[Bug 331571] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd - driver for AMD GPG r5xx/r6xx Chipsets


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331571





------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de  2007-10-15 14:43 EST -------
Ah, right.

So... we need a static date in the spec file, which must be consistent with the
time when the snapshot was baked into a tarball.

Is having the snapshot script update the "%define date" line of the spec file
after successful generation of a snapshot tarball considered bad style? :-)

It now is "sh foo-snapshot.sh --update-spec".

Also, the snapshot tarballs are now called something like
"xf86-video-radeonhd-0.0.1-20071015git.tar.bz2".

http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd.spec
http://radeonhd.lauft.net/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd/xorg-x11-drv-radeonhd-0.0.1-0.6.20071015git.fc8.src.rpm

The version is hardcoded at 0.0.1 now. Upstream has two build systems (automake
and imake/xmkmf), so they can't just set the version according to configure.ac.
Anyway, upstream cannot go much below 0.0.1 for too long, so we can use our
hardcoded 0.0.1 for the time being.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.