[Bug 247406] Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 12 06:51:14 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libcompizconfig - configuration backend for compiz >= 0.5.1


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247406





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-10-12 02:51 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=225181)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=225181&action=view)
Patch for libX11.so linkage fix

For 0.6.0-1.5615ca

* Undefined non-weak symbols
  - Still these symbols exist.
-----------------------------------------------------
[root at localhost ~]# rpm -q libcompizconfig
libcompizconfig-0.6.0-1.5615ca.fc8
[root at localhost ~]# rpmlint libcompizconfig
libcompizconfig.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XStringToKeysym
libcompizconfig.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 XKeysymToString
[root at localhost ~]# ldd -r /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0 >/dev/null
undefined symbol: XStringToKeysym	(/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0)
undefined symbol: XKeysymToString	(/usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0.0.0)
-----------------------------------------------------
    Only installing libX11-devel will not solve this issue.
    You have to patch against Makefile.in so that libcompizconfig.so
    is linked against libX11.so.

* Source
  - The tarball in your srpm was not found on the URL written
    as source0.
  * Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL ,
    section "Using Revision Control"
  * Also, if this tarball is a "pre-release", please also check
    the section "Non-Numeric Version in Release" of
    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list