620 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-10-22 11:15 EST ------- Too late for Fedora 8... ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:14:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221514.l9MFEdL7020043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cdparanoia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-10-22 11:14 EST ------- Too late for Fedora 8... ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:15:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225242] Merge Review: alsa-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221515.l9MFFluU020671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225242 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221514.l9MFESAc018190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-10-22 11:14 EST ------- Too late for Fedora 8... ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:28:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221528.l9MFS5uU020984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #233481|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-22 11:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=234181) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=234181&action=view) new desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:27:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221527.l9MFR4Je020916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-22 11:27 EST ------- I have done yet a few changes: - separated the earth icon from icons.cpp and used it as an icon for the desktop file - disabled the parallel make build as it doesn't work, it looks like that the build system doesn't define _smp_mflags, so it is buildable in Koji, but on my machine it crashes. Probably there are missing some inter-file dependencies, but it is a qmake problem. The review is here: OK source files match upstream: a995b5ae55263975ba5de36f164094c2b18f8951 QLandkarte.2007.09.18.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (development/i386) + in koji. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app, desktop file is included This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:28:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221528.l9MFSrM1023154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-22 11:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=234191) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=234191&action=view) icon for the desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:29:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221529.l9MFTT6f023252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #233471|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-22 11:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=234201) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=234201&action=view) updates for the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:29:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221529.l9MFTqil021249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #233491|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:42:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221542.l9MFgknd025772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at flyn.org ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-10-22 11:42 EST ------- *** Bug 205087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:39:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] New: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flup.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flup-1.0-1.tillf7.src.rpm Description: This package contains classes to create WSGI servers in python, e.g. fastcgi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221540.l9MFe8Rp023557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-flup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 15:50:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221550.l9MFoqUR027612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 Bug 312701 depends on bug 281751, which changed state. Bug 281751 Summary: python crashes when sending an empty string to some Tkinter widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281751 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 16:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221613.l9MGDpsq031317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-22 12:13 EST ------- I took most of the patch. I left the definitions at the top of the spec because these are filled in by the configure script and because there were references to the variables left in. Please take a look the the new set here: SPEC: http://superb-east.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM: http://superb-east.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd-1.3.5-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 16:19:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231315] Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221619.l9MGJAiS032235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit Alias: fcgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231315 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-22 12:19 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fcgi New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 16:23:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221623.l9MGN1xq000498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-22 12:23 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qlandkarte/qlandkarte.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/qlandkarte/qlandkarte-0.5.3-4.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Oct 22 2007 Douglas E. Warner 0.5.3-4 - including icon for desktop file - disabling parallel make flags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 16:20:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253361] Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221620.l9MGKu2H030845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wyrd - A ncurses frontend for the calendar application remind Alias: wyrd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-22 12:20 EST ------- Package is built for devel, F-8 and F-7 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21789 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21790 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21792 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 16:25:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221625.l9MGPa6V001149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2007-10-22 12:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qlandkarte Short Description: A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices Owners: silfreed, sharkcz Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 devel Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 18:26:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221826.l9MIQ8i7019888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-22 14:26 EST ------- Built against devel, F-8 and F-7. I'm going to leave this in F-7 updates-testing until F8 comes out and the update tree for F8 is populated to make sure we have a working upgrade path. EPEL will have to wait till I have a work related reason to maintain EPEL packages, which should be not so far away. Closing ticket NextRelease -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 18:44:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221844.l9MIiKwg025849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |makghosh at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-22 14:44 EST ------- Issues: * rpmbuild The BuildRequires should contain python-setuptools >= 0.6c6 Because this is the minimum version of python-setuptools required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 19:36:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221936.l9MJanNw003422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-22 15:36 EST ------- cvs done. Note that we are in final freeze for F8, so you will need to contact releng at fedoraproject.org to get this package added to F8, or wait until after release and use bodhi to push out the package as an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 19:38:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231315] Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221938.l9MJc1xT000767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fcgi - fastcgi development kit Alias: fcgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231315 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-22 15:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 19:42:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221942.l9MJgXjL004468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-22 15:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 19:44:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710221944.l9MJiDYi004677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-22 15:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > > * rpmbuild > The BuildRequires should contain python-setuptools >= 0.6c6 > Because this is the minimum version of python-setuptools required. Why is this so? I used the buildrequires magic from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#head-3e899702195642d7d12483e0d73451b70e8d3e9c There a specific version is not mentioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 20:36:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222036.l9MKae8N013994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-22 16:36 EST ------- Paging the maintainer to this thread... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 20:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222048.l9MKmGt4015942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-22 16:48 EST ------- I asked in the iraf.net forum about the xiraf license. Here is the thread: http://iraf.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=86447&highlight=fedora Basically, xiraf is covered under the iraf license, that I attach here. I asked them to include the copyright file in the net release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 20:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222048.l9MKmrF2012059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-22 16:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=234441) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=234441&action=view) Copyright of x11iraf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 20:50:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222050.l9MKo8xG012525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-22 16:50 EST ------- I asked in the iraf.net forum about the xiraf license. Here is the thread: http://iraf.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=86447&highlight=fedora Basically, xiraf is covered under the iraf license, that I attach here. I asked them to include the copyright file in the net release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 20:56:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222056.l9MKuSnG017568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-22 16:56 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * follow packaging guidelines * free software, one of the license included. * source match upstream except for some dates in .svn/entries * %files section right * library packaged rightly Please add a comment explaining what files are covered by the GPL. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:01:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222201.l9MM1Bsk026153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-22 18:01 EST ------- The last update for pysol music (FC edition and regular) was a long time ago and it doesn't seem to be updated too often so I'll definitely consider removing the dist tag. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PySolFC-music Short Description: Music for PySolFC Owners: firewing Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: firewing Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222203.l9MM3fEF026243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-22 18:03 EST ------- I agree, I'll leave them for now and if someones requests/complains about it then I'll mark them %doc in the spec (BTW, is there a way to mark files as %doc without moving them to the root of the source directory first?). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PySolFC Short Description: A collection of solitaire card games Owners: firewing Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: firewing Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:12:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222212.l9MMCOJx023674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-22 18:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: babl Short Description: A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library Owners: deji Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226611] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222215.l9MMF3m3028418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226611 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229416] Review Request: qpidj - qpid java implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222215.l9MMFVhu028544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidj - qpid java implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229416 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:14:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226610] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222214.l9MMEuZl028002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226610 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:15:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226633] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222215.l9MMFJTW024457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226633 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:14:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226585] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222214.l9MMEoNM024037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226585 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226622] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222215.l9MMF9wb024417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226622 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:15:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226632] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222215.l9MMFEUb024438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226632 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:15:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304311] Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222215.l9MMFimM024489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304311 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:14:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222214.l9MMEh9W024009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:18:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222218.l9MMIYdi024698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 18:18 EST ------- There is very little chance that anyone will review this if fedora-review is set to '?' which means 'review in progress'. It won't show on the review tracker page. Could you set it to ' ' unless you have some other reason for it to be set the way it is? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222222.l9MMMZRk029450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 mpg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2007-10-22 18:22 EST ------- Ooops got confused by the meaning of ? in other bug systems... Thanks for letting me now! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:20:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] New: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga.spec SRPM URL: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-7.11-0.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A software package for the development and application of grammars that are used for the analysis of words and sentences of natural languages. It is a language-independent system that offers a programming language for the modelling of the language-dependent grammatical information. This language is also called Malaga. Malaga is based on the grammatical theory of the "Left Associative Grammar" (LAG), developed by Roland Hausser, professor for Computational Linguistics at University of Erlangen, Germany. I'm not personally using this package as such, but the Finnish F/OSS spellchecker Voikko depends on Suomi-Malaga which naturally depends on Malaga, so in order to get Voikko packaged for Fedora I need to package the whole dependency chain. I'm a new packager with only one package in Fedora before these, so I may have made some errors here, I appreciate your feedback. There are some rpmlint issues with the packages: malaga.src and malaga - E: summary-too-long. Hard to fix, the summary is directly from the README and I can't come up with a better one. malaga: E: postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/malaga.info.gz. This is probably caused by the fact that the upstream Makefile installs the info file, so I don't call install-info in the spec file. Should I? malaga: W: empty-%postun. Is this caused by the issue above? malaga-devel and libmalaga: W: no-documentation. All the documentation is in the main malaga package, is that OK? Have I split the packages correctly, so that there is malaga which has all the executables, docs, man/info files etc, libmalaga which has the library files and malaga-devel? Or should the lib package be named malaga-libs? Or should the files currently in malaga and libmalaga even be in the same package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 22 22:27:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710222227.l9MMRu5u026226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 18:27 EST ------- If you do %doc path/file RPM will copy it from the source directory. But %doc /path/file will just set the documentation flag on an installed file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 00:27:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230027.l9N0RmvK013061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 20:27 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 00:24:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346161] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346161 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/xorg-x11-drv-ivtv/xorg-x11-drv-ivtv-1.0.0-1.fc7.kwizart.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/xorg-x11-drv-ivtv/xorg-x11-drv-ivtv-1.0.0-1.fc7.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Xorg X11 ivtv video driver This xorg driver needs testing and ivtv-firmware to be submitted... kernel module is part of the kernel but it seems there is some problem with vanilla 2.6.23 kernels and some userland apps (mythtv) - See the README included Anyway, that Xorg part are supposed to be compatible with any ivtv drivers from >= 0.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 00:27:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230027.l9N0RcdQ009348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 20:27 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 00:30:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230030.l9N0UCMf013510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 20:30 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 01:15:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346161] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230115.l9N1FHQ3014887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346161 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-22 21:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/xorg-x11-drv-ivtv/xorg-x11-drv-ivtv.spec koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=206411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 01:18:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230118.l9N1ItNd015124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms.| |net) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 01:24:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] New: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/ivtv-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/ivtv-firmware-0-1.20070217.noarch.rpm Description: Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip There was a preview review #250971 - but it was CLOSED to INSUFFICIENT_DATA In my view there is no need to requires anything, but instead, the ivtv-utils (or xorg-x11-drv-ivtv) need to requires the ivtv-firmware. (need to be confirmed by testers). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 01:24:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346161] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230124.l9N1OpOd019593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346161 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |346171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 01:24:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230124.l9N1Opfa019619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |346161 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 02:26:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230226.l9N2Q7fO024998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 22:26 EST ------- You don't seem to have an srpm. I built one from the spec and everything looks good except for one issue: You cannot package the two .txt files as %doc; the license requires that they be included and installed in the same directory as the firmware itself. This means that they must be included even in a --nodocs installation. The only problem with keeping them in /lib/firmware is that they have somewhat generic names. I don't think anything prohibits you from renaming the license files; maybe you could prefix them with "ivtv-" so there would be slightly less confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 02:31:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328771] Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230231.l9N2VicR025874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-22 22:31 EST ------- Thanks to Patrice and Jason. I'll add the comment about while file are under the GPL later in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 02:31:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230231.l9N2Vjq9025899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 Bug 328781 depends on bug 328771, which changed state. Bug 328771 Summary: Review Request: babl - A dynamic, any to any, pixel format conversion library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328771 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 02:43:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] Review Request: mercurial-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230243.l9N2hDcF031065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-22 22:43 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mercurial New Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 02:47:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230247.l9N2lq8B032026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-22 22:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=234441) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=234441&action=view) [edit] > Copyright of x11iraf This is MIT, acceptable, would you fix the build failure first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 02:47:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 191402] Review Request: mercurial-0.9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230247.l9N2lOkW031360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mercurial-0.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191402 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 22:47 EST ------- It looks to me as if mercurial already has an F-8 branch. Don't forget to pass -d to 'cvs update'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 02:50:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230250.l9N2oEX6032659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 22:50 EST ------- I think good to chmod 644 them. I saw some of packages installs them with mode 644 and very few installs them with 755. also, you may like to use following command on final SPEC written to avoid mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs message ==>"sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' conntrack-tools.spec" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 03:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230307.l9N37Top002973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-22 23:07 EST ------- Updated the license field, Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl-0.0.13-0.4.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 03:17:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230317.l9N3HIlf010784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-22 23:17 EST ------- 1)Source URL should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/fprobe/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 2) use defattr as %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 03:21:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230321.l9N3L2Kt005254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-22 23:21 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/ivtv-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/ivtv-firmware-0-2.20070217.src.rpm Description: Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip Done... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 03:20:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346221] New: Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346221 Summary: Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/perl-Video-ivtv.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/perl-Video-ivtv-0.13-2.fc7.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Perl modules for ivtv Video support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 03:25:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239247] Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230325.l9N3Pk6k006048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239247 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 23:25 EST ------- Might as well try to deal with any other pending emacs packages. Which is just this one, I think. Some interesting bits: This: head -28 ~/tmp/ebib-1.3.1/ebib.el | sed 's/;;//g' > COPYING has about zero chance of working. rpmlint says: emacs-common-ebib.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/emacs-common-ebib-1.3.1/COPYING Fallout from the above. emacs-common-ebib.noarch: E: description-line-too-long modifying entries), searched, and saved. Obviously, it is also possible to start This goes to exactly 80 characters; might be nice to wrap at 72. I don't know what rpmlint will allow before complaining. emacs-common-ebib.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office emacs-ebib.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office emacs-ebib-el.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office xemacs-ebib.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office xemacs-ebib-el.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office Group is irrelevant these days. emacs-ebib.noarch: W: no-documentation emacs-ebib-el.noarch: W: no-documentation xemacs-ebib.noarch: W: no-documentation xemacs-ebib-el.noarch: W: no-documentation These are OK. I know there's a bunch of stuff in the emacs packaging guidelines that isn't in this package. Things like the versioned dependencies on emacs(bin) and xemacs(bin) and the pkgconfig calls to extract that info. Over time I've lost any emacs expertise I ever had, but the guidelines do have a reasonable explanation of why those dependencies are necessary. But I guess you should know better than most. Are they needed in this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 04:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230419.l9N4JZr2013269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 00:19 EST ------- Builds fine; rpmlint says: bibexport.noarch: W: invalid-license LaTeX According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing, the License: tag should be "LPPL". Otherwise everything looks good. Review: * source files match upstream: 878458e6d161d876f049d2e2839e417260b50b180bb0756829a54e06cb18ed72 bibexport.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license (well, it uses the wrong abbreviation) * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint * final provides and requires are sane: bibexport = 2.10-1.fc8 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/texhash tetex * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no idea at all how to test this package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets look OK (texhash is called because of files in /usr/share/texmf/bibtex/bst/bibexport) * code, not content. * The documentation PDF is ten times the size of everything else in the package combined, but teh package is still only 160K so there's no point in splitting anything. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, provided you fix up the License: tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 04:29:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] New: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/ruby-ldap.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/ruby-ldap-0.9.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Ruby/LDAP is an extension library for Ruby. It provides the interface to some LDAP libraries (e.g. OpenLDAP, UMich LDAP, Netscape SDK, ActiveDirectory). The common API for application development is described in RFC1823 and is supported by Ruby/LDAP. Note: This is my first ruby package. I tried to follow the guidelines, but may have not been perfect. Please be gentle. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 05:12:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230512.l9N5Clos027020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From dlehman at redhat.com 2007-10-23 01:12 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-3.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump.spec This time I actually rebuilt on F8. Since I don't even know why I had a require on redhat-artwork I just removed it. Was that a bad move? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 05:13:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230513.l9N5DnFG027079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 01:13 EST ------- Hmm, something's still not right. Ah: install -pm 0644 license-end-user.txt \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/firmware/ivtv-license-end-user.txt install -pm 0644 license-end-user.txt \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/firmware/ivtv-license-end-user.txt You install the same file twice; I guess one of those is supposed to install license-oemihvisv.txt instead. I'll just progress with the review after changing one of those. You do end up including the license files twice. I guess this is OK, as now this package mirrors almost exactly what the ipw2200 package does. Is it expected that the firmware will one day acquire a version? If not, then there's no reason why you couldn't just use the date as the version instead of using 0 as the version and encoding the date in the release. I'll leave that up to you; you can decide to change it in the future if you want. * source files match upstream: 9d9ecb370ea3ca90956f05e0167f75325b2ccd6a17faf3fbc18475f4da0b5dda firmware-20070217.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is acceptable for firmware. * license text included in package in the required location. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane (no runtime dependencies) * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content (firmware) * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, provided you fix the bit with the missing license file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 05:36:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346161] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230536.l9N5aTZ4024657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346161 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 01:36 EST ------- This is a basic xorg driver; nothing fancy. rpmlint is silent and everything looks good. I have the firmware in a local repo so that this will install properly for me, but I don't have the hardware to test this on. You might want to flesh out the description just a little bit if possible. Specifically, it would be nice to know which boards are supported. It looks like it only works with the PVR350; I'm not sure that the other boards have a framebuffer or even do any output. * source files match upstream: e98a2ed67fea25ab7f94eecb5a53a2d3a3c42de93557d77d774fa18d311c807a xf86-video-ivtv-1.0.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description is OK (might be nice to include a little more info) * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ivtv_drv.so()(64bit) xorg-x11-drv-ivtv = 1.0.0-1.fc8 = ivtv-firmware xorg-x11-server-Xorg >= 1.3.0.0-6 * %check is not present; I've no way to test this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 06:56:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230656.l9N6uHw5002495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-23 02:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bibexport Short Description: Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files Owners: pertusus [ AT ] free.fr Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 07:01:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230701.l9N71i5D003241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 03:01 EST ------- Owners: should contain FAS account names, not (obscured) email addresses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 07:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230700.l9N70TUO008391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-23 03:00 EST ------- * doesn't configure accepts --disable-static? If yes I think it is better than removing *.a after the build. * %{_includedir}/gegl-1.0/ seems unowned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 07:11:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230711.l9N7B4x7004748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-23 03:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bibexport Short Description: Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files Owners: pertusus Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes I wasn't aware about that very good change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 07:11:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230711.l9N7BKa2009920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 07:12:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230712.l9N7CpJg010008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-23 03:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bibexport Short Description: Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files Owners: pertusus Branches: EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes Sorry, I forgot the EPEL branches... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 07:21:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 03:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230721.l9N7LE8I011301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(devrim at commandprom | |pt.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-23 03:21 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 08:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230833.l9N8X6XC022455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-23 04:33 EST ------- You need to have build and install as %build %{__python} setup.py build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I saw that anyway install is calling build so why not to call build in proper build section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 08:49:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230849.l9N8nr0S020233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 09:01:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 05:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230901.l9N91Huh026955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-10-23 05:01 EST ------- Sorry, been on holiday. I'll get back to this in a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 09:46:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 05:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239247] Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710230946.l9N9kfwr001505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239247 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-23 05:46 EST ------- Thanks Jason. I have to admit, I had completely forgotten about this package, and haven't been keeping the spec up to date with the guidelines. I'll resurrect my work on this at the weekend and fix it up. Thanks for taking a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 10:18:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239247] Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231018.l9NAINGh001798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239247 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 06:18 EST ------- No problem. I'll be away from computers this weekend but I'll be happy to take a look when I get back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 11:33:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346161] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231133.l9NBXIX9022300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346161 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-23 07:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv Short Description: Xorg X11 ivtv video driver Owners: kwizart Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 11:29:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231129.l9NBTAD4021546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-23 07:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ivtv-firmware Short Description: Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip Owners: kwizart Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes Thx for the review, I will only build on devel for now... so I could have feedbacks... from rawhiders... perl-Video-ivtv is might be around...(still missing ivtv and perl-Video-Frequency)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 11:57:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231157.l9NBv2pW025595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 11:57:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231157.l9NBvER6025632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:02:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231202.l9NC2pDk026654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-10-23 08:02 EST ------- Ok, I'll fix the paths (/usr/lib), have you see any other problems with review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231201.l9NC1eFB026602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-23 08:01 EST ------- I have send another mail to upstream some days ago but it seems that he does not want to reply. I will try the mailing list of Bioconductor if I have no reply at the end of the week. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:00:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231200.l9NC08QW026273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-23 08:00 EST ------- * URL seems to be http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/ and source should certainly come from gnu. -> you are right, changed * missing dot at the end of %descriptions -> added * Why isn't the pkgconfig file distributed???? -> right suggestion - gsl.pc is added * the gsl-config script created on the fly certainly needs a comment. And is strange anyway. It would be better, in my opinion either - to create a wrapper around pkg-config calls that recreates the gsl-config output. - or leave gsl-config as is, if not using pkgconfig it is expected to have multilib stuff broken. -> I can't imagine any think it there is not any better way - it is isomorphic to use gsl.pc or to use the present solution. It is impossible to leave gsl-config as it is because of that version causes multilib problem and it would be impossible to install 64 and 32 versions. * if the code is still useful, instead of gslcsuffix=`echo "%{_libdir}" | sed s,/usr/,,` I suggest using %_lib -> changed, thanks * .la files are still there -> removed, thanks Suggestions: * remove .gz from install-info snippets * use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) -> added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231217.l9NCHZc8029063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-23 08:17 EST ------- Thanks Patrice for your great work, please could you look to gsl-1.10-3.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:20:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231220.l9NCKT2J030560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-23 08:20 EST ------- I don't think so. So I need final updates to finish this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:25:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231225.l9NCPRIe030402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-23 08:25 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gsl New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:25:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231225.l9NCP6nP030360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-10-23 08:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) This is because this particular package requires python-setuptools >= 0.6c6. I had build it on my F7 box. It gave out an RPM build error that it requires python-setuptools>=0.6c6. Then I had the 0.6c5 version. I updated it and it worked fine... Also do fix the build thing suggested above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:33:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231233.l9NCXBI5031461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:33:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231233.l9NCXk6b032456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-23 08:33 EST ------- Yes, configure accepts --disable-static, using it now. Have also fix the directory ownership. Thanks. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl-0.0.13-0.5.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:43:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231243.l9NChV2V000752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-23 08:43 EST ------- Done. conntrack-tools-...-3 at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231244.l9NCiwnp001756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-23 08:44 EST ------- Done, fprobe-ulog-1.1-3 at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 12:52:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231252.l9NCqjGq003352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-23 08:52 EST ------- Here are the changed files: Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flup.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/python-flup-1.0-2.tillf7.src.rpm - Fedora <= 7: python-setuptools needs to be 0.6c6 or newer - Move build to %%build I used python instead of %{__python}, afaik this is ok with the guidelines and I like it more, because it is less obfuscated, e.g. %{__python} could also do some magic instead of only pointing to the python binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 13:32:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231332.l9NDWhxf010591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 ------- Additional Comments From jmoskovc at redhat.com 2007-10-23 09:32 EST ------- Hi, I fixed the errors above, so could someone please re-check it? Thank you jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 13:37:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231337.l9NDbOB4010745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-23 09:37 EST ------- Even if it doesn't depend on anything, you might consider using %{?dist} anyways, since the code is compiled, and will inevitably require rebuilds for things like gcc changes. Fedora will still inherit older packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 13:42:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231342.l9NDgYvl011636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-23 09:42 EST ------- $ wget http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-3.fc8.src.rpm --15:42:15-- http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-3.fc8.src.rpm => `system-config-kdump-1.0.12-3.fc8.src.rpm' Resolving people.redhat.com... 172.16.48.237 Connecting to people.redhat.com|172.16.48.237|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 0 [application/x-rpm] [ <=> ] 0 --.--K/s 15:42:15 (0.00 B/s) - `system-config-kdump-1.0.12-3.fc8.src.rpm' saved [0/0] $ file system-config-kdump-1.0.12-3.fc8.src.rpm system-config-kdump-1.0.12-3.fc8.src.rpm: empty $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 13:45:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231345.l9NDjacS012218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-23 09:45 EST ------- Though I didn't see your patch because of reasons in comment #12, I think you could avoid patching the source just by using --remove-category arguments to desktop-file-install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 13:54:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231354.l9NDs44x013929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-23 09:54 EST ------- Also, the tuncfg.c code is not licensed, there is no clear statement of licensing intent either. Can you contact upstream and have them clarify the license for tuncfg.c (preferably with a new code release, but an email will suffice)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 13:51:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231351.l9NDpfVS013767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-23 09:51 EST ------- Please correct the %description to say that this is actually a library, not the player. Maybe also the mikmod description should be adjusted not to mention the obsolete OSS (I see the library has patch for ESound output). You don't pass %{_smp_flags} to make. Please either comment why are concurrent builds not feasible, or add the flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 13:55:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231355.l9NDtRrR014500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 13:58:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231358.l9NDwsax015615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-23 09:58 EST ------- rpmlint: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/libmikmod-3.1.11-1.fc8.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/libmikmod-3.1.11-1.fc8.src.rpm $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/libmikmod-de libmikmod-debuginfo-3.1.11-1.fc8.i386.rpm libmikmod-devel-3.1.11-1.fc8.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/libmikmod-devel-3.1.11-1.fc8.i386.rpm libmikmod-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib/libmikmod.a libmikmod-devel.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Header files and documentation for compiling mikmod applications. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/libmikmod-debuginfo-3.1.11-1.fc8.i386.rpm $ Please deal with those -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 14:38:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231438.l9NEcahJ022582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-23 10:38 EST ------- This can probably be closed, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 14:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229322] Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231438.l9NEcYBF023045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgpool-ha : pgpool-ha uses heartbeat to keep pgpool from being a single point of failure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229322 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-23 10:38 EST ------- Built, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 14:58:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231458.l9NEwHOO026331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-10-23 10:58 EST ------- No. I'm waiting to push pgpool-ha. Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:03:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231503.l9NF3lBE026889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-23 11:03 EST ------- I think it will be good if you provide SPEC as well as SRPM links each time you update package. Otherwise it needs to open download place, browse website and then search for updated SRPM and then download SRPM instead of having direct single click download for updated SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:05:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229321] Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231505.l9NF5ChH027827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request :postgresql-pgpool-II : Connection pooling/replication server for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229321 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-10-23 11:05 EST ------- Ok, just checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:06:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231506.l9NF6vcW028074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-23 11:06 EST ------- I think it will be good if you provide SPEC as well as SRPM links each time you update package. Otherwise it needs to open download place, browse website and then search for updated SRPM and then download SRPM instead of having direct single click download for updated SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:07:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231507.l9NF72pt028113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms.| |net) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231513.l9NFDrnx028917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-23 11:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/7/SPECS/conntrack-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/7/SRPMS/conntrack-tools-0.9.5-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:12:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231512.l9NFCRkc028748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From dlehman at redhat.com 2007-10-23 11:12 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-4.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump.spec I took your advice about using desktop-file-install args instead of patching -- desktop-file-install isn't very forthcoming about its capabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 348881] New: Review Request: perl-Video-Frequencies - Perl modules for Frequencies Video support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348881 Summary: Review Request: perl-Video-Frequencies - Perl modules for Frequencies Video support Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/perl-Video-Frequencies.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/perl-Video-Frequencies-0.03-2.fc7.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Perl modules for Frequencies Video support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:14:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231514.l9NFEdW7029317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-23 11:14 EST ------- Spec URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/7/SPECS/fprobe-ulog.spec SRPM URL: http://palevo.sgu.ru/mockbuild/7/SRPMS/fprobe-ulog-1.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:20:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231520.l9NFK95C030820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-10-23 11:20 EST ------- Updated, please check again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:27:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 348911] New: Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348911 Summary: Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/ivtv.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ivtv/ivtv-1.0.3-1.fc7.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:28:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 348911] Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231528.l9NFSGAZ000442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348911 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |346221, 348881 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346221] Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231528.l9NFSHHN000483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346221 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |348911 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:28:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 348881] Review Request: perl-Video-Frequencies - Perl modules for Frequencies Video support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231528.l9NFSHZs000462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Video-Frequencies - Perl modules for Frequencies Video support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348881 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |348911 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231529.l9NFTFMw001004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-23 11:29 EST ------- Just found one missing thing that this package used obsoletes and provides but its not according to Naming guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d It should be Provides: conntrack = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: conntrack < 1.0-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231531.l9NFVIbR001695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-23 11:31 EST ------- Only thing is that my advise about changing license tag to GPL2+ was wrong, the right one would be GPLv2+. Since this is a trivial change and can't go wrong, I approve the pacakge for inclusion in Fedora so that it is not delayed any longer. APPROVED Thanks for the package, Dave! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:30:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231530.l9NFUh6Y001573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-23 11:30 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url cdb2e4edc47e8a3d5479eeabfb979ebc fprobe-ulog-1.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package fprobe-ulog-1.1-3.fc8 -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:34:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231534.l9NFYUsG002012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From dlehman at redhat.com 2007-10-23 11:34 EST ------- New packages with corrected license tag: http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump-1.0.12-5.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dlehman/s-c-kdump/system-config-kdump.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:36:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231536.l9NFaapU002889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-23 11:36 EST ------- Aright, outstanding issues have been solved, I see no other problems, and so do qa script and rpmlint. Therefore, the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231541.l9NFfCZ4003422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-23 11:41 EST ------- Ok - new version: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit-0.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit.spec Should fix all of the existing issues, as well as going to the latest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:43:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231543.l9NFhOpV003600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-23 11:43 EST ------- What the point? I'm obsoleting conntrack package (which was at 1.0-0.betasomething), but why I should provide conntrack = 0.9.5-3 (which is smaller than version I am obsoleting) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:48:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231548.l9NFmCmJ004587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-23 11:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fprobe-ulog Short Description: NetFlow probe Owners: stingray Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 15:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231545.l9NFjlHV004301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-10-23 11:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmikmod Short Description: A MOD music file player library Owners: jnovy Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 16:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231614.l9NGES12015508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-23 12:14 EST ------- Here are new packages to go with the new upstream version: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/gnome-packagekit-0.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 16:37:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225666] Merge Review: crypto-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231637.l9NGbDPa024620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: crypto-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225666 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-10-23 12:37 EST ------- It would be nice to see this in EPEL EL-5. Not sure why this isn't in RHEL5, since it appears to be in RHEL4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 16:39:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231639.l9NGdtYj025229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-23 12:39 EST ------- F-8 branches now exist... so do you really only want F-7 and devel? Or do you want F-8 here as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 16:39:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225666] Merge Review: crypto-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231639.l9NGduMA025032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: crypto-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225666 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-10-23 12:39 EST ------- Needs perl-Newt to be in EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 17:00:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231700.l9NH0E69029002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-23 13:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 17:14:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346161] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231714.l9NHEr5j031211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346161 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-23 13:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 17:34:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231734.l9NHY9aj003365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-23 13:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 17:47:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231747.l9NHlCog005844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-23 13:47 EST ------- Before making cvs requests this needs to be approved. Patrice, are you taking over the review from Jose? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 17:55:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231755.l9NHtTlo007483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-23 13:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 18:17:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349191] New: Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349191 Summary: Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-suomi-voikko.spec SRPM URL: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-suomi-voikko-0.7.6-0.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga. This version is modified to support the Voikko spellchecker/hyphenator and is not compatible with the Sukija text indexer. I've named the package malaga-suomi-voikko, because it extends Malaga (see Bug #346121) with Finnish and it is a modified version to support the F/OSS Finnish spell checker Voikko, which I intend to package also. This way malaga-suomi (without Voikko support) could be packaged separately if needed. Rpmlint outputs these errors: malaga-suomi-voikko.i386: E: no-binary malaga-suomi-voikko.