[Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 11 08:50:03 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465





------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com  2007-10-11 04:50 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Preliminary Review:-
> 
> rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me
> -------------------------------------
> system-config-nfs.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-nfs

added version

> system-config-nfs.src: W: invalid-license GPL

checked and changed to GPLv2+

> system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/share/system-config-nfs/propertiesWindow.py
> system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/share/system-config-nfs/system-config-nfs.glade
> system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsServer.py
> system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsExports.py
> system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsServerSettings.py
> system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/share/system-config-nfs/mainWindow.py

made files be installed without executable bits set unless necessary

> system-config-nfs.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.3.27 1.3.27-1.fc8

added (non-dist-tagged) releases to changelog entries

> system-config-nfs.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL
> system-config-nfs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-nfs

idem

> system-config-nfs.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
> /etc/pam.d/system-config-nfs
> system-config-nfs.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag
> /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-nfs

aded %config(noreplace)

> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> also,
>   good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-)

changed

> Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package
> before actually committing in CVS.

Package is building right now (this is a merge review).


(In reply to comment #2)
> Using xdg-open would be better than htmlview:
> 
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00025.html
> http://scop.fedorapeople.org/patches/xdg-utils/system-config-nfs.patch

xdg-open and htmlview are tried in this order, changed requirements suitably for
Fedora >= 7.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list