[Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 24 20:49:58 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121





------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi  2007-10-24 16:49 EST -------
Thank you for your feedback, I've fixed some of the issues you pointed out.

New spec: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga.spec
New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/malaga-7.11-0.2.fc7.src.rpm

(In reply to comment #1)
> - Requires between subpackages from one srpm must usually be
>   version-release specific.

Fixed.

> - debuginfo must not be empty.

NOT fixed. Upstream Makefile calls install -s, how do I remove it? Do I need to
make a patch for it, or rather Makefile.in? Sorry to use bugzilla as a
learning/discussion forum, but I couldn't get an answer from #fedora-devel either.

> - For -devel package, -devel package requires %{name} and
>   %{name} requires lib%{name}. So "Requires: lib%{name}" is not
>   needed for -devel package.

Fixed.

> - install-info must be called on %post.

Fixed.

> - Please don't write empty scriptlet entry (why is %postun line
>   needed?)

It wasn't, my error, I removed it.

> - Please check if "INSTALL.txt" is really needed.

It wasn't, so removed.


>   i.e. all documents should be moved to lib%{name} package.

Done.

> - The directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not owned by any package.

Fixed.

> - Please remove static archive.

If you mean %{_libdir}/libmalaga.a in -devel, if I remove that, rpmbuild
complains and won't build the packages. How do I go around it then?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list