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I have explained these in the comments of the spec file, copied here as well: Files differ on big-endian and small-endian archs, and they have different names (*_l vs *_b). This is the reason we use %{_libdir} instead of %{_datadir} and won't noarch the package. This is exactly what the Voikko developers asked me to do, they think that using /usr/share would be wrong, because of the issue mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 18:29:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231829.l9NITZJE013092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-23 14:29 EST ------- Did you get any chance to free up some time for this review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 18:50:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231850.l9NIouML017099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-23 14:50 EST ------- I don't see any of the raised issues fixed in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 19:02:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231902.l9NJ2xph019226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-23 15:02 EST ------- Ping Are you still in the market for a formal review of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 19:01:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231901.l9NJ1qSH019028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 19:24:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231924.l9NJOhGw022497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-23 15:24 EST ------- I take it that Aurelien is not going to be acting as reviewer on this? Is this ticket still in the market for a formal reviewer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 19:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225666] Merge Review: crypto-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231948.l9NJmbZo026489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: crypto-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225666 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-10-23 15:48 EST ------- It is scheduled to be restored to RHEL 5 by 5.1, FWIW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 19:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710231950.l9NJoLaf026810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-23 15:50 EST ------- Sorry. Of course I want F-8 :) Thx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 20:02:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232002.l9NK2Cp5028581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-23 16:02 EST ------- I posted my version after a month and a half of inactivity, and over on non-building srpm, so I think that makes me the bug reporter. If you prefer I can open a new bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 20:08:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226246] Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232008.l9NK8ciL029458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226246 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-23 16:08 EST ------- Removed BR, and built 2.005-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 20:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232019.l9NKJTV2031184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-23 16:19 EST ------- One quick note you need to update the license tag in the spec file to read GPLv2+ since the text of the header in the source files reads "version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." The licensing guidelines changed since the ticket was opened. If you haven't done so you should review the new licensing guidance. Don't spin up a new srpm and spec for just this change. I'll make a formal review and you can spin a new spec and srpm with all changes. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 20:31:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232031.l9NKV3h5001321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 16:31 EST ------- OK, builds fine for me now; rpmlint is quiet and I don't see anything worth complaining about. * source files match upstream: 48e5e4483e2847a563f02ec1d1f148e72c327bc623c5b59da41cada9590adc09 SQL-Translator-0.08001.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (and there's a bunch of them) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. See end for list. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=43, Tests=1284, 66 wallclock secs (62.53 cusr + 2.89 csys = 65.42 CPU) The two skipped tests are: t/18ttschema-producer......skipped all skipped: Template v2.15 is is incompatible with SQL::Translator 0.08+ t/33tt-table-producer......skipped all skipped: Template v2.15+ is incompatible with SQL::Translator 0.08+ * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED Here's the full dependency list: perl(Parse::RecDescent::SQL::Translator::Parser::DB2::Grammar) perl(SQL::Translator) = 0.08001 perl(SQL::Translator::Diff) perl(SQL::Translator::Filter::DefaultExtra) perl(SQL::Translator::Filter::Globals) perl(SQL::Translator::Filter::Names) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser) = 1.9 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::Access) = 1.3 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DB2) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DB2::Grammar) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI) = 1.10 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::DB2) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::MySQL) = 1.6 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::Oracle) = 1.2 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::PostgreSQL) = 1.10 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::SQLServer) = 1.6 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::SQLite) = 1.5 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::Sybase) = 1.6 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::Excel) = 1.14 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::MySQL) = 1.58 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::Oracle) = 1.29 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::PostgreSQL) = 1.48 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::SQLServer) = 1.6 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::SQLite) = 1.12 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::Storable) = 1.5 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::Sybase) = 1.10 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::XML) = 1.2 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::XML::SQLFairy) = 1.15 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::YAML) = 1.8 perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::xSV) = 1.16 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer) = 1.8 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::DB2) = 1.5 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::DiaUml) = 1.2 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::Diagram) = 1.13 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::Dumper) = 1.9 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::GraphViz) = 1.14 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::HTML) = 1.15 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::Latex) = 1.1 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::MySQL) = 1.52 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::Oracle) = 1.34 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::POD) = 1.5 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::PostgreSQL) = 1.29 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::SQLServer) = 1.7 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::SQLite) = 1.15 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::Storable) = 1.5 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::Sybase) = 1.9 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::TT::Base) = 1.6 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::TT::Table) = 1.3 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::TTSchema) = 1.11 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::XML) = 1.16 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::XML::SQLFairy) = 1.20 perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::YAML) = 1.12 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema) = 1.26 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Constants) = 1.43 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Constraint) = 1.21 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Field) = 1.26 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::CompoundEdge) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Edge) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::HyperEdge) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Node) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Port) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Index) = 1.17 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Object) = 1.8 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Procedure) = 1.8 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Table) = 1.36 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Trigger) = 1.9 perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::View) = 1.14 perl(SQL::Translator::Shell) perl(SQL::Translator::Utils) = 1.12 perl(Test::SQL::Translator) = 1.8 perl-SQL-Translator = 0.08001-1.fc8 = /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.004 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Base) perl(Class::MakeMethods::Template::Hash) perl(Class::MakeMethods::Utility::Ref) perl(Config) perl(Cwd) perl(DBI) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(GD) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(GraphViz) perl(IO::Dir) perl(IO::Handle) perl(IO::Scalar) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Parse::RecDescent) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(SQL::Translator) perl(SQL::Translator::Diff) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DB2::Grammar) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::DB2) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::MySQL) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::Oracle) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::PostgreSQL) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::SQLServer) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::SQLite) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::DBI::Sybase) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::MySQL) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::SQLite) perl(SQL::Translator::Parser::XML::SQLFairy) perl(SQL::Translator::Producer::XML::SQLFairy) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Constants) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Constraint) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Field) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::CompoundEdge) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Edge) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::HyperEdge) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Node) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Graph::Port) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Index) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Procedure) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Table) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::Trigger) perl(SQL::Translator::Schema::View) perl(SQL::Translator::Utils) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) perl(Storable) perl(Template) perl(Text::ParseWords) perl(Text::RecordParser) perl(XML::XPath) perl(XML::XPath::XMLParser) perl(YAML) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 20:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241597] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232047.l9NKl3Na004710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object Alias: perl-HTML-Tidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241597 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 16:47 EST ------- So it seems that Chris is back. Chris, did you want to move forward with this package as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:02:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232102.l9NL2kWN007139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 17:02 EST ------- Is this still blocked by the CGI::Ex ticket (which seems to be assigned to you)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:06:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232106.l9NL6Pr8008348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-23 17:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=235541) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=235541&action=view) patch spec and .nousr patch to simplify multiarch changes Also keep timestamps. You can remove the .nousr patch afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232103.l9NL3sqq007661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-23 17:03 EST ------- I am commenting until I can accept it in which case I'll take the review. rpmlint says: gsl.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gsl-1.10/THANKS gsl.i386: W: invalid-license BSD license static lib should be in a separate -static subpackage. Missing pkgconfig Requires. /usr/share/aclocal/ is unowned. Instead of the complicated patches for multilib issue, I'll attach a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/review/compiz-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/review/compiz-manager-0.6.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This script will detect what options we need to pass to compiz to get it started, and start a default plugin and possibly window decorator. Some notes: Group: I'm not really sure if this group fits. Options for starting compiz: I've not modified the options that would be started with compiz. So if there are better solutions please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:34:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232134.l9NLYsY9013185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-23 17:34 EST ------- Rather, it's the other way around -- this review is blocking the upgrade ticket :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232134.l9NLYRRc012985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |to start compiz with proper | |options -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:39:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346221] Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232139.l9NLdMs0013998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346221 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 17:39 EST ------- The URL: tag seems to be incorrect; CPAN doesn't know about this module. So I went to ivtvdriver.org and found: # Perl modules for controlling ivtv are available at: http://dl.ivtvdriver.org/supporting-tools/. These are no longer maintained and are unlikely to work. So is it really a good idea to be packaging them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 348911] Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232157.l9NLv93o016961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348911 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|348881 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:57:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346221] Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232157.l9NLvKXq016982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346221 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:57:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 348881] Review Request: perl-Video-Frequencies - Perl modules for Frequencies Video support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232157.l9NLv8bh016941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Video-Frequencies - Perl modules for Frequencies Video support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348881 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|348911 | nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-23 17:57 EST ------- This perl script is unmaintained (and are supposed not to work) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:55:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 348911] Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232155.l9NLtmjD016719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348911 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|346221 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:55:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346221] Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232155.l9NLtmHC016699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Video-ivtv - Perl modules for ivtv Video support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346221 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|348911 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-23 17:55 EST ------- Well, indeed a little more searching and I would have seen this... Closing the perl-Video-ivtv and Frequencies (unmaintained) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 21:59:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232159.l9NLxGFc017234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-23 17:59 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 22:13:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263181] Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232213.l9NMDTFH019551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263181 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 18:13 EST ------- I think the issue is that you as the maintainer of a package with no upstream need to be prepared to essentially take over development in order to fix problems and keep the package building for new Fedora releases while the packages that you depend on may go through incompatible API changes and such. That said, the updated package looks reasonable and builds without problems. I would most likely approve it with some minor tweaks, but it's important to make sure you understand the responsibilities that come with an inactive upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 22:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232218.l9NMIFlP020307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-23 18:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-SQL-Translator Short Description: Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Owners: cweyl Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 22:45:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232245.l9NMjooQ024524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 18:45 EST ------- Erm, sorry for dumbness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 23:18:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232318.l9NNIv3J029240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 19:18 EST ------- Looks good to me. The Summary: is terribly cryptic, though. I know it's what upstream uses as their summary, but perhaps it would be nicer to say something like "Fast templating engine supporting the syntax of several other templating systems" except that's too long. Ugh. I'll leave it up to you. * source files match upstream: d55664bbe5389afef51a66a07252a335d8370b2e72f3d494d147d14d05253155 Template-Alloy-1.007.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. ? summary is somewhat cryptic. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane; full list at the end. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=2992, 3 wallclock secs ( 3.14 cusr + 0.28 csys = 3.42 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED Full provides and requires: perl(Template::Alloy) = 1.007 perl(Template::Alloy::Compile) perl(Template::Alloy::Context) perl(Template::Alloy::EvalPerlHandle) perl(Template::Alloy::Exception) perl(Template::Alloy::HTE) perl(Template::Alloy::Iterator) perl(Template::Alloy::Operator) perl(Template::Alloy::Parse) perl(Template::Alloy::Perl) perl(Template::Alloy::Play) perl(Template::Alloy::TT) perl(Template::Alloy::Tmpl) perl(Template::Alloy::VMethod) perl(Template::Alloy::Velocity) perl(Template::Alloy::_ContextStash) perl-Template-Alloy = 1.007-1.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Template::Alloy) perl(Template::Alloy::Context) perl(Template::Alloy::Exception) perl(Template::Alloy::Iterator) perl(Template::Alloy::Operator) perl(Template::Alloy::VMethod) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 23:37:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232337.l9NNbqwc031974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 19:37 EST ------- This fails to build for me: + /usr/bin/pear install --nodeps --packagingroot /var/tmp/php-pear-phing-2.3.0-0.1.RC1.fc8-root-mockbuild phing.xml parsePackageName(): invalid package name "phing.xml" in "phing.xml" Unknown channel "pear.phing.info" Parsing of package.xml from file "phing.xml" failed Cannot initialize 'phing.xml', invalid or missing package file Package "phing.xml" is not valid install failed error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46949 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 23:35:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232335.l9NNZN1J031237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |266841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 23 23:35:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710232335.l9NNZNci031213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |266941 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 19:35 EST ------- Looks like this depends on php-pear-phing; that should be indicated in this ticket so reviewers know not to look at this package until the other one is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 00:19:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240019.l9O0J1V3005041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 20:19 EST ------- Any reason not to close this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 00:18:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240018.l9O0ImJo004986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus Alias: ndesk-dbus-glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 00:17:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240017.l9O0HtAE004940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 20:17 EST ------- There's not much to these channel packages. rpmlint says: php-channel-symfony.noarch: W: no-documentation which is true, but not a blocker. I'm not sure your URL: is correct. Shouldn't it point to symfony-project.com? phing.info seems to be the page for a different project. I'm not even sure the channel.xml contains copyrightable content, but given that the actual symfony-project software is all under the MIT license, are you sure that LGPLv2 is proper? Where do you find that documented? * source file matches upstream: b5e1ea8f15922ce174428fc9b264a08434a81ee97a327fd84692bf042a218533 channel.xml * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint output is OK. * final provides and requires are sane: php-channel(pear.symfony-project.com) php-channel-symfony = 1.0.0-1.fc8 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-cli php-pear(PEAR) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files (only one file!) * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (PEAR channel registration) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 00:59:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240059.l9O0xCv5011028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-23 20:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #57) > OK, I suggest if you have the time that you clean up the patch and submit it to > this bugzilla. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 00:58:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240058.l9O0wN4h010941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-23 20:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=235731) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=235731&action=view) source patch to fix function name clash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 00:57:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240057.l9O0vl2u010869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #158233|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-23 20:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=235721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=235721&action=view) specfile patch to fix function name clash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 01:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349791] New: Review Request: PySoLFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349791 Summary: Review Request: PySoLFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-cardsets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains various cardsets for pysol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 01:24:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240124.l9O1OvU9014356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-23 21:24 EST ------- Filed bug 349801 against mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 01:24:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240124.l9O1O4vh014300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |349801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 01:57:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] New: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gnome-devel-docs.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gnome-devel-docs-2.20.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains documents which are targeted for GNOME developers. It contains e.g. the Human Interface Guidelines, the Integration Guide and the Platform Overview. Known issues: COPYING is GPL, docs are under GFDL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 01:59:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240159.l9O1xqfH022593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-23 21:59 EST ------- License confusion is filed as: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486835 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 02:05:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349791] Review Request: PySoLFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240205.l9O251YR025478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySoLFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349791 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 02:26:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240226.l9O2QB1I000714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-23 22:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Template-Alloy Short Description: TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Owners: cweyl Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 02:28:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240228.l9O2Se6e001859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-23 22:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Erm, sorry for dumbness. Hey, that's my line! :) w.r.t. the summary, I agree. I'm tempted to say "Template::Any by another name" but I suspect that would be just as confusing to the layman, if slightly less to a perlite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 02:55:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349791] Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240255.l9O2tAc0012574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349791 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: PySoLFC- |Review Request: PySolFC- |cardsets - Various cardsets |cardsets - Various cardsets |for pysol |for PySolFC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 03:06:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240306.l9O366ni014635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-23 23:06 EST ------- Got following in build.log chmod: cannot access `/var/tmp/PackageKit-0.1.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py': No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 03:38:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240338.l9O3c8Ad013545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-23 23:38 EST ------- So you have: # no translations currently, but there should be eventually %find_lang %{name} --with-gnome || : and then: %files -f %{name}.lang but if find_lang fails then %{name}.lang won't exist, yea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 03:37:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240337.l9O3bU2x023919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rstrode at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 03:52:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240352.l9O3qwMw025952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-23 23:52 EST ------- hmm, I tried to copy your trick, but I seem to have failed. but actually, there are already translations, since C counts too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 03:57:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240357.l9O3vY9o026676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-23 23:57 EST ------- Looks good. The dependency list is now: R-tkWidgets = 1.16.0-1.fc8 = /bin/sh R R-DynDoc R-widgetTools The sources still match upstream: 581fa8417a68e7303eb76e52cfd500922ebb3206c1ac6f1b05a3b218cfb07840 tkWidgets_1.16.0.tar.gz And the license, well, Artistic 2.0 is OK. It would sure be nice if these folks paid attention to just the basics about how to put license statements in their code and such, but at least we have enough now to go on. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:06:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226251] Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240406.l9O46UYR017717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL Alias: perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 00:06 EST ------- iconv warning can be solve by adding following to %prep section file=ChangeLog iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 < "$file" > "${file}_" mv -f "${file}_" "$file" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:12:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240412.l9O4C4An018619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 ------- Additional Comments From bishop at platypus.bc.ca 2007-10-24 00:12 EST ------- The clear statement is for GPL2. That's in the source, but not in tuncfg.c, so may have been overlooked. Have the tun people been approached about a package for fedora? The specfile, as attached, doesn't use %dist; probably because the %dist crutch doesn't appear in all distros for which the project may be packaged, and really assumes a rebuilding user dumb enough to need %builddeps but smart enough to activate the magic crutch anyway if the specfile can't cope. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:12:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226251] Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240412.l9O4CfQX028875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL Alias: perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226251 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 00:12 EST ------- you can close this review once you finish iconv change in CVS and build the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:11:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226251] Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240411.l9O4BLlF028803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL Alias: perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 00:11 EST ------- Review based on current CVS trunk Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM But not for RPM. perl-DBD-MySQL.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-DBD-MySQL-4.005/ChangeLog ==> can be solved as given in comment #2 + source files match upstream url 39181a061348ad76b67c99326873ccd5 DBD-mysql-4.005.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs + Package perl-DBD-MySQL-4.005-3.fc8 -> Provides: mysql.so perl(Bundle::DBD::mysql) = 4.004 perl(DBD::mysql) = 4.005 perl(DBD::mysql::GetInfo) perl(DBD::mysql::db) perl(DBD::mysql::dr) perl(DBD::mysql::st) perl-DBD-mysql = 4.005-3.fc8 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypt.so.1 libcrypto.so.6 libm.so.6 libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15(libmysqlclient_15) libnsl.so.1 libssl.so.6 libz.so.1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DBD::mysql) perl(DBI) perl(DBI::Const::GetInfoType) perl(DynaLoader) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:16:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240416.l9O4Gjdp029662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-24 00:16 EST ------- %description This package contains documents which are targeted for GNOME developers. It contains e.g. the Human Interface Guidelines, the Integration Guide and the Platform Overview. ^^ e.g. should have commas on each side of it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:18:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240418.l9O4IapM019565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-24 00:18 EST ------- i guess you should either add the touch after the || or just remove the || : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:19:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240419.l9O4JXoB019686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-10-24 00:19 EST ------- fix those issues and you're set to go. rpmlint seems fine and it builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:19:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226246] Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240419.l9O4JQPR019641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Compress-Zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226246 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 00:19 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2eb448ae8ec536f4b6744882f02819d3 Compress-Zlib-2.005.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/000prereq.....ok t/01version.....ok t/03zlib-v1.....ok t/05examples....ok t/06gzsetp......ok t/08encoding....ok t/14gzopen......ok t/99pod.........ok All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=726, 2 wallclock secs ( 2.15 cusr + 0.31 csys = 2.46 CPU) + Package perl-Compress-Zlib-2.005-3.fc8-> Provides: perl(Compress::Zlib) = 2.005 perl(Zlib::OldDeflate) perl(Zlib::OldInflate) Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) >= 2.005 perl(Exporter) perl(IO::Compress::Base::Common) >= 2.005 perl(IO::Compress::Gzip) >= 2.005 perl(IO::Compress::Gzip::Constants) >= 2.005 perl(IO::Handle) perl(IO::Uncompress::Gunzip) >= 2.005 perl(Scalar::Util) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. As reviewed package is in CVS, you can CLOSE this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:25:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240425.l9O4PD39020885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 00:25 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f6522514032092dd0341aa26a408ad4d XML-Simple-2.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/0_Config........# ^M# Package Version # perl 5.8.8 # XML::Simple 2.17 # Storable 2.15 # XML::Parser 2.34 # XML::SAX 0.16 # XML::NamespaceSupport 1.09 # XML::SAX::PurePerl 0.92 # XML::LibXML::SAX::Parser 1.62 # XML::LibXML::SAX 1.62 (default parser) ok t/1_XMLin.........ok t/2_XMLout........ok t/3_Storable......ok t/4_MemShare......ok t/5_MemCopy.......ok t/6_ObjIntf.......ok t/7_SaxStuff......ok t/8_Namespaces....ok t/9_Strict........ok t/A_XMLParser.....ok t/B_Hooks.........ok All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=485, 15 wallclock secs ( 3.22 cusr + 0.29 csys = 3.51 CPU) + Package perl-XML-Simple-2.17-2.fc8 -> Provides: perl(XML::Simple) = 2.17 perl(XML::Simple::FAQ) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(XML::Parser) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(vars) + Not a GUI app APPROVED. You can CLOSE this review as reviewed package is already in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:32:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240432.l9O4WYlY021796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-24 00:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:29:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240429.l9O4TRL1031267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-24 00:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:34:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334941] Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240434.l9O4YQiE021922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phasex - Phase Harmonic Advanced Synthesis EXperiment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334941 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 00:34 EST ------- closing this review as I can see this is already built for all requested branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 04:34:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240434.l9O4YfaT032098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-24 00:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 05:11:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349791] Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240511.l9O5B54u005116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349791 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-24 01:11 EST ------- Builds OK; rpmlint says: PySolFC-cardsets.noarch: W: no-documentation No problem. PySolFC-cardsets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/PySolFC/data/cardset-hannover-court/COPYRIGHT PySolFC-cardsets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/PySolFC/data/cardset-hannover-hex/COPYRIGHT These are executable for some reason, and probably shouldn't be. They're the only two executable files in the package. I think the URL: tag should be http://pysolfc.sourceforge.net/ You can get rid of the python_sitelib and debug_package defines at the top of the spec. I also don't see the reason for the build dependency on python-devel when the only thing this package does is copy a directory. There seems to be a directory ownership problem; nothing seems to own /usr/share/PySolFC/data. The base PySolFC package just puts the base cardsets in /usr/share/PySolFC. You probably want to change the Summary and %description to mention PySolFC instead of pysol (and tack a period onto the end of %description while you're in there). You can do that thing without using the dist tag if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 05:33:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240533.l9O5XYiP007693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-10-24 01:33 EST ------- Only the fact that this package is waiting to be pushed as stable for nearly two weeks... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 06:01:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240601.l9O61gEh002130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-24 02:01 EST ------- -added "-D " as per comment #9 -updated config file location to match changes in ltsp-server Spec URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd.spec SRPM URL: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltspswapd/ltspswapd-0-0.5.20071023cvs.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 06:23:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240623.l9O6NKjg014886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 02:23 EST ------- Installed PackageKit after solving above problem but then found that package PackageKit installed /usr/share/doc/packagekit/pk-reference.html but can't find who owns /usr/share/doc/packagekit ? and why to create one more docs directory for PackageKit? I did some workaround for docs files here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 06:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240625.l9O6PVCm005281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 02:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=236001) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=236001&action=view) docs cleanup for SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 06:38:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240638.l9O6cNrW006584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 02:38 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 530801fe835fd9a680457e443eb95578 flup-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 06:46:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240646.l9O6k0lr007707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-24 02:45 EST ------- (in reply to comment #42) - changed ltsp-dhcpd startup priority to 98 so that it runs after kvm (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331651) -%ghost changed back to a %config(noreplace) - version numbers fixed in changelog - remove %%{_initrddir}/ltsp-swapfile-delete - after additional testing I do not believe this is needed - added scriptlets - fixed /var/lib/ltsp5/ - renamed /etc/ltsp5.conf /etc/ltsp5/ltsp.conf, moved all config files to /etc/ltsp5 --- /etc/ltsp5/ is consistent with /opt/ltsp5, /usr/share/ltsp5, etc (in reply to comment #43) - handle either syslog or rsyslog http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server/ltsp-server.spec SRPMS: http://k12linux.mesd.k12.or.us/K12LTSP/source/ltsp-server/ltsp-server-0-10.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:03:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240703.l9O73HGj010064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-24 03:03 EST ------- flawfinder-1.27-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update flawfinder' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333871] Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240701.l9O71tu8019859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-minihallib - Library to handle HAL devices and events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333871 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-24 03:01 EST ------- python-minihallib-0.1.8-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-minihallib' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:04:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240704.l9O74sGZ010442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |4.40-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240704.l9O74rHw020425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-24 03:04 EST ------- PySolFC-music-4.40-3 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:08:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240708.l9O78vPB021385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-24 03:08 EST ------- PySolFC-1.1-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:04:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240704.l9O74vZq020453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-24 03:04 EST ------- R-DynDoc-1.14.0-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:04:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240704.l9O74wMV020474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.14.0-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:08:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240708.l9O78wjv021418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.1-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:17:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240717.l9O7HNGh013955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-24 03:17 EST ------- xgrav-1.2.0-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:17:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333921] Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240717.l9O7HOPO013994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrav - A simple physics simulation for a large number of particles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333921 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.2.0-4.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 07:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343871] Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240714.l9O7EeFA013001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qlandkarte - A tool to visualize maps and other GPS information for Garmin devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343871 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-24 03:14 EST ------- qlandkarte-0.5.3-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qlandkarte' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 08:08:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240808.l9O8898S022786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 ------- Additional Comments From jmoskovc at redhat.com 2007-10-24 04:08 EST ------- Hi, it should be fixed only in F-7 branch. I will fix it in all other branches when you'll check it. Thank you jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 08:13:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240813.l9O8DeTH032257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-24 04:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) [...] > I'm not sure your URL: is correct. Shouldn't it point to symfony-project.com? > phing.info seems to be the page for a different project. > > I'm not even sure the channel.xml contains copyrightable content, but given that > the actual symfony-project software is all under the MIT license, are you sure > that LGPLv2 is proper? Where do you find that documented? [...] Both issues you point out are mistakes I've made when copying the phing channel spec file as a template for this one and not making the double check. This should fix it: Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-channel-symfony.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-channel-symfony-1.0.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 08:58:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240858.l9O8wSHN030789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-10-24 04:58 EST ------- The path is fixed in the latest build iproute-2.6.22-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 09:09:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240909.l9O99l1K032518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 05:09 EST ------- In build.log I saw following message warning: File listed twice: /sbin/cbq Remove following line from %files /sbin/cbq -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 09:30:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 350181] New: Review Request: upslug2 - Upslug2 firmware update utility for the nslu2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350181 Summary: Review Request: upslug2 - Upslug2 firmware update utility for the nslu2 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/upslug2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/upslug2-0.0-0.1.svn39.fc9.src.rpm Description: upslug2 is a command line program intended to allow the upgrade of a LinkSys NSLU2 firmware to new or different versions. Unlike upslug and the LinkSys (Sercomm) upgrade utilities, upslug2 will synthesise a complete 'image' from a kernel and a root file system, as such it duplicates part of the functionality of 'slugimage'. upslug2 also optimizes the upload to avoid transmitted parts of the image which need not be written or are 'blank' (set to the erased flash value of all 1's). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 09:30:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240930.l9O9UdTd011940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-10-24 05:30 EST ------- Fixed, any other issues? I don't want rebuild it again and again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 09:40:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240940.l9O9etbQ005261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 05:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Fixed, any other issues? I don't want rebuild it again and again. thanks. No issues. That's why I have started asking maintainers of packages from other Merge-reviews to submit updates to some other website and that prevents maintainers building again and again for small issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 09:45:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240945.l9O9j5Pl014134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 05:45 EST ------- oops sorry but what you fixed for comment #18? I didn't see any change in SPEC for issue reported in comment #17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 09:54:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710240954.l9O9s48W015081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 05:54 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 20ef2767896a0f156b6fbabd47936f79 iproute2-2.6.22-070710.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. - duplicates in %files present as can be seen in build.log warning: File listed twice: /sbin/cbq ==> This can be solved at next build time of this package + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package iproute-2.6.22-4.fc8 -> Provides: config(iproute) = 2.6.22-4.fc8 Requires: /bin/bash config(iproute) = 2.6.22-4.fc8 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libdb-4.6.so libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libresolv.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 10:31:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345261] Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241031.l9OAVIqx012156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmikmod - A MOD music file player library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345261 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-10-24 06:31 EST ------- Imported. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 10:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241054.l9OAseQO014504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 11:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241134.l9OBY34A019431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-24 07:34 EST ------- Yeah, I'd love to have a formal review... I noticed that there was a newer version out, so I updated the package and fixed the license tag. It's GPLv3+ now... Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/gst-inspector-0.3-1.fc7.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/gst-inspector-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 11:46:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241146.l9OBkYis021465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA | ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 07:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Axel are you still here ? > Please comments if something seems wrong to you... I was not there, see the matching wiki page of that time. > Maybe someone can help packaging perl scripts if you are short in time ? Perl scripts for the firmware package? Which firmware related scripts are you thinking of? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 11:51:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241151.l9OBpTRi022334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-24 07:51 EST ------- Thank you for this fast review. :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-flup Short Description: Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Owners: till Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 11:55:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241155.l9OBtpM2023090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 07:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 6. I'd change the summary to only include the actual chip reference and out the > full "??? for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip such as the > Hauppauge PVR 150/250/350/500 models and other supported hardware." in > %description, as the current string is misleading and overly restrictive There are technical and legal problems: a) the firmware is procuded by Hauppauge (with Conexant's tools) and is adjusted to Hauppauge's board layout. Not every board using the Mako chip can boot of the same firmware. b) Even though many boards share the base schematics the firmware under considerartion has been channeled through Hauppauge and the license is by Hauppauge. IANAL, but I think you will be violating both Hauppauge's and another manufacturer's license if you simply use this on another board. This is not to say that users cannot use this if they think they know there are no technical issues and no legal ones as well. But it means that Fedora cannot put itself in technical and legal battles with either side. BTW no non-Hauppauge user was ever confused by the choice of the summary or description, all PVR clones knew what firmware they needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 11:57:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241157.l9OBvZFX031461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 07:57 EST ------- Thanks a lot, taken as is. Will still post new URLs for spec/src.rpm to be formally correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 12:05:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241205.l9OC5uhg032715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA | ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 08:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 6- symlinks have to be relative Actually not, unless the package knows that the crossing folders are not symlinks themselves, which it cannot control. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 12:24:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 350341] New: Review Request: postfix-logwatch - A postfix log analyzer for logwatch Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350341 Summary: Review Request: postfix-logwatch - A postfix log analyzer for logwatch Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/postfix-logwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/postfix-logwatch-1.36.12-1.tillf7.src.rpm Description: This is a postfix log analyzer for logwatch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 12:29:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241229.l9OCTxLj003215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 12:29:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241229.l9OCTqpq003189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 12:49:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241249.l9OCnXwF030351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 08:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > E: maildrop setuid-binary /usr/bin/maildrop root 06755 > (and similar lines) > -------------------------------------------------------- > ? Just to confirm, would you explain why these binaries > should have setuid/setgid? See http://www.courier-mta.org/maildrop/maildrop.html for details, but in short: Every MTA that runs as a non-root user need an MDA that is suid root, otherwise you would never be able to put mails into users' mboxes/maildirs etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 12:55:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241255.l9OCtrOj007166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 08:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 2- License is now GPLv2 (not GPLv2+ ) this probably concern the kernel module > part... I haven't checked if the tools are concerned also... (we only care of > the tools actually) In the utils folder there are 22 files mentioning GPL2 of which 20 allow a later version, e.g. 2 files are GPLv2 only. Probably not the authors' intention, still until this is fixed upstream by the author that placed the copyright note we cannot label this 2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 13:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241312.l9ODCNcM001425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-24 09:12 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within TWO DAY. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 13:12:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241312.l9ODCWaa009731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-24 09:12 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within TWO DAYS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 13:21:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241321.l9ODLiNm011190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-24 09:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > The clear statement is for GPL2. That's in the source, but not in tuncfg.c, > so may have been overlooked. Yes, but there is no clear statement in any attached documentation, the only reference to the license is for the kernel module, which is not linked to tuncfg at all. Which is why we need the copyright holder (is that you?) to say that it is GPL (or preferrably, to re-release the source with the header license attribution included in tuncfg.c). > The specfile, as attached, doesn't use %dist; probably because the %dist crutch > doesn't appear in all distros for which the project may be packaged, and really > assumes a rebuilding user dumb enough to need %builddeps but smart enough to > activate the magic crutch anyway if the specfile can't cope. You really don't understand what we're doing here, sir. ;) %{?dist} will be undefined on distros/environments where it does not appear/is not defined, and thus, will not affect anything. In this specific package, %{?dist} isn't being used to conditionalize anything (and even if it was, our guidelines specifically require its use in such a way that it will not error out if it is unset). I'm recommending its use so that the packager doesn't accidentally end up with two packages with the same N-V-R in two different branches. Please take a moment and read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 13:25:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241325.l9ODPDjY011811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-24 09:25 EST ------- Who is reviewing this package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 13:26:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241326.l9ODQeZv011999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail. | |com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-24 09:26 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 13:50:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241350.l9ODoD9G015555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 09:50 EST ------- Mamoru, You proceed with this review. Would like to only CC member for this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 14:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241406.l9OE6l8t018131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 10:06 EST ------- Ping Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 14:29:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241429.l9OETEYp026687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-24 10:29 EST ------- For 0.6.0-1: * %_libdir - This script is broken on 64 bits architecture. ! Note: to make this package "noarch", some effort is needed to deal with both 32 bits and 64 bits arch. * LIBGL_NVIDIA and so on.. - What happens if sover of LIBGL_NVIDIA changes? IMO, autodetection like: ----------------------------------------------------- for driver in $libdir/nvidia/libGL.so.*.xlibmesa ; do LIBGL_NVIDIA=$driver done ----------------------------------------------------- is better. * USE_EMERALD - Please explain why you want to disable emerald by default. - If you want, the comment on the above line is not correct. - And something like: ----------------------------------------------------- USE_EMERALD=${USE_EMERALD:-no} ----------------------------------------------------- is better IMO. * Dependency - It seems that this scripts uses some commands in xorg-x11-utils (this is not installed by default). - Also, adding requirement for pciutils is better (for /sbin/lspci) - glx-utils also seems needed. - Something else may be also needed. Would you check the dependency again? * Timestamp - Please use "-p" option when using "cp" or "install" command to keep timestamps. * ExcludeArch - compiz is not available on ppc64, so please write in the spec file "ExcludeArch: ppc64" even if this is noarch ref: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00262.html ? Desktop file - Is it preferable that this package provides desktop file entry? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 15:02:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241502.l9OF2MgT025784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-24 11:02 EST ------- Well, * For this package it is better that you install gt5 script and man files by yourself using "install -p". This can easily keep timestamps and removes unneeded patch. * For F-8+, text browser provides "text-www-browser" virtial Provides, so for F-8+, this package should require "text-www-browser". * "INSTALL" file is for people who want to "install" this package by themselves and not needed for rpm users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 15:09:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241509.l9OF9qin002120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-24 11:09 EST ------- Thanks for comments. Incorporated to 1.10-4fc9, thanks for #14 it is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 15:30:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241530.l9OFUBCK006930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-10-24 11:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > For 0.6.0-1: > > * %_libdir > - This script is broken on 64 bits architecture. > ! Note: to make this package "noarch", some effort > is needed to deal with both 32 bits and 64 bits arch. Thx. I've added a if-else section to the script and replaced all libdirs. Is it right that ppc also uses /usr/lib and only x86_64 /usr/lib64? (I'm only using x86) > * LIBGL_NVIDIA and so on.. > - What happens if sover of LIBGL_NVIDIA changes? > IMO, autodetection like: > ----------------------------------------------------- > for driver in $libdir/nvidia/libGL.so.