[Bug 231861] Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Oct 15 16:45:18 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cyrus-imapd - high-performance mail server (IMAP, POP3, ...)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231861


tjanouse at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-cvs+                 |fedora-cvs?




------- Additional Comments From tjanouse at redhat.com  2007-10-15 12:45 EST -------
Lubo, Thanks for your comments and sorry for the delay. Me not like reviews, you
know.

I did a few changes as you suggested:
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd.spec?root=extras&r1=1.32&r2=1.33

And I have a few comments:
Ad 2). I'd like to leave the HTML docs in the main package, but you may try to
convince me. I don't think we should delete the HTML manpages though, because
they are linked from the HTML docs.

Ad 3). As you pointed out, there are no shared libs in the package. libcyrus is
intended to be linked statically and that's what is in the -devel subpackage.

Ad 4). I fixed these and about 1 other, will maybe fix others later.


There has been a change in the License field since, re-review this, please.

And, the most important thing:
This package has a whole lot of files in /usr/lib/cyrus-imapd, regardless of the
architecture. This used to be a reason for marking it multiarch and warning
about multiarch collisions. It's been added to a list of exceptions since then.
But the question remains -- should I leave it that way, or should I make some
effort to move those to /usr/libexec (or something similar)?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list