[Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904





------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com  2007-10-05 02:06 EST -------
Done.

http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fuse-python.spec
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fuse-python-0.2-4.fc7.src.rpm

I've got some things to discuss:

* I changed %files section according to the  Packaging/Python/Eggs from Jan's
variant when all files to package were explicitly named to more simplified form
%{python_sitearch}/* - which variant is preferrable? Personally I like Jan's
idea about explicit naming of all files but in the above example they use short
version: %{python_sitearch}/*

* What macro should be used? python_sitearch or python_sitelib? What are
differences between these macros and which is prefferable? 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.