*.xlibmesa ; do > LIBGL_NVIDIA=$driver > done > ----------------------------------------------------- > is better. Thanks. added (and also for LIBGL_FGLRX) > * USE_EMERALD > - Please explain why you want to disable emerald by > default. > - If you want, the comment on the above line is not correct. > - And something like: > ----------------------------------------------------- > USE_EMERALD=${USE_EMERALD:-no} > ----------------------------------------------------- > is better IMO. I've disabled emerald to not require more dependencies than needed. I've replaced the comment in the script with this. > * Dependency > - It seems that this scripts uses some commands in > xorg-x11-utils (this is not installed by default). > - Also, adding requirement for pciutils is better (for /sbin/lspci) > - glx-utils also seems needed. > - Something else may be also needed. Would you check the dependency > again? Thanks. This three seems to be the only not mentioned requirements (except grep and sed). Added. > * Timestamp > - Please use "-p" option when using "cp" or "install" command > to keep timestamps. Added. > > * ExcludeArch > - compiz is not available on ppc64, so please write in the spec file > "ExcludeArch: ppc64" even if this is noarch > ref: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00262.html Added. > ? Desktop file > - Is it preferable that this package provides desktop file entry? Sorry. That was my fault. I've uploaded a wrong srpm and spec first but replaced them a few minutes later. I haven't thought that anybody has downloaded them so I've not increased the release. New ones: SPEC Url: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/review/compiz-manager.spec SRPM Url: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/review/compiz-manager-0.6.0-2.fc8.src.rpm ChangeLog: - update patch: differ between different archs - update patch: don't hardcode the libGl versions - update patch: add description why not ot use emerald by default - add requires: xorg-x11-utils - add requires: pci-utils - add requires: glx-utils - add ExcludeArch for ppc64 because compiz isn't available there - keep timestamp of compiz-manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 15:46:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241546.l9OFkapq009783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-24 11:46 EST ------- It is cleaner if the static package Requires: %{name}-devel = %{versions}-%{release} Also, for -devel there is a missing Requires: pkgconfig /usr/share/aclocal/ is still unowned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 16:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331531] Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241619.l9OGJvWU006244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspswapd - Daemon that uses nbd to provide swap space for LTSP thin clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-24 12:19 EST ------- You should remove the dependency on /etc/ltsp5/ltsp.conf such that the package may be installed on its own. And in my opinion the comment in sysconfig/ltspswapd should be along # # the LTSP_SWAP_DIR variable is preferably set in /etc/ltsp5/ltsp.conf # to have a central config file. If you don't want to use /etc/ltsp5/ltsp.conf # you can also set this variable in this file # %{_localstatedir}/lib is already owned by the filesystem package. You could also add LTSP_SWAP_DIR in a comment in sysconfig/ltspswapd, like # LTSP_SWAP_DIR=/var/lib/ltsp5/swapfiles/ The following lines are not useful if the comment is not there: sed -e 's;LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH=.*;LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH=%{swapdir};' %{SOURCE1} > ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd touch -r %{SOURCE1} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/ltspswapd And if the comment is there, LTSPSWAPD_FILEPATH should be changed to LTSP_SWAP_DIR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 16:37:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240177] Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241637.l9OGbX48018098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-RecordParser - Read record-oriented files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240177 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 16:37:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240207] Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241637.l9OGbYFw018110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Base - Useful base class for deriving other modules Alias: perl-Class-Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240207 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 16:37:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:37:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241637.l9OGbWvg018082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-24 12:37 EST ------- Imported and built! As always, thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 16:56:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 350781] New: Review Request: libvoikko - A library for spellcheckers and hyphenators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350781 Summary: Review Request: libvoikko - A library for spellcheckers and hyphenators Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/libvoikko.spec SRPM URL: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/libvoikko-1.5-0.1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is libvoikko, library for spellcheckers and hyphenators using Malaga natural language grammar development tool. The library is written in C. Currently only Finnish is supported, but the API of the library has been designed to allow adding support for other languages later. Voikko depends on malaga and suomi-malaga (upstream name, I've named my package malaga-suomi-voikko), please see bug #346121 and bug #349191. Rpmlint output: libvoikko-devel.i386: W: no-documentation - but there is no documentation that would be suitable for the -devel package, the main package will have all the docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 16:55:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241655.l9OGtFr9020991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 17:15:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241715.l9OHFpQ3023885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-24 13:15 EST ------- Axel! I'm happy to have news from you! But actually I would like the problem to be solved before the F8 release, so i've took some advance: see #346171 I will change the summary from the problem you have raised, add an epoch (or can we drop it?) and add you to the cvs access (or you might need to request it ) Please can you make comments about the current spec I've used , before I import it ? (ivtv-firmware and xorg-x11-drv-ivtv are not imported yet)... see also: #346161 for xorg-x11-drv-ivtv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 17:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251611] Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241725.l9OHPr8t025428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Alloy - TT2/3, HT, HTE, Tmpl, and Velocity Engine Alias: perl-Template-Alloy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251611 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-24 13:25 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 17:39:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241739.l9OHdAp2027251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-24 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 6- symlinks have to be relative > > Actually not, unless the package knows that the crossing folders are not > symlinks themselves, which it cannot control. I didn't understood what you meant by that... ^^ What I meant was to use (if ever this is still needed, and i think not - but not sure). ln -s ../modules/v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/ (but for now they are bundled with the ivtv-firmware which seems better !?) So, since you wasn't here i've made some improvements: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348911 Somes (all?) perls scripts have to be dropped because some are requesting perl-Video-{ivtv,Frequencies}. They are known unmaintained and not working from http://ivtvdriver.org/ . So removing them will prevent to be requested by the automatic perl dependencies extractor. I wonder if we should keep this one : ivtvfwextract.pl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 17:41:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241741.l9OHfMW2019919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-24 13:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 17:49:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241749.l9OHnrRH020840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 13:49 EST ------- I don't think that this rushing out was a good move. There was a reason I kept packages compatible to what ATrpms is shipping for four year plus now. I'm also strongly involved upstream (I even both own and host the main developer and user site) and Fedora's credo was to keep upstream as much packaging as possible, correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 17:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241753.l9OHr2Mk029367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-24 13:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Is it right that ppc also uses /usr/lib and only x86_64 /usr/lib64? (I'm only > using x86) Yes (as ppc64 is disabled). > > * Timestamp > > - Please use "-p" option when using "cp" or "install" command > > to keep timestamps. > > Added. Please add "-p" option also for "cp"ing COPYING file. > ? Desktop file > > - Is it preferable that this package provides desktop file entry? Well, what I wanted to ask you is whether it is preferable to install some desktop file (e.g. named "feodra-compiz-manager.desktop) under %_datadir/applications so that this script can be used from GNOME panel, for example (not from terminal). Almost okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 17:56:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 348911] Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241756.l9OHuq8q022158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - Utilities for supporting the ivtv modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=348911 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 13:56 EST ------- See also bug #250971 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 17:54:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241754.l9OHsGLb021592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 13:54 EST ------- Please also see bug #250970 for a competing review. I don't think it is correct for a reviewer to close a submitter's bug who filed in to the /wiki/Vacation page. and push the package as his own. Especially if the items he didn't approve were rather minor or even false leading to a worse package. Please undo this review or escalate this to the appropriate instance whatever that is, fesco or else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:03:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241803.l9OI3Zpb022990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-24 14:03 EST ------- No need to raise to fesco with this... You just need to produce rational and that will be fine... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:15:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241815.l9OIF9kw000533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-24 14:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > 6- symlinks have to be relative > > > > Actually not, unless the package knows that the crossing folders are not > > symlinks themselves, which it cannot control. > > I didn't understood what you meant by that... ^^ In short: Every relative symlink is broken as it assumes a static non-symlinked layout. For example symlinks to ../lib from /usr will be broken if /usr has been moved to /storage15/usr and /usr being a symlink to it. But this is not specific to this package and you can read the archives on this at fedora-packaging. Just don't trust rpmlint on everything it recommends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:21:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351041] New: Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351041 Summary: Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql2400-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql2400-firmware-4.00.27-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:18:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351001] New: Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351001 Summary: Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql2100-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql2100-firmware-1.19.38-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:19:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351011] New: Review Request: ql2200-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351011 Summary: Review Request: ql2200-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql2200-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql2200-firmware-2.02.08-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:20:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351021] New: Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351021 Summary: Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql23xx-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/ql23xx-firmware-3.03.20-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Firmware for qlogic 2300 and 2322 devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:31:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351011] Review Request: ql2200-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241831.l9OIVGpg027604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2200-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351011 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:30:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351001] Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241830.l9OIUlB5003430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351001 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:30:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351001] Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241830.l9OIUGN5003351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351001 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:32:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351041] Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241832.l9OIW8Cx003733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351041 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351021] Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241833.l9OIXxbi028035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351021 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:44:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241844.l9OIi4oe005405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-24 14:44 EST ------- Some random comments (I just glanced at your spec file, I have not even tried to rebuild this) - Requires between subpackages from one srpm must usually be version-release specific. i.e. Requires: lib%{name} = %{version}-%{release}, for example - debuginfo must not be empty. - For -devel package, -devel package requires %{name} and %{name} requires lib%{name}. So "Requires: lib%{name}" is not needed for -devel package. - install-info must be called on %post. * Makefile is used only at build time and has no relation with the rebuilt binary rpms - Please don't write empty scriptlet entry (why is %postun line needed?) - Please check if "INSTALL.txt" is really needed. This type of files are usually needed for people who want to rebuild/install packages by themselves and are not needed for people who will install packages using rpm system. - main package depends on lib%{name} package. So if only lib%{name} package is installed and main package is not installed, no documents are installed. i.e. all documents should be moved to lib%{name} package. - The directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not owned by any package. - Please remove static archive. (In reply to comment #0) > malaga: E: postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/malaga.info.gz. This is probably caused by the fact that the upstream Makefile installs the info file, so I don't call install-info in the spec file. Should I? > > malaga: W: empty-%postun. Is this caused by the issue above? Please see above > > malaga-devel and libmalaga: W: no-documentation. All the documentation is in the main malaga package, is that OK? For %{name}-devel package, no documentation warning is okay, however as said above, all listed documents should be moved into lib%{name} package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:53:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351001] Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241853.l9OIrOVX031026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351001 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-10-24 14:53 EST ------- Source matches [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum ql2100_fw.bin 12c35a92429131323f9ed2764fc457df ql2100_fw.bin [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2100_fw.bin 12c35a92429131323f9ed2764fc457df /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2100_fw.bin builds ok rpmlint is quiet approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 18:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351011] Review Request: ql2200-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241855.l9OItOJS007146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2200-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351011 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-10-24 14:55 EST ------- [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum ql2200_fw.bin 44567f365ce6f668c69c6c40279cd878 ql2200_fw.bin [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2200_fw.bin 44567f365ce6f668c69c6c40279cd878 /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2200_fw.bin builds ok rpmlint is quiet Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 19:00:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351021] Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241900.l9OJ0bXh032499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351021 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-10-24 15:00 EST ------- [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum ql2300_fw.bin e27385f97c2f5ad2d5eb07a38081320a ql2300_fw.bin [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2300_fw.bin e27385f97c2f5ad2d5eb07a38081320a /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2300_fw.bin [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum ql2322_fw.bin 37d2a8ba7d49fc0fb72483341f559e46 ql2322_fw.bin [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2322_fw.bin 37d2a8ba7d49fc0fb72483341f559e46 /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2322_fw.bin builds ok rpmlint is quiet Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 19:01:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351041] Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241901.l9OJ1lDa032588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351041 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-10-24 15:01 EST ------- [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum ql2400_fw.bin 0a297cc86c4183abc0246cf609379ade ql2400_fw.bin [dennis at daedalus qlogic]$ md5sum /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2400_fw.bin 0a297cc86c4183abc0246cf609379ade /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/ql2400_fw.bin builds ok rpmlint is quiet Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 19:42:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241942.l9OJg5uU006053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-24 15:42 EST ------- Ok, I'll fix that. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-devel-docs Short Description: GNOME developer documentation Owners: mclasen at redhat.com Branches: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 19:39:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 345391] Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710241939.l9OJduVu013012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flup - Random assortment of WSGI servers for python Alias: python-flup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=345391 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-24 15:39 EST ------- python-flup has been built for f-7,f-8 and devel https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5189 and EL-5: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/36772-python-flup-1.0-2.el5/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:12:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351011] Review Request: ql2200-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242012.l9OKCmYq011422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2200-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2200 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351011 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-24 16:12 EST ------- CVS done, committed, built for F-7/F-8. Thanks for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:09:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351041] Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242009.l9OK9w57017850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351041 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:10:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351021] Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242010.l9OKAFeJ018229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351021 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:10:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351001] Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242010.l9OKAJdU018262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2100-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2100 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351001 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-24 16:10 EST ------- Cvs done, built for F-7/F-8. Thanks for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:17:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246215] Review Request: comgt - Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242017.l9OKHOZB012231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: comgt - Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246215 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-24 16:17 EST ------- Finally built for FC-6 (koji made me forget about the old extras :() -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:17:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246215] Review Request: comgt - Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242017.l9OKHdm8012260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: comgt - Linux UMTS/GPRS command-line tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246215 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:13:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351021] Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242013.l9OKDP1k011536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql23xx-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 23xx devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351021 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-24 16:13 EST ------- CVS done, committed, built for F-7/F-8. Thanks for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:14:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351041] Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242014.l9OKEtBb011636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ql2400-firmware - Firmware for qlogic 2400 devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351041 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-24 16:14 EST ------- CVS done, committed, built for F-7/F-8. Thanks for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:22:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] New: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mdehaan at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/func/attachment/wiki/FuncReleases/func.spec?format=raw SRPM URL: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/func/attachment/wiki/FuncReleases/func-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: (copied from Wiki) Func allows for running commands on remote systems in a secure way, like SSH, but offers several improvements. * Func allows you to manage an arbitrary group of machines all at once. * Func automatically distributes certificates to all "slave" machines. There's almost nothing to configure. * Func comes with a command line for sending remote commands and gathering data. * There are lots of modules already provided for common tasks. * Anyone can write their own modules using the simple Python module API. * Everything that can be done with the command line can be done with the Python client API. The hack potential is unlimited. * You'll never have to use "expect" or other ugly hacks to automate your workflow. * It's really simple under the covers. Func works over XMLRPC and SSL. * Any program can use func certificates, latch on to them, and take advantage of secure master-to-slave communication. * There are no databases or crazy stuff to install and configure. Again, certificate distribution is automatic too. See website: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/func/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:50:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242050.l9OKokCo017348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-24 16:50 EST ------- o Included your docs cleanup changes o It looks like the build is generating /usr/share/doc/packagekit/pk-reference.html and copying it to the other doc directory. Changed the specfile to just remove the one in /usr/share/doc/packagekit and leave the other. o I'm mystified by the chmod error in comment #13 - I don't get that error, and if I leave out the chmod command I get: PackageKit.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py from rpmlint. I'll leave it out for now. New SRPM and spec file: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit-0.1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 20:49:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242049.l9OKnwAv016818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-24 16:49 EST ------- Thank you for your feedback, I've fixed some of the issues you pointed out. New spec: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-7.11-0.2.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > - Requires between subpackages from one srpm must usually be > version-release specific. Fixed. > - debuginfo must not be empty. NOT fixed. Upstream Makefile calls install -s, how do I remove it? Do I need to make a patch for it, or rather Makefile.in? Sorry to use bugzilla as a learning/discussion forum, but I couldn't get an answer from #fedora-devel either. > - For -devel package, -devel package requires %{name} and > %{name} requires lib%{name}. So "Requires: lib%{name}" is not > needed for -devel package. Fixed. > - install-info must be called on %post. Fixed. > - Please don't write empty scriptlet entry (why is %postun line > needed?) It wasn't, my error, I removed it. > - Please check if "INSTALL.txt" is really needed. It wasn't, so removed. > i.e. all documents should be moved to lib%{name} package. Done. > - The directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not owned by any package. Fixed. > - Please remove static archive. If you mean %{_libdir}/libmalaga.a in -devel, if I remove that, rpmbuild complains and won't build the packages. How do I go around it then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:08:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328261] Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242108.l9OL8IAp019802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328261 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-24 17:08 EST ------- http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/netembryo.spec Updated spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:12:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351361] New: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/X11-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/X11-extras-0.4-1.tillf7.src.rpm Description: Missing bindings to the X11 graphics library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:13:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242113.l9OLDYFS020572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-24 17:13 EST ------- http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/libnemesi.spec Updated spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:15:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242115.l9OLF7sK028135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |X11-extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:23:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 350341] Review Request: postfix-logwatch - A postfix log analyzer for logwatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242123.l9OLNm9D029002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postfix-logwatch - A postfix log analyzer for logwatch Alias: postfix-logwatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350341 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |postfix-logwatch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:24:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240543] Review Request: dsmidiwifi - remote controll midi with your Nintendo DS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242124.l9OLOaJD022033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dsmidiwifi - remote controll midi with your Nintendo DS Alias: dsmidiwifi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240543 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |dsmidiwifi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:31:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242131.l9OLVEbm023405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-24 17:31 EST ------- The docs should be shipped. 2 relevant rpmlint warnings gegl-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gegl-svn20071011/operations/render/perlin/perlin.c gegl-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gegl-svn20071011/operations/io/ff-load.c the BuildRequires should certainly be graphviz and not graphviz-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242129.l9OLTaQ5029767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-24 17:29 EST ------- OK, everything is fixed and rpmlint is completely silent. Good job. +1 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242138.l9OLcu6s024392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-24 17:38 EST ------- Shouldn't this be called haskell-X11-extras? The X11-extras is awfully badly chosen and too generic! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:39:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349791] Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242139.l9OLdqpS031318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349791 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-24 17:39 EST ------- Fixed - New URLs: Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-cardsets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:50:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242150.l9OLodGi000556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-24 17:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't this be called haskell-X11-extras? The X11-extras is > awfully badly chosen and too generic! Maybe, but the packages this spec produces use ghc prefixes, so this may be only a problem in CVS, but when the there is a guideline for naming Haskell libraries, then this can be changed without the need of a rebuild. Using haskell as prefix for the packages is not good, because there are different incompatible haskell compilers. Using ghc-X11-extras for the spec may be a solution, but then in case it should contain also other subpackages for other compilers, it would not be good. If you demand a specific name for this package to finish review, then I would prefer to rename it to ghc-X11-extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 21:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242157.l9OLvxlg001577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-24 17:57 EST ------- I proposed that name for consistency with perl or python, but I don't have the slightest idea about what is haskell. I can, however, see when a package has a generic naming although it is a binding... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:15:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242215.l9OMFYei029911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-24 18:15 EST ------- You should add to the directories searched for fonts: /usr/share/fonts/dejavu-lgc /usr/share/fonts/liberation Hopefully the font directory won't change too often or gnuplot will try to use more generic font mechanisms. But in the mean time it is required. You should have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs your emacs add-ons packaging doesn't follow the guideline. * unuseful requires: Requires: libpng RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" is not used during build. rpmint issues that are, in my opinion worth fixing: gnuplot.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-4.2.0/ChangeLog gnuplot.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-4.2.0/demo/html/webify.pl gnuplot.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng gnuplot.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-4.2.0/demo/html/webify.pl perl(HTML::Entities) gnuplot.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-4.2.0/demo/html/webify.pl perl(ctime.pl) gnuplot.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-4.2.0/demo/html/webify.pl perl(Env) gnuplot.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/gnuplot-4.2.0/demo/html/webify.pl /usr/bin/perl gnuplot-emacs.i386: W: no-documentation gnuplot-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gnuplot-4.2.0/src/getcolor.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:22:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242222.l9OMMME7030724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|X11-extras |ghc-X11-extras Summary|Review Request: X11-extras -|Review Request: ghc-X11- |Haskell X11-extras library |extras - Haskell X11-extras | |library ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-24 18:22 EST ------- Here is a spec with the ghc prefix. This spec also uses %ghost in %files instead of rm in %preun Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-2.tillf7.src.rpm Thinking about it a little more, this is my favourite naming. I hope that someone from the Haskell Sig noticed this review request (I added it to their wiki page), but I will cc them, if it seems, that it is needed. Maybe there will be some Haskell Guidelines, when the review of this package is finished. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:24:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242224.l9OMOxNk030908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-24 18:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > The docs should be shipped. > There's a currently a problem (upstream) with generating the docs, that they have added a default configure option to disable building the doc until the issue is resolved. I can't take on the responsibility of fixing it now. > 2 relevant rpmlint warnings > gegl-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/gegl-svn20071011/operations/render/perlin/perlin.c > gegl-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/gegl-svn20071011/operations/io/ff-load.c > > the BuildRequires should certainly be graphviz and not > graphviz-devel I'll check up the last 2 issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351441] New: Review Request: php-pear-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351441 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-symfony-1.0.8-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Based on the best practices of web development, thoroughly tried on several active websites, symfony aims to speed up the creation and maintenance of web applications, and to replace the repetitive coding tasks by power, control and pleasure. Symfony provides a lot of features seamlessly integrated together, such as: - simple templating and helpers - cache management - smart URLs - scaffolding - multilingualism and I18N support - object model and MVC separation - Ajax support - enterprise ready -- I had several issues modifying Symfony to use the system's Propel components instead of its provided versions. All tests I've made developing with this modified version of Symfony so far were fine however. rpmlint complains about empty files Symfony seems to need for the new project template. Frankly, I don't know how to handle this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:31:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242231.l9OMVaVw006396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-24 18:31 EST ------- The GOOD: rpmlint runs clean fits naming guidelines specfile naming good Licensing good: GPLv3+ and tag matches Copying file included in docs as required spec written in english-ese and is legible md5sum for source matches upstream location: 69bcc7a8939582ebdb806579947b316c gst-inspector-0.3.tar.gz builds noarch in mock against f7 and program runs buildrequires look sane no locales to worry about no libs installed that need ldconfig relocatable n/a no duplicate file entries owns all directories it creates clean section is good macro usage consistent no content issues no need for a docs subpackage all doc files are non-essential no need for -devel package no static libs install section looks good desktop file included for gui application. The BAD: directory ownership chain issue Need to require hicolor-icon-theme since you are installing icons in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/ need a postun section for the icon cache updating. You have the post you just need the corresponding postun as well: %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi The UGLY: Are you sure you want to put gst-inspector in audio/video? I would have thought this would be better in Programming menu since this isn't so much an aid to end-users but an aid to people developing gst based scripts and applications. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:35:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351441] Review Request: php-pear-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242235.l9OMZhBv006947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351441 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |266841, 266941, 337791, | |337801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:35:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242235.l9OMZi2l006976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |351441 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:35:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337801] Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242235.l9OMZkYL007026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |351441 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:35:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242235.l9OMZjmc007001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |351441 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:35:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242235.l9OMZl4n007052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |351441 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:43:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242243.l9OMhFqf001270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-24 18:43 EST ------- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 22:42:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242242.l9OMgenL008137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-24 18:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: inchi Short Description: The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library Owners: rathann Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 23:18:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242318.l9ONIA52005785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-24 19:18 EST ------- You should link /usr/share/dblatex/xsl to /usr/share/sgml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets/dblatex otherwise nothing works. Maybe you could obfuscate the email adresses in the description, or even remove them and leave only the names. To keep the timestamps while doing the required iconv magic, you could do iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 $f > $f.utf8 ; touch -r $f $f.utf8 ; mv $f.utf8 $f I suggest avoid bashisms, and therefore using mv $file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/texmf/tex/latex/dblatex/`basename $file`; Also protecting end of lines is not needed, instead proper indentation should help readability. You don't need the python_sitearch definition. relevant rpmlint warning dblatex.src:78: W: macro-in-%changelog _datadir dblatex.src:80: W: macro-in-%changelog _datadir The conditional should certainly be %if 0%{?fedora} < 8 man page is automatically flaged as %doc. You should certainly own /etc/dblatex There are too much in the doc directory, and it is better to put the files in %doc directly. In my opinion there should only be %doc docs/manual.pdf You should certainly remove the empty directories /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc /usr/share/dblatex/latex/specs /usr/share/dblatex/latex/style You need to run texhash post scripts. COPYRIGHT should be in %doc Suggestions: use %{_mandir}/man1/dblatex.1* to catch all possible compression, and no compression. In the .specs file, now that the .sty are in the normal locations, you can certainly comment out the TexInputs: definition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 23:19:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242319.l9ONJ0i4005868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-24 19:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Please see: > https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex-0.2.7-9.fc7.src.rpm > https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex.spec > > I think I addressed all the above, except for the thing about 'which'. Because you don't want to fix it or for another reason? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 23:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] New: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/review/ristretto.spec SRPM URL: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/review/ristretto-0.0.9-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Ristretto is a fast and lightweight image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 24 23:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710242350.l9ONon12010489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-10-24 19:50 EST ------- Sorry, SRPM URL is http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/review/ristretto-0.0.9-1.fc8.src.rpm (F8 Mock build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 00:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250058.l9P0wDgI019060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-24 20:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 00:57:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250057.l9P0vFB7018998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-24 20:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #24) > > Please see: > > https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex-0.2.7-9.fc7.src.rpm > > https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex.spec > > > > I think I addressed all the above, except for the thing about 'which'. > > Because you don't want to fix it or for another reason? Because I haven't had time to figure out what this is about. Do you have a suggested patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 00:58:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250058.l9P0weHD025867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-24 20:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 01:46:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351611] New: Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351611 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Object-Deadly.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Object-Deadly-0.09-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Object::Deadly is meant to be used in testing. All possible overloading and method calls die. You can pass this object into methods which are not supposed to accidentally trigger any potentially overloading. Object::Deadly is used to test perl-Carp-Clan, and probably other modules. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226244 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 01:56:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226251] Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250156.l9P1ul50027600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-MySQL Alias: perl-DBD-MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226251 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-24 21:56 EST ------- perl-DBD-MySQL-4.005-4.fc9 built in dist-f9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 01:55:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226244] Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250155.l9P1tYHw027480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Carp-Clan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226244 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-24 21:55 EST ------- o Removed the extra BR: perl o Object::Deadly is not yet available in Fedora. However, since you've been so nice about reviewing all of my packages, here's an early Christmas present for you: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351611 Once perl-Object-Deadly is built in Fedora, we can remove the comment in the spec file and all tests will pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 02:19:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349791] Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250219.l9P2JXCW031328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349791 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-24 22:19 EST ------- I think you meant http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-2.src.rpm (no ".fc8") It occurs to me that the reason I couldn't download the source is because the Source0: URL is incorrect. I found that http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pysolfc/PySolFC-Cardsets-1.1.tar.bz2 works fine. I still don't get why python-devel is needed to build this; I built both with and without it and the resulting package is the same. Unfortunately, that package doesn't actually seem to do anything when I install it. Pysol shows the same cardsets whether this package is installed or not. However, I moved everything from /usr/share/PySolFC/data one directory up and the cardsets were found. However, there are some directories both in this package and in the base PySolFC package that contain the same data: cardset-2000 cardset-crystal-mahjongg cardset-dashavatara-ganjifa cardset-dondorf cardset-gnome-mahjongg-1 cardset-hexadeck cardset-kintengu cardset-matrix cardset-mughal-ganjifa cardset-oxymoron cardset-standard cardset-tuxedo cardset-vienna-2k I'm not sure there's any point in packaging them. So I guess either PySolFC needs a patch to look in the "data" directory for cardsets or this package needs to install into %{_datadir}/PySolFC Oh, yeah, and %description lacks a trailing period. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 02:23:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349841] gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250223.l9P2NOlm006295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-devel-docs - GNOME developer documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349841 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 02:44:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351611] Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250244.l9P2ieG5009563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351611 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 02:48:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250248.l9P2ml7n010409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-24 22:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdegames3 Short Description: KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 Owners: kkofler,rdieter,than Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 03:00:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351611] Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250300.l9P307e3012662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351611 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 23:00 EST ------- make test failed tests. Can you please look at that issues and add needed BRs to check make test is not failing while building package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 03:28:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226249] Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250328.l9P3SEpo010487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226249 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-24 23:28 EST ------- Included all of the above fixes - for compile.bat, I just used dos2unix on it. We could also just 'rm' it...I don't know which is preferred. New version is perl-Date-Calc-5.4-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 03:40:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226252] Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250340.l9P3eMAV012303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226252 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-24 23:40 EST ------- 1) fixed. 2) Fixed - I, too, hate dots after the %{?dist} tag. I blame spot. I also fixed the BR: perl-DBI > 1.38 to be BR: perl(DBI) > 1.38 and changed Patch: to be Patch0: New version is: perl-DBD-Pg-1.49-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 03:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226249] Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250347.l9P3lDKr012990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226249 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-24 23:47 EST ------- you missed BR: dos2unix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 03:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226255] Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250347.l9P3lmLe013011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226255 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-24 23:47 EST ------- 1) fixed 2) fixed 3) fixed new version is perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-17.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:07:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351711] New: Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351711 Summary: Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Inline-Files.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Inline-Files-0.62-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Inline::Files generalizes the notion of the `__DATA__' marker and the associated `' filehandle, to an arbitrary number of markers and associated filehandles. It is required for some of the tests in the perl-Inline package. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:11:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226262] Merge Review: perl-Inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250411.l9P4Bc5U015908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 00:11 EST ------- 1, 2, 3, and 4: all fixed. 5) yep, this is another case where fedora doesn't have a perl package needed to run those tests - in this case perl(Inline::Files) Here's a package review for perl-Inline-Files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351711 For now the BR: perl(Inline::Files) is commented out. New version: perl-Inline-0.44-17.fc9 fixes all of the other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:13:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328261] Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250413.l9P4DSnW015982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netembryo - Network abstraction library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328261 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 00:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM But not for RPM. netembryo.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.4-0.2.20071011 0.0.4-0.2.20071011git.fc8 ==> you can take care this at time of importing package in CVS. + source files match upstream. ba732800e20247a660e14eca5386113c netembryo-20071011git.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + netembryo.pc files are present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + netembryo-0.0.4-0.2.20071011git.fc8 package -> Provides: libnetembryo.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libnetembryo.so.0 libsctp.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + netembryo-devel-0.0.4-0.2.20071011git.fc8 package -> Requires: libnetembryo.so.0 netembryo = 0.0.4-0.2.20071011git pkgconfig + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351711] Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250422.l9P4M5wp017198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351711 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-10-25 00:22 EST ------- The permissions inside of the tarball are broken. Please change these permissions in %prep. All the chmod's in %install are a side-effect of these broken permissions and probably can be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:23:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226284] Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250423.l9P4NPcF017256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226284 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 00:23 EST ------- Fixed all of the above issues New version is 0.81-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:23:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226281] Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250423.l9P4NWRH017274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226281 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 00:23 EST ------- all issues above fixed. Also added %{?dist} tag to release New version is 2.30-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:31:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226252] Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250431.l9P4VlpI024362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBD-Pg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226252 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 00:31 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 76b9d6a2f4cbaefcba23380f83998215 DBD-Pg-1.49.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package perl-DBD-Pg-1.49-6.fc8 -> Provides: Pg.so perl(DBD::Pg) = 1.49 perl(DBD::Pg::DefaultValue) perl(DBD::Pg::db) perl(DBD::Pg::dr) perl(DBD::Pg::st) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpq.so.5 perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DBI) perl(DBI) >= 1.38 perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:37:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226255] Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250437.l9P4bRfj025028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Digest-HMAC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226255 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 00:37 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 32dc54c765100c638b5d7f7ff4c5c626 Digest-HMAC-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/rfc2202....ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=14, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.02 CPU) + Package perl-Digest-HMAC-1.01-17.fc8 -> Provides: perl(Digest::HMAC) = 1.01 perl(Digest::HMAC_MD5) perl(Digest::HMAC_SHA1) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Digest::HMAC) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:44:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226262] Merge Review: perl-Inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250444.l9P4iLKK025748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 00:44 EST ------- make test skipped one test. Is that ok or you are missing any BR ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:43:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226262] Merge Review: perl-Inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250443.l9P4hLIL025714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 00:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 840f47d9b6cef39e68370faf9dceab2c Inline-0.44.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00init......ok t/01usages....ok t/02config....ok t/03errors....ok t/04create....ok t/05files.....skipped all skipped: no reason given All tests successful, 1 test skipped. Files=6, Tests=14, 11 wallclock secs ( 0.88 cusr + 0.09 csys = 0.97 CPU) make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Inline-0.44/C' PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, '../blib/lib', '../blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00init.......ok t/01syntax.....ok t/02config.....ok t/03typemap....ok t/04perlapi....ok t/05xsmode.....ok All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=12, 13 wallclock secs ( 9.42 cusr + 1.59 csys = 11.01 CPU) + Package perl-Inline-0.44-17.fc8 -> Provides: perl(Foo::Tester) perl(Inline) = 0.44 perl(Inline::C) = 0.44 perl(Inline::C::ParseRecDescent) perl(Inline::C::ParseRegExp) perl(Inline::Foo) = 0.01 perl(Inline::MakeMaker) = 0.44 perl(Inline::denter) Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(Config) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Spec::Unix) perl(Inline) perl(Inline::denter) perl(base) perl(strict) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:56:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250456.l9P4uvYI021426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 00:56 EST ------- This module is also used in the tests for perl-URI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351751] New: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data-1.15-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a data pack for Business::ISBN. You can update the ISBN data without changing the version of Business::ISBN. Most of the interesting stuff is in Business::ISBN. This module is only interesting as a dependancy of perl-Business-ISBN, which will be submitted shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:55:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351751] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250455.l9P4trxF027421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 00:55 EST ------- Review request for perl-Business-ISBN: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 04:55:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] New: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-2.03-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This modules handles International Standard Book Numbers, including ISBN-10 and ISBN-13. This modules requires perl-Business-ISBN-Data: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 05:04:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226283] Merge Review: perl-URI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250504.l9P54i7K028419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-URI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226283 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 01:04 EST ------- 1, 2, and 4) all fixed. 3) perl(Business::ISBN) is not available in Fedora yet - submitted review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 The BR: perl(Business::ISBN) is commented out for now. New version is 1.35-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 05:08:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226284] Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250508.l9P58P0W029006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226284 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 01:08 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 10726bbe78bef5e4264d5f57533da7c1 XML-Dumper-0.81.