[Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 25 10:12:58 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701
------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-10-25 06:12 EST -------
Sorry for the delay. BTW why you still not build qca2?
Formal review:
- rpmlint not silent - then checking SRPM-package it shouts:
[petro at host-12-109 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/qca-ossl-0.1-2.20070706.fc7.src.rpm
qca-ossl.src:35: E: configure-without-libdir-spec
qca-ossl.src:56: W: macro-in-%changelog date
The last warning should be easily omitted. But what about first one? Looks like
qt4-buildsustem handles all such things by itself but can you prove that on
x86_64 libqca-ossl.so placed in the right place?
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ specfile is properly named
+ package meets Packaging/Guidelines
+ package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing
Guidelines.
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file legible
+ sources match the upstream source:
908eaeed2c0f873bb7cf602814041559
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qca-ossl-0.1-20070706.tar.bz2
+ package builds file (x86)
+ all build dependencies listed in BuildRequires
+ package doesn't need to call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ package owns all created directories
+ package not contains any duplicate files in the %files listing.
+ permissions on files sets properly
+ package has a %clean section
+ package uses macros consistently
+ package contains code or permissable content
+ header files are in a -devel package
+ package contains no static libs
+ package does not contain any .la libtool archives
+ not a GUI app
+ all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8
Just FIY looking at the delta.affinix.com site I found that they released new
versions for qca2 and qca-ossl.
http://delta.affinix.com/download/qca/2.0/qca-2.0.0.tar.bz2
http://delta.affinix.com/download/qca/2.0/test4/qca-ossl-0.1-20070904.tar.bz2
Maybe you should update these two packages?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list