[Bug 229182] Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229182


axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |axel.thimm at atrpms.net




------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net  2007-10-26 11:03 EST -------
FWIW I also like the errata package:

 o Upstream experts provide the needed delta is bite-ready form
 o Packager can react almost immediately, so users get their hands sooner on
   the fixes
 o No stress for mirrors (yes, even in a delta rpm world, the mirror will have to
   waste bandwidth for updates of megapackages)

Asking from the packager to do micro-dismantling of the tarballs is IMHO a waste
of his time, I'd rather see him use that time in some other tex/latex packages
than to merge erratas and re-subpackage everything again.

I also don't think this needs any special fesco/fpc blessing, but if people
object, then please raise it there and we will discuss it and give it a blessing
or a no-go.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.