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00_syntax..................ok t/01_simple_datatypes........ok t/02_circular_references.....ok t/03_objects.................ok t/04_callbacks...............okt/05_file_io.................ok t/06_compression.............ok t/07_dtd.....................ok t/08_utf8....................ok t/09_repeated_references.....ok t/10_backwards_compatible....ok t/11_control_characters......ok t/12_class_loading...........ok t/13_untaint_classnames......ok t/14_overloading.............ok t/15_oo_cmp_ident............ok t/handle_undef...............ok t/oo_style...................ok t/scalar_literals............ok All tests successful. Files=19, Tests=53, 3 wallclock secs ( 2.51 cusr + 0.36 csys = 2.87 CPU) + Package perl-XML-Dumper-0.81-3.fc8 -> Provides: perl(XML::Dumper) = 0.81 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 05:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250511.l9P5BavF023264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-25 01:11 EST ------- Here is what I get when trying to build this srpm in mock: checking for python... no checking for python2... no checking for python2.5... no checking for python2.4... no checking for python2.3... no checking for python2.2... no checking for python2.1... no checking for python2.0... no checking for python1.6... no checking for python1.5... no configure: error: no suitable Python interpreter found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7108 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 05:16:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250516.l9P5GH8a030139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 01:16 EST ------- mclasen, Are you using old rawhide(say one month old) by any chance? I also got same error. But when I mock build on latest rawhide I got it working fine on my local machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 05:39:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226281] Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250539.l9P5dmcS000425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226281 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 01:39 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f0ef2cea8acfbcc58d865c05b0c7e1ff TermReadKey-2.30.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" -w test.pl 1 .. 8 ok 1 ok 2 # skip /dev/tty is absent ok 3 # skip /dev/tty is absent ok 4 # skip /dev/tty is absent ok 5 # skip /dev/tty is absent ok 6 # skip /dev/tty is absent ok 7 # skip /dev/tty is absent ok 8 # skip /dev/tty is absent + Package perl-TermReadKey-2.30-3.fc8 -> Provides: ReadKey.so perl(Term::ReadKey) = 2.30 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 05:52:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351751] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250552.l9P5qsAg028590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 05:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250553.l9P5r3IE028624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 06:04:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351751] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250604.l9P64sMn029833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 02:04 EST ------- missed BR: perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Prereq) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 06:27:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256481] Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250627.l9P6RG5g006436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwave - Analog Waveform Viewing Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256481 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-10-25 02:27 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 07:20:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250720.l9P7Klgu008606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-25 03:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Here is what I get when trying to build this srpm in mock: > > checking for python... no > checking for python2... no > checking for python2.5... no > checking for python2.4... no > checking for python2.3... no > checking for python2.2... no > checking for python2.1... no > checking for python2.0... no > checking for python1.6... no > checking for python1.5... no > configure: error: no suitable Python interpreter found > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7108 (%build) > I think 'BuildRequires: python-devel' is needed in the spec because it contains python code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 07:43:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226249] Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250743.l9P7h5gI011445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226249 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 03:43 EST ------- You can also use sed -i -e 's/\r//' to avoid the dependency on dos2unix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:02:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250802.l9P82jQJ019008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 04:02 EST ------- missing BR: perl(GD::Barcode::EAN13) perl(Test::Pod) perl(LWP::Simple) for "make check" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:08:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263181] Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250808.l9P885CL016217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263181 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-25 04:08 EST ------- After considering your explanations for a while, I start to understand the implications. At least the source code of php-pecl-Svn doesn't look cryptic, it is just quantity because it needs to expose the whole API of Subversion to PHP, thus I'd have to learn the module API and rewrite lots of code as soon as there are such incompatible API changes on either side as you've mentioned. Now I have to weigh up the use of this package to the community against the work caused by becoming de facto upstream myself and I must say I'm not sure about this. Jason, do you think many people will need pecl Svn? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:23:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250823.l9P8NX2c022433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-25 04:23 EST ------- For 7.11-0.2: (In reply to comment #2) > > - debuginfo must not be empty. > > NOT fixed. Upstream Makefile calls install -s, how do I remove it? Do I need to > make a patch for it, or rather Makefile.in? - You have to apply a patch against Makefile.in (before configure). Alternative way is ----------------------------------------------------------------- $ sed -i.strip -e 's| -s | |' Makefile.in ----------------------------------------------------------------- at the end of %prep. > > - Please remove static archive. > > If you mean %{_libdir}/libmalaga.a in -devel, if I remove that, rpmbuild > complains and won't build the packages. How do I go around it then? - Actually remove this static archive before %install finishes (by "rm -f", for example) and remove this entry from %files. This time I tried to rebuild this packge, then several more problems are found. * build log more verbosely - The output like ---------------------------------------------------------------- Compiling avl_trees.c ---------------------------------------------------------------- is not useful. - For example, we want to check if fedora specific compilation flags are correctly honored from build.log Please make build procedure more verbose. To do so, please remove @ (at-mark)s which suppress build process output from Makefile.in. For example: ---------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i.debug -e 's|^\([ \t][ \t]*\)@|\1|' Makefile.in ---------------------------------------------------------------- - Also, it is preferred that you make libtool output more verbose like: ---------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i.silent -e 's|--silent||' Makefile.in ---------------------------------------------------------------- to check if -fPIC is passed correctly, for example. * linkage against libmalaga.so - The installed binaries in malaga don't use libmalaga.so ( is not linked against libmalaga.so). For example: ---------------------------------------------------------------- $ ldd -r ./malsym linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00ad2000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x007d6000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x007b7000) ---------------------------------------------------------------- build log says: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Linking malsym gcc avl_trees.o basic.o files.o hangul.o malaga_files.o malsym.o pools.o scanner.o sym_compiler.o symbols.o tries.o values.o -lglib-2.0 -o malsym ---------------------------------------------------------------- where ---------------------------------------------------------------- gcc -shared .libs/analysis.o .libs/avl_trees.o .libs/basic.o .libs/cache.o .libs/commands.o .libs/display.o .libs/files.o .libs/hangul.o .libs/input.o .libs/lexicon.o .libs/malaga_files.o .libs/malaga_lib.o .libs/options.o .libs/patterns.o .libs/pools.o .libs/processes.o .libs/rules.o .libs/scanner.o .libs/symbols.o .libs/transmit.o .libs/tries.o .libs/value_parser.o .libs/values.o .libs/libmalaga.o -lglib-2.0 -lm -Wl,-soname -Wl,libmalaga.so.7 -o .libs/libmalaga.so.7.0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------- so almost all objects used in malsym are in libmalaga.so. Extras issues: - Redundant Requires: "Requires: gtk2" is not needed. rpmbuild checks dependencies for libraries and automatically adds those dependency to binary rpms. - Timestamps - Add ---------------------------------------------------------------- INSTALL="install -p" ---------------------------------------------------------------- option to "make install" to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for recent Makefiles. * Permission - Permission of libmalaga.so must be 0755, not 0644 ! Don't use %attr. Change the permission of file before %install section ends so that this libraries can be stripped by rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:25:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250825.l9P8PpY9023068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 04:25 EST ------- looks like my local rawhide setup gone wrong with last week's updates. Did a koji build then and found this package is really missing BR:python-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:37:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328291] Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250837.l9P8bX2a021738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnemesi - RTSP/RTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328291 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 04:37 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but NOT for RPM. libnemesi.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.2-0.2.20071011 0.6.2-0.2.20071011git.fc8 ==> can be solved at time of CVS import. + source files match upstream. 2bedb3f40f0afc2c7cec49bb8b132732 libnemesi-20071011git.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + libnemesi.pc files are present. + -devel and -tools subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + libnemesi-0.6.2-0.2.20071011git package -> Provides: libnemesi.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1) libm.so.6 libnemesi.so.0 libnetembryo.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) libsctp.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + libnemesi-devel-0.6.2-0.2.20071011git package -> Requires: libnemesi = 0.6.2-0.2.20071011git libnemesi.so.0 pkgconfig + libnemesi-tools-0.6.2-0.2.20071011git package -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm.so.6 libnemesi.so.0 libnetembryo.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libsctp.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:48:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250848.l9P8m44P023367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-10-25 04:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Is it right that ppc also uses /usr/lib and only x86_64 /usr/lib64? (I'm only > > using x86) > Yes (as ppc64 is disabled). Thanks > > > * Timestamp > > > - Please use "-p" option when using "cp" or "install" command > > > to keep timestamps. > > > > Added. > Please add "-p" option also for "cp"ing COPYING file. Sry, overseen. Fixed. > > ? Desktop file > > > - Is it preferable that this package provides desktop file entry? > Well, what I wanted to ask you is whether it is preferable to > install some desktop file (e.g. named "feodra-compiz-manager.desktop) > under %_datadir/applications so that this script can be used > from GNOME panel, for example (not from terminal). Gnome has the "Desktop Effects" application to switch from metacity to compiz and back again. compiz-manager only starts compiz and has no ability to switch back to the former used wm. And with the script only you don't have any feedback (except starting compiz). So I don't think a additional desktop-file would be a good idea. For KDE there are some plans to include a dialog which uses compiz-manager to check and start compiz. But this script should go into compiz-kde. My intention with compiz-manager was to only add this "helper script" so that an additional GUI could easily be provided by another package. New ones: SPEC Url: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/review/compiz-manager.spec SRPM Url: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/review/compiz-manager-0.6.0-3.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: - keep timestamp also of COPYING - Update patch: always use kwin as fallback in KDE_FULL_SESSION -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:46:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226156] Merge Review: mod_python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250846.l9P8kdt1026409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mod_python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226156 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tuju at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuju at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:48:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225676] Merge Review: dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250848.l9P8mxRh023502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225676 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tuju at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuju at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:49:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250849.l9P8nEhK023534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dbus-python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tuju at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuju at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:53:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349191] Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250853.l9P8rPbE024362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349191 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |346121 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 08:53:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250853.l9P8rQP8024386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |349191 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 09:04:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250904.l9P94R7I029332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-25 05:04 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (compiz-manager) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 09:13:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 350781] Review Request: libvoikko - A library for spellcheckers and hyphenators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250913.l9P9DbTZ030870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvoikko - A library for spellcheckers and hyphenators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350781 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |346121, 349191 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 09:13:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349191] Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250913.l9P9DepC030895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349191 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |350781 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 09:13:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250913.l9P9DfCY030920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |350781 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 09:21:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250921.l9P9LIBB029075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-10-25 05:21 EST ------- Thx! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compiz-manager Short Description: A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options Owners: svahl Branches: F-8 InitialCC: drago01 Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 09:39:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351711] Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250939.l9P9dn55031727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351711 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 05:39 EST ------- Good to change permissions in %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 09:44:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226192] Merge Review: net-snmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710250944.l9P9ixUx003582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: net-snmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226192 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 226192 depends on bug 167933, which changed state. Bug 167933 Summary: RFE: net-snmp: don't remove the tkmib perl script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167933 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 10:12:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251012.l9PACwQT008015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-25 06:12 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. BTW why you still not build qca2? Formal review: - rpmlint not silent - then checking SRPM-package it shouts: [petro at host-12-109 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/qca-ossl-0.1-2.20070706.fc7.src.rpm qca-ossl.src:35: E: configure-without-libdir-spec qca-ossl.src:56: W: macro-in-%changelog date The last warning should be easily omitted. But what about first one? Looks like qt4-buildsustem handles all such things by itself but can you prove that on x86_64 libqca-ossl.so placed in the right place? + package meets naming and packaging guidelines + specfile is properly named + package meets Packaging/Guidelines + package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + spec file written in American English + spec file legible + sources match the upstream source: 908eaeed2c0f873bb7cf602814041559 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qca-ossl-0.1-20070706.tar.bz2 + package builds file (x86) + all build dependencies listed in BuildRequires + package doesn't need to call ldconfig in %post and %postun + package owns all created directories + package not contains any duplicate files in the %files listing. + permissions on files sets properly + package has a %clean section + package uses macros consistently + package contains code or permissable content + header files are in a -devel package + package contains no static libs + package does not contain any .la libtool archives + not a GUI app + all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8 Just FIY looking at the delta.affinix.com site I found that they released new versions for qca2 and qca-ossl. http://delta.affinix.com/download/qca/2.0/qca-2.0.0.tar.bz2 http://delta.affinix.com/download/qca/2.0/test4/qca-ossl-0.1-20070904.tar.bz2 Maybe you should update these two packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 11:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251150.l9PBojLH023051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-25 07:50 EST ------- Thanks. Fixed in 1.10-5.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 13:12:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251312.l9PDC8pl004349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-25 09:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I've fixed up the problems that were identified and posted new spec/SRPM: Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/gst-inspector-0.3-2.fc7.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/7/SRPMS/gst-inspector-0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm * Thu Oct 25 2007 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.3-2 - Add postun and redo post section to match - Require hicolor-icons-theme - Change category for desktop entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 13:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251319.l9PDJTXF001524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-25 09:19 EST ------- So would you fix the rest issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 13:26:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251326.l9PDQW3e003473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-25 09:26 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 13:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251348.l9PDmNEb010725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2007-10-25 09:48 EST ------- Ok, waited 3 days for comments, this should be enough, commited with fixed indents and base documentation. Built as perl-SGMLSpm-1.03ii-16.4.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 13:56:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251356.l9PDusgs009422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-10-25 09:56 EST ------- Now the package is built taking the dist tag to get the distro release. + changes upstream to switch to a default tunables DB if ever the kernel release / distro is not supported. This second change covers the issue of fedora releases that look like: fc7.92 SPEC URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/specfiles/FE/FE-13-4/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/srpms/FE/libtune-0.13-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 14:55:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251455.l9PEtUXv020360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 16:03:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263181] Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251603.l9PG3vcn004527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263181 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-25 12:03 EST ------- I honestly can't say. I don't know a whole lot about PHP. That said, the state you'd be in is not really uncommon; upstream developers go away all the time, and all you can do is deal with it when it happens. You say you've been using and relying on the software so you're probably in a far better position than most to work on it. The situation we're really trying to prevent by asking these difficult questions is the inclusion of software in Fedora that ends up being completely unmaintained, with accumulating bugs which all involved lack the ability to fix. Plus the security team eventually has to fix every security-related bug that isn't fixed by someone else regardless of how much we have to learn about PHP internals in the process. Of course, if things get bad enough we'll just drop the software and everything that depends on it in the next Fedora release, but we always want to avoid doing that kind of thing because it's not nice to the end users to have software disappear between releases. Don't forget that this is a community and you can always ask for help; my advice is to try to talk to the maintainers of other PHP packages and see if they'd be willing to help you out if you need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 16:49:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251649.l9PGnrK5007561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-25 12:49 EST ------- OK, the license looks good to me and the URL is correct. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 16:54:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251654.l9PGs2uv013162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(andy.southgate at mus | |hware.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-25 12:54 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 16:51:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352741] New: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/tkimg.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/tkimg-1.3-0.2.20071018svn.src.rpm Description: This package contains a collection of image format handlers for the Tk photo image type, and a new image type, pixmaps. The provided format handlers include bmp, gif, ico, jpeg, pcx, png, ppm, ps, sgi, sun, tga, tiff, xbm, and xpm. This package is needed to build SAOImage DS9 (http://hea-www.harvard.edu/RD/ds9/), an astronomical data visualization application -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 16:56:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299171] Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251656.l9PGu5Tx008930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299171 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-25 12:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Ok, I have updated the SRPM to include the .tar.gz file of the source. But I am > still pulling the source directly from the SVN tree and I'm hoping this is ok. You cannot do this. Fedora koji builder does not support this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 16:55:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] New: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/ds9.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/ds9-4.13-8.fc7.src.rpm Description: SAOImage DS9 is an astronomical imaging and data visualization application. DS9 supports FITS images and binary tables, multiple frame buffers, region manipulation, and many scale algorithms and colormaps. It provides for easy communication with external analysis tasks and is highly configurable and extensible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:02:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291371] Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251702.l9PH2XWv009779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291371 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-25 13:02 EST ------- GConf schemas files are used to customize application. Perhaps you can get teg work without gconf setting (i.e. by default), however with gconf file you can customize teg (perhaps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:04:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251704.l9PH493j014850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 13:04 EST ------- You should either have %{_datadir}/aclocal or %{_datadir}/aclocal/* %dir %{_datadir}/aclocal Thefollowing is not needed rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} And why do you remove the man pages? I suggest replacing rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la with rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la Only a suggestion, to keep the THANKS file timestamp, you can do touch -r THANKS THANKS.aux before mv. Also it should be better to remove the .gz from install-info scriptlets since install-info can detect itself if .gz is needed. This is not a blocker, but I can't see why you shouldn't do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:03:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244547] Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251703.l9PH3vOj009929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244547 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-25 13:03 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:09:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251709.l9PH9Nga015695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 13:09 EST ------- ok, fixed here: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit-0.1.1-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251733.l9PHXWcn015380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |249812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:34:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251734.l9PHYBYB015456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |333091 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:34:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251734.l9PHYcHg020146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |333081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:52:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352741] Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251752.l9PHqsxP023182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |352761 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 17:52:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251752.l9PHqtAo023203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |352741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 18:07:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251807.l9PI77hv021669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-25 14:07 EST ------- I've already updated and build qca2 to the final version: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21840 Concerning the absence of %_libdir, the rpm will fail to build if the .so is placed anywhere else than _libdir, because of the %files section. Right now I can't test it on x86_64, but I suppose it will work if the configure detects the qt_dir in /usr/lib64/qt. Else the build will fail in the buildsystem, and I'll fix it. Updated version: * Thu Oct 25 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.1-3.20070904 - update to 20070904 http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca-ossl.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca-ossl-0.1-3.20070904.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 18:08:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226248] Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251808.l9PI8SOt021859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226248 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 14:08 EST ------- 1) fixed 2) fixed 3) Added BR for Test::Pod and LWP::UserAgent... Also, updated to the latest upstream version (0.57), and applied a patch to prevent the Makefile generation step from prompting for user input, and changed parameters to Makefile.PL to prevent prompting. Patch sent upstream here: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=30268 New version is perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.57-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 18:10:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251810.l9PIApna022400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-25 14:10 EST ------- rpmlint turns up a few problems: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 Yeah, you should probably do the usual ldconfig run, even though another driver with XvMC libraries (i810) doesn't do that. Then there are a whole bunch of these: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 _XReply xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 _XReply Plus the same for a whole bunch of other symbols. I honestly do not know if this is an actual problem or not; the same issue came up in the i810 driver review but I never received an answer as to what causes it. I'll poke some experts. xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation This is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 18:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251815.l9PIFaT2027069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 14:15 EST ------- Ok. Also updated to latest upstream version (2.18) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 18:18:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352741] Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251818.l9PIIame027465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sergio.pasra at gmail | |.com) ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-25 14:18 EST ------- [-] source files match upstream: 07afc28f7e1149dad65471f387298052 tkimg-1.3.tar.gz 964a692db8a120dc5ed8779521a70bc8 tkimg-1.3.tar.gz.upstream * I diffed the tree and I see no changes beside owership. Please make sure you ship the version from sourcefource page. [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named and cleanly written. [-] dist tag is present. * Please use dist tag for your release tag. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag [+] build root is correct. %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in mock (rawhide). [+] package installs properly. Please, fix these two errors and provide me with new spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 18:20:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226289] Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251820.l9PIKQSl024076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226289 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 14:20 EST ------- 1, 2, and 3 fixed. New version is perl-XML-Parser-2.34.10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 18:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251819.l9PIJx7H023594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-25 14:19 EST ------- A couple of quick comments: You should use %{__ln_s} in %build since you use macroized versions of the other commands. If you don't need to update the icon cache, it's probably best to remove the comments from your %post and %postun scriptlets and use the %post -p /sbin/ldconfig form instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:00:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251900.l9PJ0Xkh001931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2007-10-25 15:00 EST ------- Instead of owning aclocal, the devel package should require automake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:25:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251925.l9PJPB7Z006850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 15:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Instead of owning aclocal, the devel package should require automake. I disagree, this is up to the packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:35:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251935.l9PJZgmI005330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-25 15:35 EST ------- Ok, looks better now. However there's now branch confusion as the F-8 and devel branches have changes (ipv6, source URL, License tag) that are not included in the F-7 branch but on the other hand lack fixes in the F-7 one (cleanups, libusb.pc fix). And the 1.3-6%{?dist} in F-7 and F-8+ are quite different. If the current F-7 package fixes were ported to the devel branch and then the whole shebang back to earlier branches from devel, I think we'd be good to go. Let me know when one/some of the branches have all the fixes and I'll take one more look at that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:34:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251934.l9PJYWkQ008089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-10-25 15:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > rpmlint turns up a few problems: > > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 > > Yeah, you should probably do the usual ldconfig run, even though another driver > with XvMC libraries (i810) doesn't do that. There's no point. The XvMC sublibraries are loadables, they're only ever used with dlopen(). > Then there are a whole bunch of these: > > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 _XReply > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 _XReply They're provided by libXvMC, which dlopens libchromeXvMCPro.so. These aren't problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:39:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251939.l9PJdOFk005697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 andy.southgate at mushware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(andy.southgate at mus| |hware.com) | ------- Additional Comments From andy.southgate at mushware.com 2007-10-25 15:39 EST ------- I've been a bit busy recently, but I should be able to find some time to repackage this weekend. I will also do some pre-reviews as you suggest when time permits, but it might take a week or two. Will get back to you soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225898] Merge Review: imake In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251938.l9PJcYEV005621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: imake https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225898 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 15:38 EST ------- This package should be split in 5. There is no reason to have all in one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:47:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351611] Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251947.l9PJlZFO010536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351611 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 15:47 EST ------- Oops - fixed here: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Object-Deadly.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Object-Deadly-0.09-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:52:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225885] Merge Review: hexedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251952.l9PJqESV008277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hexedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225885 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 15:52 EST ------- The source file timestamp is not kept. This is too late for this release, but next time it will be better to fetch it with wget -N or spectool -g to keep the timestamp. source match upstream 0d2f48610006278cd93359fea9a06d5c hexedit-1.2.12.src.tgz rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 19:56:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225885] Merge Review: hexedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710251956.l9PJuj98012381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hexedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225885 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 15:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=237951) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=237951&action=view) misc spec file fixes set license to GPLv2+. Remove unuseful export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS". keep man page timestamp. add %{_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 20:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252013.l9PKDrm1014864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 16:13 EST ------- Fixed here: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-2.03-2.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 20:15:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351751] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252015.l9PKFO8e015366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 16:15 EST ------- Fixed: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data-1.15-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 20:43:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252043.l9PKh607019584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 16:43 EST ------- It may be important to say that I am in fluxbox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 20:43:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226262] Merge Review: perl-Inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252043.l9PKhh91019666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 16:43 EST ------- See comment #2 : """ 5) yep, this is another case where fedora doesn't have a perl package needed to run those tests - in this case perl(Inline::Files) Here's a package review for perl-Inline-Files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351711 For now the BR: perl(Inline::Files) is commented out. """ That test is the test that was skipped. We can wait until bug #351711 is fixed if you want that test to pass before approving this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 20:42:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252042.l9PKgaBL019494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 16:42 EST ------- ristretto.i386: W: non-standard-group Applications/Graphics Maybe User Interface/Desktops It should certainly be cleaner to have buildrequires libxfce4util-devel >= 4.4.0 In my tests I see the mini images, but the main place where the image should appear stays black. gthumb has more mimetypes: MimeType=image/bmp;image/jpeg;image/gif;image/png;image/tiff;image/x-bmp;image/x-ico;image/x-png;image/x-pcx;image/x-tga;image/xpm;image/svg+xml; Also maybe the .eps? This is more for upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 20:48:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226249] Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252048.l9PKmx3q020538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226249 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 16:48 EST ------- The BR: is there - can you double check please? [rnorwood at solitude tmp]$ wget http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Date-Calc/5.4/3.fc9/src/perl-Date-Calc-5.4-3.fc9.src.rpm [rnorwood at solitude tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires perl-Date-Calc-5.4-3.fc9.src.rpm perl(Bit::Vector) >= 6.4 perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) dos2unix rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 [rnorwood at solitude tmp]$ md5sum perl-Date-Calc-5.4-3.fc9.src.rpm b7493810b674ddb1c0de3385ced25a4f perl-Date-Calc-5.4-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 20:52:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226286] Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252052.l9PKq63h018291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226286 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 16:52 EST ------- All of the above fixed in version perl-XML-LibXML-Common-0.13-10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 20:53:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252053.l9PKrCGb021269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-25 16:53 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi-1.4.4-6.fc8.src.rpm This should be everything requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 21:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252108.l9PL8FSo024092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 17:08 EST ------- perl should be in BuildRequires now. Why is LD used for linking instead of gcc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 21:11:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252111.l9PLBTL1022019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 17:11 EST ------- Also in my opinion it would be cleaner to use, on the make install line MANDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1 BINDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 21:36:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 350181] Review Request: upslug2 - Upslug2 firmware update utility for the nslu2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252136.l9PLaYVN026113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upslug2 - Upslug2 firmware update utility for the nslu2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350181 ------- Additional Comments From marceln at xs4all.nl 2007-10-25 17:36 EST ------- I have build the source package on a x86_64 system and used the upslug2 command to flash my nslu2 with success! # upslug2 -i openwrt-nslu2-2.6-squashfs.bin LKG7FAB7A 00:0f:66:7f:ab:7a Product ID: 1 Protocol ID:0 Firmware Version: R23V63 [0x2363] Upgrading LKG7FAB7A 00:0f:66:7f:ab:7a . original flash contents * packet timed out ! being erased - erased u being upgraded U upgraded v being verified V verified Display:
+ Status: * timeout occurred + sequence error detected 7fffff+000000 ...VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV Rebooting... done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 21:38:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252138.l9PLcO28026288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-10-25 17:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > ristretto.i386: W: non-standard-group Applications/Graphics > > Maybe > User Interface/Desktops Sorry, this was a last minute change. I had "User Interface/Desktops", but changed it to "Amusements/Graphics" in the spec. > It should certainly be cleaner to have buildrequires > libxfce4util-devel >= 4.4.0 Oops. I think I'll remove libxfce4util since it is redundant anyway, libxfce4util-devel is pulled in by Thunar-devel. > In my tests I see the mini images, but the main place where > the image should appear stays black. This depends on whether you choose "Open" or "Open Folder" (which is the same as the icon in the tool bar). If you choose to open a folder you need to click on one of the thumbnails before it gets displayed in the main area. > gthumb has more mimetypes: > MimeType=image/bmp;image/jpeg;image/gif;image/png;image/tiff;image/x-bmp;image/x-ico;image/x-png;image/x-pcx;image/x-tga;image/xpm;image/svg+xml; > Also maybe the .eps? This is more for upstream. Good catch, I can change that if you like, I'm working on a multilingual desktop file that should be included in 0.1.0. I think we should add image/tiff image/x-bmp image/x-png image/x-pcx image/x-tga image/xpm but ristretto doesn't handle svg or eps atm. (In reply to comment #3) > It may be important to say that I am in fluxbox. Doesn't matter as long as you have Thunar installed (Thunar and ristretto are sharing their thumbnail cache). Ristretto requires libthunar-vfs-1.so.2, so Thunar will be installed automagically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 21:46:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249831] Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252146.l9PLkVrD027617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249831 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rpm at greysector.net | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 21:47:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226287] Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252147.l9PLlpUX027666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226287 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-25 17:47 EST ------- I've updated to the latest upstream version, 1.65. perl-XML-LibXML-1.65-1.fc9 should fix issues 1-5. For #6 - I think we generally don't run author/developer tests. In this case, the memory test at least seems to take a very long time. Similarly, 1.65 adds a threads test which also takes a long time. I recommend we leave both of these out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 22:00:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252200.l9PM04Fn031897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 18:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > ristretto.i386: W: non-standard-group Applications/Graphics > > > > Maybe > > User Interface/Desktops > > Sorry, this was a last minute change. I had "User Interface/Desktops", but > changed it to "Amusements/Graphics" in the spec. I am not sure that it is right. I would only put image editors in that Group. Not a big deal. > > It should certainly be cleaner to have buildrequires > > libxfce4util-devel >= 4.4.0 > > Oops. I think I'll remove libxfce4util since it is redundant anyway, > libxfce4util-devel is pulled in by Thunar-devel. (by exo-devel) but without version constraints. So it may make sense to keep the versioned BR here. > > In my tests I see the mini images, but the main place where > > the image should appear stays black. > > This depends on whether you choose "Open" or "Open Folder" (which is the same as > the icon in the tool bar). If you choose to open a folder you need to click on > one of the thumbnails before it gets displayed in the main area. i tried $ ristretto ristretto-screenshot.png from http://goodies.xfce.org/_media/projects/applications/ristretto-screenshot.png and still a black main area. And even when i click on it nothing happens. > > gthumb has more mimetypes: > > > MimeType=image/bmp;image/jpeg;image/gif;image/png;image/tiff;image/x-bmp;image/x-ico;image/x-png;image/x-pcx;image/x-tga;image/xpm;image/svg+xml; > > Also maybe the .eps? This is more for upstream. > > Good catch, I can change that if you like, I'm working on a multilingual desktop > file that should be included in 0.1.0. I think we should add > image/tiff > image/x-bmp > image/x-png > image/x-pcx > image/x-tga > image/xpm Looks sane. > but ristretto doesn't handle svg or eps atm. Ok. The mini images are shown, though. > (In reply to comment #3) > > It may be important to say that I am in fluxbox. > > Doesn't matter as long as you have Thunar installed (Thunar and ristretto are > sharing their thumbnail cache). Ristretto requires libthunar-vfs-1.so.2, so > Thunar will be installed automagically. Indeed, but I experienced sometimes different behavior when not in a desktop like gnome/kde/xfce, like http://thunar.xfce.org/pwiki/documentation/faq question Why does Thunar display the fallback icon for all files and folders? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 22:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252208.l9PM8ME7030408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-25 18:08 EST ------- I have the same issue in xfce. i also get warnings: (ristretto:22815): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer: assertion `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed (ristretto:22819): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer: assertion `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 22:50:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252250.l9PMoQMS006325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-25 18:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-channel-symfony Short Description: Adds symfony project channel to PEAR Owners: akahl Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 23:24:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252324.l9PNOj1F008999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-10-25 19:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > Sorry, this was a last minute change. I had "User Interface/Desktops", but > > changed it to "Amusements/Graphics" in the spec. > > I am not sure that it is right. I would only put image editors in > that Group. Not a big deal. Well, there seems to be no common usage: $ rpm -qi eog f-spot gthumb gimp mirage | grep Group Group : User Interface/Desktops Source RPM: eog-2.18.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Group : Applications/Multimedia Source RPM: f-spot-0.3.5-2.fc7.src.rpm Group : User Interface/X Source RPM: gthumb-2.10.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Group : Applications/Multimedia Source RPM: gimp-2.2.17-1.fc7.src.rpm Group : Amusements/Graphics Source RPM: mirage-0.9-1.fc7.src.rpm I agree we could use User Interface/Desktops > > > > It should certainly be cleaner to have buildrequires > > > libxfce4util-devel >= 4.4.0 > > > > Oops. I think I'll remove libxfce4util since it is redundant anyway, > > libxfce4util-devel is pulled in by Thunar-devel. > > (by exo-devel) but without version constraints. So it may make > sense to keep the versioned BR here. +1 > > i tried > $ ristretto ristretto-screenshot.png > > and still a black main area. And even when i click on it > nothing happens. Ok, I'll test on a minimal system, there seems to be a missing requirement. > > > but ristretto doesn't handle svg or eps atm. > > Ok. The mini images are shown, though. Maybe these are cached thumbnails (pngs) that are created by a running Thunar or nautilus? Or it is indeed a bug in ristretto, the program is still in an early state. Anyway, I tried all the other filetypes you suggested and they all work except svg and eps. > > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > It may be important to say that I am in fluxbox. > > > > Doesn't matter as long as you have Thunar installed (Thunar and ristretto are > > sharing their thumbnail cache). Ristretto requires libthunar-vfs-1.so.2, so > > Thunar will be installed automagically. > > Indeed, but I experienced sometimes different behavior when not in > a desktop like gnome/kde/xfce, like > http://thunar.xfce.org/pwiki/documentation/faq > question > Why does Thunar display the fallback icon for all files and folders? This seems to be an error in the underlying thunar-vfs layer. Ristretto uses thunar_vfs_mime_info_get_media to determine the file type, if it returns NULL, no image is shown. shared-mime-data should be installed with Thunar, so I have no idea what could be wrong here. (In reply to comment #6) > I have the same issue in xfce. You mean, you have no icons in Thunar even in Xfce? > i also get warnings: > (ristretto:22815): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer: assertion > `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed > > (ristretto:22819): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer: assertion > `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed > Sorry, I don't see anything like that here in my F7 machine. When do these errors appear? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 25 23:45:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349791] Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710252345.l9PNjlVh012499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Various cardsets for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349791 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-25 19:45 EST ------- All fixed in release 3: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-3.src.rpm I double-checked the link this time ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 03:27:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260327.l9Q3Rfqh016333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 23:27 EST ------- I think you uploaded correct version of SPEC but missed to upload SRPM from it. I saw that SRPM contains SPEC that have #BuildRequires: perl(GD::Barcode::EAN13) that prevented one test case thus showing t/png_barcode............ok 4/10 skipped: Need GD::Barcode::EAN13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 03:34:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226289] Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260334.l9Q3YIxw018611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226289 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 23:34 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 84d9e0001fe01c14867256c3fe115899 XML-Parser-2.34.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/astress.........ok t/cdata...........ok t/decl............ok t/defaulted.......okt/encoding........"my" variable $p masks earlier declaration in same scope at t/encoding.t line 94. ok t/external_ent....ok t/file............okt/finish..........ok t/namespaces......ok t/parament........ok t/partial.........ok t/skip............ok t/stream..........ok t/styles..........ok All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=130, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.71 cusr + 0.18 csys = 0.89 CPU) + Package perl-XML-Parser-2.34-10.fc8 -> Provides: Expat.so perl(XML::Parser) = 2.34 perl(XML::Parser::ContentModel) perl(XML::Parser::Encinfo) perl(XML::Parser::Expat) = 2.34 perl(XML::Parser::ExpatNB) perl(XML::Parser::Style::Debug) perl(XML::Parser::Style::Objects) perl(XML::Parser::Style::Stream) perl(XML::Parser::Style::Subs) perl(XML::Parser::Style::Tree) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libexpat.so.1 perl >= 0:5.004 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(LWP) perl(URI) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. You can CLOSE this review as reviewed package is already built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 03:34:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351751] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260334.l9Q3YTdu017165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-25 23:34 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url fc752d33c352879d9462f86b358416fc Business-ISBN-Data-1.15.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs /usr/bin/perl "-MTest::Manifest" "-e" "run_t_manifest(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch', )" Level is Test::Manifest::test_harness found [t/load.t t/pod.t t/pod_coverage.t t/prereq.t t/check_data_structure.t] t/load....................ok t/pod.....................ok t/pod_coverage............ok t/prereq..................ok t/check_data_structure....ok All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=300, 4 wallclock secs ( 3.87 cusr + 0.13 csys = 4.00 CPU) + Package perl-Business-ISBN-Data-1.15-2.fc8 -> Provides: perl(Business::ISBN) perl(Business::ISBN::Data) = 1.15 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:05:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260405.l9Q45PVI021818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-10-26 00:05 EST ------- The configure option changed, you must use --with-default-backend=yum now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:22:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260422.l9Q4MNnS025322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 00:22 EST ------- yeah, missed that: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit-0.1.1-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:31:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226291] Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260431.l9Q4Vl1L025147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Simple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226291 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 00:31 EST ------- Thanks. APPROVED for new release. You can CLOSE this review as reviewed package is already built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:29:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260429.l9Q4TEcN024552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 00:29 EST ------- ok, must've fumbled something. try it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:32:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260432.l9Q4WuVv026656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 00:32 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. dfd4118a5980bac647660491fcc3698a gnome-packagekit-0.1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + scrollkeeper, Gconf, update-dekstop-database, update-gtk-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + package gnome-packagekit-0.1.1-1.fc8 -> Provides: config(gnome-packagekit) = 0.1.1-1.fc8 Requires: config(gnome-packagekit) = 0.1.1-1.fc8 dbus-glib >= 0.61 dbus-x11 >= 0.61 gnome-icon-theme gtk2 >= 2.10.0 libORBit-2.so.0 libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgconf-2.so.4 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglade-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libnotify >= 0.4.3 libnotify.so.1 libpackagekit.so.2 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226286] Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260435.l9Q4ZUbm027230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML-Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226286 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 00:35 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 13b6d93f53375d15fd11922216249659 XML-LibXML-Common-0.13.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..8 # Running under perl version 5.008008 for linux # Current time local: Fri Oct 26 00:20:39 2007 # Current time GMT: Fri Oct 26 04:20:39 2007 # Using Test.pm version 1.25 ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 ok 6 ok 7 ok 8 + Package perl-XML-LibXML-Common-0.13-10.fc8 -> Provides: Common.so perl(XML::LibXML::Common) = 0.13 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. You can CLOSE this review as reviewed package is already built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:44:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226287] Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260444.l9Q4i3Uj027234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226287 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 00:44 EST ------- rpmlint gave me perl-XML-LibXML.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun perl perl-XML-LibXML.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger perl If you feel its necessary for this package then I can approve this package with those warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:51:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260451.l9Q4pOQV029791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 00:51 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. ad915a2cd3d5028fa6e399e0947aecdc PackageKit-0.1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + packagekit.pc files are present. + -devel,-libs subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + package PackageKit-0.1.0-4.fc8 -> Provides: config(PackageKit) = 0.1.0-4.fc8 Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/python PackageKit-libs = 0.1.1-4.fc9 config(PackageKit) = 0.1.1-4.fc9 dbus >= 0.90 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libnm_glib.so.0 libpackagekit.so.2 libpolkit-dbus.so.2 libpolkit-grant.so.2 libpolkit.so.2 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) librt.so.1 libsqlite3.so.