[Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851





------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2007-10-09 10:30 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
 
> kaya.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1
>   The licensing page specifies "LGPLv2" even for 2.1.
> 
> The headers are OK, although it would probably be cleaner if they were grouped
> together in a subdirectory instead of strewn through /usr/lib/kaya.

Done,

> Binaries named /usr/bin/rekey and /usr/bin/xml2man seem destined to conflict
> with something.  /usr/bin/xml2man is present on macos and some Linux distros but
> doesn't actually seem to be in Fedora.  /usr/bin/rekey amazingly doesn't
> conflict with anything.  Still, both names are awfully generic for binaries that
> are specific to this package.  Is there any reasonable chance of getting them
> renamed with a prefix like "kaya-"?

I think, this is a design issue from the upstream and I don't try to make a
rename, because I afraid to confused poeple who try to use the tutorials.

Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.2.6-2.fc7.src.rpm



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.