[Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Oct 28 21:32:52 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats
Alias: SDL_sound

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-10-28 17:32 EST -------
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
- rpmlint output:
SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0
SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2
SDL_sound.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libSDL_sound-1.0.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libvorbis.so.0

These are okay, see comment #2
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- package license meets license guidelines
- license matches actual license
- license included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec file legible
- source matches upstream
$ diff -ur SDL_sound-1.0.1 ../SOURCES/SDL_sound-1.0.1
<no output>
- package successfully compiles and builds on F-7 x86_64
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- proper use of ldconfig
- package not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean
- macro usage consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation files
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- header files in devel subpackage
- no static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- library files without suffix in devel subpackage
- devel package requires base package
- no libtool archives
- not a GUI application
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages
- buildroot removed at beginning of %install
- all filenames are UTF-8

*** APPROVED ***


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list