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) yum >= 3.2.6 + package PackageKit-devel-0.1.0-4.fc8 -> Requires: PackageKit = 0.1.1-4.fc9 dbus-devel >= 0.90 libpackagekit.so.2 pkgconfig sqlite-devel + package PackageKit-libs-0.1.0-4.fc8 -> Provides: libpackagekit.so.2 libpk_backend_dummy.so libpk_backend_test_fail.so libpk_backend_test_nop.so libpk_backend_test_spawn.so libpk_backend_test_succeed.so libpk_backend_test_thread.so libpk_backend_yum.so Requires: dbus >= 0.90 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libnm_glib.so.0 libpackagekit.so.2 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 04:56:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260456.l9Q4ueUC030540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 00:56 EST ------- argh. Sorry for above mistake. I was already prepared for review but then I modified it according to latest SRPM and koji build log but mistakenly pasted old review text. Heres correct provides and requires: + package PackageKit-0.1.1-4.fc8 -> Provides: config(PackageKit) = 0.1.1-4.fc8 Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/python PackageKit-libs = 0.1.1-4.fc8 config(PackageKit) = 0.1.1-4.fc8 dbus >= 0.90 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libnm_glib.so.0 libpackagekit.so.2 libpolkit-dbus.so.2 libpolkit-grant.so.2 libpolkit.so.2 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) librt.so.1 libsqlite3.so.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) yum >= 3.2.6 + package PackageKit-devel-0.1.1-4.fc8 -> Requires: PackageKit = 0.1.1-4.fc8 dbus-devel >= 0.90 libpackagekit.so.2 pkgconfig sqlite-devel + package PackageKit-libs-0.1.1-4.fc8 -> Provides: libpackagekit.so.2 libpk_backend_dummy.so libpk_backend_test_fail.so libpk_backend_test_nop.so libpk_backend_test_spawn.so libpk_backend_test_succeed.so libpk_backend_test_thread.so libpk_backend_yum.so Requires: dbus >= 0.90 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libnm_glib.so.0 libpackagekit.so.2 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260509.l9Q59GGM030824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:09 EST ------- Approved okay 0.3.2 looks good to me.. except one thing. Please use %{SOURCE1} instead of %{S:1} for legibility in the spec before you commit to cvs. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:21:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260521.l9Q5LfT7000315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:21 EST ------- Dunno still getting same skipped test result I guess some thing wrong with png_barcode.t test file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:32:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260532.l9Q5WZv0003169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:32 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c639e17ba6cbfce52b288a5105724f2d conntrack-tools-0.9.5.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package conntrack-tools-0.9.5-3.fc8 -> Provides: conntrack = 1.0-1 Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1 libnfnetlink.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:37:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226278] Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260537.l9Q5bmIZ003923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-SGMLSpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226278 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:37 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5bcb197fd42e67d51c739b1414d514a7 SGMLSpm-1.03ii.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package perl-SGMLSpm-1.03ii-16.4.fc8 -> Provides: perl(SGMLS) perl(SGMLS::Output) perl(SGMLS::Refs) perl(SGMLS_Attribute) perl(SGMLS_Element) perl(SGMLS_Entity) perl(SGMLS_Event) perl(SGMLS_Notation) Requires: /usr/bin/perl openjade perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(SGMLS) perl(SGMLS::Output) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:42:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226249] Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260542.l9Q5gLWt003447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Calc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226249 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:42 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7ae34972694127e8f1c9a2af1c24585b Date-Calc-5.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=48, Tests=2770, 3 wallclock secs ( 2.20 cusr + 0.35 csys = 2.55 CPU) + Package perl-Date-Calc-5.4-3.fc8 -> Provides: Calc.so perl(Date::Calc::Object) = 5.4 perl(Date::Calendar) = 5.4 perl(Date::Calendar::Profiles) = 5.4 perl(Date::Calendar::Year) = 5.4 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Bit::Vector) perl(Bit::Vector) >= 6.4 perl(Carp::Clan) perl(Date::Calc::Object) perl(Date::Calendar::Year) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:46:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226248] Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260546.l9Q5kBkn004118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226248 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:46 EST ------- why not to use standard buildroot tag? you used BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/perl-Crypt-SSLeay-buildroot/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:53:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226262] Merge Review: perl-Inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260553.l9Q5riWe006436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:53 EST ------- thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:51:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351611] Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260551.l9Q5pJqt006281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Deadly - An object that dies whenever examined https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351611 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:51 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url fcf2895dd63b4bdd3a9ad683516b7aef Object-Deadly-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01pod.............skipped all skipped: Skipping author tests t/02pod-coverage....skipped all skipped: Skipping author tests t/03yaml............skipped all skipped: Skipping author tests t/04boilerplate.....skipped all skipped: Skipping author tests t/10load............# Testing Object::Deadly 0.09, Perl 5.008008, /usr/bin/perl ok t/20deadly..........ok t/21class...........ok All tests successful, 4 tests skipped. Files=7, Tests=139, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.36 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.42 CPU) + Package perl-Object-Deadly-0.09-2.fc8 -> Provides: perl(Object::Deadly) = 0.09 perl(Object::Deadly::_safe) perl(Object::Deadly::_unsafe) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(B) perl(Carp::Clan) >= 5.4 perl(Devel::Symdump) perl(English) perl(Object::Deadly) perl(Object::Deadly::_safe) perl(Object::Deadly::_unsafe) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 05:55:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226283] Merge Review: perl-URI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260555.l9Q5tr5M007020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-URI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226283 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 01:55 EST ------- I will wait for perl(Business::ISBN) then will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 06:12:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260612.l9Q6Ci9R008118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-26 02:12 EST ------- http://dl.atrpms.net/all/maildrop-2.0.4-4.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/maildrop.spec I forgot to fix the license tag, consider this part of "-5". :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 06:16:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260616.l9Q6GkrY010334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-26 02:16 EST ------- http://dl.atrpms.net/all/arpack-2.1-7.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/arpack.spec * Wed Oct 24 2007 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2.1-7 - apply Frederic Hecht's patch for eigenvalue bug - move static libs to separate package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 06:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260621.l9Q6LSOb009940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-26 02:21 EST ------- http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-1.0.3-2.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-fedora.spec * Wed Oct 24 2007 Axel Thimm - 1:1.0.3-2 - Update to 1.0.3. - Remove pseudo-firmware file (mpeg initialisation sequence). - Remove devel subpackage. - Use %%{optflags}. - Move parl scripts to %%{_datadir}. - Add dependency to firmware package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 06:23:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260623.l9Q6NYfO010214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-26 02:23 EST ------- http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-firmware-20070217-15.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-firmware.spec * Wed Oct 24 2007 Axel Thimm - 2:20070217-15 - Add v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg as a pseudo-firmware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 06:32:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260632.l9Q6WFRa012860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-26 02:32 EST ------- Would you check what owns the following directories? --------------------------------------------------------------- %{_localstatedir}/run/PackageKit/ %{_libdir}/packagekit-backend/ --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 06:41:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260641.l9Q6f3I6013319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-26 02:41 EST ------- Also: - According to this packaging, we can install PackageKit-libs only and we don't have to install PackageKit itself. In this case license text and other documents are not installed, which is not proper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 06:52:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260652.l9Q6qc3V014757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 02:52 EST ------- thanks for having a look on this package Mamoru. You are right. directory is not owned /usr/lib/packagekit-backend and missed my eyes following rpm view drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Oct 26 11:59 /var/lib/PackageKit -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3072 Oct 26 11:59 /var/lib/PackageKit/transactions.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2 Oct 26 11:59 /var/run/PackageKit/job_count.dat so directory /var/run/PackageKit is not owned. For Documentation thing I agree with you. -libs should install docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 06:55:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260655.l9Q6t45V015917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 02:55 EST ------- Mamoru, Do you see any other issues in this packaging? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 07:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260706.l9Q76lVb017014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-26 03:06 EST ------- Well, one more thing - It doesn't seem that PackageKit-devel should require sqlite-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 07:10:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260710.l9Q7AQwg018077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2007-10-26 03:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > Instead of owning aclocal, the devel package should require automake. > > I disagree, this is up to the packager. There is now a proposal for that directory to be owned by filesystem. This would simplify a lot of cases like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 07:15:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260715.l9Q7FHbk018560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 yaneti at declera.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2007-10-26 03:15 EST ------- Surely this cries for /usr/lib/XvMC/ or something and all of these there, outside of the default linker path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 07:46:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260746.l9Q7kwWX023834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail.| |com) | ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-10-26 03:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * Requires > - Would you explain why libfo-devel should require > libxslt-devel? >From libfo-0.5.pc: > Requires: glib-2.0 gobject-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libxslt gdk-pixbuf-2.0 http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/xmlroff/xmlroff.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/xmlroff/xmlroff-0.5.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 08:03:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260803.l9Q831mD027106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-26 04:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > * Requires > > - Would you explain why libfo-devel should require > > libxslt-devel? > > From libfo-0.5.pc: > > > Requires: glib-2.0 gobject-2.0 gmodule-2.0 libxslt gdk-pixbuf-2.0 So would you check if libxslt-devel is _actually_ needed? >From header files it seems this "libxslt" should be "libxml-2.0" (i.e. Requires: not libxslt-devel but libxml2-devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 08:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225885] Merge Review: hexedit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260827.l9Q8Rtks030780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hexedit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225885 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com, | |jmoskovc at redhat.com QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 08:40:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260840.l9Q8eREO001247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-10-26 04:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > So would you check if libxslt-devel is _actually_ needed? > From header files it seems this "libxslt" should be "libxml-2.0" > (i.e. Requires: not libxslt-devel but libxml2-devel). >From libfo/fo-xslt-transformer.c: > #include > #include > #include -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 09:25:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710260925.l9Q9PcCT008217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-26 05:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > So would you check if libxslt-devel is _actually_ needed? > > From header files it seems this "libxslt" should be "libxml-2.0" > > (i.e. Requires: not libxslt-devel but libxml2-devel). > > From libfo/fo-xslt-transformer.c: > > > #include > > #include > > #include It is for BuildRequires, not for Requires for -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:00:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261000.l9QA0sjb014708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:00 EST ------- * Wrote atest.cpp: #include int main() { unsigned long x = OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER; if(x >= 0x00907000) return 0; else return 1; } * Wrote atest.pro: CONFIG += console CONFIG -= qt app_bundle SOURCES += atest.cpp LIBS += -lssl -lcrypto * [/usr/lib/qt4/bin/qmake-qt4 atest.pro] * returned: 0 * [/usr/bin/gmake] g++ -c -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -W -I/usr/lib/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I. -o atest.o atest.cpp g++ -o atest atest.o -lssl -lcrypto * returned: 0 * [./atest] * returned: 0 * [/usr/bin/gmake distclean] rm -f atest.o rm -f *~ core *.core rm -f atest rm -f Makefile * returned: 0 * DEFINES += OSSL_097 * LIBS += -lssl -lcrypto -> yes * extra += target.path=/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/crypto INSTALLS += target Good, your configure finished. Now run /usr/bin/gmake. + make /usr/lib/qt4/bin/moc -DOSSL_097 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_PLUGIN -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I../../../../lib/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I../../../../include/QtCore -I../../../../include/QtCore -I../../../../include -I../../../../include/QtCrypto -I. -I. qca-ossl.cpp -o qca-ossl.moc g++ -c -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DOSSL_097 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_PLUGIN -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I../../../../lib/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I../../../../include/QtCore -I../../../../include/QtCore -I../../../../include -I../../../../include/QtCrypto -I. -I. -o qca-ossl.o qca-ossl.cpp qca-ossl.cpp:5263: error: conflicting return type specified for ?virtual bool opensslQCAPlugin::MyTLSContext::waitForResultsReady(int)? /usr/include/QtCrypto/qcaprovider.h:520: error: overriding ?virtual void QCA::TLSContext::waitForResultsReady(int)? qca-ossl.cpp:6147: error: conflicting return type specified for ?virtual bool opensslQCAPlugin::MyMessageContext::waitForFinished(int)? /usr/include/QtCrypto/qcaprovider.h:674: error: overriding ?virtual void QCA::MessageContext::waitForFinished(int)? qca-ossl.cpp:6459: error: expected class-name before ?{? token qca-ossl.cpp:6466: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ?Context? with no type qca-ossl.cpp:6466: error: expected ?;? before ?*? token qca-ossl.cpp:6471: error: expected `;' before ?QStringList? qca-ossl.cpp:6459: warning: ?class opensslQCAPlugin::opensslInfoContext? has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor qca-ossl.cpp: In constructor ?opensslQCAPlugin::opensslInfoContext::opensslInfoContext(QCA::Provider*)?: qca-ossl.cpp:6462: error: class ?opensslQCAPlugin::opensslInfoContext? does not have any field named ?InfoContext? qca-ossl.cpp: In member function ?virtual QCA::Provider::Context* opensslProvider::createContext(const QString&)?: qca-ossl.cpp:6574: error: cannot convert ?opensslQCAPlugin::opensslInfoContext*? to ?QCA::Provider::Context*? in return qca-ossl.moc: At global scope: qca-ossl.moc:544: error: ?InfoContext? has not been declared qca-ossl.moc: In member function ?virtual void* opensslQCAPlugin::opensslInfoContext::qt_metacast(const char*)?: qca-ossl.moc:558: error: ?InfoContext? has not been declared qca-ossl.moc: In member function ?virtual int opensslQCAPlugin::opensslInfoContext::qt_metacall(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**)?: qca-ossl.moc:563: error: ?InfoContext? has not been declared make: *** [qca-ossl.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.89396 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.89396 (%build) [petro at host-12-109 SPECS]$ rpm -q openssl openssl-0.9.8b-15.fc7 [petro at host-12-109 SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226253] Merge Review: perl-DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261022.l9QAMRXF017409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-DBI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226253 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:22 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl 2)rpmlint complained -> perl-DBI.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/dbixs_rev.pl "perl" This script uses an incorrect interpreter. perl-DBI.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/dbixs_rev.pl 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. and all others as perl-DBI.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI/dbixs_rev.h A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ==> Any reason to install /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DBI ? 3) Update to New release http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TI/TIMB/DBI-1.601.tar.gz 4) Many tests got skipped. Please check build.log for more information on which tests failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226258] Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261027.l9QARpRc018055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:27 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)you may like to keep simple disttag as "2%{dist}" only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:25:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226257] Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261025.l9QAPIoT018767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226257 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:25 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:33:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261033.l9QAXPHH019712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:33 EST ------- I've fixed the graphiz BR and the gegl-debuginfo rpmlint warnings. New pacakges below; Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl-0.0.13-0.6.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:32:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226263] Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261032.l9QAWrAY019661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226263 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:32 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl 2)you may like to keep simple disttag as "2%{dist}" only. 3) Add Changelog as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:35:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226263] Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261035.l9QAZxIm019398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-INET6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226263 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:35 EST ------- don't hard code version in source URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:34:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 338361] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261034.l9QAY7CW018849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2007-10-26 06:34 EST ------- Moving the libs to /usr/lib/XvMC is not involving this package only, as xorg-x11-drv-i810 is also dropping its files here and XvMCW probably needs to be changed too. I guess it will also breaks some users configuration. All in all, I think it doesn't belong to this package review to change that and this should be handled in another (upstream ?) bug. Ajax, what do you think ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:38:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226264] Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261038.l9QAcA1d020410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226264 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rnorwood at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:38 EST ------- 1)Source URL not working 2)you may like to keep simple disttag as "1%{dist}" only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:42:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226265] Merge Review: perl-IO-String In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261042.l9QAgjWa021232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-String https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226265 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:42 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)drop "|| :" from %check 3)you may like to add disttag 4) don't hard code version in Source URL 4)rpmlint only complained -> perl-IO-String.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:1.08-2 1.08-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:47:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226268] Merge Review: perl-libwww-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261047.l9QAlxjU021109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-libwww-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226268 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 06:47 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)rpmlint complained -> perl-libwww-perl.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-libwww-perl-5.808/AUTHORS The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). perl-libwww-perl.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-libwww-perl-5.808/README The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). perl-libwww-perl.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-libwww-perl-5.808/Changes The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). perl-libwww-perl.src: I: checking perl-libwww-perl.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 16) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. 3) make test skipped some tests but I guess they are ok. Do you think it can be solved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 10:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261048.l9QAmLMW021139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tla at rasmil.dk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-26 06:48 EST ------- Problems: X Need some BuildRequires to support python setup tools. %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel %else BuildRequires: python-setuptools %endif X Licence should follow the standard Based on the source GPL header it should be. GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:00:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261100.l9QB0hCc024226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-26 07:00 EST ------- Thanks. Fixed in gnuplot-4.2.2-2.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:05:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261105.l9QB5gRp024319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-26 07:05 EST ------- #rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/func-0.13-2.noarch.rpm func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/codes.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/sslclient.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/cmd_modules/show.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/module_loader.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/modules/test.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/inventory.py 0644 func.noarch: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/func_rotate func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/cmd_modules/call.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/test_func.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/client.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/certs.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/cmd_modules/copyfile.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/modules/process.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/logger.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/commonconfig.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/certmaster.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/utils.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/modules/virt.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/SSLConnection.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/codes.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/func_command.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/config.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/modules/service.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/modules/hardware.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/modules/func_module.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/modules/smart.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/server.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/overlord/cmd_modules/listminions.py 0644 func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/func/minion/utils.py 0644 func.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.13-2 0.13-2 func.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/funcd func.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/funcd func.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/certmaster func.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/certmaster -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:14:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261114.l9QBEEVH025270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-26 07:14 EST ------- Thanks. Fixed in gsl-1.10-6.fc9. >You should either have >%{_datadir}/aclocal > >or >%{_datadir}/aclocal/* >%dir %{_datadir}/aclocal Fixed. > And why do you remove the man pages? gsl man-pages are not in a good state, so I think it is better to remove them at all (there could be use documentation instead) > I suggest replacing > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la > with > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la I prefer the present version. > Only a suggestion, to keep the THANKS file timestamp, you can do > touch -r THANKS THANKS.aux > before mv. I prefer the present version. > Also it should be better to remove the .gz from install-info > scriptlets since install-info can detect itself if .gz is needed. > This is not a blocker, but I can't see why you shouldn't do it. Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261113.l9QBDpAE025228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-26 07:13 EST ------- MUST: * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this X license field matches the actual license. see earlier comment * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} ? verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) No upstream tarball to match, SRPM is upstream source. * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used X license text included in package and marked with %doc * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager tag not used * Vendor tag not used * Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 X BuildRequires are proper See earlier comment. * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * no libraries * no rpath * not a GUI app * no -devel sub-package necessary * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no locale data * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates X file permissions fine See earlier comments. X %defattrs present ( %defattr(-, root, root, -)) * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:17:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226269] Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261117.l9QBHnfL027032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226269 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 07:17 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)drop "|| :" from %check 3)you may like to add disttag 4)rpmlint only complained -> perl-libxml-perl.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(Data::Grove) This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it once. perl-libxml-perl.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:20:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226272] Merge Review: perl-Net-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261120.l9QBKDjX026436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Net-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226272 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 07:20 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl 2)you may like to keep simple disttag as "5%{dist}" only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261139.l9QBdJjS028950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Alias: perl-Net-FTPServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(steve at silug.org) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 07:39 EST ------- afaik make test should run all tests successfully otherwise specify a good reason to avoid it from calling in check section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:45:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261145.l9QBjggD030179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 07:45 EST ------- Actually I was waiting for new upstream release but anyway as you have already added upstream clarification regarding license its ok now. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 402bc1aacf4b39f318fa5b2bf47d123d DBI-Dumper-2.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01_use.......ok t/basic........ok t/dbidumper....Opening file: /tmp/QBa9Ygtduu 12 row(s) dumped. ok t/grammar......ok All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=131, 1 wallclock secs ( 1.10 cusr + 0.09 csys = 1.19 CPU) + Package perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-2.fc8 -> Provides: C.so perl(DBI::Dumper) = 2.01 perl(DBI::Dumper::C) = 1.00 perl(DBI::Dumper::Grammar) perl(DBI::Dumper::PurePerl) perl(Parse::RecDescent::DBI::Dumper::Grammar) Requires: /usr/bin/perl libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(DBI) perl(DBI::Dumper) perl(DBI::Dumper::Grammar) perl(DBI::Dumper::PurePerl) perl(Inline) perl(Parse::RecDescent) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 11:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261157.l9QBvcvi032107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 07:57 EST ------- Patrice, If you are interested to review feel free to ask me. I will leave review as I already have other reviews assigned to me so I may take more time to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 12:01:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261201.l9QC1oNW000559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-10-26 08:01 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I'll change that macro as requested. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gst-inspector New Branches: F-7 F-8 devel Updated Fedora Owners: jcollie Updated Description: An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 12:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 353931] New: Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353931 Summary: Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwalsh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/xguest/xguest.spec SRPM URL: ttp://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/xguest/xguest-1.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: xguest is a package that sets up a locked down user for use in kiosk systems. The user will be controlled so that all they can use is Firefox for reaching the internet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 12:17:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 353931] Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261217.l9QCHV8i003894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353931 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2007-10-26 08:17 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/xguest/xguest-1.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm First off I would like to get this review as fast as possible, to get inclusion in Fedora 8. Maybe I am too late already. The spec file does a couple of things that cause rpmlint to give errors. These are discussed at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353321 This package could be used in conjunction with Fast User Switching to allow users to share the machines with others with little risk, as well as in kiosk environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 13:06:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261306.l9QD69XI012787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-26 09:06 EST ------- ^^ the last sentence was for the ivtv-firmware -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 13:05:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261305.l9QD555Y012492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-26 09:05 EST ------- Ok, so i will close the other ivtv review - but there is still some problem with this package, and actually i cannot approve it because: NEED_WORK: MUST - Need to remove The perl Requires. MUST - In %prep Please uses sed instead as this will not work as perl have been removed of the minimal BR. (the two firsts lines in %prep could be removed) perl -pi -e's at CFLAGS = -D_GNU_SOURCE .*@CFLAGS = -D_GNU_SOURCE %{optflags}@' utils/Makefile And I wonder if some MUST - %build : add make -C utils %{?_smp_mflags} MUST - Description need to be improved to state that this is not the driver package but tools for the driver... SHOULD - You may prevent timestamps changes while using install -pm instead of mv - (but this is highly recommended by the reviewer, as this will keep the upstream date creation of files, instead of the build date in Fedora...) SHOULD - add %doc README* COPYING ChangeLog need to be added (at least README is useful to have info about kernel module info and how to build them...) SHOULD - License is missing whereas the package bundle it... But the license seems related to the kernel part (anyway it is the same, so i would say, pick it) SHOULD - This question is mainly an upstream question : the package bundles videodev2.h (which is the same as the one from /usr/include/linux/videodev2.h and as such do not give expected problem). But, some files are referring from the videodev2.h from the package whereas some others from kernel-headers... Maybe upstream have to choose one method... This isn't a problem as files are the same (but it may change...) - One Hight Remark, i wonder why we should keep compatibility -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 13:25:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261325.l9QDPEDG016025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-26 09:25 EST ------- OK well I still do not understand why we should keep old version compatibility ? Because of the license, the firmware can only be provided since Fedora 7 (not for FC6). This mean why should we keep old compatibility firmware location ?... The main problem with that is the current package conflict with "Filesystem Hierarchy Standard" and directory ownership may be wrong if those directory do not exist anymore: %{_sysconfdir}/firmware/*.fw %{_libdir}/hotplug/firmware/*.fw - Please keep timestamps as this is an easy fix - Do what you think is right for symlink and version (note that the ubuntu package from the upstream site uses version 0-%{date} )... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 13:46:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 353931] Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261346.l9QDkXPJ018328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353931 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 09:46 EST ------- good to add license file as %doc whats use of calling "exit 0" at end of each section? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 13:58:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261358.l9QDwhiO021143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 14:05:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354101] New: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354101 Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-backend-kconfig/compizconfig-backend-kconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/compizconfig-backend-kconfig/compizconfig-backend-kconfig-0.6.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Compiz Fusion Project brings 3D desktop visual effects that improve usability of the X Window System and provide increased productivity through plugins and themes contributed by the community giving a rich desktop experience. This package contains the kconfig backend for libcompizconfig == A little question if a the sources, have a LGPL licensed code , which is not included in the binary package, does %doc requires to include COPYING.LGPL ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 14:52:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 353931] Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261452.l9QEqN4k029055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353931 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2007-10-26 10:52 EST ------- Added and removed exit 0's SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/xguest/xguest-1.0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 15:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261503.l9QF3McM000567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm at atrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-26 11:03 EST ------- FWIW I also like the errata package: o Upstream experts provide the needed delta is bite-ready form o Packager can react almost immediately, so users get their hands sooner on the fixes o No stress for mirrors (yes, even in a delta rpm world, the mirror will have to waste bandwidth for updates of megapackages) Asking from the packager to do micro-dismantling of the tarballs is IMHO a waste of his time, I'd rather see him use that time in some other tex/latex packages than to merge erratas and re-subpackage everything again. I also don't think this needs any special fesco/fpc blessing, but if people object, then please raise it there and we will discuss it and give it a blessing or a no-go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 15:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261518.l9QFIRpq001959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-26 11:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > FWIW I also like the errata package: > > o Upstream experts provide the needed delta is bite-ready form Is that true? I looked and found no trace of an upstream errata package. [snip] > I also don't think this needs any special fesco/fpc blessing, but if people > object, then please raise it there and we will discuss it and give it a blessing > or a no-go. > It was raised already, and you even commented :) See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-August/msg00019.html Feelings were mixed, no consensus was reached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 15:35:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261535.l9QFZovm005615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-26 11:35 EST ------- I built/installed this package, but I don't understand how it's supposed to work. I can choose lots of nice options in the gui, but there doesn't seem to be any 'apply' button. Other than clicking buttons in the gui, how do I get ccsm to actually DO something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 15:41:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261541.l9QFfKEd006843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-10-26 11:41 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qpidc New Branches: F-7 F-8 Please add branches to allow inclusion in F-7 updates and F-8 updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 15:39:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233519] Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261539.l9QFduMi007880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233519 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-10-26 11:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: amqp New Branches: F-7 F-8 Please add branches to allow inclusion in F-7 updates and F-8 updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 15:40:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229417] Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261540.l9QFeFt3008271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-10-26 11:40 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-qpid New Branches: F-7 F-8 Please add branches to allow inclusion in F-7 updates and F-8 updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 16:20:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261620.l9QGKGYW015116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-26 12:20 EST ------- the configs are applied immediately .. just change the options and try it out .. eg: enable the cube reflection plugin, then rotate the cube.. you'll see the changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 16:28:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261628.l9QGSffw014429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-26 12:28 EST ------- Ping? Still waiting on CVS directory creation. Meanwhile, I updated my SRPM (it has been a while since the successful review): Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/kdegames3.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/kdegames3-3.5.8-1.fc7.src.rpm * Fri Oct 26 2007 Kevin Kofler <...> - 3.5.8-1 - update to 3.5.8 - fix/update trademarks patch (Rex Dieter) - License: GPLv2, libs/devel License: LGPLv2 - libs subpkg (more multilib friendly) - include ksirtet (has been omitted from KDE 4.0) - drop kpoker-desktop patch (fixed upstream) * Wed Aug 8 2007 Kevin Kofler <...> - 3.5.7-4 - patch out the trademarked names of a certain box pushing game and a certain snake-like duel game -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 16:44:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226287] Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261644.l9QGiEnu019027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226287 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 12:44 EST ------- Yes, there's not really any other way to do this - registration of the parsers is required at install/uninstall time. It's pretty nasty, though, and I wish there were a better way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 16:45:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261645.l9QGjsIQ019511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2007-10-26 12:45 EST ------- Responding to your first comments: X Need some BuildRequires to support python setup tools. * this is resolved upstream and will give new URLs shortly X Licence should follow the standard ... * this is also fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 16:49:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261649.l9QGnMsq017535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-26 12:49 EST ------- If you found some problem on ccsm, please file a new bug report and write there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 16:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261650.l9QGo98q018016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 16:50:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261650.l9QGo8uU017993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-26 12:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBI-Dumper Short Description: Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Owners: cweyl Branches: FC-6, F-7, F-8, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 17:02:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261702.l9QH2R8G021880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2007-10-26 13:02 EST ------- Responding to rpmlint "non-executable-script" * This is ok because these are modules, not scripts, so fine there. func.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.13-2 0.13-2 * Not sure what rpmlint is confused about, exactly. Seems ok. func.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/funcd func.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/funcd func.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/certmaster func.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/certmaster * these have been now disabled in the service init scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 17:05:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] New: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: liviopl.pl at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vameo.org/liviofiles/nautilus-share.spec SRPM URL will not be built by me (I messed up with Rawhide packages) Description: Nautilus extension designed for easier folders sharing via Samba (CIFS) protocol in *NIX systems. It's my first OFFICIAL package for Fedora. I'm seeking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 17:10:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261710.l9QHA48b023203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2007-10-26 13:10 EST ------- Responding to the 3rd part: MUST: X license field matches the actual license. * This has been corrected, updated URLs coming shortly ? verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) No upstream tarball to match, SRPM is upstream source. * Snapshot tarball can be uploaded, one of the developers is the upstream packager, see also: git X license text included in package and marked with %doc * Has been added X BuildRequires are proper * Fixed. X file permissions fine See earlier comments. * I'm in disagreement with the need for module (non-script) code to be chmod+x, if you can point me at packaging guidelines that indicate this is a requirement I'll address it. X %defattrs present ( %defattr(-, root, root, -)) * Adding... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 17:26:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261726.l9QHQOeh025870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2007-10-26 13:26 EST ------- Tim, I've uploaded a new SRC rpm, tarball, and specfile for you to look at. The changes I have not incorporated are: * permissions on non-script python files (which I believe is just rpmlint being confused about what should be executable) here's the spec: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/func/attachment/wiki/FuncReleases/func.spec?format=raw source rpm: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/func/attachment/wiki/FuncReleases/func-0.13-3.fc7.src.rpm here's a tarball built at the same time as the RPM: https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/func/attachment/wiki/FuncReleases/func-0.13.tar.3.gz Thanks very much for doing the review! --Michael -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 17:44:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261744.l9QHiskS028542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 13:44 EST ------- Ok. All of the above comments should be fixed with version 0.1.1-5: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/PackageKit-0.1.1-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 18:11:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261811.l9QIB4EV030920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-26 14:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > SRPM URL will not be built by me (I messed up with Rawhide packages) - What to you mean? Please upload srpm, otherwise we cannot review your package. You can create your srpm by "rpm -bs foo.spec". Anyway some comments (just from a quick look at your spec file) - Perhaps "Requires: dbus libglade libdaemon" can all be removed. rpmbuild checks the dependency of this package for libraries and adds them to Requires automatically. - Please update License tag (please refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ) - Make it sure that all directories created by this package are owned by this package. - For example, the directory %{_datadir}/nautilus-share/ is not owned by any package. ! Note - When you write --------------------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_datadir}/nautilus-share/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- This contains the directory %{_datadir}/nautilus-share/ itself and all files/directories/etc under %{_datadir}/nautilus-share/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 18:14:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261814.l9QIE2tT031126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-26 14:14 EST ------- You could replace PackageKit in Source0 with %{name}. PS: I'm starting with packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 18:19:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226264] Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261819.l9QIJRvq031963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226264 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 14:19 EST ------- Both issues above fixed in CVS. Also updated to the latest upstream version. New version is perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 18:28:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226269] Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261828.l9QIS2K3000926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226269 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 14:28 EST ------- All of the above should be fixed in the latest version: perl-libxml-perl-0.08-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 18:25:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261825.l9QIPFgj003046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-26 14:25 EST ------- Sorry, I can't build SRPM because I can't install -devel packages. I have gtk2 from Rawhide, but gtk2-devel won't install because of mesa issues, I tried, believe me. SPEC fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 19:04:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261904.l9QJ4AZW009648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-26 15:04 EST ------- New SPEC URL: http://liviopl.jogger.pl/files/nautilus-share.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 19:10:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261910.l9QJApIo008841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 15:10 EST ------- Yes, it looks like that test has a couple of bugs in it. Fixed these bugs with a patch. New version here: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-2.03-3.fc8.src.rpm The test should not be skipped now. Also submitted the patch upstream here: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=30291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 19:48:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354741] New: Review Request: clonekeen - "Commander Keen: Invasion of the Vorticons" clone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354741 Summary: Review Request: clonekeen - "Commander Keen: Invasion of the Vorticons" clone Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/clonekeen.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/clonekeen-0.8.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: CloneKeen is an almost complete clone of the old classic DOS game, Commander Keen: Invasion of the Vorticons by by ID Software. CloneKeen requires the original gamedata files to work. If you posess the original DOS games. You can play all three episodes of the game. If you don't, you can can still play the shareware episode one. Which can be freely downloaded from Apogee, but cannot be distributed as a part of Fedora. When you start CloneKeen for the first time it will offer to download the shareware datafiles for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 19:52:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226268] Merge Review: perl-libwww-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261952.l9QJqxMN018244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-libwww-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226268 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 15:52 EST ------- 1, 2) fixed 3) I don't really know enough about the module to fix them. I looked at them a few months ago, and couldn't figure out why they were failing in mock but not on my system. New version: perl-libwww-perl-5.808-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 19:58:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226265] Merge Review: perl-IO-String In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710261958.l9QJw4cY019051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-String https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226265 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 15:58 EST ------- All issues should be fixed in new version: perl-IO-String-1.08.4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 20:01:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226258] Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710262001.l9QK1ZFS016569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 16:01 EST ------- All issues should be fixed in new version: perl-Frotnier-RPC-0.07b4-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 20:04:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226257] Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710262004.l9QK4oUL020037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226257 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 16:04 EST ------- Should be fixed in new version: perl-File-MMagic-1.27-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 20:32:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226248] Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710262032.l9QKWLHA021492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226248 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-26 16:32 EST ------- Should be fixed in: perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.57-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 20:34:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239385] Review Request: peless - Text Browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710262034.l9QKYV4m024826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: peless - Text Browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239385 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-26 16:34 EST ------- This looks like it is not moving, so I close it. Feel free to reopen if things change. > I just do not feel compentent to pre-review other people's software. Sometimes > it take me an extremely long time to figure out an issue related to my own > software. Paul, once again -- doing quality reviews of other packages proves that you are familiar with packaging rules. You can not maintain a package without being familiar with process of making good packages. > I do not feel comfortable with the fedora process which is the most > complicated I have encountered. I was able to get peless into debian without > the problems I encountered here. In my opinion the Fedora process, though being quite strict, is very well documented. My personal experience is that it allows us for much easier mainteance and quality assurance of packages. If debian accepts packages from people that are not familiar with doing good packages -- well, that's their decision. > I am gratefull for the help you have given me, and am extremely sorry if this > causes problems for you. I did not know about this requirement when I submitted > peless into the fedora process. I will have to wait until I have a second > project. In the meantime, perhaps I will put the fedora version of peless into > a private repository somewhere. Anyways, thanks for an attempt. I encourage you to get familiar with the Fedora guidelines and will help you if anything is not clear in case you are interested. Otherwise maybe once someone else will submit your package for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 21:09:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710262109.l9QL9bY5030514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-26 17:09 EST ------- Which version of qca2-devel do you have installed ? Please make sure you have the qca2-2.0.0 final, the beta7 will cause this error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 21:24:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710262124.l9QLOQqd032759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 26 22:53:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710262253.l9QMrIsB012860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-26 18:53 EST ------- I've tried to fix most issues you pointed out. New spec: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-7.11-0.3.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > $ sed -i.strip -e 's| -s | |' Makefile.in Done. > - Actually remove this static archive before %install finishes > (by "rm -f", for example) and remove this entry from %files. Done. > Please make build procedure more verbose. To do so, please remove > @ (at-mark)s which suppress build process output from Makefile.in. Done. > - Also, it is preferred that you make libtool output more verbose Done. > * linkage against libmalaga.so > - The installed binaries in malaga don't use libmalaga.so ( > is not linked against libmalaga.so). NOT done yet, mostly because of lack of time in the recent couple of days and also lack of knowledge. I assume I'd have to patch Makefile.in heavily so that the binaries would actually use libmalaga.so? Also, is this really necessary, the binaries would then differ from those that are built from pristine upstream sources? If this is needed, I'll try to study about it during the next few days. > "Requires: gtk2" is not needed. Fixed. > INSTALL="install -p" Added. > - Permission of libmalaga.so must be 0755, not 0644 > ! Don't use %attr. Change the permission of file before %install > section ends so that this libraries can be stripped by > rpmbuild. Currently I've done this so that all libmalaga.so* files have permissions 0755. Though it seems to me that the library (only one, the rest are actually symbolic links) does get stripped by rpmbuild even if it is 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 00:02:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 353931] Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270002.l9R02k3x022508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353931 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-10-26 20:02 EST ------- Maybe I am just picky, but I am very much against creating files in %post. I feel that %source1 sepermit.conf, with the appropriate content, copied in %post to the right place would be cleaner and easier to manage/verify via rpm -qV -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 01:18:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270118.l9R1ItOA032472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-10-26 21:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-rpm Short Description: Ruby bindings for RPM Owners: lutter Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 01:36:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226287] Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270136.l9R1aEY7002367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-LibXML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226287 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 21:36 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM But not for RPM. perl-XML-LibXML.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun perl perl-XML-LibXML.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger perl + source files match upstream url 7871c21078f706690cda9ca68d4ddac6 XML-LibXML-1.65.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01basic..................... Compiled against libxml2 version: 20630 Running libxml2 version: 20630 ok t/02parse.....................ok t/03doc.......................ok t/04node......................ok t/05text......................ok t/06elements..................ok t/07dtd.......................ok t/08findnodes.................ok t/09xpath.....................ok t/10ns........................ok t/11memory....................ok 26/26 skipped: developers only (set MEMORY_TEST=1 to run these tests) t/12html......................ok t/13dtd.......................ok t/14sax.......................ok t/15nodelist..................ok t/16docnodes..................ok t/17callbacks.................ok t/18docfree...................ok t/19encoding..................ok t/20extras....................ok t/23rawfunctions..............ok t/24c14n......................ok t/25relaxng...................ok t/26schema....................ok t/27new_callbacks_simple......ok t/28new_callbacks_multiple....ok t/29id........................ok t/30xpathcontext..............ok t/31xpc_functions.............ok t/32xpc_variables.............ok t/40reader....................ok t/41xinclude..................ok t/90threads...................ok 14/14 skipped: optional (set THREAD_TEST=1 to run these tests) All tests successful, 40 subtests skipped. Files=33, Tests=1805, 3 wallclock secs ( 3.09 cusr + 0.47 csys = 3.56 CPU) + Package perl-XML-LibXML-1.65-1.fc8 -> Provides: LibXML.so perl(XML::LibXML) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::Attr) perl(XML::LibXML::Boolean) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::CDATASection) perl(XML::LibXML::Comment) perl(XML::LibXML::Document) perl(XML::LibXML::DocumentFragment) perl(XML::LibXML::Dtd) perl(XML::LibXML::Element) perl(XML::LibXML::InputCallback) perl(XML::LibXML::Literal) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::NamedNodeMap) perl(XML::LibXML::Namespace) perl(XML::LibXML::Node) perl(XML::LibXML::NodeList) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::Number) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::PI) perl(XML::LibXML::Reader) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::RelaxNG) perl(XML::LibXML::SAX) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::SAX::AttributeNode) perl(XML::LibXML::SAX::Builder) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::SAX::Generator) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::SAX::Parser) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::Schema) perl(XML::LibXML::Text) perl(XML::LibXML::XPathContext) = 1.65 perl(XML::LibXML::_SAXParser) Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1 perl >= 1:5.8.0 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(:WITH_ITHREADS) perl(:WITH_LARGEFILES) perl(:WITH_THREADS) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Handle) perl(XML::LibXML) perl(XML::LibXML::Boolean) perl(XML::LibXML::Common) perl(XML::LibXML::Literal) perl(XML::LibXML::NodeList) perl(XML::LibXML::Number) perl(XML::LibXML::XPathContext) perl(XML::NamespaceSupport) perl(XML::SAX::Base) perl(XML::SAX::DocumentLocator) perl(XML::SAX::Exception) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 01:47:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226248] Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270147.l9R1l71U000607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226248 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 21:47 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 82264180f5911dce33dbd85e24b1f36b Crypt-SSLeay-0.57.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. - BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00-basic......ok t/01-connect....ok 7/8 skipped: nothing listening on localhost:443 t/02-live.......# config on linux# ssl OpenSSL 0.9.8 in /usr# lib -L/usr/lib -lssl -lcrypto -lgcc # inc -I/usr/include/openssl # cc gcc ok 1/4 skipped: Network tests disabled All tests successful, 8 subtests skipped. Files=3, Tests=24, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.54 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.59 CPU) + Package perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.57-2.fc8 -> Provides: SSLeay.so perl(Crypt::SSLeay) = 0.57 perl(Crypt::SSLeay::CTX) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::Conn) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::Err) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::MainContext) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::X509) perl(Net::SSL) = 2.84 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypto.so.6 libssl.so.6 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Crypt::SSLeay) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::CTX) perl(Crypt::SSLeay::X509) perl(IO::Socket) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Socket) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) ===> Remove unnecessary BR: pkgconfig. Sorry missed that before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 01:51:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226257] Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270151.l9R1p8JH001240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-File-MMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226257 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 21:51 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4ffb13b6587888e6e455c22988abce5e File-MMagic-1.27.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01-selfcheck.....ok t/02-extmagic......ok t/03-typecheck.....ok t/04-string-mod....ok All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=6, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.18 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.22 CPU) + Package perl-File-MMagic-1.27-4.fc8 -> Provides: perl(File::MMagic) = 1.27 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(FileHandle) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 01:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226264] Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270159.l9R1xg8K002071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-Socket-SSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226264 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 21:59 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0f6e80c15341094df16828a25dbaeeaa IO-Socket-SSL-1.12.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs long output here All tests successful. Files=13, Tests=185, 34 wallclock secs ( 1.72 cusr + 0.36 csys = 2.08 CPU) + Package perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.12-1.fc8 -> Provides: perl(IO::Socket::SSL) = 1.12 perl(IO::Socket::SSL::SSL_Context) perl(IO::Socket::SSL::SSL_HANDLE) perl(IO::Socket::SSL::Session_Cache) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Errno) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::Socket) perl(Net::SSLeay) >= 1.21 perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 02:04:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226265] Merge Review: perl-IO-String In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270204.l9R24h7F002826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-String https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226265 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 22:04 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 250e5424f290299fc3d6b5d1e9da3835 IO-String-1.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/close.......ok t/para........ok t/read........ok t/seek........ok t/truncate....ok t/write.......ok All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=43, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.09 cusr + 0.04 csys = 0.13 CPU) + Package perl-IO-String-1.08-3.fc8 -> Provides: perl(IO::String) = 1.08Requires: perl >= 0:5.005_03 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Symbol) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 02:09:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226269] Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270209.l9R29dOA006591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-libxml-perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226269 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 22:09 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0ed5fbdda53d1301ddaed88db10503bb libxml-perl-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/amsterdam...........ok t/canon_xml_writer....ok t/schema..............ok t/stream..............ok t/subs................ok t/xp_sax..............ok All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=45, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.28 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.35 CPU) + Package perl-libxml-perl-0.08-3.fc8 -> Provides: perl(Data::Grove::Characters) perl(Data::Grove::Parent) = 0.08 perl(Data::Grove::ParentList) perl(Data::Grove::Visitor) = 0.08 perl(XML::ESISParser) = 0.08 perl(XML::Handler::CanonXMLWriter) = 0.08 perl(XML::Handler::Sample) perl(XML::Handler::Subs) = 0.08 perl(XML::Handler::XMLWriter) = 0.08 perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) = 0.08 perl(XML::PatAct::ACTION) perl(XML::PatAct::Amsterdam) = 0.08 perl(XML::PatAct::MatchName) = 0.08 perl(XML::PatAct::PATTERN) perl(XML::PatAct::ToObjects) = 0.08 perl(XML::Perl2SAX) = 0.08 perl(XML::SAX2Perl) = 0.08 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(IO::File) perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(XML::Handler::Subs) perl(XML::Parser) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 02:17:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270217.l9R2HibF008078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 22:17 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 507f90ec2e8f53e138222895444cef4c Business-ISBN-2.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/albania................ok t/constants..............ok t/interface..............ok t/isbn10.................# # Checking ISBNs... (this may take a bit) # # Checking bad ISBNs... (this should be fast) ok t/isbn13.................# # Checking ISBN13s... (this may take a bit) # # Checking bad ISBN13s... (this should be fast) ok t/load...................ok t/png_barcode............ok t/pod....................ok t/pod_coverage...........ok t/valid_isbn_checksum....ok t/xisbn10................ok All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=142, 20 wallclock secs (14.53 cusr + 0.13 csys = 14.66 CPU) + Package perl-Business-ISBN-2.03-3.fc8-> Provides: perl(Business::ISBN) = 2.03 perl(Business::ISBN10) perl(Business::ISBN13) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Business::ISBN) perl(Business::ISBN10) perl(Business::ISBN13) perl(Business::ISBN::Data) >= 1.15 perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(subs) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 02:43:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270243.l9R2h5e0012117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-26 22:43 EST ------- Seems okay to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 03:26:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270326.l9R3QSOD019379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-26 23:26 EST ------- New version looks ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 04:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226248] Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270410.l9R4AX61021892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226248 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-27 00:10 EST ------- No problem. Fixed in CVS. New version: devel:perl-Crypt-SSLeay-0.57-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 04:15:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270415.l9R4F6Pj022528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-27 00:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PackageKit Short Description: Package management with dbus and policykit Owners: rnorwood Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 04:17:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270417.l9R4HSdV026014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-27 00:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Business-ISBN Short Description: Perl module to work with Internation Standard Book Numbers Owners: rnorwood Branches: InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 04:19:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226248] Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270419.l9R4J9Yg022978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Crypt-SSLeay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226248 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-27 00:19 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 04:18:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351751] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270418.l9R4Ilkr022957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-27 00:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Business-ISBN-Data Short Description: The data pack for perl-Business-ISBN Owners: rnorwood Branches: InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 05:03:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354101] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270503.l9R53eNT031840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354101 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-10-27 01:03 EST ------- Answering the LGPL question, if that code is not being used in the binaries, I don't see a reason to include it but just to be safe keep it in there. Just fix that upon import. + source files match upstream: d45c21297d0edfe25d41ffa1999ad5b7085b23d5 + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. GPL License text included in package. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. - rpmlint is silent. compizconfig-backend-kconfig.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized kconfig backend for compizconfig This is safe to ignore, kconfig shouldn't be capitalized. + final provides and requires are sane: libkconfig.so compizconfig-backend-kconfig = 0.6.0-1.fc8 + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 05:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354101] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270508.l9R58Ltn032517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354101 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |s.adam at diffingo.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 09:08:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211807] Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710270908.l9R98UXP026906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firefox2 - Mozilla Firefox 2.0 Web browser for FC6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mishu at piatafinanciara.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mishu at piatafinanciara.ro | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 10:14:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271014.l9RAEYdj008413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-27 06:14 EST ------- I've added few BuildRequires and fixed some questions from yesterday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 10:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271022.l9RAMpC1005252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 06:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > > And why do you remove the man pages? > gsl man-pages are not in a good state, so I think it is better to remove them at > all (there could be use documentation instead) Why aren't they in a good state? They seem perfect to me. I used the example in gsl-histogram and it looks like a Cauchy distribution. And the gsl.3 page is just a reference to other doc. > > I suggest replacing > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la > > with > > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la > I prefer the present version. At least remove the -r, it doesn't make any sense. > > Only a suggestion, to keep the THANKS file timestamp, you can do > > touch -r THANKS THANKS.aux > > before mv. > I prefer the present version. Ok. But you should be aware than in a in a multiarch setting, a rpm -V will should wrong timestamp. In my opinion this is a sufficient reason to keep timestamps right for noarch files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 10:35:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271035.l9RAZ7Ki007025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 06:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Patrice, > If you are interested to review feel free to ask me. I will leave review as I > already have other reviews assigned to me so I may take more time to review this. I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 10:49:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271049.l9RAnt5P012883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 06:49 EST ------- You can still create srpm by "rpm -bs --nodeps foo.spec". By the way, do you mean that you never tried to rebuild your spec by yourself? How can you check your spec file without it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 10:58:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 06:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271058.l9RAwMQA014038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-27 06:58 EST ------- [[ You can still create srpm by "rpm -bs --nodeps foo.spec". ]] I can't because I can't install required -devels to build because of mesa issue in Rawhide. Friend helped me with BRs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:08:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271108.l9RB85fY011320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 07:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=240251) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=240251&action=view) patch to use the system python-which -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:04:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271104.l9RB4scX010658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-27 07:04 EST ------- Main problem when trying to install gtk2-devel isn't updateing everything to Rawhide versions, but this: --> Processing Conflict: pam conflicts db4 >= 4.6.0 --> Processing Conflict: mesa-libGL-devel conflicts xorg-x11-proto-devel <= 7.2-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:06:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271106.l9RB62AV011184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 07:06 EST ------- The iconv on fontfile_latex.dem epslatex.dem epslatex.dem fontfile.dem are completly wrong. The encoding is set in these files to latin1, they should be kept as is. Also I don't know what demo.edf is but running iconv on it is certainly wrong, since it looks like there is some binary info in it. You still don't follow the emacs guidelines, since there is a versionned dependency on emacs(bin) required. Also you should certainly use the %define emacs_version %(pkg-config emacs --modversion) %define emacs_lispdir %(pkg-config emacs --variable sitepkglispdir) %define emacs_startdir %(pkg-coonfig emacs --variable sitestartdir) with apropriate buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:07:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271107.l9RB7nm2011279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-27 07:07 EST ------- Again, [livio at rocket ~]$ sudo yum --enablerepo=development --enablerepo=livna-development install gtk2-devel > log Error: Missing Dependency: compiz = 0.5.2 is needed by package compiz-fusion-plugins-extra Error: Missing Dependency: compiz = 0.5.2 is needed by package compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported Error: Missing Dependency: compiz = 0.5.2 is needed by package compiz-fusion-plugins-main - can be fixed by removing Compiz Fusion plugins Error: Missing Dependency: firefox = 2.0.0.6 is needed by package gnome-python2-gtkmozembed Error: mesa-libGL-devel conflicts with xorg-x11-proto-devel <= 7.2-12 Error: Missing Dependency: libpoppler-glib.so.1 is needed by package gimp - probably can be fixed by removing gimp Error: Missing Dependency: firefox = 2.0.0.6 is needed by package ruby-gtkmozembed - probably can be fixed by removing ruby libraries [livio at rocket ~]$ sudo rpm -e mesa-libGL-devel xorg-x11-proto-devel b??d: pakiet mesa-libGL-devel nie jest zainstalowany (isn't installed) b??d: pakiet xorg-x11-proto-devel nie jest zainstalowany [livio at rocket ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 353931] Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271116.l9RBGb0F012578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xguest - kiosk user setup program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353931 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2007-10-27 07:16 EST ------- There are no files being created in post. sepermit.conf is owned by pam and xguest is just appending "xguest" to the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:17:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271117.l9RBHD3c016552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 07:17 EST ------- It looks like, for fig2dev, there is a missing Requires: transfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:16:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271116.l9RBG3qN016400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 07:16 EST ------- Additionally, python-which should be packaged. I did some packaging in the past, you could use the example: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/debian/python-which-1.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm The previous patch can be complemented with Patch0: dblatex-0.2.5-external-which.patch ..... %patch0 -p1 -b .external-which rm -rf lib/contrib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:19:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271119.l9RBJKFb012691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 07:19 EST ------- And, for convert: Requires: ImageMagick -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 11:44:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271144.l9RBiSRd019905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 07:44 EST ------- Missing dependencies for devel. Unless I'm wrong: Requires: babl-devel glib2-devel Since they are checked for explicitly, maybe you could have an explicit BR on pango and cairo. Also I suggest using rm %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la or, at least rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 12:00:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271200.l9RC03qq018585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 12:03:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271203.l9RC33kj022702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 12:25:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271225.l9RCPEf7025793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-27 08:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > Additionally, python-which should be packaged. I did some packaging > in the past, you could use the example: > http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/debian/python-which-1.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm > > The previous patch can be complemented with > > Patch0: dblatex-0.2.5-external-which.patch > > ..... > > %patch0 -p1 -b .external-which > rm -rf lib/contrib IIUC, your suggestion is 1) Create a python-which package (separate from dblatex) 2) dblatex requires python-which Is this correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 12:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271232.l9RCWxix022782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 08:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > IIUC, your suggestion is > 1) Create a python-which package (separate from dblatex) Yes. > 2) dblatex requires python-which > Is this correct? BuildRequires: python-which It is not needed at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 12:38:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271238.l9RCceq7023484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 08:38 EST ------- Don't ask here. Please make it sure that you can build your srpm by yourself before submitting to review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 12:53:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] New: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://nbecker/RPM/python-which.spec SRPM URL: https://nbecker/RPM/python-which-1.1.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm Description: which.py is a small GNU-which replacement. It has the following features: * it can print all matches on the PATH; * it can note "near misses" on the PATH (e.g. files that match but may not, say, have execute permissions); and * it can be used as a Python module. NOTE: This is needed for dblatex which is in review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 12:55:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271255.l9RCtKQ8029941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-27 08:55 EST ------- rpmlint says: python-which.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/which.py 0644 I think this is not an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 13:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271304.l9RD4W8h027188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-27 09:04 EST ------- I'm not asking here for anything. I'm showing you the issue that makes me unable to build SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 13:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271319.l9RDJFfl001018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-27 09:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > You should certainly remove the empty directories > /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc > /usr/share/dblatex/latex/specs > /usr/share/dblatex/latex/style > I don't understand - they're not empty. For example: /var/tmp/rpm/dblatex-0.2.7-9.fc8-root-nbecker/usr/share/dblatex/latex/specs: total 20 drwxr-xr-x 2 nbecker nbecker 4096 2007-10-27 09:14 . drwxr-xr-x 6 nbecker nbecker 4096 2007-10-27 09:14 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 nbecker nbecker 136 2006-09-28 18:51 db2latex.specs -rw-r--r-- 1 nbecker nbecker 88 2005-08-10 16:44 native.specs -rw-r--r-- 1 nbecker nbecker 89 2005-08-10 16:44 simple.specs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 13:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271326.l9RDQliq030614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-27 09:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Missing dependencies for devel. Unless I'm wrong: > Requires: babl-devel glib2-devel > Yes gegl.pc requires both. > Since they are checked for explicitly, maybe you could > have an explicit BR on pango and cairo. > But these are already pulled in by gtk2-devel. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gegl/gegl-0.0.13-0.7.20071011svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271423.l9RENjrQ009837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 10:23 EST ------- Closing for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:24:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271424.l9REOBds005472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 10:24 EST ------- Closing for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247408] Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271425.l9REP1gI005529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 10:25 EST ------- Closing for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328981] Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271425.l9REP1E6005688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ccsm - Plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328981 Bug 328981 depends on bug 247408, which changed state. Bug 247408 Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-python - Python bindings for the Compiz Configuration System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247408 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:31:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 344521] Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271431.l9REV4dB006830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprobe-ulog - NetFlow probe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344521 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:32:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271432.l9REWaZG011175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2007-10-27 10:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: conntrack-tools Short Description: Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table Owners: stingray Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:43:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271443.l9REh7b1008390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271441.l9REfC5V008253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-27 10:41 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tre New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:40:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271440.l9REe5os008053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(shadowarts at nonlogi| |c.org) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 10:40 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:42:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271442.l9REgkmF008365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-27 10:42 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: foobar New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:40:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271440.l9REebxQ012417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(qark at ospace.net) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 10:40 EST ------- CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:43:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271443.l9REhs6A008513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-27 10:43 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: crm114 New Branches: EL-5 Of course, I meant this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:47:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271447.l9RElHN8009046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 10:47 EST ------- Still the following issues are not fixed. (In reply to comment #10) > * Compilation log > - Make compilation log verbose so that we can check if > Fedora specific compilation flags are honored correctly. > > * rpmlint: > B. > --------------------------------------------------------- > W: maildrop invalid-license GPL > --------------------------------------------------------- > - Please update license tag. > > C. > --------------------------------------------------------- > W: maildrop undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librfc2045.so.0.0.0 > rfc2047_qp_allow_any > W: maildrop undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librfc822.so.0.0.0 unicode_ISO8859_1 > ( and similar lines omittted) > --------------------------------------------------------- > - libraries in -devel subpackage contains undefined non-weak > symbols (also can be checked by "ldd -r"). > This is unpleasant because this causes linkage failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 14:48:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271448.l9REmihl013311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 15:58:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271558.l9RFwtTY001064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-10-27 11:58 EST ------- I see I was added to need sponsor. I have other packages, just not other Ruby packages. I am already a member of Fedora Extras, or packagers, or whatever the group is called ( I really don't recall the name currently). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 16:38:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271638.l9RGc2Uf008476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-27 12:38 EST ------- Ah.. sorry.. I misread your message. Actually you already have several packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 16:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271642.l9RGgpsk004705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-10-27 12:42 EST ------- I made suggested changes, but I'm not really sure that a version with direct use of install command is so much better. Updated files: Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5-1.4.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 17:31:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271731.l9RHV1pX015883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-27 13:31 EST ------- Ok, I updated oqa2 and now qca-ossl builds fine. So... * rpmlint not silent but this "error" may be omitted [petro at host-12-109 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/qca-ossl-0.1-3.20070904.fc7.src.rpm qca-ossl.src:35: E: configure-without-libdir-spec + package meets naming and packaging guidelines + specfile is properly named + package meets Packaging/Guidelines + package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + COPYING file included in %doc + spec file written in American English + spec file legible + sources match the upstream source: 85713bfebcb8ed4fddf6f6bc8dd930a3 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qca-ossl-0.1-20070904.tar.bz2 - wrong source in spec file must me http://delta.affinix.com/download/qca/2.0/test4/qca-ossl-0.1-%{date}.tar.bz2 instead of http://delta.affinix.com/download/qca/2.0/beta7/qca-ossl-0.1-%{date}.tar.bz2 + package builds file (x86) + all build dependencies listed in BuildRequires + package doesn't need to call ldconfig in %post and %postun + package owns all created directories + package not contains any duplicate files in the %files listing. + permissions on files sets properly + package has a %clean section + package uses macros consistently + package contains code or permissable content + header files are in a -devel package + package contains no static libs + package does not contain any .la libtool archives + not a GUI app + all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8 Just fix the Source0 field and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 18:14:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271814.l9RIEPu2020895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-27 14:14 EST ------- SRPM: http://liviopl.jogger.pl/files/nautilus-share-0.7.2-6.fc7.src.rpm Made using --nodeps. Sclerosis doesn't hurt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 18:12:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271812.l9RIC7uv020821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-10-27 14:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > You can still create srpm by "rpm -bs --nodeps foo.spec". You shoulda written "rpmbuild -bs --nodeps foo.spec". This should work in any case :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 18:28:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271828.l9RIS1kw022543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-27 14:28 EST ------- Good catch ! I've updated the SRPM and I'll import the fixed one in CVS. Thanks a lot for reviewing ! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qca-ossl Short Description: OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 Owners: abompard Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 18:51:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251525] Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271851.l9RIpMHh025296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bibexport - Extract entries from BibTeX and .aux files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251525 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 14:51 EST ------- Built, thanks Tibbs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 19:22:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710271922.l9RJMEk0028740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 15:22 EST ------- * follow guidelines * expected rpmlint warning gegl-devel.i386: W: no-documentation * follow naming guidelines * free software * source match upstream except for dates in .svn/entries * %files section right * library correctly packaged APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 20:09:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272009.l9RK9RIj029834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 16:09 EST ------- The url is not the right one, and at the right one there is no .src.rpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 20:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272013.l9RKDhMO002272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 16:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=240701) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=240701&action=view) add without_bcond like macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 20:11:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272011.l9RKBcx5002215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 16:11 EST ------- This was a mistake. But /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc /usr/share/dblatex/latex/contrib/example /usr/share/dblatex/latex/style are empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 20:28:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272028.l9RKSZ6N004089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 16:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Why are autotools calls unuseful? Because everything is already there in the release... that you did... If it is not there you should redo a release. > URL has been added. There is still a missing URL in spec file. > You've true with license, but I decided to change information files in other way. ??? The COPYING doesn't match the license of the code. > I can make an announcement on freshmeat, no problem. Indeed. And I also think that you should contact the debian, suse and bsd maintainers. The following isn't useful: Buildrequires: audit-libs >= 1.4.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 20:44:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225777] Merge Review: gawk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272044.l9RKiIOF001250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gawk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225777 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 16:44 EST ------- I think that this bug should be closed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 20:55:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272055.l9RKtXe2002945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pertusus at free.fr |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 16:55 EST ------- Comment #14 is a must fix. But in any case I have too much disagreement to approve this package (the use of autotools and not shipping the api). I'll keep on commenting on other issues, though. At the first %build line, there is a spurious make %{?_smp_mflags} I don't see other obvious issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 21:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226167] Merge Review: mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272154.l9RLsCJV014107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226167 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 17:54 EST ------- The only issue I see that isn't addressed is the gpgme issue. There is one muttrc option that can only be set with gpgme: crypt_use_pka Therefore shouldn't gpgme support be built in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 22:19:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321731] Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272219.l9RMJute012250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Shorewall Version 4 - Iptables-based firewall - Review Tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321731 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-10-27 18:19 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/shorewall-4.0.5-1.fc7.src.rpm This is an updated package for version 4.0.5. With this new version, there is no longer any need to cache /etc/services,protocols and so the buildports.pl issue has gone away. With this version, there are no outstanding issues from a packaging perspective that I am aware of, so hopefully we can get this into the repos soon! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 22:18:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272218.l9RMIlWI012209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-27 18:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Maybe these are cached thumbnails (pngs) that are created by a running Thunar or > nautilus? maybe thunar thumbnails. But I don't have a running thunar or nautilus in general. > This seems to be an error in the underlying thunar-vfs layer. Ristretto uses No, no, I just showed that as an example that things can be different when not in xfce. Forget about the end of comment #5, it is irrelevant. In xfce there is also no image opened in ristretto. > > i also get warnings: > > (ristretto:22815): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer: assertion > > `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed > > > > (ristretto:22819): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer: assertion > > `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed > > > > Sorry, I don't see anything like that here in my F7 machine. When do these > errors appear? When starting ristretto, they appear on the console. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 27 22:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710272222.l9RMMBIf017369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-27 18:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gegl Short Description: A graph based image processing framework Owners: deji Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 00:31:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280031.l9S0Vd2l031889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-10-27 20:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Comment #14 is a must fix. But in any case I have too much The devel spec contains a -static subpackage: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/libpng/devel/libpng.spec?view=markup btw. %makeinstall should not be used, better is to use (when it works, which is afaik almost always): make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 03:24:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355581] New: Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355581 Summary: Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/koules.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/koules-1.4-1.fc8.i386/koules-1.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock build results: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/koules-1.4-1.fc8.i386/ Description: Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support Koules is a fast action arcade-style game. It works in fine resolution with cool 256 color graphics, multiplayer mode up to 5 players, full sound and, of course, network support. Koules is an original idea. First version of Koules was developed from scratch by Jan Hubicka in July 1995. Remember Red Hat Linux 4.2? Don't tell me you were not playing this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 04:40:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252115] Review Request: jfreechart - Charts Generation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280440.l9S4eXs9022547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfreechart - Charts Generation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252115 loganjerry at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2007-10-28 00:40 EST ------- As I noted in bug 252114, I'm interested in seeing jfreechart get into Fedora. I'm willing to review this package. However, I wonder if you would upgrade to a later version of jfreechart first. Version 1.0.5 is the current jpackage.org version, and version 1.0.6 is the latest version. In any case, the License tag needs to be changed to LGPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 04:39:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252114] Review Request: jcommon - Common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280439.l9S4dkgJ022056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcommon - Common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252114 loganjerry at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2007-10-28 00:39 EST ------- I'm interested in seeing jfreechart get into Fedora. I've never done a review before, but I'm willing to do my first reviews for jcommon and jfreechart (bug 252115). However, I wonder if you would upgrade to later versions first. Version 1.0.9 is the current version of jcommon, and is also available from jpackage.org. In any case, the License tag needs to be changed to LGPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 04:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] New: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/cdpr.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/cdpr-2.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: cdpr is used to decode a Cisco Disovery Protocol (CDP) packet, by default it will report the device ID, the IP Address (of the device), and the port number that the machine is connected to. Optionally it will decode the entire CDP packet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 05:20:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354101] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280520.l9S5KEAf027452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354101 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2007-10-28 01:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compizconfig-backend-kconfig Short Description: kconfig backend for compizconfig Owners: izhar Branches: F-8 devel InitialCC: izhar Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 07:16:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280716.l9S7GQqq012333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 03:16 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gt5) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 07:59:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354441] Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280759.l9S7xp7s017174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-share - Easy sharing folder via Samba (CIFS) protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354441 ------- Additional Comments From liviopl.pl at gmail.com 2007-10-28 03:59 EST ------- Updated SRPM: http://liviopl.jogger.pl/files/nautilus-share-0.7.2-7.fc7.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://liviopl.jogger.pl/files/nautilus-share.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 08:01:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280801.l9S81fT6017738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 04:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > * linkage against libmalaga.so > > - The installed binaries in malaga don't use libmalaga.so ( > > is not linked against libmalaga.so). > > NOT done yet, mostly because of lack of time in the recent couple of days and > also lack of knowledge. I assume I'd have to patch Makefile.in heavily so that > the binaries would actually use libmalaga.so? Also, is this really necessary, > the binaries would then differ from those that are built from pristine upstream > sources? If this is needed, I'll try to study about it during the next few days. - For now I can admit as it is, however please contact with upstream so that binaries in malaga package actually uses libmalaga. Rest issues: For 7.11-0.3: * readline dependency - Please check if the following build.log result is correct. ------------------------------------------------------ 185 appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool 186 checking for Win32... no 187 checking for readline in -lreadline... no 188 checking readline/readline.h usability... no 189 checking readline/readline.h presence... no 190 checking for readline/readline.h... no 191 checking for GTK+ 2.0... yes 192 checking for GLib... yes 193 configure: creating ./config.status ------------------------------------------------------ * Dependency for -devel package - Well, after I reread your spec file, perhaps -devel package does not depend on malaga package, only depends on libmalaga package. For -devel package, ------------------------------------------------------ Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ------------------------------------------------------ should be changed to ------------------------------------------------------ Requires: libmalaga = %{version}-%{release} ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 08:12:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280812.l9S8CWYW014879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-10-28 04:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > So would you check if libxslt-devel is _actually_ needed? > > > From header files it seems this "libxslt" should be "libxml-2.0" > > > (i.e. Requires: not libxslt-devel but libxml2-devel). > > > > From libfo/fo-xslt-transformer.c: > > > > > #include > > > #include > > > #include > > It is for BuildRequires, not for Requires for -devel package. No, another package BuildRequires libfo-devel, which then in turn Requires libxslt-devel so that the package can build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 08:30:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261581] Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280830.l9S8U7tg018719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 04:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > So would you check if libxslt-devel is _actually_ needed? > > > > From header files it seems this "libxslt" should be "libxml-2.0" > > > > (i.e. Requires: not libxslt-devel but libxml2-devel). > > > > > > From : > > > > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > It is for BuildRequires, not for Requires for -devel package. > > No, another package BuildRequires libfo-devel, which then in turn Requires > libxslt-devel so that the package can build. in turn Requires s|libxslt-devel|libxml2-devel| All symbols which can be used from external libraries/binaries are written in installed header files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 09:04:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 05:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710280904.l9S94dct018097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-28 05:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Comment #14 is a must fix. But in any case I have too much > > The devel spec contains a -static subpackage: > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/libpng/devel/libpng.spec?view=markup You seem to be mixing with the libpng review ;-) > btw. > %makeinstall > should not be used, better is to use (when it works, which is afaik almost always): > make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install > > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 10:05:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225777] Merge Review: gawk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281005.l9SA5h2N030951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gawk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225777 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kzak at redhat.com |skasal at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-28 06:05 EST ------- Looks like there was a maintainer change. Stepan, can you check the package and close this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 10:08:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225290] Merge Review: attr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281008.l9SA8AlS031184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: attr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225290 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dan at danny.cz |zprikryl at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-10-28 06:08 EST ------- Looks like there was a maintainer change. Zdenek, can you check the package so we can finish the review and close this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 10:13:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281013.l9SADC7N027293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-10-28 06:13 EST ------- * license field matches the actual license. * license text included in package and marked with %doc * BuildRequires are proper * file permissions fine python site-lib modules is not scripts, so no need to be +x * %defattrs present ( %defattr(-, root, root, -)) * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs $ rpm -q -R -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/func-0.13-3.fc8.noarch.rpm /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/python config(func) = 0.13-3.fc8 pyOpenSSL python >= 2.3 python(abi) = 2.5 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 $ rpm -q --provides -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/func-0.13-3.fc8.noarch.rpm config(func) = 0.13-3.fc8 func = 0.13-3.fc8 ? run rpmlint on the binary RPMs func.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.13-3 0.13-3.fc8 this is because %%SOURCE1 contains 0.13.3 & changelog entries contains 0.0.13-3 as version func.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/func/*.py python site-lib modules is not scripts, so no need to be +x could be made silenced by chmod +x *.py for all *.py files in git. SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 ? package should build in mock - I haven't tried, but I don't think it'll be a problem The Changelog entries should be fixed to have the right versions, feel free to change the permissions on the *.py files if you like. but nothing blocking. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 11:37:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 07:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226167] Merge Review: mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281137.l9SBbFLi005574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226167 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-28 07:37 EST ------- Could you apply this patch? http://www.spinnaker.de/mutt/compressed/ It's a great disk space saver when dealing with mail archives in mbox format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 12:33:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281233.l9SCX4bC012749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 08:33 EST ------- What is the current status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 12:33:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 296161] Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281233.l9SCXSw3012828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296161 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 08:33 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 12:34:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291741] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281234.l9SCYna9017776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291741 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(richip at richip.dhs. | |org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 08:34 EST ------- Richi, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 12:38:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] New: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SDL_sound.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SDL_sound-1.0.1-7.fc8.src.rpm Description: SDL_sound is a library that handles the decoding of several popular sound file formats, such as .WAV and .MP3. It is meant to make the programmer's sound playback tasks simpler. The programmer gives SDL_sound a filename, or feeds it data directly from one of many sources, and then reads the decoded waveform data back at her leisure. If resource constraints are a concern, SDL_sound can process sound data in programmer-specified blocks. Alternately, SDL_sound can decode a whole sound file and hand back a single pointer to the whole waveform. SDL_sound can also handle sample rate, audio format, and channel conversion on-the-fly and behind-the-scenes, if the programmer desires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 12:49:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281249.l9SCnfPO019887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 08:49 EST ------- For 0.9.7-1: * rdoc dependency - Would you explain why this package should have (Build)Requires: ruby-ldap? * Redundant Requires - "Requires: openldap openssl" is not needed. rpmbuild checks libraries' dependency and automatically adds it to binary rpms. * SourceURL - For sourceforge tarball, please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Stripping binaries - Stripping binaries by yourself is not allowed because this makes it impossible to create debuginfo rpm. * Timestamp - For this package you can (should) use INSTALL="install -p" option to make install to keep timestamps on installed .rb files. * %check - What is this empty %check entry for? * By the way, subdirectory test/ exists in tarball. If possible, please execute some tests in %check section. * File entry - On i386 --------------------------------------------------------------------- warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/ldap.so --------------------------------------------------------------------- ruby_sitelib points to /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8, ruby_sitearch points to /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux (on i386), so the file above is listed twice. Please avoid this. ! Note: on x86_64, ruby_sitelib points to /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8, where ruby_sitearch points to /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux. * Documents - You may also want to add "FAQ" to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 13:54:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 340011] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281354.l9SDsWhh022845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=340011 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 09:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/pyrenamer.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.in-errance.net/fichiers_jf/pyrenamer-0.4.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Seems 404... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 14:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281400.l9SE0TXd023895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |254056 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 14:00:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254057] Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281400.l9SE0TVT023919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254057 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |254056 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 14:00:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254058] Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281400.l9SE0UOW023943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254058 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |254056 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 14:00:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281400.l9SE0Sr2023870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |254057, 254058, 254060 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 14:41:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291741] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281441.l9SEf9V2028456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291741 richip at richip.dhs.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(richip at richip.dhs.| |org) | ------- Additional Comments From richip at richip.dhs.org 2007-10-28 10:41 EST ------- Still interested. Just reading the guidelines now and will be setting up the proper environment. Real life getting in the way of some of it. Was there an immediate request for it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 15:01:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281501.l9SF1nbR030764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-10-28 11:01 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-4.fc7.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=217598 I have removed Emacs support for the time being. Emacs needs to be patched (http://pida.co.uk/trac/ticket/95) and if these are accepted in the Fedora package, I shall re-add Emacs support. I have also modified a number of Requires. However I did not understand which files' timestamps need to be preserved (comment #32)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 15:04:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281504.l9SF4NMp030878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |SDL_sound AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 15:33:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291741] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281533.l9SFXGcJ007104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291741 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 11:33 EST ------- Usually if no response from the reporter is received for more than one month after potential reviewers wrote some comments (in this review report the last comment is Jason's), the bug will be closed within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 15:39:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281539.l9SFdBx8007802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 11:39 EST ------- Well, I just tried to rebuild this package but it failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=217593 Note: you can try to rebuild your arbitrary srpm on koji by ---------------------------------------------------------------- koji build --scratch ---------------------------------------------------------------- Currently can be dist-f9, dist-f8-updates-candidate or dist-fc7-updates-candidate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 15:41:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281541.l9SFfMCa008357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 11:41 EST ------- By the way, would you make build.log more verbose? The build log output like: -------------------------------------------------------- (C++) Base64.o (C++) BinFileInputStream.o (C++) BinInputStream.o (C++) BinMemInputStream.o (C++) BitSet.o (C++) DefaultPanicHandler.o -------------------------------------------------------- isn't useful. We want to check if fedora specific compilation flags are correctly used, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 16:57:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281657.l9SGvHb3011789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-28 12:57 EST ------- New spec: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-7.11-0.4.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #5) > - For now I can admit as it is, however please contact with upstream so > that binaries in malaga package actually uses libmalaga. I'll do this. I might even try to make a patch myself, but the Fedora packaging process will be a lot quicker if we won't stay waiting for it. > Rest issues: > For 7.11-0.3: > > * readline dependency CHANGES.txt mentions: "The configure option "--with-readline" enables fancy command line editing, provided that the GNU readline library is installed." But also: "When using "libmalaga", the readline library is no longer needed" I'm not sure what to make of that, but I added the --with-readline option to configure and also added BuildRequires readline-devel. I guess it won't hurt to have the readline support in there. > * Dependency for -devel package > - Well, after I reread your spec file, perhaps -devel > package does not depend on malaga package, only depends > on libmalaga package. > For -devel package, > ------------------------------------------------------ > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > ------------------------------------------------------ > should be changed to > ------------------------------------------------------ > Requires: libmalaga = %{version}-%{release} > ------------------------------------------------------ I tried this, but rpmlint said it was an error to not have Requires malaga in -devel, so I left it as it was. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 16:56:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226167] Merge Review: mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281656.l9SGu5uR016956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226167 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-28 12:56 EST ------- The patch author admits that it isn't stable still. So I am not sure that it should be in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 17:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281703.l9SH3mZZ012429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 13:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > * Dependency for -devel package > > - Well, after I reread your spec file, perhaps -devel > > package does not depend on malaga package, only depends > > on libmalaga package. > > For -devel package, > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > should be changed to > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Requires: libmalaga = %{version}-%{release} > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > I tried this, but rpmlint said it was an error to not have Requires malaga in > -devel, so I left it as it was. Really? I guess it is "warning", not "error". If it is really "error", it is a bug in rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 17:29:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281729.l9SHT17w015483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-28 13:29 EST ------- New spec: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-7.11-0.5.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #7) > Really? I guess it is "warning", not "error". If it is really > "error", it is a bug in rpmlint. You're correct, it was just a warning, so I did as you advised, -devel requires only libmalaga now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 17:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226167] Merge Review: mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281752.l9SHqMsX023688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226167 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-28 13:52 EST ------- If you're referring to the line "I fear that there are still some bugs or inconsistencies in this code (that's why Thomas Roessler didn't include it into the Mutt distribution yet)." then I assure you, it's been on that website for years. I've been using this patch since mutt-1.4 with no ill effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 17:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281757.l9SHv0mE019009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-28 13:56 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (malaga) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------- Note: As written in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure : now F-8 branch is also valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 19:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355971] Review Request: poker3d - Three dimensional multi-user online poker game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281901.l9SJ1eCr027356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker3d - Three dimensional multi-user online poker game Alias: poker3d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355971 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |poker3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 19:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355971] New: Review Request: poker3d - Three dimensional multi-user online poker game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355971 Summary: Review Request: poker3d - Three dimensional multi-user online poker game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker3d.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker3d-1.1.36-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Three dimensional multi-user online poker game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 19:21:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355971] Review Request: poker3d - Three dimensional multi-user online poker game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281921.l9SJLI5j029819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker3d - Three dimensional multi-user online poker game Alias: poker3d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355971 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |355981 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 19:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355981] Review Request: poker3d-data - Data files for the poker3d package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281921.l9SJLJXP029840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker3d-data - Data files for the poker3d package Alias: poker3d-data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355981 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |355971 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 19:20:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355981] New: Review Request: poker3d-data - Data files for the poker3d package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355981 Summary: Review Request: poker3d-data - Data files for the poker3d package Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/poker3d-data.spec SRPM URL: http://64.71.155.133/poker3d-data-1.1.36-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Data files for the poker3d package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 19:20:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355981] Review Request: poker3d-data - Data files for the poker3d package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281920.l9SJKdoM002129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker3d-data - Data files for the poker3d package Alias: poker3d-data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355981 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |poker3d-data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 19:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710281945.l9SJj1f4004781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-10-28 15:45 EST ------- I am getting the following rpmlint warnings: SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libvorbis.so.0 SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libvorbisenc.so.2 Can you please look into these? Also, you may consider replacing "MP3" with "OGG" in the %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 20:14:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282014.l9SKELxv008388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 20:13:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282013.l9SKDxAN008363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-28 16:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=240941) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=240941&action=view) Remaining cosmetic fixes Ok, devel branch looks good now, patch for some remaining cosmetic issues attached. Approved with it applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 20:22:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282022.l9SKMdHL004453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-28 16:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I am getting the following rpmlint warnings: > SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 Caused by sdl-config --libs, harmless as its really needed by SDL > SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 Caused by libmikmod-config --libs, harmless as its really needed by mikmod > SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libvorbis.so.0 Caused by pkg-config --libs vorbisfile, once more harmless > SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libvorbisenc.so.2 > That really shouldn't be there, fixed. > Can you please look into these? Also, you may consider replacing "MP3" with > "OGG" in the %description. > Done: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SDL_sound.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SDL_sound-1.0.1-8.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 20:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282036.l9SKaWGr011218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-10-28 16:36 EST ------- Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/ruby-ldap.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/ruby-ldap-0.9.7-2.fc7.src.rpm I removed the rdoc br, in my orignal version, I was using it and forgot to remove it. Fixed BR by removing openldap and openssl. Fixed SF source URL. Removed strip of ldap.so. Added install -p to make command. You can't run the tests without openldap-server, and I didn't really want to add that the BR. The tests are rather minimal. Fixed %files section to remove duplicate and added FAQ to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 20:55:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352741] Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282055.l9SKtehY008434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(sergio.pasra at gmail| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-28 16:55 EST ------- The code is taken directly from the subversion repository. Although the last released tarball is from 2004, the subversion repo has been updated since then. I have added the dist tag to the specfile: Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/tkimg.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/tkimg-1.3-0.3.20071018svn.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 21:01:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282101.l9SL1GYx009069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-28 17:01 EST ------- I can't get to reproduce the failure. I have built it in mock for i386 and x86_64. Could it be a problem with ppc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 21:03:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282103.l9SL3YRA014090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-28 17:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > FWIW I also like the errata package: > > > > o Upstream experts provide the needed delta is bite-ready form > > Is that true? I looked and found no trace of an upstream errata package. > [snip] I stand corrected then. I know texlive is working on this for quite some time and this package implied that it was using upstream updates. This indeed seems not be be true at this point in time. Still when texlive does finally ship updates/errata this will become true. Maybe this is an area where the Fedora/Red Hat packager will create momentum for texlive to finalize this step? > > I also don't think this needs any special fesco/fpc blessing, but if people > > object, then please raise it there and we will discuss it and give it a blessing > > or a no-go. > > > > It was raised already, and you even commented :) See > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-August/msg00019.html > > Feelings were mixed, no consensus was reached. I'm glad I'm not contradicting myself ;) OK, from all the people commenting I was the only one on the FPC. And we know Rex favours this approach. So you have 2 gos and nil no-gos ATM. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 21:14:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282114.l9SLEnTl015376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-28 17:14 EST ------- As said in comment #15 please consider the license tag fixed in the next iteration (befor e the import). I don't think it will be better to increase verbosity - in general the more verbose the logs the worse SNR you get and the more errors can slip. As to the non-weak symbols - what do you suggest to do to fix it? maildrop seems to work well. Perhaps these symbols are even undefined on purpose in case there are multiple possible variants for them. At least that is a valid use of undefined symbols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 21:32:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282132.l9SLWq7g017664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-10-28 17:32 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output: SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libvorbis.so.0 These are okay, see comment #2 - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package license meets license guidelines - license matches actual license - license included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file legible - source matches upstream $ diff -ur SDL_sound-1.0.1 ../SOURCES/SDL_sound-1.0.1 - package successfully compiles and builds on F-7 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - proper use of ldconfig - package not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation files - files in %doc do not affect runtime - header files in devel subpackage - no static libraries - no pkgconfig files - library files without suffix in devel subpackage - devel package requires base package - no libtool archives - not a GUI application - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages - buildroot removed at beginning of %install - all filenames are UTF-8 *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 21:40:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355971] Review Request: poker3d - Three dimensional multi-user online poker game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282140.l9SLeNja018795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker3d - Three dimensional multi-user online poker game Alias: poker3d https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355971 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-10-28 17:40 EST ------- rpmlint output: poker3d.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/bin/poker3d "/usr/libexec/poker3d/underware" This is a bug in rpmlint, see bug #355861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 22:20:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282220.l9SMKCJv018761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-28 18:20 EST ------- * Sat Oct 27 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.7-1 - version 0.7 http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird-0.7-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 22:21:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282221.l9SMLd5H024127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-28 18:21 EST ------- Sorry, make that: https://nbecker/RPM/python-which-1.1.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm https://nbecker/RPM/python-which.spec(In reply to comment #2) > The url is not the right one, and at the right one there is > no .src.rpm... Sorry, make that: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/python-which-1.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/python-which.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 22:33:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282233.l9SMXQaM020319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-28 18:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: malaga Short Description: A programming language for automatic language analysis Owners: vpv Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 22:38:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282238.l9SMctEj026145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-28 18:38 EST ------- I have modified the specfile, now the most of the tcl libraries are loaded using tcl_pkgrequire Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/ds9.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/ds9-4.13-9.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 22:58:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282258.l9SMwq9A023177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-28 18:58 EST ------- Static lib should be in a separate subpackage. In the progs description, you should remove: If you install these, you must also install gd. The /usr/share/fonts/liberation/ font directory should be added. entities.html should not be shipped. In the .pc file, Libs should be Libs: -L${libdir} -ldg Also (suggestion) I think it is better to have Cflags: -I${includedir} in case there is a way to override the variables in pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 23:03:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282303.l9SN3rL6028958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 Bug 352761 depends on bug 333091, which changed state. Bug 333091 Summary: Programs linked with tktable cannot find the libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333091 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 23:07:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282307.l9SN7iSC029552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-28 19:07 EST ------- * follow guidelines * license MIT, license file included * sane provides and requires * rpmlint gives a warning because there is a shebang in the module file. Not worth bothering. python-which.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/which.py 0644 * %files section right * match upstream 6f4abadf475af98e20664eac21f633a9 which-1.1.0.zip APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 23:10:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282310.l9SNAZAu029980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-28 19:10 EST ------- Only one thing, I think that you should remove GNU in GNU-which, since there is no compatibility whith GNu which, for instance not the same command line switches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 28 23:31:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252257] Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710282331.l9SNVdIX032321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252257 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-10-28 19:31 EST ------- Oops, fixed this a while ago. New version is at http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/perl-MogileFS-Server-2.17-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 01:10:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290110.l9T1ArYY012094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-10-28 21:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-which Short Description: which.py is a small which replacement Owners: ndbecker2 at gmail.com Branches: devel, F8 InitialCC: pertusus at free.fr Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 02:21:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290221.l9T2LXMs015218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-28 22:21 EST ------- %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make BUILD_ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" PREFIX=%{_prefix} \ MANDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1 \ BINDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} \ RPMVERSION="$RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION" INSTALL='install -p' install You mean like this? > Why is LD used for linking instead of gcc? I don't know, but does it really matter? This was upstream's decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 05:18:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226274] Merge Review: perl-Parse-RecDescent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290518.l9T5ImAA008213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Parse-RecDescent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226274 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-29 01:18 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2) rpmlint gave me perl-Parse-RecDescent.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.95.1/demo/demo_dot.pl The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). perl-Parse-RecDescent.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.95-2 1.95.1-2.fc8 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. 3) make test skipped some tests PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00.load....# Testing Parse::RecDescent 1.95.1 ok t/basics.....Name "main::D" used only once: possible typo at t/basics.t line 15. ok t/pod........skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required for testing POD All tests successful, 1 test skipped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 05:51:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290551.l9T5p1jt007497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-29 01:51 EST ------- 1) you should use Source URL as Source0: http://downloads.sf.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2) Not needed README.Win32 and INSTALL as %doc. Remove those files. 3) for fixing dos end of line you can simplify as only sed -i 's/\r//g' COPYING README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 07:32:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290732.l9T7W0LW019716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-29 03:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: SDL_sound Short Description: Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 07:34:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352741] Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290734.l9T7YObi025022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-10-29 03:34 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 07:49:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290749.l9T7nQ4p021937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-29 03:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: SDL_sound Short Description: Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 08:40:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290840.l9T8e0Un003544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-29 04:39 EST ------- ping? is the srpm given in comment #3 is built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 09:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290922.l9T9MSfv004512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 ------- Additional Comments From jmoskovc at redhat.com 2007-10-29 05:22 EST ------- Should be fixed and consistent in all actual branches (F7, F8, devel). Thank you for reviewing. jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 09:22:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290922.l9T9M7Ap010290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-29 05:22 EST ------- The packages in the repo do not properly obsolete/provide virtual tetex provides needed for upgrading from tetex to texlive components: ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: Package tetex-latex needs tetex-dvips = 3.0, this is not available. Package tetex-xdvi needs tetex-dvips = 3.0, this is not available. Package tetex-latex needs tetex = 3.0, this is not available. This was on F7/x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 09:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710290938.l9T9cqo2012991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-10-29 05:38 EST ------- Yes, there is: Obsoletes: tetex-latex <= 3.0 Provides: tetex-latex = 3.1 is the spec file, because it wouldn't be otherwise clear which package to install if both tetex and texlive provides, say, tetex-latex = 3.0, so texlive provides 3.1, newer version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 10:23:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291023.l9TANtSr013570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 06:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > make BUILD_ROOT="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" PREFIX=%{_prefix} \ > MANDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1 \ > BINDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} \ > RPMVERSION="$RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION" INSTALL='install -p' install > > You mean like this? Yes, looks good. > > Why is LD used for linking instead of gcc? > > I don't know, but does it really matter? This was upstream's decision. Looking at the files generated by LD, it could even be better to use LD and not gcc since they seem to be files that are run at the very beginning of the boot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 10:46:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291046.l9TAksNW023040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-10-29 06:46 EST ------- no, not yet, because F8 was closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 11:33:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291133.l9TBX1Cl029703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-10-29 07:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gt5 Short Description: A diff-capable 'du-browser' Owners: szpak Branches: FC-6 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 12:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 296161] Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291214.l9TCESCY003194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296161 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-10-29 08:14 EST ------- Hi, thanks for your original review -- it caught me on holiday and I'm still catching up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 14:20:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352741] Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291420.l9TEKHCo018753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-29 10:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tkimg Short Description: More Image Formats for Tk Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 14:31:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291431.l9TEV0sM025441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-29 10:30 EST ------- Hello Patrice, thanks for your effort. * The main problem I see with man-pages is that they are cover only short range of gsl interface. I think doc documentation is sufficient. * You are right I will remove -r option in the next build. But I think both these problems are not so big, so should you please grant review flag to this package? Or is there any important issue which blocks the review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 14:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291439.l9TEd3aa021115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-29 10:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > As to the non-weak symbols - what do you suggest to do to fix it? maildrop seems > to work well. Perhaps maildrop itself can be used with these undefined non-weak symbols are left. The problem is that these undefined non-weak symbols make it impossible that the libraries in maildrop are linked from other libraries/applications. So if you want to provide -devel package, this must be fixed. > Perhaps these symbols are even undefined on purpose in case there > are multiple possible variants for them. This is not because unicode_ symbols are provided by the codes under unicode/ subdirectory in maildrop, and the others are also provided by the codes in maildrop. So simply linking is not correct for these libraries. I found the related discussion here: http://www.nabble.com/Problems-using-rfc822-and-rfc2045-libraries-tf3292776.html#a9158612 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 14:46:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291446.l9TEkJ6H027777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 10:46 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi-1.4.4-7.fc8.src.rpm Satisfactory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 14:54:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291454.l9TEssNp028724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-29 10:54 EST ------- Well, I tried i386 x86_64 ppc ppc64 and only ppc build fails. ppc: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=218341 i386: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=218338 build.log differs at the beginning between i386 and ppc at below: -------------------------------------------------------------- + mkdir -p app-defaults make arch X11IRAFDIR=$PWD make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/x11iraf-1.5' -Configuring X11IRAF for redhat... -Restore archived redhat objects... +Configuring X11IRAF for linuxppc... +Restore archived linuxppc objects... No object archive found; full sysgen will be needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- So perhaps resize file are created under different directory. The related points are perhaps in mkarch file. ---------------------------------------------------------------- 40 case linux: 41 if (`$uname_cmd -m` == "ppc") then 42 set mach = "linuxppc" 43 else 44 if (-f /etc/redhat-release) then 45 set mach = "redhat" 46 else if (-f /etc/SuSE-release) then 47 set mach = "suse" 48 else 49 set mach = "linux" 50 endif 51 endif 52 breaksw ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 15:34:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291534.l9TFYsjt003967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 11:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Hello Patrice, > thanks for your effort. > * The main problem I see with man-pages is that they are cover only short range > of gsl interface. I think doc documentation is sufficient. For the commands, the man pages are necessary. The gsl.3 man page, indeed is unuseful. > * You are right I will remove -r option in the next build. > But I think both these problems are not so big, so should you please grant > review flag to this package? Or is there any important issue which blocks the > review flag. Those problems are not big, the -r is not a blocker. Not shipping useful man pages is a blocker, though. In any case there I don't see why we would need to hurry. The package is already in fedora, so what does it change? In any case if you want a more rapid reviewer, you can always try to find one (in any case Jose is the reviewer so last word is for him). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 15:37:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291537.l9TFbFSZ004830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-29 11:37 EST ------- Well, for 1.5-0.4: * ppc build issue - Please fix ppc build * On description section: - Please specify full URL for Source0 - Fix license - And include real license text - Also write a document which notifies that you have already asked upstream about license issue and upstream surely answered that this is licensed under MIT. * Desktop files - At least desktop file is needed for xgterm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 15:46:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291546.l9TFk4Ut000402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2007-10-29 11:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Those problems are not big, the -r is not a blocker. Not shipping > useful man pages is a blocker, though. In any case there I don't see why > we would need to hurry. The package is already in fedora, so what does it > change? To add this package to EPEL. See comment #12. > In any case if you want a more rapid reviewer, you can always try > to find one (in any case Jose is the reviewer so last word is for him). I agree with your points regarding the man pages. BTW you can take this review, after all you made most of the review work. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 15:52:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291552.l9TFq1q5001204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2007-10-29 11:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: func Short Description: Fedora Unified Network Controller Owners: mdehaan skvidal alikins Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 15:53:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291553.l9TFrOiB001329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-29 11:53 EST ------- Well, ---------------------------------------------------- # For noarch packages: ruby_sitelib %{ruby_sitelib}/* # For arch-specific packages: ruby_sitearch #%{ruby_sitearch}/* ---------------------------------------------------- You cannot do this. ldap.so is actually installed under ruby_sitearch (on x86_64, it is /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/), where on x86_64, ruby_sitelib is /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/. For this package you can treat this issue by specifying file lists a little more verbosely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 15:58:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291558.l9TFw7Ue002034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 11:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > Those problems are not big, the -r is not a blocker. Not shipping > > useful man pages is a blocker, though. In any case there I don't see why > > we would need to hurry. The package is already in fedora, so what does it > > change? > > To add this package to EPEL. See comment #12. Can't this be added to EPEL without a finished merge review? Packages in RHEL don't even go through a review! > I agree with your points regarding the man pages. BTW you can take this > review, after all you made most of the review work. :-) Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 15:58:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291558.l9TFwpJk008460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-29 11:58 EST ------- Perhaps ------------------------------------------------------------------- %{ruby_sitelib}/ldap/ %{ruby_sitearch}/ldap.so ------------------------------------------------------------------- should solve file entry issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 15:56:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291556.l9TFuOh2008290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 11:56 EST ------- A Vendor tag crept in. I spotted a license issue: md5.c has only this license information: * This implementation is copyright 1997 by M. Gutschke. This man seems to be the first etherboot maintainer, so it is likely not to be very problematic, but still. Otherwise it seems to be GPLv2+ (some file don't have any license, not a big deal, may be worth reporting upstream). Another issue is that the Source is wrong. mknbi.html should certainly be in %doc In general it is better to put perl noarch internal modules in %_datadir. And mknbi itself should certainly be in %_bindir directly. However, in the case of mknbi, it is certainly too much work and divergence from upstream to put everything at the right place. Therefore, all the rpmlint warnings are ignorable: mknbi.src:46: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/mknbi/ mknbi.i386: E: no-binary mknbi.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mknbi-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 16:33:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355581] Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291633.l9TGXCtV007638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support Alias: review-koules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355581 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |review-koules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 16:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355581] Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291633.l9TGXWu5014454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support Alias: koules-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355581 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|review-koules |koules-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 16:37:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291637.l9TGbLoc008515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-29 12:37 EST ------- Already APPROVED (comment #15). Please request the CVS module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 16:36:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317101] Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291636.l9TGaaUJ008435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rats - Rough Auditing Tool for Security https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317101 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 16:41:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291641.l9TGffsT009384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 12:41 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi-1.4.4-8.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Oct 29 2007 Warren Togami 1.4.4-8 - Remove Vendor tag - mknbi.html in %%doc - Do not create (empty) debuginfo package I will contact upstream regarding license clarification, however agreed that it shouldn't block this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 16:49:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187609] Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291649.l9TGnQK6016806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tre - POSIX compatible regexp library with approximate matching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187609 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 16:51:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187610] Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291651.l9TGpDdI010967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crm114 - CRM114 Bayesian Spam Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187610 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 16:52:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291652.l9TGqAbk017472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 12:52 EST ------- These branches already exist. What is your actual goal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:06:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291706.l9TH6S5T013241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 13:06 EST ------- InitialCC: perl-sig Done except for this. Given that this template must be machine readable, what do you mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291705.l9TH5twZ013169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 13:05 EST ------- InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:08:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291708.l9TH8DpN013325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 13:08 EST ------- Oops, that did actually work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:12:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226215] Merge Review: openobex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291712.l9THClp3020651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openobex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226215 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-10-29 13:12 EST ------- The F-7 branch still has "License: GPL", different source URL and the unneeded "0:" in the autoconf dependency, but fixing those is not obviously required per this review as the F-8 and devel branches look ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:14:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243576] Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291714.l9THE7ap014031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gst-inspector - An introspection data viewer for the GStreamer multimedia framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243576 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248647] Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291718.l9THIFHM021420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdegames3 - KDE 3 games not ported to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248647 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:21:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291721.l9THLnWR022159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:24:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291724.l9THO3CF015668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:24:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291724.l9THOhsr015725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-29 13:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220630] Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291727.l9THRt8X023090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidc - C++ implementation of AMQP messaging spec from Apache Qpid. Upstream for Red Hat Messaging. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220630 ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-10-29 13:27 EST ------- The goal is to get an updated version of qpidc in both F7-updates and F8-updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:25:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229417] Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291725.l9THPbAY022776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-qpid - qpid's python implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229417 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 13:25 EST ------- Again, these already exist. What is your actual goal here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233519] Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291726.l9THQ4kw022826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amqp - grammar for amqp wire format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233519 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 13:26 EST ------- Again, these already exist. What is your actual goal here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:28:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291728.l9THSZOn016441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:33:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328781] Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291733.l9THX96E023996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gegl - A graph based image processing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328781 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:33:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291733.l9THXL3N024032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-29 13:33 EST ------- OK, I've tried to split off the lightning extension. I know that packaging extensions for mozilla products is pretty hard, so I based my work on the awsome job done by the mugshot packager. Reference: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-April/msg00859.html I've tested many combinations, it seems to work fine. Plus, the script I'm using could be re-used in other extension packages. * Mon Oct 29 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.7-2 - split the lightning package - use scriptlets and triggers based on the mugshot package http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird-0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:38:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291738.l9THcLIi018017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:35:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333451] Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291735.l9THZtRI024705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PackageKit - Package management with dbus and policykit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333451 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:44:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:44:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291744.l9THiG6k025823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:39:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277921] Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291739.l9THdj4B025021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277921 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-29 13:39 EST ------- Please rebuild this package and import this to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:47:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 339961] Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291747.l9THlamg019698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: conntrack-tools - Tools to manipulate netfilter connection tracking table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339961 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:43:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 330831] Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291743.l9THheeE018949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gbrainy - a brain teaser game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lokthare at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-29 13:43 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291750.l9THo6bJ020341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:53:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291753.l9THrocU027446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:51:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354101] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291751.l9THpg30027238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354101 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-29 13:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291755.l9THtbP1028023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-29 13:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 17:59:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351251] Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291759.l9THx3Hi021546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Func - Fedora Unified Network Controller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351251 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:01:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351751] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291801.l9TI11Ja022125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data - The data pack for Business::ISBN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351751 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:07:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226167] Merge Review: mutt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291807.l9TI7DTU030138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mutt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226167 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-10-29 14:07 EST ------- Any estimate how many users will use PKA support? I don't even know what it is good for. ;) Enabling gpgme will add more than 10MB to mutt requirements. As for the compressed folders patch, is there a more specific reason why it's not included upstream yet? I'd rather not include any non-trivial patches that will need to be maintained forever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:08:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291808.l9TI8xID023234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 14:08 EST ------- The Source0 is still non existing... Also (not blockers) I think that there should be comments explaining: * the fact that optflags are not used (and the consequences on debug) * the trick that allows to build on x86_64 32 bit only * the weird placement of everything in /usr/lib/mknbi License would be better as GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:13:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352741] Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291813.l9TIDJHl030970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-29 14:13 EST ------- Hi Sergio, when you make a checkout from upstream's revision control system you need to follow these guidelines so that other people can duplicate your checkout: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#RevisionControl You can make those changes once you've imported the source but please do so before you build the package. Thanks! cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:16:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351761] Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291816.l9TIGeu6024911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-ISBN - Perl module to work with International Standard Book Numbers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351761 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-10-29 14:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291822.l9TIMCO0026056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2007-10-29 14:22 EST ------- > I found the related discussion here: > http://www.nabble.com/Problems-using-rfc822-and-rfc2045-libraries-tf3292776.html#a9158612 This discussion revolves around building it all static, which is not a favoured Fedora model. :/ >From the surface it looks like the bug is in not installing libunicode when asking for shared libs, do you agree? I'll try to get upstream's POV on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:33:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291833.l9TIX34o002026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2007-10-29 14:33 EST ------- Package needs: BuildRequires: flex BuildRequires: gcc-c++ And even after that: /bin/sh ../../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -fshort-wchar -DFLAIMWRAPPER_EXPORTS -DUNIX -D_REENTRANT -c -g -O2 "-lpthread -lrt -lstdc++ -ldl -lncurses /usr/lib/libflaim.a" -o libFlaimWrapper.la -rpath /usr/lib libFlaimWrapper_la-CSPObjectIterator.lo libFlaimWrapper_la-CSPropertyIterator.lo libFlaimWrapper_la-CSPStore.lo libFlaimWrapper_la-CSPStoreObject.lo libFlaimWrapper_la-FlaimWrapper.lo *** Warning: Linking the shared library libFlaimWrapper.la against the *** static library /usr/lib/libflaim.a is not portable! g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtbeginS.o .libs/libFlaimWrapper_la-CSPObjectIterator.o .libs/libFlaimWrapper_la-CSPropertyIterator.o .libs/libFlaimWrapper_la-CSPStore.o .libs/libFlaimWrapper_la-CSPStoreObject.o .libs/libFlaimWrapper_la-FlaimWrapper.o -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lncurses /usr/lib/libflaim.a -L/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../.. -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtendS.o /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../crtn.o -Wl,-soname -Wl,libFlaimWrapper.so.0 -o .libs/libFlaimWrapper.so.0.0.0 g++: /usr/lib/libflaim.a: No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291848.l9TImNPO004207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 14:48 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi-1.4.4-9.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Oct 29 2007 Warren Togami 1.4.4-9 - Fix Source0 - GPLv2+ - add some comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:50:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349191] Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291850.l9TIoQR0031028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349191 Bug 349191 depends on bug 346121, which changed state. Bug 346121 Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:50:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291850.l9TIoOMw030975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-29 14:50 EST ------- The package was built successfully. Mamoru Tasaka, thank you for your review and help. I'm closing this bug now as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 18:50:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 350781] Review Request: libvoikko - A library for spellcheckers and hyphenators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291850.l9TIoP0A031000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvoikko - A library for spellcheckers and hyphenators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350781 Bug 350781 depends on bug 346121, which changed state. Bug 346121 Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 19:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291907.l9TJ70hm002186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-29 15:07 EST ------- obexfs-0.11-0.1.rc2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 19:08:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328411] Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291908.l9TJ81En008096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328411 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-10-29 15:08 EST ------- archimedes-0.7.0-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 19:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328411] Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291908.l9TJ82ev008125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: archimedes - 2D Quantum Monte Carlo simulator for semiconductor devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328411 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.7.0-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 19:07:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291907.l9TJ71PM007961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.11-0.1.rc2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 19:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291920.l9TJK51e004651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-29 15:20 EST ------- p.s. Chris, thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 19:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291919.l9TJJe2t010014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-10-29 15:19 EST ------- Imported and Build, closing. p.s. I'll ask rel-eng to tag this for F-8 inclusion so that we don't have to have this in rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 19:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710291951.l9TJp00f015131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2007-10-29 15:50 EST ------- The build failure was caused by new version of Berkeley DB4 used in F8, the original dbxml package from Oracle relies on db4 version 4.3, 4.4 or 4.5. I created few patches that should make dbxml work with F8 and the new db4 API, removed that silent make build thing and merged 4 new upstream patches from Oracle. * New version: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml/ * dist-fc7-updates-candidate build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=219013 * dist-f8-updates-candidate build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=219018 * dist-f9 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=219019 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 21:07:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292107.l9TL7FAN026710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 17:07 EST ------- * doesn't really follow packaging guidelines, but it is a very special package, it is intended to create boot images, 32 bit only. No debug flags, no optflags. * source match upstream 5ddafef0a582cfb2b3cd30951662e6e2 mknbi-1.4.4.tar.gz * free software license included. Some files lack a license * follow naming guidelines Still needswork: There are perl provides that should be filtered out Provides: perl(Elf) perl(Nbi) perl(TruncFD) The source timestamp isn't kept. You can use wget -N or spectool -g. -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 212454 ao? 18 2004 mknbi-1.4.4.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 212454 oct 15 04:11 ../SOURCES/mknbi-1.4.4.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 21:59:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292159.l9TLx0fS001713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 17:58 EST ------- Alternatively, just approve it with the condition that you be allowed to add more cleanups before the first tag & build. That would save a lot of time as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 21:58:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292158.l9TLwO4f001664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 17:58 EST ------- http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mknbi-1.4.4-10.fc8.src.rpm Satisfactory? In the future, instead of going through a cycle of extremely minor cleanups at the end like this, could you please provide patches? It would save a lot of time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 22:16:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292216.l9TMG7kW032333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 18:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=242471) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=242471&action=view) filter out internal modules perl requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 22:15:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292215.l9TMFLYd032271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 18:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Alternatively, just approve it with the condition that you be allowed to add > more cleanups before the first tag & build. That would save a lot of time as well. > I try to say everything at once (except when there are issues one the design of the package), but in this case I discovered issues at the time I pointed them, I just missed them before. As for patches, sure I can always do some, just ask. I have one for filtering out internal modules perl requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 22:19:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292219.l9TMJjOF000397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-29 18:19 EST ------- With this patch (or something similar) applied, I also have * %files section is right. Although some files are not at the best place (internal noarch perl modules should be below %_datadir, mknbi should be in %_bindir or %_libexecdir) moving thing around requires some work and derive from upstream. APPROVED... unless I find something else ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 22:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 357461] New: Review Request: ctl - The Color Transformation Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357461 Summary: Review Request: ctl - The Color Transformation Language Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ctl/ctl.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ctl/ctl-1.4.1-1.fc7.kwizart.src.rpm Description: The Color Transformation Language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 23:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355171] Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292300.l9TN0OlW005710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-which - small GNU-which replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355171 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 23:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292303.l9TN3Kwn005864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-10-29 19:03 EST ------- Ok, I think I understand the %files issue. I was grabbing the entire directory x86_64 (or i386), and my package shouldn't own that. I just misread your comment last time. Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/ruby-ldap.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/ruby-ldap-0.9.7-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 23:07:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292307.l9TN7Le7006552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-10-29 19:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/cdpr.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/cdpr-2.2.1-2.src.rpm Changes made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 23:07:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352741] Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292307.l9TN7Jl4006499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-29 19:07 EST ------- I have done as you say, thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 29 23:07:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 352761] Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710292307.l9TN7KKe006520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ds9 - Astronomical Data Visualization Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352761 Bug 352761 depends on bug 352741, which changed state. Bug 352741 Summary: Review Request: tkimg - More Image Formats for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352741 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 00:18:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300018.l9U0I7Yh019073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 20:18 EST ------- Huh? Didn't I already add something like that? I don't see a second patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 00:47:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300047.l9U0lbNn019800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-29 20:47 EST ------- Here's an interesting problem: mknbi's purpose is to build network bootable BOOTP images out of kernel and initrd files. This is only usable to boot i386 clients. ltsp-server Requires mknbi mknbi only builds on i386 and x86_64. But (if it were built and installed) could mknbi's perl scripts actually work on a ppc host to connect the i386 binaries together? Perhaps this isn't worth it, and instead we should exclude the Requires mknbi dep on all but i386 and x86_64 archs. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 00:48:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300048.l9U0m970023189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 03:02:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300302.l9U32Ei2021763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-29 23:02 EST ------- SRPM not working -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 03:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300310.l9U3AXuZ013112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora dakingun at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-10-29 23:10 EST ------- Package Rename CVS Request ======================= Old name: gnomescan New name: gnome-scan Short Description: Gnome solution for scanning in the desktop on top of libsane Owners: deji Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 03:40:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300340.l9U3ewjk017432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-29 23:40 EST ------- also, I saw this package does not honor compiler flags. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448 Use build section as make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} Remember to drop INSTALL from %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 06:33:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300633.l9U6XMVw006311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-30 02:33 EST ------- This addition to the ltsp-dhcpd.conf template allows it to PXE boot a qemu guest, which reports "Etherboot-5.4" as its vendor-class-identifier. --- ltsp-dhcpd.conf.orig 2007-10-30 02:29:16.000000000 -0400 +++ ltsp-dhcpd.conf 2007-10-30 02:31:07.000000000 -0400 @@ -43,6 +43,13 @@ # NOTE: kernels are specified in /tftpboot/ltsp5/pxe/pxelinux.cfg/ filename "/ltsp5/pxe/pxelinux.0"; } + # Etherboot PXE + # NOTE: Oct 30th 2007: Not well tested, works with qemu kvm-36 + elsif substring (option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 9) = "Etherboot" + { + # NOTE: kernels are specified in /tftpboot/ltsp5/pxe/pxelinux.cfg/ + filename "/ltsp5/pxe/pxelinux.0"; + } # default to an i386 BOOTP image else { -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 07:04:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166555] Review Request: orange - Squeeze out installable Microsoft cabinet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300704.l9U74Dqu010374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: orange - Squeeze out installable Microsoft cabinet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166555 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 166555 depends on bug 166554, which changed state. Bug 166554 Summary: Review Request: unshield - Install InstallShield applications on a Pocket PC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166554 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 07:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 166554] Review Request: unshield - Install InstallShield applications on a Pocket PC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300704.l9U74CIC010346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unshield - Install InstallShield applications on a Pocket PC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166554 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-10-30 03:04 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: unshield New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 07:26:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 357661] New: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird-0.7-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: Mozilla Sunbird? is a cross-platform calendar application, built upon Mozilla Toolkit. Our goal is to bring Mozilla-style ease-of-use to your calendar, without tying you to a particular storage solution. This package also builds the Thunderbird Lightning extension, and the WCAP addition to this extension. Packaging extensions for Mozilla products is known to be pretty tricky, so I based my work on the awsome job done by the mugshot packager : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-April/msg00859.html I've tested many combinations, it seems to work fine. The script I'm using is very heavily commented, and could be re-used in other extension packages if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 07:27:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300727.l9U7RuPp024983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lightsolphoenix at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-30 03:27 EST ------- *** Bug 249234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 07:27:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300727.l9U7RuGM024958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-10-30 03:27 EST ------- Since I'm taking over this submission, I've opened another bug: bug 357661 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357661 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 08:14:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225290] Merge Review: attr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300814.l9U8E1ia020755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: attr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225290 zprikryl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From zprikryl at redhat.com 2007-10-30 04:14 EST ------- Fixed in attr-2.4.38-2.fc9. Zdenek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 08:23:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300823.l9U8Nfia001255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-30 04:23 EST ------- *** Bug 305601 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 08:23:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305601] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300823.l9U8Nfa0001215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305601 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-30 04:23 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 306951 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 08:24:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307171] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300824.l9U8O3FL022640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307171 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-30 04:24 EST ------- *** Bug 305591 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 08:24:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305591] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300824.l9U8O2Gg022603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-10-30 04:24 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 307171 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 08:24:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305601] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300824.l9U8O4K9022682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305601 Bug 305601 depends on bug 305591, which changed state. Bug 305591 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 09:19:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337791] Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300919.l9U9JPI9031873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-30 05:19 EST ------- All builds successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 09:19:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 337801] Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300919.l9U9JR9g031922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-pake - PHP5 project builder system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337801 Bug 337801 depends on bug 337791, which changed state. Bug 337791 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 09:19:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351441] Review Request: php-pear-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710300919.l9U9JQut031898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351441 Bug 351441 depends on bug 337791, which changed state. Bug 337791 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-symfony - Adds symfony project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337791 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 10:24:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349621] Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301024.l9UAOkP3019541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-manager - A wrapper script to start compiz with proper options https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349621 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-10-30 06:24 EST ------- Imported and built for f8 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 10:46:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277921] Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301046.l9UAkrYv012037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277921 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-10-30 06:46 EST ------- Sorry about that, I was waiting to see if there was any progress on the jgoodies-looks package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 12:05:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301205.l9UC56Db022230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-10-30 08:05 EST ------- I've found the bug, the wrong channel.xml file was included within php-channel-phing so pear couldn't recognize the channel. Updates for F-7 and F-8 are already being pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 12:26:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301226.l9UCQ6Zq025320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-10-30 08:26 EST ------- Thanks for your work. I agree with the idea that the EPEL branch could be created before the review is done, but I'd like to know what are the reasons not to give review flag to this package. Man pages added to gsl-1.10-7.fc9, -r option is removed there too. Is there any other problem or is this package OK now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 14:02:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301402.l9UE2ZUC007353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-10-30 10:02 EST ------- Sorry about srpm url. Fixed flags and doc. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/cdpr-2.2.1-2.fc7.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/cdpr.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 14:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301441.l9UEf1Sp024761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-30 10:41 EST ------- By the way: If you don't have ppc machine (I don't have ppc), you can try scratch build on koji: $ koji build --scratch Currently can be: dist-f9, dist-f8-updates-candidate, or dist-fc7-updates-candidate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 14:42:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301442.l9UEgGXg024936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-30 10:42 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------- This package (ruby-ldap) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 15:11:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301511.l9UFBhXw019744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-30 11:11 EST ------- Well, I tried to check your srpm, however after a quick glance I found that this package uses xqilla library (I don't know at all), which has another URL and the latest seem 1.1.0. So please - split xqilla from this package and submit a new review request for xqilla - and make dbxml depend on external xqilla package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 15:28:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301528.l9UFS6Vx023242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-30 11:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > From the surface it looks like the bug is in not installing libunicode when > asking for shared libs, do you agree? I'll try to get upstream's POV on that. Yes, this is one of the problem. When libunicode is installed properly as a shared library, linkage must be fixed according to that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 16:38:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222043] Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301638.l9UGcwQq004147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-30 12:38 EST ------- I have created the new gnome-scan package. Please follow the end of life procedure for the gnomescan package: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife Also, make sure the new package has the right Obsoletes/Provides: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 16:55:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301655.l9UGt4Nd007140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-10-30 12:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Binaries named /usr/bin/rekey and /usr/bin/xml2man seem destined to conflict > > with something. /usr/bin/xml2man is present on macos and some Linux distros but > > doesn't actually seem to be in Fedora. /usr/bin/rekey amazingly doesn't > > conflict with anything. Still, both names are awfully generic for binaries that > > are specific to this package. Is there any reasonable chance of getting them > > renamed with a prefix like "kaya-"? I have talk with the upstream author. xml2man should be renamed into kdoc2man and rekey into kayarekey. Because there is a new upstream relase, here the current package downloads: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.2.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 17:08:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301708.l9UH8Our009293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-10-30 13:08 EST ------- There is conflict in dlg_config.h for DLG__FILE_OFFSET_BITS (bug #341001). Can this #define be safely dropped or is it better to replace the file with a wrapper that will include dlg_config-{32,64}.h? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 17:30:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301730.l9UHUCY4013278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-10-30 13:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-ldap Short Description: Ruby LDAP libraries Owners: stahnma Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 17:30:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301730.l9UHUm8U023707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-10-30 13:30 EST ------- And then I realized I forgot branches... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-ldap Short Description: Ruby LDAP libraries Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4, EL5, F7, F8, dev InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 17:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277931] Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301737.l9UHb3BT014353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277931 ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-10-30 13:37 EST ------- Still no word from upstream, but I've modified the package to remove this file. NB: I haven't tested this extensively yet. http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-looks.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-looks-2.1.4-3.f7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 17:43:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301743.l9UHhBWM015252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2007-10-30 13:43 EST ------- Oh well, the whole compilation of dbxml is kinda icky. dbxml is basically a c++ library that depends on following libraries: * berkeley db4 (already in Fedora) * xerces-c (already in Fedora) * xqilla (we don't have it in Fedora) You also need specific version of xerces-c (2.7) and xqilla (1.0.1) for this version of dbxml to work properly (according to Oracle, different versions of these libraries may work, but it's not officially supported). dbxml source tarbal shipped by Oracle contains sources for all these libraries. Officially supported build procedure builds all of these libraries, creates its own directory structure and makes the libraries point to each other via rpath (this way dbxml uses its own libdb4, libxerces-c and libxqilla, which do not conflict with the versions you already may have in the system). The build procedure you can see in the spec file I provided basically removes things not compliant with fedora packaging guidelines (rpath, libtool archives, file hierarchy standard, etc.) and more importantly it relies on libdb4 and libxerces-c that's currently present in the system. We don't have XQilla in Fedora yet and we could certainly take the latest upstream version of XQilla and package it separately, but that would not help because: 1) The dbxml library relies on that particular version of xqilla. Oracle currently works on new version of dbxml that should use xqilla ver. 1.1.0, but that still a long shot. 2) To compile xqilla from sources, you need sources of xerces-c (not just the compiled libraries, you need sources of xerces-c too). That means that any source rpm for xqilla would have to contain sources of xerces-c too. I'd say the questions we need to answer here are: - is it acceptable for xqilla to be built from dbxml source rpm? - is it acceptable for xqilla source rpm to contain sources of xerces-c and use them during the build? If the answer to either of these two questions is no, I suggest this bz needs to be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 18:10:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710301810.l9UIAtpg030543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-10-30 14:10 EST ------- Huh. I guess I missed that this was approved several days ago. Let's do a CVS request, shall we? Oh, and thanks again for the review(s), Parag! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-packagekit Short Description: GNOME applications for PackageKit Owners: rnorwood Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 20:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313361] Review Request: python-zsi - Libraries for developing web services in python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302003.l9UK3bgx020372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zsi - Libraries for developing web services in python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313361 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2007-10-30 16:03 EST ------- Ping? It'd be nice to package it quick because it's recomended (not needed though) by sonata to fetch lyrics. I could package it if there weren't be any answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 20:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304391] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302016.l9UKGbg2011544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304391 downhillgames at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From downhillgames at gmail.com 2007-10-30 16:16 EST ------- I asked about packaging in #fedora-devel. If anybody else wants to package this, be my guest. I won't comment on why I won't package things. cya, B. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 20:34:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302034.l9UKYHaH014744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-30 16:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Huh? Didn't I already add something like that? > > I don't see a second patch. In comment #26, I propose a patch to filter out the Requires that are provided by the package itself, but are filtered out since they are not available as modules for real. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 20:40:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302040.l9UKeicV016218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-30 16:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > There is conflict in dlg_config.h for DLG__FILE_OFFSET_BITS (bug #341001). Can > this #define be safely dropped or is it better to replace the file with a > wrapper that will include dlg_config-{32,64}.h? Seems that my prediction turned out to be right. Really this should be understood as a problem and worked out with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 20:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302045.l9UKjwiV017162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-30 16:45 EST ------- There is now an issue in the %files section that leads to: gsl.i386: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 gsl.i386: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man3 Moreover the man3 man pages are in general in the devel packages. I suggest, something along, in the main package: %{_mandir}/man1/*.1* And in the devel package %{_mandir}/man3/*.3* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 21:01:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302101.l9UL17dw019566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-30 17:01 EST ------- We just released libvpd-1.4.0 which includes a C API for accessing the VPD db. There were no code changes to the C++ library. Here are the new files: SPEC: http://superb-east.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM: http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd-1.4.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 21:17:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302117.l9ULH8lO021912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-30 17:17 EST ------- Prior to you posting that patch, I already added something similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 21:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302122.l9ULMRAl001112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2007-10-30 17:22 EST ------- I updated spec and srpm to actually build in koji (they are at the same url). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 21:27:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:27:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302127.l9ULRLVb001844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-30 17:27 EST ------- Ok, it seemed to me that you only removed the autogenerated Provides. Then the corresponding autogenerated requires were still there and no package satisfied them. I know that am not clear, but one way to understand the issue is to try to install the package and if the package has the problem it won't install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 21:57:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331631] Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302157.l9ULvsk2006257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mknbi - Utility for creating network bootable images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331631 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-30 17:57 EST ------- Ah, nice catch. Thank you for your attention to detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 22:15:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302215.l9UMFrwW030786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-30 18:15 EST ------- This fixes the path given to nash's mount so that it actually works. --- ltsp.conf.orig 2007-10-30 18:14:22.000000000 -0400 +++ ltsp.conf 2007-10-30 18:14:37.000000000 -0400 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ LTSP_KICKSTART=/etc/ltsp5/ltsp-build-client-ks.cfg # where to fetch ltsp kernels & where to install them -LTSP_NFSROOT=$LTSP_DEFAULTIP/$LTSP_ROOTPATH +LTSP_NFSROOT=$LTSP_DEFAULTIP:$LTSP_ROOTPATH LTSP_BOOTDIR=/tftpboot/$LTSP_VERSION LTSP_PXEDIR=$LTSP_BOOTDIR/pxe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 22:18:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302218.l9UMIOET009032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-30 18:18 EST ------- Regarding mknbi, I talked briefly with dwmw2 today regarding PPC cross-compiling. Currently we don't ship any gcc cross-compile capable packages. This combined with the fact that you cannot directly install a i386 chroot on ppc, we shouldn't worry about mknbi for now. Please use this for the mknbi dependency. %ifarch i386 x86_64 Requires: mknbi %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 22:53:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302253.l9UMrmmG003840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-30 18:53 EST ------- - Refuse to install the chroot with anaconda if selinux is enforcing. - Remove rpmdb locks after anaconda is done installing. --- ltsp-build-client.orig 2007-10-30 18:37:45.000000000 -0400 +++ ltsp-build-client 2007-10-30 18:52:46.000000000 -0400 @@ -32,6 +32,15 @@ esac done +# Anaconda chroot install will fail if selinux is enforcing +# we need to port the workaround from mock... +if [ -a /usr/sbin/getenforce ]; then + if [ `/usr/sbin/getenforce` == "Enforcing" ]; then + echo "ERROR: Cannot anaconda install chroot while SELinux is enforcing." + echo "Please use 'setenforce 0'" + echo "Do not forget to enable it after anaconda is done." + fi +fi if [ "$LTSP_ROOTPATH" ]; then mkdir -p $LTSP_ROOTPATH || echo "ERROR: could not create directory $LTSP_ROOTPATH"; @@ -43,3 +52,5 @@ --rootpath $LTSP_ROOTPATH --kickstart=$LTSP_KICKSTART fi +# remove locks: i386 chroot install on x86_64 would have incompatible locks +rm -f $LTSP_ROOTPATH/var/lib/rpm/__db* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 23:12:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 333471] Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302312.l9UNCQhh016676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-packagekit - gnome applications for PackageKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333471 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-30 19:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 23:15:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346241] Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302315.l9UNFocV017257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-ldap - Ruby LDAP libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346241 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-30 19:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 23:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302343.l9UNhaWf020947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-30 19:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=243871) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=243871&action=view) minor fixes for ltsp-initialize -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 23:44:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302344.l9UNijJX021143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-30 19:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=243881) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=243881&action=view) very minor patch for 02-ltsp-dhcpd-create -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 30 23:48:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710302348.l9UNmqwE011631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-30 19:48 EST ------- in 06-xdm-config-update it should certainly be /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config instead of /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess The occurence of /etc/ltsp-dhcpd.conf in 02-ltsp-dhcpd-create should certainly be changed to /etc/ltsp5/ltsp-dhcpd.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 00:19:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310019.l9V0JUVr016001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-30 20:19 EST ------- Hi Patrice, I'm setting up a bzr repo to act as "upstream" for this. That might be a better way for us to collaboratively add fixes. Already added you to the group with access to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 00:35:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 354101] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310035.l9V0ZcgF018758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-kconfig - kconfig backend for compizconfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354101 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 01:25:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310125.l9V1PwmA003606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2007-10-30 21:25 EST ------- :) Imported and built! Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 02:27:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310227.l9V2R7gM002845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From bernie at codewiz.org 2007-10-30 22:27 EST ------- Ping? I'm going to approve this review tomorrow if nobody complains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 03:23:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310323.l9V3NG4P021863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-30 23:23 EST ------- Also add this check before anaconda runs in ltsp-build-client: # python-ruledispatch conflicts with anaconda Bug #331091 if [ -d /usr/lib*/python*/site-packages/dispatch/ ]; then echo "ERROR: python-ruledispatch conflicts with anaconda. Please remove it" echo "temporarily before running this script. See Bug #331091." exit 1 fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 03:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310327.l9V3RkNe013389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-10-30 23:27 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 1e682e7e9c03f9b004c1f97c0ed25431 cdpr-2.2.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 03:44:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310344.l9V3iFci015391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-10-30 23:44 EST ------- Something seems fishy with the CVS setup: (1) there is no common directory in ruby-rpm/ (2) each of the branch directories (devel/, F-7/, F-8/) has a common dir (3) any make operation ('make new-sources FILES=ruby-rpm.tgz' and even 'make help') just prints rpmq: no arguments given for query rpmq: no arguments given for query and then hangs on a 'grep -i ^BuildArch:.*noarch' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 04:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310446.l9V4k7Qv000324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 04:45:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310445.l9V4jsXG032660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2007-10-31 00:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cdpr Short Description: Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer Owners: stahnma Branches: EL-4, EL-5, F-7, F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 05:03:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310503.l9V53Tu7002279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-31 01:03 EST ------- Odd. The checkout looks normal here... Without ruby installed I get a spew of: sh: ruby: command not found but then the 'make help' or 'make srpm' works fine. Perhaps a clean checkout would help? Feel free to hop over to #fedora-admin for more realtime debugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 08:45:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710310845.l9V8j4Pp001707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From tom at compton.nu 2007-10-31 04:45 EST ------- The current mapnik code also contains a copy of the agg library and it looks like the RPM is currently building that as a static library and linking it into libmapnik.so rather than linking against the system libagg.so from the agg package. The mapnik headers also need the agg headers, so any mapnik-devel package will need to require the agg-devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 11:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359921] New: Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359921 Summary: Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-cck/drupal-cck.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-cck/drupal-cck-1.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Content Construction Kit allows you create and customize fields using a web browser. The 4.7x version of CCK creates custom content types and allows you to add custom fields to them. In Drupal 5.x custom content types can be created in core, and CCK allows you to add custom fields to any content type. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 11:13:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359941] New: Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Summary: Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar-1.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats, including CCK date fields, Event module event fields, node created or updated dates, etc. Switch between year, month, and day views. Back and next navigation is provided for all views. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 11:13:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] New: Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 Summary: Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-date/drupal-date.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-date/drupal-date-1.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Date API is available to be used by other modules and is not dependent on having CCK installed. The date module is a flexible date/time field type for the cck content module which requires the CCK content.module and the Date API module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 11:14:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359961] New: Review Request: drupal-service_links - Enables admins to add links to a number of sites Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359961 Summary: Review Request: drupal-service_links - Enables admins to add links to a number of sites Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-service_links/drupal-service_links.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-service_links/drupal-service_links-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The service links module enables admins to add links to a number of social bookmarking sites, blog search sites etc. Includes sites are del.icio.us, Digg, Reddit, ma.gnolia.com, Newsvine, Furl, Google, Yahoo, Technorati and IceRocket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 11:13:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] New: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views-1.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The views module provides a flexible method for Drupal site designers to control how lists of content (nodes) are presented. Traditionally, Drupal has hard-coded most of this, particularly in how taxonomy and tracker lists are formatted. This tool is essentially a smart query builder that, given enough information, can build the proper query, execute it, and display the results. It has four modes, plus a special mode, and provides an impressive amount of functionality from these modes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 12:51:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311251.l9VCpMWc006924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-10-31 08:51 EST ------- An updated SPEC file (builds from SVN) with the following fixes: - Fix fontpath from Comment #30 - Use system libagg rather than private version, Comment #31 - Split into mapnik/mapnik-devel/mapnik-python as per Comments #18 and #25 I still need to work out what to do about the soname issue and get upstream to do a release rather than rely on SVN. SPEC: http://www.passback.org.uk/svn/fedora/rpms/SPECS/mapnik-svn.spec SRPM: http://www.passback.org.uk/packages/fedora/SRPMS/mapnik-0.4.0-1.20071031.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 13:48:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311348.l9VDmqWD017646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 13:49:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311349.l9VDnpvc016684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-31 09:49 EST ------- Is there any point of having this in F-7 or newer? It doesn't seem useful if there's no juju support. FC-6 is going away soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 13:51:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249831] Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311351.l9VDp7O5017228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249831 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rpm at greysector.net| |) | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-10-31 09:51 EST ------- I'm planning to rewrite the specfile to build both MPI and regular versions are outlined in GROMACS packaging tips. Please be patient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 13:58:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311358.l9VDw2ai018281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2007-10-31 09:58 EST ------- Is there work going on to add juju support? Since we rely on this library for almost all of our cameras on our robots it would be really unfortunate if that went away, as this would mean that we have to stick to FC6 for quite a while :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 14:11:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311411.l9VEBM1O020881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-31 10:11 EST ------- No support added yet... it would work for FC-6 but F-7 and later will need libdc1394-2... For now upstream projects that use it are not ready to use -2 but if we can, maybe some patching could be done (i'm not enought aware to do this...) If we want to live in a compat-world with ieee1394, i've made an external kmod (1) with the old ieee1394, but this will requires "also" compat userland and it seems from http://wiki.linux1394.org/JujuMigration that compat libraw1394 isn't ready (need to be rebuilt at least the old libraw1394 ) (1) it is missing some blacklist script and eth1394 have to be removed as it do not work... But see here http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/ieee1394/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 14:46:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311446.l9VEkuMU028307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2007-10-31 10:46 EST ------- Sorry, I missed that this is libdc1394-1. We are using version 2. Works like a charm. Is that compatible with juju already? So with this made clear I have no problem with removing this version. Maybe someone else still needs this though? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 14:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311452.l9VEqDuH028448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-10-31 10:52 EST ------- libdc1394-2 is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239043 (juju compatible)... But indeed some apps still need it but it cannot be used with juju for now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 15:14:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 340011] Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311514.l9VFE36B032424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyrenamer - A mass file renamer written in PyGTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=340011 ------- Additional Comments From lokthare at gmail.com 2007-10-31 11:14 EST ------- That works. It is my webhoster... sometimes files are not available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 15:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311533.l9VFXWOQ003643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-31 11:33 EST ------- /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules gets created by anaconda during chroot installation, containing the host's interfaces. This causes an ugly error message during thin client bootup. It should be deleted after anaconda is done. This this be done in ltsp-build-client (ltsp-server) or in the script in ltsp-client? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 15:43:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311543.l9VFhXho006756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From eharrison at mesd.k12.or.us 2007-10-31 11:43 EST ------- (in reference to comment #58) ltsp-client-configure (in ltsp-client) is where the current client-side changes are being made. It would make sense to place this there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 15:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 317581] Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311544.l9VFiwPi005862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rpm - Ruby bindings for RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317581 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-10-31 11:44 EST ------- Sorry about that .. problem was on my end (I hadn't put the specfile in place yet) and submitted the above comment by mistake -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 16:10:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311610.l9VGA3m1010329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-31 12:10 EST ------- Well, (In reply to comment #5) > I'd say the questions we need to answer here are: > - is it acceptable for xqilla to be built from dbxml source rpm? This is usually unacceptable - It is always recommended that building libraries from tarballs provided from direct upstream, not from tarballs provided from other projects, because it makes maintainance procedure more visible - For this package this is more problematic because someone wants to package lastest xquilla and import it to Fedora, which will make conflict with your package. So you should rename xquilla 1.0.1 to xquilla101, for example (like libpng10), rename library name to avoid conflict from xquilla 1.1.0 and submit a seperate review request for xquilla 1.0.1. > - is it acceptable for xqilla source rpm to contain sources of xerces-c and use > them during the build? This is acceptable (IMO). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 16:13:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277931] Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311613.l9VGDZ4v011443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277931 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-31 12:13 EST ------- Well, actually I don't know how to use this package, so would you verify if your srpm works well for your purpose? For this package I cannot check issues other than packaging issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 16:50:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355631] Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311650.l9VGoTCR017631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdpr - Cisco Discovery Protocol Analyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355631 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-10-31 12:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 16:57:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245492] Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311657.l9VGvnDn018558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus-glib - glib mainloop integration for ndesk-dbus Alias: ndesk-dbus-glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245492 Bug 245492 depends on bug 245491, which changed state. Bug 245491 Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 16:57:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245491] Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311657.l9VGvmWw018526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ndesk-dbus - Managed DBus implementation Alias: ndesk-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245491 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ndesk-dbus-0.5.2-12.fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-10-31 12:57 EST ------- Okay, this is successfully built for F9, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 16:58:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 336911] Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311658.l9VGwLfN017734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336911 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-31 12:58 EST ------- This package needs a ton of work. - lbe isn't used at all anymore. - lbuss and lbuscd aren't used anymore. ltsp-client-configure needs to handle: - /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules gets created by anaconda during chroot installation, containing the host's interfaces. This causes an ugly error message during thin client bootup. It should be deleted after anaconda is done. This this be done in ltsp-build-client (ltsp-server) or in the script in ltsp-client? - Remove rpmdb locks +# remove locks: i386 chroot install on x86_64 would have incompatible locks +rm -f $LTSP_ROOTPATH/var/lib/rpm/__db* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 16:59:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311659.l9VGxvxZ018751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-31 12:59 EST ------- * Well, now it builds in ppc (thnks for the tip) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=220167 * The license (COPYRIGHT) and the explanation (README.COPYRIGHT) are now included. The url in Source0 is also included * I have added a desktop file for xgterm Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/x11iraf.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/x11iraf-1.5-0.4.DEV.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 17:02:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311702.l9VH2eEM018453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2007-10-31 13:02 EST ------- Upss, the source rpm is http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/x11iraf-1.5-0.5.DEV.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 17:47:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311747.l9VHlvJk026670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ibmasm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193059 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-10-31 13:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibmasm Short Description: This package contains the tools necessary to control the IBM Advanced System Management Drivers Owners: konradr Branches: F9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 17:58:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349191] Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311758.l9VHwn31028432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349191 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-31 13:58 EST ------- This is just a initial comment: - malaga requires libmalaga, so "(Build)Requires: libmalaga" is actally not needed. - For %files entry ------------------------------------------------------------ %files %{_libdir}/voikko %{_libdir}/voikko/voikko-fi_FI*_l %{_libdir}/voikko/voikko-fi_FI.pro ------------------------------------------------------------- The entry "%_libdir/voikko" (which is a directory) means the directory %_libdir/voikko itself and all files/directories/etc under this directory, so the following two entries are not needed. - Rebuild fails on ppc and ppc64. For ppc: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=222539 For ppc64: ttp://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=222476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 18:46:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343741] Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311846.l9VIkIlT003937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-base - Base Sugar library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343741 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-10-31 14:46 EST ------- you dont need BuildRequires: pkgconfig any devel package that provides .pc files must Requires it some documentation would be nice. Its the only thing rpmlint complains about. builds in mock fix the BuildRequires and i will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 18:43:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311843.l9VIhoI4003326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-31 14:43 EST ------- Now I checked the whole source codes. This time I checked only license issue and have not checked any packaging issue yet. * License issue - The licenses of the following codes are very problematic and cannot be accepted for Fedora _IMO_. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ./obm-deep/ObmW/HTML.c ./obm-deep/ObmW/HTML.h ... and some other files under ./obm-deep/ObmW/ ... and similar files under ./obm/ObmW/ ./obm/ObmW/Table.c ./obm/ObmW/Table.h ... and some other files under ./obm/ObmW ---------------------------------------------------------------- - Other licenses - The following has zlib/libpng license: ---------------------------------------------------------------- ./obm-deep/Tcl/regexp.c ./obm/Tcl/regexp.c ---------------------------------------------------------------- - Many TCL related files are licensed under TCL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 18:58:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311858.l9VIwTR9004714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-31 14:58 EST ------- Please check the dependency for drupal related packages you submitted recently and add properly the bug members to "depends on" or "blocks" columns so that reviewers can find out which reviews must be checked first easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 19:15:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311915.l9VJFZBK007640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-10-31 15:15 EST ------- Setting FE-legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 19:36:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311936.l9VJaLr0011601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-10-31 15:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Now I checked the whole source codes. > This time I checked only license issue and have not checked > any packaging issue yet. > > * License issue > - The licenses of the following codes are very problematic > and cannot be accepted for Fedora _IMO_. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > ./obm-deep/ObmW/HTML.c > ./obm-deep/ObmW/HTML.h > ... and some other files under ./obm-deep/ObmW/ > ... and similar files under ./obm/ObmW/ > > ./obm/ObmW/Table.c > ./obm/ObmW/Table.h > ... and some other files under ./obm/ObmW Yes, these files are under a license with commercial use restrictions, accordingly, it is non-free and not permissable for Fedora. You should make an attempt to contact the copyright holder (looks like it is UIUC) and see if they will relicense that code. Sorry. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 19:51:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311951.l9VJp7Wu015058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |359921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 19:51:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359921] Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311951.l9VJp6Pa015033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359921 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |359931 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 19:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311952.l9VJq8K6014309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |359911, 359931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 19:52:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311952.l9VJq8Jv014333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |359941 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 19:52:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710311952.l9VJq9LX014357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |359941 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 20:34:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312034.l9VKYQ8b022407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-31 16:34 EST ------- For the ltsp root directory, consultation on fedora-devel and fedora-packaging list leads to /var/lib being prefered (so /var/lib/ltsp5). That's also what I prefer. Any opposition? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 20:42:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312042.l9VKg6pN022890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-10-31 16:42 EST ------- /var/lib/ltsp5 would contain what? We can bring this up during the LTSP hackfest this weekend. Upstream will need to accept any changes if we are to adopt them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 20:52:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312052.l9VKqP6b025369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 mszpak at wp.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-10-31 16:52 EST ------- Imported, built and submitted for testing. Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 20:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 349191] Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312058.l9VKwcDD025360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga-suomi-voikko - A description of Finnish morphology written in Malaga (Voikko edition) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349191 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2007-10-31 16:58 EST ------- New SPEC: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-suomi-voikko.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-suomi-voikko-0.7.6-0.2.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > - malaga requires libmalaga, so "(Build)Requires: libmalaga" is actally > not needed. Fixed. > The entry "%_libdir/voikko" (which is a directory) means the > directory %_libdir/voikko itself and all files/directories/etc > under this directory, so the following two entries are not needed. Fixed, this also fixes the ppc and ppc64 build failures, I tested the new SRPM myself in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 21:04:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312104.l9VL4nPN026627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-31 17:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #61) > /var/lib/ltsp5 would contain what? The client swap and the client roots. It corresponds with the LTSP_DIR variable in /etc/ltsp5/ltsp.conf > We can bring this up during the LTSP hackfest this weekend. Upstream will need > to accept any changes if we are to adopt them. >From my short exchange with Jim, he doesn't seem to care very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 22:18:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312218.l9VMIgbk005737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 ------- Additional Comments From andy.southgate at mushware.com 2007-10-31 18:18 EST ------- New .spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.mushware.com/files/adanaxisgpl-1.2.4-1.fc7.spec SRPM URL: http://www.mushware.com/files/adanaxisgpl-1.2.4-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 22:44:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312244.l9VMiC3B010454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2007-10-31 18:44 EST ------- Spec file needed updating for the right library names. SPEC: http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM: http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd-1.4.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 23:18:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312318.l9VNIZRK014182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-10-31 19:18 EST ------- Now that the init script for ltsp-dhcpd isn't started in the default case, and given that there is some code in dhcpd-update to modify the config file for the main change, the ip of the server, I think that the hack to copy the file from /usr/share/ltsp5/config/ltsp-dhcpd.conf should be removed, so ltsp-dhcpd.conf should directly be in /etc/ltsp5 and 02-ltsp-dhcpd-create should be removed. I can do these changes in bzr if agreed. Also should the corresponding changes to the spec file be done in bzr? I also have something similar than 06-xdm-config-update that I would like to do, but for wdm. What do you prefer, a separate file, or should I modify 06-xdm-config-update to be 06-xdm-wdm-config-update and arrange such that the configuration of wdm is also done here? (wdm needs exactly the same change than xdm, the only difference is the location of the config file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 23:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 361121] New: Review Request: wqy-zenhei-fonts - A Hei Ti style Chinese outline font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361121 Summary: Review Request: wqy-zenhei-fonts - A Hei Ti style Chinese outline font Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fangqq at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/zenhei/wqy-zenhei-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/zenhei/wqy-zenhei-fonts-0.2.16-0.srpm Description: The WenQuanYi Zen Hei is the first open-source Chinese font for Hei Ti, a sans-serif font style that are widely used for general purpose text formatting, and on-screen display of Chinese characters (such as on Windows Vista and Mac OS). Simple and elegant font outlines and slightly emboldened strokes makes the glyphs present higher contrast and therefore easy to read. The unique style of this font also provide a simple interface for adding grid-fitting information for further fine-tuning of the on-screen performance. WenQuanYi Zen Hei has over 20400 Hanzi glyphs covering 97% of the Unicode CJK Unified Ideographics. This font provides full coverage to the required code points for zh_cn, zh_sg, zh_tw, zh_hk and zh_mo locales. The total vector glyphs in this font is over 35000 including Latin characters, Japanese kanas, hanguls and symbols from many other languages. The only problem so far is that mkfontdir seems did not generate proper fonts.dir file, although the font can be used normally on the system (via fontconfig). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 31 23:33:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 361121] Review Request: wqy-zenhei-fonts - A Hei Ti style Chinese outline font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200710312333.l9VNXrpZ017275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-zenhei-fonts - A Hei Ti style Chinese outline font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361121 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-10-31 19:33 EST ------- one more thing, the third digit of the upstream version number represents the accummulative compilation number for the software to generate the font outlines (currently the 16th), I copied it to the %{version} field. if it seems to be odd from Fedora's tradition, I can set it to zero. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.